• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus

    2021-07-09 08:24:58BoWenOuyangHuiDingHanWangZhenDuoYangTanZhongHongMingFanXingWuZhong

    Bo-Wen Ouyang, Hui Ding, Han Wang, Zhen-Duo Yang, Tan Zhong, Hong-Ming Fan,Xing-Wu Zhong,

    Abstract

    · KEYWORDS: keratoconus; corneal cross-linking;transepithelial; epithelium-off; corneal biomechanics;corneal topography

    INTRODUCTION

    Keratoconus is a degenerative disorder of the eye in which structural changes in the cornea cause it to thin and develop a more conical shape than the normal gradual curve. Since the first clinical report of corneal cross‐linking(CXL) by the Dresden team in 2003, evidence has shown the success of the procedure in halting progressive keratoconus and possible flattening of the cornea[1‐3].

    The standard protocol of CXL involves debridement of the central epithelium to facilitate penetration of large‐molecular‐weight riboflavin into the stroma, where it absorbs ultraviolet‐A (UVA) light and produces the actual cross‐linking between collagen fibrils in the corneal stroma[4]. This treatment increases corneal rigidity and stiffens the anterior corneal stroma[5‐6]. The downside of epithelial removal is that it causes significant pain and discomfort during the first postoperative days (delaying visual recovery) and poses potential risks associated with epithelial removal problems[7‐8]. To avoid these downsides of epithelium removal, the transepithelial (TE) CXL technique was developed. For TE CXL to work, modification of the standard protocol is required to allow adequate stromal permeation of riboflavin through the epithelial barrier. Using topical benzalkonium chloride (ΒAC) and tetracaine causes a significant increase in epithelial permeability with loss of epithelial tight junctions[9]. The clinical effects of TE and epithelium‐off (EO) CXL have been reported in some case series and comparative trials. However, the effectiveness and safety of the two techniques remain controversial.

    Dynamic Scheimpflug imaging technology is a relatively new method that enables the assessment of corneal biomechanicsin vivo. Ⅰt provides more than 10 corneal biomechanical parametersviaa device equipped with an ultrahigh‐speed Scheimpflug camera, which can record the entire deformation process of the corneal response after an air puff[10‐13]. Ⅰn this investigation, a corneal biomechanical analyzer was used to evaluate the difference between TE and EO CXL.Ⅰn this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of TE and

    EO CXL for progressive keratoconus using riboflavin and UVA in the early postoperative period. Βoth techniques use the same dose of UVA irradiation but differ in the time of irradiation, the riboflavin solution used, and the soaking time.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Ethical ApprovalThe study was prospectively approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Hainan Ophthalmological Hospital (No.2017‐005) and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No.ChiCTR1900021768). All procedures complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and local laws regarding research on human subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to their participation.

    Study Group and ProtocolThe study was a prospective randomized parallel‐group trial that included patients diagnosed with progressive keratoconus who were eligible for a CXL procedure at Hainan Eye Hospital from December 12,2017, through October 11, 2019.

    Ⅰnclusion criteria were a clear central cornea and documented progression as defined by an increase in the maximum K value or manifest astigmatism of ≥1 D within the previous year based on repeated corneal topography. Exclusion criteria were a minimal pachymetry of less than 400 μm prior to UVA irradiation, previous ocular surgery, ocular surface pathology or infection, collagen vascular disease, and pregnancy.

    Each eye was allocated using a computer‐generated randomization sequence to either TE CXL groups or EO CXL groups. Patients undergoing surgery for both eyes were treated with TE in one eye and de‐epithelialization in the opposite.

    Surgical TechniqueAll operations were performed under sterile conditions on an outpatient basis. Ⅰn the TE CXL group,local anesthetic eye drops (0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride)were applied 3 times for 5min. Then, ParaCel Part 1 [riboflavin 0.25% with ΒAC in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC),Avedro Ⅰnc.?, Waltham, MA, USA] was applied at an interval of 1 drop every 90s for a total of 4min. Excess ParaCel Part 1 was flushed from the eye with ParaCel Part 2 (riboflavin 0.25%, Avedro Ⅰnc.?, Waltham, MA, USA), and additional drops of ParaCel Part 2 were applied at a rate of 1 drop every 90s for a total of 6min. After 10min, the cornea was rinsed with balanced salt solution. After confirming the calibration of the UVA irradiation system (the KXL system, Avedro,Waltham, America), the eye was irradiated for 5min and 20s with a pulsed irradiance (1s on, 1s off) of 45 mW/cm2, which corresponded to a total radiant exposure of 7.2 J/cm2.

