• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Improving the Analyses and Forecasts of a Tropical Squall Line Using Upper Tropospheric Infrared Satellite Observations※

    2022-04-02 05:51:40ManYauCHANandXingchaoCHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年5期

    Man-Yau CHAN and Xingchao CHEN

    Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, and Center for Advanced Data Assimilation and Predictability Techniques, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, PA 16802, USA

    ABSTRACT The advent of modern geostationary satellite infrared radiance observations has noticeably improved numerical weather forecasts and analyses.However, compared to midlatitude weather systems and tropical cyclones, research into using infrared radiance observations for numerically predicting and analyzing tropical mesoscale convective systems remain mostly fallow.Since tropical mesoscale convective systems play a crucial role in regional and global weather, this deficit should be addressed.This study is the first of its kind to examine the potential impacts of assimilating all-sky upper tropospheric infrared radiance observations on the prediction of a tropical squall line.Even though these all-sky infrared radiance observations are not directly affected by lower-tropospheric winds, the high-frequency assimilation of these allsky infrared radiance observations improved the analyses of the tropical squall line’s outflow position.Aside from that, the assimilation of all-sky infrared radiance observations improved the analyses and prediction of the squall line’s cloud field.Finally, reducing the frequency of assimilating these all-sky infrared radiance observations weakened these improvements to the analyzed outflow position, as well as the analyses and predictions of cloud fields.

    Key words: data assimilation, infrared satellite observations, numerical weather prediction, mesoscale convective systems, tropical meteorology

    1.Introduction

    Tropical mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) contribute more than 60% of the total tropical precipitation (Mohr et al., 1999; Houze, 2004; Nesbitt et al., 2006; Liu, 2011;Roca and Fiolleau, 2020), which include tropical squall lines and other non-squall organized convective disturbances (Krishnamurti et al., 2013).In addition, tropical MCSs affect the global climate and weather across a large range of spatial scales (Madden and Julian, 1971; Held and Hou, 1980; Hoskins and Karoly, 1981; Weickmann, 1983;Satoh, 1994; Kiladis et al., 2009; Johnson and Ciesielski,2013).It is thus important to accurately analyze and predict tropical MCSs.

    Analyses are typically used to study the dynamics, and initiate numerical predictions, of tropical MCSs.These analyses are normally produced using a class of Bayesian inference methods known as data assimilation (DA; Geer et al.,2018; Hersbach et al., 2020).DA generates these analyses by combining observations with a forecast from a preceding forecast cycle, while accounting for the uncertainties in both sources of information (e.g., Lorenc, 1986; Talagrand and Courtier, 1987; Evensen, 1994).Thus, one way to improve the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs is to improve the DA process.Furthermore, the improved analyses produced by DA can be used to deepen our understanding of the characteristics and dynamics of tropical MCSs.

    The accuracy of DA-produced atmospheric analyses has a strong dependence on the availability of observations(Liu and Rabier, 2002; Benjamin et al., 2004; Ying and Zhang, 2018; Ying et al., 2018).Unfortunately, due to the difficulty of maintaining observation sites over ocean and tropical islands, in-situ observations of the atmosphere are generally sparse and infrequent over the Tropics.These sparse and infrequent in-situ observations are thus inadequate to capture most tropical MCSs.For instance, radiosondes and rawinsondes are usually released every 12 hours, and are typically spaced more than 500 km apart in the Tropics (Ingleby,2017).In contrast, individual convective cells within tropical MCSs typically have length scales under 100 km and evolve on time scales less an hour, i.e., it is challenging to constrain the errors in the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs using in-situ observations alone (Liu and Rabier,2002).

    Supplementing in-situ observations with geostationary satellite all-sky infrared radiance observations has the potential to improve the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs.Unlike in-situ observations, modern satellite infrared radiance observation pixels are spaced less than 10 km apart and have sampling periods of 30 minutes or less.Thus,these geostationary satellite infrared radiance observations(henceforth, IR observations) have spatiotemporal resolutions that are closer to the spatiotemporal scale of tropical moist convection than those of in-situ observations.All-sky IR observations thus have the potential to constrain errors in the analyses and prediction of tropical MCSs.This potential should be explored.

    At the time of writing, most of the research on assimilating all-sky IR observations into convection-permitting models had been done in the context of mid-latitude weather systems and tropical cyclones.Research in these contexts has found that the addition of IR observations improved the analyzed thermodynamic and cloud fields (e.g., Vukicevic et al., 2004, 2006; Otkin, 2010, 2012; Honda et al., 2018;Zhang et al., 2018; Minamide and Zhang, 2019; Sawada et al., 2019).In contrast, relatively little work has been done in the context of tropical MCSs.Nonetheless, the pattern of improvement seen in the context of convection-permitting mid-latitude severe weather and tropical cyclone prediction should also be achievable in the context of tropical MCSs.

