• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A Spatial-Temporal Network Perspective for the Propagation Dynamics of Air Traffic Delays

    2021-08-30 07:09:00QingCaiSameerAlamVuDuong
    Engineering 2021年4期

    Qing Cai,Sameer Alam*,Vu N.Duong

    School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,Nanyang Technological University,Singapore 639798,Singapore

    Keywords:

    Air traffic Transport systems Delay propagation dynamics Spatial-temporal networks

    ABSTRACT Intractable delays occur in air traffic due to the imbalance between ever-increasing air traffic demand and limited airspace capacity.As air traffic is associated with complex air transport systems,delays can be magnified and propagated throughout these systems,resulting in the emergent behavior known as delay propagation.An understanding of delay propagation dynamics is pertinent to modern air traffic management.In this work,we present a complex network perspective of delay propagation dynamics.Specifically,we model air traffic scenarios using spatial-temporal networks with airports as the nodes.To establish the dynamic edges between the nodes,we develop a delay propagation method and apply it to a given set of air traffic schedules.Based on the constructed spatial-temporal networks,we suggest three metrics—magnitude,severity,and speed—to gauge delay propagation dynamics.To validate the effectiveness of the proposed method,we carry out case studies on domestic flights in the Southeastern Asia region(SAR)and the United States.Experiments demonstrate that the propagation magnitude in terms of the number of flights affected by delay propagation and the amount of propagated delays for the US traffic are respectively five and ten times those of the SAR.Experiments further reveal that the propagation speed for US traffic is eight times faster than that of the SAR.The delay propagation dynamics reveal that about six hub airports in the SAR have significant propagated delays,while the situation in the United States is considerably worse,with a corresponding number of around 16.This work provides a potent tool for tracing the evolution of air traffic delays.

    1.Introduction

    Air transport is pivotal to modern traffic,as it facilitates our lives.Characterized by its high level of safety and fast speed,air transport is prioritized by travelers,resulting in the phenomenal growth of air traffic demands[1,2].Air transport is associated with air transport systems,which encompass manifold components interacting with one another,usually in a nonlinear fashion[3,4].The complex dynamics of air transport systems,together with a variety of uncertainties such as inclement weather,airspace restriction,mechanical failures,and so forth,result in intractable air traffic delays[5]which can be extremely difficult for air traffic controllers to deal with.This situation could worsen in the coming decade,as air traffic demands are envisaged to increase.

    Air traffic delay is one of the most challenging tasks being addressed by modern air traffic management(ATM).It not only harms entities such as passengers,airlines,and airports,but also results in economic losses[6,7].Furthermore,air traffic delay increases the pollution load on the natural environment[8,9].It should be pointed out that air traffic delay is bound to happen,due to a wide range of factors[5,10].Many efforts have been made in the past several decades to probe the reasons for delays and their internal causalities[11,12].After building a comprehensive understanding of the relationships among the causal factors and various components of air traffic delays,scientists have spared no efforts in seeking remedies to mitigate them[13-15].Representative initiatives include Air Traffic Flow Management(ATFM)[16,17],Ground Delay Programs(GDPs)[18,19],and Collaborative Decision-Making(CDM)[20-22].All these procedures have proven to be valuable in reducing air traffic delays.

    While tremendous collaborative efforts are still needed in the research on air traffic delay mitigation,a very fundamental yet challenging task pertaining to modern ATM is delay prediction[23,24].Prediction of flight delays is significant to those working in aviation,especially during their decision-making process[25,26].Thus far,researchers have developed many delay prediction methods.In particular,the data sciences represented by machine learning techniques are gaining notable momentum in delay prediction[27-30].A comprehensive literature survey on delay prediction can be found in Ref.[26].Despite the abundance of methods for delay prediction,it is cumbersome to develop models or methods that can predict precisely,given the vast amount of flight operation data available and the high complexity of air transport systems[26].

    In reality,airlines construct flight schedules with the intent of maximizing passenger movements.As a result,an aircraft normally operates a number of flight‘‘legs”or‘‘hops”(where a leg or hop refers to a flight between two airports that is part of the aircraft’s itinerary).Consequently,the delay of an upstream flight can spread to downstream flights causing reactionary delays,and the reactionary delays of one aircraft will continue to cause a cascade of reactionary delays for other aircraft.Air traffic delays therefore display the‘‘ripple effect,”which is detrimental to aviation workers[31].According to the ripple effect,also known as delay propagation[32]primary flight delays grow and propagate within complex air transport systems.Studies on delay propagation have attracted an enormous amount of attention from researchers not only in the field of aviation,but also in the fields of computer science,management science,system science,and more[33,34].Compared with studies on delay prediction,studies on delay propagation may be more appealing,as they can assist in locating the origins of delays,calculating reactionary delays,and understanding how delays evolve,making it possible for efficient measures to be taken to counterbalance the ripple effect[31].

    Dozens of studies have investigated flight delay propagation.In the literature,researchers have explored delay propagation phenomena in regions such as the United States[32,35,36],Europe[37],and China[38].In order to gauge the amount of propagated delays,researchers have devised several metrics,including the delay multiplier(DM)index[39].In order to trace how primary delays propagate,scientists have mainly utilized agent-based methods to model the propagation process[32,35,37].Because of delays,multiple flights may simultaneously request services.To resolve this conflict,scientists have predominantly applied the queuing theory[36].

    Delay propagation is a collective phenomenon,as air traffic involves a variety of interacting components[5,40,41].It is natural and straightforward to introduce complex network theories and tools to research on air traffic[40,42,43].Although complex network modeling for air transport has a short history[44,45],its systemic view is injecting new blood into ATM.While the majority of existing studies on delay propagation focus on the estimation of reactionary delays,several studies on network models for delay propagation analysis have already shown great potential[35,36,46].However,to the best of our knowledge,Refs.[35,36,46]failed to make use of the spatial-temporal properties of the constructed networks.Consequently,those works cannot provide a comprehensive understanding of delay propagation dynamics.

    In this study,we present a dynamic network perspective of the propagation dynamics of air traffic delays.More specifically,for a given set of aircraft itineraries,each of which has a one-day cycle,we model the daily traffic scenario with a spatial-temporal network,given that each aircraft has a departure delay for the first flight leg.We suggest a simple yet effective delay propagation mechanism to transfer the delays as the aircraft implement their rotations.In case multiple flights request services simultaneously at the same airport due to delays,we apply our developed delay assignment strategies to prioritize the flights.At a given time point,we construct a spatial airport network with the delayed departure flights as the edges.For a one-day duration,we then construct a spatial-temporal network.Next,we analyze the degree properties of the constructed spatial-temporal network to quantify the delay propagation dynamics in terms of magnitude,speed,and severity.To verify the effectiveness of the proposed network perspective,we carry out case studies on domestic flights in the SAR and the United States that were operated in the last part of 2016.The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed network-based method can provide spatial-temporal details of the delay propagation process.The experiments also reveal that the delay propagation dynamics of flights in the SAR differ substantially from those in the United States in terms of magnitude,severity,and speed.

    2.Related backgrounds

    2.1.Spatial networks

    Network modeling has proven to be a potent tool for capturing the systemic behaviors of complex systems[44,45].Generally speaking,a network is a set of nodes and edges.The nodes of a network denote the components of the focal network or networked system,while the edges represent the interactions or relationships between components.Mathematically,a network is denoted by G={V,E}with n=|V|being the cardinality of the node set V,and m=|E|the cardinality of the edge set E.A network is generally represented by its adjacency matrix A,with the entry aijquantifying the relationship between nodes i and j.

    In this work,we study the delay propagation dynamics of air traffic.In order to capture systemic delays,we construct airport networks with airports as the nodes.For an airport network G,if a flight flies from airport i to airport j,then an edge eij∈E connecting nodes vi∈V and vj∈V is created.

    The constructed airport networks can be weighted and/or directed,depending on the specific calculation purposes.As the airports include geographical information,the constructed networks are spatial networks[47].

    2.2.Temporal networks

    In this study,we construct airport networks.The edge constructions of the networks depend on the air traffic demands,which are time-evolving.Therefore,we can generate a sequence of airport networks to form temporal airport networks.As mentioned above,airports include geographical information.Consequently,the constructed airport networks are spatial-temporal networks.

    2.3.Air traffic delay

    The notion of delay is common in the transportation domain.In the air traffic domain,delay is normally defined as the difference between the scheduled and actual flight operation times.According to the definitions provided by the Federal Aviation Administration(FAA),a flight is considered to be delayed if it is 15 min or more past its scheduled time[49].For research purposes,we consider a flight to be delayed in this work if its delay is positive.

    The flying process of a flight generally encompasses two phases:the ground phase,which includes the departure and approach;and the airborne phase(from wheels off to wheels on),which covers the flight stages of climbing,cruising,and descending.Flight delay can occur in every phase.In the ground phase,the following five types of delay are mainly encountered:

    ·Departure delay:There is a difference between the actual and scheduled gate-out times.

    ·Taxi-out delay:There is a difference between the actual and scheduled taxi-out times.

    ·Taxi-in delay:There is a difference between the actual and scheduled taxi-in times.

    ·Arrival delay:There is a difference between the actual and scheduled gate-in times.

    ·Turn time delay:There is a difference between the actual and scheduled turn times.

