• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Seismic data reconstruction based on low dimensional manifold model

    2022-06-02 04:59:46NanYingLanFanChangZhangXingYaoYin
    Petroleum Science 2022年2期

    Nan-Ying Lan,F(xiàn)an-Chang Zhang,Xing-Yao Yin

    School of Geosciences,China University of Petroleum (East China),Qingdao,Shandong 266580,China

    Keywords:Seismic data reconstruction Low dimensional manifold model Regularization Low-rank approximation

    ABSTRACT Seismic data reconstruction is an essential and yet fundamental step in seismic data processing workflow,which is of profound significance to improve migration imaging quality,multiple suppression effect,and seismic inversion accuracy.Regularization methods play a central role in solving the underdetermined inverse problem of seismic data reconstruction.In this paper,a novel regularization approach is proposed,the low dimensional manifold model (LDMM),for reconstructing the missing seismic data.Our work relies on the fact that seismic patches always occupy a low dimensional manifold.Specifically,we exploit the dimension of the seismic patches manifold as a regularization term in the reconstruction problem,and reconstruct the missing seismic data by enforcing low dimensionality on this manifold.The crucial procedure of the proposed method is to solve the dimension of the patches manifold.Toward this,we adopt an efficient dimensionality calculation method based on low-rank approximation,which provides a reliable safeguard to enforce the constraints in the reconstruction process.Numerical experiments performed on synthetic and field seismic data demonstrate that,compared with the curvelet-based sparsity-promoting L1-norm minimization method and the multichannel singular spectrum analysis method,the proposed method obtains state-of-the-art reconstruction results.

    1.Introduction

    Seismic data is an important instrument for studying the subsurface geological structure and hydrocarbon distribution,and it contains considerable geophysical information.However,due to the constraints of obstacles or other forbidden areas such as reservoirs,levees,villages,mines,etc.,the collected seismic data are often under-sampled or aliased,which leads to the loss of geophysical information and thus is not conducive to the subsequent research.To restore complete geophysical information,reconstructing the missing seismic data becomes an essential and critical task (Stolt,2002;Trad,2009).

    Methods for seismic data reconstruction can be divided into two categories:wave equation methods and signal processing methods.The wave equation methods use the physics of wave propagation to recover missing observations (Ronen,1987;Trad,2003;Malcolm et al.,2005;Zhao et al.,2021).These methods need to understand the velocity distribution in the subsurface and perform full wavefield calculations,which limit their practical applicability.The signal processing methods can be further subdivided into:prediction error filtering methods based on linear event hypothesis,transform domain methods based on sparsity promotion,and lowrank methods.Predictive error filtering methods typically utilize low frequency data components in a regular space grid to estimate the predictive filter required to interpolate high frequency data components.Spitz(1991)first developed a frequency(f-x)domain interpolation method based on a unit-step prediction filter.However,using the unit-step prediction filter to reconstruct the missing data is time-consuming and complex because it requires solving two systems of linear equations.To solve this problem,Porsani(1999) provided a method based on a half-step prediction filter,which requires solving only one system and thus greatly improves the efficiency and tractability of interpolation.Subsequently,Gülünay (2003) extended the idea of prediction filtering to the frequency wavenumber (f-k) domain and gave an efficient f-k interpolation method.Another improved f-x interpolation method has been proposed by Naghizadeh and Sacchi(2009),which adopts an exponentially weighted recursive least-squares method to estimate the prediction filters,further improving the reconstruction efficiency.

    The transform domain methods achieve the reconstruction of under-sampled data by applying the sparsity-promoted minimization to the coefficients in a transform domain.Nowadays,many mathematical transformations have been introduced in seismic data reconstruction,such as Fourier transform(Zwartjes and Gisolf,2006;Tang and Yang,2010;Naghizadeh and Innanen,2011;Zhang et al.,2013),Radon transform (Tang and Mao,2014;Wang et al.,2017;Ibrahim et al.,2018;Tang et al.,2020),Curvelet transform(Hennenfent et al.,2010;Zhang and Chen,2013;Bai et al.,2014;Zhang et al.,2017),Shearlet transform (Liu et al.,2018;Yang et al.,2020),Seislet transform (Liu et al.2013,2017;Gan et al.,2015),Dreamlet transform (Wang et al.,2015),and dictionary-learningbased transforms (Yu et al.,2015;Siahsar et al.,2017a;Ma and Yu,2017;Lan et al.2020,2021).Sparsity-promoted minimization belongs to a classical sparse optimization problem that requires an appropriate regularization tool to obtain a unique and stable solution.Regularization tools used to promote sparsity include L0 norm (Chen et al.,2013);L1 norm (Wang et al.,2011;Yin et al.,2015);Cauchy norm (Sacchi and Ulrych,1996);or mixed L1_L2 norm(Li et al.,2012).Besides,the non-convex Lp(0 <p <1)norm is also applied to seismic data reconstruction.Zhong et al.(2015)applied the L1/2 norm as the constraint specification to reconstruct 3D irregularly sampled data.Recently,Zhang et al.(2019)proposed a smoothed L1/2 norm and applied it to restore the under-sampled seismic data,which yielded satisfactory reconstruction results.