    Ying and Zhang (2018) was among the first to examine the potential impacts of assimilating all-sky IR observations on the prediction of tropical MCSs.Using ensembles of gray-zone resolution simulations, Ying and Zhang (2018)performed idealized Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) over the tropical Indian Ocean during the active phase of the October 2011 Madden?Julian Oscillation(MJO; Madden and Julian, 1971) event.Gray-zone resolution simulations are simulations that use horizontal grid spacing fine enough to resolve mesoscale convective systems,but too coarse to resolve individual convective updrafts(Chen et al., 2018c).Ying and Zhang (2018) found that the inclusion of IR observations can improve the analyzed cloud hydrometeor fields.Chan et al.(2020b) subsequently performed real data DA experiments for a similar time period and domain and found that the assimilation of real IR observations can potentially improve cloud field analyses and predictions across a range of spatial scales, as well as short-term rainfall predictions.These improvements seen in Ying and Zhang (2018) and Chan et al.(2020b) are consistent with the improvements seen in the context of mid-latitude weather and tropical cyclone convection-permitting numerical weather prediction.

    However, several important questions remain unanswered regarding the assimilation of all-sky IR observations in the context of tropical MCSs.First, how does the assimilation of real-world IR observations improve the thermodynamic and dynamic fields of tropical MCSs? Second, how does the accuracy of the analyses and predictions of tropical MCSs vary with the frequency of IR DA? Addressing these questions could potentially inform the future assimilation of IR observations in the Tropics and improve the analyses and forecasts of tropical MCSs.

    In this article, we will attempt to answer these two important questions in the case of a tropical squall line that swept through Sumatra, the Malay Peninsula and Borneo (Fig.1a).To study these questions, we employed ensembles of grayzone resolution Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)model simulations and assimilated real-world conventional observations.We also assimilated IR observations from the Advanced Himawari Imager (AHI), which is on-board the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite (Bessho et al., 2016).

    2.Materials and Methods

    2.1.Setup of simulation ensembles

    To generate WRF simulation ensembles of the squall line, we employed the Advanced Research WRF (Skamarock et al., 2008) model (version 3.8.1).The simulation domain covers the area plotted in Fig.1a and has 560 × 450 horizontal grid points with 9-km grid spacing.45 model levels were employed, with the bottommost 9 levels within the lowest 1-km of the model, and the model top pressure set to 20 hPa.

    For the WRF model’s physics and dynamics, we employed the updated Goddard shortwave scheme (Chou and Suarez, 1999) and the Global Circulation Model version of the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTMG) longwave radiation scheme (Iacono et al., 2008).Surface processes were generally simulated using the unified Noah land surface physics scheme (Chen and Dudhia, 2001), the only exception being that surface skin temperatures were diagnosed via the method of Zeng and Beljaars (2005).The Yonsei University (YSU) boundary layer scheme (Hong et al., 2006)was employed to handle subgrid-scale turbulent mixing.Finally, we utilized the scheme of Thompson et al.(2008)to parameterize cloud microphysical processes.

    Note that while the 9-km horizontal grid spacing is too coarse to resolve individual convective updrafts, it is sufficient to resolve the basic dynamics of tropical MCSs.There are several reasons behind choosing this horizontal grid spacing.First, due to the rapid motion of the tropical squall line(Fig.1a), a large domain is required.Due to our limited computational resources, it is difficult to utilize smaller grid spacings in this large domain.Second, earlier work over the nearby Indian Ocean have shown that this 9-km grid spacing is sufficiently small to realistically replicate the precipitation, circulation, thermodynamic, and radiation features of organized mesoscale convection over tropical oceans (Wang et al., 2015).Finally, this 9-km grid spacing is widely employed in studies that examine the overturning and the physical mechanisms of organized tropical convection(Chen et al.2018a, b, c; Chen et al., 2020; Ruppert and Chen, 2020; Ruppert et al., 2020).

    We have also opted to avoid the use of cumulus parameterizations in this study.The reason is that earlier studies in the neighboring tropical Indian Ocean were able to obtain reasonable tropical MCSs without cumulus parameterizations (Wang et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2018a, b, c; He et al.,2019; Chen et al., 2020; Ou et al., 2020; Ruppert and Chen,2020; Ruppert et al., 2020).These studies were able to do so because the 9-km grid spacing was fine enough to resolve mesoscale convective updrafts.

    In this study, we initiated 50-member WRF ensemble simulations, starting at 0000 UTC 30 May 2017.To construct the needed 50 sets of initial conditions, we utilized the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast(ECMWF) fifth-generation global reanalysis data (ERA5;Hersbach et al., 2020) 10-member ensemble fields at 0000 UTC on 26, 27, 28, 29, and 30 May, as well as the ERA5 reanalysis fields at 0000 UTC 30 May.To be precise, for each of the 5 dates, we generated 10 perturbations from the ERA5 10-member ensemble by subtracting the ensemble mean on said dates from each of the 10-members.This procedure produced a set of 50 perturbations.We then added the ERA5 reanalysis fields at 0000 UTC May 30 to the 50 perturbations to produce 50 sets of initial conditions.The ERA5 reanalysis fields were also used to generate the boundary conditions, i.e., all 50-members were subjected to the same boundary conditions.The ensemble was then integrated forward for 12 hours to generate flow-dependent ensemble statistics at 1200 UTC 30 May.All data assimilation experiments began at 1200 UTC 30 May.