    In the airborne phase,the airborne delay is determined to be the difference between the actual and scheduled airborne times.

    3.Research problem and contribution

    3.1.Problem description

    This work is dedicated to investigating the propagation dynamics of air traffic delays by using dynamic network modeling and analysis.Fig.1 presents a graphical illustration of the research problem and the core idea of the network-based approach.

    Fig.1(a)depicts an air traffic scenario in which a set of aircraft are implementing their flight itineraries.The condition is that the first flight leg for each aircraft has a departure delay.For example,as shown in the bottom part of Fig.1(a),the flight departing from Makassar to Jakarta is delayed for 10 min.Due to the flights’rotations,the primary delays can propagate and elicit delays in other flights.Our research purpose is to understand the delay propagation dynamics.More specifically,we aim to answer these questions:①How much is the propagated delay?②How long will the delay propagation last?③How fast can the delay propagate?

    In order to probe answers to these questions,we suggest a dynamic network perspective.We first convert the air traffic scenario into a spatial-temporal airport delay network,with the nodes being the spatial airports and the edges being the delayed departure flights(Fig.1(b)).We then analyze the degree properties of the constructed spatial-temporal networks in order to quantify the delay propagation dynamics in terms of magnitude,severity,and speed.

    3.2.Research contribution

    This work suggests a complex network perspective towards understanding the delay propagation dynamics of air traffic.This work contributes to ATM in the following aspects.

    (1)It provides a fine-grained view of delay propagation dynamics.Complementary to existing studies on delay propagation,which only provide a coarse-grained view,this work provides a fine-grained view of spatial-temporal resolution by making use of dynamic network modeling and analysis.The network-based approach can trace the evolution process of delay propagation at given airports at given times and time durations.

    (2)It assists with strategic ATM.This study investigates delay propagation dynamics in terms of magnitude,severity,and speed.The proposed network approach can be implemented in real time.Therefore,the outcome of this study could facilitate airlines in enabling quality pre-assessment of flight schedules in terms of reactionary delays,such that they could adjust the schedules accordingly in order to mitigate air traffic delays.Furthermore,since the network approach can trace the delay propagation process with a spatial-temporal resolution,the outcome of this study will assist air navigation service providers and airports to provide better service.

    (3)It contributes to CDM.CDM is recognized as a promising paradigm for modern air traffic control.This work carries out case studies on domestic flights in the SAR and the United States,and reveals that only hub airports encounter significant delay propagation.As the proposed approach can estimate temporal propagated delays in real time for given airports,aviation players can choose the proper time to apply CDM to hub airports in order to mitigate the impact of delay propagation.Upon the implementations of several CDM initiatives,the proposed approach can be re-applied to the updated traffic scenario in order to assist decision-makers with further ATM.

    Fig.1.A conceptual diagram of the studied problem and the core idea of the proposed dynamic network approach for understanding the propagation dynamics of air traffic delays.(a)A traffic scenario in which four aircraft(distinguished by color)are implementing their flight itineraries,and each aircraft has a departure delay for the first flight leg.(b)A summary of the idea of the proposed network approach for understanding the delay propagation dynamics.

    4.Research methodology

    4.1.Method overview

    In order to solve the research problem,we first present an overview of the proposed approach and delineate its procedures in Fig.2.

    It can be seen from Fig.2 that the core idea of the proposed approach is to construct a spatial-temporal airport network.To achieve this goal,we develop a delay propagation mechanism and a delay assignment mechanism.In what follows,we will elaborate each of the two key components in detail.

    4.2.Primary departure delay

    In this work,we refer to the primary departure delay as the delay of the first flight leg in an aircraft’s itinerary.The primary departure delay is utilized as the stimulus to elicit the reactionary departure and arrival delays.There are two ways to work out the primary departure delays:obtaining them from data or sampling from a given distribution.

    Here,we directly derive the primary departure delays from the real-world flight operation data.The reasons for doing so are twofold.First,it is straightforward and easy to obtain the primary departure delays from real data.Second,the sampling-based method requires prior knowledge such as the delay distribution.

    4.3.Delay propagation mechanism

    (1)No flight can depart more than 5 min earlier.In real-world scenarios,airlines can bring forward their flight plans,resulting in earlier departures(these can be several hours ahead of schedule,as reported in real cases).Apart from flight plan adjustment,some flights can depart slightly earlier than scheduled once all necessary preparation procedures—such as refueling,payload loading,and passenger embarkation—have been done.In our model,we hypothesize that the earliest departure cannot be more than 5 min before the scheduled departure.

    Fig.2.Flowchart of the proposed network approach for the propagation dynamics of air traffic delays.