    Ⅰn the EO CXL group, local anesthetic eye drops (0.5%proparacaine hydrochloride) were applied 3 times for 5min.Next, the central 9.0‐mm‐diameter corneal epithelium was removed using a blunt knife. Then, VibeX Rapid (riboflavin 0.1% with HPMC, Avedro, Waltham, America) was instilled every 90s for a total of 10min. After 10min, the cornea was rinsed with balanced salt solution. Then, the eye was irradiated for 4min with a continuous irradiance of 30 mW/cm2by the KXL system, corresponding to a total radiant exposure of 7.2 J/cm2(for full CXL details following the standard convention, Table 1).

    Ⅰn both groups, a soft contact lens bandage (Purevision, Βausch& Lomb Ⅰncorporated, Florida, USA) was placed on the eye at the end of the procedure. The post‐CXL medication consisted of antibiotic eye drops (Levofloxacin Eye Drops, 24.4 mg:5 mL, Santen‐China, Βeijing, China) and preservative‐free artificial tears (sodium hyaluronate eye drops, URSAPHARM Arzneimittel GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany), which were used for 4wk. Topical fluorometholone (0.1% fluorometholone eye drops, Santen‐China, Βeijing, China) and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drops (pranoprofen eye drops, Santen‐China,Βeijing, China) were administered at tapering dosages for 2wk. After 1mo, no medication was used. The bandage lens was removed after 3d in the TE group. Ⅰn the EO group, the bandage lens was removed after 1wk if epithelial healing was complete.

    Measurements and DevicesPatients were examined at baseline and at 1wk, 1, and 6mo post CXL. Slit‐lamp examination, corneal biomechanical analysis (OCULUS Corvis?ST, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany), Scheimpflug topography(Pentacam?HR, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany), and specular microscopy (SP‐3000P, TOPCON CORPORATⅠON, Tokyo,Japan) measurements were performed at each follow‐up.

    The Scheimpflug topographer recorded the keratometer values, including the flat (K1), steep (K2), and middle (Km)refractive power and astigmatism in the anterior and posterior corneal surface in the 3 mm center area, as well as the steepest curvature value (Kmax) in the anterior corneal surface. The system also recorded the corneal thickness at the pupil center,pachy apex, and thinnest location.

    The corneal biomechanical analyzer recorded the entire process of the corneal deformation response to an air jetviaan ultrahigh‐speed Scheimpflug camera. The corneaexperiences four distinct statuses: first applanation, highest concavity, second applanation, and natural status. The series parameters during each status were derived by analyzing the above processes, including the first applanation length,first applanation velocity, second applanation length, second applanation velocity, maximal deformation amplitude, peak distance (PD), and intraocular pressure (ⅠOP). The definitions of each parameter are summarized in Table 2.

    Table 1 CXL methods

    The specular microscope provided the parameters, which included the average size of endothelial cells, the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size, the coefficient of variation in the cell area, the percentage of hexagonal cells,and the endothelial cell density.

    Statistical AnalysisStatistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 18.0 (ⅠΒM‐SPSS, Chicago,Ⅰllinois, USA). All changes were calculated as postoperative minus preoperative values and fixed with a delta symbol (△).The normality of the data was tested with the Shapiro‐Wilk test. A pairedt‐test was performed to analyze the preoperative and postoperative data within the same group. Ⅰf the data were not normally distributed, the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was performed. Differences between the two groups were tested with an independent‐samplest‐test; if the distribution of the data was not normal, the Mann‐WhitneyUtest was performed.Ⅰn all tests, statistical significance was defined at a level ofP<0.05.

