• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A New Safety Assessment Method Based on Belief Rule Base With Attribute Reliability

    2021-10-23 02:21:38ZhichaoFengWeiHeZhijieZhouXiaojunBanChanghuaHuandXiaoxiaHan
    IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica 2021年11期

    Zhichao Feng,Wei He,Zhijie Zhou,Xiaojun Ban,Changhua Hu,and Xiaoxia Han

    Abstract—Safety assessment is one of important aspects in health management.In safety assessment for practical systems,three problems exist:lack of observation information,high system complexity and environment interference.Belief rule base with attribute reliability (BRB-r)is an expert system that provides a useful way for dealing with these three problems.In BRB-r,once the input information is unreliable,the reliability of belief rule is influenced,which further influences the accuracy of its output belief degree.On the other hand,when many system characteristics exist,the belief rule combination will explode in BRB-r,and the BRB-r based safety assessment model becomes too complicated to be applied.Thus,in this paper,to balance the complexity and accuracy of the safety assessment model,a new safety assessment model based on BRB-r with considering belief rule reliability is developed for the first time.In the developed model,a new calculation method of the belief rule reliability is proposed with considering both attribute reliability and global ignorance.Moreover,to reduce the influence of uncertainty of expert knowledge,an optimization model for the developed safety assessment model is constructed.A case study of safety assessment of liquefied natural gas (LNG)storage tank is conducted to illustrate the effectiveness of the new developed model.

    I.INTRODUCTION

    WITH the increasing complexity of practical system,the difficulty of health management increases.Safety assessment is one of important means to ensure the reliability of system and it is applied to prevent failure [1]–[4].

    The safety assessment model applies multi-source observation information to estimate the safety state of complex system [5],[6].In the safety assessment for complex system,many excellent works have been conducted [7]–[11].For example,Ahmadiet al.[8] developed a safety assessment model based on data-driven model and a theorem of safety assessment is proposed,Syd Aliet al.[9] constructed a safety assessment framework based on fault tree analysis for automatic teller machine (ATM)system,Zhouet al.[10]proposed a hidden behavior prediction model for complex system based on belief rule base (BRB).

    In safety assessment for practical systems,three problems exist.Firstly,due to the high cost of complex system,large amounts of observation data cannot be gathered,especially fault data [12],[13].Moreover,a complex system contains many subsystems and each subsystem is interrelated.Experts can provide some knowledge about the complex system [14].However,the expert knowledge is not enough to build accurate safety assessment model and the accuracy of the knowledge-based safety assessment is limited in practical system [12].Thirdly,influenced by disturbance in engineering practice,the gathered system information may not be fully reliable and noise exists in the information [15].When the unreliable system information is used in the safety assessment model,its modeling accuracy is decreased.The above three problems in practical systems pose challenges for safety assessment.Hence,the gathered unreliable observation data and the expert knowledge should both be applied.The BRB model is developed based on fuzzy theory,Dempster-Shafer theory and IF-THEN rule,which can handle uncertain,vague and incomplete information [14],[16]–[18].Then,the BRB model with attribute reliability (BRB-r)is proposed and it is a more general BRB model,where the attribute reliability is further considered [15].In the BRB-r model,the environment noise is addressed by attribute reliability.So,in this way,the BRB-r model provides an excellent framework to address the above three problems.Thus,in this paper,a safety assessment model is constructed based on BRB-r.

    In the BRB-r model,the belief rule is constructed based on attributes by experts [19],[20].When the unreliable attributes are used in the BRB-r model,the reliability of belief rule is decreased and its output reliability is influenced.Moreover,due to the complex environment and the limitation of the experts themselves,the expert knowledge applied in the belief rule may not be fully reliable.Consequently,influenced by these two factors,the belief rule in the constructed model is unreliable and the reliability of its output is also decreased.In BRB-r,the belief rules are combined by the evidential reasoning (ER)algorithm to generate safety state of practical system [21],[22].It should be noted that in existing works of BRB-r,only the influence of unreliable attribute has been considered in the reliability of belief rule [15].The influence of unreliable expert knowledge cannot be addressed.On the other hand,the BRB-r model is an expert system that complexity is determined by the amount of belief rule.When the number of belief rules of BRB-r is too small,its modeling ability for complex system is influenced.On the contrary,once the number of belief rules is too large,the BRB-r model complexity increases and the constructed safety assessment model cannot be trained by the small amount of observation data [23]–[25].Thus,for safety assessment of complex system,some belief rules in BRB-r should be reduced and its structure should be adaptively adjusted according to the practical system.In existing studies of BRB,some researches have been conducted to optimize the model structure based on the effectiveness of the belief rule [19],and these methods are essentially data-driven structural adjustment method.In these methods,the reliability of attribute and expert knowledge is assumed to be fully reliable.Once the input characteristics and expert knowledge are unreliable,the belief rule is unreliable and its effectiveness has no meaning,and the assessment accuracy is decreased.Thus,to improve the accuracy of safety assessment model and reduce the model complexity adaptively,the unreliable belief rule should be reduced according to the influence of complex working environment.To solve the above two problems in safety assessment for complex system,a new safety assessment model based on BRB-r is developed in this paper,where a calculation method for the belief rule reliability is proposed.The belief rule in BRB-r is constructed based on the IF-THEN rule [26]–[28].Its structure is determined by experts and the unreliable attributes are used as inputs.The reliability of attributes and expert knowledge both influence the reliability of the belief rule.Once the expert knowledge is unreliable and uncertain,the constructed belief rule is unreasonable that influences its discriminate ability for safety states.The output framework of belief rule in BRB-r consists of singleton propositions and universal set.The residual belief degree assigned to the universal set is the global ignorance that is an important way to address uncertainty.The greater the global ignorance is,the less the belief rule will recognize the output state and the less effect a rule has on the model output.The global ignorance is determined by the uncertainty of attributes and the way the belief rule is constructed [20],[29].So,in this way,the global ignorance represents the influence of uncertainty of attributes and the expert knowledge applied to construct the belief rule.It should be noted that the influence of expert knowledge comes from its uncertainty and unreliability.The uncertainty and unreliability denote two different aspects of the expert knowledge.The reliability of expert knowledge is its objective aspect determined by the ability of experts while the uncertainty of expert knowledge is its subjective aspect determined by the personal judgement of experts.Moreover,uncertainty exists in the natural language of the experts that is influenced by the interference factors such as the working environment and the mood of the experts.Therefore,the uncertainty and unreliability of expert knowledge should both be handled in the constructed safety assessment model.Based on the above analysis,in this paper,a calculation method of the belief rule reliability is proposed with considering both attribute reliability and global ignorance for the first time.Then,the belief rule reliability is applied to adjust the structure of the developed model.The reduction threshold of belief rule reliability is determined according to the requirement of the practical system.It should be noted that the reduction threshold of the belief rule reliability should consider both the model complexity and modeling accuracy.In this paper,the reduction threshold of belief rule reliability is determined by experts.To deal with the influence of uncertainty expert knowledge,a new optimization model is constructed based on the projection covariance matrix adaption evolution strategy (P-CMA-ES)algorithm [15],[30].In the optimization model,the belief rule is adaptively reduced based on its reliability while the model parameters are trained.It should be noted that the parameters in the reduced belief rule are no longer used as training parameters.That is to say,after the training part,the number of parameters in the safety assessment model will be reduced,and its modelling accuracy can be guaranteed.

    The reminder of this paper is organized as follows.In Section II,the problems in the safety assessment for complex system are formulated and then a new safety assessment model based on BRB-r is developed.The calculation method of belief rule reliability is proposed in Section III with considering both attribute reliability and global ignorance.Then,in Section IV,the inference process of the developed model is presented.A case study is conducted in Section V.This paper is concluded in Section VI.

    II.PROBLEM FORMULATION

    In safety assessment,the amount and reliability of system observation information will directly affect the estimation accuracy of the safety assessment model.In this section,the problems in safety assessment for practical system are formulated and then a new safety assessment model based on BRB-r is developed.

    A.Problem Formulation of Safety Assessment

    There are three problems in safety assessment that can be concluded as follows.

    Problem 1:In engineering practice,limited by the monitoring costs and monitoring methods,a large number of high-value observation data cannot be gathered.In addition,for practical system,although some expert knowledge can be provided,the experts cannot construct its accurate mathematical model.Thus,the first problem in safety assessment for practical system is how to aggregate the gathered multi-source information to construct the following safety assessment model [31],[32].

    whereS(t)is the estimated safety state of practical system.x1(t),x2(t),...,xM(t)are theMcharacteristics.Eis the vector of model parameters andRdenotes the expert knowledge applied in the constructed model.

    Problem 2:In engineering practice,complex environment interference factors influence the reliability of the observation information and further influence the estimation accuracy of the safety assessment model.Moreover,when the safety assessment model is too complicated,the update time of model structure and parameters is long,and its modeling timeliness is limited,and a lot of system information is needed to construct an accurate safety assessment model.Then,how to adjust the safety assessment model with considering both model accuracy and complexity is the second problem.

