• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparing the effect of xenon and sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative neural injury biomarkers:a randomized controlled trial

    2022-09-10 13:18:16StevenMcGuiganLisbethEveredDavidScottBrendanSilbertHenrikZetterbergKajBlennow
    Medical Gas Research 2022年1期

    Steven McGuigan,Lisbeth Evered,David A.Scott,Brendan Silbert,Henrik Zetterberg,Kaj Blennow

    1 Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine,St.Vincent’s Hospital,Melbourne,Australia

    2 Department of Critical Care,University of Melbourne,Melbourne,Australia

    3 Department of Anesthesiology,Weill Cornell Medicine,New York,NY,USA

    4 Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology,the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg,M?lndal,Sweden

    5 Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory,Sahlgrenska University Hospital,M?lndal,Sweden

    6 Department of Neurodegenerative Disease,UCL Institute of Neurology,London,UK

    7 UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL,London,UK

    Abstract General anesthesia and surgery are associated with an increase in neural injury biomarkers.Elevations of these neural injury biomarkers in the perioperative period are associated with postoperative delirium.Xenon has been shown to be protective against a range of neurological insults in animal models.It remains to be seen if xenon anesthesia is neuroprotective in the perioperative setting in humans.Twenty-four participants scheduled for lithotripsy were randomized to receive either xenon or sevoflurane general anesthesia.There was no statistically significant difference in the concentrations of postoperative neural injury biomarkers between the xenon and sevoflurane group.Following the procedure there was a significant increase in the concentration from baseline of all three biomarkers at 1 hour post-induction with a return to baseline at 5 hours.General anesthesia for lithotripsy was associated with a significant increase at 1 hour post-induction in the neural injury biomarkers total tau,neurofilament light and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181,a marker of tau phosphorylation.The protocol was approved by the St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Ethics Committee (approval No.HREC/18/SVHM/221) on July 20,2018 and was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration No.ACTRN12618000916246) on May 31,2018.

    Key words:biomarkers;inflammation;lithotripsy;neurocognitive disorders;neurofilament;neuroprotection;postoperative delirium;tau;xenon

    INTRODUCTION

    Postoperative neurocognitive disorders are common and related to significant morbidity and mortality.1The role of general anesthesia in the development of postoperative cognitive dysfunction remains controversial.Previous studies have identified a number of potential mechanisms in animal models including neuroapoptosis,2,3enhanced amyloid production,4,5and tau phosphorylation6by which general anesthetic agents may induce cognitive dysfunction.Despite this,there is no evidence that the choice of anesthetic technique,regional,intravenous,or inhalational general anesthesia alters the trajectory of cognitive impairment following surgery.7,8

    The brain biomarkers,total tau (T-tau) protein and neurofilament light (NFL),have been identified as tools to monitor neural injury in neurodegenerative conditions,9,10traumatic brain injury11,12and following cardiac arrest.13Elevations in these markers of neural injury have been identified following anesthesia and surgery14and greater elevations of NFL15and T-tau16postoperatively are associated with postoperative delirium (POD).A recent study has also utilized these markers in a patient cohort that received general anesthesia without surgery in an attempt to distinguish the effects of anesthesia and surgery on neural injury.17

    A novel blood biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)pathophysiology is tau phosphorylated at threonine 181(P-tau181).9P-tau 181 can differentiate mild cognitive impairment from AD and high levels are associated with subsequent development of AD in cognitively normal adults.18Exposure to general anesthetic agents have been associated with elevated P-tau181 in a number of animal studies.19-21Phosphorylated forms of tau protein measured in the blood are also thought to more accurately reflect the abundance of tau in the central nervous system than T-tau.22Whilst P-tau181 is not a direct marker of neural injury,23a perioperative increase in P-tau181 could indicate an alternative mechanism by which general anesthesia can induce cognitive dysfunction.

    In contrast to the other general anesthetic agents,xenon has been identified in animal models to be less neurotoxic2,24and neuroprotective in a number of models of neural injury.25A recent review identified potential benefits of xenon anesthesia such as hemodynamic stability and cytoprotection as being particularly beneficial in the elderly surgical population.26

    There is conflicting evidence of both neurotoxic and neuroprotective effects of sevoflurane on the brain in animal models.In animal models without underlying pathology,sevoflurane is associated with dose-dependent cognitive decline.27However,in hypoxemic brain injured animals it offers neuroprotection.28A recent review of experimental studies concluded that although sevoflurane likely offers neuroprotection against brain injury,it also seems to be neurotoxic in both neonatal and aged animal models.29

    Despite evidence of neuroprotection in animal studies,the ability of xenon as the anesthetic agent to provide improved cognitive outcomes in the perioperative period remains uncertain.Whilst general anesthesia with xenon trended toward a reduction in POD in elderly subjects requiring surgery following femoral neck fractures when compared to sevoflurane,this did not achieve statistical significance.30A pilot study in off-pump cardiac surgery suggested that xenon anesthesia reduced the incidence of POD compared to conventional inhalational anesthesia31;however a larger study from the same group investigating on-pump cardiac surgery showed no difference in POD incidence for xenon anesthesia when compared to the inhalational anesthesia group.32

    The neuroprotective potential of xenon has also been studied in the intensive care setting.Inhaled xenon in conjunction with hypothermia following out of hospital cardiac arrest was associated with improved brain imaging outcomes in a pilot study when compared to hypothermia alone.A larger clinical trial of the utility of xenon in this setting is currently underway.33

    The primary hypothesis of this study was that general anesthesia with xenon for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy would result in reduced neural injury.The secondary hypothesis was that inhalational general anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,with either agent,is associated with neural injury.

    The primary outcome of the study was a comparison of the concentration of postoperative neural injury biomarkers between xenon and sevoflurane anesthetic groups.Secondary outcomes included the change in biomarkers from baseline at 1-,5- and 24-hours post-induction for all participants and comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) before and following anesthesia.A modified Brice questionnaire was performed,and bispectral index (Medtronic,Minneapolis,MN,USA) values were also recorded.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Written informed consent for this randomized single-blind control trial was obtained from all participants.The protocol was approved by the St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Ethics Committee (approval No.HREC/18/SVHM/221) on July 20,2018 and was conducted at a single centre,St.Vincent’s Hospital,Melbourne.The study protocol was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry(registration No.ACTRN12618000916246) on May 31,2018.An analysis of electroencephalograph recordings from the same participants has been reported elsewhere.34

    Study population

    The inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II patients aged 50 years and over scheduled for extra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy.All patients listed for this procedure on the St.Vincent’s Hospital Patient Administration System during the study period were screened for eligibility according to age and location.Those deemed eligible were contacted by a member of the research team by telephone for further screening and a patient information flyer was sent to interested patients.Formal written consent was obtained on the day of admission.This surgical cohort was selected as a sample of relatively healthy adult patients receiving a highly standardized and relatively minor procedure that is usually performed under general anesthesia in our institution.Exclusion criteria were a diagnosed neurocognitive condition,high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence following general anesthesia with xenon has been shown to be greater than with volatile agents),35contraindication to the use of a laryngeal mask airway,severe respiratory disease(unable to tolerate inspired oxygen concentration of 35%)or any contraindication to anesthesia with a volatile agent.Participants were also required to return to the hospital the following day for various assessments and therefore living or staying in proximity to the hospital was also a consideration.Randomization to either the xenon or sevoflurane group was achieved by computer generated random permuted blocks of four (Stata/IC 14.2,Stata Corp.,College Station,TX,USA)provided in sequential opaque sealed envelopes.Although the anesthesiologist was unable to be blinded,the participants and research staff collecting data were unaware of treatment allocation.All data analysis was performed by research staffblinded to the treatment allocation.

    Anesthetic protocol

    All participants received preoxygenation via a circle circuit for 5 minutes prior to induction.A remifentanil (Symbion,Melbourne,Australia) infusion at a dose of 0.1 μg/kg per minute was commenced simultaneously with preoxygenation.Anesthesia was induced with a bolus of propofol 2 mg/kg(Symbion) and an appropriately sized laryngeal mask airway was placed.Additional boluses of propofol could be given at the discretion of the anesthesiologist to facilitate airway placement.

    Anesthesia was maintained with a target end-tidal concentration of 60% xenon (minimum alveolar concentration of xenon is estimated as 63%)36in the xenon group and a target end-tidal concentration of 0.9 of the age adjusted minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane (Symbion) in the sevoflurane group.The inspired oxygen concentration was 35% in both groups.All participants’ lungs were ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and the respiratory rate titrated to achieve normocapnea,as measured by end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring.No participants received neuromuscular blocking agents.

    In the event of hemodynamic changes suggestive of inadequate or excessive anesthesia (change in mean arterial pressure or heart rate >20% from baseline) the remifentanil infusion rate could be titrated accordingly.Titration of the remifentanil rate and additional propofol boluses could also be administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist in response to clinical evidence of inadequate anesthetic depth (e.g.,movement,coughing or laryngospasm).Participants received paracetamol 1 g intravenous intraoperatively for postoperative analgesia and droperidol 625 μg and ondansetron 4 mg at the conclusion of the procedure for anti-emesis.Following recovery of consciousness and removal of the laryngeal mask airway participants were transferred to the post-anesthetic care unit for routine postoperative monitoring and care.

    Medical grade xenon was provided by Coregas Australia(Coregas Pty Ltd.,Thomastown,Australia).Xenon anesthesia was administered using the Akzent X Color (Stephan GmBH,Gackenbach,Germany) anesthetic machine.Xenon gas was delivered via a semi-closed circuit to minimize wastage.Sevoflurane anesthesia was administered using the Draeger Primus anesthesia machine (Draeger Australia Pty.Ltd.,Melbourne,Australia) in a low-flow circle circuit.

    Blood sample collection and analysis

    Venous blood samples were obtained from participants at four time points,immediately prior to induction of anesthesia,1,5,and 24 hours post-induction.A sample at 72 hours postinduction was initially planned but it proved a significant impediment to recruitment,requiring participants to return to the hospital on two separate occasions following their day surgery procedure.As a result,this time point was not included in the study.At each time point,excepting the 24-hour time point,a 4 mL blood sample was taken from the intravenous catheter placed for the anesthetic induction.The 24-hour sample was taken by venipuncture performed by a member of the research team.All samples were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes,stored on ice,and centrifuged within 1 hour at 3345×gfor 10 minutes.Plasma was then aliquoted into 500 μL tubes and rapidly frozen and stored at–80°C.

    At the conclusion of the study,plasma samples were frozen and transported to the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital,M?lndal,Sweden.T-tau and NFL concentrations were measured using commercial Simoa kits,NF-light and Tau 2.0 (Quanterix,Billerica,MA,USA) on an HD-X instrument.Plasma P-tau181 was measured using an in-house Simoa assay developed at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital,as described previously in detail.9Analyses were performed on a Simoa HD-1 instrument (Quanterix,Billerica,MA,USA).

    The values for all three biomarkers are reported in pg/mL.The measurements were performed in one round of experiments using one batch of reagents by board-certified laboratory technicians who were blinded to clinical data.Samples from the same individual were analyzed side-by-side on the same plate to minimize variation.Intra-assay coefficients of variation,monitored using high and low quality control samples at the beginning and end of each plate,were 1.4–8.8%,with the exception of the low P-tau internal control sample that had a coefficients of variation of 17%.

    Cognitive assessment and Brice questionnaire

    All participants underwent a brief 10-minute screening test for mild cognitive impairment and AD,the MoCA.37The MoCA was administered by a blinded member of the research team and it was administered at three timepoints:admission on the morning prior to anesthesia and surgery,5 and 24 hours postinduction of anesthesia.

    Participants planned as day case surgery were discharged 5 hours post-procedure.Participants requiring overnight admission were all discharged the following day.Following discharge participants were contacted by telephone by a member of the research staff and a modified Brice questionnaire38was administered to identify any episode of awareness in the form of recall.

    Sample size calculation

    Previous work published by members of our research team identified that the mean peak percentage increase,from baseline,in T-tau following anesthesia and surgery was 257%.14In a preliminary analysis of postoperative outcomes in the same cohort,the participants who did not develop POD during admission were found to have postoperative tau levels around 30% lower than those who did (unpublished data,mean T-tau 4.2 pg/mL,95% confidence interval 2.4–6 pg/mL,versus 6.4 pg/mL,95% confidence interval 4.9–7.9 pg/mL).Therefore,we based our power calculation on detecting a 30% reduction in the mean peak percentage increase in T-tau for participants in the xenon group when compared to the sevoflurane group.Assuming a power of 80% and an alpha of 0.05,18 participants in total (9 in each group) would be required to detect a reduction of 30% in the magnitude of rise in T-tau as per a mean comparison performed in Stata (Stata/IC 14.2,Stata Corp.,College Station,TX,USA).Allowing for a 25% loss to follow-up we planned to recruit 24 participants.

    Statistical analysis

    Normally distributed data was compared using Student’st-test and are reported as mean and standard deviation.Biomarker data was log transformed and a mixed effects model was fitted to compare the biomarker concentration between groups at each of the three post-operative time points.The model was fitted with three co-variates:anesthetic group,postoperative sampling time point and baseline biomarker value (Model 1).A second mixed effects model was fitted to compare the biomarker concentration of all participants at each postoperative time point to the baseline values (Model 2).This model was fitted with two variables:anesthetic group and sampling time point.Results of both models are reported as exponentiated coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.The exponentiated coefficient describes the estimated ratio of biomarker concentration in the sevoflurane versus the xenon group (Model 1)and the estimated ratio of biomarker concentration at each time point versus baseline values (Model 2).All statistical analysis was performed in Stata (Stata/IC 16.0).

    RESULTS

    A total of 24 participants were recruited for the study between October 2018 and September 2019,12 in each group (Figure 1).One participant allocated to the xenon group received sevoflurane due to a malfunction of the xenon delivery apparatus.The malfunction was identified during testing prior to the participant entering the operating theater.One participant randomized to the sevoflurane group withdrew consent prior to administration of the anesthetic.The results below are based on a per-protocol analysis.Participants in the two groups were comparable with respect to age,height,weight and ASA status (Table 1).

    Figure 1:CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)diagram.

    Table 1:Patient and anesthesia characteristics for xenon and sevoflurane groups

    Patient and anesthesia characteristics

    The duration of anesthetic,from induction until inhalational delivery ceased,total propofol and remifentanil dose and mean bispectral index value during maintenance were comparable between groups (Table 1).The mean time in minutes from cessation of inhalational agent to opening eyes to voice was significantly shorter in the xenon group when compared to the sevoflurane group (P<0.01).

    Comparison of biomarker concentration between groups(Model 1)

    There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the concentration of T-tau protein,P-tau181 or NFL at any of the three postoperative time points,adjusting for baseline(Figure 2 and Table 2).

    Figure 2:Change in biomarkers over time.

    Table 2:Results of mixed effects model comparing the anesthetic groups at each time point adjusting for baseline(Model 1)

    Comparison of postoperative biomarker concentration to baseline (Model 2)

    The baseline concentration of T-tau was 3.0 pg/mL (median,interquartile range 2.0–3.4 pg/mL).The concentration at 1 hour post-induction was estimated to be 2.19;95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62–2.95;P<0.001,times greater than at baseline(Figure 2 and Table 3).The concentration at 5 and 24 hours post-induction was statistically similar to baseline values.

    Table 3:Results of mixed effects model comparing the concentration of biomarker at each timepoint for all participants to baseline values (Model 2)

    The baseline concentration of P-tau181 was 5.8 pg/mL(median,interquartile range 1.9–17.0 pg/mL).The concentration at 1 hour post-induction was estimated to be 3.01;95%CI 1.87–4.85;P<0.001,times greater than at baseline.The concentration at 24 hours post-induction was estimated to be significantly lower than at baseline with an estimated ratio of 0.59;95% CI 0.36–0.96;P=0.036.There was no statistically significant difference between baseline and 5-hour values.

