• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Long-term effect of subacute ruminal acidosis on the morphology and function of rumen epithelial barrier in lactating goats

    2022-10-21 09:08:40HUHonglianYANGShuqingCHENGMengSONGLiwenXUMingGAOMinYUZhongtang
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2022年11期

    HU Hong-lian ,YANG Shu-qing ,CHENG Meng ,SONG Li-wen ,XU Ming ,GAO Min ,YU Zhong-tang

    1 Institue of Animal Nutrition and Feed,Inner Mongolia Academy of Agriculture &Animal Husbandry Sciences,Hohhot 010031,P.R.China

    2 College of Animal Science,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010018,P.R.China

    3 Department of Animal Sciences,The Ohio State University,Columbus 43210,USA

    Abstract Grain-induced subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) impairs rumen epithelial barrier function,but it is yet to be determined if SARA can cause persistent damage to the morphology and function of the rumen epithelial barrier. The objective of the present study was to investigate if SARA has persistent effects on the morphological structure and permeability of ruminal epithelium and the expression of the genes involved in epithelial barrier function using a lactating goat model. Twelve mid-lactating Saanen goats with rumen cannulas were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: control group (Ctrl,n=4) fed a basal diet with a non-fiber carbohydrate (NFC) to neutral detergent fiber (NDF) ratio of 1.40,and SARA group (SARA,n=8) fed the same basal diet but with increasing NFC to NDF ratio from 1.4 to 1.79,2.31,and 3.23 overtime to induce SARA. At the end of the SARA challenge (post-SARA),4 goats were randomly selected from the SARA group and fed only hay mixture ad libitum for another 4 weeks to allow for restitution (post-SARA). Ruminal pH was continuously recorded to monitor the severity of SARA. Samples of the ventral ruminal epithelium were collected after slaughter to examine the structural and functional changes of the ruminal epithelium using transmission electron microscopy (TEM),Ussing chambers,qRT-PCR,and Western bolt analyses. Compared with the Ctrl group,ruminal papilla length,width,surface area and thickness of stratum corneum increased (P<0.05),while stratum spinosum and basale thickness,and total depth of the epithelium decreased (P<0.05) in the SARA group. These changes diminished or tended to return to the levels of the Ctrl group in the post-SARA group (P>0.05). The SARA challenge also decreased cellular junction and widened the intercellular space between epithelial cells. Rumen transepithelial short-circuit current (Isc),tissue conductance (Gt),and mucosa-to-serosa flux of paracellular horseradish peroxidase (HRP) all increased (P<0.05) both in the SARA and post-SARA groups,which indicates that SARA can induce a sustained increase in epithelial permeability and barrier dysfunction. Moreover,the mRNA and protein expressions of CLDN1,OCLN and ZO-1 were down-regulated(P<0.01) in both the SARA and post-SARA groups. The results of this study showed that SARA could result in sustained epithelial barrier dysfunction,at both structural and functional levels,which is associated with decreased expression of rumen epithelial tight junction proteins,and the restitution of rumen epithelial barrier function is slower than that of its morphology.

    Keywords: subacute ruminal acidosis,epithelial morphology,permeability,tight junction proteins,restitution

    1.lntroduction

    Ruminants are of major worldwide interest and economic importance because of the increasing demand for meat and milk. It has become common to use readily fermentable (i.e.,high-grain) diets to maximize the productivity and performance of high-yielding cattle,sheep,and goats. However,this feeding strategy creates a challenge to the rumen microbiome and especially for the ruminal epithelium with respect to the adaptation to the resultant high acidity,and it can place the animals at a greater risk of developing metabolic diseases. The most economically important severe metabolic disease of ruminants is subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA),which impairs gastrointestinal functions,while inducing inflammation and other health-related problems (Khafipouret al.2009;Zebeli and Metzler-Zebeli 2012;Steeleet al.2016). To date,SARA has been one of the most prevalent animal welfare issues in intensive ruminant production systems,especially in regions where high-quality forages are in short supply.

