• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    One extraction tool for in vitro-in vivo extrapolation? SPME-based metabolomics of in vitro 2D,3D,and in vivo mouse melanoma models

    2021-11-11 13:38:00KarolJarochPaulinaTaczynskaMartaCzechowskaJoannaBogusiewiczKamiluczykowskiKatarzynaBurlikowskaBarbaraBojko
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2021年5期

    Karol Jaroch, Paulina Taczyˊnska, Marta Czechowska, Joanna Bogusiewicz,Kamil ?uczykowski, Katarzyna Burlikowska, Barbara Bojko

    Department of Pharmacodynamics and Molecular Pharmacology,Faculty of Pharmacy,Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz,Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruˊn Poland, 85-089, Bydgoszcz, Poland

    Keywords:Solid-phase microextraction In vitro-in vivo extrapolation Metabolomics Melanoma B16F0 C57BL6 mouse model

    ABSTRACT Solid phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with high-resolution mass spectrometry was employed for the determination of metabolomic profile of mouse melanoma growth within in vitro 2D,in vitro 3D, and in vivo models. Such multi-model approach had never been investigated before. Due to the low-invasiveness of SPME, it was possible to perform time-course analysis, which allowed building time profile of biochemical reactions in the studied material. Such approach does not require the multiplication of samples as subsequent analyses are performed from the very same cell culture or from the same individual. SPME already reduces the number of animals required for experiment;therefore,it is with good concordance with the 3Rs rule (replacement, reduction, and refinement). Among tested models, the largest number of compounds was found within the in vitro 2D cell culture model, while in vivo and in vitro 3D models had the lowest number of detected compounds. These results may be connected with a higher metabolic rate, as well as lower integrity of the in vitro 2D model compared to the in vitro 3D model resulting in a lower number of compounds released into medium in the latter model.In terms of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation,the in vitro 2D model performed more similar to in vivo model compared to in vitro 3D model;however,it might have been due to the fact that only compounds secreted to medium were investigated. Thus, in further experiments to obtain full metabolome information, the intraspheroidal assessment or spheroid dissociation would be necessary.

    1. Introduction

    Arthur and Pawliszyn [1] first introduced solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in 1990. The principle of this extraction methodology lies in the equilibrium state established between the concentrations of analytes in the sample and the fiber's coating[2].SPME occurs only via the free fraction of analytes, and generally only applies to low molecular weight compounds(<1500 Da),as is the case for the majority of commercially available and lab-made extractive phases developed to date.When an SPME sampling device is immersed inside a sample containing binding macromolecules such as proteins(e.g.,enzymes),such compounds are unable to penetrate the extractive phase;thus,small compounds adsorbed(extraction occurs by physical interaction of analyte and the coating surface) or absorbed (extraction occurs by partitioning of analytes into coating phase) by the porous sorbent are protected from enzymatic degeneration[2].Consequently,small molecules with a short lifetime can be successfully extracted [3]. As mentioned before, SPME is an equilibrium-based sample preparation technique, which, together with low-recovery rates, can lead to nondepletive extraction; thus, the decrease of compounds in the sample as a function of extraction is often negligible.Moreover,by integrating the sample preparation and extraction steps, SPME drastically decreases sample consumption, thus enabling multiple extractions from the same set of samples over time. Indeed, SPME applications directed at sampling of biological samples are often referred to as“chemical biopsy”[4,5].Together,these properties of SPME enable the construction of time profiles of biochemical reactions in the studied matrices without the need for sample multiplication, as the original matrices can be conserved and continuously sampled over time. This, in turn, leads to a minimization of sample variability.Therefore,SPME seems to be a perfect analytical tool to be employed for the determination of analytes excreted by cell cultures, especially using 96-well plates, as the sample amount is significantly limited.

