• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Variation of soil physical-chemical characteristics in salt-affected soil in the Qarhan Salt Lake, Qaidam Basin

    2022-03-26 02:30:38HUIRongTANHuijuanLIXinrongWANGbingyao
    Journal of Arid Land 2022年3期

    HUI Rong, TAN Huijuan, LI Xinrong, WANG bingyao

    Shapotou Desert Research and Experiment Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China

    Abstract: Soil salinization has adverse effects on the soil physical-chemical characteristics. However, little is known about the changes in soil salt ion concentrations and other soil physical-chemical characteristics within the Qarhan Salt Lake and at different soil depths in the surrounding areas. Here, we selected five sampling sites (S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5) alongside the Qarhan Salt Lake and in the Xidatan segment of the Kunlun Mountains to investigate the relationship among soil salt ion concentrations, soil physical-chemical characteristics, and environmental variables in April 2019. The results indicated that most sites had strongly saline and very strongly saline conditions. The main salt ions present in the soil were Na+, K+,and Cl-. Soil nutrients and soil microbial biomass (SMB) were significantly affected by the salinity (P<0.05).Moreover, soil salt ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-, CO32-, SO42-, and HCO3-) were positively correlated with electrical conductivity (EC) and soil water content (SWC), but negatively related to altitude and soil depth. Unlike soil salt ions, soil nutrients and SMB were positively correlated with altitude, but negatively related to EC and SWC. Moreover, soil nutrients and SMB were negatively correlated with soil salt ions. In conclusion, soil nutrients and SMB were mainly influenced by salinity, and were related to altitude, soil depth, and SWC in the areas from the Qarhan Salt Lake to the Xidatan segment. These results imply that the soil quality (mainly evaluated by soil physical-chemical characteristics) is mainly influenced by soil salt ions in the areas surrounding the Qarhan Salt Lake. Our results provide an accurate prediction of how the soil salt ions, soil nutrients, and SMB respond to the changes along a salt gradient. The underlying mechanisms controlling the soil salt ion distribution, soil nutrients, and SMB in an extremely arid desert climate playa should be studied in greater detail in the future.

    Keywords: salinization; soil salt ions; soil physical-chemical characteristics; soil microbial biomass; soil nutrient; Qarhan Salt Lake

    1 Introduction

    Soil salinization refers to the accumulation of soluble salts on the surface or near-surface, mainly including K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-, SO42-, CO32-, and HCO3-(Shrestha, 2006). Salinization is one of the most important factors limiting the growth of plants and microbes, and adversely affecting soil quality (Munns and Tester, 2008; Zhao et al., 2017). Soil salinization is a widespread and serious soil degradation phenomenon, which is caused by climate change and poor management of water and soil resources (Zhang, 2010). More than 7% of the Earth's surface is affected by soil salinization (Rozema and Flowers, 2008), with approximately 4.0×108hm2of cultivated land severely limited by soil salinization (Bot et al., 2000). In China, about 1.0×108hm2of the land area is affected by different degrees of soil salinization (Li et al., 2014). Numerous studies have demonstrated that soil salinization has been accelerated in arid and semi-arid regions of China (Li et al., 2007).

    The Qaidam Basin is the largest basin on the northern edge of the Tibetan Plateau. It covers a total area of 2.75×105km2(Jia et al., 2011), and is characterized by inland saline lake facies. It is located in a hyper-arid region of northwestern China, with low annual precipitation and high salinity (Jiao et al., 2015). The problem of soil salinization has become increasingly serious in the Qaidam Basin, and now affects about 42.5% of the agricultural land in the basin. Furthermore,soil salinization has a negative impact on plant growth, and worsens the soil physical-chemical properties (Paul and Lade, 2014). Wang et al. (2016) reported that the accumulation of salt in the soil induced by long-term saline water irrigation resulted in a loss of spring maize yield. Wong et al. (2008) indicated that soil salinization changed the soil aggregate structure, restricted the availability of soil nutrients, and reduced soil permeability. Previous studies on the effects of soil salinization in the Qaidam Basin have mostly focused on plant metabolism, photosynthesis,enzyme activity, nutrient absorption, and crop yields (Li et al., 2019a; Zhang et al., 2019). Li et al.(2019a) showed that soil salinization increased the amounts of osmotic substances and antioxidant enzymes ofLycium ruthenicum, but photosynthesis remained suppressed, which influenced crop yields. Zhang et al. (2019) also found that the photosynthetic properties ofElaeagnus angustifoliawere more sensitive to salinity than those ofLycium barbarum. However, these studies mostly involved the impacts of soil salinization on plants (i.e., the main economic crops and sand-fixation plants), whereas the effects of soil salinization on soil development, such as the salt ion distribution, soil nutrients, and soil microbial biomass (SMB), have been ignored.

    Soil salinization causes high levels of soluble salt ions. The dominant salt ions in most soils are K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-, SO42-, CO32-, and HCO3-(Young et al., 2015); however, Na+and Clare the most prevalent salt ions and have been the focus of most research work (Tavakkoli et al.,2010). Munns and Tester (2008) showed that excessive Na+and Cl-concentrations critically affected biochemical processes and then reduced plant growth. However, high levels of one or several salt ions inevitably resulted in variances in the contents of the other balancing ions in the soil, and the effects of different salt ions on plants may differ (Tavakkoli et al., 2010). Genc et al.(2010) reported that changes in the Ca2+and K+concentrations may affect salinity responses. It is necessary to study the salt ion distribution in soils to better understand the mechanisms controlling the soil ecosystem response to salinization.

    Soil salinization has adverse effects on the soil physical-chemical characteristics. Tejada and Gonzalez (2005) showed that an increase in electrical conductivity (EC) had a negative impact on soil structural stability, permeability, and bulk density. Mavi et al. (2012) demonstrated that soil dissolved organic matter was strongly affected by the salt-affected soils. Soil salinization also affected soil microbial communities and their activities due to the resulting variations in osmotic and matric potential of soil solution (Rietz and Haynes, 2003). SMB refers to the total number of soil microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, and protozoa, and is one of the most sensitive indicators of ecosystem stability (An et al., 2009). It is both a source and sink of available nutrients, and plays a crucial role in nutrient transformation in terrestrial ecosystems (Singh et al.,1989). Studies of SMB have become a common way to explore soil functions in response to soil environmental change (Holden and Treseder, 2013). The variation of SMB may impact on the turnover of soil organic matter. Lehmann et al. (2011) observed that increased SMB can influence soil nutrient cycling and soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization. Liang et al. (2012) also reported that SMB was important in planting, fertilization, and other agricultural management activities. Therefore, studies of SMB dynamics with changes in the salt gradient will contribute to a better understanding of the dynamic changes of soil organic matter.

    The Qarhan Salt Lake in the eastern Qaidam Basin, Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, is the largest salt lake and the largest potash and magnesium deposit production base in China (Xiang et al., 2021).The Golmud River is the major water supply to the Dabsan Lake, which is the largest saline lake in the Qarhan Salt Lake system (Wang et al., 2015). In recent years, the local environments and ecosystems had been exposed to high potential ecological and health risks due to industrial mining activities in the salt lake, agricultural development, and urbanization of the Golmud River (Xiang et al., 2021). Oasis agriculture is developing rapidly in the eastern Qaidam Basin. In this region,the light and heat conditions are conducive to the growth and development of crops, with spring wheat, oilseed rape, highland barley, potato, beans, and wolfberry being the main crops (Wang et al., 2019). In the region of eastern Qaidam Basin, soil degradation takes the form of salinization and alkalization, and has occurred mainly near the oasis borders and at lower elevations in the non-oasis regions where effective soil moisture might have been reduced by a warming-induced increase in evapotranspiration during 1990-2003 (Wang et al., 2003, Zeng and Yang, 2008). In this study, we clarified the relationship among soil water content (SWC), soil salinity, and distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake. Specifically, we investigated the dynamic changes in salt ion concentrations and other soil physical-chemical characteristics, assessed the differences in SWC,salt ion concentrations, and physical-chemical properties among five sampling sites, and analyzed the variation in salt ion concentrations and soil nutrients among the five sites. An evaluation of soil quality in the areas surrounding the Qarhan Salt Lake based on soil physical- chemical characteristics will be of great value in the adjustment of local economic strategies.

