• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Genome-wide development of interspecific microsatellite markers for Saccharum officinarum and Saccharum spontaneum

    2022-10-21 09:08:32LIULeiWANGHengboLlYihanCHENShuqiWUMingxingDOUMeijieQIYiyinFANGJingpingZHANGJisen
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2022年11期

    LIU Lei ,WANG Heng-bo ,Ll Yi-han, ,CHEN Shu-qi ,WU Ming-xing ,DOU Mei-jie,QI Yi-yin,FANG Jing-ping,ZHANG Ji-sen,

    1 Center for Genomics and Biotechnology/Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Haixia Applied Plant Systems Biology/Key Laboratory of Genetics,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,P.R.China

    2 State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Biological Resources &Guangxi Key Laboratory for Sugarcane Biology,Guangxi University,Nanning 530004,P.R.China

    3 College of Life Sciences,Fujian Normal University,Fuzhou 350007,P.R.China

    Abstract Sugarcane has a large,complex,polyploid genome that has hindered the progress of genomic research and molecular marker-assisted selection. The user-friendly SSR markers have attracted considerable attention owing to their ideal genetic attributes. However,these markers were not characterized and developed at the genome-wide scale due to the previously lacking high-quality chromosome-level assembled sugarcane genomes. In this present study,744 305 and 361 638 candidate SSRs were identified from the genomes of S.officinarum and S.spontaneum,respectively. We verified the reliability of the predicted SSRs by using 1 200 interspecific SSR primer pairs to detect polymorphisms among 11 representative accessions of Saccharum,including S.spontaneum,S.officinarum,S.robustum,and modern sugarcane hybrid. The results showed that 660 SSR markers displayed interspecific polymorphisms among these accessions. Furthermore,100 SSRs were randomly selected to detect the genetic diversity for 39 representative Saccharum accessions. A total of 320 alleles were generated using 100 polymorphic primers,with each marker ranging from two to seven alleles. The genetic diversity analysis revealed that these accessions were distributed in four main groups,including group I (14 S.spontaneum accessions),group II (two S.officinarum accessions),group III (18 modern sugarcane hybrid accessions),and group IV (five S.robustum accessions). Experimental verification supported the reliability of the SSR markers based on genome-wide predictions. The development of a large number of SSR markers based on wet experiments is valuable for genetic studies,including genetic linkage maps,comparative genome analysis,genome-wide association studies,and marker-assisted selection in Saccharum.

    Keywords: Saccharum,genome-wide,simple repeat sequences (SSR),microsatellite,molecular markers

    1.Introduction

    Sugarcane (Saccharumspp.hybrid) taxonomically belongs to the genusSaccharum,which is placed under the Poaceae family of Andropogoneae tribe and is an important commercial worldwide,providing sustainable economic growth and food security for tropical and subtropical regions of the world (Brand-Miller and Barclay 2017). Around 80% of sugar and 50% of alcohol are produced from sugarcane in the world (Waclawovskyet al.2010). TheSaccharumgenus contains six main interbreeding species: the two wild species areS.spontaneum andS.robustum,and the four cultivated species areS.officinarum,S.sinense,S.barberi,andS.edule(Hunsigi 1994). Dutch breeders in Java made the initial inter-specific crosses between noble caneS.officinarum(female) and wild caneS.spontaneum(male),followed by“Nobilization” of the hybrids by repeated backcrossing toS.officinarum. They thus obtained the disease and stress resistance ability ofS.spontaneumwhile recovering the high biomass and high sugar content ofS.officinarum(Brandes and Sartoris 1936). Modern sugarcane cultivars(2n=100-130) are genetically unstable,highly polyploid,heterozygous,and aneuploid with multi-specific origins and giant genome sizes (~10 Gb). They are interspecific hybrids,with 70-80% of the chromosomes derived fromS.officinarum(Souzaet al.2013),10-15%fromS.spontaneum,and the remaining 5-10% from interspecific recombination (D’Hontet al.1996). All commercial sugarcane breeding populations worldwide share a narrow genetic background and high linkage disequilibrium (LD) due to the limited number of original parental lines involved in sugarcane crosses (Arruda 2012). The genetic complexity,narrow genetic base,and huge genome size of sugarcane create many challenges for breeding. Information about the genetic background of wild progenitors of modern sugarcane cultivars is a vital resource for sugarcane improvement.