    2.2.Observation sources

    To examine the questions raised in section 1, we performed experiments where we assimilated non-IR conventional observations and satellite all-sky IR observations.The non-IR conventional observations include surface station, pilot, rawinsonde, radiosonde, and ship observations from the Global Telecommunication System from the National Center for Atmospheric Research’s Research Data Archive (NCAR RDA).The non-IR conventional observations also include satellite-derived atmospheric motion vectors from the Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies (CIMSS) Tropical Cyclone Archive.These non-IR conventional observations were assimilated every 3 hours in all experiments.

    Aside from the non-IR conventional observations, we also assimilated AHI channel 8 (6.2 μm) infrared brightness temperature observations (ch08-BT).The AHI instrument is on board the Himawari-8 geostationary satellite,which is located above the Equator, at 140.7°E.Under clear-sky conditions, ch08-BT observations typically reflect the upper tropospheric water vapor content (Otkin, 2012).These observations are generally available every 10 minutes.

    2.3.Setup of data assimilation experiments

    To investigate the important questions raised in section 1, we performed three DA experiments.The first experiment assimilated non-IR conventional observations every three hours (conv experiment).In the second experiment,we assimilated both ch08-BT and non-IR conventional observations every three hours (conv+ch08_3hrly).Finally, in the third experiment, we assimilated non-IR conventional observations every three hours, and ch08-BT observations every 30 minutes (conv+ch08_30min).

    In this study, we employed the Pennsylvania State University WRF Ensemble Kalman Filter system (PSU-EnKF;Meng and Zhang, 2008) as our DA system.The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) constructs ensemble analyses by combining an ensemble of forecasts with observations (Evensen,1994; Burgers et al., 1998).To be precise, the EnKF communicates information from the observations into the modeled atmospheric fields using forecast-estimated covariances between the model state variables and the observable quantities predicted by the forecast.The PSU-EnKF utilizes the method of Whitaker and Hamill (2002) to construct the ensemble analyses.A schematic of how the PSU-EnKF assimilates observations over time is shown in Fig.2.

    The PSU-EnKF algorithm employed here is a slightly modified version of the PSU-EnKF described in Chan et al.(2020b) [the Ensemble Square-Root Filter algorithm(EnSRF) in section 2c].The only modification to the algorithm is that the mean of the forecasted observations is no longer calculated using the ensemble mean.Instead, the mean of the forecasted observations is calculated by first computing the simulated observations for all forecast members,and then taking the ensemble mean of the result.This modification was made to mitigate the artificial dry bias produced by the previous EnSRF implementation when infrared observations are assimilated.The cause of this artificial dry bias is described in Section 3b of Chan et al (2020b).

    Aside from that, we also performed 80% relaxation to prior perturbations to prevent filter divergence (Zhang et al.,2004).The variables updated by the PSU-EnKF include the three-dimensional winds, water vapor mixing ratio, liquid cloud mixing ratio, ice cloud mixing ratio, rain mixing ratio,snow mixing ratio, graupel mixing ratio, temperature, and pressure.All localizations are performed using the Gaspari?Cohn 1999 fifth-order polynomial (Gaspari and Cohn, 1999).

    With regards to the assimilation of conventional observations, we assimilated the atmospheric motion vectors with a horizontal radius of influence (HROI) of 100 km, and no vertical localization.Sounding and aircraft observations were assimilated with a 700 km HROI and a 5 model layer vertical radius of influence (VROI).With regards to surface observations, Metéorologique Aviation Régulière (METAR)observations, surface synoptic observations (SYNOP) observations and ship observations were respectively assimilated with HROIs of 600 km, 300 km and 1400 km.All three surface observation types were assimilated with a 45 model layer VROI.

    To assimilate the ch08-BT observations, we employed the Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM), release 2.3.0, to calculate the IR AHI brightness temperatures from the WRF ensemble.The ch08-BT observations were thinned to a spacing of 30 km, and then assimilated with a HROI of 100 km (Chan et al., 2020b).Furthermore, we employed the adaptive observation error inflation scheme(AOEI) of Minamide and Zhang (2017), as well as the adaptive background error inflation scheme (ABEI) of Minamide and Zhang (2019), to assimilate the ch08-BT observations.No vertical localization was performed for the ch08-BT observations.Better results might be possible with more tuning, which can be explored in future studies.

    Fig.2.A schematic showing how the PSU-EnKF system assimilates observations at times t1 and t2.The bubbles represent the envelop of possible model values predicted by an ensemble of model outputs, and are color-coded by time.Suppose we have three ensemble members at time t0.To assimilate the observation at t1, we use WRF to integrate the three members from t0 to t1.Then, the PSU-EnKF ingests the observation at t1, which results in the threemember ensemble shifting towards and contracting around the ensemble.To assimilate the observation at t2 (and at all subsequent times), the same integrate-then-ingest procedure is repeated.

