• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    3D Printing of Next-generation Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices: from Multiscale to Multimaterial

    2022-07-04 09:14:06XiXuYongHaoTanJunDingandCaoGuan
    Energy & Environmental Materials 2022年2期

    Xi Xu, Yong Hao Tan, Jun Ding*, and Cao Guan*

    1. Introduction

    Electrochemical energy devices(EESD)such as batteries and supercapacitors have seen significant research interest, driven by a desire to shift from fuel to cleaner energy.[1-3]With the emergence of microelectromechanical systems and wearable electronics, great demands are being placed on EESDs, requiring ever greater energy density with an ever-smaller footprint.[4-5]This is, however, not viable in many 2D designs.[6]Various works have documented the development of a wide range of novel electrode materials showing promising energy and/or power density.[7-10]However, superior performance with these new materials using 2D ultrathin electrodes with low mass loadings (≤1 mg cm-2) is not viable for translation into commercial devices where electrode capacity is typically only 10%of the device capacity.[11-12]Common thick current collector materials such as nickel foam can achieve higher active material mass loading but suffer from heavy mass and charge transport limitations.[13-15]

    To realize the full potential of these electrode materials, 3D porous electrodes have therefore been developed to address charge transport limitations in thick electrodes as well as maximizing the usage of given footprint area,with mass loading far beyond the limits of 2D electrodes.[12]Here, we define 3D electrodes as electrodes with nonplanar geometries beyond traditional 2D plates,sheets,and rolls,etc.Such architectures enable an optimal configuration that increase the energy density of the EESD within the areal footprint by efficient use of the vertical dimension.[16]3D porous structures with a continuous conductive network and a fully interconnected hierarchical porosity are believed to be beneficial for electron and ion transport in between the electrodes, but also in the interface of electrolytes and electrodes.[17-21]A major practical consideration for EESDs beyond power and energy density is longevity and safety.[22-25]Interfacial stress is generated during the charge and discharge cycles of the typical EESD which negatively impacts the capacity and cyclability of the device.[17,26-28]Rational design of 3D EESD with multiscale construction can be beneficial to mitigate these stresses.[29-30]Designing new electrode structures may solve the interfacial resistance and stability issues of current EESDs.[31-33]The ubiquity of EESDs and the growing need for long-term sustainability means that EESDs of the future should be made as far as possible,with environmentally benign and nontoxic materials.[34]New electrode materials are required to be chemically stable in the electrolyte and compatible with active materials.Additionally,single/simple fabrication procedures should be utilized where possible for a cleaner and scalable process.[35]

    Additive manufacturing (AM), also commonly referred to as 3D printing, has been the integral enabling technology behind research efforts into 3D architectures with a high areal and volumetric capacity.[36-38]AM is being extensively utilized in many areas of electrochemistry to produce electrodes and devices, as this technique allows for fast prototyping and is low cost for short runs. Nowadays, 3D printers can be found not only in many research laboratories, workshops, but also in our homes, highlighting its simplicity and ease of use particularly in comparison with conventional manufacturing. The easy implementation of this new class of manufacturing methods as well as the growing range of processable functional materials promotes the further development of this field to be explored for diverse applications in medicine, arts, and engineering.[39-41]The afore-mentioned challenges in EESD development have being assessed and tackled vigorously by the utilization of 3D printers in many research laboratories and R&D departments.

    3D printing has two key value propositions: 1) improved performance through rationally designed geometry and 2) shortening the value chain through the reduction of processing steps.3D printing fabrication processes,such as photopolymerization and material extrusion,have already been shown to be suitable for the EESDs manufacturing,creating controllable/multiscale architectures as well as direct multimaterial device fabrication.Electrochemical energy conversion and storage are facilitated by the transport of mass and charge at a variety of scales.Readily available 3D printing technologies can cover a large range of feature sizes relevant to electrochemistry. 3D printing is also highly flexible in its application for EESDs.It can be easily integrated with different surface modification techniques to induce desired chemistries and morphologies. Its ability to create complex geometry can also be further leveraged to create multiscale templates for materials that may otherwise not be printed with the required properties. The maturation of 3D printing means that researchers and EESD designers have access to a growing library of printable materials using state-of-the-art printers and postprocessing tools. This enables the printing of a larger portion of the electrochemical reactors’ body. Multimaterial printing enables the integration of EESDs and external electronics, thereby reducing the number of steps in device assembly and packaging,potentially realizing cost savings regardless of design and product complexity.

    Over the last number of years,a significant amount of research into using 3D printing to create electrodes/devices for electrochemical energy conversion and storage has emerged.[34]There is a variety of 3D-printing technologies available, which include direct ink writing(DIW,or robocasting),fused deposition modeling(FDM),inkjet printing, select laser melting (SLM), and stereolithography (DLP or SLA),making additive manufacturing a highly versatile class of techniques for fabrication in electrochemistry.[42]Figure 1 shows the differences between number of printing techniques. Comparisons among various printing techniques with the consideration in resolution,accuracy,surface finish,throughput,and so on are given.

    However, while 3D printing can indeed potentially enable innovations in EESD development, it is a nontrivial task to do so. In order to create the desired hierarchical structures, high-resolution 3D printers are required. However, most 3D printers are typically limited to minimum feature sizes in the range of tens or even hundreds of microns for high-resolution 3D printers. To create the suitable micron and submicron scale features for high-performance EESDs, delicate and precisely controlled postprinting functionalization is generally required.

    EESDs typically have several components,made of different materials to serve different functions. 3D printing to create integrated EESDs is critically dependent on its ability to process these different materials simultaneously in the fabrication process. There are some interesting work demonstrating 3d-printed battery/ supercapacitor and well-reviewed; however, most of the reactor were printed out separately and assembled in a full device.[36,43-46]Different 3D printing techniques have different ways to enable multimaterial processing. Through theappropriate 3D printing techniques, one can realize complex multimaterial structures (with metal–ceramic and ceramic–ceramic combinations). One of the most critical issues in multimaterial printing is the boundary interface, which will inevitably exist between 2 distinct materials. There are two primary concerns regarding boundaries in multimaterial printing. Firstly, physical mixing may occur at the boundaries during the addition of different materials during printing,such as the mixing of different paste mixtures in multinozzle extrusion printing, which may degrade the desired properties. Secondly,the chemical affinity of different materials with each other needs to be evaluated to assess the risk of reaction, compositional changes, and delamination during and after printing. Desired reaction or sintering temperatures of different materials can be tailored using dopants.Matching the desired thermal behavior of distinct materials, combined with a structural design providing maximum adhesion between interfaces, enables the fabrication of high-quality multimaterial/multiscale structures.

    Xi Xu is currently pursuing her doctoral degree at the department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, under the supervision of Prof. Jun Ding. She received bachelor degree from Wuhan University of Technology in 2015 and master degree from National University of Singapore in 2017. Her research focuses on the hierarchical design of functional materials for energy- and environmental-related fields using additive manufacturing.

    Yong Hao Tan is a PhD candidate from NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences& Engineering (NGS). He was graduated from National University of Singapore in 2017 for his BS degree and the joined Prof Jun Ding’s group pursuing his doctoral degree in the field of additive manufacturing of metal materials.

    Jun Ding is a professor and deputy head of the department of Materials Science and Engineering,National University of Singapore.He graduated from the School of Physics,Wuppertal University,Germany,in 1986 and completed his PhD study in Ruhr University,Germany,in 1990.He joined the University of Western Australia from 1991 to 1997 and later National university of Singapore.His research has been concentrated on additive manufacturing.His research has been focused on the development of novel 3D printable materials for fabrication of multimaterials and multifunctional devices/structures which have great potential in practical applications.

    Cao Guan is Professor and Vice Dean of Frontiers Science Center for Flexible Electronics,Northwestern Polytechnical University.He received his BS degree from the School of Physics,Wuhan University,China,in 2009 and completed his PhD study in the School of Physics and Mathematics Sciences,Nanyang Technological University,Singapore,in 2013.He worked as a Research Fellow in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering,National University of Singapore,from 2014 to 2018.His research focuses on the design of nanostructure materials for flexible energy storage and conversion.

    Figure 1. Comparison of different 3D printing techniques. A) A spider web graph showing the key consideration in choosing different 3D printing techniques that will be taken;[98] B) determining factors in resolution limit for different 3D printing techniques.[99-101]

    Among the various 3D printing techniques, extrusion-based and photopolymerization-based techniques have garnered much interest due to their ease of operation, relative low cost, and high resolution.For conciseness, this review will be centered on these two techniques.Effort will first be made to highlight the ability of 3D printing to create multiscale structures. This will be holistically assessed from different angles looking at each technique individually, their capabilities, how the printing process can be controlled, modification of the material feedstock preprint as well as modification of the printed material postprint where applicable. Examples of the application of 3D printing to create multiscale structures in EESD research will then be discussed to showcase the applicability of 3D printing for EESDs and how it may be further applied. The multimaterial capability of 3D printing is then assessed in the same manner.

    2. Multiscale Structures by 3D Printing

    2.1. Direct 3D Printing

    2.1.1. Extrusion

    There are two extrusion techniques that will be covered in this review,fused deposition modeling(FDM)and robocasting.

    FDM, also known as free filament forming (FFF), is a 3D printing process that relies on the extrusion of thermoplastic material from a heated nozzle. The feedstock material is melted and extruded from the hot-end and deposited along the path of the nozzle in a layer by layer fashion as defined by the input CAD file.A variety of polymeric materials ranging from biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) blends to engineering grade materials like acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and even polyether ether ketone(PEEK). Flexible materials such as thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU)can also be processed with the same method. The general print speed of FDM can be 50–150 mm/h with highest claimed speed of 500 mm/h.One thing that needs to be kept in mind is that the smaller features are more easily deformed by heat in FDM printing. Structures with high aspect ratio often fail since heating of the molten plastic and nozzle will cause a soften structure.[47]Raul et al have reported a novel work in which supercritical CO2(SCCO2)and the breath figures mechanism(BFs)were combined with FDM to produce internal(pore diameters 80–300 μm) and external pores (with sizes ranging between 2 and 12 μm).[48]For extrusion-based machines like FDM and DIW,minimum feature size is a function of the diameter of the print nozzle.[47]The most common FDM nozzle diameter is 0.4 mm and ergo;the smallest feature that can be printed out is 0.4 mm.[49]And most used commercial nozzles now still have the limitation in providing nozzles with lower diameter especially with FDM printer.Smaller nozzle diameter will inevitably cause clogging.Many printers allow their nozzles tobereplacedandcanbechangedwithdiametersasnarrowas0.15 mmas demonstratedbyE3D.

    DIW or robocasting refers to the 3D printing technique where slurry or ink is extruded from a nozzle, building up a part like FDM. The difference is that the feedstock for robocasting is a homogeneous slurry of powder suspended in a fluid aqueous or organic medium, rather than a solid filament. Moreover, the nozzle is more customizable with many advanced technologies and can be downsized to tens of micrometer even nanometer size.[50]However, the requirement in ink formulation can therefore be critical for such process. It is arguably among the simplest, yet efficient process used to fabricate complex and robust structures, while being relatively low cost. Usually, an initial investment of an extrusion-based desktop 3D printer can be around few thousand US dollars. While mechanically straightforward, the technique relies on careful ink formation due to the special rheology behavior (shear thinning) needed for the printing process.[51]Compromising between high solid loading and thixotropic behavior affects significantly material preparation, printing strategy, and architectural design. Robocasting has few fundamental material limitations beyond the requirement on ink rheology, and thus, the resolution is also limited by the nozzle size. It has been widely explored for 3D printing of ceramics, metals, plastics, composites, and even emerging materials such as metal organic framework (MOF), electrospun nanofibers toward applications in energy storage with various postprocessing.[45,52-55]

    2.1.2. Photopolymerization

    Photopolymerization-based 3DP is a technique that uses light (typically ultraviolet; UV) to initiate and propagate a polymerization reaction to form a cross-linked solid structure. Typical photopolymerization-based 3D printer includes stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) as well as more recent variants such as continuous liquid interface production (CLIP), high-area rapid printing(HARP), two-photon laser lithography, and projection microstereolithography which boasts significant improvements in print speed.[56-59]Such techniques have various advantages, such as highresolution, easy operation, straightforward material change procedure,and less requirement for support structures which is important for more complex 3D electrode designs. Determining factors in resolution limit for different 3D printing techniques are presented in Figure 1B.In DLP 3D printing, XY resolution is defined by the pixel size, the smallest feature the projector can reproduce within a single layer where Z resolution. This depends on the resolution of the projector(commonly being full HD, 1080p), and its distance from the projected window. Therefore, a fixed XY resolution, generally between 35 and 100 microns, will be equipped with many commercial DLP printers. For SLA 3D printers, XY resolution is a result from both the laser’s spot size and the increments how the laser beam can be controlled. An et al. have reported a hybrid 3D printing system that combines DLP and electrohydrodynamic jet (e-jet) printing for the production of transparent and free-form 3D optoelectronic devices in ambient air which is able to print diverse functional materials with high resolutions (minimum linewidth: 2.6 μm), by adjusting the printing speed and position.[60]As a result,photopolymerization-based 3D printing can provide several micrometers printing resolution, continuous scanning production, and large-area projection creating 3D features, which all make it a suitable approach for commercial EESD fabrication. Other than printer setting modification, material-wise manipulation,such as precursor assisted printing, is also a viable route to obtain multiscale structure with higher resolution.[60-62]

    2.2. Post Modification

    Other than high printing resolution,in order to obtain a multiscale part in 3D EESDs,post-3d-printing surface modification is normally needed to improve the electrode performance for the electrochemical reactions.[63-65]Some commonly used postprocessing methods used for 3d-printed electrodes (including metal-, ceramic-, and polymer-based)are summarized in Figure 2.

