• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    3D Printing of Next-generation Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices: from Multiscale to Multimaterial

    2022-07-04 09:14:06XiXuYongHaoTanJunDingandCaoGuan
    Energy & Environmental Materials 2022年2期

    Xi Xu, Yong Hao Tan, Jun Ding*, and Cao Guan*

    1. Introduction

    Electrochemical energy devices(EESD)such as batteries and supercapacitors have seen significant research interest, driven by a desire to shift from fuel to cleaner energy.[1-3]With the emergence of microelectromechanical systems and wearable electronics, great demands are being placed on EESDs, requiring ever greater energy density with an ever-smaller footprint.[4-5]This is, however, not viable in many 2D designs.[6]Various works have documented the development of a wide range of novel electrode materials showing promising energy and/or power density.[7-10]However, superior performance with these new materials using 2D ultrathin electrodes with low mass loadings (≤1 mg cm-2) is not viable for translation into commercial devices where electrode capacity is typically only 10%of the device capacity.[11-12]Common thick current collector materials such as nickel foam can achieve higher active material mass loading but suffer from heavy mass and charge transport limitations.[13-15]

    To realize the full potential of these electrode materials, 3D porous electrodes have therefore been developed to address charge transport limitations in thick electrodes as well as maximizing the usage of given footprint area,with mass loading far beyond the limits of 2D electrodes.[12]Here, we define 3D electrodes as electrodes with nonplanar geometries beyond traditional 2D plates,sheets,and rolls,etc.Such architectures enable an optimal configuration that increase the energy density of the EESD within the areal footprint by efficient use of the vertical dimension.[16]3D porous structures with a continuous conductive network and a fully interconnected hierarchical porosity are believed to be beneficial for electron and ion transport in between the electrodes, but also in the interface of electrolytes and electrodes.[17-21]A major practical consideration for EESDs beyond power and energy density is longevity and safety.[22-25]Interfacial stress is generated during the charge and discharge cycles of the typical EESD which negatively impacts the capacity and cyclability of the device.[17,26-28]Rational design of 3D EESD with multiscale construction can be beneficial to mitigate these stresses.[29-30]Designing new electrode structures may solve the interfacial resistance and stability issues of current EESDs.[31-33]The ubiquity of EESDs and the growing need for long-term sustainability means that EESDs of the future should be made as far as possible,with environmentally benign and nontoxic materials.[34]New electrode materials are required to be chemically stable in the electrolyte and compatible with active materials.Additionally,single/simple fabrication procedures should be utilized where possible for a cleaner and scalable process.[35]

    Additive manufacturing (AM), also commonly referred to as 3D printing, has been the integral enabling technology behind research efforts into 3D architectures with a high areal and volumetric capacity.[36-38]AM is being extensively utilized in many areas of electrochemistry to produce electrodes and devices, as this technique allows for fast prototyping and is low cost for short runs. Nowadays, 3D printers can be found not only in many research laboratories, workshops, but also in our homes, highlighting its simplicity and ease of use particularly in comparison with conventional manufacturing. The easy implementation of this new class of manufacturing methods as well as the growing range of processable functional materials promotes the further development of this field to be explored for diverse applications in medicine, arts, and engineering.[39-41]The afore-mentioned challenges in EESD development have being assessed and tackled vigorously by the utilization of 3D printers in many research laboratories and R&D departments.

    3D printing has two key value propositions: 1) improved performance through rationally designed geometry and 2) shortening the value chain through the reduction of processing steps.3D printing fabrication processes,such as photopolymerization and material extrusion,have already been shown to be suitable for the EESDs manufacturing,creating controllable/multiscale architectures as well as direct multimaterial device fabrication.Electrochemical energy conversion and storage are facilitated by the transport of mass and charge at a variety of scales.Readily available 3D printing technologies can cover a large range of feature sizes relevant to electrochemistry. 3D printing is also highly flexible in its application for EESDs.It can be easily integrated with different surface modification techniques to induce desired chemistries and morphologies. Its ability to create complex geometry can also be further leveraged to create multiscale templates for materials that may otherwise not be printed with the required properties. The maturation of 3D printing means that researchers and EESD designers have access to a growing library of printable materials using state-of-the-art printers and postprocessing tools. This enables the printing of a larger portion of the electrochemical reactors’ body. Multimaterial printing enables the integration of EESDs and external electronics, thereby reducing the number of steps in device assembly and packaging,potentially realizing cost savings regardless of design and product complexity.

    Over the last number of years,a significant amount of research into using 3D printing to create electrodes/devices for electrochemical energy conversion and storage has emerged.[34]There is a variety of 3D-printing technologies available, which include direct ink writing(DIW,or robocasting),fused deposition modeling(FDM),inkjet printing, select laser melting (SLM), and stereolithography (DLP or SLA),making additive manufacturing a highly versatile class of techniques for fabrication in electrochemistry.[42]Figure 1 shows the differences between number of printing techniques. Comparisons among various printing techniques with the consideration in resolution,accuracy,surface finish,throughput,and so on are given.

    However, while 3D printing can indeed potentially enable innovations in EESD development, it is a nontrivial task to do so. In order to create the desired hierarchical structures, high-resolution 3D printers are required. However, most 3D printers are typically limited to minimum feature sizes in the range of tens or even hundreds of microns for high-resolution 3D printers. To create the suitable micron and submicron scale features for high-performance EESDs, delicate and precisely controlled postprinting functionalization is generally required.

    EESDs typically have several components,made of different materials to serve different functions. 3D printing to create integrated EESDs is critically dependent on its ability to process these different materials simultaneously in the fabrication process. There are some interesting work demonstrating 3d-printed battery/ supercapacitor and well-reviewed; however, most of the reactor were printed out separately and assembled in a full device.[36,43-46]Different 3D printing techniques have different ways to enable multimaterial processing. Through theappropriate 3D printing techniques, one can realize complex multimaterial structures (with metal–ceramic and ceramic–ceramic combinations). One of the most critical issues in multimaterial printing is the boundary interface, which will inevitably exist between 2 distinct materials. There are two primary concerns regarding boundaries in multimaterial printing. Firstly, physical mixing may occur at the boundaries during the addition of different materials during printing,such as the mixing of different paste mixtures in multinozzle extrusion printing, which may degrade the desired properties. Secondly,the chemical affinity of different materials with each other needs to be evaluated to assess the risk of reaction, compositional changes, and delamination during and after printing. Desired reaction or sintering temperatures of different materials can be tailored using dopants.Matching the desired thermal behavior of distinct materials, combined with a structural design providing maximum adhesion between interfaces, enables the fabrication of high-quality multimaterial/multiscale structures.

    Xi Xu is currently pursuing her doctoral degree at the department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, under the supervision of Prof. Jun Ding. She received bachelor degree from Wuhan University of Technology in 2015 and master degree from National University of Singapore in 2017. Her research focuses on the hierarchical design of functional materials for energy- and environmental-related fields using additive manufacturing.

    Yong Hao Tan is a PhD candidate from NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences& Engineering (NGS). He was graduated from National University of Singapore in 2017 for his BS degree and the joined Prof Jun Ding’s group pursuing his doctoral degree in the field of additive manufacturing of metal materials.

    Jun Ding is a professor and deputy head of the department of Materials Science and Engineering,National University of Singapore.He graduated from the School of Physics,Wuppertal University,Germany,in 1986 and completed his PhD study in Ruhr University,Germany,in 1990.He joined the University of Western Australia from 1991 to 1997 and later National university of Singapore.His research has been concentrated on additive manufacturing.His research has been focused on the development of novel 3D printable materials for fabrication of multimaterials and multifunctional devices/structures which have great potential in practical applications.

    Cao Guan is Professor and Vice Dean of Frontiers Science Center for Flexible Electronics,Northwestern Polytechnical University.He received his BS degree from the School of Physics,Wuhan University,China,in 2009 and completed his PhD study in the School of Physics and Mathematics Sciences,Nanyang Technological University,Singapore,in 2013.He worked as a Research Fellow in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering,National University of Singapore,from 2014 to 2018.His research focuses on the design of nanostructure materials for flexible energy storage and conversion.

    Figure 1. Comparison of different 3D printing techniques. A) A spider web graph showing the key consideration in choosing different 3D printing techniques that will be taken;[98] B) determining factors in resolution limit for different 3D printing techniques.[99-101]

    Among the various 3D printing techniques, extrusion-based and photopolymerization-based techniques have garnered much interest due to their ease of operation, relative low cost, and high resolution.For conciseness, this review will be centered on these two techniques.Effort will first be made to highlight the ability of 3D printing to create multiscale structures. This will be holistically assessed from different angles looking at each technique individually, their capabilities, how the printing process can be controlled, modification of the material feedstock preprint as well as modification of the printed material postprint where applicable. Examples of the application of 3D printing to create multiscale structures in EESD research will then be discussed to showcase the applicability of 3D printing for EESDs and how it may be further applied. The multimaterial capability of 3D printing is then assessed in the same manner.

    2. Multiscale Structures by 3D Printing

    2.1. Direct 3D Printing

    2.1.1. Extrusion

    There are two extrusion techniques that will be covered in this review,fused deposition modeling(FDM)and robocasting.

    FDM, also known as free filament forming (FFF), is a 3D printing process that relies on the extrusion of thermoplastic material from a heated nozzle. The feedstock material is melted and extruded from the hot-end and deposited along the path of the nozzle in a layer by layer fashion as defined by the input CAD file.A variety of polymeric materials ranging from biodegradable polylactic acid (PLA) and polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PETG) blends to engineering grade materials like acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and even polyether ether ketone(PEEK). Flexible materials such as thermoplastic polyurethanes (TPU)can also be processed with the same method. The general print speed of FDM can be 50–150 mm/h with highest claimed speed of 500 mm/h.One thing that needs to be kept in mind is that the smaller features are more easily deformed by heat in FDM printing. Structures with high aspect ratio often fail since heating of the molten plastic and nozzle will cause a soften structure.[47]Raul et al have reported a novel work in which supercritical CO2(SCCO2)and the breath figures mechanism(BFs)were combined with FDM to produce internal(pore diameters 80–300 μm) and external pores (with sizes ranging between 2 and 12 μm).[48]For extrusion-based machines like FDM and DIW,minimum feature size is a function of the diameter of the print nozzle.[47]The most common FDM nozzle diameter is 0.4 mm and ergo;the smallest feature that can be printed out is 0.4 mm.[49]And most used commercial nozzles now still have the limitation in providing nozzles with lower diameter especially with FDM printer.Smaller nozzle diameter will inevitably cause clogging.Many printers allow their nozzles tobereplacedandcanbechangedwithdiametersasnarrowas0.15 mmas demonstratedbyE3D.

    DIW or robocasting refers to the 3D printing technique where slurry or ink is extruded from a nozzle, building up a part like FDM. The difference is that the feedstock for robocasting is a homogeneous slurry of powder suspended in a fluid aqueous or organic medium, rather than a solid filament. Moreover, the nozzle is more customizable with many advanced technologies and can be downsized to tens of micrometer even nanometer size.[50]However, the requirement in ink formulation can therefore be critical for such process. It is arguably among the simplest, yet efficient process used to fabricate complex and robust structures, while being relatively low cost. Usually, an initial investment of an extrusion-based desktop 3D printer can be around few thousand US dollars. While mechanically straightforward, the technique relies on careful ink formation due to the special rheology behavior (shear thinning) needed for the printing process.[51]Compromising between high solid loading and thixotropic behavior affects significantly material preparation, printing strategy, and architectural design. Robocasting has few fundamental material limitations beyond the requirement on ink rheology, and thus, the resolution is also limited by the nozzle size. It has been widely explored for 3D printing of ceramics, metals, plastics, composites, and even emerging materials such as metal organic framework (MOF), electrospun nanofibers toward applications in energy storage with various postprocessing.[45,52-55]

    2.1.2. Photopolymerization

    Photopolymerization-based 3DP is a technique that uses light (typically ultraviolet; UV) to initiate and propagate a polymerization reaction to form a cross-linked solid structure. Typical photopolymerization-based 3D printer includes stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) as well as more recent variants such as continuous liquid interface production (CLIP), high-area rapid printing(HARP), two-photon laser lithography, and projection microstereolithography which boasts significant improvements in print speed.[56-59]Such techniques have various advantages, such as highresolution, easy operation, straightforward material change procedure,and less requirement for support structures which is important for more complex 3D electrode designs. Determining factors in resolution limit for different 3D printing techniques are presented in Figure 1B.In DLP 3D printing, XY resolution is defined by the pixel size, the smallest feature the projector can reproduce within a single layer where Z resolution. This depends on the resolution of the projector(commonly being full HD, 1080p), and its distance from the projected window. Therefore, a fixed XY resolution, generally between 35 and 100 microns, will be equipped with many commercial DLP printers. For SLA 3D printers, XY resolution is a result from both the laser’s spot size and the increments how the laser beam can be controlled. An et al. have reported a hybrid 3D printing system that combines DLP and electrohydrodynamic jet (e-jet) printing for the production of transparent and free-form 3D optoelectronic devices in ambient air which is able to print diverse functional materials with high resolutions (minimum linewidth: 2.6 μm), by adjusting the printing speed and position.[60]As a result,photopolymerization-based 3D printing can provide several micrometers printing resolution, continuous scanning production, and large-area projection creating 3D features, which all make it a suitable approach for commercial EESD fabrication. Other than printer setting modification, material-wise manipulation,such as precursor assisted printing, is also a viable route to obtain multiscale structure with higher resolution.[60-62]

    2.2. Post Modification

    Other than high printing resolution,in order to obtain a multiscale part in 3D EESDs,post-3d-printing surface modification is normally needed to improve the electrode performance for the electrochemical reactions.[63-65]Some commonly used postprocessing methods used for 3d-printed electrodes (including metal-, ceramic-, and polymer-based)are summarized in Figure 2.

