• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Potassium variability during hospitalization and outcomes after discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction

    2021-03-03 07:32:34XiLingZHANGHengXuanCAIShanJieWANGXiaoYuanZHANGXinRanHAOShaoHongFANGXueQinGAOBoYU
    Journal of Geriatric Cardiology 2021年1期

    Xi-Ling ZHANG, Heng-Xuan CAI, Shan-Jie WANG, Xiao-Yuan ZHANG,Xin-Ran HAO, Shao-Hong FANG, Xue-Qin GAO,?, Bo YU,?

    1. Department of Cardiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China; 2. The Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Chinese Ministry of Education, 246 Xuefu Road, Nangang District, Harbin, China;3. Department of Neurobiology, Neurobiology Key Laboratory, Harbin Medical University, Education Department of Heilongjiang Province, Harbin, China

    ABSTRACT BACKGROUND The variability of metabolic biomarkers has been determined to provide incremental prognosis information,but the implications of electrolyte variability remained unclear.METHODS We investigate the relationships between electrolyte fluctuation and outcomes in survivors of acute myocardial infarction (n = 4 386). Ion variability was calculated as the coefficient of variation, standard deviation, variability independent of the mean (VIM) and range. Hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using the multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional regression method.RESULTS During a median follow-up of 12 months, 161 (3.7%) patients died, and heart failure occurred in 550 (12.5%) participants after discharge, respectively. Compared with the bottom quartile, the highest quartile potassium VIM was associated with increased risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.36-4.06) and heart failure (HR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.01-1.72) independent of cardiac troponin I (cTnI), N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), infarction site, mean potassium and other traditional factors, while those associations across sodium VIM quartiles were insignificant. Similar trend remains across the strata of variability by other three indices. These associations were consistent after excluding patients with any extreme electrolyte value and diuretic use.CONCLUSIONS Higher potassium variability but not sodium variability was associated with adverse outcomes post-infarction. Our findings highlight that potassium variability remains a robust risk factor for mortality regardless of clinical dysnatraemia and dyskalaemia.

    Potassium and sodium have essential roles in maintaining myocardial physiological activity.[1-4]Electrolyte disturbances, such as dysnatraemia and dyskalaemia (hyper- or hypo-),are common in cardiovascular disease and associated with adverse outcomes.[5-9]Especially in the setting of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), circulating potassium or sodium abnormalities are significantly associated with risk of mortality.[7,10?12]Retrospective analysis based on the Cerner Health Facts database demonstrated a U-shaped relationship between the mean serum potassium level and in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI.[7]Sodium level on admission was reversely associated with long-term risk of mortality after AMI hospitalization.[10]However, the clinical implication of electrolyte variability is unclear.

    The variability of metabolic biomarkers has emerged as a novel risk factor to provide incremental information. Variability in blood pressure (BP),[13,14]heart rate[15]and blood gamma-glutamyl transferase[16]and glycosylated hemoglobin[17]has been authenticated to provide additional information for adverse outcomes independent of each biomarker level. It has been demonstrated the distinctive value of blood pressure variability for directing therapy and risk stratification in cardiovascular disease.[13,14,18]Given the pivotal effect of potassium and sodium homeostasis, it can be hypothesized that electrolyte fluctuation extends the clinical implications of electrolyte level. This study determines the relationship between baseline potassium or sodium fluctuation and adverse outcomes in survivors of myocardial infarction.

    METHODS

    Study Population

    Supported by China’s national key program for health, the prospective, hospital-based AMI cohort was established in 2017 in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Consecutive patients with AMI, aged 18 years or older were enrolled on admission to the cardiac care unit. AMI was defined as chest pain ≥ 20 min or dynamic electrocardiogram variations, and cTnI exceeding the 99thpercentile of the healthy population. All patients underwent optimized medical treatment and revascularization of the culprit vessel was given if appropriate. Dual antiplatelet therapy (loading dose of 300 mg of aspirin, 180 mg of ticlopidine, or 600 mg of clopidogrel), beta-blockers, and statins were performed if appropriate. In this study,among 4 909 survivors after AMI hospitalization between February 2017 and April 2019, excluding prior heart failure (n = 110), renal failure with replacement therapy (n = 13), tumour diseases (n =21) according to self-reports and records, blood electrolyte test < 3 times (n = 324), and loss to follow-up after discharge (n = 55). Finally, 4 386 individuals were available for analysis (Figure S1). The study was conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The research protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Harbin Medical University, and the written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

    Definition of Electrolyte Variability

    Potassium or sodium variability was defined as the fluctuation of three or more serum ion levels measured during AMI admission. Four indices of variability were applied: (1) Variability independent of the mean (VIM), (2) coefficient of variation(CV), (3) standard deviation (SD), and (4) range.VIM was calculated as the SD/mean.[13]The power β was derived from curve fitting of the natural logarithm of SD over the natural logarithm of the mean. CV was calculated as the SD/mean. Range was calculated as maximum minus minimum.Quartiles of VIM were used for primary analysis,and electrolyte range as continuous variable was also applied for visualization because of its simple method and easy explanation.

    Covariates

    Information on age, sex, smoking status, prior diseases, examination, laboratory data, and medication was collected from medical records and self-report. Blood sample collection and blood tests were based on a predetermined uniform protocol.Routine blood tests, myocardial injury assessment,as well as electrolyte, liver, and renal function tests were measured on admission to hospital and reviewed when needed or scheduled. Diabetes mellitus was identified by anti-hyperglycemic therapy or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%. Hypertension was defined as prior antihypertensive treatment, the average systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or the diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg at baseline. Acute heart failure was defined as clinical features (Killip class ≥ 2) and intravenous diuretics during admission. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using baseline serum creatinine based on the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula.

    Assessment of Clinical Outcomes

    All patients were recorded for all-cause death,heart failure, recurrence of MI, and stroke after hospitalization, with a median follow-up of 12 months(1-24 months). The regular follow-up points were 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months,and 24 months. The management of all data and quality control were performed with electronic data capture system. The primary endpoint was allcause mortality and heart failure after leaving hospital. The association with each HF subtype was also assessed. Heart failure post-discharge was defined as dyspnea, diuretics medication, and pulmonary rales, third heart sound, persistent sinus tachycardia, edema of lower limbs or pneumonemia sign.[19]HF events included death or rehospitalization due to HF and outpatient diagnosis and treatment. The classification of HF subtypes was assessed using echocardiography within 4 weeks before or after HF diagnosis. HF with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40%, 40% < LVEF < 50%,or LVEF ≥ 50% was categorized as HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HFpEF, respectively. Patients without LVEF data were individually defined as having unclassified HF. The secondary endpoints included recurrence of MI and stroke post-AMI. To ensure data quality, two cardiac doctors reviewed the medical records of all inpatient and outpatient diagnosis for self-report.

    Statistical Analysis

    Variables were described as mean ± SD, medians(interquartile ranges, IQR), and counts (proportions).[20]Restricted cubic spline curves were used to visualize the non-linear trends between the electrolytes and endpoints.[21]The associations between ion variability and risks of mortality, heart failure, reinfarction or stroke were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression. Crude and multivariable adjusted models were adopted. The final model was fully adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, prior MI, cTnI, NTpro-BNP, C reactive protein (CRP), eGFR, triglyceride (TG),total cholesterol (TC), High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), MI type, anterior MI, percutaneous interventional therapy (PCI), ACEI or ARB,spironolactone, acute heart failure and mean potassium level. The Fine-Gray sub-distribution hazards method was further used to repeat the association of HF post-discharge with electrolyte fluctuation, treating mortality without HF as a competing factor. Other HF subtypes and unclassified HF were also considered competitive factors when examined the association between electrolyte variability and each HF subtype.[19]After excluding patients with any extreme potassium or sodium value,repeated analysis was conducted in patients with potassium level 3.0-5.5 mmol/L and sodium 130?150 mmol/L during admission. Stratified analysis was presented with a fully adjusted model (except for subgroup factors). Interaction tests between electrolytes and interaction terms were performed using the Wald test. P ≤ 0.05 with a two-tailed test were considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted with R version 3.6 and STATA SE 15.

    RESULTS

    Baseline Characteristics

    The baseline characteristics of all survivors after AMI hospitalization are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 60.6 ± 11.6 years, and most patients were males or smokers, had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), complicated with hypertension,and were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (83.9%). The participants with higher variability of potassium or sodium were more likely to have higher cTnI, NTpro-BNP, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels as well as a higher proportion of anterior infarction and acute myocardial infarction.While the average values of electrolyte across quartiles of potassium or sodium variability VIM had minor differences. The median ranges of potassium and sodium were 0.8 (IQR, 0.5-1.1) mmol/L and 6.1(IQR, 4.1-8.4) mmol/L, respectively (Figure 1).

    Of the 4 386 survivors with AMI, 161 (3.7%) patients died, and re-MI and stroke occurred in 96(2.2%) and 53 (1.2%) participants during a median follow-up of 1 year, respectively. There had 550(12.5%) experienced HF after discharge. The proportions of HFrEF, HFmrEF, HFpEF and uncertain subtype were 26.0%, 20.6%, 37.8%, and 15.6%, respectively.

    Associations with All-cause Mortality, Recurrence of MI and Stroke Post-infarction

    Elevated potassium or sodium variability was strongly associated with mortality in the crude and sex- and age-adjusted models (Table 2 and Figure 1).After full adjustment as before mentioned, the association still complied with a dose-response pattern with an elevated risk of all-cause mortality by 68%per each 1 mmol/L increase of potassium range(HR = 1.68, 95%CI: 1.29-2.19, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed when analyzing cross strata of baseline potassium variability by the 4 indices (each P for trend ≤ 0.003). Compared with the bottom quartile of potassium VIM, more than a 2-fold increased risk for patients with potassium VIM in thehighest quartile (HR = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.36-4.06). By contrast, though a dose-response trend was observed for the association of sodium fluctuation with mortality after AMI hospitalization in univariate regression model, the significance almost vanished in fully adjusted model (Table 2 and Table S2).However, no significant association between potassium or sodium variability by all four indices and risk of re-MI or stroke was found in fully adjusted model (Table S2).

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics of AMI patients according to the electrolyte variability assessed by variability independent of the mean.

    Figure 1 Restricted cubic spline fitting for the association between ion variability and the risk of all-cause death after AMI discharge. (A): Potassium; (B): Sodium. Restricted cubic spline curve indicates the age- and sex-adjusted HRs (95%CI) estimated by Cox proportional remodel, setting the median value (0.8 mmol/L for potassium range and 6.0 mmol/L for sodium range) as reference.Knots include the 5th, 27.5th, 50th, 72.5th, and 95th percentiles of potassium or sodium range. Solid line represents point estimates. Dashed line represents 95%CIs. AMI: acute myocardial infarction; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazards ratio.

    Associations with HF Risk after AMI Discharge

    The potassium and sodium ranges had dose-response trends with HF post-discharge (Figure S2).Using the bottom quartile (Q1) as a reference, higher baseline potassium VMI was strongly associated with increased risk of HF after-discharge (Q2-4 versus Q1, hazards ratio (HR) 1.48, 1.73 and 1.99, respectively, Ptrend< 0.001) according to univariate analyses. In multiple Cox regression model with full adjustment including maximum cTnI, maximum NT-ProBNP, CRP, MI location, acute HF, mean potassium, and other traditional factors, all four potassium variability indices were moderately associated with risk of HF post-discharge (each P trend =0.005-0.051). The association followed a dose-response pattern with a 27% increased risk of chronic HF for each 1 mmol/L increase in potassium range(HR = 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.50,P = 0.004). After adjusting for identical confounders, elevating sodium fluctuation was associated with risk of HF after AMI hospitalization, with 16% increased HF risk per 5 mmol/L increment in sodium range (Table 2). However, compared with Q1 reference, only the top quartile of potassium variability, but not sodium’s was related to increased risk of HF post-discharge (Table 2 and S3).

    Sensitivity and Subgroup Analysis

    Competing risk model was applied to investigate the relationship between potassium variability and HF during follow-up again. There was also a marginal significance between all indices of potassium variability and HF post-discharge (Ptrend= 0.009 to 0.077, Table S4). The associations of potassium range with HFrEF, HFpEF and HFmrEF post-discharge are presented in Figure S3. After fully adjusting for the above potential confounders, the higher potassium range was an independent predictor of HFrEF risk post-discharge, with sub-distribution HR (sHR = 1.40, 95%CI: 1.02-1.91; P = 0.038)per 1 mmol/L potassium range increment. However,the association of potassium variability with HFmrEF or HFpEF was insignificant. It is generally known that extremely low or high ion concentrations impaired cellular physiological activity and elevated risk of adverse events. Thus, additional analysis for AMI without any extreme values (potassium level 3.0-5.5 mmol/L and sodium 130-150 mmol/L)was conducted. The highest quartile of potassium variability was also significantly associated with higher mortality compared with those in the lower quartiles (Table S5). According to stratified analyses, the association between potassium variability and increased mortality or HF post-discharge was largely consistent across MI type, age subgroup,sex, BMI, smoker, hypertension, heart failure on admission, prior MI, and renal function. However, we observed a significant interaction between potassium variability and diabetes mellitus for mortality and HF post-discharge (Figure 2).

    DISCUSSION

    In this hospital-based cohort of AMI survivors,VIM, CV, SD, and range during hospitalization were analyzed as indices of electrolyte variability.We found that potassium variability was associatedwith a higher risk of mortality and heart failure risk after AMI discharge. In particular, the association between potassium fluctuation and death post-infarction remained significant after adjustment for mean potassium, peak values of cTnI and NTpro-BNP during AMI admission, as well as excluding patients with any extreme electrolyte level, while sodium variability was insignificantly or marginally associated with poor prognosis. No relationship between electrolyte variability and myocardial re-infarction or stroke events was observed.

    Table 2 Crude and adjusted associations with all-cause mortality and HF after-discharge according to quartiles of electrolyte variability independent of the mean.

    Numerous studies investigated the association between serum potassium or sodium levels and mortality in patients with AMI, while few studied the risk of developing HF after AMI. To the best of our knowledge, no prior study reported the prognostic value of potassium or sodium variability.The lack of attention to electrolyte fluctuation may attribute to the established conventional clinical implications of dysnatraemias and dyskalaemias. Our research provides new insights into the implications of electrolyte variability. Indeed, it should not deny that extremely low or extremely high ion concentrations were dangerous and associated with an increased death risk. Diuretics medication as one indicator of acute heart failure resulted in greater ion variability. However, after adjusting for acute HF and excluding patients with any extreme potassium and sodium values during hospitalization, potassium fluctuation was also robustly linked to poor prognosis in survivors of AMI independent of potassium concentration.

    Figure 2 Subgroup analyses of baseline potassium variability and mortality or HF risk after discharge. Stratified analysis was conducted with Cox or competing risk model, which was fully adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, piror MI, cTnI,NT-proBNP, CRP, eGFR, TG, TC, HDL, MI type, anterior MI, PCI, ACEI or ARB, spironolactone, acute heart failure and mean potassium except for subgroup factors. ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; BMI: body mass index; CI: confidence interval; CRP: C-reactive protein; cTnI: cardiac troponin I; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HDL: highdensity lipoprotein; HF: heart failure; HR: hazards ratio; MI: myocardial infarction; NT-proBNP: N terminal pro B type natriuretic peptide; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; TC: total cholesterol; TG: triglyceride.

    Prior studies demonstrated that baseline hyponatraemia was significantly associated with longterm death risk in patients who experienced AMI,with all-cause mortality increasing by 17%?61%during several years of follow-up after adjusting for multiple confounders but without cTn.[10,22]Interestingly, hypernatraemia increased mortality in patients with AMI,[12]but had no obvious effect on long-term mortality in patients with chronic HF.[23]Similarly, we also observed that increased sodium fluctuation was related to higher total mortality in univariate analysis, but that effect disappeared after full adjustment. Currently, whether serum sodium was associated with incident HF post-MI still lacks strong evidence. Herein, we observed that the association of sodium fluctuation with HF post-discharge also became insignificant in the adjusted model. Thus, our study and prior reports suggest that sodium concentrations or variability may have a limited prognostic value based on current risk factors in patients with AMI.

    Clinical guidelines recommend the range of serum potassium levels between 4.0 and 5.0 mEq/L or even 4.5 to 5.5 mEq/L in patients with AMI.[24]Potassium levels between 3.5 and 4.5 mmol/L were associated with the lowest short-[24]and long-term[5,25-27]mortality in hospitalized patients with AMI. Our observations further supported the finding that potassium disturbance increases mortality risk post-MI. even during normal electrolyte range of potassium level 3.5?5.5 mmol/L and sodium level 130?150 mmol/L, we still observed more than a 2-fold increased risk of mortality for patients with potassium variability in the highest quartile, compared with those patients in the bottom quartile. Results from the SWEDEHEART cohort demonstrated that the association of potassium level at discharge with HF post-infarction was insignificant.[27]Our data provided moderate evidence of the dose-response pattern between potassium variability and HF postdischarge, independent of maximum cTnI, NTproBNP, heart failure on admission, and mean potassium. The association was still observed in patients without acute HF (sHR = 1.39, 95%CI:1.06?1.82). Thus, potassium variability might reflect better the severity of impaired homeostasis and provide incremental prognostic information independent of potassium concentration for patients with AMI.

    Current practice tended to consider HF as a complicated syndrome and study for the comprehensive mechanisms and phenotypes of HF is a great challenge. Previous studies demonstrated that HFmrEF was difficult to characterize with clinic indicators and circulating biomarkers, suggesting that patients with moderate LVEF had obvious heterogeneity.[28]Consistently, both potassium and sodium fluctuations showed no significant association with non-HFrEF in our study. Indeed, the pathophysiological evidence for classifying HF post-MI according to LVEF is unclear.[29]The description of HFpEF or HFmrEF post-infarction was just presented in a few studies and the potential mechanisms in AMI were still unclear.[29]Furthermore, LVEF is dynamic during the chronic phase of AMI and relapsing HF can be characterized as different subtypes. The heterogeneous effects to identify HF and classify HF subtypes tend to bias the difference in hazards among those HF sub-phenotypes toward the null, so the analysis regarding HF needs further investigation with larger-scale cohort. It is worth noting that, potassium fluctuation is more pronounced in the high-risk subgroup of patients. A previous study by Kraft et al. has shown that potassium homeostasis is often disturbed in critically ill patients and high-risk patients with more comorbidities.[30]This may be due to the patient's underlying disease and treatment methods that affect the Na+/K+-ATP pump. The pump is affected by many factors such as insulin level and acid-base status,and thus regulate the fluctuation of blood potassium.

    Mechanisms regarding the association of ion fluctuation with adverse prognosis in patients with AMI remain unclear. Increased variability in blood pressure was linked to an increased 10%-18% risk of cardiovascular and mortality events over the effect of mean blood pressure.[14]And the potential interpretation was that continuous blood pressure monitoring provides extra information about the stability of blood pressure compared with a single or mean value. Likewise, circulating electrolytes oscillate over time will be especially amplified in the setting of AMI. Theoretically, ion variability may more effectively indicate internal environmental conditions than a single electrolyte value, even the electrolyte concentrations were in normal range post-admission. In addition, atherosclerosis progress and plaque instability were associated with recurrence of MI or stroke, which may explain the insignificant relationship between ion variability or abnormal level and angiemphraxis events in our and other reports.[12]However, subsequent exploration is required to ascertain whether and how electrolyte fluctuation participates in the early pathophysiological mechanisms of poor prognosis post-MI.

    Our findings should be interpreted within the context of its strengths and limitations. The electrolyte variability was estimated with various methods. Study staffs were especially responsible for this prospective hospital-based cohort that facilitated relatively complete data with less misclassification bias. Moreover, patients with AMI were admitted from 2017 to 2019, baseline characteristics and therapeutic strategies reflected contemporary epidemiology. This study has some limitations. First,participants in this study were primarily residents in Northeast China where they are accustomed to a high-salt diet. Thus, our findings should be further explored in populations from other regions and backgrounds. Second, heart failure is characterized by highly heterogeneous manifestations and mechanisms, so a larger scale cohort may need to further investigate the association between ion variability and HF risk. Third, we did not acquire the information about the Charlson Index in the present study.Even though the potential confounders were adjusted to the extent possible, the residual confounding could not be completely ruled out. Fourth, the causality could not be concluded for the observational study design.

    In conclusion, our study shows that potassium variability during AMI hospitalization is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality and heart failure post discharge independent of its concentration. By contrast, sodium variability had a limited association with poor prognosis post-infarction. Attention should be given to longitudinal electrolyte fluctuation more than single ion measurement, even in those patients without extreme value.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We would like to thank the staff of cardiac followup team for raw data collecting.

    AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

    XLZ, SJW and BY conceived and designed the study. HXC and XQG developed the protocols.XRH and XYZ collected and assembled all data.SHF analysed and visualized the results. All authors contributed to the manuscript and approved to submit. Reviewed and edited the manuscript, BY and XQG take the responsibility for the integrity and accuracy of this analysis.

    FUNDING

    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2016YFC1301100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81 827 806,81 870 353, 31 771 241), and Key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Ministry of Education (No.KF201903).

    CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

    None.

    netflix在线观看网站| 欧美日韩av久久| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久热这里只有精品99| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久草成人影院| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久人妻av系列| 两性夫妻黄色片| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 免费高清在线观看日韩| avwww免费| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 女警被强在线播放| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产成人av教育| av国产精品久久久久影院| 超碰97精品在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 91国产中文字幕| 成人国语在线视频| 人人澡人人妻人| 91在线观看av| 自线自在国产av| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 99久久国产精品久久久| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产av又大| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| www.www免费av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产精品免费视频内射| 另类亚洲欧美激情| tocl精华| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲九九香蕉| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 黄色 视频免费看| 久久精品影院6| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 三级毛片av免费| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品永久免费网站| 一级片'在线观看视频| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 成人影院久久| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 88av欧美| 大陆偷拍与自拍| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 91在线观看av| 成年版毛片免费区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲国产看品久久| 黄频高清免费视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产av精品麻豆| 在线天堂中文资源库| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产激情欧美一区二区| av免费在线观看网站| 91字幕亚洲| 天堂动漫精品| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 精品电影一区二区在线| 自线自在国产av| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 久9热在线精品视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 久久伊人香网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 日韩欧美免费精品| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 美女午夜性视频免费| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 美女福利国产在线| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 亚洲avbb在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 日本a在线网址| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 天天影视国产精品| 99久久国产精品久久久| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 91成年电影在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 久久性视频一级片| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 99香蕉大伊视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 91老司机精品| 一区福利在线观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 一区在线观看完整版| www日本在线高清视频| 91精品三级在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美日韩精品网址| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产1区2区3区精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 视频区图区小说| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产片内射在线| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 精品国产国语对白av| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 制服诱惑二区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 日本a在线网址| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产亚洲欧美98| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产高清激情床上av| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 久久久久国内视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 午夜91福利影院| 久久中文看片网| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 午夜免费激情av| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 夫妻午夜视频| av中文乱码字幕在线| 香蕉国产在线看| 成年版毛片免费区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产不卡一卡二| 三级毛片av免费| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| avwww免费| 免费不卡黄色视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 91大片在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| ponron亚洲| 久久久久九九精品影院| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 大型av网站在线播放| 久久久久久久久中文| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 在线视频色国产色| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 久久草成人影院| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 丁香六月欧美| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产免费男女视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 美女福利国产在线| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 久久久久久人人人人人| 99香蕉大伊视频| 999精品在线视频| cao死你这个sao货| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 一区福利在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产精品九九99| 高清在线国产一区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 99久久国产精品久久久| 91九色精品人成在线观看| av欧美777| 又大又爽又粗| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 午夜免费观看网址| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 日本 av在线| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 黄色成人免费大全| 国产精品成人在线| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲第一av免费看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 级片在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 久久久国产成人免费| 91字幕亚洲| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 色在线成人网| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 黄色视频不卡| 成人精品一区二区免费| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 电影成人av| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 99热只有精品国产| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 成人影院久久| 国产一区二区激情短视频| netflix在线观看网站| 黄频高清免费视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 搡老乐熟女国产| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 窝窝影院91人妻| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| av视频免费观看在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 久久久国产一区二区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 性欧美人与动物交配| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| av网站在线播放免费| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 色播在线永久视频| 久久亚洲真实| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 在线免费观看的www视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美成人午夜精品| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 国产色视频综合| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 美国免费a级毛片| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 成人18禁在线播放| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| a在线观看视频网站| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 精品久久久久久,| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 国产精品野战在线观看 | 亚洲精品国产区一区二| www国产在线视频色| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 精品福利观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 91精品三级在线观看| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 91精品国产国语对白视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产精品成人在线| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产激情欧美一区二区| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 99久久人妻综合| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 午夜a级毛片| 热re99久久国产66热| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 免费在线观看黄色视频的| av视频免费观看在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 香蕉国产在线看| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 成人影院久久| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| ponron亚洲| 级片在线观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 日本免费a在线| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 性少妇av在线| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 9热在线视频观看99| aaaaa片日本免费| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久香蕉国产精品| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久热在线av|