    Direct attachment of catalysts such as hydrothermal and dip casting can be low-cost methods that can incorporate active materials to electrode surface effectively.Chang et al.have demonstrated that high-performance electrodes with NiCo2S4nanoneedles grown by hydrothermal method on the customized 3D metal architectures can be achieved through a direct 3D printing technique. Such 3D supports,optimized with control over the design, can possess good electrical conductivity, high mechanical strength, and large surface areas, with hierarchical porosity for effective electrolyte circulation and quick removal of bubbles, all contributing to the enhanced electrocatalytic performance.[66]However,large resistance of the catalyst,introduction of unwanted polymer impurity into the solution, the blocking of the active sites at high mass loadings may adverse impact the final electrochemical performance of the electrode as shown in the paper. Electrodeposition is a well-known method to produce a metallic thin-film coating by the action of an electric current.Electroless deposition is also commonly used for the production of metallic thin-film coatings by the chemical reduction of metallic ions onto a substrate,where the uniformity of the plated layer is less dependent on the conductivity of the substrate.Vaneckova et al.have found that by employing fused deposition modeling 3D printing to fabricate electrodes from a polylactic acid/copper composite filament and further surface functionalization by the copper electroplating, can effectively eliminate the kinetic barrier.[67]Xu et al.adopted a combination of two facile techniques,electroless nickel plating,and DIW,for the formation of three-dimensional architectures in a functional hybrid electrode system for electrolysis.Iffelsberger et al and Bui et al. used the similar electroless deposition method and successfully demonstrated a whole electrolyzer which also showed the promising collaboration[52,68-72]Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a process in which the substrate is exposed to one or more volatile precursors, which react and/or decompose on the substrate surface to produce the desired thin-film deposit.[73]There are various subclasses of chemical vapor deposition that have been incorporated as postsurface modification methods to generate hierarchical structures, such as ALD.[33,74]Pyrolysis is another commonly used postprinting heat treatment to obtain multiscale architecture as well as a technique for fabricating integrated electrode as both active material and conductive matrix.[75-76]Park et al. have fabricated a novel hierarchical 3D conductive electrode for microsupercapacitors by digital light processing (DLP)-based 3D printing.Photocurable composite resin with silver nanowires was optimized to achieve a design of high aspect ratio and resolution.[77]Additionally, material removal from sacrificial template enables the formation of hierarchically constructed network with micropores, mesopores,and nanopores.[26,33,75]

    2.3. 3D printed Multiscale Structures in EESDs

    Figure 2. Commonly used postprocessing methods used for 3d-printed metal,ceramic,and polymer-based electrodes.[33,52,66-69,72-76,79,87,102]

    Studies have shown that 3D composite electrodes improve the charge transport and lead to more efficient utilization of the electrode materials at high mass loading. Some of the representative work has been presented in Figure 3 to show the importance of multiscale 3D part and stated that high energy and power density can be achieved as shown in Figure 4.Yang et al have combined 3D printing technology with innovative 2D transition metal carbides material formulations to maximize surface area accessibility and ion transport within electrode. The optimized porosity created more accessible surface area in improving the performance with rational electrode design. The 3D-printed device achieves a high areal capacitance of 2.1 F cm-2at 1.7 mA cm-2and a gravimetric capacitance of 242.5 F g-1at 0.2 A g-1with a capacitance retention rate of above 90% for 10000 cycles. It also exhibits a high energy density of 0.0244 mWh cm-2and a power density of 0.64 mW cm-2at 4.3 mA cm-2. Such high performance benefits from the multiscale and multidimensional architectures.[75]Lim and her collaborators have fabricated a self-standing and hierarchically porous carbon framework with Co nanoparticles embedded as derived from cobalt-based metal–organic framework (Co-MOF) using an extrusion-based printer. The novel self-standing framework possesses good conductivity and necessary mechanical stability. Moreover, the porous framework consists of abundant micrometer-, meso-, and micropores,which together significantly benefit the efficient deposition and decomposition Li2O2within the pores. The self-standing multiscale architecture significantly enhances the cell’s practical specific energy, achieving a high value of 798 Wh kg-1cell.[75]Gao et al. explained in their recently published work that 3D-printed ultrathick AC/CNT/rGO composite electrode (ten layers) can feature high areal and volumetric mass loadings of 56.9 mg cm-2and 256.3 mg cm-3, respectively. The symmetric cell assembled with the 3D-printed thin GO separator and ultrathick AC/CNT/rGO electrodes can possess both high areal and volumetric capacitances of 4.56 F cm-2and 10.28 F cm-3, respectively. Such symmetric cell can also achieve high areal and volumetric energy densities of 0.63 mWh cm-2and 1.43 mWh cm-3, respectively.[78]Yao et al. have confirmed in their work that the hierarchically constructed pores in 3D-printed parts facilitate uniform deposition of MnO2and efficient ion diffusion during charging/discharging even at ultrahigh mass loading of MnO2. A thick graphene aerogel with MnO2loading of 182.2 mg cm-2was fabricated to achieve a high areal capacitance of 44.13 F cm-2.[79]More recently,Gao et al.have demonstrated a homogenous“tri-continuous” phase structure containing micro and nanopores. The “tricontinuous”phase functioned as a continuous network offering the conductive electron paths and interconnected ion channels, which is beneficial for increasing adhesive strength and facilitating electron/ion transport at the nanoscale.[78]

    However, as indicated in many works, the increased porosity may also sacrifice the volumetric capacitance and volumetric energy density to some extent and therefore simulation works are needed to be combined with experimental results to develop more rational device architecture.[75]

    3. Multimaterial Structures by 3D Printing

    While many works have so far explored the benefits of 3D printing for multiscale structures in the field of EESDs, fewer works have investigated the use of multimaterial 3D printing for integrated EESDs.Multiscale structures can be inherently produced from the variety of 3D printing techniques, but multimaterial printing with more complex structure that can be integrated in one step remains a major challenge.[43,80-82]In this section, some documented work using multimaterial printing concept is also reviewed.

    3.1. Direct 3D printing

    3.1.1. Extrusion (Nozzle Engineering and Ink Formulation)

    Commercially available FDM multimaterial printers, such as Raise3D,MakerGear, Robo,gCreate, MAKEiT, and Dremel,include two types of nozzle design:single and multinozzle design according to whether the materials are combined before or after passing through the melting zone. Kim et al. presented fabrication of piezoelectric sensors using BaTiO3(BTO) filler in a poly(vinylidene) fluoride (PVDF) matrix through in situ electric alignment during the FDM printing process.[83]The fabricated free-form single structures maintain uniform alignment of dipoles in the PVDF polymer. However, as limited by its material selection,some of the functional materials cannot be printed.Although such materials can be used as filler to be incorporated into the fused filament, nozzle clogging of the fillers is a serious problem that remains to be solved when being further used to fabricate more complex EESD system.

    Figure 3. Construction consideration of multiscale electrodes obtained by 3D printing. A) Design consideration of hierarchical templates. A large surface area and hierarchically constructed porous structure can be essential to retain outstanding electrochemical performance with high mass loading for energy conversion and storage reactions.Reproduced with permission.[33]Copyright 2020,ACS publication.B)Schematic illustration of a 3D printed graphene aerogel/MnO2.With the consideration of retaining a good capacitive performance at high loading of active material,a multiscale graphene aerogel was printed to be used as current collector. Reproduced with permission.[79] Copyright 2019, Cell. C) Schematic representation of extruding complex 3D architectures with hierarchical porosity(macroscale →nanoscale). Reproduced with permission.[103] Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH. D) Comparison of three schematic Li–O2 cathodes. (a) Conventional cathode (i) with powdered active materials coated on the porous conducting matrix. (b) Conventional cathode (ii) with active materials directly grown on the matrix with a low mass loading. (c) The novel cathode designed with 3D-printed self-standing and hierarchically porous catalyst framework without employing the porous matrix.Reproduced with permission.[75]Copyright 2018,Wiley-VCH.

