Endangered lowland oak forest steppe remnants keep unique bird species richness in Central Hungary

Gábor ónodi · Zoltán Botta-Dukát · Dániel Winkler · Tamás Rédei

Abstract The biodiversity of natural or semi-natural native, old oak woodlands have high conservation importance, especially in landscapes of monocultural forest plantations and arable fields.With a wider variety of microhabitats and foraging sources, such old oak forests can provide essential habitat for native forest bird communities.We conducted a study using bird point counts to compare the forest bird communities of old pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) remnants with native and non-native plantations in central Hungary in a landscape of mostly arable fields, settlements, and monocultural plantations.Avian surveys were carried out in old oak forest remnants, middle-aged oak, white poplar (Populus alba), hybrid poplar (Populus × euramericana), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), and pine (Pinus spp.) plantations.Fieldwork has been carried out in nine study sites, where all six habitat types were represented (with a few exceptions), to determine total abundance, species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity, species evenness, dominant and indicator species, and guild abundances.We found that old oak forest remnants were the most diverse habitats among the studied forest types, while hybrid poplar and pine plantations exhibited the lowest avian biodiversity.The avian guilds most sensitive to the loss of old oak forest remnants were ground foragers, bark foragers, cavity-nesters, residents, and Mediterranean migratory birds.Native habitats were more diverse than non-native plantations.Our results suggest that it is important to conserve all remaining high biodiversity old oak stands and to avoid clear-cutting of monocultural plantations in favour of practices such as mixed-species plantations, longer rotation lengths, or retention forestry.

Keywords Forest bird community · Bird conservation · Old oak forest-steppe remnant · Plantation forestry · Forest conservation · Non-native plantation

Introduction

The vast majority of natural forests are now altered worldwide by urbanization, agriculture, and various kinds of forest management practices.Less than 1% of European forests remain natural.Natural forests have heterogeneous tree species and age composition, with multi-layered habitat structure and diverse microhabitats.Such elements make natural forests optimal habitats for forest-dwelling species.Among the numerous existing forest management practices, monocultural commercial tree plantations are considered to result in the poorest habitats for forest communities (Paillet et al.2010).Species richness is higher in natural forests than in commercial plantations and both species richness and abundance are significantly higher in complex than in structurally simple plantations (Nájera and Simonetti 2010).Unfortunately, monocultural managed forest plantations are widespread and expanding worldwide, with commercial plantations representing ＞ 7% of global forest cover (Horák et al.2019).Plantations attempt to maximize wood production (either timber or pulp) of particular tree species (Carnus et al.2006; Paillet et al.2010).Globally, at least one-quarter of commercial plantations now consist of non-native species.Non-native monocultural plantations have a devastating impact on native biodiversity and are frequently considered ‘green deserts’ (Bremer and Farley 2010; Horák et al.2019).Changing natural or seminatural forests to plantations lowers avian biodiversity, species richness and overall abundance worldwide while transforming the composition of forest bird communities to include fewer forest specialists, more habitat generalists, and more species that prefer open habitats (Hansen et al.1991; Farwig et al.2008; Sheldon et al.2010; Sweeney et al.2010a).

Managed forests of Europe have lower biodiversity and species richness in terms of bryophytes, lichens, fungi, saproxylic beetles, and carabids (Paillet et al.2010).Among forestry management practices, clearcutting systems of commercial plantations are the most disadvantageous for biodiversity compared to thinning or selective cutting.Shortrotation clear-cutting systems of native plantations, however, can foster higher diversity comparing to arable feilds (Torras et al.2012; Chaudhary et al.2016).

The transitional biomes of forest steppes are considered to be among the most diverse ecosystems outside the tropics and have high conservation importance (Hoekstra et al.2005; Erd?s et al.2018).Forest steppes are present in both North and South America, while the largest areas of such habitats are found in Eurasia.Eurasian forest steppes extend from sub-Mediterranean to ultracontinental or monsoon climate zones, from Southeast Europe to the near the Pacific coast.These mosaic habitats consist of forests, shrublands, and grasslands, while their dominant tree species can be either deciduous or coniferous.These habitats can be economically beneficial to local communities as pastures.Forest steppes are, however, among the most threatened ecosystems because of habitat loss, fragmentation, and poor management (Hoekstra et al.2005; Erd?s et al.2018; Rédei et al.2020).

