• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Apparent variations in nitrogen runoff and its uptake in paddy rice under straw incorporation

    2022-10-21 09:08:48MuhammadAmjadBASHlRZHAlLimeiWANGHongyuanLlUJianQuratUlAinRAZAGENGYucongAbdurREHlMLlUHongbin
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2022年11期

    Muhammad Amjad BASHlR ,ZHAl Li-mei ,WANG Hong-yuan ,LlU Jian ,Qurat-Ul-Ain RAZA ,GENG Yu-congAbdur REHlM,,LlU Hong-bin

    1 Key Laboratory of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control,Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,P.R.China

    2 College of Agriculture,Bahadur Sub-Campus Layyah,Bahauddin Zakariya University,Mutan 60800,Pakistan

    3 School of Environment and Sustainability,University of Saskatchewan,Saskatoon,SK S7N 3H5,Canada

    4 Department of Soil Science,Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology,Bahauddin Zakariya University,Multan 60800,Pakistan

    Abstract Straw incorporation is a widespread practice to promote agricultural sustainability. However,the potential effects of straw incorporation with the prolonged time on nitrogen (N) runoff loss from paddy fields are not well studied. The current study addresses the knowledge gap by assessing the effects of straw incorporation on the processes influencing N runoff patterns and its impacts on crop yield,N uptake,total N (TN),and soil organic matter (SOM). We conducted field experiments with rice (Oryza sativa L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rotation,rice-tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.)rotation,and double-rice cropping in subtropical China from 2008 to 2012. Each rotation had three N treatments: zero N fertilization (CK),chemical N fertilization (CF),and chemical N fertilization combined with straw incorporation (CFS). The treatment effects were assessed on TN runoff loss,crop yield,N uptake,soil TN stock,and SOM. Results showed that TN runoff was reduced by substituting part of the chemical N fertilizer with straw N in the double rice rotation,while crop N uptake was significantly (P<0.05) decreased due to the lower bioavailability of straw N. In contrast,in both rice-wheat and rice-tobacco rotations,TN runoff in CFS was increased by 0.9-20.2% in the short term when straw N was applied in addition to chemical N,compared to CF. However,TN runoff was reduced by 2.3-19.3% after three years of straw incorporation,suggesting the long-term benefits of straw incorporation on TN loss reduction. Meanwhile,crop N uptake was increased by 0.8-37.3% in the CFS of both rotations. This study demonstrates the challenges in reducing N runoffloss while improving soil fertility by straw incorporation over the short term but highlights the potential of long-term straw incorporation to reduce N loss and improve soil productivity.

    Keywords: straw return,nitrogen runoff,water pollution,rice yield,nitrogen uptake

    1.lntroduction

    Crop residues are essential by-products of crop harvests(Liuet al.2017;Liet al.2021). Annually,the production of crop residues worldwide amounts to 4 Gt,of which more than 16% is produced in China (Lal 2005;Quet al.2012). With the increase in rice cultivation,the problem of rice straw generation and management has also arisen. For every mega-gram of paddy production,about 1-1.5 mega-grams of rice straw are produced (Migo-Sumaganget al.2020). This excessive straw generates problems related to proper disposal and seriously impacts the environment as per other agricultural wastes(Kalaivanan and Hattab 2016;Razaet al.2021). A common strategy used to dispose of crop residues is straw incorporation,i.e.,mixing the shredded straw into soils during tillage operations (Chenet al.2014;Zhaoet al.2021). Traditionally farmers used to incorporate straw into the soil to improve soil fertility status in China.However,for the last few years,straw burning has been adopted to save labor,which causes environmental pollution and depletion of nutrient resources (Zhanget al.2016). Therefore,straw incorporation’s agronomic and environmental impacts on soil,plant,and atmosphere are long-lasting research priorities.

    Rice is a staple food for roughly one-third of the world’s population;in China,rice accounts for almost 40% of the national gross grain production (Panet al.2017;Bashiret al.2019a,2021). Even though rice yields have been substantially increased by enhanced nutrient management and other management strategies in the past two decades,the challenges of reducing nutrient runoff from paddy soils are increasing in China (Cuiet al.2020). A recent empirical model estimation suggests that nitrogen(N) loss through surface runoff from Chinese paddy fields reaches as high as 1.1 Tg N yr-1,equivalent to around 7%of the total N fertilizer input to the paddy fields (Houet al.2016). A large amount of N loss has detrimental impacts on downstream water quality and causes eutrophication and ecological degradation in the adjacent water bodies (Liet al.2018;Henrysonet al.2020). Therefore,mitigation strategies are needed to reduce N runoff.