    Challenges also existed in the multimaterial assembly as in DIW: 1)rapid drying and clogging issues in the nozzle during printing, 2)cracking and mismatch during the co-sintering process,and 3)elemental leaching through boundaries during sintering.As mentioned before,aqueous/nonaqueous homogenous slurry of powder particles based on the conventional colloidal processing depends on a solvent-evaporation step. Such step is important in solidification of as-printed structure but may not be ideal for multimaterial printing as it may cause unwanted nozzle clogging and during the long printing process which might involve the changing of the nozzle.Shrinkage mismatch may also cause significant cracks, delamination, and structural failures when handling multimaterial printing. Lastly, chemical leaching across the boundaries between two different materials is inevitable if close contact is made.[84]

    To solve the problems existed in the multimaterial printing,different multimaterial printers and various nozzle designs were fabricated. One direct setting can multinozzle printer,the presence of a second extruder will eat into the area that would be available for printing with a single extruder.[85]The artifacts of multinozzle printing can be divided into two main types.Horizontally printed tile and vertically printed tile.Horizontally layering maintains a fixed nozzle height for each layer while vertically printing allows more flexibility in printing multigradient throughout layers.Warping and cracking during drying were observed on some of horizontally printing tile due to the nonuniform drying.However, as for the vertically printing pattern, delamination can be a big limitation.The chances of oozing and stringing become higher and layer-shifting defects will exist if one of the extruders causes material deposited by the other to warp. More specifically, several customized nozzle designs were also developed in response to the material and process constraints described above,by combining material flows not only from two separate extruders to fulfill the multimaterial printing.Bechthold et al. have proposed two unique types of extrusion nozzles. The nozzles produced two distinct configurations of material within a single print bead, a bifurcated “Janus” bead and a concentric “Center-core”bead(Figure 5).For the Janus Nozzle,the end of the two linear extruders was merged into a single nozzle. Figure 5 summarizes the design affordances of the nozzle. The center-core nozzle used the same 45 degree angle configuration of two linear extruders as the Janus nozzle,but encapsulated one nozzle inside of the other.This novel type of nozzle is capable of producing three printing patterns which are not restricted multimaterial printing but also hollow structures that can be used for further infiltration/multiscale printing. Potential design affordances of the center-core nozzle need to be verified by further study,but initial tests show promising results. Apart from design and implementation of mixing and switching nozzles,allowing multiple materials to be co-printed continuously, the frequency or resolution at which they can switch materials is limited.Specifically,the large dead volume in mixing nozzles results in long material transitions, causing nozzle clogging.More recently,Lewis et al.reported the design and fabrication of voxelated soft matter using multimaterial multinozzle 3D (MM3D)printing,in which the composition,function,and structure of the materials are programmed at the voxel scale with enhanced build speed.[86]Moreover,Studart et al.proposed multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing platform(MM-3D printing)opened the way toward the manufacturing of functional heterogeneous materials with exquisite microstructural features.Further shape change required for reconfiguration can also be achieved using a much wider range of chemistries and external triggering stimuli.[87]

    Figure 4. Multiscale electrodes with superior performance for EESDs. A) Electrochemical performance of 3D-printed few-layer large-flake Ti3C2Tx interdigitated electrodes integrated into current-collector-free symmetric MSCs (finger diameter of 326 μm and gap distance of 187 μm). A) Reproduced with permission.[104] Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. B) Electrochemical performance of the assembled AC/CNT/rGO symmetric supercapacitors. B) Reproduced with permission.[78] Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH. C) Cycling performance of Li-S cells assembled with 3D-printed freeze-dried electrode.[105] Copyright 2019,Elsevier B.V.

    From material-wise consideration,a universal formulation applicable to a variety of materials may be able to mitigate such clogging problem. Moreover, to overcome shrinkage problem, it is important to make sure a similar ligand removal and comparable sintering condition to minimize the shrinkage disparity.The suspensions can also be reformulated to consider the different shrinkage rates while retaining similar viscoelastic response to minimize printing defect. Zhang et al. have covered a self-curable epoxide–amine ink formulation to print a wide range of ceramics (metal oxides, nitrides, and carbides) and metals without the need for an external curing source.[88]Such ink system needs no extra solvent-evaporation step and effectively solved the challenges such as high energy requirements, limitations of materials with high refractive index, tedious postprocessing heat treatment processes,uneven drying shrinkages, and brittleness of green bodies which current curing techniques may encountered. Through this technique,complex multimaterial structures can be printed.[50]Otherwise,another feasible route which has been successfully demonstrated for copper-and graphene-based electrode materials by Rocha et al is using nonionic thermosensitive hydrogel (i.e., Pluronic F127).[89]Pluronic F127 with inherent reversible viscoelastic properties and shear-thinning behavior is suitable to be mixed with different material and forms printable inks.[90]As hydrogel can preserve water better than anionic/cationic-polymeric additives in the conventional colloidal ink formulations and may help to minimize the cracks problem during drying step. Although some of the proposed formulation are demonstrated for only ceramic materials, it is also applicable in many other combinations such as metal/metal, metal/ceramic. Another possible solution to minimize the sintering cracks and delamination is to increase the solid loading while using same aqueous colloidal paste via surface modification of the starting powder.

    3.1.2. Photopolymerization (Printer Setup and Ink Formulation)

    Similar to the many other desktop printers, projection stereolithography-based printer can incorporate with external setup to be used in the multimaterial and multiscale 3D printing.This allows the fabrication of multifunctional polymer composites with localized control of particle distribution, geometric flexibility, and fast build speed. Such modified process enables the design complexity, the range of polymer composites material, and a higher degree of functionality. Printing parameters of the resin in curing and patterning can be investigated easily to provide a guideline for printing composites for real application. However,because a whole tank of resin is prepared and is used for printing layers,the filler concentrations and patterns are difficult to control among layers. Although in situ particle-polymer blending can partially solve the problem, such premixing manufacturing method lacks flexibilities in producing composites with heterogeneous properties/multimaterial combination with less boundary defects,greatly limiting applications in smart machines/fast manufacturing. Pan et al. approaches for fabrications of multifunctional particle-polymer composites using external field-assisted projection-based stereolithography processes.Additionally,particle alignment mechanisms using an external magnetic field and an external acoustic field were investigated separately.[91-92]The proposed particle manipulation techniques outperform the existing particle manipulation methods on localized particle distribution control, broad filler material selection in terms of size and type, and various gradient patterns.

