• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Seismic data reconstruction based on low dimensional manifold model

    2022-06-02 04:59:46NanYingLanFanChangZhangXingYaoYin
    Petroleum Science 2022年2期

    Nan-Ying Lan,F(xiàn)an-Chang Zhang,Xing-Yao Yin

    School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum (East China),Qingdao,Shandong 266580,China

    Keywords:Seismic data reconstruction Low dimensional manifold model Regularization Low-rank approximation

    ABSTRACT Seismic data reconstruction is an essential and yet fundamental step in seismic data processing workflow,which is of profound significance to improve migration imaging quality,multiple suppression effect,and seismic inversion accuracy.Regularization methods play a central role in solving the underdetermined inverse problem of seismic data reconstruction.In this paper,a novel regularization approach is proposed,the low dimensional manifold model (LDMM),for reconstructing the missing seismic data.Our work relies on the fact that seismic patches always occupy a low dimensional manifold.Specifically,we exploit the dimension of the seismic patches manifold as a regularization term in the reconstruction problem,and reconstruct the missing seismic data by enforcing low dimensionality on this manifold.The crucial procedure of the proposed method is to solve the dimension of the patches manifold.Toward this,we adopt an efficient dimensionality calculation method based on low-rank approximation,which provides a reliable safeguard to enforce the constraints in the reconstruction process.Numerical experiments performed on synthetic and field seismic data demonstrate that,compared with the curvelet-based sparsity-promoting L1-norm minimization method and the multichannel singular spectrum analysis method,the proposed method obtains state-of-the-art reconstruction results.

    1.Introduction

    Seismic data is an important instrument for studying the subsurface geological structure and hydrocarbon distribution,and it contains considerable geophysical information.However,due to the constraints of obstacles or other forbidden areas such as reservoirs,levees,villages,mines,etc.,the collected seismic data are often under-sampled or aliased,which leads to the loss of geophysical information and thus is not conducive to the subsequent research.To restore complete geophysical information,reconstructing the missing seismic data becomes an essential and critical task (Stolt,2002;Trad,2009).

    Methods for seismic data reconstruction can be divided into two categories:wave equation methods and signal processing methods.The wave equation methods use the physics of wave propagation to recover missing observations (Ronen,1987;Trad,2003;Malcolm et al.,2005;Zhao et al.,2021).These methods need to understand the velocity distribution in the subsurface and perform full wavefield calculations,which limit their practical applicability.The signal processing methods can be further subdivided into:prediction error filtering methods based on linear event hypothesis,transform domain methods based on sparsity promotion,and lowrank methods.Predictive error filtering methods typically utilize low frequency data components in a regular space grid to estimate the predictive filter required to interpolate high frequency data components.Spitz(1991)first developed a frequency(f-x)domain interpolation method based on a unit-step prediction filter.However,using the unit-step prediction filter to reconstruct the missing data is time-consuming and complex because it requires solving two systems of linear equations.To solve this problem,Porsani(1999) provided a method based on a half-step prediction filter,which requires solving only one system and thus greatly improves the efficiency and tractability of interpolation.Subsequently,Gülünay (2003) extended the idea of prediction filtering to the frequency wavenumber (f-k) domain and gave an efficient f-k interpolation method.Another improved f-x interpolation method has been proposed by Naghizadeh and Sacchi(2009),which adopts an exponentially weighted recursive least-squares method to estimate the prediction filters,further improving the reconstruction efficiency.

    The transform domain methods achieve the reconstruction of under-sampled data by applying the sparsity-promoted minimization to the coefficients in a transform domain.Nowadays,many mathematical transformations have been introduced in seismic data reconstruction,such as Fourier transform(Zwartjes and Gisolf,2006;Tang and Yang,2010;Naghizadeh and Innanen,2011;Zhang et al.,2013),Radon transform (Tang and Mao,2014;Wang et al.,2017;Ibrahim et al.,2018;Tang et al.,2020),Curvelet transform(Hennenfent et al.,2010;Zhang and Chen,2013;Bai et al.,2014;Zhang et al.,2017),Shearlet transform (Liu et al.,2018;Yang et al.,2020),Seislet transform (Liu et al.2013,2017;Gan et al.,2015),Dreamlet transform (Wang et al.,2015),and dictionary-learningbased transforms (Yu et al.,2015;Siahsar et al.,2017a;Ma and Yu,2017;Lan et al.2020,2021).Sparsity-promoted minimization belongs to a classical sparse optimization problem that requires an appropriate regularization tool to obtain a unique and stable solution.Regularization tools used to promote sparsity include L0 norm (Chen et al.,2013);L1 norm (Wang et al.,2011;Yin et al.,2015);Cauchy norm (Sacchi and Ulrych,1996);or mixed L1_L2 norm(Li et al.,2012).Besides,the non-convex Lp(0 <p <1)norm is also applied to seismic data reconstruction.Zhong et al.(2015)applied the L1/2 norm as the constraint specification to reconstruct 3D irregularly sampled data.Recently,Zhang et al.(2019)proposed a smoothed L1/2 norm and applied it to restore the under-sampled seismic data,which yielded satisfactory reconstruction results.