    (2)Departures from and arrivals at the same airport are served by different runways.Flight departures and arrivals require airport runway services.In this work,we assume that each airport accommodates the departures and arrivals separately by using different runways.In real life,some airports may only have single runways.However,this assumption simplifies the subsequent modeling.

    (3)The minimum time separation to alleviate the wake turbulence is set to be 2 min.To alleviate the wake turbulence,we fix the minimum separation time for departures/arrivals to be 2 min.As a result,each runway can serve a maximum of 30 flights per hour.The setting of the minimum separation time is based on the wake turbulence category[50]promulgated by the International Civil Aviation Organization(ICAO),based on the fact that the majority of the aircraft in this study are of medium size.

    (4)Delay can occur to a flight in the air.In reality,arrival delay can occur to a flight due to various factors such as convective weather,airspace restriction,airport congestion,and so forth.Unlike existing studies on delay analysis,which assume that delay does not occur during the en-route phase,we introduce the airborne delay of flights to our model.More specifically,we assume that the airborne delay of a flight is a nonlinear function of its departure delay and its scheduled flying time.This assumption also provides the probabilities for flights to absorb delays in the air.

    Note that different aircraft have different minimum turnaround times.Normally,aircraft with larger sizes require longer minimum turnaround times.For a given set of flight plans,we categorize the aircraft into three classes:medium size,large size,and heavy size.We then set the minimum turnaround times TTArespectively to 60,90,and 120 min.

    with the parameters a0,a1,and a2being learned from the historical flight operation data.

    4.4.Delay assignment mechanism

    4.5.Spatial-temporal network construction

    4.6.Delay propagation dynamics

    The DMmetric is straightforward and effective for providing an overall view of the magnitude of the reactionary delays.However,its main advantage is also its main disadvantage.The DM metric cannot reflect the spatial-temporal dynamics of the delay propagation process,and this is the very motivation for proposing the spatial-temporal network-based perspective.

    We then analyze the spatial-temporal degree properties of Aφδand quantify the delay propagation dynamics in the following ways.

    One can observe from the above equations that the delay severity practically measures the time duration between the time point from which the magnitude starts to surpass its mean and the time point from which the magnitude starts to decrease from the mean.Therefore,the delay severity captures the duration of time the propagation magnitude can last.

    5.Experimental study

    5.1.Testing instances

    Section 4 elaborated in detail the proposed network approach for understanding the propagation dynamics of air traffic delays.This section will demonstrate the applications of the proposed approach to the real-world flight plan data.

    5.1.1.Flights in the SAR

    In this study,we use the flights in the SAR as the first case study.The SAR is a subregion of Asia that consists of 11 countries with a total land area of~4.5×106km2.After South Asia and East Asia,SAR is now the third most populous geographical region in the world,with a total population of over 641 million.Therefore,the SAR plays an important role both in the world’s economic development and in air transport(there are more than 700 airports in the SAR).

    We abstract the flight schedules for the SAR from the automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast(ADS-B)data provided by the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore(CAAS).The ADS-B data provided by CAAS covers domestic and global flights and spans a period of six months(June,July,September,October,November,and December)in the calendar year 2016.From the six-month ADS-B data,we filter out the schedules for the flights in the SAR.

    Fig.3 displays the spatial airport network derived from the sixmonth ADS-B data.The weight of an edge is equal to the number of flights that have flown between its two connected airports.The network shown in Fig.3 has 139 nodes and 376 edges.For the SAR airport network,we further calculate the degrees of the nodes.We then rank the nodes based on their degrees.

    Fig.3.Overview of the SAR airport network constructed using six-month ADS-B data collected for the calendar year 2016.An edge is created if there is a flight between its two endpoints.

    The top part of Table 1 summarizes the basic information for the top 22 busiest airports in the SAR.It can be seen from Table 1 that node WMKK has the largest unweighted degree of 51,followed by node WSSS with a degree of 42.The Malaysian airport WMKK has the greatest number of connections with other airports in the SAR.Although the Singapore airport WSSS is the second largest tie,the weighted degree kwvalues as recorded in Table 1 show that the Indonesian airport WIII accommodates more flights than the Singapore airport does.In general,Malaysia and Thailand have the busiest airports in the SAR.

    5.1.2.Flights in the United States

    The second case study was carried out on US flights.In the literature,validations on US flight data have been widely implemented.The key reason is that the collection strategy of US flight data is well established and the data is available to the public.It is easy to obtain ten-year US flight operation data from a handful of websites.

    For the sake of better comparison,we obtained US domestic flight schedules from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics(BTS)website for the same time period as the SAR data.Based on the six-month US domestic flight schedules,we constructed a corresponding airport network(Fig.4).

    The network shown in Fig.4 has 302 nodes and 2160 edges.The US airport network is more complicated than the SAR airport network in terms of the number of nodes and edges.The bottom part of Table 1 summarizes the basic information for the top 22 busiest airports(sorted by their weighted degrees)in the United States.

    It can be seen from Table 1 that the values of unweighted degree k for the US airports are much larger than those for SAR airports.Each of the 22 top airports in the United States has more connections with other airports than each top airport in the SAR does.Each airport in the SAR is connected to 2.7 airports on average,while US airports are connected to an average of 7.2 airports.The greater numbers of airports and airport connections lead to larger throughputs,as reflected by the weighted degree kw.

    5.2.Flight itinerary construction

    This work aims to investigate the propagation dynamics of reactionary delays.To do so,we need to work out the flight itineraries so as to trace the delay propagation between consecutive flight legs.The flight operation data obtained above contains tail numbers for all the flights.A tail number is a unique identifier thatspecifies a certain aircraft.Flights with the same tail number correspond to the same aircraft.Based on the tail numbers of the flights,we then construct the flight itineraries by sorting all the flights chronologically based on their scheduled departure time.

    Table 1 Properties of the top 22 airports in the SAR and the top 22 airports in the United States.

    Fig.4.Overview of the US airport network constructed using six-month flight schedule data collected for the calendar year 2016.An edge is created if there is a flight between its two endpoints.

    5.3.Delay statistics overview

    The SAR and the US flight schedules provide both the scheduled and actual times of the flights,based on which we know the real delays for the flights.In what follows,we first present the fundamental statistical studies on the delays.

    It can be clearly seen from the upper part of Fig.5 that the number of operated airports in the SAR in each of the studied six months is around 130,which is almost one third of the number operated in the United States.Furthermore,the number of monthly operated flights in the SAR is around 50 000,which is nearly one tenth of the number in the United States.It can also be seen from the upper part of Fig.5 that the flights in the SAR have smaller arrival and departure punctualities than those in the United States.Nevertheless,the average flight delays in the SAR are much lower than those in the United States.

    Although the average delays vary in different months,we can see that the delay distributions over different months in both the SAR and the United States share many resemblances.With regard to the curve fittings,the Weibull distribution obtains the best fittings in terms of the statistical metrics of R2and root mean squared error(RMSE).The curve-fitting results indicate that the positive delays obey the Weibull distributions.

    5.4.Problematic days selection

    The original flight schedule data is recorded by month.With regard to the fact that flight delays on different days in a month can possess unique properties,since air traffic is fraught with technical,operational,and meteorological issues,we analyze the delay propagation dynamics at a resolution of one day.More specifically,we abstract the daily flight schedules from a given monthly data as the basic unit for subsequent analysis.

    In this study,we choose four days for every month—two days with the highest average departure delays and two days with the lowest average departure delays—as the problematic days to be studied.The selected days,together with their corresponding basic information,are listed in Table 2.

    5.5.Starting time point selection

    When a problematic day is determined,we then extract the 24 h flight schedules from the original flight data.To do so,we must determine the starting time point,from which we eventually build the flight itinerary.Different selections of starting time point could lead to different flight itineraries,which may affect the final results.

    In order to determine the starting time point,we first visualize the six-month traffic demands over the time horizon from 00:00 to 24:00 at intervals of one hour.The statistics are shown in Fig.6.

    It can be seen from Fig.6(a)that 20:00 p.m.can be regarded as the peak-off hour,as there are relatively few flights,while Fig.6(b)suggests that the peak-off time for the US air traffic is 09:00 a.m.In this study,we choose the peak-off hours observed in Fig.6 as the starting time points to respectively build the daily flight itineraries from the SAR and US flight schedules.

    Fig.5.Delay statistics for the SAR and US flight operation data recorded in the calendar year 2016.Arr:arrival;Dep:departure;PDF:probabilistic distribution of the fight delays;RMSE:root mean squared error.

    5.6.Reactionary delay analysis

    For each selected problematic day,together with the primary flight delays,we implement the delay propagation and assignment mechanisms to work out the reactionary delays for the remaining flight legs.In order to investigate the difference between the reactionary delays of flights in the SAR and the United States,we calculate the values of the DM metric.Furthermore,based on the estimated reactionary delays,we calculate the classification accuracy for the delayed flights.

    Fig.7(a)visualizes the distributions of the values of the DM metric when applied to the reactionary delays for the studied 24 days.It can be seen from Fig.7 that the majority of the DM values are in the range 1-2,which indicates that a primary delay of 1 min would cause a reactionary delay of around 1 min.

    5.7.Delay propagation dynamics

    The DM metric is a widely applied index to quantify the delay propagation effect.However,as can be seen from Fig.7,the DM metric hardly provides useful insights into the magnitude,severity,and speed of the delay propagation dynamics,which is the very motivation for our suggested dynamic network approach.

    Based on the reactionary delays,we then construct the spatialtemporal networks.In order to capture the delay propagation dynamics,we construct the spatial-temporal networks at a granularity of per hour.Specifically,in the network modeling process,we setδ=60 min;as a consequence,we haveΦ=[1,24].

    5.7.1.Delay propagation magnitude

    In this paper,we only focus on the departure delays,since the results shown in Fig.5 indicate that the arrival and departure delays have an approximately linear relation.Fig.8 exhibits the delay propagation magnitude with respect to DP-mag1.On 18 July,among the top eight airports in the SAR,the three airports WMKK,WIII,and WSSS are found to be most congested,as there are about eight delayed flights per hour at each of these airports,while there are around three delayed flights per hour for each of the remaining top eight airports.On 30 November,since the average delay is smaller than that on 18 July,the top eight airports are relatively less congested.The top three airports are still found to be the most congested.

    Regarding the US airports,it can be clearly seen from Fig.8 that the delay propagation magnitude is higher than that in the SAR.Inthe United States,of the 40 busiest airports,about 30%are congested on each of the studied days,that is,21 July and 25 November,while the top two airports,namely ATL and DEN,are the most congested,with around 30 delayed flights in each airport.

    Table 2 Selected problematic days for investigating the delay propagation dynamics of flights in the SAR and the United States.

    The delay propagation magnitude in terms of the number of delayed flights shows a positive relation with the degrees of the airports.Next,we investigate the delay propagation magnitude in terms of the amount of delays occurring at each airport.The corresponding results are demonstrated in Fig.9.

    It can be seen from Fig.9 that the WMKK airport suffers from significant delays on 18 July(74 min on average)and 30 November(64 min on average).Given that the airport operates at a maximum throughput,that is,with 30 flights taking off in 1 h,each flight on 18 July has a propagated delay of 2.5 min on average.On 30 November,the average delay is decreased to 2 min,since the traffic on that day is less congested than that on 18 July.The WIII and WSSS airports have significant delays on both of the studied days.Interestingly,for some airports,such as VTCC and WMKP,even though there are not too many delayed flights on the ground,there are still massive delays,as flights are heavily delayed due to reactionary delays.

    Fig.6.Distribution of the six-month traffic demands over the time horizon from 00:00 to 24:00(UTC time)at intervals of one hour.(a)SAR;(b)United States.

    Fig.7.(a)Distribution of the values of the DM metric and(b)the classification accuracies for the delayed flights for the studied 24 problematic days.

    Fig.8.Delay propagation magnitude with respect to DP-mag1.(a,b)The values of DP-mag1 for the top 22 airports operated in the SAR(a)on 18 July and(b)30 November.(c,d)The values of DP-mag1 for the top 40 airports operated in the United States on(c)21 July and(d)25 November.

    Figs.9(c)and(d)reveal that the delay propagation magnitude in terms of delays for the US flights is more significant than that of the SAR.On 21 July,the most congested airport,ATL,suffers from huge delays.As can be seen from Fig.9,the hourly delays for the ATL airport are around 300 min.Putting it another way,each flight on the ground has a propagated delay of 10 min on average.On 25 November,the average propagated delay per flight is 2 min.Of the investigated 22 top airports in the SAR,around 25%have significant delays.However,around 40%of the 40 top US airports suffer from departure delays.

    5.7.2.Delay propagation severity

    An analysis of the spatial-temporal airport networks provides a comprehensive understanding of the delay propagation dynamics in terms of magnitude.Here,we continue to analyze the delay propagation dynamics in terms of severity.

    In this work,we define the delay propagation severity as the time duration for which the propagation magnitude can last.As the magnitude is quantified in two ways,the severity is also measured in two ways.It can be seen from the upper part of Fig.8 that the peak time(the time when the number of delayed flights starts to exceed the mean value)starts at 03:00 a.m.and ends at 13:00 p.m.for the air traffic in the SAR.The middle and bottom parts of Fig.8 indicate that the peak time starts at 13:00 p.m.and ends at 03:00 a.m.for the air traffic in the United States.Similar phenomena can be observed in Fig.9.We therefore conclude that the delay propagation for the flights in the United States lasts longer than that of the flights in the SAR,since the propagation severities are 14 and 10 h,respectively.

    Fig.9.Delay propagation magnitude with respect to DP-mag2.(a,b)The values of DP-mag2 for the top 22 airports operated in the SAR on(a)18 July and(b)30 November.(c,d)The values of DP-mag2 for the top 40 airports operated in the United States on(c)21 July and(d)25 November.

    It can be seen from the above results that the magnitude metric helps to estimate the amount of delays for each flight and airport,given the scheduled flight plans,while the severity metric indicates the duration of time the delay propagation process can last.With regard to this,airlines can estimate in advance whether scheduled flight plans will suffer from significant delays by utilizing the proposed network model and applying the magnitude metric.By doing so,airlines can adjust flight plans to counterbalance the delay propagation effect.Furthermore,air traffic controllers can utilize the proposed metrics to assist with timely monitoring of the air traffic situation.For example,the above results show that the airport ATL suffers from significant delays in terms of magnitude and severity.In this case,air traffic controllers may consider to take strategic ATM measures,such as ATFM,to balance the traffic demand,airspace,and airport capacities.In addition,airlines,air traffic controllers,airports,and other stakeholders can collaborate with each other to come up with effective CDM initiatives for better ATM.

    5.7.3.Delay propagation speed

    Apart from the delay propagation dynamics in terms of magnitude and severity,aviation workers may want to know how fast the delay can propagate.As per the definition of DP-spe presented in Subsection 4.6,we now calculate the delay propagation speed for the flights in the SAR and the United States.

    Fig.10.Delay propagation speed with respect to DP-spe.(a,b).The values of dφδfor the flights operated in the SAR on(a)18 July and(b)30 November.(c,d)The values of dφδ for the flights operated in the United States on(c)21 July and(d)25 November.

    Fig.10 shows the delay propagation speed for the flights operated on the four days investigated above.In Fig.10,the red solid curves record the values of dφδwithφ∈Φ,that is,the averaged degrees of the spatial-temporal network characterized by matrix Aφδ.As mentioned in Subsection 4.5,the construction of the network Gtican analyze delay at different levels.Here,we also calculate the average degrees of the network characterized by Aφδ,excluding edges with TDD<15,which are represented by the blue solid curves.

    Note that dφδreflects the hourly average degree of the network characterized by matrix Aφδ.In order to better compare the delay propagation speed,we further calculate the mean of dφδ,which is represented by the red and blue dashed lines in Fig.10.Table 3 records the mean values of dφδfor the selected 24 days for the flights in the SAR and United States.It can be seen from the left part of Table 3 that the average delay propagation speeds,Spd1,for the flights in the SAR are around 14,which means that primary delays can elicit delays in 14 flights per hour.When the situation in the United States is compared with that in the SAR,the delay propagation speeds for flights in the United States are about eight times faster than those in the SAR.

    6.Conclusion

    Air traffic inevitably suffers from internal/external perturbations,giving rise to air traffic delays that harm both the aviation industry and the natural environment.Studies on how delays happen and promising initiatives to mitigate delays are pivotal to aviation workers in modern ATM.Air traffic delays are associated with the high complexity of air transport systems.In order to maximize passenger movements,airlines normally plan an aircraft schedule with multiple flight legs during the aircraft’s rotation.As a consequence,a delay for one flight is likely to elicit reactionary delays for other flights,triggering the ripple effect,also known as delay propagation.

    Delay propagation is detrimental to air traffic.An understanding of how delays propagate throughout air transport systems is crucial in order to achieve optimal structural design of air transport systems and to delay mitigation.This work presented a complex network perspective on air traffic delay propagation dynamics.Complementary to existing studies,the proposed network perspective can help decision-makers to acquire a comprehensive understanding of delay propagation dynamics in terms of magnitude,severity,and speed.

    To validate the effectiveness of the proposed methodology,we carried out extensive case studies on flights in the SAR and the United States.We discovered that delay propagation dynamics for the flights in the SAR vary considerably from those in the United States.The proposed network-based method provides temporal details for the delay propagation dynamics for each airport and therefore contributes to strategic ATM and CDM.

    Table 3 Delay propagation speeds for the flights in the SAR and United States.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors would like to thank Prof.Michael Ball from the University of Maryland and Mr.Narendra Pratap Singh,a senior air traffic controller,for their technical support and suggestions,which helped a lot to improve the quality of this work.This work was supported by SUG Research Grant M4082126.050 by the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering(MAE),Nanyang Technological University (NTU),Singapore,and NTU-CAAS Research Grant M4062429.052 by the ATM Research Institute,School of MAE,NTU,Singapore.

    Compliance with ethics guidelines

    Qing Cai,Sameer Alam,and Vu N.Duong declare that they have no conflict of interest or financial conflicts to disclose.

    麻豆一二三区av精品| 六月丁香七月| 国产三级中文精品| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 久久久欧美国产精品| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 青春草视频在线免费观看| av卡一久久| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 99视频精品全部免费 在线| av黄色大香蕉| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 天堂动漫精品| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 精品福利观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 久久久精品大字幕| 我要搜黄色片| 少妇丰满av| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 99热只有精品国产| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 看片在线看免费视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 午夜a级毛片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 精品久久久噜噜| 成年免费大片在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 成人二区视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 深夜精品福利| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产色婷婷99| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产av在哪里看| 国产高潮美女av| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | aaaaa片日本免费| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 在线免费观看的www视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产成人影院久久av| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 色哟哟·www| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 少妇丰满av| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 欧美色视频一区免费| 久久中文看片网| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产黄片美女视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产 一区精品| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美日本视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 久久久色成人| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 黄片wwwwww| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 91精品国产九色| 在线免费十八禁| 中国美女看黄片| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 免费在线观看成人毛片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| a级毛片a级免费在线| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久精品夜色国产| 久久九九热精品免费| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 国产精品永久免费网站| 欧美色视频一区免费| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| av播播在线观看一区| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 久久久久久人妻| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久久久久久精品精品| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产精品免费大片| 久久久久久伊人网av| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 中文欧美无线码| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 午夜久久久在线观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 国产一区二区三区av在线| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 免费看av在线观看网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 在现免费观看毛片| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久人人爽人人片av| 麻豆成人av视频| av福利片在线| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日日啪夜夜撸| 精品国产国语对白av| 日本91视频免费播放| 91久久精品电影网| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 91久久精品电影网| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 少妇丰满av| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲综合色惰| 青春草国产在线视频| 色网站视频免费| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 午夜91福利影院| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 简卡轻食公司| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 男女国产视频网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 日本午夜av视频| 一本一本综合久久| 久久久久久久久久成人| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 91成人精品电影| av在线观看视频网站免费| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 日日啪夜夜爽| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 岛国毛片在线播放| 天堂8中文在线网| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 色视频www国产| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 欧美性感艳星| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 精品一区二区三卡| 99热网站在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 久久狼人影院| 桃花免费在线播放| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 中文天堂在线官网| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 97在线视频观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 男女免费视频国产| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 一本一本综合久久| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 九九在线视频观看精品| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 在线观看三级黄色| 亚洲图色成人| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 少妇高潮的动态图| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 全区人妻精品视频| 在线观看三级黄色| 免费在线观看成人毛片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美区成人在线视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 一级片'在线观看视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 在线 av 中文字幕| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| www.av在线官网国产| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 日韩中字成人| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 欧美+日韩+精品| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 99九九在线精品视频 | 欧美人与善性xxx| 成人国产麻豆网| 老司机影院成人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 全区人妻精品视频| 在线观看三级黄色| 久久人人爽人人片av| 色5月婷婷丁香| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 97在线视频观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 欧美日韩av久久| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国产视频首页在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日韩电影二区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | av专区在线播放| av网站免费在线观看视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 色5月婷婷丁香| av免费在线看不卡| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 美女中出高潮动态图| 久久99精品国语久久久| 在线观看国产h片| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| videos熟女内射| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 桃花免费在线播放| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 少妇的逼水好多| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 在线 av 中文字幕| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久久久久久精品精品| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 午夜影院在线不卡| 免费看光身美女| 成人国产av品久久久| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 两个人的视频大全免费| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 免费看av在线观看网站| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美日韩av久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 午夜视频国产福利| av在线观看视频网站免费| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 一个人免费看片子| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产av国产精品国产| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 全区人妻精品视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 男女边摸边吃奶| av国产精品久久久久影院| av黄色大香蕉| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| av播播在线观看一区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 日本wwww免费看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 久久久久视频综合| h视频一区二区三区| 在线观看国产h片| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 欧美性感艳星| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| www.av在线官网国产| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 免费av不卡在线播放| videossex国产| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 最黄视频免费看| av在线老鸭窝| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 美女福利国产在线| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 人妻系列 视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 丝袜喷水一区| 久久久久视频综合| 尾随美女入室| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| av在线老鸭窝| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产在线免费精品| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 99热6这里只有精品| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 免费少妇av软件| av一本久久久久| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 99久久综合免费| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 久久免费观看电影| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| av.在线天堂| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 嫩草影院入口| 色网站视频免费| 51国产日韩欧美| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久久久网色| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品亚洲成国产av| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲国产精品999| 午夜91福利影院| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 精品午夜福利在线看| 欧美97在线视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 精品亚洲成国产av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产一级毛片在线| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 日本午夜av视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久人人爽人人片av| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 黄色日韩在线| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 少妇丰满av| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 内地一区二区视频在线| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 一本久久精品| 男女边摸边吃奶| 99热这里只有是精品50| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 欧美另类一区| av有码第一页| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 七月丁香在线播放| www.av在线官网国产|