• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Re-examining Tropical Cyclone Fullness Using Aircraft Reconnaissance Data

    2021-07-26 14:38:52ZhehanCHENandQingqingLI
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2021年9期

    Zhehan CHEN and Qingqing LI

    1Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China

    2Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of the Ministry of Education,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China

    3State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather,Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences,Beijing 100081,China

    ABSTRACT We use FLIGHT+aircraft reconnaissance data for tropical cyclones (TCs) in the North Atlantic and Eastern Pacific from 1997 to 2015 to re-examine TC fullness (TCF) characteristics at the flight level.The results show a strong positive correlation between the flight-level TCF and the intensity of TCs,with the flight-level TCF increasing much more rapidly than the near-surface TCF with increasing intensity of the TCs.The tangential wind in small-TCF hurricanes is statistically significantly stronger near the eye center than that in large-TCF hurricanes.Large-TCF hurricanes have a ring-like vorticity structure.No significant correlation is observed between the flight-level TCF and the comparative extent of the vorticityskirt region occupied in the outer core skirt.The proportion of the rapid filamentation zone in the outer core skirt increases with increasing flight-level TCF.The differences in entropy between the radius of the maximum wind and the outer boundary of the outer core skirt also increase with increasing flight-level TCF.

    Key words:tropical cyclone,fullness,intensity,structure,aircraft reconnaissance data

    1.Introduction

    Tropical cyclones (TCs) are devastating weather systems that can cause serious threats to both human life and property.The size of a TC is important in estimating its destructivity (Powell and Reinhold,2007) and several different metrics can be used to measure this (Carrasco et al.,2014),such as the radius of the maximum wind (RMW),the outer radius of the vanishing wind,the radius of the outermost closed isobar,and the radius of certain wind velocity.Many studies have addressed the relationship between the size and intensity of TCs and the change in intensity,but the results vary.Merrill (1984)reported a weak correlation between the size of a TC,defined by the radius of the outermost closed isobar,and intensity,whereasCarrasco et al.(2014)found no relationship between the radius of the outermost closed isobar and changes in the intensity of North Atlantic hurricanes.Kimball and Mulekar (2004)showed that the RMW to be negatively correlated with the intensity of TCs,whereas a radius of 17 m s?1(R17) was positively correlated with intensity.By contrast,Wu et al.(2015)showed a nonlinear relationship between R17and the intensity of TCs,indicating that R17increases with the maximum wind speed of TCs increasing up to 53 m s?1and then decreases as the intensity of TCs continues to increase.Song et al.(2020)reported that the nonlinear TC size–intensity relationship is only seen in recurving typhoons in the western North Pacific that have a peak in intensity and size at different times.However,Carrasco et al.(2014)suggested that the RMW and R17have the most significant negative correlation with hurricane intensity changes by analyzing the second-generation North Atlantic hurricane database and the Extended Best-Track dataset.More recently,Ma (2020)andMa et al.(2020)further indicated that a cold-core oceanic eddy could decrease the radius of hurricane-force wind and increase the RMW while the TC tracked over the eddy region and weakened.

    These results suggest that the exact relationship between the size of a TC measured by different metrics and the intensity remains unclear.Guo and Tan (2017)introduced a new concept to quantitatively interpret the wind structure of TCs,which they referred to as TC fullness (TCF).TCF is defined as the ratio of the radial extent between the near-surface RMW and R17(namely the width of the outer core wind skirt) to R17.Guo and Tan (2017)found that the intensity of TCs is more strongly correlated with TCF than other measures of size.They further suggested that,along with rapid growth in the TCF,a strong low-level inflow and the radially inward advection of the absolute angular momentum favor the intensification of TCs.A significant finding inGuo and Tan (2017)is that either small or large TCs can be intense,depending on the TCF.Note that although TCF was proposed to supplement TC size metrics,this concept is not explicitly related to a specific TC size measurement.As found inGuo and Tan (2017),a given TCF value can be associated with either small or large TCs measured with typical TC size metrics.

    Guo and Tan (2017)used the Extended Best-Track dataset (Demuth et al.,2004,2006) to calculate the TCF.The wind radii in this dataset are mainly estimated using parameters derived from the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit instrument onboard National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and European satellites.The main drawback of using microwave data to estimate the size of a TC is that the microwave instrumentation is onboard polarorbiting satellites and is therefore not available at synoptic times.In addition,the winds estimated using microwave remote sensing may have more significant uncertainties than scatterometry,which gives the most direct estimation of surface winds (Dean et al.,2009).It is unclear whether the TCF characteristics reported byGuo and Tan (2017)are different from those determined using in situ observations.We thus re-examine the characteristics of TCF based on the Extended Flight Level Dataset for TCs (FLIGHT+;Vigh et al.,2018),which includes in situ,flight-level observations from aircraft reconnaissance flights.Moreover,the relationships between the kinematic and thermodynamic characteristics of TCs and the TCF will be discussed as well.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 introduces the data and methods.Sections 3 describes the characteristics of the flight-level TCF measured in the FLIGHT+dataset.The relationships between the kinematic and thermodynamic characteristics of TCs and the TCF are presented in section 4.A summary is given in section 5.

    2.Data and methods

    2.1.FLIGHT+aircraft reconnaissance data

    The FLIGHT+dataset includes 229 flight missions for 74 hurricanes from 1997 to 2015.FLIGHT+consolidates in situ,flight-level data observed by the NOAA WP-3D (Aberson et al.,2006b) and US Air Force WC-130 aircraft.Figure 1ashows a flight path into Hurricane Rita by WP-3D aircraft on 21 September 2005,which is in the FLIGHT+dataset and includes several radial flight legs during the penetration of the aircraft into the inner core of the hurricane.The FLIGHT+dataset consists of observations from the radial flight legs.The radial legs where the radial extent is >45 km and the aircraft flew within 25 km of the center of the TC (Fig.1b) are defined as “good” radial legs.We only use the observations in “good” radial legs in this study.More information on the FLIGHT+dataset is given inMartinez et al.(2017)andVigh et al.(2018).

    Aircraft reconnaissance missions into hurricanes are typically conducted at either 850 or 700 hPa,with the 850-hPa flight level mostly used for weak depressions and tropical storms.We only use the observations at 700 hPa in this study.During the passage through the TCs,water droplets may adhere to the sensors mounted on the aircraft exterior,which regularly generates instrument wetting errors (Eastin et al.,2002).In addition,the observed temperature may be underestimated as a result of evaporative cooling on the thermistors.The correction method introduced byZipser et al.(1981)is adopted to remove these errors.Eastin et al.(2002)concluded that this correction method could reduce the average errors in temperature,specific humidity,and equivalent potential temperature to 0.6°C,0.5 g kg?1,and 2.7 K,respectively.About 9.7% of the observational samples used in this study are corrected (not shown),a relatively low proportion.

    Because we will examine the azimuthal mean distributions of the kinematic and thermodynamic fields,we also need to ensure that the selected “good” radial legs are relatively evenly distributed in the main quadrants (Fig.1b).Therefore,the azimuthal mean values of a hurricane for each flight mission are calculated by averaging all of the“good” radial legs at each radial point.Figure 1cshows the azimuthal mean structures of the temperature and tangential wind in a flight mission into Hurricane Rita (2005) on 21 September 2005.The maximum tangential wind and the RMW at the flight level at that time were about 65 m s?1and 25 km,respectively,with an apparent warm-core structure and a temperature maximum of 28°C within the eye.

    2.2.Intensity of TCs

    Fig.1.(a) Flight path (black line) through Hurricane Rita on 21 September 2005.The red hurricane symbol denotes the center of the hurricane determined using the method proposed by Willoughby and Chelmow (1982).(b) Example of “good” radial legs (green lines) relative to the center of the TC.(c) Azimuthal mean profiles of the tangential wind(red line;m s?1) and temperature (blue line;°C) of “good” radial legs in a flight mission into Hurricane Rita on 21 September 2005.

