• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Application of Backward Nonlinear Local Lyapunov Exponent Method to Assessing the Relative Impacts of Initial Condition and Model Errors on Local Backward Predictability

    2021-07-26 14:38:28XuanLIJieFENGRuiqiangDINGandJianpingLI
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2021年9期

    Xuan LI ,Jie FENG ,Ruiqiang DING ,and Jianping LI

    1Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and Institute of Atmospheric Sciences,Fudan University,Shanghai 200438,China

    2State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China

    3Frontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System (FDOMES)/Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography/Institute for Advanced Ocean Studies,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China

    4Laboratory for Ocean Dynamics and Climate,Pilot Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (QNLM),Qingdao 266237,China

    ABSTRACT Initial condition and model errors both contribute to the loss of atmospheric predictability.However,it remains debatable which type of error has the larger impact on the prediction lead time of specific states.In this study,we perform a theoretical study to investigate the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local prediction lead time of given states in the Lorenz model.Using the backward nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent method,the prediction lead time,also called local backward predictability limit (LBPL),of given states induced by the two types of errors can be quantitatively estimated.Results show that the structure of the Lorenz attractor leads to a layered distribution of LBPLs of states.On an individual circular orbit,the LBPLs are roughly the same,whereas they are different on different orbits.The spatial distributions of LBPLs show that the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability depend on the locations of given states on the dynamical trajectory and the error magnitudes.When the error magnitude is fixed,the differences between the LBPLs vary with the locations of given states.The larger differences are mainly located on the inner trajectories of regimes.When the error magnitudes are different,the dissimilarities in LBPLs are diverse for the same given state.

    Key words:Initial condition,model errors,error magnitude,error location,LBPL

    1.Introduction

    In weather forecasting,two main types of errors affect the accuracy of forecast results:initial condition errors and model errors.The initial condition errors are the difference between the true and observed values of atmospheric variables.They are unavoidable,no matter how advanced the observation networks or data assimilation methods.In current operational forecasting,numerical models are widely used to forecast future states.However,the simplified atmospheric equations,coarse resolution and parameterization schemes introduce model errors in numerical weather prediction.Apart from the initial condition and model errors,the numerical schemes which solve the numerical models will also introduce uncertainty,resulting in loss of predictability(e.g.

    Gilson et al.,1988

    ;

    Li et al.,2000

    ;

    Berner et al.,2009

    ).

    Lorenz (1963)

    pointed out that the chaotic nature of the atmosphere would make slightly differing initial states evolve very differently in phase space over time.Given that the two types of errors can be never eliminated,the atmospheric predictability has an upper limit.

    Lorenz (1975)

    classified the problems of atmospheric predictability into two categories.The first predictability is associated with the initial condition errors,while the second predictability is related to the model errors.Researchers have also proposed several methods to quantitatively estimate atmospheric predictability.Early studies attempted to estimate the predictability limit by computing the doubling time of small errors (

    Leith,1965

    ;

    Mintz,1968

    ;

    Smagorinsky,1969

    ).

    Charney (1966)

    summarized previous studies and demonstrated that the average doubling time of small errors is 5 days.The Lyapunov exponent (LE) can characterize the average growth rate of chaotic systems,and may be used to quantify atmospheric predictability.However,the LE is almost constant on the attractor (

    Oseledec,1968

    ) while predictability is a local property in phase space (

    Trevisan and Legnani,1995

    ).Therefore,the LE is not suitable for measuring local predictability.Subsequently,the local LE was proposed to quantify atmospheric predictability (

    Nese,1989

    ;

    Yoden and Nomura,1993

    ).The local LE method is valid only if the initial error is infinitesimal.Hence,

    Ding and Li (2007)

    and

    Ding et al.(2008)

    proposed the nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent (NLLE) method to study the nonlinear growth of finite error size in a time interval.Without linearizing the governing equations,they integrated the true state and perturbed state to study the error growth.Therefore,the NLLE method remains applicable even when the initial error grows to a finite size.As an alternative to the NLLE method,

    Mu et al.(2003)

    proposed the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) method to study atmospheric predictability.The CNOP method takes into account the nonlinearity of the atmosphere and can also be used when the initial error grows to a finite size (

    Mu and Duan,2003

    ;

    Duan et al.,2004

    ;

    Mu and Zhang,2006

    ;

    Duan and Mu,2009

    ).The shadowing property reflects the approximate evolution of a computed trajectory compared to the true one (

    Sanz-Serna and Larsson,1993

    ;

    Vallejo and Sanjuán,2013

    ).Therefore,the shadowing time can indicate the predictability.Based on the distributions of finite-time LEs,the shadowing time can be calculated.That is,the predictability may be quantified.Recently,

    Vallejo and Sanjuán (2015)

    introduced the predictability index to indicate the predictability.The predictability index is also derived from the distributions of finite-time LEs.Since the finite-time LEs are computed by using the tangent linear equations (

    Yoden and Nomura,1993

    ;

    Ding and Li,2007

    ),the two methods above are different from the NLLE method.More recently,

    Daza et al.(2016)

    has proposed basin entropy to quantify the uncertainties in dynamical systems.Basin entropy has proven to be an effective method for study of the mechanism of loss of predictability in several paradigmatic models.It is essential to introduce this method into the predictability of extreme weather events in the future.These methods allow us to estimate the prediction time within which weather forecasts are credible.However,the general public and policymakers are often more concerned with the prediction lead time of specific weather events such as extreme heat waves or heavy rainfall that can cause socioeconomic damage.The predictability of extreme weather events is different from that of normal weather events.To distinguish the predictability of specific weather events from that of normal weather events,

    Li et al.(2019)

    proposed two new notions of predictability:the local forward and local backward predictabilities.The local forward predictability is associated with the prediction time of normal weather events,while the local backward predictability is concerned with the maximum prediction lead time of extreme weather events.In current operational forecasts,owing to some uncertainties present in the observations and models,forecasts in the first few days are sufficiently accurate to inform the public well.Questions arise as to whether the accurate forecast time can be extended,and how to determine the upper predictability limit from initial normal events,but these questions are unsolved.Though two weeks are widely recognized as the upper limit,this problem still needs more intensive examination.In order to address this problem,

    Li et al.(2019)

    introduced the notion of local forward predictability to study the upper predictability limit from initial normal states.Since extreme weather events occur at a low frequency,their predictabilities are unique and differ from those of normal weather events (

    Mu et al.,2002

    ;

    Chou,2011

    ).It is more difficult to estimate the predictability of extreme weather events.In order to estimate the predictability of extreme weather events,

    Li et al.(2019)

    indicated that the growing forecast errors resulting in such events should be analyzed,and proposed the notion of local backward predictability to study these kinds of events.Hence,the forward and backward predictabilities are focused on different kinds of weather events.

    Li et al.(2020b)

    studied the relative roles of initial condition and model errors in local forward predictability in the Lorenz model and found that the initial condition errors are more dominant in the forward predictability than model errors,consistent with previous studies(e.g.

    Downton and Bell,1988

    ;

    Lorenz,1989

    ;

    Richardson,1998

    ).The complexity of the predictability of specific weather events has meant that there are very few relevant studies on the relative roles of the two types of errors in local backward predictability.The occurrence of specific states,especially extreme states,has a greater impact on human society,so it is necessary to study the relative effects of the two types of errors on the local backward predictability of specific states,which may provide theoretical guidance for improving forecast skill.

    Ding and Li (2007)

    introduced the NLLE method to quantify the maximum prediction time from a random initial state.However,this technique can’t quantify how much time a specific state can be predicted in advance.In order to address this problem,

    Li et al.(2019)

    developed the backward nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent (BNLLE) method on the basis of the NLLE technique.By calculating the time of forecast errors growing to saturation level from the corresponding initial state to the specific state,the local predictability of the specific state can be quantified.Therefore,the NLLE and BNLLE techniques have different research objects.The NLLE method has been widely used in the atmospheric predictability or related fields (e.g.,

    Li and Ding,2013

    ;

    He et al.,2021

    ).However,since the BNLLE method was introduced,it has just been applied to a single study comparing the predictabilities of warm and cold events (

    Li et al.,2020a

    ).In the present work,we will perform a theoretical study to investigate the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the local backward predictability of specific states based on the BNLLE method.The BNLLE method is used to quantify the local backward predictability limit (LBPL) of a specific state.Therefore,the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability can be quantitatively estimated by comparing the difference between the LBPLs.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 introduces the BNLLE method and Lorenz model.The results of quantitative comparisons of the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability are presented in section 3.Finally,a discussion and conclusions are given in section 4.

    2.Model and method

    2.1.Model description

    In this work,the Lorenz model (1963,hereafter referred to as Lorenz63 model) is used to investigate the relative impacts of two types of uncertainties on local backward predictability.The Lorenz63 model is a conceptual model of the real atmosphere and has been widely used in studies of atmospheric predictability (e.g.

    Palmer,1993

    ;

    Evans et al.,2004

    ;

    He et al.,2006

    ,

    2008

    ;

    Feng et al.,2014

    ;

    Li et al.,2020a

    ).The detailed description of model setup parallels that of

    Li et al.(2020b)

    .

    2.2.BNLLE method

    Ding and Li (2007)

    proposed the NLLE method to quantitatively estimate atmospheric predictability.

    Figure 1

    shows the mean local relative error growth of initial errors as a function of time for different error magnitudes in the Lorenz63 model.The initial errors grow with a regularly oscillating pattern at the early stage.After that,the errors reach a saturation level and cease to grow.For different magnitudes of initial error,the time to reach saturation is different.Smaller initial errors take more time to reach saturation.Before the saturation stage,the errors grow in the linear regime.When the errors are in the period of saturation,the nonlinearity dominates the error growth (e.g.

    Lacarra and Talagrand,1988

    ;

    Farrell,1990

    ;

    Lorenz,2005

    ).Therefore,the local forward predictability limit of a single state in phase space can be measured as the time when the forecast error exceeds 95% of the saturation value (

    Li et al.,2019

    ).Using the NLLE algorithm,we can obtain the local forward predictability limit of any initial state.However,we cannot estimate the LBPL of a given state,especially for the extreme states that are of greater interest.On the basis of the NLLE algorithm,

    Li et al.(2019)

    introduced an algorithm,BNLLE,for estimating the LBPL of a given state.In an ndimensional system,the growth of small errors δ(

    t

    ) perturbed on the initial state

    x

    (

    t

    ) can be expressed by

    where η(

    x

    (

    t

    ),δ(

    t

    ),τ) is the nonlinear error propagator,and the δ(

    t

    +τ) is the time-dependent error at time

    t

    +τ.The average growth rate of errors,also called the NLLE(

    Ding and Li,2007

    ) can be described by

    where λ(

    x

    (

    t

    ),δ(

    t

    ),τ) represents the average growth rate of errors.Therefore,the average growth of forecast errors varying with time can be obtained (shown in

    Fig.1

    ).Based on the saturation time of forecast errors,we can estimate the local forward predictability limit of state

    x

    (

    t

    ).

    Li et al.(2019)

    pointed out that a specific state has a corresponding initial state.In order to estimate the LBPL of a specific state,the corresponding initial state must be found first.Once the corresponding initial state is determined,then the time length between the corresponding initial state and specific state is defined as the LBPL of the specific state.

    Li et al.(2019

    ,

    2020a)

    indicated that if numerous infinitesimal small errors perturbed on the state

    x

    (

    t

    ) grow to saturation level at the time of the specific state,the state

    x

    (

    t

    ) is the corresponding initial state.Considering that the predictability of the specific state is estimated by repeating a backward search for the corresponding initial state,the technique is called BNLLE (

    Li et al.,2019

    ).

    Fig.1.Mean growth of initial errors with different magnitudes(log10 scale),for magnitudes of 10–1,10–2,10–3,10–4,10–5,10–6,10–7,and 10–8.The mean error growths are given in terms of natural logarithms (base e).

    Figure 2

    shows the simple procedure for determining the LBPL of the given state

    x

    (

    t

    ) .The state

    x

    (

    t

    ) is a large value of the climate variables in the time series data [

    x

    (

    t

    ),

    x

    (

    t

    ),…,

    x

    (

    t

    ),…].Based on the BNLLE method,the state at time

    t

    is the corresponding initial state.Therefore,the prediction lead time of state

    x

    (

    t

    ) can be quantitatively estimated (

    t

    ?

    t

    ).

    Li et al.(2020a)

    has applied the BNLLE method to compare backward predictabilities of warm and cold events in the Lorenz63 model and found that the warm events are more predictable.

    Fig.2.Schematic of the algorithm used to estimate the LBPL of given state x(tn).The vertical axis represents climate variables X,and the horizontal axis represents the evolution time of X.The solid curve shows the variation of climate variables X over time.The red diamond-shaped star is the given state at time tn.The blue star represents the corresponding initial state at time tm that is being searched for.The black solid points on the trajectory are intermediate states.

    3.Results

    3.1.Scenario one:Only initial condition errors

    To investigate the effects of initial condition errors on the local backward predictability of given states,the model should be perfect.If (

    x

    (

    t

    ),

    y

    (

    t

    ),

    z

    (

    t

    )) is a true state,then the imperfect initial state (

    x

    ′(

    t

    )

    ,

    y

    ′(

    t

    ),

    z

    ′(

    t

    )) can be obtained by superimposing the initial error vector δ on the true state.

    Here δ,δ,and δare small perturbations superimposed on the three variables of Lorenz63 model.In this work,the number of random initial error vectors is 10 000 and their magnitudes are both 10.The Lorenz attractor has warm and cold regimes,and regions on the regime transitions are dynamically unstable (

    Evans et al.,2004

    ).Therefore,we chose an initial state (?0.46,5.02,30.90) for the dynamically unstable region.From this initial state,another 1999 consecutive states on the same trajectory were also chosen.Based on the BNLLE method,the LBPLs of 2000 consecutive states were calculated.

    Fig.3.Spatial distribution of LBPLs for 2,000 consecutive initial conditions from the given state (?0.46,5.02,30.90) on the Lorenz attractor.

    We also investigated the effects of the magnitude of initial condition errors on the LBPLs of given states.In order to make the conclusion more robust,the selected states should have different dynamical properties.We selected two states [(?0.61,2.66,28.49) and (–3.87,–5.69,18.00)],the former of which is located in the dynamically unstable region,while the latter is located in the cold regime.Thus,they represent different dynamical flows and have different dynamical properties.The LBPLs of the two given states(

    Fig.4

    ) reveal that the LBPLs decrease as the size of the initial condition errors increases.For different given states,initial condition errors of the same size have different influences.When the magnitude of the initial condition errors is 10,the LBPLs of (?0.61,2.66,28.49) is 15 time units,while that of (?3.87,?5.69,18.00) is 19 time units.For other error magnitudes,the LBPLs are also different.This is because the local backward predictabilities depend on the given state on the dynamical trajectory.The two given states are on different locations of the dynamical flows,and the predictability varies with location;consequently,the LBPLs of the two given states are different,although the magnitudes of the initial condition errors superposed on them are the same.

    3.2.Scenario two:Only model errors

    For the scenario of model errors without initial errors,the model is imperfect.Likewise,we perturbed three parameters with small perturbations in the Lorenz63 model.

    Here ε,ε,and εare small perturbations superimposed on the three parameters.The given states are the same 2000 consecutive states as used above.Using the BNLLE method,we can estimate the LBPLs of these states induced by 10 000 random model errors with magnitude of 10.

    Figure 5

    shows the spatial distribution of LBPLs of the 2000 consecutive states;the LBPLs induced by model errors also show layered structures similar to those induced by initial condition errors.It is the specific structure of the Lorenz attractor determines the specific spatial distributions of the LBPLs.Therefore,the above results indicate that structure of the attractor has greater effects on predictability limits and their distributions.We also investigate the effects of model error magnitude on the LBPLs of given states.The situation is the same as for initial condition errors (shown in

    Fig.6

    ).Increasing the model error magnitude reduces the LBPLs of given states.The LBPLs of different given states are different,although the model error magnitudes are the same.

    3.3.Relative effects of initial condition and model errors

    Fig.4.Variation of LBPLs for initial condition errors for given states (a) (?0.61,2.66,28.49) and (b) (–3.87,–5.69,18.00).Error size is shown on a log10 scale.

    Fig.5.Same as Fig.3,but for the model error.

    Fig.6.Same as Fig.4,but for the model error.

    Fig.7.Variation of LBPLs for the two types of errors for the states (a) (?0.54,1.88,26.43) and (b) (–0.32,1.27,24.64).Error size is given on a log10 scale.

    The existence of initial condition and model errors affects the predictability,which leads to an upper limit.To quantify the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the local backward predictability of given states,we compare the LBPLs they induce.In the case when the LBPLs of the given state induced by initial condition errors are higher than those of the same given state induced by model errors,this indicates that model errors have a larger impact,resulting in a lower local predictability limit,and vice versa.

    Figure 7

    shows the variation of the LBPLs of two given states with the magnitude of the two types of errors.In

    Fig.7a

    ,for the given state (?0.54,1.88,26.43)and an error magnitude of 10,the LBPLs induced by model errors are slightly higher than those induced by initial condition errors.This demonstrates that initial condition errors have a greater influence on LBPLs,resulting in lower predictability.When the error magnitude is 10,the LBPLs induced by the two types of errors are roughly the same,so the initial condition and model errors have the same effects on local backward predictability.For other error magnitudes,the LBPLs induced by model errors are lower,indicating model errors have more influence.Therefore,when error magnitudes are different,the relative roles of initial condition and model errors in LBPLs vary.In

    Fig.7b

    ,when the error magnitude is 10,the LBPLs induced by the two types of errors are both 15,unlike the case for the given state (?0.54,1.88,26.43) in

    Fig.7a

    .With other magnitudes,the situation is the same,with the relative importance of the two types of errors being different from those at the first given state.The two previous initial states were also analyzed (figures not shown).The conclusion is similar to that of the two new initial states.Therefore,even though the same error magnitude may be superimposed,if the given states are different,then the relative effects of the two types of errors are different.This indicates that the relative roles of initial condition and model errors depend on the position of the given states on the dynamical trajectory in phase space.To verify this conclusion,we selected more states to analyze.Considering that the previous 2000 consecutive states originated from the dynamically unstable regions,they are appropriate to use in the following analysis.

    Figure 8

    shows the LBPLs induced by the two types of errors and their difference as a function of the number of states for up to 2000 states.

    Figure 8a

    shows that the LBPLs induced by initial condition and model errors have the same tendencies independent of error magnitude.As the number of specified states increases,the LBPLs first increase monotonically,then decrease monotonically,with the pattern repeating with increasing number of states.In

    Fig.8b

    ,when the magnitudes of initial condition and model errors are both 10(red solid and dashed lines),the differences between model error and initial error of LBPLs are positive for the first 1339 given states,so model errors play a greater part in local backward predictability than initial condition errors,resulting in lower LBPLs.The differences are negative for the remaining 661 states,for which the initial condition errors have a greater influence on local backward predictability.Thus,the relative effect of initial condition and model errors varies with the specified state.

    Figure 8b

    also shows that the differences between the LBPLs of the same given states are different when the error magnitudes are different.This demonstrates that the error magnitude affects the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability.

    Fig.8.(a) LBPLs of 2,000 consecutive states induced by initial and model errors with different magnitudes.(b)Difference (initial condition errors minus model errors) of LBPLs induced by initial and model errors of these consecutive states with different magnitudes.The solid and dashed lines in (a) represent LBPLs induced by initial condition and model errors,respectively.The red,green,and blue solid or dashed lines refer to error magnitudes of 10–2,10–5,and 10–7,respectively (as shown by log10 values–2,–5,and–7).The black dashed line in (b) is the zero value.

    Fig.9.Spatial distributions of LBPLs projected on the X–Z plane of the Lorenz attractor with initial condition and model error magnitudes of (a–c) 10?2,(d–f) 10?5,and (g–i) 10?7.The left panels only have initial condition errors in the system,the middle panels only have model errors,and the right panels show the differences between the LBPLs (initial condition errors minus model errors)induced by initial condition and model errors.

    Figure 9

    shows the spatial distributions of LBPLs of previous 2000 consecutive states induced by the two types of errors and their differences.On an individual circular orbit,the LBPLs of given states are roughly the same,whereas the LBPLs of given states on the regime transitions are different.From the warm (cold) regime to the cold (warm)regime,the properties of states change,resulting in different predictabilities in the regime transition region.When the error magnitude is 10,the LBPLs of the 1336 states induced by initial condition errors are higher than those of the remaining states induced by model errors.For most of these 1336 states,the differences in the predictabilities are only slightly larger than zero,with just a small minority having larger values of up to nearly 3 time units.The large values in the local predictability difference of states are mainly distributed on the inner trajectories of the left regime.When the magnitude of errors is 10,the large values of difference are spread all over the attractor.When the magnitude of errors is 10,the large differences are found on the inner trajectories of both regimes.Therefore,the inner trajectories of left regime are frequent regions where the model errors have a larger impact on local backward predictability.But on other regions of the attractor,the initial condition errors play a more important role in local backward predictability.This also demonstrates that the relative effects of initial condition and model errors vary with the spatial locations of given states in phase space.From the spatial distributions,for the same given state with different error magnitudes,the difference between the LBPLs is not the same.This further demonstrates that the relative effects depend on the error magnitudes.

    4.Conclusions and discussion

    Initial condition and model errors are two main contributors to the loss of atmospheric predictability.Based on these sources of errors,

    Lorenz (1975)

    classified the predictability into two types:the first associated with initial condition errors and the second driven by model errors.Initial condition errors are unavoidable in observations,while model errors are due to imperfect knowledge of atmospheric motions,coarse resolution,numerical schemes and so on(e.g.

    Vannitsem and Toth,2002

    ).It is essential to investigate which type of error has the larger impact on predictability,so that operational forecast skills may then be improved significantly by attempting to reduce that error.This issue has been studied intensely but no consensus has been reached.There have also been fewer studies aimed at the predictability limits of specific weather events and the relative roles of the two types of errors in their predictability.The general public and policymakers are more focused on how long in advance specific,high-impact weather events can be forecasted compared with normal weather events.Moreover,considering the rare occurrence of specific weather events,their predictabilities are unique and differ from those of normal weather events and current predictability methods fail to estimate their prediction lead time.To investigate the predictability of specific states,

    Li et al.(2019)

    proposed the BNLLE method to quantitatively estimate the LBPLs (maximum prediction lead time) of specific states.

    In this work,based on the BNLLE method,we performed a theoretical study with the Lorenz model to investigate the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the LBPLs of given states.For both types of errors,the LBPLs of given states present obvious layered structures.That is,the LBPLs of given states are roughly the same on an individual circular orbit,and are different on different circular orbits.A possible explanation of this result is that the physical properties of states on an individual circular orbit are the same,resulting in the same LBPLs.As local predictability varies with location in phase space,the LBPLs are different on different circular orbits.We also find that the local backward predictability depends on the error magnitude.For a given state,the LBPLs vary with the superimposed error magnitude.The LBPLs decrease as the magnitudes of the initial condition or model errors increase.The same magnitude of initial condition or model errors may result in different LBPLs of different given states.

    Next,we compared the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the local backward predictability of consecutive states.In the case that the difference between the LBPLs induced by initial condition and model errors is positive,our results indicate that model errors have a larger influence on local backward predictability,resulting in lower LBPLs,and vice versa.We chose 2000 consecutive states on the Lorenz attractor and calculated their LBPLs.On the whole,the differences are not always positive or always negative,indicating that the relative roles of initial condition and model errors in LBPLs vary from state to state on the dynamical trajectory.With a magnitude of 10,the larger differences are mainly located on the inner trajectory of the left regime.With a magnitude of 10,the larger differences are spread all over the attractor.With a magnitude of 10,the larger differences are distributed on the inner orbits of both regimes.Therefore,the inner trajectories of left regime are frequent regions where the model errors have a larger impact on local backward predictability.From the spatial distribution of LBPLs,it further demonstrates the importance of error magnitudes in the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the local backward predictability.

    From the results,the impacts of model errors are not always larger or smaller than those of initial condition errors.This is because different dynamical regions are located on the Lorenz attractor.Some regions are more sensitive to the model errors.In these regions,model errors perturbed on the states grow more rapidly,resulting in larger contributions to the loss of predictability.For different magnitudes of errors,model errors always have impacts on the inner trajectories of left regime,indicating its sensitivity to model errors.Equally,some dynamical regions are more sensitive to the initial condition errors,resulting in larger impacts on the predictability.Therefore,the results inform us that numerical weather and climate prediction models may improve prediction skills by determining the sensitive regions and reducing the corresponding errors.

    Lorenz(1963)

    pointed out that the chaotic systems were sensitive to the initial conditions.Slight differences between the two adjacent initial conditions will grow rapidly over time.Therefore,forecast errors in operational forecast are dependent on the initial conditions.However,the initial condition is not the only factor to influence the growth of forecast errors.The model errors,numerical schemes and some other sources will also influence the growth of forecast errors.In this work,we studied the impacts of model errors on the forecast error growth in the absence of initial condition errors.The findings indicate that for some cases,the model errors play a more important role in the forecast error growth.Under such circumstances,the effects of model errors on the saturation value or the limit cannot be ignored.Although numerical models are widely used in the study of predictability,theoretical predictability methods are still necessary.The predictability limits estimated by theoretical predictability methods are complementary to those estimated by numerical models.Some research has succeeded in applying theoretical predictability methods to estimate the potential predictability limits of the real atmosphere based on observational data (e.g.

    Ding et al.,2010

    ,

    2015

    ;

    Li and Ding,2011

    ).In the present work,we applied the BNLLE method using a simple theoretical model.It is our view that it is first necessary to further examine the performance of the new method BNLLE.Only if the BNLLE performs well in the simple mode,will we have confidence to apply it to more sophisticated models.In addition,this study sheds light on the relative contributions of two types of errors on local predictability of specific states,which is also beneficial to estimating the predictability of extreme events in more sophisticated models.Therefore,it is important to carry on this work.Nevertheless,the BNLLE method applied to estimating the local backward predictability of specific states in the Lorenz model is a preliminary attempt.In the future,we will apply the BNLLE method to estimate the LBPLs of extreme weather events in the real atmosphere,which may provide guidance to modelers..This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.42005054,41975070) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(Grant No.2020M681154).

    一级毛片电影观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 久久青草综合色| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 免费少妇av软件| 曰老女人黄片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| netflix在线观看网站| 大码成人一级视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一级黄片播放器| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 满18在线观看网站| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 成人手机av| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 精品福利永久在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 午夜影院在线不卡| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 深夜精品福利| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 悠悠久久av| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 色网站视频免费| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 黄色视频不卡| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 99热全是精品| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲九九香蕉| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 午夜91福利影院| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 制服诱惑二区| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲综合色网址| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产成人系列免费观看| 久久青草综合色| 久久久久视频综合| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产精品二区激情视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲综合色网址| 一区二区三区精品91| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久久国产一区二区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久狼人影院| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 我的亚洲天堂| av片东京热男人的天堂| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 咕卡用的链子| av天堂在线播放| 深夜精品福利| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 久久影院123| a级毛片黄视频| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 人妻一区二区av| 成人手机av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 一区福利在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 老司机靠b影院| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 免费av中文字幕在线| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日本午夜av视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 成年av动漫网址| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| av在线app专区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 午夜激情av网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| videos熟女内射| 老司机影院毛片| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 91麻豆av在线| 飞空精品影院首页| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 精品福利观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 1024视频免费在线观看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 丁香六月天网| 国产精品一国产av| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 黄色一级大片看看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 高清av免费在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 中文字幕制服av| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 免费观看av网站的网址| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品成人在线| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 丁香六月天网| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 在线av久久热| 飞空精品影院首页| 亚洲人成电影观看| 五月天丁香电影| 黄色视频不卡| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久99一区二区三区| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 蜜桃在线观看..| 操美女的视频在线观看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 免费少妇av软件| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 一级黄片播放器| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产色视频综合| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 成在线人永久免费视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 日本a在线网址| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 男女免费视频国产| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产在线免费精品| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 大型av网站在线播放| 精品少妇内射三级| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 操美女的视频在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 97在线人人人人妻| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 日本91视频免费播放| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 午夜福利视频精品| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 看免费av毛片| 国产三级黄色录像| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产在线免费精品| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲成色77777| 国产av国产精品国产| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 1024香蕉在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 1024香蕉在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 在线天堂中文资源库| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 免费看不卡的av| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 91精品三级在线观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产av国产精品国产| av有码第一页| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 色网站视频免费| 国产av国产精品国产| 九草在线视频观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| a 毛片基地| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 久热爱精品视频在线9| a级毛片在线看网站| 午夜激情av网站| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲av男天堂| 免费少妇av软件| 国产激情久久老熟女| avwww免费| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| av天堂久久9| 欧美人与善性xxx| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 九草在线视频观看| 国产在视频线精品| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 午夜激情av网站| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲av男天堂| h视频一区二区三区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 欧美97在线视频| www.精华液| 尾随美女入室| 热re99久久国产66热| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 最黄视频免费看| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 一区福利在线观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| videosex国产| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 超碰97精品在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| www.精华液| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 色播在线永久视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲av男天堂| 考比视频在线观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 日本a在线网址| 久久人人爽人人片av| 美女主播在线视频| videos熟女内射| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 丝袜美足系列| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 婷婷成人精品国产| 性少妇av在线| 日韩视频在线欧美| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 午夜激情av网站| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 免费看不卡的av| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久99精品国语久久久| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 国产精品三级大全| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产精品.久久久| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| av网站在线播放免费| 91精品三级在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 一本久久精品| 成人手机av| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| av天堂久久9| 成在线人永久免费视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 一区福利在线观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 久久精品成人免费网站| 成年av动漫网址| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 精品国产一区二区久久| 午夜免费观看性视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 男女免费视频国产| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产精品三级大全| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产麻豆69| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产色视频综合| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| av线在线观看网站| 9色porny在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 在线观看www视频免费| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| www.av在线官网国产| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 一级片免费观看大全| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 制服人妻中文乱码| 男女免费视频国产| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 午夜视频精品福利| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 韩国精品一区二区三区| av天堂久久9| 久久99一区二区三区| 99久久人妻综合| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一级片免费观看大全| 丝袜喷水一区| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 |