    Aside from these settings, no ch08-BT observations were rejected in this study.Observations with large innovations are often rejected because these observations might be erroneous (e.g., J?rvinen and Undén, 1997; Cardinali et al.,2003).In our setup, the AOEI inflates the observation error of ch08-BT observations with large innovations.The AOEI thus weakens the magnitude of the analysis increments coming from these large innovation ch08-BT observations, i.e.,AOEI functions as a safety measure against potentially problematic ch08-BT observations.As such, we did not reject any ch08-BT observations in this study.

    It should also be noted that no bias correction for the ch08-BT observations were employed here because we found the ch08-BT biases are small in this tropical squall line case.As discussed in Chan et al.(2020b), the square of the bias is a component of the mean-squared difference(MSD) between the ensemble mean and observed ch08-BT.The conv, conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min experiments’ squared prior ch08-BT biases are 0.49 K2, 0.25 K2,and 0.00 K2, respectively.In contrast, the prior ch08-BT MSDs of the conv, conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min experiments are 68.9 K2, 23.0 K2, and 16.0 K2, respectively,i.e., the squared prior ch08-BT biases account for less than 1.1% of the prior ch08-BT MSD.Thus, we consider the ch08-BT biases to be small and did not employ bias correc-tion when assimilating ch08-BT observations.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Description of the observed tropical squall line

    Before delving into the important questions raised in section 1, we will describe the observed behavior of this study’s tropical squall line case.Tropical squall lines are a frequently occurring type of tropical MCSs over our study’s domain (Lo and Orton, 2016; Chan et al., 2019; Sun et al.,2020).On 30 May 2017, the AHI observed a southeastward propagating MCS over the equatorial Indian Ocean (Fig.1a).By 1500 UTC 30 May, the mesoscale convective system evolved into a southeastward propagating, bow-shaped squall line.At this time, the squall line was generally aligned in the northeast-southwest direction, with the northeastern tip of the squall line grazing the west coast of Sumatra (not shown here).

    For the next 12 hours, AHI observations indicate that the squall did not penetrate the mountain range that runs along most of the west coast of Sumatra.At approximately 0900 UTC 31 May, the northeastern half of the squall line penetrated the mountain range.Within the next 3 hours, the northeastern half and the southwestern half of the squall split apart.For the remainder of the study, we will focus on the northeastern half because it passed over surface meteorological stations.The northeastern half developed a northsouth alignment and propagated eastwards (Fig.1a), passing through Sumatra, and then the Strait of Malacca.This propagation behavior and morphology is rather typical of squalls in the Sumatra-Borneo region (Lo and Orton, 2016;Chan et al., 2019; Sun et al., 2020).By 0000 UTC 2 June,the squall line had reached the southwestern coast of Borneo (Fig.1a) and proceeded to dissipate.

    According to the ERA5, the observed squall line is collocated with the advancing edge of a westerly wind burst (not shown).Furthermore, the Australian Bureau of Meteorology’s (BoM’s) Real-time Multivariate MJO index(Wheeler and Hendon, 2004) indicated that during the squall line’s time frame, the MJO’s active phase was advancing from the Indian Ocean into the Maritime Continent.As westerly wind bursts are often associated with the onset of the MJO’s active phase (Zhang, 2005), the MJO index supports the association between the squall line and a westerly wind burst seen in the ERA5 data.Future work can examine the association between westerly wind bursts and tropical squall lines in the region.

    3.2.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved analyzed clouds

    The first question we will address in this study is whether adding all-sky IR observations into DA can improve the analyses and prediction of a tropical squall line.To that end, we will be comparing the conv and the conv+ch08_30min experiments.Furthermore, to focus on the squall line itself, the experiments will be compared in an area around the squall line’s leading edge.

    To determine the position of the leading edge, we computed the meridional average of the observed AHI channel 14 brightness temperatures (ch14-BT) for latitudes between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.The result is plotted as a longitude-time diagram in Fig.1b.Because the squall line’s clouds show up as strong cold signals in ch14-BT, we can determine the position of the leading edge of the squall line from Fig.1b,which is indicated by a dashed black line.For the rest of this article, we will be comparing the experiments in the vicinity of these inferred positions.

    We begin with examining the impacts of including half-hourly ch08-BT observations, in addition to 3-hourly conventional observations, on the cloud fields.Since ch14-BT was not assimilated and indicates the presence and absence of clouds, the root-mean-square difference (RMSD)between the analyzed and observed ch14-BT can be used to gauge the quality of the analyzed cloud fields.To be more precise, we will be comparing the ch14-BT RMSDs computed for a region surrounding the squall line’s leading edge(Fig.1c).The region covers a rectangular area between 10°S and 5°S, as well as between 15 degrees west and 5 degrees east of the leading edge (Fig.1b).As seen in Fig.1c,conv+ch08_30min’s RMSDs are at all times substantially smaller than that of conv.On average, conv+ch08_30min’s RMSD (16.2 K) is ~35% smaller than conv’s RMSD (25.0 K).In other words, the assimilation of IR observations, on top of conventional observations, can improve analyses of the squall line’s cloud field.This improvement is in line with earlier work (Ying and Zhang, 2018).Finally,conv+ch08_30min’s consistency ratio (CR ≡ root-meansquare spread (RMSS)/RMSD) is closer to the optimal value of 1 than that of conv.This indicates that the assimilation of half-hourly IR observations improved the ensemble dispersion for cloud fields.

    3.3.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved analyzed outflow position

    Aside from improving the cloud field, the inclusion of half-hourly ch08-BT observations also improved the position of the squall line surface outflow.Surface outflows can generate converging surface winds ahead of the squall line,and thus encourage the formation of new cells ahead of the squall line (e.g., Gamache and Houze, 1982; Moncrieff and Liu, 1999).Since the initiation of new cells ahead of the squall line is important for squall line propagation (e.g., Fovell et al., 2006), improving the position of the analyzed surface outflow can improve the analyses and prediction of the squall line.

    To see the improvement in surface outflow, consider that the outflow in this squall line is characterized by strong surface westerlies.Figures 3a and 3c show longitude?time diagrams of the meridionally-averaged analysis mean zonal wind at 300-m above sea level in the conv and conv+ch08_30min experiments.The thick black contours trace the observed 224 K ch14-BT contour, which indicates the position of the squall line.The meridional average was performed between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.Between 1200 UTC 31 May and 1800 UTC 1 June, the predicted outflow in the conv experiment is mostly located east of the observed leading edge (Fig.3a; black contours).In contrast, the analyzed zone of strong westerlies in conv+ch08_30min overlaps substantially with the observed squall (Fig.3c).These longitude-time diagrams suggest that the half-hourly assimilation of ch08-BT observations improved the positions of the surface outflow.

    To further confirm the improvement of the surface outflow position, we examined three-hourly unassimilated surface zonal wind observations from a surface station located at 2.7°S, 107.8°E (marked with white cross in Fig.1a).These surface observations were obtained from the Integrated Surface Database (ISD), which is maintained by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration(NOAA).The time-series of the observed and analyzed zonal winds for this station is plotted in Fig.3d.

    As can be inferred from Fig.3d, the analyzed squall line surface outflow from the conv+ch08_30min experiment outperformed that of conv in several ways.The first way is in terms of the onset time of the squall line surface outflow at the station.The onset of the squall line surface outflow is indicated by strengthening westerlies.As can be seen in Fig.3d, the onset time from the conv+ch08_30min experiment analyzed surface outflow (around 1200 UTC 31 May) is slightly closer to the observed onset time(around 1800 UTC 31 May) than that of conv (around 0600 UTC 31 May).Aside from the difference in onset times,Fig.3d indicates that the squall line outflow in conv leaves the station (around 0600 UTC 1 June) 6 hours earlier than the observed squall line (around 1200 UTC 1 June),whereas the squall line outflow from conv+ch08_30min leaves the station at roughly the same time as the observed squall line.These differences in onset and exit times imply that the squall line outflow in conv is displaced east of the actual outflow, and that this displacement error is largely reduced in conv+ch08_30min.This reduction in surface outflow displacement error is consistent with Figs.3a and 3c.

    Fig.3.Squall-relative longitude-time diagrams of the analyzed zonal wind, averaged between 3.6°S to 4.4°S, at 300 m above sea level (a, b, c).The thick black contours in panels (a), (b), and (c) indicate the 224 K contour of the observed ch14-BT,averaged between the same latitudes.The gray shading indicates the storm-relative longitudes of the mountain range along the west coast of Sumatra, where no 300-m zonal wind information is available in the model.Also, the thick dotted lines indicate the relative longitude of the surface station referred to in the text.Finally, panel (d) shows time series of the observed surface zonal wind, analyzed zonal wind, as well as the observed ch14-BT at a surface station located at 2.7°S,107.8°E.

    It should also be noted here that the conv+ch08_30min experiment also outperforms conv in terms of the fit to the unassimilated zonal wind observations when the squall line is passing over the surface station (from 2100 UTC 31 May to 1200 UTC 1 June).This improvement is likely because the eastward displacement error is substantially smaller in conv+ch08_30min than in conv.

    Interestingly, the improvements in surface outflow position introduced by spatiotemporally dense IR DA occurred in the absence of dense surface observations.Previous studies have suggested that dense surface observations can improve squall line surface outflows and the associated gust front positions (e.g., Chen et al., 2016).Our results thus suggest that spatiotemporally dense IR observations can be a potential substitute for dense surface observations when constraining errors associated with squall line surface outflows and gust front positions.

    The surface outflow position improvements introduced by half-hourly IR DA can be plausibly explained by the combination of two complementary effects.The first effect comes from the cloud field improvements introduced by half-hourly ch08-BT DA.These cloud field improvements include improvements to the position of the analyzed squall line clouds, which in turn leads to improved positioning of the squall line rainfall.Since the surface outflow is induced by rainfall, it is plausible that an improved rainfall position can improve the position of the surface outflow.

    The second effect arises from the positive correlation between forecasted ch08-BT just behind the observed leading edge, and the ~950 hPa zonal wind near the leading edge of the surface outflow (henceforth, gust front).For instance, at 0000 UTC on 1 June, the forecasted ensemble mean gust front is at roughly 1°E relative longitude (similar to the analyzed gust front in Fig.3c).Likewise, Fig.4b indicates that the ~950 hPa zonal wind at ~1°E relative longitude is positively correlated with forecasted ch08-BT just behind the leading edge (?1°E relative longitude), i.e., this positive correlation is collocated with the gust front.

