• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Gorkha earthquake (MW7.8) and aftershock sequence:A fractal approach

    2022-11-03 07:25:42RamKrishnaTiwariandHariharPaudyal
    Earthquake Science 2022年3期

    Ram Krishna Tiwari and Harihar Paudyal

    1 Central Department of Physics, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu 44618, Nepal 2 Birendra Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Bharatpur, Chitwan 44200, Nepal

    ABSTRACT On April 25,2015,Nepal was struck by the MW7.8 Gorkha earthquake followed by an intense aftershock sequence.It was one of the most destructive earthquakes in the Himalayan arc,causing more than 8 900 fatalities.In this study,we analyzed the dataset (429 events,magnitude of completeness (Mc) ≥ 4.2 local magnitude) of the first 45 days after the Gorkha earthquake to estimate the seismicity parameters b-value,D-value,and p-value.We used the maximum likelihood method to estimate the bvalue and Omori-Utsu parameters,whereas the correlation integral method was applied to estimate the fractal dimension (Dvalue).The analysis was carried out using running and sliding window techniques.The lowest b-value (0.57 ± 0.04) and the highest D-value (1.65 ± 0.02) were computed at the time of the Gorkha earthquake,after which the b-value significantly increased to a maximum of 1.57.It again dropped to 0.93 at the time of the major aftershock on May 12,2015.The D-value showed an initial quick drop and then decreased in a wavy pattern until the end of the study period,indicating the clustering and scattering of earthquakes in a fault region.The b-value contour map identified the eastern part of the study area as a high stress region (b=~0.8),implying that the stress shifted to that region.The D-value contour map reveals that the seismogenic structure shifted from linear to planar in the region.The rate of aftershock decay (p=0.86 ± 0.04) for a short period reflects that the level of stress decreased rapidly.This study helps to understand the level of stress and seismicity pattern of a region,which could be useful for aftershock studies.

    Keywords: Omori-Utsu law;correlation integral;fractal dimension;b-value;central Himalaya.

    1.Introduction

    Earthquakes are a manifestation of complex non-linear threshold dynamics in the brittle part of Earth’s crust.Multiple feedback cycles,such as crustal deformation,crustal shortening,and post-seismic creep,occurring over millions of years beneath the Himalaya have evolved into a non-linear dynamic system that may cause earthquakes(Shcherbakov et al.,2005,2015;Dal Zilio et al.,2021).Therefore,the Himalayan orogeny,delineated by major continental thrusts,is a natural laboratory for the study of earthquake systematics.Despite their complexities,earthquakes can be considered as a point process in space and time that occurs within seismically dynamic fault sectors (Ogata,1999;Ogata and Tsuruoka,2016).Moreover,these sectors are complex systems with heterogeneously distributed stress and strength (Huang J and Turcotte,1988).The continuous process of slow energy accumulation and fast energy redistribution inside the crust drives it towards the self-organized critical point,i.e.,the mainshock (Mandal and Rastogi,2005;Teotia and Kumar,2011;Pastén et al.,2015;Aggarwal et al.,2017).

    The spatiotemporal distribution of earthquake epicenters is fractal (Turcotte,1989;Dimri,2005;Nampally et al.,2018).Fractal scaling relation is used to characterize the mathematical expression of the natural pattern of an earthquake;therefore,it can be used to study the seismicity of a region.Numerous studies have been conducted in the factors that trigger earthquakes.This study focuses on three of the most used techniques,i.e.,determining thebvalue of the Gutenberg-Richter relation,fractal dimension orD-value,andp-value of the Omori-Utsu relation(Bachmann et al.,2012;Jena et al.,2021),to study earthquake distribution in the Himalayan region.These scaling exponents obey fractal statistics,and their behavior can be considered as the end-product of a self-organized critical state of the Earth’s crust at the time of the mainshock.This study estimates the stress level,frequency,and patterns of earthquakes of the region between 26.5°N–29°N latitude and 84°E–87°E longitude in the central Himalaya.

    1.1.b-value estimation

    Theb-value in the Gutenberg-Richter frequencymagnitude relation (Gutenberg and Richter,1944;Huang J and Turcotte,1988;Dimri,2005) is the power law indicating a self-similar fractal property of earthquakes.This relation can be expressed as

    whereNis an integer describing the number of earthquakes per unit time,with magnitudes greater than or equal tomfor a given time and space.The constant “a” denotes the seismicity and the constant “b” denotes the level of stress in the region.Theb-value is the ratio of the number of weak and strong events,and is estimated to be 0.8–1.2(Enescu and Ito,2002;Enescu et al.,2011).An increasedb-value denotes a rise in the number of weak events compared to strong events,and vice versa (Caneva and Smirnov,2004).Several studies have shown orderly variations inb-values throughout major earthquake sequences,with changes in the ambient stress level and fractal dimension of the stress-strength distribution (Jiang HK and Diao SZ,1995;Yeken,2016;Nava et al.,2017;Hussain et al.,2020).It was observed that major earthquakes generally happen in areas with smallb-values(El-Isa and Eaton,2014;Wang R et al.,2021),which varies with time showing a decreasing trend before major earthquakes (Smith,1981;Rehman et al.,2015;Chiba,2019;Jena et al.,2021).

    1.2.Fractal dimension

    It is believed that a straight line,plane,and volume have dimensions of 1,2,and 3,respectively.However,if we consider a rough surface covering a part of a plane,its dimensions would lie between 1 and 2,and a rougher surface corresponds to dimensions close to two.Fractals are rough objects with no specific scale,and cannot be described using traditional measurement procedures,i.e.,length or area.The concept of fractal dimension was proposed during a problem encountered while measuring the length of a coastline (Mandelbrot,1967;Mandelbrot and Wheeler,1983).Fractal methods describe the properties of an object by estimating its fractal dimension(Chen YG and Wang JJ,2013).A smaller value of the fractal dimension represents smooth coastlines,while a larger value represents rugged coastlines (Smalley et al.,1987).In fractal distribution,the number of objectsNwith a characteristic size greater thanrcan be expressed as

    whereDis the fractal dimension andCis a proportionality constant.Fractal statistics are associated with several natural processes (Mandelbrot,1967;Mandelbrot and Wheeler,1983;Goltz,1997;Malischewsky,2014).For earthquake distribution,theD-value characterizes the degree of homogeneity of spatial events,and its decrease suggests the grouping of earthquake events (Caneva and Smirnov,2004).Several authors have observed a decrease in the value of the fractal dimension before a large earthquake (Wyss et al.,2004;Fayou et al.,2010;Ghosal et al.,2012;Hamdache et al.,2019;Yin LR et al.,2019).Fractal dimensions increase with an increase in the differential stress and decrease with the evolution of the fracture process (Lei XL and Kusunose,1999;Chingtham et al.,2016;Firoozfar and Ansari,2019;Lei XL,2019).The spatial correlation dimension,a lower level of fractal dimension,is ameasure of scaling in the spatial distribution of events,and is calculated by defining the correlation integral functionc(r) for the epicenter distribution (Roy and Padhi,2007;Roy and Mondal,2009;Mondal et al.,2019) as follows:

    whereNis the total number of earthquakes in the given window,Xi-Xjisthe angular distance between two events calculated by the spherical triangle method (Hirata,1989),H(·) is theHeaviside step function,andris the scaling radius.Aftercalculatingc(r),the spatial correlation dimension can be defined from the power-law relation (Kagan,1981,2007;Kagan and Houston,2005):

    The slope of the linear part of the logr-logc(r) plot provides the correlation fractal dimension (D),as explained in the data and methodology section.

    1.3.Omori-Utsu law

    Aftershocks are manifestations of relaxation phenomena observed in various physical systems,such as solar flares,acoustic emissions,and seismicity.In seismicity,aftershocks indicate that the total strain energy was not released by the mainshock of the earthquake.Occurrence of aftershocks in a brief period and in small areas provide information about the Earth’s crust and helps understand the mechanism of earthquakes.Omori Law (Omori,1894;?alohar,2018) states that the frequency of aftershocks decays with time in a hyperbola that involves the statistics of both mainshocks and aftershocks,indicating that they are created by the same mechanism.After being replaced by a power-law function (Utsu,1969;Utsu et al.,1995;Guglielmi,2016,2017),it can be written as

    whereK,c,andpare constants that represent the number of observed earthquakes,rate of decay,and delay of the decay,respectively;tis the time since the mainshock andn(t) is the aftershock frequency measured over a certain interval of time.This equation can be temporally integrated to estimate the expected number of aftershocks.

    This decay law reflects the temporal self-similarity of earthquake source processes.pvaries according to the heterogeneity,stress,and temperature of the crust (Mogi,1967;Trivedi,2015;Guglielmi,2016).It widely differs among different locations and cases,indicating the rapid rate of decay of aftershocks,and has a value close to 1.0.For example,p-values denoting seismicity are usually in the range of 0.8 to 1.2 (Utsu et al.,1995),and ap-value of 0.5–1.5 was observed for the earthquake study in California (Reasenberg and Jones,1989;Guglielmi,2016).Generally,a reliablep-value is required to understand the mechanism of stress relaxation and the friction law in seismic zones (Hainzl et al.,1999;Helmstetter and Shaw,2006).The parameterKrepresents productivity,while the constantcis necessary to avoid singularity in the number of aftershocks.However,the value ofcand its significance remain debatable.It has been suggested that the value ofcis essentially zero,and all reported positive values are owing to incomplete sequencing in the early stage of an aftershock (Utsu,1971;Utsu et al.,1995).

    The Himalaya is divided into four litho-tectonic units,from north to south: the Tethyan Himalaya,Higher Himalaya,Lesser Himalaya,and Sub-Himalaya (Figure 1).These units are separated by the South Tibet Detachment(STD),Main Central Thrust (MCT),Main Boundary Thrust (MBT),and Main Frontal Thrust (MFT),respectively (Bai L et al.,2016).The MCT is the oldest thrust in the Himalayan region,and was activated at~22 Ma followed by reactivation~15 Ma and 6 Ma (Yin A et al.,2010).The MFT and MBT also run along the strike of the Himalaya,and the MFT is the youngest of the three.

    The slip along a major basal thrust,the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT),which surfaces along the front of the Himalayan foothills,contributes majorly to the convergence rate between the Indian and Tibetan plates across the Himalaya (~17–21 mm/a) (Ader et al.,2012;Mugnier et al.,2013).The MFT,MBT,and MCT are believed to be attached to the MHT at the deeper level(Bilham,2015,2019;Elliott et al.,2016;Dal Zilio et al.,2021;Michel et al.,2021).MHT is one of the largest(~2,400 km long),and fastest slipping active continental megathrusts that separates the underthrusting Indian Plate from the overriding Himalayan orogeny.Most earthquakes have occurred in the frictionally sealed part of the MHT in the roots of Nepal Himalaya (Pandey et al.,1995;Mugnier et al.,2013;Bilham,2019;Ghosh,2020).

    Located in a seismically active region,Nepal has hosted several large earthquakes in the past.The first documented earthquake occurred on June 7,1 255,and had a magnitude of 7.8.The next recorded major earthquake occurred in 1 260,and had a magnitude of 7.1 in the Mt.Everest region (Chaulagain et al.,2018).The 1 408 earthquake of magnitude 8.2 is another mega event that killed around 2 500 people.The devastating earthquake of 1 767 (M7.9) took 4 000 lives.TheMS8.0 Kathmandu-Bihar earthquake of August 26,1833 struck Nepal and the northern part of India and was equally devastating,taking 6 500 lives (Martin et al.,2015;Bilham,2019).On January 15,1934,the greatest earthquake (MW8.0) of modern times,known as the Nepal-Bihar earthquake,occurred in the eastern mountains of Nepal.The Udayapur earthquake(MW6.9) in 1988,240 km southeast of the Gorkha event,led to~1 500 fatalities (Chen H et al.,2017).

    On April 25,2015,a major earthquake (MW7.8)occurred in the Himalayan region of central Nepal(Adhikari et al.,2015;Baillard et al.,2017).The event was followed by thousands of aftershocks,with some of them even having magnitudeMW> 6,and it triggered theMW7.3 event (Kodari earthquake) to the east 17 days after the mainshock.Aftershocks were generated at the boundary of these ruptures,predominantly in the droopy part of the MHT (Letort et al.,2016;Miyake et al.,2017;Yamada et al.,2020).The Gorkha and Kodari events are the latest major earthquakes in the Himalaya,and the best-recorded events in the region (Figure 1).The amount of energy dissipated by these events to nearby faults is sufficient to activate earthquakes in adjacent areas (Avouac et al.,2015;Bilham et al.,2017).This study attempts to understand the behavior of the aftershocks to examine the future seismicity pattern.

    Figure 1.Epicenter location of the 429 earthquake events.Yellow stars stand for the MW7.8 Gorkha earthquake and its largest aftershock,the Kodari earthquake (MW7.3).MCT: Main Central Thrust,MBT: Main Boundary Thrust,and MFT: Main Frontal Thrust.Red stars represent historical earthquakes in the region.M7.8: 1 255 Kathmandu earthquake,M7.1: 1 260 Everest earthquake,M8.2: 1 408 Nepal-Tibet earthquake,M7.9: 1 767 northern-Bagmati region earthquake,MS8.0: 1833 Kathmandu-Bihar earthquake,MW8.0: 1934 Nepal-Bihar earthquake,and MW6.9: 1988 Udayapur earthquake (Goda et al.,2015;Chaulagain et al.,2018).The red box in the inset map marks the study region.

    2.Data and methodology

    In this work,earthquake data for the first 45 days after the Gorkha earthquake (2015-4-25–2015-06-07) was analyzed.Earthquake data were collected from the local network of the National Seismic Center,Nepal (Adhikari et al.,2015).The total number of recorded earthquakes in the catalog was 554.Completeness of the data was estimated to be 4.2 using the maximum curvature technique in the software ZMAP (Wiemer,2001).Therefore,the final dataset comprised 429 earthquakes with magnitude of completeness 4.2 (Figure 2).For the accuracy and precision of the estimatedb-value andDvalue,a time window of 100 events was considered,having an interval of 20 events (Table 1).

    Figure 2.Frequency magnitude (b-value) and magnitude of completeness (Mc) of the earthquake’s distribution.

    The temporal distribution of magnitude and 3D distributions of the earthquakes are depicted in Figure 3.

    Theb-value of the frequency magnitude distribution was calculated using the maximum likelihood estimation method (Aki,1965;Bender,1983)

    whereMais the average of all magnitudes,ΔMis the binning width of the catalogue,and the standard error in theb-value calculation is computed using the technique by Shi YL and Bolt (1982).

    wherensis the number of earthquakes in the given sample.

    The fractal dimension was calculated using the correlation integral method (Grassberger and Procaccia,1983).The correlation dimensionD,in terms of the correlation sumc(r) is defined as

    To demonstrate the fractal nature of the aftershocksequence,we depicted the logr-logc(r) plot for window 1 containing the Gorkha earthquake (2015-4-25–2015-4-25)and window 11 containing the Kodari earthquake (2015-4-27–2015-5-12) (Table 1 and Figure 4).Although,Nerenberg and Essex (1990) provided a formula for selecting the scaling region between depopulation and saturation,we used aconservative approach to identify theD-value for the range ofr∈ [1,38.90] km.

    Figure 3.Graphs showing temporal distribution of earthquakes magnitude for the study period (a) geographical distribution of earthquakes along with their depth (b).

    Figure 4.An example of D-value estimation from the correlation integral for the time windows including (a) the mainshock (2015-4-25–2015-4-25) and (b) the major aftershock (2015-4-27–2015-5-12).

    Table 1.Data for the time window,number of earthquakes,frequency size distribution (b-value),correlation fractal dimension (D),and coefficient of determination (R 2).

    The parameters of the Omori-Utsu law (p,c,andKvalues) were estimated using the maximum likelihood method (Omori,1894;Utsu et al.,1995).

    3.Results and discussion

    A significant variation was observed in theb-values from analysis of the aftershock sequence,which increased rapidly after the main shock from 0.57 ± 0.04 to 1.52 ±0.14 within 14 days,and then decreased to 0.77 ± 0.07 till the occurrence of the largest aftershock (Kodari earthquake);subsequently,it increased again to 1.23 ± 0.13 after the Kodari event (Table 1).The drop in theb-value before both earthquakes are consistent with the results of Chingtham et al.(2016),and indicates that the critically stressed fault could be the source of these earthquakes.The increase inb-value after the main event implies that most of the energy was released through the aftershocks,especially toward the east of the main event and might have also activated the nearby faults.

    Decrease in theb-value before a large earthquake reflects the fluctuations in the order parameter upon approaching the critical point,i.e.,occurrence of the mainshock (Zhuang JC et al.,2021),and are normally linked to asperities (Oncel and Wilson,2002;Kawamura and Chen KH,2017).Lowb-value during the Gorkha earthquake indicates that the event could have been initiated by breaking of the asperity of the region.This study also showed thatb-values are highly sensitive to variations in temporal stress.At the beginning of the event,theb-value was~0.9,and increased rapidly to 1.55 around May 1,2015 (Figure 5).By May 13,2015,theb-value decreased rapidly to 0.93.b-values <1 indicate areas of crustal homogeneity and high stress,and vice versa(Bridges and Gao SS,2006).Therefore,the increasingbvalue after the Gorkha and Kodari earthquakes indicates that although some stress is released in both events,the material heterogeneity increased in the region and could contribute to moderate to large earthquakes in the future.

    Figure 5.Temporal variation of the b-value for sample window of 100 events with a 4% window overlap.The b-value is maximum after the Gorkha earthquake and decreases by the time of the Kodari earthquake.It rises again after the Kodari earthquake.

    Fractal dimension generally fluctuates following a large earthquake (Tang YS et al.,2020).TheD-value range from 1.65±0.02 to 1.34±0.05 (Table 1) observed during period between the Gorkha and Kodari earthquakes may indicate such fluctuations.Decrease in the fractal dimension from 1.65 ± 0.02 to 1.46 ± 0.02 just after the Gorkha event indicates clustering of epicenters during a large event (Bayrak and Bayrak,2012).The limiting value of the dimension can be interpreted asDclose to 0,signifying that the earthquakes are concentrated in a limited area or are sparsely distributed.Dclose to 1 suggests a linear configuration of the epicenters,andDclose to 2 indicates that the earthquakes are densely distributed over the entire area (Rodríguez Pascua et al.,2003;Borgohain et al.,2018;Mondal et al.,2019;Hussain et al.,2020;Tosi,1998).Moreover,it is believed thatDis regulated by pre-existing geological,mechanical,structural,and stress field heterogeneity (?ncel et al.,1996).Therefore,the range of fractal dimension (1.34–1.65)estimated in this study indicates a shift from linear to more planar structure of the seismogenic source,with densely distributed events.The spatial correlation dimensions exhibited one slope,indicating a single source.TheDvalue estimated in this study can be related to the previous work of Nampally et al.(2018),in which a fractal correlation dimension of 1.66 was estimated for 820 aftershocks of the Gorkha earthquake between April 25 and November 12,2015.

    Faulting is generally scale invariant,and the fractal dimension (D) of the source can be related to theb-value of the earthquake distribution (Huang J and Turcotte,1988).The temporal variation ofb-value represents differential stress conditions,and the fractal dimension acts as an indicator of material heterogeneity and strength(Srivastava et al.,2015).A sudden decrease in theD-value followed by an increase (Figure 6) immediately after the mainshock can be easily correlated with the clustering and scattering of earthquakes in a fault zone,and reflect the stress accumulation and strain release patterns in the region (Roy and Nath,2007).Increasedb-value (from <0.6 to >1.5) after the Gorkha earthquake may be associated with a decrease in the fractal dimension (from 1.65 to<1.40) of the associated heterogeneities and supports the theory that most of the large earthquakes are marked by relatively a highD-value and lowb-value.The Gorkha event might have witnessed the introduction of small-scale heterogeneities (compared to the size of the fault zone) by stress accumulation after a major shock and led to the associated aftershock sequence.This result supports the findings of Bayrak and ?ztürk (2004),where a comparatively lowb-value and highD-value were correlated to a small degree of heterogeneity of the cracked surface,substantial stress,and large faults,with broadly distributed significantly stressed asperities.

    Figure 6.Temporal variation of the D-value and b-value.Time after the main shock is presented along the x axis.

    Previous studies have shown both positive and negative correlation between theb-values and the fractal dimension of earthquakes (Ogata,1999;Dimri,2005;Teotia and Kumar,2011).We estimated this correlation to be negative,with the regression functionD=-0.18b+1.66 anda coefficient of determination (R2)=0.243(Figure 7).This indicates that the accumulated stress discharged along the fault zone with a larger surface area,and the medium has not yet achieved a steady state of stress distribution.The negative correlation may have developed in response to an increase in stress (lowerb) and a decline in epicenter clustering,i.e.,an increasedD-value (Oncel and Wilson,2002).Similar type of correlation was also observed for the region in a previous study (Ghosh,2020).Furthermore,a weak correlation was observed between theD-value andb-values for the earthquake epicenter distribution in western Taiwan region as well (Wang JH and Lee,1996)

    Figure 7.Relationship between fractal dimension (D) and b-value.

    Theb-value contour map (Figure 8a) depicts the spatial variation of earthquake frequency in the region.A comparatively lowb-value contour (~0.7–0.9) was observed for the region of 84.5° E–85° E and 28° N–29° N(along the MCT) and the region of 86° E–87° E,27° N–28.75° N.Comparatively highb-value contours (~1.2–1.3)were observed towards the southwest of the study area.The averageb-value in the study area was 1.04.Areas with lowb-value are said to be under high stress,i.e.,slip movement is yet to occur,and vice versa (Enescu and Ito,2002).Mapping of theb-value identified the high stress region towards the west of the Gorkha earthquake and east of the Kodari earthquake,which can be considered as the future seismogenic sources.The fractal dimension (D)value contours reveal spatial variation in the fractal features of the earthquake source.The study area was dominated byD-value contours of~1.4–1.8 (Figure 8b).LowD-value contours (~1.4) were observed for the eastern section of the north-dipping active faults (MCT,MBT,and MFT) within the study area.The averageD-value of the region was observed to be 1.6,indicating that the earthquakes were widely distributed along the fault plane;therefore,the heterogeneity developed in the fault plane may be responsible for triggering the events.Some areas withD-value >1.5 reflect a tendency of planar epicenter distribution and low clustering.The relatively highDvalues and lowb-values along the west of the Gorkha earthquake and east of the Kodari earthquake indicate a more heterogeneous structure.Such values may be the dominant in these regions and may arise from clusters because the uniform distribution of events decreases with their increased clustering.

    Figure 8.(a) b-value contour map for the study region with major faults STD,MCT,MBT,and MFT,(b) D-value contour map for the study region.Low b-value contour (~0.7–0.9) are observed for the Gorkha (84.5° E–85° E,28° N–29° N) and Kodari (86° E–87° E,27°N–28.75° N) earthquake regions.

    Figure 9 depicts the rate of occurrence of aftershocks within 45 days of the Gorkha earthquake,which was observed to rise rapidly within the first 10 days and was followed by a steady increase.The modified Omori parameters (p=0.86 ± 0.04,c=0.005 1 ± 0.019,andK=57.9 ± 3.7) were estimated for the aftershock sequence.The exponentp(0.86 ± 0.04) was low compared to the universal value of 1.0,suggesting that the temporal disintegration patterns of aftershock sequences can be efficiently modeled by the Omori-Utsu law.The lowerpvalue also signified that the study area did not experience significant rupture during the earthquake.The parameters of Omori’s law mainly vary with the faulting style.Lowpvalues and largerKvalues denote thrust faulting events(Tahir and Grasso,2015).Thep-value estimated by this study (0.86) was slightly greater than the values 0.80 ± 0.4 estimated for the 2015 main cluster (Adhikari et al.,2015),0.82 ± 0.02 for thrust faulting events (Tahir and Grasso,2015),and 0.79 ± 0.24 for the 298 aftershocks withmb≥4.0 (Thapa et al.,2018).The smallc-value (0.051 ± 0.019)observed in this study could be the result of a heterogeneous Coulomb stress adjustment (Dieterich,1994;Helmstetter and Shaw,2006).Understanding the decay rate of early aftershocks is significant in aftershock risk assessments (Mignan and Woessner,2012).Therefore,characterization of aftershock parameters (this study)provides useful information for aftershock estimation.

    Figure 9.Omori-Utsu parameters and their standard deviations for the 429 aftershocks of the Gorkha earthquake sequence.

    4.Conclusions

    To determine the seismicity distribution and probability of the occurrence of future earthquakes in central Himalaya,this study analyzed the aftershock sequence of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake covering a period from 2015-4-25 to 2015-06-07.Theb-value and Omori-Utsu parameters (p,c,andK) were estimated using the maximum likelihood method,while the fractal dimension was estimated using the correlation integral method.Very lowb-value was observed during the Gorkha earthquake,after which it increased.Theb-value again decreased at the time of the Kodari earthquake.This reducedb-value before the earthquakes reflects the situation when the stress of the subsurface rock mass reaches a critical value,transforming the stable locked segment into a comprehensive fault failure.Continuous aftershock activity was observed in response to the high-stress level of the underlying crust.

    TheD-value rapidly decreased initially,after which an undulating decrease was observed during the study period.This variation can be correlated with the clustering and scattering of earthquakes along a fault.This study suggests that theD-value andb-values can gradually increase and decrease,respectively,before a large earthquake.Thebvalue contour map identified the eastern part of the study region as a high stress region (b=~0.8),implying that the stress shifted to that region.TheD-value contour map reveals that the seismogenic structure (fault) acquires shifts from a linear to a planar structure in this region.TheDvalue correlated negatively with theb-value,indicating that the medium has not yet achieved a steady state of stress distribution.The decay rate of aftershocks (p=0.86 ± 0.04) for a brief period reflects that the stressrelease process is fast,and can be used to evaluate the degree of destruction of the aftershocks.The results of this study are useful for explaining the level of stress patterns in earthquake activity and provide information on aftershock decay.

    Acknowledgements

    This investigation was funded by the University Grant Commission (UGC) Nepal as a PhD fellowship and supported by Tribhuvan University,Nepal that allowed a sabbatical leave to the author Tiwari RK.The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for their suggestions on improving the quality of the manuscript.

    欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 18禁观看日本| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国产乱来视频区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| av天堂久久9| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲国产精品999| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产在线免费精品| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 电影成人av| 18在线观看网站| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 永久免费av网站大全| av网站免费在线观看视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 人妻一区二区av| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲第一av免费看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av男天堂| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 国产成人精品福利久久| 黄片小视频在线播放| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| av.在线天堂| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 老司机影院毛片| 免费观看人在逋| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 香蕉国产在线看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 亚洲av综合色区一区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 91成人精品电影| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产麻豆69| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 嫩草影视91久久| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 深夜精品福利| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 老司机靠b影院| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产片内射在线| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 黄色视频不卡| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| svipshipincom国产片| 精品少妇内射三级| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 色网站视频免费| 国产精品无大码| 久久久精品94久久精品| av电影中文网址| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产色婷婷99| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 丁香六月欧美| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| av福利片在线| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 超碰97精品在线观看| 免费少妇av软件| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 最黄视频免费看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 成年动漫av网址| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 18在线观看网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 一本久久精品| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 亚洲在久久综合| 1024视频免费在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| av天堂久久9| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| videos熟女内射| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 黄色视频不卡| av福利片在线| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲国产看品久久| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品 | 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产 精品1| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 香蕉丝袜av| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 99久久综合免费| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 午夜激情av网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 免费观看人在逋| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 国产av精品麻豆| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| av在线app专区| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 不卡av一区二区三区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 不卡av一区二区三区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| xxx大片免费视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产亚洲最大av| av不卡在线播放| 欧美97在线视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| www.精华液| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产精品无大码| 免费观看性生交大片5| 日日啪夜夜爽| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| av网站在线播放免费| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 欧美另类一区| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 观看av在线不卡| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲成人手机| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 观看美女的网站| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲av男天堂| a 毛片基地| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产精品无大码| 色播在线永久视频| 免费少妇av软件| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 高清不卡的av网站| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 超碰成人久久| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 91国产中文字幕| av卡一久久| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 制服诱惑二区| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| av免费观看日本| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 蜜桃在线观看..| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 日韩大片免费观看网站| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产在线视频一区二区| 桃花免费在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 飞空精品影院首页| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 高清不卡的av网站| 一区福利在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产乱来视频区| av.在线天堂| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 两性夫妻黄色片| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 免费看av在线观看网站| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 成人国产麻豆网| a级毛片黄视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 99国产精品免费福利视频| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 蜜桃国产av成人99| 满18在线观看网站| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚洲综合精品二区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产色婷婷99| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 曰老女人黄片| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 免费av中文字幕在线| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| av.在线天堂| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 电影成人av| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产在线视频一区二区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 天天影视国产精品| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产在线免费精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久婷婷青草| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 久久性视频一级片| 高清不卡的av网站| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 中文字幕色久视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 中文字幕色久视频| 一级黄片播放器| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 大香蕉久久网| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲成色77777| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 日韩视频在线欧美| 成人国语在线视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 中文天堂在线官网| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | a级毛片黄视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲成人手机| www.av在线官网国产| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 深夜精品福利| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产一区二区 视频在线| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 999精品在线视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 两性夫妻黄色片| 999精品在线视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 97在线人人人人妻| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 熟女av电影| 两个人看的免费小视频| 尾随美女入室| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 老司机靠b影院| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 深夜精品福利| 久久97久久精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 国产 精品1| 久久99精品国语久久久| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 老司机影院成人| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 久久久久久人妻| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产精品免费视频内射| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲成人手机| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 岛国毛片在线播放| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产成人精品福利久久| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 亚洲综合色网址| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 老司机亚洲免费影院| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 午夜免费观看性视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 日本午夜av视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久性视频一级片| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 制服诱惑二区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 美女主播在线视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精|