• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Response of broomcorn millet(Panicum miliaceum L.)genotypes from semiarid regions of China to salt stress

    2015-03-13 05:51:40MinxunLiuZhijunQioShungZhngYinyueWngPingLu
    The Crop Journal 2015年1期

    Minxun Liu,Zhijun Qio,Shung Zhng,Yinyue Wng,c,Ping Lu,*

    aInstitute of Crop Science,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China

    bInstitute of Genetic Resources,Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Taiyuan 030000,China

    cFaculty of Life Science,Jilin Agricultural University,Changchun 130118,China

    1.Introduction

    Salinity is a major environmental factor adversely affecting plant growth and development,and severely reduces agricultural productivity and yield [1].More than 6% of the world's total land area and 20% of the irrigated land are salt-affected[2].The salinity problem is particularly severe for arid and semiarid areas [3,4].In China,there are 33 million acres of salinized cultivated land,distributed mainly in the northern interior of the Yangtze River Basin [5].Minimizing the effects of salt on crop yield is necessary to maintain global food production for an increasing world population,which will increase to nine billion by 2050 [6].Although different remedial and management methods,including reclamation and improved irrigation techniques,have been recommended to render salt-affected soil fit for agriculture,these methods are costly in terms of finance,energy use,and labor [7,8].In addition,there is a need to improve salinity tolerance of important crops,because salt-tolerant crops have lower requirements for leaching of salt from the soil than do sensitive crops[9].The development of salt-tolerant cultivars of staple crops is an effective approach to obtaining acceptable yields under moderately saline conditions[10,11].

    Despite numerous efforts,few salt-tolerant genotypes have been released [12],owing to insufficient genetic knowledge of the tolerance traits,lack of effective selection criteria and evaluation methods,and poor understanding of the interaction between salinity and environment [13,14].Strategies for salt tolerance selection have been proposed for many crops,including soybean (Glycine max Merr.),wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)and rice(Oryza sativa L.)[15–17].The evaluation of salt-tolerant phenotypes under field conditions is very difficult,owing to high spatial and temporal variation[18].For this reason,most screening experiments are conducted under controlled environmental conditions,such as in the greenhouse [19–22],based on plant vigor (germination rate and plant growth during early growth) or visual damage to vegetative tissues [23].Screening for genetic diversity in physiological characters has been proposed and could be effective in salt tolerance breeding [12,24–29].Ion uptake is a character of particular interest,and Na+exclusion and grain K+/Na+ratio have been suggested as reliable traits for salt-tolerant crop selection [21,30–32].The lack of a single reproducible screening scheme and differential salinity sensitivities during various growth stages greatly limit breeding for salt tolerant varieties [33].Seed germination and early seedling growth are crucial periods for crop cycles under salt stress [34],and determine the survival of plants.Several studies have shown that the salt tolerance of crops varies with growth stage [19,33,35–37]; for example,wheat is more salt tolerant during germination,flowering and grain filling stages than in seedling and vegetative stages [38].However,differences in salt tolerance among crop genotypes may also occur at different growth stages [19,36].The salt tolerance of different crop genotypes should thus be evaluated at different growth stages.

    Broomcorn millet(Panicum miliaceum L.)is a seed crop that has been cultivated in China for more than 10,000 years [39],and has also been planted in India,central Europe,the USSR,and the Middle East [40–42].This species grows at a wide range of altitudes with a short growth cycle of 10–12 weeks and requires little water for growth and development [43,44].Broomcorn millet is considered a health-food crop,owing to its unique nutritional value,including higher grain alkaline protein content than wheat,rice and oat (Avena sativa L.)[45,46].Broomcorn millet is more tolerant to salt stress than maize(Zea mays L.),wheat,rice,or foxtail millet[Setaria italica(L.) P.Beauv.] [47].There is large genotypic variation in salt tolerance in broomcorn millet [48],suggesting that it possesses rich genetic resources for improving productivity in saline soil.However,the evaluation and identification of salt-tolerant genotypes lag behind efforts in other crops,and very few genes associated with salt tolerance have been found in broomcorn millet[25,48].

    Broomcorn millet is currently planted mainly in the northern part of China,including the northwest and northeast regions.Over 8500 accessions(varieties and landraces)of broomcorn millet are conserved in the National Centre for Crop Germplasm Conservation,Beijing,China.A core collection including 780 accessions has been established.In the present study,195 accessions from the core collection were screened for salt tolerance by measurement of the germination salt damage index under mixed salt conditions,and the seedling performance of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive genotypes selected according to germination-stage tolerance was reassessed under different salt stresses to validate the results from the germination stage and to investigate physiological traits for possible use as the salt-tolerance screening criteria for broomcorn millet.The aims of this study were to optimize the evaluation and identification of broomcorn millet as well as to identify promising genetic accessions from the core collection of broomcorn millet for the improvement of salt tolerance.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Plant materials

    A total of 195 accessions were selected from the core collection of broomcorn millet,including 90 landraces,45 breeding lines,20 commercial cultivars,20 wild accessions,and 20 entries from other countries/organizations including Poland(2),Russia(2),India(2),Australia(1),France(1),Canada(1),ICRISAT (2),Japan (1),Hungary (1),and the USA (7).Seeds of all accessions were provided by the National Center for Crop Germplasm Conservation,Beijing,China.

    2.2.Salt tolerance evaluation at germination stage in 195 accessions

    Fifty seeds of each accession were surface-sterilized with 5%sodium hypochlorite for 20 min and germinated on filter paper in closed Petri dishes for 7 days in 8 mL deionized water(control) or in 8 mL of a 120 mmol L-1mixed (on a 1:1 molar basis) salt solution of NaCl and Na2SO4(treatment) using a randomized complete block design with three replications in a growth chamber at 25/20 °C day/night with 12 h light.Seeds were considered as germinated when the plumule length accounted for half of the seed length and the radicle length was equal to the seed length.

    Germinated seeds were counted daily for each replicate and the growth parameters were calculated on the seventh day.According to the method of Wang and Wang [49],salt damage index (SDI,%) was adopted to evaluate the salt tolerance of broomcorn millet.

    Saltdamageindex(S DI,%)= (G PCK–GPT)/GPCK×100,

    where GPCKrepresents germination percentage under the control condition and GPTrepresents germination percentage under salt stress.

    Accessions with SDI lower than or equal to 20.00% were considered as strongly tolerant,those with SDI between 20.01% and 40.00% as salt tolerant,those with SDI between 40.01% and 60.00% as intermediately tolerant genotypes,and those with SDI ranges of 60.01–80.00% and 80.00–100.00% as intermediately sensitive and sensitive,respectively.Seven days after germination,the seeds in the treatment regime were subjected to post-NaCl recovery by washing three times with deionized water,and allowed to germinate for an additional 5 days.Relative germination percentage (RGP),relative root length (RRL),and relative shoot length (RSL)were calculated as the ratios of the values under saline conditions to those under control conditions.Relative germination percentage (RRGP),relative shoot length (RRSL) and relative root length (RRRL) after recovery were calculated as the ratios of the values under recovery conditions to the values under control condition.

    2.3.Salt tolerance of typical genotypes at seedling stage under a series of salt concentrations

    Six broomcorn millet genotypes with differing salt tolerance at the germination stage were selected for determining the most appropriate salt concentration for further identifying seedling salt tolerance among genotypes and to evaluate ionic variation and distribution in different tissues under salt stress.Among these genotypes,Zhongwei Dahuangmi and Ningmi 4 were tolerant,with SDI scores of 1.03 and 20.11,respectively; Huishu and Zigang Mizi were moderately tolerant,with SDI scores of 57.81 and 44.58;and Yimen Yidianzong and Wahui Ruanmi were sensitive genotypes,with SDI scores of 61.86 and 81.13,respectively.

    In the seedling experiment,the six selected genotypes were exposed to salt treatment using a randomized complete block design with three replicates.A total of 20 surface-sterilized seeds for each genotype were sown directly in 10-cm diameter plastic pots containing 1.0 kg of silicon dioxide.Each pot was watered every 2 days with a Hoagland nutrient solution containing 0,80,120,160,and 200 mmol L-1mixed salt solution for 20 days.All pots were placed in a growth room at a temperature of 24 ± 1 °C and relative humidity of 70–80%.Salt damage to plant growth was visually evaluated and percentage of surviving seedlings was calculated.Growth parameters were measured for 10 plants selected randomly from each pot.Relative shoot length,root length,shoot weight,and root weight were calculated as the ratios of the mean values under saline conditions to those under the control conditions.

    Shoots and roots from each pot were sampled separately,thoroughly washed with distilled water,weighed,and dried in a forced-air oven at 70 °C to constant mass.The dried tissues were reweighed and ground into a fine powder that passed a 60-mesh screen.Dry samples of 100 mg were used to determine the concentration of K+and Na+in nitric–perchloric acid digests by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry.

    2.4.Statistical analysis

    Analyses of variance and correlation were performed for each measured or scored character using the statistical program SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc.,Chicago,IL,USA).The differences between genotypes were compared by a post hoc least significant difference(LSD)test at P <0.05.

    3.Results

    3.1.Evaluation of salt tolerance of 195 broomcorn millet accessions at the germination stage

    Forty accessions,including all entries from other countries that exhibited germination percentages lower than 80%under the control condition,were omitted to avoid confusion between poor seed germination and the effect of salt on early vegetative growth.The effects of salt stress on the germination parameters of 155 broomcorn millet accessions are shown in Table 1.The means of relative germination percentage and of relative shoot and root length were 36.7%,42.2%,and 12.9%,respectively.These results indicated that salt stress strongly inhibited seed germination and plant growth of broomcorn millet during early vegetative growth.After 5 days in the post-NaCl recovery period,RGP,RSL and RRL were significantly increased,with means of 65.3%,58.4%,and 55.4%,respectively.Among the broomcorn millet accessions tested,the coefficient of variation (CV) was the largest for the reduction in RGP and the lowest for RRRL.There was highly significant genotypic variation in the response of germination to salinity as measured by RGP and RSL,as well as by RRGP and RRSL after recovery(Table 1).

