• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Analysis and Modeling of Propagation in Tunnel at 3.7 and 28 GHz

    2022-08-24 03:28:58MdAbdusSamadandDongYouChoi
    Computers Materials&Continua 2022年5期

    Md Abdus Samad and Dong-You Choi

    1Department of Information and Communication Engineering,Chosun University,Gwangju,61452,Korea

    2Department of Electronics and Telecommunication Engineering,International Islamic University Chittagong,Chittagong,4318,Bangladesh

    Abstract:In present-day society,train tunnels are extensively used as a means of transportation.Therefore, to ensure safety, streamlined train operations,and uninterrupted internet access inside train tunnels, reliable wave propagation modeling is required.We have experimented and measured wave propagation models in a 1674 m long straight train tunnel in South Korea.The measured path loss and the received signal strength were modeled with the Close-In (CI), Floating intercept (FI), CI model with a frequency-weighted path loss exponent (CIF), and alpha-beta-gamma (ABG) models, where the model parameters were determined using minimum mean square error(MMSE) methods.The measured and the CI, FI, CIF, and ABG modelderived path loss was plotted in graphs,and the model closest to the measured path loss was identified through investigation.Based on the measured results,it was observed that every model had a comparatively lower(n <2)path loss exponent (PLE) inside the tunnel.We also determined the path loss component’s possible deviation(shadow factor)through a Gaussian distribution considering zero mean and standard deviation calculations of random error variables.The FI model outperformed all the examined models as it yielded a path loss closer to the measured datasets, as well as a minimum standard deviation of the shadow factor.

    Keywords: Path loss; shadow factor; telecommunications; train tunnel; wave propagation;wireless networks

    1 Introduction

    With the rapidly increasing pace of human lives, there has been an increase in the widespread usage of tunnels for a variety of purposes,such as transportation,mining of fossil fuels,minerals,and military operations.Among these types of tunnels,train tunnels play an essential role in present day life.Consequently, deploying a 5G network inside a tunnel is critical to ensure security and safety,and to increase the efficiency of train operations [1].Reliable transmission is required to achieve a stable and efficient telecommunication facility between the transmitter and receiver.Path loss is an essential component that may be adversely affected by several elements, such as signal frequency,distance from source to destination, environmental conditions, effect of signal fading and weather conditions [2].Numerous models of various propagation pathway losses for multiple interferences and noise-limited settings have been investigated in myriad ways to address the random characteristic of wireless networks[3].

    Nevertheless, knowledge of radio propagation inside a tunnel is essential for setting up the transmitter and receiver and to actualize the system specifications.For instance,statistical features on the wireless channel are significant in defining transmitter and receiver characteristics and in budget link computation, such as the probability density function of the received signal intensity and fade durations.In addition, the current radio propagation models typically predict the path loss, power delay profile,or delay spread for specific transmitter and receiver locations[4].However,it is generally accepted that the propagation inside a tunnel is distinctly different when compared to other types of propagation media,such as outdoor,outdoor to indoor,indoor to outdoor,or indoor-to-indoor radio wave propagation[5].The fundamental difference in the tunnel is that the radio wave is enclosed by the blocking surface(of the tunnel)through which the refracted wave cannot reach the receiver,and as such a propagated signal is received in other cases through a penetration loss at the tunnel blocking plane.Therefore,the propagation of radio waves inside the tunnel must be investigated independently.

    The properties of the wireless propagation channel determine the ultimate performance of a wireless telecommunication network based on the required quality of service (QoS).Consequently,a realistic understanding of wireless propagation channels in a tunnel environment is essential.To date, several studies on communication channels have been conducted in various tunnels [6–8].In contrast to open-air propagation,tunnel propagation includes electromagnetic waves in an enclosed environment [9].A leaky feeder communication system can be deployed inside confined locations,in particular inside road or rail tunnels [5].The cable isleakyin the sense that it includes gaps or slots in its outer conductor that allow radio signals to leak into or out of the cable along its entire length.As a result of such signal loss, line amplifiers must be installed at regular intervals to boost the signal back to acceptable levels that results in significant weight and cost increases[10].However,there is a high probability that the cable can be damaged inside the tunnel,resulting in communication complications in the entire tunnel.Consequently,leaky feedersare not generally deployed inside tunnels for telecommunication purposes.

    Currently,modal expansionin tunnels or corridors is used as a standard approach in wave propagation analysis [4,11–13].Given that a tunnel is considered an empty waveguide,the modal expansiontechnique can be applied to determine wave propagation.The cross-section of the tunnel can be represented as the sum of the transverse eigenmodes above the cutoff frequency.However,this technique becomes ineffective at high frequencies, such as the millimeter wavelength where the dimensions of the transverse wavelength are far broader,and numerous modes need to be considered.

    Radio-wave propagation modeling inside a tunnel can be performed using electromagnetic waves by numerical methods.However,the numerical approach of finding radio wave propagation inside a tunnel is complex and requires large computing capacity.Consequently,several simplified techniques to reduce the computational complexity were proposed in subsequent studies:namely the finite difference time domain (FDTD) [14], Crank Nicolson (CN) method [15], vector parabolic equation(VPE)[16,17],scalar parabolic equation(SPE)[17],and uniform theory of diffraction(UTD)[18–20].Nevertheless,all these simplified techniques are hindered by certain impediments such as:the usage of the FDTD method is limited to the large-sized tunnel, the CN entails the resolution of sets of simultaneous equations that might become large enough that dense mesh issues cannot be addressed efficiently, the VPE technique assumes that fields travel within 30°in the propagation direction, the SPE can only be used for tunnels with perfect electrical conductor(PEC)walls,and UTD cannot be used at the junctions where tunnels do not cross perpendicularly.

    A widely-accepted path loss model can be implemented in a tunnel using the ray-tracing technique(RT).However,this technique has several limitations in the implementation and analysis of RT signals.For example,an implementation through delay line time-domain analysis is minimal if the minimum delay is less than 8 ns (in which case, it will require a larger bandwidth (BW); for instance, a 1 ns time delay will require 1 GHz BW)[21].While an alternative implementation utilizes the shooting and bouncing RT realization technique,this approach has the impediment of the hypothetical size of the receiver receiving the propagated ray[22,23].Another implementation of RT is through 3D ray-tracing modeling,which has to deal with the challenge of obtaining convergence results as there are numerous reflections[24].

    Consequently,modal expansion,numerical approach,and RT-based techniques of wave propagation in tunnels have significant challenges.Conversely,a large-scale path loss model was employed for model wave propagation in the tunnel[25],and the results indicate that large-scale path loss models could be effective at modelling radio wave propagation inside tunnels.Moreover,large-scale path loss models have been used to model indoor corridors[26,27]and stairwells[28].Therefore,we used largescale path loss models to model the measured data,and found that the results were satisfactory.This study makes the following contributions:

    ·We examined the wave propagation in the newly built train tunnel,calledMangyang Tunnel 2,in South Korea,and the measured path loss was modeled using the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models.

    ·The path loss parameters of the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models were calculated using the MMSE optimization technique.

    ·We analyzed the free space path loss(FSPL)and PLE variations of the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models over 3.7 to 28 GHz frequency bands.

    ·We also modeled the shadow factor using the Gaussian distribution of the studied path loss models.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows:Section 2 provides experimental scenarios and experimental parameter descriptions.Section 3 provides analytical models of CI, FI, CIF, and ABG models and MMSE-derived optimized parameter calculation procedures.Section 4 discusses the outcomes obtained from the experimental results.Finally, the conclusions are presented in Section 5.

    2 Measurement Experiment

    This section describes the measurement technique, soundings, and instruments used for the experiment,as well as characterizing the equipment used at the transmitter and receiver ends.

    2.1 Measuring Tools

    This section includes the detailed description of the channel sounder and the scenarios covered in this measurement experiment.The basic architecture of the experimental scenario is illustrated in Fig.1.We utilized the M5183B keysight signal generator at the transmitter end and the keysight PXI 9393A signal analyzer at the receiver end.The MXG N5183B signal generator can transmit continuous wave (CW) signals at 9–40 GHz.The PXI 9393A signal analyzer used as the receiver has a frequency range of 9–30 GHz.Guided horn antennas at the frequency of 3.5 GHz(directional antenna horn),28 GHz(directional antenna horn),and 28 GHz tracking antenna system(TAS)were used in the experiment, where the antenna gain was 10, 20, and 20 dBi, respectively.The guided horn antennas were assembled with horizontal-horizontal co-polarization.The specific computing operational parameters are listed in Tab.1.High-frequency bands from RF to microwave frequency can be generated using the analog signal generator MXG N5183B[29].Analog signal generation offers the possibility of adding amplitude,frequency,phase,and pulse modulation to the(CW)transmissions from the transmitter.Moreover, frequency changeover can be performed using a listing mode with a switching time of 600 μs.In the sweep mode, the lists change step by step, similar to frequency switching.The system can produce a low power of approximately—-130 dBm and a maximum power of approximately+20 dBm.The level of accuracy of the signal generator is approximately±0.7 dB(at 10 GHz),and at 1 GHz with a 20 kHz offset,the single-sideband modulation phase noise of the device is–124 dBc/Hz.In the range of 0.5–64 rad,the signal generator may produce a pulse width of 10 ns and pulse modulation phase deviation in the normal mode.The frequency range of 9 kHz to 9,4,14,18,or 27 GHz was analyzed with this instrument in an extended mode from 3,6—50 GHz.The absolute amplitude accuracy was±0.13 dB,and the frequency switching was approximately smaller than 135 μs.The intermodulation of the 3rd order was approximately+31 dBm,and the device showed a medium noise level of up to-168 dBm/Hz.

    Figure 1:Channel sounder architecture

    Table 1:Channel specifications and configuration parameters

    Table 1:Continued

    2.2 Experiment Description

    The measurement experiment site isMangyang Tunnel 2,located in Mangyang-ri,Giseong-myeon,Uljin-gun, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea.The newly built tunnel,Mangyang Tunnel 2, is used for transportation by trains.The experiments were conducted in the tunnel before its opening, and consequently, safety issues were easily ensured.Some of the measurement attempts are presented in Figs.2a–2b.All the equipment and technical support during the measurement experiment was provided by TA Engineering Inc., South Korea.The organization deployed a physical transmitter and receiver, a mobile trolley, and other experimental facilities.Mechanical adjustments allow the transmitter’s antenna to be physically modified.The tunnel geometry at the entrance(of the experiment starting point) and some of the irregularities in the tunnel structure are shown in Figs.2c–2d.The receiver unit was installed on a trolley,which was specially designed for experimental purposes.The transmitter’s horn antenna was directed toward the central receiver unit,while the receiver trolley was moved inside the tunnel at regular intervals of 10 m up to 1500 m and then at regular intervals of 20 m for the rest of the path,and the received signal strength was measured.Thus,the received signal was measured at a total of 160 places.

    2.3 Data Pre-Processing

    Path loss is crucial in radio channel models to design the link budget and coverage of wireless networks.The path loss of a radio link can be calculated as:

    wherePTxis the transmitted signal power,PRxis the received signal power,GTxandGRxare the gains of the used antennas,andCTx,CRxare the cable losses at the Tx and Rx ends,respectively.We measured the received power,and the other gain-related parameters were calculated from the system specifications and datasheets.

    3 Path Loss Prediction Models

    Absorption and scattering are two primary processes in large-scale signal attenuation.Typically,path loss and shadowing are used to describe the large-scale signal attenuation.The relationship between path loss and channel distance is typically characterized by two models:single-frequency model and multi-frequency model,based on empirical data acquired from channel measurements.The large-scale CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models have a fixed mathematical structure,and certain parameters whose values change according to operational frequency,terrain setting,and environmental factors.This section determines the propagation parameters using the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models,which are discussed in detail in the following subsections.

    Figure 2:(a)Receiver movement trolley on the train rail,(b)Transmitter and the receiver together at an initial measurement,(c)Tunnel geometry at the entrance on one side,and(d)Structural changes in the tunnel:change in tunnel structure at the points 220,770,1000,1260,1500 m

    3.1 Single Frequency Propagation

    3.1.1 Close-In(CI)Model

    The Equation for the CI model of wave propagation is:

    whereSis a Gaussian random variable, which means that the random variable can be expressed through the mean(μ)and standard deviationσin dB,where the mean(μ)is zero,but the standard deviation(σ)is a non-zero value.The random variableSshows large-scale channel variations within a limit (defined by the probability density function) as a result of the shadowing effect [30].The free space path lossL(f,1m) is given by 10log10(4πf/c)2for a distance of 1 m, and n is the PLE.The PLE(n)path loss pattern is determined by the MMSE method that equals the value determined to the minimum mean square error(by reducingσ)with the original physical anchor point,realized by the free space power transmitted by the transmitting antenna[31].To determine the optimum PLE where the path loss is minimum,Eq.(2)can be rearranged using the MMSE method as

    AssumingF=PLCI(f,d)[dB]-L(f,1m),andZ=10log10(d),then the Eq.(2)can written as:

    The standard deviation of the shadow factor can be determined as:

    whereNis the number of Tx-Rx separation distances.Minimizing the shadow factor with standard deviationσCIis commensurate to reducing the termis reduced, the derivative ofnshould be zero:

    Therefore,from Eq.(6):

    Consequently,the lowest standard deviation for the CI model is

    The calculated values ofnfor the CI model are listed in Tab.2.

    Table 2:Parameters of the different propagation techniques

    3.1.2 Floating-Intercept(FI)Model

    The FI path loss model is expressed by:

    whereαis the floating-intercept in dB, which is equivalent to the free space path loss, andβis the slope of the path lossvs.frequency line,which is comparable to the PLE as calculated in the CI model.The termSis a Gaussian random variable with zero mean and standard deviationσCI,defining largescale signal variations.This method is also utilized in WINNER II [32] and 3GPP standards [33].Remarkably,Eq.(9)requires two parameters,whereas the CI method requires only a single parameter,PLE (n).Assuming,F(xiàn)= PLFI(d)[dB], andZ= 10log10(d) the minimum shadow factor can be determined using Eq.(10).

    and the SF standard deviation is:

    The minimum standard deviationσFIwas determined based on the minimum value of the termAs the termNis a constant number,it needs to minimizeand,the same can be achieved by finding the derivative with respect toαandβas follows:

    Eqs.(12)and(13)yield:

    Combining(14)and(15),we get:

    The optimum standard deviation of SF can be achieved by replacingαandβin Eq.(11) with Eqs.(16)and(17),respectively.The mean values of all vector elements were determined directly in the dB scale.The calculated values of the termnfor the FI model are listed in Tab.2.

    3.2 Multi-Frequency Propagation

    3.2.1 CIF Model

    In [3], a multi-frequency method was considered adequate in a closed indoor environment, as frequency-dependent loss occurs after a distance of 1 m from the transmitter owing to the surrounding environment.The CI model can be adapted to implement the frequency-dependent path loss exponent(CIF)that utilizes the same physically driven free space path loss anchor at 1 m as the CI model.The path loss of the CIF method is calculated by:

    whered(m) is the distance between Tx and Rx greater than 1 m,nis the path loss exponent (PLE)that describes the dependence of propagation loss in the path(in dB)to the logarithm of the distance starting at 1 m,andSis the Gaussian random variable with zero mean and standard deviationσ(dB).This random variable characterizes the large-scale channel fluctuations due to shadowing, andbis an optimization parameter that presents the path loss slope of the linear frequency dependence.The termL(f, 1m)is the free-space loss at a distance of 1 m,withfcbeing the center frequencyL(dB) =32.4+20 logfc(GHz).The symbolf(GHz)is the operating carrier frequency andf0,as the minimum investigated,is the frequency of operating frequencies[34].The frequencyf0is computed as follows:

    wheref0is the weighted frequency average of all measurements for each particular scene, that is determined by considering the product of the sum of all the frequencies,the total number of recorded dataNkat a specific frequency and antenna scenario,and the corresponding frequencyfk,and dividing that by the total number of measurements(that is,the summation ofNkfromk=1 toK)taken over all frequencies for that specific scenario and the used transmitter and receiver system.

    CIF method:MMSE-based parameters

    After changing the side of Eq.(18), if we assume thatF=PLCIF(f,d)[dB] -L(f,d0),Z=10 log(d1m),p=n(1-b),andq=nb,we obtain

    The shadow factors’standard deviation is:

    MinimizingσCIFis equivalent to minimizingis minimized,its derivatives with respect topandqshould be zero,i.e.,

    After simplification and combining,we obtain:

    In Eqs.(24) and (25), the closed-loop solution of the assumed termspandqwas derived.The standard derivation of the shadow factor can be derived by insertingpandqinto Eq.(21).Moreover,by using the initial definition,p=n(1-b)andthe values ofnandbcan be calculated.The calculated values of the CIF model are listed in Tab.2.

    3.2.2 Alpha-Beta-Gamma(ABG)Model

    A multi-frequency three-component model called the ABG model contains conditions for describing the propagated loss at different frequencies depending on the frequency and distance[31,34].The path loss of the ABG model is given by Eq.(26):

    whereαandγare associated with the path length and frequency element of path loss of the link,fis the frequency in GHz, andβis a parameter utilized as an offset mechanism that does not have any physical meaning.The parameter S is a Gaussian random variable representing large-scale signal variations in the mean path loss over distance.The ABG model can be recognized as the annex of the FI model for multiple frequencies.The MMSE technique can be used to determine the optimum values of theα,β, andγcoefficients.It can be shown that ifγ= 0 or 2 and the ABG model is used for a single frequency, it transforms into an FI model.As a result, the ABG model is a multifrequency generalization of the FI,and the FI can also be constructed using a single frequency[35].In addition,the ABG model may be simplified to the CI,ifαequals 20log(4pi/c),βequals PLE,andγequals 2.Given that the ABG model requires three parameters whereas the CI model requires just one parameter,the CI model is more economical in computing complexity.Moreover,others argue that the additional two variables in the ABG model provide only a marginal improvement in accuracy[36,37].The MMSE-based minimum parameter values can be determined by assumingF= PLABG(f,d)[dB],Z=10log10(d)andP=10log10(f)in Eq.(26),then SF is calculated by

    and the SF standard deviation is:

    To obtain the minimum values of the standard deviation from Eq.(28),(F-αZ-β-γ P)2/Nneeds to be minimized.Given that N is a constant,to minimize the(F-αZ-β-γ P)2,its partial derivative with respect toα,β,andγshould be zero.

    From Eqs.(29)–(31),it is clear that

    The numeric values ofα,β,andγfor the ABG model can be calculated by solving Eq.(35),and the calculated coefficients of the ABG model are given in Tab.2.

    4 Results and Discussions

    4.1 Analysis of the Large-Scale Path Loss Models

    Measurement experiments at 3.7 and 28 GHz were conducted to examine the parameters of long-term path loss models in a train tunnel.The transmitting antenna was directed inwards, and the receiver, located in the middle of the mobile van, was directed toward the receiving antenna.As mentioned earlier,three different channels were created at two frequencies(3.7 and 28 GHz)using horn and TAS antennas.We processed our measured data and produced the visible figures with MATLAB R2021a.Fig.3 depicts the coefficients of the models with diverse FSPL and PLE values.

    Fig.3a shows the changes in path loss in the 1674 m long straight train tunnel on a semi-log scale.A scatter plot was used to depict the measured path losses at various points.The recorded path loss was fitted using the CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models,all plotted as straight lines.As shown in Fig.3a,the ABG model did not fit well with the measured datasets.Except for the ABG model,the other models,CI,F(xiàn)I,and CIF,are competitive when considering the prediction performance.Additionally,CI,F(xiàn)I,and CIF models show almost identical path loss predictions at the far end,but a variation appears at the near end for FI models when compared to the CI and CIF models.At the near end,the FI model fitted the measured data in contrast to the CI and CIF models.Consequently,at 3.7 GHz frequency,the FI model fitted the measured dataset with greater efficiency than the other models.

    Fig.3b shows the changes in path loss in the 1674 m long straight train tunnel on a semi-log scale at a frequency of 28 GHz.While both the CI and CIF models showed good performance at the far end of the tunnel,they did not perform well at the near end.At a frequency of 28 GHz,the ABG model did not fit well with the measured dataset, where the ABG model parameters were calculated using the MMSE-based optimization technique.Of the remaining models,the FI model fitted the measured dataset with greater efficiency than the CI and CIF models at 28 GHz.

    Fig.3c shows the changes in path loss in the 1674 m long straight train tunnel on a semi-log scale at a frequency of 28 GHz.The figure shows that the FI model performs well at the 28 GHz TAS receiver when compared to the CI, CIF, and ABG models.At 28 GHz frequency with the TAS receiver, the ABG model did not fit well with the measured dataset.The path loss predicted by the FI model fits well with the measured datasets,and shows higher accuracy at both the near and far ends.

    Figure 3:CI,CIF,F(xiàn)I,ABG model,and measured path loss in the tunnel at(a)3.7 GHz,(b)28 GHz,(c)28 GHz(TAS);(d)FSPL variations at different frequencies developed by CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG models, (e) PLE variations at different frequencies developed by CI, FI, CIF, and ABG models, (f)Standard deviation of point-to-point variations of received power

    4.2 FSPL Variations in Different Propagation Techniques

    Fig.3d shows the variations in FSPL exhibited by the CI, FI, CIF, and ABG models.As the FSPL of the CI and CIF models is the same,for brevity the CIF model is not depicted in the figure.The FSPL developed by the ABG model is a constant quantity,as depicted by the straight yellow line marked by a hexagonal-shaped marker.While the FSPL of the CI model is much lower than that of the other models,it is evident in Figs.3a–3c that the CI model did not outperform the FI model at the frequencies of 3.7,28,and 28(TAS)GHz.The FSPL at 28 GHz with the TAS receiver is a different value,as depicted in the figure by a single red scatter point.Consequently,it is clear that the FI model has a positive slope of FSPL(even if the single red scatter dot is taken into consideration).Accordingly,the FSPL obtained using the FI model is consistent with the path loss,as shown in Figs.3a–3c.

    4.3 PLE Variations at Different Frequencies and Models

    Fig.3e shows the variations in PLE with respect to the frequency of the FI,CI,CIF,and ABG models.The path loss exponent of the CIF and ABG model is constant at 1.6 and 1.1 over frequencies of 3.7 to 28 GHz, respectively.The remaining two models, CI and FI, exhibit a negative slope.The PLE points show different CI and FI model trends for the TAS antenna system at the receiver end.Evidently,owing to the use of the TAS receiver,the PLE developed through MMSE optimization is significantly reduced in the CI model,and in the case of the FI model,the PLE for the TAS receiver increases.

    4.4 Point to Point Standard Deviation Variations of Received Power

    The point-to-point standard deviation is a valuable tool for investigating the variations in the received power in different propagation measurement experiments, as reported in [26,38].Fig.3f depicts the variations in the received power measured at different distances in the tunnel at frequencies of 3.7,28,and 28(TAS)GHz.As described earlier,we measured at 160 points inside the tunnel,and at each point two different frequencies in the S(3.7 GHz)and Ka(28 GHz)bands were used where the receiver antenna was a horn and TAS.

    4.5 Shadow Factor and Multi-Path Components

    The shadow factor is calculated as the difference(in dB)between the data points and the trajectory loss anticipated at a particular distance using the adapted model:

    The shadow factor histograms for CI fitting are shown in Figs.4a–4c at 3.7, 28, and 28 GHz,respectively, for the horn, horn, and TAS antenna receiver.Similarly, the shadow factors of the FI fittings are shown in Figs.4d–4f,CIF are shown in Figs.5a–5c,and ABG are shown in Figs.5d–5f,at 3.7,28,and 28 GHz for the horn,horn,and TAS antenna receiver,respectively.The shadow factor follows a Gaussian distribution with zero mean and standard deviationσ, whereby the probability distribution function(PDF)of the shadow factor is represented by

    Figure 4:Shadow factor of the different propagation models.(a)CI 3 GHz,(b)CI 28 GHz,(c)CI 28 GHz(TAS);(d)FI 3 GHz,(e)FI 28 GHz,(f)FI 28 GHz(TAS)

    Figure 5:Shadow factor of the different propagation models.(a)CIF 3 GHz,(b)CIF 28 GHz,(c)CIF 28 GHz(TAS);(d)ABG 3 GHz,(e)ABG 28 GHz,(f)ABG,28 GHz(TAS)

    As expected,the histograms generally corresponded to a Gaussian distribution.The experimental mean and standard shadow deviation factors are shown for each Gaussian distribution as a solid red line.The standard deviation values are listed in Tab.3.

    Table 3:Shadow factor of CI,F(xiàn)I,CIF,and ABG model fitting to the measured data using MMSE

    5 Conclusion

    This study focused on developing large-scale channel models that characterize wireless path loss in train tunnels.As mentioned earlier, there exists some structural changes in the investigated train tunnel at points 220,770,1000,1260,and 1500 m from the initial measurement position,but no abrupt changes in the received signal strength was noticed at the receiver end(Figs.3a–3c).Consequently,the effects of such smaller structural shape variations on large-scale wave propagation modelling can be negligible.At every frequency band,the ABG model did not fit well with the measured datasets.While the CI,CIF,and ABG models showed almost similar performance at a frequency of 28 GHz,at 3.7 GHz frequency the FI model suits the measured data more accurately.The FI model showed consistent matching results with the measured datasets at a frequency of 28 GHz for both antenna type horn and the TAS type antenna system.Therefore,the FI model showed better matching performance to the measured datasets than the other models in all measuring scenarios.Given that a lower standard deviation of the shadow factor in the wave propagation model was expected in this case,the FI model yielded shadow factors of 5.49, 5.53, 4.86 at frequencies of 3.7, 28, and 28 GHz (TAS) receivers,respectively.The shadow factors yielded by the FI model are almost the lowest(except for CIF at 3.7 GHz) among all models, as shown in Tab.3.A minimum shadow factor indicates that the probable error introduced in the model will also be minimal.Additionally,we checked that the point-to-point standard deviation of the received power by the FI model is also minimum among all models,which has not been shown here for brevity.Hence, it can be concluded that the FI model produced more acceptable propagation losses in the tunnel.Based on this investigation,it is assumed that the FI model can predict wave propagation loss in similarly structured train tunnels.

    Acknowledgement:The authors would like to thank TA Engineering Inc.,South Korea,for assisting with the wave propagation measurement experiments.

    Funding Statement:The authors received no specific funding for this study.

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding this study.

    精品久久久久久久末码| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 禁无遮挡网站| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 国产午夜精品论理片| 22中文网久久字幕| 综合色av麻豆| 99热全是精品| 在线播放无遮挡| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| av免费在线看不卡| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久草成人影院| av在线亚洲专区| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 简卡轻食公司| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产av在哪里看| 国产视频首页在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 69人妻影院| 国产单亲对白刺激| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| av福利片在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 777米奇影视久久| 久久午夜福利片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 亚洲在久久综合| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲综合精品二区| 男女那种视频在线观看| av在线蜜桃| 亚州av有码| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 99热这里只有精品一区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品一二三| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| av卡一久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产黄片美女视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美zozozo另类| av线在线观看网站| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 高清毛片免费看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 99久国产av精品| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 色综合站精品国产| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 精品久久久久久电影网| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| www.色视频.com| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 日韩电影二区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 免费观看精品视频网站| 日韩伦理黄色片| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 成人综合一区亚洲| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产单亲对白刺激| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 91久久精品电影网| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久久久久久久中文| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 天堂√8在线中文| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产淫语在线视频| 热99在线观看视频| a级毛色黄片| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 午夜福利高清视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国内精品宾馆在线| 欧美97在线视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 超碰97精品在线观看| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 成人综合一区亚洲| 中文天堂在线官网| 一级a做视频免费观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 午夜激情欧美在线| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 午夜激情欧美在线| 日日啪夜夜爽| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 永久网站在线| 亚洲国产av新网站| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 一本一本综合久久| 中文字幕久久专区| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲av.av天堂| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 一级a做视频免费观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| videossex国产| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 日韩中字成人| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 永久网站在线| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 欧美日本视频| 97在线视频观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 午夜日本视频在线| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 免费观看av网站的网址| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久久久久久久中文| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 99热这里只有精品一区| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产探花极品一区二区| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲色图av天堂| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 看黄色毛片网站| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 热99在线观看视频| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产淫语在线视频| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 精品久久久噜噜| 色吧在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 日日撸夜夜添| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| av免费在线看不卡| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲内射少妇av| 一级爰片在线观看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 三级国产精品片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 成人无遮挡网站| 中文字幕久久专区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 色5月婷婷丁香| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产乱来视频区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲最大成人av| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久久久久久久久中文| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲精品第二区| 中文天堂在线官网| 一级黄片播放器| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| ponron亚洲| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | videos熟女内射| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产成人aa在线观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 久久精品夜色国产| 在线天堂最新版资源| 免费观看性生交大片5| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 99热网站在线观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 日本wwww免费看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| www.av在线官网国产| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 超碰97精品在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 中文天堂在线官网| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 观看免费一级毛片| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 免费av毛片视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 777米奇影视久久| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 五月天丁香电影| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| av免费在线看不卡| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 大香蕉久久网| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 免费看日本二区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产高清三级在线| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 午夜免费激情av| 91久久精品电影网| 国产一级毛片在线| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 亚洲国产av新网站| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 高清av免费在线| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 精品一区二区三卡| 观看美女的网站| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 亚洲成人一二三区av| 美女国产视频在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 色播亚洲综合网| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产淫语在线视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 99热全是精品| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| freevideosex欧美| 直男gayav资源| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产av在哪里看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产老妇女一区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 黄色日韩在线| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 老司机影院成人| 91久久精品电影网| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 91久久精品电影网| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 三级国产精品片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 嫩草影院新地址| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 久久久久网色| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久久欧美国产精品| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 免费少妇av软件| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 内射极品少妇av片p| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 少妇丰满av| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 日本色播在线视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 国产三级在线视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 嫩草影院入口| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| av卡一久久| 国产三级在线视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产精品无大码| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | av卡一久久| 中文欧美无线码| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 一本久久精品| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看|