Oak (Quercussp.) forests of high biodiversity throughout Eurasia and the Americas provide a wide variety of ecosystem services from high-value timber harvesting to recreation.The worldwide task is to keep a balance among ecosystem services to sustain biodiversity while harvesting timber for profit (L?f et al.2016).Natural old oak forests have diverse habitat structure and can harbour a wide variety of forest specialist bird species that includes woodpeckers, a group that needs diverse microhabitats such as coarse woody debris, snags, decaying and dead trees.Such habitats also have various other cavity-nesting species such as tits (Paridae) and flycatchers (Ficedulidae and Muscicapidae) (Proen?a et al.2010; Robles et al.2011; Domokos and Cristea 2014; Olano et al.2015).The diverse canopy and shrub layers also provide nesting and foraging habitat for foliage insectivore species like Eurasian blackcap (Sylvia atricapilla) and Eurasian golden oriole (Oriolus oriolus).The nutrient-rich leaf litter provides foraging habitat for ground insectivores, like Hoopoe (Upupa epops) or song thrush (Turdus philomelos).Seed crops of such diverse habitats are essential foraging sources for granivores such as hawfinch (Coccothraustes coccothraustes) or European greenfinch (Chloris chloris) (Domokos and Cristea 2014; Czeszczewik et al.2015; Weso?owski et al.2015).

The Pannonian biogeographical region encompasses all of Hungary and extends outward to include 3% of the total EU land area (EC 2021).It is recognised as a site of EU regional importance for biodiversity conservation, supporting some 70 species of birds that are listed for strict protection in the EU Birds Directive (EEC 2009).Forest steppe vegetation of the Pannonian lowlands is the westernmost extended exclave of the Eurasian forest-steppes (Erd?s et al.2018).The pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) dominated forest steppes are critically endangered in the Pannonian sand region (Rédei et al.2020).Due the climatic and edaphic conditions, European zonal forests reach here the dry border of their tolerance.Spontaneous regeneration of the dominant pedunculate oak is limited.Due to aridification and the lowering of the groundwater table, oaks have not regenerated sufficiently in the region in recent decades, which is why non-native species were planted more in the plantations (Rédei et al.2020).On the other hand, there is a large growth in nationwide forestation projects that often include non-native plantations.Ironically, the use of non-native species continues to be funded by the government.This way, extent of the seminatural forest stands reduced heavily in the region.The remaining old oak forest remnants have exceptionally high biodiversity and conservation importance (Bíró et al.2008), with a land coverage of approximately 6,000 ha in Hungary (B?l?ni et al.2008), currently considered an endangered habitat (Borhidi 1999; Rédei et al.2020).

On the Great Hungarian Plain, most of the existing forests are even-aged, commercial plantations, including native stands, like pedunculate oak and the mixture of white poplar (Populus alba) and grey poplar (P.×canescens) (hereafter ‘native poplar’ stands), or non-native ones like hybrid poplar (P.×euramericana), black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia), and pine (Pinusspp.) plantations.Each commercial species has a relatively short rotation time.

In Hungary, after the human activities of the past 200 years, forest-steppes have undergone major changes, and only 251,000 ha (6.8%) of the total of 3,700,000 ha have survived and only 5.5% of the present stands can be considered natural (Molnár et al.2012).Currently, all components of forest steppes in Hungary consist of heavily fragmented mosaics with croplands and commercial, monocultural plantations of native and non-native tree species.

Despite their conservation importance, few studies have focused on the significance of natural, seminatural, unmanaged or less-managed oak habitats for forest birds.Those that have been conducted have been primarily focused on the difference between the avifauna of native and non-native stands (Magura et al.2008), or the non-native invasion of native stands (Laiolo et al.2003; Hanzelka and Reif 2015).

