• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Arbitrariness and Rationality

    2022-11-26 02:51:46Gvodiak
    Language and Semiotic Studies 2022年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:流體動力年銷售額銷往

    Vít Gvo?diak

    The Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences Prague, Czech Republic

    Abstract

    Keywords: semiology, linguistic sign, Ferdinand de Saussure, convention, motivation

    Everything that relates to language as a system must, I am convinced, be approached from this viewpoint, which has scarcely received the attention of linguists: the limiting of arbitrariness. This is the best possible basis for approaching the study of language as a system. In fact, the whole system of language is based on the irrational principle of the arbitrariness of the sign, which would lead to the worst sort of complication if applied without restriction. (CGL, p. 133)

    This statement from the sixth chapter of the second part of theCourse in General Linguisticsmade in the context of explaining the relation between absolute arbitrariness and relative arbitrariness, points out that language systems do not operate in harmonic accordance with the arbitrary nature of linguistic signs and hints at the former being only possible as a restriction imposed on the latter.

    In case of arbitrariness—as with many other Saussure’s terms—there are two types of false preconceptions. The first results mostly from the notoriously problematic posthumous edition of theCourse, never authorized by de Saussure himself, which in many respects poses a philological challenge. For this reason, I will try to broaden the resource pool as much as possible, and in addition to the 1916 version of theCourse in General Linguistics(hereinafter referred to asCGL) as edited by C. Bally and A.Sechehay will also draw on student notes from Saussure’s three lecture cycles (namely the second and third cycle/volume, as these are relevant to the present paper; I refer to them as Saussure 1997 and Saussure 1993) as well as Saussure’s manuscript found in 1996 and published in French in 2002 asécrits de linguistique générale(which I refer to in its English translation from 2006 asWGL). Since my goal is not to reconstruct the historical genesis of the concept of arbitrariness but rather use these sources as inputs for more systematic considerations, the second type of preconception to be dispelled is that arbitrariness—even though it is called the first principle and one of the basic principles of any type of semiological study (CGL, p. 67)—cannot be assigned the status of a singular linguistic principle. The notion that a language phenomenon can be explained by means of a single, unified methodological principle is wrong for the same reason the notion that language itself is a single, unitary entity is mistaken (WGL, p. 161), therefore, plurality nature of approaches is a principal precondition of all linguistic investigations (WGL, p. 5). More precisely, as formulated in theCGL: when examining a language, the object is not givena priori, but “it is the viewpoint that creates the object” (CGL, p. 8). Saussure’s viewpoint is formed by a set of well-known mechanisms (sign, value, langue, etc.)—each of which in itself represents an important cornerstone of structural semiology. These mechanisms are nevertheless at the same time interconnected and intertwined and their unravelling presents a significant challenge. What follows is an attempt to answer the questions of how exactly the differentiation between absolute and relative arbitrariness in Saussurean semiology relates to the systemic nature of language, what constitutes the irrationality of arbitrariness, and what could be considered its rational counterpart.

    1. Arbitrariness and Relative Arbitrariness

    With respect to the linguistic sign, arbitrariness is most often considered to be its first principle (CGL, pp. 67-70; Saussure, 1993, p. 87). It represents not only an immediate continuation of the ideas of Dwight Whitney (Koerner, 1973, p. 315), which Saussure was well familiar with (see e.g. Jakobson, 1971), but also a contribution to the complex discussion that dates all the way back to classical antiquity, as personified by Cratylus and Hermogenes, and which often led modern expounders of Saussure’s ideas to misleading interpretations, especially in relation to Peirce’s semeiotic.

    Among the several formulations of the problem offered by theCGLand other Saussure’s texts, we can for simplicity’s sake pick the one below listing the two fundamental features of arbitrariness (both have resulted in a number of critical responses, among the best known of which are Bolinger, 1965; Jakobson, 1962,1966; Benveniste, 1971):

    (1) Anti-reductiveness: even though it is, within a sign, possible to differentiate between the signifying and the signified component (signifiantandsignifié), their unification in the unity of the sign is not determined by anything outside of the sign.Thesignifiant-signifiépair at the same time cannot be reduced to a single unit, either mental or physical.