    Low-rank regularization is another most popular reconstruction approach.Trickett et al.(2010) gave a multidimensional interpolation algorithm built on the matrix-rank reduction of constantfrequency slices.Oropeza and Sacchi (2011) rearranged the seismic data into block Hankel matrix in the frequency domain,and then reduced the rank of the block Hankel matrix by multichannel singular spectrum analysis (MSSA) to gain the reconstructed seismic data.Further,Kreimer and Sacchi (2012) provided a fivedimensional seismic data reconstruction method by combining the Hankel operation and high-order singular value decomposition.Jia et al.(2016) presented the orthogonal matrix pursuit Hankel reconstruction (OMPHR),which used the rank-one orthogonal matching pursuit method instead of the singular value decomposition to reduce the rank and greatly improved the computational efficiency.Alternately,Chen et al.(2016)applied the damped multichannel singular spectrum analysis (DMSSA) operator to reconstruct highly incomplete 5D seismic data.Siahsar et al.(2017b)proposed an optimal singular value contraction method for seismic data recovery,which generates the optimal low-rank estimator according to the random matrix theory,and utilizes the attenuation factor to constrain the singular value to improve the robustness of the rank estimation.More recently,a fast and memory-efficient implementation of the MSSA method is developed by Cheng et al.(2019)for seismic data reconstruction.It takes advantage of random projections and the structure of Hankel matrices to avoid the construction of large Hankel trajectory matrices and thus significantly reduces the computational costs.

    Recently,a novel regularization method based on patches manifold had been put forward for general image processing(Osher et al.,2017),where it has achieved state-of-the-art results.This method held that patches manifold of general images is close to low dimensional,and this low dimensional manifold is an effective geometric prior in the image processing field.The superior performance of this low dimensional manifold model (LDMM) was also verified in other different fields (Lai and Li,2018;Zhu et al.,2018;Abdullah et al.,2019).Latterly,this model has been used in geophysics.Yu et al.(2017) firstly proved that the manifold of seismic data is close to low dimensional,and then applied the LDMM to attenuate seismic noise.In this paper,motivated by the inherent low-dimensional properties of seismic data,we exploit the LDMM regularization to reconstruct the missing seismic data from under-sampled observed data.The article is organized as follows.In the first section,we review the mathematical model of seismic data reconstruction.The subsequent section presents the details of the proposed LDMM-based seismic reconstruction model.A fast and efficient algorithm for solving the proposed reconstruction model is given in the third section.The fourth section performs numerical experiments and compares various methods.The discussion and conclusion are given in the fifth and sixth sections,respectively.

    2.Methodology

    2.1.Review of seismic data reconstruction model

    The mathematical model of multi-channel seismic data reconstruction can be described as:

    where y denotes the recorded wave-field data,which often is under-sampled;f denotes the complete wave-field data,Ψ denotes the sampling operator,which is a matrix of diagonal structure,consisted of zero and identity operator:

    where each I corresponds to a trace sampled from the complete data,and each O corresponds to a missing trace.Since the sampling operator is highly singular,Equation (1) is highly underdetermined.To solve the under-determined problem shown in Equation (1),the popular strategy is to convert it into an optimization problem with a regularization term

    where R(·)denotes the regularization operator that contains prior information on the modeldenotes the square of L2 norm,λ is the regularization parameter weighing the fidelity termand the model constraint term R(f).

    The most extensively used model constraint methods in the reconstruction field include:sparsity constraints and low-rank constraints.The regularization optimization problem based on sparsity constraints can be gave as(Hennenfent et al.,2010;Wang et al.,2011;Bai et al.,2014):

    where D is a sparse transform,such as Fourier transform,Curvelet transform,etc.X is the coefficients of the signal in the transform domain.‖·‖1denotes the L1 norm.Another regularization optimization problem based on low-rank constraints can be described as follows:

    where T(·)represents the mapping operations,such as Hankel/Toeplitz operation(Oropeza and Sacchi,2011;Jia et al.,2016).‖·‖*denotes the nuclear norm.

