• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Radar-based Characteristics and Formation Environment of Supercells in the Landfalling Typhoon Mujigae in 2015※

    2022-04-02 05:52:04LanqiangBAIZhiyongMENGRuilinZHOUGuixingCHENNaigengWUandWaiKinWONG
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年5期

    Lanqiang BAI, Zhiyong MENG, Ruilin ZHOU, Guixing CHEN, Naigeng WU, and Wai-Kin WONG

    1School of Atmospheric Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, and Key Laboratory of Tropical Atmosphere-Ocean System,Ministry of Education, and Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai 519082, China

    2Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China

    3Institute of Tropical and Marine Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Guangzhou 510640, China

    4Hong Kong Observatory, Hong Kong 999077, China

    ABSTRACT This study presents the radar-based characteristics and formation environment of supercells spawned by the tornadic landfalling Typhoon Mujigae (2015) in October 2015.More than 100 supercells were identified within a 24-hour period around the time of the typhoon’s landfall, of which three were tornadic with a rotational intensity clearly stronger than those of non-tornadic supercells.The identified supercells were concentrated within a relatively small area in the northeast quadrant beyond 140 km from the typhoon center.These supercells were found more likely to form over flat topography and were difficult to maintain in mountainous regions.During the study period, more supercells formed offshore than onshore.The mesocyclones of the identified supercells were characterized by a small diameter generally less than 5 km and a shallow depth generally less than 4 km above ground level.An environmental analysis revealed that the northeast quadrant had the most favorable conditions for the genesis of supercell in this typhoon case.The nondimensional supercell composite parameter (SCP) and entraining-SCP (E-SCP) were effective in separating supercell from non-supercell environment.Even though the atmosphere in the typhoon’s northeast quadrant was characterized by an E-SCP/SCP value supportive of supercell organization, orography was an impeditive factor for the supercell development.These findings support the use of traditional parameters obtained from midlatitude supercells to assess the supercell potential in a tropical cyclone envelope.

    Key words: supercell, tropical cyclone, atmospheric environment, radar meteorology

    1.Introduction

    Landfalling tropical cyclones (TCs) have long been known to spawn tornadoes (hereinafter referred to as TC tor-nadoes) in coastal regions which are typically highly populated (e.g., Novlan and Gray, 1974; McCaul, 1991; Verbout et al., 2007; Edwards, 2012; Bai et al., 2020).These tornadoes contribute to a noticeable proportion of the overall fatalities and property damage attributable to their parent TCs (Novlan and Gray, 1974; Rappaport, 2000).Edwards et al.(2012) documented that at least 79% of storms responsible for TC tornadoes are supercells, which are defined as convective storms that consist primarily of a single, quasisteady rotating updraft, namely, a mesocyclone (e.g.,Doswell and Burgess, 1993; Markowski and Richardson,2010).A tornado-producing TC often produces more than one tornado.The top three TC tornado producers in the United States even spawned more than 100 tornadoes each(Edwards, 2012).Given the prolificacy of TC tornadoes, a large number of supercells may exist within a tornadic TC.In addition to spawning tornadoes, these supercells also have a high propensity for producing other severe weather events, such as heavy rainfall and damaging winds.Improved understanding of the general features of TC supercells may help to implement and enhance the monitoring, forecasting and warning of convective disasters associated with landfalling TCs.

    Prior studies have documented that TC supercells generally exhibit a smaller diameter and a lower echo top than their midlatitude counterparts; thus, they have been named“miniature supercells” or “mini-supercells” (Spratt et al.,1997; Suzuki et al., 2000; McCaul et al., 2004).The measurable radar-echo tops of TC supercells are typically lower than 10 km (e.g., McCaul, 1987; Suzuki et al., 2000).This low-top feature mainly results from the high-shear and lowbuoyancy environment within the TC (McCaul and Weisman, 1996).Mesocyclones in TC supercells are typically shallow and have a relatively small diameter usually less than 5 km (e.g., Spratt et al., 1997; Suzuki et al., 2000; McCaul et al., 2004; Baker et al., 2009; Bai et al., 2017).Because of the relatively small size, the rotational features are often too subtle to be observed by operational weather radars.Consequently, some parameter thresholds for operationally detecting mesocyclones in midlatitudes may need to be adjusted in a TC environment.

    Our current understanding of the spatial distribution and radar features of TC supercells mainly originates from tornadic cases (e.g., Spratt et al., 1997; McCaul et al., 2004;Baker et al., 2009; Edwards et al., 2012) or limited cases(either tornadic or non-tornadic) in a small area within a TC envelope (e.g., Suzuki et al., 2000; Lee et al., 2008; Eastin and Link, 2009; Green et al., 2011).Considering the facts that TC tornadoes primarily occur in the northeast (Earth-relative) or right-front (TC motion-relative) quadrants of the TC center and that nearly 79% of these tornadoes are supercellular (Hill et al., 1966; Gentry, 1983; McCaul, 1991; Edwards et al., 2012), supercells in a specific TC may also be concentrated in these regions.Using two coastal WSR-88Ds whose unambiguous range was 174 km, Lee et al.(2008) identified 23 supercells located in the northeast quadrant of Hurricane Katrina (2005).Nearly 83% of these supercells were located over the Gulf of Mexico, providing additional evidence that TC supercells often form offshore in addition to onshore (e.g., Spratt et al., 1997; Rao et al., 2005; Lee et al.,2008; Eastin and Link, 2009).In a zone of approximately 350 km×350 km, Suzuki et al.(2000) identified nine supercells within a typhoon in Japan.Three of the nine supercells produced tornadoes.To the authors’ knowledge, the previous study domain for TC supercells typically covers a relatively small area compared to the TC circulation, which typically has a radius of O (103km).Whether this ratio is common in tornadic TCs remains unclear.In addition to giving a holistic picture of supercell feature in the entire landfalling TC envelope, statistics of supercells in a large spatial coverage within a TC will provide an opportunity to illustrate the features that discriminate between the supercell and non-supercell TC environment.

