Metal Sulfide Ag2S: Fabrication via Zone Melting Method and Its Thermoelectric Property

JIN Min, BAI Xudong, ZHANG Rulin, ZHOU Lina, LI Rongbin

Metal Sulfide Ag2S: FabricationZone Melting Method and Its Thermoelectric Property

JIN Min1, BAI Xudong2, ZHANG Rulin1, ZHOU Lina1, LI Rongbin1

(1. School of Materials Science, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai 201306, China; 2. School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China)

Metal sulfide Ag2S is an attractive semiconductor due to its excellent physical and chemical property that enable it with wide applications in fields of catalysis, sensing, optoelectronics in past years. In present work,18 mm× 50 mmAg2S ingot was successfully prepared using zone melting method and its thermoelectric (TE) behavior was investigated. Ag2S has standard monoclinic P21/c space group (-Ag2S phase) below 450 K and transfer to cubic structure (-Ag2S phase) over this temperature. Ag2S is a-type semiconductor as the Seebeck coefficientis always negative due to the Ag interstitial ions in the material that can provide additional electrons.is about -1200 μV·K–1near room temperature, declines to -680 μV·K–1at 440 K and finally decreases to ～-100 μV·K–1at-Ag2S state. The electrical conductivity () of-Ag2S is almost zero. However, the value sharply jumps to ～40000.5 S·m–1as the material just changes to-Ag2S at 450 K and then gradually deceases to 33256.2 S·m–1at 650 K. Hall measurement demonstrates that carrier concentrationHof Ag2S is suddenly increased from the level of ～1017cm–3to ～1018cm–3during phase transition. Total thermal conductivityof-Ag2S is ～0.20 W·m–1·K–1but is ～0.45 W·m–1·K–1of-Ag2S. Ultimately, a maximum=0.57 is achieved around 580 K that means Ag2S might be a promising middle-temperature TE material.

Ag2S; zone melting; thermoelectric material; phase transition

During the past years, metal sulfide Ag2S has attracted much attention due to its excellent physical and chemical properties that enable it with various applica-tions in fields of catalysis, sensing, optoelectronics and so on[1–6]. For example, Dong,[7]reports Ag2S-nanowire is an ideal candidate for making nano tem-perature and photoelectric sensors as its photocondu-ctivity is always positive under 532 or 1064 nm laser radiation. Du,[8]declares Ag2S Quantum Dots may act as nontoxic carrier for potentialbioimaging. Zhang,[9]confirms that the Ag2S Quantum Dots indeed open up the possibility ofanatomical imaging and early stage tumor diagnosis owing to their high emission efficiency in NIR-II imaging window. Besides, Ag2S is also found suitable for solar cell and infrared sensitivity device fabrication attribute to its semiconductor chara-cter which has a ～1.0 eV band gap[10]. Recently, it is announced that Ag2S exhibits a fantastic room-temperature ductile behavior. Its compression deformation can reach 50%, the bending variable surpassing 20%, and the stretching variable up to 4.2%. These shape variables are far more than known ceramic and semiconductor mate-rials, and are equivalent to the mechanical properties of some metals. Consequently, Ag2S provides a possi-bility is quest of producible inorganic semiconductors/ceramics for flexible electronic devices[11].

In order to develop more interesting functions of Ag2S, the authors focus on its potential thermoelectric (TE) behavior according to the concept of Seebeck-Peltier effect[12]. The TE device can supply green and reliable energy by direct conversion of heat into electricity. Thus, it is expected to have wide applications in power generation. The efficiency of a thermoelectric material is usually evaluated by the dimensionless figure of merit,=(2)/. Whereis Seebeck coefficient,is absolute temperature,is electrical conductivity andis thermal conductivity[13]. From the view of this formula, it is obvious that the TE material with ultra-low thermal condu-ctivity is one of a significant factor for high. Based on this recognition, the TE behavior of Ag2S is worthy of study as it has very small thermal conductivity. Wang,[14]have fabricated Ag2S cera-mic using a solution method and the thermal trans-port analysis indicates that its total thermal conductivity is 0.4– 0.6 W·m–1·K–1in range of 300–600 K, which is lower than most solid TE materials. Ultimately, a maxi-mum=0.55 (580 K) is obtained which implies that Ag2S is a promising middle-temperature TE material. In pre-sent work, a zone melting method which has the advan-tage of purifying materials is introduced for Ag2S com-pound fabrication. Its electrical/thermal transport prope-rties are systematically investigated and the final figure of meritis demonstrated.

1 Experimental

1.1 Ag2S preparation

99.999% high purity Ag and S elements were used as start materials for Ag2S synthesis, they were weighed in accordance with the standard stoichiometric ratio and the total weight was about 60.5 g. The start materials were loaded into a18 mm quartz ampoule and then sealed with a vacuum less than 10–2Pa, after that, the quartz ampoule was placed into a 1000 ℃rocking furnace. After Ag and S totally melted, the rocking system worked at a rate of 20 r/min for 30 min to enhance Ag2S synthesis homogeneity. Ultimately, Ag2S compound was obtained as the furnace was cooled to room tem-perature naturally. Subsequently, the synthesized Ag2S raw material with the same ampoule was put into a home-made zone melting furnace. The ampoule was supported by a Al2O3pedestal and a pair of thermal-couples was installed near the bottom for temperature indication. Fig. 1(a) shows the schematic diagram of the zone melting furnace which was heated by a couple of Si-Mo heaters to form a narrow high temperature zone. Fig. 1(b) is the temperature profile along vertical direction, the temperature gradient for Ag2S solidification was about 30–35 ℃/cm. The furnace temperature was controlled at 920 ℃. After Ag2S raw material was melted, the quartz ampoule was lowered down at the speed of 3.0 mm/h until all solution was exhausted. The parameters for Ag2S solidification are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Parameters for Ag2S fabrication

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the zone melting furnace (a) and temperature profile along vertical direction (b)

1.2 Characterization

The densitywas measured by Archimedes principle. Phase structure of the material was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8, Germany) using Cu Kα radiation (=0.15406 nm) at room temperature. The morpholo-gical and chemical composition were investigated using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM, JSM-6610, JEOL Ltd.) and Energy Dispersive Spectro-scopy (EDS, JED-2300T) equip-ment. The Seebeck coe-fficient and electrical conductivity were measured simul-taneously (ULVAC-RIKO ZEM-3) from 300 to 650 K. The thermal diffusivitywas tested by laser flash method (Netzsch, LFA-457, Ger-many). The total thermal conductivitywas obtained using=··p,wherepis specific heat capacity.

2 Results and discussion

The as-grown Ag2S ingot (18 mm× 50 mm) is easily separated from quartz ampoule and displays bright meta-llic luster, as Fig. 2 shows. Such phenomenon indi-cates that Ag2S has none reaction with quartz ampoule during the whole process. Its density is measured to be 7.20 g/cm3that is nearly 100% close to the theoretical value 7.23 g/cm3. Fig. 3(a) is the XRD pattern of Ag2S powder, it is observed that all diffraction peaks are matched well to those of standard-Ag2S monoclinic P21/c space group (PDF#14-0072) at room temperature. The lattice para-meters,andare calculateda general structure analysis system, and the values are 0.4251, 0.6962 and 0.7873 nm, respectively. EDS mea-sure-ment implies the atom percent of Ag is 67.2% and S is 32.8% in matrix that agrees well with the standard stoichiometric comp-osition of Ag2S, as Fig. 3(b) shows.

Fig. 2 Ag2S ingot prepared by zone melting method

Fig. 3 XRD pattern (a) and EDS map (b) of Ag2S

During SEM testing, it is interesting that some micro size particles oozed from the material. Fig. 4(a) shows the original Ag2S surface under 25 kV voltage. However, in a very short time, numerous white particles came up and then gradually grew up for about 30 s, as Fig. 4(b,c) demonstrating. Thereafter, the particle sizes are kept stable. EDS analysis reveals the particle compo-sition is 100% Ag. This result is mainly attributed to the special liquid-like character of Ag2S. As previous literature[15]reported, Ag ions are weakly bonded to the neighbour atoms in silver chalcogenides Ag2M (M=S, Se, Te) semiconductors, and apt to migrate from one site to another if there is sufficient energy force on them. For example, the external heat or voltage are both able to drive Ag ions movement. Therefore, it is easy to understand the high energy electron beam in SEM system plays a significant role causing the deposition of Ag. In fact, similar metal element deposition is also noticed in other type of liquid-like materials, such as Cu2Se, Cu2S, Ag8SnSe6and so on[16–18].

As for thermoelectric property evaluation, sample 1# for electrical transport measurement is cut parallel to Ag2S solidification direction, and sample 2# for thermal transport testing is processed along perpendicular orien-tation, as the insert in Fig. 5(a) shows. Here, we should note that such sample processing modes are widely adopted in other zone melting thermoelectric materials, such as Bi2Te3, SnSe,[19-20]. In Fig. 5(a), the relationship of temperature with Seebeck coefficientis displayed. It is found that negativethat means Ag2S is a-type semiconductor. This conductive behavior might be due to the Ag interstitial ions in crystal structure that act as donor impurities providing additional electrons[14]. Near room temperature,is about –1200 μV·K–1. As the temperature increased to 440 K,linearly deceased to –680 μV·K–1. However, when temperature conti-nu-ously increased to 450 K,undergoes a sharp decline and the value is around –100 μV·K–1. This dramatic change is mainly attributed to the phase transition of Ag2S. Below 450 K, the material has an-Ag2S mono-clinic structure. Nevertheless, it would transfer to-Ag2S body centered cubic structure as temperature surpasses 450 K. After that,maintains a relative stable state regardless the increasing of temperature to 650 K. Fig. 5(b) shows the dependence of conductivityon temperature. It is amazing that theof-Ag2S is almost zero before 450 K. However, thevalue sharply jumps to ～40000.5 S·m–1as the material just finishes phase tran-sition. Then,gradually deceases to 33256.2 S·m–1near 650 K. Fig. 5(c) exhibits power factortem-perature that calculated from=2. It is observed that theof-Ag2S is much poor because of its weak conductive property. As for-Ag2S,is practically a constant ～6 μW·cm–1·K–2in temperature range of 450–650 K.

Fig. 4 SEM images of original Ag2S surface (a), Ag particles on Ag2S matrix (b) and enlarged morphology of the surface (c)

Fig. 5 Relationship of Seebeck (a), electrical conductivity σ (b) and power factor PF (c) with temperature

In order to better understand the electrical transport behavior of Ag2S, the Hall properties are also characte-rized. Fig. 6(a) shows the temperature dependence of carrier concentrationH. Near room temperature, theHvalue is on level of ～1017cm–3. Then, as temperature is increased to the threshold of phase transition,His climbed to ～1018cm–3. This phenomenon is mainly due to the increase of carrier concentration from valence band to conduction band when temperature is added. As expected, when Ag2S is transformed from monoclinic to body centered cubic structure,His increased suddenly to ～1019cm–3near 450 K. Later, a growing number of carriers are generated in-Ag2S, andHrises to a highest ～1020cm–3level at 650 K. Fig. 6(b) is the carrier mobilityHdiagram varied with temperature. Similar to carrier concentration,Hhas a dramatic jump during phase transition. Besides, it is noticedHis alwaysdeclined when it is in-Ag2S and-Ag2S states, respectively. The maximumH= 161.6 cm2·V–1·s–1hap-pens at the moment as Ag2S finishes phase transition.

Fig. 6 Carrier concentration nH (a) and mobility μH (b) vs temperature

As for thermal transport property, the relationship of total thermal conductivitywith temperature is given in Fig. 7. When Ag2S is in monoclinic structure,is 0.20 W·m–1·K–1at room temperature and is 0.21 W·m–1·K–1near 400 K. Here it is necessary to mention that the thermal conductivity is deduced from the measured thermal diffusion coefficient and then approximately calculated through Dulong-Petit law. Thus, there may be certain errors to the accurateof the material. However, the result indicates that the thermal conductivity of-Ag2S is indeed ultralow and very stable. In-Ag2S, 2 S atoms and 6 Ag atoms form weak chemical bonds along (100) plane. Thus,-Ag2S would show low phonon vibration frequency because of the weak binding force of S to Ag[11]. As a result, the low-frequency optical branch dominated by Ag atoms can strongly scatter lattice phonons which have similar frequency. This is the key reason why-Ag2S has ultra-low thermal conductivity. When-Ag2S turns to-Ag2S,is quickly increased and keeps steady between 450–600 K and the value is ～0.45 W·m–1·K–1. It should be noted that the sulfur element might have slight volatilization during experi-ment. However, the effect of possible sulfur loss on thermoelectric properties is negligible, as the Ag2S hardly allows stoichiometric deviation of 2∶1 according to the Ag-S phase diagram. Even though any sulfur loss takes place, the excessive Ag would precipitate on the sample surface to maintain Ag2S composition stability.

Fig. 7 Relationship between κ and temperature

Fig. 8 Dependence of ZT with temperature

Ultimately, the temperature dependence ofis displayed in Fig. 8. Due to the extremely weak electrical transport property,-Ag2S has very smallalthough its thermal transport is quite low. Nevertheless, theof-Ag2S is about 0.35 at 450 K and reaches 0.57 near 600 K. The presentmaximumis comparable to that of Ag2S fabricated by melting method (=0.55, 580 K)[14], and is on the same level compared with other Ag-based materials, such as Ag2Se, Ag2Te, CuAgSe and so on[21-23]. This result verifies that such metal sulfide Ag2S is a potential low-temperature thermoeletric material. In the future, Ag2S with element doping is suggested to do help for thermoelectric property improvement.

3 Conclusions

A18 mm×50 mmAg2S ingot was fabricated using zone melting method. It undergoes a phase transition from-Ag2S monoclinic P21/c space group to-Ag2S body centered cubic structure near 450 K, which has remark influence on its electrical and thermal properties. Ag2S is a-type semiconductor as the Seebeck constantis always negative. Theof-Ag2S is much poor because of the weak conductive behavior, but the value would suddenly jump to ～6 μW·cm–1·K–2when phase transition happens. Theof-Ag2S and-Ag2S are ～0.20 W·m–1·K–1and ～0.45 W·m–1·K–1, respectively. Finally, Ag2S displays a largest= 0.57 near 580 K that means it might be a potential middle-temperature TE material.

[1] AlZAHRANI A A, ZAINAL Z, TALIB Z A,. Study the effect of the heat treatment on the photoelectrochemical performance of binary heterostructured photoanode Ag2S/ZnO nanorod arrays in photoelectrochemical cells., 2020, 1002: 187–199.

[2] ALHARTHI S S, ALZAHRANI A, RAZVI M A N,. Spectroscopic and electrical properties of Ag2S/PVA nanoco-mposite films for visible-light optoelectronic devices., 2020, 30: 3878–3885.

[3] XIE Y, YOO S H, CHEN C,. Ag2S quantum dots-sensitized TiO2nanotube array photoelectrodes., 2012, 177(1): 106–111.

[4] KONDRATENKO T S, SMIRNOV M S, OVCHINNIKOV O V,. Nonlinear optical properties of hybrid associates of Ag2S quantum dots with erythrosine molecules., 2020, 200: 163391.

[5] YOU J C, ZHAN S B, WEN J,. Construction of hetero-junction of Ag2S modified yttrium manganate visible photocatalyst and study on photocatalytic mechanism., 2020, 217: 164900.

[6] VOGEL R, HOYER P, WELLER H. Quantum-sized PbS, CdS, Ag2S, Sb2S3, and Bi2S3particles as sensitizers for various nano-porous wide-bandgap semiconductors., 1994, 98(12): 3183–3188.

[7] DONG Z M, SUN H S, XU J,. Preparation of macroscopical long Ag2S nanowire clusters characteristics., 2011, 60(7): 676–680.

[8] DU Y P, XU B, FU T,. Near-infrared photoluminescent Ag2S quantum dots from a single source precursor., 2010, 132(5): 1470–1471.

[9] ZHANG Y, HONG G S, ZHANG Y J,. Ag2S quantum dot: a bright and biocompatible fluorescent nanoprobe in the second near-infrared window., 2012, 6(5): 3695–3702.

[10] HWANG I, SEOL M, Kim H,. Improvement of photocurrent generation of Ag2S sensitized solar cell through co-sensitization with CdS., 2013, 103(2): 023902–1–4.

[11] SHI X, CHEN H Y, HAO F,. Room-temperature ductile inorganic semiconductor., 2018, 17(5): 421–426.

[12] CHEN Z W, ZHANG X Y, LIN S Q,. Rationalizing phonon dispersion for lattice thermal conductivity of solids., 2018, 5(6): 888–894.

[13] JEFFREY S G, AGNE M T, RAMYA G. Thermal conductivity of complex materials., 2019, 6(3): 380–381.