    The studies have documented considerable knowledge of some aspects,such as the effects on: (i) soil carbon(C) storage (Liet al.2016;Chaudharyet al.2017;Zhanget al.2017),soil N storage (Cucuet al.2014),soil chemical properties (Yuanet al.2014;Zhaoet al.2019),and soil microbial communities (Fenget al.2016;Penget al.2016;Tanget al.2020);(ii) crop N use efficiency(Nguyenet al.2016),water use efficiency (Liuet al.2017),and productivity (Zhanget al.2021);and (iii) greenhouse gas emissions (Yaoet al.2013,2017;Huanget al.2017)and ammonia volatilization (Zhanget al.2020). The study concludes that the increase in soil organic C (SOC)content with the straw return is significantly positively correlated to the decrease in N leaching and runoff (Xiaet al.2016;Zhaoet al.2021). The findings of these studies provided scientific bases for understanding how straw incorporation and decomposition changed soil quality,crop productivity,and soil ecosystem functions.Many of the findings pointed to the positive consequences of straw incorporation.

    Given the positive effects of straw incorporation on crop yield and greenhouse gas sequestration,straw incorporation is recommended as an important management practice for rice production in China.However,the application time effects of straw incorporation on N runoff from paddy fields are not well documented,particularly regarding repeated straw incorporations,which can have both short-and long-term effects on soil N and C turnover. This gives rise to the need for the current study. This study aimed to assess the effects of straw incorporation on N runoff from three paddy-cropping systems over five years. In addition,crop yield,N uptake,total N (TN),and soil organic matter(SOM) were monitored to obtain an overall assessment of straw incorporation impacts and shed light on the processes influencing N runoff patterns. The findings of this study would provide scientific insights on crop residue management in paddy production systems and support the development of sustainable agriculture in China and other rice-growing countries. The objectives of the current study were to: (i) identify the short-and long-term impacts of the straw incorporation on soil,environment,and crop productivity;(ii) find the particular processes influencing N runoff losses;and (iii) measure the impacts of straw incorporation of nutrient uptake.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Description of the experimental site

    The field experiments were carried out from 2008 to 2012 in three extensive rice-producing provinces of Sichuan,Fujian,and Hunan in subtropical China. The experiments included three rice rotation systems typical of the study regions: (i) Rice-wheat rotation in Sichuan Province(30.2°N,103.9°E);(ii) Rice-tobacco rotation in Fujian Province (26.7°N,117.5°E);and (iii) Double rice rotation in Hunan Province (28.1°N,113.2°E). All three provinces have a humid subtropical monsoon climate. Even so,the weather varied considerably across the experimental sites. Over the five experimental years,the mean daily temperature ranged from 17.8°C in Sichuan to 19.2°C in Fujian,and mean annual precipitation ranged from 915 mm in Sichuan to 1 693 mm in Fujian (Table 1). Due to weather variabilities,crop seasons somewhat differ with the regions. Sichuan and Fujian had approximately the same length of the rice-growing season from transplant to harvest for 3-3.5 mon,much longer than 2.5 mon for early rice and 3 mon for late rice in Hunan. Moreover,in Sichuan and Fujian,winter wheat or tobacco grows for 4 or 6 mon of the year,while in Hunan,the paddy fields are fallowed for up to 6.5 mon. All three experimental sites had medium loamy soil with similar bulk densities,while the Hunan soil had the highest fertility in terms of SOM and TN contents,followed by Fujian soil and then Sichuan soil (Table 1).

    2.2.Experimental design

    In each of the 15 field experiments (three sites by five years),a randomized complete block design was used(n=3;plot size=25-30 m2). Three treatments combining N fertilizer and crop residue management practices were implemented to examine their effects on N runoff.Specifically,the treatments were: the control null N fertilization (CK),conventional N fertilization in accordance with farmers’ practice (CF),and N fertilization combined with straw incorporation (CFS) (Table 2). Moreover,chemical phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) fertilizers were applied at consistent rates between the treatments within an experimental site but at different rates across the sites. The rates of P and K fertilizers represented farmers’ practices in the respective study provinces.The chemical N,P,and K fertilizers used were urea(46% N),superphosphate (16% P2O5),and potassium sulphate (50% K2O),respectively,and were applied as the broadcast method.

