• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Strategy of Barrel Roll and Decoy Deployment Against Infrared Air-to-Air Missile

    2022-04-08 08:43:20ZHANGNanCHENChangshengSUNJingguoLIANGXuechao
    紅外技術(shù) 2022年3期
    關(guān)鍵詞:空對(duì)空空空導(dǎo)彈誘餌

    ZHANG Nan,CHEN Changsheng,SUN Jingguo,LIANG Xuechao

    〈制導(dǎo)與對(duì)抗〉

    Strategy of Barrel Roll and Decoy Deployment Against Infrared Air-to-Air Missile

    ZHANG Nan1,CHEN Changsheng1,SUN Jingguo1,LIANG Xuechao2

    (1.,710065,;2.,100076,)

    Evasive maneuvers and decoy deployment are effective measures against infrared (IR) air-to-air missiles for fighters.In this study, both aspects were considered: barrel roll maneuver and unpowered point source decoys.For practical purposes, the interference process, movement characteristics, and influence mechanism of the decoy on the missile guidance system are expounded, in which the conditions needed for the barrel roll maneuver and the force of the decoy are considered.In addition, the air-to-air missile is assumed to adopt the true proportional navigation law or augmented proportional navigation law, and the decoys are launched in the conventional mode or emergency mode.Linearized time-varying models and adjoint models for barrel roll maneuvers with decoy deployment influence on missile guidance precision are established.The correctness of these models was verified by a simulation result analysis and comparison.The miss distance is an important parameter for characterizing the performance of an air-defense missile.The average miss distance and percentage of maximum miss distance were proposed to analyze the adjoint model results.Based on the work mentioned above, the barrel roll rate and the transition step maneuver angle of the target aircraft, as well as the simultaneous launch quantity, the period between successive launches, and launch direction policy on the miss distance are analyzed to provide strategic references for fighters against IR air-to-air missiles.

    adjoint method, decoy launch, evasive maneuver, IR air-to-air missile, miss distance, proportional navigation law

    0 Introduction

    Compared with radar air-to-air missiles, infrared (IR) air-to-air missiles have a strong anti-interference ability and high hit rate and are widely used in air combat.History suggests that almost 90% of all downed aircraft between 1979 and 1993 were destroyed by IR-homing missiles.In addition, 14 out of 22 airplanes (78%) were downed by IR homing missiles during the First Gulf War[1].IR air-to-air missiles are the most effective short-range air combat weapons.Therefore, it is necessary to study countermeasures against IR air-to-air missiles.

    Short-range IR air-to-air missiles mainly pursue the target using proportional navigation (PN)[2-3]or its modified forms[4-5].PN has been widely used in engineering because of its straight terminal trajectory, small overload, strong robustness, and high precision.PN can be used as long as line-of-sight (LOS) can be acquired.PN guidance laws can be categorized into two major classes[6].The first is missile velocity referenced PNs, which mainly include pure proportional navigation (PPN) and its variants, where the commanded acceleration is perpendicular to the missile velocity.Suwon Lee et al.[7]performed a statistical analysis of the missile’s capture region for pure proportional navigation guidance considering target maneuvers.LI Kebo et al.[8]proposed a guidance strategy with impact angle constraints based on PPN and the interception performance was demonstrated through numerical simulation examples.Satadal Ghosh et al.[9]proposed a composite proportional navigation guidance law using a combination of standard pure proportional navigation and the retro-proportional navigation guidance laws for intercepting higher speed non-maneuvering targets at specified impact angles in three-dimensional engagements.The second class of PNs is LOS referenced PNs, including true proportional navigation (TPN) and its variants.The performance of 3D TPN against an arbitrarily maneuvering target was thoroughly analyzed using the Lyapunov-like approach by LI Kebo et al.[10], and, the upper bound of the 3D LOS rate and the commanded acceleration of the 3D TPN were obtained.Feng Tyan[11]analyzed the capture area of general 3D TPN guidance laws using a novel method.A more practical capture region of the realistic true proportional navigation guidance law for an arbitrarily maneuvering target was analyzed by BAI Zhihui et al.[12].The direction of the TPN’s commanded acceleration was perpendicular to the LOS, and its magnitude was only proportional to the LOS rate.When aiming at a maneuvering target, if the target maneuver compensation is added to the proportional navigation, it is called augmented proportional navigation (APN).According to the optimal control theory, it can be proved that PN is the optimal solution of the linear guidance problem that minimizes the square integral of the control quantity without considering the target's maneuvers or the dynamic delay of the guidance system.APN is the optimal guidance navigation for a maneuvering target with a constant overload.The missiles used in this study were considered to have adopted these two guidance laws.

    The target aircraft mainly avoids attacks from IR air-to-air missiles by implementing tactical maneuvers[13]and IR interference[1,14].The numerically obtained three-dimensional optimal evasive maneuvers of a fighter against a proportional navigation missile are those of the vertical-S type and horizontal-S type[15], which are two-dimensional in nature.The barrel roll maneuver is regarded as an approximation of these optimal maneuvers; however, the barrel roll maneuver is easier to implement than the optimal maneuvers[16].The barrel roll maneuver is an effective maneuvering form[17].