    We do not use the FLIGHT+wind velocity to estimate the intensity of TCs in this study because the flight-level velocity is not routinely used to measure the intensity of TCs and the observations for the flight legs are insufficient to capture the maximum wind speed within the circulation of a TC.We use the intensity of TCs derived from the National Hurricane Center Best-Track dataset.The best-track data are available at standard synoptic times (0000,0600,1200,and 1800 UTC),but the average flight mission times are generally mismatched with the standard synoptic times.To obtain the intensity of TCs at the FLIGHT+record times,we linearly interpolate the maximum sea-level wind velocity (Vmax) and the minimum sea-level pressure (Pmin) from the best-track data at two adjacent standard synoptic times to the corresponding average flight mission time.The interpolated intensity of the TC can be used to reasonably represent the intensity of a TC at the average flight mission time because the change in intensity between two adjacent standard synoptic times is generally not large.

    2.3.TCF calculation

    Guo and Tan (2017)defined TCF as the ratio of the radial extent between the RMW and R17to R17at the surface.We focus on the TCF at 700 hPa based on the FLIGHT+dataset.Previous studies have suggested that the wind speed of TCs at sea level is about 85% of the wind speed at the 700-hPa flight level (Shea and Gray,1973;Powell,1982;Jorgensen,1984a;Powell et al.,2009).Here,the radius of the 20 m s?1wind speed is applied to represent the outer boundary of the outer core wind skirt of TCs.The TCF at the flight level is thus formulated as:

    where RMW700hPais the mean RMW at 700 hPa in the“good” radial flight legs.Similarly,R20is the azimuthal mean of the 20 m s?1wind speed radius in the “good” radial legs.An 11-point smoothing method is used to remove finescale features in the wind field outside the RMW when we estimateR20.The box-and-whisker plot inFig.2shows that the bottom and top quartiles of RMW700hPaare 18 and 75 km,respectively,whereas the bottom and top quartiles ofR20are 100 and 197 km,respectively.TCs at different stages show distinct values of RMW700hPaandR20(not shown).

    Fig.2.Box-and-whisker plots of RMW700hPa and calculated using the FLIGHT+aircraft reconnaissance dataset.The interior line indicates the median,the boxes extend to the 25th and 75th percentiles,and the whiskers extend to the minimum and maximum values.R20

    FollowingGuo and Tan (2017),we classify the flightlevel TCF into four categories:FS1 (TCF ≤ 0.4);FS2 (0.4 0.8).The numbers of the flight missions satisfying the four TCF categories are 28,50,94,and 57,respectively.

    3.Characteristics of the flight-level TCF

    Figure 3shows the relationship of TCF with Vmax,RMW700hPa,andR20.For most category 3 and more intense hurricanes (Vmax>50 m s?1),the radii of the maximum wind speed are <60 km and the radii of the 20 m s?1wind speed are >100 km.Not surprisingly,RMW700hPatends to decrease with increasing Vmax,with a correlation coefficient of ?0.4204 at the 95% confidence level.By contrast,the correlation coefficient between TCF and Vmaxreaches 0.7088 and that between TCF and Pminis ?0.6468 at the 95% confidence level.Specifically,the TCF values of the majority of intense TCs (Vmax>50 m s?1) are >0.6 (Fig.3).Therefore,similar to the near-surface TCF results inGuo and Tan (2017),a larger flight-level TCF corresponds to a more intense hurricane.In addition,there is virtually no correlation between TCF and both R20and RMW700hPa(Fig.3),consistent with the result inGuo and Tan (2017).

    The scatter diagrams inFig.4indicate that there is a nonlinear relationship between TCF and the intensity of a TC.We use a curve-fitting method to fit the relationship between TCF and the intensity of a TC.Power functions are found to express the relationship between TCF and Vmaxand Pminreasonably well.The red curve inFig.4ashows the best-fit result for the relationship between the flight-level TCF and Vmax,which is given by:

    Fig.3.Dependence of Vmax (colored dots;m s?1) on RMW700hPa (km),R20 (km),and the TCF (dashed lines).

    Fig.4.(a) Scatter diagram of Vmax (m s?1) versus the TCF.The red curve shows the best-fit result for the relationship between the flight-level TCF and Vmax and the orange curve shows the best-fit result of Guo and Tan (2017).(b) Scatter diagram of Pmin (hPa) and the TCF.The red curve shows the best-fit result.

    whereV20=20 m s?1.The coefficient of determination for the best-fit curve inFig.4ais 0.52 at the 95% confidence level.The best-fit curve (orange curve) representing the relationship between the near-surface TCF and VmaxinGuo and Tan (2017)is also plotted inFig.4a.Those two curves behave differently,although both show TCF increasing with the intensity of the TC (Fig.4a).In particular,the flightlevel TCF increases much more rapidly with increasing Vmaxthan the near-surface TCF.Regardless of the differences in the data used here and inGuo and Tan (2017),the outer boundary of the outer core wind skirt seems to expand more slowly near the surface than at the flight level during the intensification of a TC,possibly as a result of acceleration abated by surface friction.

    She kept the house in order for them; in the mornings they went to the mountains and looked for copper and gold, in the evenings they came back, and then their supper had to be ready

    Figure 4bshows the relationship between the flightlevel TCF and Pmin,which also suggests that TCF increases with increasing intensity of a TC.The relationship can be fitted with a power function as follows:

    whereP0=1000 hPa.

    4.Kinematic and thermodynamic characteristics of TCs associated with the flightlevel TCF

    4.1.Kinematic characteristics

    Figure 5ashows the relationships between the flightlevel TCF and the difference in the tangential wind velocity at RMW700hPaandR20.Figure 5ashows that the higher the TCF,the higher the difference in the tangential wind velocity.In particular,when TCF >0.6,the difference in the tangential wind velocity at RMW700hPaandR20increases more rapidly with the TCF.As noted above,the TCF is related to the TC intensity.Figure 5aindicates that the difference in the tangential wind velocity at RMW700hPaandR20is also related to the hurricane intensity,with a full correlation coefficient of 0.83 at the 95% confidence level.Therefore,it is difficult to attribute the TCF exclusively to the difference in the tangential wind velocity.Here we utilize partial correlations to isolate the TCF response to the difference in the tangential wind velocity after controlling for changes in the TC intensity and the tangential wind velocity difference.Similar partial correlations are evaluated to examine the relationships between the TCF and other variables.The partial correlation coefficient between the TCF and the difference in the tangential wind velocity is 0.61 at the 95% confidence level.This result indicates that the difference in the tangential wind velocity at RMW700hPaandR20indeed increases with increasing TCF.

    Figure 5bshows the composites of the flight-level tangential wind velocity normalized by the tangential wind at R20for different categories of TCF.Note that the radius is also normalized by RMW700hPa.The normalized tangential wind of FS1 hurricanes is statistically significantly stronger than that of FS2,FS3,and FS4 hurricanes within a distance of one-half the RMW700hPafrom the storm center.This possibly reflects the presence of hub convection rather than a visible eye near the center of the relatively weak TCs with a small TCF.The tangential wind at RMW700hPaincreases markedly with an increase in TCF,consistent with the relationship between the TC intensity and the TCF.

    Figure 6ashows the relationship between the flightlevel TCF and the relative vorticity difference at RMW700hPaandR20.As expected,the relative vorticity difference tends to increase with increasing TCF,with a partial correlation coefficient of 0.5 at the 95% confidence level.Figure 6bshows the relative vorticity composites for different categories of TCF normalized by the vorticity atR20.The FS4 hurricanes have much higher vorticity near the RMW than other categories.FS3 and FS4 hurricanes clearly show a ring-like vorticity structure,coincident with the greater intensity of these hurricanes.Schubert et al.(1999)showed that such an annular structure of vorticity favors exponential barotropic instability.By contrast,the annular vorticity structure is not apparent in FS1 and FS2 hurricanes (Fig.6b).

    The difference in absolute angular momentum between RMW700hPaandR20is negatively correlated with the TCF(Fig.7a) with a weak partial correlation coefficient of ?0.2 at the 95% confidence level.The composites of the absolute angular momentum normalized by the absolute angular momentum at R20show that the absolute angular momentum increases with the radius (Fig.7b),in agreement with the results of previous studies.The normalized absolute angular momentum is largest for FS1 hurricanes,particularly near the RMW,and smallest for FS4 hurricanes,with FS2 and FS3 hurricanes in between.Compared to hurricanes with larger TCF,hurricanes with smaller TCF generally show larger absolute angular momentum at the RMW because the RMW is larger (Fig.3),while absolute angular momentum is smaller atR20becauseR20is smaller (Fig.3).As a result,FS1 hurricanes exhibit the largest normalized absolute angular momentum near the RMW.

    Fig.5.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level tangential wind (m s?1) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level tangential wind corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    Fig.6.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level vertical vorticity (10?4 s?1) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level vertical vorticity corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    Fig.7.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level absolute angular momentum (104 m2 s?1) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level absolute angular momentum corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    Radial gradients in the potential vorticity play an essential part in the formation of vortex Rossby waves (Montgomery and Kallenbach,1997).The activity of vortex Rossby waves has striking effects on the intensity of TCs and changes in their structure (Wang,2002a,b;Li and Wang,2012a;Li et al.,2014,2017).The radial extent of the potential vorticity skirt determines the area in which vortex Rossby waves are active.Because the TCF depends on the outer core skirt,an interesting question is whether there is a relationship between the TCF and the region in which vortex Rossby waves form and propagate radially outward.Shapiro and Montgomery (1993)defined an effective beta value [is the inertial parameter,V is the tangential wind,qis the potential vorticity,r is the radius,and the overbar denotes the azimuthal mean]to describe the potential vorticity skirt.The region in which the effective beta value is positive favors the formation and development of vortex Rossby waves.Because it is difficult to calculate the potential vorticity based on the FLIGHT+data,we define a quasi-effective beta (βqua) as follows:

    Rozoff et al.(2006)showed that strong horizontal deformation inhibits deep cellular convection formation,thus forming the moat in the inner core of TCs.The region with τfil≤45 min is defined as the rapid filamentation zone,which favors the development of organized inner spiral rainbands (Wang,2008;Li and Wang,2012b).

    Figure 8bsuggests that the proportion of the rapid filamentation zone in the region between RMW700hPaandR20tends to increase with an increase in the TCF with a partial correlation coefficient of 0.3 at the 95% confidence level.This result shows that active inner rainbands may be observed in more extensive regions within the outer core skirt,of TCs with a greater TCF (Wang,2008;Li and Wang,2012b),assuming that the variation in RMW is comparatively small.

    A radius of three or four times the RMW is roughly defined in many studies as the outer boundary of the inner core (Wang,2008;Li and Wang,2012a,b;Li et al.,2017),within which inner rainbands are usually observed.However,our result indicates that the relative extent of the rapid filamentation zone varies with the TCF.Therefore defining a fixed radius as the outer boundary of the inner core of a TC with a varying TCF remains arguable.In addition,we suggest that when the RMW is decreasing and the TCF is increasing in intensifying TCs,the rapid filamentation zone tends to broaden.This broadening of the rapid filamentation zone means that more inner rainbands will develop in this region,and more diabatic heating induced by the inner rainbands will be produced.This scenario can contribute to further intensification of the TC (Li et al.,2014),which might be one of the reasons why more intense TCs tend to have a larger TCF (Figs.3and4).

    Fig.8.Dependence of the proportions of (a) the region of positive quasi-effective beta and (b) the rapid filamentation zone in the region between RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.

    4.2.Thermodynamic characteristics

    Figure 9 ashows that the temperature differences between RMW700hPaand R20are statistically significantly correlated with the TCF with a partial correlation coefficient of up to 0.53 at the 95% confidence level.The increase in the difference in temperature with increasing TCF again indicates that more active eyewall convection in more intense TCs with a larger TCF tends to produce stronger diabatic heating.This is also seen inFig.9b,which shows higher normalized temperatures near RMW for FS3 and FS4 hurricanes.Figure 9bshows temperature maxima near the center of the TC for FS1,FS2,and FS3 hurricanes,indicating the existence of a warm-core structure.TCs with a larger TCF have a more significant warm core.However,the composite temperature maximum of FS4 hurricanes occurs just inward of the RMW rather than near the center of the TC (Fig.9b),with the inner core temperature characterized by a warm-ring structure.This feature seems to be consistent with the results ofSchubert et al.(2007).They documented that remarkable subsidence tends to occur immediately on the inner side of the eyewall of intense TCs rather than at the center of the eye as a result of the large inertial stability,resulting in significant adiabatic heating.

    Fig.9.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level temperature (°C) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level temperature corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    The humidity differences between RMW700hPaandR20also tend to increase with increasing TCF (Fig.10a).The normalized humidity is at a maximum near the RMW for FS4 hurricanes,whereas it peaks at the center of the eye for FS1 and FS2 hurricanes (Fig.10b).The maximum humidity near the RMW for FS4 hurricanes arises from the active eyewall convection that vertically advects moisture from the surface.The maximum low-level humidity at the center of the eye for FS1 and FS2 hurricanes is probably related to the existence of hub clouds in the eye (Simpson,1952,1955;Jordan,1961;Willoughby,1998;Aberson et al.,2006a).

    Figure 11ashows that the differences in the equivalent potential temperature (θe) between RMW700hPaandR20tend to increase with increasing TCF.The partial correlation coefficient between the TCF and the difference inθeis 0.43 at the 95% confidence level.Figure 11bshows the compositeθenormalized by theθevalue at R20.An increasedθe(an entropy excess) appears near the center of the eye,and similar phenomena have been found in other studies (Hawkins and Imbembo,1976;Jorgensen,1984b;Willoughby,1998;Eastin et al.,2002;Schneider and Barnes,2005;Montgomery et al.,2006;Sitkowski and Barnes,2009).For FS4 hurricanes,the maximumθeis near the eyewall (Fig.11b),matching the expectation of both empirical (Malkus and Riehl,1960) and theoretical arguments (Emanuel,1986).

    5.Concluding remarks

    Fig.10.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level specific humidity (g kg?1) at RMW700hPa a nd R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level specific humidity corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    Fig.11.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level θe (K) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b)Composites of the normalized flight-level θe corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    A new concept,TCF,was proposed byGuo and Tan(2017)to describe the relationship between the intensity and size of TCs.TCF was initially defined as the ratio of the radial extent between the near-surface RMW and R17to R17.Guo and Tan (2017)documented the characteristics of TCF based on the Extended Best-Track dataset in which the wind radii are estimated in terms of the data retrieved from satellites.The most insightful finding inGuo and Tan (2017)is that the intensity of TCs is more strongly correlated with TCF than with other measures of the size of a TC.To further examine whether the characteristics of TCF change when the TCF is evaluated with direct observations,we use in situ,flight-level observations from aircraft reconnaissance flights to calculate the flight-level TCF.

    Similar to the results inGuo and Tan (2017),we found a strong positive correlation between the flight-level TCF and the intensity of TCs.In particular,the flight-level TCF of most TCs with Vmax>50 m s?1exceeds 0.6.Compared toGuo and Tan (2017),however,the flight-level TCF tends to increase much more rapidly than the near-surface TCF with an increasing Vmax.

    The kinematic and thermodynamic features associated with the TCs with different flight-level TCF values were also investigated.FS3 and FS4 hurricanes have a ring-like vorticity structure.No significant correlation is found between the flight-level TCF and the comparative extent of the (potential) vorticity-skirt region occupied in the outer core skirt.The proportion of the rapid filamentation zone in the outer core skirt increases with increasing flight-level TCF,indicating that inner rainbands may develop in more extensive regions for TCs with a larger TCF.FS1,FS2,and FS3 hurricanes show a more significant inner warm core,whereas FS4 hurricanes are characterized by a warm-ring structure.Theθedifferences between RMW700hPaand tend to increase with an increase in the flight-level TCF.

    Based on in situ,flight-level observations from aircraft reconnaissance,we show that the TCF can be used to describe the relationship between the intensity of a TC and the entire structure of the wind field.There are several shortcomings regarding the flight-level TCF discussed here.For instance,the TCF calculation is based on observations from several radial flight legs,which may lead to observational undersampling of the TC wind fields.In addition,TCF cannot represent the azimuthally asymmetric wind field structures of TCs in complex environments.

    Acknowledgements.We thank two anonymous reviewers for their reviews.We are greatly grateful to Dr.Jonathan L.VIGH for providing the Extended Flight Level Dataset (FLIGHT+) for tropical cyclones.The FLIGHT+was created by the Research Applications Laboratory at the National Center for Atmospheric Research(NCAR) from data provided by the NOAA Hurricane Research Division of AOML and the U.S.Air Force Reserve.This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant 2017YFC1501601,the Key Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China under Grant 2017YFE0107700,and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 41875054,41730961,41730960,andR20 41775065.

    国产高清激情床上av| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 级片在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 精品国产亚洲在线| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| www.www免费av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| www日本黄色视频网| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久久久久人人人人人| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 午夜福利高清视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | www.www免费av| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产精品野战在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 999精品在线视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 天天添夜夜摸| 在线看三级毛片| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成人国产综合亚洲| 99久久精品热视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 免费看日本二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 美女午夜性视频免费| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 999精品在线视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日韩有码中文字幕| 不卡av一区二区三区| 欧美在线黄色| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 香蕉丝袜av| 91麻豆av在线| 全区人妻精品视频| videosex国产| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日本熟妇午夜| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 大型av网站在线播放| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 不卡一级毛片| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 又大又爽又粗| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 免费看日本二区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 特级一级黄色大片| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 欧美日本视频| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 深夜精品福利| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 黄色视频不卡| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 级片在线观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 中文资源天堂在线| 免费在线观看完整版高清| bbb黄色大片| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 特级一级黄色大片| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 香蕉丝袜av| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 麻豆av在线久日| 成人欧美大片| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲激情在线av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| www.999成人在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 黄色成人免费大全| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 天堂√8在线中文| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产野战对白在线观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久久国产成人免费| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 一本一本综合久久| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| ponron亚洲| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久精品影院6| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 九色成人免费人妻av| www.精华液| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 俺也久久电影网| 搞女人的毛片| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 制服人妻中文乱码| av欧美777| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 一夜夜www| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 夜夜爽天天搞| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 成人18禁在线播放| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产免费男女视频| 成在线人永久免费视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久香蕉国产精品| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| www国产在线视频色| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 国产精品野战在线观看| 九色成人免费人妻av| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产免费男女视频| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| av在线播放免费不卡| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产av又大| 黄色成人免费大全| 国产成人精品无人区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美 | 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 男人舔奶头视频| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 亚洲av成人av| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| www.精华液| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 精品福利观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 88av欧美| 看免费av毛片| 国产三级黄色录像| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 一级毛片精品| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久久久久久久中文| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 在线免费观看的www视频| 欧美大码av| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久精品影院6| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 亚洲无线在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲av美国av| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 看片在线看免费视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 麻豆av在线久日| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 三级毛片av免费| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 一本精品99久久精品77| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久久久久人人人人人| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 岛国在线观看网站| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 成人av在线播放网站| 嫩草影视91久久| xxxwww97欧美| 在线观看一区二区三区| 伦理电影免费视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产精品野战在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 又大又爽又粗| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 校园春色视频在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲无线在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美午夜高清在线| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 免费看十八禁软件| 怎么达到女性高潮| av在线播放免费不卡| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| videosex国产| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲全国av大片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 成在线人永久免费视频| 欧美大码av| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 成人精品一区二区免费| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 无限看片的www在线观看| 在线观看www视频免费| 床上黄色一级片| 两个人看的免费小视频| 99久久精品热视频| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 悠悠久久av| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 一进一出抽搐动态| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 色综合婷婷激情| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲中文av在线| 看片在线看免费视频| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 午夜久久久久精精品| 午夜免费观看网址| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| svipshipincom国产片| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 女人被狂操c到高潮| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 精品高清国产在线一区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品影院久久| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 黄色成人免费大全| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产午夜精品论理片| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 床上黄色一级片| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 99热这里只有是精品50| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美网| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| ponron亚洲| 国产精品永久免费网站| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 欧美日本视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲国产看品久久| 精品第一国产精品| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产三级在线视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 不卡一级毛片| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 精品人妻1区二区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久伊人香网站| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 欧美大码av| 美女黄网站色视频| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 很黄的视频免费| av国产免费在线观看| 欧美大码av| 亚洲无线在线观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美乱妇无乱码| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| www.999成人在线观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 色播亚洲综合网| 999精品在线视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲激情在线av| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 国产av不卡久久| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 免费在线观看成人毛片|