    2 Materials and methods

    2.1 Study area

    The Qarhan Salt Lake (36°37′36″-37°12′33″N, 94°42′36″-96°14′35″E) is situated in the center of the southern Qaidam Basin, northern China (Fig. 1), with an elevation of 2675 m. The lake is 168 km long from west to east and 20-40 km wide from north to south, with a gross area of 5856 km2,making it the largest playa in the eastern Qaidam Basin (Huang and Han, 2007). The Qarhan Salt Lake has an extremely arid desert climate, where the mean annual precipitation is less than 30 mm, and the annual potential evaporation is more than 3000 mm (Li et al., 2015). The average wind speed is 4.3 m/s, with winds predominantly from the west to the northwest (Li et al., 2015).In the region of Qarhan Salt Lake, the precipitation declines from around the mountains to the center of the region. The precipitation is mainly concentrated in May-September, which accounts for more than 80% of annual rainfall (Zhang et al., 2012). The soil type in the Qarhan Salt Lake is saline sand, with a mean particle size of 164.50-186.08 μm (Li et al., 2019b). The naturally dominant plants in the Qaidam Basin are shrub/semi-shrub desert vegetation, includingHaloxylon ammodendron,Salsolaspp.,Ceratoides lateens,Ephedra przewalskii,Tamarixspp.,Calligonumspp.,Nitrariaspp., andArtemisiaspp. (Fan et al., 2014). Inflows to the Qarhan Salt Lake are mainly from perennial river water and spring water (Zhang et al., 1993), and perennial river water from the eastern Kunlun Mountains into the Qarhan Salt Lake (Fan et al., 2015). The Xidatan segment lies to the northern side of the Kunlun Mountains, with an elevation of about 4350 m.The climate in this region is semi-arid. According to meteorological records from the local weather station, annual mean temperature is -3.7°C in this region. The lowest temperature is recorded in January, with a mean value of -20.0°C, and the highest temperature is recorded in July, with a mean value of 14.0°C. Mean annual precipitation is about 400 mm, most of which falls from May to September (Luo et al., 2018). In this region, the dominant species areCarex moorcroftii,Stipa purpurea, and other cushion plants, such asAndrosace tapeteandArenaria kansuensis(Yang et al., 2013).

    2.2 Soil sample collection

    This study was conducted in April 2019 in the Qaidam Basin, northwestern China. In order to evaluate the soil salinity distribution and chemical processes, we collected soil samples and measured the related parameters, including SWC, pH, EC, ion concentrations, SOC, total nitrogen(TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN), and microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP).

    We selected five sampling sites (S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5) alongside the Qarhan Salt Lake and the Xidatan segment of the Kunlun Mountains (Fig. 1). Their distances from the Qarhan Salt Lake followed the order of S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5. We summarized the general characteristics of each sampling site based on the results of a field investigation in Table 1. At each site, we established three quadrats (10 m×10 m) and collected five soil samples using a soil auger along the diagonal of each quadrat at depths of 0-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-80, and 80-100 cm. Five replicate soil samples from the same depth were evenly mixed into a composite sample of each quadrat. Thus, a total of 105 soil composite samples were collected at five sampling sites. All soil composite samples were randomly divided into three parts. One part was used to determine the SWC; the other part was air dried, ground, and then passed through a 2 mm-mesh sieve to measure salt ion concentrations (including Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-, CO32-, SO42-, and HCO3-)and other physical-chemical properties (pH, EC, SOC, TN, TP, and TK); and the rest part was kept in liquid nitrogen and used to analyze MBC, MBN, and MBP. In addition, we dug a hole about 0.50 m deep and 0.25 m square in each 10 m×10 m quadrat to measure the salt crust thickness directly using a steel tape.

    Fig. 1 Overview of the study area and sample sites. DEM, digital elevation model.

    Table 1 General characteristics of the five sampling sites

    2.3 Sample analysis

    The SWC was determined by the gravimetric method, in which the soil samples were oven-dried for 48 h at 105°C to a constant weight (Nanjing Institute of Soil Research, CAS, 1980). The pH and EC were measured by a pH meter and a portable conductivity meter, respectively (Chen et al., 2017).The SOC was estimated using wet oxidation with K2Cr2O7and a titration with ferrous ammonium sulfate following the methods described by Li et al. (2010). The TN was determined by the Kjeldahl method, the TP was assessed by spectrophotometry after a perchloric acid-sulfuric acid digestion,and the TK was measured by flame photometry (Gammon, 1951; Olsen and Sommers, 1982).

    Salt ion concentrations were determined based on the soil diluted extract method. The K+and Na+concentrations were measured by flame photometry, while the Ca2+and Mg2+concentrations were determined by an EDTA titration, the Cl-concentration was determined by a silver nitrate titration, the SO42-concentration was determined by an EDTA complexometric titration, and the CO32-and HCO3-concentrations were determined by the acid-alkali neutralization titrimetric method (with a pH of about 4.8) (Yang et al., 2014; Chen et al., 2019).

    Each fresh soil sample was divided into six equal subsamples for MBC, MBN, and MBP estimation using the fumigation extraction method (Brookes et al., 1982, 1985). Carbon and nitrogen were extracted from fumigated (with ethanol free CHCl3) and non-fumigated samples with 50 mL 0.5 mol/L K2SO4, shaken for 30 min at 200 r/min, and filtered (Dijkstra et al., 2015).The MBC and MBN were calculated as the difference between the carbon and nitrogen extracted from fumigated and non-fumigated samples, using extraction efficiencies of 0.38(Jiang et al., 2006) and 0.54 (Brookes et al., 1985), respectively. The MBP was analyzed calorimetrically with a spectrophotometer (Xue et al., 2014). Fumigated soil samples were extracted by 0.5 mol/L NaHCO3in an oscillator, and then Mo-Sb sepetrochrometry solution was added for color development. A simultaneous extraction of non-fumigated soil samples was also conducted. After 30 min, the color intensity was analyzed with a spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 700 nm. The difference between the phosphorus extracted from fumigated and non-fumigated samples was converted into the MBP using an extraction efficiency of 0.4(Brookes et al., 1985).

    2.4 Statistical analysis

    All data were expressed as the mean±standard deviation (SD), with three biological replications.A one-way analysis of variance followed by a Duncan's test was used to evaluate the differences in SWC, salt ion concentrations, and physical-chemical properties among the five sites. Data was log-transformed to normalize distributions. A significance level ofP<0.05 was defined. Statistical analyses were conducted using the SPSS 16.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). A redundancy analysis (RDA) was applied to explore how salt ion concentrations and soil nutrients varied among environmental variables of sampling sites (altitude, SWC, EC, and soil depth). The data were initially analyzed by a detrended correspondence analyses (DCA) to assess the gradient length, which confirmed that a linear model RDA was an appropriate approach (SD<3) (Rubino and McCarthy, 2003). The DCA and RDA analyses were conducted in R 3.5.1 software using the vegan package.

    3 Results

    3.1 Soil water content (SWC), pH, and electrical conductivity (EC)

    SWC, pH, and EC displayed diverse tendencies at the different sampling sites and soil depths(Table 2). Within the 0-100 cm soil depth, SWC first increased and then decreased with distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake, reaching a maximum at S3, especially in the upper 0-10 cm soil depth.There was no obvious trend in the variation of soil pH from S1 to S5, which ranged between 8.03 and 8.88. The average EC significantly decreased with distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake. At S1,which was the site closest to the Qarhan Salt Lake, the value of EC within the 0-5 cm soil depth reached 25.2 dS/m, but it was only 6.6 dS/m at S5, which was the site farthest from the Qarhan Salt Lake (Table 2). Soil depth also affected the SWC, pH, and EC. Other than at S5, SWC rapidly increased with soil depth from the soil surface to the 40 cm soil depth, and remained constant in the 40-100 cm soil depth, while pH values gradually decreased with soil depth.Similarly, EC also decreased with soil depth at all the five sampling sites. The mean EC values in the 80-100 cm soil depth were 6.9, 7.0, 7.7, 3.7, and 4.2 dS/m at S1, S2, S3, S4, and S5,respectively, with the reductions of 72.62%, 71.19%, 63.85%, 43.08%, and 36.36% compared with that in the 0-5 cm soil depth, respectively (Table 2). These results indicated that the distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake had little effect on soil pH, but did influence the SWC and EC. In addition, soil depth also affected SWC, pH, and EC at all the sampling sites except S5.