    Essentially,both sparsity constraints and low-rank constraints are based on certain assumptions(sparsity or low-rank)of seismic data in the transformation space (sparse space or rank space) to reconstruct the missing data.These model constraint methods have demonstrated their unique properties in seismic data reconstruction.However,when seismic data do not meet these assumptions,they may be difficult to obtain satisfactory reconstruction results.Unlike the aforementioned model-constrained approaches,this paper exploits the inherent low-dimensional properties of seismic data to achieve high-quality reconstruction.More specifically,relying on the fact that seismic patches occupy a low-dimensional manifold,we propose a new model constraint approach,the lowdimensional manifold model,for reconstructing the missing seismic data.The specific details are provided in the next section.

    2.2.Seismic data reconstruction based on LDMM

    For given seismic data f,definition the matrix G(f)is a set of all patches of size r×r extracted from the seismic image

    where P[·]denotes the patch operator,x is center of the patch,and Θ is an index set that describes the location of the patches.The patches set G(f)can be regarded as a point cloud in,containing a large number of patch points.The basic idea of LDMM is that this point cloud is usually close to the smooth manifold embedded in,which is called the patches manifold of seismic data and denotes as M .Fig.1 shows the relationship between patches,patches set,and patches manifold.Due to the low-dimensional properties of seismic patches manifold,the dimension of patches manifold can be exploited a regularization term to reconstruct missing seismic data.More specifically,the reconstruction model based on LDMM regularization can be described as:

    where dim(M )denotes the dimension of patches manifold.

    The optimization problem of Equation (7) has strong nonconvex and nonlinear,and its effective solution strategy is iterative method.The crucial step of iterative method is to calculate the dimension of manifold on the patch point cloud utilizing the lowrank approximation method,and the details are introduced in the next section.

    2.3.Optimization by alternating iteration method

    In most cases,patches manifold is not a single manifold with a specific dimension,but a set of several manifolds with different sub-dimensions.Thus,the patches manifold dimension can be rewritten into the form of integral:

    where dim(M(Gx(f)))represents the dimension of the submanifold which the patch Gx(f)belongs.The key point to solving the optimization problem in Equation (8) is how to calculate the dimension of each sub-manifold.In the original LDMM,the dimension of the sub-manifold can be calculated as the Dirichlet energy of the coordinate function on the manifold,and the corresponding Laplace-Beltrami equation can be solved by the point integration method (Osher et al.,2017;Shi and Sun,2017).However,the original LDMM has the drawback of poor computational efficiency (Shi et al.,2018).

    To improve work efficiency,we calculate the dimension of each sub-manifold by using low-rank approximation on its manifold.Since the dimension of the sub-manifold which each patch belongs is same as the dimension of its tangent space,it can be approximated as the rank of the covariance matrix generated by the similar set of each patch Gx(f)on M .On the discrete case,the patch set G(f)belongs to the sampling of the manifold M,so the low-rank property of the covariance matrix formed by the similar set of Gx(f)on M can be linearly approximated by the matrix that is generated for the K-nearest-neighbors of corresponding patch in G(f).Therefore,if we define the matrix FM(Gx(f))as the Knearest-neighbors of patch Gx(f)in the patch set G(f),then there are

    Fig.1.The relationship diagram of patches,patches set,and patches manifold.

    where rank(·)denotes the rank operator.Note that the matrix FM(Gx(f))is obtained by concatenating the K-nearest-neighbors patches as columns.Given the above definition,Equation(8)can be rewritten as:

    The alternating iterative method is a common technique for solving Equation (10),which needs to divide this optimization problem into two sub-problems:first,fixed the manifold Mk,update the seismic datafk+1;second,the seismic data fk+1is fixed,update the manifold Mk+1.Specifically,these two sub-problems can be stated as:

    where k is the number of outer iterations.