    According to the radiation characteristics of IR decoys, the decoys can be divided into point source decoys and surface decoys.According to their motion characteristics, IR decoys can be divided into unpowered, aerodynamic, self-propelled, towered, and air-launched decoys.Most research on IR decoys focuses on compositions[18], simulations[19], IR target recognition algorithms[20- 21], and so on.This paper focuses on the deployment policy of the unpowered point source decoy considering the influence on the missile miss distance from the guidance point of view, and thus, target recognition is reasonably simplified.

    In terms of research methods, the adjoint method is widely used for missile modeling and simulation, performance evaluation, precision analysis of guidance system, and other problems such as target allocation.Among them, Martin Weiss et al.introduced the adjoint method for state space models[22], hybrid guidance loop state-space models[23]and two-phase guidance loop models[24].LI Quancheng et al.[25]presented three seeker blind range guidance policies with different guidance precisions using the adjoint method.Several computationally efficient weapon target-allocation algorithms for assigning defenders to missiles in a cooperative interception scenario were developed by Vitaly Shalumov et al.[26].Domenic Bucco and Martin Weiss[27]used the adjoint method to study the influence of the blind range of seekers on missile guidance.Timo Sailaranta et al.[17]established a simple model of the target barrel roll maneuver, and validated its rationality using the adjoint method.However, none of the above studies considered the influence of decoy deployment on the miss distance of the missiles.WANG Weiqiang et al.[28]proposed a guidance precision analysis method for the entir process of air countermeasures from infrared decoy deployment, identification, and guidance disturbance to the final miss distance calculation.Arthur Vermeulen et al.[29]used the adjoint method to study the influence of the target maneuver and decoy interference on the miss distance of the missile and provided corresponding countermeasures; however, they studied the two-dimensional maneuver of the target and did not consider the effect of the decoy force.Huang Hesong et al.[30]established the movement and radiation models of target maneuver and surface-type decoy based on real data, and the best defense strategy was analyzed when the missile came from the front of the aircraft, however there was little work on a multi-decoy deployment policy.

    In this study, considering the interference process, movement characteristics, and influence mechanism of the decoy on the missile guidance system, mathematical models to study the tactical strategy of the target barrel roll maneuver and decoy deployment against an infrared air-to-air missile were proposed based on the adjoint method.The main contributions of this study are as follows:

    1) The model built in this study comprehensively considers the barrel roll maneuver and decoy deployment, which are closer to the actual situation, and fully validates the model.The modeling method can provide a reference for other maneuver forms and decoy deployment research.

    2) Maneuver and decoy deployment strategies are usually studied from an experimental point of view, which requires a large amount of work and lacks regularity.In contrast, computational efficiency can be improved, and more rules can be found with the introduction of the adjoint method.

    3) The target and decoy of this study are built in an absolute coordinate system, which can not only can model and analyze the conventional deployment mode but also the emergency deployment mode.

    4) The miss distance is considered an important index of missile combat performance.The average miss distance and percentage of maximum miss distance, which considers the occurrence probability of time-to-go, are proposed to analyze the results of the adjoint model.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.The decoy interference processes are described in Section 1.The linearized time-varying models and adjoint analysis models for barrel roll maneuvers with decoy deployment influence on the missile guidance precision are established in Section 2.Section 3 presents model validation, simulation results, and analysis.Finally, conclusions are presented in Section 4.

    1 Description and modeling of decoy interference process

    The classical decoy interference process in this study is described as follows: when the decoy is launched, a radiation source similar to the target IR characteristic is generated in the seeker's field of view.Without loss of generality, we can assume that the LOS of the missile is no longer aimed at the target, but at the power centroid of the target and the decoys until the target has been identified.This type of interference is called power centroid interference.Suppose that the position, velocity, and acceleration for the i-th decoy in the seeker field of view are (Di,Di), (Dyi,Dzi) and (Dyi,Dzi), respectively.While (T,T), (Ty,Tz) and (Ty,Tz) are the position, velocity, and acceleration of the target, respectively.Tdenotes the radiation intensity of the target.Then, the positionC, velocityCyand accelerationCyof the power centroid in the-direction can be calculated as:

    The corresponding physical quantity of the power centroid in the-direction is similar to that in(1).The technical parameters involved include simultaneous launch quantity, the period between successive launches, and launch direction policy.

    The missile anti-interference process can be described in three phases[29], as shown in Fig.1.

    Fig.1 The process of air-to-air missile anti-interference

    In the missile's terminal guidance, the seeker locks and tracks the target and the target launches the decoy att.The decoy ignites and leaves the target, as shown in Fig.1 (a), corresponding to the first phase.The lateral position of the decoy is consistent with that of the aircraft; however, their lateral accelerations and velocities are different.Because the missile seeker cannot instantaneously discriminate between the decoy and target, the seeker tracks the power centroid, that is, the false target.With the movements of the decoy and target, the false target moves away from the aircraft, and the seeker tracks it during the period of timettot,as shown in Fig.1(b), corresponding to the second phase.After the discrimination time, the seeker has successfully discriminated the target through the anti-interference algorithm of the seeker att, which means the missile begins to track the target (assuming that the target is still in the seeker's field of view) and the aiming point instantly shifts back to the target, as shown in Fig.1(c) corresponding to the third phase.If the target has already left the seeker’s field of view, then the seeker will lose the target, which is not discussed in this paper.In the figure,MandTrepresent the constant velocities of the missile and target, respectively.crepresents the closing speed of the missile and the target.For the head-on scenario,c=M+T,and for tail chase,c=M-T.For simplicity, the initial value of the LOS angle was taken as zero, that is,=0.The time-to-gogo=F-, whereFis the final time of the engagement corresponding to the minimal miss distance andis the current flight time.The distance between the missile and the target,, is given by the product ofcandgo.MandTare taken as the maneuver overloads of the missile and target, respectively.Ddenotes the decoy velocity.DCb,DCbandDCbare the suddenly shifted values of the displacement, velocity, and acceleration of the power centroid, respectively, att.

    To induce an IR-guided air-to-air missile effectively, the radiation intensity of the decoy is always designed to be higher than the IR radiation intensity of the aircraft.The ratio of the decoy radiation energy to the target radiation energy in the dynamic state, that is, the suppression coefficient, is generally between 2 and 3.It can be considered that the intensity of the IR radiation source formed by multiple decoys launched by the target in each group is the sum of the radiation intensity of every single decoy.Here, we consider the radiation intensity of the decoy to be the same and equal toD.Thus,can be calculated as

    =D/T(2)

    2 Models of Target Maneuver and Decoy Deployment Influence on Missile

    2.1 Model of target maneuver

    The model described in [17] considers that the aircraft barrel roll maneuver has a certain normal velocity, however the normal situation is that the target aircraft is in a cruising state; that is, the target is in a uniform straight flight state when the missile is launched.The target first implements a step-transition maneuver that utilizes the rated overload capacity, then the barrel roll will be implemented.Fig.2 shows a schematic of the barrel roll maneuver.The maneuver was as follows: the target flew with a circular motion in the plumb plane and moved at a uniform speed along the axle of the barrel roll.The origin of the coordinate system is the barrel roll axis.

    0anddenote the initial phase angle and the barrel roll rate, respectively.The initial velocity of the target barrel rollR=T/=T/, and the time spent on the step maneuver isstep=R/T=1/.0=0+p/2 is the angle of the step maneuver.Ty,Tz,Ty, andTzare the overload and acceleration values of the target in theanddirections, respectively, which can be calculated during the step maneuver as follows:

    Whereas overload and acceleration value of target during barrel roll can be given by

    According to the definition in Fig.2 and the origin of the coordinate system, the initialandcoordinates of the targetsT0andT0are

    And the position of the target in the simulation can be calculated as

    The target maneuver can then be transformed into a pulse input function, and the acceleration in the Y-direction is shown in Fig.3.

    2.2 Model of IR decoy

    The decoy is primarily affected by gravity and aerodynamic drag.The kinematic equations are as follows[30]:

    whereis the atmospheric density and,d,,D,Dare the drag force, drag coefficient, windward area, mass, and velocity of the decoy, respectively.Dx,Dy,Dzdenote the components of the missile velocity in the coordinate system shown in Fig.2, andis the gravitational acceleration.This paper discusses the initial velocity of the decoy in the barrel roll maneuver, which can be calculated as follows:

    whereFis the launch velocity of the decoy relative to the target aircraft, which is positive when the decoy is launched to the outer side of the circular motion; otherwise, it is negative.denotes the angle for the barrel roll maneuver during decoy launch.

    Taking the-direction as an example, a decoy model was established, and the-direction is similar.To facilitate modeling, the decoy accelerationDyis considered to be constant in the second phase of Fig.1.The specific calculation is as follows:

    whereDyaandDybare the velocities of the decoy in the-direction attandt, respectively.Certainly,tttis the significant time of the decoy, that is, the identification time required by the anti-interference algorithms of the seeker.

    2.3 Calculation model of miss distance for IR decoy in conventional launch mode

    The conventional launch mode of the IR decoy considered here refers to the launch mode with a period of successive launches not less than thet.Other parameters include the simultaneous launch quantity n and the launch direction policy.In actual combat situations, the quantity, direction, and speed of every decoy causes a difference in the discrimination time of the seeker.In this study, it is assumed that the seeker needs another fixed time to discriminate the real target whenever a new decoy appears in the seeker field of view.By analyzing the anti-interference process of the IR air-to-air missile, as shown in Fig.1, in the absence of velocity pointing deviation and initial displacement deviation, the influence model of the power centroid under the barrel roll maneuver on the missile miss distance is shown in Fig.4.

    Fig.4 Influence model of power centroid under barrel roll

    In Fig.4,D=/(+1) is the sudden shift value andCTdenotes the influence of the target maneuver on the power centroid velocity when the decoy works.According to (1), the effect of the target on the acceleration of the power centroid is decreased byDtimes at t, and the effect is increased byDtimes att.Because of the time delay link, the initial phase of the sinusoidal signal needs to be adjusted according to (9) to ensure consistency with the phase at the moment of acceleration shift.

    DTyarepresents the velocity shift value of the power centroid caused by the target maneuver att, whereasDTybandDTbrepresent the velocity and displacement shift values attrespectively, which can be calculated as

    whereTyarepresents the velocity of the target attandTybandTbrepresent the velocity and position of the target at t, respectively.When multiple groups of decoys are launched, the velocity and absolute displacement of the target at each discrimination time can be calculated in advance using (5) to avoid the individual calculation for each module and reduce the complexity of the model.

    The motion characteristics of the decoy when launched without maneuvering are shown in Fig.5.

    Fig.5 The process of decoy interference

    In Fig.5, the decoy is launched attand discriminated attusing the anti-interference algorithm of the seeker.Dbrepresents the position of the decoy att.In the first phase (t), it can be considered that the position of the decoy coincides with the IR radiation source of the target, however the acceleration and velocity of the power centroid change.The acceleration shift valueDDyaand velocity shift valueDDyacaused by the decoy can be calculated using (12).During the second phase (t-t), because the acceleration of the power centroid caused by the decoy is considered to be constant before, the velocity changes linearly and the displacement changes parabolically.In the last phase (t),DDyb,DDyb, andDDbdenote the acceleration, velocity, and position shift value of the power centroid caused by decoy, respectively, att, and they can be expressed as follows:

    Therefore, the linearized model of the power centroid under decoy interference can be expressed as an impulse function, as shown in Fig.6.In this figure,CDrepresents the effect of the decoy on the velocity of the power centroid.

    2.4 Calculation model of miss distance for IR decoy in emergency launch mode

    The emergency launch mode means that the target will launch decoys intensively with a period of successive launches less than thet.Because thetis generally small, for the convenience of modeling analysis, it is assumed that the period of successive launches ist/2.As previously assumed, when a new decoy appears in the seeker’s field of view, the seeker needs another timetto discriminate the real target.It is assumed thattafter launch, every decoy will be out of the seeker’s field of view or have been eliminated by the anti-interference algorithm.Consequently, the power centroid calculation does not consider these eliminated decoys.The power centroid moves toward the target after the new decoy launches; however, based on previous assumptions, the seeker will continue aiming at the power centroid consisting of the target and multiple new decoys.The seeker will not discriminate the real target for a long period of time, and this increases the discrimination difficulty because of the lack of target information accumulation.Therefore, it is necessary to study the influence of emergency launch mode on the missile miss distance.Table 1 shows the weight coefficients of the power centroid at the time of the first row in the emergency launch mode, so the sum of the coefficients in every column is 1.1,2,3, and4are the weight coefficients of the power centroid and can be calculated as follows:

    Table 1 Weight coefficients of power centroid

    The target launches the first group decoys atstep, and no more than three groups of decoys should be considered when calculating the power centroid.The parameters shown in Table 1 are the weight coefficients of the target and decoy in the power centroid calculation at each time step; therefore, the shift value of each time can be calculated by using the weight coefficients of the current column minus the former ones.We can then establish a mathematical model of the emergency launch mode based on the conventional launch mode.

    2.5 Linearized model of IR air-to-air missile

    If the missile adopts TPN, the direction of the missile overload command is vertical to that of the LOS and can be stated as

    If the missile can estimate the target acceleration value and adopts APN, the overload value of the guidance law outputAPNcan be expressed as:

    Fig.7 Linearized model of air-to-air missile

    Using the superposition principle, taking the-direction as an example, combined with the calculation module shown in Fig.4 and Fig.6, a linearized model of the target barrel roll maneuver with decoy deployment influence on the missile is established, as shown in Fig.7.N,AP,M,andare the signal processing time constant, autopilot time constant, airframe response angular velocity, damping ratio, and proportional navigation coefficient of the missile, respectively.

    2.6 Establishment of adjoint analysis model

    According to the criterion for establishing the adjoint model of the linearized system[4], the adjoint analysis model of the target barrel roll and decoy launch influence on the missile was established.The adjoint form of the time-delay link is itself.The model in this study uses a time-forward simulation to calculate the required parameters of the adjoint model, which can avoid complicated case discussion and parameter derivation, as well as to aid the research on more complex maneuvers, continuous maneuvers, and multiple decoy launches.

    There are three inputs in the model shown in Fig.7; therefore, the miss distance in the-direction,m, is the sum of the three outputs.Similarly, the miss distance in the-direction (m) can be acquired, and the miss distanceallcan be expressed as:

    For the multi-decoy case, the shift value calculation module can be connected in parallel with the missile adjoint model at the corresponding time.Furthermore, through one simulation of the adjoint method, we can obtain the results of the time-forward system, which needs to be simulated many times; that is, the calculation efficiency is greatly improved.

    3 Simulation and analysis

    3.1 Time-forward model validation

    Compared with the adjoint model, each variable of the time-forward simulation model has a clear physical significance and is easy to follow.Therefore, the time-forward simulation model was validated by taking the barrel roll maneuver and one decoy launch for the TPN missile as an example.The simulation conditions are listed in Table 2.The acceleration changes in the power centroid induced by the target and decoy, the acceleration of the target, and the power centroid are shown in Fig.8, and the corresponding velocity and position changes are shown in Fig.9 and 10.At 0.4s, the target implements a barrel roll maneuver and launches decoys towards the outside of the circular motion at the same time; meanwhile, the acceleration, velocity, and displacement of the power centroid induced by the maneuver become 1/3 of the target.At 0.8s, the seeker discriminates the real target, and the physical quantities curve of the power centroid coincides with the target later.All these simulation results match the expected results.

    Table 2 Simulation parameters

    Fig.8 Acceleration change of the power centroid and the target in the Y-direction

    Fig.9 Velocity change of the power centroid and the target in the Y-direction

    Fig.10 Position change of the power centroid and the target in the Y-direction

    3.2 Time-forward simulation and adjoint simulation results validation

    All decoys are launched towards the outside of the circular motion, and the time-forward simulation time varies from 0.2s to 7s with an interval of 0.2s.It can be seen from Fig.11 that the time-forward simulation and the adjoint simulation miss distance exactly coincide, which verifies the correctness of the adjoint model.

    3.3 Simulation results of decoy launch during target barrel roll maneuver

    The target launches decoys during the barrel-roll maneuver process.The initial mass of a typical decoy is 0.3kg, the mass consumption rate is 0.04kg/s, the windward areais 0.003m2, drag coefficientdis 0.35, the combustion time is 5s, and the launch speed is 30m/s, which is launched upward vertically relative to the target.At the beginning of the simulation, the attitude angles of the target aircraft were all 0°, the flight altitude was 4 km, the overload was 6g, the speed is 0.8Ma, and the barrel roll rate was 2rad/s.Then, the velocity of the decoy can be obtained.The position of the decoy can be obtained by integrating the velocity.The phase angle of the target barrel roll varied from 0° to 300° at intervals of 60°.Theplane trajectory diagram and change in velocity versus time are shown in Fig.12.The position, velocity, and acceleration of the decoy launched at each moment with different initial phase angles of the barrel roll maneuver were calculated.

    Fig.11 Miss distance comparison for time-forward simulation and adjoint simulation

    Fig.12 The trajectory diagram and the change of velocity vs time

    3.4 Analysis of miss distance affected by barrel roll

    1) Effect of barrel roll rate on miss distance for TPN and APN missiles

    The barrel roll ratevalues studied were 1, 1.5, 2, 3and 4rad/s with different associated barrel diameters.The missile was a tail chase on the target, and the remaining simulation parameters were set as listed in Table 2.The influence of the barrel roll rate on the miss distance of the missile was studied.The variation in the missile miss distance versusgois shown in Fig.13.

    Fig.13 The variation curves of miss distancevstgo for different barrel roll rates

    wheremaxrepresents the maximumgoandm(go) represents the miss distance corresponding togo, as shown in Fig.14 (a).Meanwhile the concept of namely the percentage of the maximum miss distance[25]pfor the-th curve can be calculated as:

    Fig.14 Analysis of the average miss distance and the percentage of the maximum miss distance

    where max(go) represents the maximum miss distance of all curves corresponding togo, as shown in Fig.14(b).Assuming that the probability of eachgounder real airborne combat condition is equal, combined with thegoestimation error[32], the higher value means that there will be a greater survival probability.If the average miss distance varies slightly, more useful information can be obtained through the percentage of the maximum miss distance.

    It can be seen from Fig.13 that to make the miss distance generated by the TPN-and APN-guided missiles sufficiently large, the barrel roll maneuver should be performed whengois greater than 2s, and the aircraft should try to put the missile behind the tail to increasego.By combining Fig.13 and Fig.14, it can be concluded that with the same barrel roll rate, APN will produce a higher miss distance than TPN.However, when the barrel roll rate is small, the average miss distances of the two guidance laws are not significantly different, nevertheless the TPN will produce a higher miss distance with a higher probability.TPN generates the maximum average miss at approximately 2rad/s, and APN generates the maximum average miss at 3rad/s.

    2) The influence of initial phase angle of barrel roll maneuver on missile miss distance

    The barrel roll rate is set to 2.5rad/s and decoys are launched vertically upward relative to the target.Two decoys were launched simultaneously with a launch period of 0.6s.The average miss distance and the percentage of maximum miss distance corresponding to the initial phase angle of the target barrel roll maneuver are shown in Fig.15.It can be seen that the average miss distances change only slightly with0in this simulation.When0is 0°, the TPN guidance law has the highest percentage of maximum miss distance, whereas when0is 120° and 220°, the TPN guidance law has the highest percentage of maximum miss distance.

    Fig.15 Average miss distance and percentage of maximum miss distance vs initial phase angle of barrel roll maneuver

    3.5 Analysis of the influence of decoy parameters on miss distance during barrel roll maneuver

    1) The influence of simultaneous launch quantity on miss distance

    The parameters of the decoy launch and barrel roll rate were set as shown in Fig.12 and 15.The other parameters are the same as those shown in Fig.13.The initial phase angle of the barrel roll maneuver was 0°.The suppression coefficient for one decoy was set to 2, and the suppression ratiofor the simultaneous launch quantitydecoys was 2.The variation curve of the miss distance versusgois shown in Fig.16, where=0 indicates that no decoy was launched.

    As shown in Fig.16, for the two types of guidance laws, more simultaneous launches lead to higher missile miss distances.Comparing the curves in the figure, the decoy launch generates a higher miss distance than merely implementing barrel roll; however, with the increase in quantity, the miss distance growth tendency decreases.Furthermore, because of the limited quantity of decoys carried on the aircraft and the fact that there are generally multiple missile attacks during airborne combat, the simultaneous launch quantity should not be set higher than two or three due to economic and efficacy concerns.

    Fig.16 Miss distance vstgofor different simultaneous launch quantity

    2) The influence of the period between successive launches and launch direction policy on missile miss distance

    The most practical deployment of decoys is to launch them at a certain rate[29].The group time intervals for conventional launch mode are from 0.5s to 2.1s with an interval of 0.2s, while for emergency launch mode it is set to 0.2s.The simultaneous launch quantity is 2, and the barrel roll rate is 2.5rad/s.Here, considering four policies, decoys are launched in the same directions for the first two policies, while for each of the other two policies, decoys are launched in reverse directions.The first group of decoys for the first and third policies are launched towards the outside of the circular motion, whereas for the other two policies, decoys are launched towards the inside.The remaining simulation conditions were the same as those shown in Fig.15.The launch speeds of all the decoys were the same, and the initial phase angle of the barrel roll was 0 °.The average miss distance of the missile in the emergency launch mode is shown in Table3; the influence on the miss distance under different launch policies in the conventional launch mode is shown in Fig.17.

    By comparing Table 3 and Fig.17, it can be seen that the emergency launch mode generates a higher average miss distance, which is likely to cause the target to fly out of the seeker field of view to complete the escape.

    Table 3 The average miss of missile in the emergency launch mode

    4 Conclusions

    In this study, a realistic target barrel roll maneuver model, decoy launch model, and adjoint analysis model were established for missile guidance accuracy.The influence of the target barrel roll maneuver and IR decoy on the miss distance of the IR-guided missile was studied.After the missile warning system issues an alarm signal, the target should place the missile behind the tail and implement a step maneuver with the maximum overload.When the velocity condition is reached, the target will perform the barrel roll maneuver with a roll rate of approximately 2 rad/s for TPN-guided missiles and with a roll rate of approximately 3 rad/s for APN-guided missiles.Currently, the aircraft launches decoys outside of the circular motion.The proposed simultaneous launch quantity is 2 or 3, and the period between successive launches should be less than 1s.If necessary, an emergency launch mode can be implemented for great effect.This study has significance in providing guidance on target maneuvers and decoy launches for evading IR-guided missiles.

    [1] Raghav Harini Venkatesan, Nandan Kumar Sinha.Key factors that affect the performance of flares against a heat-seeking air-to-air missile[J].:,,, 2014, 11(4): 387-401.

    [2] Giovanni Franzini,Luca Tardioli, Lorenzo Pollini, et al.Visibility augmented proportional navigation guidance[J].,,, 2018, 41(4): 983-991.

    [3] XU Yang, FANG Yangwang, WU Youli, et al.Proportional guidance intelligent regulation strategy under the infrared interference and maneuvering[J]., 2019, 41(3): 137-145.

    [4] Paul Zarchan.[M].the 6th, AIAA, 2012.

    [5] WANG Xiaohai, MENG Xiuyun, ZHOU Feng, et al.Sliding mode guidance law with impact angle constraint based on bias proportional navigation[J]., 2021, 43(5): 1295-1302.

    [6] LI Kebo, LIANG Yangang, SU Wenshan, et al.Performance of 3D TPN against true-arbitrarily maneuvering target for exoatmospheric interception[J]., 2018, 61(8): 1161-1174.

    [7] LEE Suwon, LEE Youngjun, LEE Seokwon, et al.Data-driven capturability analysis for pure proportional navigation guidance considering target maneuver[J]., 2021,22(5): 1209-1221.

    [8] LI Kebo, LIAO Xuanping, LIANG Yangang, et al.Guidance strategy with impact angle constraint based on pure proportional navigation[J]., 2020, 41(S2): 724277.

    [9] Satadal Ghosh,Debasish Ghose, Soumyendu Raha.Composite guidance for impact angle control against higher speed targets[J].,,, 2016, 39(1): 98-117.

    [10] LI Kebo, LIANG Yangang, SU Wenshan, et al.Performance of 3D TPN against true-arbitrarily maneuvering target for exoatmospheric interception[J]., 2018, 61(8): 1161-1174.

    [11] FENG Tyan.The capture region of a general 3D TPN guidance law for missile and target with limited maneuverability[C]//, 2001: 512-517.

    [12] BAI Zhihui, LI Kebo, SU Wenshan, et al.Capture region of RTPN guidance law against arbitrarily maneuvering targets[J]., 2020, 41(8): 323947.

    [13] SHI Zhenqing, LIANG Xiaolong, ZHANG Jiaqiang, et al.Modeling and simulation analysis of 3-D air-to-air missile attack zone under the condition of target maneuvers[J]., 2019, 39(3): 97-106.

    [14] Ernst-Christian Koch.Review on pyrotechnic aerial infrared decoys[J]., 2011, 26(1): 3-11.

    [15] Ilan Rusnak.Bounds on the root-mean-square miss of radar-guided missiles against sinusoidal target maneuvers[J]., 2011, 34(4): 1066-1069.

    [16] Fumiaki Imado and Sachio Uehara.High-g barrel roll maneuvers against proportional navigation from optimal control viewpoint[J]., 1988, 21(6): 876-881.

    [17] Timo Sailaranta, Ari Siltavuori, Antti Pankkonen.Simple missile models against high-g barrel roll maneuver[C]//, 2011: 01-12.

    [18] Ernst Christian Koch, Arno Hahma, Volker Weiser, et al.Metal-Fluorocarbon Pyrolants.XIII: High performance infrared decoy flare compositions based on MgB2and Mg2Si and polytetrafluoroe-thylene/viton[J]., 2010, 35: 1-7.

    [19] Srinivasan Ramaswam, David A Vaitekunas, Willem H Gunter, et al.Improvements to the ShipIR/NTCS adaptive track gate algorithm and 3D flare particle model[C]//+, 2017, 10178: 1-12.

    [20] LI Shaoyi, ZHANG Kai, YIN Jianfei, et al.Study on IR target recognition approach in aerial jamming environment based on bayesian probabilistic model[J]., 2019, 7: 50300-50316.

    [21] SHI Chen.Research on target recognition for anti-jamming towards infrared decoys[D].Chengdu: University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2020.

    [22] Martin Weiss.Adjoint method for missile performance analysis on state space models[J]., 2005, 28(2): 236-248.

    [23] Martin Weiss, Domenic Bucco.Adjoint method for hybrid guidance loop state-space models[J]., 2015, 38(4): 614-622.

    [24] Martin Weiss, Domenic Bucco.Evaluation method for dual phase guided weapons based on the adjoint method[C]//, 2007: 1-12.

    [25] LI Quancheng, FAN Yonghua, WAN Shizheng, et al.Influence of the seeker blind range guidance policy on guidance precision[C]//9(CYBER), 2019: 1120-1124.

    [26] Vitaly Shalumov, Tal Shima.Weapon–target-allocation strategies in multiagent target–missile–defender engagement[J]., 2017, 40(10): 2452-2464.

    [27] Domenic Bucco and Martin Weiss.Blind range influence on guidance loop performance: an adjoint-based analysis[C]//, 2013: 1-16.

    [28] WANG Weiqiang, JIA Xiaohong, FU Kuisheng, et al.Guidance precision analysis based on airborne IRCM stochastic process[J]., 2019, 41(2): 163-170.

    [29] Arthur Vermeulen, Gerrit Maes.Missile avoidance maneuvres with simultaneous decoy deployment[C]//, 2009: 1-17.

    [30] HUANG Hesong, TONG Zhongxiang, LI Taorui, et al.Defense strategy of aircraft confronted with IR guided missile[J]., 2017, 2017: 1-9.

    [31] Hecht C.Homing guidance using angular acceleration of the line of sight[C]//, 1991: 856-869.

    [32] Satadal Ghosh,Debasish Ghose, Soumyendu Raha.Unified time-to-go algorithms for proportional navigation class of guidance[J]., 2016, 39(6): 1188-1205.

    基于桶滾機(jī)動(dòng)和誘餌投射的紅外空空導(dǎo)彈對(duì)抗策略研究

    張 楠1,陳長(zhǎng)勝1,孫靖國(guó)1,梁雪超2

    (1.中國(guó)航空工業(yè)計(jì)算所,陜西 西安 710065;2.中國(guó)運(yùn)載火箭技術(shù)研究院,北京 100076)

    機(jī)動(dòng)規(guī)避和投射誘餌是戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)對(duì)抗紅外空對(duì)空導(dǎo)彈的有效措施。本文主要從桶滾機(jī)動(dòng)和無(wú)動(dòng)力型點(diǎn)源誘餌兩方面進(jìn)行了對(duì)抗策略研究。為了使研究更具實(shí)用性,在考慮桶滾機(jī)動(dòng)所需條件和誘餌彈受力的前提下,闡述了誘餌彈的運(yùn)動(dòng)特性、干擾過(guò)程和對(duì)導(dǎo)彈制導(dǎo)系統(tǒng)的影響機(jī)理。為使研究更具適用性,本文假設(shè)空對(duì)空導(dǎo)彈采用真比例導(dǎo)引律或增廣比例導(dǎo)引律,并且誘餌考慮在常規(guī)模式和應(yīng)急模式下投射。建立了桶滾機(jī)動(dòng)并伴有誘餌投射時(shí)對(duì)導(dǎo)彈制導(dǎo)精度影響的線性化時(shí)變模型和伴隨模型。同時(shí),通過(guò)仿真結(jié)果的分析與比較,驗(yàn)證了模型的正確性。脫靶量是表征防空導(dǎo)彈性能的一個(gè)重要參數(shù),提出了平均脫靶量和最大脫靶量占比來(lái)分析伴隨模型的仿真結(jié)果。在此基礎(chǔ)上,分析了目標(biāo)機(jī)的桶滾機(jī)動(dòng)角速率和過(guò)渡機(jī)動(dòng)方位角以及誘餌彈的齊投數(shù)量、投射間隔與投射方向策略對(duì)導(dǎo)彈脫靶量的影響規(guī)律。這將為戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)對(duì)抗紅外空對(duì)空導(dǎo)彈提供策略參考。

    伴隨法;誘餌投射;機(jī)動(dòng)規(guī)避;紅外空空導(dǎo)彈;脫靶量;比例導(dǎo)引律

    TJ765.3

    A

    1001-8891(2022)03-0231-13

    date:2021-08-02;

    date:2021-09-23.

    ZHANG Nan (1987-), Male, Xi'an Shaanxi, Master degree, Mainly engaged in the research of avionics bus network and guidance.E-mail: 550100308@qq.com.

    猜你喜歡
    空對(duì)空空空導(dǎo)彈誘餌
    險(xiǎn)惡之人
    雪花誘餌
    紅外空空導(dǎo)彈抗干擾效能評(píng)估建模
    攔截空空導(dǎo)彈成新趨勢(shì)
    杜絕認(rèn)證考核“空對(duì)空” 細(xì)則標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來(lái)規(guī)范
    2018英國(guó)海軍節(jié)航展空對(duì)空航拍照片賞析
    航空世界(2018年11期)2018-07-23 07:14:32
    開(kāi)啟“野獸模式”F-35可掛16枚導(dǎo)彈
    美國(guó)將為F—35戰(zhàn)機(jī)增加內(nèi)部武器掛載量
    一種基于Radon-Wigner變換的拖曳式誘餌辨識(shí)方法
    反腐責(zé)任不會(huì)“空對(duì)空”
    精品久久久久久久久av| 嫩草影视91久久| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美日韩黄片免| 嫩草影视91久久| 黄片wwwwww| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 日本色播在线视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 成人国产综合亚洲| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 特级一级黄色大片| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 欧美3d第一页| 国产午夜精品论理片| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产午夜精品论理片| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产一区二区三区视频了| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 十八禁网站免费在线| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 亚洲av二区三区四区| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 香蕉av资源在线| 久久精品影院6| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国内精品宾馆在线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 赤兔流量卡办理| h日本视频在线播放| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 级片在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| or卡值多少钱| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 俺也久久电影网| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 精品久久久久久久末码| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 69人妻影院| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 极品教师在线视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 日韩高清综合在线| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 如何舔出高潮| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 一区福利在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 成年免费大片在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产高潮美女av| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 九色成人免费人妻av| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品色激情综合| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 成人国产综合亚洲| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产色婷婷99| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 欧美3d第一页| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 97超视频在线观看视频| 88av欧美| 色综合婷婷激情| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 有码 亚洲区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 亚洲四区av| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 一夜夜www| 久久亚洲真实| 国产精华一区二区三区| bbb黄色大片| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美性感艳星| 久99久视频精品免费| 美女高潮的动态| 一本一本综合久久| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 禁无遮挡网站| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 88av欧美| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产三级中文精品| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| av视频在线观看入口| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 午夜福利高清视频| 午夜a级毛片| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| av专区在线播放| 22中文网久久字幕| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 免费看日本二区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 日本熟妇午夜| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 久久久精品大字幕| 久久精品91蜜桃| 热99在线观看视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| netflix在线观看网站| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日本黄大片高清| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 嫩草影视91久久| 综合色av麻豆| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | av专区在线播放| avwww免费| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产老妇女一区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产三级中文精品| 熟女电影av网| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 色综合婷婷激情| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产av在哪里看| 黄片wwwwww| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 色在线成人网| 久久中文看片网| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 不卡一级毛片| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人av| 成年免费大片在线观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产免费男女视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚州av有码| 三级毛片av免费| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 成年免费大片在线观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 深夜精品福利| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 久久人妻av系列| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 99热网站在线观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 一级黄片播放器| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产色婷婷99| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 免费看av在线观看网站| 小说图片视频综合网站| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 成人二区视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 简卡轻食公司| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产成人影院久久av| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 成年版毛片免费区| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 91在线观看av| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲最大成人av| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 欧美黑人巨大hd| 色播亚洲综合网| 色av中文字幕| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 一夜夜www| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 免费大片18禁| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久精品影院6| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 免费av观看视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 不卡一级毛片| 美女黄网站色视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久人妻av系列| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | av在线亚洲专区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 22中文网久久字幕| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 特级一级黄色大片| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日本黄大片高清| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 色哟哟·www| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 久久久久久久久久成人| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 长腿黑丝高跟| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产一区二区三区视频了| ponron亚洲| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日本色播在线视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 一级黄片播放器| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 我要搜黄色片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 久久精品影院6| 成人欧美大片| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 一本精品99久久精品77| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 久久精品影院6| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 在线播放国产精品三级| www.色视频.com| 欧美3d第一页| 丰满的人妻完整版| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 欧美3d第一页| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 黄色女人牲交| 午夜免费激情av| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲avbb在线观看| av福利片在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 99热只有精品国产| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产不卡一卡二| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 天堂动漫精品| 一级av片app| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 内地一区二区视频在线| 91久久精品电影网| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 欧美性感艳星| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| a级毛片a级免费在线| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 一区福利在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 看免费成人av毛片| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 日本三级黄在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲四区av| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久久久国内视频| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲第一电影网av| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 长腿黑丝高跟| 如何舔出高潮| 两个人的视频大全免费| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 黄色一级大片看看| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 一区二区三区激情视频| 简卡轻食公司| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 高清在线国产一区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 综合色av麻豆| 久久久国产成人精品二区| eeuss影院久久| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 午夜老司机福利剧场|