    The baseline concentration of NFL was 14.0 pg/mL (median,interquartile range 11.2–21.3 pg/mL).The concentration at 1 hour post-induction was estimated to be be 1.10;95%CI 1.00–1.21;P=0.048,times greater than at baseline.The concentration at 5 and 24 hours post-induction was not significantly different from baseline.

    Cognitive assessment and Brice questionnaire

    Two participants in the sevoflurane group could not be contacted to administer the Brice questionnaire.All other participants completed the questionnaire.No participants in the xenon or sevoflurane group reported either memories or dreams between induction and emergence from anesthesia.

    DISCUSSION

    There was no statistically significant difference in participant MoCA scores between groups at baseline,5 or 24 hours postinduction (Table 4).

    Table 4:Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores for each anesthetic group

    In the present study,there was no statistically significant differ-ence in the concentrations of the neural injury biomarkers T-tau and NFL in participants who received xenon or sevoflurane anesthesia within 24 hours post-induction.There was also no difference between groups in the concentration of P-tau181 within 24 hours post-induction.We did find that there was a statistically significant increase in the concentration of all three biomarkers following anesthesia at 1 hour post-induction when compared to baseline.

    Whilst we are unaware of any previous studies that have compared the impact of different general anesthetic agents on the release of the neural injury biomarkers T-tau and NFL,previous studies have investigated changes in these biomarkers following anesthesia and surgery.14-17To the authors’ knowledge,no previous study has investigated the perioperative changes in P-tau181,a marker of tau phosphorylation.

    An increase in plasma levels of both T-tau and NFL was observed in a study of 30 participants aged 60 years and older who received either inhalational or intravenous general anesthesia.The majority of participants underwent orthopedic surgery,while six patients underwent cardiac surgery.14An increase in T-tau was identified 1 hour following surgical incision.However,in contrast to the present study,the plasma level of tau continued to rise beyond 1 hour and peaked at the next sampling time point,6 hours post-incision.

    This earlier study also identified a significant increase in NFL following anesthesia and surgery with a mean peak increase 67% above baseline.The authors found that NFL values were trending upward at the final sampling time point,48 hours postincision.In keeping with this,Casey and colleagues study of non-cardiac surgery showed that NFL continues to rise up to 4 days postoperatively.15Whilst a small but statistically significant increase in NFL was detected at 1 hour post-induction in our own study,the concentration at 5 and 24 hours postinduction was similar to baseline.It may be that our failure to identify an increase in T-tau or NFL at the 5- and 24-hour time points was due to a comparatively reduced surgical and anesthetic insult.

    Another recent study utilized a participant cohort who received anesthesia in the absence of surgery in an attempt to distinguish between the effects of anesthesia and surgery on neural biomarker release.17In this study 59 participants received a 2-hour inhalational anesthetic for an imaging procedure with no surgical stimulus.The authors reported that there was a decrease in three neural biomarkers,T-tau,NFL and glial fibrillary acid protein,5 hours following anesthesia induction.This was the only post-induction time point measured.The authors concluded that increases in neural biomarkers found in other studies are likely related to the surgical insult rather than exposure to inhalational anesthetic agents.

    Our own findings suggest that such a conclusion may be an oversimplification.In the present study,all three biomarkers measured at 5 hours post-induction were not significantly different from baseline,the peak having occurred earlier at 1 hour.Due to the single 5-hour post-induction measurement reported by the previous authors,it remains unclear if anesthesia without surgery would have produced an increase in biomarkers if measured earlier.Our study suggests that a relatively brief anesthetic for a minor interventional procedure,without a skin incision,does result in a significant increase in neural biomarkers.

    The study of Casey and colleagues showed that the rise in NFL following a major non-cardiac surgery was greater in participants who developed POD in comparison to those who did not.15A further analysis of the same cohort indicated that elevated postoperative T-tau was also associated with POD.16In this second analysis,recovery from delirium was associated with return of T-tau to baseline values whilst NFL continued to rise until day 4 postoperatively.The authors concluded that whilst NFL is likely a marker of neuronal injury,tau protein may indicate more subtle changes in the central nervous system.The authors suggested that elevated tau protein could indicate synaptic pruning of tau containing synpases.16The significantly greater increase in T-tau as compared to NFL in our own study supports the hypothesis that the presence of tau and NFL in blood plasma could reflect different processes.

    This study is the first to consider the effect of anesthesia and surgery on plasma levels of P-tau181,a novel biomarker of AD pathology.9Anesthetic agents,both inhalational and intravenous,have been shown to induce tau phosphorylation39and neurons have been shown to metabolize and secrete these phosphorylated forms of tau differently to non-phosphorylated forms.40The significant increase in P-tau181 postoperatively,a biomarker highly correlated with AD pathology,raises the possibility that perioperative neurocognitive disorders and AD may share pathophysiological mechanisms.

    Anesthesia and surgery are associated with the translocation of larger molecules across the blood brain barrier than are permitted in normal physiological circumstances.41,42It may be that the rise in neural biomarkers in the early postoperative period is a result of translocation from the central nervous system to the periphery rather than an absolute increase in their abundance.The elevation in biomarkers,which was evident within one hour of induction,in our study is not inconsistent with a translocation hypothesis.

    In this study,we utilized a surgical cohort that received a highly standardized and relatively minor surgical insult.In this way we anticipated that the contribution of the surgery to the inflammatory and biomarker response would be homogenous,allowing us to attribute any difference in response to the anesthetic.The combined stimulus of the anesthetic and surgery was sufficient to generate a neural biomarker response,and the mean peak increase in tau was in keeping with an earlier study.14

    The primary finding of this study is that the use of xenon rather than sevoflurane for general anesthesia did not influence the postoperative release of neural injury biomarkers.Xenon is a potent inhibitor of the N-methyl-D-aspartate(NMDA) receptor whilst sevoflurane,which strongly potentiates γ-aminobutyric acid-A receptors,has little activity at the NMDA receptor.43Overactivation of the NMDA receptor can occur following acute insults such as stroke,cardiac arrest and traumatic brain injury33as well as in chronic neurodegenerative diseases such as AD.44Xenon is thought to provide neuroprotection through NMDA antagonism and it lacks the intrinsic neurotoxic properties of other NMDA antagonists such as ketamine.33

    An alternative mechanism for the reduction in postoperative complications with xenon anesthesia is an improvement in end-organ perfusion due to greater hemodynamic stability.26,33Participants in the xenon group in our study maintained a mean arterial pressure significantly closer to their baseline and received significantly less ephedrine than those in the sevoflurane group (Table 1).Despite this,the release in neural biomarkers was similar in both groups.This would suggest that in the setting of a minor procedure,the greater hemodynamic stability achieved with xenon does not contribute to a reduction in neural injury biomarker release.

    Xenon has a mechanistic basis for superior neuroprotection and animal studies have identified neuroprotection in response to a wide variety of insults.25There are also encouraging findings from a pilot study of xenon versus hypothermia alone following out of hospital cardiac arrest.33Despite this,xenon as an anesthetic agent has not shown an ability to improve postoperative cognitive outcomes.30,32In keeping with this we found no difference in MoCA scores between anesthetic groups at each postoperative time point.

    It may be that the mechanisms of neurological injury related to anesthesia and surgery are different to those related to hypoxic-ischemic injury in which the preclinical evidence for xenon neuroprotection is strongest.25Our own findings suggest that one proposed mechanism underlying xenon neuroprotection in the perioperative setting,namely reduced neuronal cell death,is not reflected in reduced neural injury biomarkers in the perioperative period.

    There are several limitations with this study.Given the use of a relatively novel anesthetic agent,it was deemed inappropriate to recruit high-risk (ASA III and IV) patients and the inclusion criteria allowed for patients as young as 50 years old.The relatively low incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction amongst this patient group limited the ability to identify differences in clinical outcomes between the groups.Postoperative assessment of cognitive function was limited to the MoCA,a tool primarily utilized for the detection of mild cognitive impairment.The power calculation was based on biomarker results from a previous study involving a greater

    duration of anesthesia and a more invasive surgical procedure.14Despite this,there was a similar mean peak increase in tau protein (257%vs.235%) in the two studies.However,this increase was not sustained beyond 1 hour in our study and the rise in NFL observed in our cohort was lower than that described in the previous study.

    In conclusion,we identified that there was no difference in the measurements of neural injury biomarkers between participants receiving either xenon or sevoflurane anesthesia following a minor,non-invasive interventional procedure.There was,however,a significant increase in T-tau,P-tau181 and NFL at 1 hour post-anesthesia induction which then returned to baseline.General anesthesia in conjunction with a minor procedure was associated with significant early increases in plasma levels of neural injury biomarkers.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Dr.Roman Kluger,St.Vincent’s Hospital,Melbourne and Cameron Patrick,University of Melbourne for their assistance with statistical analysis;Babak Shoghi,Biomedical Engineering,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for his support and expertise in managing the xenon delivery apparatus;Petrea Corcoran,Anesthetic Research Nurse,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for her assistance in data collection and as a valuable liaison with participants;Erika Fortunato,Clinical Research Assistant,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for her assistance in data management,data collection and general enthusiasm for the process;Dr.Alex Bolger,MBBS,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne,Anesthesia resident for her assistance in data collection and participant liaison;Sharon Keys,Lithotripsy coordinator,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for her invaluable assistance in participant recruitment;Mark Salvatore,Lithotripsy Radiographer and Mark Pemberton-Webb,Lithotripsy Technician,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for their patience and professionalism.

    Author contributions

    Study conception,data analysis and manuscript writing:SM;study design:SM,LE,BS,DS;laboratory analysis:HZ,KB;data collection:LE,BS;manuscript review:LE,BS,DS,HZ,KB.All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Conflicts of interest

    HZ has served at scientific advisory boards for Alector,Denali,Roche Diagnostics,Wave,Samumed,Siemens Healthineers,Pinteon Therapeutics and CogRx,has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Cellectricon,Fujirebio,Alzecure and Biogen,and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS),which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program.KB has served as a consultant,at advisory boards,or at data monitoring committees for Abcam,Axon,Biogen,JOMDD/Shimadzu.Julius Clinical,Lilly,MagQu,Novartis,Roche Diagnostics,and Siemens Healthineers,and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS),which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program.The other authors (SM,LE,DS,BS) declare no competing interests.

    Financial support

    This study was supported in part by grants from the ANZCA Research Foundation,Australian and New Zealand College of Anesthetists[N20/009,AMEARA/19].

    Institutional review board statement

    The protocol was approved by the St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Ethics Committee (approval No.HREC/18/SVHM/221) on July 20,2018 and was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration No.ACTRN12618000916246) on May 31,2018.

    Declaration of patient consent

    The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms.In the form the patients have consented to their clinical information being reported in an academic journal.The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published,and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity,but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

    Reporting statement

    This study follows the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials(CONSORT) statement for protocol reporting.

    Biostatistics statement

    The statistical methods of this study were reviewed by Cameron Patrick,Statistical Consultant of The University of Melbourne,Australia.

    Copyright transfer agreement

    The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

    Data sharing statement

    Individual participant data that underlie these results can be shared following deidentification.The study protocol will also be made available on request.Data will be available from 9 months until 36 months after publication.Data can be shared with investigations whose proposed use has been approved by an independent review committee and after approval by the Research Governance Unit of St.Vincent’s Hospital,Melbourne.Proposals should be directed to steven.mcguigan@svha.org.au.To gain access data requestors will need to sign a data transfer agreement.

    Plagiarism check

    Checked twice by iThenticate.

    Peer review

    Externally peer reviewed.

    Open access statement

    This is an open access journal,and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License,which allows others to remix,tweak,and build upon the work non-commercially,as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

    久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 在线观看一区二区三区| 18+在线观看网站| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| bbb黄色大片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 免费av不卡在线播放| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 一级黄片播放器| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美色视频一区免费| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲 国产 在线| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 精品久久久久久成人av| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 99国产综合亚洲精品| av欧美777| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 精品电影一区二区在线| 两个人的视频大全免费| 免费看光身美女| 久久久久久久久中文| 丁香六月欧美| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 在线看三级毛片| 国产免费男女视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 欧美日韩乱码在线| 床上黄色一级片| 丰满的人妻完整版| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产成人系列免费观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久国产精品影院| 波野结衣二区三区在线 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日本成人三级电影网站| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 午夜视频国产福利| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| av欧美777| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 热99在线观看视频| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 九九在线视频观看精品| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 制服人妻中文乱码| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 在线播放国产精品三级| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产日本99.免费观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产真实乱freesex| 51国产日韩欧美| 99热6这里只有精品| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲激情在线av| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 乱人视频在线观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| xxxwww97欧美| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| xxx96com| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| av在线蜜桃| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 97碰自拍视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲片人在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| a在线观看视频网站| 久久久久九九精品影院| 热99re8久久精品国产| 内地一区二区视频在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 日日夜夜操网爽| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 精品人妻1区二区| 色在线成人网| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 搡老岳熟女国产| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产精品 国内视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 91在线观看av| 国产老妇女一区| 国产三级中文精品| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 免费大片18禁| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲精品在线美女| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 91麻豆av在线| 在线观看日韩欧美| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 国产高清三级在线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产综合懂色| 欧美+日韩+精品| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 精品国产三级普通话版| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 观看免费一级毛片| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 一夜夜www| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产乱人视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 欧美区成人在线视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲五月天丁香| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 我要搜黄色片| 性色avwww在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产真实乱freesex| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 日本与韩国留学比较| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 18+在线观看网站| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品一及| 香蕉丝袜av| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 一进一出抽搐动态| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 欧美成人a在线观看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 在线免费观看的www视频| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 丁香欧美五月| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久 | 亚洲不卡免费看| 18+在线观看网站| 日本五十路高清| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 热99在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 日韩高清综合在线| 级片在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 99久国产av精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 成人欧美大片| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 久9热在线精品视频| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产成人a区在线观看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 久久精品影院6| 中国美女看黄片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 级片在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久久成人免费电影| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 日本一本二区三区精品| 黄色日韩在线| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 1024手机看黄色片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| www国产在线视频色| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 嫩草影视91久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产成人av教育| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产探花极品一区二区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久久久国内视频| 窝窝影院91人妻| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 嫩草影院入口| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 香蕉av资源在线| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 变态另类丝袜制服| bbb黄色大片| 免费av观看视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 成人三级黄色视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产成人福利小说| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产三级中文精品| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 美女免费视频网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产在视频线在精品| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 免费看十八禁软件| 在线国产一区二区在线| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 很黄的视频免费| 少妇高潮的动态图| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产高清videossex| 精品久久久久久,| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲无线观看免费| www.999成人在线观看| www国产在线视频色| 无限看片的www在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 久久草成人影院| av在线蜜桃| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 午夜福利高清视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 成人精品一区二区免费| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 久久人妻av系列| 91av网一区二区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 香蕉丝袜av| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久 | 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久久久久久大av| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲无线在线观看| xxx96com| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 免费看日本二区| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久性视频一级片| 精品福利观看| 亚洲av熟女| netflix在线观看网站| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 成人18禁在线播放| 欧美bdsm另类| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 久久精品人妻少妇| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 最好的美女福利视频网| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久久色成人| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 久久久久国内视频| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲无线观看免费| www.999成人在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 日本 欧美在线| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久性视频一级片| 久久国产精品影院| 国产精品久久视频播放| 波野结衣二区三区在线 | 禁无遮挡网站| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 毛片女人毛片| 全区人妻精品视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日本a在线网址| 少妇高潮的动态图| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 亚洲成人久久性| 女警被强在线播放| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 嫩草影院入口| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 在线国产一区二区在线| 长腿黑丝高跟| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| xxx96com| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲无线观看免费| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 69人妻影院| 国产熟女xx| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 小说图片视频综合网站| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 黄色成人免费大全| 精品欧美国产一区二区三|