    Figure 5. Multimaterial electrodes by 3D printing. A) Diagram showing the various nozzle prototypes produced. The large travel distance of the Janus Nozzle v1 prevented clay from extruding. Janus Nozzle v2 oriented extruders at a 45 degree angle to one another in order to reduce the travel distance from the end of the clay cylinder to the tool tip. Center-core nozzle retained the general form of Janus Nozzle v2 but adjusted material flow to provide a concentric extrusion. A) Reproduced with permission.[85] Copyright 2019, ACADIA. B) (a) Schematic of voxelated architectures printed using a single (0D) nozzle (top)and the 1D (middle) and 2D (bottom) MM3D printheads. (b) Photographs of the corresponding 0D, 1D, and 2D four-material MM3D printheads. (c)Photographs showing the top (top) and side (middle and bottom) views of a 4 × 4-nozzle, four-material, 2D MM3D printhead. Scale bars, 10 mm. (d)Schematic of MM3D printhead operation, where V1–V4 represents the voltage waveforms controlling the extrusion pressures p1–p4 for materials 1–4, and patm denotes the atmospheric pressure. (e) Voxelated matter produced by MM3D printing using a 4 × 4-nozzle, four-material, 2D printhead. B) Reproduced with permission.[86] Copyright 2019, Nature.

    However, mixing of particles and liquid resin remains the primary challenge, as agglomeration or undesired particle dispersion patterns occur when the particles are not blended properly before the printing or when the 3D printing process takes a long time. Magdassi et al.reported a family of highly stretchable elastomers that are suitable for the DLP-based 3D printing technology.[93]By mixing monomers at various ratios, such DLP printed elastomers can be stretched by up to 1100%. It enables the direct creation of complex 3D lattices or hollow structures for multimaterial combination and multiscale architecture where extremely large deformation is needed.

    Figure 6. 3D printed Multimaterial EESDs.A)(a)Optical and(b)SEM images of printed and annealed LTO-LFP architectures.(c)Full-cell voltage as a function of areal capacity for 8-layer interdigitated LTO-LFP electrodes. (d) Areal capacity of full cell composed of 8-layer interdigitated LTO-LFP electrodes measured as a function of number of cycles tested.Reproduced with permission.[50]Copyright 2013,Wiley-VCH.B)Electrochemical properties of the single 3D-printed QSS-NFB devices. (a) Schematic illustration, (b) CV curves, (c) galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) curves, (d) rate properties, (e) cycling properties of the 3D-printed QSS-NFB device.Reproduced with permission.[96]Copyright 2020,ACS publication.

    One advantage over extrusion-based printing is the as-formed solid products enables one-step assembly. Not many works have been explored the possibility of fabricating EESDs using photopolymerization-based 3D printing techniques although the high printing quality and fast speed have been proven.However,restriction in material selection limited the further application.The formulation manipulation techniques need to be carried out to outperform the existing particle manipulation methods on localized particle distribution control, broad filler material selection in terms of size and type. Fantino et al. have coupled the photoreduction of a metal precursor with 3D-printing technology and showed the possibility of the fabrication of conductive 3D hybrid structures consisting of metal nanoparticles and organic polymers shaped in complex multilayered architectures.[93]3D conductive structures were fabricated incorporating silver nitrate into a photocurable oligomer in the presence of suitable photoinitiators and exposing them to a digital light system.Similar skills are foreseeable to be broad to other metal electrodes. Wang et al. demonstrated that by mixing the conductive filler with polymer matrix, the printed conductive complex structures can be used as hollow capacitive sensor,electrically activated shape memory composites, stretchable circuits, showing the versatility of photopolymerization-based 3D printing for conductive complex structures.[94]Yin et al.presented a work in alternative digital light processing 3D printing of two photocurable precursors: hydrogel and water-dilutable polyurethane acrylate (WPUA), in which the ionically conductive hydrogel layers serve as soft,transparent electrodes and the electrically insulated WPUA as flexible, transparent dielectric layers.[95]Moreover,the effects of process parameters on the particle-resin mixture curing and particle patterning can be easily investigated to provide a guideline for printing composites thus is suitable for practical application.

    3.2. 3D printed Multimaterial EESDs

    Sun et al.have carefully designed concentrated LFP and LTO viscoelastic inks enabled printing of these thin-walled anode and cathode structures in one batch (Figure 6). Using this LFP-LTO combination, they have achieved a high areal energy density of 9.7 J cm-2at a power density of 2.7 mW cm-2.[50]Other demonstrated work mainly focuses on planar mesh integration without taking complex structures into consideration. Kong et al. have demonstrated a printing with multicomponents as quasi-solid-state nickel iron battery (QSS-NFB), two electrodes consisting of ultrathin Ni(OH)2nanosheet array cathode and holey α-Fe2O3nanorod array anode are achieved with a ultrahigh active material loading over 130 mg cm-3and excellent compressibility up to 60% (Figure 6). The compressible QSS-NFB exhibited an excellent cycling stability (~91.3% capacity retentions after 10 000 cycles) and ultrahigh energy (28.1 mWh cm-3at a power of 10.6 mW cm-3).[96]Integrated EESDs in the form of complete devices hold the promise of simplified production and real applications. There have, however, been major strides made toward the realization of multimaterial printing with more complex and compact design which has been discussed in detailed in the previous section and below as outlook.[97]

    4. Summary and Outlook

    Compared with traditional 2D electrodes and planar EESD structures,the synthesis of 3D thick porous electrodes/3D EESD has proven to be promising in addressing charge transport limitations in commercial EESDs. The realization of improved electron, ion transport, and mechanical properties through the construction of continuous 3D structures with hierarchical porosity is essential. 3D structures have also demonstrated excellent structural stability,being able to withstand stresses caused by volume change during charge/discharge. One of the major benefits in using 3D printing technique is the design flexibility and having that advantage not only promotes the energy density and power density but also enables the development of EESDs for wearable devices. Complex 3D structures, with hierarchically constructed architecture,are beneficial to improve electrochemical performance therefore need to be printed with high resolution, accuracy, and surface finish.From the technique’s perspective,optimized printer setting is a prerequisite to achieve high-resolution 3D architectures. Presently, various works have demonstrated good results, showing the promise of 3D printing.However,there does not seem to yet be a standard metric by which authors report performance, for example, areal versus volumetric.Standardization of performance metrics will provide a better framework for comparison, against other works as well as commercial systems. There also remains much untapped potential in the free-form shaping afforded by 3D printing, with many current works so far still experimenting with relatively simple shapes such as flat rectangular meshes.Developments in modeling and simulation tools such as generative design have combined advanced computational tools and 3D printing for structures with designed mechanical properties. This can potentially be leveraged for optimization of EESDs,for robust structures that can undergo large deformation to power flexible wearable devices.Other tools like computational fluid dynamics can be utilized to optimize flow in new complex 3D electrodes for further improved performance.

    The next major challenge of 3D printed EESDs is the realization of viable integrated electronic devices. While many works have so far showed the possibility of utilizing 3D printing for multiscale structures toward EESDs with enhanced performance,fewer works have been documented the realization of multimaterial 3D printing for integrated EESDs. Integrated EESDs in the form of complete devices with all the benefits of complexity afforded by 3D printing hold the promise of simplified production and real applications.Multiscale structures can be inherently produced from the variety of 3D printing techniques, but multimaterial printing remains highly challenging. Challenges and efforts in multimaterial printing have been reviewed in this article. For multimaterial printing,major issues include nozzle clogging,crack/delamination, as well as elemental leaching. Material-wise modification can potentially mitigate such boundary defects,among the many other possibilities in fabricating postprocessing-free 3D-printed EESDs without sacrificing their electrochemical performance. Meanwhile, new innovative printer designs regarding the printer setup such as the introduction of an ultrasound nozzle, oxygen-embedded print chamber are expected to be developed.

    Together with fast development in active material chemistry and structural flexibility in 3D-printed parts, effective/optimized electrode architecture modeling will be necessary to realize EES systems with superior energy and power density and to meet the insatiable demand for more energy and power. Ex situ and in situ characterization techniques (e.g., high-resolution TEM, atomic force microscopy, NMR spectroscopy,cryo-electron microscopy,and transmission X-ray microscopy) are helpful to understand and even monitor the real-time electrochemical performance and serve as a better guideline for nextgeneration 3D EESDs design.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors acknowledge the financial supports by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51902265), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (no.2020KWZ-001), and Project for graduate Innovation team of Northwestern Polytechnical University.

    Conflict of Interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Keywords

    3d printing, electrochemical energy storage devices, multimaterial, multiscale

    Received: October 5, 2020

    Revised: November 14, 2020

    Published online: December 6, 2020

    [1] R.Raccichini,A.Varzi,S.Passerini,B.Scrosati,Nat.Mater.2015,14,271.

    [2] P.Alstone,D.Gershenson,D.M.Kammen,Nat.Clim.Chang.2015,5,305.

    [3] X. Li, M. Rui, J. Song, Z. Shen, H. Zeng, Adv. Func. Mater. 2015, 25,4929.

    [4] Y. Gogotsi, P. Simon, Science 2011, 334, 917.

    [5] P. Forouzandeh, S. C. Pillai, Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 5, 233.

    [6] T.S.Arthur,D.J.Bates,N.Cirigliano,D.C.Johnson,P.Malati,J.M.Mosby,E.Perre,M.T.Rawls,A.L.Prieto,B.Dunn,MRS Bull.2011,36,523.

    [7] S. C. Pang, M. A. Anderson, T. W. Chapman, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000,147, 444.

    [8] K. Shen, X. Chen, J. Chen, Y. Li, ACS Catalysis 2016, 6, 5887.

    [9] S. Chen, L. Ma, S. Wu, S. Wang, Z. Li, A. A. Emmanuel, M. R. Huqe, C.Zhi, J. A. Zapien, Adv. Func. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908945.

    [10] X. Cheng, J. Pan, Y. Zhao, M. Liao, H. Peng, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018,8, 1702184.

    [11] Z. Kang, G. Yang, J. Mo, Y. Li, S. Yu, D. A. Cullen, S. T. Retterer, T. J.Toops, G. Bender, B. S. Pivovar, Nano Energy 2018, 47, 434.

    [12] H. Sun, J. Zhu, D. Baumann, L. Peng, Y. Xu, I. Shakir, Y. Huang, X.Duan, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 45.

    [13] N. Nitta, F. Wu, J. T. Lee, G. Yushin, Mater. Today 2015, 18, 252.

    [14] H. Chen, J. Jiang, L. Zhang, D. Xia, Y. Zhao, D. Guo, T. Qi, H. Wan, J.Power Sources 2014, 254, 249.

    [15] Z.-H. Huang, Y. Song, D.-Y. Feng, Z. Sun, X. Sun, X.-X. Liu, ACS Nano 2018, 12, 3557.

    [16] J. Werner, G. Rodr′?guez-Calero, H. Abru~na, U. Wiesner, Energy Environ.Sci. 2018, 11, 1261.

    [17] Q. Zhang, H. Wan, G. Liu, Z. Ding, J. P. Mwizerwa, X. Yao, Nano Energy 2019, 57, 771.

    [18] Z. Yu, D. G. Mackanic, W. Michaels, M. Lee, A. Pei, D. Feng, Q. Zhang,Y. Tsao, C. V. Amanchukwu, X. Yan, Joule 2019, 3, 2761.

    [19] S. Yang, S. Wang, X. Liu, L. Li, Carbon 2019, 147, 540.

    [20] J.Dai,L.Wang,A.Xie,J.He,Y.Yan,ACS Sustain.Chem.Eng.2019,8,739.

    [21] F. Zhang, P. Xiong, X. Guo, J. Zhang, W. Yang, W. Wu, H. Liu, G.Wang, Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 19, 251.

    [22] A. Ahmadiparidari, R. E. Warburton, L. Majidi, M. Asadi, A. Chamaani,J. R. Jokisaari, S. Rastegar, Z. Hemmat, B. Sayahpour, R. S. Assary, Adv.Mater. 2019, 31, 1902518.

    [23] K. A. Severson, P. M. Attia, N. Jin, N. Perkins, B. Jiang, Z. Yang, M. H.Chen, M. Aykol, P. K. Herring, D. Fraggedakis, Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 383.

    [24] H. Jiang, J. Sun, L. Wei, M. Wu, W. Shyy, T. Zhao, Energy Storage Mater.2020, 24, 529.

    [25] Y. He, C. Lu, S. Liu, W. Zheng, J. Luo, Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9,1901810.

    [26] Z. Li, K. Jiang, F. Khan, A. Goswami, J. Liu, A. Passian, T. Thundat, Sci.Adv. 2019, 5, eaav2820.

    [27] F. Hao, W. Wang, P. P. Mukherjee, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 034038.

    [28] X. Song, Y. Lu, F. Wang, X. Zhao, H. Chen, J. Power Sources 2020, 452,227803.

    [29] K. Li, Z. Hu, J. Ma, S. Chen, D. Mu, J. Zhang, Adv. Mater. 2019, 31,1902399.

    [30] Y. Chen, X. Ke, Y. Cheng, M. Fan, W. Wu, X. Huang, Y. Liang, Y.Zhong, Z. Ao, Y. Lai, Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 26, 56.

    [31] C.Sun,Y.Ruan,W.Zha,W.Li,M.Cai,Z.Wen,Mater.Horizons 2020,7,30.

    [32] Y. Zheng, H. Seifert, H. Shi, Y. Zhang, C. K¨ubel, W. Pfleging, Electrochim. Acta 2019, 317, 502.

    [33] X. Xu, C. Guan, L. Xu, Y. H. Tan, D. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, D. J.Blackwood, J. Wang, M. Li, ACS Nano 2019, 14, 937.

    [34] X. Gao, X. Yang, Q. Sun, J. Luo, J. Liang, W. Li, J. Wang, S. Wang, M. Li,R. Li, Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 682.

    [35] Z. Lv, W. Li, L. Yang, X. J. Loh, X. Chen, Acs Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 606.

    [36] F. Zhang, M. Wei, V. V. Viswanathan, B. Swart, Y. Shao, G. Wu, C.Zhou, Nano Energy 2017, 40, 418.

    [37] C. Sun, S. Liu, X. Shi, C. Lai, J. Liang, Y. Chen, Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381,122641.

    [38] T. S. Wei, B. Y. Ahn, J. Grotto, J. A. Lewis, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30,1703027.

    [39] W. Shi, M. Sun, X. Hu, B. Ren, J. Cheng, C. Li, X. Duan, X. Fu, J. Zhang,H. Chen, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1701089.

    [40] Y. Yang, Z. Chen, X. Song, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, K. K. Shung, Q. Zhou, Y.Chen, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1605750.

    [41] D. G. Moore, L. Barbera, K. Masania, A. R. Studart, Nat. Mater. 2020,19, 212.

    [42] A. T. Kutbee, R. R. Bahabry, K. O. Alamoudi, M. T. Ghoneim, M. D.Cordero, A. S. Almuslem, A. Gumus, E. M. Diallo, J. M. Nassar, A. M.Hussain, NPJ Flexible Electronics 2017, 1, 1.

    [43] S. M. H. Hashemi, U. Babic, P. Hadikhani, D. Psaltis, Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 20, 6.

    [44] P. Chang, H. Mei, S. Zhou, K. G. Dassios, L. Cheng, J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 4230.

    [45] X. Tian, J. Jin, S. Yuan, C. K. Chua, S. B. Tor, K. Zhou, Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700127.

    [46] Y. Pang, Y. Cao, Y. Chu, M. Liu, K. Snyder, D. MacKenzie, C. Cao, Adv.Func. Mater. 2020, 30, 1906244.

    [47] J. S. Chohan, R. Singh, Rapid Prototyp. J. 2017, 23, 495.

    [48] R. Sanz-Horta, C. Elvira, A. Gallardo, H. Reinecke, J. Rodr′?guez-Hern′andez. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1080.

    [49] V. Mazzanti, L. Malagutti, F. Mollica, Polymers 2019, 11, 1094.

    [50] K. Sun, T.-S. Wei, B. Y. Ahn, J. Y. Seo, S. J. Dillon, J. A. Lewis, Adv.Mater. 2013, 25, 4539.

    [51] J. A. Lewis, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 83, 2341.

    [52] X. Xu, C. Li, J. G. Lim, Y. Wang, A. Ong, X. Li, E. Peng, J. Ding, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 30273.

    [53] C. Zhu, T. Liu, F. Qian, W. Chen, S. Chandrasekaran, B. Yao, Y. Song, E.B. Duoss, J. D. Kuntz, C. M. Spadaccini, M. A. Worsley, Y. Li, Nano Today 2017, 15, 107.

    [54] Y. Zhao, B. Liu, L. Pan, G. Yu, Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2856.

    [55] Y. Yan, X. Liu, J. Yan, C. Guan, J. Wang. Energy Environ. Mater, 1.

    [56] X. Kuang, Z. Zhao, K. Chen, D. Fang, G. Kang, H. J. Qi, Macromol.Rapid Commun. 2018, 39, 1700809.

    [57] D. A. Walker, J. L. Hedrick, C. A. Mirkin, Science 2019, 366, 360.

    [58] S. K. Saha, D. Wang, V. H. Nguyen, Y. Chang, J. S. Oakdale, S.-C. Chen,Science 2019, 366, 105.

    [59] R. M. Hensleigh, H. Cui, J. S. Oakdale, C. Y. Jianchao, P. G. Campbell, E.B. Duoss, C. M. Spadaccini, X. Zheng, M. A. Worsley, Mater. Horizons 2018, 5, 1035.

    [60] B. Ren, J. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, K. Gan, Y. Rong, J. Yang, J. Am. Ceram.Soc. 2019, 102, 6498.

    [61] B. Elder, R. Neupane, E. Tokita, U. Ghosh, S. Hales, Y. L. Kong, Adv.Mater. 2020, 32, e1907142.

    [62] J. T. Muth, P. G. Dixon, L. Woish, L. J. Gibson, J. A. Lewis, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 1832.

    [63] B. Yao, S. Chandrasekaran, H. Zhang, A. Ma, J. Kang, L. Zhang, X. Lu, F.Qian, C. Zhu, E. B. Duoss, C. M. Spadaccini, M. A. Worsley, Y. Li, Adv.Mater. 2020, 32, 1906652.

    [64] Z. Liang, Y. Pei, C. Chen, B. Jiang, Y. Yao, H. Xie, M. Jiao, G. Chen, T.Li, B. Yang, L. Hu, ACS Nano 2019, 13, 12653.

    [65] G. Ercolano, T. Zambelli, C. van Nisselroy, D. Momotenko, J. V¨or¨os, T.Merle, W. W. Koelmans, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2019, 22, 1900961.

    [66] S. Chang, X. Huang, C. Y. Aaron Ong, L. Zhao, L. Li, X. Wang, J. Ding,J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 18338.

    [67] E. Van?e?ckov′a, M. Bou?sa, R. Sokolov′a, P. Moreno-Garc′?a, P. Broekmann,V. Shestivska, J. Rathousk′y, M. G′al, T. Sebechlebsk′a, V. Kolivo?ska, J.Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 858, 113763.

    [68] J. Xue, L. Gao, X. Hu, K. Cao, W. Zhou, W. Wang, Y. Lu, Nano-Micro Lett. 2019, 11, 1.

    [69] X. Su, X. Li, C. Y. A. Ong, T. S. Herng, Y. Wang, E. Peng, J. Ding, Adv.Sci. 2019, 6, 1801670.

    [70] C. Iffelsberger, S. Ng, M. Pumera, Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20,100654.

    [71] J. C. Bui, J. T. Davis, D. V. Esposito, Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 213.

    [72] S. Ng, C. Iffelsberger, Z. Sofer, M. Pumera, Adv. Func. Mater. 2020, 30,1910193.

    [73] P. C. Sherrell, C. Mattevi, Mater. Today 2016, 19, 428.

    [74] C. Marichy, M. Bechelany, N. Pinna, Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1017.

    [75] Z. Lyu, G. J. H. Lim, R. Guo, Z. Kou, T. Wang, C. Guan, J. Ding, W.Chen, J. Wang, Adv. Func. Mater. 2019, 29, 1806658.

    [76] Z. Lyu, G. J. Lim, R. Guo, Z. Pan, X. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. He, S. Adams,W. Chen, J. Ding, Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 336.

    [77] S. H. Park, M. Kaur, D. Yun, W. S. Kim, Langmuir 2018, 34, 10897.

    [78] T. Gao, Z. Zhou, J. Yu, J. Zhao, G. Wang, D. Cao, B. Ding, Y. Li, Adv.Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802578.

    [79] B. Yao, S. Chandrasekaran, J. Zhang, W. Xiao, F. Qian, C. Zhu, E. B.Duoss, C. M. Spadaccini, M. A. Worsley, Y. Li, Joule 2019, 3, 459.

    [80] G. D. O’Neil, Curr. Opin. Electrochem 2020, 20, 5.

    [81] P. Wu, Z. Fang, A. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Tang, Y. Zhou, G. Yu, Research 2019, 2019, 8393085.

    [82] V. G. Rocha, E. Saiz, I. S. Tirichenko, E. Garc′?a-Tu~n′on, J. Mater. Chem.A 2020, 8, 15646.

    [83] H. Kim, F. Torres, D. Villagran, C. Stewart, Y. Lin, T. L. B. Tseng, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1700229.

    [84] E. Peng, D. Zhang, J. Ding, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802404.

    [85] Z. Seibold, S. Mhatre, J. L. G. del Castillo, M. Bechthold.presented at Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) 2019.