    For the first sub-problem,by introducing the auxiliary variableit can be expressed as follows:

    Using the augmented Lagrangian method,the constrained optimization problem in Equation (12) can be reformulated the following unconstrained form:

    where μ represents penalty factor,Q is the scaled Lagrange multipliers,and ‖·‖F(xiàn)denotes the Frobenius norm.Similar to the split-Bregman iteration (Goldstein and Osher,2009;Osher et al.,2017;Lai and Li,2018;Liu et al.,2018),the solution of optimization Equation (13) can be characterized by the following iterative format:

    where j is the number of inner iterations.Equation(14)is a classical nuclear norm optimization problem,which can be solved by the singular value thresholding(Cai et al.,2010).Specifically,its closedform solution can be described as:

    where D1/μ(·)presents the soft-thresholding operator,which defines as the following equation:

    The optimization problem in Equation (15) is a least squares problem whose solution can be formulated as:

    For the second sub-problem,the manifold Mk+1can be directly updated through Equation (11b).Thus,by combining equations(11b),(16) and (17) and (21),the LDMM-based reconstruction model shown in Equation(7)can be solved efficiently.Algorithm 1 summarizes the overall algorithm workflow of the proposed LDMM-based seismic data reconstruction method.

    Algorithm 1.Seismic data reconstruction based on LDMM

    3.Examples

    In this section,we perform numerical experiments to test the proposed LDMM method on synthetic and field seismic data.Note that the number of inner and outer iterations of the proposed method is set to 3 and 10 in all the examples,respectively.For comparison,we also present the reconstruction results with the Curvelet-based sparsity-promoting L1-norm minimization method(Wang et al.,2011)and the multichannel singular spectrum analysis method (Oropeza and Sacchi,2011).To quantitatively evaluate the reconstruction performance,this paper introduces two measurement parameters,which defined as follows:

    where f*denotes the reconstructed data,f denotes the complete data.Here,the higher the SNR value and the lower the ERR value means that the result has better reconstruction quality.

    3.1.Synthetic example

    In order to analyze the feasibility and stability of the proposed method,we forward a synthetic record (see Fig.2a) using Marmousi model and finite-difference approach with the following parameter settings:the temporal sampling interval is 2 ms,the time samples are 1001,the trace interval is 25 m,and the trace number is 500.By irregularly removing 50% traces from the complete data,we simulate the under-sampled data and show it in Fig.2b.Fig.3a illustrates the reconstruction results using the LDMM algorithm with patch size 16 × 16 and patch overlap 15,which is substantially close to the exact result shown in Fig.2a.We compared the proposed LDMM method with the Curvelet and MSSA methods.For Curvelet method,the maximum number of iterations is set to 300,and the Lagrangian parameter is set to 0.15.In MSSA method,the processing frequency range is 0-125 Hz,the size of the local window is set to 100,the window overlap is set to 70 in each dimension,the rank is determined by the adaptive strategy (Wang et al.,2020),and the rank reduction process is implemented by the rank-one orthogonal matching pursuit algorithm (Jia et al.,2016).We reveal the reconstruction results of the Curvelet method and the MSSA method,as shown in Fig.3c and e.From Fig.3c and e,it can be observed that Curvelet method and MSSA method all effectively restore the removing traces,but these are slightly inferior to LDMM in the continuity of seismic events.In addition,we also draw the difference between the reconstructed results of three methods and the original data,as shown in Fig.3b,d,and 3f,respectively.As can be seen from Fig.3b,d,and 3f,the LDMM method has a smaller residual signal than the other two methods.This clearly confirms that the proposed method obtains a more accurate reconstruction result than other two methods.

    Fig.2.The synthetic data for testing.(a) Original synthetic record.(b) Decimated data with irregularly missing 50% traces.

    Fig.3.Reconstructed results of three methods on the decimated data with irregularly missing 50% of traces.(a) Reconstruction by LDMM,SNR=20.2231 dB.(b) Reconstruction error of LDMM.(c) Reconstruction by Curvelet,SNR=18.5131 dB.(d)Reconstruction error of Curvelet.(e) Reconstruction by MSSA,SNR=16.2443 dB.(f)Reconstruction error of MSSA.

    To show the details of the reconstruction in different methods,we present a comparison of the 217th trace in Fig.4.In Fig.4,the blue line is the original seismic trace.The red,magenta and green line is the recovery result of the LDMM,Curvelet,and MSSA,respectively.As can be seen from Fig.4,the blue and red lines are still very close to each other while the magenta line and green line deviate from the blue line a lot as shown in arrows,meaning that the proposed LDMM method can better preserve the amplitude.We summarize the evaluation metrics and calculation time of the above three reconstruction methods in Table 1.From the evaluation metrics in Table 1,we can note that the SNR value of reconstructed data of the LDMM is 20.2231 dB,which is higher than other methods.At the same time,the LDMM method yields a lower ERR value than the other methods.It is apparent that the LDMM method achieves a higher reconstruction quality than the other methods.From the time cost comparisons in Table 1,although the efficient iterative algorithm is utilized to solve the LDMM-based reconstruction model,its efficiency is still slightly inferior to the other two methods.