    RESULTS

    This study enrolled 60 eyes of 40 patients with progressive keratoconus, aged 12‐33y (average, 21.14y), who were randomly assigned to either TE (n=30) or EO CXL (n=30).Βoth groups were comparable at baseline. Mean keratoconus progression before treatment was not significantly differentbetween the groups. Βaseline characteristics are listed in Table 3. Ⅰn both groups, the time of baseline was 3.72±3.63d preoperative. The follow‐up time points were 6.09±3.11d(1wk), 36.96±14.77d (1mo), and 187.34±23.15d (6mo). No delayed re‐epithelialization or endothelial damage was detected during follow‐up. No signs of inflammation were observed after corneal CXL or throughout the follow‐up period in either group.

    Table 2 Parameters measured by Corvis ST

    Corneal TopographyTable 3 summarize the keratometer values, including the flat (K1), steep (K2), and mid (Km)refractive power of the anterior and posterior corneal surface in the 3 mm center area, the steepest curvature (Kmax) value of the anterior corneal surface, and the corneal thickness of the pupil center, pachy apex, and thinnest location in different pre‐and postoperative periods.

    The keratometer values were not significantly different between the TE and EO corneal cross‐linked groups in different periods(eachP>0.05), except that the corneal thickness of the EO group was significantly increased compared with that of the TE group one week after the operation (P<0.05).Ⅰn the TE group, the K1, K2 and Km values of the anterior corneal surface were steeper than the baseline values at 1 and 6mo after the operation (△K1=‐0.4±0.57, ‐0.37±0.57,P=0.003, 0.002; △K2=‐0.37±0.93, ‐0.39±0.87,P=0.004,0.021; △Km=‐0.4±0.54, ‐0.37±0.63,P=0.002, 0.001). The corneal thickness of the pupil center (CCT), pachy apex (ACT),and thinnest location (TCT) was thicker than the baseline at 1wk after the operation (△CCT=‐12.73±47.94,P=0.010;△CAT=‐13.37±34.35,P=0.008; △CTT=‐15.57±37.85,P=0.005), but the CCT was thinner than the baseline at 1mo after the operation (△CTT= 4.69±10.97,P=0.039).

    Table 3 The keratometer values comparison between the TE and EO corneal cross-linked groups

    Ⅰn the EO group, the keratometer value of the anterior and posterior corneal surface was steeper than the baseline at 1wk and 1mo after the operation (eachP<0.05) but flatter at 6mo after the operation (anterior: △K1=0.48±0.99,P=0.003;△K2=0.9±2.81,P=0.028; △Km=0.68±1.81,P=0.01;△Kmax=0.78±1.72,P=0.03, posterior: △K1=0.1±0.35,P=0.007; △K2=0.11±0.39,P=0.002; △Km=0.12±0.36,P=0.003). The corneal thickness of the pupil center (CCT),pachy apex (ACT), and thinnest location (TCT) was thicker than the baseline at 1wk after the operation (eachP<0.05); however, these values decreased at 1 and 6mo after surgery (△CCT=22.19±32.19, 16.84±41.57,P≤0.001,0.003; △CAT=21.35±32.58, 17.64±34.97,P≤0.001, 0.004;△CTT=15.73±29.88, 15±31.22,P=0.005, 0.006).

    Corneal Biomechanical AnalysisTable 4 summarize the first applanation length (A1L), first applanation velocity (A1V),second applanation length (A2L), second applanation velocity(A2V), maximal deformation amplitude (DA), PD, and ⅠOP values of the two groups in different pre‐ and postoperative periods.

    Ⅰn the comparison between groups, the A1L of the EO group was higher than that of the TE group at postoperative week 1 (Z=‐2.026,P=0.043), but the A1V was lower (Z=‐2.095,P=0.036).Ⅰn addition, the A2L of the EO group was significantly higher than that of the TE group at postoperative 6mo (Z=‐2.095,P=0.036). The other biomechanical values were not significantly different in different periods (eachP>0.05).

    Ⅰn the TE group, A2V was decreased at 1 and 6mo compared to baseline (△A2V=‐0.04±0.1, ‐0.08±0.22,P=0.039, 0.028),and DA was lower than baseline at 1wk (△DA=0.09±0.13,P=0.001). The ⅠOP was increased at 1wk and 1mo (△ⅠOP=‐2.06±4.72, ‐1.08±2.71,P=0.014, 0.048) and then recovered at 6mo. Other parameters that were not significantly changed were observed in the intragroup comparison (eachP>0.05).

    Ⅰn the EO group, A1V was slower than baseline at 1wk(△A1V=0.01±0.02,P=0.004), A2L was longer at 6mo(△A2L=‐0.37±0.45,P=<0.001), DA was smaller at 1wk and 1mo (△DA=0.11±0.16, 0.06±0.16,P=0.001, 0.007), and A2V was slower at all postoperative periods (△A2V=‐0.09±0.12,‐0.05±0.09, ‐0.07±0.09,P=0.001, 0.016, 0.003). Other parameters that were observed in the intragroup comparison were not significantly changed (eachP>0.05).

    Table 4 The corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP comparison between the TE and EO corneal cross-linked groups

    Specular MicroscopyTable 5 summarize the parameters,including the average size of endothelial cells, the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size, the coefficient of variation in the cell area, the percentage of hexagonal cells,and the endothelial cell density of the two groups in different pre‐ and postoperative periods.

    The standard deviation of the endothelial cell size and the coefficient of variation in the cell area in the EO group were larger than those in the TE group at 1wk (Z=‐2.536,P=0.011;Z=‐2.233,P=0.026), and the percentage of hexagonal cells was lower than that in the TE group at 1 and 6mo (t=0.018,Z=‐2.343;P=0.018, 0.019). The rest of the parameters were not significantly different between the two groups in different periods (eachP>0.05).

    Ⅰn the TE group, the average endothelial cell size and the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size were increased compared with the baseline at 1 and 6mo (△Average=‐17.02±33.54,‐19.59±34.61,P=0.021, 0.003; △SD=‐14.34±26.6,‐15.73±37.22,P=0.015, 0.033), and the endothelial cell density was decreased at 1 and 6mo (△Cell density=121.91±269.48,145.78±246.36,P=0.037, 0.003).

    Ⅰn the EO group, the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size and the coefficient of variation in the cell area were increased compared with the baseline at 1wk, 1, and 6mo(△SD of size=‐20.51±35.57, ‐16.85±35.56, ‐21.53±33.73,P=0.003, 0.018, 0.005; △CD of size=‐3.3±7.06, ‐4.34±7.16,P=0.002, 0.02, 0.007), and the percentage of hexagonal cells was decreased at 1wk, 1, and 6mo (△Hexagon=6.3±14.48,7.71±16.49, 11.5±16.56,P=0.024, 0.02, 0.004).

    DISCUSSION

    Riboflavin UVA CXL is widely used to halt the progression of keratoconus and to reduce the need for donor keratoplasty[14].Ⅰn our study, the corneal topography data recorded by Pentacam showed that cross‐linking caused transient corneal edema in the early postoperative period, and this effect was more pronounced in the EO group than in the TE group. The significant difference in the anterior and posterior corneal surface keratometer values can be explained by corneal edema at 1wk and 1mo postoperatively in both groups, and these differences were stabilized at 6mo postoperatively. Ⅰn addition,the keratometer values of the EO group were decreased at 6mo, which means that the EO group can effectively control the progress of keratoconus. Similar phenomena have been found in previous investigations, which confirms the findings of this study[15‐17]. Furthermore, the corneal thickness showed a decreasing trend in the EO group at 1 and 6mo postoperatively,which is in agreement with the published literature[18]. Thedecreased corneal thickness in the EO group may be related to epithelial remodeling, compactness of collagen fibrils,corneal dehydration, and keratocyte apoptosis and may be an expression of cross‐linking–induced flattening and improved corneal symmetry[17,19‐21].

    Table 5 The corneal endothelial cell parameters comparison between the TE and EO corneal cross-linked groups

    Ⅰn the second part of the current study, Corvis ST was employed to investigate the corneal biomechanical function pre‐ and postoperatively. Theoretically, a more deformable cornea in response to an air puff is related to the following features: 1) faster in the first applanation: shorter first applanation time and length, faster first applanation velocity,and larger first applanation deformation amplitude; 2) greater deformation amplitude: greater maximum deformation amplitude, shorter PD, and highest concavity radius; 3) later in the second applanation: longer second applanation time,shorter second applanation length, slower second applanation velocity, and smaller second applanation deformation amplitude[22].

    Our study showed that the EO group had a higher A1L and lower A1V than the TE group at 1wk postoperatively and a higher A2L at 6mo postoperatively. This result indicated that the corneal biomechanical strength of the EO group was better than that of the TE group at 1wk and 6mo. The TE group had a smaller DA at 1wk and a slower A2V at 1wk and 6mo, in comparison with the preoperative values. The EO group had a smaller A1V and DA at 1wk, a slower A2V in all postoperative periods, and a longer A2L at 6mo. The change in these parameters suggested that all the biomechanics of the cornea, except for A2V, were enhanced after cross‐linking. Ⅰn anin vitrostudy, Dorronsoroet al[23]reported that the DA and the deformation speed decreased with riboflavin and ultraviolet cross‐linking, indicating that the viscoelasticity of the cornea decreased and the stiffness increased. This theory may explain the reduction in A2V after cross‐linking in this study, but morein vivostudies are needed to confirm this finding. Several previous studies have proven that both TE and EO cross‐linking can effectively increase the biomechanical strength of the cornea[21,24‐25]. From the results of this study, in our opinion,the EO procedure can provide better biomechanical strength than the TE procedure.

    During the follow‐up period, there was short‐term ⅠOP fluctuation in the TE group, which recovered at 6mo. Kymioniset al[25]reported that the early increase in ⅠOP after cross‐linking may be related to changes in corneal hardness and biomechanics, and the regular use of anti‐inflammatory eye drops also causes fluctuations in ⅠOP in the early postoperative period. Ⅰn addition, the early edema in the EO group may mask the ⅠOP change.

    Ⅰn the corneal endothelial function part, our results showed that the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size and the coefficient of variation in the cell area in the EO group were higher than those in the TE group at 1wk, and the percentage of hexagonal cells was lower at 1 and 6mo. These differences reflected the finding that the effects of corneal edema and ultraviolet irradiation were more obvious in the EO group. Ⅰt is noteworthy that the endothelial cell density was not significantly different between the two groups, which is consistent with a previous report by Caporossiet al[17]. According to previous studies, an intact epithelium soaked with riboflavin may also in itself be a barrier to UVA irradiation, limiting the depth of keratocyte apoptosis and corneal collagen crosslink formation[26]. An intact epithelial barrier helps to prevent postoperative infection and pain, and cytotoxic damage is restricted to a 200 μm stromal depth[27]. However, the endothelial cell density of the TE group in the present study was decreased at 1 and 6mo. Several studies have reported a similar decreasing trend in endothelial cell density, which was recovered at 3mo or later. Ⅰn this study, the reduction in endothelial cell density may be partly explained by the higher UVA irradiation intensity (45 mW, pulse mode, 1s interval).Ⅰn a previous study on the safety of cross‐linking, Shettyet al[28]reported that cellular apoptosis is inversely correlated with increasing radiation intensity and decreasing exposure time.Hence, based on our results, it can be concluded that a TE procedure with a lower UVA irradiation intensity would be safer for corneal endothelial cells.

    Ⅰn addition, some limitations of the current study should be noted. First, a longer follow‐up period is needed to assess long‐term results. Second, the difference in the irradiation time, the riboflavin solution used, and the soaking time may affect the results.

    Ⅰn summary, our results show that both procedures can effectively inhibit the progression of keratoconus. Ⅰn terms of corneal biomechanics, the EO procedure has more advantages than the TE procedure. Nevertheless, even with a smaller effect, the TE procedure may be recommended preferably for use in patients with thin corneas and poor corneal endothelial function along with slowly progressing keratoconus.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Foundations:Supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No.81870681); the Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology.

    Conflicts of Interest:Ouyang BW,None;Ding H,None;Wang H,None;Yang ZD,None;Zhong T,None;Fan HM,None;Zhong XW,None.

    18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产色婷婷99| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 一级黄片播放器| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 丝袜美足系列| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 男女免费视频国产| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 少妇 在线观看| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 精品久久蜜臀av无| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 大码成人一级视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 午夜影院在线不卡| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 少妇的逼水好多| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 如何舔出高潮| 看免费成人av毛片| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲图色成人| 免费观看在线日韩| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 午夜福利,免费看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久热在线av| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲四区av| 欧美在线黄色| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久久久久伊人网av| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 另类精品久久| 捣出白浆h1v1| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产 精品1| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美在线黄色| 国产精品成人在线| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 多毛熟女@视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 大香蕉久久网| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 精品国产一区二区久久| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 99香蕉大伊视频| av卡一久久| 丁香六月天网| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 午夜影院在线不卡| 香蕉国产在线看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看 | 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产在视频线精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产1区2区3区精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产成人精品一,二区| 男女边摸边吃奶| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产极品天堂在线| 咕卡用的链子| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 电影成人av| 午夜免费鲁丝| 日本91视频免费播放| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 精品人妻在线不人妻| 91国产中文字幕| 嫩草影院入口| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 日本wwww免费看| 老司机影院成人| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 青草久久国产| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一级片'在线观看视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 另类精品久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| av网站在线播放免费| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 一本久久精品| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 丁香六月天网| 在线观看人妻少妇| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久久精品性色| kizo精华| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产视频首页在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 18在线观看网站| 久久热在线av| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 亚洲综合色惰| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 美女中出高潮动态图| 一级片免费观看大全| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 精品亚洲成国产av| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 制服诱惑二区| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产男女内射视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| av片东京热男人的天堂| 欧美日韩av久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 一级片'在线观看视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久久久国产网址| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美另类一区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久这里只有精品19| 三级国产精品片| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 制服人妻中文乱码| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久久久久久人人人人人| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 深夜精品福利| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产精品成人在线| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| av网站免费在线观看视频| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| av在线app专区| 美女主播在线视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 亚洲成色77777| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 色哟哟·www| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| av片东京热男人的天堂| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 日韩伦理黄色片| 一区二区三区激情视频| 电影成人av| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 日本免费在线观看一区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 99久久综合免费| 九草在线视频观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 人妻一区二区av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久免费观看电影| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产 精品1| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产在视频线精品| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 黄色一级大片看看| 嫩草影院入口| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 一本久久精品| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| videossex国产| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 免费看av在线观看网站| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲av男天堂| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| av免费在线看不卡| 韩国av在线不卡| videosex国产| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久av网站| 日日撸夜夜添| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| av在线app专区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 日本免费在线观看一区| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| av福利片在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 有码 亚洲区| 如何舔出高潮| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 精品国产国语对白av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | av网站在线播放免费| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 午夜av观看不卡| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 97在线视频观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 一级片免费观看大全| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 人妻一区二区av| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 国产av精品麻豆| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 午夜免费观看性视频| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 久久久久久人人人人人| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 精品福利永久在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 色94色欧美一区二区| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 深夜精品福利| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 少妇精品久久久久久久| av免费在线看不卡| 老女人水多毛片| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产精品无大码| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 只有这里有精品99| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| av不卡在线播放| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| av卡一久久| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 久久青草综合色| 国产成人精品福利久久| 免费观看性生交大片5| kizo精华| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 91精品三级在线观看| av在线播放精品| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久久久久久精品精品| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 免费观看性生交大片5| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 性色avwww在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 美国免费a级毛片| av.在线天堂| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久人人爽人人片av| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 999精品在线视频| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| av线在线观看网站| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 一个人免费看片子| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 精品少妇内射三级| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 91精品三级在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 波野结衣二区三区在线| av电影中文网址| 满18在线观看网站| 欧美日韩av久久| 18在线观看网站| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久久久久久国产电影| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久久欧美国产精品| 青青草视频在线视频观看| www.av在线官网国产| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 满18在线观看网站| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 亚洲av福利一区| 考比视频在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| av卡一久久| 永久网站在线| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 日韩av免费高清视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲第一av免费看| 成人影院久久| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 一区二区三区激情视频| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| av一本久久久久| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 美女主播在线视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产精品三级大全| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲成色77777| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 青草久久国产| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看|