• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Analysis and Modeling of Propagation in Tunnel at 3.7 and 28 GHz

    2022-08-24 03:28:58MdAbdusSamadandDongYouChoi
    Computers Materials&Continua 2022年5期

    Md Abdus Samad and Dong-You Choi

    1Department of Information and Communication Engineering,Chosun University,Gwangju,61452,Korea

    2Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering,International Islamic University Chittagong,Chittagong,4318,Bangladesh

    Abstract:In present-day society,train tunnels are extensively used as a means of transportation.Therefore, to ensure safety, streamlined train operations,and uninterrupted internet access inside train tunnels, reliable wave propagation modeling is required.We have experimented and measured wave propagation models in a 1674 m long straight train tunnel in South Korea.The measured path loss and the received signal strength were modeled with the Close-In (CI), Floating intercept (FI), CI model with a frequency-weighted path loss exponent (CIF), and alpha-beta-gamma (ABG) models, where the model parameters were determined using minimum mean square error(MMSE) methods.The measured and the CI, FI, CIF, and ABG modelderived path loss was plotted in graphs,and the model closest to the measured path loss was identified through investigation.Based on the measured results,it was observed that every model had a comparatively lower(n <2)path loss exponent (PLE) inside the tunnel.We also determined the path loss component’s possible deviation(shadow factor)through a Gaussian distribution considering zero mean and standard deviation calculations of random error variables.The FI model outperformed all the examined models as it yielded a path loss closer to the measured datasets, as well as a minimum standard deviation of the shadow factor.

    Keywords: Path loss; shadow factor; telecommunications; train tunnel; wave propagation;wireless networks

    1 Introduction

    With the rapidly increasing pace of human lives, there has been an increase in the widespread usage of tunnels for a variety of purposes,such as transportation,mining of fossil fuels,minerals,and military operations.Among these types of tunnels,train tunnels play an essential role in present day life.Consequently, deploying a 5G network inside a tunnel is critical to ensure security and safety,and to increase the efficiency of train operations [1].Reliable transmission is required to achieve a stable and efficient telecommunication facility between the transmitter and receiver.Path loss is an essential component that may be adversely affected by several elements, such as signal frequency,distance from source to destination, environmental conditions, effect of signal fading and weather conditions [2].Numerous models of various propagation pathway losses for multiple interferences and noise-limited settings have been investigated in myriad ways to address the random characteristic of wireless networks[3].

    Nevertheless, knowledge of radio propagation inside a tunnel is essential for setting up the transmitter and receiver and to actualize the system specifications.For instance,statistical features on the wireless channel are significant in defining transmitter and receiver characteristics and in budget link computation, such as the probability density function of the received signal intensity and fade durations.In addition, the current radio propagation models typically predict the path loss, power delay profile,or delay spread for specific transmitter and receiver locations[4].However,it is generally accepted that the propagation inside a tunnel is distinctly different when compared to other types of propagation media,such as outdoor,outdoor to indoor,indoor to outdoor,or indoor-to-indoor radio wave propagation[5].The fundamental difference in the tunnel is that the radio wave is enclosed by the blocking surface(of the tunnel)through which the refracted wave cannot reach the receiver,and as such a propagated signal is received in other cases through a penetration loss at the tunnel blocking plane.Therefore,the propagation of radio waves inside the tunnel must be investigated independently.

    The properties of the wireless propagation channel determine the ultimate performance of a wireless telecommunication network based on the required quality of service (QoS).Consequently,a realistic understanding of wireless propagation channels in a tunnel environment is essential.To date, several studies on communication channels have been conducted in various tunnels [6–8].In contrast to open-air propagation,tunnel propagation includes electromagnetic waves in an enclosed environment [9].A leaky feeder communication system can be deployed inside confined locations,in particular inside road or rail tunnels [5].The cable isleakyin the sense that it includes gaps or slots in its outer conductor that allow radio signals to leak into or out of the cable along its entire length.As a result of such signal loss, line amplifiers must be installed at regular intervals to boost the signal back to acceptable levels that results in significant weight and cost increases[10].However,there is a high probability that the cable can be damaged inside the tunnel,resulting in communication complications in the entire tunnel.Consequently,leaky feedersare not generally deployed inside tunnels for telecommunication purposes.

    Currently,modal expansionin tunnels or corridors is used as a standard approach in wave propagation analysis [4,11–13].Given that a tunnel is considered an empty waveguide,the modal expansiontechnique can be applied to determine wave propagation.The cross-section of the tunnel can be represented as the sum of the transverse eigenmodes above the cutoff frequency.However,this technique becomes ineffective at high frequencies, such as the millimeter wavelength where the dimensions of the transverse wavelength are far broader,and numerous modes need to be considered.

    Radio-wave propagation modeling inside a tunnel can be performed using electromagnetic waves by numerical methods.However,the numerical approach of finding radio wave propagation inside a tunnel is complex and requires large computing capacity.Consequently,several simplified techniques to reduce the computational complexity were proposed in subsequent studies:namely the finite difference time domain (FDTD) [14], Crank Nicolson (CN) method [15], vector parabolic equation(VPE)[16,17],scalar parabolic equation(SPE)[17],and uniform theory of diffraction(UTD)[18–20].Nevertheless,all these simplified techniques are hindered by certain impediments such as:the usage of the FDTD method is limited to the large-sized tunnel, the CN entails the resolution of sets of simultaneous equations that might become large enough that dense mesh issues cannot be addressed efficiently, the VPE technique assumes that fields travel within 30°in the propagation direction, the SPE can only be used for tunnels with perfect electrical conductor(PEC)walls,and UTD cannot be used at the junctions where tunnels do not cross perpendicularly.

    A widely-accepted path loss model can be implemented in a tunnel using the ray-tracing technique(RT).However,this technique has several limitations in the implementation and analysis of RT signals.For example,an implementation through delay line time-domain analysis is minimal if the minimum delay is less than 8 ns (in which case, it will require a larger bandwidth (BW); for instance, a 1 ns time delay will require 1 GHz BW)[21].While an alternative implementation utilizes the shooting and bouncing RT realization technique,this approach has the impediment of the hypothetical size of the receiver receiving the propagated ray[22,23].Another implementation of RT is through 3D ray-tracing modeling,which has to deal with the challenge of obtaining convergence results as there are numerous reflections[24].

    Consequently,modal expansion,numerical approach,and RT-based techniques of wave propagation in tunnels have significant challenges.Conversely,a large-scale path loss model was employed for model wave propagation in the tunnel[25],and the results indicate that large-scale path loss models could be effective at modelling radio wave propagation inside tunnels.Moreover,large-scale path loss models have been used to model indoor corridors[26,27]and stairwells[28].Therefore,we used largescale path loss models to model the measured data,and found that the results were satisfactory.This study makes the following contributions:

    ·We examined the wave propagation in the newly built train tunnel,calledMangyang Tunnel 2,in South Korea,and the measured path loss was modeled using the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models.

    ·The path loss parameters of the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models were calculated using the MMSE optimization technique.

    ·We analyzed the free space path loss(FSPL)and PLE variations of the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models over 3.7 to 28 GHz frequency bands.

    ·We also modeled the shadow factor using the Gaussian distribution of the studied path loss models.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows:Section 2 provides experimental scenarios and experimental parameter descriptions.Section 3 provides analytical models of CI, FI, CIF, and ABG models and MMSE-derived optimized parameter calculation procedures.Section 4 discusses the outcomes obtained from the experimental results.Finally, the conclusions are presented in Section 5.

    2 Measurement Experiment

    This section describes the measurement technique, soundings, and instruments used for the experiment,as well as characterizing the equipment used at the transmitter and receiver ends.

    2.1 Measuring Tools

    This section includes the detailed description of the channel sounder and the scenarios covered in this measurement experiment.The basic architecture of the experimental scenario is illustrated in Fig.1.We utilized the M5183B keysight signal generator at the transmitter end and the keysight PXI 9393A signal analyzer at the receiver end.The MXG N5183B signal generator can transmit continuous wave (CW) signals at 9–40 GHz.The PXI 9393A signal analyzer used as the receiver has a frequency range of 9–30 GHz.Guided horn antennas at the frequency of 3.5 GHz(directional antenna horn),28 GHz(directional antenna horn),and 28 GHz tracking antenna system(TAS)were used in the experiment, where the antenna gain was 10, 20, and 20 dBi, respectively.The guided horn antennas were assembled with horizontal-horizontal co-polarization.The specific computing operational parameters are listed in Tab.1.High-frequency bands from RF to microwave frequency can be generated using the analog signal generator MXG N5183B[29].Analog signal generation offers the possibility of adding amplitude,frequency,phase,and pulse modulation to the(CW)transmissions from the transmitter.Moreover, frequency changeover can be performed using a listing mode with a switching time of 600 μs.In the sweep mode, the lists change step by step, similar to frequency switching.The system can produce a low power of approximately—-130 dBm and a maximum power of approximately+20 dBm.The level of accuracy of the signal generator is approximately±0.7 dB(at 10 GHz),and at 1 GHz with a 20 kHz offset,the single-sideband modulation phase noise of the device is–124 dBc/Hz.In the range of 0.5–64 rad,the signal generator may produce a pulse width of 10 ns and pulse modulation phase deviation in the normal mode.The frequency range of 9 kHz to 9,4,14,18,or 27 GHz was analyzed with this instrument in an extended mode from 3,6—50 GHz.The absolute amplitude accuracy was±0.13 dB,and the frequency switching was approximately smaller than 135 μs.The intermodulation of the 3rd order was approximately+31 dBm,and the device showed a medium noise level of up to-168 dBm/Hz.

    Figure 1:Channel sounder architecture

    Table 1:Channel specifications and configuration parameters

    Table 1:Continued

    2.2 Experiment Description

    The measurement experiment site isMangyang Tunnel 2,located in Mangyang-ri,Giseong-myeon,Uljin-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea.The newly built tunnel,Mangyang Tunnel 2, is used for transportation by trains.The experiments were conducted in the tunnel before its opening, and consequently, safety issues were easily ensured.Some of the measurement attempts are presented in Figs.2a–2b.All the equipment and technical support during the measurement experiment was provided by TA Engineering Inc., South Korea.The organization deployed a physical transmitter and receiver, a mobile trolley, and other experimental facilities.Mechanical adjustments allow the transmitter’s antenna to be physically modified.The tunnel geometry at the entrance(of the experiment starting point) and some of the irregularities in the tunnel structure are shown in Figs.2c–2d.The receiver unit was installed on a trolley,which was specially designed for experimental purposes.The transmitter’s horn antenna was directed toward the central receiver unit,while the receiver trolley was moved inside the tunnel at regular intervals of 10 m up to 1500 m and then at regular intervals of 20 m for the rest of the path,and the received signal strength was measured.Thus,the received signal was measured at a total of 160 places.

    2.3 Data Pre-Processing

    Path loss is crucial in radio channel models to design the link budget and coverage of wireless networks.The path loss of a radio link can be calculated as:

    wherePTxis the transmitted signal power,PRxis the received signal power,GTxandGRxare the gains of the used antennas,andCTx,CRxare the cable losses at the Tx and Rx ends,respectively.We measured the received power,and the other gain-related parameters were calculated from the system specifications and datasheets.

    3 Path Loss Prediction Models

    Absorption and scattering are two primary processes in large-scale signal attenuation.Typically,path loss and shadowing are used to describe the large-scale signal attenuation.The relationship between path loss and channel distance is typically characterized by two models:single-frequency model and multi-frequency model,based on empirical data acquired from channel measurements.The large-scale CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models have a fixed mathematical structure,and certain parameters whose values change according to operational frequency,terrain setting,and environmental factors.This section determines the propagation parameters using the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models,which are discussed in detail in the following subsections.

    Figure 2:(a)Receiver movement trolley on the train rail,(b)Transmitter and the receiver together at an initial measurement,(c)Tunnel geometry at the entrance on one side,and(d)Structural changes in the tunnel:change in tunnel structure at the points 220,770,1000,1260,1500 m

    3.1 Single Frequency Propagation

    3.1.1 Close-In(CI)Model

    The Equation for the CI model of wave propagation is:

    whereSis a Gaussian random variable, which means that the random variable can be expressed through the mean(μ)and standard deviationσin dB,where the mean(μ)is zero,but the standard deviation(σ)is a non-zero value.The random variableSshows large-scale channel variations within a limit (defined by the probability density function) as a result of the shadowing effect [30].The free space path lossL(f,1m) is given by 10log10(4πf/c)2for a distance of 1 m, and n is the PLE.The PLE(n)path loss pattern is determined by the MMSE method that equals the value determined to the minimum mean square error(by reducingσ)with the original physical anchor point,realized by the free space power transmitted by the transmitting antenna[31].To determine the optimum PLE where the path loss is minimum,Eq.(2)can be rearranged using the MMSE method as

    AssumingF=PLCI(f,d)[dB]-L(f,1m),andZ=10log10(d),then the Eq.(2)can written as:

    The standard deviation of the shadow factor can be determined as:

    whereNis the number of Tx-Rx separation distances.Minimizing the shadow factor with standard deviationσCIis commensurate to reducing the termis reduced, the derivative ofnshould be zero:

    Therefore,from Eq.(6):

    Consequently,the lowest standard deviation for the CI model is

    The calculated values ofnfor the CI model are listed in Tab.2.

    Table 2:Parameters of the different propagation techniques

    3.1.2 Floating-Intercept(FI)Model

    The FI path loss model is expressed by:

    whereαis the floating-intercept in dB, which is equivalent to the free space path loss, andβis the slope of the path lossvs.frequency line,which is comparable to the PLE as calculated in the CI model.The termSis a Gaussian random variable with zero mean and standard deviationσCI,defining largescale signal variations.This method is also utilized in WINNER II [32] and 3GPP standards [33].Remarkably,Eq.(9)requires two parameters,whereas the CI method requires only a single parameter,PLE (n).Assuming,F(xiàn)= PLFI(d)[dB], andZ= 10log10(d) the minimum shadow factor can be determined using Eq.(10).

    and the SF standard deviation is:

    The minimum standard deviationσFIwas determined based on the minimum value of the termAs the termNis a constant number,it needs to minimizeand,the same can be achieved by finding the derivative with respect toαandβas follows:

    Eqs.(12)and(13)yield:

    Combining(14)and(15),we get:

    The optimum standard deviation of SF can be achieved by replacingαandβin Eq.(11) with Eqs.(16)and(17),respectively.The mean values of all vector elements were determined directly in the dB scale.The calculated values of the termnfor the FI model are listed in Tab.2.

    3.2 Multi-Frequency Propagation

    3.2.1 CIF Model

    In [3], a multi-frequency method was considered adequate in a closed indoor environment, as frequency-dependent loss occurs after a distance of 1 m from the transmitter owing to the surrounding environment.The CI model can be adapted to implement the frequency-dependent path loss exponent(CIF)that utilizes the same physically driven free space path loss anchor at 1 m as the CI model.The path loss of the CIF method is calculated by:

    whered(m) is the distance between Tx and Rx greater than 1 m,nis the path loss exponent (PLE)that describes the dependence of propagation loss in the path(in dB)to the logarithm of the distance starting at 1 m,andSis the Gaussian random variable with zero mean and standard deviationσ(dB).This random variable characterizes the large-scale channel fluctuations due to shadowing, andbis an optimization parameter that presents the path loss slope of the linear frequency dependence.The termL(f, 1m)is the free-space loss at a distance of 1 m,withfcbeing the center frequencyL(dB) =32.4+20 logfc(GHz).The symbolf(GHz)is the operating carrier frequency andf0,as the minimum investigated,is the frequency of operating frequencies[34].The frequencyf0is computed as follows:

    wheref0is the weighted frequency average of all measurements for each particular scene, that is determined by considering the product of the sum of all the frequencies,the total number of recorded dataNkat a specific frequency and antenna scenario,and the corresponding frequencyfk,and dividing that by the total number of measurements(that is,the summation ofNkfromk=1 toK)taken over all frequencies for that specific scenario and the used transmitter and receiver system.

    CIF method:MMSE-based parameters

    After changing the side of Eq.(18), if we assume thatF=PLCIF(f,d)[dB] -L(f,d0),Z=10 log(d1m),p=n(1-b),andq=nb,we obtain

    The shadow factors’standard deviation is:

    MinimizingσCIFis equivalent to minimizingis minimized,its derivatives with respect topandqshould be zero,i.e.,

    After simplification and combining,we obtain:

    In Eqs.(24) and (25), the closed-loop solution of the assumed termspandqwas derived.The standard derivation of the shadow factor can be derived by insertingpandqinto Eq.(21).Moreover,by using the initial definition,p=n(1-b)andthe values ofnandbcan be calculated.The calculated values of the CIF model are listed in Tab.2.

    3.2.2 Alpha-Beta-Gamma(ABG)Model

    A multi-frequency three-component model called the ABG model contains conditions for describing the propagated loss at different frequencies depending on the frequency and distance[31,34].The path loss of the ABG model is given by Eq.(26):

    whereαandγare associated with the path length and frequency element of path loss of the link,fis the frequency in GHz, andβis a parameter utilized as an offset mechanism that does not have any physical meaning.The parameter S is a Gaussian random variable representing large-scale signal variations in the mean path loss over distance.The ABG model can be recognized as the annex of the FI model for multiple frequencies.The MMSE technique can be used to determine the optimum values of theα,β, andγcoefficients.It can be shown that ifγ= 0 or 2 and the ABG model is used for a single frequency, it transforms into an FI model.As a result, the ABG model is a multifrequency generalization of the FI,and the FI can also be constructed using a single frequency[35].In addition,the ABG model may be simplified to the CI,ifαequals 20log(4pi/c),βequals PLE,andγequals 2.Given that the ABG model requires three parameters whereas the CI model requires just one parameter,the CI model is more economical in computing complexity.Moreover,others argue that the additional two variables in the ABG model provide only a marginal improvement in accuracy[36,37].The MMSE-based minimum parameter values can be determined by assumingF= PLABG(f,d)[dB],Z=10log10(d)andP=10log10(f)in Eq.(26),then SF is calculated by

    and the SF standard deviation is:

    To obtain the minimum values of the standard deviation from Eq.(28),(F-αZ-β-γ P)2/Nneeds to be minimized.Given that N is a constant,to minimize the(F-αZ-β-γ P)2,its partial derivative with respect toα,β,andγshould be zero.

    From Eqs.(29)–(31),it is clear that

    The numeric values ofα,β,andγfor the ABG model can be calculated by solving Eq.(35),and the calculated coefficients of the ABG model are given in Tab.2.

    4 Results and Discussions

    4.1 Analysis of the Large-Scale Path Loss Models

    Measurement experiments at 3.7 and 28 GHz were conducted to examine the parameters of long-term path loss models in a train tunnel.The transmitting antenna was directed inwards, and the receiver, located in the middle of the mobile van, was directed toward the receiving antenna.As mentioned earlier,three different channels were created at two frequencies(3.7 and 28 GHz)using horn and TAS antennas.We processed our measured data and produced the visible figures with MATLAB R2021a.Fig.3 depicts the coefficients of the models with diverse FSPL and PLE values.

    Fig.3a shows the changes in path loss in the 1674 m long straight train tunnel on a semi-log scale.A scatter plot was used to depict the measured path losses at various points.The recorded path loss was fitted using the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models,all plotted as straight lines.As shown in Fig.3a,the ABG model did not fit well with the measured datasets.Except for the ABG model,the other models,CI,F(xiàn)I,and CIF,are competitive when considering the prediction performance.Additionally,CI,F(xiàn)I,and CIF models show almost identical path loss predictions at the far end,but a variation appears at the near end for FI models when compared to the CI and CIF models.At the near end,the FI model fitted the measured data in contrast to the CI and CIF models.Consequently,at 3.7 GHz frequency,the FI model fitted the measured dataset with greater efficiency than the other models.

    Fig.3b shows the changes in path loss in the 1674 m long straight train tunnel on a semi-log scale at a frequency of 28 GHz.While both the CI and CIF models showed good performance at the far end of the tunnel,they did not perform well at the near end.At a frequency of 28 GHz,the ABG model did not fit well with the measured dataset, where the ABG model parameters were calculated using the MMSE-based optimization technique.Of the remaining models,the FI model fitted the measured dataset with greater efficiency than the CI and CIF models at 28 GHz.

    Fig.3c shows the changes in path loss in the 1674 m long straight train tunnel on a semi-log scale at a frequency of 28 GHz.The figure shows that the FI model performs well at the 28 GHz TAS receiver when compared to the CI, CIF, and ABG models.At 28 GHz frequency with the TAS receiver, the ABG model did not fit well with the measured dataset.The path loss predicted by the FI model fits well with the measured datasets,and shows higher accuracy at both the near and far ends.

    Figure 3:CI,CIF,F(xiàn)I,ABG model,and measured path loss in the tunnel at(a)3.7 GHz,(b)28 GHz,(c)28 GHz(TAS);(d)FSPL variations at different frequencies developed by CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models, (e) PLE variations at different frequencies developed by CI, FI, CIF, and ABG models, (f)Standard deviation of point-to-point variations of received power

    4.2 FSPL Variations in Different Propagation Techniques

    Fig.3d shows the variations in FSPL exhibited by the CI, FI, CIF, and ABG models.As the FSPL of the CI and CIF models is the same,for brevity the CIF model is not depicted in the figure.The FSPL developed by the ABG model is a constant quantity,as depicted by the straight yellow line marked by a hexagonal-shaped marker.While the FSPL of the CI model is much lower than that of the other models,it is evident in Figs.3a–3c that the CI model did not outperform the FI model at the frequencies of 3.7,28,and 28(TAS)GHz.The FSPL at 28 GHz with the TAS receiver is a different value,as depicted in the figure by a single red scatter point.Consequently,it is clear that the FI model has a positive slope of FSPL(even if the single red scatter dot is taken into consideration).Accordingly,the FSPL obtained using the FI model is consistent with the path loss,as shown in Figs.3a–3c.

    4.3 PLE Variations at Different Frequencies and Models

    Fig.3e shows the variations in PLE with respect to the frequency of the FI,CI,CIF,and ABG models.The path loss exponent of the CIF and ABG model is constant at 1.6 and 1.1 over frequencies of 3.7 to 28 GHz, respectively.The remaining two models, CI and FI, exhibit a negative slope.The PLE points show different CI and FI model trends for the TAS antenna system at the receiver end.Evidently,owing to the use of the TAS receiver,the PLE developed through MMSE optimization is significantly reduced in the CI model,and in the case of the FI model,the PLE for the TAS receiver increases.

    4.4 Point to Point Standard Deviation Variations of Received Power

    The point-to-point standard deviation is a valuable tool for investigating the variations in the received power in different propagation measurement experiments, as reported in [26,38].Fig.3f depicts the variations in the received power measured at different distances in the tunnel at frequencies of 3.7,28,and 28(TAS)GHz.As described earlier,we measured at 160 points inside the tunnel,and at each point two different frequencies in the S(3.7 GHz)and Ka(28 GHz)bands were used where the receiver antenna was a horn and TAS.

    4.5 Shadow Factor and Multi-Path Components

    The shadow factor is calculated as the difference(in dB)between the data points and the trajectory loss anticipated at a particular distance using the adapted model:

    The shadow factor histograms for CI fitting are shown in Figs.4a–4c at 3.7, 28, and 28 GHz,respectively, for the horn, horn, and TAS antenna receiver.Similarly, the shadow factors of the FI fittings are shown in Figs.4d–4f,CIF are shown in Figs.5a–5c,and ABG are shown in Figs.5d–5f,at 3.7,28,and 28 GHz for the horn,horn,and TAS antenna receiver,respectively.The shadow factor follows a Gaussian distribution with zero mean and standard deviationσ, whereby the probability distribution function(PDF)of the shadow factor is represented by

    Figure 4:Shadow factor of the different propagation models.(a)CI 3 GHz,(b)CI 28 GHz,(c)CI 28 GHz(TAS);(d)FI 3 GHz,(e)FI 28 GHz,(f)FI 28 GHz(TAS)

    Figure 5:Shadow factor of the different propagation models.(a)CIF 3 GHz,(b)CIF 28 GHz,(c)CIF 28 GHz(TAS);(d)ABG 3 GHz,(e)ABG 28 GHz,(f)ABG,28 GHz(TAS)

    As expected,the histograms generally corresponded to a Gaussian distribution.The experimental mean and standard shadow deviation factors are shown for each Gaussian distribution as a solid red line.The standard deviation values are listed in Tab.3.

    Table 3:Shadow factor of CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG model fitting to the measured data using MMSE

    5 Conclusion

    This study focused on developing large-scale channel models that characterize wireless path loss in train tunnels.As mentioned earlier, there exists some structural changes in the investigated train tunnel at points 220,770,1000,1260,and 1500 m from the initial measurement position,but no abrupt changes in the received signal strength was noticed at the receiver end(Figs.3a–3c).Consequently,the effects of such smaller structural shape variations on large-scale wave propagation modelling can be negligible.At every frequency band,the ABG model did not fit well with the measured datasets.While the CI,CIF,and ABG models showed almost similar performance at a frequency of 28 GHz,at 3.7 GHz frequency the FI model suits the measured data more accurately.The FI model showed consistent matching results with the measured datasets at a frequency of 28 GHz for both antenna type horn and the TAS type antenna system.Therefore,the FI model showed better matching performance to the measured datasets than the other models in all measuring scenarios.Given that a lower standard deviation of the shadow factor in the wave propagation model was expected in this case,the FI model yielded shadow factors of 5.49, 5.53, 4.86 at frequencies of 3.7, 28, and 28 GHz (TAS) receivers,respectively.The shadow factors yielded by the FI model are almost the lowest(except for CIF at 3.7 GHz) among all models, as shown in Tab.3.A minimum shadow factor indicates that the probable error introduced in the model will also be minimal.Additionally,we checked that the point-to-point standard deviation of the received power by the FI model is also minimum among all models,which has not been shown here for brevity.Hence, it can be concluded that the FI model produced more acceptable propagation losses in the tunnel.Based on this investigation,it is assumed that the FI model can predict wave propagation loss in similarly structured train tunnels.

    Acknowledgement:The authors would like to thank TA Engineering Inc.,South Korea,for assisting with the wave propagation measurement experiments.

    Funding Statement:The authors received no specific funding for this study.

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding this study.

    在线a可以看的网站| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 成人综合一区亚洲| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| av专区在线播放| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| av天堂在线播放| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 欧美zozozo另类| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 欧美性感艳星| 一本一本综合久久| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 级片在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 日本熟妇午夜| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久6这里有精品| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久久久久久久久成人| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产精品.久久久| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 乱人视频在线观看| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 禁无遮挡网站| 直男gayav资源| 三级经典国产精品| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲国产色片| 中文字幕制服av| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 色视频www国产| 尾随美女入室| 国产视频内射| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 老司机福利观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 成人三级黄色视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲图色成人| 欧美区成人在线视频| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| www.色视频.com| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产三级在线视频| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久久精品94久久精品| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 精品人妻视频免费看| av在线播放精品| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产成人精品婷婷| 性欧美人与动物交配| 91狼人影院| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久久成人免费电影| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 少妇丰满av| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产在线男女| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 在线观看66精品国产| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 九草在线视频观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 变态另类丝袜制服| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 极品教师在线视频| 悠悠久久av| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产黄片美女视频| 色哟哟·www| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产成人精品一,二区 | 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日本成人三级电影网站| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日本三级黄在线观看| av.在线天堂| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 久久久久久久久中文| 精品人妻视频免费看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| kizo精华| www.色视频.com| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 99久久精品热视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 嫩草影院入口| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲av男天堂| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 1000部很黄的大片| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 嫩草影院入口| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 长腿黑丝高跟| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久久精品大字幕| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美3d第一页| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 69av精品久久久久久| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久久久久久久大av| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 悠悠久久av| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 毛片女人毛片| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 日日撸夜夜添| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 久久中文看片网| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 日本黄大片高清| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产精华一区二区三区| or卡值多少钱| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 久久草成人影院| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 中国国产av一级| 美女高潮的动态| 搞女人的毛片| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产一级毛片在线| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 日本色播在线视频| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲综合色惰| 内地一区二区视频在线| www日本黄色视频网| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产高清激情床上av| 观看美女的网站| 日本在线视频免费播放| 日本成人三级电影网站| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 永久网站在线| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 日本与韩国留学比较| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美日本视频| 国产成人福利小说| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 丝袜喷水一区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| or卡值多少钱| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 乱人视频在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 青春草视频在线免费观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 深夜a级毛片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 悠悠久久av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产三级中文精品| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 一级av片app| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 夜夜爽天天搞| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产视频首页在线观看| kizo精华| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 在线免费十八禁| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 看片在线看免费视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美性感艳星| 少妇高潮的动态图| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 小说图片视频综合网站| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 只有这里有精品99| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲av男天堂| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区 | 老女人水多毛片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日本欧美国产在线视频| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 日韩中字成人| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 黑人高潮一二区| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美+日韩+精品| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产视频内射| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 99热精品在线国产| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 97热精品久久久久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美3d第一页| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 黄色日韩在线| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产 一区精品| 内地一区二区视频在线| 少妇的逼好多水| 麻豆成人av视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| h日本视频在线播放| 久久久色成人| 日韩欧美精品v在线| av黄色大香蕉| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 中文欧美无线码| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 人妻系列 视频| 午夜a级毛片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲在久久综合| 日本一二三区视频观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 免费看av在线观看网站| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 中国国产av一级| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 亚洲精品色激情综合| 看黄色毛片网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| www.色视频.com| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 免费人成在线观看视频色| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产精品.久久久| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 夜夜爽天天搞| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产成人aa在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| av福利片在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久人人爽人人片av| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 精品久久久久久成人av| 少妇的逼好多水| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 97超碰精品成人国产| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 只有这里有精品99| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久人人爽人人片av| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产综合懂色| 一夜夜www| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看 | 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 男女那种视频在线观看| 69人妻影院| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 美女黄网站色视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 99热这里只有是精品50| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲精品自拍成人| av黄色大香蕉| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 日本免费a在线| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 成年免费大片在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 观看美女的网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产|