• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Gorkha earthquake (MW7.8) and aftershock sequence:A fractal approach

    2022-11-03 07:25:42RamKrishnaTiwariandHariharPaudyal
    Earthquake Science 2022年3期

    Ram Krishna Tiwari and Harihar Paudyal

    1 Central Department of Physics, Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur, Kathmandu 44618, Nepal 2 Birendra Multiple Campus, Tribhuvan University, Bharatpur, Chitwan 44200, Nepal

    ABSTRACT On April 25,2015,Nepal was struck by the MW7.8 Gorkha earthquake followed by an intense aftershock sequence.It was one of the most destructive earthquakes in the Himalayan arc,causing more than 8 900 fatalities.In this study,we analyzed the dataset (429 events,magnitude of completeness (Mc) ≥ 4.2 local magnitude) of the first 45 days after the Gorkha earthquake to estimate the seismicity parameters b-value,D-value,and p-value.We used the maximum likelihood method to estimate the bvalue and Omori-Utsu parameters,whereas the correlation integral method was applied to estimate the fractal dimension (Dvalue).The analysis was carried out using running and sliding window techniques.The lowest b-value (0.57 ± 0.04) and the highest D-value (1.65 ± 0.02) were computed at the time of the Gorkha earthquake,after which the b-value significantly increased to a maximum of 1.57.It again dropped to 0.93 at the time of the major aftershock on May 12,2015.The D-value showed an initial quick drop and then decreased in a wavy pattern until the end of the study period,indicating the clustering and scattering of earthquakes in a fault region.The b-value contour map identified the eastern part of the study area as a high stress region (b=~0.8),implying that the stress shifted to that region.The D-value contour map reveals that the seismogenic structure shifted from linear to planar in the region.The rate of aftershock decay (p=0.86 ± 0.04) for a short period reflects that the level of stress decreased rapidly.This study helps to understand the level of stress and seismicity pattern of a region,which could be useful for aftershock studies.

    Keywords: Omori-Utsu law;correlation integral;fractal dimension;b-value;central Himalaya.

    1.Introduction

    Earthquakes are a manifestation of complex non-linear threshold dynamics in the brittle part of Earth’s crust.Multiple feedback cycles,such as crustal deformation,crustal shortening,and post-seismic creep,occurring over millions of years beneath the Himalaya have evolved into a non-linear dynamic system that may cause earthquakes(Shcherbakov et al.,2005,2015;Dal Zilio et al.,2021).Therefore,the Himalayan orogeny,delineated by major continental thrusts,is a natural laboratory for the study of earthquake systematics.Despite their complexities,earthquakes can be considered as a point process in space and time that occurs within seismically dynamic fault sectors (Ogata,1999;Ogata and Tsuruoka,2016).Moreover,these sectors are complex systems with heterogeneously distributed stress and strength (Huang J and Turcotte,1988).The continuous process of slow energy accumulation and fast energy redistribution inside the crust drives it towards the self-organized critical point,i.e.,the mainshock (Mandal and Rastogi,2005;Teotia and Kumar,2011;Pastén et al.,2015;Aggarwal et al.,2017).

    The spatiotemporal distribution of earthquake epicenters is fractal (Turcotte,1989;Dimri,2005;Nampally et al.,2018).Fractal scaling relation is used to characterize the mathematical expression of the natural pattern of an earthquake;therefore,it can be used to study the seismicity of a region.Numerous studies have been conducted in the factors that trigger earthquakes.This study focuses on three of the most used techniques,i.e.,determining thebvalue of the Gutenberg-Richter relation,fractal dimension orD-value,andp-value of the Omori-Utsu relation(Bachmann et al.,2012;Jena et al.,2021),to study earthquake distribution in the Himalayan region.These scaling exponents obey fractal statistics,and their behavior can be considered as the end-product of a self-organized critical state of the Earth’s crust at the time of the mainshock.This study estimates the stress level,frequency,and patterns of earthquakes of the region between 26.5°N–29°N latitude and 84°E–87°E longitude in the central Himalaya.

    1.1.b-value estimation

    Theb-value in the Gutenberg-Richter frequencymagnitude relation (Gutenberg and Richter,1944;Huang J and Turcotte,1988;Dimri,2005) is the power law indicating a self-similar fractal property of earthquakes.This relation can be expressed as

    whereNis an integer describing the number of earthquakes per unit time,with magnitudes greater than or equal tomfor a given time and space.The constant “a” denotes the seismicity and the constant “b” denotes the level of stress in the region.Theb-value is the ratio of the number of weak and strong events,and is estimated to be 0.8–1.2(Enescu and Ito,2002;Enescu et al.,2011).An increasedb-value denotes a rise in the number of weak events compared to strong events,and vice versa (Caneva and Smirnov,2004).Several studies have shown orderly variations inb-values throughout major earthquake sequences,with changes in the ambient stress level and fractal dimension of the stress-strength distribution (Jiang HK and Diao SZ,1995;Yeken,2016;Nava et al.,2017;Hussain et al.,2020).It was observed that major earthquakes generally happen in areas with smallb-values(El-Isa and Eaton,2014;Wang R et al.,2021),which varies with time showing a decreasing trend before major earthquakes (Smith,1981;Rehman et al.,2015;Chiba,2019;Jena et al.,2021).

    1.2.Fractal dimension

    It is believed that a straight line,plane,and volume have dimensions of 1,2,and 3,respectively.However,if we consider a rough surface covering a part of a plane,its dimensions would lie between 1 and 2,and a rougher surface corresponds to dimensions close to two.Fractals are rough objects with no specific scale,and cannot be described using traditional measurement procedures,i.e.,length or area.The concept of fractal dimension was proposed during a problem encountered while measuring the length of a coastline (Mandelbrot,1967;Mandelbrot and Wheeler,1983).Fractal methods describe the properties of an object by estimating its fractal dimension(Chen YG and Wang JJ,2013).A smaller value of the fractal dimension represents smooth coastlines,while a larger value represents rugged coastlines (Smalley et al.,1987).In fractal distribution,the number of objectsNwith a characteristic size greater thanrcan be expressed as

    whereDis the fractal dimension andCis a proportionality constant.Fractal statistics are associated with several natural processes (Mandelbrot,1967;Mandelbrot and Wheeler,1983;Goltz,1997;Malischewsky,2014).For earthquake distribution,theD-value characterizes the degree of homogeneity of spatial events,and its decrease suggests the grouping of earthquake events (Caneva and Smirnov,2004).Several authors have observed a decrease in the value of the fractal dimension before a large earthquake (Wyss et al.,2004;Fayou et al.,2010;Ghosal et al.,2012;Hamdache et al.,2019;Yin LR et al.,2019).Fractal dimensions increase with an increase in the differential stress and decrease with the evolution of the fracture process (Lei XL and Kusunose,1999;Chingtham et al.,2016;Firoozfar and Ansari,2019;Lei XL,2019).The spatial correlation dimension,a lower level of fractal dimension,is ameasure of scaling in the spatial distribution of events,and is calculated by defining the correlation integral functionc(r) for the epicenter distribution (Roy and Padhi,2007;Roy and Mondal,2009;Mondal et al.,2019) as follows:

    whereNis the total number of earthquakes in the given window,Xi-Xjisthe angular distance between two events calculated by the spherical triangle method (Hirata,1989),H(·) is theHeaviside step function,andris the scaling radius.Aftercalculatingc(r),the spatial correlation dimension can be defined from the power-law relation (Kagan,1981,2007;Kagan and Houston,2005):

    The slope of the linear part of the logr-logc(r) plot provides the correlation fractal dimension (D),as explained in the data and methodology section.

    1.3.Omori-Utsu law

    Aftershocks are manifestations of relaxation phenomena observed in various physical systems,such as solar flares,acoustic emissions,and seismicity.In seismicity,aftershocks indicate that the total strain energy was not released by the mainshock of the earthquake.Occurrence of aftershocks in a brief period and in small areas provide information about the Earth’s crust and helps understand the mechanism of earthquakes.Omori Law (Omori,1894;?alohar,2018) states that the frequency of aftershocks decays with time in a hyperbola that involves the statistics of both mainshocks and aftershocks,indicating that they are created by the same mechanism.After being replaced by a power-law function (Utsu,1969;Utsu et al.,1995;Guglielmi,2016,2017),it can be written as

    whereK,c,andpare constants that represent the number of observed earthquakes,rate of decay,and delay of the decay,respectively;tis the time since the mainshock andn(t) is the aftershock frequency measured over a certain interval of time.This equation can be temporally integrated to estimate the expected number of aftershocks.

    This decay law reflects the temporal self-similarity of earthquake source processes.pvaries according to the heterogeneity,stress,and temperature of the crust (Mogi,1967;Trivedi,2015;Guglielmi,2016).It widely differs among different locations and cases,indicating the rapid rate of decay of aftershocks,and has a value close to 1.0.For example,p-values denoting seismicity are usually in the range of 0.8 to 1.2 (Utsu et al.,1995),and ap-value of 0.5–1.5 was observed for the earthquake study in California (Reasenberg and Jones,1989;Guglielmi,2016).Generally,a reliablep-value is required to understand the mechanism of stress relaxation and the friction law in seismic zones (Hainzl et al.,1999;Helmstetter and Shaw,2006).The parameterKrepresents productivity,while the constantcis necessary to avoid singularity in the number of aftershocks.However,the value ofcand its significance remain debatable.It has been suggested that the value ofcis essentially zero,and all reported positive values are owing to incomplete sequencing in the early stage of an aftershock (Utsu,1971;Utsu et al.,1995).

    The Himalaya is divided into four litho-tectonic units,from north to south: the Tethyan Himalaya,Higher Himalaya,Lesser Himalaya,and Sub-Himalaya (Figure 1).These units are separated by the South Tibet Detachment(STD),Main Central Thrust (MCT),Main Boundary Thrust (MBT),and Main Frontal Thrust (MFT),respectively (Bai L et al.,2016).The MCT is the oldest thrust in the Himalayan region,and was activated at~22 Ma followed by reactivation~15 Ma and 6 Ma (Yin A et al.,2010).The MFT and MBT also run along the strike of the Himalaya,and the MFT is the youngest of the three.

    The slip along a major basal thrust,the Main Himalayan Thrust (MHT),which surfaces along the front of the Himalayan foothills,contributes majorly to the convergence rate between the Indian and Tibetan plates across the Himalaya (~17–21 mm/a) (Ader et al.,2012;Mugnier et al.,2013).The MFT,MBT,and MCT are believed to be attached to the MHT at the deeper level(Bilham,2015,2019;Elliott et al.,2016;Dal Zilio et al.,2021;Michel et al.,2021).MHT is one of the largest(~2,400 km long),and fastest slipping active continental megathrusts that separates the underthrusting Indian Plate from the overriding Himalayan orogeny.Most earthquakes have occurred in the frictionally sealed part of the MHT in the roots of Nepal Himalaya (Pandey et al.,1995;Mugnier et al.,2013;Bilham,2019;Ghosh,2020).

    Located in a seismically active region,Nepal has hosted several large earthquakes in the past.The first documented earthquake occurred on June 7,1 255,and had a magnitude of 7.8.The next recorded major earthquake occurred in 1 260,and had a magnitude of 7.1 in the Mt.Everest region (Chaulagain et al.,2018).The 1 408 earthquake of magnitude 8.2 is another mega event that killed around 2 500 people.The devastating earthquake of 1 767 (M7.9) took 4 000 lives.TheMS8.0 Kathmandu-Bihar earthquake of August 26,1833 struck Nepal and the northern part of India and was equally devastating,taking 6 500 lives (Martin et al.,2015;Bilham,2019).On January 15,1934,the greatest earthquake (MW8.0) of modern times,known as the Nepal-Bihar earthquake,occurred in the eastern mountains of Nepal.The Udayapur earthquake(MW6.9) in 1988,240 km southeast of the Gorkha event,led to~1 500 fatalities (Chen H et al.,2017).

    On April 25,2015,a major earthquake (MW7.8)occurred in the Himalayan region of central Nepal(Adhikari et al.,2015;Baillard et al.,2017).The event was followed by thousands of aftershocks,with some of them even having magnitudeMW> 6,and it triggered theMW7.3 event (Kodari earthquake) to the east 17 days after the mainshock.Aftershocks were generated at the boundary of these ruptures,predominantly in the droopy part of the MHT (Letort et al.,2016;Miyake et al.,2017;Yamada et al.,2020).The Gorkha and Kodari events are the latest major earthquakes in the Himalaya,and the best-recorded events in the region (Figure 1).The amount of energy dissipated by these events to nearby faults is sufficient to activate earthquakes in adjacent areas (Avouac et al.,2015;Bilham et al.,2017).This study attempts to understand the behavior of the aftershocks to examine the future seismicity pattern.

    Figure 1.Epicenter location of the 429 earthquake events.Yellow stars stand for the MW7.8 Gorkha earthquake and its largest aftershock,the Kodari earthquake (MW7.3).MCT: Main Central Thrust,MBT: Main Boundary Thrust,and MFT: Main Frontal Thrust.Red stars represent historical earthquakes in the region.M7.8: 1 255 Kathmandu earthquake,M7.1: 1 260 Everest earthquake,M8.2: 1 408 Nepal-Tibet earthquake,M7.9: 1 767 northern-Bagmati region earthquake,MS8.0: 1833 Kathmandu-Bihar earthquake,MW8.0: 1934 Nepal-Bihar earthquake,and MW6.9: 1988 Udayapur earthquake (Goda et al.,2015;Chaulagain et al.,2018).The red box in the inset map marks the study region.

    2.Data and methodology

    In this work,earthquake data for the first 45 days after the Gorkha earthquake (2015-4-25–2015-06-07) was analyzed.Earthquake data were collected from the local network of the National Seismic Center,Nepal (Adhikari et al.,2015).The total number of recorded earthquakes in the catalog was 554.Completeness of the data was estimated to be 4.2 using the maximum curvature technique in the software ZMAP (Wiemer,2001).Therefore,the final dataset comprised 429 earthquakes with magnitude of completeness 4.2 (Figure 2).For the accuracy and precision of the estimatedb-value andDvalue,a time window of 100 events was considered,having an interval of 20 events (Table 1).

    Figure 2.Frequency magnitude (b-value) and magnitude of completeness (Mc) of the earthquake’s distribution.

    The temporal distribution of magnitude and 3D distributions of the earthquakes are depicted in Figure 3.

    Theb-value of the frequency magnitude distribution was calculated using the maximum likelihood estimation method (Aki,1965;Bender,1983)

    whereMais the average of all magnitudes,ΔMis the binning width of the catalogue,and the standard error in theb-value calculation is computed using the technique by Shi YL and Bolt (1982).

    wherensis the number of earthquakes in the given sample.

    The fractal dimension was calculated using the correlation integral method (Grassberger and Procaccia,1983).The correlation dimensionD,in terms of the correlation sumc(r) is defined as

    To demonstrate the fractal nature of the aftershocksequence,we depicted the logr-logc(r) plot for window 1 containing the Gorkha earthquake (2015-4-25–2015-4-25)and window 11 containing the Kodari earthquake (2015-4-27–2015-5-12) (Table 1 and Figure 4).Although,Nerenberg and Essex (1990) provided a formula for selecting the scaling region between depopulation and saturation,we used aconservative approach to identify theD-value for the range ofr∈ [1,38.90] km.

    Figure 3.Graphs showing temporal distribution of earthquakes magnitude for the study period (a) geographical distribution of earthquakes along with their depth (b).

    Figure 4.An example of D-value estimation from the correlation integral for the time windows including (a) the mainshock (2015-4-25–2015-4-25) and (b) the major aftershock (2015-4-27–2015-5-12).

    Table 1.Data for the time window,number of earthquakes,frequency size distribution (b-value),correlation fractal dimension (D),and coefficient of determination (R 2).

    The parameters of the Omori-Utsu law (p,c,andKvalues) were estimated using the maximum likelihood method (Omori,1894;Utsu et al.,1995).

    3.Results and discussion

    A significant variation was observed in theb-values from analysis of the aftershock sequence,which increased rapidly after the main shock from 0.57 ± 0.04 to 1.52 ±0.14 within 14 days,and then decreased to 0.77 ± 0.07 till the occurrence of the largest aftershock (Kodari earthquake);subsequently,it increased again to 1.23 ± 0.13 after the Kodari event (Table 1).The drop in theb-value before both earthquakes are consistent with the results of Chingtham et al.(2016),and indicates that the critically stressed fault could be the source of these earthquakes.The increase inb-value after the main event implies that most of the energy was released through the aftershocks,especially toward the east of the main event and might have also activated the nearby faults.

    Decrease in theb-value before a large earthquake reflects the fluctuations in the order parameter upon approaching the critical point,i.e.,occurrence of the mainshock (Zhuang JC et al.,2021),and are normally linked to asperities (Oncel and Wilson,2002;Kawamura and Chen KH,2017).Lowb-value during the Gorkha earthquake indicates that the event could have been initiated by breaking of the asperity of the region.This study also showed thatb-values are highly sensitive to variations in temporal stress.At the beginning of the event,theb-value was~0.9,and increased rapidly to 1.55 around May 1,2015 (Figure 5).By May 13,2015,theb-value decreased rapidly to 0.93.b-values <1 indicate areas of crustal homogeneity and high stress,and vice versa(Bridges and Gao SS,2006).Therefore,the increasingbvalue after the Gorkha and Kodari earthquakes indicates that although some stress is released in both events,the material heterogeneity increased in the region and could contribute to moderate to large earthquakes in the future.

    Figure 5.Temporal variation of the b-value for sample window of 100 events with a 4% window overlap.The b-value is maximum after the Gorkha earthquake and decreases by the time of the Kodari earthquake.It rises again after the Kodari earthquake.

    Fractal dimension generally fluctuates following a large earthquake (Tang YS et al.,2020).TheD-value range from 1.65±0.02 to 1.34±0.05 (Table 1) observed during period between the Gorkha and Kodari earthquakes may indicate such fluctuations.Decrease in the fractal dimension from 1.65 ± 0.02 to 1.46 ± 0.02 just after the Gorkha event indicates clustering of epicenters during a large event (Bayrak and Bayrak,2012).The limiting value of the dimension can be interpreted asDclose to 0,signifying that the earthquakes are concentrated in a limited area or are sparsely distributed.Dclose to 1 suggests a linear configuration of the epicenters,andDclose to 2 indicates that the earthquakes are densely distributed over the entire area (Rodríguez Pascua et al.,2003;Borgohain et al.,2018;Mondal et al.,2019;Hussain et al.,2020;Tosi,1998).Moreover,it is believed thatDis regulated by pre-existing geological,mechanical,structural,and stress field heterogeneity (?ncel et al.,1996).Therefore,the range of fractal dimension (1.34–1.65)estimated in this study indicates a shift from linear to more planar structure of the seismogenic source,with densely distributed events.The spatial correlation dimensions exhibited one slope,indicating a single source.TheDvalue estimated in this study can be related to the previous work of Nampally et al.(2018),in which a fractal correlation dimension of 1.66 was estimated for 820 aftershocks of the Gorkha earthquake between April 25 and November 12,2015.

    Faulting is generally scale invariant,and the fractal dimension (D) of the source can be related to theb-value of the earthquake distribution (Huang J and Turcotte,1988).The temporal variation ofb-value represents differential stress conditions,and the fractal dimension acts as an indicator of material heterogeneity and strength(Srivastava et al.,2015).A sudden decrease in theD-value followed by an increase (Figure 6) immediately after the mainshock can be easily correlated with the clustering and scattering of earthquakes in a fault zone,and reflect the stress accumulation and strain release patterns in the region (Roy and Nath,2007).Increasedb-value (from <0.6 to >1.5) after the Gorkha earthquake may be associated with a decrease in the fractal dimension (from 1.65 to<1.40) of the associated heterogeneities and supports the theory that most of the large earthquakes are marked by relatively a highD-value and lowb-value.The Gorkha event might have witnessed the introduction of small-scale heterogeneities (compared to the size of the fault zone) by stress accumulation after a major shock and led to the associated aftershock sequence.This result supports the findings of Bayrak and ?ztürk (2004),where a comparatively lowb-value and highD-value were correlated to a small degree of heterogeneity of the cracked surface,substantial stress,and large faults,with broadly distributed significantly stressed asperities.

    Figure 6.Temporal variation of the D-value and b-value.Time after the main shock is presented along the x axis.

    Previous studies have shown both positive and negative correlation between theb-values and the fractal dimension of earthquakes (Ogata,1999;Dimri,2005;Teotia and Kumar,2011).We estimated this correlation to be negative,with the regression functionD=-0.18b+1.66 anda coefficient of determination (R2)=0.243(Figure 7).This indicates that the accumulated stress discharged along the fault zone with a larger surface area,and the medium has not yet achieved a steady state of stress distribution.The negative correlation may have developed in response to an increase in stress (lowerb) and a decline in epicenter clustering,i.e.,an increasedD-value (Oncel and Wilson,2002).Similar type of correlation was also observed for the region in a previous study (Ghosh,2020).Furthermore,a weak correlation was observed between theD-value andb-values for the earthquake epicenter distribution in western Taiwan region as well (Wang JH and Lee,1996)

    Figure 7.Relationship between fractal dimension (D) and b-value.

    Theb-value contour map (Figure 8a) depicts the spatial variation of earthquake frequency in the region.A comparatively lowb-value contour (~0.7–0.9) was observed for the region of 84.5° E–85° E and 28° N–29° N(along the MCT) and the region of 86° E–87° E,27° N–28.75° N.Comparatively highb-value contours (~1.2–1.3)were observed towards the southwest of the study area.The averageb-value in the study area was 1.04.Areas with lowb-value are said to be under high stress,i.e.,slip movement is yet to occur,and vice versa (Enescu and Ito,2002).Mapping of theb-value identified the high stress region towards the west of the Gorkha earthquake and east of the Kodari earthquake,which can be considered as the future seismogenic sources.The fractal dimension (D)value contours reveal spatial variation in the fractal features of the earthquake source.The study area was dominated byD-value contours of~1.4–1.8 (Figure 8b).LowD-value contours (~1.4) were observed for the eastern section of the north-dipping active faults (MCT,MBT,and MFT) within the study area.The averageD-value of the region was observed to be 1.6,indicating that the earthquakes were widely distributed along the fault plane;therefore,the heterogeneity developed in the fault plane may be responsible for triggering the events.Some areas withD-value >1.5 reflect a tendency of planar epicenter distribution and low clustering.The relatively highDvalues and lowb-values along the west of the Gorkha earthquake and east of the Kodari earthquake indicate a more heterogeneous structure.Such values may be the dominant in these regions and may arise from clusters because the uniform distribution of events decreases with their increased clustering.

    Figure 8.(a) b-value contour map for the study region with major faults STD,MCT,MBT,and MFT,(b) D-value contour map for the study region.Low b-value contour (~0.7–0.9) are observed for the Gorkha (84.5° E–85° E,28° N–29° N) and Kodari (86° E–87° E,27°N–28.75° N) earthquake regions.

    Figure 9 depicts the rate of occurrence of aftershocks within 45 days of the Gorkha earthquake,which was observed to rise rapidly within the first 10 days and was followed by a steady increase.The modified Omori parameters (p=0.86 ± 0.04,c=0.005 1 ± 0.019,andK=57.9 ± 3.7) were estimated for the aftershock sequence.The exponentp(0.86 ± 0.04) was low compared to the universal value of 1.0,suggesting that the temporal disintegration patterns of aftershock sequences can be efficiently modeled by the Omori-Utsu law.The lowerpvalue also signified that the study area did not experience significant rupture during the earthquake.The parameters of Omori’s law mainly vary with the faulting style.Lowpvalues and largerKvalues denote thrust faulting events(Tahir and Grasso,2015).Thep-value estimated by this study (0.86) was slightly greater than the values 0.80 ± 0.4 estimated for the 2015 main cluster (Adhikari et al.,2015),0.82 ± 0.02 for thrust faulting events (Tahir and Grasso,2015),and 0.79 ± 0.24 for the 298 aftershocks withmb≥4.0 (Thapa et al.,2018).The smallc-value (0.051 ± 0.019)observed in this study could be the result of a heterogeneous Coulomb stress adjustment (Dieterich,1994;Helmstetter and Shaw,2006).Understanding the decay rate of early aftershocks is significant in aftershock risk assessments (Mignan and Woessner,2012).Therefore,characterization of aftershock parameters (this study)provides useful information for aftershock estimation.

    Figure 9.Omori-Utsu parameters and their standard deviations for the 429 aftershocks of the Gorkha earthquake sequence.

    4.Conclusions

    To determine the seismicity distribution and probability of the occurrence of future earthquakes in central Himalaya,this study analyzed the aftershock sequence of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake covering a period from 2015-4-25 to 2015-06-07.Theb-value and Omori-Utsu parameters (p,c,andK) were estimated using the maximum likelihood method,while the fractal dimension was estimated using the correlation integral method.Very lowb-value was observed during the Gorkha earthquake,after which it increased.Theb-value again decreased at the time of the Kodari earthquake.This reducedb-value before the earthquakes reflects the situation when the stress of the subsurface rock mass reaches a critical value,transforming the stable locked segment into a comprehensive fault failure.Continuous aftershock activity was observed in response to the high-stress level of the underlying crust.

    TheD-value rapidly decreased initially,after which an undulating decrease was observed during the study period.This variation can be correlated with the clustering and scattering of earthquakes along a fault.This study suggests that theD-value andb-values can gradually increase and decrease,respectively,before a large earthquake.Thebvalue contour map identified the eastern part of the study region as a high stress region (b=~0.8),implying that the stress shifted to that region.TheD-value contour map reveals that the seismogenic structure (fault) acquires shifts from a linear to a planar structure in this region.TheDvalue correlated negatively with theb-value,indicating that the medium has not yet achieved a steady state of stress distribution.The decay rate of aftershocks (p=0.86 ± 0.04) for a brief period reflects that the stressrelease process is fast,and can be used to evaluate the degree of destruction of the aftershocks.The results of this study are useful for explaining the level of stress patterns in earthquake activity and provide information on aftershock decay.

    Acknowledgements

    This investigation was funded by the University Grant Commission (UGC) Nepal as a PhD fellowship and supported by Tribhuvan University,Nepal that allowed a sabbatical leave to the author Tiwari RK.The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and the associate editor for their suggestions on improving the quality of the manuscript.

    亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 男女免费视频国产| 制服诱惑二区| 桃花免费在线播放| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 青草久久国产| 国产麻豆69| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 人人澡人人妻人| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| av免费在线观看网站| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 欧美日韩精品网址| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 久久热在线av| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 91老司机精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 捣出白浆h1v1| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 飞空精品影院首页| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久这里只有精品19| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 五月开心婷婷网| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 日本wwww免费看| 成人国语在线视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久久这里只有精品19| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 少妇的丰满在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 男女免费视频国产| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 天天添夜夜摸| 夫妻午夜视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 乱人伦中国视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲精品在线美女| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| netflix在线观看网站| 精品亚洲成国产av| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 日本五十路高清| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 日本a在线网址| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 飞空精品影院首页| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 一级黄色大片毛片| 丝袜喷水一区| 免费观看av网站的网址| www.精华液| 国产成人欧美| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面 | 在线看a的网站| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 在线永久观看黄色视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| cao死你这个sao货| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 999久久久国产精品视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 精品一区在线观看国产| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| av欧美777| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲国产欧美网| 成年av动漫网址| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 深夜精品福利| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 脱女人内裤的视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 咕卡用的链子| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 99热全是精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| www日本在线高清视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 日本91视频免费播放| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 亚洲第一av免费看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲人成电影观看| 欧美日韩av久久| videosex国产| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| av在线老鸭窝| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 精品福利永久在线观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 看免费av毛片| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 久久性视频一级片| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 午夜老司机福利片| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产成人av教育| 国产在视频线精品| 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产区一区二久久| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 99久久国产精品久久久| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| www日本在线高清视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲av男天堂| 精品人妻1区二区| 最黄视频免费看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| cao死你这个sao货| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| av在线播放精品| 宅男免费午夜| 国产高清videossex| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产成人av教育| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 18在线观看网站| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| www日本在线高清视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 最黄视频免费看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 18在线观看网站| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| www日本在线高清视频| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产高清videossex| 午夜免费观看性视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| av在线app专区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| bbb黄色大片| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 老司机影院毛片| 丝袜美足系列| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲中文av在线| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 高清av免费在线| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 一本综合久久免费| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 在线 av 中文字幕| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 午夜激情av网站| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 一级片'在线观看视频| 免费少妇av软件| 久久久国产一区二区| 久热这里只有精品99| 成人影院久久| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 超碰成人久久| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| av在线app专区| 中文字幕色久视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲av美国av| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 精品福利永久在线观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 老熟女久久久| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 一区二区三区精品91| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 天堂8中文在线网| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 色播在线永久视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 制服诱惑二区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 午夜福利,免费看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 超色免费av| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲,欧美精品.| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 乱人伦中国视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 国产免费现黄频在线看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| a级毛片在线看网站| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 三级毛片av免费| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲av美国av| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 满18在线观看网站| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| av天堂在线播放| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 在线av久久热| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 嫩草影视91久久| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 精品高清国产在线一区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 悠悠久久av| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲第一青青草原| 色播在线永久视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 深夜精品福利| 国产在视频线精品| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 精品人妻1区二区| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲人成电影观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| av片东京热男人的天堂| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 高清在线国产一区| 老司机影院毛片| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久久久国内视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| av线在线观看网站| 男女国产视频网站| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 在线av久久热| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产成人精品无人区| 午夜视频精品福利| 免费av中文字幕在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 热99re8久久精品国产| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产片内射在线| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 18禁观看日本| 国产高清videossex| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 18禁观看日本| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 久久中文字幕一级| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 99热网站在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 黄频高清免费视频|