    Table 1 A summary of experimental conditions for the three rice rotation systems1)

    Table 2 Fertilizer and straw return treatments for the three rice rotation systems

    For the CFS treatment in all experiments and crop seasons except early rice in Hunan,the crop residues (rice/wheat/late rice straw) were chopped and incorporated into the soil before crop sowing or transplanting. For the rice-wheat/tobacco rotations,the CFS treatment received the same rate of chemical N fertilizer as CF;thus,straw return in CFS resulted in a higher total N application rate than CF. For the double rice rotation,in contrast,the application rate of chemical N fertilizer was reduced in CFS to maintain the same total N rate as in CF.

    2.3.Monitoring of runoff,crop,and soil

    To monitor surface runoff,each field plot was surrounded by cemented ridges (20 cm in height and 12 cm in width)on all sides and 30-40 cm in the ground to prevent water and nutrient transport between plots. A cemented pool(5-6 m in length,0.8-1.2 m in width,and 0.8-1 m in height) was installedin situat the edge of each plot tocollect the runoff,with the top of the pool 20 cm above the ground. The pool was connected to the plot through a polyvinyl chloride pipe (5 cm in diameter),with the top of the pipe equaled altitude with the top of the ridge. To prevent the entry of rainwater or small field animals,the pool was covered with a stainless-steel plate all the time except when water samples were collected.

    The surface runoff caused by rainfall was collected for each plot after every runoff event. The water depth of runoff was measured in each pool and was used to calculate the volume of runoff water. Runoff water samples were collected with 500 mL clean plastic bottles,placed in a portable refrigerator,and immediately transported to the laboratory for testing. After collecting the samples,residual water and sediments in the pool were removed so that the pool was prepared for the next runoff collection (Shanet al.2015).

    In conjunction with runoff monitoring,daily meteorological data,including precipitation and air temperature,were recorded at an automatic HOBO-U30 weather station installed on-site (Onset Computer Corporation;MA,USA). Moreover,the yield and aboveground biomass of all crops were measured at harvest. Soil samples were collected at the beginning of the trial in 2008 and annually after harvesting rice from 2008 to 2012. The samples were collected at a depth of 0-20 cm using a 5-cm internal diameter auger.

    2.4.Laboratory analysis and calculations

    Water samples were analyzed for TN using a continuous flow analyzer (AA3,BRAN+LUEBBE,Germany).In addition,water pH was determined by using a potentiometer. To determine general soil properties(Table 1),soil samples collected from all plots within an experimental field were mixed to prepare a homogenous mixture. Soil texture was obtained by the sedimentation method of the samples and reported according to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA)classification. Soil bulk density was measured after drying the soil in an oven at 105°C for 24 h. Soil pH was determined at 1:5 soil/water with a potentiometer. Soils were analyzed for individual plots to assess treatment effects on soil C,soil N,and crop N uptake. The content of SOM was determined by the dichromate oxidation method. The concentration of TN in both soil and plant was determined by the Kjeldahl digestion method (KDY-9830,China) (Zhanget al.2017).

    Loss of TNviarunoff and contributions of N loss by soil residue N and exogenous N (chemical fertilizer N and straw N) were calculated using the following equations,respectively:

    where TN is the total N runoff losses (kg N ha-1);TNC is the TN concentration in runoff (mg L-1);V is the runoffwater volume (L);S is the area of field treatment plot(m2);CR is TN runoff coefficients;TNCK is the annual cumulative TN runoff loss of the CK treatment (kg N ha-1yr-1);CSN is the contribution of residual soil N to the annual cumulative TN runoff loss in a given treatment(%);TNT is the annual cumulative TN runoff loss of the CF or CFS treatment (kg N ha-1yr-1);and CEN is the contribution of exogenous N to the annual cumulative TN runoff loss (%).

    2.5.Statistical analysis

    Data were analyzed using SPSS 19.0 Statistical Software(SPSS,China). Mean comparisons were performed to test the treatment effects on N runoff loss,crop yield,crop N uptake,SOM,and soil TN,using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Repeated measures ANOVA was used to test the significance of differences among treatments. When theF-test was significant at a 0.05 probability level,mean differences were analyzed by the least significant difference (LSD) method.

    3.Results

    3.1.Crop yield and N uptake

    Crop yields were significantly (P<0.05) affected by the treatments (Fig.1). Yields of all crops were increased significantly (P<0.05) by 21-270% in the CF treatment and by 26-267% in the CFS treatment as compared to the yields in the CK treatment,respectively. The only exceptions were found in the rice-wheat rotation,where the yields of rice and wheat in 2008 and the rice yield in 2012 did not differ significantly between the N treatments and CK. Among the three crop rotations,the greatest increase in yield by N application and straw return was observed in the rice-tobacco rotation.Generally,the two N treatments with and without straw return produced statistically the same crop yields,except that,compared to CF,CFS produced higher wheat yields from 2009 to 2012 in the rice-wheat rotation but lower early rice yield in 2009 and late rice yield in 2012 in the double rice rotation.

    Even though CFS and CF had similar effects on crop yields in most of the experiments,their effects on crop N uptake differed more profoundly (Fig.2). Particularly for the rice-wheat rotation during 2009-2012,the crop N uptake in the CFS treatment was 15-37% higher than the N uptake in the CF treatment. For the double rice rotation,in contrast,the crop N uptake in the CFS treatment was significantly reduced in both 2009 and 2010,compared with that in CF (P<0.05). It implies that straw incorporation substituting equal chemical N might suppress the rice N uptake in the short term.

    In the rice-tobacco rotation system,N uptake was high in rice in 2008,2009,2010,and 2011,while it was high in tobacco in 2012. Moreover,for the double rice rotation,straw incorporation improved N uptake in late rice during 2008,2009,2010,and 2012 and in early rice during 2011.Furthermore,the rice-wheat rotation system showed high N uptake in wheat during 2009,2010,and 2012 and in rice during 2008 and 2011 (Fig.3).

    3.2.Characteristics of TN runoff

    The annual cumulative TN runoff from different experiments and treatments is presented in Fig.4. As affected by rainfall patterns,the TN runoff loss varied greatly between years and between cropping rotation systems. The annual TN runoff ranged from 0.7 to 1.9,1.7 to 16.3,and 1.0 to 10.8 kg N ha-1yr-1in rice-wheat,ricetobacco,and double rice rotation systems,respectively.Moreover,the TN runoff loss was significantly (P<0.05)affected by treatments. Compared to CK,the CF and CFS treatments significantly (P<0.05) increased annual TN runoff loss in most experimental years. The relative comparisons between CF and CFS shifted over the five experimental years. During the initial three experimental years (2008-2010),compared with CF,the return of crop straws in CFS increased annual cumulative TN runoff by 0.9-20.2% and 10.1-13.3% in the rice-wheat and ricetobacco rotations,respectively. After the three years of straw return,the annual TN runoff losses in the CFS treatment were reduced by 2.3-8.9% in the rice-wheat rotation and by 5.4-19.3% in the rice-tobacco rotation,as compared to the CF treatment. In contrast,for the double rice rotation,the CFS treatment consistently resulted in less annual cumulative TN runoff than the CF treatment throughout the five experimental years. Even so,the difference in TN loss between the two treatments was significant (P<0.05) from 2008 to 2011 (by 6.4-33.6%)but insignificant in 2012 (by 2.1%). These results indicate that the long-term straw application has a tremendous influence on reducing runoff losses.

    The predominant runoff occurrence periods greatly varied in the three crop rotations (Appendices A-C).Specifically,the runoff events mainly occurred in rice (late May to middle October),tobacco (early March to June),and early rice (May to early July) growing seasons for the rice-wheat rotation,rice-tobacco rotation,and double rice rotation,respectively. In the three seasons,the seasonal precipitation accounted for 70-89%,37-82%,and 19-42% of the respective annual precipitation.Correspondingly,the TN runoff loss in these seasons amounted to 79-100%,58-100%,and 68-100% of the annual TN loss,respectively.

    Averaged across five years,the TN runoff coefficients of CFS were 0.09-1.20%,slightly lower than the coefficients of the CF treatment (0.11-1.50%) (Table 3). Residue soil N was a primary source of TN runoff loss from paddy soils in China. Across all rice cropping systems,residue soil N contributed 41.8-86.6% of the annual TN losses,with the highest rate in the rice-wheat rotation. In addition,straw incorporation improved the contribution of exogenous N in all rice cropping systems. In contrast,the soil N contribution was high in double rice cropping system as compared to other rotations (Fig.5).

