• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Radar-based Characteristics and Formation Environment of Supercells in the Landfalling Typhoon Mujigae in 2015※

    2022-04-02 05:52:04LanqiangBAIZhiyongMENGRuilinZHOUGuixingCHENNaigengWUandWaiKinWONG
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年5期

    Lanqiang BAI, Zhiyong MENG, Ruilin ZHOU, Guixing CHEN, Naigeng WU, and Wai-Kin WONG

    1School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, and Key Laboratory of Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean System,Ministry of Education, and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China

    2Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

    3Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Guangzhou 510640, China

    4Hong Kong Observatory, Hong Kong 999077, China

    ABSTRACT This study presents the radar-based characteristics and formation environment of supercells spawned by the tornadic landfalling Typhoon Mujigae (2015) in October 2015.More than 100 supercells were identified within a 24-hour period around the time of the typhoon’s landfall, of which three were tornadic with a rotational intensity clearly stronger than those of non-tornadic supercells.The identified supercells were concentrated within a relatively small area in the northeast quadrant beyond 140 km from the typhoon center.These supercells were found more likely to form over flat topography and were difficult to maintain in mountainous regions.During the study period, more supercells formed offshore than onshore.The mesocyclones of the identified supercells were characterized by a small diameter generally less than 5 km and a shallow depth generally less than 4 km above ground level.An environmental analysis revealed that the northeast quadrant had the most favorable conditions for the genesis of supercell in this typhoon case.The nondimensional supercell composite parameter (SCP) and entraining-SCP (E-SCP) were effective in separating supercell from non-supercell environment.Even though the atmosphere in the typhoon’s northeast quadrant was characterized by an E-SCP/SCP value supportive of supercell organization, orography was an impeditive factor for the supercell development.These findings support the use of traditional parameters obtained from midlatitude supercells to assess the supercell potential in a tropical cyclone envelope.

    Key words: supercell, tropical cyclone, atmospheric environment, radar meteorology

    1.Introduction

    Landfalling tropical cyclones (TCs) have long been known to spawn tornadoes (hereinafter referred to as TC tor-nadoes) in coastal regions which are typically highly populated (e.g., Novlan and Gray, 1974; McCaul, 1991; Verbout et al., 2007; Edwards, 2012; Bai et al., 2020).These tornadoes contribute to a noticeable proportion of the overall fatalities and property damage attributable to their parent TCs (Novlan and Gray, 1974; Rappaport, 2000).Edwards et al.(2012) documented that at least 79% of storms responsible for TC tornadoes are supercells, which are defined as convective storms that consist primarily of a single, quasisteady rotating updraft, namely, a mesocyclone (e.g.,Doswell and Burgess, 1993; Markowski and Richardson,2010).A tornado-producing TC often produces more than one tornado.The top three TC tornado producers in the United States even spawned more than 100 tornadoes each(Edwards, 2012).Given the prolificacy of TC tornadoes, a large number of supercells may exist within a tornadic TC.In addition to spawning tornadoes, these supercells also have a high propensity for producing other severe weather events, such as heavy rainfall and damaging winds.Improved understanding of the general features of TC supercells may help to implement and enhance the monitoring, forecasting and warning of convective disasters associated with landfalling TCs.

    Prior studies have documented that TC supercells generally exhibit a smaller diameter and a lower echo top than their midlatitude counterparts; thus, they have been named“miniature supercells” or “mini-supercells” (Spratt et al.,1997; Suzuki et al., 2000; McCaul et al., 2004).The measurable radar-echo tops of TC supercells are typically lower than 10 km (e.g., McCaul, 1987; Suzuki et al., 2000).This low-top feature mainly results from the high-shear and lowbuoyancy environment within the TC (McCaul and Weisman, 1996).Mesocyclones in TC supercells are typically shallow and have a relatively small diameter usually less than 5 km (e.g., Spratt et al., 1997; Suzuki et al., 2000; McCaul et al., 2004; Baker et al., 2009; Bai et al., 2017).Because of the relatively small size, the rotational features are often too subtle to be observed by operational weather radars.Consequently, some parameter thresholds for operationally detecting mesocyclones in midlatitudes may need to be adjusted in a TC environment.

    Our current understanding of the spatial distribution and radar features of TC supercells mainly originates from tornadic cases (e.g., Spratt et al., 1997; McCaul et al., 2004;Baker et al., 2009; Edwards et al., 2012) or limited cases(either tornadic or non-tornadic) in a small area within a TC envelope (e.g., Suzuki et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2008; Eastin and Link, 2009; Green et al., 2011).Considering the facts that TC tornadoes primarily occur in the northeast (Earth-relative) or right-front (TC motion-relative) quadrants of the TC center and that nearly 79% of these tornadoes are supercellular (Hill et al., 1966; Gentry, 1983; McCaul, 1991; Edwards et al., 2012), supercells in a specific TC may also be concentrated in these regions.Using two coastal WSR-88Ds whose unambiguous range was 174 km, Lee et al.(2008) identified 23 supercells located in the northeast quadrant of Hurricane Katrina (2005).Nearly 83% of these supercells were located over the Gulf of Mexico, providing additional evidence that TC supercells often form offshore in addition to onshore (e.g., Spratt et al., 1997; Rao et al., 2005; Lee et al.,2008; Eastin and Link, 2009).In a zone of approximately 350 km×350 km, Suzuki et al.(2000) identified nine supercells within a typhoon in Japan.Three of the nine supercells produced tornadoes.To the authors’ knowledge, the previous study domain for TC supercells typically covers a relatively small area compared to the TC circulation, which typically has a radius of O (103km).Whether this ratio is common in tornadic TCs remains unclear.In addition to giving a holistic picture of supercell feature in the entire landfalling TC envelope, statistics of supercells in a large spatial coverage within a TC will provide an opportunity to illustrate the features that discriminate between the supercell and non-supercell TC environment.

    Based on a dense radar network in South China, the present study aims to identify supercells within a large spatial region within the landfalling Typhoon Mujigae (2015)that spawned three tornadoes.In contrast to other tornadic TCs that often spawn dozens of tornadoes, Typhoon Mujigae (2015) produced relatively few tornadoes.By identifying supercells over a large spatial region, we can investigate the holistic picture of supercells (both tornadic or non-tornadic) in the TC circulation, including the overall prevalence and distribution of supercells, the basic radar characteristics of these supercells, the ratio between tornadic and non-tornadic supercells and identifying atmospheric features that discriminate between the supercell and non-supercell environment, and the feasibility of the environmental parameters for assessing midlatitude supercell potential in this TC case.

    The rest of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 describes the data and methods used in this study.The spatiotemporal distribution of the supercells and their associated basic characteristics are presented in section 3.The formation environment of these supercells is discussed in section 4.Section 5 summarizes the manuscript.

    2.Data and Methods

    Along the steering flow of the western Pacific subtropical high, Typhoon Mujigae (2015) advanced toward the northwest and made landfall on the coast of South China at 1400 local standard time (LST; LST = UTC + 8) 4 October 2015 (Fig.1).According to the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale, it was a Category 3 TC with the 1-min maximum sustained surface winds of approximately 52 m s?1and the minimum central sea level pressure of 935 hPa.There were three reported tornadoes that were separately spawned by three supercells in the northeast quadrant with respect to the TC center 3 h before (Shanwei tornado), 1.5 h(Foshan tornado; Bai et al., 2017) and 2.7 h (Guangzhou tornado) after the TC’s landfall, respectively (refer to the triangles in Figs.2a, b).

    The ground-based Doppler weather radars in South China were used to identify the supercells within the TC envelope (Fig.2a).The China Meteorological Administration has deployed many Doppler weather radars throughout the coastal region in China over the last two decades (Bai et al., 2020).These operational radars conform to the standards of the Weather Surveillance Radar?1988 Doppler radars (WSR-88Ds) in the United States in terms of both hardware and software (Yu et al., 2006).During this event, they operated in the volume coverage pattern 21 (VCP21) and scanned nine elevation angles of approximately 0.5°, 1.5°,2.4°, 3.4°, 4.3°, 6°, 9.9°, 14.6°, and 19.5° with a volumetric update time of approximately 6 min.The radar data were sampled approximately every 1° in azimuth with a range resolution of 1 km (250 m) for the reflectivity (radial velocity).The maximum unambiguous ranges for the reflectivity and radial velocity were 460 and 230 km, respectively.

    The focus study period extends from 0800 LST 4 October (6 h before TC landfall) to 0800 LST 5 October 2015(18 h after TC landfall) (refer to the TC track with shaded dots in Fig.2a).This 24-hour period was chosen because the TC underwent a sea-land transition and a large portion of TC rainbands were well covered by the detection ranges of the coastal Doppler radars.During the study period, the data coverage of the volume scans for all radars was 96.8%.Considering the possible inaccuracy in the rotational velocity estimation at a long radar range, we set a radar range of 145 km as an upper limit for the analysis (refer to the circles in Fig.2a).

    Fig.1.Geopotential heights (shaded) and horizontal winds at 500 hPa plotted using the ERA5 reanalysis at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The half barbs, full barbs, and pennants denote 2, 4, and 20 m s?1, respectively.The TC track (blue line) is plotted every 6 h (dots).The red star symbol denotes the location of the TC center at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The subtropical high is labeled as “H”.

    A supercell was determined when a well-defined mesocyclone was identified from radar data.The Gibson-Ridge Analyst version 2 (GR2Analyst 2.0) radar-viewing software was used to de-alias the raw radial velocities, after which the mesocyclones were identified manually.It is known that mesocyclones in a TC envelope typically display smaller sizes, shallower depths and weaker strengths than their midlatitude counterparts.The following criteria,which are partly adapted from those provided by Stumpf et al.(1998) and Richter et al.(2017), were used to identify a mesocyclone: 1) it was located within a convective storm(maximum radar reflectivity ≥40 dBZ); 2) a two-dimensional couplet of the storm-relativea“Storm-relative” was used to refer to a convective cell rather than a TC.The storm-relative radial velocity of a convective cell was computed by the GR2Analyst software.This storm-relative product requires a storm-motion vector which was estimated by tracking the centroid of velocity couplet signature of a given convective cell.inbound (VSRVin) and outbound (VSRVout) radial velocity maxima was detected with a separation distance (e.g., core diameter of mesocyclone) of 1.5?10 km; 3) the couplet of the storm-relative velocity maxima had a cyclonic shear signaturebConsidering that mesocyclones in the Northern Hemisphere typify a cyclonic rotation, the cyclonic shear signature on the Doppler velocity products was used to identify mesocyclones in this study.; 4) the rotational velocity [VR= (|VSRVin| + |VSRVout|)/2] was at least 10 m s?1; and 5) such a cyclonic shear signature was thoroughly recognized in at least two adjacent elevation angles within a volume scan and in at least two successive volume scans (i.e., within at least 12 min).The aforementioned Doppler velocity pattern of a mesocyclone in a storm-relative reference frame at a certain elevation angle was defined as a mesocyclone signature.The VRthreshold of 10 m s?1was used by referring to McCaul et al.(2004), in which the characteristic VRof the documented mini-supercell mesocyclones were in the 10?15 m s?1range.It is worth noting that such a VRthreshold was only used to locate the velocity couplet signature, whereas a mesocyclone was ultimately determined if the maximum rotational shear vorticitycRotational shear vorticity is defined using twice rotational velocity divided by half the core diameter (McCaul et al., 2004).of the couplet signature was at least 0.01 s?1(McCaul et al., 2004).Figures 2c and d present an example of an identified supercell based on these criteria.If a continuously developed cyclonic shear signature did not meet the above conditions in one volume scan while it was confirmed as a mesocyclone before and after this volume scan, then the shear signature in the entire set of volume scans (including this null volume scan) was regarded as one single mesocyclone.

    3.Basic characteristics of the identified TC supercells

    3.1.Spatial distribution of TC supercells

    Fig.2.(a) Selected Doppler weather radars (black crosses) in South China with the gray circles indicating the 145-km ranges of radial velocity observations.The curves in different colors denote the tracks of the 113 identified supercells.The TC track (gray line) is plotted every 6 h with the red dot indicating the time of 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The gray shaded dots indicate the TC locations during the study period.(b) Composite radar reflectivity (dBZ)at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.In both panels, the triangles (from west to east) represent the locations of the Foshan,Guangzhou and Shanwei tornadoes, respectively.The radar deployed at sea is highlighted by the red cross.(c)Storm-relative radial velocities (SRV, m s?1) and (d) reflectivity (dBZ) at the 2.4°elevation angle of the Guangzhou radar at 1543 LST 4 October 2015.

    A total of 113 supercells/mesocyclones were identified in the envelope of Typhoon Mujigae (2015) during the 24-hour period.They were primarily embedded in the outer rainbands.Only three of these supercells were tornadic, suggesting a substantial potential for false alarms.By way of comparison, approximately 26% of the Great Plains supercells produce tornadoes in the United States (Trapp et al., 2005).The identified supercells were not distributed throughout the entire study area.The highest concentration of the supercells occurred in the northeast quadrant with respect to the TC center (Fig.3a).No supercell was detected in the northwest or southwest quadrants.Although rare radar observation exhibits at sea in the southeast quadrant, there were also a fair number of convective cells sampled by an operational radar (the red cross in Fig.2b) deployed on an island.All of the convective cells detected by this radar were non-supercellular.

    More than 90% of the supercells formed in an Earth-relative azimuthal sector between ?10° and 30° (due east is regarded as 0°) with respect to the TC center with a median of 16° (Fig.3a).In the TC motion-relative coordinatedThe TC motion at the supercell time was estimated by linearly interpolating the Japan Meteorological Agency best-track data of TC., only 9 of the 113 supercells formed in the right-front quadrant of the TC (Fig.3b).Previous studies have suggested that the convective asymmetry is closely associated with ambient deeptropospheric vertical wind shear (VWS), with the 850?200-hPa layer VWS being particularly relevant to deep convection in a TC envelope (Schenkel et al., 2020; and references therein).Schenkel et al.(2020) demonstrated a clear dependence of the spatial distribution of TC tornadoes on the strength of 850?200-hPa VWS and tornadoes tend to be concentrated over the downshear half of the parent TC.In the present study, the spatial distribution of supercells in the shear-relative framework was also investigated.The area-averaged 850?200-hPa VWS was obtained within a 500-km radius from the TC center.Before the computation, the rotational and divergent wind components associated with the TC were removed by applying a vortex removal technique described in Kurihara et al.(1990, 1993).The computed magnitude of the VWS vector (u = 6.5 m s?1, v = ?1.0 m s?1)was 6.6 m s?1(weak shear category in Schenkel et al., 2020)at the time of TC’s landfall.In the shear-relative coordinates, most supercells become localized to the downshear left region with respect to the TC center (Fig.3c), which is consistent with the spatial pattern of tornadoes observed in weak-shear TC environment (Schenkel et al., 2020).

    The tracks of the supercells/mesocyclones were primarily located in the coastal regions with flat underlying surfaces (Fig.4).Supercells were repeatedly produced in relatively small areas within a period of several hours (refer to the colors in Fig.4).The distances of their formation locations from the TC center ranged from 140 to 750 km with a median of 453 km.There is a tendency for the identified mesocyclones to be unable to cross mountain barriers.For instance, the mesocyclones that formed over coastal waters abruptly vanished as they approached Lianhua Mountain(denoted by the magenta arrow in Fig.4).Previous numerical studies have suggested that mesocyclones may be enhanced as their parent supercells descend a mountain due to the preexisting vertical vorticity anomaly (if any) in the lee (e.g., Markowski and Dotzek, 2011).In the present case,it seems that it was difficult for TC supercells to develop over complex terrains, which is likely due to the fact that they are typically shallow.

    3.2.Diameters and heights of mesocyclones

    Diameters and heights of the identified 113 mesocyclones were discussed by examining the mesocyclone signatures in all volume scans.A total of 1017 volume scans were taken of these mesocyclones.In a volume scan, the maximum core diameters of mesocyclone signature primarily ranged from approximately 2 to 5 km, with a median of 3.4 km (Fig.5a).To obtain the mesocyclone height at a relatively high vertical resolution, only the supercells that were located within a radar range of 50 km during their entire lifespans were examined.The height of the 0.5° radar beam was approximately 590 m above radar level at the 50-km range point.If a supercell was too close to a radar site, the mesocyclone height might be higher than the highest radar beam.In this instance, the neighboring radars were used to confirm the uppermost level of the mesocyclone.A total of 38 supercells met these criteria, including 300 volume scans taken of the mesocyclones.Figure 5b shows that 75% of these volume scans have a mesocyclone top height lower than 3.2 km above ground level (AGL) with a median value of 2.6 km AGL.The median vertical extent (i.e., distance between mesocyclone base and top heights) of these mesocyclones in all volume scans is 2.0 km (Fig.5c).Characterized by the mesocyclones that were generally low topped, these supercells could be reasonably regarded as miniature supercells.In numerical modeling products, the detection of midlatitude supercells usually employs the updraft helicity (UH), a good metric to identify rotating updrafts (i.e., mesocyclones) by integrating the vertical component of helicity over a layer from 2 km to 5 km AGL (Kain et al., 2008).In the present statistics, the mesocyclones from the 300 volume scans have a median base height of 525 m AGL and 90% of them have a top height lower than 4 km AGL (Fig.5b).The UH metric for identifying simulated supercells in TC circulations may need an adjustment of integration layer (such as 1?4 km AGL) to be adapted to the shallow nature of minisupercells.

    Fig.5.Box-and-whisker plots of the mesocyclone characteristics.The sample sizes are indicated in the bottom-left corner of each panel.(a) Maximum core diameters and (e)maximum rotational velocities of mesocyclone signatures in a volume scan for all the 1017 volume scans taken of the 113 mesocyclones/supercells.(b) Top heights and (c) vertical extents of the mesocyclones from the 300 volume scans taken of the supercells that were located within a radar range of 50 km during their entire lifespans.(d) Maximum rotational shear vorticities during the (f) lifespans of the identified 113 supercells.The lifespans of the supercells that formed (g) onshore and (h) offshore are also shown.In the box-and-whisker diagrams, the percentile extents and corresponding values represent the 25th?75th percentiles for the boxes, the 10th?90th percentiles for the whiskers, and the 50th percentile for the lines in the boxes.The crosses indicate the values higher (lower) than the 90th (10th) percentile.In(e), the peak intensities of the mesocyclones which produced Foshan (FS), Shanwei (SW) and Guangzhou (GZ) tornadoes are labeled.

    3.3.Formation time, lifetimes and intensities of TC supercells

    During the study period, the occurrences of supercells could be identified throughout the day, although the occurrences were more frequent during daylight hours (Figs.6a?c).Approximately 51% of all the supercells occurred during 0800?1500 LST, while only 27% of the overall supercells occurred at night (1900?0700 LST).Note that the diurnal variation in TC supercell occurrence may be associated with the exact time at which a TC makes landfall.Statistics from additional TC cases, especially those making landfall at night, are necessary to examine the diurnal cycle of TC supercells.The lifespans of the identified supercells were generally shorter than their midlatitude counterparts.Nearly 70% of the supercells had a lifespan of no longer than 60 min (Fig.6d), which is appreciably shorter than those (1?4 h) of typical midlatitude supercells (Markowski and Richardson, 2010).The median lifespan of all identified supercells was 48 min (Fig.5f).

    Figure 7a presents the time series of the maximum rotational velocities in each volume scan of the 113 mesocyclones against the time elapsed since their formations.The maximum rotational velocities from the 1017 volume scans were generally less than 20 m s?1, with a median strength of 12.3 m s?1(Fig.5e) and a corresponding median altitude of 1.4 km AGL.Although the magnitude of rotational velocity is relatively small as compared to that of midlatitude mesocyclones, the maximum rotational shear vorticities of these mesocyclones from 90% of the volume scans exceeded 0.009 s?1(Fig.7b) primarily due to their relatively small diameters.For the 113 supercells, the maximum rotational shear vorticities during their lifespans mainly ranged from 0.016 s?1to 0.031 s?1(25th?75th percentiles; Fig.5d).The maximum intensities of the three tornadic mesocyclones were found to be distinctly stronger than those of the non-tornadic mesocyclones (Fig.7a).It is worth noting that the intensity of a mesocyclone may be overestimated when a tornado exists, especially when the tornado vortex is located near one of the radial velocity maxima of the mesocyclone signature on radar displays (e.g., Figs.7c, d).From the evolution of mesocyclone intensities as shown in Fig.7a, quite a few number of mesocyclones (without tornadoes being observed) rapidly intensified with a rotational velocity greater than that of the three tornadic mesocyclones at tornado formation time,suggesting a substantial potential for false alarms of tornadoes within a TC envelope.

    Fig.6.Frequencies of the formation times (left) and lifespans (right) for: (a), (d) all identified mesocyclones (b), (e) onshore mesocyclones and (c), (f) offshore mesocyclones.

    During the 24-hour study period, the supercells that formed offshore were more prevalent than those that formed onshore even though the study period covers 18 h after but only 6 h before the TC’s landfall.Note that nearly all supercells that formed on land had been identified, while the number of offshore supercells were likely underestimated due to the limited radar coverage over the sea.Despite the possible underestimation in the offshore counts, a total of 76 offshore supercells were identified, which is about twice the number of onshore supercells.Statistically, the mesocyclones of onshore supercells were found to be slightly stronger than those of offshore supercells (at the 95% confidence level).The median values of the rotational velocities of the onshore and offshore mesocyclones were 12.6 and 12.2 m s?1, respectively.Nevertheless, the onshore supercells were more short-lived (at the 95% confidence level) (Figs.5g, h, and 6e, f).The median lifespans of the onshore and offshore supercells were 30 and 54 min, respectively.The shorter duration of the onshore supercells may be partly due to the orographic barriers and the decrease of instability on land.Additionally, there was no difference (at the 95% confidence level) in the top heights and diameters of the mesocyclones between offshore and onshore in this TC case.

    Fig.7.(a) Time series of the maximum rotational velocities (m s?1) in a volume scan for the identified 113 mesocyclones/supercells against the time elapsed since their formations.The dots denote the formation time of the Foshan (red), Guangzhou (magenta) and Shanwei (blue) tornadoes, respectively.(b) Same as Fig.5d, but for the maximum rotational shear vorticities of mesocyclone signatures in a volume scan for all the 1017 volume scans taken of the 113 mesocyclones/supercells.(c) Storm-relative radial velocities (m s?1) and (d) reflectivity (dBZ) from the 0.5° elevation angle of the Guangzhou radar at 1536 LST 4 October 2015.The dashed and solid circles represent the approximate locations of the mesocyclone and the Foshan tornado, respectively.

    4.Formation environment of TC supercells

    Prior studies have shed light on the atmospheric conditions that are favorable for supercell formation in midlatitudes, such as large vertical wind shear in the lower and middle troposphere (Weisman and Klemp, 1982, 1984),large storm-relative helicity (SRH) (Davies-Jones, 1984;Thompson et al., 2003), large instability, and large supercell composite parameter (SCP; Thompson et al., 2002,2003).McCaul (1991) documented that the vertical wind shear and helicity parameter spatially collocated well with the reported TC tornadoes, while the convective available potential energy (CAPE) shows a weak correlation with tornado activities.Recent published papers suggest that the entraining CAPE (E-CAPE) which considers the entrainment effects, is highly collocated with the locations of TC tornadoes (Sueki and Niino, 2016; Bai et al., 2020).In this section, we present a diagnosis of the supercell formation environment in Typhoon Mujigae (2015) by examining the following parameters: 0?6-km shear, 0?1-km SRH, CAPE, ECAPE and SCP.

    A convection-permitting simulation by the Advanced Research core of the Weather Research and Forecasting(WRF-ARW) model (Skamarock et al., 2008), version 3.7.1, was conducted to obtain the three-dimensional atmospheric conditions with high resolution relative to the global reanalysis data.The simulation was initiated at 0800 LST 4 October 2015 using the NCEP final analysis fields as the initial and boundary conditions.Two domains were configured in two-way nesting with the horizontal grid spacings of 13.5 km and 4.5 km, respectively (Fig.8a).The main physical parameterization schemes include the WRF single moment six-class (WSM6) microphysics (Hong et al., 2004), Kain?Fritsch cumulus scheme (Kain and Fritsch,1990,1993; for domain 1 only), the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTM) for longwave and shortwave radiations(Chou and Suarez, 1994), and the Yonsei State University(YSU) PBL schemes (Noh et al., 2003).The TC track and rainbands were reproduced reasonably well in the model domain 2 (refer to the composite simulated reflectivity in Fig.8b).Although the horizontal grid spacing of 4.5 km is not fine enough to explicitly resolve a mini-supercell, additional idealized large-eddy simulations with a grid spacing of 100 m driven by the WRF soundings can successfully simulate mini-supercells in the observed mini-supercell region(not shown).The subsequent analysis on the large-to-mesoscale atmospheric conditions was based on the simulated results from this domain at 1400 LST 4 October 2015 when Typhoon Mujigae (2015) was making landfall.

    4.1.Kinematic parameters

    The magnitude of vertical wind shear has long been known to influence storm organization (Markowski and Richardson, 2010).Strong 0?6 km wind shear (greater than 20 m s?1) is often operationally used to assess the supercell potential (e.g., Rasmussen and Blanchard, 1998; Thompson et al., 2003).The 0?6-km wind shear was quantified in this study by the magnitude of 0?6-km bulk wind difference(BWD; Markowski and Richardson, 2010).Figure 9a shows that large 0?6 km wind shear mainly appears in the northern part of the TC circulation on land and in the offshore region of Guangdong Province.Notably strong wind shear(greater than 25 m s?1) is located to the north and northeast of the TC center.Although the wind shear is relatively low(10?20 m s?1) in the offshore areas where supercells were observed (refer to the blue dashed contour in Fig.9a), the initiated storms in that region were moving into a stronger-shear environment.The increasing tendency of the shear magnitude may indicate that the relatively isolated convection has a high probability to become a supercell storm under such an atmospheric condition.Close to the coastlines, the wind shear already reaches roughly 15?20 m s?1.Such magnitudes are demonstrated to be necessary to support supercells by both numerical and observational studies (e.g., Weisman and Klemp, 1982; Markowski et al., 1998; Bunkers,2002).

    Fig.8.(a) Model domain configuration.(b) Composite simulated reflectivity (dBZ) from the WRF domain 2 at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The triangles represent the tornado locations as described in Fig.1.

    Previous studies demonstrated good agreement between the spatial distributions of TC tornadoes and large SRH values (e.g., McCaul, 1991; Sueki and Niino, 2016;Bai et al., 2020), which may imply that the spatial distribution of TC supercells also correlates with large SRH values.A large SRH value is indicative of a high potential of the low-level horizontal vorticity to produce cyclonic updraft rotations of supercells through tilting in the Northern Hemisphere (Davies-Jones, 1984).The SRH obtained from ground to a given height (h) was calculated in this work by integrating the storm-relative streamwise vorticity (Davies-Jones, 1984):

    Fig.9.The (a) 0?6-km bulk wind difference (BWD; proxy of shear), (b) 0?1-km storm relative helicity (SRH), (c)MUCAPE and (d) entraining-CAPE (E-CAPE) with an entrainment rate of 40% km?1, (e) supercell composite parameter (SCP), and (f) entraining supercell composite parameter (E-SCP).All parameters were calculated from the WRF domain 2 at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The vectors are simulated 10-m horizontal winds.The red star represents the observed TC center.The general areas of the observed TC supercells are contoured by the dashed blue lines.The triangles represent the tornado locations as described in Fig.1.In (e) and (f), the terrain heights of above 250 m are hatched with the black lines.

    where VH,Cand k represent the horizontal wind, storm motion and the unit vector in the vertical direction, respectively.The storm motion was estimated following the methods suggested by Bunkers et al.(2000) for right-moving supercells.Figure 9b shows that the 0?1-km SRH exhibits analogous spatial patterns to the 0?6-km wind shear.The observed TC supercells formed in an environment with increasing 0?1-km SRH values from 100 to 400 m2s?2.Such enhanced 0?1-km SRH values indicate that significant streamwise vorticity is available in that region for tilting into the vertical, increasing the risk of supercell occurrences.It is worth noting that TC supercells did not appear in the areas characterized by super high SRH and vertical wind shear values (refer to the west of the blue contours in Figs.9a, b).These results imply that there should be other factors affecting the supercell formation.

    4.2.Thermodynamic parameters

    In contrast with the aforementioned kinematic environment, the thermodynamic conditions at sea are more favorable for convective activities.The CAPE was calculated by integrating the buoyancy of a lifted air parcel between the level of free convection (LFC) and the equilibrium level(EL):

    It has been long known that the spatial pattern of CAPE is not well collocated with that of TC tornadoes (e.g.,McCaul, 1991; Bai et al., 2020).Instead, by considering the effect of the entrainment of ambient air, E-CAPE has a better correlation with TC tornado locations (Sueki and Niino,2016).E-CAPE was computed by updating the air parcel temperature considering the entrainment effect following the Lagrangian parcel model (Romps and Kuang, 2010; Sueki and Niino, 2016).The constant mass entrainment rate of 40%km?1(Bai et al., 2020) was assumed for an ascending air parcel at a speed of 1 m s?1(Molinari et al., 2012).The initial parcel for computing E-CAPE was obtained from the most unstable layer.

    Fig.10.(a) Albedo in channel 1 and (b) brightness temperature in channel 8 (water vapor channel) from the Himawari-8 satellite at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The red cross denotes a radar site in the South China Sea with the circle depicting a range of 145 km.

    Figure 9d shows that high-value area of E-CAPE is more concentrated along TC rainbands while a large fraction of high-value area of MUCAPE is characterized by fairly small E-CAPE (Figs.9c, d).This phenomenon is a result of entrainment effects in the mid-troposphere.From the moisture-channel imagery of the satellite Himawari-8,clearly dry air at ~400 hPa was found over the sea in the southeast quadrant where relatively high MUCAPE was located (Fig.10).A drier mid-troposphere leads to the fact that the lifted air parcel entrains more unsaturated air and thus the amount of latent heat released per unit mass in the parcel decreases more, which causes the parcel to have lower equivalent potential temperature and thus smaller E-CAPE.From Fig.9d, it is clear that the observed supercell region features fairly large E-CAPE values (roughly >120 J kg?1).Similar to the tornado situation, the E-CAPE seems to be more helpful in assessing the potential area for deep convective storms in TC’s interior than the widely used CAPE.Along the spiral rainband closer to the TC center (rainband 1 in Fig.9d), the E-CAPE values are particularly large although no supercells were observed, which is likely due to the marginal vertical wind shear and SRH values in that region.This result suggests that a good match between kinematic and thermodynamic features is important for the supercell formation, and this good match happens to be in the northeast quadrant.This point was further confirmed by the analysis of the supercell composite parameter.

    4.3.Supercell Composite Parameter

    Supercell composite parameter (SCP) is a nondimensional parameter that involves both kinematic and thermodynamic conditions.It combines the MUCAPE, 0?3-km SRH(SRH0?3km) and bulk Richardson number (BRN) shear (Shear-BRN, Thompson et al., 2003):

    here, ShearBRNis the denominator of the bulk Richardson number equation and is defined as one half of the square of the BWD between the density-weighted mean winds at 0?6 km and 0?500 m (Carter et al., 2012).The SCP has been demonstrated to be effective in separating midlatitude supercell from non-supercell storm environment (Thompson et al., 2003).An SCP value greater than 1 is commonly indicative of a supercell storm environment (Thompson et al.,2003).Figure 9e shows that the northeast quadrant has larger SCP values than other quadrants with the supercell areas characterized by SCP values generally greater than 5, suggesting an atmosphere that strongly favors supercells.Around the zone of the observed TC tornadoes (triangles in Fig.9e),the SCP values exceed 10.

    We additionally examined the E-SCP which has recently been demonstrated to be better correlated with tornado locations than SCP (Tochimoto et al., 2019).The ESCP was calculated by substituting the MUCAPE by the ECAPE:

    Slightly different from the E-SCP calculation in Tochimoto et al.(2019), we normalized the E-CAPE by 100 J kg?1rather than by 1000 J kg?1, considering the fact that the E-CAPE is roughly an order .of magnitude smaller than the traditional CAPE due to the entrainment effect(Figs.9c, d; Sueki and Niino, 2016).Figure 9f shows that the E-SCP shares a similar spatial pattern to that of the SCP.Remarkably high E-SCP/SCP values are located on the relatively flat land in the northwest quadrant with no supercells being observed (Figs.9e, f).The super high shear (Fig.9a)and SRH (Fig.9b) are demonstrated to be responsible for the high E-SCP/SCP there.An area featuring super high shear but low instability (Figs.9c, d) would be detrimental to convection, since there the convective towers tend to get ripped apart from their roots and thus sheared off from the sustained updrafts (e.g., Weisman and Klemp, 1982).Additionally, one may have noticed that there is also a substantial area featuring fairly large E-SCP/SCP over the mountain regions (Figs.9e, f).As discussed in section 3.1, it was difficult for the identified supercells to survive when they encountered orography.After excluding these values located over the mountains, the rest of the large E-SCP/SCP region is in quite good agreement with the locations of the observed TC supercells (refer to the blue contours in Figs.9e, f).Although the above environmental analyses were performed at the time of TC’s landfall, additional analyses at other times present similar results (e.g., Fig.11).The northeast and northwest quadrants of Typhoon Mujigae (2015)are always characterized by remarkably large shear and SRH (Figs.11a?d) while the instability is primarily located near the coasts and over the ocean (Figs.11e, f), leading to the large-value SCP being concentrated in coastal regions in the TC’s northeast quadrant (Figs.11g, h).These results lend support to the confidence of using the E-SCP/SCP to distinguish a supercell environment in a TC envelope.

    5.Summary

    This study presents an analysis of the radar-based characteristics and formation environment of the identifiable supercells (both onshore and offshore) embedded in the landfalling Typhoon Mujigae (2015) based on Doppler weather radars and numerical simulations.During a 24-hour study period (from 6 h before to 18 h after TC’s landfall), a total of 113 supercells were identified with only 3 of them being tornadic.The tornadic mesocyclones were found to be distinctly stronger than the non-tornadic ones.The identified supercells could form at any time of day and had a median lifespan of 48 min.Their mesocyclones were characterized by a diameter of generally less than 5 km and a depth of less than 4 km.

    Figure 12 shows an idealized illustration of the convective regions in Typhoon Mujigae (2015).Supercells mainly formed in the northeast quadrant rather than the right-front quadrant with respect to the TC motion.More than 90% of the supercells were located in the azimuthal sector between?10° and 30° (due east is regarded as 0°) with respect to the TC center.These supercells were primarily observed over flat underlying surfaces and tended to dissipate when approaching mountain barriers.No supercell was detected in the northwest or southwest quadrants.In the shear-relative coordinates, most supercells were localized to the downshear left region, which is in agreement with the spatial pattern of the tornadoes in a weak sheared-TC environment(Schenkel et al., 2020).The number of onshore supercells was nearly one-half that of offshore supercells, providing strong evidence that offshore supercells could be more prevalent than onshore supercells in a TC circulation.It is worth noting that we do not try to generalize any conclusion based on this single case.However, the observational findings do provide us with a sense that quite a number of supercells may exist offshore (or over ocean) within a landfalling TC interior.Their attendant damaging winds and tornadoes are a potential risk to maritime traffic and oil rigs.

    Fig.11.As in Fig.9, but for the parameters calculated at (left column) 6 h before and (right column) 6 h after the landfall of Typhoon Mujigae (2015).

    The environmental analysis for Typhoon Mujigae(2015) suggests that the northeast quadrant is most favorable for supercell formation due to the best match among the entraining CAPE, lower-troposphere vertical wind shear, and low-level storm relative helicity.The nondimensional supercell composite parameter that is widely used for assessing midlatitude supercell potential is also potentially effective in separating supercell from non-supercell environments in the TC envelope.Regarding the practical use of the SCP/E-SCP for assessing a TC supercell environment, it is important to determine the exact criteria by observations from different landfalling TCs.Additionally, the orography impedes supercell organization even though the atmospheric conditions are favorable for supercell formation.

    Fig.12.Schematic illustration of radar reflectivity in Typhoon Mujigae (2015).

    Although the present study was based on only one TC case, the holistic picture of supercell features within a TC’s envelope is of benefit for identifying the environmental features that separate supercell from non-supercell zones on a horizontal scale of O (103km), providing evidence for the feasibility of SCP in the TC environment.The statistics show that only 3 of 113 mini-supercells were tornadic, suggesting the number of tornadic storms may be small even in an outbreak of mini-supercells within a landfalling TC.This paper provides a detailed study of TC supercells from China, adding to the body of literature that illustrates global TC supercell and risk assessments.The results may help provide insights for our understanding of TC associated supercells and tornadoes, especially in coastal areas that are vulnerable to severe convective weather due to landfalling TCs.

    Acknowledgements.This article is dedicated to Dr.Fuqing ZHANG, who was a talented atmospheric scientist, a very good friend and a great mentor.Fuqing’s passion for life and atmospheric science inspired and encouraged many of us.As a Ph.D student of Fuqing, the corresponding author really cherishes those days when Fuqing occasionally stepped into office with “How are you” and “Something is wrong” during discussion.This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.41875051 and 41905043), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No.2019M653146).The authors would like to thank Dr.Kenta SUEKI for helping the E-CAPE calculation, and anonymous reviewers who helped us improve the quality of this paper.The numerical simulations were performed on TianHe-1 (A) at National Supercomputer Center in Tianjin, China.

    国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 天堂√8在线中文| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 人人澡人人妻人| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 操美女的视频在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 久久狼人影院| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 操美女的视频在线观看| 三级毛片av免费| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久久久久大精品| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 91成人精品电影| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久久久久人人人人人| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日本五十路高清| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | av在线播放免费不卡| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 香蕉丝袜av| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 91大片在线观看| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 黄色成人免费大全| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| av在线播放免费不卡| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲av美国av| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 在线视频色国产色| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 看片在线看免费视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 两性夫妻黄色片| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久精品影院6| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 制服诱惑二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产在线观看jvid| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 日本 av在线| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 中国美女看黄片| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲av成人av| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日韩免费av在线播放| 日韩欧美三级三区| 一本久久中文字幕| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 手机成人av网站| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产精品九九99| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 天天一区二区日本电影三级 | 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 99香蕉大伊视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产精品 国内视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 又大又爽又粗| 性少妇av在线| 看黄色毛片网站| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 欧美成人午夜精品| 午夜免费观看网址| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| av电影中文网址| 日本五十路高清| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| av福利片在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产精品,欧美在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲全国av大片| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久香蕉精品热| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 一本综合久久免费| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 搞女人的毛片| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产精品免费视频内射| 精品国产亚洲在线| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 免费高清视频大片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 91成人精品电影| 黄色视频不卡| 久久久久九九精品影院| 日本三级黄在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 久久精品影院6| 久久香蕉激情| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 午夜免费激情av| 成人18禁在线播放| av免费在线观看网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 两性夫妻黄色片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 电影成人av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 欧美午夜高清在线| 又大又爽又粗| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 满18在线观看网站| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产av在哪里看| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久精品影院6| 国产色视频综合| 伦理电影免费视频| 在线观看66精品国产| av在线播放免费不卡| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 午夜精品在线福利| 精品第一国产精品| 少妇 在线观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 满18在线观看网站| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 午夜影院日韩av| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| tocl精华| 怎么达到女性高潮| ponron亚洲| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 一级黄色大片毛片| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲午夜理论影院| av视频免费观看在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 免费少妇av软件| 在线天堂中文资源库| av网站免费在线观看视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 很黄的视频免费| av免费在线观看网站| 黄色视频不卡| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 日本三级黄在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产免费男女视频| 极品教师在线免费播放| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲片人在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产麻豆69| 不卡av一区二区三区| 免费高清视频大片| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 色综合婷婷激情| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美日韩精品网址| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲av熟女| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲av熟女| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 午夜激情av网站| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 88av欧美| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 男人操女人黄网站| 91字幕亚洲| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 欧美中文综合在线视频| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久精品影院6| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| av片东京热男人的天堂| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| a级毛片在线看网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 午夜福利18| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 久久影院123| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 88av欧美| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| cao死你这个sao货| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 久热这里只有精品99| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 91在线观看av| 久久亚洲真实| 999精品在线视频| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| av有码第一页| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久亚洲真实| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 欧美在线黄色| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清 | 久久国产精品影院| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| xxx96com| 久久香蕉国产精品| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 成人手机av| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 一区在线观看完整版| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 精品国产亚洲在线| 免费看十八禁软件| 不卡av一区二区三区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 99国产精品99久久久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 大码成人一级视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲成人久久性| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 18禁观看日本| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| www国产在线视频色| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 制服诱惑二区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| www.自偷自拍.com| 在线播放国产精品三级| 天天添夜夜摸| 精品国产亚洲在线| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 热99re8久久精品国产| 免费av毛片视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 免费少妇av软件| 丁香六月欧美| 久久精品成人免费网站| 色在线成人网| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| av视频在线观看入口| 精品电影一区二区在线| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产亚洲欧美98| 在线免费观看的www视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 怎么达到女性高潮| 日本 欧美在线| 午夜福利18| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久久久国内视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 久久久久国内视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 大香蕉久久成人网| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久热在线av| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 最好的美女福利视频网|