    Low-rank regularization is another most popular reconstruction approach.Trickett et al.(2010) gave a multidimensional interpolation algorithm built on the matrix-rank reduction of constantfrequency slices.Oropeza and Sacchi (2011) rearranged the seismic data into block Hankel matrix in the frequency domain,and then reduced the rank of the block Hankel matrix by multichannel singular spectrum analysis (MSSA) to gain the reconstructed seismic data.Further,Kreimer and Sacchi (2012) provided a fivedimensional seismic data reconstruction method by combining the Hankel operation and high-order singular value decomposition.Jia et al.(2016) presented the orthogonal matrix pursuit Hankel reconstruction (OMPHR),which used the rank-one orthogonal matching pursuit method instead of the singular value decomposition to reduce the rank and greatly improved the computational efficiency.Alternately,Chen et al.(2016)applied the damped multichannel singular spectrum analysis (DMSSA) operator to reconstruct highly incomplete 5D seismic data.Siahsar et al.(2017b)proposed an optimal singular value contraction method for seismic data recovery,which generates the optimal low-rank estimator according to the random matrix theory,and utilizes the attenuation factor to constrain the singular value to improve the robustness of the rank estimation.More recently,a fast and memory-efficient implementation of the MSSA method is developed by Cheng et al.(2019)for seismic data reconstruction.It takes advantage of random projections and the structure of Hankel matrices to avoid the construction of large Hankel trajectory matrices and thus significantly reduces the computational costs.

    Recently,a novel regularization method based on patches manifold had been put forward for general image processing(Osher et al.,2017),where it has achieved state-of-the-art results.This method held that patches manifold of general images is close to low dimensional,and this low dimensional manifold is an effective geometric prior in the image processing field.The superior performance of this low dimensional manifold model (LDMM) was also verified in other different fields (Lai and Li,2018;Zhu et al.,2018;Abdullah et al.,2019).Latterly,this model has been used in geophysics.Yu et al.(2017) firstly proved that the manifold of seismic data is close to low dimensional,and then applied the LDMM to attenuate seismic noise.In this paper,motivated by the inherent low-dimensional properties of seismic data,we exploit the LDMM regularization to reconstruct the missing seismic data from under-sampled observed data.The article is organized as follows.In the first section,we review the mathematical model of seismic data reconstruction.The subsequent section presents the details of the proposed LDMM-based seismic reconstruction model.A fast and efficient algorithm for solving the proposed reconstruction model is given in the third section.The fourth section performs numerical experiments and compares various methods.The discussion and conclusion are given in the fifth and sixth sections,respectively.

    2.Methodology

    2.1.Review of seismic data reconstruction model

    The mathematical model of multi-channel seismic data reconstruction can be described as:

    where y denotes the recorded wave-field data,which often is under-sampled;f denotes the complete wave-field data,Ψ denotes the sampling operator,which is a matrix of diagonal structure,consisted of zero and identity operator:

    where each I corresponds to a trace sampled from the complete data,and each O corresponds to a missing trace.Since the sampling operator is highly singular,Equation (1) is highly underdetermined.To solve the under-determined problem shown in Equation (1),the popular strategy is to convert it into an optimization problem with a regularization term

    where R(·)denotes the regularization operator that contains prior information on the modeldenotes the square of L2 norm,λ is the regularization parameter weighing the fidelity termand the model constraint term R(f).