    Direct attachment of catalysts such as hydrothermal and dip casting can be low-cost methods that can incorporate active materials to electrode surface effectively.Chang et al.have demonstrated that high-performance electrodes with NiCo2S4nanoneedles grown by hydrothermal method on the customized 3D metal architectures can be achieved through a direct 3D printing technique. Such 3D supports,optimized with control over the design, can possess good electrical conductivity, high mechanical strength, and large surface areas, with hierarchical porosity for effective electrolyte circulation and quick removal of bubbles, all contributing to the enhanced electrocatalytic performance.[66]However,large resistance of the catalyst,introduction of unwanted polymer impurity into the solution, the blocking of the active sites at high mass loadings may adverse impact the final electrochemical performance of the electrode as shown in the paper. Electrodeposition is a well-known method to produce a metallic thin-film coating by the action of an electric current.Electroless deposition is also commonly used for the production of metallic thin-film coatings by the chemical reduction of metallic ions onto a substrate,where the uniformity of the plated layer is less dependent on the conductivity of the substrate.Vaneckova et al.have found that by employing fused deposition modeling 3D printing to fabricate electrodes from a polylactic acid/copper composite filament and further surface functionalization by the copper electroplating, can effectively eliminate the kinetic barrier.[67]Xu et al.adopted a combination of two facile techniques,electroless nickel plating,and DIW,for the formation of three-dimensional architectures in a functional hybrid electrode system for electrolysis.Iffelsberger et al and Bui et al. used the similar electroless deposition method and successfully demonstrated a whole electrolyzer which also showed the promising collaboration[52,68-72]Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a process in which the substrate is exposed to one or more volatile precursors, which react and/or decompose on the substrate surface to produce the desired thin-film deposit.[73]There are various subclasses of chemical vapor deposition that have been incorporated as postsurface modification methods to generate hierarchical structures, such as ALD.[33,74]Pyrolysis is another commonly used postprinting heat treatment to obtain multiscale architecture as well as a technique for fabricating integrated electrode as both active material and conductive matrix.[75-76]Park et al. have fabricated a novel hierarchical 3D conductive electrode for microsupercapacitors by digital light processing (DLP)-based 3D printing.Photocurable composite resin with silver nanowires was optimized to achieve a design of high aspect ratio and resolution.[77]Additionally, material removal from sacrificial template enables the formation of hierarchically constructed network with micropores, mesopores,and nanopores.[26,33,75]

    2.3. 3D printed Multiscale Structures in EESDs

    Figure 2. Commonly used postprocessing methods used for 3d-printed metal,ceramic,and polymer-based electrodes.[33,52,66-69,72-76,79,87,102]

    Studies have shown that 3D composite electrodes improve the charge transport and lead to more efficient utilization of the electrode materials at high mass loading. Some of the representative work has been presented in Figure 3 to show the importance of multiscale 3D part and stated that high energy and power density can be achieved as shown in Figure 4.Yang et al have combined 3D printing technology with innovative 2D transition metal carbides material formulations to maximize surface area accessibility and ion transport within electrode. The optimized porosity created more accessible surface area in improving the performance with rational electrode design. The 3D-printed device achieves a high areal capacitance of 2.1 F cm-2at 1.7 mA cm-2and a gravimetric capacitance of 242.5 F g-1at 0.2 A g-1with a capacitance retention rate of above 90% for 10000 cycles. It also exhibits a high energy density of 0.0244 mWh cm-2and a power density of 0.64 mW cm-2at 4.3 mA cm-2. Such high performance benefits from the multiscale and multidimensional architectures.[75]Lim and her collaborators have fabricated a self-standing and hierarchically porous carbon framework with Co nanoparticles embedded as derived from cobalt-based metal–organic framework (Co-MOF) using an extrusion-based printer. The novel self-standing framework possesses good conductivity and necessary mechanical stability. Moreover, the porous framework consists of abundant micrometer-, meso-, and micropores,which together significantly benefit the efficient deposition and decomposition Li2O2within the pores. The self-standing multiscale architecture significantly enhances the cell’s practical specific energy, achieving a high value of 798 Wh kg-1cell.[75]Gao et al. explained in their recently published work that 3D-printed ultrathick AC/CNT/rGO composite electrode (ten layers) can feature high areal and volumetric mass loadings of 56.9 mg cm-2and 256.3 mg cm-3, respectively. The symmetric cell assembled with the 3D-printed thin GO separator and ultrathick AC/CNT/rGO electrodes can possess both high areal and volumetric capacitances of 4.56 F cm-2and 10.28 F cm-3, respectively. Such symmetric cell can also achieve high areal and volumetric energy densities of 0.63 mWh cm-2and 1.43 mWh cm-3, respectively.[78]Yao et al. have confirmed in their work that the hierarchically constructed pores in 3D-printed parts facilitate uniform deposition of MnO2and efficient ion diffusion during charging/discharging even at ultrahigh mass loading of MnO2. A thick graphene aerogel with MnO2loading of 182.2 mg cm-2was fabricated to achieve a high areal capacitance of 44.13 F cm-2.[79]More recently,Gao et al.have demonstrated a homogenous“tri-continuous” phase structure containing micro and nanopores. The “tricontinuous”phase functioned as a continuous network offering the conductive electron paths and interconnected ion channels, which is beneficial for increasing adhesive strength and facilitating electron/ion transport at the nanoscale.[78]

    However, as indicated in many works, the increased porosity may also sacrifice the volumetric capacitance and volumetric energy density to some extent and therefore simulation works are needed to be combined with experimental results to develop more rational device architecture.[75]

    3. Multimaterial Structures by 3D Printing

    While many works have so far explored the benefits of 3D printing for multiscale structures in the field of EESDs, fewer works have investigated the use of multimaterial 3D printing for integrated EESDs.Multiscale structures can be inherently produced from the variety of 3D printing techniques, but multimaterial printing with more complex structure that can be integrated in one step remains a major challenge.[43,80-82]In this section, some documented work using multimaterial printing concept is also reviewed.

    3.1. Direct 3D printing

    3.1.1. Extrusion (Nozzle Engineering and Ink Formulation)

    Commercially available FDM multimaterial printers, such as Raise3D,MakerGear, Robo,gCreate, MAKEiT, and Dremel,include two types of nozzle design:single and multinozzle design according to whether the materials are combined before or after passing through the melting zone. Kim et al. presented fabrication of piezoelectric sensors using BaTiO3(BTO) filler in a poly(vinylidene) fluoride (PVDF) matrix through in situ electric alignment during the FDM printing process.[83]The fabricated free-form single structures maintain uniform alignment of dipoles in the PVDF polymer. However, as limited by its material selection,some of the functional materials cannot be printed.Although such materials can be used as filler to be incorporated into the fused filament, nozzle clogging of the fillers is a serious problem that remains to be solved when being further used to fabricate more complex EESD system.

    Figure 3. Construction consideration of multiscale electrodes obtained by 3D printing. A) Design consideration of hierarchical templates. A large surface area and hierarchically constructed porous structure can be essential to retain outstanding electrochemical performance with high mass loading for energy conversion and storage reactions.Reproduced with permission.[33]Copyright 2020,ACS publication.B)Schematic illustration of a 3D printed graphene aerogel/MnO2.With the consideration of retaining a good capacitive performance at high loading of active material,a multiscale graphene aerogel was printed to be used as current collector. Reproduced with permission.[79] Copyright 2019, Cell. C) Schematic representation of extruding complex 3D architectures with hierarchical porosity(macroscale →nanoscale). Reproduced with permission.[103] Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH. D) Comparison of three schematic Li–O2 cathodes. (a) Conventional cathode (i) with powdered active materials coated on the porous conducting matrix. (b) Conventional cathode (ii) with active materials directly grown on the matrix with a low mass loading. (c) The novel cathode designed with 3D-printed self-standing and hierarchically porous catalyst framework without employing the porous matrix.Reproduced with permission.[75]Copyright 2018,Wiley-VCH.