    In biological applications, SPME is also characterized by“balanced coverage”; in other words, SPME enables extraction of both polar and non-polar analytes from biological matrices.This is explained by the fact that while polar compounds have low affinity for the SPME sorbent, the low protein binding typical of these compounds in such matrices results in high free concentrations of these compounds.On the other hand,non-polar compounds,which have high affinity for SPME sorbents, are usually highly bound to proteins and other matrix components,and are thus present in low levels in their free concentrations. These two ‘balancing forces’together enable balanced extraction of both types of analytes by the sorbent from biological matrices in relatively similar amounts[6,7].

    For researchers, an important feature of in vitro assays lies in their ability to generate patterns similar to in vivo states. This approach is called in vitro-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE). The main goal of IVIVE studies is to design such an in vitro platform that in vivo animal-based tests are no longer be necessary during the drug development process.Having an in vitro assay that is accurate in terms of IVIVE would provide compliance with the 3Rs rule(replacement, reduction, and refinement) implemented to animal research [8]. Accurate in vitro assays would especially help in complying with replacement and reduction.In this respect,SPME is presented as an ideal sampling tool capable of fulfilling the animalresearch requirements for reliable IVIVE platforms, while also reducing environmental waste as well as enabling cost savings.Due to its minimally invasive nature, SPME enables monitoring of biosystem(s) without disturbing said systems, thus enabling multiple extractions from the very same cell culture as well as the same individual over time. Such an advantage largely reduces the number of biological replicates needed in such studies while also minimizing inter-sample variability. Conversely, in time-course analyses of tumor tissue in in vivo mouse model, traditional sample preparation techniques such as solid-liquid extraction (SLE)require a separate group of specimens for each time point planned in the experimental design due to their exhaustive nature, an approach that does not comply with the 3Rs rule.

    SPME has been widely applied in both targeted and untargeted analyses of complex matrices, including in a variety of metabolomics applications involving matrices such as biofluids and tissues, both for the purposes of selecting (untargeted) as well as monitoring (targeted) metabolites of interest i.e., potential biomarkers [9]. Coupling of SPME with high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), e.g., orbitrap mass spectrometer or time-offlight, enables detection of metabolites with high mass accuracy and thus precise identification of these low molecular weight compounds.SPME has also been shown to be suitable for extraction of metabolites excreted by cell cultures [10,11].

    Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) is widely used for metabolomics studies. An untargeted analysis allows for a wider insight into the overall metabolism of cells, while targeted analyses are ideal for monitoring of biomarkers.In order to compare different sample types,e.g.,in vitro and in vivo,and thus extrapolate findings, it is generally recommended that the same analytical workflow be adopted throughout the study for both types of samples, from sample preparation to LC-MS analysis. The fewer differences in analytical protocols, the more certain one may be that any variability in the final comparative results stem from biological factors,but not from divergences in the mentioned procedures that may have led to dissimilarities in compound coverage.The current ‘gold standard’analytical approach for sample preparation and extraction in in vitro cell studies is protein precipitation (PP), in which an organic reagent (e.g., methanol or acetonitrile, etc.) is added to the liquid sample to denature proteins and simultaneously extract organic compounds.The introduction of organic solution into in vitro cell cultures is a terminal protocol;thus,new samples are needed for each time point of the experiment.PP is most commonly selected for such applications due to its relative ease of use and efficiency;however, it necessitates new cell seedings for subsequent time points of the analysis,a disadvantage that in addition to being costly and time-consuming may also introduce biological variances, as immortalized cell lines are known to undergo changes between individual passages [12]. SLE, on the other hand, is the current ‘gold standard’ for in vivo model studies. However, application of SLE necessitates homogenization of tissue sample for analysis;thus,SLE is only suitable for ex vivo analysis. Previous studies have demonstrated that in vivo versus ex vivo metabolomics patterns may vary significantly. For instance, in previous work [3], in vivo SPME extracted 70 additional features when compared to ex vivo SPME,PP,or ultrafiltration.Only SPME,both in in vivo and ex vivo experiments,was capable of extracting very labile compounds such as β-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide and adenosine monophosphate.Furthermore, only in vivo SPME enabled precise determination of the ratio of glutathione to oxidized glutathione (2.5) as previously established in the literature; in other words, in vivo SPME was the only technique among the above mentioned that provided sufficient metabolism quenching[3].However,this study was carried out with the use of mouse blood as matrix;for a tissue-based approach,it is expected that the homogenization step (necessary for non-SPME approaches) would introduce even more discrepancies with respect to low abundance compounds in comparison to the in vivo state of this matrix.

    Given the previously described features of SPME, as well as limitations related to sample consumption when traditional techniques such as PP or SLE are used,we proposed the use of SPME for untargeted metabolomics of in vitro 2D and in vitro 3D cell cultures as well as in vivo mouse model of murine B16F10 melanoma with the aim to describe biochemical changes during tumor growth.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. General SPME protocol

    SPME fibers were manufactured in-house with 5 μm hydrophilic-lipophilic balanced particles kindly provided by Prof.Pawliszyn (University of Waterloo,Waterloo, Canada). The coating protocol was adopted from Gˊomez-Ríos et al. [13]. Coating length was 2 mm, and two layers of coating were applied to each fashioned device. All other chemicals were of LC-MS grade (Merck,Poznaˊn, Poland) unless stated otherwise. Preconditioning of SPME fibers was carried out overnight with a methanol:water solution(1:1,V/V)under static conditions.Fibers were rinsed with water for 5 s without agitation directly prior to extraction. Extractions from 96-well plates containing in vitro 2D and in vitro 3D cell cultures were carried out for 30 min by direct immersion of fibers in 100 μL of samples. In vivo sampling from a tumor was carried out by insertion of fibers into tissue for 15 min. Following extraction, in in vitro and in vivo experiments,fibers were rinsed with water for 5 s without agitation so as to remove any matrix components loosely attached to the fibers. Desorption was carried out in acetonitrile:water solution (4:1,V/V) for 90 min with orbital shaker agitation set at 1,200 rpm, using a desorption solution volume of 100 μL. Subsequently, extracts were submitted to instrumental analysis on an LC-MS system.

    2.2. General cell culture protocol

    A B16F10 cell line was cultivated at 37°C and 5%CO2with RPMI-1640 with L-glutamine and sodium bicarbonate (R8758, Sigma-Aldrich, Poznaˊn, Poland), with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biowest,Nuaillˊe, France), as well as antibiotics and antimycotic (A5955,Sigma-Aldrich, Poznaˊn, Poland) with addition of ciprofloxacin(17850, Sigma-Aldrich, Poznaˊn, Poland).

    2.3. In vitro 2D cell culture extraction protocol

    A total of 1000 cells per well were seeded on a 96-well plate.The SPME protocol was implemented following 24(T1),48(T2),and 72(T3) h of initial plating. Experiments were conducted on four separate cell culture replicates.A representative photograph of the sampling step is shown on Figs.1A and B [11].

    2.4. In vitro 3D cell culture extraction protocol

    A total of 1000 cells per well were seeded onto an ultra-low adhesive 96-well plate (Nunclon Sphera, U-bottom, Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The plate was gently transferred into a centrifuge and spun under 200gfor 4 min.The SPME protocol was carried out at 5(T1)and 8(T2)days of initial plating.Experiments were conducted on four separate cell culture replicates.A representative photograph of the sampling step is shown in Figs.1A and B [11].

    2.5. In vivo extraction protocol

    Adult male mice C57BL6/cmdb (6-8 weeks old) were utilized for this study. Animals were housed in a controlled environment under the following conditions:temperature(22±2)°C,12 h lightdark cycle, humidity (55 ± 10)%, with food and water available ad libitum. Mice were administered isoflurane and kept under anesthesia throughout the extraction procedure. The inguinal region part of the leg was sampled with SPME fibers (Fig.1B). In order to penetrate the skin,fibers were housed in hypodermic needles that were used to guide the fibers to the proper sampling location in the leg. Once the fiber coating was inserted into the tissue, the needle was removed. Sampling was performed before tumor inoculation(T0) then following inoculation with B16F10 cells (2 × 106per 100 μL phosphate buffer saline (PBS) per animal) [14]. Tumor sampling was carried out 10 days after inoculation, once tumors reached a size of ca. 5 mm in diameter (T1 on 10th day after inoculation) and after an additional 4 days (T2 on 14th day after inoculation).A total of two animals were used for experiments,and two fibers per animal were used for each time point. Once samplings for the last time point of sample collection were finished,the mice were sacrificed by manual cervical dislocation, resulting in euthanasia within approximately 10 s. The study was conducted under a research protocol reviewed and approved by the Local Ethical Committee on Animal Testing at the Faculty of Animal Breeding and Biology, University of Science and Technology in Bydgoszcz(Approval No.25/2018).All the procedures were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines, and all sampling procedures carried out on living animals were performed under anesthesia as described above, and all precautions were taken to minimize suffering.