    The most extensively used model constraint methods in the reconstruction field include:sparsity constraints and low-rank constraints.The regularization optimization problem based on sparsity constraints can be gave as(Hennenfent et al.,2010;Wang et al.,2011;Bai et al.,2014):

    where D is a sparse transform,such as Fourier transform,Curvelet transform,etc.X is the coefficients of the signal in the transform domain.‖·‖1denotes the L1 norm.Another regularization optimization problem based on low-rank constraints can be described as follows:

    where T(·)represents the mapping operations,such as Hankel/Toeplitz operation(Oropeza and Sacchi,2011;Jia et al.,2016).‖·‖*denotes the nuclear norm.

    Essentially,both sparsity constraints and low-rank constraints are based on certain assumptions(sparsity or low-rank)of seismic data in the transformation space (sparse space or rank space) to reconstruct the missing data.These model constraint methods have demonstrated their unique properties in seismic data reconstruction.However,when seismic data do not meet these assumptions,they may be difficult to obtain satisfactory reconstruction results.Unlike the aforementioned model-constrained approaches,this paper exploits the inherent low-dimensional properties of seismic data to achieve high-quality reconstruction.More specifically,relying on the fact that seismic patches occupy a low-dimensional manifold,we propose a new model constraint approach,the lowdimensional manifold model,for reconstructing the missing seismic data.The specific details are provided in the next section.

    2.2.Seismic data reconstruction based on LDMM

    For given seismic data f,definition the matrix G(f)is a set of all patches of size r×r extracted from the seismic image

    where P[·]denotes the patch operator,x is center of the patch,and Θ is an index set that describes the location of the patches.The patches set G(f)can be regarded as a point cloud in,containing a large number of patch points.The basic idea of LDMM is that this point cloud is usually close to the smooth manifold embedded in,which is called the patches manifold of seismic data and denotes as M .Fig.1 shows the relationship between patches,patches set,and patches manifold.Due to the low-dimensional properties of seismic patches manifold,the dimension of patches manifold can be exploited a regularization term to reconstruct missing seismic data.More specifically,the reconstruction model based on LDMM regularization can be described as:

    where dim(M )denotes the dimension of patches manifold.

    The optimization problem of Equation (7) has strong nonconvex and nonlinear,and its effective solution strategy is iterative method.The crucial step of iterative method is to calculate the dimension of manifold on the patch point cloud utilizing the lowrank approximation method,and the details are introduced in the next section.

    2.3.Optimization by alternating iteration method

    In most cases,patches manifold is not a single manifold with a specific dimension,but a set of several manifolds with different sub-dimensions.Thus,the patches manifold dimension can be rewritten into the form of integral:

    where dim(M(Gx(f)))represents the dimension of the submanifold which the patch Gx(f)belongs.The key point to solving the optimization problem in Equation (8) is how to calculate the dimension of each sub-manifold.In the original LDMM,the dimension of the sub-manifold can be calculated as the Dirichlet energy of the coordinate function on the manifold,and the corresponding Laplace-Beltrami equation can be solved by the point integration method (Osher et al.,2017;Shi and Sun,2017).However,the original LDMM has the drawback of poor computational efficiency (Shi et al.,2018).

    To improve work efficiency,we calculate the dimension of each sub-manifold by using low-rank approximation on its manifold.Since the dimension of the sub-manifold which each patch belongs is same as the dimension of its tangent space,it can be approximated as the rank of the covariance matrix generated by the similar set of each patch Gx(f)on M .On the discrete case,the patch set G(f)belongs to the sampling of the manifold M,so the low-rank property of the covariance matrix formed by the similar set of Gx(f)on M can be linearly approximated by the matrix that is generated for the K-nearest-neighbors of corresponding patch in G(f).Therefore,if we define the matrix FM(Gx(f))as the Knearest-neighbors of patch Gx(f)in the patch set G(f),then there are

    Fig.1.The relationship diagram of patches,patches set,and patches manifold.

    where rank(·)denotes the rank operator.Note that the matrix FM(Gx(f))is obtained by concatenating the K-nearest-neighbors patches as columns.Given the above definition,Equation(8)can be rewritten as:

    The alternating iterative method is a common technique for solving Equation (10),which needs to divide this optimization problem into two sub-problems:first,fixed the manifold Mk,update the seismic datafk+1;second,the seismic data fk+1is fixed,update the manifold Mk+1.Specifically,these two sub-problems can be stated as:

    where k is the number of outer iterations.