[14] WANG T, CHEN H Y, QIU P F,. Thermoelectric properties of Ag2S superionic conductor with intrinsically low lattice thermal conductivity., 2019, 68(9): 18–26.

[15] CHEN H Y, YUE Z M, REN D D,. Thermal conductivity during phase transitions., 2019, 31(6): 1806518.

[16] LU P, LIU H L, YUAN X,. Multiformity and fluctuation of Cu ordering in Cu2Se thermoelectric materials., 2015, 3(13): 6901–6908.

[17] ZHANG Y B, WANG Y W, XI L L,. Electronic structure of antifluorite Cu2X (X=S, Se, Te) within the modified Becke- Johnson potential plus an on-site Coulomb U., 2014, 140(7): 074702.

[18] JIN M, LIN S Q, LI W,. Fabrication and thermoelectric properties of single-crystal argyrodite Ag8SnSe6., 2019, 31: 2603–2610.

[19] JIANG J, CHEN L D, BAI S Q,. Thermoelectric properties of p-type (Bi2Te3)(Sb2Te3)1–xcrystals preparedzone melting., 2005, 277(1–4): 258–263.

[20] WANG X, XU J T, LIU G Q,. Texturing degree boosts thermoelectric performance of silver-doped polycrystalline SnSe., 2017, 9(8): 426.

[21] WANG X B, QIU P F, ZHANG T S,. Compound defects and thermoelectric properties in ternary CuAgSe-based materials., 2015, 3(26): 13662–13670.

[22] DAY T, DRYMIOTIS F, ZHANG T S,. Evaluating the potential for high thermoelectric efficiency of silver selenide., 2013, 1(45): 7568–7573.

[23] PEI Y Z, HEINZ N A, SNYDER G J. Alloying to increase the band gap for improving thermoelectric properties of Ag2Te., 2011, 21(45): 18256–18260.

區(qū)熔法制備金屬硫化物Ag2S及其熱電性能研究

金敏1, 白旭東2, 張如林1, 周麗娜1, 李榮斌1

（1. 上海電機(jī)學(xué)院 材料學(xué)院, 上海 201306; 2. 上海理工大學(xué) 材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)院, 上海 200093）

金屬硫化物Ag2S具有優(yōu)異的物理化學(xué)性能, 在催化、傳感及光電子等領(lǐng)域具有廣闊的應(yīng)用空間。本工作利用一種區(qū)熔技術(shù)制備了尺寸為18 mm×50 mm的Ag2S并對(duì)其潛在熱電性能進(jìn)行了研究。Ag2S在450 K以下具有標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的-Ag2S單斜P21/c結(jié)構(gòu), 450 K以上發(fā)生相變成為立方-Ag2S相。Ag2S在300～650 K范圍始終具有負(fù)的Seebeck系數(shù)而呈現(xiàn)型半導(dǎo)體特征, 這主要是因?yàn)椴牧现写嬖贏g間隙離子而提供了多余電子。Ag2S的Seebeck系數(shù)在室溫下約為-1200 μV·K–1, 440 K時(shí)降為-680 μV·K–1, 當(dāng)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)?Ag2S后則大幅降至～-100 μV·K–1。-Ag2S的電導(dǎo)率幾乎為零, 然而在剛發(fā)生-Ag2S相變(450 K)時(shí), 電導(dǎo)率突然增加至～40000.5 S·m–1, 而后隨著溫度持續(xù)升高, 其值在650 K降低為33256.2 S·m–1?；魻枩y(cè)試表明Ag2S的載流子濃度H在相變時(shí)可從～1017cm–3迅速增加到～1018cm–3量級(jí)。-Ag2S和-Ag2S的總熱導(dǎo)率幾乎是常數(shù), 分別為～0.20和～0.45 W·m–1·K–1。最終Ag2S在580 K獲得最大值0.57, 說(shuō)明它是一種很有發(fā)展?jié)摿Φ闹袦責(zé)犭姴牧稀?/p>

Ag2S; 區(qū)熔; 熱電材料; 相轉(zhuǎn)變

TQ174

A

2020-11-16;

2020-12-03;

2021-03-01

Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (19ZR1419900)

JIN Min (1982–), male, professor. E-mail: jmaish@aliyun.com

金敏(1982–), 男, 教授. E-mail: jmaish@aliyun.com

1000-324X(2022)01-0101-06

10.15541/jim20200653