Our study focused on the avifauna of a forest matrix of six forest types (old oak remnants, oak plantations, native poplar, hybrid poplar, black locust, and pine), seeking out both the effects of forest type and the effects of short-rotation clearcutting systems on forest bird communities, as bird species are considered to be indicators of habitat quality (Coote et al.2013; Gao et al.2015; Duguid et al.2016).Our goal was to address the following questions:

· Which bird species groups are the most sensitive to current forestry practices?

· Can native plantations be considered better habitat for forest bird communities compared with non-native plantations?

· Can forest plantations conserve forest bird diversity of natural old oak remnants, under present landscape management practices?

We compared the six habitat types in terms of species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity, species evenness, total abundance and abundance of foraging, nesting, and migratory guilds.We also identified the dominant and specialist species and estimated the importance of each bird species of the studied forest stands.

Materials and methods

Study area

Nine study sites were chosen, in the vicinity of the following settlements: Csévharaszt, Hetényegyháza, Kunbaracs, Kunpeszér, Nagyk?r?s, Nyárl?rinc, and Pusztavacs, Szabadszállás and Tatárszentgy?rgy (Fig.1), where each or most of the six considered forest types were present.Only stands with an area ＞ 3 ha were selected for the study.The number of study sites, thus the sample size, was limited by the number of old oak forest remnants that large enough: all old oak stands that met the requirement were sampled.

Fig.1 Map of the study sites

The maximum age of planted stands was determined by the rotation length of each plantation type.The minimum age was established to include only the oldest stands at each site.Six habitat types were represented at each site:

(1) Old oak forests ≥ 80 years old natural or semi-natural, closed stands, consisted mainly of pedunculate oak and mixed with native tree species such as white and black poplar, Tatar maple (Acer tataricum) and very rarely European hornbeam (Carpinus betulus).These forests had an uneven-aged structure with a high density of standing and fallen deadwood.The diameter at breast height (dbh) of the thickest trees was about 120 cm.The tree cover of old oak forest remnants was consistent in time (maintained mainly by the management practice of coppicing), although these stands became more and more fragmented over time.These stands are ancient forests (with the permanent historical presence of forests), according to Buchwald (2005) they belong to the recently (n4) or long (n5) untouched forests with many old characteristics as the occurrence of e.g.large logs and snags, veteran living and partly senescent trees.The humus-rich soil on the sandy substrate of such forests was undisturbed but contributed to aridification, a problem that is typically addressed by clear-cutting, followed by full soil preparations and the planting of native or non-native monocultures.

(2) Middle-aged managed oak plantations were 50-80 years old, even-aged, closed stands that consisted mainly of pedunculate oak.The DBH of trees was 10-60 cm.

(3) Native poplar stands were 30-60 years old, evenaged, closed monocultural plantations, with a DBH of 10-60 cm.

(4) Hybrid poplar stands were 20-25 years old, even-aged, closed monocultural plantations.The DBH of trees in the canopy was 10-40 cm.

(5) Black locust stands were 20-40 years old, evenaged, closed monocultural plantations with a DBH of 10-40 cm.

(6) Pine stands were 30-50 years old, even-aged, closed plantations of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris), black pine (P.nigra), or both with a DBH of 10-40 cm.

As the age of plantations was close to their rotation length, a considerable amount of standing and fallen deadwood was found in the stands depending on the intensity of management.

The shrub layer of native habitat types consisted mainly of species with fleshy fruits dispersed via endozoochory, including common hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna), elder (Sambucus nigra), common dogwood (Cornus sanguinea), European spindle (Euonimus europaeus), European wild pear (Pyrus piraster), common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica), European barberry (Berberis vulgaris), European dewberry (Rubus caesius), and the alien black cherry (Prunus serotina).Above these shrubs, non-endozoochorous species were present, such as common hazel (Corylus avellana).The shrub layer was almost absent from hybrid poplar, black locust, and pine plantations, partly because of the cutting of shrubs, but in some cases, hawthorn, black cherry, and European dewberry established via endozoochory.