    For the first sub-problem,by introducing the auxiliary variableit can be expressed as follows:

    Using the augmented Lagrangian method,the constrained optimization problem in Equation (12) can be reformulated the following unconstrained form:

    where μ represents penalty factor,Q is the scaled Lagrange multipliers,and ‖·‖F(xiàn)denotes the Frobenius norm.Similar to the split-Bregman iteration (Goldstein and Osher,2009;Osher et al.,2017;Lai and Li,2018;Liu et al.,2018),the solution of optimization Equation (13) can be characterized by the following iterative format:

    where j is the number of inner iterations.Equation(14)is a classical nuclear norm optimization problem,which can be solved by the singular value thresholding(Cai et al.,2010).Specifically,its closedform solution can be described as:

    where D1/μ(·)presents the soft-thresholding operator,which defines as the following equation:

    The optimization problem in Equation (15) is a least squares problem whose solution can be formulated as:

    For the second sub-problem,the manifold Mk+1can be directly updated through Equation (11b).Thus,by combining equations(11b),(16) and (17) and (21),the LDMM-based reconstruction model shown in Equation(7)can be solved efficiently.Algorithm 1 summarizes the overall algorithm workflow of the proposed LDMM-based seismic data reconstruction method.

    Algorithm 1.Seismic data reconstruction based on LDMM

    3.Examples

    In this section,we perform numerical experiments to test the proposed LDMM method on synthetic and field seismic data.Note that the number of inner and outer iterations of the proposed method is set to 3 and 10 in all the examples,respectively.For comparison,we also present the reconstruction results with the Curvelet-based sparsity-promoting L1-norm minimization method(Wang et al.,2011)and the multichannel singular spectrum analysis method (Oropeza and Sacchi,2011).To quantitatively evaluate the reconstruction performance,this paper introduces two measurement parameters,which defined as follows:

    where f*denotes the reconstructed data,f denotes the complete data.Here,the higher the SNR value and the lower the ERR value means that the result has better reconstruction quality.

    3.1.Synthetic example

    In order to analyze the feasibility and stability of the proposed method,we forward a synthetic record (see Fig.2a) using Marmousi model and finite-difference approach with the following parameter settings:the temporal sampling interval is 2 ms,the time samples are 1001,the trace interval is 25 m,and the trace number is 500.By irregularly removing 50% traces from the complete data,we simulate the under-sampled data and show it in Fig.2b.Fig.3a illustrates the reconstruction results using the LDMM algorithm with patch size 16 × 16 and patch overlap 15,which is substantially close to the exact result shown in Fig.2a.We compared the proposed LDMM method with the Curvelet and MSSA methods.For Curvelet method,the maximum number of iterations is set to 300,and the Lagrangian parameter is set to 0.15.In MSSA method,the processing frequency range is 0-125 Hz,the size of the local window is set to 100,the window overlap is set to 70 in each dimension,the rank is determined by the adaptive strategy (Wang et al.,2020),and the rank reduction process is implemented by the rank-one orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm (Jia et al.,2016).We reveal the reconstruction results of the Curvelet method and the MSSA method,as shown in Fig.3c and e.From Fig.3c and e,it can be observed that Curvelet method and MSSA method all effectively restore the removing traces,but these are slightly inferior to LDMM in the continuity of seismic events.In addition,we also draw the difference between the reconstructed results of three methods and the original data,as shown in Fig.3b,d,and 3f,respectively.As can be seen from Fig.3b,d,and 3f,the LDMM method has a smaller residual signal than the other two methods.This clearly confirms that the proposed method obtains a more accurate reconstruction result than other two methods.

    Fig.2.The synthetic data for testing.(a) Original synthetic record.(b) Decimated data with irregularly missing 50% traces.

    Fig.3.Reconstructed results of three methods on the decimated data with irregularly missing 50% of traces.(a) Reconstruction by LDMM,SNR=20.2231 dB.(b) Reconstruction error of LDMM.(c) Reconstruction by Curvelet,SNR=18.5131 dB.(d)Reconstruction error of Curvelet.(e) Reconstruction by MSSA,SNR=16.2443 dB.(f)Reconstruction error of MSSA.

    To show the details of the reconstruction in different methods,we present a comparison of the 217th trace in Fig.4.In Fig.4,the blue line is the original seismic trace.The red,magenta and green line is the recovery result of the LDMM,Curvelet,and MSSA,respectively.As can be seen from Fig.4,the blue and red lines are still very close to each other while the magenta line and green line deviate from the blue line a lot as shown in arrows,meaning that the proposed LDMM method can better preserve the amplitude.We summarize the evaluation metrics and calculation time of the above three reconstruction methods in Table 1.From the evaluation metrics in Table 1,we can note that the SNR value of reconstructed data of the LDMM is 20.2231 dB,which is higher than other methods.At the same time,the LDMM method yields a lower ERR value than the other methods.It is apparent that the LDMM method achieves a higher reconstruction quality than the other methods.From the time cost comparisons in Table 1,although the efficient iterative algorithm is utilized to solve the LDMM-based reconstruction model,its efficiency is still slightly inferior to the other two methods.

    Table 1The evaluation metrics and time cost of three methods in synthetic example.

    To test the sensitivities of different methods to the undersampling rate,we consider several sampling rates vary from 30%to 80%.For a fair comparison,we repeat the test for each sampling ratio with 10 irregularly sampling operators,and then take the average value of the 10 indicators (SNR and ERR) as the metric at this sampling ratio.Fig.5a and b respectively provide a comparison of the SNR values and ERR values for all of the above sampling ratios.From Fig.5,the SNR values of the LDMM method are always the largest and the ERR values are always the smallest among these methods.Meanwhile,it also can be found that the reconstruction accuracy of the three approaches is not much different at high sampling rates,while the proposed LDMM method has a significant improvement at low sampling rates.This demonstrates that the proposed LDMM method can be potentially advantageous in reconstructing seismic data with low sampling rates.To illustrate this point more visually,F(xiàn)ig.6 shows an example of the above synthetic data reconstruction where 30% of traces are sampling.Fig.6a and b plot the complete and under-sampled data,respectively.Fig.6c-e presents the reconstructed data of the LDMM,Curvelet,and MSSA methods,and Fig.6f-g draw their reconstruction errors,respectively.As shown in Fig.6,the Curvelet and MSSA methods recover the missing traces to a certain extent,while introducing a large number of amplitude artifacts in reconstructed profiles.In contrast,the LDMM method can produce much better results because it recovers the effective signal well and greatly avoids the generation of additional artifacts.Using Curvelet method and MSSA method in this case,we could achieve SNR=11.2358 dB(ERR=0.2743),and SNR=9.1107 dB(ERR=0.3503),respectively,while LDMM achieved SNR=13.4563 dB(ERR=0.2124).Obviously,the LDMM method does superb work of reconstructing the seismic data with a low sampling rate.

    3.2.Field data example

    To verify the applicability of the proposed method,we choose a field pre-stack gather as the experimental data,as shown in Fig.7a.Fig.7b presents the under-sampled data,which regularly removes 50%traces of Fig.7a.The reconstructed data obtained by the LDMM,Curvelet,and MSSA methods are depicted in Fig.8a,c,8e,and their corresponding reconstruction errors are shown in Fig.8b,d,8f,respectively.In this example,the maximum number of iterations of Curvelet method is 300,and the Lagrange parameter is 0.062.For the MSSA method,we linearly increase the frequency band from 0 to 125 Hz at an interval of 0.05 Hz and implement the reconstruction on each frequency slice.Meanwhile,the local window strategy is still applied,and its specific parameters are set as follows:the window size is 60,the window overlap is 35,and the rank is also determined by the adaptive strategy.For the proposed LDMM method,the parameters are set up in the same way as the synthetic example.From Fig.8c and d,we can observe that the Curvelet method successfully recovers missing data,but it also produces certain amplitude artifacts.It is found from Fig.8e and f that the MSSA method performs slightly worse on the wave-field boundaries,and there are serious energy residues in these areas.From Fig.8a and b,it can be observed that,the continuity of seismic events is well enhanced and the amplitude variation is effectively maintained after reconstruction by the present method,while the reconstruction result is closer to the original field data,demonstrating that the proposed LDMM method still has higher accuracy in field data reconstruction.

    Fig.4.Comparison of the 217th seismic trace in Fig.3.In which the blue line is the original seismic trace.The red,magenta and green line is the recovery result of the LDMM,Curvelet,and MSSA,respectively.

    Fig.5.The SNR (a) and ERR (b) diagrams of the three approaches with different sampling rate.

    Fig.6.Reconstructed results of three methods on the under-sampled data with missing 70% of traces.(a) Complete data.(b) Under-sampled data.(c) Reconstruction by LDMM,SNR=13.4563 dB.(d) Reconstruction by Curvelet,SNR=11.2358 dB.(e)Reconstruction by MSSA,SNR=9.1107 dB.(f) Reconstruction error of LDMM.(g) Reconstruction error of Curvelet.(h) Reconstruction error of MSSA.

    Fig.7.The first field data for testing.(a) The complete field data.(b) The under-sampled data with regularly removing 50% traces.

    In addition,we also compared the F-K spectrum of the second field data before and after reconstruction.Fig.9a and b are the F-K representations of the data in Fig.7a and b,respectively.From Fig.9b,we can see that severe spatial aliasing that is attributable to the regular removal of seismic traces.Fig.10 illustrates the F-K spectrum of the data in Fig.8,in which Fig.10a,c,10e are the F-K spectrum of the reconstructed results of three methods,and Fig.10b,d,10f are the F-K spectrum of the reconstructed errors.From F-K spectrum of the reconstruction results,we observe that the most of aliased energy presented in the F-K spectrum has been effectively eliminated by three methods.However,from the F-K spectrum of the reconstruction errors,we can find that the more residual energy is distributed around the effective signal in both the Curvelet method and the MSSA method (as shown the white arrows),and the proposed LDMM method has fewer residual energy around the effective signal.This result further proves that the proposed LDMM method has distinct strengths in aspect of preserving the reconstructed amplitude.Table 2 presents the reconstruction evaluation metrics and time cost of the above three methods in this example.From Table 2,it is clear that the proposed LDMM method outperforms the other two methods in terms of accuracy,but is slightly inferior to them in terms of efficiency.

    Table 2The evaluation metrics and time cost of three methods in first field data example.

    The second field example is shown in Fig.11,which intends to further test the effectiveness of the proposed LDMM method for reconstructing the mixed missing data.Fig.11a plots the original complete seismic gather with a temporal sampling interval of 2 ms and a trace interval of 10 m.We regularly remove 50%of the traces and irregularly remove 10%of the traces from Fig.11a to obtain the mixed missing data,as shown in Fig.11b.We implement the proposed LDMM method to reconstruct this decimated data.In this case,the patch size is 20 × 20,and the patch overlap is 19.The reconstruction result and error are shown in Fig.11c and d,for which we can see that the proposed LDMM method successfully restore the removing seismic traces,and the signal leakage is quite small.To more vividly show the reconstruction effect,we have drawn the F-K spectrum of Fig.11.Fig.12a displays the F-K spectrum of the complete data.Fig.12b displays the F-K spectrum of the decimated data and clearly shows that severe noise and spectrum aliasing are produced in the F-K domain due to the mixed missing.Fig.12c displays the F-K spectrum of the reconstruction data performed by the LDMM method.As Fig.12c exhibits,after reconstruction by the proposed LDMM method,the noise and aliasing in F-K spectrum are well suppressed,and the reconstructed spectrum is essentially consistent with the spectrum of the original data.In this example,the value of SNR and ERR is equal to 15.1765 dB and 0.1742,respectively.All the evidence demonstrates that the proposed LDMM method has good adaptability for reconstructing the mixed missing data.

    The last example is employed to validate the practicality of this method in actual processing.Fig.13a shows an acquired pre-stack gather,which contains 150 traces with a spatial sampling interval of 10 m.Fig.13c shows an enlargement of the rectangular area in Fig.13a.As seen in Fig.13a and c,there is an obvious sawtooth phenomenon in the acquired gather,which is caused by too large spatial sampling interval.Using the presented LDMM method for reconstruction,we obtained reconstructed gather with 300 traces and 5 m spatial sampling interval,as shown in Fig.13b.It can be seen from Fig.13b that,the sawtooth phenomenon is well alleviated after reconstruction by the LDMM method,which can also be clearly seen in Fig.13d.Fig.14 plots the F-K spectrum of the gather before and after reconstruction using the proposed LDMM method.Fig.14a pictures the F-K spectrum of the seismic gather before reconstruction,in which the spatial aliasing caused by big trace interval is visible,as shown at the arrow.Fig.14b is the F-K spectrum of the seismic gather reconstructed by the LDMM method presented in this paper.After reconstruction,trace interval is halved so that the spatial aliasing phenomenon is effectively suppressed.This result further demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method for seismic data reconstruction.

