• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Improving the Analyses and Forecasts of a Tropical Squall Line Using Upper Tropospheric Infrared Satellite Observations※

    2022-04-02 05:51:40ManYauCHANandXingchaoCHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年5期

    Man-Yau CHAN and Xingchao CHEN

    Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, and Center for Advanced Data Assimilation and Predictability Techniques, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA 16802, USA

    ABSTRACT The advent of modern geostationary satellite infrared radiance observations has noticeably improved numerical weather forecasts and analyses.However, compared to midlatitude weather systems and tropical cyclones, research into using infrared radiance observations for numerically predicting and analyzing tropical mesoscale convective systems remain mostly fallow.Since tropical mesoscale convective systems play a crucial role in regional and global weather, this deficit should be addressed.This study is the first of its kind to examine the potential impacts of assimilating all-sky upper tropospheric infrared radiance observations on the prediction of a tropical squall line.Even though these all-sky infrared radiance observations are not directly affected by lower-tropospheric winds, the high-frequency assimilation of these allsky infrared radiance observations improved the analyses of the tropical squall line’s outflow position.Aside from that, the assimilation of all-sky infrared radiance observations improved the analyses and prediction of the squall line’s cloud field.Finally, reducing the frequency of assimilating these all-sky infrared radiance observations weakened these improvements to the analyzed outflow position, as well as the analyses and predictions of cloud fields.

    Key words: data assimilation, infrared satellite observations, numerical weather prediction, mesoscale convective systems, tropical meteorology

    1.Introduction

    Tropical mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) contribute more than 60% of the total tropical precipitation (Mohr et al., 1999; Houze, 2004; Nesbitt et al., 2006; Liu, 2011;Roca and Fiolleau, 2020), which include tropical squall lines and other non-squall organized convective disturbances (Krishnamurti et al., 2013).In addition, tropical MCSs affect the global climate and weather across a large range of spatial scales (Madden and Julian, 1971; Held and Hou, 1980; Hoskins and Karoly, 1981; Weickmann, 1983;Satoh, 1994; Kiladis et al., 2009; Johnson and Ciesielski,2013).It is thus important to accurately analyze and predict tropical MCSs.

    Analyses are typically used to study the dynamics, and initiate numerical predictions, of tropical MCSs.These analyses are normally produced using a class of Bayesian inference methods known as data assimilation (DA; Geer et al.,2018; Hersbach et al., 2020).DA generates these analyses by combining observations with a forecast from a preceding forecast cycle, while accounting for the uncertainties in both sources of information (e.g., Lorenc, 1986; Talagrand and Courtier, 1987; Evensen, 1994).Thus, one way to improve the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs is to improve the DA process.Furthermore, the improved analyses produced by DA can be used to deepen our understanding of the characteristics and dynamics of tropical MCSs.

    The accuracy of DA-produced atmospheric analyses has a strong dependence on the availability of observations(Liu and Rabier, 2002; Benjamin et al., 2004; Ying and Zhang, 2018; Ying et al., 2018).Unfortunately, due to the difficulty of maintaining observation sites over ocean and tropical islands, in-situ observations of the atmosphere are generally sparse and infrequent over the Tropics.These sparse and infrequent in-situ observations are thus inadequate to capture most tropical MCSs.For instance, radiosondes and rawinsondes are usually released every 12 hours, and are typically spaced more than 500 km apart in the Tropics (Ingleby,2017).In contrast, individual convective cells within tropical MCSs typically have length scales under 100 km and evolve on time scales less an hour, i.e., it is challenging to constrain the errors in the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs using in-situ observations alone (Liu and Rabier,2002).

    Supplementing in-situ observations with geostationary satellite all-sky infrared radiance observations has the potential to improve the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs.Unlike in-situ observations, modern satellite infrared radiance observation pixels are spaced less than 10 km apart and have sampling periods of 30 minutes or less.Thus,these geostationary satellite infrared radiance observations(henceforth, IR observations) have spatiotemporal resolutions that are closer to the spatiotemporal scale of tropical moist convection than those of in-situ observations.All-sky IR observations thus have the potential to constrain errors in the analyses and prediction of tropical MCSs.This potential should be explored.

    At the time of writing, most of the research on assimilating all-sky IR observations into convection-permitting models had been done in the context of mid-latitude weather systems and tropical cyclones.Research in these contexts has found that the addition of IR observations improved the analyzed thermodynamic and cloud fields (e.g., Vukicevic et al., 2004, 2006; Otkin, 2010, 2012; Honda et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2018; Minamide and Zhang, 2019; Sawada et al., 2019).In contrast, relatively little work has been done in the context of tropical MCSs.Nonetheless, the pattern of improvement seen in the context of convection-permitting mid-latitude severe weather and tropical cyclone prediction should also be achievable in the context of tropical MCSs.