    (2) Stabilization and immanence: arbitrariness works as the stabilization principle of signs with respect to the mutable, individual psychology of their users and mutability of the extra-sign world. Therefore, Saussure identifies arbitrariness with unmotivatedness (Saussure, 1993, p. 85). Linguistic sign as a combination ofsignifiantandsignifiéis not determined by either purposes and intentions of speakers, nor by the nature of what the speakers talk about; arbitrariness is therefore an important cornerstone of Saussurean immanentism. A sign is seen as in no way connected to the thing it refers to. Constitution of a sign is undetermined by reference; in other words,signs are “free and arbitrary in relation to the object” (WGL, p. 140).

    It would then appear, at least when considering the genesis of theCGLthat arbitrariness was not initially seen by Saussure as particularly problematic. Indeed, he did not handle arbitrariness in his first lecture cycle at all. A brief mention appears in the second cycle: basic properties of writing (which are essentially similar to those of language in general) include the arbitrary nature of signs, and therefore nonexistence of (causal) relation between signs and the things they refer to; the character of sign value is purely that of differentiation, and therefore negative (Saussure, 1997, pp. 7,113; cf.WGL, p. 147). Arbitrariness is given closer attention in the last lecture cycle,where it is seen as the most important property of language and as such plays a key role in semiology (Saussure, 1993, p. 76; cf. Koerner, 1973, p. 335).

    Even though language can be considered an institution of sorts, it is precisely its arbitrariness that makes it idiosyncratic and incomparable to other human institutions(Saussure, 2006, pp. 146-147). In case of customs, laws, fashion or symbols, we are dealing with a “necessity” between means and ends, and “the natural relation of things” (CGL, p. 75;WGL, p. 147). Language on the other hand is autonomous in selection of its means and its identification with other institutions only leads to misunderstandings (WGL, p. 149). Even though arbitrariness serves as a functional distinctive feature on the level of institutions (sign systems), it cannot be seen as a feature which exhausts the properties of the system of language. On the contrary, the notion of an entirely arbitrary system of signs is impossible. Linguistic arbitrariness/unmotivatedness cannot be reduced to zero (Saussure, 1993, p. 89), while the opposite pole of complete motivatedness is equally impossible. Absolute motivatedness and absolute arbitrariness are constructs that refer to abstract limits of possibility and which in their pure form do not exist in any language (CGL, p. 133).

    Arbitrariness in language is, in general, limited by solidarity with the tradition of the language’s past states (CGL, pp. 73-74), i.e. by its temporality. If language could be a non-temporal system, it most likely could and would also be completely arbitrary. It is precisely temporality that prevents complete freedom of selection in language. The second limiting principle is the differentiating nature of language, or its synchronic systemic character, which prevents revolutionary changes and complete randomness. Saussure and theCGLattempt to weaken the power of arbitrariness by means of introducing the concept of relative arbitrariness.

    The difference between absolute and relative arbitrariness is discussed only in the third lecture cycle (Saussure, 1993, pp. 85-90), in relation to the question of abstract units. In theCGL(p. 132), this appears as continuation of the differentiation between associative and (especially) syntagmatic relations. From the associative (paradigmatic)standpoint, the expression “dix-neuf” (nineteen) is motivated by its relations to expressions such as “dix-huit” (eighteen) or “soixante-dix” (seventy); from the syntagmatic standpoint, it is motivated by its components “dix” and “neuf” (CGL,p. 131). Both systemic relations thus at first glance seem to neutralize the proposed absolute arbitrariness of linguistic signs; on closer inspection we nevertheless see that the components of a sign motivated in this way are themselves arbitrary and,moreover, the differentiating value of the whole motivated sign is not a simple sum (of values) of its components (CGL, p. 132).

    Despite the suggested terminological similarity and the mutual conceptual relatedness, we need to distinguish between absolute and relative arbitrariness, based mostly on the following pair of features:

    (1) Absolute arbitrariness and relative arbitrariness (or motivatedness) are not principles of the same order. Relative arbitrariness is a more complex systemic relation. It has a dual nature; it includes the internal relation between signifiantandsignifiéas well as the external relation between terms as complete signs. Relations between terms (signs) are in all probability secondary—provided that no two signs exist such that each of them separately consists of a combination ofsignifiantandsignifié, we cannot consider external relations at all. Internal relations may be independent of external relations, whereas each external relation does presuppose(at least two) internal relations (Saussure, 1993, p. 90). Absolute arbitrariness is a precondition of relative arbitrariness/motivatedness. Further terminological and conceptual support for the belief in this categorical difference rests in the fact that relative arbitrariness and relative motivatedness—due precisely to their relativity—may function as synonyms, or, to use Saussurean diction, represent two sides of the same coin. There is, however, no such synonymy with absolute arbitrariness; absolute arbitrariness and absolute motivatedness are the extreme poles of an opposition.

    (2) Absolute arbitrariness cannot constitute the foundations of sign value or language system. The language system,langue, is dependent on intra-systemic differences (WGL, p. 189), it is a set of values, “the existence of which is only made possible due to the fact of their being in opposition” (WGL, p. 51). From the standpoint of both modalities of arbitrariness, this fact is formulated relatively clearly:“Reduction in any system of langue of absolute arbitrariness to relative arbitrariness;this is what makes up the ‘system’.” (WGL, p. 233) The third lecture cycle makes it apparent exactly how important Saussure considered the fact that without the internal relation of arbitrariness, two words (two signs) cannot be compared with respect to their relative motivatedness. A sign is built on an autonomous internal relation betweensignifiantandsignifiéwhich is not or does not have to be affected by its relation to other signs at all. We could say that absolute arbitrariness involves a certain type of atomism, something Saussure however was most likely aware of,when he referred to the arbitrariness of linguistic signs as an “irrational principle”, the limitation of which is a precondition of the study of language as a system (Saussure,1993, p. 87). It is in fact the external relation of relative motivatedness that represents one of the principles of order and regularity (CGL, p. 139) and aids in construction of language system in the narrower sense by reduction of absolute arbitrariness to relative arbitrariness, that is to say, a “relatively rational” language system, which can be studied by logic and grammar (Saussure, 1993, p. 96), or even studied at all.

    伊頓是一家全球領(lǐng)先的動力管理公司,2016年銷售額達(dá)197億美元。伊頓提供各種節(jié)能高效的解決方案,以幫助客戶更有效、更安全、更具可持續(xù)性地管理電力、流體動力和機(jī)械動力。伊頓致力于利用動力管理技術(shù)和服務(wù),提高人類生活品質(zhì)和環(huán)境質(zhì)量。伊頓在全球擁有約9.5萬名員工,產(chǎn)品銷往超過175個國家和地區(qū)。

    2. Rationality and Irrationality

    Saussure does not give any special, explicitly defined attention to rationality, it nevertheless does appear in several places in his writings as an attribute which is supposed to associate correctness of explanation or of a certain categorization. For instance, differentiation of the object of linguistic study into speaking and language which is in turn further divided into synchrony and diachrony is seen as “the rational form” (CGL, p. 98). Elsewhere, Saussure takes this even further when he asserts that even though linguistic facts must be investigated by different methods (WGL,p. 5), due to the nature of language linguistics is nevertheless obligated to use only two standpoints, synchronic and metachronic, i.e. diachronic (WGL, p. 188).TheCGLchapter “Rational Divisions” provides a list of categories of subjects of linguistic disciplines—i.e. morphology, lexicology, syntax—based on associative and syntagmatic relations. Study of a living language has to employ the rational method which “consists of (a) setting up the system of sounds as revealed by direct observation, and (b) observing the system of signs used to represent—imperfectly—these sounds” (CGL, p. 37). The completely non-systematic use of the term shows that the “rational” attribute is used in at least two non-synonymous ways:

    (1) Rational, meaning motivated. A relation is rational given that it is causal or has some sort of its own norm. Given this standpoint, non-arbitrary and symbolic systems may be seen as rational because sign units of such systems have “rational” relations to the things that are being referred to (CGL, pp. 68, 73). Monogamous matrimony is (probably) more reasonable than polygamy, whereas the sign relation between the expression “cow” and the notion of cow is based on “pure unreason” (WGL, p. 149).The form of matrimony and the suitability of any of its variations can be subject to rational or philosophical discussion (WGL, p. 149;CGL, p. 73) while an arbitrary sign cannot, because “any subject in order to be discussed must have a reasonable basis” (CGL, p. 73). If, however, language unlike all other human institutions is in fact completely arbitrary, not based on any reasonable norm, and its speakers use it without having explicit knowledge of its system, this then also means that arbitrariness is the cause due to which language itself is principally beyond rational and scientific, linguistic understanding. It is along these lines that one could probably interpret the complaint (CGL, p. 133) that language is not fully rational. If it were, it would be possible to study it “independently”.