    Based on a dense radar network in South China, the present study aims to identify supercells within a large spatial region within the landfalling Typhoon Mujigae (2015)that spawned three tornadoes.In contrast to other tornadic TCs that often spawn dozens of tornadoes, Typhoon Mujigae (2015) produced relatively few tornadoes.By identifying supercells over a large spatial region, we can investigate the holistic picture of supercells (both tornadic or non-tornadic) in the TC circulation, including the overall prevalence and distribution of supercells, the basic radar characteristics of these supercells, the ratio between tornadic and non-tornadic supercells and identifying atmospheric features that discriminate between the supercell and non-supercell environment, and the feasibility of the environmental parameters for assessing midlatitude supercell potential in this TC case.

    The rest of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 describes the data and methods used in this study.The spatiotemporal distribution of the supercells and their associated basic characteristics are presented in section 3.The formation environment of these supercells is discussed in section 4.Section 5 summarizes the manuscript.

    2.Data and Methods

    Along the steering flow of the western Pacific subtropical high, Typhoon Mujigae (2015) advanced toward the northwest and made landfall on the coast of South China at 1400 local standard time (LST; LST = UTC + 8) 4 October 2015 (Fig.1).According to the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale, it was a Category 3 TC with the 1-min maximum sustained surface winds of approximately 52 m s?1and the minimum central sea level pressure of 935 hPa.There were three reported tornadoes that were separately spawned by three supercells in the northeast quadrant with respect to the TC center 3 h before (Shanwei tornado), 1.5 h(Foshan tornado; Bai et al., 2017) and 2.7 h (Guangzhou tornado) after the TC’s landfall, respectively (refer to the triangles in Figs.2a, b).

    The ground-based Doppler weather radars in South China were used to identify the supercells within the TC envelope (Fig.2a).The China Meteorological Administration has deployed many Doppler weather radars throughout the coastal region in China over the last two decades (Bai et al., 2020).These operational radars conform to the standards of the Weather Surveillance Radar?1988 Doppler radars (WSR-88Ds) in the United States in terms of both hardware and software (Yu et al., 2006).During this event, they operated in the volume coverage pattern 21 (VCP21) and scanned nine elevation angles of approximately 0.5°, 1.5°,2.4°, 3.4°, 4.3°, 6°, 9.9°, 14.6°, and 19.5° with a volumetric update time of approximately 6 min.The radar data were sampled approximately every 1° in azimuth with a range resolution of 1 km (250 m) for the reflectivity (radial velocity).The maximum unambiguous ranges for the reflectivity and radial velocity were 460 and 230 km, respectively.

    The focus study period extends from 0800 LST 4 October (6 h before TC landfall) to 0800 LST 5 October 2015(18 h after TC landfall) (refer to the TC track with shaded dots in Fig.2a).This 24-hour period was chosen because the TC underwent a sea-land transition and a large portion of TC rainbands were well covered by the detection ranges of the coastal Doppler radars.During the study period, the data coverage of the volume scans for all radars was 96.8%.Considering the possible inaccuracy in the rotational velocity estimation at a long radar range, we set a radar range of 145 km as an upper limit for the analysis (refer to the circles in Fig.2a).

    Fig.1.Geopotential heights (shaded) and horizontal winds at 500 hPa plotted using the ERA5 reanalysis at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The half barbs, full barbs, and pennants denote 2, 4, and 20 m s?1, respectively.The TC track (blue line) is plotted every 6 h (dots).The red star symbol denotes the location of the TC center at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The subtropical high is labeled as “H”.

    A supercell was determined when a well-defined mesocyclone was identified from radar data.The Gibson-Ridge Analyst version 2 (GR2Analyst 2.0) radar-viewing software was used to de-alias the raw radial velocities, after which the mesocyclones were identified manually.It is known that mesocyclones in a TC envelope typically display smaller sizes, shallower depths and weaker strengths than their midlatitude counterparts.The following criteria,which are partly adapted from those provided by Stumpf et al.(1998) and Richter et al.(2017), were used to identify a mesocyclone: 1) it was located within a convective storm(maximum radar reflectivity ≥40 dBZ); 2) a two-dimensional couplet of the storm-relativea“Storm-relative” was used to refer to a convective cell rather than a TC.The storm-relative radial velocity of a convective cell was computed by the GR2Analyst software.This storm-relative product requires a storm-motion vector which was estimated by tracking the centroid of velocity couplet signature of a given convective cell.inbound (VSRVin) and outbound (VSRVout) radial velocity maxima was detected with a separation distance (e.g., core diameter of mesocyclone) of 1.5?10 km; 3) the couplet of the storm-relative velocity maxima had a cyclonic shear signaturebConsidering that mesocyclones in the Northern Hemisphere typify a cyclonic rotation, the cyclonic shear signature on the Doppler velocity products was used to identify mesocyclones in this study.; 4) the rotational velocity [VR= (|VSRVin| + |VSRVout|)/2] was at least 10 m s?1; and 5) such a cyclonic shear signature was thoroughly recognized in at least two adjacent elevation angles within a volume scan and in at least two successive volume scans (i.e., within at least 12 min).The aforementioned Doppler velocity pattern of a mesocyclone in a storm-relative reference frame at a certain elevation angle was defined as a mesocyclone signature.The VRthreshold of 10 m s?1was used by referring to McCaul et al.(2004), in which the characteristic VRof the documented mini-supercell mesocyclones were in the 10?15 m s?1range.It is worth noting that such a VRthreshold was only used to locate the velocity couplet signature, whereas a mesocyclone was ultimately determined if the maximum rotational shear vorticitycRotational shear vorticity is defined using twice rotational velocity divided by half the core diameter (McCaul et al., 2004).of the couplet signature was at least 0.01 s?1(McCaul et al., 2004).Figures 2c and d present an example of an identified supercell based on these criteria.If a continuously developed cyclonic shear signature did not meet the above conditions in one volume scan while it was confirmed as a mesocyclone before and after this volume scan, then the shear signature in the entire set of volume scans (including this null volume scan) was regarded as one single mesocyclone.