    Table 3 Nitrogen runoff coefficients (runoff N/total N applied)for chemical fertilizer treatments with and without straw incorporation1)

    3.3.Changes in SOM and soil TN stock

    Over the five experimental years,the CFS treatment significantly (P<0.05) improved both SOM and soil N stock in all rice rotation systems (Fig.6). The temporal changes in SOM were similar in all treatments from 2008 to 2009,demonstrating no short-term effect of CFS on SOM. After that,however,the treatment effects started to display,following the order: CFS>CF>CK. By 2012,the CFS treatment increased SOM by 3.3-14.1% and 10.0-51.8% compared with CF and CK,respectively. In all treatments,the patterns of soil TN were similar to that of SOM. Compared to CF,the soil TN in the CFS treatment was increased by 4.8-28.9% by 2012. This indicates that over two years (long-term application),straw incorporation improves soil fertility.

    4.Discussion

    4.1.Effect of straw incorporation on crop yield

    In all cropping systems,the crop yield increased significantly with straw incorporation. This major increase in crop yield can be associated with the direct nutrient supply from straw as well as the improvement of soil fertility (Wanget al.2015;Zhaoet al.2021). In addition to improving soil quality,residue retention also plays a critical role in moderating soil temperature,ultimately enhancing root and plant growth and thus increasing crop yield and productivity (Sharmaet al.2021). Moreover,residue incorporation contributes to increasing crop yield due to the improved soil physico-chemical properties,available macro-and micro-nutrients and SOC. It also improves soil aggregation,water intake,availability,and retention,root penetration,and soil microbial status. All these entities contribute to maintaining an edaphic environment and enhancing crop yield (Vashishtet al.2021).

    4.2.Short-term effects of straw incorporation on N runoff

    Surface runoff is primarily determined by precipitation and irrigation patterns. Previously,several studies reported elevated nutrient concentrations in surface runoff from fertilized croplands during rainfall events(Lianet al.2020). Moreover,it is found that applying organic amendments in addition to chemical N fertilizers reduced N runoff by 27.4-36.3% compared to applying chemical N alone (Xieet al.2021). However,our results showed that the effects of short-term (1-3 years) straw incorporation on the reduction of N runoff losses were unsatisfactory. The reason could be the release of higher nutrients at an early and higher decomposition rate of straw,which was reduced at later stages. So,the long-term application helped to control the losses with involved microbial activities (Jinet al.2020).Compared with CF,the annual TN runoff losses were even increased in the CFS treatment with additional straw return in both rice-wheat and rice-tobacco rotation systems. This result was primarily due to the extra straw N input to the soil,which led to additional N release from plant materials and N mineralization in the CFS treatment. The additional N release eventually contributed to elevated TN concentrations in runoff water(Appendix D).

    In the double rice system,TN runoff loss in the CFS treatment was reduced throughout the entire experimental period (2008-2012) compared to CF. The decrease in TN runoff was primarily because of the reduction of fertilizer N rate in the CFS treatment. Even though the total N application rate as a sum of fertilizer N and straw N in the CFS treatment was the same as the total N application in the CF treatment,which solely was fertilizer N,the straw N in CFS is expected to have lower bioavailability to crops particularly over the short term (Zhanget al.2018). Indeed,the crop N uptake in the CFS treatment was significantly decreased (P<0.05) during the early experimental years (2009-2010) compared to that in the CF treatment. Two reasons could have contributed to the reduction of crop N uptake in the CFS treatment. First of all,as a kind of organic material with high C/N,the decomposition of straw can lead to competition between microorganisms and crops for the uptake of N (Jinet al.2020). Also,the release of N from crop straws associated with decomposition and mineralization may be too slow to supply sufficient N to the seasonal crops (Zechmeister-Boltensternet al.2015;Jinet al.2020). For example,it was observed that after 4-5 years of field application,up to 20% of straws could remain on the soil surface without decomposition (Lvet al.2011). As years of straw incorporation increase,more straws are available for decomposition. This is likely the reason for the low crop N uptake in the early experimental years but increased N uptake in the later years.