    Challenges also existed in the multimaterial assembly as in DIW: 1)rapid drying and clogging issues in the nozzle during printing, 2)cracking and mismatch during the co-sintering process,and 3)elemental leaching through boundaries during sintering.As mentioned before,aqueous/nonaqueous homogenous slurry of powder particles based on the conventional colloidal processing depends on a solvent-evaporation step. Such step is important in solidification of as-printed structure but may not be ideal for multimaterial printing as it may cause unwanted nozzle clogging and during the long printing process which might involve the changing of the nozzle.Shrinkage mismatch may also cause significant cracks, delamination, and structural failures when handling multimaterial printing. Lastly, chemical leaching across the boundaries between two different materials is inevitable if close contact is made.[84]

    To solve the problems existed in the multimaterial printing,different multimaterial printers and various nozzle designs were fabricated. One direct setting can multinozzle printer,the presence of a second extruder will eat into the area that would be available for printing with a single extruder.[85]The artifacts of multinozzle printing can be divided into two main types.Horizontally printed tile and vertically printed tile.Horizontally layering maintains a fixed nozzle height for each layer while vertically printing allows more flexibility in printing multigradient throughout layers.Warping and cracking during drying were observed on some of horizontally printing tile due to the nonuniform drying.However, as for the vertically printing pattern, delamination can be a big limitation.The chances of oozing and stringing become higher and layer-shifting defects will exist if one of the extruders causes material deposited by the other to warp. More specifically, several customized nozzle designs were also developed in response to the material and process constraints described above,by combining material flows not only from two separate extruders to fulfill the multimaterial printing.Bechthold et al. have proposed two unique types of extrusion nozzles. The nozzles produced two distinct configurations of material within a single print bead, a bifurcated “Janus” bead and a concentric “Center-core”bead(Figure 5).For the Janus Nozzle,the end of the two linear extruders was merged into a single nozzle. Figure 5 summarizes the design affordances of the nozzle. The center-core nozzle used the same 45 degree angle configuration of two linear extruders as the Janus nozzle,but encapsulated one nozzle inside of the other.This novel type of nozzle is capable of producing three printing patterns which are not restricted multimaterial printing but also hollow structures that can be used for further infiltration/multiscale printing. Potential design affordances of the center-core nozzle need to be verified by further study,but initial tests show promising results. Apart from design and implementation of mixing and switching nozzles,allowing multiple materials to be co-printed continuously, the frequency or resolution at which they can switch materials is limited.Specifically,the large dead volume in mixing nozzles results in long material transitions, causing nozzle clogging.More recently,Lewis et al.reported the design and fabrication of voxelated soft matter using multimaterial multinozzle 3D (MM3D)printing,in which the composition,function,and structure of the materials are programmed at the voxel scale with enhanced build speed.[86]Moreover,Studart et al.proposed multimaterial magnetically assisted 3D printing platform(MM-3D printing)opened the way toward the manufacturing of functional heterogeneous materials with exquisite microstructural features.Further shape change required for reconfiguration can also be achieved using a much wider range of chemistries and external triggering stimuli.[87]

    Figure 4. Multiscale electrodes with superior performance for EESDs. A) Electrochemical performance of 3D-printed few-layer large-flake Ti3C2Tx interdigitated electrodes integrated into current-collector-free symmetric MSCs (finger diameter of 326 μm and gap distance of 187 μm). A) Reproduced with permission.[104] Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH. B) Electrochemical performance of the assembled AC/CNT/rGO symmetric supercapacitors. B) Reproduced with permission.[78] Copyright 2018, Wiley-VCH. C) Cycling performance of Li-S cells assembled with 3D-printed freeze-dried electrode.[105] Copyright 2019,Elsevier B.V.

    From material-wise consideration,a universal formulation applicable to a variety of materials may be able to mitigate such clogging problem. Moreover, to overcome shrinkage problem, it is important to make sure a similar ligand removal and comparable sintering condition to minimize the shrinkage disparity.The suspensions can also be reformulated to consider the different shrinkage rates while retaining similar viscoelastic response to minimize printing defect. Zhang et al. have covered a self-curable epoxide–amine ink formulation to print a wide range of ceramics (metal oxides, nitrides, and carbides) and metals without the need for an external curing source.[88]Such ink system needs no extra solvent-evaporation step and effectively solved the challenges such as high energy requirements, limitations of materials with high refractive index, tedious postprocessing heat treatment processes,uneven drying shrinkages, and brittleness of green bodies which current curing techniques may encountered. Through this technique,complex multimaterial structures can be printed.[50]Otherwise,another feasible route which has been successfully demonstrated for copper-and graphene-based electrode materials by Rocha et al is using nonionic thermosensitive hydrogel (i.e., Pluronic F127).[89]Pluronic F127 with inherent reversible viscoelastic properties and shear-thinning behavior is suitable to be mixed with different material and forms printable inks.[90]As hydrogel can preserve water better than anionic/cationic-polymeric additives in the conventional colloidal ink formulations and may help to minimize the cracks problem during drying step. Although some of the proposed formulation are demonstrated for only ceramic materials, it is also applicable in many other combinations such as metal/metal, metal/ceramic. Another possible solution to minimize the sintering cracks and delamination is to increase the solid loading while using same aqueous colloidal paste via surface modification of the starting powder.

    3.1.2. Photopolymerization (Printer Setup and Ink Formulation)

    Similar to the many other desktop printers, projection stereolithography-based printer can incorporate with external setup to be used in the multimaterial and multiscale 3D printing.This allows the fabrication of multifunctional polymer composites with localized control of particle distribution, geometric flexibility, and fast build speed. Such modified process enables the design complexity, the range of polymer composites material, and a higher degree of functionality. Printing parameters of the resin in curing and patterning can be investigated easily to provide a guideline for printing composites for real application. However,because a whole tank of resin is prepared and is used for printing layers,the filler concentrations and patterns are difficult to control among layers. Although in situ particle-polymer blending can partially solve the problem, such premixing manufacturing method lacks flexibilities in producing composites with heterogeneous properties/multimaterial combination with less boundary defects,greatly limiting applications in smart machines/fast manufacturing. Pan et al. approaches for fabrications of multifunctional particle-polymer composites using external field-assisted projection-based stereolithography processes.Additionally,particle alignment mechanisms using an external magnetic field and an external acoustic field were investigated separately.[91-92]The proposed particle manipulation techniques outperform the existing particle manipulation methods on localized particle distribution control, broad filler material selection in terms of size and type, and various gradient patterns.