    3.Basic characteristics of the identified TC supercells

    3.1.Spatial distribution of TC supercells

    Fig.2.(a) Selected Doppler weather radars (black crosses) in South China with the gray circles indicating the 145-km ranges of radial velocity observations.The curves in different colors denote the tracks of the 113 identified supercells.The TC track (gray line) is plotted every 6 h with the red dot indicating the time of 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The gray shaded dots indicate the TC locations during the study period.(b) Composite radar reflectivity (dBZ)at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.In both panels, the triangles (from west to east) represent the locations of the Foshan,Guangzhou and Shanwei tornadoes, respectively.The radar deployed at sea is highlighted by the red cross.(c)Storm-relative radial velocities (SRV, m s?1) and (d) reflectivity (dBZ) at the 2.4°elevation angle of the Guangzhou radar at 1543 LST 4 October 2015.

    A total of 113 supercells/mesocyclones were identified in the envelope of Typhoon Mujigae (2015) during the 24-hour period.They were primarily embedded in the outer rainbands.Only three of these supercells were tornadic, suggesting a substantial potential for false alarms.By way of comparison, approximately 26% of the Great Plains supercells produce tornadoes in the United States (Trapp et al., 2005).The identified supercells were not distributed throughout the entire study area.The highest concentration of the supercells occurred in the northeast quadrant with respect to the TC center (Fig.3a).No supercell was detected in the northwest or southwest quadrants.Although rare radar observation exhibits at sea in the southeast quadrant, there were also a fair number of convective cells sampled by an operational radar (the red cross in Fig.2b) deployed on an island.All of the convective cells detected by this radar were non-supercellular.

    More than 90% of the supercells formed in an Earth-relative azimuthal sector between ?10° and 30° (due east is regarded as 0°) with respect to the TC center with a median of 16° (Fig.3a).In the TC motion-relative coordinatedThe TC motion at the supercell time was estimated by linearly interpolating the Japan Meteorological Agency best-track data of TC., only 9 of the 113 supercells formed in the right-front quadrant of the TC (Fig.3b).Previous studies have suggested that the convective asymmetry is closely associated with ambient deeptropospheric vertical wind shear (VWS), with the 850?200-hPa layer VWS being particularly relevant to deep convection in a TC envelope (Schenkel et al., 2020; and references therein).Schenkel et al.(2020) demonstrated a clear dependence of the spatial distribution of TC tornadoes on the strength of 850?200-hPa VWS and tornadoes tend to be concentrated over the downshear half of the parent TC.In the present study, the spatial distribution of supercells in the shear-relative framework was also investigated.The area-averaged 850?200-hPa VWS was obtained within a 500-km radius from the TC center.Before the computation, the rotational and divergent wind components associated with the TC were removed by applying a vortex removal technique described in Kurihara et al.(1990, 1993).The computed magnitude of the VWS vector (u = 6.5 m s?1, v = ?1.0 m s?1)was 6.6 m s?1(weak shear category in Schenkel et al., 2020)at the time of TC’s landfall.In the shear-relative coordinates, most supercells become localized to the downshear left region with respect to the TC center (Fig.3c), which is consistent with the spatial pattern of tornadoes observed in weak-shear TC environment (Schenkel et al., 2020).

    The tracks of the supercells/mesocyclones were primarily located in the coastal regions with flat underlying surfaces (Fig.4).Supercells were repeatedly produced in relatively small areas within a period of several hours (refer to the colors in Fig.4).The distances of their formation locations from the TC center ranged from 140 to 750 km with a median of 453 km.There is a tendency for the identified mesocyclones to be unable to cross mountain barriers.For instance, the mesocyclones that formed over coastal waters abruptly vanished as they approached Lianhua Mountain(denoted by the magenta arrow in Fig.4).Previous numerical studies have suggested that mesocyclones may be enhanced as their parent supercells descend a mountain due to the preexisting vertical vorticity anomaly (if any) in the lee (e.g., Markowski and Dotzek, 2011).In the present case,it seems that it was difficult for TC supercells to develop over complex terrains, which is likely due to the fact that they are typically shallow.

