• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Improving the Analyses and Forecasts of a Tropical Squall Line Using Upper Tropospheric Infrared Satellite Observations※

    2022-04-02 05:51:40ManYauCHANandXingchaoCHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年5期

    Man-Yau CHAN and Xingchao CHEN

    Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, and Center for Advanced Data Assimilation and Predictability Techniques, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA 16802, USA

    ABSTRACT The advent of modern geostationary satellite infrared radiance observations has noticeably improved numerical weather forecasts and analyses.However, compared to midlatitude weather systems and tropical cyclones, research into using infrared radiance observations for numerically predicting and analyzing tropical mesoscale convective systems remain mostly fallow.Since tropical mesoscale convective systems play a crucial role in regional and global weather, this deficit should be addressed.This study is the first of its kind to examine the potential impacts of assimilating all-sky upper tropospheric infrared radiance observations on the prediction of a tropical squall line.Even though these all-sky infrared radiance observations are not directly affected by lower-tropospheric winds, the high-frequency assimilation of these allsky infrared radiance observations improved the analyses of the tropical squall line’s outflow position.Aside from that, the assimilation of all-sky infrared radiance observations improved the analyses and prediction of the squall line’s cloud field.Finally, reducing the frequency of assimilating these all-sky infrared radiance observations weakened these improvements to the analyzed outflow position, as well as the analyses and predictions of cloud fields.

    Key words: data assimilation, infrared satellite observations, numerical weather prediction, mesoscale convective systems, tropical meteorology

    1.Introduction

    Tropical mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) contribute more than 60% of the total tropical precipitation (Mohr et al., 1999; Houze, 2004; Nesbitt et al., 2006; Liu, 2011;Roca and Fiolleau, 2020), which include tropical squall lines and other non-squall organized convective disturbances (Krishnamurti et al., 2013).In addition, tropical MCSs affect the global climate and weather across a large range of spatial scales (Madden and Julian, 1971; Held and Hou, 1980; Hoskins and Karoly, 1981; Weickmann, 1983;Satoh, 1994; Kiladis et al., 2009; Johnson and Ciesielski,2013).It is thus important to accurately analyze and predict tropical MCSs.

    Analyses are typically used to study the dynamics, and initiate numerical predictions, of tropical MCSs.These analyses are normally produced using a class of Bayesian inference methods known as data assimilation (DA; Geer et al.,2018; Hersbach et al., 2020).DA generates these analyses by combining observations with a forecast from a preceding forecast cycle, while accounting for the uncertainties in both sources of information (e.g., Lorenc, 1986; Talagrand and Courtier, 1987; Evensen, 1994).Thus, one way to improve the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs is to improve the DA process.Furthermore, the improved analyses produced by DA can be used to deepen our understanding of the characteristics and dynamics of tropical MCSs.

    The accuracy of DA-produced atmospheric analyses has a strong dependence on the availability of observations(Liu and Rabier, 2002; Benjamin et al., 2004; Ying and Zhang, 2018; Ying et al., 2018).Unfortunately, due to the difficulty of maintaining observation sites over ocean and tropical islands, in-situ observations of the atmosphere are generally sparse and infrequent over the Tropics.These sparse and infrequent in-situ observations are thus inadequate to capture most tropical MCSs.For instance, radiosondes and rawinsondes are usually released every 12 hours, and are typically spaced more than 500 km apart in the Tropics (Ingleby,2017).In contrast, individual convective cells within tropical MCSs typically have length scales under 100 km and evolve on time scales less an hour, i.e., it is challenging to constrain the errors in the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs using in-situ observations alone (Liu and Rabier,2002).

    Supplementing in-situ observations with geostationary satellite all-sky infrared radiance observations has the potential to improve the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs.Unlike in-situ observations, modern satellite infrared radiance observation pixels are spaced less than 10 km apart and have sampling periods of 30 minutes or less.Thus,these geostationary satellite infrared radiance observations(henceforth, IR observations) have spatiotemporal resolutions that are closer to the spatiotemporal scale of tropical moist convection than those of in-situ observations.All-sky IR observations thus have the potential to constrain errors in the analyses and prediction of tropical MCSs.This potential should be explored.

    At the time of writing, most of the research on assimilating all-sky IR observations into convection-permitting models had been done in the context of mid-latitude weather systems and tropical cyclones.Research in these contexts has found that the addition of IR observations improved the analyzed thermodynamic and cloud fields (e.g., Vukicevic et al., 2004, 2006; Otkin, 2010, 2012; Honda et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2018; Minamide and Zhang, 2019; Sawada et al., 2019).In contrast, relatively little work has been done in the context of tropical MCSs.Nonetheless, the pattern of improvement seen in the context of convection-permitting mid-latitude severe weather and tropical cyclone prediction should also be achievable in the context of tropical MCSs.

