• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Improving the Analyses and Forecasts of a Tropical Squall Line Using Upper Tropospheric Infrared Satellite Observations※

    2022-04-02 05:51:40ManYauCHANandXingchaoCHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年5期

    Man-Yau CHAN and Xingchao CHEN

    Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, and Center for Advanced Data Assimilation and Predictability Techniques, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA 16802, USA

    ABSTRACT The advent of modern geostationary satellite infrared radiance observations has noticeably improved numerical weather forecasts and analyses.However, compared to midlatitude weather systems and tropical cyclones, research into using infrared radiance observations for numerically predicting and analyzing tropical mesoscale convective systems remain mostly fallow.Since tropical mesoscale convective systems play a crucial role in regional and global weather, this deficit should be addressed.This study is the first of its kind to examine the potential impacts of assimilating all-sky upper tropospheric infrared radiance observations on the prediction of a tropical squall line.Even though these all-sky infrared radiance observations are not directly affected by lower-tropospheric winds, the high-frequency assimilation of these allsky infrared radiance observations improved the analyses of the tropical squall line’s outflow position.Aside from that, the assimilation of all-sky infrared radiance observations improved the analyses and prediction of the squall line’s cloud field.Finally, reducing the frequency of assimilating these all-sky infrared radiance observations weakened these improvements to the analyzed outflow position, as well as the analyses and predictions of cloud fields.

    Key words: data assimilation, infrared satellite observations, numerical weather prediction, mesoscale convective systems, tropical meteorology

    1.Introduction

    Tropical mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) contribute more than 60% of the total tropical precipitation (Mohr et al., 1999; Houze, 2004; Nesbitt et al., 2006; Liu, 2011;Roca and Fiolleau, 2020), which include tropical squall lines and other non-squall organized convective disturbances (Krishnamurti et al., 2013).In addition, tropical MCSs affect the global climate and weather across a large range of spatial scales (Madden and Julian, 1971; Held and Hou, 1980; Hoskins and Karoly, 1981; Weickmann, 1983;Satoh, 1994; Kiladis et al., 2009; Johnson and Ciesielski,2013).It is thus important to accurately analyze and predict tropical MCSs.

    Analyses are typically used to study the dynamics, and initiate numerical predictions, of tropical MCSs.These analyses are normally produced using a class of Bayesian inference methods known as data assimilation (DA; Geer et al.,2018; Hersbach et al., 2020).DA generates these analyses by combining observations with a forecast from a preceding forecast cycle, while accounting for the uncertainties in both sources of information (e.g., Lorenc, 1986; Talagrand and Courtier, 1987; Evensen, 1994).Thus, one way to improve the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs is to improve the DA process.Furthermore, the improved analyses produced by DA can be used to deepen our understanding of the characteristics and dynamics of tropical MCSs.

    The accuracy of DA-produced atmospheric analyses has a strong dependence on the availability of observations(Liu and Rabier, 2002; Benjamin et al., 2004; Ying and Zhang, 2018; Ying et al., 2018).Unfortunately, due to the difficulty of maintaining observation sites over ocean and tropical islands, in-situ observations of the atmosphere are generally sparse and infrequent over the Tropics.These sparse and infrequent in-situ observations are thus inadequate to capture most tropical MCSs.For instance, radiosondes and rawinsondes are usually released every 12 hours, and are typically spaced more than 500 km apart in the Tropics (Ingleby,2017).In contrast, individual convective cells within tropical MCSs typically have length scales under 100 km and evolve on time scales less an hour, i.e., it is challenging to constrain the errors in the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs using in-situ observations alone (Liu and Rabier,2002).

    Supplementing in-situ observations with geostationary satellite all-sky infrared radiance observations has the potential to improve the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs.Unlike in-situ observations, modern satellite infrared radiance observation pixels are spaced less than 10 km apart and have sampling periods of 30 minutes or less.Thus,these geostationary satellite infrared radiance observations(henceforth, IR observations) have spatiotemporal resolutions that are closer to the spatiotemporal scale of tropical moist convection than those of in-situ observations.All-sky IR observations thus have the potential to constrain errors in the analyses and prediction of tropical MCSs.This potential should be explored.

    At the time of writing, most of the research on assimilating all-sky IR observations into convection-permitting models had been done in the context of mid-latitude weather systems and tropical cyclones.Research in these contexts has found that the addition of IR observations improved the analyzed thermodynamic and cloud fields (e.g., Vukicevic et al., 2004, 2006; Otkin, 2010, 2012; Honda et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2018; Minamide and Zhang, 2019; Sawada et al., 2019).In contrast, relatively little work has been done in the context of tropical MCSs.Nonetheless, the pattern of improvement seen in the context of convection-permitting mid-latitude severe weather and tropical cyclone prediction should also be achievable in the context of tropical MCSs.

    Ying and Zhang (2018) was among the first to examine the potential impacts of assimilating all-sky IR observations on the prediction of tropical MCSs.Using ensembles of gray-zone resolution simulations, Ying and Zhang (2018)performed idealized Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) over the tropical Indian Ocean during the active phase of the October 2011 Madden?Julian Oscillation(MJO; Madden and Julian, 1971) event.Gray-zone resolution simulations are simulations that use horizontal grid spacing fine enough to resolve mesoscale convective systems,but too coarse to resolve individual convective updrafts(Chen et al., 2018c).Ying and Zhang (2018) found that the inclusion of IR observations can improve the analyzed cloud hydrometeor fields.Chan et al.(2020b) subsequently performed real data DA experiments for a similar time period and domain and found that the assimilation of real IR observations can potentially improve cloud field analyses and predictions across a range of spatial scales, as well as short-term rainfall predictions.These improvements seen in Ying and Zhang (2018) and Chan et al.(2020b) are consistent with the improvements seen in the context of mid-latitude weather and tropical cyclone convection-permitting numerical weather prediction.

    However, several important questions remain unanswered regarding the assimilation of all-sky IR observations in the context of tropical MCSs.First, how does the assimilation of real-world IR observations improve the thermodynamic and dynamic fields of tropical MCSs? Second, how does the accuracy of the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs vary with the frequency of IR DA? Addressing these questions could potentially inform the future assimilation of IR observations in the Tropics and improve the analyses and forecasts of tropical MCSs.

    In this article, we will attempt to answer these two important questions in the case of a tropical squall line that swept through Sumatra, the Malay Peninsula and Borneo (Fig.1a).To study these questions, we employed ensembles of grayzone resolution Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)model simulations and assimilated real-world conventional observations.We also assimilated IR observations from the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI), which is on-board the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite (Bessho et al., 2016).

    2.Materials and Methods

    2.1.Setup of simulation ensembles

    To generate WRF simulation ensembles of the squall line, we employed the Advanced Research WRF (Skamarock et al., 2008) model (version 3.8.1).The simulation domain covers the area plotted in Fig.1a and has 560 × 450 horizontal grid points with 9-km grid spacing.45 model levels were employed, with the bottommost 9 levels within the lowest 1-km of the model, and the model top pressure set to 20 hPa.

    For the WRF model’s physics and dynamics, we employed the updated Goddard shortwave scheme (Chou and Suarez, 1999) and the Global Circulation Model version of the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTMG) longwave radiation scheme (Iacono et al., 2008).Surface processes were generally simulated using the unified Noah land surface physics scheme (Chen and Dudhia, 2001), the only exception being that surface skin temperatures were diagnosed via the method of Zeng and Beljaars (2005).The Yonsei University (YSU) boundary layer scheme (Hong et al., 2006)was employed to handle subgrid-scale turbulent mixing.Finally, we utilized the scheme of Thompson et al.(2008)to parameterize cloud microphysical processes.

    Note that while the 9-km horizontal grid spacing is too coarse to resolve individual convective updrafts, it is sufficient to resolve the basic dynamics of tropical MCSs.There are several reasons behind choosing this horizontal grid spacing.First, due to the rapid motion of the tropical squall line(Fig.1a), a large domain is required.Due to our limited computational resources, it is difficult to utilize smaller grid spacings in this large domain.Second, earlier work over the nearby Indian Ocean have shown that this 9-km grid spacing is sufficiently small to realistically replicate the precipitation, circulation, thermodynamic, and radiation features of organized mesoscale convection over tropical oceans (Wang et al., 2015).Finally, this 9-km grid spacing is widely employed in studies that examine the overturning and the physical mechanisms of organized tropical convection(Chen et al.2018a, b, c; Chen et al., 2020; Ruppert and Chen, 2020; Ruppert et al., 2020).

    We have also opted to avoid the use of cumulus parameterizations in this study.The reason is that earlier studies in the neighboring tropical Indian Ocean were able to obtain reasonable tropical MCSs without cumulus parameterizations (Wang et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2018a, b, c; He et al.,2019; Chen et al., 2020; Ou et al., 2020; Ruppert and Chen,2020; Ruppert et al., 2020).These studies were able to do so because the 9-km grid spacing was fine enough to resolve mesoscale convective updrafts.

    In this study, we initiated 50-member WRF ensemble simulations, starting at 0000 UTC 30 May 2017.To construct the needed 50 sets of initial conditions, we utilized the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast(ECMWF) fifth-generation global reanalysis data (ERA5;Hersbach et al., 2020) 10-member ensemble fields at 0000 UTC on 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 May, as well as the ERA5 reanalysis fields at 0000 UTC 30 May.To be precise, for each of the 5 dates, we generated 10 perturbations from the ERA5 10-member ensemble by subtracting the ensemble mean on said dates from each of the 10-members.This procedure produced a set of 50 perturbations.We then added the ERA5 reanalysis fields at 0000 UTC May 30 to the 50 perturbations to produce 50 sets of initial conditions.The ERA5 reanalysis fields were also used to generate the boundary conditions, i.e., all 50-members were subjected to the same boundary conditions.The ensemble was then integrated forward for 12 hours to generate flow-dependent ensemble statistics at 1200 UTC 30 May.All data assimilation experiments began at 1200 UTC 30 May.

