• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Optical Flow with Learning Feature for Deformable Medical Image Registration

    2022-08-24 03:27:50JinrongHuLujinLiYingFuMaoyangZouJiliuZhouandShanhuiSun
    Computers Materials&Continua 2022年5期

    Jinrong Hu,Lujin Li,Ying Fu,Maoyang Zou,Jiliu Zhou and Shanhui Sun

    1Department of Computer Science,Chengdu University of Information Technology,Chengdu,610225,China

    2Curacloud Corporation,999 Third Ave,Suite 700 Seattle,WA,98104,USA

    Abstract:Deformable medical image registration plays a vital role in medical image applications, such as placing different temporal images at the same time point or different modality images into the same coordinate system.Various strategies have been developed to satisfy the increasing needs of deformable medical image registration.One popular registration method is estimating the displacement field by computing the optical flow between two images.The motion field(flow field)is computed based on either gray-value or handcrafted descriptors such as the scale-invariant feature transform(SIFT).These methods assume that illuminationis constant between images.However,medical images may not always satisfy this assumption.In this study, we propose a metric learning-based motion estimation method called Siamese Flow for deformable medical image registration.We train metric learners using a Siamese network,which produces an image patch descriptor that guarantees a smaller feature distance in two similar anatomical structures and a larger feature distance in two dissimilar anatomical structures.In the proposed registration framework,the flow field is computed based on such features and is close to the real deformation field due to the excellent feature representation ability of the Siamese network.Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the Demons, SIFT Flow,Elastix, and Voxel-Morph networks regarding registration accuracy and robustness,particularly with large deformations.

    Keywords: Deformation registration; feature extraction; optical flow; convolutional neural network

    1 Introduction

    Medical image registration refers to seeking one or a series of spatial transformations for a medical image (moving image) to achieve spatial and anatomical position correspondence to another fixed image [1–3].In many clinical applications, medical image registration can provide complementary information for accurate diagnosis and tumor treatment planning.For instance,aligning a map of important anatomical structures to patient images provides useful guidance for preoperative and intraoperative planning in neurosurgery.In addition, image registration technology is used to put studied patient images into a common coordinate system to study anatomical and functional variations in the population.Image registration is also used to compensate for motion, such as breathing and cardiac motions, in dynamic images.In computer-aided diagnosis and radiation therapy, image registration also plays an important role in aligning and tracking tumor growth in longitudinal images.

    Deformable image registration is an active field of medical image analysis [4–6], and many studies have investigated this topic [7–9].The optical flow-based method [10–12] was proposed to estimate object motion in two successive images in [13].Thirion et al.[14] proposed the Demons image registration algorithm based on the similarity between the deformation field and the optical flow field.The Demons approach solves the image registration problem by considering the optical flow and calculates the optical flow field based on the difference in intensity of pixels between the fixed and moving images.Due to nonuniform illumination and abnormal lesions in medical images, the intensity difference-based optical flow method cannot correctly estimate the deformation field, and it is difficult to achieve accurate registration results.

    To overcome this problem, Ce Liu et al.proposed the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT)Flow algorithm, which computes the optical flow field based on the difference in SIFT features of a pixel between fixed and moving images [15,16].Although this method can obtain a more accurate deformation field than traditional optical flow methods, such as Demons, it also has limitations:(1) because SIFT features are based on gradient information, the SIFT Flow method mismatches SIFT features and cannot accurately register medical images with weak contrast and complex structures; and (2) because a SIFT feature is a low-level image feature and cannot represent a higher level or abstract image feature [17], the SIFT Flow method cannot robustly estimate the deformation field or effectively register medical images with large deformations.

    Recently, in the field of computer vision, machine-learning methods have been used to learn feature descriptions from large datasets.In particular, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have strong feature representation abilities and exhibit good performance for various computer vision tasks [18–20].In this study, we propose a deep metric learning feature-based optical flow method(Siamese Flow) for deformable medical image registration.This method is composed of three primary steps:deep metric learning feature extraction, deformation field estimation and warping.Specifically, we obtain image patches that are densely clustered around a given pixel.Then, we extract the deep metric learning feature of the pixel using the Siamese network [21].Finally, we calculate the optical flow field based on these in-depth learning features and obtain the registered image by warping the moving image using the computed deformation field.

    To construct the proposed registration framework, the learned image patch representation using deep contrastive metric learning and the deformation field estimation using such learned representations are developed.The learned image patch representation uses the Siamese network to train the metric learner, which produces an image patch descriptor that guarantees a smaller feature distance in two similar anatomical structures and a larger feature distance in two dissimilar anatomical structures.Unlike the SIFT feature and general deep learning features, such as those from the Visual Geometry Group (VGG) networks [22], the proposed deep metric learning feature is more discriminative and more stable.The proposed Siamese Flow method can thus solve the optical flow field with regard to the real deformation field.To our knowledge, this is the first study that combines contrastive metric learning into optical flow to solve the problem of deformable medical image registration.Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the Demons [14], SIFT Flow [16], Elastix [23], and VoxelMorph [24] networks regarding registration accuracy and robustness, particularly with large deformations.

    2 Method

    Fig.1 shows an overview of the proposed Siamese Flow method, which consists of three primary components:Siamese feature extraction, deformation field estimation and warping.Among these components, Siamese feature extraction is the most critical.After obtaining the deformation field, we obtain the registered image by warping the moving image according to the determined deformation field.

    Figure 1:Overview of the proposed image registration framework using the Siamese Flow method

    2.1 Siamese Feature Extraction

    In the context of image registration, a good local image representation can significantly improve the corresponding point matching performance, leading to an accurate and robust deformation field.To perform this process accurately without using manually designed features, we propose to learn local image representations directly from the data using contrastive metric learning, a Siamese network.

    Fig.2 shows the structure of the proposed Siamese network, which consists of two CNN networks, in which we share computations across two networks.The input of each network is an image patch of size 15×15.The output of the network is a 128-dimensional feature representation.The convolution layers of each network use a 3×3 convolution kernel with a stride of 1 following a leaky rectified linear unit (LeakyReLU) activation function.In addition,the fully connected layers (Dense 1 and Dense 2) use an ReLU activation function, and we add a dropout layer after the flattened layer to mitigate overfitting.Network parameters are shown in Fig.2.

    The proposed Siamese network makes a discriminative image feature by minimizing a contrastive loss function, which is shown as follows:

    whereNis the number of input sample pairs; di=||xi1-xi22||is the Euclidean distance of each pair;marginis a constant value of 1; andyiis the binary label for input pairs, where 1 indicates that it is a positive sample pair without deformation, and 0 indicates that it is a negative sample pair with deformation.

    Figure 2:Architecture of the Siamese network

    The mapping learned using contrastive metric learning can make the Euclidean distance between the Siamese features small for two patches without deformation and large for two patches with deformation.Therefore, compared with the SIFT feature and general deep learning features,such as the VGG [22], the proposed Siamese feature extracted by the Siamese network is more discriminative in the context of the image registration problem.

    2.2 Deformation Field Estimation

    Inspired by the SIFT Flow method, we incorporate the learned feature representation into an optical flow-based image registration framework to estimate a dense deformation field.The goal of this method is to match the Siamese features densely in two images and then minimize the energy loss function to obtain the displacement vector for each pixel.We defined the energy loss function as follows:

    where S1and S2are the Siamese feature vectors of the fixed and moving images; w (p) =(u(p),v(p)) is the flow vector at pixel location p =(x,y);εcontains all the spatial neighborhoods(an eight-neighbor system is used); andηandαare used to maintain the desired balance between the terms.The first term Eq.(2a) accounts for the dissimilarity of the Siamese feature between the fixed and moving images; the second term Eq.(2b) provides a regularization on the first-order magnitude of w; and the third term Eq.(2c) enforces a smooth flow field, which constrains the flow vectors of adjacent pixels to be similar.We use the thresholdstanddto consider matching outliers and flow discontinuities.These thresholds allow large deformations in soft tissues and discontinuous displacements between adjacent tissues.Due to large deformations, such as those caused by cardiac and respiratory motions, the weight ofαin Eq.(2c) should be larger than that ofηin Eq.(2b).

    To optimize the objective functionE(w), we use a dual-layer loopy belief propagation (BPS) [25] method that is similar to that used in SIFT Flow.In addition, we use a coarse-to-fine matching scheme to speed up optimization [26].Finally, we warp the moving image to obtain the registered result based on the deformation field using cubic spline interpolation [27].

    3 Experiment and Results

    3.1 Dataset and Ground Truth

    We validated the proposed method with the BrainWeb [28–30], EXPIRE10 [31], and ACDC [32] datasets, as well as with our own nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patient data.BrainWeb is a simulated brain database (SBD) produced by an MRI simulator and contains simulated brain MRI data based on two anatomical models:normal and multiple sclerosis (MS).Full 3-dimensional data volumes were simulated using three sequences (T1-, T2- and PD-weighted)and a variety of slice thicknesses, noise levels, and levels of intensity nonuniformity.This dataset has rich image texture information and good image quality.EMPIRE10 is a lung dataset that contains 30 clinical chest CT scans and their corresponding masks obtained using the lung segmentation method that was proposed by Rikxoorta et al.[33].ACDC is a multislice cine MRI clinical cardiac dataset that contains 150 patients.Finally, NPC is a 3D CT and MRI clinical nasopharyngeal cancer dataset that includes 100 patients (male/female:52/48; mean age±standard deviation:50.3±11.2 years old; age range:21–76 years old), who underwent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy at West China Hospital.

    We randomly selected 45 T1 and T2 images from BrainWeb and 30 MRI lung images from EXPIPE10 to create training and validation datasets.Furthermore, to obtain the corresponding moving images, we deformed those images using the method proposed by Patrice et al.[34] with the deformation level parameterλfrom 50 to 200 to control the degree of deformation.Then, we densely extracted image patches with a size of 15×15 pixels from the fixed and moving images.We used the patch pairs as the training data and validation data.A patch pair received a positive label if the patches were generated from the same location of the same fixed image; a negative label was applied if the patches were created from the same place of the fixed and moving images.Fig.3 shows example patches with positive and negative labels.The patches in pairs with positive labels are identical; there is a deformation between the patch pair with a negative label.

    Figure 3:Some positive and negative sample pairs for Siamese network training.(a) BrainWeb T1 positive sample pair (b) BrainWeb T2 positive sample pair (c) EXPIPE10 positive sample pairs (d)BrainWeb T1 negative sample pair (e) BrainWeb T2 negative sample pair (f) EXPIPE10 negative sample pair

    3.2 Experiment Setup

    We compared the proposed Siamese Flow to Demons [14], SIFT Flow [16], the Elastix toolbox [23], and VoxelMorph [24].The Elastix toolbox consists of a collection of algorithms that are commonly used to solve rigid and nonrigid medical image registration problems.VoxelMorph is a self-supervised end-to-end deep learning-based registration method and is one of the most advanced existing methods.

    We generated image patch pairs following Section 3.1 and used 6,000,000 and 1,200,000 patch pairs as training and validation data for the Siamese network, respectively.We implemented the Siamese network using Keras, where the training batch size was 512, the optimizer was RMSprop [35] with momentum, and the initial learning rate was 0.001 with a momentum of 0.9.The training of each epoch took approximately 52 s on an NVIDIA Tesla K40C GPU.We trained the Siamese network with 200 epochs, and it converged before the end of training.

    In the experiments, for the Demons parameters, we set the number of histogram levels and iterations to 1024 and 50, respectively.For the SIFT Flow parameters, we setηto 0.005,αto 2, and the number of iterations to 200.For the elasticity parameters, we chose advanced Mattes mutual information as the optimization criterion, adaptive stochastic gradient descent as the optimization routine, and B-splines (BSPLINE) as the transformation model.We used the four image pyramids (resolutions), each with 500 iterations.For VoxelMorph, we used the mean squared error (MSE) as the loss function and implemented EMPIRE10 and BrainWeb as training datasets to train the model using the released code from the authors [36].

    3.3 Evaluation Indices

    3.3.1 Root Mean Squared Difference(RMSD)

    The RMSD measures the difference between the two images and has the following definition:

    whereI1andI2are images;I1(p) andI2(p) are the gray values at location p =(x,y);ΩIis the image domain ofI1andI2; and |ΩI|is the number of pixels inI1orI2.The smaller the RMSD value between the registered and fixed images is, the more accurate the registration result is.

    3.3.2 DICE Coefficient

    We also compare the corresponding regions of interest (ROIs) of fixed and moving images.The method behind this comparison assumes that the ROI is given in the fixed image and that the corresponding ROI in the moving image is computed by warping the ROI in the fixed image using a computed deformation field.We use the DICE coefficient to determine this comparison evaluation index [37].The DICE coefficient is defined as follows:

    whereXandYare the ROIs of the two images, andX∩Yis the overlapping ROI.For images from EMPIRE10, the ROI is the lung segmentation.For images from ACDC, the ROIs are the annotated left ventricular endocardium (LV), right ventricular endocardium (RV) and myocardium(MC).Fig.4 shows examples of lung and cardiac images and their masks.

    Figure 4:Examples of (a) a lung image (b) its lung mask (c) a cardiac image and (d) its LV, RV and MC masks

    3.3.3 Mutual Information(MI)

    MI measures the similarity between the two images, and the following is one of the standard mathematical definitions for MI:

    whereE(I1) andE(I2) are the individual entropies andE(I1,I2) is the joint entropy.When two similar images are perfectly aligned, the joint entropyE(I1,I2) is minimized, and thus, MI reaches its maximum.Thus, the greater the MI value between the registered and fixed images is, the more accurate the registration result is.

    3.4 Registration Accuracy

    We randomly chose twenty images from BrainWeb and EMPIRE10 as the fixed images and deformed them with a specific deformation levelλfrom 50 to 200 with a step of 50 to create the moving images.There are a total of 160 paired fixed and deformable moving images used to validate the registration accuracy of the five methods.

    Tab.1 summarizes the average RMSD indices of the five compared methods with the Brain-Web and EMPIRE10 datasets.Tab.2 summarizes the average DICE indices of the five methods with the EMPIRE10 dataset.The results shown in Tabs.1 and 2 demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms Demons, SIFT Flow, and the most advanced methods (Elastix and VoxelMorph) in all cases in terms of RMSD and DICE.

    Figs.5 and 6 show two examples of registration results with different methods (Demons,SIFT Flow, Elastix, VoxelMorph, and the proposed Siamese Flow) from the test BrainWeb and EMPIRE10 datasets.Fig.5a is the fixed T1 image; Fig.5b is the moving T1 image; Fig.5c is the heatmap between the fixed and moving images; Figs.5d–5h are the registered images obtained by Demons, SIFT Flow, Elastix, VoxelMorph and Siamese Flow, respectively; and Figs.5i–5m are the heatmaps between the fixed and registered images.The heatmap shows the absolute difference between the fixed and registered images.Figs.5 and 6 show that the heatmaps of the five methods are consistent with their RMSD and DICE results, and the proposed Siamese Flow achieves the most accurate registration results.

    3.5 Cross-Modality

    To demonstrate the cross-modality registration capability of the proposed method, we applied the proposed method to two new tasks (multimodality applications).The first task was to register T1 and T2 images from BrainWeb, and the second task was to register CT and MRI images from NPC.For the two tasks, we trained the Siamese networks on image patch pairs taken from the T1-T2 slices of BrainWeb and the CT-MR slices of NPC.For each task, we used 150,000 and 40,000 patch pairs as training data and validation data, respectively.

    Table 1:RMSD results with BRAINWEB and EMPIRE10 at different deformation levels

    Table 2:DICE results with EMPIRE10 at different deformation levels

    We randomly chose fifteen paired T1-T2 and CT-MR images from BrainWeb and NPC separately, took T1 and CT as the fixed images, and deformed the paired T2 and MRI with a specific deformation levelλfrom 50 to 200 with a step of 50 to create the moving images.There are a total of 120 paired fixed and distorted moving images to validate the proposed method’s ability to register the multimodality registration.

    Tab.3 summarizes the average MI of the five compared methods on the BrainWeb and NPC datasets.The results presented in Tab.3 demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms VoxelMorph, Demons, SIFT Flow, and the most advanced cross-modality registration method Elastix in all cases.

    Figure 5:Visualization of registration accuracy results using a heatmap for a randomly selected BrainWeb T1 image and its deformable image (λ= 150).(a) Fixed T1 (b) Moving T1 (c) Heatmap of the fixed and moving T1 (d) Demons (e) SIFT Flow (f) Elastix (g) VoxelMorph (h) Siamese Flow (i) Heatmap of Demons (j) Heatmap of SIFT Flow (k) Heatmap of Elastix (I) Heatmap of VoxelMorph (m) Heatmap of Siamese Flow

    Figs.7 and 8 show how well different registration algorithms perform in the application of registering a pair of images from the different image modalities.Fig.7a is the fixed T1 MR image; Fig.7b is the corresponding T2 MR slice (ground truth); Fig.7c is the moving T2 MR image generated by distorting image (b) withλ=150; Fig.7d is the ground truth T2 MR image overlayed on the fixed T1 image; Fig.7e is the moving T2 MR image overlayed on the fixed T1 image; and Figs.7f–7j are the registration results obtained by Demons, SIFT Flow, Elastix,VoxelMorph and Siamese Flow overlayed on the fixed T1 image, respectively.The proposed method is shown to achieve better registration accuracy than Elastix when registering images from cross-modalities.

    Figure 6:Visualization of registration accuracy results using a heatmap for a randomly selected EMPIRE10 image and its deformable image (λ= 150).(a) Fixed image (b) Moving image (c)Heatmap between the fixed and moving image (d) Demons (e) SIFT Flow (f) Elastix (g) Voxel-Morph (h) Siamese Flow (i) Heatmap of Demons (j) Heatmap of SIFT Flow (k) Heatmap of Elastix (I) Heatmap of VoxelMorph (m) Heatmap of Siamese Flow

    Table 3:MI results with BrainWeb T1-T2 and NPC CT-MRI at different deformation levels

    3.6 Large-Deformation and Unseen Dataset

    Large deformations due to heartbeat and respiration effects lead to a challenging deformable image registration task.In this section, we investigated registration performance in the case of the large deformable motion of cardiac tissue from ACDC for the five compared methods.The cardiac cine MRI scans in ACDC consist of short-axis cardiac image slices, each containing 20 time points that encompass the entire cardiac cycle.An expert annotated the LV, the RV and the MC at end diastolic (ED) and end systolic (ES) time points.To facilitate quantitative evaluation,we took the images in the ED and ES phases as fixed and moving images, respectively.We also trained the Siamese network on the image patches taken from the MR slices from BrainWeb and EMPIRE10, and the testing images were randomly selected from ACDC (unseen dataset and body part).

    Tab.4 shows the average DICE of the annotated LV, RV and MC regions that correspond to the registered images obtained by the five methods for ED and ES frames from the ACDC dataset.Tab.4 shows that the proposed Siamese Flow achieves the highest average DICE.

    Fig.9 shows a comparison among different registration algorithms with large deformations and unseen datasets.Fig.9a shows one fixed image randomly selected from ACDC; Fig.9b is the corresponding moving image at the ES time point; and Figs.9c–9h are superimposed LV,RV and MC regions of the ground truth (red) and the deformed regions of the registered image(green).Specifically, Fig.9c is the result before registration; and Figs.9d–9h are the results after registration using Demons, SIFT Flow, Elastix, VoxelMorph and Siamese Flow, respectively.Fig.9 shows that the deformed region attained by Siamese Flow achieves the closest alignment with the ground truth region.

    Figure 7:Illustration example of T1-T2 images from BrainWeb with different registration methods.(a) Fixed T1 (b) True T2 (c) Initial moving image (d) Ground truth overlay (e) Unregistered (f)Demons (g) SIFT Flow (h) Elastix (i) VoxelMorph (j) Siamese Flow

    Figure 8:Illustration examples of CT-MR slices from NPCs with different registration methods.(a) Fixed CT (b) True MR (c) Initial moving image (d) Ground truth overlay (e) Unregistered (f)Demons (g) SIFT Flow (h) Elastix (i) VoxelMorph (j) Siamese Flow

    Table 4:DICE results for ACDC with different time points

    4 Discussion

    In this study, we proposed a deep learning feature-based optical flow method (Siamese Flow) for deformable medical image registration.Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms Demons, SIFT Flow, and the most advanced existing methods (Elastix and VoxelMorph) with regard to registration accuracy, robustness, and large deformation.

    The registration accuracy results (Tabs.1 and 2, and Figs.5 and 6) show that the proposed Siamese Flow method performs better than the comparison methods regarding RMSD, DICE,and heatmap visualization.Demons, SIFT Flow, and Siamese Flow are optical flow-based registration methods that align the fixed and moving images by minimizing image dissimilarities in the context of the optical flow approach.The feature representation derived from the proposed deep learning approach outperforms handcrafted features, such as SIFT Flow and pixel intensity-based approaches.The proposed approach thus produces better registration accuracy than Demons and SIFT Flow-based approaches.

    Conversely, Elastix and VoxelMorph perform image registration via an optimizer that maximizes the intensity-based similarity between the overall fixed and moving images.The cost function thus plays an essential role in these methods to achieve an accurate registration result.Using the same cost function, we observed that the RMSD and DICE results in these two algorithms are similar.While it is a challenging task to design an optimal cost function in a specific task, we do not need to use an explicit image registration cost function in the proposed approach because image similarity is learned via metric learning and contrastive samples prepared in the learning stage.From comparative experiments that consider RMSD and DICE indices as well as heatmap visualization on BrainWeb and EMPIRE10, we observed that the proposed approach outperformed these two methods.

    Figure 9:Example results for large-deformation cardiac-motion registration.(a) Fixed image (ED time point) (b) Moving image (ES time point) (c) unregistered (d) Demons (e) SIFT Flow (f)Elastix (g) VoxelMorph (h) Siamese Flow

    From the results in Tab.3, Figs.7, and 8, the proposed algorithm is shown to be capable of registering multimodal deformable images.Demons and VoxelMorph fail to align two images in the case of appearance variations across different modalities because they assume that illumination is constant between images.SIFT Flow also fails because the SIFT feature is based on the gradient information and does not consider multimodal information.Unlike Demons, SIFT Flow and VoxelMorph, Elastix and Siamese Flow perform well in these cross-modality registration tasks.In addition, from the MI results in Tab.3 and the color coding results in Figs.7 and 8,particularly the red arrows pointing in Fig.7h, Siamese Flow is shown to perform better than Elastix, which uses handcrafted mutual information as a cost function to measure image similarity under a global statistical assumption.However, Siamese Flow calculates image similarity via metric learning image features, making it more suitable for deformable medical image registration and allowing it to produce more accurate results.

    Better registration is reflected by closer alignment of the fixed and moving images.Based on the DICE results in Tab.4 and the superimposed LV, RV and MC regions in Fig.9, Siamese Flow is shown to be capable of managing large tissue or organ deformations and achieves the best performance among all investigated methods.The Demons approach fails to align two images because the underlying assumptions (constant gray values and constant gradient) are unsatisfactory in optical flow estimation.VoxelMorph fails to attain accurate registered results due to the large unseen deformation level.SIFT Flow obtains alignment results that are comparable to those of Elastix for this large-deformation registration task.Elastix fails to align two images under a certain iteration number (e.g., 500 iterations).SIFT Flow also fails to use the handcrafted SIFT feature.In contrast, Siamese Flow is successful in all of these cases because the learned image patch representation is robust and generalizable, even to large deformations.

    Furthermore, Tab.4 and Fig.9 show that Siamese Flow can generalize different tasks without retraining the model.The model learns a generic local descriptor that is applicable to other unseen datasets (ACDC) and unseen body parts (cardiac).

    5 Conclusion

    In this study, we presented a deep metric learning feature-based optical flow method for deformable medical image registration.In this framework, the critical components are the learned image patch representation that uses contrastive loss and the proposed optical flow that uses this learned representation.Experimental results show that the proposed Siamese Flow-based registration method performs better than pixel intensity and SIFT feature-based optical flow methods.Additionally, the proposed method outperforms conventional intensity-based image registration methods, such as Elastix, and end-to-end deep learning-based image registration methods, such as VoxelMorph, with regard to registration accuracy, robustness, and ability to manage large deformations.

    In the future, we plan to extend the proposed algorithm as follows.First, we plan to investigate the end-to-end deep learning feature-based optical flow method (Siamese Flow) for deformable image registration to reduce computation time.Second, we plan to investigate the deep learning feature-based optical flow method for multimodality deformable image registration.Last, we plan to use the proposed algorithm to register lungs with large deformations to evaluate regional lung deformation.

    Funding Statement:This study was supported in part by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2019YFH0085, 2019ZDZX0005, 2019YFG0196) and in part by the Foundation of Chengdu University of Information Technology (No.KYTZ202008).

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

    人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲国产av新网站| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 一级av片app| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 嫩草影院新地址| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久久久久久久久大av| 舔av片在线| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 成人欧美大片| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| av播播在线观看一区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 99久久人妻综合| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| a级毛色黄片| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 久热久热在线精品观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 一夜夜www| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产av在哪里看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 91久久精品电影网| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产三级在线视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲图色成人| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产精品三级大全| 免费看av在线观看网站| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久国产乱子免费精品| av卡一久久| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99热网站在线观看| 中国国产av一级| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 简卡轻食公司| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 午夜福利在线观看吧| videossex国产| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 欧美zozozo另类| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 美女高潮的动态| av黄色大香蕉| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | av在线播放精品| 免费av毛片视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| or卡值多少钱| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 日韩伦理黄色片| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 大香蕉久久网| www.av在线官网国产| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 日本色播在线视频| 777米奇影视久久| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 免费大片18禁| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久99久视频精品免费| av黄色大香蕉| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲国产色片| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 特级一级黄色大片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 777米奇影视久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 色哟哟·www| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产成人a区在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 99久久精品热视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 夫妻午夜视频| 嫩草影院入口| 青春草国产在线视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 色网站视频免费| 日本免费在线观看一区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| a级毛色黄片| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| .国产精品久久| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 综合色丁香网| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 少妇丰满av| 久久久久网色| .国产精品久久| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 只有这里有精品99| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 色哟哟·www| 春色校园在线视频观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 嫩草影院精品99| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产 一区精品| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲内射少妇av| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 精品一区二区免费观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 欧美潮喷喷水| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 极品教师在线视频| 国产精品.久久久| eeuss影院久久| 久久久精品94久久精品| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 一级毛片电影观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产 一区精品| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲国产色片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 欧美潮喷喷水| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 色综合色国产| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产视频内射| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 舔av片在线| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 热99在线观看视频| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日日啪夜夜爽| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产成人a区在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 久久久久国产网址| 国产av国产精品国产| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 夫妻午夜视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 色综合站精品国产| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 韩国av在线不卡| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 亚洲国产色片| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 久久久色成人| av.在线天堂| 一级毛片我不卡| .国产精品久久| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产老妇女一区| 久久午夜福利片| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 色综合色国产| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 永久免费av网站大全| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 禁无遮挡网站| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| av福利片在线观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 人妻一区二区av| 日本免费在线观看一区| 精品久久久久久久末码| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲电影在线观看av| 一级毛片我不卡| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 色综合色国产| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 黄色日韩在线| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 六月丁香七月| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 91久久精品电影网| 一本久久精品| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | or卡值多少钱| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| a级毛色黄片| 熟女电影av网| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 永久免费av网站大全| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 免费看日本二区| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 高清av免费在线| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 美女大奶头视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 在线a可以看的网站| 免费大片18禁| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 日本色播在线视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 全区人妻精品视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 简卡轻食公司| 欧美区成人在线视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产成人91sexporn| 免费看av在线观看网站| 午夜福利高清视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 日日啪夜夜撸| 老司机影院成人| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚州av有码| av黄色大香蕉| 欧美bdsm另类| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 内射极品少妇av片p| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 色视频www国产| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 午夜精品在线福利| 黄色日韩在线| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久97久久精品| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 少妇的逼水好多| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 99久久人妻综合| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 青春草国产在线视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产69精品久久久久777片| av播播在线观看一区| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | av一本久久久久| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 岛国毛片在线播放| 综合色av麻豆| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 夫妻午夜视频| 69人妻影院| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 91av网一区二区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 精品一区二区三卡| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 人妻系列 视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产高清三级在线| 国产av不卡久久| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 免费av毛片视频| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲av男天堂| 在线观看人妻少妇| 美女国产视频在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 99热网站在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 久久久久久伊人网av| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产色婷婷99| 黑人高潮一二区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 欧美另类一区| 日韩成人伦理影院| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 久久久久国产网址| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 日韩成人伦理影院| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产成人一区二区在线| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| .国产精品久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频 | 欧美97在线视频| 综合色av麻豆| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 免费av不卡在线播放| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产在视频线在精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| av专区在线播放| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| videossex国产| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 91久久精品电影网| 久久人人爽人人片av| 免费观看a级毛片全部| av线在线观看网站| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 精品午夜福利在线看| 成人欧美大片| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 97在线视频观看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产在视频线在精品| 床上黄色一级片| 欧美人与善性xxx| videossex国产| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉|