• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Application of Backward Nonlinear Local Lyapunov Exponent Method to Assessing the Relative Impacts of Initial Condition and Model Errors on Local Backward Predictability

    2021-07-26 14:38:28XuanLIJieFENGRuiqiangDINGandJianpingLI
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2021年9期

    Xuan LI ,Jie FENG ,Ruiqiang DING ,and Jianping LI

    1Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and Institute of Atmospheric Sciences,Fudan University,Shanghai 200438,China

    2State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China

    3Frontiers Science Center for Deep Ocean Multispheres and Earth System (FDOMES)/Key Laboratory of Physical Oceanography/Institute for Advanced Ocean Studies,Ocean University of China,Qingdao 266100,China

    4Laboratory for Ocean Dynamics and Climate,Pilot Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology (QNLM),Qingdao 266237,China

    ABSTRACT Initial condition and model errors both contribute to the loss of atmospheric predictability.However,it remains debatable which type of error has the larger impact on the prediction lead time of specific states.In this study,we perform a theoretical study to investigate the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local prediction lead time of given states in the Lorenz model.Using the backward nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent method,the prediction lead time,also called local backward predictability limit (LBPL),of given states induced by the two types of errors can be quantitatively estimated.Results show that the structure of the Lorenz attractor leads to a layered distribution of LBPLs of states.On an individual circular orbit,the LBPLs are roughly the same,whereas they are different on different orbits.The spatial distributions of LBPLs show that the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability depend on the locations of given states on the dynamical trajectory and the error magnitudes.When the error magnitude is fixed,the differences between the LBPLs vary with the locations of given states.The larger differences are mainly located on the inner trajectories of regimes.When the error magnitudes are different,the dissimilarities in LBPLs are diverse for the same given state.

    Key words:Initial condition,model errors,error magnitude,error location,LBPL

    1.Introduction

    In weather forecasting,two main types of errors affect the accuracy of forecast results:initial condition errors and model errors.The initial condition errors are the difference between the true and observed values of atmospheric variables.They are unavoidable,no matter how advanced the observation networks or data assimilation methods.In current operational forecasting,numerical models are widely used to forecast future states.However,the simplified atmospheric equations,coarse resolution and parameterization schemes introduce model errors in numerical weather prediction.Apart from the initial condition and model errors,the numerical schemes which solve the numerical models will also introduce uncertainty,resulting in loss of predictability(e.g.

    Gilson et al.,1988

    ;

    Li et al.,2000

    ;

    Berner et al.,2009

    ).

    Lorenz (1963)

    pointed out that the chaotic nature of the atmosphere would make slightly differing initial states evolve very differently in phase space over time.Given that the two types of errors can be never eliminated,the atmospheric predictability has an upper limit.

    Lorenz (1975)

    classified the problems of atmospheric predictability into two categories.The first predictability is associated with the initial condition errors,while the second predictability is related to the model errors.Researchers have also proposed several methods to quantitatively estimate atmospheric predictability.Early studies attempted to estimate the predictability limit by computing the doubling time of small errors (

    Leith,1965

    ;

    Mintz,1968

    ;

    Smagorinsky,1969

    ).

    Charney (1966)

    summarized previous studies and demonstrated that the average doubling time of small errors is 5 days.The Lyapunov exponent (LE) can characterize the average growth rate of chaotic systems,and may be used to quantify atmospheric predictability.However,the LE is almost constant on the attractor (

    Oseledec,1968

    ) while predictability is a local property in phase space (

    Trevisan and Legnani,1995

    ).Therefore,the LE is not suitable for measuring local predictability.Subsequently,the local LE was proposed to quantify atmospheric predictability (

    Nese,1989

    ;

    Yoden and Nomura,1993

    ).The local LE method is valid only if the initial error is infinitesimal.Hence,

    Ding and Li (2007)

    and

    Ding et al.(2008)

    proposed the nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent (NLLE) method to study the nonlinear growth of finite error size in a time interval.Without linearizing the governing equations,they integrated the true state and perturbed state to study the error growth.Therefore,the NLLE method remains applicable even when the initial error grows to a finite size.As an alternative to the NLLE method,

    Mu et al.(2003)

    proposed the conditional nonlinear optimal perturbation (CNOP) method to study atmospheric predictability.The CNOP method takes into account the nonlinearity of the atmosphere and can also be used when the initial error grows to a finite size (

    Mu and Duan,2003

    ;

    Duan et al.,2004

    ;

    Mu and Zhang,2006

    ;

    Duan and Mu,2009

    ).The shadowing property reflects the approximate evolution of a computed trajectory compared to the true one (

    Sanz-Serna and Larsson,1993

    ;

    Vallejo and Sanjuán,2013

    ).Therefore,the shadowing time can indicate the predictability.Based on the distributions of finite-time LEs,the shadowing time can be calculated.That is,the predictability may be quantified.Recently,

    Vallejo and Sanjuán (2015)

    introduced the predictability index to indicate the predictability.The predictability index is also derived from the distributions of finite-time LEs.Since the finite-time LEs are computed by using the tangent linear equations (

    Yoden and Nomura,1993

    ;

    Ding and Li,2007

    ),the two methods above are different from the NLLE method.More recently,

    Daza et al.(2016)

    has proposed basin entropy to quantify the uncertainties in dynamical systems.Basin entropy has proven to be an effective method for study of the mechanism of loss of predictability in several paradigmatic models.It is essential to introduce this method into the predictability of extreme weather events in the future.These methods allow us to estimate the prediction time within which weather forecasts are credible.However,the general public and policymakers are often more concerned with the prediction lead time of specific weather events such as extreme heat waves or heavy rainfall that can cause socioeconomic damage.The predictability of extreme weather events is different from that of normal weather events.To distinguish the predictability of specific weather events from that of normal weather events,

    Li et al.(2019)

    proposed two new notions of predictability:the local forward and local backward predictabilities.The local forward predictability is associated with the prediction time of normal weather events,while the local backward predictability is concerned with the maximum prediction lead time of extreme weather events.In current operational forecasts,owing to some uncertainties present in the observations and models,forecasts in the first few days are sufficiently accurate to inform the public well.Questions arise as to whether the accurate forecast time can be extended,and how to determine the upper predictability limit from initial normal events,but these questions are unsolved.Though two weeks are widely recognized as the upper limit,this problem still needs more intensive examination.In order to address this problem,

    Li et al.(2019)

    introduced the notion of local forward predictability to study the upper predictability limit from initial normal states.Since extreme weather events occur at a low frequency,their predictabilities are unique and differ from those of normal weather events (

    Mu et al.,2002

    ;

    Chou,2011

    ).It is more difficult to estimate the predictability of extreme weather events.In order to estimate the predictability of extreme weather events,

    Li et al.(2019)

    indicated that the growing forecast errors resulting in such events should be analyzed,and proposed the notion of local backward predictability to study these kinds of events.Hence,the forward and backward predictabilities are focused on different kinds of weather events.

    Li et al.(2020b)

    studied the relative roles of initial condition and model errors in local forward predictability in the Lorenz model and found that the initial condition errors are more dominant in the forward predictability than model errors,consistent with previous studies(e.g.

    Downton and Bell,1988

    ;

    Lorenz,1989

    ;

    Richardson,1998

    ).The complexity of the predictability of specific weather events has meant that there are very few relevant studies on the relative roles of the two types of errors in local backward predictability.The occurrence of specific states,especially extreme states,has a greater impact on human society,so it is necessary to study the relative effects of the two types of errors on the local backward predictability of specific states,which may provide theoretical guidance for improving forecast skill.

    Ding and Li (2007)

    introduced the NLLE method to quantify the maximum prediction time from a random initial state.However,this technique can’t quantify how much time a specific state can be predicted in advance.In order to address this problem,

    Li et al.(2019)

    developed the backward nonlinear local Lyapunov exponent (BNLLE) method on the basis of the NLLE technique.By calculating the time of forecast errors growing to saturation level from the corresponding initial state to the specific state,the local predictability of the specific state can be quantified.Therefore,the NLLE and BNLLE techniques have different research objects.The NLLE method has been widely used in the atmospheric predictability or related fields (e.g.,

    Li and Ding,2013

    ;

    He et al.,2021

    ).However,since the BNLLE method was introduced,it has just been applied to a single study comparing the predictabilities of warm and cold events (

    Li et al.,2020a

    ).In the present work,we will perform a theoretical study to investigate the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the local backward predictability of specific states based on the BNLLE method.The BNLLE method is used to quantify the local backward predictability limit (LBPL) of a specific state.Therefore,the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability can be quantitatively estimated by comparing the difference between the LBPLs.The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 introduces the BNLLE method and Lorenz model.The results of quantitative comparisons of the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability are presented in section 3.Finally,a discussion and conclusions are given in section 4.

    2.Model and method

    2.1.Model description

    In this work,the Lorenz model (1963,hereafter referred to as Lorenz63 model) is used to investigate the relative impacts of two types of uncertainties on local backward predictability.The Lorenz63 model is a conceptual model of the real atmosphere and has been widely used in studies of atmospheric predictability (e.g.

    Palmer,1993

    ;

    Evans et al.,2004

    ;

    He et al.,2006

    ,

    2008

    ;

    Feng et al.,2014

    ;

    Li et al.,2020a

    ).The detailed description of model setup parallels that of

    Li et al.(2020b)

    .

    2.2.BNLLE method

    Ding and Li (2007)

    proposed the NLLE method to quantitatively estimate atmospheric predictability.

    Figure 1

    shows the mean local relative error growth of initial errors as a function of time for different error magnitudes in the Lorenz63 model.The initial errors grow with a regularly oscillating pattern at the early stage.After that,the errors reach a saturation level and cease to grow.For different magnitudes of initial error,the time to reach saturation is different.Smaller initial errors take more time to reach saturation.Before the saturation stage,the errors grow in the linear regime.When the errors are in the period of saturation,the nonlinearity dominates the error growth (e.g.

    Lacarra and Talagrand,1988

    ;

    Farrell,1990

    ;

    Lorenz,2005

    ).Therefore,the local forward predictability limit of a single state in phase space can be measured as the time when the forecast error exceeds 95% of the saturation value (

    Li et al.,2019

    ).Using the NLLE algorithm,we can obtain the local forward predictability limit of any initial state.However,we cannot estimate the LBPL of a given state,especially for the extreme states that are of greater interest.On the basis of the NLLE algorithm,

    Li et al.(2019)

    introduced an algorithm,BNLLE,for estimating the LBPL of a given state.In an ndimensional system,the growth of small errors δ(

    t

    ) perturbed on the initial state

    x

    (

    t

    ) can be expressed by

    where η(

    x

    (

    t

    ),δ(

    t

    ),τ) is the nonlinear error propagator,and the δ(

    t

    +τ) is the time-dependent error at time

    t

    +τ.The average growth rate of errors,also called the NLLE(

    Ding and Li,2007

    ) can be described by

    where λ(

    x

    (

    t

    ),δ(

    t

    ),τ) represents the average growth rate of errors.Therefore,the average growth of forecast errors varying with time can be obtained (shown in

    Fig.1

    ).Based on the saturation time of forecast errors,we can estimate the local forward predictability limit of state

    x

    (

    t

    ).

    Li et al.(2019)

    pointed out that a specific state has a corresponding initial state.In order to estimate the LBPL of a specific state,the corresponding initial state must be found first.Once the corresponding initial state is determined,then the time length between the corresponding initial state and specific state is defined as the LBPL of the specific state.

    Li et al.(2019

    ,

    2020a)

    indicated that if numerous infinitesimal small errors perturbed on the state

    x

    (

    t

    ) grow to saturation level at the time of the specific state,the state

    x

    (

    t

    ) is the corresponding initial state.Considering that the predictability of the specific state is estimated by repeating a backward search for the corresponding initial state,the technique is called BNLLE (

    Li et al.,2019

    ).

    Fig.1.Mean growth of initial errors with different magnitudes(log10 scale),for magnitudes of 10–1,10–2,10–3,10–4,10–5,10–6,10–7,and 10–8.The mean error growths are given in terms of natural logarithms (base e).

    Figure 2

    shows the simple procedure for determining the LBPL of the given state

    x

    (

    t

    ) .The state

    x

    (

    t

    ) is a large value of the climate variables in the time series data [

    x

    (

    t

    ),

    x

    (

    t

    ),…,

    x

    (

    t

    ),…].Based on the BNLLE method,the state at time

    t

    is the corresponding initial state.Therefore,the prediction lead time of state

    x

    (

    t

    ) can be quantitatively estimated (

    t

    ?

    t

    ).

    Li et al.(2020a)

    has applied the BNLLE method to compare backward predictabilities of warm and cold events in the Lorenz63 model and found that the warm events are more predictable.

    Fig.2.Schematic of the algorithm used to estimate the LBPL of given state x(tn).The vertical axis represents climate variables X,and the horizontal axis represents the evolution time of X.The solid curve shows the variation of climate variables X over time.The red diamond-shaped star is the given state at time tn.The blue star represents the corresponding initial state at time tm that is being searched for.The black solid points on the trajectory are intermediate states.

    3.Results

    3.1.Scenario one:Only initial condition errors

    To investigate the effects of initial condition errors on the local backward predictability of given states,the model should be perfect.If (

    x

    (

    t

    ),

    y

    (

    t

    ),

    z

    (

    t

    )) is a true state,then the imperfect initial state (

    x

    ′(

    t

    )

    ,

    y

    ′(

    t

    ),

    z

    ′(

    t

    )) can be obtained by superimposing the initial error vector δ on the true state.

    Here δ,δ,and δare small perturbations superimposed on the three variables of Lorenz63 model.In this work,the number of random initial error vectors is 10 000 and their magnitudes are both 10.The Lorenz attractor has warm and cold regimes,and regions on the regime transitions are dynamically unstable (

    Evans et al.,2004

    ).Therefore,we chose an initial state (?0.46,5.02,30.90) for the dynamically unstable region.From this initial state,another 1999 consecutive states on the same trajectory were also chosen.Based on the BNLLE method,the LBPLs of 2000 consecutive states were calculated.

    Fig.3.Spatial distribution of LBPLs for 2,000 consecutive initial conditions from the given state (?0.46,5.02,30.90) on the Lorenz attractor.

    We also investigated the effects of the magnitude of initial condition errors on the LBPLs of given states.In order to make the conclusion more robust,the selected states should have different dynamical properties.We selected two states [(?0.61,2.66,28.49) and (–3.87,–5.69,18.00)],the former of which is located in the dynamically unstable region,while the latter is located in the cold regime.Thus,they represent different dynamical flows and have different dynamical properties.The LBPLs of the two given states(

    Fig.4

    ) reveal that the LBPLs decrease as the size of the initial condition errors increases.For different given states,initial condition errors of the same size have different influences.When the magnitude of the initial condition errors is 10,the LBPLs of (?0.61,2.66,28.49) is 15 time units,while that of (?3.87,?5.69,18.00) is 19 time units.For other error magnitudes,the LBPLs are also different.This is because the local backward predictabilities depend on the given state on the dynamical trajectory.The two given states are on different locations of the dynamical flows,and the predictability varies with location;consequently,the LBPLs of the two given states are different,although the magnitudes of the initial condition errors superposed on them are the same.

    3.2.Scenario two:Only model errors

    For the scenario of model errors without initial errors,the model is imperfect.Likewise,we perturbed three parameters with small perturbations in the Lorenz63 model.

    Here ε,ε,and εare small perturbations superimposed on the three parameters.The given states are the same 2000 consecutive states as used above.Using the BNLLE method,we can estimate the LBPLs of these states induced by 10 000 random model errors with magnitude of 10.

    Figure 5

    shows the spatial distribution of LBPLs of the 2000 consecutive states;the LBPLs induced by model errors also show layered structures similar to those induced by initial condition errors.It is the specific structure of the Lorenz attractor determines the specific spatial distributions of the LBPLs.Therefore,the above results indicate that structure of the attractor has greater effects on predictability limits and their distributions.We also investigate the effects of model error magnitude on the LBPLs of given states.The situation is the same as for initial condition errors (shown in

    Fig.6

    ).Increasing the model error magnitude reduces the LBPLs of given states.The LBPLs of different given states are different,although the model error magnitudes are the same.

    3.3.Relative effects of initial condition and model errors

    Fig.4.Variation of LBPLs for initial condition errors for given states (a) (?0.61,2.66,28.49) and (b) (–3.87,–5.69,18.00).Error size is shown on a log10 scale.

    Fig.5.Same as Fig.3,but for the model error.

    Fig.6.Same as Fig.4,but for the model error.

    Fig.7.Variation of LBPLs for the two types of errors for the states (a) (?0.54,1.88,26.43) and (b) (–0.32,1.27,24.64).Error size is given on a log10 scale.

    The existence of initial condition and model errors affects the predictability,which leads to an upper limit.To quantify the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the local backward predictability of given states,we compare the LBPLs they induce.In the case when the LBPLs of the given state induced by initial condition errors are higher than those of the same given state induced by model errors,this indicates that model errors have a larger impact,resulting in a lower local predictability limit,and vice versa.

    Figure 7

    shows the variation of the LBPLs of two given states with the magnitude of the two types of errors.In

    Fig.7a

    ,for the given state (?0.54,1.88,26.43)and an error magnitude of 10,the LBPLs induced by model errors are slightly higher than those induced by initial condition errors.This demonstrates that initial condition errors have a greater influence on LBPLs,resulting in lower predictability.When the error magnitude is 10,the LBPLs induced by the two types of errors are roughly the same,so the initial condition and model errors have the same effects on local backward predictability.For other error magnitudes,the LBPLs induced by model errors are lower,indicating model errors have more influence.Therefore,when error magnitudes are different,the relative roles of initial condition and model errors in LBPLs vary.In

    Fig.7b

    ,when the error magnitude is 10,the LBPLs induced by the two types of errors are both 15,unlike the case for the given state (?0.54,1.88,26.43) in

    Fig.7a

    .With other magnitudes,the situation is the same,with the relative importance of the two types of errors being different from those at the first given state.The two previous initial states were also analyzed (figures not shown).The conclusion is similar to that of the two new initial states.Therefore,even though the same error magnitude may be superimposed,if the given states are different,then the relative effects of the two types of errors are different.This indicates that the relative roles of initial condition and model errors depend on the position of the given states on the dynamical trajectory in phase space.To verify this conclusion,we selected more states to analyze.Considering that the previous 2000 consecutive states originated from the dynamically unstable regions,they are appropriate to use in the following analysis.

    Figure 8

    shows the LBPLs induced by the two types of errors and their difference as a function of the number of states for up to 2000 states.

    Figure 8a

    shows that the LBPLs induced by initial condition and model errors have the same tendencies independent of error magnitude.As the number of specified states increases,the LBPLs first increase monotonically,then decrease monotonically,with the pattern repeating with increasing number of states.In

    Fig.8b

    ,when the magnitudes of initial condition and model errors are both 10(red solid and dashed lines),the differences between model error and initial error of LBPLs are positive for the first 1339 given states,so model errors play a greater part in local backward predictability than initial condition errors,resulting in lower LBPLs.The differences are negative for the remaining 661 states,for which the initial condition errors have a greater influence on local backward predictability.Thus,the relative effect of initial condition and model errors varies with the specified state.

    Figure 8b

    also shows that the differences between the LBPLs of the same given states are different when the error magnitudes are different.This demonstrates that the error magnitude affects the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on local backward predictability.

    Fig.8.(a) LBPLs of 2,000 consecutive states induced by initial and model errors with different magnitudes.(b)Difference (initial condition errors minus model errors) of LBPLs induced by initial and model errors of these consecutive states with different magnitudes.The solid and dashed lines in (a) represent LBPLs induced by initial condition and model errors,respectively.The red,green,and blue solid or dashed lines refer to error magnitudes of 10–2,10–5,and 10–7,respectively (as shown by log10 values–2,–5,and–7).The black dashed line in (b) is the zero value.

    Fig.9.Spatial distributions of LBPLs projected on the X–Z plane of the Lorenz attractor with initial condition and model error magnitudes of (a–c) 10?2,(d–f) 10?5,and (g–i) 10?7.The left panels only have initial condition errors in the system,the middle panels only have model errors,and the right panels show the differences between the LBPLs (initial condition errors minus model errors)induced by initial condition and model errors.

    Figure 9

    shows the spatial distributions of LBPLs of previous 2000 consecutive states induced by the two types of errors and their differences.On an individual circular orbit,the LBPLs of given states are roughly the same,whereas the LBPLs of given states on the regime transitions are different.From the warm (cold) regime to the cold (warm)regime,the properties of states change,resulting in different predictabilities in the regime transition region.When the error magnitude is 10,the LBPLs of the 1336 states induced by initial condition errors are higher than those of the remaining states induced by model errors.For most of these 1336 states,the differences in the predictabilities are only slightly larger than zero,with just a small minority having larger values of up to nearly 3 time units.The large values in the local predictability difference of states are mainly distributed on the inner trajectories of the left regime.When the magnitude of errors is 10,the large values of difference are spread all over the attractor.When the magnitude of errors is 10,the large differences are found on the inner trajectories of both regimes.Therefore,the inner trajectories of left regime are frequent regions where the model errors have a larger impact on local backward predictability.But on other regions of the attractor,the initial condition errors play a more important role in local backward predictability.This also demonstrates that the relative effects of initial condition and model errors vary with the spatial locations of given states in phase space.From the spatial distributions,for the same given state with different error magnitudes,the difference between the LBPLs is not the same.This further demonstrates that the relative effects depend on the error magnitudes.

    4.Conclusions and discussion

    Initial condition and model errors are two main contributors to the loss of atmospheric predictability.Based on these sources of errors,

    Lorenz (1975)

    classified the predictability into two types:the first associated with initial condition errors and the second driven by model errors.Initial condition errors are unavoidable in observations,while model errors are due to imperfect knowledge of atmospheric motions,coarse resolution,numerical schemes and so on(e.g.

    Vannitsem and Toth,2002

    ).It is essential to investigate which type of error has the larger impact on predictability,so that operational forecast skills may then be improved significantly by attempting to reduce that error.This issue has been studied intensely but no consensus has been reached.There have also been fewer studies aimed at the predictability limits of specific weather events and the relative roles of the two types of errors in their predictability.The general public and policymakers are more focused on how long in advance specific,high-impact weather events can be forecasted compared with normal weather events.Moreover,considering the rare occurrence of specific weather events,their predictabilities are unique and differ from those of normal weather events and current predictability methods fail to estimate their prediction lead time.To investigate the predictability of specific states,

    Li et al.(2019)

    proposed the BNLLE method to quantitatively estimate the LBPLs (maximum prediction lead time) of specific states.

    In this work,based on the BNLLE method,we performed a theoretical study with the Lorenz model to investigate the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the LBPLs of given states.For both types of errors,the LBPLs of given states present obvious layered structures.That is,the LBPLs of given states are roughly the same on an individual circular orbit,and are different on different circular orbits.A possible explanation of this result is that the physical properties of states on an individual circular orbit are the same,resulting in the same LBPLs.As local predictability varies with location in phase space,the LBPLs are different on different circular orbits.We also find that the local backward predictability depends on the error magnitude.For a given state,the LBPLs vary with the superimposed error magnitude.The LBPLs decrease as the magnitudes of the initial condition or model errors increase.The same magnitude of initial condition or model errors may result in different LBPLs of different given states.

    Next,we compared the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the local backward predictability of consecutive states.In the case that the difference between the LBPLs induced by initial condition and model errors is positive,our results indicate that model errors have a larger influence on local backward predictability,resulting in lower LBPLs,and vice versa.We chose 2000 consecutive states on the Lorenz attractor and calculated their LBPLs.On the whole,the differences are not always positive or always negative,indicating that the relative roles of initial condition and model errors in LBPLs vary from state to state on the dynamical trajectory.With a magnitude of 10,the larger differences are mainly located on the inner trajectory of the left regime.With a magnitude of 10,the larger differences are spread all over the attractor.With a magnitude of 10,the larger differences are distributed on the inner orbits of both regimes.Therefore,the inner trajectories of left regime are frequent regions where the model errors have a larger impact on local backward predictability.From the spatial distribution of LBPLs,it further demonstrates the importance of error magnitudes in the relative effects of initial condition and model errors on the local backward predictability.

    From the results,the impacts of model errors are not always larger or smaller than those of initial condition errors.This is because different dynamical regions are located on the Lorenz attractor.Some regions are more sensitive to the model errors.In these regions,model errors perturbed on the states grow more rapidly,resulting in larger contributions to the loss of predictability.For different magnitudes of errors,model errors always have impacts on the inner trajectories of left regime,indicating its sensitivity to model errors.Equally,some dynamical regions are more sensitive to the initial condition errors,resulting in larger impacts on the predictability.Therefore,the results inform us that numerical weather and climate prediction models may improve prediction skills by determining the sensitive regions and reducing the corresponding errors.

    Lorenz(1963)

    pointed out that the chaotic systems were sensitive to the initial conditions.Slight differences between the two adjacent initial conditions will grow rapidly over time.Therefore,forecast errors in operational forecast are dependent on the initial conditions.However,the initial condition is not the only factor to influence the growth of forecast errors.The model errors,numerical schemes and some other sources will also influence the growth of forecast errors.In this work,we studied the impacts of model errors on the forecast error growth in the absence of initial condition errors.The findings indicate that for some cases,the model errors play a more important role in the forecast error growth.Under such circumstances,the effects of model errors on the saturation value or the limit cannot be ignored.Although numerical models are widely used in the study of predictability,theoretical predictability methods are still necessary.The predictability limits estimated by theoretical predictability methods are complementary to those estimated by numerical models.Some research has succeeded in applying theoretical predictability methods to estimate the potential predictability limits of the real atmosphere based on observational data (e.g.

    Ding et al.,2010

    ,

    2015

    ;

    Li and Ding,2011

    ).In the present work,we applied the BNLLE method using a simple theoretical model.It is our view that it is first necessary to further examine the performance of the new method BNLLE.Only if the BNLLE performs well in the simple mode,will we have confidence to apply it to more sophisticated models.In addition,this study sheds light on the relative contributions of two types of errors on local predictability of specific states,which is also beneficial to estimating the predictability of extreme events in more sophisticated models.Therefore,it is important to carry on this work.Nevertheless,the BNLLE method applied to estimating the local backward predictability of specific states in the Lorenz model is a preliminary attempt.In the future,we will apply the BNLLE method to estimate the LBPLs of extreme weather events in the real atmosphere,which may provide guidance to modelers..This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.42005054,41975070) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(Grant No.2020M681154).

    91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 嫩草影院新地址| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久6这里有精品| 成人无遮挡网站| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 欧美+日韩+精品| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 欧美另类一区| 久久精品夜色国产| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲综合色惰| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 丝袜喷水一区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | freevideosex欧美| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲国产av新网站| 多毛熟女@视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 久久av网站| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 一区二区av电影网| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 观看av在线不卡| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 51国产日韩欧美| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 欧美bdsm另类| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 舔av片在线| 精品久久久久久久末码| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 免费观看性生交大片5| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| av免费观看日本| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 中文欧美无线码| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| xxx大片免费视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 日韩伦理黄色片| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲图色成人| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 99热这里只有精品一区| 熟女电影av网| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 老熟女久久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 麻豆成人av视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久久欧美国产精品| av.在线天堂| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 免费大片18禁| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 老女人水多毛片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 一级av片app| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 亚洲av男天堂| 在线 av 中文字幕| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品成人在线| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 美女高潮的动态| 午夜免费观看性视频| av.在线天堂| 亚洲国产av新网站| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产乱来视频区| 蜜桃在线观看..| 全区人妻精品视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 韩国av在线不卡| kizo精华| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 少妇 在线观看| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 身体一侧抽搐| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲国产精品999| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 91精品国产九色| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 久久影院123| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| videos熟女内射| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 精品酒店卫生间| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲精品第二区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 视频区图区小说| 天堂8中文在线网| 色视频www国产| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 免费看av在线观看网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 少妇人妻 视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 久久婷婷青草| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 色吧在线观看| 久久久久久人妻| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产探花极品一区二区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 丝袜喷水一区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产视频首页在线观看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲av男天堂| 亚洲图色成人| 在线观看一区二区三区| 久热久热在线精品观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 在线观看国产h片| 免费少妇av软件| 少妇丰满av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 在线免费十八禁| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 欧美日本视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| av天堂中文字幕网| 午夜福利视频精品| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| av一本久久久久| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产极品天堂在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 久久热精品热| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产在线视频一区二区| 观看美女的网站| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚州av有码| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| av免费观看日本| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 一区在线观看完整版| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 婷婷色综合www| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美日本视频| 97在线视频观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 色视频www国产| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 在线天堂最新版资源| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 在线播放无遮挡| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 老女人水多毛片| 成人国产麻豆网| 成人二区视频| 只有这里有精品99| 国产乱来视频区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 岛国毛片在线播放| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产色婷婷99| 大码成人一级视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 婷婷色综合www| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 欧美成人a在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 午夜福利视频精品| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 视频区图区小说| 三级国产精品片| 免费观看av网站的网址| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品成人在线| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲精品一二三| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产综合精华液| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 日本欧美视频一区| 日本午夜av视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久6这里有精品| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 免费看光身美女| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲成人手机| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 22中文网久久字幕| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 日韩国内少妇激情av| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产精品成人在线| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲中文av在线| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产视频首页在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲av福利一区| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 五月天丁香电影| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 99热网站在线观看| 久久婷婷青草| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| kizo精华| 久久6这里有精品| 熟女电影av网| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久久色成人| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 1000部很黄的大片| 五月天丁香电影| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久久久久精品精品| www.av在线官网国产| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| av卡一久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 熟女av电影| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产综合精华液| 国产毛片在线视频| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 欧美+日韩+精品| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产成人freesex在线| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 久久97久久精品| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 熟女av电影| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 九九在线视频观看精品| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产成人aa在线观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 久久人人爽人人片av| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 日本色播在线视频| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| av免费在线看不卡| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 日韩强制内射视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 高清不卡的av网站| 色网站视频免费| 国内精品宾馆在线| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产精品无大码| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| av免费在线看不卡| 美女中出高潮动态图| 久久影院123| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国内精品宾馆在线| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产成人a区在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 韩国av在线不卡| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 欧美zozozo另类| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 男女国产视频网站| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 在线看a的网站| 免费黄色在线免费观看| av免费观看日本| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 色哟哟·www| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日本av免费视频播放| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产淫语在线视频| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲第一av免费看| av卡一久久| 中文欧美无线码| av专区在线播放| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 在线观看一区二区三区| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 91狼人影院| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 美女国产视频在线观看|