    Figure 5. Multimaterial electrodes by 3D printing. A) Diagram showing the various nozzle prototypes produced. The large travel distance of the Janus Nozzle v1 prevented clay from extruding. Janus Nozzle v2 oriented extruders at a 45 degree angle to one another in order to reduce the travel distance from the end of the clay cylinder to the tool tip. Center-core nozzle retained the general form of Janus Nozzle v2 but adjusted material flow to provide a concentric extrusion. A) Reproduced with permission.[85] Copyright 2019, ACADIA. B) (a) Schematic of voxelated architectures printed using a single (0D) nozzle (top)and the 1D (middle) and 2D (bottom) MM3D printheads. (b) Photographs of the corresponding 0D, 1D, and 2D four-material MM3D printheads. (c)Photographs showing the top (top) and side (middle and bottom) views of a 4 × 4-nozzle, four-material, 2D MM3D printhead. Scale bars, 10 mm. (d)Schematic of MM3D printhead operation, where V1–V4 represents the voltage waveforms controlling the extrusion pressures p1–p4 for materials 1–4, and patm denotes the atmospheric pressure. (e) Voxelated matter produced by MM3D printing using a 4 × 4-nozzle, four-material, 2D printhead. B) Reproduced with permission.[86] Copyright 2019, Nature.

    However, mixing of particles and liquid resin remains the primary challenge, as agglomeration or undesired particle dispersion patterns occur when the particles are not blended properly before the printing or when the 3D printing process takes a long time. Magdassi et al.reported a family of highly stretchable elastomers that are suitable for the DLP-based 3D printing technology.[93]By mixing monomers at various ratios, such DLP printed elastomers can be stretched by up to 1100%. It enables the direct creation of complex 3D lattices or hollow structures for multimaterial combination and multiscale architecture where extremely large deformation is needed.

    Figure 6. 3D printed Multimaterial EESDs.A)(a)Optical and(b)SEM images of printed and annealed LTO-LFP architectures.(c)Full-cell voltage as a function of areal capacity for 8-layer interdigitated LTO-LFP electrodes. (d) Areal capacity of full cell composed of 8-layer interdigitated LTO-LFP electrodes measured as a function of number of cycles tested.Reproduced with permission.[50]Copyright 2013,Wiley-VCH.B)Electrochemical properties of the single 3D-printed QSS-NFB devices. (a) Schematic illustration, (b) CV curves, (c) galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) curves, (d) rate properties, (e) cycling properties of the 3D-printed QSS-NFB device.Reproduced with permission.[96]Copyright 2020,ACS publication.

    One advantage over extrusion-based printing is the as-formed solid products enables one-step assembly. Not many works have been explored the possibility of fabricating EESDs using photopolymerization-based 3D printing techniques although the high printing quality and fast speed have been proven.However,restriction in material selection limited the further application.The formulation manipulation techniques need to be carried out to outperform the existing particle manipulation methods on localized particle distribution control, broad filler material selection in terms of size and type. Fantino et al. have coupled the photoreduction of a metal precursor with 3D-printing technology and showed the possibility of the fabrication of conductive 3D hybrid structures consisting of metal nanoparticles and organic polymers shaped in complex multilayered architectures.[93]3D conductive structures were fabricated incorporating silver nitrate into a photocurable oligomer in the presence of suitable photoinitiators and exposing them to a digital light system.Similar skills are foreseeable to be broad to other metal electrodes. Wang et al. demonstrated that by mixing the conductive filler with polymer matrix, the printed conductive complex structures can be used as hollow capacitive sensor,electrically activated shape memory composites, stretchable circuits, showing the versatility of photopolymerization-based 3D printing for conductive complex structures.[94]Yin et al.presented a work in alternative digital light processing 3D printing of two photocurable precursors: hydrogel and water-dilutable polyurethane acrylate (WPUA), in which the ionically conductive hydrogel layers serve as soft,transparent electrodes and the electrically insulated WPUA as flexible, transparent dielectric layers.[95]Moreover,the effects of process parameters on the particle-resin mixture curing and particle patterning can be easily investigated to provide a guideline for printing composites thus is suitable for practical application.

    3.2. 3D printed Multimaterial EESDs

    Sun et al.have carefully designed concentrated LFP and LTO viscoelastic inks enabled printing of these thin-walled anode and cathode structures in one batch (Figure 6). Using this LFP-LTO combination, they have achieved a high areal energy density of 9.7 J cm-2at a power density of 2.7 mW cm-2.[50]Other demonstrated work mainly focuses on planar mesh integration without taking complex structures into consideration. Kong et al. have demonstrated a printing with multicomponents as quasi-solid-state nickel iron battery (QSS-NFB), two electrodes consisting of ultrathin Ni(OH)2nanosheet array cathode and holey α-Fe2O3nanorod array anode are achieved with a ultrahigh active material loading over 130 mg cm-3and excellent compressibility up to 60% (Figure 6). The compressible QSS-NFB exhibited an excellent cycling stability (~91.3% capacity retentions after 10 000 cycles) and ultrahigh energy (28.1 mWh cm-3at a power of 10.6 mW cm-3).[96]Integrated EESDs in the form of complete devices hold the promise of simplified production and real applications. There have, however, been major strides made toward the realization of multimaterial printing with more complex and compact design which has been discussed in detailed in the previous section and below as outlook.[97]

    4. Summary and Outlook

    Compared with traditional 2D electrodes and planar EESD structures,the synthesis of 3D thick porous electrodes/3D EESD has proven to be promising in addressing charge transport limitations in commercial EESDs. The realization of improved electron, ion transport, and mechanical properties through the construction of continuous 3D structures with hierarchical porosity is essential. 3D structures have also demonstrated excellent structural stability,being able to withstand stresses caused by volume change during charge/discharge. One of the major benefits in using 3D printing technique is the design flexibility and having that advantage not only promotes the energy density and power density but also enables the development of EESDs for wearable devices. Complex 3D structures, with hierarchically constructed architecture,are beneficial to improve electrochemical performance therefore need to be printed with high resolution, accuracy, and surface finish.From the technique’s perspective,optimized printer setting is a prerequisite to achieve high-resolution 3D architectures. Presently, various works have demonstrated good results, showing the promise of 3D printing.However,there does not seem to yet be a standard metric by which authors report performance, for example, areal versus volumetric.Standardization of performance metrics will provide a better framework for comparison, against other works as well as commercial systems. There also remains much untapped potential in the free-form shaping afforded by 3D printing, with many current works so far still experimenting with relatively simple shapes such as flat rectangular meshes.Developments in modeling and simulation tools such as generative design have combined advanced computational tools and 3D printing for structures with designed mechanical properties. This can potentially be leveraged for optimization of EESDs,for robust structures that can undergo large deformation to power flexible wearable devices.Other tools like computational fluid dynamics can be utilized to optimize flow in new complex 3D electrodes for further improved performance.

    The next major challenge of 3D printed EESDs is the realization of viable integrated electronic devices. While many works have so far showed the possibility of utilizing 3D printing for multiscale structures toward EESDs with enhanced performance,fewer works have been documented the realization of multimaterial 3D printing for integrated EESDs. Integrated EESDs in the form of complete devices with all the benefits of complexity afforded by 3D printing hold the promise of simplified production and real applications.Multiscale structures can be inherently produced from the variety of 3D printing techniques, but multimaterial printing remains highly challenging. Challenges and efforts in multimaterial printing have been reviewed in this article. For multimaterial printing,major issues include nozzle clogging,crack/delamination, as well as elemental leaching. Material-wise modification can potentially mitigate such boundary defects,among the many other possibilities in fabricating postprocessing-free 3D-printed EESDs without sacrificing their electrochemical performance. Meanwhile, new innovative printer designs regarding the printer setup such as the introduction of an ultrasound nozzle, oxygen-embedded print chamber are expected to be developed.

    Together with fast development in active material chemistry and structural flexibility in 3D-printed parts, effective/optimized electrode architecture modeling will be necessary to realize EES systems with superior energy and power density and to meet the insatiable demand for more energy and power. Ex situ and in situ characterization techniques (e.g., high-resolution TEM, atomic force microscopy, NMR spectroscopy,cryo-electron microscopy,and transmission X-ray microscopy) are helpful to understand and even monitor the real-time electrochemical performance and serve as a better guideline for nextgeneration 3D EESDs design.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors acknowledge the financial supports by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 51902265), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi (no.2020KWZ-001), and Project for graduate Innovation team of Northwestern Polytechnical University.

    Conflict of Interest

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    Keywords

    3d printing, electrochemical energy storage devices, multimaterial, multiscale

    Received: October 5, 2020

    Revised: November 14, 2020

    Published online: December 6, 2020

    [1] R.Raccichini,A.Varzi,S.Passerini,B.Scrosati,Nat.Mater.2015,14,271.

    [2] P.Alstone,D.Gershenson,D.M.Kammen,Nat.Clim.Chang.2015,5,305.

    [3] X. Li, M. Rui, J. Song, Z. Shen, H. Zeng, Adv. Func. Mater. 2015, 25,4929.

    [4] Y. Gogotsi, P. Simon, Science 2011, 334, 917.

    [5] P. Forouzandeh, S. C. Pillai, Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 5, 233.

    [6] T.S.Arthur,D.J.Bates,N.Cirigliano,D.C.Johnson,P.Malati,J.M.Mosby,E.Perre,M.T.Rawls,A.L.Prieto,B.Dunn,MRS Bull.2011,36,523.

    [7] S. C. Pang, M. A. Anderson, T. W. Chapman, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2000,147, 444.

    [8] K. Shen, X. Chen, J. Chen, Y. Li, ACS Catalysis 2016, 6, 5887.

    [9] S. Chen, L. Ma, S. Wu, S. Wang, Z. Li, A. A. Emmanuel, M. R. Huqe, C.Zhi, J. A. Zapien, Adv. Func. Mater. 2020, 30, 1908945.

    [10] X. Cheng, J. Pan, Y. Zhao, M. Liao, H. Peng, Adv. Energy Mater. 2018,8, 1702184.

    [11] Z. Kang, G. Yang, J. Mo, Y. Li, S. Yu, D. A. Cullen, S. T. Retterer, T. J.Toops, G. Bender, B. S. Pivovar, Nano Energy 2018, 47, 434.

    [12] H. Sun, J. Zhu, D. Baumann, L. Peng, Y. Xu, I. Shakir, Y. Huang, X.Duan, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 45.

    [13] N. Nitta, F. Wu, J. T. Lee, G. Yushin, Mater. Today 2015, 18, 252.

    [14] H. Chen, J. Jiang, L. Zhang, D. Xia, Y. Zhao, D. Guo, T. Qi, H. Wan, J.Power Sources 2014, 254, 249.

    [15] Z.-H. Huang, Y. Song, D.-Y. Feng, Z. Sun, X. Sun, X.-X. Liu, ACS Nano 2018, 12, 3557.

    [16] J. Werner, G. Rodr′?guez-Calero, H. Abru~na, U. Wiesner, Energy Environ.Sci. 2018, 11, 1261.

    [17] Q. Zhang, H. Wan, G. Liu, Z. Ding, J. P. Mwizerwa, X. Yao, Nano Energy 2019, 57, 771.

    [18] Z. Yu, D. G. Mackanic, W. Michaels, M. Lee, A. Pei, D. Feng, Q. Zhang,Y. Tsao, C. V. Amanchukwu, X. Yan, Joule 2019, 3, 2761.

    [19] S. Yang, S. Wang, X. Liu, L. Li, Carbon 2019, 147, 540.

    [20] J.Dai,L.Wang,A.Xie,J.He,Y.Yan,ACS Sustain.Chem.Eng.2019,8,739.

    [21] F. Zhang, P. Xiong, X. Guo, J. Zhang, W. Yang, W. Wu, H. Liu, G.Wang, Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 19, 251.

    [22] A. Ahmadiparidari, R. E. Warburton, L. Majidi, M. Asadi, A. Chamaani,J. R. Jokisaari, S. Rastegar, Z. Hemmat, B. Sayahpour, R. S. Assary, Adv.Mater. 2019, 31, 1902518.

    [23] K. A. Severson, P. M. Attia, N. Jin, N. Perkins, B. Jiang, Z. Yang, M. H.Chen, M. Aykol, P. K. Herring, D. Fraggedakis, Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 383.

    [24] H. Jiang, J. Sun, L. Wei, M. Wu, W. Shyy, T. Zhao, Energy Storage Mater.2020, 24, 529.

    [25] Y. He, C. Lu, S. Liu, W. Zheng, J. Luo, Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9,1901810.

    [26] Z. Li, K. Jiang, F. Khan, A. Goswami, J. Liu, A. Passian, T. Thundat, Sci.Adv. 2019, 5, eaav2820.

    [27] F. Hao, W. Wang, P. P. Mukherjee, Phys. Rev. Appl. 2019, 11, 034038.

    [28] X. Song, Y. Lu, F. Wang, X. Zhao, H. Chen, J. Power Sources 2020, 452,227803.

    [29] K. Li, Z. Hu, J. Ma, S. Chen, D. Mu, J. Zhang, Adv. Mater. 2019, 31,1902399.

    [30] Y. Chen, X. Ke, Y. Cheng, M. Fan, W. Wu, X. Huang, Y. Liang, Y.Zhong, Z. Ao, Y. Lai, Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 26, 56.

    [31] C.Sun,Y.Ruan,W.Zha,W.Li,M.Cai,Z.Wen,Mater.Horizons 2020,7,30.

    [32] Y. Zheng, H. Seifert, H. Shi, Y. Zhang, C. K¨ubel, W. Pfleging, Electrochim. Acta 2019, 317, 502.

    [33] X. Xu, C. Guan, L. Xu, Y. H. Tan, D. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, D. J.Blackwood, J. Wang, M. Li, ACS Nano 2019, 14, 937.

    [34] X. Gao, X. Yang, Q. Sun, J. Luo, J. Liang, W. Li, J. Wang, S. Wang, M. Li,R. Li, Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 682.

    [35] Z. Lv, W. Li, L. Yang, X. J. Loh, X. Chen, Acs Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 606.

    [36] F. Zhang, M. Wei, V. V. Viswanathan, B. Swart, Y. Shao, G. Wu, C.Zhou, Nano Energy 2017, 40, 418.

    [37] C. Sun, S. Liu, X. Shi, C. Lai, J. Liang, Y. Chen, Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381,122641.

    [38] T. S. Wei, B. Y. Ahn, J. Grotto, J. A. Lewis, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30,1703027.