    In contrast to the labor-intensive and time-consuming procedures of conventional breeding,molecular markers can greatly accelerate the breeding progress by efficiently selecting key agronomic and quality traits. However,sugarcane marker-assisted breeding aimed at further enhancing sugarcane sucrose and biomass production have largely been challenged by the lack of traitassociated makers. For decades molecular markers have had numerous applications allowing important advances in many fields,including cultivar identification (Cordeiroet al.2003),marker-assisted breeding (Panet al.2006),molecular fingerprint (Panget al.2019),genetic population and diversity analysis (Bertaniet al.2021),genetic mapping (Youet al.2019),and the fine mapping and cloning of genes (Wanget al.2017). In sugarcane,various molecular markers are being developed and employed to characterize sugarcane germplasm,including amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) (Besseet al.1998;Aitkenet al.2006),restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) (Cresteet al.2014),random amplification polymorphism DNAs (RAPDs) (Da Silvaet al.2008;Nawazet al.2010;Ramakrishnanet al.2016),simple sequence repeats (SSRs) (Xuet al.1999;Aitkenet al.2005;Caiet al.2005;Andruet al.2011;Nayaket al.2014;Zaweddeet al.2015),inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSRs) (Almeidaet al.2009;Devarumathet al.2012),and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (Yanget al.2018). Among these molecular markers,the userfriendly SSR markers have attracted much attention owing to their ideal genetic attributes (Kantetyet al.2002),such as richness,high-polymorphism levels,multi-allelic nature,and co-dominant inheritance (Amaret al.2011;Baert-Desurmontet al.2016) and enjoyed great success in sugarcane genetic diversity research (Wanget al.2020),genetic mapping (Pan and Liu 2010),and marker-assisted selection (MAS) (Olatoyeet al.2019). Previous studies focused more on the development of expressed sequence tag (EST)-based markers (Oliveiraet al.2007) than genomic ones due to the lack of genomic sequence data.Although EST-SSRs are useful for genetic analysis,they have disadvantages. Specifically,they have relatively low numbers of polymorphisms and high concentrations in gene-rich regions of the genome,which may limit their usage,especially for the construction of linkage maps(Temnykhet al.2000). In addition,considering the high levels of polyploidy in the sugarcane genome,more genomic markers are needed for the advancement in genetics,genomics,and breeding of sugarcane.

    Identifying SSRs from available genome sequences has proved to be a robust,rapid,and widely applicable strategy (Zhanget al.2012;Liu Cet al.2016;Cuiet al.2017). The advances in sequencing technologies have taken a significant leap in the last decade. Next generation sequencing (NGS) and third-generation DNA sequencing technologies have enabled the completion of a rapidly growing number of whole-genome sequencing projects. More and more genome sequence information can be obtained from public databases,promoting the development and application of SSR markers (Baraketet al.2011;Giovanniniet al.2012;Pottset al.2012;Emanuelliet al.2013;Hajmansooret al.2013). Recently,a haploidS.spontaneum,AP85-441,was assembled into 32 pseudo-chromosomes comprising eight homologous groups of four members each (Zhanget al.2018).Moreover,the genome ofS.officinarum,Louisiana Purple(LA-purple),was assembled into 80 pseudo-chromosomes in 10 homologous groups (unpublished data in our lab),which provided an opportunity to screen for SSRs across the sugarcane genomes of wild progenitors more thoroughly and efficiently.

    The present study used the available dataset of sugarcane genome sequences to mine the SSRs throughout sugarcane assembled genomes using bioinformatics methods (Zhanget al.2018). We identified SSR motifs in a genome-wide manner and characterized these SSR motifs. We also attempted to evaluate genetic diversity and population structure among theS.officinarumandS.spontaneumusing SSR markers. This is the first report on genome-wide interspecific SSR identification and interspecific SSR markers development in sugarcane.The inventory of SSR markers proposed in the present study could facilitate sugarcane genetic and breeding studies. Our study provides a large-scale SSR marker dataset forSaccharumthat could be widely applied in cross-breeding identification,basic research for MAS,and interspecific cross-genetic map construction.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Plant materials and DNA extraction