    Fig.1.Solid phase microextraction(SPME)device for(A and B)in vitro 2D,in vitro 3D,and (C) in vivo sampling procedure.

    2.6. LC-HRMS analysis

    The LC-MS system consisted of a Dionex UltiMate 3000 RS autosampler, Dionex Ultimate 3000 RS pump (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany), and a Q-Exactive Focus high resolution mass spectrometer(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).

    Chromatographic separation was performed using reversed phase pentafluorophenyl(PFP)Discovery HS F5column(100 mm ⅹ2.1 mm, 3 μm, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) with mobile phase consisting of 99.9%water+0.1%formic acid(mobile phase A)and 99.9% acetonitrile + 0.1% formic acid (mobile phase B). The LC gradient for the PFP column was adopted from the study by Vuckovic and Pawliszyn [15] and consisted of the following gradient conditions:0-3 min 0%B,3-25 min linear gradient to 90%B,25-34 min 90%B,34-40 min 0%B,and a flow of 0.3 mL/min.All solvents and additives used for SPME and LC-MS analysis were of LC-MS grade.The injection order of all the three protocols(in vitro 2D,in vitro 3D and in vivo)was randomized for each set of samples,and fiber blanks and pooled quality control (QC) samples were utilized for background determination and data normalization,respectively. Fiber blanks were prepared by rinsing fibers with water for 5 s, then submitting fibers to the same preconditioning and desorption steps utilized for sampling fibers, as described above.

    The MS was operated in positive ionization mode, with heat assisted electrospray ionization ion source parameters set as follows: spray voltage 1500 V, capillary temperature 300°C, sheath gas 40 a.u.,auxiliary gas flow rate 15 a.u.,probe heater temperature 300°C, S-Lens RF level 55%. Data acquisition was performed via Xcalibur software v. 4.0. The MS was calibrated using Pierce LTQ Velos ESI Positive Ion Calibration Solution (88323, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany) every 72 h according to the manufacturer's protocol.

    2.7. Data processing and statistical analysis

    Datasets for each protocol carried out in this study, namely in vitro 2D, in vitro 3D, and in vivo, were analyzed individually, with each protocol being designated their own set of fiber blanks and pooled quality control(QC)samples.Data processing and statistical analyses were performed on Compound Discoverer 2.1. software(Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). The selected mass tolerance window was set to 3 ppm, the signal-to-noise threshold to 10,and the maximum sample-to-blank ratio to 5(where a value lower than 5 marked a feature as background). Minimal peak intensity was set to 5000. Pooled QC samples were used for data mean normalization with minimal QC coverage set to 50%and max QC area RSD set to 50%.Compounds were automatically annotated by Compound Discoverer 2.1 software using ChemSpider and the databases BioCyc, Human Metabolome Database, and KEGG with 3 ppm tolerance. Statistical software (ver 13.1 Dell Inc., Tulsa, OK,USA) was used for chart generation based on normalized data provided by Compound Discoverer 2.1 software. Scopus and PubMed databases were searched using phrases such as“B16”and“Metabolomics” or “B16F10” and “Metabolomics” to evaluate whether the annotated compounds were biologically important according to previous studies. The quality of the peaks picked by the Compound Discoverer 2.1 software was also scrutinized by a manual inspection of chromatograms.

