• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Optical Flow with Learning Feature for Deformable Medical Image Registration

    2022-08-24 03:27:50JinrongHuLujinLiYingFuMaoyangZouJiliuZhouandShanhuiSun
    Computers Materials&Continua 2022年5期

    Jinrong Hu,Lujin Li,Ying Fu,Maoyang Zou,Jiliu Zhou and Shanhui Sun

    1Department of Computer Science,Chengdu University of Information Technology,Chengdu,610225,China

    2Curacloud Corporation,999 Third Ave,Suite 700 Seattle,WA,98104,USA

    Abstract:Deformable medical image registration plays a vital role in medical image applications, such as placing different temporal images at the same time point or different modality images into the same coordinate system.Various strategies have been developed to satisfy the increasing needs of deformable medical image registration.One popular registration method is estimating the displacement field by computing the optical flow between two images.The motion field(flow field)is computed based on either gray-value or handcrafted descriptors such as the scale-invariant feature transform(SIFT).These methods assume that illuminationis constant between images.However,medical images may not always satisfy this assumption.In this study, we propose a metric learning-based motion estimation method called Siamese Flow for deformable medical image registration.We train metric learners using a Siamese network,which produces an image patch descriptor that guarantees a smaller feature distance in two similar anatomical structures and a larger feature distance in two dissimilar anatomical structures.In the proposed registration framework,the flow field is computed based on such features and is close to the real deformation field due to the excellent feature representation ability of the Siamese network.Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method outperforms the Demons, SIFT Flow,Elastix, and Voxel-Morph networks regarding registration accuracy and robustness,particularly with large deformations.

    Keywords: Deformation registration; feature extraction; optical flow; convolutional neural network

    1 Introduction

    Medical image registration refers to seeking one or a series of spatial transformations for a medical image (moving image) to achieve spatial and anatomical position correspondence to another fixed image [1–3].In many clinical applications, medical image registration can provide complementary information for accurate diagnosis and tumor treatment planning.For instance,aligning a map of important anatomical structures to patient images provides useful guidance for preoperative and intraoperative planning in neurosurgery.In addition, image registration technology is used to put studied patient images into a common coordinate system to study anatomical and functional variations in the population.Image registration is also used to compensate for motion, such as breathing and cardiac motions, in dynamic images.In computer-aided diagnosis and radiation therapy, image registration also plays an important role in aligning and tracking tumor growth in longitudinal images.

    Deformable image registration is an active field of medical image analysis [4–6], and many studies have investigated this topic [7–9].The optical flow-based method [10–12] was proposed to estimate object motion in two successive images in [13].Thirion et al.[14] proposed the Demons image registration algorithm based on the similarity between the deformation field and the optical flow field.The Demons approach solves the image registration problem by considering the optical flow and calculates the optical flow field based on the difference in intensity of pixels between the fixed and moving images.Due to nonuniform illumination and abnormal lesions in medical images, the intensity difference-based optical flow method cannot correctly estimate the deformation field, and it is difficult to achieve accurate registration results.

    To overcome this problem, Ce Liu et al.proposed the scale-invariant feature transform (SIFT)Flow algorithm, which computes the optical flow field based on the difference in SIFT features of a pixel between fixed and moving images [15,16].Although this method can obtain a more accurate deformation field than traditional optical flow methods, such as Demons, it also has limitations:(1) because SIFT features are based on gradient information, the SIFT Flow method mismatches SIFT features and cannot accurately register medical images with weak contrast and complex structures; and (2) because a SIFT feature is a low-level image feature and cannot represent a higher level or abstract image feature [17], the SIFT Flow method cannot robustly estimate the deformation field or effectively register medical images with large deformations.

    Recently, in the field of computer vision, machine-learning methods have been used to learn feature descriptions from large datasets.In particular, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have strong feature representation abilities and exhibit good performance for various computer vision tasks [18–20].In this study, we propose a deep metric learning feature-based optical flow method(Siamese Flow) for deformable medical image registration.This method is composed of three primary steps:deep metric learning feature extraction, deformation field estimation and warping.Specifically, we obtain image patches that are densely clustered around a given pixel.Then, we extract the deep metric learning feature of the pixel using the Siamese network [21].Finally, we calculate the optical flow field based on these in-depth learning features and obtain the registered image by warping the moving image using the computed deformation field.