    Fig.8.Reconstructed results of three methods on the first field data.(a) Reconstruction by LDMM,SNR=16.7316 dB.(b) Reconstruction error of LDMM.(c) Reconstruction by Curvelet,SNR=14.5530 dB.(d) Reconstruction error of Curvelet.(e)Reconstruction by MSSA,SNR=13.7563 dB.(f) Reconstruction error of MSSA.

    4.Discussion

    The low dimensional manifold model is a patch-based regularization method,thus the characteristics (patch size and overlap degree) of the patch will directly determine the reconstruction accuracy and efficiency of this method.Herein,we will examine the impact of different patch features on the reconstruction results.We first analyze the sensitivity of the LDMM method to the patch size parameter using Fig.7b as the test data.Fig.15 shows the reconstruction accuracy and efficiency of LDMM with patch sizes from 6 × 6 to 24 × 24 (the patch overlap is set to maximum).It can be observed from Fig.15a that,as the patch size increases,the SNR of the reconstruction result increases first and then decreases slightly,and the ERR decreases rapidly and then increases slightly.This indicates that when the patch size is too small,the complete structural information contained in the patch will be very scarce,which is unfavorable for the recovery of missing data.Conversely,when the patch size is too large,over-fitting will make the result too smooth and lose more detail features,resulting in a slight decrease in reconstruction quality.In Fig.15b,we can see that the consuming time exhibits an exponential increase with the patch size increases.Comprehensive considering of the relationship between reconstruction quality and computational time,we hold that the patch size of 16 × 16 is the most appropriate in this example.

    Here we discuss how overlap degree affects the accuracy and computational efficiency of LDMM.Similarly,taking Fig.7b as an example,the relationship between patch overlap and the reconstruction result is studied where the patch size is equal to 16×16.Fig.16a presents the variation of the number of patches with the patch overlap degree and clearly shows that the higher patch overlap can produce a greater number of patches.Fig.16b portrays the change curve between the patch overlap and the evaluation metrics of reconstruction result,and Fig.16c demonstrates how the computational time changes with patch overlap.As Figs.16b and c shown,the reconstruction accuracy and computational time both increase as the patch overlap increases.The reason is perhaps that the highly overlapped patches can generate more points (patches)to approximate the manifold,thus improving the reconstruction quality.However,using more points (patches) to approximate the manifold also brings a huge amount of computation.In seismic data reconstruction work,its goal is to obtain optimal reconstruction result in order to recover the lost geophysical information as much as possible.Therefore,we recommend that the overlap degree of patch should be set to the maximum when using the LDMM method for seismic data reconstruction.

    Fig.9.The F-K spectrum of Fig.7.(a) The F-K spectrum of Fig.7a.(b) The F-K spectrum of Fig.7b.

    Fig.10.The F-K spectrum of Fig.8.(a)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8a.(b)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8b.(c)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8c.(d)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8d.(e)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8e.(f) The F-K spectrum of Fig.8f.

    Fig.11.The second field example for testing.(a)The original field gather.(b)The mixed missing data with removing 60%of traces.(c)The reconstructed result using the proposed LDMM method.(d) The reconstructed residual.

    Fig.12.The F-K spectrum of Fig.11.(a) The F-K spectrum of Fig.11a.(b) The F-K spectrum of Fig.11b.(c) The F-K spectrum of Fig.11c.

    Fig.13.The last field example for testing.(a)Original field gather with 10 m trace interval.(b)Reconstructed field gather using proposed LDMM method with 5 m trace interval.(c)Enlargement of the rectangular area in Fig.13a.(d) Enlargement of the rectangular area in Fig.13b.

    Fig.14.The comparisons of the F-K spectrum.(a) The F-K spectrum of Fig.13a.(b) The F-K spectrum of Fig.13b.

    Fig.15.The change curves of evaluation metrics (a) and the computational time (b) with patch size r × r.

    5.Conclusions

    In this paper,we have presented a novel framework for reconstructing the under-sampled seismic data based on low dimensional manifold model.In a manner,the proposed method can be regarded as a generalization of conventional regularized reconstruction method.Specifically,the proposed method replaces the transformation or mapping operations of the conventional regularized reconstruction method with a patches manifold of the seismic data,and utilizes the dimension of the patches manifold as the regularizer to reconstruct the under-sampled seismic data.The crucial procedure of the proposed method is to solve the dimension of the patches manifold.Toward this,we adopt an efficient dimensionality calculation method based on low-rank approximation,which provides a reliable safeguard to enforce low dimensionality in the reconstruction process.We use one synthetic data set and three field gathers to test the performance of the proposed method.Numerical experiments show that the proposed method has good flexibility and adaptability.Meanwhile,the proposed method also achieves state-of-the-art reconstruction results,compared to the Curvelet-based sparsity-promoting L1-norm minimization method and the multichannel singular spectrum analysis method.In future work,we will focus on the expansion of this method for reconstructing high-dimensional seismic data,as well as investigate the parallelization to further speed up its execution efficiency.

