• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A review on treatment of disinfection byproduct precursors by biological activated carbon process

    2022-11-05 06:47:12JieFuChingHuHungChenyunDngQilinWng
    Chinese Chemical Letters 2022年10期

    Jie Fu,Ching-Hu Hung,Chenyun Dng,Qilin Wng

    a School of Environmental Science and Engineering,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China

    b School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Georgia Institute of Technology,Atlanta,GA 30332,United States

    c Center for Technology in Water and Wastewater,School of Civil and Environmental Engineering,University of Technology Sydney,Sydney,New South Wales 2007,Australia

    Keywords:Disinfection byproduct precursor Biological activated carbon Formation potential Natural organic matter Empty bed contact time Ozonation

    ABSTRACT Disinfection by-products (DBPs) in water systems have attracted increasing attention due to their toxic effects.Removal of precursors (mainly natural organic matter (NOM)) prior to the disinfection process has been recognized as the ideal strategy to control the DBP levels.Currently,biological activated carbon(BAC) process is a highly recommended and prevalent process for treatment of DBP precursors in advanced water treatment.This paper first introduces the fundamental knowledge of BAC process,including the history,basic principles,typical process flow,and basic operational parameters.Then,the selection of BAC process for treatment of DBP precursors is explained in detail based on the comparative analysis of dominant water treatment technologies from the aspects of mechanisms for NOM removal as well as the treatability of different groups of DBP precursors.Next,a thorough overview is presented to summarize the recent developments and breakthroughs in the removal of DBP precursors using BAC process,and the contents involved include effect of pre-BAC ozonation,removal performance of various DBP precursors,toxicity risk reduction,fractional analysis of NOM,effect of empty bed contact time (EBCT) and engineered biofiltration.Finally,some recommendations are made to strengthen current research and address the knowledge gaps,including the issues of microbial mechanisms,toxicity evaluation,degradation kinetics and microbial products.

    1.Introduction

    Disinfection byproducts (DBPs) are generated from reactions of organic and inorganic matter in water with chemical agents during the water disinfection process.Chlorine,ozone,chlorine dioxide,chloramines and peracetic acid (PAA) are among the commonly used disinfectants for water/wastewater treatment today,and each produces its own suite of DBPs,with overlapping constituents [1].Based on the disinfectant type,the DBPs can be categorized into chlorination DBPs and those from non-chlorinated disinfectants.The DBPs from chlorination may include those regulated for drinking water such as the trihalomethanes (THMs,e.g.,chloroform,bromodichloromethane,chlorodibromomethane and bromoform),haloacetic acids (HAAs,e.g.,chloro-,bromo-,dichloro-,dibromo-and trichloroacetic acids) and chlorite,and the so-called“emerging” DBPs such as halonitromethanes (HNMs),haloacetonitriles (HANs),haloacetamides (HAMs),halofuranones,iodotrihalomethanes (I-THMs),iodo-acids (I-HAAs),nitrosamines (NAs),and others.The DBPs from non-halogenated oxidants are mainly resulted from the application of ozone or PAA as the disinfectant,including the regulated bromate (from ozonation),and other various types of aldehydes (e.g.,formaldehyde),ketones,and carboxylic acids (from ozone and PAA) [2,3].The existence of elevated levels of DBPs in the drinking water systems worldwide puts risk to the public health due to their potential for carcinogenic,genotoxic,and negative reproductive/developmental effects [2,4].

    So far,over 700 DBPs have been identified,and unfortunately,only a small part has been assessed either in quantitative detection or toxicity studies.More than half of the organic halogen generated by the chlorination [5]or aldehydes,bromate,and organic bromine generated by ozonation have not been reckoned as the known DBPs [6].Table S1 (Supporting information) illustrates typical DBPs and their toxicities in different treatment processes.Generally,the DBPs in drinking water have been quantified at sub-μg/L or low-to mid-μg/L levels [1,2,4,7],and many of them show considerable genotoxicity or carcinogenicity [2].

    Based on the discoveries of DBPs,the developed nations have promulgated guidelines or regulations to manage the concentration level and health risk of DBPs.In 1979,the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) published a regulation to guarantee the annual average level of Total THMs (TTHM,including chloroform,bromodichloromethane,dibromochloromethane,and bromoform) in drinking water under 100 μg/L [8].In 1998,the USEPA published the Stage 1 Disinfectants/DBP Rule to lower the maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) of TTHM to 80 μg/L;in addition,HAA5 (defined as chloroacetic,dichloroacetic,trichloroacetic,bromoacetic and dibromoacetic acids),bromate,and chlorite are regulated for the first time with the permissible levels at 60 μg/L,10 μg/L,and 1000 μg/L,respectively (Table S2 in Supporting information) [9].The European Union (EU) and World Health Organization (WHO) also published guidelines or standards to regulate DBPs (Table S2) [10,11].

    Table 1 Mechanisms and selectivity of different water treatment processes on removal of NOM.

    To meet the stricter regulations,many drinking water plants have employed so-called alternative disinfectants (e.g.,ozone,chlorine dioxide,and chloramines) to replace chlorine.However,ozone disinfection would significantly enhance the production of aldehydes,bromate,and organic bromine,which are of carcinogenic concern [12].Chloramination would produce a considerable amount ofN-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA),which is also a carcinogen classified by the USEPA [13].Another available strategy to reduce the DBPs levels is removal of precursors before the disinfection process,which can avoid the production of alternative DBPs by other disinfectants.

    Natural organic matter (NOM) in water is generally the predominant precursor of DBPs [14],and represents a significant portion of total organic carbon (TOC) content.NOM is originated from vegetation and microbial degradation processes,and has pedogenic and aquagenic sources [15].The pedogenic NOM has a higher lignin content and aromatic fraction,whereas aquagenic NOM is low in phenolic and aromatic constituents [16].There are several available technologies to reduce the concentration of NOM including coagulation,anion exchange,membranes process,activated carbon adsorption,biotreatment,advanced oxidation processes (AOPs),and ozonation [17].

    Of these technologies,biological activated carbon (BAC) process is an optimum process (see Section 3) and increasingly used in the last decade for treatment of DBP precursors.Two recent publications have reviewed the current knowledge of BAC for advanced water and wastewater treatment [18,19],however,the related issue and research progress on the treatment of DBP precursors by BAC process has not addressed.Liuet al.reviewed biofiltration processes for controlling disinfection by-products and their precursors,including BAC process [20].The rule of removing various disinfection by-products and the influence of process parameters were discussed in detail.Unfortunately,there are still many issues not involved,such as the selection of technology,removal of toxicity risk,fractional analysis of precursor components,and engineered biofiltration.To this end,this paper presents a thorough overview to summarize the recent developments and breakthroughs in the removal of DBP precursors using BAC process,including the fundamental knowledge of BAC process,selection of BAC process for treatment of DBP precursors from the perspective of removal mechanisms,the comprehensive performance of BAC process in applications,and discussion of the current knowledge gaps and further evolution of BAC process for the treatment of DBP precursors.

    2.Biological activated carbon process

    2.1.History of BAC process

    Fig.1.Developmental history of BAC process.

    Fig.1 summarizes the important events for the development of BAC process.The BAC technology is derived from granular activated carbon (GAC) technology.The first water treatment plant using GAC adsorption tank was constructed in Philadelphia,US in 1930[18].In the initial applications,the prechlorination is often used prior to GAC treatment.As a result,the growth of microorganisms in the carbon layer is significantly inhibited.To improve the removal of recalcitrant macromolecules,ozonation is sometimes utilized as the preoxidation step of GAC treatment.The combination of ozonation and GAC process was firstly put into practice at Amstaad Water Plant in Dusseldorf,Germany in 1961 [21].The advantages of microbial activity in the activated carbon layer were first confirmed by Parkhrust and his colleagues in 1967 [22],which enabled the prolonging the operation life of GAC media.In the 1970s,the research and application of ozonation-GAC process were widely carried out in Germany.Until 1978,the BAC process was firstly defined by Miller and Rice [18].Since then,the BAC technology is widely spread and used,and the treatment itself is perfected gradually.By now,BAC has become the prevalent process in advanced water treatment worldwide,and moreover,the process is also used in sewage reclamation and industrial wastewater treatment.

    2.2.Basic principles of BAC process

    BAC process utilizes the synergistic effect between physicalchemical adsorption and biological-oxidation degradation.Activated carbon has good adsorption capacity with different sizes of micropores,mesopores and macropores [23],and different sized organic molecules and dissolved oxygen (DO) can enter these pores[24].However,the adsorption sites would be occupied by adsorbatesvianon-specific mechanisms,including hydrophobic interactions,dipole interactions and van der Waals forces [25].For BAC technology,microorganisms on activated carbon will extend the adsorption capacity of activated carbon by regenerating the adsorption sites through the biodegradation of organic adsorbates[26].The BAC technology is based on the interaction between activated carbon,microorganisms,organic matters (OM) and DO (Fig.S1 in Supporting information) [18].Activated carbon is used as a carrier of microorganisms,which will reproduce and grow on the activated carbon to form BAC by feeding on sufficient OM and DO.The biofacies on activated carbon consist of bacteria,fungi,algae,protozoa and metazoan.

    2.3.Typical BAC process flow

    To date,the application of BAC process is in the following three areas: the advanced treatment of drinking water and sewage reclamation,and treatment of industrial wastewater.Fig.S2 (Supporting information) presents the typical processes of the advanced treatment of drinking water or sewage reclamation.The processes are based on conventional coagulation-sedimentation-filtration way.To improve the biodegradation efficiency,pre-ozonation prior to BAC,i.e.,O3-BAC,is widely applied.The refractory organics are oxidized into small molecules by ozone,which are more prone to be degraded by microorganisms on the activated carbon;meantime the oxygen derived from the decomposition of ozone will increase the level of DO and promote the biological-oxidation degradation [27].In practice,O3-BAC can be placed after sedimentation and before filtration as shown in Fig.S2a.In this process,a relatively higher ozone dosage is required to guarantee the quality of the effluent.The sand filter in the end can remove the tiny carbon particles and fallen microorganisms in the outflow of BAC.Alternatively,O3-BAC can be placed after the filtration as shown in Fig.S2b.Compared with process A,a lower ozone dosage is needed because the ozone depleting substances will be removed by filtration.However,the frequent backwash on the activated carbon is required to alleviate the leaping of micro carbon particles and microorganisms from BAC [18].

    2.4.Basic operational parameters of BAC process

    For the design of a BAC system,the characteristics of water quality,water amount and some certain operational parameters are necessary to be considered.Table S3 (Supporting information)summarizes the typical operational parameters of BAC process.First of all,the GAC material selection is crucial for the treatment performance.GAC for water treatment typically has an average diameter of 1.2-1.6 mm.GAC pore size has a significant influence on the attachment of microbial cells,and highest biomass was observed with the pore size of 2-50 nm.For the BAC operation,flow rate,height of the carbon layer,empty bed contact time (EBCT)and gas-water ratio directly influence the effluent quality.In practice,the general flow rate is 8-15 km/h;height of the carbon layer is within 1.5-3 m;EBCT should be 6-30 min;and gas-water ratio could be (4-6):1 [28].The growth of microorganisms and suspended solids brought by the inflow on the long-term operation may block the carbon layer.Therefore,the carbon layer should be washed periodically,and related parameters for backwash are also shown in Table S3.

    3.Selection of BAC process for treatment of DBP precursors

    Table 1 summarizes the mechanisms of dominant water treatment technologies as well as the most or least treatable fraction of NOM.Coagulation is the most commonly used process to remove NOM through principally electrostatic mechanisms [16].Coagulation can remove a large part of the NOM and especially the hydrophobic fraction,containing more aromatic and larger molecules in comparison to hydrophilic fraction.However,significant DBP formation potential (DBPFP) is still retained in the residual NOM after coagulation [29].Therefore,advanced treatment is needful for the removal of residual NOM components.Membrane process is an increasingly used water treatment,including microfiltration,ultrafiltration (UF),nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO).In general,owing to the small size of DBP precursors,NF membranes with a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of below 200 Da are required for successful precursor removal [30],which greatly increase the investment and operation cost,thus limiting their large scale application.Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs),based on thein situgeneration of hydroxyl radicals (·OH),is an effective technology to non-selectively remove various NOM compositions[31].Nevertheless,the breakdown intermediates by AOPs tend to increase the downstream DBPFP [32].Moreover,higher energy and chemical input is generally needed for AOPs to guarantee the treatment efficiency.GAC is a more ideal technology for control of DBP precursors in larger systems [33].GAC has very high adsorption capacity for small,neutral,and hydrophobic molecules,however,the adsorption capacity of GAC for hydrophilic and charged molecules is relatively lower [34].In addition,the routinely replacing the GAC media due to adsorption saturation has become a major constraint in operating GAC contactors [16].BAC process can extend GAC media lifevia in situregeneration of adsorption sites through biodegradation,which will substantially reduce the GAC replacement costs [35].Moreover,the biological process in BAC can enhance the treatment performance of GAC on low molecular weight (MW) hydrophilic compositions,e.g.,amino acids,and aldehydes [17].Especially,combined with pre-ozonation,the biodegradation performance of BAC process can be significantly promoted due to the enhanced biodegradability of NOM by transforming the large aromatic compositions into small MW and oxygen-containing molecules [18].Therefore,BAC/O3-BAC process is the best choice for advanced water treatment.

    In terms of removal mechanisms,treatability of NOM is largely determined by physical properties,especially size,charge and hydrophobicity (Table 1).Thus,assigning the NOM groups with discriminative properties is necessary to optimize the processes to remove the DBP precursors.Based on several assumptions,NOM can be classified to several groups,i.e.,humic substances,carboxylic acids,amino acids,proteins and carbohydrates (Table 2)[36].Humic substances are the largest,most hydrophobic and highly charged of the NOM groups,which make up 40%-60%of the dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in natural surface water[36]and are directly proportional to specific ultraviolet absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA254) [37].The high DBPFP of humic substances is well known,and they are the main sources of THM and HAA precursors [29].Carboxylic acids (e.g.,acetate,glycolate,butyrate,and formate acids) in NOM are assumed to be smaller and more hydrophilic than humic substances,of which properties are consistent with the NOM transphilic fraction [38].Although the percentage of carboxylic acids in raw water is small,the concentration of carboxylic acids can be significantly increased during the oxidation process (e.g.,ozonation) [39],which constitute the important sources of THM and HAA precursors [17].Glutamic acid,glycine,serine and aspartic acid are the most abundant aqueous amino acids and they are usually present in a combined form [36].Amino acids are the considered to be the major source of nitrogencontaining DBP (N-DBP) precursors [17],and many of them (e.g.,tryptophan,tyrosine,aspartic acid and asparagine) are also known to be reactive HAA precursors [40].Proteins in water often originate from algae or phytoplankton and can include phenol,pyridine,toluene and styrene groups [41].The concentration of proteins will correlate to N-DBP formation [42],and proteins also show high HAA formation potential (HAAFP) [43].Carbohydrates (e.g.,glucose,arabinose and mannose) are neutral,relatively hydrophilic and relatively small molecules [36].Typically,carbohydrates have a relatively low DBPFP [43].

    Based on the physiochemical properties of NOM groups,the treatability of different processes can be proposed (Table 2).Coagulation is normally the first step of conventional water treatment[16].Coagulation can remove most of humic substances,which may be sufficient for controlling the regulated DBPs,because humic substances are the main sources of THM and HAA precursors.Unfortunately,some fragments of lower size and charge remain in the residual humic substances that retain considerable DBPFP.What is worse,the other hydrophilic NOM groups including carboxylic acids,amino acids,proteins,and carbohydrates,which are important sources of DBP (especially N-DBP) precursors,are recalcitrant for the coagulation treatment [17,29].Post-treatment is thereby employed to further dislodge residual NOM compositions to control the DBPFP level.Among the available technologies including membranes,AOPs,GAC and (O3-)BAC,BAC is a more ideal choice for the control of DBP precursors based on not only the economical consideration but also removal mechanisms.The size exclusion is the major mechanism for rejection of molecules by membrane process,and typically,only the NF membranes with the MWCO of below 200 Da have the considerable efficacy for DBP control [44].AOPs have strong oxidation ability of non-selectivity,which can degrade all kinds of organic compounds.However,since the produced intermediates during the oxidation process may provide new DBP precursors,AOPs always show a limited removal of DBPFP.Moreover,AOPs are generally not economically feasible.GAC prefers to adsorb small,neutral,and hydrophobic molecules relative to hydrophilic and charged molecules [34].Compared with GAC,BAC process could enhance the removal of small compounds with low aromaticity and high nitrogen content in NOM (e.g.,carboxylic acids or amino acids) through biodegradation [45],and reduce the formation potential of HAA and N-DBP [17].Combined with pre-ozonation,the biodegradation performance of BAC process can be further enhanced.Based on the above discussion,it can be concluded that BAC/O3-BAC process is an ideal and feasible choice for treatment of various DBP precursors,especially the emerging ones such as N-DBP precursors.

    4.Treatment of DBP precursors by BAC process

    Table S4 (Supporting information) summarizes the studies on treatment of DBP precursors by BAC process.The earliest study was reported by Sketchellet al.in 1995 [46],where the effects of DOC and bromide on the formation of THM were investigated through a laboratory-scale BAC column test.After 2005,more and more studies have been carried out on the removal of DBP precursors by BAC process (Fig.2A).In the early studies,researchers focused on the regulated DBPs,i.e.,THMs and HAAs.In 2012,Chu and the colleagues first extended the target regulated DBPs to some NDBPs including two HAMs,four HANs and trichloronitromethane(TCNM) [47].Since then,the emerging DBPs have gained increasing attention and been widely studied.Based on the literature statistics (Fig.2B),it can be found that BAC technology is mainly used in drinking water treatment (accounting for 94%),while only three publications reported controlling the DBP precursors in sewage reclamation with BAC process [48-50].In terms of the study scale,pilot-scale study is most commonly conducted relative to laboratory-or full-scale study.This may be due to that the pilot experiment is close to the actual situation and convenient to evaluate the process feasibility and optimize the process parameters.As for the study geography,almost half of the researches come from China with a variety of water sources such as Taihu Lake [51,52],Yangtze River [53],Yellow River [54]and Huangpu River [55].The deteriorating water pollution and eutrophication in these surface waters are threatening local water quality safety [56].Especially,the algal blooms caused by eutrophication release large quantities of algal organic matters into water such as oligosaccharides,polysaccharides,proteins,peptides,amino acids,as well as other traceable organic acids [57],which provide considerable DBP precursors.Therefore,BAC technology is widely employed in China’s drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs) to control the effluent DBPFP [51].Since the relatively lower proportion of biodegradable fractions in NOM (biodegradable DOC (BDOC)/DOC = 0.1-0.3) [58],the single BAC process may not well play the biodegradation function.Thus,the pre-filter treatment has been employed to change the NOM compositions and enhance the BDOC fraction such as ozonation [48],AOPs (e.g.,O3/H2O2[59],ultraviolet (UV)/O3[60],vacuum UV (VUV) [24],and UV/H2O2[32]),biofiltration [29],and membrane process [61].Of these pretreatments,ozonation is recognized as the optimal procedure and has been widely used in many DWTPs around the world.

    Fig.2.Studies on treatment of DBP precursors by BAC process: (A) publication number versus publication year;(B) publication distributions based on application field,study scale,geography and process.The target regulated and unregulated DBPs in each publication were marked with different color in (A).Abbreviations:BAF,biological anthracite filter;NF,nanofiltration;UF,ultrafiltration;VUV,vacuum ultraviolet.

    4.1.Effect of pre-BAC ozonation

    Ozonation is usually applied before the BAC process (Table S4),and the typical ozone dose and contact time are 1.5-2.5 mg/L and 10-30 min.Researches indicate that ozonation can significantly increase the small MW fractions,breakdown the large aromatic structures,and increase the BDOC/DOC ratio of the NOM in water[18].For example,Chen and the co-workers conducted a comparative pilot study to evaluate the effects of ozonation on the NOM biodegradability and removal of DBP precursors by following BAC process [62].The results indicated the ozonation prominently increased BDOC from 0.25 mg/L to 0.72 mg/L,resulting in a 67.4% of HAAFP removal by BAC.However,without pre-ozonation,the BAC process could remove only 24.5% of HAAFP.

    The alteration of NOM characteristics by ozonation is due to the reaction of ozone towards the electron-rich moieties of NOM which include activated aromatic systems,olefins,and nonprotonated amines [63].Fig.3 illustrates the typical reaction paths as well as the impact on the formation of different types of DBPs during post-chlorination.Ozone reacts with phenolic compounds(Fig.3A)viaan ozone adduct which proceeds primarily to ring cleavage,formation of muconic-type compounds,and eventually resulting in aliphatic aldehydes,ketones and carboxylic acids [64].These formed aliphatic products can be biodegraded during the subsequent BAC process [65],which are expected to reduce the formation potential (FP) of THMs,HAAs,chloral hydrate (CH) and haloketones (HKs).For olefins (Fig.3B),the ozone reaction occursviathe Criegee mechanism that involves cleavage of the C=C double bond and formation of carbonyl compounds [66],which are biodegradable for BAC process,and ultimately reducing the FP of THMs,HAAs,CH and HKs.For amines (Fig.3C),an ozone adduct on the nitrogen atom leads to formation ofN-oxide for tertiary amines and hydroxylamine for primary and secondary amines [67],and further ozone oxidation can form nitro compounds [68].Biodegradation of these ozonolysis products of amines in BAC process is beneficial for the reduction of N-DBPFP such as HANs,HAMs,and HNMs.

    Fig.4 summarizes the treatment performance of pre-BAC ozonation on bulk water quality parameters and various structural types of DBP precursors in literatures (Table S4).Ozonation had a significant effect on UV254removal (average 29%),but limited or negligible effect on DOC (5.7%) and DON (dissolved organic nitrogen) removals (11.5%).This can be explained from the reaction mechanism that certain UV absorbing units of NOM can be partially oxidized and transformed to lower MW compounds by ozonation rather than being mineralized (Fig.3) [63].In addition,in the full-scale operation,the particulate matter leaked from presand filtration could be oxidized to the dissolved organic matter by ozone,which leads to the increase of DOC level after postozonation [69].For the DBP precursors,ozonation shows a significant effect on decrease of THMFP (18.3%),HAAFP (14.7%),HAMFP(20.4%),HANFP (23.3%) and NAFP (26.7%),but limited effect on HKFP removal (11%) and negative effect on HALFP (haloacetaldehyde formation potential) (-5%) and HNMFP removals (-136.9%).The dramatic increase of HNMFP after ozonation is due to the oxidation of amino groups,leading to pronounced formation of nitro compounds (Fig.3C).

    4.2.Removal of various DBP precursors

    Fig.5 illustrates the treatment performance of BAC process on bulk water quality parameters and various structural types of DBP precursors based on the literature data (Table S4).BAC process can remove approximately 30.3% of DOC on an average level,decreasing from 3.76 mg/L to 2.36 mg/L (Fig.5A).The TOXFP in the influent has an average level of 1 mg/L,accounting for 27% of DOC(Fig.5B),and BAC can averagely reduce 43.9% of TOXFP [47,63,70-72].This indicates the DBP precursors are relatively easier to be decreased in comparison to bulk DOC.The known DBPFP including THMFP,HAAFP,HALFP,HKFP,HAMFP,HANFP,HNMFP and NAFP in the influent has an average level of 390 μg/L and accounts for 38.7% of TOXFP (Fig.5B).The removal efficiency of these known DBPFPs across the BAC contactor (45.2%) is slightly higher than that of TOXFP,resulting in the weakly increased proportion of known DBPFP in the BAC effluent (Fig.5C).Of the known DBP precursors,THMs and HAAs,mid-μg/L concentration level (Fig.5A),are the predominant ones and they together account for over 90%of the identified DBPs in both influent and effluent of the BAC process.HALFP,HKFP,HAMFP,HANFP and HNMFP are usually at lowμg/L level in the influent,while NAFP is typically at sub-μg/L level.

    Fig.3.Impact of ozonation and biodegradation on DBP precursors: (A) phenolates,(B) olefins,and (C) amines.Abbreviations: CH,chloral hydrate;HAAs,haloacetic acids;HAMs,haloacetamides;HANs,haloacetonitriles;HKs,haloketones;HNMs,halonitromethanes;THMs,trihalomethanes.This figure is modified from literature [63].

    Fig.4.Effect of pre-BAC ozonation on the removal of bulk water quality parameters and various structural types of DBP precursors.Abbreviations: DOC,dissolved organic carbon;DON,dissolved organic nitrogen;FP,formation potential;HAA,haloacetic acid;HAL,haloacetaldehyde;HAM,haloacetamide;HAN,haloacetonitrile;HK,haloketone;HNM,halonitromethane;NA,nitrosamines;THM,trihalomethane;UV254,ultraviolet at 254 nm.The detailed literature data can be found in Table S4.

    For different types of DBP precursors,the average removal efficiency across the BAC process is in the order of HKFP (72.5%)>HALFP (69%)>HNMFP (66%)>NAFP (57.7%)>HAMFP (51.3%)>HAAFP (48.1%)>HANFP (46%)>THMFP (37.4%) (Fig.5A).The direct precursors for HKs and HALs are ketones and aldehydes,which are prone to removal by biodegradation (Table 1 and Fig.3).In addition,HKs and HALs,as intermediate DBPs,are rapidly formed as soon as the water is chlorinated,and finally converted to THMs or HAAs due to hydrolysis or reactions with residual chlorine [73],which also contributes the high reduction of HKFP and HALFP.Non-aromatic amines of small size are the most important precursors to form HNMs,which are highly biodegradable [17].Thus,high FP removal of HNMs across the BAC process has been observed.NAs formation seems to be complex,and early mechanistic research suggested the nucleophilic substitution reaction between unprotonated secondary amines and chloramines was the most important NA formation pathway [74].The biological degradation of secondary amines [65]and biological oxidization of ammonia [16]during the BAC process can effectively suppress the formation of NAs.Amino acids and aldehydes yield the highest HAM and HAN concentrations [74],and biodegradation plays the crucial role to breakdown of these precursors (Table 1).Relatively,the removal of THMFP and HAAFP is restrained compared with intermediate DBPs (HKs and HALs) and N-DBPs (NNMs,NAs,HAMs and HANs).This can be explained by the high contents of THM and HAA precursors (e.g.,humic substances) (Table 2) and replenishment from the conversion of intermediate DBPs (e.g.,HKs and HALs) [73].

    Bromide ions are nearly ubiquitous in natural water sources,and chlorine can rapidly oxidize bromide ions to form bromine during the drinking water chlorination process [75],which shows a stronger halogenating activity than chlorine and can produce brominated DBPs (bromo-DBPs) [29].Because of their high molecular weights,bromo-DBPs can cause difficulties for utilities to meet the regulatory limits of TTHM and HAA5.Moreover,bromo-DBPs may present higher health risks than their chlorinated analogs based on some toxicological studies [75].Bromine incorporation factor (BIF) has been used by many researchers to evaluate bromine substitution of DBPs [75,76].Typically,the BIF across the water treatment processes (including BAC process) shows an increasing trend [46,76],because of non-affecting bromide ion concentrations [70,77].For instance,Kosakaet al.[76]observed the BIF in a DWTP increased from ~0.2 in raw water to ~0.8 in BAC effluents.However,although BAC may increase the bromo-DBP proportion,the overall reduction of DBPFP far exceeds this negative change,thereby producing a much less toxic effluent.I-THMs have the similar situation,and the average removal of I-THMFP across the BAC process is-13.8%,while their proportion in the TOXFP of effluent is only 0.8% [49,69,77].

    4.3.Removal of toxicity risks of DBPFP

    Above discussion indicates the BAC process can effectively remove various DBP precursors.Since different classes of DBPs have different toxicity levels,it seems more meaningful to evaluate the control effectiveness of DBPs by comparing their integrated toxicity risks,rather than merely investigating their FPs [69].Plewa and colleagues systematically investigated the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of a broad range of DBPs,including THMs,HAAs,HANs,HNMs and HAMs,and established the combined toxicity value(CTV,L/mol) of each DBP [78,79].Based on these CTVs,Chu and colleagues calculated the integrated toxicity risk value (ITRV) of a specific DBP in DWTPs by multiplying its CTV by FP (nL/mol) [80].The ITRV for one class of DBPs can be calculated by summing values for each DBP.

    Fig.5.BAC treatment performance on the removal of bulk water quality parameters and various structural types of DBP precursors: removal amount and efficiency(A),and proportional distribution of DBP precursors in DOC before (B) and after (C)treatment.Abbreviations: DOC,dissolved organic carbon;DON,dissolved organic nitrogen;Ef,effluent;FP,formation potential;HAA,haloacetic acid;HAL,haloacetaldehyde;HAM,haloacetamide;HAN,haloacetonitrile;HK,haloketone;HNM,halonitromethane;In,influent;NA,nitrosamines;Re,removal efficiency;THM,trihalomethane;TOX,total organic halide.The detailed literature data can be found in Table S4.

    We used the reported data from a full-scale study [69]to illustrate the removal of toxicity risks of DBPFP across the BAC process.As shown in Fig.6,the BAC process shows a good removal of all kinds of DBPFP with an average efficiency of 37.1%.However,the toxicity risks of BAC effluent actually slightly increase by 2.4%.Inspecting the DBP classes,we find the toxicity risk of HANs is significantly elevated by 42.4% across the BAC process,and moreover,the ITRV of HANs accounts for the largest proportion (>80%) in the ITRV of total DBPs.Therefore,HANs play the critical role for the toxicity risks of DBPs though their concentrations are much lower than those of THMs and HAAs.Further inspecting the HAN species,dibromoacetonitrile (DBAN) is caught out due to its dramatic increase of concentration (by nearly onefold) and high CTV (61,444 L/mol).Although the dichloroacetonitrile (DCAN) is the dominant HAN species and its concentration is reduced by 64%,the relatively lower toxicity (CTV = 712 L/mol)cannot compensate the increased risk induced by DBAN.Thus,the significant higher toxicity risk caused by HANs than other DBPs cannot be ignored.In fact,many studies have indicated HANs,especially DBAN,are the toxicity drivers among the known DBPs [81-83].Moreover,most of the target DBPs are aliphatic compounds,while many of more toxic aromatic DBPs have not been well identified,such as halo-benzoquinones,halo-hydroxybenzaldehydes,halo-hydroxybenzoic acids,halo-salicylic acids,halo-phenols,and halo-pyrroles [52,84,85].Therefore,the change of toxicity risks of DBPFP across BAC process is difficult to predict,and some toxic species may pose an important effect.

    Fig.6.Removal of DBPFP (A) and integrated toxicity risks (B) by a full-scale BAC process.Abbreviations: HAA,haloacetic acid;HAL,haloacetaldehyde;HAM,haloacetamide;HAN,haloacetonitrile;HNM,halonitromethane;THM,trihalomethane.The used data are from literature [69].

    4.4.Fractional analysis on NOM

    Many researchers conducted the fractional analysis on NOM to explore the removal patterns of NOM and DBP precursors across the BAC process.The employed methods include composition characterization by liquid chromatography-organic carbon detection (LC-OCD) analysis [59,70-72]and fluorescence excitationemission matrix (F-EEM) [47,53,86],MW distribution analysis by high performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) [63,87],MW fractionation through ultrafiltration [51,55,86,88],and polarity fractionation through solid-phase extraction [76]and resins[51,54,61,89].LC-OCD can characterize NOM into five fractions including biopolymers,humic substances,building blocks,low molecular weight (LMW) acids,and LMW neutrals [90].According to the fluorescence features of NOM,F-EEM may be divided into five parts [91]: (I) aromatic protein (represented by tyrosine);(II)aromatic protein (represented by tryptophan);(III) fulvic acid-like;(IV) soluble biological byproduct-like;(V) humic acid-like.HPSEC can be used to characterize the MW distribution in a series of MW gradients,such as<0.5 kDa,0.5-1 kDa,1-3 kDa and>3 kDa[87],while ultrafiltration can separate the samples into subgroups according to the MW gradients [92].Resins or solid-phase extraction are often adopted to fractionate NOM into different fractions based on the polarity,such as hydrophobic acid,base and neutral,weakly hydrophobic acid and hydrophilic matter [61].

    Generally,the LMW fraction (<1 kDa) and hydrophilic fraction are the dominant compositions in NOM [92],which are the major sources of DBP precursors [51],and also preferable fractions for biodegradation (Table 1).For instance,the LMW fraction of<1 kDa in the Feng-shan Reservoir water of Southern Taiwan was 1.40 mg/L,and accounted for 38% of DOC.This fraction caused a THMFP of 222.79 μg/L,accounting for 53.1% of the THMFP for total dissolved organic matter (DOM) [93].BAC can preferably remove the LMW fraction,resulting in the relatively higher removal of DBP precursors relative to that of bulk DOC across BAC process (Fig.5A).For instance,a pilot-scale study indicated the removal efficiency of LMW (<3 kDa) DOC by BAC was 30%,while the removal of high molecular weight (HMW) fraction (>3 kDa) was only 8% [55].FEEM studies indicated BAC could effectively decrease the fractions of aromatic proteins and soluble biological byproducts [89],which are significant precursors of NDBPs (Table 2).Therefore,high removal efficiency of NDBPFP can be achieved by using BAC technology (Fig.5A).

    4.5.Effect of EBCT

    Of the BAC studies for removing DBP precursors (Table S4),the typical EBCT is 12-22.5 min.Extending the EBCT can enhance the removal of organics,but it may sacrifice efficiency and increase cost.Thus,exploring the relationship between removal of organics and EBCT is very important for BAC process.Many studies have indicated the effluent DOC along increased EBCT during biofiltration process shows a fast decrease in a characteristic initial period followed by a period of slow decrease [94].de Vera and colleagues also observed a similar trend for the decrease of DBP precursors across BAC process [63].The relationship between effluent DOC or DBPFP and EBCT can be described by a first-order kinetic equation[63,94]:

    wheretis the EBCT (min),kis the specific first-order rate constant(min-1),Ptis the concentration at timet(mmol/L),Pbiodegis the biodegradable concentration (mmol/L),andPfis the minimum DOC concentration or DBPFP (mmol/L) after a certain EBCT.

    Table S5 (Supporting information) summarizes the model parameters for reduction of DOC and DBPFP across BAC process in de Veraet al.’s study [63].The results indicated a good fitting of Eq.1 for various DBPFP as well as DOC with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9268-0.9993.kcan be used to evaluated the sensitivity of different classes of DBP precursors for the EBCT,and a largerkvalue indicates a faster decrease with increasing the EBCT.The calculatedkfor different classes of DBP precursors is in the order of HAL>HK>HNM>HAN>THM>HAM>HAA,which is basically consistent with their removal efficiency (Fig.5A).For a desired DBPFP level,the needed EBCT can be calculated using the deformation of Eq.1,t= [ln (Pbiodeg)-ln (Pt-Pf)]/k.For example,if we want an effluent THMFP of 1.5 μmol/L,the needed EBCT is calculated to be 11.4 min.

    4.6.Engineered biofiltration

    Currently,the biofiltration (mainly BAC) process is generally working in a passive pattern,and the treatment performance and stability are largely dependent on media configuration,backwash strategy and loading rate [95].The microbial activity plays a crucial role in the performance of a biofilter including removal of NOM and inorganic contaminants,reduction of turbidity,underdrain fouling,media clogging and filter head loss.Recently,“engineered biofiltration” has been proposed to change the passive process to a purposefully operated biological system.The goal of engineered biofiltration is to improve the water quality or hydraulic performance by providing specific conditions to enhance the biological performance.So far,two engineered strategies are prevalent: nutrient enhancement and peroxide enhancement.

    Nutrients are important for the microbial production and secretion of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS),which consists of exopolysaccharides and other biopolymers [96].EPS are the structural materials of microbial biofilms,where microorganisms can establish stable intercellular arrangements and function as synergistic microbiota.EPS also constructs protective barrier for microbes to resist various environmental stress [97,98].In a biofilter,the ratio of C (bioavailable organic carbon,BOC):N (ammonium nitrogen,NH3-N):P (orthophosphate phosphorus,PO4-P),is important for the microbial growth [95],and a molar ratio of C:N:P = 100:10:1 is generally recommended in an aerobic process[99].However,the nutrient concentrations of NH3-N and PO4-P are usually are limitation factors for microbial EPS production and activity levels [100].Therefore,replenishing nutrients in the feed water has been considered as an effective way to promote the microbial growth in the biofilter,and enhance the microbial activity for removal of NOM and DBP precursors.

    A number of researches have been conducted to evaluate the nutrient enhancement on the performance of BAC process[16,29,71,95,101,102].A pilot-scale study investigated the method of nutrient enhancement to improve the performance of BAC process at the John F.Kubala Water Treatment Plant (JKWTP).The BAC contactor with nutrient enhancement was found to decrease terminal head loss by approximately 15% relative to a control BAC contactor without nutrient enhancement.Nutrient enhancement also decreased breakthroughs of DOC as well as 2-methylisobornel(MIB),and manganese (Mn) [95].Nemani and colleagues claimed phosphorus addition to the BAC influent had a small impact on DOC (3%) and THMFP (5%) reduction when compared to control without nutrient enhancement [101].However,other studies suggested the nutrient addition had no significant effect on enhancing the biological performance of BAC for removal of DOC and DBP precursors [29,71].A possible explanation is the biodegradable carbon fraction was limited in their study and addition of nitrogen or phosphorus would not further enhance the biological performance.

    For peroxide enhancement,hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is commonly applied to the biofilters,which can not only provide microorganisms with an additional source of dissolved oxygen,but induce the expression of peroxidase-family oxidoreductase enzymes in microorganisms to catalyze the oxidation of organic matters [103].Studies indicated low dosages of peroxide (<1 mg/L)may effectively mediate the oxidation of inactive biomass and EPS[104,105].EPS are potential foulants of biofilters and play a significant role in media clogging,underdrain fouling,and filter head loss [106].Therefore,removing the excessive EPS can effectively improve the operational performance of biofilters [95].

    Lauderdale and the coworkers have conducted a series of pilot studies to investigate effect of H2O2on the operational performance of biofilters.A case study in JKWTP suggested H2O2increased oxidative action of BAC microorganisms and promoted the oxidation of inactive biomass;the addition of peroxide decreased terminal head loss up to approximately 60% relative to the control biofilter [95].In Azzehet al.’s work [71],addition of 0.5 mg/L H2O2to BAC contactor decreased head loss by up to 45% without affecting removal of DBP precursors.The hydraulic improvement by peroxide is specific and dependent on multiple factors,such as temperature,source water,microbial ecology and upstream treatment.

    5.Conclusions and perspectives

    DBP issue is a relatively troublesome problem in drinking water treatment.One reason is that DBPs are very toxic and pose a threat to human health,and the other is that the DBPs have a broad of precursors,which are difficult to remove.NOM in surface water and especially the LMW polar fractions (e.g.,amino acids,aldehydes and ketones) play a critical role in the formation of DBPs during the post-chlorination process.Unfortunately,the conventional treatment processes,i.e.,coagulation-sedimentationfiltration,preferably remove HMW hydrophobic fractions of NOM,and therefore,considerable DBPFP still exists in the effluent.Advanced treatment is needed to further remove the recalcitrant NOM compositions.Based on the detailed analyses on DBPFP of different NOM groups and the mechanisms and selectivity of different water treatment processes,BAC process is the optimal choice for controlling the DBP levels in the finished water,especially when combined with pre-ozonation,which can significantly increase the small MW fractions,breakdown the large aromatic structures,and increase the BDOC/DOC ratio of the NOM in water.

    Typically,BAC process has a better treatment performance on DBP precursors compared with the bulk DOC.It is gratifying that BAC process can effectively decrease the FP of N-DBPs,which are considered to be more toxic than the carbonaceous DBPs (C-DBPs).These removal patterns of DBP precursors can be well explained by the fractional analysis on NOM.EBCT is an important parameter for BAC’s performance,and a first-order kinetic equation can be used to determine the optimal EBCT with the goal of decreasing suffi-cient DBPFP.In addition,the recently proposed engineered biofiltration with nutrient or peroxide enhancement seems to achieve considerable hydraulic improvement but limited effect on DOC or DBPFP removal.

    O3-BAC/BAC process is a mature technology and widely used to control the DBP levels in many DWTPs and some sewage treatment plants for potable water.Although large numbers of researches have been conducted and the treatment performance of BAC on DBP precursors removal has been recognized,there are still many knowledge gaps especially microbial mechanisms needed further study to fill up.The following issues may be constructive for the future BAC study on the removal of DBP precursors:

    (1) Microbial mechanisms.Microbes in BAC play the key role for removing the organic and inorganic contaminants,where biodegradation of organics and nitrification of ammonium are the dominant processes.Previous researches rarely involve microorganisms.Only few studies measured the biomass or characterize the bacterial community structure.The biochemical mechanisms on the degradation of various DBP precursors have not been addressed.The recent prevalent metagenomics technique is a powerful tool that can map the profiles of microbial community structure and functions.Applying metagenomics may be helpful to construct the enzyme-based metabolic pathway for the transformation and degradation of DBP precursors during BAC process.

    (2) Toxicity evaluation.The toxicity of DBPs is the major concern,while the current regulation of water quality is based on the mass weight of target DBPs.As discussed in the review,the change of toxicity risks of DBPFP across BAC process is difficult to predict,and some toxic species may pose an important effect.Moreover,the DBPs are a mixture of various types of toxic compounds,and some synergistic and antagonistic effects may exist among these compounds.Therefore,it is particularly necessary to establish a simple and effective method for determining the water potential toxicity induced by the formation of DBPs.In addition,the pre-filter ozonation could generate large quantities of bromate,and organic bromine,promoting the production of bromo-DBPs which may present higher health risks than their chlorinated analogs.The potential heal risks of preozonation should be investigated in details.

    (3) Degradation kinetics.The degradation kinetics of pollutants along BAC bed can reflect the relationship between microbial growth and degradation velocity of organic substrate,and the Monod equation is universally acknowledged as the practical model.The relationship between degradation velocity and biomass can be used to estimate the matrix potency;if the relationship is linear,the matrix has high organic degradation potency,while if the relationship is in exponential form,the matrix has low organic degradation potency.This model can be applied to BAC matrix to estimate its degradation potency for DBP precursors.

    (4) Microbial products.The microorganisms in the BAC will produce some microbial products such as soluble microbial products (SMP) and EPS,when microorganisms degrade organics in water.These microbial products will generate new sources for DBP precursors.However,these DBP precursor sources are less concerned.Some researches can be conducted to characterize the microbial products in the BAC effluent and evaluate their contribution to the total DBPFP.The development of microbial metabolomics may provide a powerful tool for the screen and identification of the compounds derived from microbial metabolism.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

    Acknowledgments

    J.Fu acknowledges the support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos.91851110 and 41701541),and Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No.2020CFA106).

    Supplementary materials

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found,in the online version,at doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2021.12.044.

    搞女人的毛片| 高清毛片免费看| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| videossex国产| 只有这里有精品99| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| av黄色大香蕉| 69av精品久久久久久| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 综合色丁香网| 久久久久久伊人网av| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲色图av天堂| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久精品影院6| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 日本与韩国留学比较| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 嫩草影院精品99| 午夜视频国产福利| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 只有这里有精品99| 特级一级黄色大片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 美女黄网站色视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久草成人影院| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 免费看a级黄色片| 色视频www国产| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 99热这里只有精品一区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久6这里有精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 乱人视频在线观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 黄色日韩在线| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产成人精品一,二区 | 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | av天堂在线播放| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 欧美zozozo另类| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产色婷婷99| 级片在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 一本久久精品| 亚洲av成人av| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 在线观看66精品国产| 欧美日本视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚州av有码| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产老妇女一区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产91av在线免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 黄色配什么色好看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲成人久久性| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲性久久影院| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 午夜视频国产福利| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久久色成人| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 观看免费一级毛片| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 成人三级黄色视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 人妻系列 视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日本在线视频免费播放| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| kizo精华| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲av男天堂| 午夜免费激情av| 中国美女看黄片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 欧美色视频一区免费| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 91久久精品电影网| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 一级黄片播放器| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 小说图片视频综合网站| av免费观看日本| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 热99在线观看视频| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产一区二区激情短视频| av卡一久久| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 综合色丁香网| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久久久久大精品| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 熟女电影av网| 国产av不卡久久| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 日本成人三级电影网站| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 人妻系列 视频| av黄色大香蕉| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 大香蕉久久网| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 欧美bdsm另类| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 国产探花极品一区二区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 美女高潮的动态| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 免费看光身美女| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲性久久影院| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲av一区综合| 成年免费大片在线观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产精品无大码| 乱人视频在线观看| 久久久久性生活片| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | kizo精华| 国产av在哪里看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 人妻系列 视频| 日本熟妇午夜| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 少妇的逼好多水| 春色校园在线视频观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 成人二区视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产探花极品一区二区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产视频首页在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| www日本黄色视频网| av卡一久久| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 午夜福利高清视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 免费看日本二区| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 中国美女看黄片| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 此物有八面人人有两片| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产一级毛片在线| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 毛片女人毛片| 成人欧美大片| 此物有八面人人有两片| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 成人二区视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| avwww免费| 国产精品久久视频播放| av在线老鸭窝| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 久久久国产成人免费| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 观看美女的网站| 中文字幕制服av| 少妇高潮的动态图| 久久久久久久久大av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 日本五十路高清| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产91av在线免费观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 日本色播在线视频| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 美女大奶头视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 内射极品少妇av片p| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精华一区二区三区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产成人福利小说| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 午夜福利高清视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| av卡一久久| 如何舔出高潮| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚州av有码| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 黄片wwwwww| 在线免费十八禁| 国产精品.久久久| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 老女人水多毛片| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 性色avwww在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 午夜免费激情av| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日日撸夜夜添| 成年免费大片在线观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 久久亚洲精品不卡| 三级毛片av免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 在线播放国产精品三级| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 午夜福利在线在线| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 只有这里有精品99| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久久久国产网址| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | or卡值多少钱| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 69人妻影院| 日韩成人伦理影院| 有码 亚洲区| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 黄片wwwwww| 欧美3d第一页| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 日日啪夜夜撸| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产成人精品一,二区 | www.色视频.com| 中出人妻视频一区二区| av免费观看日本| 亚洲图色成人| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| kizo精华| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 97超视频在线观看视频| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久6这里有精品| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 久久久精品大字幕| 综合色av麻豆| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| kizo精华| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 成年版毛片免费区| 69人妻影院| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 精品日产1卡2卡| 久久中文看片网| 看片在线看免费视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产 一区精品| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲在久久综合| 久久午夜福利片|