    It is, however, precisely the combination of the notions of “independently”and “rational” which in this case leads to a dead end. This is because Saussurean semiology uses the conception oflangueand attempts to propose study of language in itself, its special character determined by the arbitrary nature of signs. “Full rationality”—if we were to understand it in the sense of “full motivatedness” or “full symbolicity”—however upsets this notion of an independent language which was as an ideal form supposed to be the subject of interest of linguistics. In other words,should language be fully rational, we could not study it separately and independently because its units (signs) would be causally linked to the things they refer to. At the same time, if we were to study language as a completely independent phenomenon, its study could not be rational.

    Saussure rules out these extremes not by opting for one of the absolutes and refusing the other, but rather by reference to “relative rationality” which governs language, yet at the same time allows for it to qualify as an object which can be studied reflectively, i.e. rationally (CGL, p. 73). The attributes of “rational” and“irrational” then do not amount to much more than abstract conceptions which,similarly to “absolute motivatedness” and “absolute arbitrariness”, do not set the rules of any specific games, or an even more specific game strategy, but rather attempt to outline the conditions for existence of playgrounds and spaces for games to be played in, regardless of the actual games being played there and whose arbitrariness and rationality at each given moment are necessarily relative. If we were to understand arbitrariness and rationality in one of the specific forms, Saussurean semiology would find itself in the unenviable position of trying to avoid its own redundancy on the one hand and actual unfeasibility as a scientific discipline on the other hand.

    (2) Rational, meaning conventional. In contrast to the aforementioned identification of the rational with the motivated, there is a somewhat cryptic statement in theCGLto the effect that given precisely the arbitrariness of linguistic signs, language system appears to be organized “freely” based on “a rational principle” (CGL, p. 78).

    The statement can nevertheless also be understood as saying that the arbitrary character of the units is not based on the exclusion that is seemingly hinted at, but rather in a curious connection between the “free” and the “rational” which cannot be reduced to rational motivatedness. This “free rationality” could simply be called conventionality and identified with arbitrariness. This is supported by Saussure’s familiarity with the works of Dwight Whitney, who conceived of “arbitrary” and“conventional” as synonyms (Koerner, 1973, p. 317; cf.CGL, pp. 10, 76), as well as certain statements by Saussure which seem to hint at the fact that the life of signs is based on a contract, without which a sign cannot exist (WGL, p. 68). Such understanding of “arbitrary convention” is most probably given its most explicit formulation in theCGL’s section on immutability and mutability of the sign (CGL,pp. 71-78), which points out thede factoinseparable connection of language with the community of speakers and time. The hypothetical rational principle which organizes language is not in contradiction of the social character of language, because it does not work based on a purely “l(fā)ogical base” (in this case, the formulations of theCGLsuggest that the reader identifies “rational” with “l(fā)ogical”), but it is in contradiction of the social force which works within time. The social force in time is the principle of continuity which “cancels freedom” (CGL, p. 78), and, should we understand it as a different expression for “convention” (“free” in the sense of “dynamic”), we would at the same time have to refuse its identification with arbitrariness, because it is not(absolute) arbitrariness but rather continuity which forms the basis of sign connections betweensignifiantandsignifié.

    All these interpretations are evidently faced with a number of difficulties, and there is unfortunately no straightforward path to solving them. Two more general facts can nevertheless be taken into consideration, which are referred to repeatedly by Saussure in his texts and which lead to the belief that, from the standpoint of rationality, internal or absolute arbitrariness represents a sort of threshold for semiological inquiry, below which Saussurean semiology cannot operate but without which it at the same time cannot exist.

    The first of these is the assertion (CGL, p. 122) that language has at its disposal only complex units whose complexity is “deprived of any natural unity” and which cannot be further simplified. The basic language units are not to be thought of as chemical elements, but rather as chemical mixtures (WGL, p. 4). Searching for rational relations below the level of these mixtures is meaningless in the same way as it is meaningless to look for unified language facts independently with respect to phonological and psychological facts, albeit they may in fact exist that way(WGL, p. 68). If the systematicity oflangueis from the standpoint of arbitrariness a secondary property, then it must be acknowledged that rational relations are likewise qualitatively secondary and that no decompositional analysis of sign can either capture or isolate them. An analytical approach may with respect to language facts identify a pair of sign components/objects,signifiantandsignifié, or—as they are called elsewhere, using more obscure terminology—signs and ideas, these however do not constitute objects of the same kind and any independent considerations of them as separate entities only lead to postulation of “two different grammars” (the grammar of ideas and the grammar of signs), each of which is “incorrect and incomplete” (WGL,p. 5). Given this standpoint, there is no rationality in language such as would not be a rationality of complex units.