    [39] W. Shi, M. Sun, X. Hu, B. Ren, J. Cheng, C. Li, X. Duan, X. Fu, J. Zhang,H. Chen, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1701089.

    [40] Y. Yang, Z. Chen, X. Song, Z. Zhang, J. Zhang, K. K. Shung, Q. Zhou, Y.Chen, Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1605750.

    [41] D. G. Moore, L. Barbera, K. Masania, A. R. Studart, Nat. Mater. 2020,19, 212.

    [42] A. T. Kutbee, R. R. Bahabry, K. O. Alamoudi, M. T. Ghoneim, M. D.Cordero, A. S. Almuslem, A. Gumus, E. M. Diallo, J. M. Nassar, A. M.Hussain, NPJ Flexible Electronics 2017, 1, 1.

    [43] S. M. H. Hashemi, U. Babic, P. Hadikhani, D. Psaltis, Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 20, 6.

    [44] P. Chang, H. Mei, S. Zhou, K. G. Dassios, L. Cheng, J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 4230.

    [45] X. Tian, J. Jin, S. Yuan, C. K. Chua, S. B. Tor, K. Zhou, Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1700127.

    [46] Y. Pang, Y. Cao, Y. Chu, M. Liu, K. Snyder, D. MacKenzie, C. Cao, Adv.Func. Mater. 2020, 30, 1906244.

    [47] J. S. Chohan, R. Singh, Rapid Prototyp. J. 2017, 23, 495.

    [48] R. Sanz-Horta, C. Elvira, A. Gallardo, H. Reinecke, J. Rodr′?guez-Hern′andez. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1080.

    [49] V. Mazzanti, L. Malagutti, F. Mollica, Polymers 2019, 11, 1094.

    [50] K. Sun, T.-S. Wei, B. Y. Ahn, J. Y. Seo, S. J. Dillon, J. A. Lewis, Adv.Mater. 2013, 25, 4539.

    [51] J. A. Lewis, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2004, 83, 2341.

    [52] X. Xu, C. Li, J. G. Lim, Y. Wang, A. Ong, X. Li, E. Peng, J. Ding, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2018, 10, 30273.

    [53] C. Zhu, T. Liu, F. Qian, W. Chen, S. Chandrasekaran, B. Yao, Y. Song, E.B. Duoss, J. D. Kuntz, C. M. Spadaccini, M. A. Worsley, Y. Li, Nano Today 2017, 15, 107.

    [54] Y. Zhao, B. Liu, L. Pan, G. Yu, Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 2856.

    [55] Y. Yan, X. Liu, J. Yan, C. Guan, J. Wang. Energy Environ. Mater, 1.

    [56] X. Kuang, Z. Zhao, K. Chen, D. Fang, G. Kang, H. J. Qi, Macromol.Rapid Commun. 2018, 39, 1700809.

    [57] D. A. Walker, J. L. Hedrick, C. A. Mirkin, Science 2019, 366, 360.

    [58] S. K. Saha, D. Wang, V. H. Nguyen, Y. Chang, J. S. Oakdale, S.-C. Chen,Science 2019, 366, 105.

    [59] R. M. Hensleigh, H. Cui, J. S. Oakdale, C. Y. Jianchao, P. G. Campbell, E.B. Duoss, C. M. Spadaccini, X. Zheng, M. A. Worsley, Mater. Horizons 2018, 5, 1035.

    [60] B. Ren, J. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, K. Gan, Y. Rong, J. Yang, J. Am. Ceram.Soc. 2019, 102, 6498.

    [61] B. Elder, R. Neupane, E. Tokita, U. Ghosh, S. Hales, Y. L. Kong, Adv.Mater. 2020, 32, e1907142.

    [62] J. T. Muth, P. G. Dixon, L. Woish, L. J. Gibson, J. A. Lewis, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 1832.

    [63] B. Yao, S. Chandrasekaran, H. Zhang, A. Ma, J. Kang, L. Zhang, X. Lu, F.Qian, C. Zhu, E. B. Duoss, C. M. Spadaccini, M. A. Worsley, Y. Li, Adv.Mater. 2020, 32, 1906652.

    [64] Z. Liang, Y. Pei, C. Chen, B. Jiang, Y. Yao, H. Xie, M. Jiao, G. Chen, T.Li, B. Yang, L. Hu, ACS Nano 2019, 13, 12653.

    [65] G. Ercolano, T. Zambelli, C. van Nisselroy, D. Momotenko, J. V¨or¨os, T.Merle, W. W. Koelmans, Adv. Eng. Mater. 2019, 22, 1900961.

    [66] S. Chang, X. Huang, C. Y. Aaron Ong, L. Zhao, L. Li, X. Wang, J. Ding,J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 18338.

    [67] E. Van?e?ckov′a, M. Bou?sa, R. Sokolov′a, P. Moreno-Garc′?a, P. Broekmann,V. Shestivska, J. Rathousk′y, M. G′al, T. Sebechlebsk′a, V. Kolivo?ska, J.Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 858, 113763.

    [68] J. Xue, L. Gao, X. Hu, K. Cao, W. Zhou, W. Wang, Y. Lu, Nano-Micro Lett. 2019, 11, 1.

    [69] X. Su, X. Li, C. Y. A. Ong, T. S. Herng, Y. Wang, E. Peng, J. Ding, Adv.Sci. 2019, 6, 1801670.

    [70] C. Iffelsberger, S. Ng, M. Pumera, Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20,100654.

    [71] J. C. Bui, J. T. Davis, D. V. Esposito, Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 213.

    [72] S. Ng, C. Iffelsberger, Z. Sofer, M. Pumera, Adv. Func. Mater. 2020, 30,1910193.

    [73] P. C. Sherrell, C. Mattevi, Mater. Today 2016, 19, 428.

    [74] C. Marichy, M. Bechelany, N. Pinna, Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 1017.

    [75] Z. Lyu, G. J. H. Lim, R. Guo, Z. Kou, T. Wang, C. Guan, J. Ding, W.Chen, J. Wang, Adv. Func. Mater. 2019, 29, 1806658.

    [76] Z. Lyu, G. J. Lim, R. Guo, Z. Pan, X. Zhang, H. Zhang, Z. He, S. Adams,W. Chen, J. Ding, Energy Storage Mater. 2020, 24, 336.

    [77] S. H. Park, M. Kaur, D. Yun, W. S. Kim, Langmuir 2018, 34, 10897.

    [78] T. Gao, Z. Zhou, J. Yu, J. Zhao, G. Wang, D. Cao, B. Ding, Y. Li, Adv.Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1802578.

    [79] B. Yao, S. Chandrasekaran, J. Zhang, W. Xiao, F. Qian, C. Zhu, E. B.Duoss, C. M. Spadaccini, M. A. Worsley, Y. Li, Joule 2019, 3, 459.

    [80] G. D. O’Neil, Curr. Opin. Electrochem 2020, 20, 5.

    [81] P. Wu, Z. Fang, A. Zhang, X. Zhang, Y. Tang, Y. Zhou, G. Yu, Research 2019, 2019, 8393085.

    [82] V. G. Rocha, E. Saiz, I. S. Tirichenko, E. Garc′?a-Tu~n′on, J. Mater. Chem.A 2020, 8, 15646.

    [83] H. Kim, F. Torres, D. Villagran, C. Stewart, Y. Lin, T. L. B. Tseng, Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2017, 302, 1700229.

    [84] E. Peng, D. Zhang, J. Ding, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1802404.

    [85] Z. Seibold, S. Mhatre, J. L. G. del Castillo, M. Bechthold.presented at Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) 2019.

    [86] M. A. Skylar-Scott, J. Mueller, C. W. Visser, J. A. Lewis, Nature 2019,575, 330.

    [87] D. Kokkinis, M. Schaffner, A. R. Studart, Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8643.

    [88] D. Zhang, E. Peng, R. Borayek, J. Ding, Adv. Func. Mater. 2019, 29,1807082.

    [89] V.G.Rocha,E.Garc′?a-Tu~n′on,C.Botas,F.Markoulidis,E.Feilden,E.D’Elia,N.Ni,M.Shaffer,E.Saiz,ACS Appl.Mater.Interfaces.2017,9,37136.

    [90] E. Feilden, E. G.-T. Blanca, F. Giuliani, E. Saiz, L. Vandeperre, J. Eur.Ceram. Soc. 2016, 36, 2525.

    [91] L. Lu, Dissertation/Thesis ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 2019.

    [92] L. Lu, P. Guo, Y. Pan, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2017, 139.

    [93] B. Zhang, S. Li, H. Hingorani, A. Serjouei, L. Larush, A. A. Pawar, W. H.Goh, A. H. Sakhaei, M. Hashimoto, K. Kowsari, S. Magdassi, Q. Ge, J.Mater. Chem. B 2018, 6, 3246.

    [94] Q. Mu, L. Wang, C. K. Dunn, X. Kuang, F. Duan, Z. Zhang, H. J. Qi, T.Wang, Additive Manufacturing 2017, 18, 74.

    [95] X. Y. Yin, Y. Zhang, J. Xiao, C. Moorlag, J. Yang, Adv. Func. Mater.2019, 29, 1904716.

    [96] D. Kong, Y. Wang, S. Huang, B. Zhang, Y. V. Lim, G. J. Sim, P. Valdivia y Alvarado, Q. Ge, H. Y. Yang, ACS Nano 2020, 14, 9675.

    [97] M. Rafiee, R. D. Farahani, D. Therriault, Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 1902307.

    [98] E. E. Petersen, J. Pearce, Technologies 2017, 5, 7.

    [99] A. Blaeser, D. F. Duarte Campos, U. Puster, W. Richtering, M. M. Stevens, H. Fischer, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2016, 5, 326.

    [100] M. Mao, J. He, X. Li, B. Zhang, Q. Lei, Y. Liu, D. Li, Micromachines 2017, 8, 113.

    [101] J. Stringer, B. Derby, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 29, 913.

    [102] L. F. Arenas, N. Kaishubayeva, C. Ponce de Le′on, F. C. Walsh, Transactions IMF 2020, 98, 48.

    [103] S. D. Lacey, D. J. Kirsch, Y. Li, J. T. Morgenstern, B. C. Zarket, Y. Yao, J.Dai, L. Q. Garcia, B. Liu, T. Gao, S. Xu, S. R. Raghavan, J. W. Connell, Y.Lin, L. Hu, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1705651.

    [104] W. Yang, J. Yang, J. J. Byun, F. P. Moissinac, J. Xu, S. J. Haigh, M.Domingos, M. A. Bissett, R. A. W. Dryfe, S. Barg, Adv. Mater. 2019, 31,1902725.

    [105] X.Gao,Q.Qian,X.Yang,J.Liang,A.Koo,W.Li,J.Wang,R.Li,F.Holness,A.Price,S.Yang,T.Sham,X.Sun,Nano Energy,2018,56,595.

    www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 日本熟妇午夜| 69av精品久久久久久| av黄色大香蕉| 欧美区成人在线视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | а√天堂www在线а√下载| 久久热精品热| av专区在线播放| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 日本色播在线视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 免费av毛片视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲在久久综合| 老司机影院成人| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲在线观看片| 69人妻影院| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 成人欧美大片| 久久久久网色| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 黄色日韩在线| 国产乱人视频| 91av网一区二区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 免费观看a级毛片全部| .国产精品久久| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 综合色av麻豆| 国产高清激情床上av| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 看黄色毛片网站| 99久久人妻综合| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产真实乱freesex| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| av卡一久久| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 美女大奶头视频| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 三级毛片av免费| 中国国产av一级| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 在线免费十八禁| av免费在线看不卡| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产免费男女视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 六月丁香七月| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 亚洲av熟女| 日日撸夜夜添| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产高潮美女av| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区 | 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产成人福利小说| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 三级经典国产精品| 在线播放无遮挡| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频 | 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 91精品国产九色| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 中文欧美无线码| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 天堂网av新在线| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 日日啪夜夜撸| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| .国产精品久久| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 久99久视频精品免费| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 91久久精品电影网| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产三级中文精品| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 如何舔出高潮| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 欧美3d第一页| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产av不卡久久| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频 | 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产午夜精品论理片| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 嫩草影院新地址| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 色综合色国产| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产91av在线免费观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 美女大奶头视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 久久久色成人| 亚洲五月天丁香| 六月丁香七月| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 22中文网久久字幕| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 国产黄片美女视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产av不卡久久| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲色图av天堂| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产av不卡久久| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产精品无大码| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲四区av| 中文字幕制服av| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频 | 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产免费男女视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 成人av在线播放网站| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 嫩草影院精品99| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产高清三级在线| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 黄色日韩在线| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 三级毛片av免费| 色综合站精品国产| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 深夜精品福利| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 九色成人免费人妻av| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 成人欧美大片| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 欧美3d第一页| 欧美潮喷喷水| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 成人欧美大片| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产精品一及| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久久久国产网址| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲av成人av| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 熟女电影av网| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产三级中文精品| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 久久久久久久久久成人| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 只有这里有精品99| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 日韩强制内射视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 美女黄网站色视频| 国内精品宾馆在线| av专区在线播放| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲无线观看免费| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久久久性生活片| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久九九热精品免费| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| avwww免费| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 天堂网av新在线| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 搞女人的毛片| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲国产色片| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 日韩强制内射视频| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲av成人av| 久久久久久久久中文| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 99热只有精品国产| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 老女人水多毛片| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产av不卡久久| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产日本99.免费观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 内射极品少妇av片p| 色哟哟·www| 在线播放国产精品三级| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 免费av观看视频| 舔av片在线| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产色婷婷99| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 一本久久精品| 国产精品.久久久| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 黑人高潮一二区| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 看片在线看免费视频| 日韩强制内射视频| 麻豆成人av视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 99热网站在线观看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 性欧美人与动物交配| 99久久精品热视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲18禁久久av| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产在线男女| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚州av有码| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 99热只有精品国产| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 欧美色视频一区免费| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 色吧在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 在现免费观看毛片| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 高清毛片免费看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产老妇女一区| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产高潮美女av| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| www.色视频.com| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 欧美日本视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 久久99精品国语久久久| 性欧美人与动物交配| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| www.色视频.com| 国产在视频线在精品| 久久精品影院6| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播|