    Table 2 Soil water content (SWC), pH, and electrical conductivity (EC) at different soil depths in the five sampling sites

    3.2 Soil nutrient contents

    Soil nutrient contents were affected by the distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake and soil depths.The SOC significantly increased from S1 to S5, and the increase amplitude became larger with increasing distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake. For S2 to S5, the SOC increased substantially by 0.3%, 15.4%, 43.2%, and 61.5%, respectively, in the 0-5 cm soil depth, and by 5.7%, 18.7%,48.5%, and 70.2%, respectively, in the 20-40 cm soil depth, compared with S1 (Table 3).However, soil nutrient concentrations decreased gradually with soil depth at S1-S5, and reached a minimum value when the soil depth reached 80-100 cm. The increase in soil depth caused a reduction in the SOC of 3.5%, 13.2%, 30.8%, 39.3%, 38.6%, and 40.6% in the 5-10, 10-20,20-40, 40-60, 60-80, and 80-100 cm soil depths, respectively, compared with the SOC in the 0-5 cm soil depth at S3 (Table 3). Similar trends in TN, TP, and TK were observed. The SOC, TN,TP, and TK increased with distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake, but decreased with soil depth.

    3.3 Soil salt ion concentrations

    Table 3 Soil nutrient contents at different soil depths in the five sampling sites

    Fig. 2 Soil salt ions concentrations at different soil depths in the five sampling sites. S1-S5 are the five sampling sites. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among five sampling sites at same soil depth (P<0.05). Bars mean standard deviation. (a), Na+ concentration; (b), K+ concentration; (c), Ca2+ concentration;(d), Mg2+ concentration; (e), Cl- concentration; (f), CO32- concentration; (g), SO42- concentration; (h), HCO3-concentration.

    3.4 Soil microbial biomass

    SMB varied among the different sampling sites and soil depths. MBC, MBN, and MBP concentrations increased with distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake, and reached a maximum at S5.At S5, MBC, MBN, and MBP concentrations significantly increased by 66.3%, 72.4%, and 36.4%,respectively, in the 0-5 cm soil depth, and increased substantially by 72.6%, 62.7%, and 30.8%,respectively, in the 5-10 cm soil depth, and increased by 61.8%, 72.0%, and 65.1%, respectively,in the 10-20 cm soil depth, compared with S1 (Fig. 3). The variations in the MBC, MBN, and MBP concentrations in the different soil depths at the same site were complicated. MBC concentration tended to decrease with soil depth, and reduced to a minimum level in the 10-20 cm soil depth (Fig. 3a). Similarly, MBN concentration fell to a minimum value of 9.53, 9.66, 9.96,11.11, and 16.05 mg/kg in the 10-20 cm soil depth at sites S1-S5, respectively, and decreased by 20.8%, 21.0%, 45.5%, 42.3%, and 29.2% compared with the concentrations in the 0-5 cm soil depth (Fig. 3b), respectively. MBP concentration was highest in the 5-10 cm soil depth, followed by the 10-20 cm soil depth, and was lowest in the 0-5 cm soil depth (Fig. 3c). These results indicated that the distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake significantly influenced SMB, and there was variability among the different soil depths.

    Fig. 3 Soil microbial biomass concentrations at different soil depths in the five sampling sites. S1-S5 are the five sampling sites. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among five sampling sites at same soil depth (P<0.05). Bars mean standard deviation. (a), microbial biomass carbon (MBC) concentration; (b),microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) concentration; (c), microbial biomass phosphorus (MBP) concentration.

    3.5 The relationship between environmental variables and soil physical-chemical properties

    As shown in Figure 4, 58.18% of the cumulative variation in soil physical-chemical proprieties was explained by the first axis and 23.72% was explained by the second axis. According to the permutation test, the first (F=239.93,P<0.001), second (F=97.82,P<0.001), and third (F=34.37,P<0.01) canonical axes were highly significant in terms of soil physical-chemical properties(Table 4). Soil salt ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-, SO42-, and HCO3-) were positively correlated with EC and SWC, but negatively correlated with altitude and soil depth (Fig. 4a). Unlike soil salt ions, soil nutrients and SMB concentrations (BMC, BMN, and BMP) were positively correlated with altitude, but negatively correlated with EC and SWC. The first axis explained 77.60% of the cumulative variation in soil nutrients and SMB concentrations, while only 2.34% was explained by the second axis (Fig. 4b). According to the permutation test, the first canonical axis was highly significant for soil nutrients and SMB concentrations (F=149.06,P<0.001; Table 4). Soil nutrients and SMB concentrations were negatively correlated with soil salt ions, with Cl-, Na+, K+, and SO42-having more influence than Ca2+, Mg2+, CO32-, and HCO3-on soil nutrient and SMB concentrations (Fig. 4b).

    4 Discussion

    EC can be used to compare different soils and is classified depending on the salinity hazard and its effects on the yield of field crops (Rengasamy, 2010). Our results indicated that most of sites were strongly saline (EC=8-16 dS/m) or very strongly saline (EC>16 dS/m), with the degree of salinity deceasing with distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake and soil depth. The decrease in salinity with distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake may be related to environmental factors (such as rainfall,temperature, altitude, and evaporation). The influence of soil depth may be due to salt accumulation.Salt accumulation tended to occur in the topsoil (0-20 cm), with some salt leaching downwards to the bottom of the soil (80-100 cm) (Yu et al., 2007; Zlotopolski, 2017). As with previous studies,pH results of this study indicated that the soil was likely to be saline-alkaline (pH>8.5) (van Beek and Tóth, 2012).

    Our results indicated that distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake had a large influence on soil salt ion concentrations. Closer to the Qarhan Salt Lake, there was a greater salt ion accumulation in the soil. This may be related to water inflows into the Qarhan Salt Lake containing high levels of salt. Near the Qarhan Salt Lake (S1-S3), the lower altitude results in more perennial river water and spring water inflows into the lake or flowing through the soil (Zhang et al., 1993), which means that more salt will accumulate in these sites (Fan et al., 2015). The differences in climatic conditions (S1-S3 and S4-S5 have extremely arid desert and semi-arid climates, respectively) (Li et al., 2015; Luo et al., 2018) may also influence soil salt ion concentrations. The low annual mean temperature and high mean annual precipitation likely restricted the soil salt ion concentrations in the high altitude sites (S4 and S5). Hu et al. (2018) indicated that cation exchange and mineral dissolution/precipitation were key factors in the variation of the dynamic characteristics and evolution of brine, with evaporation and enrichment being the main mechanisms of underground brine evolution in a salt lake. Salt bearing rocks and eolian migration of salts were present in salt-affected locations with a deficit of moisture, but precipitation resulted in the redistribution of salts in the profiles of automorphic salt-affected soils (Pankova and Konyushkova, 2013). An increase in precipitation was usually accompanied by a decrease in the intensity of weathering and initial accumulation of salts, where salts entered low altitude regions with the runoff caused by precipitation. Our study showed that Na+, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, Cl-, SO42-,and HCO3-were the main salts in the soil. This was due to rock salt (NaCl), sodium carnallite,gypsum (CaSO4?2H2O), calcite (CaCO3), feldspar (KAlSi3O8-NaAlSi3O8-CaAl2Si2O8), sylvine(KCl), and dolomite (CaMg(CO3)2) being the base minerals of the halide layer in the salt lake of the Qaidam Basin (Ye et al., 2015). The pattern of soil salt ion formation may have been affected by palaeoclimatic conditions, where the alternation of a dry climate and a relatively humid climate with wet events over the last millennium have significantly influenced the soil salinity(Chen et al., 2009). Soils differed in their percentage salt content as well as the degree and chemistry of salinization. The distribution of salts in the soil was mainly determined by the presence and properties of the salt bearing rocks and the eolian migration of salts (Hu et al.,2018).

    Salinization can cause soil degradation, which had numerous negative effects on ecological and non-ecological soil functions (Daliakopoulos et al., 2016), especially the soil nutrient content.Our results showed that the SOC, TN, TP, and TK concentrations increased with distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake, while they decreased with soil depth. The salt content decreased with distance from the Qarhan Salt Lake and soil depth. There were several reasons why the soil nutrient content decreased with an increase in the soil salt content. First, the degree of salinity (salt content, salt composition, and salt crust thickness in the top layer of soil was higher in low altitude regions than that in high altitude regions due to the lower precipitation, higher evaporation, and more potential sources of saline ions with runoff or river water from high altitude regions (Li et al., 2015; Song et al., 2017; Luo et al., 2018). Generally, higher saline ion concentrations had an adverse impact on the improvement of soil qualities. Second, the nutrient cycling of soil would be inhibited due to the adverse effect of salinity on plants. As one of the most brutal environmental factors, salinity limited the productivity of plants, with most plants being sensitive to high salt concentrations in the soil, and the area of land affected by salt was increasing daily (Shrivastava and Kumar, 2015). A saline growth medium has been shown to affect almost all aspects of plant development and growth (Ashraf, 2004), and thus limits nutrient fixing, conversion, and storage in plants, which then degrades the soil quality. Third, soil salinity has affected the overall pattern of vegetation distribution in the Qaidam Basin, with the harsh climatic conditions and unique geographical location already being considerable environmental stresses on vegetation growth (Wang et al., 2018a). The vegetation distribution pattern was to some extent influenced by the nutrient status of the soil. The adverse impacts of increased salinity on soil nutrients could also occur through a decrease in soil biodiversity and microorganism activity (Singh, 2015). Soils were sensitive to salinity, with losses of carbon reported after both short- and long-term exposure (Servais et al., 2019). Depending on its form and stage of development, salinization seriously degraded the fertility of soil, ultimately eliminating all vegetation (JRC et al., 2012; Trnka et al., 2013). The SOC loss due to salinization had a negative feedback on soil fertility, microbial activity, and enzyme activities, which increased the dispersion of clay particles and led to higher wind and water erosion rates, therefore having a direct or indirect influence on soil nutrients (De la Paix et al., 2013; Singh, 2015).

    Salinity can also regulate nitrogen cycling by significantly shaping the community structure of both nitrifiers and denitrifiers (Wang et al., 2018b). Our results also showed that the SMB was significantly affected by the salinity, with the microbial biomass decreasing in high-salt conditions. This reflected the fact that soil microorganisms were influenced by salinity. Rath et al.(2016) indicated that a range of microbial processes in soil were strongly inhibited by salinity,despite fungal growth being found to be less influenced by salts than bacterial growth. With an increase in salinity, the redox potential, electron acceptor availability, osmotic stress, and organic substrate quantity and quality will change, which will affect microbe-mediated biogeochemical processes (Chambers et al., 2014; Servais et al., 2019). The variation of these processes may ultimately influence soil nutrients (Flower et al., 2017) and the species composition of microbial communities (Ikenaga et al., 2011). Moreover, soil salinization was closely related to soil physicochemical properties, and soil nutrients were considered to be the key factor influencing the differences in soil salinization (Xie et al., 2019). Our results indicated that salinization had a negative effect on the content of soil available nutrients. One explanation of this negative effect was the decrease in soil organic matter under saline conditions, where plant inputs decreased due to scarce vegetation cover, while the enhancement of the activity of carbon-degrading extracellular enzymes and microbial decomposition rates will negatively affect soil available nutrients (Morrissey, 2014). In fact, a saline soil was likely to have a low organic matter content because of the decreased plant input rather than the increased decomposition (Setia et al., 2013).

    5 Conclusions

    Our results indicated that most of the sites from the Qarhan Salt Lake to the Xidatan segment were strongly saline or very strongly saline. The main salt ions present in the soil were Na+, K+,and Cl-. Comparative data collected along salt gradients from the Qarhan Salt Lake to the Xidatan segment suggested that salinity decreased with increasing altitude and soil depth. The SOC, TN,TP, and TK concentrations increased with altitude. SMB were influenced by salinity, with SMB concentration decreasing under high-salt conditions and being significantly affected by the salinity. In the future, there is a need to determine how the diversity and composition of microorganisms vary across salinity gradients within the extremely arid desert climate playa(Qarhan Salt Lake) in the center of the southern Qaidam Basin, northern China. Specifically, there is a need to understand how the salt ions, soil nutrients, and SMB work together so that we can understand the relationships among them.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41621001,32061123006) and the Fund of Ningxia Independent Innovation on Agriculture Science and Technology, China (NGSB-2021-14-04).

    又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 亚洲av成人av| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 热99在线观看视频| 免费观看人在逋| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 美女高潮的动态| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 精品久久久久久,| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| www.色视频.com| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 观看美女的网站| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 久久这里只有精品中国| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| www.www免费av| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| av视频在线观看入口| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 深夜精品福利| 热99re8久久精品国产| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产三级中文精品| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产 一区精品| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| eeuss影院久久| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 久久热精品热| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 欧美区成人在线视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 舔av片在线| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| www日本黄色视频网| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 天堂网av新在线| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 内地一区二区视频在线| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 精品久久久久久,| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产视频内射| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲在线观看片| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 日韩中字成人| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 高清在线国产一区| 久久香蕉精品热| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 色av中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产亚洲欧美98| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久久国产成人免费| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 欧美区成人在线视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲图色成人| 最好的美女福利视频网| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 免费搜索国产男女视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 午夜激情欧美在线| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 免费av观看视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日本黄色片子视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲 国产 在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| netflix在线观看网站| 久久久久久伊人网av| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产精品野战在线观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 极品教师在线视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 色综合婷婷激情| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 国产高潮美女av| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久热精品热| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 有码 亚洲区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 日本与韩国留学比较| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产在视频线在精品| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 高清在线国产一区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 乱人视频在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 97超视频在线观看视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲国产色片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 韩国av在线不卡| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 嫩草影院新地址| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产高清激情床上av| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 美女高潮的动态| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 日本五十路高清| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产美女午夜福利| 成人综合一区亚洲| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 高清在线国产一区| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品福利观看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| videossex国产| 国产在线男女| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 色在线成人网| 欧美成人a在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 最好的美女福利视频网| av视频在线观看入口| 简卡轻食公司| 天堂网av新在线| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久精品影院6| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| www日本黄色视频网| 美女高潮的动态| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 在现免费观看毛片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲色图av天堂| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美+日韩+精品| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美性感艳星| 欧美人与善性xxx| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 色吧在线观看| 久久久精品大字幕| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 99热精品在线国产| 色哟哟·www| 成人欧美大片| 日韩强制内射视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产午夜精品论理片| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 一进一出抽搐动态| 99久国产av精品| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国产成人福利小说| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 不卡一级毛片| 一夜夜www| 99热这里只有是精品50| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 色视频www国产| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 午夜a级毛片| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 97碰自拍视频| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 免费观看在线日韩| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 18+在线观看网站| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 热99在线观看视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产成人a区在线观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| xxxwww97欧美| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 综合色av麻豆| av专区在线播放| 久久久成人免费电影| 免费看av在线观看网站| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 三级毛片av免费| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 黄色一级大片看看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 日本 av在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久色成人| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 99热网站在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 色播亚洲综合网| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 长腿黑丝高跟| or卡值多少钱| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 赤兔流量卡办理| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 88av欧美| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 久久6这里有精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 在现免费观看毛片| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 深夜精品福利| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久久久久久久大av| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 久久香蕉精品热| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产综合懂色| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| a在线观看视频网站| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 天堂动漫精品| 国产免费男女视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产三级在线视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲av熟女| av.在线天堂| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲综合色惰| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产成人影院久久av| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 毛片女人毛片| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 窝窝影院91人妻| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 在线a可以看的网站| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 欧美激情在线99| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久国产成人免费| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 一区二区三区激情视频| 欧美3d第一页| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日本五十路高清| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| av天堂在线播放| av在线老鸭窝| 日本a在线网址| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 色av中文字幕| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产午夜精品论理片| 午夜精品在线福利| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99热这里只有是精品50| av视频在线观看入口| 亚洲 国产 在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 深夜精品福利| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 久久久色成人| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美日本视频| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲国产色片| 久久久久久伊人网av| 特级一级黄色大片| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲综合色惰| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 三级毛片av免费| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 看免费成人av毛片| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 直男gayav资源| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲精品在线观看二区|