    Fig.16.The change curves of the number of patches (a),the evaluation metrics (b) and the computational time (c) with different patch overlap.

    Acknowledgments

    We are grateful to all the reviewers for their helpful comments on this paper.This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.41874146 and No.42030103) and Postgraduate Innovation Project of China University of Petroleum(East China) (No.YCX2021012).

    一边亲一边摸免费视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 在线观看人妻少妇| 免费观看在线日韩| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久av网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 久热这里只有精品99| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 成人国产av品久久久| av有码第一页| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 熟女电影av网| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 高清毛片免费看| av有码第一页| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 午夜影院在线不卡| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美另类一区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲成色77777| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 午夜av观看不卡| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产亚洲最大av| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品.久久久| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 97超视频在线观看视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 大片免费播放器 马上看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 大香蕉久久成人网| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 免费少妇av软件| a级毛片在线看网站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| videos熟女内射| 两个人的视频大全免费| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 18在线观看网站| 久久青草综合色| 日日啪夜夜爽| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | av.在线天堂| 精品一区在线观看国产| 99久久人妻综合| 日本黄大片高清| 欧美性感艳星| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| av播播在线观看一区| 精品国产国语对白av| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| .国产精品久久| 在线观看三级黄色| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 免费av中文字幕在线| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| av国产精品久久久久影院| 91成人精品电影| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| av网站免费在线观看视频| 黑人高潮一二区| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| a 毛片基地| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 欧美日韩av久久| 精品久久久噜噜| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 精品亚洲成国产av| 日本av免费视频播放| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 热re99久久国产66热| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产精品.久久久| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 简卡轻食公司| 久久久精品区二区三区| 一级爰片在线观看| 色94色欧美一区二区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 国产精品无大码| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 午夜影院在线不卡| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| av电影中文网址| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av免费在线看不卡| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久狼人影院| 99热网站在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| 一区二区三区精品91| 一本久久精品| 免费看光身美女| 夫妻午夜视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 桃花免费在线播放| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| a级毛片黄视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 久久人人爽人人片av| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产av国产精品国产| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 免费大片18禁| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 日本免费在线观看一区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国产成人精品婷婷| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 成人二区视频| 日本色播在线视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| a 毛片基地| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 黄色配什么色好看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日本91视频免费播放| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲综合精品二区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 日韩视频在线欧美| 在线观看三级黄色| 日韩电影二区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| av一本久久久久| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 97超视频在线观看视频| 久久久久精品性色| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 一本久久精品| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久成人| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日日撸夜夜添| 天天影视国产精品| 有码 亚洲区| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 中文字幕久久专区| 精品久久久久久久久av| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| av免费在线看不卡| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产成人精品在线电影| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 老司机影院毛片| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 如何舔出高潮| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产片内射在线| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 午夜视频国产福利| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品成人在线| 中文字幕制服av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产在线免费精品| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 在现免费观看毛片| av视频免费观看在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久99一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| h视频一区二区三区| 美女主播在线视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 美女主播在线视频| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 午夜免费鲁丝| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 如何舔出高潮| 成人手机av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 99久久人妻综合| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 在线 av 中文字幕| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产成人精品婷婷| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 婷婷色综合www| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 超色免费av| 国产乱来视频区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产永久视频网站| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久av网站| 制服人妻中文乱码| av视频免费观看在线观看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| videosex国产| 嫩草影院入口| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 99热6这里只有精品| 超色免费av| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 色5月婷婷丁香| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 大香蕉久久网| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 精品久久久精品久久久| 免费观看在线日韩| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 满18在线观看网站| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 男女国产视频网站| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 免费大片18禁| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 尾随美女入室| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 免费看不卡的av| 精品国产国语对白av| 91国产中文字幕| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 飞空精品影院首页| 一级毛片电影观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 色哟哟·www| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 在线观看www视频免费| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 成人手机av| 一个人免费看片子| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品少妇内射三级| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| av线在线观看网站| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 熟女电影av网| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看|