    Table 1The evaluation metrics and time cost of three methods in synthetic example.

    To test the sensitivities of different methods to the undersampling rate,we consider several sampling rates vary from 30%to 80%.For a fair comparison,we repeat the test for each sampling ratio with 10 irregularly sampling operators,and then take the average value of the 10 indicators (SNR and ERR) as the metric at this sampling ratio.Fig.5a and b respectively provide a comparison of the SNR values and ERR values for all of the above sampling ratios.From Fig.5,the SNR values of the LDMM method are always the largest and the ERR values are always the smallest among these methods.Meanwhile,it also can be found that the reconstruction accuracy of the three approaches is not much different at high sampling rates,while the proposed LDMM method has a significant improvement at low sampling rates.This demonstrates that the proposed LDMM method can be potentially advantageous in reconstructing seismic data with low sampling rates.To illustrate this point more visually,F(xiàn)ig.6 shows an example of the above synthetic data reconstruction where 30% of traces are sampling.Fig.6a and b plot the complete and under-sampled data,respectively.Fig.6c-e presents the reconstructed data of the LDMM,Curvelet,and MSSA methods,and Fig.6f-g draw their reconstruction errors,respectively.As shown in Fig.6,the Curvelet and MSSA methods recover the missing traces to a certain extent,while introducing a large number of amplitude artifacts in reconstructed profiles.In contrast,the LDMM method can produce much better results because it recovers the effective signal well and greatly avoids the generation of additional artifacts.Using Curvelet method and MSSA method in this case,we could achieve SNR=11.2358 dB(ERR=0.2743),and SNR=9.1107 dB(ERR=0.3503),respectively,while LDMM achieved SNR=13.4563 dB(ERR=0.2124).Obviously,the LDMM method does superb work of reconstructing the seismic data with a low sampling rate.

    3.2.Field data example

    To verify the applicability of the proposed method,we choose a field pre-stack gather as the experimental data,as shown in Fig.7a.Fig.7b presents the under-sampled data,which regularly removes 50%traces of Fig.7a.The reconstructed data obtained by the LDMM,Curvelet,and MSSA methods are depicted in Fig.8a,c,8e,and their corresponding reconstruction errors are shown in Fig.8b,d,8f,respectively.In this example,the maximum number of iterations of Curvelet method is 300,and the Lagrange parameter is 0.062.For the MSSA method,we linearly increase the frequency band from 0 to 125 Hz at an interval of 0.05 Hz and implement the reconstruction on each frequency slice.Meanwhile,the local window strategy is still applied,and its specific parameters are set as follows:the window size is 60,the window overlap is 35,and the rank is also determined by the adaptive strategy.For the proposed LDMM method,the parameters are set up in the same way as the synthetic example.From Fig.8c and d,we can observe that the Curvelet method successfully recovers missing data,but it also produces certain amplitude artifacts.It is found from Fig.8e and f that the MSSA method performs slightly worse on the wave-field boundaries,and there are serious energy residues in these areas.From Fig.8a and b,it can be observed that,the continuity of seismic events is well enhanced and the amplitude variation is effectively maintained after reconstruction by the present method,while the reconstruction result is closer to the original field data,demonstrating that the proposed LDMM method still has higher accuracy in field data reconstruction.

    Fig.4.Comparison of the 217th seismic trace in Fig.3.In which the blue line is the original seismic trace.The red,magenta and green line is the recovery result of the LDMM,Curvelet,and MSSA,respectively.

    Fig.5.The SNR (a) and ERR (b) diagrams of the three approaches with different sampling rate.

    Fig.6.Reconstructed results of three methods on the under-sampled data with missing 70% of traces.(a) Complete data.(b) Under-sampled data.(c) Reconstruction by LDMM,SNR=13.4563 dB.(d) Reconstruction by Curvelet,SNR=11.2358 dB.(e)Reconstruction by MSSA,SNR=9.1107 dB.(f) Reconstruction error of LDMM.(g) Reconstruction error of Curvelet.(h) Reconstruction error of MSSA.

    Fig.7.The first field data for testing.(a) The complete field data.(b) The under-sampled data with regularly removing 50% traces.

    In addition,we also compared the F-K spectrum of the second field data before and after reconstruction.Fig.9a and b are the F-K representations of the data in Fig.7a and b,respectively.From Fig.9b,we can see that severe spatial aliasing that is attributable to the regular removal of seismic traces.Fig.10 illustrates the F-K spectrum of the data in Fig.8,in which Fig.10a,c,10e are the F-K spectrum of the reconstructed results of three methods,and Fig.10b,d,10f are the F-K spectrum of the reconstructed errors.From F-K spectrum of the reconstruction results,we observe that the most of aliased energy presented in the F-K spectrum has been effectively eliminated by three methods.However,from the F-K spectrum of the reconstruction errors,we can find that the more residual energy is distributed around the effective signal in both the Curvelet method and the MSSA method (as shown the white arrows),and the proposed LDMM method has fewer residual energy around the effective signal.This result further proves that the proposed LDMM method has distinct strengths in aspect of preserving the reconstructed amplitude.Table 2 presents the reconstruction evaluation metrics and time cost of the above three methods in this example.From Table 2,it is clear that the proposed LDMM method outperforms the other two methods in terms of accuracy,but is slightly inferior to them in terms of efficiency.

    Table 2The evaluation metrics and time cost of three methods in first field data example.

    The second field example is shown in Fig.11,which intends to further test the effectiveness of the proposed LDMM method for reconstructing the mixed missing data.Fig.11a plots the original complete seismic gather with a temporal sampling interval of 2 ms and a trace interval of 10 m.We regularly remove 50%of the traces and irregularly remove 10%of the traces from Fig.11a to obtain the mixed missing data,as shown in Fig.11b.We implement the proposed LDMM method to reconstruct this decimated data.In this case,the patch size is 20 × 20,and the patch overlap is 19.The reconstruction result and error are shown in Fig.11c and d,for which we can see that the proposed LDMM method successfully restore the removing seismic traces,and the signal leakage is quite small.To more vividly show the reconstruction effect,we have drawn the F-K spectrum of Fig.11.Fig.12a displays the F-K spectrum of the complete data.Fig.12b displays the F-K spectrum of the decimated data and clearly shows that severe noise and spectrum aliasing are produced in the F-K domain due to the mixed missing.Fig.12c displays the F-K spectrum of the reconstruction data performed by the LDMM method.As Fig.12c exhibits,after reconstruction by the proposed LDMM method,the noise and aliasing in F-K spectrum are well suppressed,and the reconstructed spectrum is essentially consistent with the spectrum of the original data.In this example,the value of SNR and ERR is equal to 15.1765 dB and 0.1742,respectively.All the evidence demonstrates that the proposed LDMM method has good adaptability for reconstructing the mixed missing data.

    The last example is employed to validate the practicality of this method in actual processing.Fig.13a shows an acquired pre-stack gather,which contains 150 traces with a spatial sampling interval of 10 m.Fig.13c shows an enlargement of the rectangular area in Fig.13a.As seen in Fig.13a and c,there is an obvious sawtooth phenomenon in the acquired gather,which is caused by too large spatial sampling interval.Using the presented LDMM method for reconstruction,we obtained reconstructed gather with 300 traces and 5 m spatial sampling interval,as shown in Fig.13b.It can be seen from Fig.13b that,the sawtooth phenomenon is well alleviated after reconstruction by the LDMM method,which can also be clearly seen in Fig.13d.Fig.14 plots the F-K spectrum of the gather before and after reconstruction using the proposed LDMM method.Fig.14a pictures the F-K spectrum of the seismic gather before reconstruction,in which the spatial aliasing caused by big trace interval is visible,as shown at the arrow.Fig.14b is the F-K spectrum of the seismic gather reconstructed by the LDMM method presented in this paper.After reconstruction,trace interval is halved so that the spatial aliasing phenomenon is effectively suppressed.This result further demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed method for seismic data reconstruction.

    Fig.8.Reconstructed results of three methods on the first field data.(a) Reconstruction by LDMM,SNR=16.7316 dB.(b) Reconstruction error of LDMM.(c) Reconstruction by Curvelet,SNR=14.5530 dB.(d) Reconstruction error of Curvelet.(e)Reconstruction by MSSA,SNR=13.7563 dB.(f) Reconstruction error of MSSA.