    Problem 3:For practical system,experts cannot provide accurate information to construct the safety assessment model,and uncertainty exists in the expert knowledge.So,in this way,the initial safety assessment model may not be able to accurately assess the safety state of the practical system.Moreover,the unreliable gathered information also influences the model accuracy.Therefore,how to adjust the model structure and train the model parameters simultaneously is the third problem that needs to be solved.

    B.Construction of the New Safety Assessment Model

    To solve the above three problems in engineering practice,a new BRB-r based safety assessment model is proposed in this subsection.

    In the new safety assessment model,there are multiple belief rules and thekth rule is profiled as [15]

    wherex1,x2,...,xMare theMcharacteristics of the practical system.denote theMreference points of thekth belief rule of the system characteristics and they are determined by experts.D1,D2,...,DNare the safety state levels and β1,k,β2,k,...,βN,kare their corresponding belief degree.θkis the weight of thekth belief rule.δ1,δ2,...,δMare the weight of theMcharacteristics andr1,r2,...,rMrepresent their radiabilities.Lis the number of the belief rule in the constructed safety assessment model based on BRB-r.Rkdenotes the reliability of thekth belief rule and it is calculated based on the characteristic reliability and global ignorance.The belief rule reliability can quantitatively measure the influence of unreliable characteristics and unreliable expert knowledge.The modeling process of the developed safety assessment model is shown in Fig.1.

    III.CALCULATION METHOD OF BELIEF RULE RELIABILITY

    The reliability of belief rule in BRB-r represents the influence degree of the unreliable attributes and unreliable expert knowledge to the belief rule.In the constructed safety assessment model,the belief rule reliability is applied as the key characteristic for model reduction.Thus,in this section,with considering both attribute reliability and expert knowledge reliability,a calculation method of belief rule reliability is proposed.

    Fig.1.The safety assessment model with both considering model complexity and accuracy.

    In the BRB-r based safety assessment model,the reliability of belief rule consists of two parts:the attribute reliability and the expert knowledge reliability.The reliability of belief rule is represented by

    The authors in [15] proposed a calculation method of attribute reliability based on the statistical method,where the disturbance factors are assumed to be static and the attribute reliability is a constant.In this paper,assume that the disturbance factors are static.Hence,the attribute reliability is calculated by

    whereTis the number of observation data.yirepresents the sum of unreliable observation data that can be eliminated by the fluctuation range.τ is the adjustment coefficient of the fluctuation range and represents the requirement of the complex system.When the observation data is reliable and little noise exists,the observation data can represent the system information andyi,j=1,j=1,2,...,T;otherwise,yi,j=0.Then,.

    In the output of belief degree,the global ignorance is the residual belief degree that cannot be distinguished which safety state should be assigned.It is generated because of the influence of expert knowledge and attribute.When the expert knowledge is unreliable,the ability of the constructed belief rule to discriminate the safety states of complex system is decreased.In other words,limited by the ability of experts,the recognition ability of the constructed belief rule is constrained.Thus,the global ignorance in the output of the belief rule can be used to calculate the reliability of expert knowledge [15],[33].Then,the reliability of belief rule can be calculated by

    wherer1,r2,...,rMare the comprehensive radiabilities of attributes.(1?βD,k/κ)is the reliability of expert knowledge in thekth belief rule,and κ is the scale factor that represents the influence ratio of attribute uncertainty and unreliability expert knowledge.As shown in the above formula,once the global ignorance βD,kis 0,the unreliability expert knowledge does not influences the belief rule reliability and the reliability of the belief rule is only influenced by the reliability of attributes.

    Remark 1:There is need to explain the effectiveness of attribute uncertainty,attribute reliability,expert knowledge uncertainty and expert knowledge reliability.In the BRB-r based safety assessment model,the uncertainty in attribute exists in qualitative knowledge,such as natural language,and it is mainly caused by incomplete information,inconsistent source,inaccurate expression.For the attribute reliability,it represents the influence of the disturbance factors,such as environment noise,and it is the objective aspect of the characteristic.The uncertainty of expert knowledge is the incompleteness,approximation and randomness in the natural language,and it may be influenced by the environment and other factors.In the BRB-r based safety assessment model,the uncertainty of expert knowledge can be addressed by the optimization model based on the gathered observation data.The reliability of expert knowledge represents the expert’s own ability and has nothing to do with external factors.

    IV.THE SAFETY ASSESSMENT MODEL BASED ON BRB-R

    In this section,a new safety assessment model based on BRB-r with considering belief rule reliability is developed.In the new safety assessment model,its structure is adaptively adjusted based on the belief rule reliability while its estimation accuracy is the optimization goal.So,in this way,the model complexity and accuracy can be both considered.In this section,the modeling process of the constructed safety assessment model based on BRB-r is presented in Section IVA,and then an optimization model is constructed based on the P-CMA-ES algorithm in Section IV-B.In Section IV-C,the modeling process of the developed model for complex system is presented.

