• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Re-examining Tropical Cyclone Fullness Using Aircraft Reconnaissance Data

    2021-07-26 14:38:52ZhehanCHENandQingqingLI
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2021年9期

    Zhehan CHEN and Qingqing LI

    1Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China

    2Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of the Ministry of Education,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology,Nanjing 210044,China

    3State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather,Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences,Beijing 100081,China

    ABSTRACT We use FLIGHT+aircraft reconnaissance data for tropical cyclones (TCs) in the North Atlantic and Eastern Pacific from 1997 to 2015 to re-examine TC fullness (TCF) characteristics at the flight level.The results show a strong positive correlation between the flight-level TCF and the intensity of TCs,with the flight-level TCF increasing much more rapidly than the near-surface TCF with increasing intensity of the TCs.The tangential wind in small-TCF hurricanes is statistically significantly stronger near the eye center than that in large-TCF hurricanes.Large-TCF hurricanes have a ring-like vorticity structure.No significant correlation is observed between the flight-level TCF and the comparative extent of the vorticityskirt region occupied in the outer core skirt.The proportion of the rapid filamentation zone in the outer core skirt increases with increasing flight-level TCF.The differences in entropy between the radius of the maximum wind and the outer boundary of the outer core skirt also increase with increasing flight-level TCF.

    Key words:tropical cyclone,fullness,intensity,structure,aircraft reconnaissance data

    1.Introduction

    Tropical cyclones (TCs) are devastating weather systems that can cause serious threats to both human life and property.The size of a TC is important in estimating its destructivity (Powell and Reinhold,2007) and several different metrics can be used to measure this (Carrasco et al.,2014),such as the radius of the maximum wind (RMW),the outer radius of the vanishing wind,the radius of the outermost closed isobar,and the radius of certain wind velocity.Many studies have addressed the relationship between the size and intensity of TCs and the change in intensity,but the results vary.Merrill (1984)reported a weak correlation between the size of a TC,defined by the radius of the outermost closed isobar,and intensity,whereasCarrasco et al.(2014)found no relationship between the radius of the outermost closed isobar and changes in the intensity of North Atlantic hurricanes.Kimball and Mulekar (2004)showed that the RMW to be negatively correlated with the intensity of TCs,whereas a radius of 17 m s?1(R17) was positively correlated with intensity.By contrast,Wu et al.(2015)showed a nonlinear relationship between R17and the intensity of TCs,indicating that R17increases with the maximum wind speed of TCs increasing up to 53 m s?1and then decreases as the intensity of TCs continues to increase.Song et al.(2020)reported that the nonlinear TC size–intensity relationship is only seen in recurving typhoons in the western North Pacific that have a peak in intensity and size at different times.However,Carrasco et al.(2014)suggested that the RMW and R17have the most significant negative correlation with hurricane intensity changes by analyzing the second-generation North Atlantic hurricane database and the Extended Best-Track dataset.More recently,Ma (2020)andMa et al.(2020)further indicated that a cold-core oceanic eddy could decrease the radius of hurricane-force wind and increase the RMW while the TC tracked over the eddy region and weakened.

    These results suggest that the exact relationship between the size of a TC measured by different metrics and the intensity remains unclear.Guo and Tan (2017)introduced a new concept to quantitatively interpret the wind structure of TCs,which they referred to as TC fullness (TCF).TCF is defined as the ratio of the radial extent between the near-surface RMW and R17(namely the width of the outer core wind skirt) to R17.Guo and Tan (2017)found that the intensity of TCs is more strongly correlated with TCF than other measures of size.They further suggested that,along with rapid growth in the TCF,a strong low-level inflow and the radially inward advection of the absolute angular momentum favor the intensification of TCs.A significant finding inGuo and Tan (2017)is that either small or large TCs can be intense,depending on the TCF.Note that although TCF was proposed to supplement TC size metrics,this concept is not explicitly related to a specific TC size measurement.As found inGuo and Tan (2017),a given TCF value can be associated with either small or large TCs measured with typical TC size metrics.