    4.Discussion

    The low dimensional manifold model is a patch-based regularization method,thus the characteristics (patch size and overlap degree) of the patch will directly determine the reconstruction accuracy and efficiency of this method.Herein,we will examine the impact of different patch features on the reconstruction results.We first analyze the sensitivity of the LDMM method to the patch size parameter using Fig.7b as the test data.Fig.15 shows the reconstruction accuracy and efficiency of LDMM with patch sizes from 6 × 6 to 24 × 24 (the patch overlap is set to maximum).It can be observed from Fig.15a that,as the patch size increases,the SNR of the reconstruction result increases first and then decreases slightly,and the ERR decreases rapidly and then increases slightly.This indicates that when the patch size is too small,the complete structural information contained in the patch will be very scarce,which is unfavorable for the recovery of missing data.Conversely,when the patch size is too large,over-fitting will make the result too smooth and lose more detail features,resulting in a slight decrease in reconstruction quality.In Fig.15b,we can see that the consuming time exhibits an exponential increase with the patch size increases.Comprehensive considering of the relationship between reconstruction quality and computational time,we hold that the patch size of 16 × 16 is the most appropriate in this example.

    Here we discuss how overlap degree affects the accuracy and computational efficiency of LDMM.Similarly,taking Fig.7b as an example,the relationship between patch overlap and the reconstruction result is studied where the patch size is equal to 16×16.Fig.16a presents the variation of the number of patches with the patch overlap degree and clearly shows that the higher patch overlap can produce a greater number of patches.Fig.16b portrays the change curve between the patch overlap and the evaluation metrics of reconstruction result,and Fig.16c demonstrates how the computational time changes with patch overlap.As Figs.16b and c shown,the reconstruction accuracy and computational time both increase as the patch overlap increases.The reason is perhaps that the highly overlapped patches can generate more points (patches)to approximate the manifold,thus improving the reconstruction quality.However,using more points (patches) to approximate the manifold also brings a huge amount of computation.In seismic data reconstruction work,its goal is to obtain optimal reconstruction result in order to recover the lost geophysical information as much as possible.Therefore,we recommend that the overlap degree of patch should be set to the maximum when using the LDMM method for seismic data reconstruction.

    Fig.9.The F-K spectrum of Fig.7.(a) The F-K spectrum of Fig.7a.(b) The F-K spectrum of Fig.7b.

    Fig.10.The F-K spectrum of Fig.8.(a)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8a.(b)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8b.(c)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8c.(d)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8d.(e)The F-K spectrum of Fig.8e.(f) The F-K spectrum of Fig.8f.

    Fig.11.The second field example for testing.(a)The original field gather.(b)The mixed missing data with removing 60%of traces.(c)The reconstructed result using the proposed LDMM method.(d) The reconstructed residual.

    Fig.12.The F-K spectrum of Fig.11.(a) The F-K spectrum of Fig.11a.(b) The F-K spectrum of Fig.11b.(c) The F-K spectrum of Fig.11c.

    Fig.13.The last field example for testing.(a)Original field gather with 10 m trace interval.(b)Reconstructed field gather using proposed LDMM method with 5 m trace interval.(c)Enlargement of the rectangular area in Fig.13a.(d) Enlargement of the rectangular area in Fig.13b.

    Fig.14.The comparisons of the F-K spectrum.(a) The F-K spectrum of Fig.13a.(b) The F-K spectrum of Fig.13b.

    Fig.15.The change curves of evaluation metrics (a) and the computational time (b) with patch size r × r.

    5.Conclusions

    In this paper,we have presented a novel framework for reconstructing the under-sampled seismic data based on low dimensional manifold model.In a manner,the proposed method can be regarded as a generalization of conventional regularized reconstruction method.Specifically,the proposed method replaces the transformation or mapping operations of the conventional regularized reconstruction method with a patches manifold of the seismic data,and utilizes the dimension of the patches manifold as the regularizer to reconstruct the under-sampled seismic data.The crucial procedure of the proposed method is to solve the dimension of the patches manifold.Toward this,we adopt an efficient dimensionality calculation method based on low-rank approximation,which provides a reliable safeguard to enforce low dimensionality in the reconstruction process.We use one synthetic data set and three field gathers to test the performance of the proposed method.Numerical experiments show that the proposed method has good flexibility and adaptability.Meanwhile,the proposed method also achieves state-of-the-art reconstruction results,compared to the Curvelet-based sparsity-promoting L1-norm minimization method and the multichannel singular spectrum analysis method.In future work,we will focus on the expansion of this method for reconstructing high-dimensional seismic data,as well as investigate the parallelization to further speed up its execution efficiency.

    Fig.16.The change curves of the number of patches (a),the evaluation metrics (b) and the computational time (c) with different patch overlap.

    Acknowledgments

    We are grateful to all the reviewers for their helpful comments on this paper.This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.41874146 and No.42030103) and Postgraduate Innovation Project of China University of Petroleum(East China) (No.YCX2021012).

    非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 搞女人的毛片| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产高清三级在线| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 有码 亚洲区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 色吧在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 大香蕉久久网| 老女人水多毛片| 午夜激情欧美在线| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产视频首页在线观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 一本久久精品| 久久久久久大精品| 国产成人aa在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 综合色丁香网| 床上黄色一级片| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 在线观看66精品国产| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 午夜免费激情av| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 嫩草影院精品99| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| or卡值多少钱| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲不卡免费看| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 两个人的视频大全免费| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 丰满的人妻完整版| 全区人妻精品视频| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 六月丁香七月| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| kizo精华| 久久草成人影院| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 中国美女看黄片| 免费av毛片视频| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 成年版毛片免费区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 日本三级黄在线观看| kizo精华| 只有这里有精品99| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲av一区综合| 91狼人影院| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 夜夜爽天天搞| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 免费观看人在逋| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产av在哪里看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日本色播在线视频| 色吧在线观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 久久久久网色| av在线老鸭窝| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 性欧美人与动物交配| videossex国产| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 嫩草影院精品99| av在线播放精品| 乱人视频在线观看| 欧美激情在线99| 一本一本综合久久| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 毛片女人毛片| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产午夜精品论理片| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 中文字幕久久专区| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 日本免费a在线| 国产乱人视频| 久久久久国产网址| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 午夜a级毛片| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 99热只有精品国产| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 大香蕉久久网| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 我要搜黄色片| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 99热精品在线国产| 亚洲图色成人| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 综合色丁香网| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 午夜福利高清视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 舔av片在线| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 老司机福利观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国内精品宾馆在线| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 热99在线观看视频| 久久久久性生活片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 美女黄网站色视频| 国内精品宾馆在线| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 免费大片18禁| 校园春色视频在线观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 97在线视频观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 老司机影院成人| 色综合色国产| 免费av毛片视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产视频内射| 1024手机看黄色片| 久99久视频精品免费| 人妻系列 视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| eeuss影院久久| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 欧美激情在线99| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产成人91sexporn| 三级毛片av免费| 大香蕉久久网| 在线免费观看的www视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产 一区精品| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 99久久人妻综合| 永久网站在线| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 69人妻影院| 色5月婷婷丁香| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 成年av动漫网址| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 老司机影院成人| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 一本久久中文字幕| 久久精品91蜜桃| videossex国产| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 久久久精品94久久精品| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 97超视频在线观看视频| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 欧美潮喷喷水| 色吧在线观看| 一级av片app| av在线蜜桃| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 久久6这里有精品| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 日韩成人伦理影院| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 97超碰精品成人国产| 色哟哟·www| 成年av动漫网址| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 深夜精品福利| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久久成人免费电影| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 一夜夜www| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 99热只有精品国产| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 热99re8久久精品国产| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 熟女电影av网| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲最大成人中文| 床上黄色一级片| av黄色大香蕉| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 级片在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 男人舔奶头视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| kizo精华| 少妇丰满av| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 国产在线男女| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 尾随美女入室| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产综合懂色| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 99久久人妻综合| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产色婷婷99| 在线免费观看的www视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 久久99精品国语久久久| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久中文看片网| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 午夜久久久久精精品| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 中文资源天堂在线| videossex国产| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 悠悠久久av| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 插逼视频在线观看| 人妻系列 视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 韩国av在线不卡| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 97超视频在线观看视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久99久视频精品免费| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲国产色片| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| av黄色大香蕉| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 床上黄色一级片| 亚洲在久久综合| 日本一二三区视频观看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲综合色惰| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 六月丁香七月| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 看免费成人av毛片| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美bdsm另类| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲成人久久性| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 成人av在线播放网站| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 观看美女的网站| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 三级毛片av免费| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲无线观看免费| 一本一本综合久久| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 男女那种视频在线观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产精品永久免费网站| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 99热网站在线观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产精华一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线在线| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产三级中文精品| 男女那种视频在线观看| 欧美激情在线99| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲无线在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产精品三级大全| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 熟女电影av网| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲最大成人av| 不卡一级毛片| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 免费观看人在逋| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 波多野结衣高清无吗| av黄色大香蕉|