    In the present study,the available sugarcane genomes ofS.officinarum(LA-purple) andS.spontaneum(AP85-441,1n=4x=32) (Zhanget al.2018) were used for SSR identification and validation. Eleven sugarcane elite accessions (1,Badila;2,Black Cheribon;3,Crystalina;4,Loethers;5,LA-purple;6,SES-208;7,FU89-1-1;8,Guangdong21;9,SC79-2011;10,POJ-2878;11,ROC-22) were used for SSR validation. Besides,39 sugarcane accessions,includingS.officinarum(nine accessions),S.spontaneum(14 accessions),S.robustum(five accessions),and modern sugarcane cultivars (11 accessions),were selected for the diversity analysis(Table 1). Total genomic DNA was isolated from fresh leaves by an optimized CTAB method (Yaoet al.2005).The concentration and quality of all DNA samples were determined using the NanoDrop spectrophotometer (ND-1000 version 3.1.1,USA),and all DNA samples were diluted to 25 ng L-1to enable subsequent PCR-basedinvitroamplification.

    Table 1 Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) accessions used in the study1)

    2.2.SSR marker identification and primer development

    The LA-purple genome consists of 80 pseudochromosomes with 10 homologous groups of eight members each (http://sugarcane.zhangjisenlab.cn/sgd/html/download.html). The haploidS.spontaneum,AP85-441,is an assembly of 32 pseudo-chromosomes comprised of eight homologous groups of four members each.

    The genome sequences were used to identify SSR loci using a Perl program MISA,MIcroSAtellite identification tool (Thielet al.2003) available at thewebsite (http://pgrc.ipkgatersleben.de/misa/misa).The SSR loci containing perfect repeat units of 1-6 nucleotides only were considered. The criteria for identifying the minimum repetition time of mono-,di-,tri-,tetra-,penta-and hexa-nucleotide repeats were 10,7,6,5,4,and 4,respectively. Compound microsatellites were defined as those with the interval between two repeats motifs shorter than 100 nt (Wanget al.2015;Denget al.2016;Liu Fet al.2016).

    To find the SSR loci with unique flanking sequences,the BLASTN (Joneset al.2002) search of the genomic sequence was carried out using the repetitive motif and the flanking sequences on both sides of the 150 bp(E-value cut-off of 1e-5) and filtered with 100% identity and 100% alignment length of the flanking sequences.We identified SSR loci with a single hit for marker development. Primer 3 (https://sourceforge.net/projects/primer3/) was used to design PCR primers for all candidate loci to amplify 100-300 bp products with 40-60% GC content. Primer sizes ranged from 18 to 22 bp with an optimum size of 20 bp,and the annealing temperature was set at 60°C.

    The precision of the designed primers was estimated through the electronic PCR (e-PCR) program. The genome sequences ofS.officinarumandS.spontaneumwere used as templates for primers to blast with the following criteria: 100 bp margin,100-400 bp product sizes,and 1 bp mismatch. Primers obtained fromS.officinarumspecies were compared to those obtained fromS.spontaneumspecies andvice versa.Through e-PCR,the size of the PCR product for each pair of primers in each template was scored. If the size and position of PCR products were unique in twoSaccharumspecies,this combination of primers was recognized as the interspecific SSR primers forS.officinarumandS.spontaneum.

    2.3.Experimental validations of SSR markers

    SSR length is an important factor for SSR marker development. According to the length of SSRs,SSRs can be divided into two groups. Class I SSRs (hypervariable markers) are composed of those with ≥20 bp repeats in length,while Class II SSRs (potentially variable markers)contain repeats <20 bp in length (Temnykhet al.2001).Only the Class I SSRs and non-mononucleotides were selected for final genome-wide SSR marker development inSaccharumto improve their utilization efficiency.

    Mononucleotides were filtered due to the difficulty in distinguishing bona fide microsatellites from sequencing or assembly error and because (A/T)n repeats in the coding region may be confused with polyadenylation tracks. SSR markers derived from longer perfect repeats (SSRs≥20 nucleotides in length) have been demonstrated to show high levels of polymorphisms from the experimental data in many organisms such as human (Iwasakiet al.1992)and rice (Choet al.2000).

    To validate the e-PCR results,PCR amplification was performed in a 20-μL PCR volume which was composed of 0.5 μL template DNA (25 ng μL-1),0.5 μL of each primer,10 μL 2×TaqMaster Mix (Boshang Biological,Shanghai,China),and 8.5 μL ddH2O.PCR amplification was completed using the following touchdown program:94°C for 90 s for initial denaturation,then 34 cycles at 94°C (20 s)/59.5°C (20 s)/72°C (30 s),and the last extension step was 72°C for 5 min. The PCR products were identified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.The fragment sizes of the PCR products were examined by identification with the DL50 DNA ladder (TaKaRa,Dalian,China).

    2.4.Cloning and sequencing of PCR products

    PCR products of SSRs that showed amplification in all sugarcane genotypes were excised from the 5% agarose gel through Gel Extraction Kit (OMEGA Bio-Tek,USA),cloned into the TA cloning vector (pEASYTM-T5 Zero,Transgen Biotech,Beijing,China),and sequenced to examine their conservation and cross-species transferability. The final edited sequences belonging to each locus were compared with the respective original SSR sequence using DNAMAN (Lynnon BioSoft,Vaudreuil,Quebec,Canada) for ascertaining the target domain/SSR conservation (Battilanaet al.2009).

    3.Results

    3.1.SSR motif content in the sugarcane genome

    The genome sequences ofS.officinarumandS.spontaneumwere used for searching the SSRs with various types of required repeating motifs,from single nucleotides to hexanucleotides. The results of MISA showed that the assembled genome size ofS.officinarumwas 6 804 994 kb,in which a total of 744 305 microsatellites were identified with an average interval length of 9.14 kb between SSR loci (Table 2);the assembled genome size ofS.spontaneumwas 3 140 615 kb,in which a total of 361 638 microsatellites were identified with an average interval length 8.68 kb for each SSR loci (Table 2). Based on the assembled genomes ofS.officinarumandS.spontaneum,the distribution of the chromosome of microsatellites was investigated.The distribution of each chromosome showed thatmicrosatellite markers are uniformly distributed throughout the genome (Fig.1;Appendices A and B).

    Table 2 Distribution of SSR loci in the genomes of Saccharum officinarum LA-purple and Saccharum spontaneum AP85-441

    Of these SSRs,mono-nucleotide repeats accounted for 55.66 and 58.18%,which were the largest proportion,followed by di-nucleotide (19.67 and 17.91%) and tetra-nucleotide repeats (9.89 and 9.21%) in the twoSaccharumspecies,respectively (Table 2). The distribution of SSR motifs inS.officinarumwas consistent withS.spontaneum. The dominance of dinucleotides was attributed to an overrepresentation of AT/TA motifs. TGT/ACA motifs were dominant in trinucleotide SSRs,and AAAT/TTTA and AAAT/TTAA motifs were dominant in tetra-nucleotide SSRs (Fig.2).The total repeat number of T/A was significantly greater than that of C/G in all of the genome-wide SSRs. There were many types of penta-and hexa-nucleotide SSRs,each with low frequencies,ranging from 4.84 to 13.25%across twoSaccharumspecies genomes (Xuet al.2013). The numbers of mono-,di-,tri-,tetra-,penta-,and hexa-nucleotide,and compound-type motifs are listed in Table 2. The frequencies of SSR motifs with regard to the repeat number were examined (Fig.3).We found that for each motif type,the SSR abundance decreased dramatically with an increased number of repeat units. The most significant rate of decrease was for the hexanucleotide motifs.

    3.2.Polymorphisms of the interspecific SSR markers between S.officinarum and S.spontaneum

    Primers were designed for the candidate SSR loci using Primer3 Software. Amplification primer pairs were designed for 63 414 and 68 214 SSRs inS.officinarumandS.spontaneum,respectively. To test the amplification efficiency,specificity,and polymorphisms of the newly developed SSR primers,the genome sequences ofS.officinarumandS.spontaneumwere used as templates for e-PCR analysis. After SSR detection,a total of 41 725 (65.79%),5 292 (8.35%),3 260 (5.14%),and 13 137 (20.72%) of these primers could generate 1,2,3,>3 loci inS.officinarum,respectively. A total number of 42 888 (62.87%),8 549 (12.53%),6 140 (9.10%),and 10 636 (15.59%) of these primers could generate 1,2,3,>3 loci inS.spontaneum,respectively. The amplification efficiency of these primers was 100%.

    By comparing SSR sequences between the two genomes,a new dataset containing 1 807 SSR markers was established. These SSRs had unique sizes and specific chromosomal positions for PCR products in bothSaccharumgenomes,indicating that they are valuable as genetic markers (Fig.1). The markers are evenly distributed on each chromosome of sugarcane and can be used as representative candidate markers for subsequent experimental analysis. Among these markers,SSRs with di-,tri-,tetra-,penta-,and hexa-nucleotide motifs accounted for 46.21,15.71,5.53,9.07,4.76,and 18.71%,respectively (Fig.4).

    3.3.Development of SSR markers for interspecific identification of Saccharum

    Finally,1 200 SSR markers were selected to check their amplification efficiency in theSaccharumgenus(S.officinarum,S.spontaneum,and sugarcane modern cultivars). We randomly selected 15 pairs of primers from each of the 10 homologous groups ofS.officinarumgenome for PCR amplification. Initially,the effectiveness of these primer pairs was estimated for theSaccharumspecies,includingS.officinarum(five accessions),S.spontaneum(four accessions),and modern sugarcane cultivars (two accessions) (Table 1) using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). A total of 1 152 (96%)SSR markers could amplify at least one band,of which 660 showed interspecific polymorphisms among theSaccharumplant materials (Appendix C). These SSRs were co-dominant markers,and their main bands were clear,stable,and easily distinguished in each accession,while the remaining markers were dominant and displayed a weak band at the expected position (Fig.5-A). One of the reasons might be that the e-PCR would underestimate the complexity of sugarcane and there were more multiple loci amplifications in experimental PCR than e-PCR. The incompleteSaccharumgenome sequences used in this study might be responsible for the underestimation of the genome complexity.

    To evaluate polymorphisms in newly developed SSR markers,100 validated microsatellite markers were amplified in theSaccharumgenus,including 39 accessions: nineS.officinarum,17S.spontaneum,fiveS.robustum,and 11 modern sugarcane cultivars (Table 1;Appendix D). All the markers displayed interspecific polymorphisms in these four sugarcane species (Fig.5-B).The highly successful amplification rate inSaccharumdemonstrated that the newly developed 1 807 microsatellite markers for theSaccharumgenome can be used for species identification and extend the sugarcane marker pool for functional genomics and molecular breeding.

    To determine the effectiveness of the SSR markers,sequence similarities of the PCR products were compared among fourSaccharumspecies. The bands presented in all species were sequenced. All identical sequences of PCR bands had high similarities (85%) acrossS.officinarum,S.spontaneum,S.robustum,and modern sugarcane cultivars. Marker polymorphisms among the four species were mainly caused by the variation in the number of repeats of SSR motifs. Sequence alignment showed that all bands contained the (CCT)n and (TTTA)n repeat motifs. We found that the same primers were consistent in the amplification of different materials,the accession ofS.spontaneumYN-4 were observed to have six CCT,and four CCT were found inS.officinarumNC20. The sizes of the fragments were also different when amplified by the same primer in the same material.InS.hybridcultivar Co419,the two bands were found to have four and six tri-nucleotide repeat motif CAG,respectively (Fig.5-C). These sequence files were analyzed and unequivocally confirmed the cross-species conservation and transferability.

    3.4.Genetic distance-based clustering analysis

    Cluster analysis based on Nei’s genetic similarity coefficient using the UPGMA algorithm is shown in Fig.6.The 39 sugarcane accessions were divided into four groups (I,II,III,and IV) according to the clustering results.The similarity among all the accessions varied from 0.51 to 0.85,with an average value of 0.68. When the genetic similarity coefficient was 0.64,39 sugarcane accessions could be grouped into four clusters. Cluster I comprised 14 accessions,which belonged toS.spontaneum.Cluster II and Cluster III grouped two and 18 accessions,respectively,together belonging toS.officinarumand cultivated sugarcane species. Cluster IV had five genotypes withinS.robustum. The UPGMA dendrogram produced clusters separatingS.spontaneum(Cluster I)andS.officinarum,S.hybrid,andS.robustum(Cluster II,III,and IV) into two distinct groups when the genetic similarity was 0.51. The results were highly consistent with the material source information and further indicated that the newly developed sugarcane SSRs can be used to analyze the genetic diversity of theSaccharumgenus.