    4.3.Long-term effects of straw incorporation on N turnover

    Contrary to the short-term effects,the TN runoff loss was reduced by straw incorporation in the later experimental years for all sites,suggesting the efficacy of straw return in reducing TN runoff over the long term. The reduction of TN loss by straw incorporation can further help to improve soil quality and agricultural productivity (Liuet al.2021). Following decomposition of straw over the long term,SOM and crop N uptake were greatly increased,which contributed to reducing N loss and improving crop productivity. In the current study,five years of straw incorporation increased SOM and soil TN stock by 3.3-14.1% and 4.8-28.9%,respectively. Similar results were obtained by other research. For example,a meta-analysis reported an average 12% increase in SOM and TN by straw incorporation across a large array of croplands (Liuet al.2014;Berhaneet al.2020). In general,long-term straw incorporation can enhance the formation of macroaggregates while decreasing the proportion of microaggregates. This can help to improve SOM and TN stock because macro-aggregates often have higher C and N densities than micro-aggregates (Xueet al.2020). It has been suggested that straw incorporation improves soil aggregation and enhances SOC stabilization (Zhanget al.2017). In turn,physical soil conditions are also effectively promoted with increased SOM content,as indicated by improved soil water-holding capacity,total porosity,and bulk density (Bashiret al.2019b). Therefore,the SOC sequestration in cropping systems has been considered a cost-effective and eco-friendly strategy for sequestrating soil N and reducing N loss (Soong and Cotrufo 2015;Khanet al.2016),and straw returning to soil is an effective measure to improve SOC. Additionally,crop N uptake was greatly affected by straw incorporation over the long term. With the same rates of chemical N fertilizer,straw incorporation increased the N uptake by crops,especially in the rice-wheat rotation. As a result,the long-term straw return can increase SOM accumulation and crop N uptake,which improves soil N immobilization potential and crop N uptake,eventually reducing risks of N loss in the rice cropping systems in subtropical China.

    4.4.Sources of N in runoff from paddy systems

    Residue soil N was a primary source of TN runoff loss from paddy soils (Langdaleet al.2018). In this study,residue soil N contributed 41.8-86.6% of TN runoff,while the exogenous N contributed 13.4-58.6% (Fig.5)in CF treatments. Notably,runoff is different from other pathways of N loss. For instance,with regard to N losses via ammonia volatilization,the contribution of residue soil N was only up to 17.3% (Chenet al.2014). The reasons for the high contribution rate of residue soil N were: (i)large amounts of N accumulation in the topsoil resulting from historically high N inputs (Zhaoet al.2016),and (ii)rainfall-induced soil erosion that results in large amounts of sediment-bound N loss (Chenet al.2015). To reduce N runoff loss,it is recommended that mitigation measures should be taken not only for N loss from seasonal N applications (e.g.,by reducing N application rates) but also for the loss from residue soil N. Meanwhile,the contribution of residue soil N to TN runoff in the ricewheat rotation was much greater than its contribution in the other two rotation systems. This might be due to the much lower SOM content (7.3 g kg-1) in the rice-wheat rotation system than elsewhere (15.9-37.7 g kg-1),which has unfavorable soil physical conditions,such as soil water-holding capacity,total porosity,and bulk density.The results indicated that maintaining high SOM through long-term straw incorporation might be an effective measure to reduce TN runoff losses resulting from residue soil N in paddy soils.

    Chemical fertilization is a common practice in the agroecosystem,which has generated serious concerns about N losses. Long-term straw incorporation can be an effective technique to overcome the chemical fertilization rate and boosts the integrated agroecosystem. This will be not just eco-friendly but also cheap and more beneficial for the farming community. In the field of resources management and environmental research,the process of farmland N runoff mainly depends on the water-soluble N content of farmland during rainfall or drainage. Although the water-soluble N contents of farmland are affected by other processes,including the long-term process of SOC and N conversion,these processes are lacking in the current study;hence,it is recommended to consider the processes for future research studies.

    5.Conclusion

    Results indicated that short-term straw incorporation might increase N runoff loss and reduce crop N uptake in paddy soils in subtropical China. After three years of straw incorporation,the TN runoff was reduced,and N uptake by crops was increased,suggesting the longterm efficacy of straw return on reducing TN runoff. Straw incorporation also improved SOM,an important indicator of soil fertility. Moreover,residue soil N was the primary source of TN runoff loss from paddy soils,contributing about 41.8-86.6% of TN loss across different rice rotation systems. This study demonstrates the challenges in reducing N runoff with straw incorporation while improving soil fertility over the short term but highlights the benefits of long-term straw incorporation on N runoff reduction and soil productivity enhancement. We acknowledge that limitations are present related to examining the relationships among straw retentions and transformation rates of N-species,interactions associated with microbial communities,and influences of specific functional genes or N-cycling.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFD1700901),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31972519),the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-01-33),and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences(2060302-05-956-1).

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Appendicesassociated with this paper are available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 青青草视频在线视频观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美人与善性xxx| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看 | 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 免费大片18禁| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久6这里有精品| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 美女主播在线视频| 日本午夜av视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 99久久综合免费| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产av国产精品国产| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 婷婷色综合www| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 成年av动漫网址| 老熟女久久久| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| h视频一区二区三区| 免费看不卡的av| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 成人影院久久| 搡老乐熟女国产| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 少妇的逼好多水| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 老司机影院成人| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 香蕉精品网在线| av在线老鸭窝| 久久久欧美国产精品| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产精品.久久久| 少妇高潮的动态图| 蜜桃在线观看..| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产av国产精品国产| 在线 av 中文字幕| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 熟女电影av网| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久久久久久国产电影| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 一级毛片电影观看| 美女福利国产在线| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产在线视频一区二区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 高清av免费在线| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲国产色片| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲无线观看免费| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产 精品1| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 久久久久国产网址| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| av福利片在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 99久久综合免费| 老司机影院成人| 曰老女人黄片| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 综合色丁香网| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 99久久精品热视频| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 91成人精品电影| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| av线在线观看网站| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 日韩电影二区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| av卡一久久| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久影院123| 亚洲精品第二区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 午夜福利视频精品| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 精品久久久噜噜| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美区成人在线视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| av视频免费观看在线观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产精品免费大片| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 内射极品少妇av片p| av播播在线观看一区| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 大码成人一级视频| 久久久久网色| 久久狼人影院| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 在线观看三级黄色| 五月天丁香电影| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产成人精品无人区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| h日本视频在线播放| 草草在线视频免费看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产av码专区亚洲av| www.色视频.com| 大香蕉97超碰在线| videos熟女内射| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲性久久影院| 一区在线观看完整版| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日本黄大片高清| 多毛熟女@视频| 五月天丁香电影| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 高清不卡的av网站| 超碰97精品在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 嫩草影院入口| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 男女免费视频国产| 国产精品免费大片| 人妻系列 视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 免费av中文字幕在线| 简卡轻食公司| 尾随美女入室| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 嫩草影院入口| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 91久久精品电影网| 伦理电影免费视频| 成人二区视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 777米奇影视久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 黑人高潮一二区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| av一本久久久久| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 日本午夜av视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 男女国产视频网站| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产黄片美女视频| av免费在线看不卡| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 在线看a的网站| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 一区二区av电影网| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 91精品国产九色| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 男女免费视频国产| 免费大片18禁| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 婷婷色综合www| 中文资源天堂在线| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 亚洲三级黄色毛片| av福利片在线| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 91成人精品电影| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放 | av不卡在线播放| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 成人二区视频| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲中文av在线| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 人妻一区二区av| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| av播播在线观看一区| 国产在视频线精品| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 欧美另类一区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 老司机影院成人| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久婷婷青草| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 成人无遮挡网站| 尾随美女入室| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久99精品国语久久久| a 毛片基地| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲综合色惰| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 一级av片app| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产91av在线免费观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 老司机影院成人| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 极品教师在线视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 全区人妻精品视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 老女人水多毛片| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 三级经典国产精品| 久久97久久精品| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 精品亚洲成国产av| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| .国产精品久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| av专区在线播放| 九色成人免费人妻av| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 简卡轻食公司| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| h日本视频在线播放| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| av有码第一页| av卡一久久| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 97超视频在线观看视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产高清三级在线| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 精品久久久久久久久av| av视频免费观看在线观看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产探花极品一区二区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| freevideosex欧美| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| av黄色大香蕉| xxx大片免费视频| 秋霞伦理黄片| 在线观看国产h片| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 久久青草综合色| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久成人av| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久久欧美国产精品| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产精品.久久久| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 一级av片app| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 热re99久久国产66热| av福利片在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 香蕉精品网在线| 亚洲av.av天堂| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 黄色配什么色好看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲久久久国产精品| av在线播放精品| 色网站视频免费| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 三级国产精品片| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 99久久精品一区二区三区|