    The other fact is the concept of differentiating value, probably the most important cornerstone of systematic semiology which at the same time plays a key role in differentiating between absolute and relative arbitrariness. The sign value which—in surprising opposition to theCGL(p. 114)—Saussure in his manuscript principally identifies with meaning, significance, function and even use (WGL, p. 12) cannot be considered only from the standpoint of the internal, absolutely arbitrary relation betweensignifiantandsignifié.

    Saussure brings up this fact repeatedly. One comprehensive example being for instance the following set of assumptions which Saussure proposed in his manuscript(WGL, p. 20): (1) The sign exists solely based on its meaning, (2) meaning exists solely based on its sign, (3) signs and meanings exist solely based on the difference between signs. The first two assumptions represent a mirror requirement of the obligatory reciprocity ofsignifiantandsignifié. The third assumption then represents a conglomerate of two levels of difference, on the one hand a purely negative level,which articulatessignifiantandsignifiéseparately, on the other hand a positive level of its kind, which operates at the level of signs as complex units. The first of these levels—the comparison of the units ofsignifiantand the units ofsignifiéindividually—is a difference in the proper sense for its pure negativity and, above all, because it delimits both components of the sign which have no existence of their own before this differentiation. Relations at the second level should not be thought of as relations of difference, but rather as relations of units which, because of their positive nature, are only distinct (CGL, p. 121). Arbitrariness seems to be in some way breaking between these the two levels. From the point of view of thesignifiantsignifiérelation, arbitrariness assumes existence of negative values of the sign components, i.e. differential values in the proper sense, corresponding to the first level. At the same time, arbitrary relation of sign components is itself a prerequisite for determining the value of the sign as a whole, which corresponds to the second level. Even though Saussure (WGL, p. 238) in relation to definition of semiology as a discipline concerned with values which are not connected to extra-linguistic “things”by any sort of causal or rational relations speaks of “arbitrarily determinable value”,arbitrariness does not in fact construct the system in any way, nor can it principally do so, as this would lead to “the worst sort of complication”.

    Since “[a]rbitrary and differential are two correlative qualities” (CGL, p. 118),arbitrariness is a necessary part of the sign value delimitation mechanism; at the same time, it requires the first level and conditions the second. Its primary use for Saussure is however more that of a shorthand answer to those who would insist to pollute the immanent “purity” of language by extra-linguistic motivatedness. Should—hypothetically—components of signs be unified based on some sort of external or rational motivation, then (linguistic) values would also be determined by external motivation and necessarily precede the system, precede linguistic differentiation. The irrationality of absolute arbitrariness is a precondition of relative sign values, because it is a precondition of the very existence of an autonomous language system which—should it be motivated/rational—would be a thoroughly non-autonomous system and could only be studied in the same manner as other symbolic systems. The very notion of the language system, and, by the same token, linguistics and semiology as independent scientific disciplines would in that case appear superfluous.

    3. Conclusion

    Even though the terms rational and rationalistic are not synonymous and the way Saussure uses the former is not systematic, while he does not use the latter at all,Valentin Voloshinov suggests considering Saussure’s semiology as a rationalistic project. His main reason for this (Voloshinov, 1973, pp. 57-58) is the fact that arbitrariness and conventionality of language is a characteristic property of philosophical rationalism of the 18th century, which, being a study of forms, abstracts from ideological contents and focuses solely on “the inner logic of the system of signs itself” (Voloshinov, 1973, p. 58). It is therefore not difficult for Voloshinov to define Saussure’s semiology precisely as based on the conception of arbitrariness, with the Leibnizian idea of universal grammar. Although certain support for this notion could be found e.g. in Saussure’s assertion that linguistics cannot consider sensory data to be the source of its inquiries (WGL, p. 5), and that (linguistic) sign is not the opposite of the physical and the mental, because “[t]here is one domain, interior,psychic, where both sign and meaning are to be found, bound indissolubly one to the other” (WGL, p. 6), this forms a rather vague support, against which there could be raised arguments at the very least from the standpoint of its problematic conception of substance. Voloshinov’s line of thought nevertheless gives, albeit indirectly, rise to two questions worth attention. The first of these is the relation between (linguistic)sign and (language) system which finds its expression in assertions on “l(fā)anguage as a system of arbitrary signs”; the other is then the relation between arbitrariness and convention, which finds its expression in assertions on “arbitrary convention”.

    The relation between sign and system is primarily a question of the mechanism of value, without which it would not be possible to consider the systematic nature of language at all (CGL, p. 112). The role played by arbitrariness here may therefore seem vague or even inappropriate. In his critique of arbitrariness, émile Benveniste(1971) says that the union of sign components is not arbitrary, but rather necessary;Saussurean semiology based on arbitrariness is then not a manifestation of rationalism,but rather of philosophical relativism. The assertion that “the whole system of language is based on the irrational principle of the arbitrariness of the sign” (CGL,p. 133) cannot be understood as a belief in arbitrariness as a constituting principle of the system of language. It can only be understood as a constitutive principle in the sense of a force in opposition to which linguistic system is formed. It therefore does not come as a surprise that absolute arbitrariness is seen by many commentators as“an excessive relativist rigidity that contradicted the general ‘spirit’ of Saussure’s teaching” (Gasparov, 2012, p. 73), because the two most important concepts—those of arbitrary sign and the system—appear as opposing forces.

    When Saussure states that “l(fā)anguage represents arbitrary convention” (WGL, p.140), he is in fact guilty of a certain simplification for the sake of explanation—a similar formulation is used by Voloshinov (1973, p. 58) when he speaks of “l(fā)anguage as a system of conventional, arbitrary signs”—and with this simple gesture identifies two principles which are correlated but hardly identical. Arbitrariness can be seen as a pre-rational precondition of constitution of a sign or a linguistic system whicha priorirules out any determination other than an internal linguistic one, without however constituting a construction mechanism of the said determination. Convention in the sense in which it is used by Saussure is largely of a pragmatic nature; it does not precede the system as its precondition but is rather formed—as acknowledged by theCGL(p. 78), after all—continually (see mainlyWGL, p. 67) as a combination of the social force and temporal nature of language. It is therefore superfluous at best to speak of “arbitrary convention”, because every convention presupposes arbitrariness.Every convention—as accentuated by David Lewis (2002, p. 70)—is a convention due to, among other things, the principal necessity of existence of at least one alternative which could fulfill the role of the existing convention with the same effectiveness.Should there be no such alternative, there would be no convention either, but rather an unavoidable necessity, that is to say, a necessity which could be found in symbolic systems with their own, non-arbitrary bases. Arbitrariness is, given this standpoint,a plurality of possibilities, which can be entirely irrational, because the number of options within complex systems is infinite (seeWGL, p. 52). Convention, on the other hand, is selection of a specific option over others. While from the standpoint of the continuity principle, selection as convention (CGL, p. 78) is not entirely rational,from the standpoint of cultural dynamics it represents a necessary precondition for the establishment of convention. This selection is not and in principle cannot be a conscious decision of any particular individual, but only a collective, cultural custom or pattern (CGL, p. 68). This leads to somewhat indeterminate conclusion that selection is not only a prerequisite, but also a product of the dynamics of interpersonal linguistic dynamics.