    Ying and Zhang (2018) was among the first to examine the potential impacts of assimilating all-sky IR observations on the prediction of tropical MCSs.Using ensembles of gray-zone resolution simulations, Ying and Zhang (2018)performed idealized Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) over the tropical Indian Ocean during the active phase of the October 2011 Madden?Julian Oscillation(MJO; Madden and Julian, 1971) event.Gray-zone resolution simulations are simulations that use horizontal grid spacing fine enough to resolve mesoscale convective systems,but too coarse to resolve individual convective updrafts(Chen et al., 2018c).Ying and Zhang (2018) found that the inclusion of IR observations can improve the analyzed cloud hydrometeor fields.Chan et al.(2020b) subsequently performed real data DA experiments for a similar time period and domain and found that the assimilation of real IR observations can potentially improve cloud field analyses and predictions across a range of spatial scales, as well as short-term rainfall predictions.These improvements seen in Ying and Zhang (2018) and Chan et al.(2020b) are consistent with the improvements seen in the context of mid-latitude weather and tropical cyclone convection-permitting numerical weather prediction.

    However, several important questions remain unanswered regarding the assimilation of all-sky IR observations in the context of tropical MCSs.First, how does the assimilation of real-world IR observations improve the thermodynamic and dynamic fields of tropical MCSs? Second, how does the accuracy of the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs vary with the frequency of IR DA? Addressing these questions could potentially inform the future assimilation of IR observations in the Tropics and improve the analyses and forecasts of tropical MCSs.

    In this article, we will attempt to answer these two important questions in the case of a tropical squall line that swept through Sumatra, the Malay Peninsula and Borneo (Fig.1a).To study these questions, we employed ensembles of grayzone resolution Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)model simulations and assimilated real-world conventional observations.We also assimilated IR observations from the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI), which is on-board the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite (Bessho et al., 2016).

    2.Materials and Methods

    2.1.Setup of simulation ensembles

    To generate WRF simulation ensembles of the squall line, we employed the Advanced Research WRF (Skamarock et al., 2008) model (version 3.8.1).The simulation domain covers the area plotted in Fig.1a and has 560 × 450 horizontal grid points with 9-km grid spacing.45 model levels were employed, with the bottommost 9 levels within the lowest 1-km of the model, and the model top pressure set to 20 hPa.

    For the WRF model’s physics and dynamics, we employed the updated Goddard shortwave scheme (Chou and Suarez, 1999) and the Global Circulation Model version of the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTMG) longwave radiation scheme (Iacono et al., 2008).Surface processes were generally simulated using the unified Noah land surface physics scheme (Chen and Dudhia, 2001), the only exception being that surface skin temperatures were diagnosed via the method of Zeng and Beljaars (2005).The Yonsei University (YSU) boundary layer scheme (Hong et al., 2006)was employed to handle subgrid-scale turbulent mixing.Finally, we utilized the scheme of Thompson et al.(2008)to parameterize cloud microphysical processes.

    Note that while the 9-km horizontal grid spacing is too coarse to resolve individual convective updrafts, it is sufficient to resolve the basic dynamics of tropical MCSs.There are several reasons behind choosing this horizontal grid spacing.First, due to the rapid motion of the tropical squall line(Fig.1a), a large domain is required.Due to our limited computational resources, it is difficult to utilize smaller grid spacings in this large domain.Second, earlier work over the nearby Indian Ocean have shown that this 9-km grid spacing is sufficiently small to realistically replicate the precipitation, circulation, thermodynamic, and radiation features of organized mesoscale convection over tropical oceans (Wang et al., 2015).Finally, this 9-km grid spacing is widely employed in studies that examine the overturning and the physical mechanisms of organized tropical convection(Chen et al.2018a, b, c; Chen et al., 2020; Ruppert and Chen, 2020; Ruppert et al., 2020).

    We have also opted to avoid the use of cumulus parameterizations in this study.The reason is that earlier studies in the neighboring tropical Indian Ocean were able to obtain reasonable tropical MCSs without cumulus parameterizations (Wang et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2018a, b, c; He et al.,2019; Chen et al., 2020; Ou et al., 2020; Ruppert and Chen,2020; Ruppert et al., 2020).These studies were able to do so because the 9-km grid spacing was fine enough to resolve mesoscale convective updrafts.

    In this study, we initiated 50-member WRF ensemble simulations, starting at 0000 UTC 30 May 2017.To construct the needed 50 sets of initial conditions, we utilized the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast(ECMWF) fifth-generation global reanalysis data (ERA5;Hersbach et al., 2020) 10-member ensemble fields at 0000 UTC on 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 May, as well as the ERA5 reanalysis fields at 0000 UTC 30 May.To be precise, for each of the 5 dates, we generated 10 perturbations from the ERA5 10-member ensemble by subtracting the ensemble mean on said dates from each of the 10-members.This procedure produced a set of 50 perturbations.We then added the ERA5 reanalysis fields at 0000 UTC May 30 to the 50 perturbations to produce 50 sets of initial conditions.The ERA5 reanalysis fields were also used to generate the boundary conditions, i.e., all 50-members were subjected to the same boundary conditions.The ensemble was then integrated forward for 12 hours to generate flow-dependent ensemble statistics at 1200 UTC 30 May.All data assimilation experiments began at 1200 UTC 30 May.

    2.2.Observation sources

    To examine the questions raised in section 1, we performed experiments where we assimilated non-IR conventional observations and satellite all-sky IR observations.The non-IR conventional observations include surface station, pilot, rawinsonde, radiosonde, and ship observations from the Global Telecommunication System from the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Research Data Archive (NCAR RDA).The non-IR conventional observations also include satellite-derived atmospheric motion vectors from the Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Tropical Cyclone Archive.These non-IR conventional observations were assimilated every 3 hours in all experiments.

    Aside from the non-IR conventional observations, we also assimilated AHI channel 8 (6.2 μm) infrared brightness temperature observations (ch08-BT).The AHI instrument is on board the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite,which is located above the Equator, at 140.7°E.Under clear-sky conditions, ch08-BT observations typically reflect the upper tropospheric water vapor content (Otkin, 2012).These observations are generally available every 10 minutes.

    2.3.Setup of data assimilation experiments

    To investigate the important questions raised in section 1, we performed three DA experiments.The first experiment assimilated non-IR conventional observations every three hours (conv experiment).In the second experiment,we assimilated both ch08-BT and non-IR conventional observations every three hours (conv+ch08_3hrly).Finally, in the third experiment, we assimilated non-IR conventional observations every three hours, and ch08-BT observations every 30 minutes (conv+ch08_30min).

    In this study, we employed the Pennsylvania State University WRF Ensemble Kalman Filter system (PSU-EnKF;Meng and Zhang, 2008) as our DA system.The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) constructs ensemble analyses by combining an ensemble of forecasts with observations (Evensen,1994; Burgers et al., 1998).To be precise, the EnKF communicates information from the observations into the modeled atmospheric fields using forecast-estimated covariances between the model state variables and the observable quantities predicted by the forecast.The PSU-EnKF utilizes the method of Whitaker and Hamill (2002) to construct the ensemble analyses.A schematic of how the PSU-EnKF assimilates observations over time is shown in Fig.2.

    The PSU-EnKF algorithm employed here is a slightly modified version of the PSU-EnKF described in Chan et al.(2020b) [the Ensemble Square-Root Filter algorithm(EnSRF) in section 2c].The only modification to the algorithm is that the mean of the forecasted observations is no longer calculated using the ensemble mean.Instead, the mean of the forecasted observations is calculated by first computing the simulated observations for all forecast members,and then taking the ensemble mean of the result.This modification was made to mitigate the artificial dry bias produced by the previous EnSRF implementation when infrared observations are assimilated.The cause of this artificial dry bias is described in Section 3b of Chan et al (2020b).

    Aside from that, we also performed 80% relaxation to prior perturbations to prevent filter divergence (Zhang et al.,2004).The variables updated by the PSU-EnKF include the three-dimensional winds, water vapor mixing ratio, liquid cloud mixing ratio, ice cloud mixing ratio, rain mixing ratio,snow mixing ratio, graupel mixing ratio, temperature, and pressure.All localizations are performed using the Gaspari?Cohn 1999 fifth-order polynomial (Gaspari and Cohn, 1999).

    With regards to the assimilation of conventional observations, we assimilated the atmospheric motion vectors with a horizontal radius of influence (HROI) of 100 km, and no vertical localization.Sounding and aircraft observations were assimilated with a 700 km HROI and a 5 model layer vertical radius of influence (VROI).With regards to surface observations, Metéorologique Aviation Régulière (METAR)observations, surface synoptic observations (SYNOP) observations and ship observations were respectively assimilated with HROIs of 600 km, 300 km and 1400 km.All three surface observation types were assimilated with a 45 model layer VROI.

    To assimilate the ch08-BT observations, we employed the Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM), release 2.3.0, to calculate the IR AHI brightness temperatures from the WRF ensemble.The ch08-BT observations were thinned to a spacing of 30 km, and then assimilated with a HROI of 100 km (Chan et al., 2020b).Furthermore, we employed the adaptive observation error inflation scheme(AOEI) of Minamide and Zhang (2017), as well as the adaptive background error inflation scheme (ABEI) of Minamide and Zhang (2019), to assimilate the ch08-BT observations.No vertical localization was performed for the ch08-BT observations.Better results might be possible with more tuning, which can be explored in future studies.

    Fig.2.A schematic showing how the PSU-EnKF system assimilates observations at times t1 and t2.The bubbles represent the envelop of possible model values predicted by an ensemble of model outputs, and are color-coded by time.Suppose we have three ensemble members at time t0.To assimilate the observation at t1, we use WRF to integrate the three members from t0 to t1.Then, the PSU-EnKF ingests the observation at t1, which results in the threemember ensemble shifting towards and contracting around the ensemble.To assimilate the observation at t2 (and at all subsequent times), the same integrate-then-ingest procedure is repeated.

    Aside from these settings, no ch08-BT observations were rejected in this study.Observations with large innovations are often rejected because these observations might be erroneous (e.g., J?rvinen and Undén, 1997; Cardinali et al.,2003).In our setup, the AOEI inflates the observation error of ch08-BT observations with large innovations.The AOEI thus weakens the magnitude of the analysis increments coming from these large innovation ch08-BT observations, i.e.,AOEI functions as a safety measure against potentially problematic ch08-BT observations.As such, we did not reject any ch08-BT observations in this study.

    It should also be noted that no bias correction for the ch08-BT observations were employed here because we found the ch08-BT biases are small in this tropical squall line case.As discussed in Chan et al.(2020b), the square of the bias is a component of the mean-squared difference(MSD) between the ensemble mean and observed ch08-BT.The conv, conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min experiments’ squared prior ch08-BT biases are 0.49 K2, 0.25 K2,and 0.00 K2, respectively.In contrast, the prior ch08-BT MSDs of the conv, conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min experiments are 68.9 K2, 23.0 K2, and 16.0 K2, respectively,i.e., the squared prior ch08-BT biases account for less than 1.1% of the prior ch08-BT MSD.Thus, we consider the ch08-BT biases to be small and did not employ bias correc-tion when assimilating ch08-BT observations.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Description of the observed tropical squall line

    Before delving into the important questions raised in section 1, we will describe the observed behavior of this study’s tropical squall line case.Tropical squall lines are a frequently occurring type of tropical MCSs over our study’s domain (Lo and Orton, 2016; Chan et al., 2019; Sun et al.,2020).On 30 May 2017, the AHI observed a southeastward propagating MCS over the equatorial Indian Ocean (Fig.1a).By 1500 UTC 30 May, the mesoscale convective system evolved into a southeastward propagating, bow-shaped squall line.At this time, the squall line was generally aligned in the northeast-southwest direction, with the northeastern tip of the squall line grazing the west coast of Sumatra (not shown here).

    For the next 12 hours, AHI observations indicate that the squall did not penetrate the mountain range that runs along most of the west coast of Sumatra.At approximately 0900 UTC 31 May, the northeastern half of the squall line penetrated the mountain range.Within the next 3 hours, the northeastern half and the southwestern half of the squall split apart.For the remainder of the study, we will focus on the northeastern half because it passed over surface meteorological stations.The northeastern half developed a northsouth alignment and propagated eastwards (Fig.1a), passing through Sumatra, and then the Strait of Malacca.This propagation behavior and morphology is rather typical of squalls in the Sumatra-Borneo region (Lo and Orton, 2016;Chan et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020).By 0000 UTC 2 June,the squall line had reached the southwestern coast of Borneo (Fig.1a) and proceeded to dissipate.

    According to the ERA5, the observed squall line is collocated with the advancing edge of a westerly wind burst (not shown).Furthermore, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s (BoM’s) Real-time Multivariate MJO index(Wheeler and Hendon, 2004) indicated that during the squall line’s time frame, the MJO’s active phase was advancing from the Indian Ocean into the Maritime Continent.As westerly wind bursts are often associated with the onset of the MJO’s active phase (Zhang, 2005), the MJO index supports the association between the squall line and a westerly wind burst seen in the ERA5 data.Future work can examine the association between westerly wind bursts and tropical squall lines in the region.

    3.2.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved analyzed clouds

    The first question we will address in this study is whether adding all-sky IR observations into DA can improve the analyses and prediction of a tropical squall line.To that end, we will be comparing the conv and the conv+ch08_30min experiments.Furthermore, to focus on the squall line itself, the experiments will be compared in an area around the squall line’s leading edge.

    To determine the position of the leading edge, we computed the meridional average of the observed AHI channel 14 brightness temperatures (ch14-BT) for latitudes between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.The result is plotted as a longitude-time diagram in Fig.1b.Because the squall line’s clouds show up as strong cold signals in ch14-BT, we can determine the position of the leading edge of the squall line from Fig.1b,which is indicated by a dashed black line.For the rest of this article, we will be comparing the experiments in the vicinity of these inferred positions.

    We begin with examining the impacts of including half-hourly ch08-BT observations, in addition to 3-hourly conventional observations, on the cloud fields.Since ch14-BT was not assimilated and indicates the presence and absence of clouds, the root-mean-square difference (RMSD)between the analyzed and observed ch14-BT can be used to gauge the quality of the analyzed cloud fields.To be more precise, we will be comparing the ch14-BT RMSDs computed for a region surrounding the squall line’s leading edge(Fig.1c).The region covers a rectangular area between 10°S and 5°S, as well as between 15 degrees west and 5 degrees east of the leading edge (Fig.1b).As seen in Fig.1c,conv+ch08_30min’s RMSDs are at all times substantially smaller than that of conv.On average, conv+ch08_30min’s RMSD (16.2 K) is ~35% smaller than conv’s RMSD (25.0 K).In other words, the assimilation of IR observations, on top of conventional observations, can improve analyses of the squall line’s cloud field.This improvement is in line with earlier work (Ying and Zhang, 2018).Finally,conv+ch08_30min’s consistency ratio (CR ≡ root-meansquare spread (RMSS)/RMSD) is closer to the optimal value of 1 than that of conv.This indicates that the assimilation of half-hourly IR observations improved the ensemble dispersion for cloud fields.

    3.3.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved analyzed outflow position

    Aside from improving the cloud field, the inclusion of half-hourly ch08-BT observations also improved the position of the squall line surface outflow.Surface outflows can generate converging surface winds ahead of the squall line,and thus encourage the formation of new cells ahead of the squall line (e.g., Gamache and Houze, 1982; Moncrieff and Liu, 1999).Since the initiation of new cells ahead of the squall line is important for squall line propagation (e.g., Fovell et al., 2006), improving the position of the analyzed surface outflow can improve the analyses and prediction of the squall line.

    To see the improvement in surface outflow, consider that the outflow in this squall line is characterized by strong surface westerlies.Figures 3a and 3c show longitude?time diagrams of the meridionally-averaged analysis mean zonal wind at 300-m above sea level in the conv and conv+ch08_30min experiments.The thick black contours trace the observed 224 K ch14-BT contour, which indicates the position of the squall line.The meridional average was performed between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.Between 1200 UTC 31 May and 1800 UTC 1 June, the predicted outflow in the conv experiment is mostly located east of the observed leading edge (Fig.3a; black contours).In contrast, the analyzed zone of strong westerlies in conv+ch08_30min overlaps substantially with the observed squall (Fig.3c).These longitude-time diagrams suggest that the half-hourly assimilation of ch08-BT observations improved the positions of the surface outflow.

    To further confirm the improvement of the surface outflow position, we examined three-hourly unassimilated surface zonal wind observations from a surface station located at 2.7°S, 107.8°E (marked with white cross in Fig.1a).These surface observations were obtained from the Integrated Surface Database (ISD), which is maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA).The time-series of the observed and analyzed zonal winds for this station is plotted in Fig.3d.

    As can be inferred from Fig.3d, the analyzed squall line surface outflow from the conv+ch08_30min experiment outperformed that of conv in several ways.The first way is in terms of the onset time of the squall line surface outflow at the station.The onset of the squall line surface outflow is indicated by strengthening westerlies.As can be seen in Fig.3d, the onset time from the conv+ch08_30min experiment analyzed surface outflow (around 1200 UTC 31 May) is slightly closer to the observed onset time(around 1800 UTC 31 May) than that of conv (around 0600 UTC 31 May).Aside from the difference in onset times,Fig.3d indicates that the squall line outflow in conv leaves the station (around 0600 UTC 1 June) 6 hours earlier than the observed squall line (around 1200 UTC 1 June),whereas the squall line outflow from conv+ch08_30min leaves the station at roughly the same time as the observed squall line.These differences in onset and exit times imply that the squall line outflow in conv is displaced east of the actual outflow, and that this displacement error is largely reduced in conv+ch08_30min.This reduction in surface outflow displacement error is consistent with Figs.3a and 3c.

    Fig.3.Squall-relative longitude-time diagrams of the analyzed zonal wind, averaged between 3.6°S to 4.4°S, at 300 m above sea level (a, b, c).The thick black contours in panels (a), (b), and (c) indicate the 224 K contour of the observed ch14-BT,averaged between the same latitudes.The gray shading indicates the storm-relative longitudes of the mountain range along the west coast of Sumatra, where no 300-m zonal wind information is available in the model.Also, the thick dotted lines indicate the relative longitude of the surface station referred to in the text.Finally, panel (d) shows time series of the observed surface zonal wind, analyzed zonal wind, as well as the observed ch14-BT at a surface station located at 2.7°S,107.8°E.

    It should also be noted here that the conv+ch08_30min experiment also outperforms conv in terms of the fit to the unassimilated zonal wind observations when the squall line is passing over the surface station (from 2100 UTC 31 May to 1200 UTC 1 June).This improvement is likely because the eastward displacement error is substantially smaller in conv+ch08_30min than in conv.

    Interestingly, the improvements in surface outflow position introduced by spatiotemporally dense IR DA occurred in the absence of dense surface observations.Previous studies have suggested that dense surface observations can improve squall line surface outflows and the associated gust front positions (e.g., Chen et al., 2016).Our results thus suggest that spatiotemporally dense IR observations can be a potential substitute for dense surface observations when constraining errors associated with squall line surface outflows and gust front positions.

    The surface outflow position improvements introduced by half-hourly IR DA can be plausibly explained by the combination of two complementary effects.The first effect comes from the cloud field improvements introduced by half-hourly ch08-BT DA.These cloud field improvements include improvements to the position of the analyzed squall line clouds, which in turn leads to improved positioning of the squall line rainfall.Since the surface outflow is induced by rainfall, it is plausible that an improved rainfall position can improve the position of the surface outflow.

    The second effect arises from the positive correlation between forecasted ch08-BT just behind the observed leading edge, and the ~950 hPa zonal wind near the leading edge of the surface outflow (henceforth, gust front).For instance, at 0000 UTC on 1 June, the forecasted ensemble mean gust front is at roughly 1°E relative longitude (similar to the analyzed gust front in Fig.3c).Likewise, Fig.4b indicates that the ~950 hPa zonal wind at ~1°E relative longitude is positively correlated with forecasted ch08-BT just behind the leading edge (?1°E relative longitude), i.e., this positive correlation is collocated with the gust front.

    To see how this positive gust front zonal wind correlation allows the EnKF to shift the gust front, consider that the forecasted squall line clouds tend to be displaced eastwards of the observed squall line clouds.Since the observed squall line’s highest clouds tend to occur at around ?1°E relative longitude (not shown, but can be inferred from Fig.1b),this eastward displacement indicates that the forecasted clouds at ?1°E relative longitude should be lower than that of the observations.In other words, the forecasted ch08-BT is higher than that of the observations at ?1°E relative longitude.This results in a negative ch08-BT innovation at ?1°E relative longitude.Because of the positive correlation, this negative innovation results in a negative westerly (or easterly) analysis increment at the gust front.Since the wind in the gust front is mostly westerly, the analysis increment weakens the westerly winds at the gust front.This weakening means that the forecasted gust front is forced westward.As such, the assimilation of ch08-BT observations near the observed leading edge improved the position of the gust front through the correlations between ch08-BT and the gust front’s zonal wind.

    3.4.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved deterministic forecasts of cloud fields

    Aside from improving the analyzed cloud fields and surface outflow position, the half-hourly assimilation of IR observations also improved the short-term deterministic forecasts of the squall line.These deterministic forecasts were initiated from the EnKF analysis means.Figure 5 shows the meridionally-averaged, deterministically forecasted ch14-BT.Like Figs.1c, 3, and 4, the meridional average was done between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.As can be seen in Fig.5, for the first 3 hours of the deterministic forecasts, the positions of the forecasted clouds from conv+ch08_30min are closer to the observations than those from conv, especially for the forecasts initialized after 1200 UTC 1 June.Furthermore,the squall-relative ch14-BT RMSD (calculated as in Fig.1c)of the conv+ch08_30min deterministic forecasts are lower than those of the conv (not shown) for the first three hours.To be more precise, on average, conv+ch08_30min ch14-BT deterministic forecast RMSDs are about 20% smaller than those of conv from initiation to up to a lead time of 2 hours.For lead times of 3 hours and longer, the ch14-BT deterministic forecast RMSDs of both experiments are statistically indistinguishable.These improvements to the shortterm deterministic forecasts of cloud fields are akin to those seen in Chan et al.(2020b).

    Fig.4.Correlations between ch08-BT and zonal wind on 1 June (0000 UTC) for (a) the conv + ch08_3hrly experiment, and (b) the conv + ch08_30min experiment.These correlations are plotted for a ch08 observation located 1 degree west of the squall’s leading edge (vertical dashed lines).Note that the plotted values are the average of correlations across 10 zonal cross-sections between 3.6°S to 4.4°S.

    Fig.5.Storm-relative longitude-time diagrams of deterministically forecasted ch14-BT (shading), as well as the 224 K contour of the observed ch14-BT (black contours).All plotted ch14-BT are averaged between 3.6°S to 4.4°S.Panels a, d, g and j show the deterministic forecasts from the conv experiment.Similar plots were also produced for the conv + ch08_3hrly(b, e, h and k) and conv + ch08_30min (c, f, i and l) experiments.The forecasted ch14-BT and the observed ch14-BT at the corresponding times are shown for the start times of the forecasts (a, b and c), at a lead time of 1 hour (d, e and f), at a lead time of 2 hours (g, h and i), and a lead time of 3 hours (j, k and l).Note that the deterministic forecasts from 13 initiation times are shown in each panel.The first deterministic forecasts were initiated on 31 May (1200 UTC), and subsequent deterministic forecasts were initiated every 3 hours, up to and including 2 June (0000 UTC).

    3.5.Reducing the frequency of ch08-BT DA degraded analyses and deterministic forecasts

    Another important question raised in section 1 is how the accuracy and prediction of the tropical squall line vary with the update frequency of IR DA.To examine this question, we will be comparing the conv+ch08_30min and conv+ch08_3hrly experiments.

    Reducing the frequency of ch08-BT DA generally degraded the analyses and deterministic forecasts of cloud fields (Figs.1 and 5).According to Fig.1c, decreasing ch08-BT DA frequency from half-hourly to three-hourly generally increased the analysis ch14-BT RMSD.On average,the RMSDs increased by ~10%, from 16.2 K to 18.1 K.Furthermore, Fig.5 indicates that reduction in ch08-BT DA frequency degraded the deterministically forecasted positions of the squall line for the three hours of the deterministic forecast, and the degradations are especially noticeable for the forecasts initialized after 1200 UTC 1 June (Figs.5e and 5h).Taken together, these degradations imply that a higher frequency of data assimilation is preferable for short-term cloud field analyses and forecasts.

    The analyzed positions of the squall line’s outflow were also degraded when the frequency of ch08-BT DA was reduced from half-hourly to three-hourly.Between 31 May (1200 UTC) and 1 June (1800 UTC), the analyzed strong zonal wind zone from conv+ch08_3hrly does not overlap much with the observed squall (Fig.3b), whereas that of the conv+ch08_30min substantially overlaps the observed squall (Fig.3c).Furthermore, while the validation surface station data indicates the analyzed outflows of conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min arrived at the station at the same time (Fig.3d), the conv+ch08_30min analyzed outflow is clearly better than that of conv+ch08_3hrly when the squall line passed over the surface station during 0000 UTC–1200 UTC 1 June.In other words, high frequency data assimilation is preferable for improving the analyzed position of storm outflows.

    This degradation in squall line outflow position is also consistent with the ensemble correlations between simulated ch08-BT and zonal wind (Fig.4a).While similar nearsurface dipole correlation patterns exist in both the conv+ch08_30min and conv+ch08_3hrly experiments, the dipole pattern in conv+ch08_3hrly is dislocated ~1.5 degrees east of the ch08-BT observation location.In other words, the capability of conv+ch08_3hrly in moving the squall line surface outflow position westwards is limited when compared to that of conv+ch08_30min.

    It should be noted here that while decreasing the frequency of ch08-BT DA did dramatically degrade the quality of the analyzed cloud fields, analyzed outflow, and forecasted clouds, these quantities in conv+ch08_3hrly still outperformed those conv.In other words, even a moderate frequency of ch08-BT DA was able to improve these quantities beyond what is achieved by non-IR conventional observation DA.

    4.Conclusions

    In this study, we have delved into the hitherto unexplored dynamic and thermodynamic impacts of assimilating IR observations for the case of a tropical squall line.In line with earlier work (e.g., Ying and Zhang, 2018), we confirmed that introducing ch08-BT observations into DA improved the analyses and predictions of a tropical squall line’s cloud field.Even though the ch08-BT observations are insensitive to lower-tropospheric zonal winds, the assimilation of these observations improved the position of the squall line’s lower tropospheric outflow zone.This improvement was likely due to the improved cloud fields, as well as the near-surface dipole forecast ensemble correlations between ch08-BT and lower-tropospheric zonal winds.Finally, we also found that increasing the frequency of ch08-BT observations further improved the analyzed cloud field, forecasted cloud field, and the analyzed outflow position.

    Since this study is the first of its kind to specifically examine the improvements from introducing IR observations into tropical MCS analyses and prediction, there are many areas for future work.These areas can be broken into three types: completeness, the assimilation of other observations and areas for future DA algorithm development.

    The first area for completeness concerns the fact that we have only examined the impacts for one tropical squall line in the Sumatra-Borneo region.As such, future work can examine if similar improvements can be found in other tropical MCSs, including other tropical areas.Second, comparisons against surface station temperature observations (not shown) indicate that the simulated squall line cold pools tend to be much stronger than observed.These overly strong simulated cold pools might be due to model errors in the surface parameterization or radiation schemes.Future work can thus examine tuning these schemes to produce more realistic cold pools.Aside from that, future work can also explore whether the improvements obtained here are retained when the model’s horizontal grid spacing is reduced to a value that allows for the explicit resolution of convective updrafts (usually 1 km or less).

    Future work can also explore the assimilation of other uncommonly used observations.For instance, it is possible that the inclusion of observations from additional water vapor channels can improve the analysis and prediction tropical MCSs.This improvement might be possible because different channels respond to different parts of the atmospheric column (Schmit et al., 2005).Aside from that, several studies have indicated that sub-hourly AMV data assimilation has the potential to improve forecasts of moist convection (Otsuka et al., 2015; Kunii et al., 2016).Presently,AMVs are generally assimilated every 3~6 hours.Thus, the impact of frequently assimilating infrared-derived atmospheric motion vector observations is also another avenue of future study.

    Finally, future work can also delve into methods that address certain assumptions that are made in IR DA.One important assumption in the EnKF is that the simulated observations have an approximately linear relationship with modelled atmospheric variables.However, the relationship between simulated IR observations and modelled atmospheric is often nonlinear (e.g., Steward, 2012).Other cutting-edge DA methods might be able handle this nonlinearity.Such methods include particle filters (e.g., van Leeuwen, 2011; Penny and Miyoshi, 2016; Poterjoy, 2016),iterative EnKF methods (Lorentzen and Naevdal, 2011),and Gaussian-mixture model methods (e.g., Anderson and Anderson, 1999; Sondergaard and Lermusiaux, 2013; Chan et al., 2020a).Aside from linearity, the EnKF also assumes that the forecast ensemble follows a Gaussian distribution.However, the displacements of cloud features among ensemble members can result in non-Gaussian properties,violating this Gaussian assumption.As such, future work can explore methods that address displacement errors.Such methods include variants of the feature calibration and alignment technique (Hoffman and Grassotti, 1996; Brewster,2003; Nehrkorn et al., 2015; Stratman et al., 2018) and the recently developed multiscale alignment data assimilation(Ying, 2019).

    The advent of modern geostationary satellite IR observations has ushered in a new era of high-frequency, high spatial-density, and globe-encompassing remote observations.While the data assimilation community is well on its way to exploit these observations, many unexplored avenues remain, especially in the Tropics.With continued advancements in computing power and data assimilation techniques,the day we can fully exploit these IR observations is just beyond the horizon.

    Samples and Data

    The ERA5 pressure level and surface data were obtained from the ECMWF’s Climate Data Store (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels, and https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-singlelevels).Aside from that, the in-situ conventional observations were obtained from the NCAR RDA (https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds351.0, and, https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds461.0), and the atmospheric motion vector observations were obtained from the CIMSS Tropical Cyclone Archive (http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/archive/).The Himawari-8 AHI data was obtained from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) P-Tree system via File Transfer Protocol (FTP; ftp://ftp.ptree.jaxa.jp/).

    Acknowledgements.This study is supported by the Water Cycle and Climate Extremes Modelling (WACCEM) project,which is funded by the U.S.Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research, as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling program.This work is also partially supported by ONR Grant N00014-18-1-2517.Computations were performed on the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center Cori supercluster and the Texas Advanced Computer Center.This paper is dedicated to Dr.Fuqing ZHANG, who passed away unexpectedly in 2019.Dr.Fuqing ZHANG made tre-mendous contributions to the atmospheric sciences.His contributions include innovative and pioneering research on atmospheric dynamics, predictability, and ensemble-based data assimilation.He devoted boundless energy to engaging, mentoring, and inspiring undergraduate and graduate students, as well as early-career scientists, including us, the two authors of this paper.His death is a great loss to his family, friends, students, colleagues, and our entire community.

    男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲图色成人| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 免费看不卡的av| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 乱人伦中国视频| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 大码成人一级视频| 男女国产视频网站| 国产 精品1| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 一级av片app| 最近手机中文字幕大全| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 少妇 在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲综合色惰| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日本色播在线视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产极品天堂在线| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 成人免费观看视频高清| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| av播播在线观看一区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产男女内射视频| 欧美另类一区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品久久久精品久久久| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 少妇 在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 中文字幕制服av| 国内精品宾馆在线| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 三级国产精品片| 高清毛片免费看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| a级毛色黄片| 成人综合一区亚洲| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 在线观看三级黄色| 99久久综合免费| 曰老女人黄片| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| kizo精华| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲av福利一区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 女性被躁到高潮视频| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 久久青草综合色| a级毛色黄片| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 国产在线免费精品| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 精品久久久久久电影网| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| av有码第一页| 久久99精品国语久久久| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲性久久影院| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久影院123| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 色视频www国产| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲av福利一区| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 91精品国产九色| 少妇的逼水好多| 永久网站在线| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久97久久精品| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产永久视频网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲精品第二区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 有码 亚洲区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| av在线老鸭窝| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产av国产精品国产| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 男女免费视频国产| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 久久97久久精品| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产精品无大码| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 欧美区成人在线视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产av国产精品国产| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲在久久综合| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 在线观看三级黄色| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲综合色惰| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 九九在线视频观看精品| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 精品亚洲成国产av| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 九草在线视频观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| www.av在线官网国产| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 三级国产精品片| 在线播放无遮挡| 日本av免费视频播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 内地一区二区视频在线| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 六月丁香七月| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 桃花免费在线播放| 午夜福利视频精品| 成年av动漫网址| 色94色欧美一区二区| 色吧在线观看| 久久久久精品性色| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产色婷婷99| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 777米奇影视久久| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 少妇的逼水好多| 日韩中字成人| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 三级经典国产精品| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 老司机影院成人| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲成色77777| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 六月丁香七月| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 一级av片app| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 久热这里只有精品99| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 成人综合一区亚洲| 五月开心婷婷网| 七月丁香在线播放| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 在线观看国产h片| 99久久人妻综合| 日本黄大片高清| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 三级国产精品片| 三级经典国产精品| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 99热全是精品| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 大香蕉久久网| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产精品.久久久| 黑人高潮一二区| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 九草在线视频观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 黄色配什么色好看| 色吧在线观看| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产成人aa在线观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 一级av片app| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 97在线视频观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 97在线视频观看| 如何舔出高潮| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 97在线视频观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久青草综合色| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产精品成人在线| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 18+在线观看网站| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 51国产日韩欧美| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 老司机影院毛片| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产一级毛片在线| 永久免费av网站大全| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 一本久久精品| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 成人国产av品久久久| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 蜜桃在线观看..| 色吧在线观看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 久久婷婷青草| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 色94色欧美一区二区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 嫩草影院入口| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 永久免费av网站大全| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产在线视频一区二区| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久热这里只有精品99| 九色成人免费人妻av| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 97在线人人人人妻| 美女主播在线视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 成人影院久久| 中文字幕久久专区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 蜜桃在线观看..| 午夜久久久在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 黄色日韩在线| av在线播放精品| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 国产乱人偷精品视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产av国产精品国产| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲综合色惰| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 全区人妻精品视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 午夜福利视频精品| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 亚洲性久久影院| 久久久久久久精品精品| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 免费大片18禁| 午夜福利,免费看| 日韩强制内射视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 另类精品久久| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久热久热在线精品观看| av免费观看日本| 如何舔出高潮| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 在线观看三级黄色| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久影院123| 亚洲在久久综合| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 色网站视频免费| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 成人国产av品久久久| 大香蕉久久网| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久婷婷青草| 在线观看国产h片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 内地一区二区视频在线| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 国产黄色免费在线视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲成人手机| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 精品酒店卫生间| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲精品视频女| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲综合色惰| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 九草在线视频观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产爽快片一区二区三区|