    3.2.Diameters and heights of mesocyclones

    Diameters and heights of the identified 113 mesocyclones were discussed by examining the mesocyclone signatures in all volume scans.A total of 1017 volume scans were taken of these mesocyclones.In a volume scan, the maximum core diameters of mesocyclone signature primarily ranged from approximately 2 to 5 km, with a median of 3.4 km (Fig.5a).To obtain the mesocyclone height at a relatively high vertical resolution, only the supercells that were located within a radar range of 50 km during their entire lifespans were examined.The height of the 0.5° radar beam was approximately 590 m above radar level at the 50-km range point.If a supercell was too close to a radar site, the mesocyclone height might be higher than the highest radar beam.In this instance, the neighboring radars were used to confirm the uppermost level of the mesocyclone.A total of 38 supercells met these criteria, including 300 volume scans taken of the mesocyclones.Figure 5b shows that 75% of these volume scans have a mesocyclone top height lower than 3.2 km above ground level (AGL) with a median value of 2.6 km AGL.The median vertical extent (i.e., distance between mesocyclone base and top heights) of these mesocyclones in all volume scans is 2.0 km (Fig.5c).Characterized by the mesocyclones that were generally low topped, these supercells could be reasonably regarded as miniature supercells.In numerical modeling products, the detection of midlatitude supercells usually employs the updraft helicity (UH), a good metric to identify rotating updrafts (i.e., mesocyclones) by integrating the vertical component of helicity over a layer from 2 km to 5 km AGL (Kain et al., 2008).In the present statistics, the mesocyclones from the 300 volume scans have a median base height of 525 m AGL and 90% of them have a top height lower than 4 km AGL (Fig.5b).The UH metric for identifying simulated supercells in TC circulations may need an adjustment of integration layer (such as 1?4 km AGL) to be adapted to the shallow nature of minisupercells.

    Fig.5.Box-and-whisker plots of the mesocyclone characteristics.The sample sizes are indicated in the bottom-left corner of each panel.(a) Maximum core diameters and (e)maximum rotational velocities of mesocyclone signatures in a volume scan for all the 1017 volume scans taken of the 113 mesocyclones/supercells.(b) Top heights and (c) vertical extents of the mesocyclones from the 300 volume scans taken of the supercells that were located within a radar range of 50 km during their entire lifespans.(d) Maximum rotational shear vorticities during the (f) lifespans of the identified 113 supercells.The lifespans of the supercells that formed (g) onshore and (h) offshore are also shown.In the box-and-whisker diagrams, the percentile extents and corresponding values represent the 25th?75th percentiles for the boxes, the 10th?90th percentiles for the whiskers, and the 50th percentile for the lines in the boxes.The crosses indicate the values higher (lower) than the 90th (10th) percentile.In(e), the peak intensities of the mesocyclones which produced Foshan (FS), Shanwei (SW) and Guangzhou (GZ) tornadoes are labeled.

    3.3.Formation time, lifetimes and intensities of TC supercells

    During the study period, the occurrences of supercells could be identified throughout the day, although the occurrences were more frequent during daylight hours (Figs.6a?c).Approximately 51% of all the supercells occurred during 0800?1500 LST, while only 27% of the overall supercells occurred at night (1900?0700 LST).Note that the diurnal variation in TC supercell occurrence may be associated with the exact time at which a TC makes landfall.Statistics from additional TC cases, especially those making landfall at night, are necessary to examine the diurnal cycle of TC supercells.The lifespans of the identified supercells were generally shorter than their midlatitude counterparts.Nearly 70% of the supercells had a lifespan of no longer than 60 min (Fig.6d), which is appreciably shorter than those (1?4 h) of typical midlatitude supercells (Markowski and Richardson, 2010).The median lifespan of all identified supercells was 48 min (Fig.5f).

    Figure 7a presents the time series of the maximum rotational velocities in each volume scan of the 113 mesocyclones against the time elapsed since their formations.The maximum rotational velocities from the 1017 volume scans were generally less than 20 m s?1, with a median strength of 12.3 m s?1(Fig.5e) and a corresponding median altitude of 1.4 km AGL.Although the magnitude of rotational velocity is relatively small as compared to that of midlatitude mesocyclones, the maximum rotational shear vorticities of these mesocyclones from 90% of the volume scans exceeded 0.009 s?1(Fig.7b) primarily due to their relatively small diameters.For the 113 supercells, the maximum rotational shear vorticities during their lifespans mainly ranged from 0.016 s?1to 0.031 s?1(25th?75th percentiles; Fig.5d).The maximum intensities of the three tornadic mesocyclones were found to be distinctly stronger than those of the non-tornadic mesocyclones (Fig.7a).It is worth noting that the intensity of a mesocyclone may be overestimated when a tornado exists, especially when the tornado vortex is located near one of the radial velocity maxima of the mesocyclone signature on radar displays (e.g., Figs.7c, d).From the evolution of mesocyclone intensities as shown in Fig.7a, quite a few number of mesocyclones (without tornadoes being observed) rapidly intensified with a rotational velocity greater than that of the three tornadic mesocyclones at tornado formation time,suggesting a substantial potential for false alarms of tornadoes within a TC envelope.

    Fig.6.Frequencies of the formation times (left) and lifespans (right) for: (a), (d) all identified mesocyclones (b), (e) onshore mesocyclones and (c), (f) offshore mesocyclones.

    During the 24-hour study period, the supercells that formed offshore were more prevalent than those that formed onshore even though the study period covers 18 h after but only 6 h before the TC’s landfall.Note that nearly all supercells that formed on land had been identified, while the number of offshore supercells were likely underestimated due to the limited radar coverage over the sea.Despite the possible underestimation in the offshore counts, a total of 76 offshore supercells were identified, which is about twice the number of onshore supercells.Statistically, the mesocyclones of onshore supercells were found to be slightly stronger than those of offshore supercells (at the 95% confidence level).The median values of the rotational velocities of the onshore and offshore mesocyclones were 12.6 and 12.2 m s?1, respectively.Nevertheless, the onshore supercells were more short-lived (at the 95% confidence level) (Figs.5g, h, and 6e, f).The median lifespans of the onshore and offshore supercells were 30 and 54 min, respectively.The shorter duration of the onshore supercells may be partly due to the orographic barriers and the decrease of instability on land.Additionally, there was no difference (at the 95% confidence level) in the top heights and diameters of the mesocyclones between offshore and onshore in this TC case.

    Fig.7.(a) Time series of the maximum rotational velocities (m s?1) in a volume scan for the identified 113 mesocyclones/supercells against the time elapsed since their formations.The dots denote the formation time of the Foshan (red), Guangzhou (magenta) and Shanwei (blue) tornadoes, respectively.(b) Same as Fig.5d, but for the maximum rotational shear vorticities of mesocyclone signatures in a volume scan for all the 1017 volume scans taken of the 113 mesocyclones/supercells.(c) Storm-relative radial velocities (m s?1) and (d) reflectivity (dBZ) from the 0.5° elevation angle of the Guangzhou radar at 1536 LST 4 October 2015.The dashed and solid circles represent the approximate locations of the mesocyclone and the Foshan tornado, respectively.

    4.Formation environment of TC supercells

    Prior studies have shed light on the atmospheric conditions that are favorable for supercell formation in midlatitudes, such as large vertical wind shear in the lower and middle troposphere (Weisman and Klemp, 1982, 1984),large storm-relative helicity (SRH) (Davies-Jones, 1984;Thompson et al., 2003), large instability, and large supercell composite parameter (SCP; Thompson et al., 2002,2003).McCaul (1991) documented that the vertical wind shear and helicity parameter spatially collocated well with the reported TC tornadoes, while the convective available potential energy (CAPE) shows a weak correlation with tornado activities.Recent published papers suggest that the entraining CAPE (E-CAPE) which considers the entrainment effects, is highly collocated with the locations of TC tornadoes (Sueki and Niino, 2016; Bai et al., 2020).In this section, we present a diagnosis of the supercell formation environment in Typhoon Mujigae (2015) by examining the following parameters: 0?6-km shear, 0?1-km SRH, CAPE, ECAPE and SCP.

    A convection-permitting simulation by the Advanced Research core of the Weather Research and Forecasting(WRF-ARW) model (Skamarock et al., 2008), version 3.7.1, was conducted to obtain the three-dimensional atmospheric conditions with high resolution relative to the global reanalysis data.The simulation was initiated at 0800 LST 4 October 2015 using the NCEP final analysis fields as the initial and boundary conditions.Two domains were configured in two-way nesting with the horizontal grid spacings of 13.5 km and 4.5 km, respectively (Fig.8a).The main physical parameterization schemes include the WRF single moment six-class (WSM6) microphysics (Hong et al., 2004), Kain?Fritsch cumulus scheme (Kain and Fritsch,1990,1993; for domain 1 only), the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTM) for longwave and shortwave radiations(Chou and Suarez, 1994), and the Yonsei State University(YSU) PBL schemes (Noh et al., 2003).The TC track and rainbands were reproduced reasonably well in the model domain 2 (refer to the composite simulated reflectivity in Fig.8b).Although the horizontal grid spacing of 4.5 km is not fine enough to explicitly resolve a mini-supercell, additional idealized large-eddy simulations with a grid spacing of 100 m driven by the WRF soundings can successfully simulate mini-supercells in the observed mini-supercell region(not shown).The subsequent analysis on the large-to-mesoscale atmospheric conditions was based on the simulated results from this domain at 1400 LST 4 October 2015 when Typhoon Mujigae (2015) was making landfall.

    4.1.Kinematic parameters

    The magnitude of vertical wind shear has long been known to influence storm organization (Markowski and Richardson, 2010).Strong 0?6 km wind shear (greater than 20 m s?1) is often operationally used to assess the supercell potential (e.g., Rasmussen and Blanchard, 1998; Thompson et al., 2003).The 0?6-km wind shear was quantified in this study by the magnitude of 0?6-km bulk wind difference(BWD; Markowski and Richardson, 2010).Figure 9a shows that large 0?6 km wind shear mainly appears in the northern part of the TC circulation on land and in the offshore region of Guangdong Province.Notably strong wind shear(greater than 25 m s?1) is located to the north and northeast of the TC center.Although the wind shear is relatively low(10?20 m s?1) in the offshore areas where supercells were observed (refer to the blue dashed contour in Fig.9a), the initiated storms in that region were moving into a stronger-shear environment.The increasing tendency of the shear magnitude may indicate that the relatively isolated convection has a high probability to become a supercell storm under such an atmospheric condition.Close to the coastlines, the wind shear already reaches roughly 15?20 m s?1.Such magnitudes are demonstrated to be necessary to support supercells by both numerical and observational studies (e.g., Weisman and Klemp, 1982; Markowski et al., 1998; Bunkers,2002).