    4.Discussion

    Genetic analysis of sugarcane has been hampered because of its complex polyploid genome and lack of sufficiently informative markers. Thus,large numbers of useful polymorphic markers are required for germplasm diversity and analysis of the genetic relationship of sugarcane because of its large genome and complex genetic background. SSRs have increasingly become the marker of choice for these sorts of analyses as they have the advantage of simplicity,high abundance,ubiquity,high level of polymorphisms,stable co-dominance,and multiple-allelismamong genomes (Fraseret al.2004;Chenet al.2006;Hiranoet al.2011). In previous studies,thedenovodevelopment of SSRs was a costly,laborintensive,and time-consuming endeavor due to a lack of genome sequence information (Zaneet al.2010). The increasing availability of genomic sequence data has made it faster and less expensive to characterize and utilize genome-wide SSR markers from many species(Zhanget al.2018). In recent years,considerable progress has been made in sugarcane genomics,including the sequencing ofS.spontaneumAP85-441(Zhanget al.2018) andS.officinarumLA-purple(unpublished data in our lab),which facilitated successful efforts in gene family identification,genetic mapping,population genetic,and genome evolution analysis in sugarcane (Maet al.2020;Liet al.2021;Zhanget al.2021). In this paper,the newly assembled genomes ofS.officinarumandS.spontaneumwere used for largescale genome-wide SSR mining and generated 744 305 and 361 638 candidate SSRs,respectively. The motifs which have more than 7 nt were not considered in this paper because of their small proportion (Xuet al.2017).

    4.1.Frequency and characteristics of SSRs in Saccharum genomes

    In the current study,the average SSR density was one SSR every 9.14 and 8.68 kb inS.officinarumandS.spontaneum. Based on the survey across other plant genomes,on average,one SSR was found every 1.14 kb inArabidopsis(Lawson and Zhang 2006),3.6 kb in rice(Zhanget al.2007),220 kb in sorghum (Iniguez-Luyet al.2008),15.48 kb in maize (Xuet al.2013),220 kb in sorghum (Iniguez-Luyet al.2008),and 578 kb in wheat(Morganteet al.2002). Compared with other plants,we found that theSaccharumspecies with large genome sizes have a moderate SSR frequency,which agreed well with the generally negative correlation between genome sizes and SSR frequencies in plants (Deguchiet al.1996).

    In sugarcane,the most common SSR types were mono-,di-,and tri-nucleotide repeats,which together account for 90% of all SSRs. Mono-,di-,and trinucleotides occupy 63,16,and 11% of the total SSRs inS.officinarumand 62,20,and 8% inS.spontaneum(Table 2),respectively. The frequency of SSRs within certain nucleotide compositions shows species and genome fraction specificity among eukaryotic genomes.The motifs containing A/T were more common than the motifs containing G/C (Table 2). A similar trend has also been observed in other plant genomes such as rice,sorghum,apple,and tobacco (Tonget al.2015;Fuet al.2016) that also exhibit a strong bias to AT-richness in SSR motifs,but this was not the trend inBrachypodium distachyonand maize (Liuet al.2012). AT/TA was the most common repeat unit across sugarcane genomes,representing 56.71% inS.officinarumand 57.92% inS.spontaneum. These results were consistent with the analysis of sorghum,tobacco,and apple,but not other Poaceae plants including wheat (Yuet al.2004),rice(Liuet al.2012),and maize (Duanet al.2006),in which AG motif were the most abundant. The TGT/ACA motif(16.04%) appeared the most frequently in sugarcane genomes. This AT-rich trend was similar toArabidopsis(AAG/TTC) (Lawson and Zhang 2006),tobacco (AAC/TTG) (Limet al.2004),and apple (AAC/GTT) (Heet al.2011) but different from barley,wheat,maize,rice,sorghum,and rye (Choet al.2000;Thielet al.2003;Lvet al.2019;Wanget al.2019),in which CCG/GCC is the most prevalent triplet while ATT/TAA is the least. The strong bias towards AT-rich in motifs especially in 1-3 nucleotide motifs could be attributed to two possible reasons: first,methylated C residue is more easily transformed into T (Levinson and Gutman 1987);second,SSR sites are generated by the high rates of strand slippage during DNA replication (Halsted and Devlin 2001;Andrés and Bogdanowicz 2012),during which time,the SSR motif based on the A-T structure type requires less energy than the G-C type,making the A-T baserich structure type easier to produce than the G-C type.However,with the increased nucleotide repetition motif from 3 to 6,the energy advantage of this hydrogen bond is relatively less.

    4.2.Evaluation of genomic SSR markers in Saccharum species

    SSR markers have been widely used for genetic analysis,high-throughput genotypic and map construction,and breeding in many crop species. Previous studies have used EST-derived markers inSaccharum,but only a limited number of genomic markers have been developed and evaluated (Da Silva 2001;Pintoet al.2004,2006;Aitkenet al.2005;Paridaet al.2009). The limitation of previously developed genomic SSR markers in trait dissection and discovery of candidate genes restricts their use in sugarcane genetic studies and molecular breeding. In this study,a total of 1 200 interspecific genomic SSR primer pairs were designed,and 1 152(96%) primer pairs proved effective. Due to the selfcomplementary requirement for dimer formation,AT/TA was not used to develop markers in our analysis (Wanget al.2011). Among these primers,100 pairs of SSR primers with polymorphisms were used to analyze the SSR polymorphisms among 39 sugarcane materials(Appendix D),and the total number of amplified bands was 313. The genetic similarity indices among the 39 sugarcane germplasms varied between 0.51 and 0.85 with an average of 0.68,which reflects a substantial level of genetic diversity within the differentSaccharumspecies and cultivated varieties that come from diverse geographic locations across the world. The results of clustering analysis showed that the sugarcane accessions of each group were derived from their respective progenitors and shared genetic intimacy with each other. SSR genetic similarity and cluster analysis of this study revealed that the offspring from the same cross combination had higher genetic similarity with each other,and the same series of sugarcane accessions mostly grouped in one cluster. The clustering results based on genetic similarity of SSR among sugarcane germplasms are largely consistent with the material source. For example,F134 (Co290×POJ2878) and Co419 (POJ2878×Co290)from the same parents had very high genetic similarity coefficients,therefore being located in the same cluster.

    However,some results of inheritance similarity and clustering analysis are irreconcilable with the sources of sugarcane materials,which may be closely related to the cross-breeding process of sugarcane or the genetic composition of sugarcane. Sugarcane is an allopolyploid plant with high heterozygosity,and cross-breeding,backcrossing,and self-crossing will lead to high-level separations in offspring,so the offspring from the same cross combination may have a large genetic difference,while the offspring from different combinations may also have a small genetic difference. In addition,genealogical records of some cultivars failed to reflect their genetic relationships due to the phenomenon of self-crossing,powdering,and seed mixing.

    The cluster analysis revealed a distant genetic relationship amongS.spontaneum,S.officinarum,cultivated sugarcane species,andS.robustum. One of the main reasons is the northern India origin of the diversity ofS.spontaneum,where the lowest chromosome number of accessions of this species (2n=40) were found(Zhanget al.2013).Saccharumofficinarumlikely evolved fromS.robustumas they share the same center of origin and diversity in Papua New Guinea (Skinneret al.1987).High genetic similarity between theS.officinarumclones and commercial cultivars indicates a large amount of introgression fromS.officinaruminto modern cultivars(Selviet al.2003;Singhet al.2011;Chandraet al.2013),confirming the consensus that modern sugarcane cultivars are aneuploidy,interspecific hybrids with chromosomes ranging from 2n=100 to 130,comprising 70-80%S.officinarum,10-20%S.spontaneum,and 10% recombinant chromosomes between the two species(Daugroiset al.1996).

    The PCR-based DNA markers facilitate the determination of the genetic variability that occurs among conventional progenitor species and commercial cultivars (Singhet al.2019). The genomic constitution of different plant genetic resources can be accurately and finely evaluated by determining the population structure with different DNA markers (Nachimuthuet al.2015;Singhet al.2017). Based on the advances in genomic resources,SSR markers are preferred to be applied in rapid analysis of the genetic structures of breeding germplasms (Liu Cet al.2016;Singhet al.2019).

    5.Conclusion

    Our study is the first systematic and comprehensive analysis of the SSR markers from the sugarcane genome.We predicted 744 305 and 361 638 candidate SSRs in the genomes ofS.officinarumandS.spontaneum,respectively. Out of 1 200 SSR markers,660 displayed interspecific polymorphisms among the 11 representative accessions,proving the reliability of the examined SSRs.We also used 100 SSRs to detect the genetic diversity for 39 representativeSaccharumaccessions. Our study provides a valuable resource for the genetic analysis of sugarcane.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF1000101-5),the Science and Technology Planting Project of Guangdong Province,China (2019B020238001),the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province,China(2019J05066),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41906096),and the Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture and the State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agrobioresources,China.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Appendicesassociated with this paper are available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产色婷婷99| 级片在线观看| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 天堂动漫精品| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 丰满的人妻完整版| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲片人在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 精品久久久久久,| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 97碰自拍视频| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 免费看光身美女| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日本黄大片高清| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 悠悠久久av| 精品久久久久久,| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 色综合站精品国产| 嫩草影院精品99| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看 | 小说图片视频综合网站| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 宅男免费午夜| a级毛片a级免费在线| 我要搜黄色片| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产精品久久视频播放| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 丁香六月欧美| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 久久久成人免费电影| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 色视频www国产| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲成人久久性| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 色av中文字幕| av黄色大香蕉| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 亚洲内射少妇av| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 老司机福利观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 身体一侧抽搐| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品,欧美在线| 免费大片18禁| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 成人午夜高清在线视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| av国产免费在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 如何舔出高潮| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 看免费av毛片| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 永久网站在线| 午夜a级毛片| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产日本99.免费观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 91av网一区二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 精品久久久久久久末码| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产成人a区在线观看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 精品福利观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 丁香欧美五月| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 悠悠久久av| 日韩欧美三级三区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 熟女电影av网| av国产免费在线观看| 色哟哟·www| www.www免费av| 免费看日本二区| 怎么达到女性高潮| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 波野结衣二区三区在线| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 观看美女的网站| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 看免费av毛片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 三级毛片av免费| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 性欧美人与动物交配| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 在线免费观看的www视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产真实乱freesex| 精品日产1卡2卡| 18+在线观看网站| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 一区福利在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 一本一本综合久久| 高清在线国产一区| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| www日本黄色视频网| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 久久久国产成人精品二区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 我要搜黄色片| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 内射极品少妇av片p| www日本黄色视频网| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 久久国产精品影院| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久6这里有精品| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产在视频线在精品| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 欧美区成人在线视频| 深夜精品福利| 成人av在线播放网站| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 91字幕亚洲| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲国产欧美人成| xxxwww97欧美| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| www日本黄色视频网| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 少妇的逼水好多| av在线观看视频网站免费| 嫩草影院新地址| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产三级黄色录像| 在线看三级毛片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| www.色视频.com| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 搞女人的毛片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 青草久久国产| 少妇的逼水好多| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日本免费a在线| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| av天堂中文字幕网| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产免费男女视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 搞女人的毛片| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 成年版毛片免费区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 少妇高潮的动态图| 床上黄色一级片| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲不卡免费看| 51国产日韩欧美| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 51国产日韩欧美| 一本综合久久免费| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 极品教师在线免费播放| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久精品影院6| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 男女那种视频在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 免费看光身美女| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 午夜精品在线福利| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 免费高清视频大片| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 中文字幕久久专区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| aaaaa片日本免费| 免费av不卡在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 日本与韩国留学比较| 毛片女人毛片| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 91字幕亚洲| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 有码 亚洲区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美色视频一区免费| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 91在线观看av| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 色视频www国产| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 嫩草影院入口| 一本综合久久免费| 天堂√8在线中文| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 色播亚洲综合网| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 久久热精品热| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 丁香欧美五月| 三级毛片av免费| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久久亚洲真实| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 少妇的逼好多水| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| a在线观看视频网站| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 一级黄色大片毛片| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 特级一级黄色大片| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 身体一侧抽搐| 毛片女人毛片| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产在线男女| 久久精品影院6| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 一a级毛片在线观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产免费男女视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 精品久久久久久,| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| www.色视频.com| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 免费看a级黄色片| 很黄的视频免费| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 免费看a级黄色片| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 免费看日本二区| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 在线看三级毛片| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| ponron亚洲| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 在线a可以看的网站| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 美女高潮的动态| 成人三级黄色视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 脱女人内裤的视频| 综合色av麻豆| 搞女人的毛片| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 久久久国产成人免费| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 久久中文看片网| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 在线观看66精品国产| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 波多野结衣高清作品| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲avbb在线观看|