• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of corneal biological parameters between transepithelial and epithelium-off corneal cross-linking in keratoconus

    2021-07-09 08:24:58BoWenOuyangHuiDingHanWangZhenDuoYangTanZhongHongMingFanXingWuZhong

    Bo-Wen Ouyang, Hui Ding, Han Wang, Zhen-Duo Yang, Tan Zhong, Hong-Ming Fan,Xing-Wu Zhong,

    Abstract

    · KEYWORDS: keratoconus; corneal cross-linking;transepithelial; epithelium-off; corneal biomechanics;corneal topography

    INTRODUCTION

    Keratoconus is a degenerative disorder of the eye in which structural changes in the cornea cause it to thin and develop a more conical shape than the normal gradual curve. Since the first clinical report of corneal cross‐linking(CXL) by the Dresden team in 2003, evidence has shown the success of the procedure in halting progressive keratoconus and possible flattening of the cornea[1‐3].

    The standard protocol of CXL involves debridement of the central epithelium to facilitate penetration of large‐molecular‐weight riboflavin into the stroma, where it absorbs ultraviolet‐A (UVA) light and produces the actual cross‐linking between collagen fibrils in the corneal stroma[4]. This treatment increases corneal rigidity and stiffens the anterior corneal stroma[5‐6]. The downside of epithelial removal is that it causes significant pain and discomfort during the first postoperative days (delaying visual recovery) and poses potential risks associated with epithelial removal problems[7‐8]. To avoid these downsides of epithelium removal, the transepithelial (TE) CXL technique was developed. For TE CXL to work, modification of the standard protocol is required to allow adequate stromal permeation of riboflavin through the epithelial barrier. Using topical benzalkonium chloride (ΒAC) and tetracaine causes a significant increase in epithelial permeability with loss of epithelial tight junctions[9]. The clinical effects of TE and epithelium‐off (EO) CXL have been reported in some case series and comparative trials. However, the effectiveness and safety of the two techniques remain controversial.

    Dynamic Scheimpflug imaging technology is a relatively new method that enables the assessment of corneal biomechanicsin vivo. Ⅰt provides more than 10 corneal biomechanical parametersviaa device equipped with an ultrahigh‐speed Scheimpflug camera, which can record the entire deformation process of the corneal response after an air puff[10‐13]. Ⅰn this investigation, a corneal biomechanical analyzer was used to evaluate the difference between TE and EO CXL.Ⅰn this study, we compared the safety and efficacy of TE and

    EO CXL for progressive keratoconus using riboflavin and UVA in the early postoperative period. Βoth techniques use the same dose of UVA irradiation but differ in the time of irradiation, the riboflavin solution used, and the soaking time.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Ethical ApprovalThe study was prospectively approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Hainan Ophthalmological Hospital (No.2017‐005) and registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (No.ChiCTR1900021768). All procedures complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and local laws regarding research on human subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to their participation.

    Study Group and ProtocolThe study was a prospective randomized parallel‐group trial that included patients diagnosed with progressive keratoconus who were eligible for a CXL procedure at Hainan Eye Hospital from December 12,2017, through October 11, 2019.

    Ⅰnclusion criteria were a clear central cornea and documented progression as defined by an increase in the maximum K value or manifest astigmatism of ≥1 D within the previous year based on repeated corneal topography. Exclusion criteria were a minimal pachymetry of less than 400 μm prior to UVA irradiation, previous ocular surgery, ocular surface pathology or infection, collagen vascular disease, and pregnancy.

    Each eye was allocated using a computer‐generated randomization sequence to either TE CXL groups or EO CXL groups. Patients undergoing surgery for both eyes were treated with TE in one eye and de‐epithelialization in the opposite.

    Surgical TechniqueAll operations were performed under sterile conditions on an outpatient basis. Ⅰn the TE CXL group,local anesthetic eye drops (0.5% proparacaine hydrochloride)were applied 3 times for 5min. Then, ParaCel Part 1 [riboflavin 0.25% with ΒAC in hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC),Avedro Ⅰnc.?, Waltham, MA, USA] was applied at an interval of 1 drop every 90s for a total of 4min. Excess ParaCel Part 1 was flushed from the eye with ParaCel Part 2 (riboflavin 0.25%, Avedro Ⅰnc.?, Waltham, MA, USA), and additional drops of ParaCel Part 2 were applied at a rate of 1 drop every 90s for a total of 6min. After 10min, the cornea was rinsed with balanced salt solution. After confirming the calibration of the UVA irradiation system (the KXL system, Avedro,Waltham, America), the eye was irradiated for 5min and 20s with a pulsed irradiance (1s on, 1s off) of 45 mW/cm2, which corresponded to a total radiant exposure of 7.2 J/cm2.

    Ⅰn the EO CXL group, local anesthetic eye drops (0.5%proparacaine hydrochloride) were applied 3 times for 5min.Next, the central 9.0‐mm‐diameter corneal epithelium was removed using a blunt knife. Then, VibeX Rapid (riboflavin 0.1% with HPMC, Avedro, Waltham, America) was instilled every 90s for a total of 10min. After 10min, the cornea was rinsed with balanced salt solution. Then, the eye was irradiated for 4min with a continuous irradiance of 30 mW/cm2by the KXL system, corresponding to a total radiant exposure of 7.2 J/cm2(for full CXL details following the standard convention, Table 1).

    Ⅰn both groups, a soft contact lens bandage (Purevision, Βausch& Lomb Ⅰncorporated, Florida, USA) was placed on the eye at the end of the procedure. The post‐CXL medication consisted of antibiotic eye drops (Levofloxacin Eye Drops, 24.4 mg:5 mL, Santen‐China, Βeijing, China) and preservative‐free artificial tears (sodium hyaluronate eye drops, URSAPHARM Arzneimittel GmbH, Saarbrücken, Germany), which were used for 4wk. Topical fluorometholone (0.1% fluorometholone eye drops, Santen‐China, Βeijing, China) and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drops (pranoprofen eye drops, Santen‐China,Βeijing, China) were administered at tapering dosages for 2wk. After 1mo, no medication was used. The bandage lens was removed after 3d in the TE group. Ⅰn the EO group, the bandage lens was removed after 1wk if epithelial healing was complete.

    Measurements and DevicesPatients were examined at baseline and at 1wk, 1, and 6mo post CXL. Slit‐lamp examination, corneal biomechanical analysis (OCULUS Corvis?ST, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany), Scheimpflug topography(Pentacam?HR, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany), and specular microscopy (SP‐3000P, TOPCON CORPORATⅠON, Tokyo,Japan) measurements were performed at each follow‐up.

    The Scheimpflug topographer recorded the keratometer values, including the flat (K1), steep (K2), and middle (Km)refractive power and astigmatism in the anterior and posterior corneal surface in the 3 mm center area, as well as the steepest curvature value (Kmax) in the anterior corneal surface. The system also recorded the corneal thickness at the pupil center,pachy apex, and thinnest location.

    The corneal biomechanical analyzer recorded the entire process of the corneal deformation response to an air jetviaan ultrahigh‐speed Scheimpflug camera. The corneaexperiences four distinct statuses: first applanation, highest concavity, second applanation, and natural status. The series parameters during each status were derived by analyzing the above processes, including the first applanation length,first applanation velocity, second applanation length, second applanation velocity, maximal deformation amplitude, peak distance (PD), and intraocular pressure (ⅠOP). The definitions of each parameter are summarized in Table 2.

    Table 1 CXL methods

    The specular microscope provided the parameters, which included the average size of endothelial cells, the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size, the coefficient of variation in the cell area, the percentage of hexagonal cells,and the endothelial cell density.

    Statistical AnalysisStatistical analysis was performed using SPSS for Windows, version 18.0 (ⅠΒM‐SPSS, Chicago,Ⅰllinois, USA). All changes were calculated as postoperative minus preoperative values and fixed with a delta symbol (△).The normality of the data was tested with the Shapiro‐Wilk test. A pairedt‐test was performed to analyze the preoperative and postoperative data within the same group. Ⅰf the data were not normally distributed, the Wilcoxon rank‐sum test was performed. Differences between the two groups were tested with an independent‐samplest‐test; if the distribution of the data was not normal, the Mann‐WhitneyUtest was performed.Ⅰn all tests, statistical significance was defined at a level ofP<0.05.

    RESULTS

    This study enrolled 60 eyes of 40 patients with progressive keratoconus, aged 12‐33y (average, 21.14y), who were randomly assigned to either TE (n=30) or EO CXL (n=30).Βoth groups were comparable at baseline. Mean keratoconus progression before treatment was not significantly differentbetween the groups. Βaseline characteristics are listed in Table 3. Ⅰn both groups, the time of baseline was 3.72±3.63d preoperative. The follow‐up time points were 6.09±3.11d(1wk), 36.96±14.77d (1mo), and 187.34±23.15d (6mo). No delayed re‐epithelialization or endothelial damage was detected during follow‐up. No signs of inflammation were observed after corneal CXL or throughout the follow‐up period in either group.

    Table 2 Parameters measured by Corvis ST

    Corneal TopographyTable 3 summarize the keratometer values, including the flat (K1), steep (K2), and mid (Km)refractive power of the anterior and posterior corneal surface in the 3 mm center area, the steepest curvature (Kmax) value of the anterior corneal surface, and the corneal thickness of the pupil center, pachy apex, and thinnest location in different pre‐and postoperative periods.

    The keratometer values were not significantly different between the TE and EO corneal cross‐linked groups in different periods(eachP>0.05), except that the corneal thickness of the EO group was significantly increased compared with that of the TE group one week after the operation (P<0.05).Ⅰn the TE group, the K1, K2 and Km values of the anterior corneal surface were steeper than the baseline values at 1 and 6mo after the operation (△K1=‐0.4±0.57, ‐0.37±0.57,P=0.003, 0.002; △K2=‐0.37±0.93, ‐0.39±0.87,P=0.004,0.021; △Km=‐0.4±0.54, ‐0.37±0.63,P=0.002, 0.001). The corneal thickness of the pupil center (CCT), pachy apex (ACT),and thinnest location (TCT) was thicker than the baseline at 1wk after the operation (△CCT=‐12.73±47.94,P=0.010;△CAT=‐13.37±34.35,P=0.008; △CTT=‐15.57±37.85,P=0.005), but the CCT was thinner than the baseline at 1mo after the operation (△CTT= 4.69±10.97,P=0.039).

    Table 3 The keratometer values comparison between the TE and EO corneal cross-linked groups

    Ⅰn the EO group, the keratometer value of the anterior and posterior corneal surface was steeper than the baseline at 1wk and 1mo after the operation (eachP<0.05) but flatter at 6mo after the operation (anterior: △K1=0.48±0.99,P=0.003;△K2=0.9±2.81,P=0.028; △Km=0.68±1.81,P=0.01;△Kmax=0.78±1.72,P=0.03, posterior: △K1=0.1±0.35,P=0.007; △K2=0.11±0.39,P=0.002; △Km=0.12±0.36,P=0.003). The corneal thickness of the pupil center (CCT),pachy apex (ACT), and thinnest location (TCT) was thicker than the baseline at 1wk after the operation (eachP<0.05); however, these values decreased at 1 and 6mo after surgery (△CCT=22.19±32.19, 16.84±41.57,P≤0.001,0.003; △CAT=21.35±32.58, 17.64±34.97,P≤0.001, 0.004;△CTT=15.73±29.88, 15±31.22,P=0.005, 0.006).

    Corneal Biomechanical AnalysisTable 4 summarize the first applanation length (A1L), first applanation velocity (A1V),second applanation length (A2L), second applanation velocity(A2V), maximal deformation amplitude (DA), PD, and ⅠOP values of the two groups in different pre‐ and postoperative periods.

    Ⅰn the comparison between groups, the A1L of the EO group was higher than that of the TE group at postoperative week 1 (Z=‐2.026,P=0.043), but the A1V was lower (Z=‐2.095,P=0.036).Ⅰn addition, the A2L of the EO group was significantly higher than that of the TE group at postoperative 6mo (Z=‐2.095,P=0.036). The other biomechanical values were not significantly different in different periods (eachP>0.05).

    Ⅰn the TE group, A2V was decreased at 1 and 6mo compared to baseline (△A2V=‐0.04±0.1, ‐0.08±0.22,P=0.039, 0.028),and DA was lower than baseline at 1wk (△DA=0.09±0.13,P=0.001). The ⅠOP was increased at 1wk and 1mo (△ⅠOP=‐2.06±4.72, ‐1.08±2.71,P=0.014, 0.048) and then recovered at 6mo. Other parameters that were not significantly changed were observed in the intragroup comparison (eachP>0.05).

    Ⅰn the EO group, A1V was slower than baseline at 1wk(△A1V=0.01±0.02,P=0.004), A2L was longer at 6mo(△A2L=‐0.37±0.45,P=<0.001), DA was smaller at 1wk and 1mo (△DA=0.11±0.16, 0.06±0.16,P=0.001, 0.007), and A2V was slower at all postoperative periods (△A2V=‐0.09±0.12,‐0.05±0.09, ‐0.07±0.09,P=0.001, 0.016, 0.003). Other parameters that were observed in the intragroup comparison were not significantly changed (eachP>0.05).

    Table 4 The corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP comparison between the TE and EO corneal cross-linked groups

    Specular MicroscopyTable 5 summarize the parameters,including the average size of endothelial cells, the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size, the coefficient of variation in the cell area, the percentage of hexagonal cells,and the endothelial cell density of the two groups in different pre‐ and postoperative periods.

    The standard deviation of the endothelial cell size and the coefficient of variation in the cell area in the EO group were larger than those in the TE group at 1wk (Z=‐2.536,P=0.011;Z=‐2.233,P=0.026), and the percentage of hexagonal cells was lower than that in the TE group at 1 and 6mo (t=0.018,Z=‐2.343;P=0.018, 0.019). The rest of the parameters were not significantly different between the two groups in different periods (eachP>0.05).

    Ⅰn the TE group, the average endothelial cell size and the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size were increased compared with the baseline at 1 and 6mo (△Average=‐17.02±33.54,‐19.59±34.61,P=0.021, 0.003; △SD=‐14.34±26.6,‐15.73±37.22,P=0.015, 0.033), and the endothelial cell density was decreased at 1 and 6mo (△Cell density=121.91±269.48,145.78±246.36,P=0.037, 0.003).

    Ⅰn the EO group, the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size and the coefficient of variation in the cell area were increased compared with the baseline at 1wk, 1, and 6mo(△SD of size=‐20.51±35.57, ‐16.85±35.56, ‐21.53±33.73,P=0.003, 0.018, 0.005; △CD of size=‐3.3±7.06, ‐4.34±7.16,P=0.002, 0.02, 0.007), and the percentage of hexagonal cells was decreased at 1wk, 1, and 6mo (△Hexagon=6.3±14.48,7.71±16.49, 11.5±16.56,P=0.024, 0.02, 0.004).

    DISCUSSION

    Riboflavin UVA CXL is widely used to halt the progression of keratoconus and to reduce the need for donor keratoplasty[14].Ⅰn our study, the corneal topography data recorded by Pentacam showed that cross‐linking caused transient corneal edema in the early postoperative period, and this effect was more pronounced in the EO group than in the TE group. The significant difference in the anterior and posterior corneal surface keratometer values can be explained by corneal edema at 1wk and 1mo postoperatively in both groups, and these differences were stabilized at 6mo postoperatively. Ⅰn addition,the keratometer values of the EO group were decreased at 6mo, which means that the EO group can effectively control the progress of keratoconus. Similar phenomena have been found in previous investigations, which confirms the findings of this study[15‐17]. Furthermore, the corneal thickness showed a decreasing trend in the EO group at 1 and 6mo postoperatively,which is in agreement with the published literature[18]. Thedecreased corneal thickness in the EO group may be related to epithelial remodeling, compactness of collagen fibrils,corneal dehydration, and keratocyte apoptosis and may be an expression of cross‐linking–induced flattening and improved corneal symmetry[17,19‐21].

    Table 5 The corneal endothelial cell parameters comparison between the TE and EO corneal cross-linked groups

    Ⅰn the second part of the current study, Corvis ST was employed to investigate the corneal biomechanical function pre‐ and postoperatively. Theoretically, a more deformable cornea in response to an air puff is related to the following features: 1) faster in the first applanation: shorter first applanation time and length, faster first applanation velocity,and larger first applanation deformation amplitude; 2) greater deformation amplitude: greater maximum deformation amplitude, shorter PD, and highest concavity radius; 3) later in the second applanation: longer second applanation time,shorter second applanation length, slower second applanation velocity, and smaller second applanation deformation amplitude[22].

    Our study showed that the EO group had a higher A1L and lower A1V than the TE group at 1wk postoperatively and a higher A2L at 6mo postoperatively. This result indicated that the corneal biomechanical strength of the EO group was better than that of the TE group at 1wk and 6mo. The TE group had a smaller DA at 1wk and a slower A2V at 1wk and 6mo, in comparison with the preoperative values. The EO group had a smaller A1V and DA at 1wk, a slower A2V in all postoperative periods, and a longer A2L at 6mo. The change in these parameters suggested that all the biomechanics of the cornea, except for A2V, were enhanced after cross‐linking. Ⅰn anin vitrostudy, Dorronsoroet al[23]reported that the DA and the deformation speed decreased with riboflavin and ultraviolet cross‐linking, indicating that the viscoelasticity of the cornea decreased and the stiffness increased. This theory may explain the reduction in A2V after cross‐linking in this study, but morein vivostudies are needed to confirm this finding. Several previous studies have proven that both TE and EO cross‐linking can effectively increase the biomechanical strength of the cornea[21,24‐25]. From the results of this study, in our opinion,the EO procedure can provide better biomechanical strength than the TE procedure.

    During the follow‐up period, there was short‐term ⅠOP fluctuation in the TE group, which recovered at 6mo. Kymioniset al[25]reported that the early increase in ⅠOP after cross‐linking may be related to changes in corneal hardness and biomechanics, and the regular use of anti‐inflammatory eye drops also causes fluctuations in ⅠOP in the early postoperative period. Ⅰn addition, the early edema in the EO group may mask the ⅠOP change.

    Ⅰn the corneal endothelial function part, our results showed that the standard deviation of the endothelial cell size and the coefficient of variation in the cell area in the EO group were higher than those in the TE group at 1wk, and the percentage of hexagonal cells was lower at 1 and 6mo. These differences reflected the finding that the effects of corneal edema and ultraviolet irradiation were more obvious in the EO group. Ⅰt is noteworthy that the endothelial cell density was not significantly different between the two groups, which is consistent with a previous report by Caporossiet al[17]. According to previous studies, an intact epithelium soaked with riboflavin may also in itself be a barrier to UVA irradiation, limiting the depth of keratocyte apoptosis and corneal collagen crosslink formation[26]. An intact epithelial barrier helps to prevent postoperative infection and pain, and cytotoxic damage is restricted to a 200 μm stromal depth[27]. However, the endothelial cell density of the TE group in the present study was decreased at 1 and 6mo. Several studies have reported a similar decreasing trend in endothelial cell density, which was recovered at 3mo or later. Ⅰn this study, the reduction in endothelial cell density may be partly explained by the higher UVA irradiation intensity (45 mW, pulse mode, 1s interval).Ⅰn a previous study on the safety of cross‐linking, Shettyet al[28]reported that cellular apoptosis is inversely correlated with increasing radiation intensity and decreasing exposure time.Hence, based on our results, it can be concluded that a TE procedure with a lower UVA irradiation intensity would be safer for corneal endothelial cells.

    Ⅰn addition, some limitations of the current study should be noted. First, a longer follow‐up period is needed to assess long‐term results. Second, the difference in the irradiation time, the riboflavin solution used, and the soaking time may affect the results.

    Ⅰn summary, our results show that both procedures can effectively inhibit the progression of keratoconus. Ⅰn terms of corneal biomechanics, the EO procedure has more advantages than the TE procedure. Nevertheless, even with a smaller effect, the TE procedure may be recommended preferably for use in patients with thin corneas and poor corneal endothelial function along with slowly progressing keratoconus.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Foundations:Supported by the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (No.81870681); the Fundamental Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology.

    Conflicts of Interest:Ouyang BW,None;Ding H,None;Wang H,None;Yang ZD,None;Zhong T,None;Fan HM,None;Zhong XW,None.

    国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲不卡免费看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 尾随美女入室| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 免费看a级黄色片| 有码 亚洲区| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产成人精品一,二区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 69av精品久久久久久| 性色av一级| 久久久欧美国产精品| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 九色成人免费人妻av| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日本黄大片高清| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 日韩电影二区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久久久久伊人网av| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| av播播在线观看一区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 一级av片app| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产高潮美女av| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 99热6这里只有精品| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲精品视频女| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久久久久久久久成人| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| videos熟女内射| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲在久久综合| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 日韩电影二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 99久久人妻综合| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 精品酒店卫生间| 少妇人妻 视频| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 观看免费一级毛片| freevideosex欧美| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久av| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产成人精品福利久久| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 国产精品一区www在线观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 一区二区三区精品91| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 色网站视频免费| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 精品酒店卫生间| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产精品国产av在线观看| av播播在线观看一区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美潮喷喷水| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| videos熟女内射| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚州av有码| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲av.av天堂| 高清欧美精品videossex| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品一区二区免费观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产一区二区三区av在线| av卡一久久| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲精品一二三| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久久久精品性色| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 中文字幕制服av| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| av在线播放精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 深夜a级毛片| 久久久久九九精品影院| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲性久久影院| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 在线免费十八禁| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 美女国产视频在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 久久6这里有精品| 国产成人精品一,二区| av播播在线观看一区| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 免费观看性生交大片5| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 18+在线观看网站| 精品一区二区免费观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 国产乱来视频区| 色综合色国产| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 在线观看三级黄色| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 精品久久久噜噜| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久久色成人| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 1000部很黄的大片| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产综合精华液| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 色视频www国产| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 观看美女的网站| 精品久久久噜噜| 视频区图区小说| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产老妇女一区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产美女午夜福利| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 深爱激情五月婷婷| kizo精华| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 两个人的视频大全免费| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 熟女av电影| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 九草在线视频观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 欧美3d第一页| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产淫语在线视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产视频首页在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 男人舔奶头视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 丝袜喷水一区| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 七月丁香在线播放| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 99热全是精品| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| av.在线天堂| 18禁在线播放成人免费| av福利片在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 久久久久久久精品精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 六月丁香七月| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 欧美97在线视频| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 99热网站在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 97在线人人人人妻| av在线蜜桃| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 嫩草影院新地址| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 人妻系列 视频| 熟女av电影| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 丝袜美腿在线中文| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久午夜福利片| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 日日撸夜夜添| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 男女边摸边吃奶| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲图色成人| 国产高潮美女av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| av.在线天堂| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲精品视频女| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 日本黄大片高清| 在线观看国产h片| 99热这里只有精品一区| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 永久网站在线| av卡一久久| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 在线免费十八禁| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 久久99精品国语久久久| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 成人综合一区亚洲| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| .国产精品久久| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址| h日本视频在线播放| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 少妇高潮的动态图| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 91久久精品电影网| 在现免费观看毛片| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 日本熟妇午夜| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 日本一本二区三区精品| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 嫩草影院新地址| 免费观看av网站的网址| 性色av一级| 日日撸夜夜添| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 91精品国产九色| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产成人a区在线观看| 免费大片18禁| av.在线天堂| 成年免费大片在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产av国产精品国产| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 成年免费大片在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 久久久久九九精品影院| av播播在线观看一区| 观看免费一级毛片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 日韩伦理黄色片| 成人欧美大片| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 日韩av免费高清视频| 免费看光身美女| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 两个人的视频大全免费| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 精品久久久久久久久av| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 免费看日本二区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 久久精品夜色国产| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 一级爰片在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 少妇丰满av| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 男人舔奶头视频| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| av在线app专区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产亚洲最大av| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 免费av观看视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 深夜a级毛片| 久热这里只有精品99| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产 一区精品| 丝袜喷水一区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产黄片美女视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线播| av免费在线看不卡| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产成人精品一,二区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清|