    Based on salt damage indices,the 155 accessions examined were divided into five groups (Fig.1).The first group,strongly tolerant genotypes,contained 39 accessions with salt damage indices lower than or equal to 20.00% (Table 2).The second,tolerant,group contained 22 accessions with salt damage indices between 20.01% and 40.00%.The third,moderately tolerant,group contained 26 accessions with salt damage indices between 40.01% and 60.00%.The fourth and fifth moderately sensitive and sensitive groups included 47 genotypes.

    3.2.Effect of salt stress on seedling growth of P.miliaceum

    Large genotypic variation was found for seedling growth under different levels of salt stress (Table 3).The percentage of surviving seedlings,a statistic directly reflecting the salt tolerance of genotypes,was significantly affected by salt concentration.The relative surviving seedling numbers of Zhongwei Dahuangmi,Ningmi 4,Huishu,Zigan Mizi,and Wahui Ruanmi were greater than 90%under 80 mmol L-1salt stress but only 10%under 200 mmol L-1salt stress.

    Table 1-Growth characteristics at germination stage in 155 accessions of Panicum miliaceum under 120 mmol L-1 salt stress.

    The RSL markedly decreased with increasing salt concentration,but the trend in variation was different among genotypes.At 80 mmol L-1salt stress,the RSL of Zigan Mizi was the highest and that of Ningmi 4 was the lowest,with the six genotypes showing a mean value of 48.95%.With the increase in salt concentration,the decreases of Zigan Mizi and Yimen Yidianzong were greater than those of Zhongwei Dahuangmi and Ningmi 4.The former were 19.5% and 18.9%under 160 mmol L-1and 6.9% and 12.3% under 200 mmol L-1salt stress,respectively; while the latter were 29.4% and 20.0%under 160 mmol L-1and 20.8%and 16.3%under 200 mmol L-1salt stress,respectively.

    The RRL of genotypes was greater than 100% under 80 mmol L-1mixed salt stress,indicating that low salt stress can stimulate root growth.With increasing salt stress,root growth began to be inhibited,and the RRL of most genotypes was lower than that of the control under 160 mmol L-1salt stress.However,a significant reduction in root growth was observed under 200 mmol L-1stress (P <0.05),and the mean value of RRL was 22.2%.The variation in RRL among genotypes under salt stress was not significant.

    The aboveground biomass decreased markedly with the increase in salt stress.The genotypic variation was significant for salt stress ranging from 160 to 200 mmol L-1.Under 80 mmol L-1salt stress,Zigan Mizi had the highest relative biomass,whereas Huishu had the lowest and the mean of the six genotypes was 54.5%.When the salt concentration was 160 mmol L-1,the aboveground biomass of Zigan Mizi significantly decreased and was only half of its original value under 80 mmol L-1salt stress.The decrease in aboveground biomass in other genotypes,except for Zhongwei Dahuangmi,was 10% lower than that in the control.Under high salt stress (200 mmol L-1),the aboveground biomasses of the sensitive genotypes Yimen Yidianzong and Wahui Ruanmi were significantly lower than that under low salt stress.For the tolerant genotypes,the aboveground biomass under 200 mmol L-1salt stress decreased slightly compared to that under 160 mmol L-1salt stress.

    Low levels of salt stress had very little effect on belowground biomass and even stimulated root growth,as observed for Huishu and Wahui Ruanmi.However,when salt stress was increased to 160 mmol L-1,the belowground biomasses of all genotypes were lower than those of the controls.With increased salt stress,the difference in belowground biomass among genotypes was significant (P <0.01).The decrease in the belowground biomass of the tolerant genotypes was less than that of the sensitive genotypes.

    Fig.1-Salt tolerance distribution of Panicum miliaceum during germination stage under 120 mmol L-1 salt stress.

    Table 2-List of genotypes with strong tolerance to salt stress.

    3.3.Ion change under different levels of salt stress

    The Na+concentrations in both shoots and roots increased with salt concentration (Table 4).When the salt stress was 80 mmol L-1,the mean concentration of Na+was 0.036 mmol g-1in shoots and 0.062 mmol g-1in roots,and the values were not significantly increased compared to those of the control (0.027 and 0.074 mmol g-1,respectively).With further increase in salt stress,Na+concentrations in shoots and roots significantly increased.When the salt stress was increased to 120 mmol L-1,the shoot Na+concentration was 0.118 mmol g-1,and root Na+concentration was 0.37 mmol g-1,approximately four-and sixfold higher,respectively,than those under the control condition.The Na+concentration in root was greater than that in shoot,confirming that root was the first organ exposed to salt stress.The concentration of Na+varied significantly among genotypes under salt stress.The shoot Na+concentration in Yimen Yidianzong was 0.870 mmol g-1and was significantly higher than that of Zhongwei Dahuangmi(0.297 mmol g-1)at 200 mmol L-1salt stress.However,the root Na+concentration in Zhongwei Dahuangmi (2.363 mmol g-1)was higher than that in Yimen Yidianzong (1.058 mmol g-1).These results indicated that the Na+concentration in roots was different among genotypes.The salt-tolerant genotypes usually accumulated more Na+in roots than in shoots to reduce the transport of Na+into aboveground parts and to avoid damage from salt stress.In contrast,the sensitive genotypes lacked this ability and often accumulated more Na+in shoots than in roots.

