• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Enhancing Parkinson’s Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning and Feature Selection Methods

    2022-08-23 02:20:50FaisalSaeedMohammadAlSaremMuhannadAlMohaimeedAbdelhamidEmaraWadiiBoulilaMohammedAlasliandFahadGhabban
    Computers Materials&Continua 2022年6期

    Faisal Saeed,Mohammad Al-Sarem,Muhannad Al-Mohaimeed,Abdelhamid Emara,4,Wadii Boulila,5,Mohammed Alasli and Fahad Ghabban

    1College of Computer Science and Engineering,Taibah University,Medina,41477,Saudi Arabia

    2School of Computing and Digital Technology,Birmingham City University,Birmingham,B47XG,United Kingdom

    3Information System Department,Saba’a Region University,Mareeb,Yemen

    4Computers and Systems Engineering Department,Al-Azhar University,Cairo,11884,Egypt

    5RIADI Laboratory,National School of Computer Sciences,University of Manouba,Manouba,2010,Tunisia

    Abstract: Several millions of people suffer from Parkinson’s disease globally.Parkinson’s affects about 1% of people over 60 and its symptoms increase with age.The voice may be affected and patients experience abnormalities in speech that might not be noticed by listeners,but which could be analyzed using recorded speech signals.With the huge advancements of technology,the medical data has increased dramatically,and therefore,there is a need to apply data mining and machine learning methods to extract new knowledge from this data.Several classification methods were used to analyze medical data sets and diagnostic problems,such as Parkinson’s Disease(PD).In addition,to improve the performance of classification,feature selection methods have been extensively used in many fields.This paper aims to propose a comprehensive approach to enhance the prediction of PD using several machine learning methods with different feature selection methods such as filter-based and wrapper-based.The dataset includes 240 recodes with 46 acoustic features extracted from 3 voice recording replications for 80 patients.The experimental results showed improvements when wrapper-based features selection method was used with K-NN classifier with accuracy of 88.33%.The best obtained results were compared with other studies and it was found that this study provides comparable and superior results.

    Keywords: Filter-based feature selection methods; machine learning;parkinson’s disease;wrapper-based feature selection methods

    1 Introduction

    Parkinson’s disease(PD)is a long term degenerative disorder of the central nervous system which causes both motor and non-motor symptoms[1].The exact causes of PD are unknown and unclear,but it is supposed to include risk factors which are both genetic and environmental.More than 10%of patients with PD have a first-degree relative with PD disease.In addition,PD is more prevalent between people who are disclosed to some pesticides and the people with past history of head injury,while PD risk is lower for patients who smoke [2].PD mainly affects neurons in a certain region of the mid brain that is known as substantia nigra, dopamine-producing brain cells, which leads to inadequate dopamine secretion in this region[3].

    In the early stage of the PD,the main symptoms are shaking,difficulty with walking and slowness of movement.The common symptoms with late phase of PD are anxiety, dementia and depression.Moreover, emotional problems, sleep and sensory symptoms may also occur [4,5], in addition to Parkinsonian syndrome [6].These symptoms are mainly used to diagnose typical PD, in addition to examinations such as neuroimaging.There is no total recovery for PD, however treatment aims to improve the symptoms [7,8].The medical decision support systems (MDSS) have increasingly used a significant diagnosis and treatment method that uses artificial intelligence (AI) methods on a clinical dataset to assist clinicians to make better decisions[9,10].Recent improvements in machine learning,AI and statistical learning have improved decision support system(DSS),which has helped to introduce intelligent decision systems[10,11].Some studies reported that the artificial intelligence cannot be effective without learning [12].There are many types of machine learning methods such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Na?ve Bayes (NB), K-nearest Neighbor (KNN), Multilayer Perceptron, Decision Tree (DT) and Random Forests (RF) that have been used to solve medical decision problems.

    There is a significant overlapping between ML and data mining which often use the same procedures, but whereas ML concentrates on prediction, based on previously definite properties learned from the training data,data mining concentrates on the detection of unknown properties in the clinical data.The machine learning(ML)techniques have a significant role to play in the medical disease diagnosis field and are widely used in bioinformatics[13,14].

    Recently,the variety of medical data is continuously increasing,therefore,effective classification and prediction algorithms are required.The previous studies on machine learning research reported that the accuracy of a classification algorithm can be influenced by many agents[15].ML algorithms are used to analyze medical data sets and diagnostic problems [12].Subsequently, improvement of medical decisions,treatments,and decrease financial costs will occur[14,16].

    In addition,feature selection plays an important role in the explanation of medical data.Feature selection technique constitutes a significant issue of global combinatorial optimization in machine learning,which is used to decrease the number of features from the original features,removes irrelevant or redundant features without incurring much loss of information,as well as simplification of models to make them easier to interpret and shortening training times[17].Therefore,a good feature selection method is required to accelerate processing time and predictive accuracy.There are three types of feature selection algorithms,which are:filter(extract features from the data set without any learning),wrapper(use learning techniques to estimate useful features)and hybrid(gather the feature selection step and the classifier construction)[18,19].

    Recently,the medical field is the most favorable field to use machine learning methods.Therefore,Na?ve Bayes(NB),Support Vector Machine(SVM),K-nearest Neighbor,Multilayer Perceptron and Random Forests as well as feature selection methods have been suggested to solve medical decision problems, such as the prediction of Parkinson’s disease.In this paper, the main contributions in the domain of prediction of Parkinson’s Disease can be summarized as follows.

    1.A comprehensive approach was used to investigate the performance of several feature selection methods and machine learning methods in order to enhance the prediction of PD.

    2.These feature selection methods include both filter-based methods such as(Information gain IG,Principle Component Analysis PCA)and wrapper methods that include different search methods such as First Best Greedy Stepwise PSO Method.

    3.A comparative analysis was conducted to examine the performances of all methods/combinations used and the best prediction results were reported.

    This paper is organized as follows: Section 2: the related works.Section 3: discussion of the methods.Section 4:experimental results and discussion.Section 5:conclusions and future works.

    2 Related Studies

    Several works have investigated the diagnosis of PD, in which many machine learning methods were applied such as Support Vector Machine,neural network,Na?ve Bayes,K-nearest neighbor and Random Forests.In this paper,several datasets were used to search for related studies on Parkinson’s disease,including Scopus,IEEE Xplore,Science Direct and Google Scholar.

    In[20]a supervised ML method was proposed that combined the Principal Components Analysis(PCA)to extract features and SVM as classification method to identify PD patients.The main goal of this method was to determine patients that will be diagnosed with PD or with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy(PSP).The experiments were conducted on data of several patients with clinical and demographic features.The results depicted good accuracy of the proposed method in identifying the PD patients compared to existing related works.

    In addition, the authors in [21] proposed an expert system of PD using features extracted from recordings of patients’voice.They developed a Bayesian classification approach to deal with the dependence to match the replication-based experimental design.The experiments were performed on voice recordings involving 80 subjects,50%of them had PD.The aim was to identify which subjects had no PD and which did have the disease.Naranjo et al.addressed the problem of identifying PD patients using the extracted acoustic features from repeated voice recordings.The proposed method was based on two steps,namely variable selection,and classification.The first step aims to reduce the number of features,while the next step uses a regularization method named LASSO(Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator)as a classifier.The proposed method was tested on the previously described database and showed a good capacity for PD discrimination.

    In addition,the authors in[22]addressed the problem of PD diagnosis by developing an approach that investigated gait and tremor features that were extracted from the voice reordering data.They started by filtering data to remove noises,then,using this data to extract gait features they detectedthe peak and measuredthe pulse duration.The average accuracy obtained for the identifying PD patients by the proposed approach was satisfactory.

    The authors in [23] proposed a method to automatically detect PD by using the convolutional neural network (CNN).The authors suggested considering electroencephalogram (EEG) signals to build a thirteen-layer CNN model.The proposed approach experimented with EEG signals of 20 Parkinson’s disease patients (50% men and 50% women).The CNN method obtained interesting results to identify PD patients;however,its performance should be evaluated using a large population.

    Recently, Mostafa et al.[24] tried to enhance the diagnoses of PD by using several methods of feature evaluation and classification.They used a multi-agent system to evaluate multiple features by using five classification methods,namely DT,NB,NN,RF, and SVM.To evaluate the proposed method,they conducted several experiments using original and filtered datasets.The results depicted that this method enhanced the performance of ML methods used by finding the best set of features.

    In addition,several methods were applied by[25–27]in order to predict Parkinson’s disease.These methods applied several machine learning and feature selection methods to enhance the prediction of Parkinson’s disease and other studies utilized machine learning and deep learning to improving prediction of diseases[28–38].This paper extends these efforts by applying a comprehensive approach to investigate the performance of several machine learning with feature selection methods.

    3 Methods

    There are many feature selection techniques available,and we have considered the utilization of the following feature selection techniques:Filter-based technique,Correlation-based Feature Subset Selection(CfsSubsetEval),Principle Component Analysis(PCA),and Wrapper technique.The aforementioned techniques use different strategies or search algorithms to generate subsets and progress the search processes including (i) Best First (ii) Greedy Stepwise, (iii) Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO),and(vi)Ranker(see Fig.1).

    Figure 1:Filter-based approach vs.wrapper-based approach

    The dataset used in this paper is available online at UCI Machine Learning Repository[14].The dataset contains acoustic features of 80 patients,50%of them suffering from Parkinson’s disease.The data set has 240 recordings with 46 acoustic features extracted from 3 voice recording replications per patient.The data set is well-balanced by gender and class label(whether the patients have Parkinson’s disease or not).

    The experimental protocol was designed for evaluating the combination of the above techniques and search algorithms when they were used with the following classification models:(i)Na?ve Bayes,(ii)Support Vector Machine(SVM)1Both,the c-SVM and nu-SVM are examined.,(iii)K-Nearest Neighbor(K-NN),(vi)Multi-Layer Perceptron(MLP) and (v) Random Forest (RF).The experiments were carried out on WEKA tool version 3.8 and MacBook Pro with OS X Yosemite version 10.10.5 as an operating system.To evaluate the performance of each classifier,we first ran feature selection in order to find the representative features and then we applied the classification models.Additionally,10-fold cross validation was applied and the results have been reported in terms of Accuracy,Recall,Precision and F-score.Finally,we analyzed the results achieved from the experimentations.As stated earlier, the main goal of the research is to enhance the prediction of Parkinson’s disease.However, this work also provides a useful guide to selecting the best feature selection technique for different classification models.

    3.1 Feature Selection Techniques

    Several feature selection techniques were applied before feeding the data into the classifier.The filter-based techniques consider the relevance between the features.Thus, they have low complexity,acceptable stability and scalability [39].A disadvantage of this type of technique is that it might ignore some informative features,especially when the data is coming in stream[40].The filter-based approaches can be either univariate or multivariate [41].The univariate methods examine features according to the statistically-based criterion such as Information Gain (IG) [42–44].Multivariate methods compute feature dependency before ranking the feature.In addition,Principle Component Analysis(PCA)is a common statistical method that is used for data analysis.PCA reduces the size of the data sets by selecting a set of features that represents the whole data set.Since PCA is a conversion technique,the principal components of the first variables is the component with the highest variance value.Then,other principal components are ordered with descending variance values[45].In addition,the wrapper-based techniques evaluate the quality of the selected features using the performance of the learning classifier.

    Regarding the search strategies, the search algorithms follows either sequential forward search(SFS),or sequential backward search(SBS).The SFS starts with a single feature and then iteratively adds or removes features until some terminating criterion is met whereas SBS starts with the whole feature set and then continues with adding and deleting operations.Since the SBS method attempts to find solutions ranged between suboptimal and near optimal regions[41],it is worth fully employing optimization techniques to figure out the subset that leads to maximizing the learner’s performance,in particular,with the wrapper approach.At this end,the wrapper-based method can take advantage of various optimization methods such genetic algorithm[46,47]and ant colony optimization algorithm(ACO)[48].

    3.2 Machine Learning Classifiers

    In machine learning, the data classification is still an attractive domain.Lately, there are many proposed algorithms that have been examined in several domains such as NB, SVM, K-NN, MLP and RF,which are presented briefly in the next subsections.

    3.2.1 Support Vector Machine

    The basic idea behind SVM algorithm is to construct a hyperplane between groups of data.The quality of the hyperplane is evaluated by measuring to which degree it can maintain the largest distance from the points in either class [39].Therefore, as it is presented in Fig.2, the higher the separation ability of the hyperplane,the lower the error in the value[49].The computational complexity of SVM isO(n2)[50,51].

    Figure 2: SVM illustration.The larger margin separating the data points, the higher accuracy we obtained

    3.2.2 Na?ve Bayes

    Na?ve Bayes (NB) is a probabilistic classifier that is based on Bayesian theorem.It is called Na?ve because the classifier works on a strong features independence assumption.In literature,there are several variants of NB: simple Na?ve Bayes, Gaussian Na?ve Bayes, Multinomial Na?ve Bayes,Bernoulli Na?ve Bayes and Multi-variant Poisson Na?ve Bayes in which the main different among them is the way the probability of the target class is computed.The time complexity of Na?ve Bayes isO(d×c)wheredis the query vector’s dimension,andcis the total classes.

    3.2.3 K-Nearest Neighbor

    K-NN is a type of lazy learning,in which there is no explicit training phase and all computations are deferred until classification.It is a method of classifying data based on the nearest training data points in the feature space.The K-NN classifier uses the Euclidean distance measure, or another measure such as Euclidean squared, Manhattan, and Chebyshev, to estimate the target class.The performance of the classifier depends upon the parameter k,while the best value of k depends upon the dataset.In general, the greater the value of k, the lower the noises in the classification, but the boundaries between the classes become less distinct as shown in Fig.3.The time complexity of K-NN isO(n×m), where n is the number of training examples and m is the number of dimensions in the training set[52].

    3.2.4 Multilayer Perceptron Model

    The MLP is a classical feedforward neural network classifier in which the errors of the output are used to train the network[53].MLP consists of three layers of nodes:(i)input layer,(ii)at least one or more hidden layer(s),and(iii)output layer.The input layer is connected to the hidden layers which are connected to the output layer.All the layers are processed by weighted values.Fig.4 represents a MLP with a single hidden layer.MLP is one-way error propagation where back-propagation techniques have been utilized to train and test these weight values.The time complexity of MLP isO(n2).

    Figure 3:K-NN model.When k=3,the classifier predicts a new point as B class(Fig.a),whilst,when k=5,the point is determined as a class A.(a)K-NN model with K=3(b)K-NN model with K=5

    Figure 4:MLP model with 1 input layer,1 hidden layer,and 1 output layer

    3.2.5 Random Forests

    The Random Forests(RF)classifier is a type of ensemble method that combines multiple decision tree predictions.In RF, the trees are generated randomly by selecting attributes at each node.The output of the ensemble is tree votes with the most popular class.The pseudo-code of the Random Forest ensemble is presented in Tab.1.The time complexity of Random Forest of sizeTand maximum depthD(excluding the root)isO(T×D)[54].

    Table 1: Pseudo-code of RF model

    Table 1:Continued

    The random forest method is more robust to errors and outliers.Therefore,the problem of overfitting is not faced.The accuracy of the model depends mainly on the strength of the base classifiers and measure of the dependence between them[55].

    4 Experimental Results

    The experiments were conducted such that 10-fold cross validation was applied for each classifier.The performance of each classifier was measured by the accuracy, precision, recall and F-score.Tabs.2–12 show the experimental results of several machine learning methods both with and without different feature selection methods.

    Table 2: The performance of classifiers without features selection

    Table 3: Performance of classifiers with CfsSubsetEval Feature Selection Combinations

    Table 3:Continued

    Table 4: Performance of classifiers with features selection based on information gain

    Table 5: Performance of classifier with features selection based on PCA

    Table 6: Summary of the accuracy of classifiers with filter-based features selection methods

    Table 7: Performance of classifiers for wrapper-based method with Na?ve Bayes as base classifier

    Table 8: Performance of classifiers for wrapper-based methods with c-SVM as base classifier

    Table 8:Continued

    Table 9: Performance of classifiers for wrapper-based methods with nu-SVM as base classifier

    Table 10: Performance of classifiers for wrapper-based methods with MLP as base classifier

    Table 11: Performance of classifiers when wrapper-based methods with K-NN are applied

    Table 12: Performance of classifiers for wrapper-based methods with RF as base classifier

    5 Discussion

    Tab.2,shows the performance of all classifiers used before applying features selecting methods.The results showed Na?ve Bayes obtained the best performance using all evaluation measures compared to the other classifiers.It obtained 82.92%,83.30%,82.90%and 82.90%for accuracy,precision,recall and F-score respectively.

    The number of features was reduced using correlation based feature selection (CfsSubsetEval)method to 23,17,18 for the search methods of First Best,Greedy Stepwise and POS respectively,as shown in Fig.5.The performance of with CfsSubsetEval combinations for each classifier is shown in Tab.3.The results showed that no improvements were obtained by most of the combinations,except for RF with Greedy Stepwise and POS methods.

    Tab.4 showed the performance of classifiers used when features selection method based on information gain was applied.As shown in Fig.5, the number of features was reduced to 10.The results showed that no improvements were reported on the performance of all classifiers after applying this feature selection method.

    Figure 5:Number of remaining features after applying features selection methods

    In addition,Tab.5 shows the performance of all classifiers when features selection method based on PCA was applied.The results showed that only SVM methods obtained better performance after applying this features selection method.The number of features was reduced to 20 as shown in Fig.5.

    Tab.6 summarizes the performance of filter based features selection methods.The results showed that feature selections with PCA obtained the best performance when SVM classifier was applied.

    Tabs.7–12 show the performance of wrapper-based features selection methods using different base classifiers.In each table,First Best,Greedy Stepwise and PSO search methods were applied.

    Tab.7 showed that,when Na?ve Bayes was used as the base classifier for wrapper-based feature selection method, the performance of NB using PSO search method was enhanced to 0.854, 0.855,0.854 and 0.854 for accuracy,precision,recall and F-score respectively.The performance of the other classifiers using this method was reduced.

    Tab.8 shows the performance of classifiers when the wrapper-based features selection method with c-SVM as the base classifier was applied.The results showed the enhancements obtained by all classifiers using all search methods.However,the best performance was obtained by SVM using First Best and Greedy Stepwise search methods.

    However, Tab.9 shows the performance of classifiers when wrapper-based features selection method with nu-SVM as the base classifier was applied.The results showed that the enhancements were obtained by applying c-SVM,K-NN and RF,especially when the POS search method was used.

    In addition,Tab.10 shows the performance of classifiers when wrapper-based features selection method with MLP as base classifier was applied.The results showed that the enhancements were obtained by applying MLP and RF for the three search methods.The best results were obtained using MLP classifier.

    Moreover, Tab.11 shows the performance of classifiers when wrapper-based features selection method with K-NN as base classifier was applied.The results showed that the enhancements were obtained by applying K-NN and RF for the First Best and POS search methods.The best results were obtained using K-NN classifier with accuracy,precision,recall and F-scores of 0.883,0.884,0.883 and 0.883 respectively.

    Tab.12 shows the performance of classifiers when wrapper-based features selection method with RF as base classifier was applied.The results showed that the enhancements were obtained by applying MLP and RF for the three search methods.The best results were obtained using RF classifier.

    Tab.13 shows a comparison of different wrapper-based features selection methods(using different base classifiers).The results showed that the best performing classifier was K-NN associated with the wrapper-based feature selection with KNN as base classifier,obtaining 88.33%accuracy.The number of features was reduced(with the best performance obtained)to 20,5 and 22 using First Best,Greedy Stepwise and PSO search methods.

    Table 13: Best Results for wrapper-based techniques

    Finally, Tab.14 shows a comparison of using different features selection methods (filter and wrapper base methods).It shows that the best performance was obtained by K-NN classifier associated with wrapper-based feature selection method with K-NN as base classifier and using Best First and PSO search method.

    Table 14: Comparison between filter-based and wrapper-based techniques

    For this paper a comparison has been conducted between the best performing methods and the previous studies on predicting Parkinson’s disease using the same dataset,and other datasets,as shown in Tab.15.The comparison results showed that the best performing method(K-NN classifier associated with wrapper-based feature selection method with K-NN as base classifier and using Best First and PSO search method)obtained comparable and superior results.

    Table 15: Comparison with previous studies

    6 Conclusions and Future Works

    This paper examined the performance of several classifiers with filter-based and wrapper-based features selections methods to enhance the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease.Different evaluation metrics were used including accuracy, precision, recall and F-score.The experiments compared the performance of machine learning on original and filtered datasets.The results showed that wrapperbased features selection method with K-NN enhanced the performance of predicting Parkinson’s disease,with the accuracy reached to 88.33%.In future work,more machine learning and deep learning methods could be applied with these combinations of features selection methods.In addition,other features selection methods could be investigated to improve the performance of predicting Parkinson’s disease.

    Acknowledgement:The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research&Innovation,Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work;project number(77/442).Also, the authors would like to extend their appreciation to Taibah University for its supervision support.

    Funding Statement:This research was funded by the Deputyship for Research&Innovation,Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia under the Project Number(77/442).

    Conflicts of Interest:The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

    99国产精品一区二区三区| 满18在线观看网站| 青草久久国产| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 乱人伦中国视频| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| av天堂在线播放| 丝袜喷水一区| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| av网站在线播放免费| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 中文字幕色久视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| a级毛片黄视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 在线观看人妻少妇| cao死你这个sao货| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 久9热在线精品视频| 欧美大码av| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 国产成人影院久久av| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成年动漫av网址| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 777米奇影视久久| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 宅男免费午夜| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久9热在线精品视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲 国产 在线| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 日本wwww免费看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 日本五十路高清| 国产av精品麻豆| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 91av网站免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 777米奇影视久久| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 色在线成人网| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| av福利片在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 免费在线观看日本一区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 性少妇av在线| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 午夜激情av网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产在线免费精品| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产成人系列免费观看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 一进一出抽搐动态| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲国产欧美网| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲av美国av| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 麻豆av在线久日| 大码成人一级视频| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产不卡一卡二| 久9热在线精品视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产区一区二久久| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 乱人伦中国视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 搡老乐熟女国产| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 亚洲精品一二三| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 一进一出抽搐动态| av免费在线观看网站| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 成人国语在线视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产又爽黄色视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 手机成人av网站| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 丝袜美足系列| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 午夜福利,免费看| 中文字幕色久视频| av天堂在线播放| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美日韩精品网址| 91av网站免费观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 国产xxxxx性猛交| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 曰老女人黄片| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 蜜桃在线观看..| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 中文字幕制服av| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 香蕉国产在线看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产在线视频一区二区| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 天天影视国产精品| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 91国产中文字幕| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 天天添夜夜摸| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 在线看a的网站| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 国产成人系列免费观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 天堂8中文在线网| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 午夜福利,免费看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 丁香六月天网| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 少妇 在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产精品二区激情视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 乱人伦中国视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 大型av网站在线播放| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲综合色网址| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 99久久人妻综合| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 成在线人永久免费视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 91成年电影在线观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 两个人看的免费小视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 91大片在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 丁香六月欧美| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲九九香蕉| www日本在线高清视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 人人澡人人妻人| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 我的亚洲天堂| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 91大片在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产麻豆69| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 一级毛片电影观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 一级毛片精品| 91成年电影在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产麻豆69| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 蜜桃在线观看..| 我的亚洲天堂| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 91成年电影在线观看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲全国av大片| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 超碰97精品在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 五月天丁香电影| 国产成人影院久久av| 午夜视频精品福利| 热99re8久久精品国产| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| av一本久久久久| 捣出白浆h1v1| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 性少妇av在线| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 午夜91福利影院| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| cao死你这个sao货| netflix在线观看网站| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 在线av久久热| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 久久性视频一级片| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 在线看a的网站| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 飞空精品影院首页| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 老司机靠b影院| 在线av久久热| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 99九九在线精品视频| 中国美女看黄片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产色视频综合| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 99久久国产精品久久久| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 精品高清国产在线一区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 黄色视频不卡| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| svipshipincom国产片| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 黄色成人免费大全| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 青草久久国产| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产精品免费大片| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 午夜两性在线视频| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 不卡av一区二区三区| av福利片在线| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看 | 久久国产精品影院| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产淫语在线视频| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一个人免费看片子| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲国产av新网站| 深夜精品福利| 9热在线视频观看99| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 成年版毛片免费区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲伊人色综图| 两个人看的免费小视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 精品高清国产在线一区| 中文欧美无线码| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 一本综合久久免费| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交|