    Guo and Tan (2017)used the Extended Best-Track dataset (Demuth et al.,2004,2006) to calculate the TCF.The wind radii in this dataset are mainly estimated using parameters derived from the Advanced Microwave Sounding Unit instrument onboard National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and European satellites.The main drawback of using microwave data to estimate the size of a TC is that the microwave instrumentation is onboard polarorbiting satellites and is therefore not available at synoptic times.In addition,the winds estimated using microwave remote sensing may have more significant uncertainties than scatterometry,which gives the most direct estimation of surface winds (Dean et al.,2009).It is unclear whether the TCF characteristics reported byGuo and Tan (2017)are different from those determined using in situ observations.We thus re-examine the characteristics of TCF based on the Extended Flight Level Dataset for TCs (FLIGHT+;Vigh et al.,2018),which includes in situ,flight-level observations from aircraft reconnaissance flights.Moreover,the relationships between the kinematic and thermodynamic characteristics of TCs and the TCF will be discussed as well.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 introduces the data and methods.Sections 3 describes the characteristics of the flight-level TCF measured in the FLIGHT+dataset.The relationships between the kinematic and thermodynamic characteristics of TCs and the TCF are presented in section 4.A summary is given in section 5.

    2.Data and methods

    2.1.FLIGHT+aircraft reconnaissance data

    The FLIGHT+dataset includes 229 flight missions for 74 hurricanes from 1997 to 2015.FLIGHT+consolidates in situ,flight-level data observed by the NOAA WP-3D (Aberson et al.,2006b) and US Air Force WC-130 aircraft.Figure 1ashows a flight path into Hurricane Rita by WP-3D aircraft on 21 September 2005,which is in the FLIGHT+dataset and includes several radial flight legs during the penetration of the aircraft into the inner core of the hurricane.The FLIGHT+dataset consists of observations from the radial flight legs.The radial legs where the radial extent is >45 km and the aircraft flew within 25 km of the center of the TC (Fig.1b) are defined as “good” radial legs.We only use the observations in “good” radial legs in this study.More information on the FLIGHT+dataset is given inMartinez et al.(2017)andVigh et al.(2018).

    Aircraft reconnaissance missions into hurricanes are typically conducted at either 850 or 700 hPa,with the 850-hPa flight level mostly used for weak depressions and tropical storms.We only use the observations at 700 hPa in this study.During the passage through the TCs,water droplets may adhere to the sensors mounted on the aircraft exterior,which regularly generates instrument wetting errors (Eastin et al.,2002).In addition,the observed temperature may be underestimated as a result of evaporative cooling on the thermistors.The correction method introduced byZipser et al.(1981)is adopted to remove these errors.Eastin et al.(2002)concluded that this correction method could reduce the average errors in temperature,specific humidity,and equivalent potential temperature to 0.6°C,0.5 g kg?1,and 2.7 K,respectively.About 9.7% of the observational samples used in this study are corrected (not shown),a relatively low proportion.

    Because we will examine the azimuthal mean distributions of the kinematic and thermodynamic fields,we also need to ensure that the selected “good” radial legs are relatively evenly distributed in the main quadrants (Fig.1b).Therefore,the azimuthal mean values of a hurricane for each flight mission are calculated by averaging all of the“good” radial legs at each radial point.Figure 1cshows the azimuthal mean structures of the temperature and tangential wind in a flight mission into Hurricane Rita (2005) on 21 September 2005.The maximum tangential wind and the RMW at the flight level at that time were about 65 m s?1and 25 km,respectively,with an apparent warm-core structure and a temperature maximum of 28°C within the eye.

    2.2.Intensity of TCs

    Fig.1.(a) Flight path (black line) through Hurricane Rita on 21 September 2005.The red hurricane symbol denotes the center of the hurricane determined using the method proposed by Willoughby and Chelmow (1982).(b) Example of “good” radial legs (green lines) relative to the center of the TC.(c) Azimuthal mean profiles of the tangential wind(red line;m s?1) and temperature (blue line;°C) of “good” radial legs in a flight mission into Hurricane Rita on 21 September 2005.

