• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparing the effect of xenon and sevoflurane anesthesia on postoperative neural injury biomarkers:a randomized controlled trial

    2022-09-10 13:18:16StevenMcGuiganLisbethEveredDavidScottBrendanSilbertHenrikZetterbergKajBlennow
    Medical Gas Research 2022年1期

    Steven McGuigan,Lisbeth Evered,David A.Scott,Brendan Silbert,Henrik Zetterberg,Kaj Blennow

    1 Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine,St.Vincent’s Hospital,Melbourne,Australia

    2 Department of Critical Care,University of Melbourne,Melbourne,Australia

    3 Department of Anesthesiology,Weill Cornell Medicine,New York,NY,USA

    4 Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology,the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg,M?lndal,Sweden

    5 Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory,Sahlgrenska University Hospital,M?lndal,Sweden

    6 Department of Neurodegenerative Disease,UCL Institute of Neurology,London,UK

    7 UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL,London,UK

    Abstract General anesthesia and surgery are associated with an increase in neural injury biomarkers.Elevations of these neural injury biomarkers in the perioperative period are associated with postoperative delirium.Xenon has been shown to be protective against a range of neurological insults in animal models.It remains to be seen if xenon anesthesia is neuroprotective in the perioperative setting in humans.Twenty-four participants scheduled for lithotripsy were randomized to receive either xenon or sevoflurane general anesthesia.There was no statistically significant difference in the concentrations of postoperative neural injury biomarkers between the xenon and sevoflurane group.Following the procedure there was a significant increase in the concentration from baseline of all three biomarkers at 1 hour post-induction with a return to baseline at 5 hours.General anesthesia for lithotripsy was associated with a significant increase at 1 hour post-induction in the neural injury biomarkers total tau,neurofilament light and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181,a marker of tau phosphorylation.The protocol was approved by the St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Ethics Committee (approval No.HREC/18/SVHM/221) on July 20,2018 and was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration No.ACTRN12618000916246) on May 31,2018.

    Key words:biomarkers;inflammation;lithotripsy;neurocognitive disorders;neurofilament;neuroprotection;postoperative delirium;tau;xenon

    INTRODUCTION

    Postoperative neurocognitive disorders are common and related to significant morbidity and mortality.1The role of general anesthesia in the development of postoperative cognitive dysfunction remains controversial.Previous studies have identified a number of potential mechanisms in animal models including neuroapoptosis,2,3enhanced amyloid production,4,5and tau phosphorylation6by which general anesthetic agents may induce cognitive dysfunction.Despite this,there is no evidence that the choice of anesthetic technique,regional,intravenous,or inhalational general anesthesia alters the trajectory of cognitive impairment following surgery.7,8

    The brain biomarkers,total tau (T-tau) protein and neurofilament light (NFL),have been identified as tools to monitor neural injury in neurodegenerative conditions,9,10traumatic brain injury11,12and following cardiac arrest.13Elevations in these markers of neural injury have been identified following anesthesia and surgery14and greater elevations of NFL15and T-tau16postoperatively are associated with postoperative delirium (POD).A recent study has also utilized these markers in a patient cohort that received general anesthesia without surgery in an attempt to distinguish the effects of anesthesia and surgery on neural injury.17

    A novel blood biomarker of Alzheimer’s disease (AD)pathophysiology is tau phosphorylated at threonine 181(P-tau181).9P-tau 181 can differentiate mild cognitive impairment from AD and high levels are associated with subsequent development of AD in cognitively normal adults.18Exposure to general anesthetic agents have been associated with elevated P-tau181 in a number of animal studies.19-21Phosphorylated forms of tau protein measured in the blood are also thought to more accurately reflect the abundance of tau in the central nervous system than T-tau.22Whilst P-tau181 is not a direct marker of neural injury,23a perioperative increase in P-tau181 could indicate an alternative mechanism by which general anesthesia can induce cognitive dysfunction.