    猜你喜歡
    流體動力年銷售額銷往
    首年銷售額破100萬,好潤集團(tuán)強(qiáng)勢布局江西市場
    油藏開發(fā)流體動力地質(zhì)作用對儲集層的改造
    太行明珠將方便小米粥銷往28個省
    憑借產(chǎn)品和服務(wù),中漁科技年銷售額增長超200%! 智能漁機(jī)設(shè)備將迎來一個美好機(jī)遇
    福伊特將上調(diào)銷往北美的造紙機(jī)織物價格
    造紙信息(2019年3期)2019-09-10 07:22:44
    巴斯夫2018年銷售額小幅增長
    上海建材(2019年2期)2019-07-13 05:55:58
    燕山大學(xué)重型機(jī)械流體動力傳輸與控制實(shí)驗(yàn)室
    某船用低速柴油機(jī)曲柄銷軸承彈性流體動力潤滑分析
    這家企業(yè)苦練“內(nèi)功”,將茶粕銷往東南亞、日本、澳大利亞、西班牙等,現(xiàn)又進(jìn)軍國內(nèi)蝦蟹市場
    年銷售額2629 億美元 授權(quán)行業(yè)再增長4.4% 其中玩具占13.3% 為351 億美元
    玩具世界(2017年9期)2017-11-24 05:17:37
    国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 91精品国产九色| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| av在线亚洲专区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 美女高潮的动态| 国产视频内射| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久久久久久国产电影| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 1000部很黄的大片| 深夜a级毛片| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲av成人av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久久久网色| 国产美女午夜福利| 日本三级黄在线观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 波多野结衣高清无吗| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| av.在线天堂| 国产高潮美女av| av免费在线看不卡| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲av男天堂| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 在线免费十八禁| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产精品三级大全| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 大香蕉久久网| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 久久亚洲精品不卡| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| av视频在线观看入口| 一级av片app| 欧美+日韩+精品| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 精品酒店卫生间| 少妇丰满av| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 内地一区二区视频在线| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 大香蕉久久网| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 色5月婷婷丁香| av播播在线观看一区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| h日本视频在线播放| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产三级在线视频| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 色播亚洲综合网| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久热久热在线精品观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 欧美bdsm另类| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产精品,欧美在线| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 日本五十路高清| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国产成人aa在线观看| kizo精华| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 尾随美女入室| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 婷婷色av中文字幕| h日本视频在线播放| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 看免费成人av毛片| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 久久久久性生活片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 久久久欧美国产精品| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 特级一级黄色大片| 日本熟妇午夜| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕制服av| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 午夜福利视频精品| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲国产精品999| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产精品一国产av| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 日本欧美视频一区| 熟女电影av网| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 久久婷婷青草| 18在线观看网站| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| kizo精华| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 午夜福利视频精品| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 日本免费在线观看一区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 久久久精品94久久精品| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 日本午夜av视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 99热全是精品| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成人无遮挡网站| 精品亚洲成国产av| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件 | 国产精品成人在线| 一级毛片 在线播放| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| a 毛片基地| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产在视频线精品| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产在视频线精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 性色av一级| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 久久久久久人妻| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 男女边摸边吃奶| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| av.在线天堂| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 99热全是精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 精品少妇内射三级| 黄色配什么色好看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 老司机影院成人| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 制服人妻中文乱码| 日韩视频在线欧美| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 成年动漫av网址| 桃花免费在线播放| 乱人伦中国视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产精品免费大片| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 99热网站在线观看| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲国产色片| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | av电影中文网址| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | a 毛片基地| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 大香蕉久久网| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久av网站| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲av福利一区| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| av一本久久久久| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 久久久久久人妻| 日本午夜av视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| av网站免费在线观看视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 夫妻午夜视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产精品免费大片| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产男女内射视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 午夜视频国产福利| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产精品三级大全| 蜜桃在线观看..| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 午夜免费观看性视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久影院123| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 尾随美女入室| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产精品.久久久| 嫩草影院入口| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲精品视频女| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 97超碰精品成人国产| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| freevideosex欧美| 一本久久精品| 久久久久国产网址| 七月丁香在线播放| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日本wwww免费看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产成人精品一,二区| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 9色porny在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 99热全是精品| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 久久午夜福利片| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 成人无遮挡网站| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国产亚洲最大av| 免费少妇av软件| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久久久视频综合| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 欧美性感艳星| 国产淫语在线视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 夫妻午夜视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av国产精品久久久久影院| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| a级毛片黄视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久av网站| 伦理电影免费视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 中国三级夫妇交换| 久久久欧美国产精品| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 精品一区二区三卡| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产精品无大码| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产精品无大码| av在线app专区| 色哟哟·www| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 黄色配什么色好看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩中字成人| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产成人aa在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 精品一区二区三卡| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久久国产一区二区| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 国产高清三级在线| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 18禁观看日本| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 制服诱惑二区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产精品无大码| 国产成人欧美| 观看av在线不卡| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 高清毛片免费看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产精品免费大片| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 久久久久久久国产电影| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 在线观看三级黄色| 精品酒店卫生间| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久久久久伊人网av| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 成人手机av| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| av在线app专区| 国产综合精华液| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 亚洲av福利一区| av有码第一页| 欧美成人午夜精品| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| www.av在线官网国产| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 捣出白浆h1v1| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| h视频一区二区三区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 少妇 在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 久久久久久人妻| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 少妇高潮的动态图| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 日本91视频免费播放| 免费av中文字幕在线| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 日本欧美视频一区| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久热这里只有精品99| 我要看黄色一级片免费的|