    Several studies conducted in cows and goats demonstrated that grain-rich diets or SARA induced thereby lead to disruption of the rumen epithelial barrier as indicated by disrupted morphological and histological integrity of the ruminal papillae (Steeleet al.2009;Zhanget al.2017,2020),increased lesions(Steeleet al.2011) and paracellular permeability of ruminal epithelium (Klevenhusenet al.2013;Meissneret al.2017;Sunet al.2018). It is well recognized that elevated levels of lipopolysaccharides (LPS),high acidity,and hyperosmolality induced by SARA decrease the barrier function and enhance the permeability of the ruminal epithelium. The increased rumen epithelial permeability following the acidotic insult may be caused by impaired adhesion and organization of cells of the stratum granulosum (Steeleet al.2011),increased cell necrosis (Liuet al.2013),and delay of the return of the swollen epithelial cells to normal cell volume,all of which further opens the paracellular space jointly with the damaged tight junction (TJ) (Aschenbachet al.2019).At the molecular level,the enhanced rumen epithelial permeability induced by grain-rich diets is caused by down-regulated expression of genes encoding critical barrier function proteins,including the TJ proteins (e.g.,CLDN4 and OCLN),and by redistribution of CLDN1,CLDN4,and OCLN (Liuet al.2013). Our recent study demonstrated that grain-induced SARA increased rumen epithelial permeability and down-regulated the intercellular junction proteins including CLDN1,CLDN7,OCLN,ZO-1,Cx43,and DSG1,simultaneously (Sunet al.2018).However,the underlying mechanisms of the disruption of the barrier functions of ruminal epithelium in response to SARA are still not completely understood.

    Although grain-induced SARA has been reported to impair ruminal barrier function (Steeleet al.2011;Zhanget al.2017,2019),most of the studies reported so far have focused on the short-term effects on the structure and function of ruminal epithelium,leaving the likelihood of persistence of the damaging changes unknown. A recent study reported that the recovery of rumen epithelial function bears a high degree of uncertainty because only a few studies have investigated the functional recovery of the ruminal epithelium after an acidotic insult (Aschenbachet al.2019). Therefore,it remains largely unknown if SARA results in compromised barrier function of ruminal epithelium in a sustained manner. It was hypothesized that SARA might cause sustained rumen epithelial barrier dysfunction,which might not recover. Thus,the objective of this study was to investigate the long-term effect of grain-induced SARA on the lactation performance,rumen epithelial morphological structure and permeability,and the expression of TJ proteins in lactating goats and to elucidate the molecular mechanisms orchestrating these changes.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Animals,experimental design and diets

    This study was a part of a series of studies designed to evaluate the effects of SARA on the gastrointestinal barrier function and health of dairy goats. Twelve rumencannulated mid-lactating Saanen goats ((36.50±2.13) kg of body weight) aged 2-3 years were used in this study.Balanced for body weight and age,the goats were assigned to 1 of 2 groups in a completely randomized design: control group (Ctrl,n=4) that was fed a basal diet with a non-fiber carbohydrate (NFC) to neutral detergent fiber (NDF) ratio of 1.40 (concentrate:forage,51:49)until slaughter at day 60,and SARA group (SARA,n=8)that was fed the same basal diet but with increasing NFC:NDF ratio from 1.40 to 1.79,2.31,and finally 3.23 overtime to induce SARA,with each NFC:NDF ratio being fed for 15 d including 12 d for adaption and 3 d for sampling. At the end of the SARA challenge,4 goats were randomly selected from the SARA group and slaughtered for sampling,while the other 4 goats were fed only a hay mixture consisting of alfalfa hay and Chinese wildrye hay in a 31:19 ratioadlibitumfor an additional 4 weeks to allow for restitution (post-SARA,n=4),as adapted from Wu (2013). The 4 increasing NFC:NDF ratios (the corresponding concentrate:forage ratios were 51:49,60:40,68:32,and 79:21,respectively) were chosen according to prior SARA-induced trials in dairy goats (Cheng 2016;Sunet al.2018). These diets were formulated to meet all nutrient requirements of 40 kg dairy goats producing 2 kg of milk per day according to the recommendations for Chinese dairy goats (Jin 1989) and ensure that nutrient and energy content remained constant during the SARAinduce period. The ingredients and nutrient composition of the diets are presented in Table 1. The goats were fed twice daily at 08:30 and 18:30 during SARA induction,and the feed offered and refused were manually recorded daily.These goats were kept under the same environmental conditions,with the temperature in the goathouse kept at 15 to 26°C and the air humidity maintained at 47 to 55%.All goats were housed in individual pens with free access to drinking water.

    Table 1 Ingredients and composition of the experimental diets with different NFC:NDF ratios

    2.2.Ruminal pH measurement

    The ruminal pH was continuously monitored during the last 3 d of each SARA induction period using an indwelling pH probe (S651CD,Sensorex Corporation,Stanton,CA) as described by Wanget al.(2020). Briefly,each pH probe was placed through the rumen cannula and suspended in the ventral sac of the rumen. The pH probe was protected by a wire shield and attached to a 600 g stainless-steel ball to keep the probe positioned in the rumen ventral sac. The pH probes were connected to a Jenco Digital pH Transmitter (model 692,Jenco Inc.,La Jolla,CA). The output of the pH transmitter was captured by a universal analogue input multiplexer AI-12 (model R4100,SUPCON Technology,Inc.,Zhejiang,China)and a DO-12 analogue input board (R4100,SUPCON Technology Inc.). The software used for data capturewas Inscan HIS Version 6.30 (SUPCON Technology Inc.).The pH was measured once every minute and averaged over each 10 min interval,then stored digitally for 72 consecutive hours. Daily lowest,highest,and mean ruminal pH,as well as the duration below pH 5.8 and 5.5 for each 72 h period was calculated. The threshold of incidence of SARA was set at pH 5.5.

    2.3.Milk sampling and analysis

    The goats were milked at 07:30 and 17:30 daily. Daily milk production was recorded using weighing scales.Daily milk samples were taken from both milkings and mixed at a ratio of 6:4 (morning milking:afternoon milking)for each goat and were analyzed for milk fat,protein and lactose contents using a milk composition analyzer(Master Classic,LM2,Europe).

    2.4.Rumen papilla sampling

    The goats in the Ctrl and SARA groups were slaughtered at d 60,while the post-SARA goats were slaughtered after the 4-week restitution (at d 88) following SARA induction.Rumen epithelial tissue samples were collected from the ventral sac of each goat immediately after slaughter and the collected tissues were subsequently divided into 3 sections. The first section was used immediately to determine permeability using Ussing chambers (see permeability measurements below). The second section was washed,cut into pieces (approximately 1.0 cm×1.0 cm each),rinsed with ice-cold PBS buffer (pH=7.4),and then immediately fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich,St.Louis,MO,USA) or 2.5% glutaraldehyde for evaluation of rumen epithelial morphology (see morphological measurement below). The third section was cut into small pieces (approximately 0.5 cm×0.5 cm each),snapfrozen in liquid nitrogen,and then stored at -80°C until mRNA isolation (see quantitative reverse transcription PCR analysis below) and protein expression analysis (see Western blotting analysis below).

    2.5.Morphological measurement

    Ruminal epithelium samples fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol (50,70,85,95,and 100%) baths,embedded in paraffin,and sectioned. The length and width of the ruminal papillae were determined using the Image-Pro Plus Software(Media Cybernetics,Inc.,Silver Spring,MD). The density of papillae was measured as the number of papillae per cm2of the epithelial surface. The total surface area of papillae per cm2of the epithelial surface was calculated as average papilla length×average papilla width×2×papilla density.

    The total epithelial thickness and individual strata thickness within the ruminal epithelium were measured using the Image-Pro Plus Software (Media Cybernetics Inc.) at a magnification of 40× according to the method reported previously (Liuet al.2013).

    Ruminal epithelium samples fixed in 2.5%glutaraldehyde were placed in a 1% osmium solution for 2-3 h and dehydrated in a graded series of acetone solutions (50,70,85,95,and 100%). The dehydrated samples were placed in a mixture of Spurr resin and acetone (1:1,v/v) overnight and then in 100% resin for 10 h. The samples and the resin were placed in molds and let still at 45°C for 12 h and then at 60°C for 24 h for the resin to polymerize. Semi-thin sections (0.25-0.5 μm)were cut and stained with 1% toluidine blue-O in 1%sodium borate. Ultrathin (60-80 nm) sections were also cut and then stained with uranyl acetate and then lead citrate. The ultrastructure of the ruminal epithelium was examined using a transmission electron microscope(Hitachi H-7650,Hitachi Technologies,Tokyo,Japan). Six specimens were prepared for each animal,and 5 fields of view were analyzed for each of them.

    2.6.Permeability measurements

    The rumen epithelial permeability was measured by transepithelial electrophysiological properties (i.e.,shortcircuit current,Isc;and tissue conductance,Gt) and paracellular flux of horseradish peroxidase (HRP,Sigma-Aldrich,St.Louis,MO) as a marker in Ussing chambers as described previously (Klevenhusenet al.2013;Yang 2014). Briefly,rumen epithelial tissue (approximately 50 cm×50 cm) from the ventral sac was excised and rinsed by immersion in 37°C buffer solution. The removed ruminal epithelium was then stripped from the muscular layer in an oxygenated (95% O2and 5% CO2) buffer solution,cut into a 1 cm×1 cm squares and mounted in an Easy Mount Ussing Chamber System (VCC MC6,Physiologic Instruments,San Diego,CA). Both halves of the chamber were rapidly filled with buffer solution and gassed with carbogen gas (95% O2and 5% CO2)at 37°C. After equilibration for 20 min with the buffer solution (open-circuit condition) in the Ussing chambers,the ruminal epithelium was short-circuited and HRP was added to the mucosal side of each chamber to a final concentration of 2 μmol L-1. After 20 min of equilibration,200 μL of the solution from the serosal side was collected every 1 h for 3 h. To maintain the assay volume,200 μL of buffer solution was added to the mucosal side. In total,6 incubation chambers were used per animal,and they were considered as repeated measurements. The concentrations of HRP collected from the serosal side were measured at a wavelength of 380 nm using a microplate reader as described previously (Yang 2014;Cheng 2016;Chenget al.2016). Both Isc and Gt were recorded at 10-min intervals over a 3-h period with the aid of an automatic computer-controlled voltage-clamp device and the Acquire and Analyze Software (Physiologic Instruments Inc.,Reno,NV,USA).

    2.7.qRT-PCR

    Total RNA was isolated from rumen epithelial samples of each goat using the TRIzol Reagent(Invitrogen Corporation,Carlsbad,CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA was purified following degradation of DNA using RNase-free DNase I.The qRT-PCR was performed using specific primers(Table 2) and an SYBR Green Master Mix (Promega Corporation,Madison,WI) with theβ-actinserving as the housekeeping gene. The mRNA expression of each genewas normalized against theβ-actinlevels,and the data were analyzed according to the 2-ΔΔCtmethod (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).

    Table 2 Primer sequences and length of PCR amplicons

    2.8.Western blotting

    Approximately 100 mg of each frozen rumen epithelial tissue sample was homogenized in 1 mL of ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay protein isolation buffer(Sunshine Biotechnology Co.,Nanjing,China) for total protein extraction. Protein concentration was then measured using the BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher,USA). A total of 50 μg of total protein extract from each sample was subjected to electrophoresis on a 10% SDSPAGE gel,and the separated proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore Sigma,Bedford,MA). The membranes were incubated for 12 h at 4°C with specific primary antibodies: rabbit anticlaudin-1,mouse anti-occludin and mouse anti-ZO-1,then washed and incubated in corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. The membranes were incubated at 25°C for 2 h and then were washed and visualized using an Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) Kit (Amersham Biosciences Corp.,Arlington Heights,IL). The signals were recorded using a Bio-Rad Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories,Hercules,CA),and the results were analyzed with the Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad). β-actin was used as the reference protein for normalization. The protein expression of each target protein was expressed as the ratio of the densitometry units of TJ protein and β-actin.

    2.9.Statistical analysis

    The data were analyzed using the General Linear Model Procedure (GLM) in the SAS 9.2 Software (SAS Institute Inc.,Cary,NC). The treatment was included as fix effect and animal was included as random effect in the model. Normality of distributions of residuals was tested using PROC UNIVARIATE of SAS (SAS Institue Inc.). Time with ruminal pH below 5.8 was not normally distributed and was therefore log-transformed to alleviate heterogeneity of residual variances. One-way analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of treatments on morphological structure,permeability and tight junction proteins expression of ruminal epithelium from the lactating goats. Each individual animal was considered as an experimental unit for all data. The Duncan multiple comparison test was carried out to test for significant difference between treatments. Results were expressed as the mean±standard error. Significance was declared atP<0.05.

    3.Results

    3.1.Feed intake,milk production and composition

    Compared with the Ctrl group,the SARA group had significant decreases (P<0.05) in feed intake (by 13.38%),milk yield (by 25.73%),milk protein percentage (by 8.33%),and milk fat percentage (by 19.40%),but milk lactose percentage remained unaffected (P>0.05). These parameters were similar (P>0.05) between SARA and post-SARA,except for milk protein percentage (Table 3).

    3.2.Alterations in ruminal pH during SARA induction

    As the NFC:NDF ratio increased,the minimum,maximum,and mean ruminal pH all descended (P<0.05),and the durations of ruminal pH<5.8 or pH<5.5 elongated (P<0.05)in an NFC:NDF-dependent manner (Table 4). At the end of the last induction period at NFC:NDF ratio of 3.23,the daily rumen pH fell below 5.8 for nearly 11.33 h and below 5.5 for nearly 3.83 h. The nadir of the ruminal pH fell to 5.5,while the peak ruminal pH was below 6.0. Based on the pH threshold for SARA (Kleenet al.2003;Penneret al.2007),SARA was inducted in all the goats during the last induction period at NFC:NDF ratio of 3.23.

    3.3.Alterations in morphology and ultrastructure of ruminal epithelium in response to SARA

    Compared with the Ctrl group,the SARA group had increases (P<0.01) in the length (by 111.2%),width (by 9.0%),and surface areas of papillae (by 130.1%),but the papilla density remained unaffected (P>0.05) (Table 5).The ruminal epithelium was thinner (by 18.8%,P<0.05)in the SARA group than in the Ctrl group,but the stratum corneum was thicker (by 53.1%,P<0.05) and the stratum granulosum tended to be thicker (by 8.7%,P>0.05).The SARA group also had a thinner (by 36.7%,P<0.01)stratum spinosum and basale than the Ctrl group. At the end of the 4-week restitution (the post-SARA group),papilla width,total epithelial thickness,stratum corneum thickness,and stratum spinosum and basale thickness all reversed to values not significantly different from those of the Ctrl group. The length and surface area of papillae,however,did not reverse to the values of the Ctrl group,remaining to be longer (by 46.6%,P<0.01) and larger(by 54.6%,P<0.01),respectively,than those of the Ctrl group.

    Table 3 The feed intake,milk yield and milk composition of the lactating goats

    Table 4 Ruminal pH in lactating goats during subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) induction

    Table 5 Morphological structure of ruminal epithelium of the lactating goats

    The ruminal epithelium of the Ctrl goats appeared normal in both structural integrity and intercellular junctions(Fig.1-A and D),while apparent damages were observed in the SARA group,including peeling,irregular edges,vague intercellular boundaries,damaged TJ and increased intercellular space between epithelial cells (Fig.1-B and E).The compromised integrity of the ruminal epithelium showed some signs of recovery in the post-SARA group after the 4-week restitution,especially increased numbers of TJ and diminished peeling (Fig.1-C and F).

    3.4.Permeability of the ruminal epithelium

    Compared with the Ctrl group,an increase (P<0.05) was noted in rumen transepithelial short-circuit current (Isc),tissue conductance (Gt),and paracellular mucosal-toserosal flux of HRP in the SARA group (Fig.2). At the end of the restitution for 4 weeks,the measurements of these 3 indicators of epithelial permeability decreased numerically (P>0.05) compared to the SARA group,but they continued to remain higher (P<0.05) than those of the Ctrl group.

    3.5.mRNA and protein expressions of tight junction proteins involved in rumen epithelial barrier function

    As shown in Table 6,all the analyzed genes encoding tight junction proteins were down-regulated (P<0.01) in response to SARA. After the restitution,all the down-regulation was moderated,but they remained to be altered (P<0.01)compared to the Ctrl and similar (P>0.05) to those of the SARA group. The protein expression of the three tight junction proteins responded to SARA and restitution similarly to the mRNA expression of their coding genes (Fig.3).

    Table 6 The mRNA expression of tight junction proteins of the ruminal epithelium in the lactating goats

    4.Discussion

    In the present study,we investigated if SARA could affect lactation performance,rumen epithelial morphological structure and permeability,and the expression of TJ protein involved in epithelial barrier function. The hypothesis that SARA might cause sustained rumen epithelial barrier dysfunction,which might not recover,was supported in part by the results of the presentstudy. Overall,our results showed that SARA resulted in compromised rumen epithelial integrity,persistent excessive permeability,and down-regulated expression of TJ proteins,CLDN1,OCLN,and ZO-1,of the ruminal epithelium. Moreover,the compromised rumen barrier structure could be restored only to some extent,and barrier function was not recovered 4 weeks after the SARA challenge,which corresponded to a persistent decrease in lactation performance of goats. Our study provided new insight into the mechanistic underpinning of the slow recovery of impaired lactation performance and barrier function weeks after SARA insults.

    Previous studies on the effects of SARA on rumen epithelial barrier function were limited to the short-term effects (refs),but little information is available on the longterm effects,particularly whether compromised rumen epithelial barrier can recover after SARA insults. In the present study,we evaluated how SARA could damage the ruminal epithelium and to what extent the compromised ruminal epithelium could recover following SARA. As revealed by histological and ultrastructural analyses of the ruminal epithelium,SARA increased the dimensions(both length and width) of ruminal papillae,decreased the thickness of the epithelium strata,and widened the TJ between epithelial cells. Based on the magnitude of the alterations,the increased papillae surface area was primarily attributed to the elongation of the papillae.Similarly,the SARA-induced decrease in epithelial thickness was largely attributed to the decrease in the thickness of stratum spinosum and basale. Evidently,SARA compromised the structural integrity of the ruminal epithelium. These damaging alterations of the ruminal epithelium are consistent with those reported in dairy cows and goats (Steeleet al.2011;Liuet al.2013;Zhanget al.2017). Not analyzed in the present study,transepithelial translocation of LPS might have increased while the integrity of ruminal epithelium was disrupted.

    We continued the feeding experiment to examine how the rumen epithelial integrity and structures restitution after the acidotic insult. All the measured papillae and epithelial stratum features returned to what was measured in the Ctrl group,except for the length and surface area of papillae,which remained to be longer (by 47%,P<0.01)and larger (by 55%,P<0.01) than those of the Ctrl group.These findings suggest that the papillae both grew and swelled in length during SARA,and the papillae elongation was not reversible after the SARA insult. These results are in general agreement with a study conducted in dairy cattle by Steeleet al.(2011),who reported that the reintroduction of the high-forage diet during the SARA challenge was marked by increased (P<0.01) thickness of all living strata to levels not significantly different from that of pre-acidosis. The similarity findings of that study and the present study suggest that most of the compromised epithelial structure caused by SARA can be restituted to some extent after SARA insults. Such selfrestitution was attributed to likely alteration of the rate of mitosis and differentiation of epithelial cells in a ruminal VFA concentration-dependent manner (Goodlad 1981).However,the molecular underpinning of this cellular regulatory mechanism remains unknown. Interestingly,Steeleet al.(2011) found that when dairy cattle were fed a high-grain diet (65% grain) for 3 weeks and then all forage for another 3 weeks,the thickness of the stratum granulosum in the ruminal epithelium was significantly reduced,while the thickness of stratum corneum was not significantly affected during the high-grain feeding,especially during week 1 when SARA occurred. In contrast,the present study showed that the thickness of the stratum corneum was significantly increased,and the thickness of stratum granulosum was not significantly altered when SARA occurred. The discrepancy may be explained by the differences in experimental design,the physical nature of the diet,and most importantly,the duration of the grain challenge and the severity of the SARA insults. Overall,the above results indicated that SARA resulted in compromised rumen epithelial barrier structure,which could be restored naturally to some extent.

    The compromised integrity and structure of the ruminal epithelium were accompanied by increased permeability across the ruminal epithelium. As expected,the acidotic insult associated with SARA significantly increased the Isc and Gt across the ruminal epithelium. A concurrent increase in both Isc (a measurement of active electrogenic electrolyte transport) and Gt (a measurement of passive ion permeability) reflects an increased capacity of charge transfer across the ruminal epithelium through the transcellular and/or paracellular route. Both Isc and Gt decreased only slightly after 4 weeks of restitution in the post-SARA group. The elevated Isc and Gt in the post-SARA group indicate that the restitution of the capacity of charge transfer across the ruminal epithelium was much slower than the restitution of the rumen epithelial structures. A long-term adaptation of the epithelium may have occurred in dairy goats,which may have balanced the ruminal concentration of the total VFA (Klevenhusenet al.2013). Several studies found that such adaptation can be achieved by increasing the epithelial surface area coupled with increased activity of ion exchangers for enhanced VFA absorption (Gaebelet al.1987;Lodemann and Martens 2006),which is in agreement with the increased ruminal papillae dimensions during the SARA challenge observed in the present study. The increased flux of HRP,which is a nonspecific fluid-phase endocytosis marker,observed in the SARA group is consistent with the finding of a previous study(Klevenhusenet al.2013). Similar to the restitution of Isc and Gt,the flux of HRP across the ruminal epithelium only decreased by a small margin after the 4-week restitution. The increased electrophysiological properties and permeability of the ruminal epithelium suggest that SARA may compromise epithelial permeability and barrier function for a much longer period,at least longer than 4 weeks. Compromised epithelial permeability can increase translocation of microbes and LPS from the rumen milieu into the portal circulation (Gozhoet al.2005;Emmanuelet al.2007),and thus SARA can increase the risk of liver abscesses,laminitis,and whole-animal inflammatory responses (Steeleet al.2011). Such risk may remain for some time after animals are switched from high-to lowconcentrate diets due to the slow and delayed recovery of rumen epithelial permeability following SARA.

    To better understand the mechanistic underpinning of the elevated permeability of the ruminal epithelium,we quantified the expression,at both the transcriptional and translational levels,of 3 key epithelial TJ proteins. As expected,the expression of these 3 proteins was affected similarly at both the transcriptional and translational levels. The expression of all the analyzed proteins was down-regulated by SARA. These results are in accordance with twoinvitroandinvivofindings (Meissneret al.2017;Zhanget al.2019) and suggest that acidotic insult in combination with high VFA concentration during SARA has an extensive impact on TJ proteins.

    The expression of the 3 TJ protein genes did not return to levels similar to those of the Ctrl group after the 4-week restitution. Evidently,the effect of the acidotic insult on these genes persisted for a much longer time,at least 4 weeks. The slow and delayed recovery of gene expression,at both the transcriptional and translational levels,of these TJ proteins mirrors that of the compromised permeability of the ruminal epithelium. Future research is needed to elucidate this underlying mechanism of the slow and delayed recovery of expression of the TJ proteins.

    Claudins are identified as the key molecules in the barrier function of TJ protein (Tsukitaet al.2001),and OCLN plays both a functional and structural role in defining the paracellular barrier (Matter and Balda 2003). It has been proposed that down-regulation of intestinal OCLN expression may be an important mechanism leading to an increase in intestinal epithelial TJ permeability (Ciccocioppoet al.2006;Markovet al.2015). A study also demonstrated that OCLN depletion in intestinal epithelial cells,bothinvitroandinvivo,increased paracellular flux of larger molecules,suggesting that OCLN plays a crucial role in the maintenance of intestinal epithelial TJ barrier function,through the largechannel pathway (Al-Sadiet al.2011),which we also detected in the present study. ZO-1 is an important linker protein in TJ that affiliates with transmembrane protein,such as OCLN,and other cytoplasmic proteins such as ZO-2,ZO-3,and actin. TJ barrier formation disintegrated when ZO-1 was depleted in cultured epithelial cells(Umedaet al.2006). A variation in epithelial permeability can be related to a change in the abundance of TJ proteins. Our data revealed that decreased TJ protein CLDN1,OCLN,and ZO-1 during the SARA challenge coincided with the increased rumen epithelial permeability. Taken together,our findings suggest that SARA had a sustained profound effect on the expression of the genes related to barrier function in the ruminal epithelium and further confirmed that long-term downregulated expression of TJ proteins could contribute to the increased permeability and reduce the ruminal epithelium barrier function of goats suffering from SARA.

    The damaged morphological structures of the ruminal epithelium were restored 4 weeks after the switch from the high NFC:NDF diet to hay mixture,but the compromised rumen epithelial barrier function only recovered slightly,remaining not significantly different compared to the goats suffering from SARA. The lagging of the functional recovery behind the structural recovery was also manifested at the molecular level,both mRNA and protein.We have not found any study in the literature that has documented such a difference in recovery pace between the structure and function of the ruminal epithelium following SARA. However,one study found that the restitution of intestine (jejunum,ileum,and colon) barrier function in rats was slower than that of the morphology after hemorrhagic shock,and there was no direct correlation between them (Changet al.2005). Another study in piglets demonstrated that early weaning resulted in sustained impairment in intestinal barrier function and found the recovery of the intestinal morphology has priority over the recovery of intestinal barrier function (Huet al.2013). The results of the present study and the other studies using rats and pigs point towards a slower recovery process of epithelial barrier function.

    In this study,we found that SARA did not only persistently increase permeability or impair barrier function of the ruminal epithelium,but also led to negative effects on feed intake,milk yield and milk component. Similar results have been observed by Zhangetal.(2020),who found dairy goats suffering from SARA showed a significantly reduced dry matter intake (DMI) and milk yield compared with the control goats. At the end of the restitution for 4 weeks,feed intake and milk yield decreased continuously compared with the SARA goats in this study. Decreased DMI might be a self-regulatory mechanism of the body to the acidic environment in the rumen,alleviating the depressed ruminal pH by reducing the intake of fermentable substrates,or it might also be due to focal and systemic inflammation induced by repeated bacterial or LPS entry into the ruminal epithelium and blood circulation.Previous studies reported that low feed intake could reduce SCFA absorption (Albornozet al.2013),papillae surface area (Pederzolliet al.2018),and increase permeability of the gastrointestinal tract when feed intake was restricted to 25% of voluntary intake (Zhanget al.2013). Whereby decreased feed intake had a sustained profound effect on compromised rumen epithelial barrier function.

    5.Conclusion

    As a common metabolic disorder in dairy production,SARA causes rather extensive damages to the structure of the ruminal epithelium and compromises its barrier function. In this study,we demonstrated that SARA could result in lingering impairment in the rumen epithelial barrier function in lactating goats after one month of feeding with mixed hay only. The slow recovery of the epithelial barrier function coincided with the laggard recovery of down-regulated expression of key TJ proteins in the ruminal epithelium. Future research is warranted to elucidate the effect of the reduced feed intake by SARA on the above aspects and mechanism underpinning the slow recovery of impaired regulation of expression of the genes encoding tight junction proteins.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31472124),the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia,China (2019MS03031),the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-36),the Innovation Fund of Inner Mongolia Agricultural and Animal Husbandry,China(2021CXJJM02),and a China Scholarship Council(Beijing) fellowship to Hu Honglian for training at the Ohio State University,USA (201909150001).

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Ethical approval

    All animal experimental procedures used in this study were approved by the Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural &Animal Husbandry Sciences’ Animal Care and Use Committee,China.

    久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | www.精华液| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 在线天堂中文资源库| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产精品成人在线| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 大型av网站在线播放| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 久久热在线av| 久久久国产一区二区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 日韩有码中文字幕| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 窝窝影院91人妻| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 一夜夜www| 亚洲av成人av| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 久久狼人影院| av视频免费观看在线观看| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产精品久久视频播放| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 色在线成人网| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 成人18禁在线播放| 视频区图区小说| 久久精品成人免费网站| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 久久香蕉激情| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 曰老女人黄片| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 中文字幕色久视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 精品一区二区三卡| ponron亚洲| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 精品第一国产精品| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 成人三级做爰电影| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 成人18禁在线播放| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久久久久人人人人人| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 悠悠久久av| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 18在线观看网站| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| tocl精华| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 99久久国产精品久久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美色视频一区免费| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 女警被强在线播放| 久99久视频精品免费| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 在线av久久热| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| av网站在线播放免费| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| av电影中文网址| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 一本综合久久免费| 国产免费男女视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产精品免费视频内射| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 午夜精品在线福利| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲 国产 在线| 日本五十路高清| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 免费av中文字幕在线| 99国产精品一区二区三区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 成在线人永久免费视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 9色porny在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 天天影视国产精品| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产精品.久久久| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 手机成人av网站| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产av精品麻豆| 99热网站在线观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 91精品三级在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲成人手机| 曰老女人黄片| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 午夜免费观看网址| 青草久久国产| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 无限看片的www在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 色94色欧美一区二区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 精品第一国产精品| 精品国产亚洲在线| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲第一av免费看| 捣出白浆h1v1| 精品福利永久在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 精品高清国产在线一区| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 午夜免费成人在线视频| ponron亚洲| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 日本五十路高清| 露出奶头的视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲九九香蕉| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片 | xxx96com| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 精品亚洲成国产av| 久久亚洲真实| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产高清激情床上av| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 无限看片的www在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 在线永久观看黄色视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 91字幕亚洲| 国产av精品麻豆| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 成人手机av| 精品国产国语对白av| 精品久久久久久,| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 99热只有精品国产| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 免费看a级黄色片| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 人妻一区二区av| 一进一出抽搐动态| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 成年版毛片免费区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 窝窝影院91人妻| 天天影视国产精品| 中国美女看黄片| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| tocl精华| 国产在视频线精品| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 国产在视频线精品| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 日韩有码中文字幕| av电影中文网址| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 国产成人系列免费观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 一级黄色大片毛片| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| av免费在线观看网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产精华一区二区三区| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 丁香六月欧美| 91成人精品电影| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产精品成人在线| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲成人手机| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲精品一二三| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 大香蕉久久网| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久热在线av| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院 | 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲伊人色综图| 久9热在线精品视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产在视频线精品| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 一级黄色大片毛片| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| av欧美777| 国产亚洲欧美98| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 看免费av毛片| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 午夜久久久在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 欧美大码av| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 精品国产亚洲在线| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 看片在线看免费视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| av一本久久久久| 黄片小视频在线播放| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲第一青青草原| 免费观看精品视频网站| 午夜福利,免费看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 岛国在线观看网站| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| av视频免费观看在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 午夜视频精品福利| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 大码成人一级视频| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 精品久久久精品久久久| 电影成人av| 飞空精品影院首页| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| av一本久久久久| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 午夜福利欧美成人|