    3. Results and discussion

    While the executed protocols did not consider quantitative analysis, qualitative comparisons between results obtained for subsequent experiments, i.e., in vitro 2D, in vitro 3D and in vivo experiments, were performed. After filtering of data to remove background compounds present in fiber blank samples and compounds that did not meet reproducibility requirements,compound counts were determined. For in vitro 2D analysis, a total of 54986 features constituting 8117 compounds were found, among which 810 unique compounds were positively identified using databases and 34 were found relevant to the B16F10 model(Figs. 2A-C). For in vitro 3D analysis, a total of 26998 features, 3933 compounds,with 680 hits and 16 compounds relevant to the B16F10 cell line were determined(Figs.2D-F).For in vivo analysis,a total of 35944 features,5946 compounds,785 compounds identified in databases,and 30 with biological meaning (Figs. 2G-I) were found.

    A comparison of total (unfiltered) numbers of features and putatively identified compounds found in the analyses showed that the best coverage was observed in the in vitro 2D model (Fig. 3).Considering in vitro models only, the number of compounds secreted into the sampled medium correlates with the metabolic capacity of cell cultures, which is connected with their proton production rate (PPR). The PPR, in turn, is related to glycolysis,which results in the production of lactate and protons (H+), and thus in the acidification of cell culture[16,17].The larger number of compounds found in the in vitro 2D cell line may be partially owed to the faster metabolism (higher PPR) of monolayer cultures as compared to spheroids,a phenomenon which has been previously reported in the literature [18]. Another cause of this result may concern the higher integrity of spheroid cultures than that of monolayer cultures. In a previous drug penetration study utilizing the hanging-drop technique, the authors concluded that the integrity of in vitro 3D spheroids hindered drug penetration as compared to that attained in the in vitro 2D model[19].As the cell intake rate in in vitro 3D is lower than that in in vitro 2D models,it is expected that the efflux into medium will also be slower. The hanging-drop and ultra-low adhesive in vitro 3D models (utilized in present study) can be considered to yield equivalent results, as both techniques result in spheroid formation. Since both techniques anchorage independently, i.e., no scaffolds or extracellular matrix used, the created spheroids are thus similar in terms of morphology [20]. Additionally, due to the much slower proliferation rate of the in vitro 3D model as compared to the in vitro 2D model, a longer incubation time for in vitro 3D cell cultures(eight days)was employed.This might have led to a decrease in medium components since the medium was not replaced or replenished during this time; therefore, the medium components were likely present in lower amounts than required for SPME-LC-HRMS detection.

    Fig.2.Scatter plots representing respectively numbers of features, compounds, and ChemSpider hits within (A-C) in vitro 2D model, (D-F) in vitro 3D model and (G-I) in vivo mouse melanoma model. Blue dots represent biologically important compounds.

    Fig.3.Chart representing the number of features and compounds per study group,with bars representing standard deviations.

    Fig.4.Chart representing insight into the in vivo count of features and compounds(A:mouse #1; B: mouse #2). Bars represent standard deviations.

    Given that SPME is an equilibrium-based approach,the amount of compounds that can be extracted from a matrix by a given coating strongly relies on various parameters, e.g., time, temperature, and matrix composition. Unsurprisingly, 30 min extractions from the in vitro 2D model enabled detection of more features than the 15 min extractions from the in vivo animal model.On the other hand, a slightly larger number of features/compounds were detected in the in vivo study as compared to the in vitro 3D model.These additional features/compounds may be owed to the presence of additional compounds associated with the increased blood flow typical of neoangiogenesis within the tumor tissue. Another possible explanation for this would be the contamination of fibers with blood during skin and tumor penetration. However, a recent study on the fundamental principles of SPME extraction demonstrated that SPME might enable faster mass transfer of certain compounds in tissue than in liquid samples. For the tested compounds,an equilibrium state was reached after 20 min of extraction from tissue as compared to a 60 min extraction in PBS solution.This phenomenon was explained by the presence of binding components in the tissue, e.g., proteins, which act as a reservoir for extracted molecules. SPME extracts via free concentration; therefore,the extracted molecules are replenished by the ones released from binding components as the system aims to reestablish equilibrium [21]. Accordingly, in a comparison between in vivo and in vitro assays, a larger number of features/compounds was found for the in vitro 2D model while the in vitro 3D and in vivo models yielded a similar number of compounds.

    The highest standard deviations (SD) were observed in the in vivo part of the study,which can be explained by inter-individual variability(Fig.4,T0).The further increases in SDs observed at the tumor growth stage (Fig. 4,T1) might be owed to the fact that the sampled tumor tissues were relatively small (around 4-5 mm) at this stage.It is also possible that the fibers were not inserted in the same tumor regions, namely, in the necrotic core or the highly proliferating outer layer.At the T2 sampling time,the tumor tissue had grown big enough so as to enable insertion of both fibers at the same tissue height, which contributed to a decrease in the intraanimal SD (Fig. 4, T2). Feature count differences between individual animals were 858,1063,and 261 for T0,T1,and T2,respectively.Since this work was a proof-of-concept study, only a minimum number of animals(2 animals;two fibers each per time point)were used to attain a sufficient number of samples for statistical comparisons with in vitro 2D and in vitro 3D models. In a study employing a traditional sample preparation method, a total of six animals would have been necessary for each time point since the tissue sample would have had to be homogenized for further sample preparation,necessitating that the animals be sacrificed at each sampling point. Undoubtedly, from this perspective, SPME is far superior to traditional approaches as far as compliance with the 3Rs rule is concerned.

    A database search revealed a total of 256 previously reported compounds related to the B16F10 cell line[22-35].In four of these studies, LC-MS was used for instrumental analysis [22-25] while NMR was employed in nine cases [26-35]. In vivo metabolomics was considered in eight cases [22,29-35]. Among them, only one study was performed with the use of MS as an analytical platform and B16 as a cancer model, with serum chosen as a matrix [22].Metabolomic analyses were carried out directly from the tumor tissue in four of the cited in vivo studies,while the other protocols sampled different tissues (e.g., spleen, liver, stomach) and/or biofluids (serum). Of note, none of the above-mentioned studies combined in vitro and in vivo samplings,utilized a in vitro 3D cell culture approach,or carried out time-course profiling.Such a gap in the literature suggests the need for a reliable untargeted metabolomic strategy serving IVIVE. In the current investigation, 42 biologically relevant compounds were putatively determined(Table 1).Among them,21 metabolites were found in the literature as described above (Table S1) [22-35]. The different numbers of detected and identified compounds as compared to the literature might be due to the different sample preparation techniques and/or different instrumental platforms used in the particular experiments, and/or different matrices employed.

    Table 1 Distribution of putatively identified compounds among different mouse melanoma models.

    The putatively identified compounds histidine, glutamic acid,leucine/isoleucine, and dipeptide Phe-Ans/Ans-Phe were the only compounds detected in all sample types (Fig. 5). As leucine andisoleucine have identical accurate masses, identification can be done based on retention time.As no authentic standards were used in this study to identify compounds, the amino acids were not assigned to the particular peaks in the chromatogram [36]. The mass tentatively identified as Phe-Ans or Ans-Phe based on the database search also corresponded to two chromatographic peaks.This is in good agreement with the literature[37].Within all tested models a positive relationship between leucine/isoleucine and cells number was observed, i.e., the larger cell number the higher peak area. Levels were stable throughout the tested time points for histidine and glutamic acid in the in vitro 2D cell culture,while an increasing trend over time was observed in in vitro 3D and in vivo models.Conversely,levels of Phe-Ans/Ans-Phe decreased over time in both in vitro assays as well as in vivo assays.

    Fig.5.Normalized areas of compounds detected in in vitro 2D model, in vitro 3D model, and in vivo mouse melanoma model (A: histidine; B: glutamic acid; C and D: leucine/isoleucine; E and F: Phe-Asn/Asn-Phe). Bars represent standard error. Note: for leucine/isoleucine and dipeptide Phe-Asn/Asn-Phe, two chromatographic peaks were detected.

    Purine derivatives are frequently found as biochemical biomarkers of various melanoma cell lines, including B16F10[23,25,30,31,33]. In our experiments we were able to characterize levels of hypoxanthine (Fig. 6A), arabinosylhypoxanthine (Fig. 6B)and xanthine (Fig. 6C). In all cases, an increase in levels of the aforementioned metabolites over time was observed. Other identified compounds included amino acids,vitamins(both groups were cell culture medium components), small peptides, and derivatives of the above listed medium components(Table S1,Fig.S1)[22-35].

    Fig.6.Normalized areas of purine derivatives(A:hypoxanthine;B:arabinosylhypoxanthine;C:xanthine)detected within in vitro 2D model,in vitro 3D model,and in vivo mouse melanoma model. Bars represent standard error.

    A total of 10 common compounds were detected in both in vitro 2D cell culture and in vivo models. However, no common compounds were found between the in vitro 3D and in vivo models(Table 1). In general, this finding runs counter to the wellestablished fact that spheroid cultures are more similar to in vivo states than monolayer cell cultures. This discrepancy might be explained by the fact that the SPME probe was inserted inside the tumor tissue during the in vivo procedure, whereas in the in vitro 3D model,fibers were positioned so as to extract metabolites from/via the medium.It is possible that many inter-spheroid metabolites either were not released from the spheroid altogether, or were present at concentrations that were too low to be detected.In order to achieve in-depth metabolomics characterization of the in vitro 3D model and provide a thorough comparison between in vivo tumors and the above-mentioned in vitro 3D model, intraspheroidal sampling must be employed in both cases. For such studies, miniaturization of the SPME probe should be utilized in a manner similar to that of previous experiments conducted on single cells[38].In that study,SPME probes consisting of a coating length of 150 μm with conical geometry (diameter varied in the range 10-30 μm) were used to characterize intracellular metabolites of Alium cepa cells. After 48 h, with inoculum of 1000 cells, a B16F10 hanging-drop in vitro 3D model generates spheroids of approx. 400 μm [39]. The mentioned examples certainly support that it may be possible to extract metabolites from the interior part of B16F10 in vitro 3D cell spheroids with the use of miniaturized SPME, consequently enabling an in vitro application that better reflects in vivo conditions.

    4. Conclusion

    A reliable analytical tool for IVIVE would enable further investigations of biological systems while significantly reducing the number of animals used during the drug development process.Given that SPME low-invasive sampling,the same animals could be used multiple times over the course of an investigation, thus significantly reducing the number of animals needed for such studies while additionally minimizing inter-sample variability. For instance,in this project,only two animals were needed to establish three time point samplings; conversely, traditional methods such as the standard SLE approach would require six animals for an analogous experiment. Similarly, multiple samplings of cell cultures can be carried from the same culturing plate(well)via SPME,resulting in cost saving while additionally eliminating inter-seeding errors typical of routine detection methods such as cytotoxicity assessments or immunohistochemical staining,since such methods require several seedings for time-course studies. In the currently presented study,attempts to utilize SPME for time-course analyses of in vitro 2D,in vitro 3D,and animal models of B16F10 cells were demonstrated. The results showed that SPME is an easy-to-use,simple, and effective tool for extraction of relevant compounds from various types of biological matrices. However, the several drawbacks already discussed in this work should be addressed in future experiments. One of the major issues encountered in this proof-of-concept work concerns the discrepancies in metabolite coverage between the in vitro 2D and in vitro 3D models and the in vivo animal model. As previously discussed, the encountered discrepancies are likely to be due to the extraction strategies utilized in this work and not biological factors. The proposed modifications of the sampling procedures should address these discrepancies.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

    Acknowledgments

    This work has been funded by the statutory grant from Nicolaus Copernicus University (Grant No.: 451). We would like to extend our gratitude to Thermo Fisher Scientific (Bremen, Germany) for providing the Q-Exactive Focus.

    Appendix A. Supplementary data

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2021.03.005.

    五月玫瑰六月丁香| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产高潮美女av| 深夜精品福利| 春色校园在线视频观看| 老女人水多毛片| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 成人二区视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美性感艳星| aaaaa片日本免费| 看片在线看免费视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久久久久久久大av| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 大香蕉久久网| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 三级经典国产精品| 久久久久久伊人网av| 色播亚洲综合网| 老司机福利观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲国产色片| 美女高潮的动态| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| ponron亚洲| 国产av不卡久久| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 欧美+日韩+精品| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 九九在线视频观看精品| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 又爽又黄a免费视频| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产色婷婷99| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 中文资源天堂在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久精品夜色国产| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 一级毛片电影观看 | 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| a级毛色黄片| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 91狼人影院| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 69人妻影院| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久久久国产网址| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | av福利片在线观看| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 色在线成人网| 一本久久中文字幕| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 精品国产三级普通话版| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久6这里有精品| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久久国产成人免费| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 综合色丁香网| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 日本五十路高清| 嫩草影院新地址| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲最大成人av| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 成年av动漫网址| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 成人二区视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 免费看日本二区| av福利片在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 六月丁香七月| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 97超视频在线观看视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 免费观看人在逋| 日本在线视频免费播放| 日本与韩国留学比较| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久久欧美国产精品| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 简卡轻食公司| 大香蕉久久网| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产 一区精品| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产三级在线视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 色吧在线观看| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 搞女人的毛片| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产视频内射| 不卡一级毛片| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 色av中文字幕| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 天堂网av新在线| 午夜福利18| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲色图av天堂| av免费在线看不卡| 老司机福利观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 成人无遮挡网站| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产高清激情床上av| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 日日撸夜夜添| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产高清激情床上av| 99热6这里只有精品| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久久久国产网址| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 午夜福利高清视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| www.色视频.com| 毛片女人毛片| 国产精品野战在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 欧美性感艳星| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 97碰自拍视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久久久久伊人网av| 免费看日本二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲av成人av| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 精品久久国产蜜桃| a级毛色黄片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 在线免费十八禁| 赤兔流量卡办理| 成人三级黄色视频| 精品久久久久久久末码| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 精品国产三级普通话版| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久久欧美国产精品| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 国产高清三级在线| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 我要搜黄色片| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产精品一及| 在线播放国产精品三级| 热99在线观看视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日韩高清综合在线| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久久久九九精品影院| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 精品久久久久久久末码| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| www日本黄色视频网| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 午夜福利在线在线| 夜夜爽天天搞| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产三级在线视频| videossex国产| 看黄色毛片网站| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 日韩欧美免费精品| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 一夜夜www| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产在线男女| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 哪里可以看免费的av片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| a级毛片a级免费在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲无线在线观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| or卡值多少钱| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| .国产精品久久| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产黄片美女视频| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 在线观看66精品国产| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| videossex国产| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 一本久久中文字幕| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 精品一区二区免费观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 变态另类丝袜制服| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产视频内射| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 久久久色成人| 日日啪夜夜撸| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 一本一本综合久久| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产乱人视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 日本 av在线| 老女人水多毛片| 国产成人福利小说| 内射极品少妇av片p| av卡一久久| av.在线天堂| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产精品一及| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 色av中文字幕| 精品午夜福利在线看| 18+在线观看网站| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 极品教师在线视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 99热6这里只有精品| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久久色成人| 永久网站在线| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 免费看光身美女| 国产精华一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 高清毛片免费看| 床上黄色一级片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 老司机福利观看| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日本一二三区视频观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| av在线亚洲专区| 97热精品久久久久久| 97碰自拍视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国内精品久久久久精免费| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 老司机福利观看| 有码 亚洲区| 精品福利观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产午夜精品论理片| 毛片女人毛片| 日韩中字成人| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 精品午夜福利在线看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产精品久久视频播放| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 色播亚洲综合网| 波多野结衣高清无吗| av在线老鸭窝| 欧美激情在线99| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日本三级黄在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频|