    [86] M. A. Skylar-Scott, J. Mueller, C. W. Visser, J. A. Lewis, Nature 2019,575, 330.

    [87] D. Kokkinis, M. Schaffner, A. R. Studart, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8643.

    [88] D. Zhang, E. Peng, R. Borayek, J. Ding, Adv. Func. Mater. 2019, 29,1807082.

    [89] V.G.Rocha,E.Garc′?a-Tu~n′on,C.Botas,F.Markoulidis,E.Feilden,E.D’Elia,N.Ni,M.Shaffer,E.Saiz,ACS Appl.Mater.Interfaces.2017,9,37136.

    [90] E. Feilden, E. G.-T. Blanca, F. Giuliani, E. Saiz, L. Vandeperre, J. Eur.Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 2525.

    [91] L. Lu, Dissertation/Thesis ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 2019.

    [92] L. Lu, P. Guo, Y. Pan, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017, 139.

    [93] B. Zhang, S. Li, H. Hingorani, A. Serjouei, L. Larush, A. A. Pawar, W. H.Goh, A. H. Sakhaei, M. Hashimoto, K. Kowsari, S. Magdassi, Q. Ge, J.Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 3246.

    [94] Q. Mu, L. Wang, C. K. Dunn, X. Kuang, F. Duan, Z. Zhang, H. J. Qi, T.Wang, Additive Manufacturing 2017, 18, 74.

    [95] X. Y. Yin, Y. Zhang, J. Xiao, C. Moorlag, J. Yang, Adv. Func. Mater.2019, 29, 1904716.

    [96] D. Kong, Y. Wang, S. Huang, B. Zhang, Y. V. Lim, G. J. Sim, P. Valdivia y Alvarado, Q. Ge, H. Y. Yang, ACS Nano 2020, 14, 9675.

    [97] M. Rafiee, R. D. Farahani, D. Therriault, Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902307.

    [98] E. E. Petersen, J. Pearce, Technologies 2017, 5, 7.

    [99] A. Blaeser, D. F. Duarte Campos, U. Puster, W. Richtering, M. M. Stevens, H. Fischer, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2016, 5, 326.

    [100] M. Mao, J. He, X. Li, B. Zhang, Q. Lei, Y. Liu, D. Li, Micromachines 2017, 8, 113.

    [101] J. Stringer, B. Derby, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 913.

    [102] L. F. Arenas, N. Kaishubayeva, C. Ponce de Le′on, F. C. Walsh, Transactions IMF 2020, 98, 48.

    [103] S. D. Lacey, D. J. Kirsch, Y. Li, J. T. Morgenstern, B. C. Zarket, Y. Yao, J.Dai, L. Q. Garcia, B. Liu, T. Gao, S. Xu, S. R. Raghavan, J. W. Connell, Y.Lin, L. Hu, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705651.

    [104] W. Yang, J. Yang, J. J. Byun, F. P. Moissinac, J. Xu, S. J. Haigh, M.Domingos, M. A. Bissett, R. A. W. Dryfe, S. Barg, Adv. Mater. 2019, 31,1902725.

    [105] X.Gao,Q.Qian,X.Yang,J.Liang,A.Koo,W.Li,J.Wang,R.Li,F.Holness,A.Price,S.Yang,T.Sham,X.Sun,Nano Energy,2018,56,595.

    性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产成人精品在线电影| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 大香蕉久久网| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 高清av免费在线| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 在线视频色国产色| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 色在线成人网| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| av电影中文网址| 人人澡人人妻人| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 中文欧美无线码| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 成人影院久久| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| tube8黄色片| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| av电影中文网址| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| av片东京热男人的天堂| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲av成人av| 黄色女人牲交| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 精品第一国产精品| 国产男女内射视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 久久久久国内视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| netflix在线观看网站| 操美女的视频在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 咕卡用的链子| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| av有码第一页| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 色播在线永久视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 中文字幕色久视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 超色免费av| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 免费观看人在逋| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久狼人影院| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 满18在线观看网站| 捣出白浆h1v1| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 午夜免费观看网址| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 99国产精品99久久久久| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 大码成人一级视频| 久久影院123| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 精品福利永久在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 黄片小视频在线播放| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 黄色视频不卡| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载 | 91老司机精品| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| tocl精华| 热99re8久久精品国产| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产97色在线日韩免费| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久热在线av| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 一本综合久久免费| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| av不卡在线播放| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 老熟女久久久| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久9热在线精品视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| av天堂久久9| 怎么达到女性高潮| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 操美女的视频在线观看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品第一国产精品| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 精品福利观看| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 在线天堂中文资源库| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 日本a在线网址| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产区一区二久久| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| videos熟女内射| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 一区二区三区精品91| av中文乱码字幕在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 伦理电影免费视频| 美女福利国产在线| 午夜激情av网站| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 老司机福利观看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| cao死你这个sao货| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 99久久人妻综合| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 久久久久久久国产电影| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 欧美成人午夜精品| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产高清videossex| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产av又大| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久中文看片网| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 丁香六月欧美| 精品国产亚洲在线| 1024香蕉在线观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美性长视频在线观看| tube8黄色片| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| xxx96com| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| av国产精品久久久久影院| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久久久视频综合| 看黄色毛片网站| ponron亚洲| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 亚洲av熟女| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久这里只有精品19| 精品福利永久在线观看| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产麻豆69| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产99白浆流出| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久久久国内视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 手机成人av网站| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 成在线人永久免费视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 成人精品一区二区免费| 嫩草影视91久久| 老司机影院毛片| 国产亚洲欧美98| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 乱人伦中国视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 天堂动漫精品| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| av网站在线播放免费| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 亚洲第一青青草原| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 高清av免费在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | aaaaa片日本免费| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| av欧美777| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产淫语在线视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 精品第一国产精品| 午夜视频精品福利| 大香蕉久久网| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 9191精品国产免费久久| av中文乱码字幕在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 成年动漫av网址| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲国产欧美网| avwww免费| 操出白浆在线播放| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 成年动漫av网址| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 三级毛片av免费| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 看黄色毛片网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产成人欧美| 男女免费视频国产| 人人澡人人妻人| 色在线成人网| 成人手机av| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 免费不卡黄色视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 在线观看www视频免费| 在线看a的网站| 精品第一国产精品| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 成年动漫av网址| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 老司机靠b影院| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| 中文字幕色久视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 在线播放国产精品三级| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 精品国产亚洲在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载 | 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 精品久久久精品久久久| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | av在线播放免费不卡| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| av欧美777| av片东京热男人的天堂| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产精品久久视频播放| 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 午夜影院日韩av| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 青草久久国产| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | videosex国产| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 国产激情久久老熟女| videos熟女内射| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久久久久久国产电影| av福利片在线| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 18在线观看网站| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| av不卡在线播放| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 色综合婷婷激情| 露出奶头的视频| 丝袜美足系列| 国产成人精品在线电影| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久亚洲真实| 成年版毛片免费区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 午夜激情av网站| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲人成电影观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 青草久久国产| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产激情久久老熟女| 精品视频人人做人人爽| svipshipincom国产片| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 欧美日韩乱码在线| a级毛片黄视频| 久久久久国内视频| 一区二区三区激情视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三|