    To see how this positive gust front zonal wind correlation allows the EnKF to shift the gust front, consider that the forecasted squall line clouds tend to be displaced eastwards of the observed squall line clouds.Since the observed squall line’s highest clouds tend to occur at around ?1°E relative longitude (not shown, but can be inferred from Fig.1b),this eastward displacement indicates that the forecasted clouds at ?1°E relative longitude should be lower than that of the observations.In other words, the forecasted ch08-BT is higher than that of the observations at ?1°E relative longitude.This results in a negative ch08-BT innovation at ?1°E relative longitude.Because of the positive correlation, this negative innovation results in a negative westerly (or easterly) analysis increment at the gust front.Since the wind in the gust front is mostly westerly, the analysis increment weakens the westerly winds at the gust front.This weakening means that the forecasted gust front is forced westward.As such, the assimilation of ch08-BT observations near the observed leading edge improved the position of the gust front through the correlations between ch08-BT and the gust front’s zonal wind.

    3.4.Assimilating half-hourly ch08-BT improved deterministic forecasts of cloud fields

    Aside from improving the analyzed cloud fields and surface outflow position, the half-hourly assimilation of IR observations also improved the short-term deterministic forecasts of the squall line.These deterministic forecasts were initiated from the EnKF analysis means.Figure 5 shows the meridionally-averaged, deterministically forecasted ch14-BT.Like Figs.1c, 3, and 4, the meridional average was done between 3.6°S and 4.4°S.As can be seen in Fig.5, for the first 3 hours of the deterministic forecasts, the positions of the forecasted clouds from conv+ch08_30min are closer to the observations than those from conv, especially for the forecasts initialized after 1200 UTC 1 June.Furthermore,the squall-relative ch14-BT RMSD (calculated as in Fig.1c)of the conv+ch08_30min deterministic forecasts are lower than those of the conv (not shown) for the first three hours.To be more precise, on average, conv+ch08_30min ch14-BT deterministic forecast RMSDs are about 20% smaller than those of conv from initiation to up to a lead time of 2 hours.For lead times of 3 hours and longer, the ch14-BT deterministic forecast RMSDs of both experiments are statistically indistinguishable.These improvements to the shortterm deterministic forecasts of cloud fields are akin to those seen in Chan et al.(2020b).

    Fig.4.Correlations between ch08-BT and zonal wind on 1 June (0000 UTC) for (a) the conv + ch08_3hrly experiment, and (b) the conv + ch08_30min experiment.These correlations are plotted for a ch08 observation located 1 degree west of the squall’s leading edge (vertical dashed lines).Note that the plotted values are the average of correlations across 10 zonal cross-sections between 3.6°S to 4.4°S.

    Fig.5.Storm-relative longitude-time diagrams of deterministically forecasted ch14-BT (shading), as well as the 224 K contour of the observed ch14-BT (black contours).All plotted ch14-BT are averaged between 3.6°S to 4.4°S.Panels a, d, g and j show the deterministic forecasts from the conv experiment.Similar plots were also produced for the conv + ch08_3hrly(b, e, h and k) and conv + ch08_30min (c, f, i and l) experiments.The forecasted ch14-BT and the observed ch14-BT at the corresponding times are shown for the start times of the forecasts (a, b and c), at a lead time of 1 hour (d, e and f), at a lead time of 2 hours (g, h and i), and a lead time of 3 hours (j, k and l).Note that the deterministic forecasts from 13 initiation times are shown in each panel.The first deterministic forecasts were initiated on 31 May (1200 UTC), and subsequent deterministic forecasts were initiated every 3 hours, up to and including 2 June (0000 UTC).

    3.5.Reducing the frequency of ch08-BT DA degraded analyses and deterministic forecasts

    Another important question raised in section 1 is how the accuracy and prediction of the tropical squall line vary with the update frequency of IR DA.To examine this question, we will be comparing the conv+ch08_30min and conv+ch08_3hrly experiments.

    Reducing the frequency of ch08-BT DA generally degraded the analyses and deterministic forecasts of cloud fields (Figs.1 and 5).According to Fig.1c, decreasing ch08-BT DA frequency from half-hourly to three-hourly generally increased the analysis ch14-BT RMSD.On average,the RMSDs increased by ~10%, from 16.2 K to 18.1 K.Furthermore, Fig.5 indicates that reduction in ch08-BT DA frequency degraded the deterministically forecasted positions of the squall line for the three hours of the deterministic forecast, and the degradations are especially noticeable for the forecasts initialized after 1200 UTC 1 June (Figs.5e and 5h).Taken together, these degradations imply that a higher frequency of data assimilation is preferable for short-term cloud field analyses and forecasts.

    The analyzed positions of the squall line’s outflow were also degraded when the frequency of ch08-BT DA was reduced from half-hourly to three-hourly.Between 31 May (1200 UTC) and 1 June (1800 UTC), the analyzed strong zonal wind zone from conv+ch08_3hrly does not overlap much with the observed squall (Fig.3b), whereas that of the conv+ch08_30min substantially overlaps the observed squall (Fig.3c).Furthermore, while the validation surface station data indicates the analyzed outflows of conv+ch08_3hrly and conv+ch08_30min arrived at the station at the same time (Fig.3d), the conv+ch08_30min analyzed outflow is clearly better than that of conv+ch08_3hrly when the squall line passed over the surface station during 0000 UTC–1200 UTC 1 June.In other words, high frequency data assimilation is preferable for improving the analyzed position of storm outflows.

    This degradation in squall line outflow position is also consistent with the ensemble correlations between simulated ch08-BT and zonal wind (Fig.4a).While similar nearsurface dipole correlation patterns exist in both the conv+ch08_30min and conv+ch08_3hrly experiments, the dipole pattern in conv+ch08_3hrly is dislocated ~1.5 degrees east of the ch08-BT observation location.In other words, the capability of conv+ch08_3hrly in moving the squall line surface outflow position westwards is limited when compared to that of conv+ch08_30min.

    It should be noted here that while decreasing the frequency of ch08-BT DA did dramatically degrade the quality of the analyzed cloud fields, analyzed outflow, and forecasted clouds, these quantities in conv+ch08_3hrly still outperformed those conv.In other words, even a moderate frequency of ch08-BT DA was able to improve these quantities beyond what is achieved by non-IR conventional observation DA.

    4.Conclusions

    In this study, we have delved into the hitherto unexplored dynamic and thermodynamic impacts of assimilating IR observations for the case of a tropical squall line.In line with earlier work (e.g., Ying and Zhang, 2018), we confirmed that introducing ch08-BT observations into DA improved the analyses and predictions of a tropical squall line’s cloud field.Even though the ch08-BT observations are insensitive to lower-tropospheric zonal winds, the assimilation of these observations improved the position of the squall line’s lower tropospheric outflow zone.This improvement was likely due to the improved cloud fields, as well as the near-surface dipole forecast ensemble correlations between ch08-BT and lower-tropospheric zonal winds.Finally, we also found that increasing the frequency of ch08-BT observations further improved the analyzed cloud field, forecasted cloud field, and the analyzed outflow position.

    Since this study is the first of its kind to specifically examine the improvements from introducing IR observations into tropical MCS analyses and prediction, there are many areas for future work.These areas can be broken into three types: completeness, the assimilation of other observations and areas for future DA algorithm development.

    The first area for completeness concerns the fact that we have only examined the impacts for one tropical squall line in the Sumatra-Borneo region.As such, future work can examine if similar improvements can be found in other tropical MCSs, including other tropical areas.Second, comparisons against surface station temperature observations (not shown) indicate that the simulated squall line cold pools tend to be much stronger than observed.These overly strong simulated cold pools might be due to model errors in the surface parameterization or radiation schemes.Future work can thus examine tuning these schemes to produce more realistic cold pools.Aside from that, future work can also explore whether the improvements obtained here are retained when the model’s horizontal grid spacing is reduced to a value that allows for the explicit resolution of convective updrafts (usually 1 km or less).

    Future work can also explore the assimilation of other uncommonly used observations.For instance, it is possible that the inclusion of observations from additional water vapor channels can improve the analysis and prediction tropical MCSs.This improvement might be possible because different channels respond to different parts of the atmospheric column (Schmit et al., 2005).Aside from that, several studies have indicated that sub-hourly AMV data assimilation has the potential to improve forecasts of moist convection (Otsuka et al., 2015; Kunii et al., 2016).Presently,AMVs are generally assimilated every 3~6 hours.Thus, the impact of frequently assimilating infrared-derived atmospheric motion vector observations is also another avenue of future study.

    Finally, future work can also delve into methods that address certain assumptions that are made in IR DA.One important assumption in the EnKF is that the simulated observations have an approximately linear relationship with modelled atmospheric variables.However, the relationship between simulated IR observations and modelled atmospheric is often nonlinear (e.g., Steward, 2012).Other cutting-edge DA methods might be able handle this nonlinearity.Such methods include particle filters (e.g., van Leeuwen, 2011; Penny and Miyoshi, 2016; Poterjoy, 2016),iterative EnKF methods (Lorentzen and Naevdal, 2011),and Gaussian-mixture model methods (e.g., Anderson and Anderson, 1999; Sondergaard and Lermusiaux, 2013; Chan et al., 2020a).Aside from linearity, the EnKF also assumes that the forecast ensemble follows a Gaussian distribution.However, the displacements of cloud features among ensemble members can result in non-Gaussian properties,violating this Gaussian assumption.As such, future work can explore methods that address displacement errors.Such methods include variants of the feature calibration and alignment technique (Hoffman and Grassotti, 1996; Brewster,2003; Nehrkorn et al., 2015; Stratman et al., 2018) and the recently developed multiscale alignment data assimilation(Ying, 2019).

    The advent of modern geostationary satellite IR observations has ushered in a new era of high-frequency, high spatial-density, and globe-encompassing remote observations.While the data assimilation community is well on its way to exploit these observations, many unexplored avenues remain, especially in the Tropics.With continued advancements in computing power and data assimilation techniques,the day we can fully exploit these IR observations is just beyond the horizon.

    Samples and Data

    The ERA5 pressure level and surface data were obtained from the ECMWF’s Climate Data Store (https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels, and https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-singlelevels).Aside from that, the in-situ conventional observations were obtained from the NCAR RDA (https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds351.0, and, https://rda.ucar.edu/datasets/ds461.0), and the atmospheric motion vector observations were obtained from the CIMSS Tropical Cyclone Archive (http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/archive/).The Himawari-8 AHI data was obtained from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) P-Tree system via File Transfer Protocol (FTP; ftp://ftp.ptree.jaxa.jp/).

    Acknowledgements.This study is supported by the Water Cycle and Climate Extremes Modelling (WACCEM) project,which is funded by the U.S.Department of Energy Office of Science Biological and Environmental Research, as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling program.This work is also partially supported by ONR Grant N00014-18-1-2517.Computations were performed on the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center Cori supercluster and the Texas Advanced Computer Center.This paper is dedicated to Dr.Fuqing ZHANG, who passed away unexpectedly in 2019.Dr.Fuqing ZHANG made tre-mendous contributions to the atmospheric sciences.His contributions include innovative and pioneering research on atmospheric dynamics, predictability, and ensemble-based data assimilation.He devoted boundless energy to engaging, mentoring, and inspiring undergraduate and graduate students, as well as early-career scientists, including us, the two authors of this paper.His death is a great loss to his family, friends, students, colleagues, and our entire community.

    欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| cao死你这个sao货| 午夜久久久在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲精品在线美女| 999精品在线视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产av又大| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 免费看a级黄色片| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 91av网站免费观看| 美女大奶头视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 后天国语完整版免费观看| 免费高清视频大片| 午夜福利18| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 午夜免费观看网址| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 不卡一级毛片| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 精品国产国语对白av| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产av不卡久久| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 久久精品影院6| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| av电影中文网址| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 91麻豆av在线| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产av又大| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 宅男免费午夜| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲av美国av| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 搞女人的毛片| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 一夜夜www| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 久久久久久大精品| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 免费看日本二区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产单亲对白刺激| 91国产中文字幕| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 88av欧美| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 久久香蕉激情| 免费看十八禁软件| 一区二区三区精品91| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产色视频综合| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产一区二区激情短视频| www.999成人在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 看片在线看免费视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 在线观看日韩欧美| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 欧美午夜高清在线| 国产野战对白在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 男人舔奶头视频| ponron亚洲| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 精品高清国产在线一区| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 成人手机av| 69av精品久久久久久| 成人免费观看视频高清| 午夜a级毛片| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区 | 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 一级黄色大片毛片| 精品国产国语对白av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 热re99久久国产66热| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久久久久久久中文| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 在线av久久热| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 热re99久久国产66热| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 一区二区三区激情视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 一级片免费观看大全| 黄片小视频在线播放| 午夜免费激情av| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 精品福利观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 一区二区三区激情视频| 丁香欧美五月| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 观看免费一级毛片| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 丁香六月欧美| 悠悠久久av| 99热只有精品国产| 中国美女看黄片| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 精品日产1卡2卡| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 午夜两性在线视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产黄片美女视频| 午夜福利18| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 十八禁网站免费在线| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 成人18禁在线播放| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| av视频在线观看入口| tocl精华| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| ponron亚洲| 日本 av在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 久热爱精品视频在线9| 美女大奶头视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 热99re8久久精品国产| 怎么达到女性高潮| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 成在线人永久免费视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 午夜福利欧美成人| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产视频内射| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 香蕉av资源在线| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 黄色女人牲交| 久久久久九九精品影院| 日本三级黄在线观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 色av中文字幕| 国产精品免费视频内射| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 超碰成人久久| av中文乱码字幕在线| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜免费激情av| 91大片在线观看| 18禁观看日本| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 级片在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 变态另类丝袜制服| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 中文资源天堂在线| av在线播放免费不卡| 午夜免费激情av| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 老司机靠b影院| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产又爽黄色视频| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 脱女人内裤的视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产av又大| 久久青草综合色| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| av福利片在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 99久久国产精品久久久| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品第一国产精品| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 一级片免费观看大全| 中文字幕高清在线视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲av美国av| 性欧美人与动物交配| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 操出白浆在线播放| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 99久久国产精品久久久| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久久久大精品| 精品第一国产精品| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| av欧美777| av福利片在线| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久, | 久久久久久人人人人人| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 手机成人av网站| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 久热这里只有精品99| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久人妻av系列| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | videosex国产| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 午夜久久久在线观看| av在线播放免费不卡| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 1024手机看黄色片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 在线国产一区二区在线| 波多野结衣高清作品| 欧美大码av| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 色在线成人网| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日本a在线网址| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产黄片美女视频| 久久性视频一级片| 日韩欧美 国产精品|