    In contrast to the other general anesthetic agents,xenon has been identified in animal models to be less neurotoxic2,24and neuroprotective in a number of models of neural injury.25A recent review identified potential benefits of xenon anesthesia such as hemodynamic stability and cytoprotection as being particularly beneficial in the elderly surgical population.26

    There is conflicting evidence of both neurotoxic and neuroprotective effects of sevoflurane on the brain in animal models.In animal models without underlying pathology,sevoflurane is associated with dose-dependent cognitive decline.27However,in hypoxemic brain injured animals it offers neuroprotection.28A recent review of experimental studies concluded that although sevoflurane likely offers neuroprotection against brain injury,it also seems to be neurotoxic in both neonatal and aged animal models.29

    Despite evidence of neuroprotection in animal studies,the ability of xenon as the anesthetic agent to provide improved cognitive outcomes in the perioperative period remains uncertain.Whilst general anesthesia with xenon trended toward a reduction in POD in elderly subjects requiring surgery following femoral neck fractures when compared to sevoflurane,this did not achieve statistical significance.30A pilot study in off-pump cardiac surgery suggested that xenon anesthesia reduced the incidence of POD compared to conventional inhalational anesthesia31;however a larger study from the same group investigating on-pump cardiac surgery showed no difference in POD incidence for xenon anesthesia when compared to the inhalational anesthesia group.32

    The neuroprotective potential of xenon has also been studied in the intensive care setting.Inhaled xenon in conjunction with hypothermia following out of hospital cardiac arrest was associated with improved brain imaging outcomes in a pilot study when compared to hypothermia alone.A larger clinical trial of the utility of xenon in this setting is currently underway.33

    The primary hypothesis of this study was that general anesthesia with xenon for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy would result in reduced neural injury.The secondary hypothesis was that inhalational general anesthesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy,with either agent,is associated with neural injury.

    The primary outcome of the study was a comparison of the concentration of postoperative neural injury biomarkers between xenon and sevoflurane anesthetic groups.Secondary outcomes included the change in biomarkers from baseline at 1-,5- and 24-hours post-induction for all participants and comparison of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA) before and following anesthesia.A modified Brice questionnaire was performed,and bispectral index (Medtronic,Minneapolis,MN,USA) values were also recorded.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Written informed consent for this randomized single-blind control trial was obtained from all participants.The protocol was approved by the St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Ethics Committee (approval No.HREC/18/SVHM/221) on July 20,2018 and was conducted at a single centre,St.Vincent’s Hospital,Melbourne.The study protocol was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry(registration No.ACTRN12618000916246) on May 31,2018.An analysis of electroencephalograph recordings from the same participants has been reported elsewhere.34

    Study population

    The inclusion criteria were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class I and II patients aged 50 years and over scheduled for extra-corporeal shockwave lithotripsy.All patients listed for this procedure on the St.Vincent’s Hospital Patient Administration System during the study period were screened for eligibility according to age and location.Those deemed eligible were contacted by a member of the research team by telephone for further screening and a patient information flyer was sent to interested patients.Formal written consent was obtained on the day of admission.This surgical cohort was selected as a sample of relatively healthy adult patients receiving a highly standardized and relatively minor procedure that is usually performed under general anesthesia in our institution.Exclusion criteria were a diagnosed neurocognitive condition,high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (postoperative nausea and vomiting incidence following general anesthesia with xenon has been shown to be greater than with volatile agents),35contraindication to the use of a laryngeal mask airway,severe respiratory disease(unable to tolerate inspired oxygen concentration of 35%)or any contraindication to anesthesia with a volatile agent.Participants were also required to return to the hospital the following day for various assessments and therefore living or staying in proximity to the hospital was also a consideration.Randomization to either the xenon or sevoflurane group was achieved by computer generated random permuted blocks of four (Stata/IC 14.2,Stata Corp.,College Station,TX,USA)provided in sequential opaque sealed envelopes.Although the anesthesiologist was unable to be blinded,the participants and research staff collecting data were unaware of treatment allocation.All data analysis was performed by research staffblinded to the treatment allocation.

    Anesthetic protocol

    All participants received preoxygenation via a circle circuit for 5 minutes prior to induction.A remifentanil (Symbion,Melbourne,Australia) infusion at a dose of 0.1 μg/kg per minute was commenced simultaneously with preoxygenation.Anesthesia was induced with a bolus of propofol 2 mg/kg(Symbion) and an appropriately sized laryngeal mask airway was placed.Additional boluses of propofol could be given at the discretion of the anesthesiologist to facilitate airway placement.

    Anesthesia was maintained with a target end-tidal concentration of 60% xenon (minimum alveolar concentration of xenon is estimated as 63%)36in the xenon group and a target end-tidal concentration of 0.9 of the age adjusted minimum alveolar concentration of sevoflurane (Symbion) in the sevoflurane group.The inspired oxygen concentration was 35% in both groups.All participants’ lungs were ventilated with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg and the respiratory rate titrated to achieve normocapnea,as measured by end-tidal carbon dioxide monitoring.No participants received neuromuscular blocking agents.

    In the event of hemodynamic changes suggestive of inadequate or excessive anesthesia (change in mean arterial pressure or heart rate >20% from baseline) the remifentanil infusion rate could be titrated accordingly.Titration of the remifentanil rate and additional propofol boluses could also be administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist in response to clinical evidence of inadequate anesthetic depth (e.g.,movement,coughing or laryngospasm).Participants received paracetamol 1 g intravenous intraoperatively for postoperative analgesia and droperidol 625 μg and ondansetron 4 mg at the conclusion of the procedure for anti-emesis.Following recovery of consciousness and removal of the laryngeal mask airway participants were transferred to the post-anesthetic care unit for routine postoperative monitoring and care.

    Medical grade xenon was provided by Coregas Australia(Coregas Pty Ltd.,Thomastown,Australia).Xenon anesthesia was administered using the Akzent X Color (Stephan GmBH,Gackenbach,Germany) anesthetic machine.Xenon gas was delivered via a semi-closed circuit to minimize wastage.Sevoflurane anesthesia was administered using the Draeger Primus anesthesia machine (Draeger Australia Pty.Ltd.,Melbourne,Australia) in a low-flow circle circuit.

    Blood sample collection and analysis

    Venous blood samples were obtained from participants at four time points,immediately prior to induction of anesthesia,1,5,and 24 hours post-induction.A sample at 72 hours postinduction was initially planned but it proved a significant impediment to recruitment,requiring participants to return to the hospital on two separate occasions following their day surgery procedure.As a result,this time point was not included in the study.At each time point,excepting the 24-hour time point,a 4 mL blood sample was taken from the intravenous catheter placed for the anesthetic induction.The 24-hour sample was taken by venipuncture performed by a member of the research team.All samples were collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes,stored on ice,and centrifuged within 1 hour at 3345×gfor 10 minutes.Plasma was then aliquoted into 500 μL tubes and rapidly frozen and stored at–80°C.

    At the conclusion of the study,plasma samples were frozen and transported to the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital,M?lndal,Sweden.T-tau and NFL concentrations were measured using commercial Simoa kits,NF-light and Tau 2.0 (Quanterix,Billerica,MA,USA) on an HD-X instrument.Plasma P-tau181 was measured using an in-house Simoa assay developed at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital,as described previously in detail.9Analyses were performed on a Simoa HD-1 instrument (Quanterix,Billerica,MA,USA).

    The values for all three biomarkers are reported in pg/mL.The measurements were performed in one round of experiments using one batch of reagents by board-certified laboratory technicians who were blinded to clinical data.Samples from the same individual were analyzed side-by-side on the same plate to minimize variation.Intra-assay coefficients of variation,monitored using high and low quality control samples at the beginning and end of each plate,were 1.4–8.8%,with the exception of the low P-tau internal control sample that had a coefficients of variation of 17%.

    Cognitive assessment and Brice questionnaire

    All participants underwent a brief 10-minute screening test for mild cognitive impairment and AD,the MoCA.37The MoCA was administered by a blinded member of the research team and it was administered at three timepoints:admission on the morning prior to anesthesia and surgery,5 and 24 hours postinduction of anesthesia.

    Participants planned as day case surgery were discharged 5 hours post-procedure.Participants requiring overnight admission were all discharged the following day.Following discharge participants were contacted by telephone by a member of the research staff and a modified Brice questionnaire38was administered to identify any episode of awareness in the form of recall.

    Sample size calculation

    Previous work published by members of our research team identified that the mean peak percentage increase,from baseline,in T-tau following anesthesia and surgery was 257%.14In a preliminary analysis of postoperative outcomes in the same cohort,the participants who did not develop POD during admission were found to have postoperative tau levels around 30% lower than those who did (unpublished data,mean T-tau 4.2 pg/mL,95% confidence interval 2.4–6 pg/mL,versus 6.4 pg/mL,95% confidence interval 4.9–7.9 pg/mL).Therefore,we based our power calculation on detecting a 30% reduction in the mean peak percentage increase in T-tau for participants in the xenon group when compared to the sevoflurane group.Assuming a power of 80% and an alpha of 0.05,18 participants in total (9 in each group) would be required to detect a reduction of 30% in the magnitude of rise in T-tau as per a mean comparison performed in Stata (Stata/IC 14.2,Stata Corp.,College Station,TX,USA).Allowing for a 25% loss to follow-up we planned to recruit 24 participants.

    Statistical analysis

    Normally distributed data was compared using Student’st-test and are reported as mean and standard deviation.Biomarker data was log transformed and a mixed effects model was fitted to compare the biomarker concentration between groups at each of the three post-operative time points.The model was fitted with three co-variates:anesthetic group,postoperative sampling time point and baseline biomarker value (Model 1).A second mixed effects model was fitted to compare the biomarker concentration of all participants at each postoperative time point to the baseline values (Model 2).This model was fitted with two variables:anesthetic group and sampling time point.Results of both models are reported as exponentiated coefficients and 95% confidence intervals.The exponentiated coefficient describes the estimated ratio of biomarker concentration in the sevoflurane versus the xenon group (Model 1)and the estimated ratio of biomarker concentration at each time point versus baseline values (Model 2).All statistical analysis was performed in Stata (Stata/IC 16.0).

    RESULTS

    A total of 24 participants were recruited for the study between October 2018 and September 2019,12 in each group (Figure 1).One participant allocated to the xenon group received sevoflurane due to a malfunction of the xenon delivery apparatus.The malfunction was identified during testing prior to the participant entering the operating theater.One participant randomized to the sevoflurane group withdrew consent prior to administration of the anesthetic.The results below are based on a per-protocol analysis.Participants in the two groups were comparable with respect to age,height,weight and ASA status (Table 1).

    Figure 1:CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT)diagram.

    Table 1:Patient and anesthesia characteristics for xenon and sevoflurane groups

    Patient and anesthesia characteristics

    The duration of anesthetic,from induction until inhalational delivery ceased,total propofol and remifentanil dose and mean bispectral index value during maintenance were comparable between groups (Table 1).The mean time in minutes from cessation of inhalational agent to opening eyes to voice was significantly shorter in the xenon group when compared to the sevoflurane group (P<0.01).

    Comparison of biomarker concentration between groups(Model 1)

    There was no statistically significant difference between groups in the concentration of T-tau protein,P-tau181 or NFL at any of the three postoperative time points,adjusting for baseline(Figure 2 and Table 2).

    Figure 2:Change in biomarkers over time.

    Table 2:Results of mixed effects model comparing the anesthetic groups at each time point adjusting for baseline(Model 1)

    Comparison of postoperative biomarker concentration to baseline (Model 2)

    The baseline concentration of T-tau was 3.0 pg/mL (median,interquartile range 2.0–3.4 pg/mL).The concentration at 1 hour post-induction was estimated to be 2.19;95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62–2.95;P<0.001,times greater than at baseline(Figure 2 and Table 3).The concentration at 5 and 24 hours post-induction was statistically similar to baseline values.

    Table 3:Results of mixed effects model comparing the concentration of biomarker at each timepoint for all participants to baseline values (Model 2)

    The baseline concentration of P-tau181 was 5.8 pg/mL(median,interquartile range 1.9–17.0 pg/mL).The concentration at 1 hour post-induction was estimated to be 3.01;95%CI 1.87–4.85;P<0.001,times greater than at baseline.The concentration at 24 hours post-induction was estimated to be significantly lower than at baseline with an estimated ratio of 0.59;95% CI 0.36–0.96;P=0.036.There was no statistically significant difference between baseline and 5-hour values.

    The baseline concentration of NFL was 14.0 pg/mL (median,interquartile range 11.2–21.3 pg/mL).The concentration at 1 hour post-induction was estimated to be be 1.10;95%CI 1.00–1.21;P=0.048,times greater than at baseline.The concentration at 5 and 24 hours post-induction was not significantly different from baseline.

    Cognitive assessment and Brice questionnaire

    Two participants in the sevoflurane group could not be contacted to administer the Brice questionnaire.All other participants completed the questionnaire.No participants in the xenon or sevoflurane group reported either memories or dreams between induction and emergence from anesthesia.

    DISCUSSION

    There was no statistically significant difference in participant MoCA scores between groups at baseline,5 or 24 hours postinduction (Table 4).

    Table 4:Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores for each anesthetic group

    In the present study,there was no statistically significant differ-ence in the concentrations of the neural injury biomarkers T-tau and NFL in participants who received xenon or sevoflurane anesthesia within 24 hours post-induction.There was also no difference between groups in the concentration of P-tau181 within 24 hours post-induction.We did find that there was a statistically significant increase in the concentration of all three biomarkers following anesthesia at 1 hour post-induction when compared to baseline.

    Whilst we are unaware of any previous studies that have compared the impact of different general anesthetic agents on the release of the neural injury biomarkers T-tau and NFL,previous studies have investigated changes in these biomarkers following anesthesia and surgery.14-17To the authors’ knowledge,no previous study has investigated the perioperative changes in P-tau181,a marker of tau phosphorylation.

    An increase in plasma levels of both T-tau and NFL was observed in a study of 30 participants aged 60 years and older who received either inhalational or intravenous general anesthesia.The majority of participants underwent orthopedic surgery,while six patients underwent cardiac surgery.14An increase in T-tau was identified 1 hour following surgical incision.However,in contrast to the present study,the plasma level of tau continued to rise beyond 1 hour and peaked at the next sampling time point,6 hours post-incision.

    This earlier study also identified a significant increase in NFL following anesthesia and surgery with a mean peak increase 67% above baseline.The authors found that NFL values were trending upward at the final sampling time point,48 hours postincision.In keeping with this,Casey and colleagues study of non-cardiac surgery showed that NFL continues to rise up to 4 days postoperatively.15Whilst a small but statistically significant increase in NFL was detected at 1 hour post-induction in our own study,the concentration at 5 and 24 hours postinduction was similar to baseline.It may be that our failure to identify an increase in T-tau or NFL at the 5- and 24-hour time points was due to a comparatively reduced surgical and anesthetic insult.

    Another recent study utilized a participant cohort who received anesthesia in the absence of surgery in an attempt to distinguish between the effects of anesthesia and surgery on neural biomarker release.17In this study 59 participants received a 2-hour inhalational anesthetic for an imaging procedure with no surgical stimulus.The authors reported that there was a decrease in three neural biomarkers,T-tau,NFL and glial fibrillary acid protein,5 hours following anesthesia induction.This was the only post-induction time point measured.The authors concluded that increases in neural biomarkers found in other studies are likely related to the surgical insult rather than exposure to inhalational anesthetic agents.

    Our own findings suggest that such a conclusion may be an oversimplification.In the present study,all three biomarkers measured at 5 hours post-induction were not significantly different from baseline,the peak having occurred earlier at 1 hour.Due to the single 5-hour post-induction measurement reported by the previous authors,it remains unclear if anesthesia without surgery would have produced an increase in biomarkers if measured earlier.Our study suggests that a relatively brief anesthetic for a minor interventional procedure,without a skin incision,does result in a significant increase in neural biomarkers.

    The study of Casey and colleagues showed that the rise in NFL following a major non-cardiac surgery was greater in participants who developed POD in comparison to those who did not.15A further analysis of the same cohort indicated that elevated postoperative T-tau was also associated with POD.16In this second analysis,recovery from delirium was associated with return of T-tau to baseline values whilst NFL continued to rise until day 4 postoperatively.The authors concluded that whilst NFL is likely a marker of neuronal injury,tau protein may indicate more subtle changes in the central nervous system.The authors suggested that elevated tau protein could indicate synaptic pruning of tau containing synpases.16The significantly greater increase in T-tau as compared to NFL in our own study supports the hypothesis that the presence of tau and NFL in blood plasma could reflect different processes.

    This study is the first to consider the effect of anesthesia and surgery on plasma levels of P-tau181,a novel biomarker of AD pathology.9Anesthetic agents,both inhalational and intravenous,have been shown to induce tau phosphorylation39and neurons have been shown to metabolize and secrete these phosphorylated forms of tau differently to non-phosphorylated forms.40The significant increase in P-tau181 postoperatively,a biomarker highly correlated with AD pathology,raises the possibility that perioperative neurocognitive disorders and AD may share pathophysiological mechanisms.

    Anesthesia and surgery are associated with the translocation of larger molecules across the blood brain barrier than are permitted in normal physiological circumstances.41,42It may be that the rise in neural biomarkers in the early postoperative period is a result of translocation from the central nervous system to the periphery rather than an absolute increase in their abundance.The elevation in biomarkers,which was evident within one hour of induction,in our study is not inconsistent with a translocation hypothesis.

    In this study,we utilized a surgical cohort that received a highly standardized and relatively minor surgical insult.In this way we anticipated that the contribution of the surgery to the inflammatory and biomarker response would be homogenous,allowing us to attribute any difference in response to the anesthetic.The combined stimulus of the anesthetic and surgery was sufficient to generate a neural biomarker response,and the mean peak increase in tau was in keeping with an earlier study.14

    The primary finding of this study is that the use of xenon rather than sevoflurane for general anesthesia did not influence the postoperative release of neural injury biomarkers.Xenon is a potent inhibitor of the N-methyl-D-aspartate(NMDA) receptor whilst sevoflurane,which strongly potentiates γ-aminobutyric acid-A receptors,has little activity at the NMDA receptor.43Overactivation of the NMDA receptor can occur following acute insults such as stroke,cardiac arrest and traumatic brain injury33as well as in chronic neurodegenerative diseases such as AD.44Xenon is thought to provide neuroprotection through NMDA antagonism and it lacks the intrinsic neurotoxic properties of other NMDA antagonists such as ketamine.33

    An alternative mechanism for the reduction in postoperative complications with xenon anesthesia is an improvement in end-organ perfusion due to greater hemodynamic stability.26,33Participants in the xenon group in our study maintained a mean arterial pressure significantly closer to their baseline and received significantly less ephedrine than those in the sevoflurane group (Table 1).Despite this,the release in neural biomarkers was similar in both groups.This would suggest that in the setting of a minor procedure,the greater hemodynamic stability achieved with xenon does not contribute to a reduction in neural injury biomarker release.

    Xenon has a mechanistic basis for superior neuroprotection and animal studies have identified neuroprotection in response to a wide variety of insults.25There are also encouraging findings from a pilot study of xenon versus hypothermia alone following out of hospital cardiac arrest.33Despite this,xenon as an anesthetic agent has not shown an ability to improve postoperative cognitive outcomes.30,32In keeping with this we found no difference in MoCA scores between anesthetic groups at each postoperative time point.

    It may be that the mechanisms of neurological injury related to anesthesia and surgery are different to those related to hypoxic-ischemic injury in which the preclinical evidence for xenon neuroprotection is strongest.25Our own findings suggest that one proposed mechanism underlying xenon neuroprotection in the perioperative setting,namely reduced neuronal cell death,is not reflected in reduced neural injury biomarkers in the perioperative period.

    There are several limitations with this study.Given the use of a relatively novel anesthetic agent,it was deemed inappropriate to recruit high-risk (ASA III and IV) patients and the inclusion criteria allowed for patients as young as 50 years old.The relatively low incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction amongst this patient group limited the ability to identify differences in clinical outcomes between the groups.Postoperative assessment of cognitive function was limited to the MoCA,a tool primarily utilized for the detection of mild cognitive impairment.The power calculation was based on biomarker results from a previous study involving a greater

    duration of anesthesia and a more invasive surgical procedure.14Despite this,there was a similar mean peak increase in tau protein (257%vs.235%) in the two studies.However,this increase was not sustained beyond 1 hour in our study and the rise in NFL observed in our cohort was lower than that described in the previous study.

    In conclusion,we identified that there was no difference in the measurements of neural injury biomarkers between participants receiving either xenon or sevoflurane anesthesia following a minor,non-invasive interventional procedure.There was,however,a significant increase in T-tau,P-tau181 and NFL at 1 hour post-anesthesia induction which then returned to baseline.General anesthesia in conjunction with a minor procedure was associated with significant early increases in plasma levels of neural injury biomarkers.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Dr.Roman Kluger,St.Vincent’s Hospital,Melbourne and Cameron Patrick,University of Melbourne for their assistance with statistical analysis;Babak Shoghi,Biomedical Engineering,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for his support and expertise in managing the xenon delivery apparatus;Petrea Corcoran,Anesthetic Research Nurse,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for her assistance in data collection and as a valuable liaison with participants;Erika Fortunato,Clinical Research Assistant,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for her assistance in data management,data collection and general enthusiasm for the process;Dr.Alex Bolger,MBBS,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne,Anesthesia resident for her assistance in data collection and participant liaison;Sharon Keys,Lithotripsy coordinator,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for her invaluable assistance in participant recruitment;Mark Salvatore,Lithotripsy Radiographer and Mark Pemberton-Webb,Lithotripsy Technician,St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne for their patience and professionalism.

    Author contributions

    Study conception,data analysis and manuscript writing:SM;study design:SM,LE,BS,DS;laboratory analysis:HZ,KB;data collection:LE,BS;manuscript review:LE,BS,DS,HZ,KB.All the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Conflicts of interest

    HZ has served at scientific advisory boards for Alector,Denali,Roche Diagnostics,Wave,Samumed,Siemens Healthineers,Pinteon Therapeutics and CogRx,has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Cellectricon,Fujirebio,Alzecure and Biogen,and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS),which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program.KB has served as a consultant,at advisory boards,or at data monitoring committees for Abcam,Axon,Biogen,JOMDD/Shimadzu.Julius Clinical,Lilly,MagQu,Novartis,Roche Diagnostics,and Siemens Healthineers,and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB (BBS),which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program.The other authors (SM,LE,DS,BS) declare no competing interests.

    Financial support

    This study was supported in part by grants from the ANZCA Research Foundation,Australian and New Zealand College of Anesthetists[N20/009,AMEARA/19].

    Institutional review board statement

    The protocol was approved by the St.Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Ethics Committee (approval No.HREC/18/SVHM/221) on July 20,2018 and was registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration No.ACTRN12618000916246) on May 31,2018.

    Declaration of patient consent

    The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms.In the form the patients have consented to their clinical information being reported in an academic journal.The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published,and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity,but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

    Reporting statement

    This study follows the CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials(CONSORT) statement for protocol reporting.

    Biostatistics statement

    The statistical methods of this study were reviewed by Cameron Patrick,Statistical Consultant of The University of Melbourne,Australia.

    Copyright transfer agreement

    The Copyright License Agreement has been signed by all authors before publication.

    Data sharing statement

    Individual participant data that underlie these results can be shared following deidentification.The study protocol will also be made available on request.Data will be available from 9 months until 36 months after publication.Data can be shared with investigations whose proposed use has been approved by an independent review committee and after approval by the Research Governance Unit of St.Vincent’s Hospital,Melbourne.Proposals should be directed to steven.mcguigan@svha.org.au.To gain access data requestors will need to sign a data transfer agreement.

    Plagiarism check

    Checked twice by iThenticate.

    Peer review

    Externally peer reviewed.

    Open access statement

    This is an open access journal,and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License,which allows others to remix,tweak,and build upon the work non-commercially,as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

    丝袜在线中文字幕| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| av欧美777| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 精品国产国语对白av| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| av视频免费观看在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 欧美在线黄色| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 免费不卡黄色视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 男女免费视频国产| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 成人影院久久| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 一级黄片播放器| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 99国产精品99久久久久| 成人手机av| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产高清videossex| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 精品久久久久久电影网| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 日本五十路高清| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 满18在线观看网站| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 999精品在线视频| 国产在视频线精品| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 一区福利在线观看| 自线自在国产av| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 女警被强在线播放| av福利片在线| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 考比视频在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 美国免费a级毛片| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| www.精华液| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 熟女av电影| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 脱女人内裤的视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 丝袜美足系列| 成人国产av品久久久| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 一区二区三区精品91| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产精品国产av在线观看| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 一级黄色大片毛片| 99久久人妻综合| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| www.精华液| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 大陆偷拍与自拍| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 精品一区二区三卡| 大香蕉久久网| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 午夜视频精品福利| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 日本色播在线视频| 电影成人av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 999精品在线视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | a 毛片基地| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 18在线观看网站| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 99久久人妻综合| 黄片小视频在线播放| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 午夜av观看不卡| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 五月开心婷婷网| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产精品.久久久| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 在线观看人妻少妇| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| tube8黄色片| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品成人免费网站| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 午夜福利,免费看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品少妇内射三级| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 91国产中文字幕| 丁香六月天网| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 久久人人爽人人片av| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 一级毛片 在线播放| 国产高清videossex| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 18在线观看网站| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 不卡av一区二区三区| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 一级毛片电影观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 咕卡用的链子| 午夜91福利影院| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 精品国产国语对白av| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 一级黄片播放器| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲国产精品999| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 制服诱惑二区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 精品国产国语对白av| 老司机靠b影院| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| av不卡在线播放| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 搡老乐熟女国产| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 自线自在国产av| avwww免费| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 后天国语完整版免费观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 日本91视频免费播放| 在线观看www视频免费| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 蜜桃在线观看..| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 我的亚洲天堂| 欧美大码av| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 9191精品国产免费久久| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 中文字幕制服av| 免费看不卡的av| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产成人影院久久av| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产精品一国产av| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 蜜桃在线观看..| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 成人免费观看视频高清| 999精品在线视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 一区二区三区激情视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| videos熟女内射| 国产成人精品在线电影| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 精品亚洲成国产av| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 久久99精品国语久久久| av网站在线播放免费| 热re99久久国产66热| 手机成人av网站| 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 9色porny在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | av在线播放精品| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产淫语在线视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 日本a在线网址| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 飞空精品影院首页| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 一区在线观看完整版| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 五月天丁香电影| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久久狼人影院| 丁香六月天网| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 美国免费a级毛片| tube8黄色片| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产成人影院久久av| 中国国产av一级| 悠悠久久av| av在线老鸭窝| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 午夜久久久在线观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 婷婷成人精品国产| 9热在线视频观看99| 午夜91福利影院| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 欧美另类一区| 多毛熟女@视频| 日本a在线网址| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久中文字幕一级| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久 成人 亚洲| 免费看av在线观看网站| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久久久网色| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲成色77777| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 久久性视频一级片| 高清不卡的av网站| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 男女免费视频国产| 国产精品免费大片| 一区二区av电影网| 制服人妻中文乱码| 成人国产av品久久久| 老司机影院成人| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 黄色一级大片看看| 最黄视频免费看| 午夜免费鲁丝| a级毛片黄视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 不卡av一区二区三区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 超色免费av| 两个人看的免费小视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 丁香六月天网| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 下体分泌物呈黄色| h视频一区二区三区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产在视频线精品| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产男女内射视频| 曰老女人黄片| h视频一区二区三区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 免费不卡黄色视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 一区在线观看完整版| 两性夫妻黄色片| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 中国美女看黄片| 午夜老司机福利片| 性色av一级| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 91字幕亚洲| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| av一本久久久久| 99久久人妻综合| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 午夜福利,免费看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| av天堂在线播放| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产1区2区3区精品| 我的亚洲天堂| 99久久综合免费| av在线老鸭窝| 麻豆av在线久日| 美国免费a级毛片| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| avwww免费| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品一国产av| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 老司机影院成人| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 青春草视频在线免费观看| av网站在线播放免费| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 午夜日韩欧美国产| av在线老鸭窝| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久av网站| 成年动漫av网址| 操美女的视频在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 精品国产一区二区久久| 在线av久久热| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 男人操女人黄网站| 桃花免费在线播放| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久免费观看电影| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产1区2区3区精品| 18禁观看日本| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 在现免费观看毛片| 在线看a的网站| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av|