    Ying and Zhang (2018) was among the first to examine the potential impacts of assimilating all-sky IR observations on the prediction of tropical MCSs.Using ensembles of gray-zone resolution simulations, Ying and Zhang (2018)performed idealized Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) over the tropical Indian Ocean during the active phase of the October 2011 Madden?Julian Oscillation(MJO; Madden and Julian, 1971) event.Gray-zone resolution simulations are simulations that use horizontal grid spacing fine enough to resolve mesoscale convective systems,but too coarse to resolve individual convective updrafts(Chen et al., 2018c).Ying and Zhang (2018) found that the inclusion of IR observations can improve the analyzed cloud hydrometeor fields.Chan et al.(2020b) subsequently performed real data DA experiments for a similar time period and domain and found that the assimilation of real IR observations can potentially improve cloud field analyses and predictions across a range of spatial scales, as well as short-term rainfall predictions.These improvements seen in Ying and Zhang (2018) and Chan et al.(2020b) are consistent with the improvements seen in the context of mid-latitude weather and tropical cyclone convection-permitting numerical weather prediction.

    However, several important questions remain unanswered regarding the assimilation of all-sky IR observations in the context of tropical MCSs.First, how does the assimilation of real-world IR observations improve the thermodynamic and dynamic fields of tropical MCSs? Second, how does the accuracy of the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs vary with the frequency of IR DA? Addressing these questions could potentially inform the future assimilation of IR observations in the Tropics and improve the analyses and forecasts of tropical MCSs.

    In this article, we will attempt to answer these two important questions in the case of a tropical squall line that swept through Sumatra, the Malay Peninsula and Borneo (Fig.1a).To study these questions, we employed ensembles of grayzone resolution Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)model simulations and assimilated real-world conventional observations.We also assimilated IR observations from the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI), which is on-board the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite (Bessho et al., 2016).

    2.Materials and Methods

    2.1.Setup of simulation ensembles

    To generate WRF simulation ensembles of the squall line, we employed the Advanced Research WRF (Skamarock et al., 2008) model (version 3.8.1).The simulation domain covers the area plotted in Fig.1a and has 560 × 450 horizontal grid points with 9-km grid spacing.45 model levels were employed, with the bottommost 9 levels within the lowest 1-km of the model, and the model top pressure set to 20 hPa.

    For the WRF model’s physics and dynamics, we employed the updated Goddard shortwave scheme (Chou and Suarez, 1999) and the Global Circulation Model version of the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTMG) longwave radiation scheme (Iacono et al., 2008).Surface processes were generally simulated using the unified Noah land surface physics scheme (Chen and Dudhia, 2001), the only exception being that surface skin temperatures were diagnosed via the method of Zeng and Beljaars (2005).The Yonsei University (YSU) boundary layer scheme (Hong et al., 2006)was employed to handle subgrid-scale turbulent mixing.Finally, we utilized the scheme of Thompson et al.(2008)to parameterize cloud microphysical processes.

    Note that while the 9-km horizontal grid spacing is too coarse to resolve individual convective updrafts, it is sufficient to resolve the basic dynamics of tropical MCSs.There are several reasons behind choosing this horizontal grid spacing.First, due to the rapid motion of the tropical squall line(Fig.1a), a large domain is required.Due to our limited computational resources, it is difficult to utilize smaller grid spacings in this large domain.Second, earlier work over the nearby Indian Ocean have shown that this 9-km grid spacing is sufficiently small to realistically replicate the precipitation, circulation, thermodynamic, and radiation features of organized mesoscale convection over tropical oceans (Wang et al., 2015).Finally, this 9-km grid spacing is widely employed in studies that examine the overturning and the physical mechanisms of organized tropical convection(Chen et al.2018a, b, c; Chen et al., 2020; Ruppert and Chen, 2020; Ruppert et al., 2020).

    We have also opted to avoid the use of cumulus parameterizations in this study.The reason is that earlier studies in the neighboring tropical Indian Ocean were able to obtain reasonable tropical MCSs without cumulus parameterizations (Wang et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2018a, b, c; He et al.,2019; Chen et al., 2020; Ou et al., 2020; Ruppert and Chen,2020; Ruppert et al., 2020).These studies were able to do so because the 9-km grid spacing was fine enough to resolve mesoscale convective updrafts.

    In this study, we initiated 50-member WRF ensemble simulations, starting at 0000 UTC 30 May 2017.To construct the needed 50 sets of initial conditions, we utilized the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast(ECMWF) fifth-generation global reanalysis data (ERA5;Hersbach et al., 2020) 10-member ensemble fields at 0000 UTC on 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 May, as well as the ERA5 reanalysis fields at 0000 UTC 30 May.To be precise, for each of the 5 dates, we generated 10 perturbations from the ERA5 10-member ensemble by subtracting the ensemble mean on said dates from each of the 10-members.This procedure produced a set of 50 perturbations.We then added the ERA5 reanalysis fields at 0000 UTC May 30 to the 50 perturbations to produce 50 sets of initial conditions.The ERA5 reanalysis fields were also used to generate the boundary conditions, i.e., all 50-members were subjected to the same boundary conditions.The ensemble was then integrated forward for 12 hours to generate flow-dependent ensemble statistics at 1200 UTC 30 May.All data assimilation experiments began at 1200 UTC 30 May.

    2.2.Observation sources

    To examine the questions raised in section 1, we performed experiments where we assimilated non-IR conventional observations and satellite all-sky IR observations.The non-IR conventional observations include surface station, pilot, rawinsonde, radiosonde, and ship observations from the Global Telecommunication System from the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Research Data Archive (NCAR RDA).The non-IR conventional observations also include satellite-derived atmospheric motion vectors from the Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Tropical Cyclone Archive.These non-IR conventional observations were assimilated every 3 hours in all experiments.

    Aside from the non-IR conventional observations, we also assimilated AHI channel 8 (6.2 μm) infrared brightness temperature observations (ch08-BT).The AHI instrument is on board the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite,which is located above the Equator, at 140.7°E.Under clear-sky conditions, ch08-BT observations typically reflect the upper tropospheric water vapor content (Otkin, 2012).These observations are generally available every 10 minutes.

    2.3.Setup of data assimilation experiments

    To investigate the important questions raised in section 1, we performed three DA experiments.The first experiment assimilated non-IR conventional observations every three hours (conv experiment).In the second experiment,we assimilated both ch08-BT and non-IR conventional observations every three hours (conv+ch08_3hrly).Finally, in the third experiment, we assimilated non-IR conventional observations every three hours, and ch08-BT observations every 30 minutes (conv+ch08_30min).

    In this study, we employed the Pennsylvania State University WRF Ensemble Kalman Filter system (PSU-EnKF;Meng and Zhang, 2008) as our DA system.The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) constructs ensemble analyses by combining an ensemble of forecasts with observations (Evensen,1994; Burgers et al., 1998).To be precise, the EnKF communicates information from the observations into the modeled atmospheric fields using forecast-estimated covariances between the model state variables and the observable quantities predicted by the forecast.The PSU-EnKF utilizes the method of Whitaker and Hamill (2002) to construct the ensemble analyses.A schematic of how the PSU-EnKF assimilates observations over time is shown in Fig.2.

    The PSU-EnKF algorithm employed here is a slightly modified version of the PSU-EnKF described in Chan et al.(2020b) [the Ensemble Square-Root Filter algorithm(EnSRF) in section 2c].The only modification to the algorithm is that the mean of the forecasted observations is no longer calculated using the ensemble mean.Instead, the mean of the forecasted observations is calculated by first computing the simulated observations for all forecast members,and then taking the ensemble mean of the result.This modification was made to mitigate the artificial dry bias produced by the previous EnSRF implementation when infrared observations are assimilated.The cause of this artificial dry bias is described in Section 3b of Chan et al (2020b).

    Aside from that, we also performed 80% relaxation to prior perturbations to prevent filter divergence (Zhang et al.,2004).The variables updated by the PSU-EnKF include the three-dimensional winds, water vapor mixing ratio, liquid cloud mixing ratio, ice cloud mixing ratio, rain mixing ratio,snow mixing ratio, graupel mixing ratio, temperature, and pressure.All localizations are performed using the Gaspari?Cohn 1999 fifth-order polynomial (Gaspari and Cohn, 1999).

    With regards to the assimilation of conventional observations, we assimilated the atmospheric motion vectors with a horizontal radius of influence (HROI) of 100 km, and no vertical localization.Sounding and aircraft observations were assimilated with a 700 km HROI and a 5 model layer vertical radius of influence (VROI).With regards to surface observations, Metéorologique Aviation Régulière (METAR)observations, surface synoptic observations (SYNOP) observations and ship observations were respectively assimilated with HROIs of 600 km, 300 km and 1400 km.All three surface observation types were assimilated with a 45 model layer VROI.

    To assimilate the ch08-BT observations, we employed the Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM), release 2.3.0, to calculate the IR AHI brightness temperatures from the WRF ensemble.The ch08-BT observations were thinned to a spacing of 30 km, and then assimilated with a HROI of 100 km (Chan et al., 2020b).Furthermore, we employed the adaptive observation error inflation scheme(AOEI) of Minamide and Zhang (2017), as well as the adaptive background error inflation scheme (ABEI) of Minamide and Zhang (2019), to assimilate the ch08-BT observations.No vertical localization was performed for the ch08-BT observations.Better results might be possible with more tuning, which can be explored in future studies.

    Fig.2.A schematic showing how the PSU-EnKF system assimilates observations at times t1 and t2.The bubbles represent the envelop of possible model values predicted by an ensemble of model outputs, and are color-coded by time.Suppose we have three ensemble members at time t0.To assimilate the observation at t1, we use WRF to integrate the three members from t0 to t1.Then, the PSU-EnKF ingests the observation at t1, which results in the threemember ensemble shifting towards and contracting around the ensemble.To assimilate the observation at t2 (and at all subsequent times), the same integrate-then-ingest procedure is repeated.

    Aside from these settings, no ch08-BT observations were rejected in this study.Observations with large innovations are often rejected because these observations might be erroneous (e.g., J?rvinen and Undén, 1997; Cardinali et al.,2003).In our setup, the AOEI inflates the observation error of ch08-BT observations with large innovations.The AOEI thus weakens the magnitude of the analysis increments coming from these large innovation ch08-BT observations, i.e.,AOEI functions as a safety measure against potentially problematic ch08-BT observations.As such, we did not reject any ch08-BT observations in this study.

    It should also be noted that no bias correction for the ch08-BT observations were employed here because we found the ch08-BT biases are small in this tropical squall line case.As discussed in Chan et al.(2020b), the square of the bias is a component of the mean-squared difference(MSD) between the ensemble mean and observed ch08-BT.The conv, conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min experiments’ squared prior ch08-BT biases are 0.49 K2, 0.25 K2,and 0.00 K2, respectively.In contrast, the prior ch08-BT MSDs of the conv, conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min experiments are 68.9 K2, 23.0 K2, and 16.0 K2, respectively,i.e., the squared prior ch08-BT biases account for less than 1.1% of the prior ch08-BT MSD.Thus, we consider the ch08-BT biases to be small and did not employ bias correc-tion when assimilating ch08-BT observations.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Description of the observed tropical squall line

    Before delving into the important questions raised in section 1, we will describe the observed behavior of this study’s tropical squall line case.Tropical squall lines are a frequently occurring type of tropical MCSs over our study’s domain (Lo and Orton, 2016; Chan et al., 2019; Sun et al.,2020).On 30 May 2017, the AHI observed a southeastward propagating MCS over the equatorial Indian Ocean (Fig.1a).By 1500 UTC 30 May, the mesoscale convective system evolved into a southeastward propagating, bow-shaped squall line.At this time, the squall line was generally aligned in the northeast-southwest direction, with the northeastern tip of the squall line grazing the west coast of Sumatra (not shown here).

    For the next 12 hours, AHI observations indicate that the squall did not penetrate the mountain range that runs along most of the west coast of Sumatra.At approximately 0900 UTC 31 May, the northeastern half of the squall line penetrated the mountain range.Within the next 3 hours, the northeastern half and the southwestern half of the squall split apart.For the remainder of the study, we will focus on the northeastern half because it passed over surface meteorological stations.The northeastern half developed a northsouth alignment and propagated eastwards (Fig.1a), passing through Sumatra, and then the Strait of Malacca.This propagation behavior and morphology is rather typical of squalls in the Sumatra-Borneo region (Lo and Orton, 2016;Chan et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020).By 0000 UTC 2 June,the squall line had reached the southwestern coast of Borneo (Fig.1a) and proceeded to dissipate.

    According to the ERA5, the observed squall line is collocated with the advancing edge of a westerly wind burst (not shown).Furthermore, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s (BoM’s) Real-time Multivariate MJO index(Wheeler and Hendon, 2004) indicated that during the squall line’s time frame, the MJO’s active phase was advancing from the Indian Ocean into the Maritime Continent.As westerly wind bursts are often associated with the onset of the MJO’s active phase (Zhang, 2005), the MJO index supports the association between the squall line and a westerly wind burst seen in the ERA5 data.Future work can examine the association between westerly wind bursts and tropical squall lines in the region.

    3.2.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved analyzed clouds

    The first question we will address in this study is whether adding all-sky IR observations into DA can improve the analyses and prediction of a tropical squall line.To that end, we will be comparing the conv and the conv+ch08_30min experiments.Furthermore, to focus on the squall line itself, the experiments will be compared in an area around the squall line’s leading edge.

    To determine the position of the leading edge, we computed the meridional average of the observed AHI channel 14 brightness temperatures (ch14-BT) for latitudes between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.The result is plotted as a longitude-time diagram in Fig.1b.Because the squall line’s clouds show up as strong cold signals in ch14-BT, we can determine the position of the leading edge of the squall line from Fig.1b,which is indicated by a dashed black line.For the rest of this article, we will be comparing the experiments in the vicinity of these inferred positions.

    We begin with examining the impacts of including half-hourly ch08-BT observations, in addition to 3-hourly conventional observations, on the cloud fields.Since ch14-BT was not assimilated and indicates the presence and absence of clouds, the root-mean-square difference (RMSD)between the analyzed and observed ch14-BT can be used to gauge the quality of the analyzed cloud fields.To be more precise, we will be comparing the ch14-BT RMSDs computed for a region surrounding the squall line’s leading edge(Fig.1c).The region covers a rectangular area between 10°S and 5°S, as well as between 15 degrees west and 5 degrees east of the leading edge (Fig.1b).As seen in Fig.1c,conv+ch08_30min’s RMSDs are at all times substantially smaller than that of conv.On average, conv+ch08_30min’s RMSD (16.2 K) is ~35% smaller than conv’s RMSD (25.0 K).In other words, the assimilation of IR observations, on top of conventional observations, can improve analyses of the squall line’s cloud field.This improvement is in line with earlier work (Ying and Zhang, 2018).Finally,conv+ch08_30min’s consistency ratio (CR ≡ root-meansquare spread (RMSS)/RMSD) is closer to the optimal value of 1 than that of conv.This indicates that the assimilation of half-hourly IR observations improved the ensemble dispersion for cloud fields.

    3.3.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved analyzed outflow position

    Aside from improving the cloud field, the inclusion of half-hourly ch08-BT observations also improved the position of the squall line surface outflow.Surface outflows can generate converging surface winds ahead of the squall line,and thus encourage the formation of new cells ahead of the squall line (e.g., Gamache and Houze, 1982; Moncrieff and Liu, 1999).Since the initiation of new cells ahead of the squall line is important for squall line propagation (e.g., Fovell et al., 2006), improving the position of the analyzed surface outflow can improve the analyses and prediction of the squall line.

    To see the improvement in surface outflow, consider that the outflow in this squall line is characterized by strong surface westerlies.Figures 3a and 3c show longitude?time diagrams of the meridionally-averaged analysis mean zonal wind at 300-m above sea level in the conv and conv+ch08_30min experiments.The thick black contours trace the observed 224 K ch14-BT contour, which indicates the position of the squall line.The meridional average was performed between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.Between 1200 UTC 31 May and 1800 UTC 1 June, the predicted outflow in the conv experiment is mostly located east of the observed leading edge (Fig.3a; black contours).In contrast, the analyzed zone of strong westerlies in conv+ch08_30min overlaps substantially with the observed squall (Fig.3c).These longitude-time diagrams suggest that the half-hourly assimilation of ch08-BT observations improved the positions of the surface outflow.

    To further confirm the improvement of the surface outflow position, we examined three-hourly unassimilated surface zonal wind observations from a surface station located at 2.7°S, 107.8°E (marked with white cross in Fig.1a).These surface observations were obtained from the Integrated Surface Database (ISD), which is maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA).The time-series of the observed and analyzed zonal winds for this station is plotted in Fig.3d.

    As can be inferred from Fig.3d, the analyzed squall line surface outflow from the conv+ch08_30min experiment outperformed that of conv in several ways.The first way is in terms of the onset time of the squall line surface outflow at the station.The onset of the squall line surface outflow is indicated by strengthening westerlies.As can be seen in Fig.3d, the onset time from the conv+ch08_30min experiment analyzed surface outflow (around 1200 UTC 31 May) is slightly closer to the observed onset time(around 1800 UTC 31 May) than that of conv (around 0600 UTC 31 May).Aside from the difference in onset times,Fig.3d indicates that the squall line outflow in conv leaves the station (around 0600 UTC 1 June) 6 hours earlier than the observed squall line (around 1200 UTC 1 June),whereas the squall line outflow from conv+ch08_30min leaves the station at roughly the same time as the observed squall line.These differences in onset and exit times imply that the squall line outflow in conv is displaced east of the actual outflow, and that this displacement error is largely reduced in conv+ch08_30min.This reduction in surface outflow displacement error is consistent with Figs.3a and 3c.

    Fig.3.Squall-relative longitude-time diagrams of the analyzed zonal wind, averaged between 3.6°S to 4.4°S, at 300 m above sea level (a, b, c).The thick black contours in panels (a), (b), and (c) indicate the 224 K contour of the observed ch14-BT,averaged between the same latitudes.The gray shading indicates the storm-relative longitudes of the mountain range along the west coast of Sumatra, where no 300-m zonal wind information is available in the model.Also, the thick dotted lines indicate the relative longitude of the surface station referred to in the text.Finally, panel (d) shows time series of the observed surface zonal wind, analyzed zonal wind, as well as the observed ch14-BT at a surface station located at 2.7°S,107.8°E.

    It should also be noted here that the conv+ch08_30min experiment also outperforms conv in terms of the fit to the unassimilated zonal wind observations when the squall line is passing over the surface station (from 2100 UTC 31 May to 1200 UTC 1 June).This improvement is likely because the eastward displacement error is substantially smaller in conv+ch08_30min than in conv.

    Interestingly, the improvements in surface outflow position introduced by spatiotemporally dense IR DA occurred in the absence of dense surface observations.Previous studies have suggested that dense surface observations can improve squall line surface outflows and the associated gust front positions (e.g., Chen et al., 2016).Our results thus suggest that spatiotemporally dense IR observations can be a potential substitute for dense surface observations when constraining errors associated with squall line surface outflows and gust front positions.

    The surface outflow position improvements introduced by half-hourly IR DA can be plausibly explained by the combination of two complementary effects.The first effect comes from the cloud field improvements introduced by half-hourly ch08-BT DA.These cloud field improvements include improvements to the position of the analyzed squall line clouds, which in turn leads to improved positioning of the squall line rainfall.Since the surface outflow is induced by rainfall, it is plausible that an improved rainfall position can improve the position of the surface outflow.

    The second effect arises from the positive correlation between forecasted ch08-BT just behind the observed leading edge, and the ~950 hPa zonal wind near the leading edge of the surface outflow (henceforth, gust front).For instance, at 0000 UTC on 1 June, the forecasted ensemble mean gust front is at roughly 1°E relative longitude (similar to the analyzed gust front in Fig.3c).Likewise, Fig.4b indicates that the ~950 hPa zonal wind at ~1°E relative longitude is positively correlated with forecasted ch08-BT just behind the leading edge (?1°E relative longitude), i.e., this positive correlation is collocated with the gust front.

    To see how this positive gust front zonal wind correlation allows the EnKF to shift the gust front, consider that the forecasted squall line clouds tend to be displaced eastwards of the observed squall line clouds.Since the observed squall line’s highest clouds tend to occur at around ?1°E relative longitude (not shown, but can be inferred from Fig.1b),this eastward displacement indicates that the forecasted clouds at ?1°E relative longitude should be lower than that of the observations.In other words, the forecasted ch08-BT is higher than that of the observations at ?1°E relative longitude.This results in a negative ch08-BT innovation at ?1°E relative longitude.Because of the positive correlation, this negative innovation results in a negative westerly (or easterly) analysis increment at the gust front.Since the wind in the gust front is mostly westerly, the analysis increment weakens the westerly winds at the gust front.This weakening means that the forecasted gust front is forced westward.As such, the assimilation of ch08-BT observations near the observed leading edge improved the position of the gust front through the correlations between ch08-BT and the gust front’s zonal wind.

    3.4.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved deterministic forecasts of cloud fields

    Aside from improving the analyzed cloud fields and surface outflow position, the half-hourly assimilation of IR observations also improved the short-term deterministic forecasts of the squall line.These deterministic forecasts were initiated from the EnKF analysis means.Figure 5 shows the meridionally-averaged, deterministically forecasted ch14-BT.Like Figs.1c, 3, and 4, the meridional average was done between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.As can be seen in Fig.5, for the first 3 hours of the deterministic forecasts, the positions of the forecasted clouds from conv+ch08_30min are closer to the observations than those from conv, especially for the forecasts initialized after 1200 UTC 1 June.Furthermore,the squall-relative ch14-BT RMSD (calculated as in Fig.1c)of the conv+ch08_30min deterministic forecasts are lower than those of the conv (not shown) for the first three hours.To be more precise, on average, conv+ch08_30min ch14-BT deterministic forecast RMSDs are about 20% smaller than those of conv from initiation to up to a lead time of 2 hours.For lead times of 3 hours and longer, the ch14-BT deterministic forecast RMSDs of both experiments are statistically indistinguishable.These improvements to the shortterm deterministic forecasts of cloud fields are akin to those seen in Chan et al.(2020b).

    Fig.4.Correlations between ch08-BT and zonal wind on 1 June (0000 UTC) for (a) the conv + ch08_3hrly experiment, and (b) the conv + ch08_30min experiment.These correlations are plotted for a ch08 observation located 1 degree west of the squall’s leading edge (vertical dashed lines).Note that the plotted values are the average of correlations across 10 zonal cross-sections between 3.6°S to 4.4°S.

    Fig.5.Storm-relative longitude-time diagrams of deterministically forecasted ch14-BT (shading), as well as the 224 K contour of the observed ch14-BT (black contours).All plotted ch14-BT are averaged between 3.6°S to 4.4°S.Panels a, d, g and j show the deterministic forecasts from the conv experiment.Similar plots were also produced for the conv + ch08_3hrly(b, e, h and k) and conv + ch08_30min (c, f, i and l) experiments.The forecasted ch14-BT and the observed ch14-BT at the corresponding times are shown for the start times of the forecasts (a, b and c), at a lead time of 1 hour (d, e and f), at a lead time of 2 hours (g, h and i), and a lead time of 3 hours (j, k and l).Note that the deterministic forecasts from 13 initiation times are shown in each panel.The first deterministic forecasts were initiated on 31 May (1200 UTC), and subsequent deterministic forecasts were initiated every 3 hours, up to and including 2 June (0000 UTC).

    3.5.Reducing the frequency of ch08-BT DA degraded analyses and deterministic forecasts

    Another important question raised in section 1 is how the accuracy and prediction of the tropical squall line vary with the update frequency of IR DA.To examine this question, we will be comparing the conv+ch08_30min and conv+ch08_3hrly experiments.

    Reducing the frequency of ch08-BT DA generally degraded the analyses and deterministic forecasts of cloud fields (Figs.1 and 5).According to Fig.1c, decreasing ch08-BT DA frequency from half-hourly to three-hourly generally increased the analysis ch14-BT RMSD.On average,the RMSDs increased by ~10%, from 16.2 K to 18.1 K.Furthermore, Fig.5 indicates that reduction in ch08-BT DA frequency degraded the deterministically forecasted positions of the squall line for the three hours of the deterministic forecast, and the degradations are especially noticeable for the forecasts initialized after 1200 UTC 1 June (Figs.5e and 5h).Taken together, these degradations imply that a higher frequency of data assimilation is preferable for short-term cloud field analyses and forecasts.

    The analyzed positions of the squall line’s outflow were also degraded when the frequency of ch08-BT DA was reduced from half-hourly to three-hourly.Between 31 May (1200 UTC) and 1 June (1800 UTC), the analyzed strong zonal wind zone from conv+ch08_3hrly does not overlap much with the observed squall (Fig.3b), whereas that of the conv+ch08_30min substantially overlaps the observed squall (Fig.3c).Furthermore, while the validation surface station data indicates the analyzed outflows of conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min arrived at the station at the same time (Fig.3d), the conv+ch08_30min analyzed outflow is clearly better than that of conv+ch08_3hrly when the squall line passed over the surface station during 0000 UTC–1200 UTC 1 June.In other words, high frequency data assimilation is preferable for improving the analyzed position of storm outflows.

    This degradation in squall line outflow position is also consistent with the ensemble correlations between simulated ch08-BT and zonal wind (Fig.4a).While similar nearsurface dipole correlation patterns exist in both the conv+ch08_30min and conv+ch08_3hrly experiments, the dipole pattern in conv+ch08_3hrly is dislocated ~1.5 degrees east of the ch08-BT observation location.In other words, the capability of conv+ch08_3hrly in moving the squall line surface outflow position westwards is limited when compared to that of conv+ch08_30min.

    It should be noted here that while decreasing the frequency of ch08-BT DA did dramatically degrade the quality of the analyzed cloud fields, analyzed outflow, and forecasted clouds, these quantities in conv+ch08_3hrly still outperformed those conv.In other words, even a moderate frequency of ch08-BT DA was able to improve these quantities beyond what is achieved by non-IR conventional observation DA.

    4.Conclusions

    In this study, we have delved into the hitherto unexplored dynamic and thermodynamic impacts of assimilating IR observations for the case of a tropical squall line.In line with earlier work (e.g., Ying and Zhang, 2018), we confirmed that introducing ch08-BT observations into DA improved the analyses and predictions of a tropical squall line’s cloud field.Even though the ch08-BT observations are insensitive to lower-tropospheric zonal winds, the assimilation of these observations improved the position of the squall line’s lower tropospheric outflow zone.This improvement was likely due to the improved cloud fields, as well as the near-surface dipole forecast ensemble correlations between ch08-BT and lower-tropospheric zonal winds.Finally, we also found that increasing the frequency of ch08-BT observations further improved the analyzed cloud field, forecasted cloud field, and the analyzed outflow position.

    Since this study is the first of its kind to specifically examine the improvements from introducing IR observations into tropical MCS analyses and prediction, there are many areas for future work.These areas can be broken into three types: completeness, the assimilation of other observations and areas for future DA algorithm development.

    The first area for completeness concerns the fact that we have only examined the impacts for one tropical squall line in the Sumatra-Borneo region.As such, future work can examine if similar improvements can be found in other tropical MCSs, including other tropical areas.Second, comparisons against surface station temperature observations (not shown) indicate that the simulated squall line cold pools tend to be much stronger than observed.These overly strong simulated cold pools might be due to model errors in the surface parameterization or radiation schemes.Future work can thus examine tuning these schemes to produce more realistic cold pools.Aside from that, future work can also explore whether the improvements obtained here are retained when the model’s horizontal grid spacing is reduced to a value that allows for the explicit resolution of convective updrafts (usually 1 km or less).

    Future work can also explore the assimilation of other uncommonly used observations.For instance, it is possible that the inclusion of observations from additional water vapor channels can improve the analysis and prediction tropical MCSs.This improvement might be possible because different channels respond to different parts of the atmospheric column (Schmit et al., 2005).Aside from that, several studies have indicated that sub-hourly AMV data assimilation has the potential to improve forecasts of moist convection (Otsuka et al., 2015; Kunii et al., 2016).Presently,AMVs are generally assimilated every 3~6 hours.Thus, the impact of frequently assimilating infrared-derived atmospheric motion vector observations is also another avenue of future study.

    Finally, future work can also delve into methods that address certain assumptions that are made in IR DA.One important assumption in the EnKF is that the simulated observations have an approximately linear relationship with modelled atmospheric variables.However, the relationship between simulated IR observations and modelled atmospheric is often nonlinear (e.g., Steward, 2012).Other cutting-edge DA methods might be able handle this nonlinearity.Such methods include particle filters (e.g., van Leeuwen, 2011; Penny and Miyoshi, 2016; Poterjoy, 2016),iterative EnKF methods (Lorentzen and Naevdal, 2011),and Gaussian-mixture model methods (e.g., Anderson and Anderson, 1999; Sondergaard and Lermusiaux, 2013; Chan et al., 2020a).Aside from linearity, the EnKF also assumes that the forecast ensemble follows a Gaussian distribution.However, the displacements of cloud features among ensemble members can result in non-Gaussian properties,violating this Gaussian assumption.As such, future work can explore methods that address displacement errors.Such methods include variants of the feature calibration and alignment technique (Hoffman and Grassotti, 1996; Brewster,2003; Nehrkorn et al., 2015; Stratman et al., 2018) and the recently developed multiscale alignment data assimilation(Ying, 2019).

    The advent of modern geostationary satellite IR observations has ushered in a new era of high-frequency, high spatial-density, and globe-encompassing remote observations.While the data assimilation community is well on its way to exploit these observations, many unexplored avenues remain, especially in the Tropics.With continued advancements in computing power and data assimilation techniques,the day we can fully exploit these IR observations is just beyond the horizon.

    Samples and Data

    The ERA5 pressure level and surface data were obtained from the ECMWF’s Climate Data Store (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels, and https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-singlelevels).Aside from that, the in-situ conventional observations were obtained from the NCAR RDA (https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds351.0, and, https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds461.0), and the atmospheric motion vector observations were obtained from the CIMSS Tropical Cyclone Archive (http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/archive/).The Himawari-8 AHI data was obtained from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) P-Tree system via File Transfer Protocol (FTP; ftp://ftp.ptree.jaxa.jp/).

    Acknowledgements.This study is supported by the Water Cycle and Climate Extremes Modelling (WACCEM) project,which is funded by the U.S.Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research, as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling program.This work is also partially supported by ONR Grant N00014-18-1-2517.Computations were performed on the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center Cori supercluster and the Texas Advanced Computer Center.This paper is dedicated to Dr.Fuqing ZHANG, who passed away unexpectedly in 2019.Dr.Fuqing ZHANG made tre-mendous contributions to the atmospheric sciences.His contributions include innovative and pioneering research on atmospheric dynamics, predictability, and ensemble-based data assimilation.He devoted boundless energy to engaging, mentoring, and inspiring undergraduate and graduate students, as well as early-career scientists, including us, the two authors of this paper.His death is a great loss to his family, friends, students, colleagues, and our entire community.

    97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产成人精品在线电影| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 热re99久久国产66热| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 搞女人的毛片| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 日本 欧美在线| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 日本免费a在线| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 1024香蕉在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 露出奶头的视频| 国产av又大| 久久影院123| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 怎么达到女性高潮| 欧美成人午夜精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 中国美女看黄片| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产麻豆69| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| xxx96com| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 91成年电影在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲av美国av| 一进一出抽搐动态| 成人精品一区二区免费| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产亚洲欧美98| 一本综合久久免费| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 久热这里只有精品99| 欧美在线黄色| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 中国美女看黄片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 9色porny在线观看| 91在线观看av| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 午夜激情av网站| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 午夜激情av网站| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 在线观看日韩欧美| 精品国产国语对白av| 最好的美女福利视频网| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 免费少妇av软件| a级毛片在线看网站| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 欧美大码av| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 成人三级黄色视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 又大又爽又粗| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 成人国语在线视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产在线观看jvid| 天堂√8在线中文| 又大又爽又粗| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久人妻av系列| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 18禁观看日本| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产精品九九99| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲全国av大片| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区 | 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 中文字幕久久专区| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 国产麻豆69| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 日韩欧美三级三区| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 成人三级黄色视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久中文看片网| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲伊人色综图| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 一进一出抽搐动态| 9191精品国产免费久久| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 久久久国产成人免费| 久99久视频精品免费| 高清在线国产一区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 免费少妇av软件| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 色老头精品视频在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 69av精品久久久久久| 看免费av毛片| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 1024香蕉在线观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲片人在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美日韩乱码在线| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲av熟女| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产成人av激情在线播放| www日本在线高清视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 91av网站免费观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 成年版毛片免费区| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 精品人妻1区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 91国产中文字幕| 中文字幕久久专区| 日本五十路高清| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 不卡av一区二区三区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 97碰自拍视频| av有码第一页| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产精品 国内视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| bbb黄色大片| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 级片在线观看| 美女免费视频网站| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美日本视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久影院123| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 一进一出抽搐动态| 曰老女人黄片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| www.999成人在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| www.www免费av| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 嫩草影院精品99| 九色国产91popny在线| 欧美在线黄色| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 免费观看人在逋| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 色播在线永久视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| www日本在线高清视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 操美女的视频在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久中文字幕一级| 制服人妻中文乱码| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 中国美女看黄片| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲国产看品久久| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 天天一区二区日本电影三级 | 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 97碰自拍视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产av精品麻豆| 美国免费a级毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 日本免费a在线| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 欧美成人午夜精品| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| av福利片在线| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| av视频免费观看在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 欧美黑人精品巨大| xxx96com| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 成在线人永久免费视频| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 91成年电影在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 99热只有精品国产| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 久99久视频精品免费| 成年人黄色毛片网站| av天堂久久9| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久性视频一级片| 99国产精品99久久久久| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 咕卡用的链子| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲九九香蕉| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 日本免费a在线| netflix在线观看网站| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 免费看十八禁软件| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 精品第一国产精品| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 9191精品国产免费久久| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久热在线av| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 大香蕉久久成人网| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品免费视频内射| a级毛片在线看网站| 精品福利观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久影院123| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 成年版毛片免费区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久亚洲真实| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲九九香蕉| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 色播亚洲综合网| 一级黄色大片毛片| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 两性夫妻黄色片| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久草成人影院| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 精品人妻1区二区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 在线播放国产精品三级| 亚洲av美国av| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 手机成人av网站| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲人成电影观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 亚洲av熟女| 91字幕亚洲| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 搞女人的毛片| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 成人手机av| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 成人三级做爰电影| 黄色女人牲交| 久久人妻av系列| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 久久久久久久久中文| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲第一av免费看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 久久香蕉国产精品| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 欧美乱妇无乱码| av天堂在线播放| 精品日产1卡2卡| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 久热这里只有精品99| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 一区二区三区精品91| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧|