• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Activation of sulfite by ferric ion for the degradation of 2,4,6-tribromophenol with the addition of sulfite in batches

    2022-12-07 08:26:30ZongpingWngFnBiLisnCoSiyngYueJingwenWngSonglinWngJunPenghoXie
    Chinese Chemical Letters 2022年11期

    Zongping Wng, Fn Bi, Lisn Co, Siyng Yue, Jingwen Wng, Songlin Wng,Jun M, Pengho Xie,?

    a School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Water & Wastewater Treatment (MOHURD), Hubei Provincial Engineering Research Center for Water Quality Safety and Pollution Control, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

    b School of Architecture & Urban Planning, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China

    c State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China

    Keywords:Fe(III)/S(IV)2,4,6-Tribromophenol (TBP)Sulfate radical (SO4?–)Batches Acute toxicity

    ABSTRACT In this work, the removal of 2,4,6-tribromophenol (TBP) by ferric ion-activated sulfite [Fe(III)/S(IV)] process was systematically investigated with determining the intermediate products and evaluating the influences of some operational conditions and water matrices.Our results show that batching addition of S(IV) benefits the S(IV) utilization efficiency and TBP removal, with SO4?– being the primary reactive radical accounting for TBA degradation.The maximum TBP removal in the Fe(III)/S(IV) process was observed at pH 4.0 and oxygen is essential in this process.With increasing Fe(III) and S(IV) dosages from 0.05 and 0.1 mmol/L to 0.2 and 2.0 mmol/L, respectively, TBP removal followed trends of first increase then decrease.As the acute toxicity of the TBP solution was significantly reduced, the Fe(III)/S(IV) process was believed to be a good choice in the treatment of TBP.

    Aromatic phenols are important environmental micro-organic pollutants and have attracted extensive attentions [1–3].2,4,6-Tribromophenol (TBP) which is commonly used as a pesticide,wood conservative and intermediate for brominated flame retardants has been widely studied in environmental field due to its worldwide use, environmental persistence and related health issues [3,4].The extensive application of TBP makes it easy to enter environmental matrices, such as surface water, landfill leachates,air, and sediment [4,5].As TBP that has a toxicological risk is difficult to be removed by conventional treatment processes [6,7], it is necessary to develop effective techniques to remove TBP from contaminated environments.

    Due to the high degradation efficiency, advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) with producing high oxidative radicals have been widely applied for the treatment of organic pollutants [8,9].In comparison with hydroxyl radical (HO?) (2.4–2.7 V), sulfate radical (SO4?–) has a comparable redox potential (2.5–3.1 V), wider pH range, longer half-life and higher selectivity [10].Over the past decades, SO4?–-based advanced oxidation processes (SR-AOPs)have gained increasing attention [9,11-14].Due to the selectivity of SO4?–towards the bond of C–Br, SR-AOPs have been widely studied for the degradation of brominated organic pollutants such as bromophenols and tetrabromobisphenol A [15,16].Usually, SO4?–is obtained through the activation of persulfate (PS) including peroxydisulfate (PDS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) [11,12].However, the application of PDS or PMS in water/wastewater treatment might be limited due to their expensive price and the formation of bromate (BrO3–) in the presence of bromide (Br–) [15,17,18].Thus,it is meaningful to develop other economic SR-AOPs that can reduce the formation of BrO3–.

    Recently, a promising SR-AOP through the activation of sulfite[S(IV)] has received increasing attention [19–21].Among the activated S(IV) processes, the iron-activated S(IV) is considered to have bright prospects [9,22].As for the iron-activated S(IV) process, a series of reactive radicals, such as SO3?–, SO5?–and SO4?–, are producedviathe reactions shown in Eqs.S6-S17 (Supporting information) [9,23].Additionally, HO?can also be produced through the reaction between SO4?–and OH–(or H2O) [10,20,21].As a strong reducing and complexing agent, S(IV) could transfer Fe(III) to Fe(II)and complex with iron ions, which can accelerate the Fe(II)/Fe(III)cycle, reduce the formed sludge, and broaden the adequate pH range [22,24,25].

    In the traditional SR-AOPs, bromate (BrO3–) would be produced in the presence of bromide (Br–) with producing a sequence of intermediate oxidative bromine including Br?, Br2?–and HBrO[15,17,18].As a strong reducing agent, S(IV) can fast react with these oxidative bromine to re-convert them to Br–, which can inhibit BrO3–formation [23,24].As TBP can be fast degraded by SO4?–[26,27], the iron-activated S(IV) process would be a good choice in the treatment of TBP with simultaneous controlling BrO3–formation.However, S(IV) can also fast react with the oxidative radicals, which would cause the waste of S(IV) and lower the treatment efficiency [24,25].It is important to develop methods to increase the utilization efficiency of S(IV).As lowering the initial S(IV) concentration can slow down the rate of S(IV) reacting with the oxidative radicals, adding S(IV) in batches is proposed to increase the utilization efficiency, which still needs to be further studied.

    The objectives of this study were to (1) determine the efficiency of iron-activated S(IV) process on TBP removal and disclose the roles of reactive radicals; (2) make clear whether the addition of sulfite in batches benefits TBP degradation; (3) investigate the influences of some typical operational parameters and water matrices; (4) and evaluate the transformation of bromine and the acute toxicity variation.

    In this work, all solutions were prepared in ultra-pure water produced from a water purifier (MicroPure UV, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany), and the experimental procedures and analytic methods were offered in Text S1 (Supporting information).All the samples were replicated for two times at least and the errors stand for the standard deviations among the replicated samples.

    As shown in Fig.1, negligible difference of TBP removal was observed in the presence of sulfite or Fe(III) compared to the control sample, meaning that the addition of sulfite or Fe(III) had no effect on TBP removal.It should be noted that the TBP concentration reduced by about 9% for the control sample, which might be due to that some TBP could be separated out from water solution during the continuous stirring, which was also observed in some previous studies focusing on the treatment of insoluble pollutants [22,24].In contrast, about 70.2% of TBP was removed by the combined process of Fe(III) and sulfite [Fe(III)/S(IV)] in 6 min at the selective experimental conditions, which was similar to the results obtained in other previous studies [22,28], suggesting that the iron-activated S(IV) process would be a good choice in the degradation of TBP.Additionally, different iron-activated processes including Fe(III)/S(IV), Fe(II)/S(IV), Fe0/S(IV), Fe2O3/S(IV)and Fe3O4/S(IV) were comparatively studied.As shown in Fig.S1(Supporting information), both Fe(III)/S(IV) and Fe(II)/S(IV) systems were observed to efficiently degrade TBP with similar removal efficiency at the same iron species concentration (0.1 mmol/L).However, negligible TBP degradation was observed in Fe0/S(IV),Fe2O3/S(IV) and Fe3O4/S(IV) systems with equivalent iron concentration (0.1 mmol/L).As ferric ion is much stable than ferrous ion,Fe(III)/S(IV) system was selected as a typical iron-activated process to evaluate the removal of TBP in the subsequent experiments.

    Fig.1 .TBP removal in different systems.Conditions: [TBP]0= 10 μmol/L, [Fe(III)]0=0.1 mmol/L, [S(IV)]0= 0.4 mmol/L, pH 4.0, temperature 25°C.

    As for the Fe(III)/S(IV) process, fast TBP degradation was observed in the initial 3 min and the TBP degradation reached 68.6%at 3 min (Fig.1), while only a little removal was observed with further prolonging reaction time to 6 min, which might be due to the lack of S(IV) [23,25].To make clear the reason, the variation of S(IV) concentration was monitored.Fig.S2 (Supporting information) illustrates that S(IV) was fast consumed and reduced to nearly zero after reaction for 3 min due to the fact that S(IV) in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system can quickly complex with Fe(III) to form FeSO3+and can be further transformed to SO5?–and SO4?–in the presence of oxygen [29–31], which was in line with the variation of TBP concentration, evidencing that the lack of S(IV) stopped the further degradation of TBP from 3 min to 6 min.Our previous studies also found that the supplement of S(IV) can further increase the treatment efficiency of iron-activated S(IV) processes [20].As S(IV)can fast react with the reactive radicals, such as SO4?–, SO5?–and HO?, in the iron-activated S(IV) systems to consume both S(IV) and reactive radicals [23,30], lowering the initial S(IV) dosage and increasing the dose times would benefit the utilization efficiency of S(IV).

    Fig.2 shows the effect of adding S(IV) in batches on TBP removal at 25°C with the initial reaction pH being 4.0.During the experiment, the total S(IV) dosages for all the samples were 0.4 mmol/L, and the three specific methods of adding S(IV) in batches are as follows: 0.4 mmol/L S(IV) was introduced into the system at 0 min in a time, adding S(IV) at 0 and 3 min separately with 0.2 mmol/L S(IV) each time, and adding S(IV) at 0, 2 and 4 min separately with 0.133 mmol/L S(IV) each time.With increasing S(IV) dosing times from 1 to 2 and 3, the removal of TBP was significantly increased from 70.8% to 87.5% and 91.5% after reaction for 6 min, respectively, evidencing that adding S(IV) in batches benefits the utilization efficiency of S(IV).Additionally, the variations of S(IV) concentration and solution pH during the reaction were monitored.As shown in Fig.S2, the S(IV) concentration decreased rapidly after the reaction started in all systems.As the reaction of Fe(III) and HSO3–could produce H+(Eq.S8 in Supporting information), the solution pH for all the samples also decreased at the beginning of the reaction (Fig.S3a in Supporting information),which was similar to other previous studies [22,24].From Figs.S2 and S3a, it is observed that the S(IV) was consumed completely in 6 min when adding S(IV) in a time, along with that the pH value gradually decreased to around 3.55 within 6 min.However, the pH values for the samples with multiple S(IV) addition suddenly increased after adding S(IV), which can be explained by that SO32?can react with H+to produce HSO3–.Along with the increase of TBP removal efficiency (Fig.2), the residual S(IV) after reaction for 6 min also gradually increased with increasing the S(IV) addition times from 1 to 3 (Fig.S2).The results suggest that adding S(IV)in batches was not only beneficial to increase the utilization effi-ciency of S(IV), but also can ease the pH reduction.

    Fig.2 .Effect of sulfite dose times on TBP removal in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system.Conditions: [TBP]0= 10 μmol/L, [Fe(III)]0= 0.1 mmol/L, [S(IV)]total=0.4 mmol/L, pH 4.0,temperature 25 °C.

    As the removal of TBP after reaction for 6 min was similar for the samples of adding S(IV) in 2 times and 3 times (Fig.2), the experimental condition with adding S(IV) in 2 times was selected for the next experiments in this study.The changes of Fe(III), Fe(II) and total Fe concentration in the system were also monitored when S(IV) was dosed in 2 times (Fig.S4 in Supporting information).In the initial 15 s, the rapid decrease of Fe(III) and increase of Fe(II)were observed, which could be attributed to the rapid formation and decomposition of FeSO3+viareactions shown in Eqs.S8 and S9 (Supporting information), respectively [29,31,32].According to the sequence reactions shown in Eqs.S6-S17 (Supporting information), Fe(II) and Fe(III) would circulate dynamically, and the concentration tends to be stable.However, due to the consumption of S(IV), the Fe(III) concentration gradually increased along with the gradual decrease of Fe(II) concentration with extending the reaction time from 15 s to 3 min.At 3 min, significant transformation of Fe(III) to Fe(II) was observed with adding S(IV), meaning that batching addition of S(IV) could elevate the utilization efficiency of iron too.It is worthy to note that the total concentration of dissolved iron ions gradually decreased, which can be explained by the hydrolysis of iron ions [24].

    Previous reports have evidenced that SO3?–, SO4?–, SO5?–and HO?would be the main reactive radicals in the iron-activated S(IV)systems [24,28,33].SO4?–and SO5?–can be producedviathe sequence reactions shown in Eqs.S6-S17, and HO?can form through the oxidation of H2O and OH–by SO4?–[34].Due to the low oxidation ability of SO3?–, its role in the degradation of organic pollutants is always ignored in the activated S(IV) processes [20–23].However, the roles of SO4?–, SO5?–and HO?were different and controversial in different studies [22,24,28].In order to clarify which reactive species in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system contributed to TBP degradation, different radical inhibitors were used in this study.

    Based on the data shown in Table S2 and Fig.S5 (Supporting information), the reaction rate constants of TBP reacting with HO?and SO4?–were determined to be 5.51× 109L mol?1s?1and 1.36× 109L mol?1s?1, respectively, using a relative rate technique[10].Generally, TBA is considered as a good quencher for HO?(6×108L mol?1s?1) but not for SO4?–(9.1× 105L mol?1s?1) [35,36].As EtOH can fast react with SO4?–(7.7× 107L mol?1s?1) and HO?(1.9× 109L mol?1s?1) but is difficult to react with SO5?–(<1×103L mol?1s?1), EtOH can be used to scavenge both SO4?–and HO?in the Fe(III)/S(IV) process [35,37].Then the TBP removal efficiencies among the samples with adding different scavengers can tell the roles of different radicals on TBP degradation.Based on the discussion in Text S2 (Supporting information), the initial TBA and EtOH concentrations were set at 1 and 8.65 mmol/L, respectively.As shown in Fig.3a, in comparison with the control sample, the removal ratio of TBP decreased from 88.6% to 80.5% with the addition of TBA, suggesting that HO?played a small role in TBP degradation.However, TBP removal ratio significantly declined to 23.5%in the presence of EtOH, meaning that SO4?–played the dominant role in the system.Combing the results shown in Figs.1 and 3a,the removal efficiency of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system with the addition of EtOH was still higher than the sample without S(IV) or Fe(III) (around 9%), which means that SO5?–would also take part in the treatment of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system.

    Fig.3 .Effect of TBA or EtOH (a), initial Fe(III) concentration (b), and initial S(VI) concentration (c) on TBP degradation in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system with dosing S(IV) in two times.Conditions: [TBP]0= 10 μmol/L, [Fe(III)]0= 0.1 mmol/L (except b), [S(IV)]0= 0.4 mmol/L (except c), pH 4.0, temperature 25 °C.

    Fig.3 b shows the effect of different Fe(III) concentrations on TBP removal in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system.With 0.4 mmol/L S(IV)dosage and pH 4.0, the removal efficiencies of TBP only slightly increased from 83.8% to 87.5% after reaction for 6 min with the initial Fe(III) dosages increasing from 0.05 mmol/L to 0.1 mmol/L.However, when the initial Fe(III) dosage was further increased to 0.2 mmol/L, the removal efficiency dropped to 73.8%.The production of SO3?–increased with Fe(III) dose increasing from 0.05 mmol/L to 0.1 mmol/L, which would benefit the formation of SO5?–and SO4?–, causing the slight increase of TBP removal.However, with further elevating Fe(III) concentration, excessive Fe(III)would produce a large amount of Fe(II) to consume the formed SO4?–, which might be the reason for the inhibition of TBP removal [38,39].In addition, the formation of Fe(OH)3colloids at high Fe(III) concentration might also inhibit the degradation of TBP[23,24].

    Fig.3 c shows the effect of different S(IV) dosages on TBP degradation in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system, and a similar trend to the Fe(III)dosages was observed.When the initial Fe(III) dosage and pH were 0.1 mmol/L and 4.0, respectively, the TBP removal efficiencies increased rapidly from 43.3% to 87.5% after 6 min with S(IV) dosages increasing from 0.1 mmol/L to 0.4 mmol/L.As S(IV) dose was further elevated to 2.0 mmol/L, the TBP removal efficiency dropped rapidly from 87.5% to 43.5%, indicating that high concentration of S(IV) had an adverse effect on the removal efficiency, which was also reported in some previous studies [22,24].Although the supplement of S(IV) can affect the solution pH (Fig.S3a), the solution pH kept in the range of around 3.5–3.9 for all the samples with the addition of S(IV) at different concentration, meaning that the different TBP degradation efficiencies would not be due to the solution pH.It is expected that more radicals would be generated in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system with increasing the initial S(IV) concentration, which was beneficial to the removal of TBP.However, as a strong reducing agent, S(IV) could also fast consume the formed SO4?–, HO?and SO5?–at the meantime.Therefore, excess S(IV) dose played adverse role in the degradation of TBP.pH directly affects the distribution of Fe(III) and S(IV) species, which can significantly influence the treatment efficiency of pollutants in the Fe(III)/S(IV)system [23,29].Fig.S6a (Supporting information) presents the effect of different initial pH values on the degradation of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system with adding S(IV) in two times.The removal efficiencies initially increased from 25.9% to 87.5% as the pH varied from 2 to 4, then gradually decreased to 6.0% with further elevating the initial pH to 6.

    Although iron ions in the solution were the most at pH 2 and 3, SO2(aq) which is the dominant S(IV) species could not be combined by iron ions [22,23,29].In addition, the reactionviaEq.S8 would be inhibited because of the H+at pH 2 and 3 [20,29].HSO3–, the dominant S(IV) species at pH 4–6, could complex with Fe(III) to produce FeSO3+, which benefit the removal of TBP in the iron-activated processes.However, significant decline of TBP removal efficiency was observed with the initial solution pH increasing from 4 to 6, which was different from the results obtained in previous studies that high treatment efficiency was maintained in the initial pH range of 4–6 when the S(IV) was added in one time[20,22,23].To make clear the reason, the variations of solution pH were monitored.As shown in Fig.S6b (Supporting information), insignificant variations of solution pH were observed for the samples whose initial solution pH were 2, 3, and 6.While small decrease of solution pH was obtained for the samples whose initial solution pH were 4, 4.5 and 5, but the final solution pH after reaction for 6 min gradual increased with elevating the solution pH, which was different from some previous studies that similar final solution pH of around 3.5–3.8 was achieved in an initial solution pH range of 4–6 with dosing S(IV) in a time [22,23].Following the reactions shown in Eqs.S6-S17, lots of H+can be produced in the iron-activated S(IV) system, causing the decrease of solution pH[24,29].However, aforementioned discussion has proven that the addition of S(IV) consumed H+to efficiently ease the pH decline(Fig.S3 in Supporting information).Therefore, the significant decrease of TBP removal in the pH range of 4–6 would be because of the precipitation of Fe(III).

    The oxidation of SO3?–by oxygen to form SO5?–viathe reaction shown in Eq.S10 was an essential step for the subsequent production of SO4?–[22,29].In order to investigate the effect of O2on the degradation of TBP, experiments with no purging (control sample), continuous purging air and continuous purging N2were carried out with simultaneous monitoring the dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration.As shown in Fig.S7a (Supporting information), there was negligible difference of the removal efficiencies between the control sample and the sample of purging air because of the enough oxygen in the two systems (Fig.S7b in Supporting information), which was also obtained by some previous studies[23,24].However, the removal efficiency of TBP significantly decreased to 17.5% with continuous purging nitrogen, which would be due to that the lack of O2inhibited the transformation of SO3?–to SO5?–[20,24].The explanation was supported by the low DO concentration for the sample of purging N2(Fig.S7b).

    As shown in Fig.S8 (Supporting information), the removal effi-ciency of TBP significantly decreased from 97.6% to 32.9% when the TBP concentration increased from 5 μmol/L to 50 μmol/L.Although the overall removal efficiency decreased, the total removal amounts of TBP increased with the increase of initial TBP concentration.As the concentration of TBP increased, its ability to compete for radicals could be enhanced, resulting in the reduced concentrations of reactive radicals [22].While the stronger competition ability of reactive radicals by TBP elevated the total amounts of reduced TBP.

    Humic acid (HA) is a common seen representative substance of natural organic matter (NOM) which always shows negative effect on the degradation of pollutants in AOPs through the competition of reactive radicals [40,41].Fig.S9a (Supporting information) shows the effect of HA on the degradation of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system with adding S(IV) in two times.When the initial HA concentration increased from 0 mg/L to 10 mg/L, the removal efficiencies of TBP gradually decreased from 87.5% to 73.7%,which was also reported in iron-activated S(IV) systems in previous studies [20,22,24].Generally, the reaction rate constants of NOM reacting with HO?and SO4?–were at the levels of 108(L mol?1)carbons?1and 107(L mol?1)carbons?1, respectively [10,42].Although the reaction rate constants were slower than that of TBP,the high HA concentration made sure it could compete for reactive radicals to decrease TBP removal.Additionally, the carboxylic functional groups in HA would complex with Fe(III) and inhibit the formation of FeSO3+, which would also contribute to the decrease of TBP degradation [24].Fig.S9b (Supporting information) shows the effect of HCO3–on the degradation of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system.When the concentration of HCO3–increased from 0 mmol/L to 2 mmol/L, the removal efficiency of TBP decreased from 87.5%to 76.1% within 6 min.HCO3–could react with HO?and SO4?–to produce CO3?–which had much weaker oxidation ability than HO?and SO4?–[22,34], causing the decrease of TBP removal in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system.In addition, HCO3–could act as solution buffer and increase the solution pH to some extent during the reaction,which would also lower the removal of TBP.Fig.S9c (Supporting information) shows the effect of Cl–on the degradation of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system.When the concentration of Cl–increased from 0 mmol/L to 2 mmol/L, the removal efficiencies of TBP decreased from 87.5% to 74.0% after reaction for 6 min.SO4?–and HO?could be consumed through the reaction with Cl–, which would produce a sequence of reactive chlorine species, such as Cl?and Cl2?–[34,43].As these reactive chlorine species can also selectively degrade organic pollutants, the influence of Cl–on organic pollutants degradation in AOPs always depends on the reaction rate constants of these chlorine species reacting with organic pollutants [17,23].In this study, the inhibition of TBP degradation in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system would be because that the reaction rate constants between these chlorine species and TBP were lower than that of SO4?–and HO?.

    Although HA, HCO3–and Cl–could retard TBP degradation in the Fe(III)/S(IV) process with adding S(IV) in batches, good treatment efficiency can always be achieved for all the samples (>70%), suggesting that the Fe(III)/S(IV) process with adding S(IV) in batches might perform well for the treatment of TBP in natural water.

    The degradation of TBP might form 2,4-dibromophenol, an intermediate product that is more toxic than TBP [44–46].In addition, the presence of bromine atoms in TBP might produce a series of other toxic brominated intermediates and BrO3–.Therefore, inorganic bromine including Br–and BrO3–were monitored and shown in Fig.S10 (Supporting information).No BrO3–was detected during the treatment of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system, which was also observed when applying Fe(III)/S(IV) system to degrade TBBPA [23].However, the concentration of Br–gradually increased to around 20 μmol/L with extending the reaction time to 6 min, which means that about 67% of bromine atoms in the system were converted to nontoxic Br–.Additionally, two kinds of brominated intermediates including 2,6-dibromo-1,4-benzenediol and dibromophenol(2,4-dibromophenol or 2,6-dibromophenol) were detected by an ultimate 3000 complete ultra high performance liquid chromatography system (U-HPLC-Q-Exactive Orbitrap HRMs, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) (Table S3 in Supporting information), suggesting that debromination and hydroxylation might be the initial reaction in the system.Combining with the result that the remained TBP was about 13% (4 μmol/L bromine atoms), it is calculated that only around 20% (6 μmol/L) of bromine atoms were contained in the brominated organic intermediates based on mass balance.As brominated organic matters usually contain higher toxicity [47], the treatment of TBP by Fe(III)/S(IV) process is expected to reduce the toxicity of TBP solution.To comprehensively evaluate the safety of applying Fe(III)/S(IV) system to degrade TBP, the variation of the acute toxicity during the reaction was investigated by luminescent bacteria [48].As shown in Fig.4, the inhibition ratio of the original reaction solution was 27.3%, which indicated that TBP had a certain toxic effect on luminescent bacteria.Then the inhibition ratio rapidly decreased to 17.6% within 1 min, and then gradually stabilized to 16.1% at 3 min, which was coincided with the disappearance of S(IV) (Fig.S2).After the addition of S(IV) again, the inhibition ratio gradually decreased to 0 in 6 min.The results reflect that adding S(IV)in batches can not only greatly increase the removal efficiency of TBP but also can greatly reduce the acute toxicity of the reaction solution.

    Fig.4 .The inhibition of luminescent bacteria during the treatment of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system with dosing S(IV) in two times.Conditions: [TBP]0= 10 μmol/L,[Fe(III)]0= 0.1 mmol/L, [S(IV)]0= 0.4 mmol/L, pH 4.0, temperature 25 °C.

    This study comprehensively evaluated the degradation of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system with adding S(IV) in batches, evidencing that the addition of S(IV) in batches could effectively increase the utilization efficiency of S(IV), which improved the removal efficiency of TBP.The oxidation of TBP was attributed to SO4?–, HO?and SO5?–as SO4?–was the primary radical.Highest TBP removal in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system was achieved at pH 4.0 in the system.In the selected experimental conditions, the treatment efficiencies followed trends of initial increase then decrease with increasing initial Fe(III) and S(IV) dosages from 0.05 and 0.1 mmol/L to 0.2 and 2.0 mmol/L, respectively.Additionally, the increase of initial TBP concentration lowered TBP removal efficiency, and oxygen has been found to be necessary for the degradation of TBP in the Fe(III)/S(IV) system.The typical water matrices including HA,HCO3–and Cl–performed negative impacts on the degradation of TBP.The significant decrease of acute toxicity after the treatment of TBP by the Fe(III)/S(IV) system with adding S(IV) in batches further suggests that this system would be a good AOP in the degradation of TBP.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Acknowledgments

    The support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.51878308) and the Young Top-notch Talent Cultivation Program of Hubei Province are appreciated.We also thank the Analytical and Testing Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology for the related measurements.

    Supplementary materials

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2022.01.003.

    两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 舔av片在线| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产成人福利小说| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 99久国产av精品| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 久久香蕉精品热| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| avwww免费| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 搞女人的毛片| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 天堂动漫精品| av视频在线观看入口| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产成人av教育| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产综合懂色| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 有码 亚洲区| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 免费av观看视频| 国产三级中文精品| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产成人福利小说| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久6这里有精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日本 av在线| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| xxx96com| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 乱人视频在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 久久精品影院6| 久久久国产成人免费| 脱女人内裤的视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 成年免费大片在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 一区福利在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 两个人看的免费小视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 特级一级黄色大片| 午夜福利欧美成人| 欧美色视频一区免费| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品影院久久| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产高清三级在线| av天堂在线播放| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产单亲对白刺激| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 丁香欧美五月| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产探花极品一区二区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 看片在线看免费视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 免费在线观看日本一区| eeuss影院久久| 久久久久国内视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 最好的美女福利视频网| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 色在线成人网| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国内精品美女久久久久久| av在线天堂中文字幕| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 日韩高清综合在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品三级大全| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 十八禁人妻一区二区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 成人精品一区二区免费| 美女黄网站色视频| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久久久九九精品影院| www日本在线高清视频| 99热只有精品国产| 精品日产1卡2卡| 不卡一级毛片| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产熟女xx| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产精品影院久久| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日本一二三区视频观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 精品日产1卡2卡| 精品电影一区二区在线| 午夜免费激情av| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 日本熟妇午夜| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 日本三级黄在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产午夜精品论理片| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 制服人妻中文乱码| 搡老岳熟女国产| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日本成人三级电影网站| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 美女黄网站色视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲国产色片| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产成人福利小说| 国产色婷婷99| 国产精品一及| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 69av精品久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| xxxwww97欧美| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产真实乱freesex| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 不卡一级毛片| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产三级在线视频| 欧美3d第一页| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产精品 国内视频| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品三级大全| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 免费在线观看日本一区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 午夜免费观看网址| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 午夜久久久久精精品| av欧美777| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲五月天丁香| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 免费看光身美女| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 日本 欧美在线| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产老妇女一区| www.www免费av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 美女黄网站色视频| 九色国产91popny在线| 在线免费观看的www视频| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 久久久久久久久中文| 露出奶头的视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日本a在线网址| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久性视频一级片| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 51国产日韩欧美| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 热99re8久久精品国产| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产激情欧美一区二区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产视频内射| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 欧美zozozo另类| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 禁无遮挡网站| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 校园春色视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 成人欧美大片| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 午夜免费激情av| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 高清在线国产一区| 一本一本综合久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| www国产在线视频色| 一a级毛片在线观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 长腿黑丝高跟| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 波多野结衣高清作品| 窝窝影院91人妻| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 中国美女看黄片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 成年免费大片在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 看免费av毛片| 观看美女的网站| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| www.www免费av| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 色视频www国产| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 九九在线视频观看精品| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 美女大奶头视频| svipshipincom国产片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产成人av激情在线播放| a级毛片a级免费在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 久久久久久大精品| 成年版毛片免费区| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 特级一级黄色大片| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 岛国在线观看网站| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| www国产在线视频色| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 久久草成人影院| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 天堂√8在线中文| www日本在线高清视频| 1024手机看黄色片| 午夜福利欧美成人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 九色成人免费人妻av| 岛国在线观看网站| 操出白浆在线播放| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 久久这里只有精品中国| 18+在线观看网站| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| xxxwww97欧美| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 嫩草影院入口| 精品人妻1区二区| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久久久久人人人人人| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美性感艳星| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 有码 亚洲区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| av天堂中文字幕网| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 天堂√8在线中文| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| xxxwww97欧美| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| www.999成人在线观看| 国产黄片美女视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产黄片美女视频| 美女高潮的动态| 免费高清视频大片| av福利片在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久香蕉国产精品| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟|