• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Potassium variability during hospitalization and outcomes after discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    2021-03-03 07:32:34XiLingZHANGHengXuanCAIShanJieWANGXiaoYuanZHANGXinRanHAOShaoHongFANGXueQinGAOBoYU
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2021年1期

    Xi-Ling ZHANG, Heng-Xuan CAI, Shan-Jie WANG, Xiao-Yuan ZHANG,Xin-Ran HAO, Shao-Hong FANG, Xue-Qin GAO,?, Bo YU,?

    1. Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; 2. The Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Chinese Ministry of Education, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, China;3. Department of Neurobiology, Neurobiology Key Laboratory, Harbin Medical University, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, China

    ABSTRACT BACKGROUND The variability of metabolic biomarkers has been determined to provide incremental prognosis information,but the implications of electrolyte variability remained unclear.METHODS We investigate the relationships between electrolyte fluctuation and outcomes in survivors of acute myocardial infarction (n = 4 386). Ion variability was calculated as the coefficient of variation, standard deviation, variability independent of the mean (VIM) and range. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using the multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional regression method.RESULTS During a median follow-up of 12 months, 161 (3.7%) patients died, and heart failure occurred in 550 (12.5%) participants after discharge, respectively. Compared with the bottom quartile, the highest quartile potassium VIM was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.36-4.06) and heart failure (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.01-1.72) independent of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), infarction site, mean potassium and other traditional factors, while those associations across sodium VIM quartiles were insignificant. Similar trend remains across the strata of variability by other three indices. These associations were consistent after excluding patients with any extreme electrolyte value and diuretic use.CONCLUSIONS Higher potassium variability but not sodium variability was associated with adverse outcomes post-infarction. Our findings highlight that potassium variability remains a robust risk factor for mortality regardless of clinical dysnatraemia and dyskalaemia.

    Potassium and sodium have essential roles in maintaining myocardial physiological activity.[1-4]Electrolyte disturbances, such as dysnatraemia and dyskalaemia (hyper- or hypo-),are common in cardiovascular disease and associated with adverse outcomes.[5-9]Especially in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), circulating potassium or sodium abnormalities are significantly associated with risk of mortality.[7,10?12]Retrospective analysis based on the Cerner Health Facts database demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between the mean serum potassium level and in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI.[7]Sodium level on admission was reversely associated with long-term risk of mortality after AMI hospitalization.[10]However, the clinical implication of electrolyte variability is unclear.

    The variability of metabolic biomarkers has emerged as a novel risk factor to provide incremental information. Variability in blood pressure (BP),[13,14]heart rate[15]and blood gamma-glutamyl transferase[16]and glycosylated hemoglobin[17]has been authenticated to provide additional information for adverse outcomes independent of each biomarker level. It has been demonstrated the distinctive value of blood pressure variability for directing therapy and risk stratification in cardiovascular disease.[13,14,18]Given the pivotal effect of potassium and sodium homeostasis, it can be hypothesized that electrolyte fluctuation extends the clinical implications of electrolyte level. This study determines the relationship between baseline potassium or sodium fluctuation and adverse outcomes in survivors of myocardial infarction.

    METHODS

    Study Population

    Supported by China’s national key program for health, the prospective, hospital-based AMI cohort was established in 2017 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Consecutive patients with AMI, aged 18 years or older were enrolled on admission to the cardiac care unit. AMI was defined as chest pain ≥ 20 min or dynamic electrocardiogram variations, and cTnI exceeding the 99thpercentile of the healthy population. All patients underwent optimized medical treatment and revascularization of the culprit vessel was given if appropriate. Dual antiplatelet therapy (loading dose of 300 mg of aspirin, 180 mg of ticlopidine, or 600 mg of clopidogrel), beta-blockers, and statins were performed if appropriate. In this study,among 4 909 survivors after AMI hospitalization between February 2017 and April 2019, excluding prior heart failure (n = 110), renal failure with replacement therapy (n = 13), tumour diseases (n =21) according to self-reports and records, blood electrolyte test < 3 times (n = 324), and loss to follow-up after discharge (n = 55). Finally, 4 386 individuals were available for analysis (Figure S1). The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The research protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Harbin Medical University, and the written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

    Definition of Electrolyte Variability

    Potassium or sodium variability was defined as the fluctuation of three or more serum ion levels measured during AMI admission. Four indices of variability were applied: (1) Variability independent of the mean (VIM), (2) coefficient of variation(CV), (3) standard deviation (SD), and (4) range.VIM was calculated as the SD/mean.[13]The power β was derived from curve fitting of the natural logarithm of SD over the natural logarithm of the mean. CV was calculated as the SD/mean. Range was calculated as maximum minus minimum.Quartiles of VIM were used for primary analysis,and electrolyte range as continuous variable was also applied for visualization because of its simple method and easy explanation.

    Covariates

    Information on age, sex, smoking status, prior diseases, examination, laboratory data, and medication was collected from medical records and self-report. Blood sample collection and blood tests were based on a predetermined uniform protocol.Routine blood tests, myocardial injury assessment,as well as electrolyte, liver, and renal function tests were measured on admission to hospital and reviewed when needed or scheduled. Diabetes mellitus was identified by anti-hyperglycemic therapy or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. Hypertension was defined as prior antihypertensive treatment, the average systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or the diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg at baseline. Acute heart failure was defined as clinical features (Killip class ≥ 2) and intravenous diuretics during admission. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using baseline serum creatinine based on the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula.

    Assessment of Clinical Outcomes

    All patients were recorded for all-cause death,heart failure, recurrence of MI, and stroke after hospitalization, with a median follow-up of 12 months(1-24 months). The regular follow-up points were 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months,and 24 months. The management of all data and quality control were performed with electronic data capture system. The primary endpoint was allcause mortality and heart failure after leaving hospital. The association with each HF subtype was also assessed. Heart failure post-discharge was defined as dyspnea, diuretics medication, and pulmonary rales, third heart sound, persistent sinus tachycardia, edema of lower limbs or pneumonemia sign.[19]HF events included death or rehospitalization due to HF and outpatient diagnosis and treatment. The classification of HF subtypes was assessed using echocardiography within 4 weeks before or after HF diagnosis. HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, 40% < LVEF < 50%,or LVEF ≥ 50% was categorized as HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HFpEF, respectively. Patients without LVEF data were individually defined as having unclassified HF. The secondary endpoints included recurrence of MI and stroke post-AMI. To ensure data quality, two cardiac doctors reviewed the medical records of all inpatient and outpatient diagnosis for self-report.

    Statistical Analysis

    Variables were described as mean ± SD, medians(interquartile ranges, IQR), and counts (proportions).[20]Restricted cubic spline curves were used to visualize the non-linear trends between the electrolytes and endpoints.[21]The associations between ion variability and risks of mortality, heart failure, reinfarction or stroke were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Crude and multivariable adjusted models were adopted. The final model was fully adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, prior MI, cTnI, NTpro-BNP, C reactive protein (CRP), eGFR, triglyceride (TG),total cholesterol (TC), High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), MI type, anterior MI, percutaneous interventional therapy (PCI), ACEI or ARB,spironolactone, acute heart failure and mean potassium level. The Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazards method was further used to repeat the association of HF post-discharge with electrolyte fluctuation, treating mortality without HF as a competing factor. Other HF subtypes and unclassified HF were also considered competitive factors when examined the association between electrolyte variability and each HF subtype.[19]After excluding patients with any extreme potassium or sodium value,repeated analysis was conducted in patients with potassium level 3.0-5.5 mmol/L and sodium 130?150 mmol/L during admission. Stratified analysis was presented with a fully adjusted model (except for subgroup factors). Interaction tests between electrolytes and interaction terms were performed using the Wald test. P ≤ 0.05 with a two-tailed test were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted with R version 3.6 and STATA SE 15.

    RESULTS

    Baseline Characteristics

    The baseline characteristics of all survivors after AMI hospitalization are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 60.6 ± 11.6 years, and most patients were males or smokers, had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), complicated with hypertension,and were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (83.9%). The participants with higher variability of potassium or sodium were more likely to have higher cTnI, NTpro-BNP, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as well as a higher proportion of anterior infarction and acute myocardial infarction.While the average values of electrolyte across quartiles of potassium or sodium variability VIM had minor differences. The median ranges of potassium and sodium were 0.8 (IQR, 0.5-1.1) mmol/L and 6.1(IQR, 4.1-8.4) mmol/L, respectively (Figure 1).

    Of the 4 386 survivors with AMI, 161 (3.7%) patients died, and re-MI and stroke occurred in 96(2.2%) and 53 (1.2%) participants during a median follow-up of 1 year, respectively. There had 550(12.5%) experienced HF after discharge. The proportions of HFrEF, HFmrEF, HFpEF and uncertain subtype were 26.0%, 20.6%, 37.8%, and 15.6%, respectively.

    Associations with All-cause Mortality, Recurrence of MI and Stroke Post-infarction

    Elevated potassium or sodium variability was strongly associated with mortality in the crude and sex- and age-adjusted models (Table 2 and Figure 1).After full adjustment as before mentioned, the association still complied with a dose-response pattern with an elevated risk of all-cause mortality by 68%per each 1 mmol/L increase of potassium range(HR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.29-2.19, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed when analyzing cross strata of baseline potassium variability by the 4 indices (each P for trend ≤ 0.003). Compared with the bottom quartile of potassium VIM, more than a 2-fold increased risk for patients with potassium VIM in thehighest quartile (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.36-4.06). By contrast, though a dose-response trend was observed for the association of sodium fluctuation with mortality after AMI hospitalization in univariate regression model, the significance almost vanished in fully adjusted model (Table 2 and Table S2).However, no significant association between potassium or sodium variability by all four indices and risk of re-MI or stroke was found in fully adjusted model (Table S2).

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics of AMI patients according to the electrolyte variability assessed by variability independent of the mean.

    Figure 1 Restricted cubic spline fitting for the association between ion variability and the risk of all-cause death after AMI discharge. (A): Potassium; (B): Sodium. Restricted cubic spline curve indicates the age- and sex-adjusted HRs (95%CI) estimated by Cox proportional remodel, setting the median value (0.8 mmol/L for potassium range and 6.0 mmol/L for sodium range) as reference.Knots include the 5th, 27.5th, 50th, 72.5th, and 95th percentiles of potassium or sodium range. Solid line represents point estimates. Dashed line represents 95%CIs. AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazards ratio.

    Associations with HF Risk after AMI Discharge

    The potassium and sodium ranges had dose-response trends with HF post-discharge (Figure S2).Using the bottom quartile (Q1) as a reference, higher baseline potassium VMI was strongly associated with increased risk of HF after-discharge (Q2-4 versus Q1, hazards ratio (HR) 1.48, 1.73 and 1.99, respectively, Ptrend< 0.001) according to univariate analyses. In multiple Cox regression model with full adjustment including maximum cTnI, maximum NT-ProBNP, CRP, MI location, acute HF, mean potassium, and other traditional factors, all four potassium variability indices were moderately associated with risk of HF post-discharge (each P trend =0.005-0.051). The association followed a dose-response pattern with a 27% increased risk of chronic HF for each 1 mmol/L increase in potassium range(HR = 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.50,P = 0.004). After adjusting for identical confounders, elevating sodium fluctuation was associated with risk of HF after AMI hospitalization, with 16% increased HF risk per 5 mmol/L increment in sodium range (Table 2). However, compared with Q1 reference, only the top quartile of potassium variability, but not sodium’s was related to increased risk of HF post-discharge (Table 2 and S3).

    Sensitivity and Subgroup Analysis

    Competing risk model was applied to investigate the relationship between potassium variability and HF during follow-up again. There was also a marginal significance between all indices of potassium variability and HF post-discharge (Ptrend= 0.009 to 0.077, Table S4). The associations of potassium range with HFrEF, HFpEF and HFmrEF post-discharge are presented in Figure S3. After fully adjusting for the above potential confounders, the higher potassium range was an independent predictor of HFrEF risk post-discharge, with sub-distribution HR (sHR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.02-1.91; P = 0.038)per 1 mmol/L potassium range increment. However,the association of potassium variability with HFmrEF or HFpEF was insignificant. It is generally known that extremely low or high ion concentrations impaired cellular physiological activity and elevated risk of adverse events. Thus, additional analysis for AMI without any extreme values (potassium level 3.0-5.5 mmol/L and sodium 130-150 mmol/L)was conducted. The highest quartile of potassium variability was also significantly associated with higher mortality compared with those in the lower quartiles (Table S5). According to stratified analyses, the association between potassium variability and increased mortality or HF post-discharge was largely consistent across MI type, age subgroup,sex, BMI, smoker, hypertension, heart failure on admission, prior MI, and renal function. However, we observed a significant interaction between potassium variability and diabetes mellitus for mortality and HF post-discharge (Figure 2).

    DISCUSSION

    In this hospital-based cohort of AMI survivors,VIM, CV, SD, and range during hospitalization were analyzed as indices of electrolyte variability.We found that potassium variability was associatedwith a higher risk of mortality and heart failure risk after AMI discharge. In particular, the association between potassium fluctuation and death post-infarction remained significant after adjustment for mean potassium, peak values of cTnI and NTpro-BNP during AMI admission, as well as excluding patients with any extreme electrolyte level, while sodium variability was insignificantly or marginally associated with poor prognosis. No relationship between electrolyte variability and myocardial re-infarction or stroke events was observed.

    Table 2 Crude and adjusted associations with all-cause mortality and HF after-discharge according to quartiles of electrolyte variability independent of the mean.

    Numerous studies investigated the association between serum potassium or sodium levels and mortality in patients with AMI, while few studied the risk of developing HF after AMI. To the best of our knowledge, no prior study reported the prognostic value of potassium or sodium variability.The lack of attention to electrolyte fluctuation may attribute to the established conventional clinical implications of dysnatraemias and dyskalaemias. Our research provides new insights into the implications of electrolyte variability. Indeed, it should not deny that extremely low or extremely high ion concentrations were dangerous and associated with an increased death risk. Diuretics medication as one indicator of acute heart failure resulted in greater ion variability. However, after adjusting for acute HF and excluding patients with any extreme potassium and sodium values during hospitalization, potassium fluctuation was also robustly linked to poor prognosis in survivors of AMI independent of potassium concentration.

    Figure 2 Subgroup analyses of baseline potassium variability and mortality or HF risk after discharge. Stratified analysis was conducted with Cox or competing risk model, which was fully adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, piror MI, cTnI,NT-proBNP, CRP, eGFR, TG, TC, HDL, MI type, anterior MI, PCI, ACEI or ARB, spironolactone, acute heart failure and mean potassium except for subgroup factors. ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; CRP: C-reactive protein; cTnI: cardiac troponin I; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL: highdensity lipoprotein; HF: heart failure; HR: hazards ratio; MI: myocardial infarction; NT-proBNP: N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride.

    Prior studies demonstrated that baseline hyponatraemia was significantly associated with longterm death risk in patients who experienced AMI,with all-cause mortality increasing by 17%?61%during several years of follow-up after adjusting for multiple confounders but without cTn.[10,22]Interestingly, hypernatraemia increased mortality in patients with AMI,[12]but had no obvious effect on long-term mortality in patients with chronic HF.[23]Similarly, we also observed that increased sodium fluctuation was related to higher total mortality in univariate analysis, but that effect disappeared after full adjustment. Currently, whether serum sodium was associated with incident HF post-MI still lacks strong evidence. Herein, we observed that the association of sodium fluctuation with HF post-discharge also became insignificant in the adjusted model. Thus, our study and prior reports suggest that sodium concentrations or variability may have a limited prognostic value based on current risk factors in patients with AMI.

    Clinical guidelines recommend the range of serum potassium levels between 4.0 and 5.0 mEq/L or even 4.5 to 5.5 mEq/L in patients with AMI.[24]Potassium levels between 3.5 and 4.5 mmol/L were associated with the lowest short-[24]and long-term[5,25-27]mortality in hospitalized patients with AMI. Our observations further supported the finding that potassium disturbance increases mortality risk post-MI. even during normal electrolyte range of potassium level 3.5?5.5 mmol/L and sodium level 130?150 mmol/L, we still observed more than a 2-fold increased risk of mortality for patients with potassium variability in the highest quartile, compared with those patients in the bottom quartile. Results from the SWEDEHEART cohort demonstrated that the association of potassium level at discharge with HF post-infarction was insignificant.[27]Our data provided moderate evidence of the dose-response pattern between potassium variability and HF postdischarge, independent of maximum cTnI, NTproBNP, heart failure on admission, and mean potassium. The association was still observed in patients without acute HF (sHR = 1.39, 95%CI:1.06?1.82). Thus, potassium variability might reflect better the severity of impaired homeostasis and provide incremental prognostic information independent of potassium concentration for patients with AMI.

    Current practice tended to consider HF as a complicated syndrome and study for the comprehensive mechanisms and phenotypes of HF is a great challenge. Previous studies demonstrated that HFmrEF was difficult to characterize with clinic indicators and circulating biomarkers, suggesting that patients with moderate LVEF had obvious heterogeneity.[28]Consistently, both potassium and sodium fluctuations showed no significant association with non-HFrEF in our study. Indeed, the pathophysiological evidence for classifying HF post-MI according to LVEF is unclear.[29]The description of HFpEF or HFmrEF post-infarction was just presented in a few studies and the potential mechanisms in AMI were still unclear.[29]Furthermore, LVEF is dynamic during the chronic phase of AMI and relapsing HF can be characterized as different subtypes. The heterogeneous effects to identify HF and classify HF subtypes tend to bias the difference in hazards among those HF sub-phenotypes toward the null, so the analysis regarding HF needs further investigation with larger-scale cohort. It is worth noting that, potassium fluctuation is more pronounced in the high-risk subgroup of patients. A previous study by Kraft et al. has shown that potassium homeostasis is often disturbed in critically ill patients and high-risk patients with more comorbidities.[30]This may be due to the patient's underlying disease and treatment methods that affect the Na+/K+-ATP pump. The pump is affected by many factors such as insulin level and acid-base status,and thus regulate the fluctuation of blood potassium.

    Mechanisms regarding the association of ion fluctuation with adverse prognosis in patients with AMI remain unclear. Increased variability in blood pressure was linked to an increased 10%-18% risk of cardiovascular and mortality events over the effect of mean blood pressure.[14]And the potential interpretation was that continuous blood pressure monitoring provides extra information about the stability of blood pressure compared with a single or mean value. Likewise, circulating electrolytes oscillate over time will be especially amplified in the setting of AMI. Theoretically, ion variability may more effectively indicate internal environmental conditions than a single electrolyte value, even the electrolyte concentrations were in normal range post-admission. In addition, atherosclerosis progress and plaque instability were associated with recurrence of MI or stroke, which may explain the insignificant relationship between ion variability or abnormal level and angiemphraxis events in our and other reports.[12]However, subsequent exploration is required to ascertain whether and how electrolyte fluctuation participates in the early pathophysiological mechanisms of poor prognosis post-MI.

    Our findings should be interpreted within the context of its strengths and limitations. The electrolyte variability was estimated with various methods. Study staffs were especially responsible for this prospective hospital-based cohort that facilitated relatively complete data with less misclassification bias. Moreover, patients with AMI were admitted from 2017 to 2019, baseline characteristics and therapeutic strategies reflected contemporary epidemiology. This study has some limitations. First,participants in this study were primarily residents in Northeast China where they are accustomed to a high-salt diet. Thus, our findings should be further explored in populations from other regions and backgrounds. Second, heart failure is characterized by highly heterogeneous manifestations and mechanisms, so a larger scale cohort may need to further investigate the association between ion variability and HF risk. Third, we did not acquire the information about the Charlson Index in the present study.Even though the potential confounders were adjusted to the extent possible, the residual confounding could not be completely ruled out. Fourth, the causality could not be concluded for the observational study design.

    In conclusion, our study shows that potassium variability during AMI hospitalization is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality and heart failure post discharge independent of its concentration. By contrast, sodium variability had a limited association with poor prognosis post-infarction. Attention should be given to longitudinal electrolyte fluctuation more than single ion measurement, even in those patients without extreme value.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We would like to thank the staff of cardiac followup team for raw data collecting.

    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

    XLZ, SJW and BY conceived and designed the study. HXC and XQG developed the protocols.XRH and XYZ collected and assembled all data.SHF analysed and visualized the results. All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved to submit. Reviewed and edited the manuscript, BY and XQG take the responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of this analysis.

    FUNDING

    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC1301100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81 827 806,81 870 353, 31 771 241), and Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education (No.KF201903).

    CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

    None.

    a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 国产探花极品一区二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产成人福利小说| 1024手机看黄色片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 日本 欧美在线| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 成年版毛片免费区| 香蕉av资源在线| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 91av网一区二区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产视频内射| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲成人久久性| 88av欧美| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产在视频线在精品| h日本视频在线播放| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 一夜夜www| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美bdsm另类| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久精品人妻少妇| 观看美女的网站| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 欧美+日韩+精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产日本99.免费观看| 色综合婷婷激情| 此物有八面人人有两片| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 91av网一区二区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 欧美+日韩+精品| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲在线观看片| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 免费观看精品视频网站| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 嫩草影院精品99| 成年免费大片在线观看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 91久久精品电影网| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产99白浆流出| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| netflix在线观看网站| 国产av在哪里看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲18禁久久av| 禁无遮挡网站| 中文资源天堂在线| 免费av毛片视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 午夜激情福利司机影院| 成人精品一区二区免费| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产在视频线在精品| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 天堂动漫精品| 国产成人影院久久av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲国产色片| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 欧美日本视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产视频内射| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 在线a可以看的网站| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产99白浆流出| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 中文字幕久久专区| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 国产成人av教育| 男女那种视频在线观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 此物有八面人人有两片| 波多野结衣高清作品| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 香蕉av资源在线| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 很黄的视频免费| 免费在线观看日本一区| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 午夜福利18| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 51国产日韩欧美| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 少妇丰满av| tocl精华| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 校园春色视频在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| av专区在线播放| 一a级毛片在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产老妇女一区| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 手机成人av网站| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 一区福利在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲国产欧美网| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 少妇的逼水好多| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 在线a可以看的网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 怎么达到女性高潮| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 一夜夜www| 成人精品一区二区免费| 有码 亚洲区| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| av天堂中文字幕网| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 亚洲自拍偷在线| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 色综合站精品国产| 成人欧美大片| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 亚洲人成网站在线播| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久久久久大精品| 国产精品野战在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 级片在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 99久国产av精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 午夜激情欧美在线| 97碰自拍视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 午夜精品在线福利| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| www日本在线高清视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲18禁久久av| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 草草在线视频免费看| www国产在线视频色| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产美女午夜福利| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲成人久久性| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 久久久久久久久大av| svipshipincom国产片| 热99在线观看视频| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲av美国av| 国产色婷婷99| 国产成人福利小说| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲无线在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 欧美日韩精品网址| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 嫩草影院入口| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 禁无遮挡网站| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩有码中文字幕| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 悠悠久久av| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产三级中文精品| av片东京热男人的天堂| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产在视频线在精品| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲av熟女| 搞女人的毛片| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产综合懂色| 久久中文看片网| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久久久久久久大av| 一本精品99久久精品77| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产色婷婷99| 色综合站精品国产| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲无线在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 美女黄网站色视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲国产色片| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美性感艳星| 综合色av麻豆| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国产成人av教育| 午夜福利高清视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 精品国产亚洲在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 午夜视频国产福利| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 久久草成人影院| 国产老妇女一区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 在线观看66精品国产| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 很黄的视频免费| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 一本久久中文字幕| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| h日本视频在线播放| 日本 欧美在线| 日本成人三级电影网站| 欧美激情在线99| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 99热只有精品国产| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 怎么达到女性高潮| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 色播亚洲综合网| 在线观看66精品国产| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产熟女xx| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 小说图片视频综合网站| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产真实乱freesex| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 午夜福利18| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲av熟女| 久久精品人妻少妇| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 宅男免费午夜| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 午夜a级毛片| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 舔av片在线| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 久久性视频一级片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 久久久久性生活片| 99久久精品热视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 两个人看的免费小视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产探花极品一区二区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 18+在线观看网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 日本成人三级电影网站| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 成人三级黄色视频|