    2.2.Observation sources

    To examine the questions raised in section 1, we performed experiments where we assimilated non-IR conventional observations and satellite all-sky IR observations.The non-IR conventional observations include surface station, pilot, rawinsonde, radiosonde, and ship observations from the Global Telecommunication System from the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Research Data Archive (NCAR RDA).The non-IR conventional observations also include satellite-derived atmospheric motion vectors from the Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Tropical Cyclone Archive.These non-IR conventional observations were assimilated every 3 hours in all experiments.

    Aside from the non-IR conventional observations, we also assimilated AHI channel 8 (6.2 μm) infrared brightness temperature observations (ch08-BT).The AHI instrument is on board the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite,which is located above the Equator, at 140.7°E.Under clear-sky conditions, ch08-BT observations typically reflect the upper tropospheric water vapor content (Otkin, 2012).These observations are generally available every 10 minutes.

    2.3.Setup of data assimilation experiments

    To investigate the important questions raised in section 1, we performed three DA experiments.The first experiment assimilated non-IR conventional observations every three hours (conv experiment).In the second experiment,we assimilated both ch08-BT and non-IR conventional observations every three hours (conv+ch08_3hrly).Finally, in the third experiment, we assimilated non-IR conventional observations every three hours, and ch08-BT observations every 30 minutes (conv+ch08_30min).

    In this study, we employed the Pennsylvania State University WRF Ensemble Kalman Filter system (PSU-EnKF;Meng and Zhang, 2008) as our DA system.The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) constructs ensemble analyses by combining an ensemble of forecasts with observations (Evensen,1994; Burgers et al., 1998).To be precise, the EnKF communicates information from the observations into the modeled atmospheric fields using forecast-estimated covariances between the model state variables and the observable quantities predicted by the forecast.The PSU-EnKF utilizes the method of Whitaker and Hamill (2002) to construct the ensemble analyses.A schematic of how the PSU-EnKF assimilates observations over time is shown in Fig.2.

    The PSU-EnKF algorithm employed here is a slightly modified version of the PSU-EnKF described in Chan et al.(2020b) [the Ensemble Square-Root Filter algorithm(EnSRF) in section 2c].The only modification to the algorithm is that the mean of the forecasted observations is no longer calculated using the ensemble mean.Instead, the mean of the forecasted observations is calculated by first computing the simulated observations for all forecast members,and then taking the ensemble mean of the result.This modification was made to mitigate the artificial dry bias produced by the previous EnSRF implementation when infrared observations are assimilated.The cause of this artificial dry bias is described in Section 3b of Chan et al (2020b).

    Aside from that, we also performed 80% relaxation to prior perturbations to prevent filter divergence (Zhang et al.,2004).The variables updated by the PSU-EnKF include the three-dimensional winds, water vapor mixing ratio, liquid cloud mixing ratio, ice cloud mixing ratio, rain mixing ratio,snow mixing ratio, graupel mixing ratio, temperature, and pressure.All localizations are performed using the Gaspari?Cohn 1999 fifth-order polynomial (Gaspari and Cohn, 1999).

    With regards to the assimilation of conventional observations, we assimilated the atmospheric motion vectors with a horizontal radius of influence (HROI) of 100 km, and no vertical localization.Sounding and aircraft observations were assimilated with a 700 km HROI and a 5 model layer vertical radius of influence (VROI).With regards to surface observations, Metéorologique Aviation Régulière (METAR)observations, surface synoptic observations (SYNOP) observations and ship observations were respectively assimilated with HROIs of 600 km, 300 km and 1400 km.All three surface observation types were assimilated with a 45 model layer VROI.

    To assimilate the ch08-BT observations, we employed the Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM), release 2.3.0, to calculate the IR AHI brightness temperatures from the WRF ensemble.The ch08-BT observations were thinned to a spacing of 30 km, and then assimilated with a HROI of 100 km (Chan et al., 2020b).Furthermore, we employed the adaptive observation error inflation scheme(AOEI) of Minamide and Zhang (2017), as well as the adaptive background error inflation scheme (ABEI) of Minamide and Zhang (2019), to assimilate the ch08-BT observations.No vertical localization was performed for the ch08-BT observations.Better results might be possible with more tuning, which can be explored in future studies.

    Fig.2.A schematic showing how the PSU-EnKF system assimilates observations at times t1 and t2.The bubbles represent the envelop of possible model values predicted by an ensemble of model outputs, and are color-coded by time.Suppose we have three ensemble members at time t0.To assimilate the observation at t1, we use WRF to integrate the three members from t0 to t1.Then, the PSU-EnKF ingests the observation at t1, which results in the threemember ensemble shifting towards and contracting around the ensemble.To assimilate the observation at t2 (and at all subsequent times), the same integrate-then-ingest procedure is repeated.

    Aside from these settings, no ch08-BT observations were rejected in this study.Observations with large innovations are often rejected because these observations might be erroneous (e.g., J?rvinen and Undén, 1997; Cardinali et al.,2003).In our setup, the AOEI inflates the observation error of ch08-BT observations with large innovations.The AOEI thus weakens the magnitude of the analysis increments coming from these large innovation ch08-BT observations, i.e.,AOEI functions as a safety measure against potentially problematic ch08-BT observations.As such, we did not reject any ch08-BT observations in this study.

    It should also be noted that no bias correction for the ch08-BT observations were employed here because we found the ch08-BT biases are small in this tropical squall line case.As discussed in Chan et al.(2020b), the square of the bias is a component of the mean-squared difference(MSD) between the ensemble mean and observed ch08-BT.The conv, conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min experiments’ squared prior ch08-BT biases are 0.49 K2, 0.25 K2,and 0.00 K2, respectively.In contrast, the prior ch08-BT MSDs of the conv, conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min experiments are 68.9 K2, 23.0 K2, and 16.0 K2, respectively,i.e., the squared prior ch08-BT biases account for less than 1.1% of the prior ch08-BT MSD.Thus, we consider the ch08-BT biases to be small and did not employ bias correc-tion when assimilating ch08-BT observations.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Description of the observed tropical squall line

    Before delving into the important questions raised in section 1, we will describe the observed behavior of this study’s tropical squall line case.Tropical squall lines are a frequently occurring type of tropical MCSs over our study’s domain (Lo and Orton, 2016; Chan et al., 2019; Sun et al.,2020).On 30 May 2017, the AHI observed a southeastward propagating MCS over the equatorial Indian Ocean (Fig.1a).By 1500 UTC 30 May, the mesoscale convective system evolved into a southeastward propagating, bow-shaped squall line.At this time, the squall line was generally aligned in the northeast-southwest direction, with the northeastern tip of the squall line grazing the west coast of Sumatra (not shown here).

    For the next 12 hours, AHI observations indicate that the squall did not penetrate the mountain range that runs along most of the west coast of Sumatra.At approximately 0900 UTC 31 May, the northeastern half of the squall line penetrated the mountain range.Within the next 3 hours, the northeastern half and the southwestern half of the squall split apart.For the remainder of the study, we will focus on the northeastern half because it passed over surface meteorological stations.The northeastern half developed a northsouth alignment and propagated eastwards (Fig.1a), passing through Sumatra, and then the Strait of Malacca.This propagation behavior and morphology is rather typical of squalls in the Sumatra-Borneo region (Lo and Orton, 2016;Chan et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020).By 0000 UTC 2 June,the squall line had reached the southwestern coast of Borneo (Fig.1a) and proceeded to dissipate.

    According to the ERA5, the observed squall line is collocated with the advancing edge of a westerly wind burst (not shown).Furthermore, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s (BoM’s) Real-time Multivariate MJO index(Wheeler and Hendon, 2004) indicated that during the squall line’s time frame, the MJO’s active phase was advancing from the Indian Ocean into the Maritime Continent.As westerly wind bursts are often associated with the onset of the MJO’s active phase (Zhang, 2005), the MJO index supports the association between the squall line and a westerly wind burst seen in the ERA5 data.Future work can examine the association between westerly wind bursts and tropical squall lines in the region.

    3.2.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved analyzed clouds

    The first question we will address in this study is whether adding all-sky IR observations into DA can improve the analyses and prediction of a tropical squall line.To that end, we will be comparing the conv and the conv+ch08_30min experiments.Furthermore, to focus on the squall line itself, the experiments will be compared in an area around the squall line’s leading edge.

    To determine the position of the leading edge, we computed the meridional average of the observed AHI channel 14 brightness temperatures (ch14-BT) for latitudes between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.The result is plotted as a longitude-time diagram in Fig.1b.Because the squall line’s clouds show up as strong cold signals in ch14-BT, we can determine the position of the leading edge of the squall line from Fig.1b,which is indicated by a dashed black line.For the rest of this article, we will be comparing the experiments in the vicinity of these inferred positions.

    We begin with examining the impacts of including half-hourly ch08-BT observations, in addition to 3-hourly conventional observations, on the cloud fields.Since ch14-BT was not assimilated and indicates the presence and absence of clouds, the root-mean-square difference (RMSD)between the analyzed and observed ch14-BT can be used to gauge the quality of the analyzed cloud fields.To be more precise, we will be comparing the ch14-BT RMSDs computed for a region surrounding the squall line’s leading edge(Fig.1c).The region covers a rectangular area between 10°S and 5°S, as well as between 15 degrees west and 5 degrees east of the leading edge (Fig.1b).As seen in Fig.1c,conv+ch08_30min’s RMSDs are at all times substantially smaller than that of conv.On average, conv+ch08_30min’s RMSD (16.2 K) is ~35% smaller than conv’s RMSD (25.0 K).In other words, the assimilation of IR observations, on top of conventional observations, can improve analyses of the squall line’s cloud field.This improvement is in line with earlier work (Ying and Zhang, 2018).Finally,conv+ch08_30min’s consistency ratio (CR ≡ root-meansquare spread (RMSS)/RMSD) is closer to the optimal value of 1 than that of conv.This indicates that the assimilation of half-hourly IR observations improved the ensemble dispersion for cloud fields.

    3.3.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved analyzed outflow position

    Aside from improving the cloud field, the inclusion of half-hourly ch08-BT observations also improved the position of the squall line surface outflow.Surface outflows can generate converging surface winds ahead of the squall line,and thus encourage the formation of new cells ahead of the squall line (e.g., Gamache and Houze, 1982; Moncrieff and Liu, 1999).Since the initiation of new cells ahead of the squall line is important for squall line propagation (e.g., Fovell et al., 2006), improving the position of the analyzed surface outflow can improve the analyses and prediction of the squall line.

    To see the improvement in surface outflow, consider that the outflow in this squall line is characterized by strong surface westerlies.Figures 3a and 3c show longitude?time diagrams of the meridionally-averaged analysis mean zonal wind at 300-m above sea level in the conv and conv+ch08_30min experiments.The thick black contours trace the observed 224 K ch14-BT contour, which indicates the position of the squall line.The meridional average was performed between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.Between 1200 UTC 31 May and 1800 UTC 1 June, the predicted outflow in the conv experiment is mostly located east of the observed leading edge (Fig.3a; black contours).In contrast, the analyzed zone of strong westerlies in conv+ch08_30min overlaps substantially with the observed squall (Fig.3c).These longitude-time diagrams suggest that the half-hourly assimilation of ch08-BT observations improved the positions of the surface outflow.

    To further confirm the improvement of the surface outflow position, we examined three-hourly unassimilated surface zonal wind observations from a surface station located at 2.7°S, 107.8°E (marked with white cross in Fig.1a).These surface observations were obtained from the Integrated Surface Database (ISD), which is maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA).The time-series of the observed and analyzed zonal winds for this station is plotted in Fig.3d.

    As can be inferred from Fig.3d, the analyzed squall line surface outflow from the conv+ch08_30min experiment outperformed that of conv in several ways.The first way is in terms of the onset time of the squall line surface outflow at the station.The onset of the squall line surface outflow is indicated by strengthening westerlies.As can be seen in Fig.3d, the onset time from the conv+ch08_30min experiment analyzed surface outflow (around 1200 UTC 31 May) is slightly closer to the observed onset time(around 1800 UTC 31 May) than that of conv (around 0600 UTC 31 May).Aside from the difference in onset times,Fig.3d indicates that the squall line outflow in conv leaves the station (around 0600 UTC 1 June) 6 hours earlier than the observed squall line (around 1200 UTC 1 June),whereas the squall line outflow from conv+ch08_30min leaves the station at roughly the same time as the observed squall line.These differences in onset and exit times imply that the squall line outflow in conv is displaced east of the actual outflow, and that this displacement error is largely reduced in conv+ch08_30min.This reduction in surface outflow displacement error is consistent with Figs.3a and 3c.

    Fig.3.Squall-relative longitude-time diagrams of the analyzed zonal wind, averaged between 3.6°S to 4.4°S, at 300 m above sea level (a, b, c).The thick black contours in panels (a), (b), and (c) indicate the 224 K contour of the observed ch14-BT,averaged between the same latitudes.The gray shading indicates the storm-relative longitudes of the mountain range along the west coast of Sumatra, where no 300-m zonal wind information is available in the model.Also, the thick dotted lines indicate the relative longitude of the surface station referred to in the text.Finally, panel (d) shows time series of the observed surface zonal wind, analyzed zonal wind, as well as the observed ch14-BT at a surface station located at 2.7°S,107.8°E.

    It should also be noted here that the conv+ch08_30min experiment also outperforms conv in terms of the fit to the unassimilated zonal wind observations when the squall line is passing over the surface station (from 2100 UTC 31 May to 1200 UTC 1 June).This improvement is likely because the eastward displacement error is substantially smaller in conv+ch08_30min than in conv.

    Interestingly, the improvements in surface outflow position introduced by spatiotemporally dense IR DA occurred in the absence of dense surface observations.Previous studies have suggested that dense surface observations can improve squall line surface outflows and the associated gust front positions (e.g., Chen et al., 2016).Our results thus suggest that spatiotemporally dense IR observations can be a potential substitute for dense surface observations when constraining errors associated with squall line surface outflows and gust front positions.

    The surface outflow position improvements introduced by half-hourly IR DA can be plausibly explained by the combination of two complementary effects.The first effect comes from the cloud field improvements introduced by half-hourly ch08-BT DA.These cloud field improvements include improvements to the position of the analyzed squall line clouds, which in turn leads to improved positioning of the squall line rainfall.Since the surface outflow is induced by rainfall, it is plausible that an improved rainfall position can improve the position of the surface outflow.

    The second effect arises from the positive correlation between forecasted ch08-BT just behind the observed leading edge, and the ~950 hPa zonal wind near the leading edge of the surface outflow (henceforth, gust front).For instance, at 0000 UTC on 1 June, the forecasted ensemble mean gust front is at roughly 1°E relative longitude (similar to the analyzed gust front in Fig.3c).Likewise, Fig.4b indicates that the ~950 hPa zonal wind at ~1°E relative longitude is positively correlated with forecasted ch08-BT just behind the leading edge (?1°E relative longitude), i.e., this positive correlation is collocated with the gust front.

    To see how this positive gust front zonal wind correlation allows the EnKF to shift the gust front, consider that the forecasted squall line clouds tend to be displaced eastwards of the observed squall line clouds.Since the observed squall line’s highest clouds tend to occur at around ?1°E relative longitude (not shown, but can be inferred from Fig.1b),this eastward displacement indicates that the forecasted clouds at ?1°E relative longitude should be lower than that of the observations.In other words, the forecasted ch08-BT is higher than that of the observations at ?1°E relative longitude.This results in a negative ch08-BT innovation at ?1°E relative longitude.Because of the positive correlation, this negative innovation results in a negative westerly (or easterly) analysis increment at the gust front.Since the wind in the gust front is mostly westerly, the analysis increment weakens the westerly winds at the gust front.This weakening means that the forecasted gust front is forced westward.As such, the assimilation of ch08-BT observations near the observed leading edge improved the position of the gust front through the correlations between ch08-BT and the gust front’s zonal wind.

    3.4.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved deterministic forecasts of cloud fields

    Aside from improving the analyzed cloud fields and surface outflow position, the half-hourly assimilation of IR observations also improved the short-term deterministic forecasts of the squall line.These deterministic forecasts were initiated from the EnKF analysis means.Figure 5 shows the meridionally-averaged, deterministically forecasted ch14-BT.Like Figs.1c, 3, and 4, the meridional average was done between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.As can be seen in Fig.5, for the first 3 hours of the deterministic forecasts, the positions of the forecasted clouds from conv+ch08_30min are closer to the observations than those from conv, especially for the forecasts initialized after 1200 UTC 1 June.Furthermore,the squall-relative ch14-BT RMSD (calculated as in Fig.1c)of the conv+ch08_30min deterministic forecasts are lower than those of the conv (not shown) for the first three hours.To be more precise, on average, conv+ch08_30min ch14-BT deterministic forecast RMSDs are about 20% smaller than those of conv from initiation to up to a lead time of 2 hours.For lead times of 3 hours and longer, the ch14-BT deterministic forecast RMSDs of both experiments are statistically indistinguishable.These improvements to the shortterm deterministic forecasts of cloud fields are akin to those seen in Chan et al.(2020b).

    Fig.4.Correlations between ch08-BT and zonal wind on 1 June (0000 UTC) for (a) the conv + ch08_3hrly experiment, and (b) the conv + ch08_30min experiment.These correlations are plotted for a ch08 observation located 1 degree west of the squall’s leading edge (vertical dashed lines).Note that the plotted values are the average of correlations across 10 zonal cross-sections between 3.6°S to 4.4°S.

    Fig.5.Storm-relative longitude-time diagrams of deterministically forecasted ch14-BT (shading), as well as the 224 K contour of the observed ch14-BT (black contours).All plotted ch14-BT are averaged between 3.6°S to 4.4°S.Panels a, d, g and j show the deterministic forecasts from the conv experiment.Similar plots were also produced for the conv + ch08_3hrly(b, e, h and k) and conv + ch08_30min (c, f, i and l) experiments.The forecasted ch14-BT and the observed ch14-BT at the corresponding times are shown for the start times of the forecasts (a, b and c), at a lead time of 1 hour (d, e and f), at a lead time of 2 hours (g, h and i), and a lead time of 3 hours (j, k and l).Note that the deterministic forecasts from 13 initiation times are shown in each panel.The first deterministic forecasts were initiated on 31 May (1200 UTC), and subsequent deterministic forecasts were initiated every 3 hours, up to and including 2 June (0000 UTC).

    3.5.Reducing the frequency of ch08-BT DA degraded analyses and deterministic forecasts

    Another important question raised in section 1 is how the accuracy and prediction of the tropical squall line vary with the update frequency of IR DA.To examine this question, we will be comparing the conv+ch08_30min and conv+ch08_3hrly experiments.

    Reducing the frequency of ch08-BT DA generally degraded the analyses and deterministic forecasts of cloud fields (Figs.1 and 5).According to Fig.1c, decreasing ch08-BT DA frequency from half-hourly to three-hourly generally increased the analysis ch14-BT RMSD.On average,the RMSDs increased by ~10%, from 16.2 K to 18.1 K.Furthermore, Fig.5 indicates that reduction in ch08-BT DA frequency degraded the deterministically forecasted positions of the squall line for the three hours of the deterministic forecast, and the degradations are especially noticeable for the forecasts initialized after 1200 UTC 1 June (Figs.5e and 5h).Taken together, these degradations imply that a higher frequency of data assimilation is preferable for short-term cloud field analyses and forecasts.

    The analyzed positions of the squall line’s outflow were also degraded when the frequency of ch08-BT DA was reduced from half-hourly to three-hourly.Between 31 May (1200 UTC) and 1 June (1800 UTC), the analyzed strong zonal wind zone from conv+ch08_3hrly does not overlap much with the observed squall (Fig.3b), whereas that of the conv+ch08_30min substantially overlaps the observed squall (Fig.3c).Furthermore, while the validation surface station data indicates the analyzed outflows of conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min arrived at the station at the same time (Fig.3d), the conv+ch08_30min analyzed outflow is clearly better than that of conv+ch08_3hrly when the squall line passed over the surface station during 0000 UTC–1200 UTC 1 June.In other words, high frequency data assimilation is preferable for improving the analyzed position of storm outflows.

    This degradation in squall line outflow position is also consistent with the ensemble correlations between simulated ch08-BT and zonal wind (Fig.4a).While similar nearsurface dipole correlation patterns exist in both the conv+ch08_30min and conv+ch08_3hrly experiments, the dipole pattern in conv+ch08_3hrly is dislocated ~1.5 degrees east of the ch08-BT observation location.In other words, the capability of conv+ch08_3hrly in moving the squall line surface outflow position westwards is limited when compared to that of conv+ch08_30min.

    It should be noted here that while decreasing the frequency of ch08-BT DA did dramatically degrade the quality of the analyzed cloud fields, analyzed outflow, and forecasted clouds, these quantities in conv+ch08_3hrly still outperformed those conv.In other words, even a moderate frequency of ch08-BT DA was able to improve these quantities beyond what is achieved by non-IR conventional observation DA.

    4.Conclusions

    In this study, we have delved into the hitherto unexplored dynamic and thermodynamic impacts of assimilating IR observations for the case of a tropical squall line.In line with earlier work (e.g., Ying and Zhang, 2018), we confirmed that introducing ch08-BT observations into DA improved the analyses and predictions of a tropical squall line’s cloud field.Even though the ch08-BT observations are insensitive to lower-tropospheric zonal winds, the assimilation of these observations improved the position of the squall line’s lower tropospheric outflow zone.This improvement was likely due to the improved cloud fields, as well as the near-surface dipole forecast ensemble correlations between ch08-BT and lower-tropospheric zonal winds.Finally, we also found that increasing the frequency of ch08-BT observations further improved the analyzed cloud field, forecasted cloud field, and the analyzed outflow position.

    Since this study is the first of its kind to specifically examine the improvements from introducing IR observations into tropical MCS analyses and prediction, there are many areas for future work.These areas can be broken into three types: completeness, the assimilation of other observations and areas for future DA algorithm development.

    The first area for completeness concerns the fact that we have only examined the impacts for one tropical squall line in the Sumatra-Borneo region.As such, future work can examine if similar improvements can be found in other tropical MCSs, including other tropical areas.Second, comparisons against surface station temperature observations (not shown) indicate that the simulated squall line cold pools tend to be much stronger than observed.These overly strong simulated cold pools might be due to model errors in the surface parameterization or radiation schemes.Future work can thus examine tuning these schemes to produce more realistic cold pools.Aside from that, future work can also explore whether the improvements obtained here are retained when the model’s horizontal grid spacing is reduced to a value that allows for the explicit resolution of convective updrafts (usually 1 km or less).

    Future work can also explore the assimilation of other uncommonly used observations.For instance, it is possible that the inclusion of observations from additional water vapor channels can improve the analysis and prediction tropical MCSs.This improvement might be possible because different channels respond to different parts of the atmospheric column (Schmit et al., 2005).Aside from that, several studies have indicated that sub-hourly AMV data assimilation has the potential to improve forecasts of moist convection (Otsuka et al., 2015; Kunii et al., 2016).Presently,AMVs are generally assimilated every 3~6 hours.Thus, the impact of frequently assimilating infrared-derived atmospheric motion vector observations is also another avenue of future study.

    Finally, future work can also delve into methods that address certain assumptions that are made in IR DA.One important assumption in the EnKF is that the simulated observations have an approximately linear relationship with modelled atmospheric variables.However, the relationship between simulated IR observations and modelled atmospheric is often nonlinear (e.g., Steward, 2012).Other cutting-edge DA methods might be able handle this nonlinearity.Such methods include particle filters (e.g., van Leeuwen, 2011; Penny and Miyoshi, 2016; Poterjoy, 2016),iterative EnKF methods (Lorentzen and Naevdal, 2011),and Gaussian-mixture model methods (e.g., Anderson and Anderson, 1999; Sondergaard and Lermusiaux, 2013; Chan et al., 2020a).Aside from linearity, the EnKF also assumes that the forecast ensemble follows a Gaussian distribution.However, the displacements of cloud features among ensemble members can result in non-Gaussian properties,violating this Gaussian assumption.As such, future work can explore methods that address displacement errors.Such methods include variants of the feature calibration and alignment technique (Hoffman and Grassotti, 1996; Brewster,2003; Nehrkorn et al., 2015; Stratman et al., 2018) and the recently developed multiscale alignment data assimilation(Ying, 2019).

    The advent of modern geostationary satellite IR observations has ushered in a new era of high-frequency, high spatial-density, and globe-encompassing remote observations.While the data assimilation community is well on its way to exploit these observations, many unexplored avenues remain, especially in the Tropics.With continued advancements in computing power and data assimilation techniques,the day we can fully exploit these IR observations is just beyond the horizon.

    Samples and Data

    The ERA5 pressure level and surface data were obtained from the ECMWF’s Climate Data Store (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels, and https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-singlelevels).Aside from that, the in-situ conventional observations were obtained from the NCAR RDA (https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds351.0, and, https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds461.0), and the atmospheric motion vector observations were obtained from the CIMSS Tropical Cyclone Archive (http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/archive/).The Himawari-8 AHI data was obtained from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) P-Tree system via File Transfer Protocol (FTP; ftp://ftp.ptree.jaxa.jp/).

    Acknowledgements.This study is supported by the Water Cycle and Climate Extremes Modelling (WACCEM) project,which is funded by the U.S.Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research, as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling program.This work is also partially supported by ONR Grant N00014-18-1-2517.Computations were performed on the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center Cori supercluster and the Texas Advanced Computer Center.This paper is dedicated to Dr.Fuqing ZHANG, who passed away unexpectedly in 2019.Dr.Fuqing ZHANG made tre-mendous contributions to the atmospheric sciences.His contributions include innovative and pioneering research on atmospheric dynamics, predictability, and ensemble-based data assimilation.He devoted boundless energy to engaging, mentoring, and inspiring undergraduate and graduate students, as well as early-career scientists, including us, the two authors of this paper.His death is a great loss to his family, friends, students, colleagues, and our entire community.

    欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 午夜影院在线不卡| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| tube8黄色片| 丝袜喷水一区| 熟女电影av网| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产永久视频网站| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲综合色网址| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产高清三级在线| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 精品久久久久久电影网| 一级毛片我不卡| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 91精品三级在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 一本久久精品| 久久99一区二区三区| 五月开心婷婷网| 免费看光身美女| 五月开心婷婷网| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 91久久精品电影网| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 五月天丁香电影| 99热6这里只有精品| 中文字幕制服av| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 男人操女人黄网站| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产成人freesex在线| 大香蕉久久网| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 永久网站在线| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 高清毛片免费看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美97在线视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产 一区精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 成人影院久久| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| av在线app专区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 观看av在线不卡| 免费观看性生交大片5| 999精品在线视频| 久久久久久久久久成人| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 综合色丁香网| 国产男女内射视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲图色成人| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 在线看a的网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国内精品宾馆在线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 91精品国产九色| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 99久久人妻综合| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 精品人妻在线不人妻| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产免费现黄频在线看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 天堂8中文在线网| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 有码 亚洲区| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| av专区在线播放| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 一本一本综合久久| 久久 成人 亚洲| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 性色av一级| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久青草综合色| 丁香六月天网| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| freevideosex欧美| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 伦精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲av男天堂| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 18在线观看网站| 热re99久久国产66热| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 春色校园在线视频观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日本91视频免费播放| a级毛片在线看网站| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久久久国产网址| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 观看美女的网站| 青春草国产在线视频| 日韩强制内射视频| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| av卡一久久| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 午夜视频国产福利| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| av一本久久久久| 性色av一级| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 久久久久久久国产电影| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 午夜av观看不卡| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| av天堂久久9| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 简卡轻食公司| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产av国产精品国产| 精品久久久噜噜| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久青草综合色| 少妇的逼水好多| 桃花免费在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲四区av| av有码第一页| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 精品一区二区免费观看| 综合色丁香网| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| .国产精品久久| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 大码成人一级视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 永久网站在线| 伦理电影免费视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 蜜桃在线观看..| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚州av有码| 曰老女人黄片| 尾随美女入室| 成人国产麻豆网| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 午夜av观看不卡| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 在线播放无遮挡| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| av播播在线观看一区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 曰老女人黄片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美日韩av久久| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 在线观看国产h片| 欧美日韩av久久| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 乱人伦中国视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久狼人影院| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 色网站视频免费| 成人影院久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产成人精品福利久久| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 老熟女久久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产精品三级大全| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 高清不卡的av网站| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 一级毛片我不卡| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 九草在线视频观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| av.在线天堂| 国内精品宾馆在线| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产精品无大码| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 精品少妇内射三级| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲综合精品二区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产永久视频网站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产在视频线精品| 久久99一区二区三区| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久久久精品性色| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 中国国产av一级| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 老司机影院成人| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| a级毛片黄视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久久久久人妻| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久青草综合色| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久久久网色| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产乱来视频区| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 91精品国产九色| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 一本一本综合久久| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美人与善性xxx| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产片内射在线| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| .国产精品久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 嫩草影院入口| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产 精品1| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 午夜影院在线不卡| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 草草在线视频免费看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 国产成人freesex在线| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 永久网站在线| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 天美传媒精品一区二区| kizo精华| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 多毛熟女@视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 在线播放无遮挡| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产av国产精品国产| videosex国产| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 自线自在国产av| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 高清毛片免费看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 99热全是精品| 亚州av有码| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 满18在线观看网站| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 老司机影院毛片| 日本黄色片子视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| av有码第一页| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 久久97久久精品| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 丁香六月天网| 国产男女内射视频| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产视频内射| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 最黄视频免费看| 成人二区视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 成人国语在线视频| 99久久人妻综合| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 九草在线视频观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久|