    A.Inference Process of the New Safety Assessment Model

    The reliability of belief rule is determined by the attribute reliability and the expert knowledge reliability,and its calculation method is shown in Section III.Influenced by the unreliability belief rule,the accuracy of the estimated safety state generated by the ER algorithm is decreased.In addition,the BRB-r model is an expert system that complexity is determined by the number of belief rules.Thus,the unreliable belief rule should be eliminated.In general,in the BRB-r based safety assessment model,the unreliable belief rule will not only affect the accuracy of the model output,but also increase the complexity of the model.Thus,the structure and accuracy of the BRB-r based safety assessment model should both be considered and the inference process is presented in this section.

    When the observation data is available,due to the different formats of observation data for different characteristics,the observation data of characteristics cannot be aggregated directly.Thus,the observation data should be converted into a uniform format by the following formula [34],[35].

    wherexi(k+1)andxikare the reference values of theith characteristic in the (k+1)th and thekth belief rule,respectively.denotes the input of theith characteristic.Lis the numbers of the belief rules in the constructed model.

    Based on the frame of the belief rule as shown in (2),the total matching degree of the multiple characteristics can be obtained by the following formulas.

    where αkis the matching degree of theMinput characteristics to thekth belief rule.Cidenotes the new weight with considering the weight and reliability of theith attribute.represents the relative weight of theith attribute [15].Note that 0≤≤1.

    Once the observation information of system is available,it will activate the belief rules in the safety assessment model and the activation weights can be calculated by

    wherewkis the activation weight of thekth belief rule,which is determined by the input of system characteristics.The activation weight represents the effectiveness of the model inputs to the belief rule.θkdenotes the weight of thekth belief rule andLis the number of the belief rule in the BRB-r model.

    When the belief rule is unreliable,the estimated output is influenced and it increases the complexity of the safety assessment model.Thus,these belief rules should be eliminated according to the practical system.To adaptively adjust the structure of safety assessment model in the optimization model,the belief rule is reduced based on its reliability by

    whereRthresholdis the reduction threshold of the belief rule,and it can be determined by experts according to the model complexity and accuracy requirement.Once the reliability of belief rule cannot meet the requirement,the effectiveness of the belief rule is set to 0 andwk=0.So,in this way,the structure of the constructed safety assessment model can be adjusted.

    Then,after the activation weights of the belief rules are calculated,they can be combined by the ER algorithm and its analytic algorithm is shown as

    where βnis the belief degree of thenth safety state generated by the developed safety assessment model.Note that+βD=1.βDis the residual belief degree unassigned to any safety state,and it is influenced by the uncertainty of expert knowledge and unreliable expert knowledge.In the new safety assessment model,βDis used to calculate the belief rule reliability.L′is the number of the belief rule that satisfies the reliability requirement.

    After the belief degree of each safety state has been obtained,the final safety state of complex system can be calculated by

    whereu(Di)is the utility of theith safety levelDi,which is determined by experts according to the safety state of the practical system.denotes the final estimated safety state of the complex system.

    Remark 2:In the inference process of the developed safety assessment model,the attribute reliability and the residual belief degree are used to calculate the belief rule reliability.Once the belief rule reliability is lower than the thresholdRthreshold,the weight of the belief rule is set to 0 and it will not influence the final output of the safety assessment model.

    B.Optimization Model for the New Safety Assessment Model

    The initial safety assessment model is constructed based on the expert knowledge.Due to the complexity of practical system,the experts cannot provide accurate system information and uncertainty exists in the expert knowledge.Moreover,limited by the ability of experts,the expert knowledge may not be fully reliable.So,in this way,the safety assessment model constructed by the expert knowledge cannot estimate the safety state of complex system accurately.Thus,the gathered observation data should be applied to adaptively adjust the structure and parameters according to the practical system,and an optimization model for the new safety assessment model is developed in this subsection.

    In the BRB-r based safety assessment model,the optimization parameters consist of attribute weights,belief rule weights and belief degree in output of belief rules.There are two parts in the optimization model:the structure adjustment and parameter optimization.For the structure adjustment of the safety assessment model,once the reliability of belief rule cannot meet the requirement,its weight is set to 0 and its output belief degree is not trained in the optimization model.In addition,the BRB-r model is an expert system whose parameters must have physical meaning.Therefore,it parameters should be trained in constraints.Based on the original physical meaning,the constraints of optimization parameters can be listed as

    The mean square error (MSE)between the estimated safety state and actual safety state can represent the accuracy of the safety assessment model,and it can be calculated by the following formula [30].

    whereoutputactualis the actual safety state of the complex system,which is determined by experts according to the system mechanism.outputestimateddenotes the estimation output of the safety assessment model and it is calculated by(14).

    The optimization goal is to minimize the error between the actual safety state and the estimated safety state by the constructed model.Hence,the optimization model of the safety state assessment model can be profiled as

    Remark 3:In the optimization model,the parameters need to be trained and the model structure is adjusted adaptively by the reliability of belief rule simultaneously.It should be noted that when the belief rule reliability is lower than the threshold,the rule weight is set to 0 and its output belief degree is not trained in the training part.That is to say,the belief rule does not work in the constructed safety assessment model.So,in this way,the model structure can be adjusted according to the practical system,and the constructed safety assessment model can address the influence of the unreliable characteristics and the unreliable expert knowledge.Thus,by the optimization process,the accuracy of the optimization model can be improved while its model complexity is decreased.

    C.Modeling Process of the New Safety Assessment Model

    The modeling process of the new safety assessment model can be concluded by the following steps.

    Step 1:Construct the safety assessment model based on BRB-r.Note that the structure and parameters of the initial safety assessment model are both determined by experts.

    Step 2:Calculate the reliability of characteristics based on the calculation method presented in Section III,and the reliability reduction threshold of belief rule is determined by experts.

    Step 3:Reduce the belief rule based on the attribute reliability and global ignorance in belief rule output.At the same time,the parameters in the residual belief rules are optimized by the training data.

    Step 4:Test the optimized safety assessment model by the testing data.Note that in the testing part,the structure of the safety assessment model is not needed to be adjusted adaptively while its parameters of the safety assessment model are not changed.

    V.CASE STUDY

    To illustrate the effectiveness of the developed model,a case study of safety assessment for liquefied natural gas(LNG)storage tank in Hainan province,China,is conducted.

    A.Problem Formulation in Safety Assessment Model for LNG Storage Tank

    In this section,the LNG storage tank in Hainan province,China,is selected as the experimental object.The LNG is applied as one of the important energy sources that is increasingly used in China.In Hainan province,two storage tanks have been built by reclaiming land from the sea as shown in Fig.2.In this way,the foundation of the storage tank is unstable,and influenced by the excessive pressure of the storage tank,uneven settlement may occur in the LNG storage tank.Once the storage tank is unevenly settled,it will cause cracks in the storage tank,which will further lead to the LNG leakage and safety accidents.Thus,it is necessary to estimate the safety state accurately [10],[36].

    Fig.2.LNG storage tank in Hainan province,China.

    In the safety assessment of the LNG storage tank,due to its high cost,a large number of experiments cannot be conducted.Therefore,the number of observation data that can be gathered is small,and an accurate safety assessment model based on the quantitative data cannot be established.Moreover,due to the influence of the disturbance factors in practical environment,noise exists in the gathered observation information,and its reliability is decreased.On the other hand,the LNG storage tank is a typical complex system,where many subsystems exist and they are related to each other.The experts cannot provide accurate information for the storage tank and an analytical model cannot be obtained.So,it is necessary to aggregate the expert knowledge and the gathered observation data to construct the safety assessment model for the LNG storage tank,and the unreliability of the gathered information needs to be solved.When the expert knowledge and the characteristics are unreliable,the reliability of the belief rule is influenced,which further influences the accuracy of the safety assessment model.In addition,the number of belief rule determines the complexity of the safety assessment model.Consequently,to improve the estimation accuracy and decrease the model complexity,in the training part,the belief rule in the rule base should be adjusted by its reliability adaptively according to the actual working environment of the LNG storage tank.Thus,in the experiment,a new safety assessment model for the LNG storage tank is constructed based on the developed model in this paper.

    In the experiment,12 monitoring points are installed in the storage tank,and 42 sets of observation data are gathered from 2012 to 2019.Based on the analysis of the structure and location of the storage tank,the first monitoring point (FP)and the seventh monitoring point (SP)are selected by experts as two attributes of the BRB-r model.The observation data of these two attributes are shown in Fig.3.It can be seen from Fig.3 that the LNG storage tank’s settlement is irregular over time and has a large change range.Based on the building deformation measurement specifications (JGJ8-2007),the greater the gap between the two monitoring points is,the lower the safety state of the LNG storage tank is.Hence,the actual safety state of the LNG storage tank is determined by experts at each monitoring point.It should be noted that the actual safety state of the LNG storage tank should also consider its location.

    Fig.3.The observation data of FP and SP.

    Remark 4:In engineering practice,there are several factors that lead to the LNG storage tank failure,such as the uneven settlement,uneven filling of the insulation material,the failure of the vacuum and the residual gas inside the tank,etc.Based on the investigation in Hainan LNG Company,the uneven settlement should be paid more attention to in the face of other failure factors by the construction mode of the storage tank.So,in this paper,the uneven settlement is selected as the major concern and assume that the other aspects of the storage tank are normal.

    B.Construction of the Adaptive Safety Assessment Model for LNG Storage Tank

    To solve the above analyzed problems and improve the safety assessment accuracy for the LNG storage tank,in this subsection,an adaptive safety assessment model is constructed based on the developed model.

    In the constructed safety assessment model,the first monitoring point and the seventh monitoring point are selected as two attributes,represented byFPandSP,respectively.The safety state of the LNG storage tank is divided into three levels:the high safety state (H),the medium safety state (M)and the low safety state (L).Based on (2),the belief rule in the BRB-r based safety assessment model can be profiled as

    whereyis the estimated safety state of the LNG storage tank.In the training process,once the reliability of thekth belief ruleRkdoes not satisfy the requirement,its rule weight θkis set to 0 and it has no effect in the safety assessment model.

    The reference point indicates the degree of division of the characteristics.It should be noted that the number of the reference points determines the complexity and accuracy of the safety assessment model.Thus,in this experiment,five reference points ofFPandSPare selected:low (L),slightly low (SL),medium (M),slightly high (SH),high (H).For the reference values ofFPandSP,they should be determined by experts in accordance with the three principles of uniform distribution,covering the variation range of two characteristics and focusing on the data-intensive area.Thus,combined with the characteristics of the storage tank under different working states,the reference values ofFPandSPare given by experts as shown in Tables I and II.Moreover,three reference points are selected for safety state and their reference values are shown in Table III.

    Based on the reference value of both attributes and (21),the parameters in the initial safety assessment model can be given by experts.As shown in Table IV,all the belief rules are assumed to be fully important and two characteristics are assumed to be fully important.In the initial safety assessment model,the expert knowledge is assumed to be fully reliable and the global ignorance of each belief rule is set to 0.

    TABLE I REFERENCE POINT AND VALUE OF FP

    TABLE II REFERENCE POINT AND VALUE OF SP

    TABLE III REFERENCE POINT AND VALUE OF THREE SAFETY STATES

    C.Training and Testing of the Constructed Safety Assessment Model

    In the initial safety assessment model,due to the uncertainty of expert knowledge,its estimation accuracy is influenced.Moreover,as shown in Table IV,there are 25 belief rules in the safety assessment model and 127 parameters exist.However,in the experiment,only 42 sets of observation data have been gathered,which cannot adequately train the model parameters.On the other hand,due to the disturbance factors in actual working environment and the limitation of the expert’s own capabilities,the characteristics and the expert knowledge are not fully reliable.As profiled in (21),once the characteristics and the expert knowledge are unreliable,the reliability of the belief rule in the assessment model is influenced.These unreliable belief rules not only influence the accuracy of the safety assessment model but also increase the model complexity.Thus,these unreliable belief rules should be eliminated.Based on the optimization model developed in Section IV-B,in the training process,the structure of the safety assessment model is adjusted while the parameters are optimized.

    In this section,the reduction threshold of the reliability of belief rule is determined by experts andRk=0.3,it is determined by experts according to the estimation accuracy and model complexity.On the basis of the training data and the constructed optimization model,the safety assessment can be optimized as shown in Table V.The estimated output of the new safety assessment model is shown in Fig.4.As shown in Fig.4,the developed model can estimate the safety state of the LNG storage tank accurately,and the MSE of the developed safety assessment model is 0.0509.There are 22 belief rules and 112 parameters in the optimized safety assessment model.The number of the parameters of the optimized model reduces 11.8% and the number of belief rule reduces 12% compared with the initial safety assessment model.Although some observation points cannot be accurately assessed,the error does not exceed half of the actual safety state of the LNG storage tank,which can still provide a reference for decision-making in engineering practice.

    Fig.4.Estimated safety state of the developed model.

    TABLE IV INITIAL BRB-R BASED SAFETY ASSESSMENT MODEL

    TABLE V OpTIMIzED BRB-R BASED SAFETY ASSESSMENT MODEL

    Fig.5.Relationship between reduction threshold of belief rule reliability and number of belief rule.

    Fig.6.Relationship between MSE of the developed model and reduction threshold of belief rule reliability.

    Fig.7.Relationship between error of the developed model and reduction threshold of belief rule reliability.

    The complexity of the developed safety assessment model is determined by the number of the belief rules,and there is a direct relationship between the reduction threshold of belief rule reliability and the complexity of the safety assessment model.As shown in Fig.5,when the reduction threshold of the belief rule reliability changes from 0.1 to 1,the amount of belief rule gradually decreases.The experiment is conducted for 40 times.WhenRk>0.3,the number of belief rules quickly decreases,and once the reduction threshold is greater than 0.6,the number of belief rules becomes 0.On the other hand,as the reduction threshold of the belief rule reliability changes,the accuracy of the safety assessment model also changes.As shown in Figs.6 and 7,when the reduction threshold of belief rule reliability changes from 0.1 to 1,the MSE and error of the constructed safety assessment model first decrease and then increase,and whenRk>0.6,the model MSE and error between actual safety state and estimated output become infinite.That is to say,as the reduction threshold increases from 0.1 to 1,the estimation accuracy of the developed model first increases and then decreases,and the best accuracy of the safety assessment model isRk=0.3.Moreover,as the reduction thresholdRkincreases,the distribution range of MSE first decreases and then increases.Thus,the robustness of the safety assessment model first increases and then decreases.Consequently,in this way,we can obtain a conclusion that the reduction threshold of belief rule reliability can influence the complexity and accuracy of the developed safety assessment model.For practical systems,the reduction threshold of the belief rule reliability cannot be greater than 0.5,and 0

    D.Comparative Studies

    To illustrate the effectiveness of the developed safety assessment model in this paper,comparative studies are conducted in this subsection.

    First,the safety assessment model developed in this paper is constructed based on BRB-r while its structure is adjusted according to the belief rule reliability.In the safety assessment model based on the traditional BRB-r model,its structure is not changed and only the model parameters are trained.Compared with the traditional BRB-r model,the complexity of the proposed safety assessment model in this paper decreases.Moreover,the BRB-r model is one of the expert systems,where the observation data and expert knowledge are aggregated simultaneously.For the LNG storage tank,there are only 42 monitoring data,which is a typical small sample problem,and it is also a complex system.Consequently,in this subsection,comparative studies with the traditional BRBr model,BP neural network and fuzzy inference method are conducted.

    The MSEs of the developed safety assessment model in this paper,the safety assessment models developed by the traditional BRB-r model,the BP neural network and the fuzzy inference method are shown in Table VI.The MSE of the fuzzy inference method is 0.1160,where the initial rule base is determined by experts and the inputs are the observation data of the two characteristics of the LNG storage tank [12].Moreover,the MSE of the BP neural network is 0.0837,where the training data and the testing data are same as the developed model in this paper,and the number of iterations and learning rate are set to 500 and 0.1,respectively.Therefore,compared with the BP neural network and the fuzzy inference method,the new developed safety model based on BRB-r can aggregate the observation data and expert knowledge,and its estimation accuracy is improved by 56.1%and 39.1%,respectively.The MSE of the safety assessment model based on traditional BRB-r is 0.0722,where the model structure is not changed.Assume that the expert knowledge applied in the two BRB-r models is same.That is to say,the reliability of expert knowledge in the two models is same that can be handled by the new developed model.Compared with the traditional BRB-r model,the accuracy of the proposed model improves 29.5%.Moreover,compared with the safety assessment model developed in this paper,there are 25 belief rules and 127 parameters in the safety assessment model developed by the traditional BRB-r model.The complexity of the new proposed model is decreased and its accuracy is higher than that of the traditional BRB-r model.Thus,the developed model can handle the unreliable observation data and the unreliable expert knowledge better,which is more suitable for modeling practical systems.

    TABLE VI COMpARATIvE STUDIES

    VI.CONCLUSION

    In this paper,a new safety assessment model with model structure adaptive adjustment is developed to solve three problems in engineering practice:lack of observation data,high system complexity and environment interference factors.To deal with the influence of the unreliable belief rule to the model accuracy and complexity,a new calculation method of belief rule reliability is proposed,where the reliability of system characteristics and the reliability of expert knowledge are both considered.In the optimization model of the developed safety assessment model,its structure is adjusted adaptively while the model parameters are optimized.In this way,the new belief rule base with attribute reliability (BRB-r)based safety assessment model can be adjusted according to the practical system.

    There are three innovations in this paper.Firstly,for practical system,to solve the lack of observation data,high complexity of system and complex environment interference factors,a new safety assessment model based on BRB-r is developed.Secondly,limited by the ability of the experts and influenced by the unreliable observation data,the belief rules in the constructed safety assessment model may not be fully reliable.These unreliable belief rules cannot estimate the safety state of complex system,but increase the complexity of the safety assessment model.Therefore,a new calculation method of belief rule is developed to reduce the model structure.Lastly,to consider both the model accuracy and complexity,an optimization model is constructed to adaptively adjust the model structure based on belief rule reliability and optimize the model parameters.

    In the case study for the LNG storage tank in Hainan province,China,only the uneven settlement is considered and we assume that the storage tank is not affected by other factors,such as uneven filling of the insulation material.In practical system,these failure causes should be considered simultaneously.Moreover,in this paper,the developed BRB-r based safety assessment model is a general method.Some specific problems in other areas,such as traffic control,need to be further studied and the BRB-r based safety assessment model should also be adjusted according to the subject.These challenges need to be solved in future works.

    免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 免费av毛片视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 97超视频在线观看视频| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久精品人妻少妇| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 久久午夜福利片| 99热这里只有精品一区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 丰满的人妻完整版| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产精品一及| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 香蕉av资源在线| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 级片在线观看| 不卡一级毛片| 精品午夜福利在线看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 一本久久中文字幕| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 亚洲第一电影网av| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 88av欧美| 51国产日韩欧美| 日日夜夜操网爽| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 久久久久久大精品| 国产单亲对白刺激| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲av美国av| 国产成人av教育| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| av在线蜜桃| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 日本成人三级电影网站| 天堂动漫精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲四区av| 极品教师在线视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 日本黄大片高清| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 搞女人的毛片| 国产成人aa在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 少妇的逼好多水| 欧美zozozo另类| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产黄片美女视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产av在哪里看| 99热只有精品国产| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 免费看光身美女| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩中字成人| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久久久久久久中文| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| videossex国产| aaaaa片日本免费| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 免费看光身美女| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 美女大奶头视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久午夜福利片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 悠悠久久av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 久久久国产成人免费| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| av中文乱码字幕在线| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 小说图片视频综合网站| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 69人妻影院| 如何舔出高潮| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 午夜福利18| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 舔av片在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 久久久久久久久大av| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| av在线亚洲专区| 午夜影院日韩av| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 性色avwww在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 日韩欧美三级三区| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲图色成人| 精品福利观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产免费男女视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 日本免费a在线| 99热这里只有精品一区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 日本免费a在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| ponron亚洲| 日本 欧美在线| 日日夜夜操网爽| 草草在线视频免费看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 嫩草影院精品99| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | av天堂在线播放| 日韩强制内射视频| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 少妇丰满av| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 热99在线观看视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 午夜福利18| 在线免费十八禁| 国产黄片美女视频| 久久6这里有精品| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产精品伦人一区二区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧美色视频一区免费| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 中文字幕久久专区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 一夜夜www| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 18+在线观看网站| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 99热6这里只有精品| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久久久国内视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 午夜久久久久精精品| 美女免费视频网站| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产精品无大码| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 床上黄色一级片| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 日本熟妇午夜| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 夜夜爽天天搞| 免费av不卡在线播放| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 91在线观看av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 九色国产91popny在线| 悠悠久久av| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 日本成人三级电影网站| 欧美激情在线99| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 中文资源天堂在线| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产免费男女视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 看片在线看免费视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久久精品大字幕| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产视频内射| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 色吧在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 尾随美女入室| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 三级毛片av免费| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 有码 亚洲区| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 69av精品久久久久久| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 91在线观看av| avwww免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 午夜福利在线在线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美+日韩+精品| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| avwww免费| 亚洲图色成人| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 日本与韩国留学比较| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久久久久大精品| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产老妇女一区| 禁无遮挡网站| av在线蜜桃| 在线免费十八禁| 此物有八面人人有两片| 51国产日韩欧美| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 午夜影院日韩av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 欧美性感艳星| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 99久久精品热视频| 在线看三级毛片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 亚洲图色成人| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 久久九九热精品免费| 色综合色国产| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 亚洲图色成人| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 欧美潮喷喷水| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 全区人妻精品视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 午夜激情欧美在线| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 极品教师在线免费播放| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 午夜福利18| 很黄的视频免费| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 熟女电影av网| 久久久久国内视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲av熟女| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久久久久久久久久成人| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产色婷婷99| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 97超视频在线观看视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 午夜福利欧美成人| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 一区福利在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 黄片wwwwww| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 美女免费视频网站| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 免费看av在线观看网站| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 色在线成人网| 一级av片app| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲国产色片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 精品国产三级普通话版| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产精品久久视频播放| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 少妇的逼水好多| videossex国产| 国产av在哪里看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 少妇丰满av| 国产在线男女| 成人无遮挡网站| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 成年免费大片在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| а√天堂www在线а√下载| ponron亚洲| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 91狼人影院| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 91av网一区二区| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 成人国产麻豆网| 久久久精品大字幕| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 国产精品三级大全| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 69av精品久久久久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 黄色配什么色好看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久久久久久久久大av| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址|