    Fig.8.(a) Model domain configuration.(b) Composite simulated reflectivity (dBZ) from the WRF domain 2 at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The triangles represent the tornado locations as described in Fig.1.

    Previous studies demonstrated good agreement between the spatial distributions of TC tornadoes and large SRH values (e.g., McCaul, 1991; Sueki and Niino, 2016;Bai et al., 2020), which may imply that the spatial distribution of TC supercells also correlates with large SRH values.A large SRH value is indicative of a high potential of the low-level horizontal vorticity to produce cyclonic updraft rotations of supercells through tilting in the Northern Hemisphere (Davies-Jones, 1984).The SRH obtained from ground to a given height (h) was calculated in this work by integrating the storm-relative streamwise vorticity (Davies-Jones, 1984):

    Fig.9.The (a) 0?6-km bulk wind difference (BWD; proxy of shear), (b) 0?1-km storm relative helicity (SRH), (c)MUCAPE and (d) entraining-CAPE (E-CAPE) with an entrainment rate of 40% km?1, (e) supercell composite parameter (SCP), and (f) entraining supercell composite parameter (E-SCP).All parameters were calculated from the WRF domain 2 at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The vectors are simulated 10-m horizontal winds.The red star represents the observed TC center.The general areas of the observed TC supercells are contoured by the dashed blue lines.The triangles represent the tornado locations as described in Fig.1.In (e) and (f), the terrain heights of above 250 m are hatched with the black lines.

    where VH,Cand k represent the horizontal wind, storm motion and the unit vector in the vertical direction, respectively.The storm motion was estimated following the methods suggested by Bunkers et al.(2000) for right-moving supercells.Figure 9b shows that the 0?1-km SRH exhibits analogous spatial patterns to the 0?6-km wind shear.The observed TC supercells formed in an environment with increasing 0?1-km SRH values from 100 to 400 m2s?2.Such enhanced 0?1-km SRH values indicate that significant streamwise vorticity is available in that region for tilting into the vertical, increasing the risk of supercell occurrences.It is worth noting that TC supercells did not appear in the areas characterized by super high SRH and vertical wind shear values (refer to the west of the blue contours in Figs.9a, b).These results imply that there should be other factors affecting the supercell formation.

    4.2.Thermodynamic parameters

    In contrast with the aforementioned kinematic environment, the thermodynamic conditions at sea are more favorable for convective activities.The CAPE was calculated by integrating the buoyancy of a lifted air parcel between the level of free convection (LFC) and the equilibrium level(EL):

    It has been long known that the spatial pattern of CAPE is not well collocated with that of TC tornadoes (e.g.,McCaul, 1991; Bai et al., 2020).Instead, by considering the effect of the entrainment of ambient air, E-CAPE has a better correlation with TC tornado locations (Sueki and Niino,2016).E-CAPE was computed by updating the air parcel temperature considering the entrainment effect following the Lagrangian parcel model (Romps and Kuang, 2010; Sueki and Niino, 2016).The constant mass entrainment rate of 40%km?1(Bai et al., 2020) was assumed for an ascending air parcel at a speed of 1 m s?1(Molinari et al., 2012).The initial parcel for computing E-CAPE was obtained from the most unstable layer.

    Fig.10.(a) Albedo in channel 1 and (b) brightness temperature in channel 8 (water vapor channel) from the Himawari-8 satellite at 1400 LST 4 October 2015.The red cross denotes a radar site in the South China Sea with the circle depicting a range of 145 km.

    Figure 9d shows that high-value area of E-CAPE is more concentrated along TC rainbands while a large fraction of high-value area of MUCAPE is characterized by fairly small E-CAPE (Figs.9c, d).This phenomenon is a result of entrainment effects in the mid-troposphere.From the moisture-channel imagery of the satellite Himawari-8,clearly dry air at ~400 hPa was found over the sea in the southeast quadrant where relatively high MUCAPE was located (Fig.10).A drier mid-troposphere leads to the fact that the lifted air parcel entrains more unsaturated air and thus the amount of latent heat released per unit mass in the parcel decreases more, which causes the parcel to have lower equivalent potential temperature and thus smaller E-CAPE.From Fig.9d, it is clear that the observed supercell region features fairly large E-CAPE values (roughly >120 J kg?1).Similar to the tornado situation, the E-CAPE seems to be more helpful in assessing the potential area for deep convective storms in TC’s interior than the widely used CAPE.Along the spiral rainband closer to the TC center (rainband 1 in Fig.9d), the E-CAPE values are particularly large although no supercells were observed, which is likely due to the marginal vertical wind shear and SRH values in that region.This result suggests that a good match between kinematic and thermodynamic features is important for the supercell formation, and this good match happens to be in the northeast quadrant.This point was further confirmed by the analysis of the supercell composite parameter.

    4.3.Supercell Composite Parameter

    Supercell composite parameter (SCP) is a nondimensional parameter that involves both kinematic and thermodynamic conditions.It combines the MUCAPE, 0?3-km SRH(SRH0?3km) and bulk Richardson number (BRN) shear (Shear-BRN, Thompson et al., 2003):

    here, ShearBRNis the denominator of the bulk Richardson number equation and is defined as one half of the square of the BWD between the density-weighted mean winds at 0?6 km and 0?500 m (Carter et al., 2012).The SCP has been demonstrated to be effective in separating midlatitude supercell from non-supercell storm environment (Thompson et al., 2003).An SCP value greater than 1 is commonly indicative of a supercell storm environment (Thompson et al.,2003).Figure 9e shows that the northeast quadrant has larger SCP values than other quadrants with the supercell areas characterized by SCP values generally greater than 5, suggesting an atmosphere that strongly favors supercells.Around the zone of the observed TC tornadoes (triangles in Fig.9e),the SCP values exceed 10.

    We additionally examined the E-SCP which has recently been demonstrated to be better correlated with tornado locations than SCP (Tochimoto et al., 2019).The ESCP was calculated by substituting the MUCAPE by the ECAPE:

    Slightly different from the E-SCP calculation in Tochimoto et al.(2019), we normalized the E-CAPE by 100 J kg?1rather than by 1000 J kg?1, considering the fact that the E-CAPE is roughly an order .of magnitude smaller than the traditional CAPE due to the entrainment effect(Figs.9c, d; Sueki and Niino, 2016).Figure 9f shows that the E-SCP shares a similar spatial pattern to that of the SCP.Remarkably high E-SCP/SCP values are located on the relatively flat land in the northwest quadrant with no supercells being observed (Figs.9e, f).The super high shear (Fig.9a)and SRH (Fig.9b) are demonstrated to be responsible for the high E-SCP/SCP there.An area featuring super high shear but low instability (Figs.9c, d) would be detrimental to convection, since there the convective towers tend to get ripped apart from their roots and thus sheared off from the sustained updrafts (e.g., Weisman and Klemp, 1982).Additionally, one may have noticed that there is also a substantial area featuring fairly large E-SCP/SCP over the mountain regions (Figs.9e, f).As discussed in section 3.1, it was difficult for the identified supercells to survive when they encountered orography.After excluding these values located over the mountains, the rest of the large E-SCP/SCP region is in quite good agreement with the locations of the observed TC supercells (refer to the blue contours in Figs.9e, f).Although the above environmental analyses were performed at the time of TC’s landfall, additional analyses at other times present similar results (e.g., Fig.11).The northeast and northwest quadrants of Typhoon Mujigae (2015)are always characterized by remarkably large shear and SRH (Figs.11a?d) while the instability is primarily located near the coasts and over the ocean (Figs.11e, f), leading to the large-value SCP being concentrated in coastal regions in the TC’s northeast quadrant (Figs.11g, h).These results lend support to the confidence of using the E-SCP/SCP to distinguish a supercell environment in a TC envelope.

    5.Summary

    This study presents an analysis of the radar-based characteristics and formation environment of the identifiable supercells (both onshore and offshore) embedded in the landfalling Typhoon Mujigae (2015) based on Doppler weather radars and numerical simulations.During a 24-hour study period (from 6 h before to 18 h after TC’s landfall), a total of 113 supercells were identified with only 3 of them being tornadic.The tornadic mesocyclones were found to be distinctly stronger than the non-tornadic ones.The identified supercells could form at any time of day and had a median lifespan of 48 min.Their mesocyclones were characterized by a diameter of generally less than 5 km and a depth of less than 4 km.

    Figure 12 shows an idealized illustration of the convective regions in Typhoon Mujigae (2015).Supercells mainly formed in the northeast quadrant rather than the right-front quadrant with respect to the TC motion.More than 90% of the supercells were located in the azimuthal sector between?10° and 30° (due east is regarded as 0°) with respect to the TC center.These supercells were primarily observed over flat underlying surfaces and tended to dissipate when approaching mountain barriers.No supercell was detected in the northwest or southwest quadrants.In the shear-relative coordinates, most supercells were localized to the downshear left region, which is in agreement with the spatial pattern of the tornadoes in a weak sheared-TC environment(Schenkel et al., 2020).The number of onshore supercells was nearly one-half that of offshore supercells, providing strong evidence that offshore supercells could be more prevalent than onshore supercells in a TC circulation.It is worth noting that we do not try to generalize any conclusion based on this single case.However, the observational findings do provide us with a sense that quite a number of supercells may exist offshore (or over ocean) within a landfalling TC interior.Their attendant damaging winds and tornadoes are a potential risk to maritime traffic and oil rigs.

    Fig.11.As in Fig.9, but for the parameters calculated at (left column) 6 h before and (right column) 6 h after the landfall of Typhoon Mujigae (2015).

    The environmental analysis for Typhoon Mujigae(2015) suggests that the northeast quadrant is most favorable for supercell formation due to the best match among the entraining CAPE, lower-troposphere vertical wind shear, and low-level storm relative helicity.The nondimensional supercell composite parameter that is widely used for assessing midlatitude supercell potential is also potentially effective in separating supercell from non-supercell environments in the TC envelope.Regarding the practical use of the SCP/E-SCP for assessing a TC supercell environment, it is important to determine the exact criteria by observations from different landfalling TCs.Additionally, the orography impedes supercell organization even though the atmospheric conditions are favorable for supercell formation.

    Fig.12.Schematic illustration of radar reflectivity in Typhoon Mujigae (2015).

    Although the present study was based on only one TC case, the holistic picture of supercell features within a TC’s envelope is of benefit for identifying the environmental features that separate supercell from non-supercell zones on a horizontal scale of O (103km), providing evidence for the feasibility of SCP in the TC environment.The statistics show that only 3 of 113 mini-supercells were tornadic, suggesting the number of tornadic storms may be small even in an outbreak of mini-supercells within a landfalling TC.This paper provides a detailed study of TC supercells from China, adding to the body of literature that illustrates global TC supercell and risk assessments.The results may help provide insights for our understanding of TC associated supercells and tornadoes, especially in coastal areas that are vulnerable to severe convective weather due to landfalling TCs.

    Acknowledgements.This article is dedicated to Dr.Fuqing ZHANG, who was a talented atmospheric scientist, a very good friend and a great mentor.Fuqing’s passion for life and atmospheric science inspired and encouraged many of us.As a Ph.D student of Fuqing, the corresponding author really cherishes those days when Fuqing occasionally stepped into office with “How are you” and “Something is wrong” during discussion.This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.41875051 and 41905043), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No.2019M653146).The authors would like to thank Dr.Kenta SUEKI for helping the E-CAPE calculation, and anonymous reviewers who helped us improve the quality of this paper.The numerical simulations were performed on TianHe-1 (A) at National Supercomputer Center in Tianjin, China.

    免费看不卡的av| 日韩中字成人| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 高清不卡的av网站| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 老女人水多毛片| 国产毛片在线视频| 午夜av观看不卡| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 韩国av在线不卡| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| videossex国产| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 三级国产精品片| 国产色婷婷99| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久婷婷青草| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 亚洲综合色网址| 最近手机中文字幕大全| av黄色大香蕉| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲中文av在线| 99香蕉大伊视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 99久久人妻综合| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成人国语在线视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 色5月婷婷丁香| 大香蕉久久成人网| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲四区av| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 婷婷成人精品国产| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 黄色 视频免费看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲国产看品久久| www.av在线官网国产| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| a级毛色黄片| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产av精品麻豆| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| a 毛片基地| 制服人妻中文乱码| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 在线天堂中文资源库| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产激情久久老熟女| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久99一区二区三区| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 老司机影院成人| 国产色婷婷99| 成人手机av| 观看美女的网站| 国产一级毛片在线| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 成人影院久久| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 美女国产视频在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 精品少妇内射三级| av视频免费观看在线观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| tube8黄色片| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 久久这里只有精品19| 春色校园在线视频观看| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 三级国产精品片| av有码第一页| 国产激情久久老熟女| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 大码成人一级视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 午夜免费观看性视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 老司机影院成人| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 咕卡用的链子| 深夜精品福利| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲国产精品999| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 老女人水多毛片| 国产探花极品一区二区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 午夜日本视频在线| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久久国产网址| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| tube8黄色片| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日日撸夜夜添| 成人二区视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 赤兔流量卡办理| 日本wwww免费看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 三级国产精品片| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 精品第一国产精品| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 观看av在线不卡| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久狼人影院| 久久久久久伊人网av| a级毛色黄片| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产成人精品一,二区| 18在线观看网站| 性色avwww在线观看| 色5月婷婷丁香| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产又爽黄色视频| 国产精品.久久久| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 男女国产视频网站| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 日韩av免费高清视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 春色校园在线视频观看| 色网站视频免费| 久久热在线av| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 日韩一区二区三区影片| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 免费看av在线观看网站| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| av卡一久久| 亚洲精品一二三| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 午夜激情av网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 久久 成人 亚洲| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 人妻一区二区av| 国产激情久久老熟女| tube8黄色片| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久影院123| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久久久视频综合| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 99热网站在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| av在线观看视频网站免费| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产在线免费精品| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲av福利一区| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 色哟哟·www| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲性久久影院| 观看av在线不卡| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久99精品国语久久久| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 在线观看www视频免费| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 看免费av毛片| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久97久久精品| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产片内射在线| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 久久久精品区二区三区| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 黄色一级大片看看| 99久久综合免费| 国产成人精品在线电影| videossex国产| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 免费观看a级毛片全部| a级毛片黄视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产 精品1| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 22中文网久久字幕| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 1024视频免费在线观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 美女中出高潮动态图| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 一级爰片在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 99热网站在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 亚洲图色成人| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 久久 成人 亚洲| 秋霞伦理黄片| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 老司机影院成人| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 另类精品久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产激情久久老熟女| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 成人影院久久| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 大码成人一级视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产视频首页在线观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日本91视频免费播放| 九色成人免费人妻av| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久精品国产综合久久久 | 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 18+在线观看网站| 久久久久久久精品精品| 全区人妻精品视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| av免费观看日本| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 色5月婷婷丁香| 嫩草影院入口| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 另类精品久久| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 免费看av在线观看网站| av播播在线观看一区| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 精品久久久精品久久久| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 五月天丁香电影| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 老女人水多毛片| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲在久久综合| 久久热在线av| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 欧美3d第一页| 久久久久视频综合| 欧美+日韩+精品| 精品国产国语对白av| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久久久久久国产电影| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 免费观看性生交大片5| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 人人澡人人妻人| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 老司机影院毛片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 街头女战士在线观看网站| 99九九在线精品视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 乱人伦中国视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 18在线观看网站| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 两个人看的免费小视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 另类精品久久| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产在线免费精品| 久久精品夜色国产| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 伦精品一区二区三区| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| videos熟女内射| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲综合色网址| 成人免费观看视频高清| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 伦精品一区二区三区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 少妇的逼水好多| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 亚洲综合色惰| 欧美人与善性xxx| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 免费大片18禁| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 欧美性感艳星| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 97在线人人人人妻| 综合色丁香网| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 久久久久久久精品精品| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 99九九在线精品视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一|