    We do not use the FLIGHT+wind velocity to estimate the intensity of TCs in this study because the flight-level velocity is not routinely used to measure the intensity of TCs and the observations for the flight legs are insufficient to capture the maximum wind speed within the circulation of a TC.We use the intensity of TCs derived from the National Hurricane Center Best-Track dataset.The best-track data are available at standard synoptic times (0000,0600,1200,and 1800 UTC),but the average flight mission times are generally mismatched with the standard synoptic times.To obtain the intensity of TCs at the FLIGHT+record times,we linearly interpolate the maximum sea-level wind velocity (Vmax) and the minimum sea-level pressure (Pmin) from the best-track data at two adjacent standard synoptic times to the corresponding average flight mission time.The interpolated intensity of the TC can be used to reasonably represent the intensity of a TC at the average flight mission time because the change in intensity between two adjacent standard synoptic times is generally not large.

    2.3.TCF calculation

    Guo and Tan (2017)defined TCF as the ratio of the radial extent between the RMW and R17to R17at the surface.We focus on the TCF at 700 hPa based on the FLIGHT+dataset.Previous studies have suggested that the wind speed of TCs at sea level is about 85% of the wind speed at the 700-hPa flight level (Shea and Gray,1973;Powell,1982;Jorgensen,1984a;Powell et al.,2009).Here,the radius of the 20 m s?1wind speed is applied to represent the outer boundary of the outer core wind skirt of TCs.The TCF at the flight level is thus formulated as:

    where RMW700hPais the mean RMW at 700 hPa in the“good” radial flight legs.Similarly,R20is the azimuthal mean of the 20 m s?1wind speed radius in the “good” radial legs.An 11-point smoothing method is used to remove finescale features in the wind field outside the RMW when we estimateR20.The box-and-whisker plot inFig.2shows that the bottom and top quartiles of RMW700hPaare 18 and 75 km,respectively,whereas the bottom and top quartiles ofR20are 100 and 197 km,respectively.TCs at different stages show distinct values of RMW700hPaandR20(not shown).

    Fig.2.Box-and-whisker plots of RMW700hPa and calculated using the FLIGHT+aircraft reconnaissance dataset.The interior line indicates the median,the boxes extend to the 25th and 75th percentiles,and the whiskers extend to the minimum and maximum values.R20

    FollowingGuo and Tan (2017),we classify the flightlevel TCF into four categories:FS1 (TCF ≤ 0.4);FS2 (0.4 0.8).The numbers of the flight missions satisfying the four TCF categories are 28,50,94,and 57,respectively.

    3.Characteristics of the flight-level TCF

    Figure 3shows the relationship of TCF with Vmax,RMW700hPa,andR20.For most category 3 and more intense hurricanes (Vmax>50 m s?1),the radii of the maximum wind speed are <60 km and the radii of the 20 m s?1wind speed are >100 km.Not surprisingly,RMW700hPatends to decrease with increasing Vmax,with a correlation coefficient of ?0.4204 at the 95% confidence level.By contrast,the correlation coefficient between TCF and Vmaxreaches 0.7088 and that between TCF and Pminis ?0.6468 at the 95% confidence level.Specifically,the TCF values of the majority of intense TCs (Vmax>50 m s?1) are >0.6 (Fig.3).Therefore,similar to the near-surface TCF results inGuo and Tan (2017),a larger flight-level TCF corresponds to a more intense hurricane.In addition,there is virtually no correlation between TCF and both R20and RMW700hPa(Fig.3),consistent with the result inGuo and Tan (2017).

    The scatter diagrams inFig.4indicate that there is a nonlinear relationship between TCF and the intensity of a TC.We use a curve-fitting method to fit the relationship between TCF and the intensity of a TC.Power functions are found to express the relationship between TCF and Vmaxand Pminreasonably well.The red curve inFig.4ashows the best-fit result for the relationship between the flight-level TCF and Vmax,which is given by:

    Fig.3.Dependence of Vmax (colored dots;m s?1) on RMW700hPa (km),R20 (km),and the TCF (dashed lines).

    Fig.4.(a) Scatter diagram of Vmax (m s?1) versus the TCF.The red curve shows the best-fit result for the relationship between the flight-level TCF and Vmax and the orange curve shows the best-fit result of Guo and Tan (2017).(b) Scatter diagram of Pmin (hPa) and the TCF.The red curve shows the best-fit result.

    whereV20=20 m s?1.The coefficient of determination for the best-fit curve inFig.4ais 0.52 at the 95% confidence level.The best-fit curve (orange curve) representing the relationship between the near-surface TCF and VmaxinGuo and Tan (2017)is also plotted inFig.4a.Those two curves behave differently,although both show TCF increasing with the intensity of the TC (Fig.4a).In particular,the flightlevel TCF increases much more rapidly with increasing Vmaxthan the near-surface TCF.Regardless of the differences in the data used here and inGuo and Tan (2017),the outer boundary of the outer core wind skirt seems to expand more slowly near the surface than at the flight level during the intensification of a TC,possibly as a result of acceleration abated by surface friction.

    She kept the house in order for them; in the mornings they went to the mountains and looked for copper and gold, in the evenings they came back, and then their supper had to be ready

    Figure 4bshows the relationship between the flightlevel TCF and Pmin,which also suggests that TCF increases with increasing intensity of a TC.The relationship can be fitted with a power function as follows:

    whereP0=1000 hPa.

    4.Kinematic and thermodynamic characteristics of TCs associated with the flightlevel TCF

    4.1.Kinematic characteristics

    Figure 5ashows the relationships between the flightlevel TCF and the difference in the tangential wind velocity at RMW700hPaandR20.Figure 5ashows that the higher the TCF,the higher the difference in the tangential wind velocity.In particular,when TCF >0.6,the difference in the tangential wind velocity at RMW700hPaandR20increases more rapidly with the TCF.As noted above,the TCF is related to the TC intensity.Figure 5aindicates that the difference in the tangential wind velocity at RMW700hPaandR20is also related to the hurricane intensity,with a full correlation coefficient of 0.83 at the 95% confidence level.Therefore,it is difficult to attribute the TCF exclusively to the difference in the tangential wind velocity.Here we utilize partial correlations to isolate the TCF response to the difference in the tangential wind velocity after controlling for changes in the TC intensity and the tangential wind velocity difference.Similar partial correlations are evaluated to examine the relationships between the TCF and other variables.The partial correlation coefficient between the TCF and the difference in the tangential wind velocity is 0.61 at the 95% confidence level.This result indicates that the difference in the tangential wind velocity at RMW700hPaandR20indeed increases with increasing TCF.

    Figure 5bshows the composites of the flight-level tangential wind velocity normalized by the tangential wind at R20for different categories of TCF.Note that the radius is also normalized by RMW700hPa.The normalized tangential wind of FS1 hurricanes is statistically significantly stronger than that of FS2,FS3,and FS4 hurricanes within a distance of one-half the RMW700hPafrom the storm center.This possibly reflects the presence of hub convection rather than a visible eye near the center of the relatively weak TCs with a small TCF.The tangential wind at RMW700hPaincreases markedly with an increase in TCF,consistent with the relationship between the TC intensity and the TCF.

    Figure 6ashows the relationship between the flightlevel TCF and the relative vorticity difference at RMW700hPaandR20.As expected,the relative vorticity difference tends to increase with increasing TCF,with a partial correlation coefficient of 0.5 at the 95% confidence level.Figure 6bshows the relative vorticity composites for different categories of TCF normalized by the vorticity atR20.The FS4 hurricanes have much higher vorticity near the RMW than other categories.FS3 and FS4 hurricanes clearly show a ring-like vorticity structure,coincident with the greater intensity of these hurricanes.Schubert et al.(1999)showed that such an annular structure of vorticity favors exponential barotropic instability.By contrast,the annular vorticity structure is not apparent in FS1 and FS2 hurricanes (Fig.6b).

    The difference in absolute angular momentum between RMW700hPaandR20is negatively correlated with the TCF(Fig.7a) with a weak partial correlation coefficient of ?0.2 at the 95% confidence level.The composites of the absolute angular momentum normalized by the absolute angular momentum at R20show that the absolute angular momentum increases with the radius (Fig.7b),in agreement with the results of previous studies.The normalized absolute angular momentum is largest for FS1 hurricanes,particularly near the RMW,and smallest for FS4 hurricanes,with FS2 and FS3 hurricanes in between.Compared to hurricanes with larger TCF,hurricanes with smaller TCF generally show larger absolute angular momentum at the RMW because the RMW is larger (Fig.3),while absolute angular momentum is smaller atR20becauseR20is smaller (Fig.3).As a result,FS1 hurricanes exhibit the largest normalized absolute angular momentum near the RMW.

    Fig.5.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level tangential wind (m s?1) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level tangential wind corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    Fig.6.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level vertical vorticity (10?4 s?1) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level vertical vorticity corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    Fig.7.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level absolute angular momentum (104 m2 s?1) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level absolute angular momentum corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    Radial gradients in the potential vorticity play an essential part in the formation of vortex Rossby waves (Montgomery and Kallenbach,1997).The activity of vortex Rossby waves has striking effects on the intensity of TCs and changes in their structure (Wang,2002a,b;Li and Wang,2012a;Li et al.,2014,2017).The radial extent of the potential vorticity skirt determines the area in which vortex Rossby waves are active.Because the TCF depends on the outer core skirt,an interesting question is whether there is a relationship between the TCF and the region in which vortex Rossby waves form and propagate radially outward.Shapiro and Montgomery (1993)defined an effective beta value [is the inertial parameter,V is the tangential wind,qis the potential vorticity,r is the radius,and the overbar denotes the azimuthal mean]to describe the potential vorticity skirt.The region in which the effective beta value is positive favors the formation and development of vortex Rossby waves.Because it is difficult to calculate the potential vorticity based on the FLIGHT+data,we define a quasi-effective beta (βqua) as follows:

    Rozoff et al.(2006)showed that strong horizontal deformation inhibits deep cellular convection formation,thus forming the moat in the inner core of TCs.The region with τfil≤45 min is defined as the rapid filamentation zone,which favors the development of organized inner spiral rainbands (Wang,2008;Li and Wang,2012b).

    Figure 8bsuggests that the proportion of the rapid filamentation zone in the region between RMW700hPaandR20tends to increase with an increase in the TCF with a partial correlation coefficient of 0.3 at the 95% confidence level.This result shows that active inner rainbands may be observed in more extensive regions within the outer core skirt,of TCs with a greater TCF (Wang,2008;Li and Wang,2012b),assuming that the variation in RMW is comparatively small.

    A radius of three or four times the RMW is roughly defined in many studies as the outer boundary of the inner core (Wang,2008;Li and Wang,2012a,b;Li et al.,2017),within which inner rainbands are usually observed.However,our result indicates that the relative extent of the rapid filamentation zone varies with the TCF.Therefore defining a fixed radius as the outer boundary of the inner core of a TC with a varying TCF remains arguable.In addition,we suggest that when the RMW is decreasing and the TCF is increasing in intensifying TCs,the rapid filamentation zone tends to broaden.This broadening of the rapid filamentation zone means that more inner rainbands will develop in this region,and more diabatic heating induced by the inner rainbands will be produced.This scenario can contribute to further intensification of the TC (Li et al.,2014),which might be one of the reasons why more intense TCs tend to have a larger TCF (Figs.3and4).

    Fig.8.Dependence of the proportions of (a) the region of positive quasi-effective beta and (b) the rapid filamentation zone in the region between RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.

    4.2.Thermodynamic characteristics

    Figure 9 ashows that the temperature differences between RMW700hPaand R20are statistically significantly correlated with the TCF with a partial correlation coefficient of up to 0.53 at the 95% confidence level.The increase in the difference in temperature with increasing TCF again indicates that more active eyewall convection in more intense TCs with a larger TCF tends to produce stronger diabatic heating.This is also seen inFig.9b,which shows higher normalized temperatures near RMW for FS3 and FS4 hurricanes.Figure 9bshows temperature maxima near the center of the TC for FS1,FS2,and FS3 hurricanes,indicating the existence of a warm-core structure.TCs with a larger TCF have a more significant warm core.However,the composite temperature maximum of FS4 hurricanes occurs just inward of the RMW rather than near the center of the TC (Fig.9b),with the inner core temperature characterized by a warm-ring structure.This feature seems to be consistent with the results ofSchubert et al.(2007).They documented that remarkable subsidence tends to occur immediately on the inner side of the eyewall of intense TCs rather than at the center of the eye as a result of the large inertial stability,resulting in significant adiabatic heating.

    Fig.9.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level temperature (°C) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level temperature corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    The humidity differences between RMW700hPaandR20also tend to increase with increasing TCF (Fig.10a).The normalized humidity is at a maximum near the RMW for FS4 hurricanes,whereas it peaks at the center of the eye for FS1 and FS2 hurricanes (Fig.10b).The maximum humidity near the RMW for FS4 hurricanes arises from the active eyewall convection that vertically advects moisture from the surface.The maximum low-level humidity at the center of the eye for FS1 and FS2 hurricanes is probably related to the existence of hub clouds in the eye (Simpson,1952,1955;Jordan,1961;Willoughby,1998;Aberson et al.,2006a).

    Figure 11ashows that the differences in the equivalent potential temperature (θe) between RMW700hPaandR20tend to increase with increasing TCF.The partial correlation coefficient between the TCF and the difference inθeis 0.43 at the 95% confidence level.Figure 11bshows the compositeθenormalized by theθevalue at R20.An increasedθe(an entropy excess) appears near the center of the eye,and similar phenomena have been found in other studies (Hawkins and Imbembo,1976;Jorgensen,1984b;Willoughby,1998;Eastin et al.,2002;Schneider and Barnes,2005;Montgomery et al.,2006;Sitkowski and Barnes,2009).For FS4 hurricanes,the maximumθeis near the eyewall (Fig.11b),matching the expectation of both empirical (Malkus and Riehl,1960) and theoretical arguments (Emanuel,1986).

    5.Concluding remarks

    Fig.10.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level specific humidity (g kg?1) at RMW700hPa a nd R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b) Composites of the normalized flight-level specific humidity corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    Fig.11.(a) Dependence of the difference in the flight-level θe (K) at RMW700hPa and R20 on the TCF and Vmax.(b)Composites of the normalized flight-level θe corresponding to different categories of TCF.The bold lines indicate that the composite results are statistically significant at the 95% confidence level and the radius is normalized by the RMW700hPa.

    A new concept,TCF,was proposed byGuo and Tan(2017)to describe the relationship between the intensity and size of TCs.TCF was initially defined as the ratio of the radial extent between the near-surface RMW and R17to R17.Guo and Tan (2017)documented the characteristics of TCF based on the Extended Best-Track dataset in which the wind radii are estimated in terms of the data retrieved from satellites.The most insightful finding inGuo and Tan (2017)is that the intensity of TCs is more strongly correlated with TCF than with other measures of the size of a TC.To further examine whether the characteristics of TCF change when the TCF is evaluated with direct observations,we use in situ,flight-level observations from aircraft reconnaissance flights to calculate the flight-level TCF.

    Similar to the results inGuo and Tan (2017),we found a strong positive correlation between the flight-level TCF and the intensity of TCs.In particular,the flight-level TCF of most TCs with Vmax>50 m s?1exceeds 0.6.Compared toGuo and Tan (2017),however,the flight-level TCF tends to increase much more rapidly than the near-surface TCF with an increasing Vmax.

    The kinematic and thermodynamic features associated with the TCs with different flight-level TCF values were also investigated.FS3 and FS4 hurricanes have a ring-like vorticity structure.No significant correlation is found between the flight-level TCF and the comparative extent of the (potential) vorticity-skirt region occupied in the outer core skirt.The proportion of the rapid filamentation zone in the outer core skirt increases with increasing flight-level TCF,indicating that inner rainbands may develop in more extensive regions for TCs with a larger TCF.FS1,FS2,and FS3 hurricanes show a more significant inner warm core,whereas FS4 hurricanes are characterized by a warm-ring structure.Theθedifferences between RMW700hPaand tend to increase with an increase in the flight-level TCF.

    Based on in situ,flight-level observations from aircraft reconnaissance,we show that the TCF can be used to describe the relationship between the intensity of a TC and the entire structure of the wind field.There are several shortcomings regarding the flight-level TCF discussed here.For instance,the TCF calculation is based on observations from several radial flight legs,which may lead to observational undersampling of the TC wind fields.In addition,TCF cannot represent the azimuthally asymmetric wind field structures of TCs in complex environments.

    Acknowledgements.We thank two anonymous reviewers for their reviews.We are greatly grateful to Dr.Jonathan L.VIGH for providing the Extended Flight Level Dataset (FLIGHT+) for tropical cyclones.The FLIGHT+was created by the Research Applications Laboratory at the National Center for Atmospheric Research(NCAR) from data provided by the NOAA Hurricane Research Division of AOML and the U.S.Air Force Reserve.This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant 2017YFC1501601,the Key Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China under Grant 2017YFE0107700,and the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 41875054,41730961,41730960,andR20 41775065.

    久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 看免费av毛片| tocl精华| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 黄色 视频免费看| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲av美国av| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| www.www免费av| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久精品91蜜桃| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 免费观看人在逋| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 中文字幕久久专区| 午夜老司机福利片| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 一区福利在线观看| 国产99白浆流出| 久久青草综合色| 精品国产一区二区久久| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 高清在线国产一区| 国产成人影院久久av| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲五月天丁香| 免费av毛片视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 中出人妻视频一区二区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 岛国在线观看网站| 中文字幕色久视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 色在线成人网| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产av又大| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 免费高清视频大片| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| bbb黄色大片| 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 午夜影院日韩av| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产区一区二久久| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 午夜免费激情av| cao死你这个sao货| 国产成人av教育| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 精品日产1卡2卡| 精品久久久精品久久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 欧美在线黄色| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 欧美在线黄色| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 黄片播放在线免费| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产高清videossex| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 国产99白浆流出| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 黄色视频不卡| 久久精品成人免费网站| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 在线观看日韩欧美| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 人人澡人人妻人| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 999精品在线视频| 黄色视频不卡| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 91成人精品电影| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 看黄色毛片网站| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲激情在线av| 香蕉丝袜av| bbb黄色大片| xxx96com| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 久久狼人影院| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产区一区二久久| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 午夜视频精品福利| 欧美午夜高清在线| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 性少妇av在线| 国产高清videossex| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 88av欧美| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| a级毛片在线看网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 色综合婷婷激情| 在线国产一区二区在线| 看片在线看免费视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 成人精品一区二区免费| 无限看片的www在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲 国产 在线| 一区二区三区激情视频| 色综合站精品国产| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美大码av| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 午夜福利,免费看| 男人操女人黄网站| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 长腿黑丝高跟| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲第一电影网av| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 午夜免费鲁丝| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 宅男免费午夜| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | aaaaa片日本免费| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲中文av在线| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| www.www免费av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产熟女xx| 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日本欧美视频一区| 嫩草影院精品99| 一级片免费观看大全| cao死你这个sao货| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产片内射在线| 不卡av一区二区三区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 一a级毛片在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| av天堂在线播放| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 久久久久国内视频| 大码成人一级视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| av视频免费观看在线观看| av视频在线观看入口| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 曰老女人黄片| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久精品影院6| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产三级在线视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 久久中文看片网| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 久9热在线精品视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 级片在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 看黄色毛片网站| 国产三级在线视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| netflix在线观看网站| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 无限看片的www在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 国产成人欧美在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 大香蕉久久成人网| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 多毛熟女@视频| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 此物有八面人人有两片| 美女大奶头视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| av欧美777| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲av美国av| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| netflix在线观看网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久狼人影院| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| svipshipincom国产片| 两个人看的免费小视频| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| av天堂久久9| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 中国美女看黄片| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久热在线av| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 久久香蕉精品热| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| videosex国产| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 一本久久中文字幕| 成人18禁在线播放| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 午夜两性在线视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 黄色视频不卡| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 老司机福利观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 国产精品影院久久| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲av成人av| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 美国免费a级毛片| 999精品在线视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 色综合婷婷激情| av在线播放免费不卡| 99国产综合亚洲精品| aaaaa片日本免费| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 久久热在线av| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 99热只有精品国产| 欧美大码av| 午夜福利欧美成人| 青草久久国产| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 看黄色毛片网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久中文看片网| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产精品影院久久| 很黄的视频免费| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 在线免费观看的www视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 99热只有精品国产| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| av视频免费观看在线观看| 又大又爽又粗| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 一本综合久久免费| 久久中文看片网| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 国产区一区二久久| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产成人欧美| 国产精品九九99| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 一级毛片女人18水好多| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 久久香蕉激情| 中文字幕久久专区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 精品久久久久久,| 国产精品九九99| 制服人妻中文乱码| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| or卡值多少钱| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 免费看十八禁软件| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡|