• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    One extraction tool for in vitro-in vivo extrapolation? SPME-based metabolomics of in vitro 2D,3D,and in vivo mouse melanoma models

    2021-11-11 13:38:00KarolJarochPaulinaTaczynskaMartaCzechowskaJoannaBogusiewiczKamiluczykowskiKatarzynaBurlikowskaBarbaraBojko
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2021年5期

    Karol Jaroch, Paulina Taczyˊnska, Marta Czechowska, Joanna Bogusiewicz,Kamil ?uczykowski, Katarzyna Burlikowska, Barbara Bojko

    Department of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology,Faculty of Pharmacy,Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz,Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruˊn Poland, 85-089, Bydgoszcz, Poland

    Keywords:Solid-phase microextraction In vitro-in vivo extrapolation Metabolomics Melanoma B16F0 C57BL6 mouse model

    ABSTRACT Solid phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with high-resolution mass spectrometry was employed for the determination of metabolomic profile of mouse melanoma growth within in vitro 2D,in vitro 3D, and in vivo models. Such multi-model approach had never been investigated before. Due to the low-invasiveness of SPME, it was possible to perform time-course analysis, which allowed building time profile of biochemical reactions in the studied material. Such approach does not require the multiplication of samples as subsequent analyses are performed from the very same cell culture or from the same individual. SPME already reduces the number of animals required for experiment;therefore,it is with good concordance with the 3Rs rule (replacement, reduction, and refinement). Among tested models, the largest number of compounds was found within the in vitro 2D cell culture model, while in vivo and in vitro 3D models had the lowest number of detected compounds. These results may be connected with a higher metabolic rate, as well as lower integrity of the in vitro 2D model compared to the in vitro 3D model resulting in a lower number of compounds released into medium in the latter model.In terms of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation,the in vitro 2D model performed more similar to in vivo model compared to in vitro 3D model;however,it might have been due to the fact that only compounds secreted to medium were investigated. Thus, in further experiments to obtain full metabolome information, the intraspheroidal assessment or spheroid dissociation would be necessary.

    1. Introduction

    Arthur and Pawliszyn [1] first introduced solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in 1990. The principle of this extraction methodology lies in the equilibrium state established between the concentrations of analytes in the sample and the fiber's coating[2].SPME occurs only via the free fraction of analytes, and generally only applies to low molecular weight compounds(<1500 Da),as is the case for the majority of commercially available and lab-made extractive phases developed to date.When an SPME sampling device is immersed inside a sample containing binding macromolecules such as proteins(e.g.,enzymes),such compounds are unable to penetrate the extractive phase;thus,small compounds adsorbed(extraction occurs by physical interaction of analyte and the coating surface) or absorbed (extraction occurs by partitioning of analytes into coating phase) by the porous sorbent are protected from enzymatic degeneration[2].Consequently,small molecules with a short lifetime can be successfully extracted [3]. As mentioned before, SPME is an equilibrium-based sample preparation technique, which, together with low-recovery rates, can lead to nondepletive extraction; thus, the decrease of compounds in the sample as a function of extraction is often negligible.Moreover,by integrating the sample preparation and extraction steps, SPME drastically decreases sample consumption, thus enabling multiple extractions from the same set of samples over time. Indeed, SPME applications directed at sampling of biological samples are often referred to as“chemical biopsy”[4,5].Together,these properties of SPME enable the construction of time profiles of biochemical reactions in the studied matrices without the need for sample multiplication, as the original matrices can be conserved and continuously sampled over time. This, in turn, leads to a minimization of sample variability.Therefore,SPME seems to be a perfect analytical tool to be employed for the determination of analytes excreted by cell cultures, especially using 96-well plates, as the sample amount is significantly limited.

    In biological applications, SPME is also characterized by“balanced coverage”; in other words, SPME enables extraction of both polar and non-polar analytes from biological matrices.This is explained by the fact that while polar compounds have low affinity for the SPME sorbent, the low protein binding typical of these compounds in such matrices results in high free concentrations of these compounds.On the other hand,non-polar compounds,which have high affinity for SPME sorbents, are usually highly bound to proteins and other matrix components,and are thus present in low levels in their free concentrations. These two ‘balancing forces’together enable balanced extraction of both types of analytes by the sorbent from biological matrices in relatively similar amounts[6,7].

    For researchers, an important feature of in vitro assays lies in their ability to generate patterns similar to in vivo states. This approach is called in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). The main goal of IVIVE studies is to design such an in vitro platform that in vivo animal-based tests are no longer be necessary during the drug development process.Having an in vitro assay that is accurate in terms of IVIVE would provide compliance with the 3Rs rule(replacement, reduction, and refinement) implemented to animal research [8]. Accurate in vitro assays would especially help in complying with replacement and reduction.In this respect,SPME is presented as an ideal sampling tool capable of fulfilling the animalresearch requirements for reliable IVIVE platforms, while also reducing environmental waste as well as enabling cost savings.Due to its minimally invasive nature, SPME enables monitoring of biosystem(s) without disturbing said systems, thus enabling multiple extractions from the very same cell culture as well as the same individual over time. Such an advantage largely reduces the number of biological replicates needed in such studies while also minimizing inter-sample variability. Conversely, in time-course analyses of tumor tissue in in vivo mouse model, traditional sample preparation techniques such as solid-liquid extraction (SLE)require a separate group of specimens for each time point planned in the experimental design due to their exhaustive nature, an approach that does not comply with the 3Rs rule.

    SPME has been widely applied in both targeted and untargeted analyses of complex matrices, including in a variety of metabolomics applications involving matrices such as biofluids and tissues, both for the purposes of selecting (untargeted) as well as monitoring (targeted) metabolites of interest i.e., potential biomarkers [9]. Coupling of SPME with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), e.g., orbitrap mass spectrometer or time-offlight, enables detection of metabolites with high mass accuracy and thus precise identification of these low molecular weight compounds.SPME has also been shown to be suitable for extraction of metabolites excreted by cell cultures [10,11].

    Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is widely used for metabolomics studies. An untargeted analysis allows for a wider insight into the overall metabolism of cells, while targeted analyses are ideal for monitoring of biomarkers.In order to compare different sample types,e.g.,in vitro and in vivo,and thus extrapolate findings, it is generally recommended that the same analytical workflow be adopted throughout the study for both types of samples, from sample preparation to LC-MS analysis. The fewer differences in analytical protocols, the more certain one may be that any variability in the final comparative results stem from biological factors,but not from divergences in the mentioned procedures that may have led to dissimilarities in compound coverage.The current ‘gold standard’analytical approach for sample preparation and extraction in in vitro cell studies is protein precipitation (PP), in which an organic reagent (e.g., methanol or acetonitrile, etc.) is added to the liquid sample to denature proteins and simultaneously extract organic compounds.The introduction of organic solution into in vitro cell cultures is a terminal protocol;thus,new samples are needed for each time point of the experiment.PP is most commonly selected for such applications due to its relative ease of use and efficiency;however, it necessitates new cell seedings for subsequent time points of the analysis,a disadvantage that in addition to being costly and time-consuming may also introduce biological variances, as immortalized cell lines are known to undergo changes between individual passages [12]. SLE, on the other hand, is the current ‘gold standard’ for in vivo model studies. However, application of SLE necessitates homogenization of tissue sample for analysis;thus,SLE is only suitable for ex vivo analysis. Previous studies have demonstrated that in vivo versus ex vivo metabolomics patterns may vary significantly. For instance, in previous work [3], in vivo SPME extracted 70 additional features when compared to ex vivo SPME,PP,or ultrafiltration.Only SPME,both in in vivo and ex vivo experiments,was capable of extracting very labile compounds such as β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and adenosine monophosphate.Furthermore, only in vivo SPME enabled precise determination of the ratio of glutathione to oxidized glutathione (2.5) as previously established in the literature; in other words, in vivo SPME was the only technique among the above mentioned that provided sufficient metabolism quenching[3].However,this study was carried out with the use of mouse blood as matrix;for a tissue-based approach,it is expected that the homogenization step (necessary for non-SPME approaches) would introduce even more discrepancies with respect to low abundance compounds in comparison to the in vivo state of this matrix.

    Given the previously described features of SPME, as well as limitations related to sample consumption when traditional techniques such as PP or SLE are used,we proposed the use of SPME for untargeted metabolomics of in vitro 2D and in vitro 3D cell cultures as well as in vivo mouse model of murine B16F10 melanoma with the aim to describe biochemical changes during tumor growth.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. General SPME protocol

    SPME fibers were manufactured in-house with 5 μm hydrophilic-lipophilic balanced particles kindly provided by Prof.Pawliszyn (University of Waterloo,Waterloo, Canada). The coating protocol was adopted from Gˊomez-Ríos et al. [13]. Coating length was 2 mm, and two layers of coating were applied to each fashioned device. All other chemicals were of LC-MS grade (Merck,Poznaˊn, Poland) unless stated otherwise. Preconditioning of SPME fibers was carried out overnight with a methanol:water solution(1:1,V/V)under static conditions.Fibers were rinsed with water for 5 s without agitation directly prior to extraction. Extractions from 96-well plates containing in vitro 2D and in vitro 3D cell cultures were carried out for 30 min by direct immersion of fibers in 100 μL of samples. In vivo sampling from a tumor was carried out by insertion of fibers into tissue for 15 min. Following extraction, in in vitro and in vivo experiments,fibers were rinsed with water for 5 s without agitation so as to remove any matrix components loosely attached to the fibers. Desorption was carried out in acetonitrile:water solution (4:1,V/V) for 90 min with orbital shaker agitation set at 1,200 rpm, using a desorption solution volume of 100 μL. Subsequently, extracts were submitted to instrumental analysis on an LC-MS system.

    2.2. General cell culture protocol

    A B16F10 cell line was cultivated at 37°C and 5%CO2with RPMI-1640 with L-glutamine and sodium bicarbonate (R8758, Sigma-Aldrich, Poznaˊn, Poland), with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biowest,Nuaillˊe, France), as well as antibiotics and antimycotic (A5955,Sigma-Aldrich, Poznaˊn, Poland) with addition of ciprofloxacin(17850, Sigma-Aldrich, Poznaˊn, Poland).

    2.3. In vitro 2D cell culture extraction protocol

    A total of 1000 cells per well were seeded on a 96-well plate.The SPME protocol was implemented following 24(T1),48(T2),and 72(T3) h of initial plating. Experiments were conducted on four separate cell culture replicates.A representative photograph of the sampling step is shown on Figs.1A and B [11].

    2.4. In vitro 3D cell culture extraction protocol

    A total of 1000 cells per well were seeded onto an ultra-low adhesive 96-well plate (Nunclon Sphera, U-bottom, Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The plate was gently transferred into a centrifuge and spun under 200gfor 4 min.The SPME protocol was carried out at 5(T1)and 8(T2)days of initial plating.Experiments were conducted on four separate cell culture replicates.A representative photograph of the sampling step is shown in Figs.1A and B [11].

    2.5. In vivo extraction protocol

    Adult male mice C57BL6/cmdb (6-8 weeks old) were utilized for this study. Animals were housed in a controlled environment under the following conditions:temperature(22±2)°C,12 h lightdark cycle, humidity (55 ± 10)%, with food and water available ad libitum. Mice were administered isoflurane and kept under anesthesia throughout the extraction procedure. The inguinal region part of the leg was sampled with SPME fibers (Fig.1B). In order to penetrate the skin,fibers were housed in hypodermic needles that were used to guide the fibers to the proper sampling location in the leg. Once the fiber coating was inserted into the tissue, the needle was removed. Sampling was performed before tumor inoculation(T0) then following inoculation with B16F10 cells (2 × 106per 100 μL phosphate buffer saline (PBS) per animal) [14]. Tumor sampling was carried out 10 days after inoculation, once tumors reached a size of ca. 5 mm in diameter (T1 on 10th day after inoculation) and after an additional 4 days (T2 on 14th day after inoculation).A total of two animals were used for experiments,and two fibers per animal were used for each time point. Once samplings for the last time point of sample collection were finished,the mice were sacrificed by manual cervical dislocation, resulting in euthanasia within approximately 10 s. The study was conducted under a research protocol reviewed and approved by the Local Ethical Committee on Animal Testing at the Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz(Approval No.25/2018).All the procedures were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines, and all sampling procedures carried out on living animals were performed under anesthesia as described above, and all precautions were taken to minimize suffering.

    Fig.1.Solid phase microextraction(SPME)device for(A and B)in vitro 2D,in vitro 3D,and (C) in vivo sampling procedure.

    2.6. LC-HRMS analysis

    The LC-MS system consisted of a Dionex UltiMate 3000 RS autosampler, Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany), and a Q-Exactive Focus high resolution mass spectrometer(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).

    Chromatographic separation was performed using reversed phase pentafluorophenyl(PFP)Discovery HS F5column(100 mm ⅹ2.1 mm, 3 μm, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) with mobile phase consisting of 99.9%water+0.1%formic acid(mobile phase A)and 99.9% acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase B). The LC gradient for the PFP column was adopted from the study by Vuckovic and Pawliszyn [15] and consisted of the following gradient conditions:0-3 min 0%B,3-25 min linear gradient to 90%B,25-34 min 90%B,34-40 min 0%B,and a flow of 0.3 mL/min.All solvents and additives used for SPME and LC-MS analysis were of LC-MS grade.The injection order of all the three protocols(in vitro 2D,in vitro 3D and in vivo)was randomized for each set of samples,and fiber blanks and pooled quality control (QC) samples were utilized for background determination and data normalization,respectively. Fiber blanks were prepared by rinsing fibers with water for 5 s, then submitting fibers to the same preconditioning and desorption steps utilized for sampling fibers, as described above.

    The MS was operated in positive ionization mode, with heat assisted electrospray ionization ion source parameters set as follows: spray voltage 1500 V, capillary temperature 300°C, sheath gas 40 a.u.,auxiliary gas flow rate 15 a.u.,probe heater temperature 300°C, S-Lens RF level 55%. Data acquisition was performed via Xcalibur software v. 4.0. The MS was calibrated using Pierce LTQ Velos ESI Positive Ion Calibration Solution (88323, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) every 72 h according to the manufacturer's protocol.

    2.7. Data processing and statistical analysis

    Datasets for each protocol carried out in this study, namely in vitro 2D, in vitro 3D, and in vivo, were analyzed individually, with each protocol being designated their own set of fiber blanks and pooled quality control(QC)samples.Data processing and statistical analyses were performed on Compound Discoverer 2.1. software(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The selected mass tolerance window was set to 3 ppm, the signal-to-noise threshold to 10,and the maximum sample-to-blank ratio to 5(where a value lower than 5 marked a feature as background). Minimal peak intensity was set to 5000. Pooled QC samples were used for data mean normalization with minimal QC coverage set to 50%and max QC area RSD set to 50%.Compounds were automatically annotated by Compound Discoverer 2.1 software using ChemSpider and the databases BioCyc, Human Metabolome Database, and KEGG with 3 ppm tolerance. Statistical software (ver 13.1 Dell Inc., Tulsa, OK,USA) was used for chart generation based on normalized data provided by Compound Discoverer 2.1 software. Scopus and PubMed databases were searched using phrases such as“B16”and“Metabolomics” or “B16F10” and “Metabolomics” to evaluate whether the annotated compounds were biologically important according to previous studies. The quality of the peaks picked by the Compound Discoverer 2.1 software was also scrutinized by a manual inspection of chromatograms.

    3. Results and discussion

    While the executed protocols did not consider quantitative analysis, qualitative comparisons between results obtained for subsequent experiments, i.e., in vitro 2D, in vitro 3D and in vivo experiments, were performed. After filtering of data to remove background compounds present in fiber blank samples and compounds that did not meet reproducibility requirements,compound counts were determined. For in vitro 2D analysis, a total of 54986 features constituting 8117 compounds were found, among which 810 unique compounds were positively identified using databases and 34 were found relevant to the B16F10 model(Figs. 2A-C). For in vitro 3D analysis, a total of 26998 features, 3933 compounds,with 680 hits and 16 compounds relevant to the B16F10 cell line were determined(Figs.2D-F).For in vivo analysis,a total of 35944 features,5946 compounds,785 compounds identified in databases,and 30 with biological meaning (Figs. 2G-I) were found.

    A comparison of total (unfiltered) numbers of features and putatively identified compounds found in the analyses showed that the best coverage was observed in the in vitro 2D model (Fig. 3).Considering in vitro models only, the number of compounds secreted into the sampled medium correlates with the metabolic capacity of cell cultures, which is connected with their proton production rate (PPR). The PPR, in turn, is related to glycolysis,which results in the production of lactate and protons (H+), and thus in the acidification of cell culture[16,17].The larger number of compounds found in the in vitro 2D cell line may be partially owed to the faster metabolism (higher PPR) of monolayer cultures as compared to spheroids,a phenomenon which has been previously reported in the literature [18]. Another cause of this result may concern the higher integrity of spheroid cultures than that of monolayer cultures. In a previous drug penetration study utilizing the hanging-drop technique, the authors concluded that the integrity of in vitro 3D spheroids hindered drug penetration as compared to that attained in the in vitro 2D model[19].As the cell intake rate in in vitro 3D is lower than that in in vitro 2D models,it is expected that the efflux into medium will also be slower. The hanging-drop and ultra-low adhesive in vitro 3D models (utilized in present study) can be considered to yield equivalent results, as both techniques result in spheroid formation. Since both techniques anchorage independently, i.e., no scaffolds or extracellular matrix used, the created spheroids are thus similar in terms of morphology [20]. Additionally, due to the much slower proliferation rate of the in vitro 3D model as compared to the in vitro 2D model, a longer incubation time for in vitro 3D cell cultures(eight days)was employed.This might have led to a decrease in medium components since the medium was not replaced or replenished during this time; therefore, the medium components were likely present in lower amounts than required for SPME-LC-HRMS detection.

    Fig.2.Scatter plots representing respectively numbers of features, compounds, and ChemSpider hits within (A-C) in vitro 2D model, (D-F) in vitro 3D model and (G-I) in vivo mouse melanoma model. Blue dots represent biologically important compounds.

    Fig.3.Chart representing the number of features and compounds per study group,with bars representing standard deviations.

    Fig.4.Chart representing insight into the in vivo count of features and compounds(A:mouse #1; B: mouse #2). Bars represent standard deviations.

    Given that SPME is an equilibrium-based approach,the amount of compounds that can be extracted from a matrix by a given coating strongly relies on various parameters, e.g., time, temperature, and matrix composition. Unsurprisingly, 30 min extractions from the in vitro 2D model enabled detection of more features than the 15 min extractions from the in vivo animal model.On the other hand, a slightly larger number of features/compounds were detected in the in vivo study as compared to the in vitro 3D model.These additional features/compounds may be owed to the presence of additional compounds associated with the increased blood flow typical of neoangiogenesis within the tumor tissue. Another possible explanation for this would be the contamination of fibers with blood during skin and tumor penetration. However, a recent study on the fundamental principles of SPME extraction demonstrated that SPME might enable faster mass transfer of certain compounds in tissue than in liquid samples. For the tested compounds,an equilibrium state was reached after 20 min of extraction from tissue as compared to a 60 min extraction in PBS solution.This phenomenon was explained by the presence of binding components in the tissue, e.g., proteins, which act as a reservoir for extracted molecules. SPME extracts via free concentration; therefore,the extracted molecules are replenished by the ones released from binding components as the system aims to reestablish equilibrium [21]. Accordingly, in a comparison between in vivo and in vitro assays, a larger number of features/compounds was found for the in vitro 2D model while the in vitro 3D and in vivo models yielded a similar number of compounds.

    The highest standard deviations (SD) were observed in the in vivo part of the study,which can be explained by inter-individual variability(Fig.4,T0).The further increases in SDs observed at the tumor growth stage (Fig. 4,T1) might be owed to the fact that the sampled tumor tissues were relatively small (around 4-5 mm) at this stage.It is also possible that the fibers were not inserted in the same tumor regions, namely, in the necrotic core or the highly proliferating outer layer.At the T2 sampling time,the tumor tissue had grown big enough so as to enable insertion of both fibers at the same tissue height, which contributed to a decrease in the intraanimal SD (Fig. 4, T2). Feature count differences between individual animals were 858,1063,and 261 for T0,T1,and T2,respectively.Since this work was a proof-of-concept study, only a minimum number of animals(2 animals;two fibers each per time point)were used to attain a sufficient number of samples for statistical comparisons with in vitro 2D and in vitro 3D models. In a study employing a traditional sample preparation method, a total of six animals would have been necessary for each time point since the tissue sample would have had to be homogenized for further sample preparation,necessitating that the animals be sacrificed at each sampling point. Undoubtedly, from this perspective, SPME is far superior to traditional approaches as far as compliance with the 3Rs rule is concerned.

    A database search revealed a total of 256 previously reported compounds related to the B16F10 cell line[22-35].In four of these studies, LC-MS was used for instrumental analysis [22-25] while NMR was employed in nine cases [26-35]. In vivo metabolomics was considered in eight cases [22,29-35]. Among them, only one study was performed with the use of MS as an analytical platform and B16 as a cancer model, with serum chosen as a matrix [22].Metabolomic analyses were carried out directly from the tumor tissue in four of the cited in vivo studies,while the other protocols sampled different tissues (e.g., spleen, liver, stomach) and/or biofluids (serum). Of note, none of the above-mentioned studies combined in vitro and in vivo samplings,utilized a in vitro 3D cell culture approach,or carried out time-course profiling.Such a gap in the literature suggests the need for a reliable untargeted metabolomic strategy serving IVIVE. In the current investigation, 42 biologically relevant compounds were putatively determined(Table 1).Among them,21 metabolites were found in the literature as described above (Table S1) [22-35]. The different numbers of detected and identified compounds as compared to the literature might be due to the different sample preparation techniques and/or different instrumental platforms used in the particular experiments, and/or different matrices employed.

    Table 1 Distribution of putatively identified compounds among different mouse melanoma models.

    The putatively identified compounds histidine, glutamic acid,leucine/isoleucine, and dipeptide Phe-Ans/Ans-Phe were the only compounds detected in all sample types (Fig. 5). As leucine andisoleucine have identical accurate masses, identification can be done based on retention time.As no authentic standards were used in this study to identify compounds, the amino acids were not assigned to the particular peaks in the chromatogram [36]. The mass tentatively identified as Phe-Ans or Ans-Phe based on the database search also corresponded to two chromatographic peaks.This is in good agreement with the literature[37].Within all tested models a positive relationship between leucine/isoleucine and cells number was observed, i.e., the larger cell number the higher peak area. Levels were stable throughout the tested time points for histidine and glutamic acid in the in vitro 2D cell culture,while an increasing trend over time was observed in in vitro 3D and in vivo models.Conversely,levels of Phe-Ans/Ans-Phe decreased over time in both in vitro assays as well as in vivo assays.

    Fig.5.Normalized areas of compounds detected in in vitro 2D model, in vitro 3D model, and in vivo mouse melanoma model (A: histidine; B: glutamic acid; C and D: leucine/isoleucine; E and F: Phe-Asn/Asn-Phe). Bars represent standard error. Note: for leucine/isoleucine and dipeptide Phe-Asn/Asn-Phe, two chromatographic peaks were detected.

    Purine derivatives are frequently found as biochemical biomarkers of various melanoma cell lines, including B16F10[23,25,30,31,33]. In our experiments we were able to characterize levels of hypoxanthine (Fig. 6A), arabinosylhypoxanthine (Fig. 6B)and xanthine (Fig. 6C). In all cases, an increase in levels of the aforementioned metabolites over time was observed. Other identified compounds included amino acids,vitamins(both groups were cell culture medium components), small peptides, and derivatives of the above listed medium components(Table S1,Fig.S1)[22-35].

    Fig.6.Normalized areas of purine derivatives(A:hypoxanthine;B:arabinosylhypoxanthine;C:xanthine)detected within in vitro 2D model,in vitro 3D model,and in vivo mouse melanoma model. Bars represent standard error.

    A total of 10 common compounds were detected in both in vitro 2D cell culture and in vivo models. However, no common compounds were found between the in vitro 3D and in vivo models(Table 1). In general, this finding runs counter to the wellestablished fact that spheroid cultures are more similar to in vivo states than monolayer cell cultures. This discrepancy might be explained by the fact that the SPME probe was inserted inside the tumor tissue during the in vivo procedure, whereas in the in vitro 3D model,fibers were positioned so as to extract metabolites from/via the medium.It is possible that many inter-spheroid metabolites either were not released from the spheroid altogether, or were present at concentrations that were too low to be detected.In order to achieve in-depth metabolomics characterization of the in vitro 3D model and provide a thorough comparison between in vivo tumors and the above-mentioned in vitro 3D model, intraspheroidal sampling must be employed in both cases. For such studies, miniaturization of the SPME probe should be utilized in a manner similar to that of previous experiments conducted on single cells[38].In that study,SPME probes consisting of a coating length of 150 μm with conical geometry (diameter varied in the range 10-30 μm) were used to characterize intracellular metabolites of Alium cepa cells. After 48 h, with inoculum of 1000 cells, a B16F10 hanging-drop in vitro 3D model generates spheroids of approx. 400 μm [39]. The mentioned examples certainly support that it may be possible to extract metabolites from the interior part of B16F10 in vitro 3D cell spheroids with the use of miniaturized SPME, consequently enabling an in vitro application that better reflects in vivo conditions.

    4. Conclusion

    A reliable analytical tool for IVIVE would enable further investigations of biological systems while significantly reducing the number of animals used during the drug development process.Given that SPME low-invasive sampling,the same animals could be used multiple times over the course of an investigation, thus significantly reducing the number of animals needed for such studies while additionally minimizing inter-sample variability. For instance,in this project,only two animals were needed to establish three time point samplings; conversely, traditional methods such as the standard SLE approach would require six animals for an analogous experiment. Similarly, multiple samplings of cell cultures can be carried from the same culturing plate(well)via SPME,resulting in cost saving while additionally eliminating inter-seeding errors typical of routine detection methods such as cytotoxicity assessments or immunohistochemical staining,since such methods require several seedings for time-course studies. In the currently presented study,attempts to utilize SPME for time-course analyses of in vitro 2D,in vitro 3D,and animal models of B16F10 cells were demonstrated. The results showed that SPME is an easy-to-use,simple, and effective tool for extraction of relevant compounds from various types of biological matrices. However, the several drawbacks already discussed in this work should be addressed in future experiments. One of the major issues encountered in this proof-of-concept work concerns the discrepancies in metabolite coverage between the in vitro 2D and in vitro 3D models and the in vivo animal model. As previously discussed, the encountered discrepancies are likely to be due to the extraction strategies utilized in this work and not biological factors. The proposed modifications of the sampling procedures should address these discrepancies.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    This work has been funded by the statutory grant from Nicolaus Copernicus University (Grant No.: 451). We would like to extend our gratitude to Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bremen, Germany) for providing the Q-Exactive Focus.

    Appendix A. Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2021.03.005.

    99热只有精品国产| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 色吧在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 1024手机看黄色片| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲图色成人| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| or卡值多少钱| www日本黄色视频网| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久久久性生活片| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| avwww免费| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 大香蕉久久网| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 色在线成人网| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 日本 av在线| 午夜影院日韩av| www日本黄色视频网| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 久久中文看片网| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 在线观看一区二区三区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产av在哪里看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 22中文网久久字幕| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久6这里有精品| 午夜激情欧美在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产在线男女| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲成人久久性| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 在线免费观看的www视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 欧美成人a在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 免费大片18禁| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲av美国av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 日韩成人伦理影院| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 观看免费一级毛片| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产视频内射| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 日本三级黄在线观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 搞女人的毛片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 欧美3d第一页| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产 一区精品| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 午夜福利18| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 99热精品在线国产| or卡值多少钱| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 嫩草影视91久久| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲图色成人| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| av天堂在线播放| 观看美女的网站| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 欧美日韩在线观看h| 欧美成人a在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国内精品宾馆在线| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 一级毛片我不卡| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产高清三级在线| 精品人妻视频免费看| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 久久久成人免费电影| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 色哟哟·www| 国产精华一区二区三区| 级片在线观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 午夜久久久久精精品| 色5月婷婷丁香| av天堂在线播放| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 在线国产一区二区在线| 波多野结衣高清作品| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久久久国内视频| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 黄色日韩在线| 午夜a级毛片| 色在线成人网| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 看片在线看免费视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 草草在线视频免费看| 六月丁香七月| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 热99在线观看视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | av.在线天堂| 亚洲av成人av| 国产美女午夜福利| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 免费看a级黄色片| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产精品永久免费网站| 午夜福利18| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 一级黄片播放器| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲四区av| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| or卡值多少钱| 99热精品在线国产| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产高清三级在线| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲第一电影网av| 美女免费视频网站| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日本免费a在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| www.色视频.com| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲四区av| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 我要搜黄色片| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 99热这里只有精品一区| 精品国产三级普通话版| 一级av片app| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 免费av观看视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 综合色av麻豆| 成人欧美大片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久久成人免费电影| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 美女大奶头视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产 一区精品| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久久人妻av系列| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 老女人水多毛片| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| videossex国产| 赤兔流量卡办理| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 国产成人aa在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 精品久久久噜噜| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 岛国在线免费视频观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 波多野结衣高清作品| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 99热只有精品国产| 99热精品在线国产| 综合色av麻豆| 久久久欧美国产精品| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲性久久影院| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 在线观看午夜福利视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 在线免费十八禁| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 99热全是精品| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 国产不卡一卡二| 日本在线视频免费播放| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日本熟妇午夜| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 黄色日韩在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产高潮美女av| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 简卡轻食公司| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久久久久久久久成人| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 日本黄大片高清| 三级毛片av免费| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 精品日产1卡2卡| 99热网站在线观看| av专区在线播放| or卡值多少钱| 看免费成人av毛片| 午夜免费激情av| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲最大成人av| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲成人久久性| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 在线a可以看的网站| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产高清激情床上av| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 久久久久久大精品| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 免费看av在线观看网站| av免费在线看不卡| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产精品,欧美在线| 内地一区二区视频在线| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 免费观看在线日韩| 一夜夜www| 久久久久久久久中文| 长腿黑丝高跟| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 最好的美女福利视频网| 在线免费十八禁| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 中国美女看黄片| 精品福利观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| videossex国产| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久久久久大精品| 少妇的逼水好多| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 九色成人免费人妻av| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 少妇丰满av| 成年免费大片在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 99久国产av精品国产电影| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | av国产免费在线观看| 99久国产av精品| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 精品日产1卡2卡| 成人国产麻豆网| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产精品三级大全| 成人精品一区二区免费| 色综合站精品国产| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 久久久成人免费电影| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| or卡值多少钱| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 一进一出抽搐动态| www.色视频.com| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 午夜福利18| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 一本精品99久久精品77| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 变态另类丝袜制服| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久久国产成人免费| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 久久6这里有精品| 国产乱人视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 舔av片在线| 插逼视频在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 成人av在线播放网站| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 欧美日本视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产三级中文精品| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产三级在线视频| 免费观看人在逋| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 日本色播在线视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 俺也久久电影网| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 成人二区视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 一本一本综合久久| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 久久久成人免费电影| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 日本免费a在线| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美|