    Salt stress can reduce the K+accumulation of shoot in broomcorn millet (Table 4).The mean decrease in K+concentration in shoot under 80 mmol L-1salt stress was 0.048 mmol g-1.When the salt concentration was greater than 120 mmol L-1,the variation of K+concentration in the shoot was small.The effect of salt stress on the K+concentration in root was small and not consistent.The K+concentration among genotypes varied significantly under salt stress,and the tolerant genotypes often had higher values in root and lower values in shoot compared to the sensitive genotypes.

    The Na+/K+ratio is important for the balance of ion concentration in plant cells under salt stress.We found that the Na+/K+ratio was increased not only in shoot but also in root with increasing salt stress(Fig.2).Under 80 mmol L-1salt stress,the variation in shoot Na+/K+ratio among the genotypes was not significant.When the salt stress was increased to 200 mmol L-1,the Na+/K+ratios of the sensitive genotypes were much higher than those of the tolerant genotypes.The variation of Na+/K+ratio in root differed from that in shoot,and the tolerant genotypes usually had higher Na+/K+ratios than the sensitive genotypes.The results indicated that the tolerant genotypes had greater Na+restriction than the sensitive genotypes and that this restriction increased with salt stress(Fig.3).

    Table 3-Effects of salt treatment on seedling traits of Panicum miliaceum L.

    3.4.Correlations among salt damage index,growth parameters,and ion concentration at the seedling stage

    The relationships among salt damage index,growth parameters and ion concentration at the seedling stage were analyzed as pairwise correlation coefficients (Table 5).There were significant negative correlations between salt damage index and percentage survival seedlings (P = 0.001),root Na+concentration (P = 0.029) and Na+restriction (P = 0.008),as well as significant positive correlations with aboveground biomass (P = 0.001),shoot Na+concentration (P = 0.007) and shoot Na+/K+ratio(P = 0.012).Shoot Na+concentration exhibited the highest levels of correlation with most parameters examined,including a significant positive correlation with salt damage index and aboveground biomass and a significant negative correlation with survival seedling number,root K+concentration,shoot Na+/K+ratio and Na+restriction.Shoot Na+/K+ratio exhibited close correlations with the parameters of seedlings and salt damage index during germination,including significant negative and positive correlations with survival seedling number and aboveground biomass,respectively,and a significant positive correlation with belowground biomass.

    4.Discussion

    The results of this study indicated that salt stress caused a substantial decrease in germination rate of all broomcorn millet accessions,but that the accessions differed significantly in their germination rates under saline conditions.Such a variable response of genotypes to salt stress has been previously described in different crops [25,50,51].A total of 39 entries,accounting for 25.2%of all the tested entries,were classified as strongly salt-tolerant in this study.These entries will be useful for salt-tolerance improvement in broomcorn millet.

    Many crops are sensitive to salt stress at the seedling stage[52].Seedling number strongly affects yield by reducing plant density.For this reason,the inclusion of seedling growth parameters in evaluation of salt tolerance is necessary for improving crop production under salinity.There were significant differences among genotypes in two parameters (RAB and RBB)under 80 mmol L-1,three(RSL,RAB,and RBB)under 120 mmol L-1,three (PSS,RAB,and RBB) under 160 mmol L-1and four (PSS,RSL,RAB,and RBB) under 200 mmol L-1(Table 3).So the most efficient parameters for evaluation of seedling salt tolerance in broomcorn millet are aboveground and belowground biomass.The seedling salt tolerance evaluation showed that salt-tolerant genotypes such as Ningmi 4 and Zhongwei Dahuangmi often had higher survival rates than salt-sensitive genotypes,especially under high salt stress.Correlation analysis showed that survival rate was negatively (R2=-0.80,P = 0.001) but aboveground biomass positively (R2= 0.77,P = 0.029) correlated with salt damage index.

    Table 4-Na+ and K+concentration in shoots and roots of Panicum miliaceum under different levels of salt stress.

    Under saline conditions,plants usually accumulate large amounts of Na+in vacuoles for osmoregulation [53].Salt tolerance is associated with the low accumulation of Na+[54]and the partial exclusion and compartmentalization of salt in cells[3].Na+is the main toxic ion under salinized conditions,and if excessive amounts of Na+enter the plant,the Na+concentration can rise to a toxic level,inhibiting photosynthesis and reducing growth rate [20].In the present study,Na+concentrations in shoots and roots increased significantly with salt stress(P = 0.019 and 0.007 in shoot and root,respectively).The large range of variation (0.024–0.095 mmol g-1dry weight under 80 mmol L-1salt stress and 0.252–2.363 mmol g-1dry weight under 200 mmol L-1salt stress) in Na+concentration among broomcorn millet entries suggest that Na+concentration could potentially be utilized as a selection criterion.The maintenance of low Na+concentration in actively growing tissues such as the shoot could be an important mechanism contributing to the enhanced salt tolerance of some genotypes [55].This idea is supported by our study in which salt-tolerant genotypes usually had higher root and lower shoot Na+accumulation compared to sensitive genotypes.Shoot Na+concentration was positively correlated with salt damage index (R2= 0.92,P = 0.001) and aboveground biomass (R2= 0.83,P <0.001) and negatively correlated with survival rate (R2=-0.80,P = 0.01).We accordingly propose that shoot Na+concentration would be an effective selection criterion for salt-tolerant broomcorn millet.This conclusion is consistent with that of a study of pearl millet(Pennisetum americana[L.]Leek)[33].

    Salt stress not only imposes osmotic and ion toxicity on plants but also affects uptake and transport of essential nutrients,such as K+[56].A decrease in K+with an increase in Na+in plant shoots has been reported[57–59].In addition,the capacity to concentrate K+in response to salinity stress is accompanied by reduced growth and accordingly does not represent adaption to salt stress [60].Our results for the relationship between Na+and K+are consistent with those reported earlier.However,K+concentrations in shoot and root showed no obvious variation under different salt conditions.There are two reasons for the decrease in K+concentration.First,the competition between Na+and K+to enter the membrane channels reduces the absorption of K+under salt stress.Second,a large amount of Na+accumulates in the cell,destroying the membrane and resulting in a great loss of K+in the membrane[61].Identifying the reason for the decrease in K+in broomcorn millet awaits further study by noninvasive micro-test techniques(NMT)for detecting K+flux in roots and shoots.

    Fig.2-Na+/K+ change in Panicum miliaceum under different levels of salt stress.

    A low Na+/K+ratio in cytoplasm is essential for maintenance of several enzymatic processes[62].El-Hendawy et al.[7]found that the order of wheat genotypes for Na+/K+ratio in the upper and lower two leaves of the main stem under different conditions correlated well with their salt-tolerance ranking.This result suggests that the Na+/K+ratio would be a valuable selection criterion for screening salt-tolerant genotypes under different conditions.In our study,the Na+/K+ratios of salt-tolerant genotypes such as Zhongwei Dahuangmi and Ningmi 4 were significantly lower than those of sensitive genotypes such as Yimen Yidianzong and Wahui Ruanmi.Thus,the Na+/K+ratio clearly increased with salt concentration.The Na+/K+ratio in roots was 2.5–6.5-fold higher than that in shoots under 80 mmol L-1stress and 5.2–14.6-fold higher under 240 mmol L-1(Table 4).The Na+/K+ratio in shoot was significantly correlated with salt damage index (R2= 0.64,P = 0.020),belowground biomass(R2= 0.62,P = 0.026),percentage survival seedlings (R2=-0.749,P = 0.010) and aboveground biomass(R2= 0.865,P <0.001).These results confirmed the importance of Na+–K+selectivity in the salt tolerance of broomcorn millet.

    Fig.3-Na+ restriction ability of Panicum miliaceum under different levels of salt stress.

    5.Conclusion

    Clear variation in salt tolerance was observed at the germination and seedling stages in 155 broomcorn millet accessions,including 39 entries that were salt-tolerant according to a salt damage index.These salt-tolerant entries usually showed higher survival rates of seedlings and greater belowground biomass than sensitive entries when exposed to salt stress.Salt damage index and seedling survival rate were highly correlated with Na+concentration and Na+/K+ratio in shoot,indices that were proposed as potential criteria for identification of salinity tolerance in broomcorn millet.

    Table 5-Correlation coefficients among salt damage index,growth parameters,and ion accumulation during seedling stage.

    This research was supported by the National Millet Crops Research and Development System (CARS-07-12[1].5-A1) and the National Key Technology R&D Program of China(2013BAD01B05-2).

    [1] D.Golldack,I.Lüking,O.Yang,Plant tolerance to drought and salinity:stress regulating transcription factors and their functional significance in the cellular transcriptional network,Plant Cell Rep.30(2011)1383–1391.

    [2] FAO,FAO land and plant nutrition management service,http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/spush 2008.

    [3] M.Ashraf,Breeding for salinity tolerance in plant,Crit.Rev.Plant Sci.13(1994) 17–42.

    [4] U.Schleiff,Analysis of water supply of plants under saline soil conditions and conclusions for research on crop salt tolerance,J.Agron.Crop Sci.194 (2008) 1–8.

    [5] Y.J.Weng,Salt Tolerance Cultivar and Cultivated Technique of Crop,China Agriculture Press,Beijing,2003.

    [6] H.C.Godfray,J.R.Beddington,I.R.Crute,L.Haddad,D.Lawrence,J.F.Muri,J.Pretty,S.Robinson,S.M.Thomas,C.Toulmin,Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people,Science 327 (2010) 812–818.

    [7] S.E.El-Hendawy,Y.Ruan,Y.Hu,U.Schmidhalter,A comparison of screening criteria for salt tolerance in wheat under field and controlled environmental conditions,J.Agron.Crop Sci.195 (2009) 356–367.

    [8] S.Singh,M.Singh,Genotypic basis of response to salinity stress in some crosses of spring wheat Triticum aestivum L.Euphytica 115 (2000) 209–219.