    To construct the proposed registration framework, the learned image patch representation using deep contrastive metric learning and the deformation field estimation using such learned representations are developed.The learned image patch representation uses the Siamese network to train the metric learner, which produces an image patch descriptor that guarantees a smaller feature distance in two similar anatomical structures and a larger feature distance in two dissimilar anatomical structures.Unlike the SIFT feature and general deep learning features, such as those from the Visual Geometry Group (VGG) networks [22], the proposed deep metric learning feature is more discriminative and more stable.The proposed Siamese Flow method can thus solve the optical flow field with regard to the real deformation field.To our knowledge, this is the first study that combines contrastive metric learning into optical flow to solve the problem of deformable medical image registration.Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the Demons [14], SIFT Flow [16], Elastix [23], and VoxelMorph [24] networks regarding registration accuracy and robustness, particularly with large deformations.

    2 Method

    Fig.1 shows an overview of the proposed Siamese Flow method, which consists of three primary components:Siamese feature extraction, deformation field estimation and warping.Among these components, Siamese feature extraction is the most critical.After obtaining the deformation field, we obtain the registered image by warping the moving image according to the determined deformation field.

    Figure 1:Overview of the proposed image registration framework using the Siamese Flow method

    2.1 Siamese Feature Extraction

    In the context of image registration, a good local image representation can significantly improve the corresponding point matching performance, leading to an accurate and robust deformation field.To perform this process accurately without using manually designed features, we propose to learn local image representations directly from the data using contrastive metric learning, a Siamese network.

    Fig.2 shows the structure of the proposed Siamese network, which consists of two CNN networks, in which we share computations across two networks.The input of each network is an image patch of size 15×15.The output of the network is a 128-dimensional feature representation.The convolution layers of each network use a 3×3 convolution kernel with a stride of 1 following a leaky rectified linear unit (LeakyReLU) activation function.In addition,the fully connected layers (Dense 1 and Dense 2) use an ReLU activation function, and we add a dropout layer after the flattened layer to mitigate overfitting.Network parameters are shown in Fig.2.

    The proposed Siamese network makes a discriminative image feature by minimizing a contrastive loss function, which is shown as follows:

    whereNis the number of input sample pairs; di=||xi1-xi22||is the Euclidean distance of each pair;marginis a constant value of 1; andyiis the binary label for input pairs, where 1 indicates that it is a positive sample pair without deformation, and 0 indicates that it is a negative sample pair with deformation.

    Figure 2:Architecture of the Siamese network

    The mapping learned using contrastive metric learning can make the Euclidean distance between the Siamese features small for two patches without deformation and large for two patches with deformation.Therefore, compared with the SIFT feature and general deep learning features,such as the VGG [22], the proposed Siamese feature extracted by the Siamese network is more discriminative in the context of the image registration problem.

    2.2 Deformation Field Estimation

    Inspired by the SIFT Flow method, we incorporate the learned feature representation into an optical flow-based image registration framework to estimate a dense deformation field.The goal of this method is to match the Siamese features densely in two images and then minimize the energy loss function to obtain the displacement vector for each pixel.We defined the energy loss function as follows:

    where S1and S2are the Siamese feature vectors of the fixed and moving images; w (p) =(u(p),v(p)) is the flow vector at pixel location p =(x,y);εcontains all the spatial neighborhoods(an eight-neighbor system is used); andηandαare used to maintain the desired balance between the terms.The first term Eq.(2a) accounts for the dissimilarity of the Siamese feature between the fixed and moving images; the second term Eq.(2b) provides a regularization on the first-order magnitude of w; and the third term Eq.(2c) enforces a smooth flow field, which constrains the flow vectors of adjacent pixels to be similar.We use the thresholdstanddto consider matching outliers and flow discontinuities.These thresholds allow large deformations in soft tissues and discontinuous displacements between adjacent tissues.Due to large deformations, such as those caused by cardiac and respiratory motions, the weight ofαin Eq.(2c) should be larger than that ofηin Eq.(2b).

    To optimize the objective functionE(w), we use a dual-layer loopy belief propagation (BPS) [25] method that is similar to that used in SIFT Flow.In addition, we use a coarse-to-fine matching scheme to speed up optimization [26].Finally, we warp the moving image to obtain the registered result based on the deformation field using cubic spline interpolation [27].

    3 Experiment and Results

    3.1 Dataset and Ground Truth

    We validated the proposed method with the BrainWeb [28–30], EXPIRE10 [31], and ACDC [32] datasets, as well as with our own nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patient data.BrainWeb is a simulated brain database (SBD) produced by an MRI simulator and contains simulated brain MRI data based on two anatomical models:normal and multiple sclerosis (MS).Full 3-dimensional data volumes were simulated using three sequences (T1-, T2- and PD-weighted)and a variety of slice thicknesses, noise levels, and levels of intensity nonuniformity.This dataset has rich image texture information and good image quality.EMPIRE10 is a lung dataset that contains 30 clinical chest CT scans and their corresponding masks obtained using the lung segmentation method that was proposed by Rikxoorta et al.[33].ACDC is a multislice cine MRI clinical cardiac dataset that contains 150 patients.Finally, NPC is a 3D CT and MRI clinical nasopharyngeal cancer dataset that includes 100 patients (male/female:52/48; mean age±standard deviation:50.3±11.2 years old; age range:21–76 years old), who underwent chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy at West China Hospital.

    We randomly selected 45 T1 and T2 images from BrainWeb and 30 MRI lung images from EXPIPE10 to create training and validation datasets.Furthermore, to obtain the corresponding moving images, we deformed those images using the method proposed by Patrice et al.[34] with the deformation level parameterλfrom 50 to 200 to control the degree of deformation.Then, we densely extracted image patches with a size of 15×15 pixels from the fixed and moving images.We used the patch pairs as the training data and validation data.A patch pair received a positive label if the patches were generated from the same location of the same fixed image; a negative label was applied if the patches were created from the same place of the fixed and moving images.Fig.3 shows example patches with positive and negative labels.The patches in pairs with positive labels are identical; there is a deformation between the patch pair with a negative label.

    Figure 3:Some positive and negative sample pairs for Siamese network training.(a) BrainWeb T1 positive sample pair (b) BrainWeb T2 positive sample pair (c) EXPIPE10 positive sample pairs (d)BrainWeb T1 negative sample pair (e) BrainWeb T2 negative sample pair (f) EXPIPE10 negative sample pair

    3.2 Experiment Setup

    We compared the proposed Siamese Flow to Demons [14], SIFT Flow [16], the Elastix toolbox [23], and VoxelMorph [24].The Elastix toolbox consists of a collection of algorithms that are commonly used to solve rigid and nonrigid medical image registration problems.VoxelMorph is a self-supervised end-to-end deep learning-based registration method and is one of the most advanced existing methods.

    We generated image patch pairs following Section 3.1 and used 6,000,000 and 1,200,000 patch pairs as training and validation data for the Siamese network, respectively.We implemented the Siamese network using Keras, where the training batch size was 512, the optimizer was RMSprop [35] with momentum, and the initial learning rate was 0.001 with a momentum of 0.9.The training of each epoch took approximately 52 s on an NVIDIA Tesla K40C GPU.We trained the Siamese network with 200 epochs, and it converged before the end of training.

    In the experiments, for the Demons parameters, we set the number of histogram levels and iterations to 1024 and 50, respectively.For the SIFT Flow parameters, we setηto 0.005,αto 2, and the number of iterations to 200.For the elasticity parameters, we chose advanced Mattes mutual information as the optimization criterion, adaptive stochastic gradient descent as the optimization routine, and B-splines (BSPLINE) as the transformation model.We used the four image pyramids (resolutions), each with 500 iterations.For VoxelMorph, we used the mean squared error (MSE) as the loss function and implemented EMPIRE10 and BrainWeb as training datasets to train the model using the released code from the authors [36].

    3.3 Evaluation Indices

    3.3.1 Root Mean Squared Difference(RMSD)

    The RMSD measures the difference between the two images and has the following definition:

    whereI1andI2are images;I1(p) andI2(p) are the gray values at location p =(x,y);ΩIis the image domain ofI1andI2; and |ΩI|is the number of pixels inI1orI2.The smaller the RMSD value between the registered and fixed images is, the more accurate the registration result is.

    3.3.2 DICE Coefficient

    We also compare the corresponding regions of interest (ROIs) of fixed and moving images.The method behind this comparison assumes that the ROI is given in the fixed image and that the corresponding ROI in the moving image is computed by warping the ROI in the fixed image using a computed deformation field.We use the DICE coefficient to determine this comparison evaluation index [37].The DICE coefficient is defined as follows:

    whereXandYare the ROIs of the two images, andX∩Yis the overlapping ROI.For images from EMPIRE10, the ROI is the lung segmentation.For images from ACDC, the ROIs are the annotated left ventricular endocardium (LV), right ventricular endocardium (RV) and myocardium(MC).Fig.4 shows examples of lung and cardiac images and their masks.

    Figure 4:Examples of (a) a lung image (b) its lung mask (c) a cardiac image and (d) its LV, RV and MC masks

    3.3.3 Mutual Information(MI)

    MI measures the similarity between the two images, and the following is one of the standard mathematical definitions for MI:

    whereE(I1) andE(I2) are the individual entropies andE(I1,I2) is the joint entropy.When two similar images are perfectly aligned, the joint entropyE(I1,I2) is minimized, and thus, MI reaches its maximum.Thus, the greater the MI value between the registered and fixed images is, the more accurate the registration result is.

    3.4 Registration Accuracy

    We randomly chose twenty images from BrainWeb and EMPIRE10 as the fixed images and deformed them with a specific deformation levelλfrom 50 to 200 with a step of 50 to create the moving images.There are a total of 160 paired fixed and deformable moving images used to validate the registration accuracy of the five methods.

    Tab.1 summarizes the average RMSD indices of the five compared methods with the Brain-Web and EMPIRE10 datasets.Tab.2 summarizes the average DICE indices of the five methods with the EMPIRE10 dataset.The results shown in Tabs.1 and 2 demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms Demons, SIFT Flow, and the most advanced methods (Elastix and VoxelMorph) in all cases in terms of RMSD and DICE.

    Figs.5 and 6 show two examples of registration results with different methods (Demons,SIFT Flow, Elastix, VoxelMorph, and the proposed Siamese Flow) from the test BrainWeb and EMPIRE10 datasets.Fig.5a is the fixed T1 image; Fig.5b is the moving T1 image; Fig.5c is the heatmap between the fixed and moving images; Figs.5d–5h are the registered images obtained by Demons, SIFT Flow, Elastix, VoxelMorph and Siamese Flow, respectively; and Figs.5i–5m are the heatmaps between the fixed and registered images.The heatmap shows the absolute difference between the fixed and registered images.Figs.5 and 6 show that the heatmaps of the five methods are consistent with their RMSD and DICE results, and the proposed Siamese Flow achieves the most accurate registration results.

    3.5 Cross-Modality

    To demonstrate the cross-modality registration capability of the proposed method, we applied the proposed method to two new tasks (multimodality applications).The first task was to register T1 and T2 images from BrainWeb, and the second task was to register CT and MRI images from NPC.For the two tasks, we trained the Siamese networks on image patch pairs taken from the T1-T2 slices of BrainWeb and the CT-MR slices of NPC.For each task, we used 150,000 and 40,000 patch pairs as training data and validation data, respectively.

    Table 1:RMSD results with BRAINWEB and EMPIRE10 at different deformation levels

    Table 2:DICE results with EMPIRE10 at different deformation levels

    We randomly chose fifteen paired T1-T2 and CT-MR images from BrainWeb and NPC separately, took T1 and CT as the fixed images, and deformed the paired T2 and MRI with a specific deformation levelλfrom 50 to 200 with a step of 50 to create the moving images.There are a total of 120 paired fixed and distorted moving images to validate the proposed method’s ability to register the multimodality registration.

    Tab.3 summarizes the average MI of the five compared methods on the BrainWeb and NPC datasets.The results presented in Tab.3 demonstrate that the proposed approach outperforms VoxelMorph, Demons, SIFT Flow, and the most advanced cross-modality registration method Elastix in all cases.

    Figure 5:Visualization of registration accuracy results using a heatmap for a randomly selected BrainWeb T1 image and its deformable image (λ= 150).(a) Fixed T1 (b) Moving T1 (c) Heatmap of the fixed and moving T1 (d) Demons (e) SIFT Flow (f) Elastix (g) VoxelMorph (h) Siamese Flow (i) Heatmap of Demons (j) Heatmap of SIFT Flow (k) Heatmap of Elastix (I) Heatmap of VoxelMorph (m) Heatmap of Siamese Flow

    Figs.7 and 8 show how well different registration algorithms perform in the application of registering a pair of images from the different image modalities.Fig.7a is the fixed T1 MR image; Fig.7b is the corresponding T2 MR slice (ground truth); Fig.7c is the moving T2 MR image generated by distorting image (b) withλ=150; Fig.7d is the ground truth T2 MR image overlayed on the fixed T1 image; Fig.7e is the moving T2 MR image overlayed on the fixed T1 image; and Figs.7f–7j are the registration results obtained by Demons, SIFT Flow, Elastix,VoxelMorph and Siamese Flow overlayed on the fixed T1 image, respectively.The proposed method is shown to achieve better registration accuracy than Elastix when registering images from cross-modalities.

    Figure 6:Visualization of registration accuracy results using a heatmap for a randomly selected EMPIRE10 image and its deformable image (λ= 150).(a) Fixed image (b) Moving image (c)Heatmap between the fixed and moving image (d) Demons (e) SIFT Flow (f) Elastix (g) Voxel-Morph (h) Siamese Flow (i) Heatmap of Demons (j) Heatmap of SIFT Flow (k) Heatmap of Elastix (I) Heatmap of VoxelMorph (m) Heatmap of Siamese Flow

    Table 3:MI results with BrainWeb T1-T2 and NPC CT-MRI at different deformation levels

    3.6 Large-Deformation and Unseen Dataset

    Large deformations due to heartbeat and respiration effects lead to a challenging deformable image registration task.In this section, we investigated registration performance in the case of the large deformable motion of cardiac tissue from ACDC for the five compared methods.The cardiac cine MRI scans in ACDC consist of short-axis cardiac image slices, each containing 20 time points that encompass the entire cardiac cycle.An expert annotated the LV, the RV and the MC at end diastolic (ED) and end systolic (ES) time points.To facilitate quantitative evaluation,we took the images in the ED and ES phases as fixed and moving images, respectively.We also trained the Siamese network on the image patches taken from the MR slices from BrainWeb and EMPIRE10, and the testing images were randomly selected from ACDC (unseen dataset and body part).

    Tab.4 shows the average DICE of the annotated LV, RV and MC regions that correspond to the registered images obtained by the five methods for ED and ES frames from the ACDC dataset.Tab.4 shows that the proposed Siamese Flow achieves the highest average DICE.

    Fig.9 shows a comparison among different registration algorithms with large deformations and unseen datasets.Fig.9a shows one fixed image randomly selected from ACDC; Fig.9b is the corresponding moving image at the ES time point; and Figs.9c–9h are superimposed LV,RV and MC regions of the ground truth (red) and the deformed regions of the registered image(green).Specifically, Fig.9c is the result before registration; and Figs.9d–9h are the results after registration using Demons, SIFT Flow, Elastix, VoxelMorph and Siamese Flow, respectively.Fig.9 shows that the deformed region attained by Siamese Flow achieves the closest alignment with the ground truth region.

    Figure 7:Illustration example of T1-T2 images from BrainWeb with different registration methods.(a) Fixed T1 (b) True T2 (c) Initial moving image (d) Ground truth overlay (e) Unregistered (f)Demons (g) SIFT Flow (h) Elastix (i) VoxelMorph (j) Siamese Flow

    Figure 8:Illustration examples of CT-MR slices from NPCs with different registration methods.(a) Fixed CT (b) True MR (c) Initial moving image (d) Ground truth overlay (e) Unregistered (f)Demons (g) SIFT Flow (h) Elastix (i) VoxelMorph (j) Siamese Flow

    Table 4:DICE results for ACDC with different time points

    4 Discussion

    In this study, we proposed a deep learning feature-based optical flow method (Siamese Flow) for deformable medical image registration.Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms Demons, SIFT Flow, and the most advanced existing methods (Elastix and VoxelMorph) with regard to registration accuracy, robustness, and large deformation.

    The registration accuracy results (Tabs.1 and 2, and Figs.5 and 6) show that the proposed Siamese Flow method performs better than the comparison methods regarding RMSD, DICE,and heatmap visualization.Demons, SIFT Flow, and Siamese Flow are optical flow-based registration methods that align the fixed and moving images by minimizing image dissimilarities in the context of the optical flow approach.The feature representation derived from the proposed deep learning approach outperforms handcrafted features, such as SIFT Flow and pixel intensity-based approaches.The proposed approach thus produces better registration accuracy than Demons and SIFT Flow-based approaches.

    Conversely, Elastix and VoxelMorph perform image registration via an optimizer that maximizes the intensity-based similarity between the overall fixed and moving images.The cost function thus plays an essential role in these methods to achieve an accurate registration result.Using the same cost function, we observed that the RMSD and DICE results in these two algorithms are similar.While it is a challenging task to design an optimal cost function in a specific task, we do not need to use an explicit image registration cost function in the proposed approach because image similarity is learned via metric learning and contrastive samples prepared in the learning stage.From comparative experiments that consider RMSD and DICE indices as well as heatmap visualization on BrainWeb and EMPIRE10, we observed that the proposed approach outperformed these two methods.

    Figure 9:Example results for large-deformation cardiac-motion registration.(a) Fixed image (ED time point) (b) Moving image (ES time point) (c) unregistered (d) Demons (e) SIFT Flow (f)Elastix (g) VoxelMorph (h) Siamese Flow

    From the results in Tab.3, Figs.7, and 8, the proposed algorithm is shown to be capable of registering multimodal deformable images.Demons and VoxelMorph fail to align two images in the case of appearance variations across different modalities because they assume that illumination is constant between images.SIFT Flow also fails because the SIFT feature is based on the gradient information and does not consider multimodal information.Unlike Demons, SIFT Flow and VoxelMorph, Elastix and Siamese Flow perform well in these cross-modality registration tasks.In addition, from the MI results in Tab.3 and the color coding results in Figs.7 and 8,particularly the red arrows pointing in Fig.7h, Siamese Flow is shown to perform better than Elastix, which uses handcrafted mutual information as a cost function to measure image similarity under a global statistical assumption.However, Siamese Flow calculates image similarity via metric learning image features, making it more suitable for deformable medical image registration and allowing it to produce more accurate results.

    Better registration is reflected by closer alignment of the fixed and moving images.Based on the DICE results in Tab.4 and the superimposed LV, RV and MC regions in Fig.9, Siamese Flow is shown to be capable of managing large tissue or organ deformations and achieves the best performance among all investigated methods.The Demons approach fails to align two images because the underlying assumptions (constant gray values and constant gradient) are unsatisfactory in optical flow estimation.VoxelMorph fails to attain accurate registered results due to the large unseen deformation level.SIFT Flow obtains alignment results that are comparable to those of Elastix for this large-deformation registration task.Elastix fails to align two images under a certain iteration number (e.g., 500 iterations).SIFT Flow also fails to use the handcrafted SIFT feature.In contrast, Siamese Flow is successful in all of these cases because the learned image patch representation is robust and generalizable, even to large deformations.

    Furthermore, Tab.4 and Fig.9 show that Siamese Flow can generalize different tasks without retraining the model.The model learns a generic local descriptor that is applicable to other unseen datasets (ACDC) and unseen body parts (cardiac).

    5 Conclusion

    In this study, we presented a deep metric learning feature-based optical flow method for deformable medical image registration.In this framework, the critical components are the learned image patch representation that uses contrastive loss and the proposed optical flow that uses this learned representation.Experimental results show that the proposed Siamese Flow-based registration method performs better than pixel intensity and SIFT feature-based optical flow methods.Additionally, the proposed method outperforms conventional intensity-based image registration methods, such as Elastix, and end-to-end deep learning-based image registration methods, such as VoxelMorph, with regard to registration accuracy, robustness, and ability to manage large deformations.

    In the future, we plan to extend the proposed algorithm as follows.First, we plan to investigate the end-to-end deep learning feature-based optical flow method (Siamese Flow) for deformable image registration to reduce computation time.Second, we plan to investigate the deep learning feature-based optical flow method for multimodality deformable image registration.Last, we plan to use the proposed algorithm to register lungs with large deformations to evaluate regional lung deformation.

    Funding Statement:This study was supported in part by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2019YFH0085, 2019ZDZX0005, 2019YFG0196) and in part by the Foundation of Chengdu University of Information Technology (No.KYTZ202008).

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

    大香蕉97超碰在线| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产一级毛片在线| 在线观看国产h片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲图色成人| 性色avwww在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 最黄视频免费看| 大香蕉久久网| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 熟女av电影| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲成人手机| 夫妻午夜视频| 中文欧美无线码| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产毛片在线视频| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久久久网色| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 简卡轻食公司| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产成人精品福利久久| 一级爰片在线观看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 三级国产精品片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 七月丁香在线播放| 久久国产乱子免费精品| av.在线天堂| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产色婷婷99| 色视频www国产| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲精品一二三| 黄色日韩在线| 少妇的逼水好多| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产亚洲最大av| 中国三级夫妇交换| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产 一区精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 精品亚洲成国产av| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产精品.久久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 黄色日韩在线| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| a级毛色黄片| 简卡轻食公司| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| av免费观看日本| 久久99精品国语久久久| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 老司机影院毛片| 赤兔流量卡办理| 九色成人免费人妻av| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 免费看光身美女| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久午夜福利片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日本wwww免费看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产永久视频网站| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 美女国产视频在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 日本黄大片高清| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲中文av在线| 黄色日韩在线| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 黄色日韩在线| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产在线视频一区二区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 高清毛片免费看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产乱人视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲在久久综合| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 看免费成人av毛片| 国产在线视频一区二区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 22中文网久久字幕| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 中文欧美无线码| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 日本wwww免费看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 精品一区在线观看国产| 免费大片18禁| 久久午夜福利片| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产乱来视频区| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲在久久综合| 九草在线视频观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 有码 亚洲区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产综合精华液| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| .国产精品久久| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲av男天堂| 日韩av免费高清视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 色哟哟·www| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产视频内射| 又爽又黄a免费视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 97热精品久久久久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久热久热在线精品观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日韩av免费高清视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产乱来视频区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 男女边摸边吃奶| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲四区av| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| videos熟女内射| 国产在线男女| 插逼视频在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 高清不卡的av网站| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 美女福利国产在线 | 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 中文欧美无线码| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 观看免费一级毛片| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 欧美性感艳星| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 极品教师在线视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产成人91sexporn| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 简卡轻食公司| 在线观看人妻少妇| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美另类一区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产成人精品婷婷| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久久色成人| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 91精品国产九色| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 中文欧美无线码| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 18+在线观看网站| 一级黄片播放器| 精品久久久久久电影网| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久久久视频综合| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲国产精品999| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 人妻系列 视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 永久免费av网站大全| 搡老乐熟女国产| 色视频www国产| 色综合色国产| 久久久久久伊人网av| 97热精品久久久久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| av福利片在线观看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 久久午夜福利片| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产成人精品一,二区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 丝袜喷水一区| 男女免费视频国产| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 高清av免费在线| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲图色成人| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产极品天堂在线| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 内地一区二区视频在线| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 内地一区二区视频在线| 身体一侧抽搐| 久久久久久久精品精品| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久6这里有精品| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 老司机影院成人| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 秋霞伦理黄片| 草草在线视频免费看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产男女内射视频| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 日本黄大片高清| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 一区在线观看完整版| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| tube8黄色片| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产综合精华液| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 深夜a级毛片| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产成人freesex在线| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日本免费在线观看一区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| av视频免费观看在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 大码成人一级视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 老熟女久久久| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 有码 亚洲区| 一个人免费看片子| 日本wwww免费看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 日本一二三区视频观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲精品第二区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 青春草国产在线视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 舔av片在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 日韩av免费高清视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久热久热在线精品观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 日本av手机在线免费观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| xxx大片免费视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 在线观看一区二区三区| 极品教师在线视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 简卡轻食公司| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产在线免费精品| av在线播放精品| 看免费成人av毛片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 少妇丰满av| 直男gayav资源| 99久久精品热视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产精品一及| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 久久6这里有精品| 黄色一级大片看看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国内精品宾馆在线| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 高清毛片免费看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 日日啪夜夜爽|