• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Response of broomcorn millet(Panicum miliaceum L.)genotypes from semiarid regions of China to salt stress

    2015-03-13 05:51:40MinxunLiuZhijunQioShungZhngYinyueWngPingLu
    The Crop Journal 2015年1期

    Minxun Liu,Zhijun Qio,Shung Zhng,Yinyue Wng,c,Ping Lu,*

    aInstitute of Crop Science,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China

    bInstitute of Genetic Resources,Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Taiyuan 030000,China

    cFaculty of Life Science,Jilin Agricultural University,Changchun 130118,China

    1.Introduction

    Salinity is a major environmental factor adversely affecting plant growth and development,and severely reduces agricultural productivity and yield [1].More than 6% of the world's total land area and 20% of the irrigated land are salt-affected[2].The salinity problem is particularly severe for arid and semiarid areas [3,4].In China,there are 33 million acres of salinized cultivated land,distributed mainly in the northern interior of the Yangtze River Basin [5].Minimizing the effects of salt on crop yield is necessary to maintain global food production for an increasing world population,which will increase to nine billion by 2050 [6].Although different remedial and management methods,including reclamation and improved irrigation techniques,have been recommended to render salt-affected soil fit for agriculture,these methods are costly in terms of finance,energy use,and labor [7,8].In addition,there is a need to improve salinity tolerance of important crops,because salt-tolerant crops have lower requirements for leaching of salt from the soil than do sensitive crops[9].The development of salt-tolerant cultivars of staple crops is an effective approach to obtaining acceptable yields under moderately saline conditions[10,11].

    Despite numerous efforts,few salt-tolerant genotypes have been released [12],owing to insufficient genetic knowledge of the tolerance traits,lack of effective selection criteria and evaluation methods,and poor understanding of the interaction between salinity and environment [13,14].Strategies for salt tolerance selection have been proposed for many crops,including soybean (Glycine max Merr.),wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)and rice(Oryza sativa L.)[15–17].The evaluation of salt-tolerant phenotypes under field conditions is very difficult,owing to high spatial and temporal variation[18].For this reason,most screening experiments are conducted under controlled environmental conditions,such as in the greenhouse [19–22],based on plant vigor (germination rate and plant growth during early growth) or visual damage to vegetative tissues [23].Screening for genetic diversity in physiological characters has been proposed and could be effective in salt tolerance breeding [12,24–29].Ion uptake is a character of particular interest,and Na+exclusion and grain K+/Na+ratio have been suggested as reliable traits for salt-tolerant crop selection [21,30–32].The lack of a single reproducible screening scheme and differential salinity sensitivities during various growth stages greatly limit breeding for salt tolerant varieties [33].Seed germination and early seedling growth are crucial periods for crop cycles under salt stress [34],and determine the survival of plants.Several studies have shown that the salt tolerance of crops varies with growth stage [19,33,35–37]; for example,wheat is more salt tolerant during germination,flowering and grain filling stages than in seedling and vegetative stages [38].However,differences in salt tolerance among crop genotypes may also occur at different growth stages [19,36].The salt tolerance of different crop genotypes should thus be evaluated at different growth stages.

    Broomcorn millet(Panicum miliaceum L.)is a seed crop that has been cultivated in China for more than 10,000 years [39],and has also been planted in India,central Europe,the USSR,and the Middle East [40–42].This species grows at a wide range of altitudes with a short growth cycle of 10–12 weeks and requires little water for growth and development [43,44].Broomcorn millet is considered a health-food crop,owing to its unique nutritional value,including higher grain alkaline protein content than wheat,rice and oat (Avena sativa L.)[45,46].Broomcorn millet is more tolerant to salt stress than maize(Zea mays L.),wheat,rice,or foxtail millet[Setaria italica(L.) P.Beauv.] [47].There is large genotypic variation in salt tolerance in broomcorn millet [48],suggesting that it possesses rich genetic resources for improving productivity in saline soil.However,the evaluation and identification of salt-tolerant genotypes lag behind efforts in other crops,and very few genes associated with salt tolerance have been found in broomcorn millet[25,48].

    Broomcorn millet is currently planted mainly in the northern part of China,including the northwest and northeast regions.Over 8500 accessions(varieties and landraces)of broomcorn millet are conserved in the National Centre for Crop Germplasm Conservation,Beijing,China.A core collection including 780 accessions has been established.In the present study,195 accessions from the core collection were screened for salt tolerance by measurement of the germination salt damage index under mixed salt conditions,and the seedling performance of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive genotypes selected according to germination-stage tolerance was reassessed under different salt stresses to validate the results from the germination stage and to investigate physiological traits for possible use as the salt-tolerance screening criteria for broomcorn millet.The aims of this study were to optimize the evaluation and identification of broomcorn millet as well as to identify promising genetic accessions from the core collection of broomcorn millet for the improvement of salt tolerance.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Plant materials

    A total of 195 accessions were selected from the core collection of broomcorn millet,including 90 landraces,45 breeding lines,20 commercial cultivars,20 wild accessions,and 20 entries from other countries/organizations including Poland(2),Russia(2),India(2),Australia(1),France(1),Canada(1),ICRISAT (2),Japan (1),Hungary (1),and the USA (7).Seeds of all accessions were provided by the National Center for Crop Germplasm Conservation,Beijing,China.

    2.2.Salt tolerance evaluation at germination stage in 195 accessions

    Fifty seeds of each accession were surface-sterilized with 5%sodium hypochlorite for 20 min and germinated on filter paper in closed Petri dishes for 7 days in 8 mL deionized water(control) or in 8 mL of a 120 mmol L-1mixed (on a 1:1 molar basis) salt solution of NaCl and Na2SO4(treatment) using a randomized complete block design with three replications in a growth chamber at 25/20 °C day/night with 12 h light.Seeds were considered as germinated when the plumule length accounted for half of the seed length and the radicle length was equal to the seed length.

    Germinated seeds were counted daily for each replicate and the growth parameters were calculated on the seventh day.According to the method of Wang and Wang [49],salt damage index (SDI,%) was adopted to evaluate the salt tolerance of broomcorn millet.

    Saltdamageindex(S DI,%)= (G PCK–GPT)/GPCK×100,

    where GPCKrepresents germination percentage under the control condition and GPTrepresents germination percentage under salt stress.

    Accessions with SDI lower than or equal to 20.00% were considered as strongly tolerant,those with SDI between 20.01% and 40.00% as salt tolerant,those with SDI between 40.01% and 60.00% as intermediately tolerant genotypes,and those with SDI ranges of 60.01–80.00% and 80.00–100.00% as intermediately sensitive and sensitive,respectively.Seven days after germination,the seeds in the treatment regime were subjected to post-NaCl recovery by washing three times with deionized water,and allowed to germinate for an additional 5 days.Relative germination percentage (RGP),relative root length (RRL),and relative shoot length (RSL)were calculated as the ratios of the values under saline conditions to those under control conditions.Relative germination percentage (RRGP),relative shoot length (RRSL) and relative root length (RRRL) after recovery were calculated as the ratios of the values under recovery conditions to the values under control condition.

    2.3.Salt tolerance of typical genotypes at seedling stage under a series of salt concentrations

    Six broomcorn millet genotypes with differing salt tolerance at the germination stage were selected for determining the most appropriate salt concentration for further identifying seedling salt tolerance among genotypes and to evaluate ionic variation and distribution in different tissues under salt stress.Among these genotypes,Zhongwei Dahuangmi and Ningmi 4 were tolerant,with SDI scores of 1.03 and 20.11,respectively; Huishu and Zigang Mizi were moderately tolerant,with SDI scores of 57.81 and 44.58;and Yimen Yidianzong and Wahui Ruanmi were sensitive genotypes,with SDI scores of 61.86 and 81.13,respectively.

    In the seedling experiment,the six selected genotypes were exposed to salt treatment using a randomized complete block design with three replicates.A total of 20 surface-sterilized seeds for each genotype were sown directly in 10-cm diameter plastic pots containing 1.0 kg of silicon dioxide.Each pot was watered every 2 days with a Hoagland nutrient solution containing 0,80,120,160,and 200 mmol L-1mixed salt solution for 20 days.All pots were placed in a growth room at a temperature of 24 ± 1 °C and relative humidity of 70–80%.Salt damage to plant growth was visually evaluated and percentage of surviving seedlings was calculated.Growth parameters were measured for 10 plants selected randomly from each pot.Relative shoot length,root length,shoot weight,and root weight were calculated as the ratios of the mean values under saline conditions to those under the control conditions.

    Shoots and roots from each pot were sampled separately,thoroughly washed with distilled water,weighed,and dried in a forced-air oven at 70 °C to constant mass.The dried tissues were reweighed and ground into a fine powder that passed a 60-mesh screen.Dry samples of 100 mg were used to determine the concentration of K+and Na+in nitric–perchloric acid digests by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry.

    2.4.Statistical analysis

    Analyses of variance and correlation were performed for each measured or scored character using the statistical program SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc.,Chicago,IL,USA).The differences between genotypes were compared by a post hoc least significant difference(LSD)test at P <0.05.

    3.Results

    3.1.Evaluation of salt tolerance of 195 broomcorn millet accessions at the germination stage

    Forty accessions,including all entries from other countries that exhibited germination percentages lower than 80%under the control condition,were omitted to avoid confusion between poor seed germination and the effect of salt on early vegetative growth.The effects of salt stress on the germination parameters of 155 broomcorn millet accessions are shown in Table 1.The means of relative germination percentage and of relative shoot and root length were 36.7%,42.2%,and 12.9%,respectively.These results indicated that salt stress strongly inhibited seed germination and plant growth of broomcorn millet during early vegetative growth.After 5 days in the post-NaCl recovery period,RGP,RSL and RRL were significantly increased,with means of 65.3%,58.4%,and 55.4%,respectively.Among the broomcorn millet accessions tested,the coefficient of variation (CV) was the largest for the reduction in RGP and the lowest for RRRL.There was highly significant genotypic variation in the response of germination to salinity as measured by RGP and RSL,as well as by RRGP and RRSL after recovery(Table 1).

    Based on salt damage indices,the 155 accessions examined were divided into five groups (Fig.1).The first group,strongly tolerant genotypes,contained 39 accessions with salt damage indices lower than or equal to 20.00% (Table 2).The second,tolerant,group contained 22 accessions with salt damage indices between 20.01% and 40.00%.The third,moderately tolerant,group contained 26 accessions with salt damage indices between 40.01% and 60.00%.The fourth and fifth moderately sensitive and sensitive groups included 47 genotypes.

    3.2.Effect of salt stress on seedling growth of P.miliaceum

    Large genotypic variation was found for seedling growth under different levels of salt stress (Table 3).The percentage of surviving seedlings,a statistic directly reflecting the salt tolerance of genotypes,was significantly affected by salt concentration.The relative surviving seedling numbers of Zhongwei Dahuangmi,Ningmi 4,Huishu,Zigan Mizi,and Wahui Ruanmi were greater than 90%under 80 mmol L-1salt stress but only 10%under 200 mmol L-1salt stress.

    Table 1-Growth characteristics at germination stage in 155 accessions of Panicum miliaceum under 120 mmol L-1 salt stress.

    The RSL markedly decreased with increasing salt concentration,but the trend in variation was different among genotypes.At 80 mmol L-1salt stress,the RSL of Zigan Mizi was the highest and that of Ningmi 4 was the lowest,with the six genotypes showing a mean value of 48.95%.With the increase in salt concentration,the decreases of Zigan Mizi and Yimen Yidianzong were greater than those of Zhongwei Dahuangmi and Ningmi 4.The former were 19.5% and 18.9%under 160 mmol L-1and 6.9% and 12.3% under 200 mmol L-1salt stress,respectively; while the latter were 29.4% and 20.0%under 160 mmol L-1and 20.8%and 16.3%under 200 mmol L-1salt stress,respectively.

    The RRL of genotypes was greater than 100% under 80 mmol L-1mixed salt stress,indicating that low salt stress can stimulate root growth.With increasing salt stress,root growth began to be inhibited,and the RRL of most genotypes was lower than that of the control under 160 mmol L-1salt stress.However,a significant reduction in root growth was observed under 200 mmol L-1stress (P <0.05),and the mean value of RRL was 22.2%.The variation in RRL among genotypes under salt stress was not significant.

    The aboveground biomass decreased markedly with the increase in salt stress.The genotypic variation was significant for salt stress ranging from 160 to 200 mmol L-1.Under 80 mmol L-1salt stress,Zigan Mizi had the highest relative biomass,whereas Huishu had the lowest and the mean of the six genotypes was 54.5%.When the salt concentration was 160 mmol L-1,the aboveground biomass of Zigan Mizi significantly decreased and was only half of its original value under 80 mmol L-1salt stress.The decrease in aboveground biomass in other genotypes,except for Zhongwei Dahuangmi,was 10% lower than that in the control.Under high salt stress (200 mmol L-1),the aboveground biomasses of the sensitive genotypes Yimen Yidianzong and Wahui Ruanmi were significantly lower than that under low salt stress.For the tolerant genotypes,the aboveground biomass under 200 mmol L-1salt stress decreased slightly compared to that under 160 mmol L-1salt stress.

    Low levels of salt stress had very little effect on belowground biomass and even stimulated root growth,as observed for Huishu and Wahui Ruanmi.However,when salt stress was increased to 160 mmol L-1,the belowground biomasses of all genotypes were lower than those of the controls.With increased salt stress,the difference in belowground biomass among genotypes was significant (P <0.01).The decrease in the belowground biomass of the tolerant genotypes was less than that of the sensitive genotypes.

    Fig.1-Salt tolerance distribution of Panicum miliaceum during germination stage under 120 mmol L-1 salt stress.

    Table 2-List of genotypes with strong tolerance to salt stress.

    3.3.Ion change under different levels of salt stress

    The Na+concentrations in both shoots and roots increased with salt concentration (Table 4).When the salt stress was 80 mmol L-1,the mean concentration of Na+was 0.036 mmol g-1in shoots and 0.062 mmol g-1in roots,and the values were not significantly increased compared to those of the control (0.027 and 0.074 mmol g-1,respectively).With further increase in salt stress,Na+concentrations in shoots and roots significantly increased.When the salt stress was increased to 120 mmol L-1,the shoot Na+concentration was 0.118 mmol g-1,and root Na+concentration was 0.37 mmol g-1,approximately four-and sixfold higher,respectively,than those under the control condition.The Na+concentration in root was greater than that in shoot,confirming that root was the first organ exposed to salt stress.The concentration of Na+varied significantly among genotypes under salt stress.The shoot Na+concentration in Yimen Yidianzong was 0.870 mmol g-1and was significantly higher than that of Zhongwei Dahuangmi(0.297 mmol g-1)at 200 mmol L-1salt stress.However,the root Na+concentration in Zhongwei Dahuangmi (2.363 mmol g-1)was higher than that in Yimen Yidianzong (1.058 mmol g-1).These results indicated that the Na+concentration in roots was different among genotypes.The salt-tolerant genotypes usually accumulated more Na+in roots than in shoots to reduce the transport of Na+into aboveground parts and to avoid damage from salt stress.In contrast,the sensitive genotypes lacked this ability and often accumulated more Na+in shoots than in roots.

    Salt stress can reduce the K+accumulation of shoot in broomcorn millet (Table 4).The mean decrease in K+concentration in shoot under 80 mmol L-1salt stress was 0.048 mmol g-1.When the salt concentration was greater than 120 mmol L-1,the variation of K+concentration in the shoot was small.The effect of salt stress on the K+concentration in root was small and not consistent.The K+concentration among genotypes varied significantly under salt stress,and the tolerant genotypes often had higher values in root and lower values in shoot compared to the sensitive genotypes.

    The Na+/K+ratio is important for the balance of ion concentration in plant cells under salt stress.We found that the Na+/K+ratio was increased not only in shoot but also in root with increasing salt stress(Fig.2).Under 80 mmol L-1salt stress,the variation in shoot Na+/K+ratio among the genotypes was not significant.When the salt stress was increased to 200 mmol L-1,the Na+/K+ratios of the sensitive genotypes were much higher than those of the tolerant genotypes.The variation of Na+/K+ratio in root differed from that in shoot,and the tolerant genotypes usually had higher Na+/K+ratios than the sensitive genotypes.The results indicated that the tolerant genotypes had greater Na+restriction than the sensitive genotypes and that this restriction increased with salt stress(Fig.3).

    Table 3-Effects of salt treatment on seedling traits of Panicum miliaceum L.

    3.4.Correlations among salt damage index,growth parameters,and ion concentration at the seedling stage

    The relationships among salt damage index,growth parameters and ion concentration at the seedling stage were analyzed as pairwise correlation coefficients (Table 5).There were significant negative correlations between salt damage index and percentage survival seedlings (P = 0.001),root Na+concentration (P = 0.029) and Na+restriction (P = 0.008),as well as significant positive correlations with aboveground biomass (P = 0.001),shoot Na+concentration (P = 0.007) and shoot Na+/K+ratio(P = 0.012).Shoot Na+concentration exhibited the highest levels of correlation with most parameters examined,including a significant positive correlation with salt damage index and aboveground biomass and a significant negative correlation with survival seedling number,root K+concentration,shoot Na+/K+ratio and Na+restriction.Shoot Na+/K+ratio exhibited close correlations with the parameters of seedlings and salt damage index during germination,including significant negative and positive correlations with survival seedling number and aboveground biomass,respectively,and a significant positive correlation with belowground biomass.

    4.Discussion

    The results of this study indicated that salt stress caused a substantial decrease in germination rate of all broomcorn millet accessions,but that the accessions differed significantly in their germination rates under saline conditions.Such a variable response of genotypes to salt stress has been previously described in different crops [25,50,51].A total of 39 entries,accounting for 25.2%of all the tested entries,were classified as strongly salt-tolerant in this study.These entries will be useful for salt-tolerance improvement in broomcorn millet.

    Many crops are sensitive to salt stress at the seedling stage[52].Seedling number strongly affects yield by reducing plant density.For this reason,the inclusion of seedling growth parameters in evaluation of salt tolerance is necessary for improving crop production under salinity.There were significant differences among genotypes in two parameters (RAB and RBB)under 80 mmol L-1,three(RSL,RAB,and RBB)under 120 mmol L-1,three (PSS,RAB,and RBB) under 160 mmol L-1and four (PSS,RSL,RAB,and RBB) under 200 mmol L-1(Table 3).So the most efficient parameters for evaluation of seedling salt tolerance in broomcorn millet are aboveground and belowground biomass.The seedling salt tolerance evaluation showed that salt-tolerant genotypes such as Ningmi 4 and Zhongwei Dahuangmi often had higher survival rates than salt-sensitive genotypes,especially under high salt stress.Correlation analysis showed that survival rate was negatively (R2=-0.80,P = 0.001) but aboveground biomass positively (R2= 0.77,P = 0.029) correlated with salt damage index.

    Table 4-Na+ and K+concentration in shoots and roots of Panicum miliaceum under different levels of salt stress.

    Under saline conditions,plants usually accumulate large amounts of Na+in vacuoles for osmoregulation [53].Salt tolerance is associated with the low accumulation of Na+[54]and the partial exclusion and compartmentalization of salt in cells[3].Na+is the main toxic ion under salinized conditions,and if excessive amounts of Na+enter the plant,the Na+concentration can rise to a toxic level,inhibiting photosynthesis and reducing growth rate [20].In the present study,Na+concentrations in shoots and roots increased significantly with salt stress(P = 0.019 and 0.007 in shoot and root,respectively).The large range of variation (0.024–0.095 mmol g-1dry weight under 80 mmol L-1salt stress and 0.252–2.363 mmol g-1dry weight under 200 mmol L-1salt stress) in Na+concentration among broomcorn millet entries suggest that Na+concentration could potentially be utilized as a selection criterion.The maintenance of low Na+concentration in actively growing tissues such as the shoot could be an important mechanism contributing to the enhanced salt tolerance of some genotypes [55].This idea is supported by our study in which salt-tolerant genotypes usually had higher root and lower shoot Na+accumulation compared to sensitive genotypes.Shoot Na+concentration was positively correlated with salt damage index (R2= 0.92,P = 0.001) and aboveground biomass (R2= 0.83,P <0.001) and negatively correlated with survival rate (R2=-0.80,P = 0.01).We accordingly propose that shoot Na+concentration would be an effective selection criterion for salt-tolerant broomcorn millet.This conclusion is consistent with that of a study of pearl millet(Pennisetum americana[L.]Leek)[33].

    Salt stress not only imposes osmotic and ion toxicity on plants but also affects uptake and transport of essential nutrients,such as K+[56].A decrease in K+with an increase in Na+in plant shoots has been reported[57–59].In addition,the capacity to concentrate K+in response to salinity stress is accompanied by reduced growth and accordingly does not represent adaption to salt stress [60].Our results for the relationship between Na+and K+are consistent with those reported earlier.However,K+concentrations in shoot and root showed no obvious variation under different salt conditions.There are two reasons for the decrease in K+concentration.First,the competition between Na+and K+to enter the membrane channels reduces the absorption of K+under salt stress.Second,a large amount of Na+accumulates in the cell,destroying the membrane and resulting in a great loss of K+in the membrane[61].Identifying the reason for the decrease in K+in broomcorn millet awaits further study by noninvasive micro-test techniques(NMT)for detecting K+flux in roots and shoots.

    Fig.2-Na+/K+ change in Panicum miliaceum under different levels of salt stress.

    A low Na+/K+ratio in cytoplasm is essential for maintenance of several enzymatic processes[62].El-Hendawy et al.[7]found that the order of wheat genotypes for Na+/K+ratio in the upper and lower two leaves of the main stem under different conditions correlated well with their salt-tolerance ranking.This result suggests that the Na+/K+ratio would be a valuable selection criterion for screening salt-tolerant genotypes under different conditions.In our study,the Na+/K+ratios of salt-tolerant genotypes such as Zhongwei Dahuangmi and Ningmi 4 were significantly lower than those of sensitive genotypes such as Yimen Yidianzong and Wahui Ruanmi.Thus,the Na+/K+ratio clearly increased with salt concentration.The Na+/K+ratio in roots was 2.5–6.5-fold higher than that in shoots under 80 mmol L-1stress and 5.2–14.6-fold higher under 240 mmol L-1(Table 4).The Na+/K+ratio in shoot was significantly correlated with salt damage index (R2= 0.64,P = 0.020),belowground biomass(R2= 0.62,P = 0.026),percentage survival seedlings (R2=-0.749,P = 0.010) and aboveground biomass(R2= 0.865,P <0.001).These results confirmed the importance of Na+–K+selectivity in the salt tolerance of broomcorn millet.

    Fig.3-Na+ restriction ability of Panicum miliaceum under different levels of salt stress.

    5.Conclusion

    Clear variation in salt tolerance was observed at the germination and seedling stages in 155 broomcorn millet accessions,including 39 entries that were salt-tolerant according to a salt damage index.These salt-tolerant entries usually showed higher survival rates of seedlings and greater belowground biomass than sensitive entries when exposed to salt stress.Salt damage index and seedling survival rate were highly correlated with Na+concentration and Na+/K+ratio in shoot,indices that were proposed as potential criteria for identification of salinity tolerance in broomcorn millet.

    Table 5-Correlation coefficients among salt damage index,growth parameters,and ion accumulation during seedling stage.

    This research was supported by the National Millet Crops Research and Development System (CARS-07-12[1].5-A1) and the National Key Technology R&D Program of China(2013BAD01B05-2).

    [1] D.Golldack,I.Lüking,O.Yang,Plant tolerance to drought and salinity:stress regulating transcription factors and their functional significance in the cellular transcriptional network,Plant Cell Rep.30(2011)1383–1391.

    [2] FAO,FAO land and plant nutrition management service,http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/spush 2008.

    [3] M.Ashraf,Breeding for salinity tolerance in plant,Crit.Rev.Plant Sci.13(1994) 17–42.

    [4] U.Schleiff,Analysis of water supply of plants under saline soil conditions and conclusions for research on crop salt tolerance,J.Agron.Crop Sci.194 (2008) 1–8.

    [5] Y.J.Weng,Salt Tolerance Cultivar and Cultivated Technique of Crop,China Agriculture Press,Beijing,2003.

    [6] H.C.Godfray,J.R.Beddington,I.R.Crute,L.Haddad,D.Lawrence,J.F.Muri,J.Pretty,S.Robinson,S.M.Thomas,C.Toulmin,Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people,Science 327 (2010) 812–818.

    [7] S.E.El-Hendawy,Y.Ruan,Y.Hu,U.Schmidhalter,A comparison of screening criteria for salt tolerance in wheat under field and controlled environmental conditions,J.Agron.Crop Sci.195 (2009) 356–367.

    [8] S.Singh,M.Singh,Genotypic basis of response to salinity stress in some crosses of spring wheat Triticum aestivum L.Euphytica 115 (2000) 209–219.

    [9] J.D.Rhoades,A.Kandiah,A.M.Mashali,The Use of Saline Waters for Crop Production,FAO's Irrigation and Drainage,Rome,Italy,1992.p.48.

    [10] M.C.Shannon,Adaptation of plants to salinity,Adv.Agron.60(1997) 75–120.

    [11] A.Atia,A.Smaoui,Z.Barhoumi,C.Abdelly,A.Debez,Differential response to salinity and water deficit stress in Polypogonmon speliensis (L.)Desf.provenances during germination,Plant Biol.13 (2011) 541–545.

    [12] T.J.Flowers,A.R.Yeo,Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plant: where next? Aust.J.Plant Physiol.22(1995) 875–884.

    [13] M.Z.Jafar,M.Farooq,M.A.Cheema,I.Afzal,S.M.A.Basra,M.A.Wahid,T.Aziz,M.Shahid,Improving the performance of wheat by seed priming under saline conditions,J.Agron.Crop Sci.198 (2012) 38–45.

    [14] J.M.Lenis,M.Ellersieck,D.G.Blevins,D.A.Sleper,H.T.Nguyen,D.Dunn,J.D.Lee,J.G.Shannon,Difference in ion accumulation and salt tolerance among Glycine accessions,J.Agron.Crop Sci.197 (2011) 302–310.

    [15] S.Houshmand,A.Arzani,S.A.M.Maibody,M.Feizi,Evaluation of salt-tolerant genotypes of durum wheat derived from in vitro and field experiment,Field Crop Res.91(2005)345–354.

    [16] G.B.Gregorio,D.Senadhira,R.D.Mendoza,Screening rice for salinity tolerance,IRRI Discussion Paper Series No.22,The International Rice Research Institute,Manila,the Philippines,1997.

    [17] W.Y.Kao,T.T.Tsai,H.C.Tsai,C.N.Shih,Response of three Glycine species to salt stress,Environ.Exp.Bot.56(2006)120–125.

    [18] S.N.Hajrasuliha,J.Baniabassi,D.R.Nilson,Special variability in soil sampling for salinity studies in Southwest Iran,Irrig.Sci.1(1980) 197–208.

    [19] P.W.Kingsbury,E.Epstein,Selection for salt resistant in spring wheat,Crop Sci.24(1984) 310–315.

    [20] R.Munns,S.Husain,A.R.Rivelli,R.A.James,A.G.Condon,M.P.Lindsay,E.S.Lagudah,D.P.Schachtman,R.A.Hare,Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops,and the role of physiological based selection traits,Plant Soil 247(2002)93–105.

    [21] A.Rahnama,K.Poustini,R.Tavakkol-Afshari,A.Ahmadi,H.Alizadeh,Growth properties and ion distribution in different tissues of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.)differing in salt tolerance,J.Agron.Crop Sci.197(2011)21–30.

    [22] M.Lonov,N.Yuldasheva,N.Ulchenko,A.I.Glushenkova,B.Heuer,Growth,development and yield of Crambe abyssinica under saline irrigation in the greenhouse,J.Agron.Crop Sci.199 (2013) 331–339.

    [23] C.Patanè,A.Saita,O.Sortino,Comparative effects of salt and water stress on seed germination and early embryo growth in two cultivars of sweet sorghum,J.Agron.Crop Sci.199(2013)30–37.

    [24] A.R.Yeo,M.E.Yeo,S.A.Flowers,T.J.Flowers,Screening of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for physiological characters contributing to salinity resistance,and their relationship to overall performance,Theor.Appl.Genet.79(1990) 377–384.

    [25] P.Sabir,M.Ashraf,N.A.Akram,Accession variation for salt tolerance in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) using leaf proline content and activities of some key antioxidant enzymes,J.Agron.Crop Sci.197 (2011) 340–347.

    [26] A.H.Abdel-Ghani,Response of wheat varieties from semi-arid regions of Jordan to salt stress,J.Agron.Crop Sci.195(2009)55–65.

    [27] S.K.Panda,M.H.Khan,Growth oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in greengram (Vigna radiata L.) under short-term salinity stress and its recovery,J.Agron.Crop Sci.195 (2009) 442–454.

    [28] Y.Wang,J.X.Guo,Q.L.Meng,X.Y.Cui,Physiological responses of krishum(Iris lacteal Pall.var.chinensis Koidz)to neutral and alkaline salts,J.Agron.Crop Sci.194(2008)429–437.

    [29] K.Yan,P.Chen,H.Shao,S.Zhao,L.Zhang,L.Zhang,G.Xu,J.Sun,Responses of photosynthesis and photo system II to higher temperature and salt stress in sorghum,J.Agron.Crop Sci.198 (2012) 218–226.

    [30] K.Poustini,A.Siosemardeh,Ion distribution in wheat cultivars in response to salinity stress,Field Crop Res.85(2004) 125–133.

    [31] S.C.Praxedes,C.F.de Lacerda,F.M.DaMatta,J.T.Prisco,E.Gomes-Filho,Salt tolerance is associated with differences in ion accumulation,biomass allocation and photosynthesis in cow pea cultivars,J.Agron.Crop Sci.196 (2010) 193–204.

    [32] A.Saleem,M.Ashraf,N.A.Akram,Salt (NaCl)-induced modulation in some key physio-biochemical attributes in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.),J.Agron.Crop Sci.197 (2011)202–213.

    [33] L.Krishnamurthy,R.Serraj,K.N.Rai,C.T.Hash,A.J.Dakheel,Identification of pearl millet[Pennisetum glaucum (L.)R.Br.]lines tolerant to soil salinity,Euphytica 158 (2007) 179–188.

    [34] A.A.Khan,S.A.Rao,T.McNeilly,Assessment of salinity tolerance based upon seedling root growth response functions in maize (Zea mays L.),Euphytica 131 (2003) 81–89.

    [35] S.E.El-Hendawy,Y.Hu,G.M.Yakout,A.M.Awad,S.E.Hafiz,U.Schmidhalter,Evaluating salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters,Eur.J.Agron.22(2005) 243–253.

    [36] B.H.Tian,S.Y.Wang,Y.J.Li,J.G.Wang,L.X.Zhang,F.Q.Liang,Y.Z.Zhai,J.R.Liu,Response to sodium chloride stress at germination and seedling and identification of salinity tolerant genotypes in foxtail millet landraces originated from China,Acta Agron.Sin.34(2008) 2218–2222.

    [37] J.M.Li,L.Liu,Y.L.Bai,P.J.Zhang,R.Finkers,Y.C.Du,R.G.F.Visser,A.W.V.Heusden,Seedling salt tolerance in tomato,Euphytica 178 (2011) 403–414.

    [38] E.V.Mass,J.A.Poss,Slat sensitivity of cowpea at various growth stages,Irrig.Sci.10(1989) 313–320.

    [39] G.W.Crawford,Agricultural origins in North China pushed back to the Pleistocene–Holocene boundary,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.106 (2009) 7271–7272.

    [40] J.M.J.De Wet,Origin,evolution and systematics of minor cereals,in: A.Seetharam,K.W.Riley,Harinarayana (Eds.),Small Millets in Global Agriculture,Oxford and IBH Publ,New Delhi,India,1989,pp.19–30.

    [41] H.Doggett,Small millets: a selective overview,in: A.Seetharam,K.W.Riley,Harinarayana (Eds.),Small Millets in Global Agriculture,Oxford and IBH Publ,New Delhi,India,1989,pp.3–17.

    [42] J.R.Harlan,Crops and Man,Am.Soc.Agron.Crop Sci.Soci,Madison,Wis.,USA,1992.

    [43] K.Jana,M.Jan,Content and quality of protein in proso millet(Panicum miliaceum L.) varieties,Plant Foods Hum.Nutr.61(2006) 45–49.

    [44] R.Lágler,G.Gyulai,M.Humphreys,Z.Szabó,L.Horváth,A.Bittsánszky,J.Kiss,L.Holly,L.Heszky,Morphological and molecular analysis of common millet (P.miliaceum) cultivars compared to a DNA sample from the 15th century(Hungary),Euphytica 146 (2005) 77–85.

    [45] K.Chang,Archeology of ancient China,Science 162 (1968)519–526.

    [46] P.Geervani,B.O.Eggum,Nutrient composition and protein quality of minor millets,Plant Foods Hum.Nutr.39(1989)201–208.

    [47] Y.C.Dong,D.S.Zheng,Crops and Their Wild Relatives in China,China Agriculture Press,Beijing,2006.

    [48] L.Wang,X.Y.Wang,Q.F.Weng,B.E.Wu,L.P.Cao,Identification of salt tolerance in Chinese prosomillet germplasm,J.Plant Genet.Resour.8(2007)426–429.

    [49] X.Y.Wang,L.Wang,Descriptors and Data Standard for Broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.),China Agriculture Press,Beijing,2006.

    [50] Z.Noreen,M.Ashraf,M.U.Hassan,Inter-accessional variation for salt tolerance in pea(Pisum sativum L.)at germination and seedling stage,Pak.J.Bot.39(2007)275–285.

    [51] T.Tekalign,P.S.Hammes,Growth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and reproductive growth:I.Stomatal conductance,rate of transpiration,net photosynthesis and dry matter production and allocation,Sci.Hort 105(2005)13–27.

    [52] T.J.Flowers,A.R.Yeo,Variability in the resistance of sodium chloride salinity with rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties,New Phytol.88(1981) 363–373.

    [53] A.K.Parida,A.B.Das,Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review,Ecotoxicol.Environ.Saf.60(2005) 324–349.

    [54] G.E.Santa-Maria,E.Epstein,Potassium/sodium selectivity in wheat and amphiploid cross wheat × Lophopyrum elongatum,Plant Sci.160 (2001) 523–534.

    [55] P.M.Hasegawa,R.A.Bressan,J.K.Zhu,Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity,Annu.Rev.Plant Physiol.51(2000) 463–499.

    [56] P.J.C.Kuiper,Functioning of plant cell membrane under saline conditions: membrane lipid composition and ATPase,in:R.C.Staples,G.H.Toenniessen(Eds.),Salinity Tolerance in Plant–Strategies for Crop Improvement,John Wiley &Sons,New York,1984,pp.77–91.

    [57] X.D.Wang,C.Wang,Z.H.Ma,R.R.Hou,Q.Gao,Q.Chen,Effect of short-term salt stress on the absorption of K+and accumulation of Na+,K+in seedling of different wheat varieties,Acta Ecol.Sin.31 (2011) 2822–2830.

    [58] A.Qadar,Requirement of rice crop for phosphorus and potassium at varying sodicity levels,J.Plant Nutr.18(1995)2291–2303.

    [59] M.C.Shannon,J.D.Rhoades,J.H.Darper,S.C.Scardici,M.D.Spyres,Assessment of salt tolerance in rice cultivars in responses to salinity problem in California,Crop Sci.38(1998)394–398.

    [60] S.Meneguzzo,F.Navari-Izzo,R.Izzo,NaCl effects on water relations and accumulation of mineral nutrients in shoots,roots and cell sap of wheat seedling,J.Plant Physiol.156(2000)711–716.

    [61] L.Zeng,M.C.Shannon,Salinity effects on seeding growth and yield components of rice,Crop Sci.40 (2000) 996–1003.

    [62] R.A.James,R.Munns,S.Caemmerer,C.Trejo,C.Miller,T.Condon,Photosynthetic capacity is related to the cellular and sub cellular partitioning of Na+,K+and Cl-in salt effected barley and durum wheat,Plant Cell Environ.29(2006)2185–2197.

    久久精品人妻少妇| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久久欧美国产精品| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 中文字幕制服av| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 69人妻影院| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 精品久久久久久久久av| 久久中文看片网| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| a级毛色黄片| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 在线免费十八禁| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产精品久久视频播放| 观看美女的网站| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 此物有八面人人有两片| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 日本与韩国留学比较| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲av男天堂| 热99在线观看视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 变态另类丝袜制服| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲最大成人av| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 嫩草影院新地址| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 久久久色成人| 热99re8久久精品国产| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 少妇的逼水好多| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| av在线亚洲专区| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久99精品国语久久久| 少妇丰满av| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 尾随美女入室| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 波多野结衣高清作品| 久久久久久大精品| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 免费看av在线观看网站| 高清毛片免费看| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产精品三级大全| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲国产色片| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 如何舔出高潮| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 小说图片视频综合网站| 悠悠久久av| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲综合色惰| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产视频内射| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 免费看日本二区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| av.在线天堂| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| av免费在线看不卡| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 禁无遮挡网站| 免费看日本二区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产精品三级大全| av视频在线观看入口| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产成人精品一,二区 | 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 1024手机看黄色片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 99久国产av精品| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 春色校园在线视频观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 国产高潮美女av| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看 | 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| av专区在线播放| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 综合色av麻豆| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 色视频www国产| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 日本色播在线视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 美女国产视频在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 内射极品少妇av片p| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 91av网一区二区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 春色校园在线视频观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 长腿黑丝高跟| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 大香蕉久久网| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 99热全是精品| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 只有这里有精品99| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 九九在线视频观看精品| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 欧美激情在线99| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 色综合色国产| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产成人福利小说| 国产真实乱freesex| 精品久久久噜噜| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 深夜a级毛片| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 久久久国产成人免费| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 午夜a级毛片| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日日啪夜夜撸| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| kizo精华| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 九草在线视频观看| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产色婷婷99| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 老司机福利观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 春色校园在线视频观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 成年av动漫网址| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 中国国产av一级| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区 | 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 级片在线观看| 永久网站在线| 中国国产av一级| 99久久人妻综合| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 校园春色视频在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 老司机福利观看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 中国国产av一级| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 有码 亚洲区| 极品教师在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日本黄大片高清| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 尾随美女入室| 日日撸夜夜添| 99热全是精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| av在线亚洲专区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 草草在线视频免费看| 久99久视频精品免费| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久久久性生活片| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 色吧在线观看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 麻豆一二三区av精品| avwww免费| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 看免费成人av毛片| 有码 亚洲区| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 黄片wwwwww| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲性久久影院| 99热只有精品国产| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 一级毛片电影观看 | 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 青春草国产在线视频 | 看片在线看免费视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 日本黄色片子视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区 | 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲av成人av| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 色播亚洲综合网| 欧美+日韩+精品| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 中国美女看黄片| 久久久久国产网址| 嫩草影院精品99| av专区在线播放| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| av免费观看日本| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 不卡一级毛片| 一本久久中文字幕| h日本视频在线播放| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 少妇的逼好多水| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| av天堂中文字幕网| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产精品三级大全| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚州av有码| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 极品教师在线视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日本欧美国产在线视频| av福利片在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人av| 尾随美女入室| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 午夜视频国产福利| 色综合站精品国产| 99热精品在线国产| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产在线男女| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 有码 亚洲区| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 丝袜喷水一区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 乱人视频在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 国产精华一区二区三区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 免费看a级黄色片| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 一区福利在线观看| 国产在视频线在精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| av专区在线播放| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲五月天丁香| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 美女内射精品一级片tv| 在线天堂最新版资源| 日本一二三区视频观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 成年av动漫网址| 黑人高潮一二区| 看黄色毛片网站| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| av福利片在线观看| 久久久久网色| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 成人欧美大片| 日本免费a在线| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 久久久精品94久久精品| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲成人久久性| a级毛色黄片|