Data collection

Two-visit point counts were made.Point count stations were sampled at each of our nine study sites.All of the studied forest types were represented in point count stations at all sites with three exceptions.In the site of Hetényegyháza, there was no hybrid poplar plantation suitable for the criteria; in the site of Nyárl?rinc, there was no pine plantation that met the criteria.We did not make counts in the appointed black locust plantation of Tatárszentgy?rgy, because it was smaller and closer to the other studied stands than to meet with the requirements of our protocol).Point count stations were made at least 250 m apart from each other and at least 50 m from the forest edge.Depending on the extension of the particular forest unit, there were cases where we appointed more than one point count stations (up to four, to avoid oversampling).We maximized the number of point count stations in each study sites in ten so that we assured that survey can be logistically made from one hour after sunrise to late morning (until the temperature reached 25 °C).In our study, we appointed altogether 80 point count stations.Visits were made from April to June 2018.Due to forestry activity and other logistical considerations, ten point count stations could only be visited once.After a three minute waiting period, made to mitigate disturbance caused by the approaching observer, all birds seen or heard during the next ten minutes within a 50 m radius were counted.Each visit was made in opposite directions at each site to avoid any bias associated with interrupting the daily activity of birds.Counts were carried out during days without any heavy rain or wind.

Analyses

For points visited twice, the higher observed abundance of each species was used in the analysis.Total abundance, species richness, Shannon-Wiener diversity, and species evenness were calculated for each point.

Species were assigned to guilds according to their foraging and nesting preferences and migratory strategies.Total abundance was calculated for each foraging, nesting, and migratory guild.Guilds were assigned based on earlier studies (Czeszczewik et al.2015; Domokos and Domokos 2016), the database of www.birdl ife.org and the database of the BirdLife Hungary (www.mme.hu).We assigned species in the following foraging guilds: foraging outside the forest (such as black storkCiconia nigra), predator (foraging on vertebrates), herbivore, ground insectivore, bark insectivore, foliage insectivore, airborne insectivore, scavenger, and omnivore.Nesting guilds were classified as ground-nester, midstory-nester, canopy-nester, cavity-nester, and nest parasite.Migratory guilds were classified after where the species spend the winter as resident, Mediterranean migratory, sub-Saharan migratory species.

For comparison of forest types, we fitted generalized linear mixed models (hereafter GLMM) using habitat type as fixed and study site as a random factor (Zuur et al.2009).For total abundance, species richness, and guild abundances, Poisson or negative binomial distributions were used, based on the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC, Akaike 1973).For Shannon-Wiener diversity and species evenness, gamma distribution was fitted.Overall differences between habitat types were tested using likelihood ratio tests.If there were overall significant differences among types, Tukey post hoc tests of multiple comparisons were made.

The relative frequency was calculated for each species at each point.A species was considered to be dominant if its relative frequency was greater than 0.05 (Fulco and Tellini Florenzo 2008).We calculated point biserial correlation (De Cáceres and Legendre 2009) as an indicator species value for each species, to determine which species were more important in the evaluation of habitat quality (Dufrêne and Legendre 1997; Domokos and Domokos 2016).A particular species can be an indicator of more than one habitat type; therefore multi-level analysis was applied (De Cáceres et al.2010).

We conducted the analyses in R version 3.6.3 (R Core Team 2020) using glmmTMB (version 1.0.1.9000; Brooks et al.2017),multcomp(version 1.4-10, Hothorn et al.2008), emmeans (version 1.4.7, Lenth 2020) andindicspecies(version 1.7.6) packages.

Results

A total of 41 bird species, represented by 1194 birds were recorded in the overall study: 33 species in old oak forest remnants, 29 in managed oak, 24 in native poplar, 20 in hybrid poplar, 23 in black locust, and 25 in pine.

On the community level, GLMM was fit to negative binomial distribution in total abundance, to Poisson distribution in species richness and to gamma distribution in Shannon-Wiener diversity and species evenness.We found overall significant differences between habitat types in total abundance (χ2=60.966, df=5,P＜ 0.0001, species richness (χ2=44.522, df=5,P＜ 0.0001), Shannon-Wiener diversity (χ2=42.205, df=5,P＜ 0.0001) and species evenness (χ2=51.437, df=5,P＜ 0.0001).

Old oak forest yielded significantly higher bird abundance than did all other forest types.Managed oak yielded significantly higher abundance than did hybrid poplar (Fig.2a).Old oak forests were significantly higher in species richness than native poplar, hybrid poplar, black locust, and pine stands.Managed oak forests had significantly higher species richness than hybrid poplar stands as well (Fig.2b).In the case of Shannon-Wiener diversity, old oak forests had significantly higher values relative to all other forest types, excluding managed oak stands (Fig.2c).Old oak forests showed significantly higher species evenness comparing to other habitat types while managed oak forests were significantly higher in species evenness than hybrid poplar plantations (Fig.2d).

On the guild level, GLMM was fit to Poisson distribution for most guild abundance variables, except for the cavitynesting birds and those that are foraging outside the forest.We found significant overall differences between habitat types for the abundances of the following guilds: ground insectivore (χ2=32.286, df=5,P＜ 0.0001), bark insectivore (χ2=62.081, df=5,P＜ 0.0001), foliage insectivore (χ2=14.1, df=5,P＜ 0.05), midstorey-nester (χ2=15.098, df=5,P＜ 0.05), cavity-nester (χ2=52.473, df=5,P＜ 0.0001), resident (χ2=86.354, df=5,P＜ 0.0001) and Mediterranean migrator (χ2=24.761, df=5,P＜ 0.001).

The posthoc test revealed that, in terms of herbivores, the studied forest types were not significantly different from each other (Fig.2e).There were significantly more ground insectivores in old oak forests compared to all other types, except for managed oak forests.The other types did not differ significantly from each other (Fig.2f).There were also significantly more bark foragers in old oak forests compared to other types except for managed oak forests.Managed oak had a significantly higher abundance of bark foragers than pine and hybrid poplar stands had.Bark foragers were significantly more abundant in native poplar type than in hybrid poplar type.Black locust stands had significantly more bark foragers than hybrid poplar stands (Fig.2g).Foliage insectivores were significantly more abundant in old oak forests than in managed oak and black locust stands (Fig.2h).

Fig.2 Results of posthoc tests in variables where significant correspondences were found

Midstory-nesters were significantly more abundant in old oaks than in hybrid poplar plantations (Fig.2i).Old oak forest remnants had significantly more cavity-nesters than all the other types except for managed oak stands.Managed oak stands also had significantly more cavity-nesters than hybrid poplar plantations (Fig.2j).

Significantly more resident birds were recorded within the old oak forests than all the other habitats.Managed oak stands also had significantly more residents than hybrid poplar stands (Fig.2k).Old oak forests had significantly more Mediterranean migratory birds than hybrid poplar and pine stands (Fig.2l).

We found nine dominant species in old oak, managed oak, and hybrid poplar stands, eight in native poplar and black locust stands, and ten in pine stands.The most frequent species was the great tit (Parus major) in every forest type except pine stands, where common chaffinch was the most frequent species.Blue tit (Cyanistes caeruleus), chiffchaff (Phylloscopus collybita), Eurasian blackcap, Eurasian nuthatch (Sitta europaea), European robin (Erithacus rubecula), common starling (Sturnus vulgaris) and common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) were dominant in almost every type (Table 1).

Table 1 Lists of observed bird species in each habitat type, in the descending order of mean frequencies

Table 1 (continued)

Six species preferred old oak forests: short-toed treecreeper (Certhia brachydactyla;r=0.469,P＜ 0.01), blue tit (r=0.459,P＜ 0.01), song thrush (r=0.428,P＜ 0.01), Eurasian jay (Garrulus glandarius;r=0.404,P＜ 0.01), stock dove (Columba oenas;r=0.365,P＜ 0.05), and common blackbird (Turdus merula;r=0.347,P＜ 0.05).European robin (r=0.536,P＜ 0.01) and middle spotted woodpecker (Leiopicus medius;r=0.488;P＜ 0.01) preferred oak forests, irrespective of management status.Coal tit (Periparus ater; r=0.580,P＜ 0.01) and common chaffinch (r=0.336,P＜ 0.05) preferred pine forests, while Eurasian nuthatch (r=0.554,P＜ 0.01) preferred deciduous types.Above all, black woodpecker (Dryocopus martius;r=0.352,P＜ 0.05) preferred old oak and native poplar stands and tree pipit (Anthus trivialis;r=0.384,P＜ 0.05) preferred black locust and poplar (both native and hybrid) forests.

Discussion

We found that old oak forest remnants harboured the highest bird diversity and species evenness of forest types examined.In this fragmented forest landscape, these old forests had the most diverse avifauna with the highest species richness and total abundance.Dominant species were common chaffinch, European robin, Eurasian blackcap, common starling, and great tit, as also reported by Weso?owski et al.(2015) who studied the avifauna of oak-lime-hornbeam (Tilio-Carpinetum) stands at Bia?owie?a National Park in Eastern Poland.Due to the nutrient-rich, diverse, native leaf litter, old oak remnants had high importance for ground insectivore species, such as song thrush and common blackbirds.Due to its age, this type of forest had more decaying and dead trees with diverse microhabitats than the other types had, thus old remnant oak forests were the most important for bark insectivores like short-toed treecreeper, Eurasian nuthatch, woodpecker species (Picidae, e.g., middle spotted and black woodpecker) and other cavity-nesters (e.g., blue tit and stock dove).For cavity-nesting species, it is important to conserve such stands because hardwood oak trees need more time for cavities to be formed compared to softwood tree species (Quine et al.2007; Ranius et al.2009).

As most non-migratory species are among the abovementioned guilds, old oak stands in our study had high conservation value for this guild.Old oak stands were more abundant in terms of canopy insectivores than managed oak stands, as old oak forests have more diverse, multi-level canopy structure, compared to even-aged managed oak stands with simpler canopy structure (Ceia and Ramos 2016).With the conservation of old oak stands, managers could promote a diverse community of insectivorous bird species, potentially source populations of species that have important roles controlling pests in a landscape of forest plantations (Ceia and Ramos 2016).Oak forests that are older than 80 years have diverse forest structure and are more beneficial habitats compared to younger stands with less diverse structure (Domokos and Cristea 2014).

Monocultural oak plantations can support comparable bird communities to old oak remnants, although those plantations are poorer in microhabitats than natural oak woods.Nonetheless, these plantations can provide better conditions for forest birds such as European robin and middle spotted woodpecker than non-native plantations (Graham et al.2014).On the other hand, commercial oak plantations can only conserve a fraction of the avifauna of the structurally more diverse old oak forests under the present clear-cutting practices (Felton et al.2016).Old oak stands can provide structurally more diverse habitats and more potential tree cavities for secondary cavity nesters (Robles et al.2011).

Foliage insectivores were present in lower abundances in oak plantations compared to old oak stands, as these plantations have a more open midstory layer.Graham et al.(2014) also found such results in a similar study in Ireland, made in semi-natural and monocultural oak plantations.More bark-foraging species were found in ‘native poplar’ plantations comparing to hybrid poplar stands.The Eurasian aspen (Populus tremula) (which is closely related towhite and grey poplar), through its softwood and diverse bark structure, can provide crucial microhabitats for forest birds, especially bark-foraging species, such as woodpeckers (Hansson 1992; Walankiewicz and Czeszczewik 2005; Kosiński and Kempa 2007; Hebda et al.2017).Black woodpeckers were only found in ‘native poplar’ plantations in addition to old oak remnants.Consequently, dominant tree species and structure together determine the high richness of bird communities of the seminatural oak stands.

Hybrid poplars are hybrids of the native black poplar (Populus nigra) and numerous North American poplar species and have been planted throughout Europe (Camprodon et al.2015).Hybrid poplar plantations may have a role as ‘green corridor’ for forest birds, but stands that are near the end of their rotation time could provide nesting habitat in the short term for forest specialists, such as lesser spotted woodpeckers (Dryobates minor) (Martín-García et al.2013; Camprodon et al.2015).In our study, hybrid poplar plantations proved to be poor habitat for birds, with less structured microhabitats, because of the regular midstory encroachment used to increase timber production.As found for other non-native plantations, some species (e.g.Eurasian golden oriole, tree pipit) preferred more open habitats.Generalist forest species (e.g.common chaffinch and great tit) were also found in non-native stands.Martín-García et al.(2013) showed similar results in a study of poplar plantations and riparian forests in Spain.They suggested that managers should not control the understory of poplar plantations, so this habitat could harbour more forest specialist species.More appropriate rotation lengths can also make poplar plantations better habitats to meet conservation goals by providing more decaying and dead trees that enrich the diversity of microhabitats (Riffell et al.2011; Camprodon et al.2015; Turkalj 2017).

Black locust stands exhibited both lower bird diversity and species richness, and mostly forest habitat generalist species were present such as great tits, common chaffinches, European robins, or Eurasian blackcaps.Such stands were also used by species that prefer more open forest structure like spotted flycatchers (Muscicapa striata) or common starlings (Hanzelka and Reif 2015; Kroftová and Reif 2017).As the black locust stands were close to the end of their rotation time, with a considerable amount of standing deadwood that provided tree holes, it is also understandable that even less common species that favour more open forests with standing deadwood, such as collared flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis) were also present (Hanzelka and Reif 2015).Middle spotted woodpecker, which also requires forest habitats with plenty of decaying and dead trees (Domínguez et al.2017) was also present in two black locust stands of our study, although, in contrast to collared flycatchers, middle spotted woodpeckers were only recorded once in the two visits at those two sites.The reason for this species’ occurrence can also be the structure of pre-rotation aged stands and that those stands can be part of their home range.The size of this species’ home range can be between 4.2 and 33.3 ha in Central Europe (del Hoyo et al.2002).

In a study on insectivorous birds in a system of old and secondary oak forests with black locusts, Laiolo et al.(2003) concluded that from a conservation perspective, it would be benefciial to not cut black locust trees, but rather to allow the trees to age and die naturally, particularly since black locusts resprout well after cutting.Numerous studies have shown that ageing and dying black locust stands can be suppressed by native vegetation (Motta et al.2009).In the situation reported in our study, the function of plantations is purely economical and, thus, under such suboptimal conditions, black locust trees typically collapse after 30-50 years and so they will not be older than the rotation time.

Black locust is considered to be one of the most significant invasive species in European woodlands (Kroftová and Reif 2017; Wagner et al.2017; Campagnaro et al.2018).The planting of this species is controversial, as it is economically beneficial, both because of timber production and by the honey produced from its nectar.Moreover, the species is highly adaptable and fast-spreading both generatively and vegetatively on arid soils, as well as being a nitrogen-fixing pioneer (Cierjacks et al.2013; Vítková et al.2017).

Enescu and D?nescu (2013) stated that black locust could be a solution for land reclamation in arid landscapes in the face of climate change, but also should be managed with great care in the vicinity of protected landscapes as its plantation also mean great biodiversity loss comparing to nearby native habitats (Kroftová and Reif 2017).Climate change could foster the invasion of black locust with increasing aridity of landscapes and, thus, this species has the potential to transform even protected areas that are now out of concern (Kleinbauer et al.2010).By global warming, black locust could pose a potential threat to even non-arid habitats such as riparian forests (Nadal-Sala et al.2019).

Two pine species that have been planted in the study region include the Scots pine and the Austrian pine (P.nigra).The former has a wide distribution from Spain to East Asia, while the latter is native to the high elevations of southern Europe (Farjon 2013).Both species are allochthonous to the Great Hungarian Plain (Gencsi and Vancsura 1997; Gardner 2013).The planting of pine species is controversial as the environmental circumstances make this region suboptimal for the plantation of pine species, such forests can only be rejuvenated by soil preparation.In one hand, it prevents soil erosion, ameliorates and shades the soil, but in the other hand, these species suppress native communities, the plantations have low diversity, extreme fire risk and high risk of invasion (Cseresnyés and Tamás 2014).These pine stands cannot be rejuvenated by coppicing, but only by plantation combined with soil disturbance.

These non-native forests are at the margin of their tolerance with poor growth characteristics and low economic value.Non-native coniferous plantations have negative effects on the native forest communities.With the ageing of the stands, this effect could be mitigated, but short-rotation harvesting could mean serious drawbacks for the survival of native tree species (Brockerhoff et al.2003; Sweeney et al.2010a).We found that pine plantations were one of the poorest habitats for birds of this plantation matrix, largely because of their inability to decompose leaf litter, their poor under-and midstorey levels, and among other factors, the resin of pines inhibits cavity formation in living trees (Conner et al.2001).Coniferous stands, hybrid poplar and black locust plantations in our study also harboured lower total abundance, diversity, and species richness relative to old oak remnants, with most consisting of habitat generalists such as common chaffinch (Graham et al.2014) and species that prefer open forests such as Eurasian golden oriole, spotted flycatcher, and tree pipit (Pedley et al.2019).Pine plantations also provide nesting habitat for specialists of coniferous forests such as coal tits (Sweeney et al.2010a; Winkler and Erd? 2012).

Cavity-nesting species in our study occurred in lower abundances in pine plantations compared to old oak forests as has been found in similar studies conducted in a variety of Mediterranean oak habitats and pine plantations in Italy (de Gasperis et al.2016), in pedunculate oak forests and coniferous plantations in Ireland (O’Connell et al.2012).In a study conducted in oak forests and coniferous plantations in Turkey, both cavity-and ground-nesters were more abundant in oak forests, as the understory layer of coniferous plantations is scarce, and older stands had positive effects on avian diversity (Walankiewicz et al.2014; Bergner et al.2015).The authors of the Turkey study recommended that managers increase the number of old trees in plantations, and also retain the understory layer, to enrich the habitat structures for breeding forest birds.On top of this, forestry practices that manage for continuous understory cover should be implemented (Calladine et al.2015).Retention of native trees in coniferous plantations or creating mixed-species plantations would also benefit forest birds (Barrientos 2010; Sweeney et al.2010b; Hanzelka and Reif 2016).To mitigate the effects of clear-cutting of native plantations, green-tree retention should also be promoted to conserve native forest bird communities, and thereby leaving old, decaying trees with tree holes and diverse microhabitats as ‘legacy trees’ (Machar et al.2019).

Mature non-native plantations with higher structural diversity can provide nesting habitat for more diverse forest bird communities (Hanzelka and Reif 2016; Rodríguez-Perez et al.2018).Mixed-species plantations can also mitigate the effects of non-native plantations on forest avifauna, but only to a lesser extent, compared with natural or semi-natural old oak forest stands (Hanzelka and Reif 2016; O’Connell et al.2012).In the situation presented in this study, the constraints of short rotation times and monocultural practices preclude other forms of forest management.Moreover, the suboptimal environmental sources in the region will likely results in collapse when such plantations reach 30-50 years of age.

Conclusion

Old oak remnants were the most optimal habitats for forest birds among the forest types studied both in terms of age of stands and by diverse forest structure.Such old oak forests serve as source habitats for avian bird diversity in the region.Most sensitive to old oak forest loss were ground foragers, bark foragers, cavity-nesters, residents, and Mediterranean migratory birds.Native plantations were better habitats relative to non-native plantations but if present forestry practices continue, including further fragmentation of old oak remnants, forest plantations will lose bird diversity in old oak stands.These old oak forest remnants are among the last remaining, critically endangered stands of this particular habitat type in the Pannonian forest steppe region (Rédei et al.2020).The disappearance of such high diversity remnants would have negative effects on native avian communities within forest plantation matrices, resulting in local extinctions of forest specialist species, thus magnifying the importance of such habitats to conservation initiatives (Noh et al.2019).

AcknowledgementsOpen access funding provided by University of Sopron.We would like to express our gratitude to members of local hunting and forestry companies, and landowners, who helped on the fieldwork.We would like to also thank Dorota Czeszczewik, who made useful comments on both the planning of the study and on the making of the manuscript, as an expert on point count studies and Walter D.Koenig, who made the language corrections.We also thank Anikó Csecserits, who made the study map and Péter ódor of his professional advice.Gó was funded by LIFE16NAT/IT/000245 and OeAD-GmbH-ICM-2020-00204, ZB-D and TR were funded by GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00019.

Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creat iveco mmons.org/l icen ses/ by/4.0/.