    [9] J.D.Rhoades,A.Kandiah,A.M.Mashali,The Use of Saline Waters for Crop Production,FAO's Irrigation and Drainage,Rome,Italy,1992.p.48.

    [10] M.C.Shannon,Adaptation of plants to salinity,Adv.Agron.60(1997) 75–120.

    [11] A.Atia,A.Smaoui,Z.Barhoumi,C.Abdelly,A.Debez,Differential response to salinity and water deficit stress in Polypogonmon speliensis (L.)Desf.provenances during germination,Plant Biol.13 (2011) 541–545.

    [12] T.J.Flowers,A.R.Yeo,Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plant: where next? Aust.J.Plant Physiol.22(1995) 875–884.

    [13] M.Z.Jafar,M.Farooq,M.A.Cheema,I.Afzal,S.M.A.Basra,M.A.Wahid,T.Aziz,M.Shahid,Improving the performance of wheat by seed priming under saline conditions,J.Agron.Crop Sci.198 (2012) 38–45.

    [14] J.M.Lenis,M.Ellersieck,D.G.Blevins,D.A.Sleper,H.T.Nguyen,D.Dunn,J.D.Lee,J.G.Shannon,Difference in ion accumulation and salt tolerance among Glycine accessions,J.Agron.Crop Sci.197 (2011) 302–310.

    [15] S.Houshmand,A.Arzani,S.A.M.Maibody,M.Feizi,Evaluation of salt-tolerant genotypes of durum wheat derived from in vitro and field experiment,Field Crop Res.91(2005)345–354.

    [16] G.B.Gregorio,D.Senadhira,R.D.Mendoza,Screening rice for salinity tolerance,IRRI Discussion Paper Series No.22,The International Rice Research Institute,Manila,the Philippines,1997.

    [17] W.Y.Kao,T.T.Tsai,H.C.Tsai,C.N.Shih,Response of three Glycine species to salt stress,Environ.Exp.Bot.56(2006)120–125.

    [18] S.N.Hajrasuliha,J.Baniabassi,D.R.Nilson,Special variability in soil sampling for salinity studies in Southwest Iran,Irrig.Sci.1(1980) 197–208.

    [19] P.W.Kingsbury,E.Epstein,Selection for salt resistant in spring wheat,Crop Sci.24(1984) 310–315.

    [20] R.Munns,S.Husain,A.R.Rivelli,R.A.James,A.G.Condon,M.P.Lindsay,E.S.Lagudah,D.P.Schachtman,R.A.Hare,Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops,and the role of physiological based selection traits,Plant Soil 247(2002)93–105.

    [21] A.Rahnama,K.Poustini,R.Tavakkol-Afshari,A.Ahmadi,H.Alizadeh,Growth properties and ion distribution in different tissues of bread wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.)differing in salt tolerance,J.Agron.Crop Sci.197(2011)21–30.

    [22] M.Lonov,N.Yuldasheva,N.Ulchenko,A.I.Glushenkova,B.Heuer,Growth,development and yield of Crambe abyssinica under saline irrigation in the greenhouse,J.Agron.Crop Sci.199 (2013) 331–339.

    [23] C.Patanè,A.Saita,O.Sortino,Comparative effects of salt and water stress on seed germination and early embryo growth in two cultivars of sweet sorghum,J.Agron.Crop Sci.199(2013)30–37.

    [24] A.R.Yeo,M.E.Yeo,S.A.Flowers,T.J.Flowers,Screening of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes for physiological characters contributing to salinity resistance,and their relationship to overall performance,Theor.Appl.Genet.79(1990) 377–384.

    [25] P.Sabir,M.Ashraf,N.A.Akram,Accession variation for salt tolerance in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) using leaf proline content and activities of some key antioxidant enzymes,J.Agron.Crop Sci.197 (2011) 340–347.

    [26] A.H.Abdel-Ghani,Response of wheat varieties from semi-arid regions of Jordan to salt stress,J.Agron.Crop Sci.195(2009)55–65.

    [27] S.K.Panda,M.H.Khan,Growth oxidative damage and antioxidant responses in greengram (Vigna radiata L.) under short-term salinity stress and its recovery,J.Agron.Crop Sci.195 (2009) 442–454.

    [28] Y.Wang,J.X.Guo,Q.L.Meng,X.Y.Cui,Physiological responses of krishum(Iris lacteal Pall.var.chinensis Koidz)to neutral and alkaline salts,J.Agron.Crop Sci.194(2008)429–437.

    [29] K.Yan,P.Chen,H.Shao,S.Zhao,L.Zhang,L.Zhang,G.Xu,J.Sun,Responses of photosynthesis and photo system II to higher temperature and salt stress in sorghum,J.Agron.Crop Sci.198 (2012) 218–226.

    [30] K.Poustini,A.Siosemardeh,Ion distribution in wheat cultivars in response to salinity stress,Field Crop Res.85(2004) 125–133.

    [31] S.C.Praxedes,C.F.de Lacerda,F.M.DaMatta,J.T.Prisco,E.Gomes-Filho,Salt tolerance is associated with differences in ion accumulation,biomass allocation and photosynthesis in cow pea cultivars,J.Agron.Crop Sci.196 (2010) 193–204.

    [32] A.Saleem,M.Ashraf,N.A.Akram,Salt (NaCl)-induced modulation in some key physio-biochemical attributes in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.),J.Agron.Crop Sci.197 (2011)202–213.

    [33] L.Krishnamurthy,R.Serraj,K.N.Rai,C.T.Hash,A.J.Dakheel,Identification of pearl millet[Pennisetum glaucum (L.)R.Br.]lines tolerant to soil salinity,Euphytica 158 (2007) 179–188.

    [34] A.A.Khan,S.A.Rao,T.McNeilly,Assessment of salinity tolerance based upon seedling root growth response functions in maize (Zea mays L.),Euphytica 131 (2003) 81–89.

    [35] S.E.El-Hendawy,Y.Hu,G.M.Yakout,A.M.Awad,S.E.Hafiz,U.Schmidhalter,Evaluating salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters,Eur.J.Agron.22(2005) 243–253.

    [36] B.H.Tian,S.Y.Wang,Y.J.Li,J.G.Wang,L.X.Zhang,F.Q.Liang,Y.Z.Zhai,J.R.Liu,Response to sodium chloride stress at germination and seedling and identification of salinity tolerant genotypes in foxtail millet landraces originated from China,Acta Agron.Sin.34(2008) 2218–2222.

    [37] J.M.Li,L.Liu,Y.L.Bai,P.J.Zhang,R.Finkers,Y.C.Du,R.G.F.Visser,A.W.V.Heusden,Seedling salt tolerance in tomato,Euphytica 178 (2011) 403–414.

    [38] E.V.Mass,J.A.Poss,Slat sensitivity of cowpea at various growth stages,Irrig.Sci.10(1989) 313–320.

    [39] G.W.Crawford,Agricultural origins in North China pushed back to the Pleistocene–Holocene boundary,Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.106 (2009) 7271–7272.

    [40] J.M.J.De Wet,Origin,evolution and systematics of minor cereals,in: A.Seetharam,K.W.Riley,Harinarayana (Eds.),Small Millets in Global Agriculture,Oxford and IBH Publ,New Delhi,India,1989,pp.19–30.

    [41] H.Doggett,Small millets: a selective overview,in: A.Seetharam,K.W.Riley,Harinarayana (Eds.),Small Millets in Global Agriculture,Oxford and IBH Publ,New Delhi,India,1989,pp.3–17.

    [42] J.R.Harlan,Crops and Man,Am.Soc.Agron.Crop Sci.Soci,Madison,Wis.,USA,1992.

    [43] K.Jana,M.Jan,Content and quality of protein in proso millet(Panicum miliaceum L.) varieties,Plant Foods Hum.Nutr.61(2006) 45–49.

    [44] R.Lágler,G.Gyulai,M.Humphreys,Z.Szabó,L.Horváth,A.Bittsánszky,J.Kiss,L.Holly,L.Heszky,Morphological and molecular analysis of common millet (P.miliaceum) cultivars compared to a DNA sample from the 15th century(Hungary),Euphytica 146 (2005) 77–85.

    [45] K.Chang,Archeology of ancient China,Science 162 (1968)519–526.

    [46] P.Geervani,B.O.Eggum,Nutrient composition and protein quality of minor millets,Plant Foods Hum.Nutr.39(1989)201–208.

    [47] Y.C.Dong,D.S.Zheng,Crops and Their Wild Relatives in China,China Agriculture Press,Beijing,2006.

    [48] L.Wang,X.Y.Wang,Q.F.Weng,B.E.Wu,L.P.Cao,Identification of salt tolerance in Chinese prosomillet germplasm,J.Plant Genet.Resour.8(2007)426–429.

    [49] X.Y.Wang,L.Wang,Descriptors and Data Standard for Broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.),China Agriculture Press,Beijing,2006.

    [50] Z.Noreen,M.Ashraf,M.U.Hassan,Inter-accessional variation for salt tolerance in pea(Pisum sativum L.)at germination and seedling stage,Pak.J.Bot.39(2007)275–285.

    [51] T.Tekalign,P.S.Hammes,Growth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and reproductive growth:I.Stomatal conductance,rate of transpiration,net photosynthesis and dry matter production and allocation,Sci.Hort 105(2005)13–27.

    [52] T.J.Flowers,A.R.Yeo,Variability in the resistance of sodium chloride salinity with rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties,New Phytol.88(1981) 363–373.

    [53] A.K.Parida,A.B.Das,Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: a review,Ecotoxicol.Environ.Saf.60(2005) 324–349.

    [54] G.E.Santa-Maria,E.Epstein,Potassium/sodium selectivity in wheat and amphiploid cross wheat × Lophopyrum elongatum,Plant Sci.160 (2001) 523–534.

    [55] P.M.Hasegawa,R.A.Bressan,J.K.Zhu,Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity,Annu.Rev.Plant Physiol.51(2000) 463–499.

    [56] P.J.C.Kuiper,Functioning of plant cell membrane under saline conditions: membrane lipid composition and ATPase,in:R.C.Staples,G.H.Toenniessen(Eds.),Salinity Tolerance in Plant–Strategies for Crop Improvement,John Wiley &Sons,New York,1984,pp.77–91.

    [57] X.D.Wang,C.Wang,Z.H.Ma,R.R.Hou,Q.Gao,Q.Chen,Effect of short-term salt stress on the absorption of K+and accumulation of Na+,K+in seedling of different wheat varieties,Acta Ecol.Sin.31 (2011) 2822–2830.

    [58] A.Qadar,Requirement of rice crop for phosphorus and potassium at varying sodicity levels,J.Plant Nutr.18(1995)2291–2303.

    [59] M.C.Shannon,J.D.Rhoades,J.H.Darper,S.C.Scardici,M.D.Spyres,Assessment of salt tolerance in rice cultivars in responses to salinity problem in California,Crop Sci.38(1998)394–398.

    [60] S.Meneguzzo,F.Navari-Izzo,R.Izzo,NaCl effects on water relations and accumulation of mineral nutrients in shoots,roots and cell sap of wheat seedling,J.Plant Physiol.156(2000)711–716.

    [61] L.Zeng,M.C.Shannon,Salinity effects on seeding growth and yield components of rice,Crop Sci.40 (2000) 996–1003.

    [62] R.A.James,R.Munns,S.Caemmerer,C.Trejo,C.Miller,T.Condon,Photosynthetic capacity is related to the cellular and sub cellular partitioning of Na+,K+and Cl-in salt effected barley and durum wheat,Plant Cell Environ.29(2006)2185–2197.

    美女国产视频在线观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲在久久综合| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 在线观看免费高清a一片| 三级国产精品片| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 一级av片app| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 黄片wwwwww| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 只有这里有精品99| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 天堂网av新在线| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 精品久久久久久久末码| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 黄色一级大片看看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 一本久久精品| 日韩视频在线欧美| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 99热6这里只有精品| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲四区av| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 男女那种视频在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚州av有码| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久精品夜色国产| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 一级毛片 在线播放| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产成人福利小说| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲不卡免费看| av线在线观看网站| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产淫语在线视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 三级经典国产精品| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩成人伦理影院| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 91久久精品电影网| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| a级毛色黄片| 黄色一级大片看看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产黄频视频在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲精品一二三| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产高清三级在线| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| av国产免费在线观看| 一本久久精品| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产av不卡久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 欧美激情在线99| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 在线观看人妻少妇| 午夜福利在线在线| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 免费av不卡在线播放| xxx大片免费视频| 99热全是精品| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 色综合站精品国产| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| ponron亚洲| 综合色丁香网| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 婷婷色综合www| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 久久精品夜色国产| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 直男gayav资源| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国精品久久久久久国模美| av在线老鸭窝| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 日韩欧美三级三区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 身体一侧抽搐| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚州av有码| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| kizo精华| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 天堂√8在线中文| 毛片女人毛片| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 黄色配什么色好看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品久久视频播放| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 免费看光身美女| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日本三级黄在线观看| 免费看不卡的av| 日日啪夜夜撸| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 在现免费观看毛片| 观看免费一级毛片| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 三级国产精品片| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久精品人妻少妇| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美另类一区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲最大成人av| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 少妇高潮的动态图| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲性久久影院| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产在视频线在精品| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 嫩草影院新地址| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产成人福利小说| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 天堂网av新在线| 草草在线视频免费看| 极品教师在线视频| 美女大奶头视频| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 一夜夜www| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 久久久国产一区二区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 99热6这里只有精品| 22中文网久久字幕| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲四区av| 色网站视频免费| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 成年av动漫网址| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 91av网一区二区| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 91精品国产九色| freevideosex欧美| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久久久网色| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 日本wwww免费看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 色视频www国产| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 99热网站在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 特级一级黄色大片| 69av精品久久久久久| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日日啪夜夜撸| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 一级爰片在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 午夜视频国产福利| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 日韩成人伦理影院| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 久久久色成人| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 91久久精品电影网| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 精品酒店卫生间| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 成人综合一区亚洲| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 一夜夜www| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 成人国产麻豆网| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产精品一二三区在线看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久热精品热| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲精品视频女| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| www.色视频.com| 成年免费大片在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 联通29元200g的流量卡| eeuss影院久久| 五月天丁香电影| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 日本与韩国留学比较| 在线 av 中文字幕| 看免费成人av毛片| 色哟哟·www| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 七月丁香在线播放| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 99久久人妻综合| 色吧在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 免费观看的影片在线观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产av新网站| 午夜免费观看性视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| av.在线天堂| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产av在哪里看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲av成人av| 麻豆成人av视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 国产乱人偷精品视频| 色哟哟·www| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| av在线老鸭窝| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产乱来视频区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 高清毛片免费看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 禁无遮挡网站| av在线观看视频网站免费| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲综合色惰| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产综合精华液| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲成色77777| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 日本色播在线视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 观看免费一级毛片| 嫩草影院新地址| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| eeuss影院久久| 久久久欧美国产精品| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 成人无遮挡网站| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日韩电影二区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 午夜日本视频在线| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 一夜夜www| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 欧美潮喷喷水| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽|