• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    BCC-ESM1 Model Datasets for the CMIP6 Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project (AerChemMIP)

    2021-02-26 08:22:44JieZHANGTongwenWUFangZHANGKalliFURTADOXiaogeXINXueliSHIJianglongLIMinCHULiZHANGQianxiaLIUJinghuiYanMinWEIandQiangMA
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2021年2期

    Jie ZHANG, Tongwen WU, Fang ZHANG, Kalli FURTADO, Xiaoge XIN, Xueli SHI, Jianglong LI,Min CHU, Li ZHANG, Qianxia LIU, Jinghui Yan, Min WEI, and Qiang MA

    1Beijing Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China

    2Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter EX1 3PB, UK

    3National Meteorological Information Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China

    ABSTRACT

    Key words:BCC-ESM1,CMIP6,AerChemMIP,climate sensitivity,precipitation,surface air temperature,sulfate

    1.Introduction

    Climate impacts of atmospheric chemistry, especially the contribution of tropospheric ozone precursors to radiative forcing, have been estimated in all the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reports. However,even the models used in the IPCC’s fourth report were mostly offline chemistry transport models, and none of the climate models included tropospheric ozone chemistry(Collins et al., 2017). The Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP) was launched in 2011 and aimed to document changes in atmospheric composition and the associated radiative forcings in CMIP5 models (Lamarque et al., 2013). However, the model setups for ACCMIP were generally different from CMIP5 (with lower resolution but more complex chemistry)and only four of the models could be used to estimate future climate changes in surface ozone (Schnell et al., 2016). To build on the experiences of previous programs, the CMIP6-endorsed Aerosol Chemistry Model Intercomparison Project(AerChemMIP) is a series experiments with the goal of quantifying the effects of near-term climate forcers (NTCFs: methane, tropospheric aerosols and ozone, and their precursors)and reactive well-mixed greenhouse gases (WMGHGs) on climate and air quality (Collins et al., 2017). AerChemMIP is designed to answer four scientific questions: (1) how have anthropogenic emissions contributed to global radiative forcing and affected regional climate over the historical period? (2) How might future policies (on climate, air quality, and land use) affect the abundances of NTCFs and their climate impacts? (3) How do uncertainties in historical NTCF emissions affect radiative forcing estimates? (4) How important are climate feedbacks to natural NTCF emissions,atmospheric composition, and radiative effects?

    BCC-ESM1 is a new version of the Beijing Climate Center’s ESM that includes interactive atmospheric chemistry and aerosols. Its details are described in Wu et al. (2020a).BCC-ESM1, along with 14 other ESMs, have participated in AerChemMIP, including CESM2-WACCM, CNRMESM2-1, EC-Earth3-AerChem, EMAC-2-54-AerChem,GFDL-ESM4, GISS-E2.1, IPSL-CM5A2-INCA, IPSLCM6A-AER-LR, MIROC6, MIROC-ES2L, MPI-ESM-1-2-HAM, MRI-ESM2-0, NorESM2, and UKESM1-0-LL. All of these ESMs are run in AerChemMIP and the other programs under CMIP6 [DECK (Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima) and the other CMIP6-endorsed MIPs] with their maximum available complexity. Therefore, their results can be shared across MIPs and used for more comprehensive assessments. The AerChemMIP experiments are classified into three tiers by their priority. The Aer-ChemMIP is the first international MIP that BCC-ESM1 has been involved in, and thus far it has conducted all its Tier 1 experiments and seven experiments in lower priorities. BCC-ESM1 has also run the DECK and CMIP historical simulations, which serve as the “entry cards” for models participating in CMIP6 (Eyring et al., 2016).

    AerChemMIP is the first chemistry program fully involved in the CMIP structure. Most of its experiments are newly designed and of special scientific interest. This paper introduces the experiment settings as well as the BCCESM1 outputs, to facilitate their use. Following this introduction, a brief overview of BCC-ESM1 is provided in section 2. The experiments run by BCC-ESM1 are also summarized in that section. Section 3 presents a technical validation of BCC-ESM1, including the model climate sensitivity and evaluations of surface air temperature (SAT), precipitation, and surface sulfate concentrations. Section 4 provides a summary, and section 5 shows some usage notes.

    2.Model and experiments

    2.1.Model configuration

    BCC-ESM1 is based on the climate system model BCC-CSM2 (Wu et al., 2019a), but includes interactive representations of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols. As the successor of BCC-CSM1.1 (Wu et al., 2013), which participated in CMIP5, BCC-CSM2 included updates to the deep convection parameterization, considered the indirect effects of aerosols and gravity wave drag generated by deep convection, and introduced a new scheme for the cloud fraction.BCC-CSM2-MR, the medium resolution version of BCCCSM2, shows an overall improvement in many aspects,such as the tropospheric air temperature at the global and regional scale in East Asia, the stratospheric quasi-biennial oscillation, and the Madden–Julian Oscillation.

    The atmospheric component of BCC-ESM1 is BCCAGCM3-Chem (Wu et al., 2020a), which includes an interactive tropospheric gas-phase and aerosol chemistry scheme.The model includes 66 gas-phase species and 13 prognostic aerosol species. The main atmospheric chemistry built in BCC-AGCM3-chem is based on MOZART2 (Model for OZone And Related chemical Tracers, version 2), a troposphere-only chemistry transport model developed by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (Horowitz et al.,2003). SO, dimethyl sulfide (DMS), and NHare the gas tracers newly added to BCC-ESM1. A bulk aerosol scheme is also newly introduced in BCC-ESM1, including the relative reactions, transport, emissions, and depositions. The aerosol species involved are sulfate (SO), hydrophobic and hydrophilic organic carbon (OC1 and OC2), hydrophobic and hydrophilic black carbon (BC1 and BC2), four categories of soil dust (DST01, DST02, DST03, DST04), and four categories of sea salt (SSLT01, SSLT02, SSLT03, SSLT04).Dust and sea salt aerosols are classified into four size bins by diameter. The mass-mixing ratios of each aerosol type are prognostic variables. Prognostic aerosol masses are used to estimate the liquid cloud droplet number concentration and the indirect effects of aerosols are considered.

    To save computing resources and tune the model more efficiently, BCC-AGCM3-Chem has a relatively low horizontal resolution of T42 (about 280 km) and has 26 vertical levels with the top level at 2.914 hPa. The land component of BCC-ESM1 is the BCC Atmosphere and Vegetation Interaction Model, BCC-AVIM2.0, with terrestrial carbon cycle(Li et al., 2019). The oceanic component is the Modular Ocean Model, version 4, with 40 levels included (MOM4-L40; Griffies et al., 2005). The sea-ice component is the Sea Ice Simulator (SIS), with three vertical layers, one snow cover layer, and two ice layers (Winton, 2000). MOM4-L40 and SIS use a tripolar grid with a horizontal resolution of 1°longitude by 1/3° latitude between 10°S and 10°N, increasing to 1° at 30°S and 30°N.

    2.2.Experiments

    The experiments conducted by BCC-ESM1 are summarized in Table 1. The simulation data have been archived on the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) node (https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/projects/cmip6/). DECK includes four basic experiments: (a) a historical Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (amip) simulation; (b) a control simulation under pre-industrial conditions (piControl); (c) a simulation that branches from piControl in 1850 and is forced by an abruptly quadrupled global-mean concentration of CO(abrupt-4×CO2); and (d) a simulation that branches from piControl and is forced by a gradually increased COconcentration at a rate of 1% per year (1pctCO2). Amip is run by an atmospheric general circulation model (AGCM) with prescribed sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice concentration (SIC) and include three ensemble members. The other three experiments are all conducted by a coupled atmosphere–ocean general circulation model (AOGCM) and include only one ensemble member. The CMIP historical experiment (historical) is also conducted by the AOGCM. It branches from piControl and is forced by evolving external forcing. There are three ensemble members for historical with slightly varying initial conditions. Amip, piControl,and historical are baselines for many CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs. Abrupt-4×CO2 and 1pctCO2 are used to estimate model climate sensitivities and feedbacks.

    Table 1. Experiments conducted by BCC-ESM1.

    The AerChemMIP experiments are run with the same complexity as in DECK and historical. The experiments are classified into three tiers by their priority. The Tier 1 experiments mainly focus on the impacts of NTCFs and reactive well-mixed gases on historical and future climate, as well as future NTCFs under different air quality policies. Tier 2 and 3 will examine the effects of NTCF emissions and climate feedback more specifically, to provide detailed uncertainty estimates.

    BCC-ESM1 has run all the Tier 1 experiments and seven Tier 2 and 3 experiments:

    ● hist-piNTCF in Tier 1 parallels historical but with the anthropogenic emissions of aerosols, and ozone precursors fixed to their 1850 values. hist-piAer in Tier 3 is similar to hist-piNTCF but with the anthropogenic emissions of aerosol fixed to the 1850 values.By comparing with historical, these experiments can be used to estimate the climate impacts of anthropogenic emissions of NTCFs and aerosols. Three ensemble members are conducted for both histpiNTCF and hist-piAer with the same initial conditions as historical.

    ● piClim-control in Tier 1 is run under pre-industrial conditions for 31 years with prescribed SST and SIC from 30 years of piControl climatology. It is designed following the protocols of the Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (Pincus et al.,2016). Eight more piClim-X experiments are also conducted by BCC-ESM1 that branch from piClim-control: (a) piClim-NTCF and piClim-CH4 in Tier 1,which are the same as piClim-control but set NTCF emissions and the CHconcentration to present-day values, respectively; (b) piClim-aer, piClim-BC and piClim-O3 in Tier 2, which set the emissions of aerosol precursors, black carbon and ozone precursors to present-day values, respectively; (c) piClim-NOX,piClim-VOC and piClim-SO2 in Tier 3, which set the NOx, CO and VOCs, and SOemissions to presentday values, respectively. These experiments can help to quantify the effective radiative forcings (ERFs) at pre-industrial levels due to different drivers, as in Thornhill et al. (2020). The piClim-X experiments include only one ensemble per experiment in BCCESM1.

    ● histSST in Tier 1 also branches from piClim-control but with prescribed time-evolving SST and SIC from historical. All other forcings are the same as in historical. histSST-piNTCF and histSST-piCH4 in Tier 1 are the same as histSST and branch from the same point as histSST but with the NTCF precursors and methane fixed to their 1850 values, respectively.These experiments can help to diagnose the transient ERFs for NTCF and methane. The histSST-X experiments include only one ensemble per experiment.

    ● ssp370 in Tier 1 is a future simulation with the highest levels of short-lived climate pollutants without climate policy. It achieves forcing levels of 7.0 W min 2100. ssp370-lowNTCF in Tier 1 is a future simulation with strong levels of air quality control measures. Both experiments branch from the historical experiments in 2015 and are run for 50 years from 2015 to 2055 instead of 85 years from 2015 to 2100 as suggested by AerChemMIP, to reduce the computational expense. These experiments can help to estimate the impacts on future climate and air quality, as in Allen et al. (2020) and Turnock et al.(2020). Three ensemble members are conducted for both ssp370 and ssp370-lowNTCF.

    ● ssp370SST in Tier 1 is a transient future prescribed-SST simulation following the ssp370 scenario. It branches from the first member of amip in year 2015 with prescribed SST and SIC from the first member of the ssp370 experiment. ssp370SST-lowNTCF in Tier 1 branches at the same point as ssp370SST with prescribed SST and SIC from the first member of ssp370-lowNTCF following the ssp370-lowNTCF scenario. Different ERF changes between these future prescribed SST simulations and the relevant coupled model projections (ssp370 and ssp370-lowNTCF) help to quantify the efficacy of NTCFs to affect climate. Both experiments include only one ensemble.

    3.Technical validation

    3.1.Model climate sensitivities to idealized CO2 forcing

    Climate sensitivity is an important metric for model evaluation. It is one of the major factors responsible for different model climate responses and uncertainty in future climate projections (Grose et al., 2018). Here, we estimate the global mean SAT response to idealized COforcing by using the 1pctCO2 and abrupt-4×CO2 experiments. Both experiments are initialized from the piControl experiment,which is used as the reference experiment.

    The transient climate response (TCR) is calculated from the 1pctCO2 simulation in which COis gradually increased at a rate of 1% per year. The TCR is defined as the annual mean SAT change relative to the piControl equilibrium climate state, averaged over a 20-year period centered on the time at which the COconcentration was doubled(year 70 of the simulation). The 1pctCO2 forcing resembles the COforcing in the 21st century but is more idealized.As shown in Fig.1a, the evolution of SAT anomaly is linearly correlated with the COconcentration in the 1pctCO2 experiment. A high linear correlation is also evident in observations at both global and regional scales (Wu et al.,2019b). The TCR in BCC-ESM1 is about 1.78 K, which is 1.40 K for BCC-CSM2-MR (Shi et al., 2020). The TCRs in both BCC models lie within the “l(fā)ikely” range of 1.0–2.5 K suggested by IPCC AR5 (Bindoff et al., 2013). In the 1pctCO2 experiment and the real world, the distribution of heat flux at the atmosphere–ocean interface has not yet reached equilibrium.

    The equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) is measured as the SAT changes in a double COexperiment when the climate system reaches its equilibrium climate state. The ECS in BCC-ESM1 is estimated by the abrupt-4xCO2 experiment. SAT changes in the abrupt-4xCO2 experiment are shown in Fig.1b. The model response to quadrupled COcan be separated into a fast-response stage in the first two decades and a slow-response stage afterward. Following the approach of Gregory et al. (2004), we regress the global annual mean net radiative-flux changes at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) on SAT changes and then extrapolate to zero net flux (Fig.2). The ECS is then defined as half of the xintercept concerning a COdoubling. This method yields an ECS estimate of 3.34 K for BCC-ESM1, which is 3.03 K for BCC-CSM2-MR (Wu et al., 2019a). ECSs in both BCCESM1 and BCC-CSM2-MR are within the “l(fā)ikely” range of 1.5–4.5 K suggested by IPCC AR5.

    3.2.SAT in piControl and historical experiments

    Fig.1. (a) Temporal evolution of globally averaged SAT changes relative to the reference experiment (piControl) for the 151 model years in the 1%CO2 experiment. (b) As in (a)but for SAT changes in the abrupt-4×CO2 experiment. Units: K.

    Fig.2. Annual changes of the net TOA radiative flux and the global-mean SAT for the first 151 years of the abrupt CO2 quadrupling experiment (abrupt-4×CO2) relative to the preindustrial control run (piControl). The regression line is also calculated to estimate the ECS of BCC-ESM1.

    Figure 3a shows the evolution of the global mean annual averaged SAT in the piControl run. In piControl,SAT reaches a quasi-equilibrium state with a slight increasing trend of about 0.016°C (100 yr), which is much smaller than the standard deviation of SAT (0.10°C yr). Time series of annual mean SAT anomalies from the three members of the CMIP6 historical simulations are shown in Fig.3b, as well as the observation from HadCRUT4(https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcrut4/). The anomalies are relative to the 1850–1950 mean. The SAT simulations show good agreement with HadCRUT in the first 100 years. However, there is a significant cooling bias in the second half of the 20th century, especially over the period from the 1960s to 1990s. We colloquially refer to this significant cooling bias as the “pot-hole” bias (because it represents an undesirable dip in the “road” of an accurately simulated SAT trend). It is a common problem in most of the ESMs participating in CMIP6. One possible reason for the pot-hole bias is that the prognostic aerosol schemes produce overly strong aerosol cooling (Flynn and Mauritsen, 2020; Meehl et al., 2020).

    The spatial structure of SAT in the historical experiment is examined over the period from 1986 to 2005 (Fig.4),as well as its biases compared with ERA5 reanalysis (Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2017). The spatial structure of SAT is well captured with a spatial correlation of 0.99. Simulated SAT is about 0.35 K higher than that in ERA5, attributable to the warmer tropics and subtropics. Generally, the biases in BCC-ESM1 show great similarity with those in BCC-CSM2-MR (Wu et al., 2019a), including the slight systematic warm biases over oceans, as well as the relatively large warming/cooling biases over the polar regions. The biases over the oceans and polar regions may partly come from the ocean and sea-ice modules, which are the same in BCC-ESM1 and BCC-CSM2-MR. Both models also show systematic cool biases over most land regions. The cooling bias may be partly attributable to the land surface modeling component, since it is also evident in AMIP simulations, or to other processes like errors in cloud properties. The cooling biases in BCC-ESM1 may also be related to the overestimated sulfate concentration in the atmosphere shown in subsection 3.4.

    Fig.3. (a) Time series of the global mean SAT in the piControl simulation. (b) Time series of the global mean SAT anomalies in the historical simulations (three members, black lines) and the observation (red line) from HadCRUT4. The anomalies are relative to the 1850–1950 mean.

    3.3.Precipitation and associated near-surface horizontal wind

    Annual mean precipitation in the historical experiment and its comparison with GPCP observation (Adler et al.,2003) are examined and shown in Fig.5. The biases are generally within 1 mm dand the global mean precipitation in BCC-ESM1 is very close to the observation: 2.27 mm dversus 2.24 mm d. BCC-ESM1 still suffers from the double ITCZ problem: precipitation south of the equator in the eastern Pacific is overestimated and the SPCZ is too zonally elongated. Zhang et al. (2015) found that the double ITCZ related biases include sufficient precipitation in the southeastern Pacific, warmer SST, weaker easterly flow,and stronger meridional wind divergences away from the equator. However, no progress can be identified from the multimodel ensemble (MME) mean in CMIP3 to that in CMIP5.The double ITCZ measures are also examined for BCC-ESM1, as in Zhang et al. (2015). The SST bias in BCC-ESM1 closely resembles the SAT bias (not shown).As indicated by Fig.4c, the warmer SST south of the equator amplifies the precipitation over the Southeast Pacific and leads to the eastward-extended SPCZ. Over the eastern tropical Pacific, the near-surface zonal wind weakens and the meridional wind converges south of the equator(Fig.6). Both zonal and meridional wind biases contribute to the SPCZ biases in BCC-ESM1. Generally, biases of the double ITCZ measures in BCC-ESM1 are quite similar to those in the CMIP3 and CMIP5 MMEs. With great improvements in atmospheric physical parameterizations, the double ITCZ bias is much weaker in the newly developed high-resolution climate system model, BCC-CSM3-HR (Wu, 2020b).

    Fig.4. Annual mean SAT in (a) BCC-ESM1 and (b) ERA5 reanalysis from 1986 to 2005. (c) The SAT biases. Units: °C.

    Other model deficiencies in precipitation reproductions are evident, including the overestimations over eastern Indonesia, western Indian Ocean, southern Africa, and East Asia. Meanwhile, underestimations are pronounced north of the equator in the Pacific and Atlantic. Such biases seem to be common in CMIP3 and CMIP5 models (Oueslati and Bellon, 2015). The sufficient precipitation over eastern Indonesia and the western Indian Ocean accompanies stronger trade winds in the east. The anomalous easterlies converge toward the biased precipitation, west of the Maritime Continent and the eastern African coast. The underestimations north of the equator in the Pacific and Atlantic are asymmetric with the overestimations in the south, which may be attributable to the asymmetric warming amplitudes by the equator as well as the local meridional wind divergences(Zhang et al., 2015). The Southern Africa and East Asia are greatly affected by the global monsoon system, and the precipitation biases can be related to many physical and dynamic processes, but investigating these is beyond the scope of the present study.

    Fig.5. Annual mean precipitation in (a) BCC-ESM1 and (b)GPCP from 1986 to 2005. (c) The precipitation biases. Units:mm d?1.

    3.4.Surface sulfate and its variation

    Sulfate is a major species of aerosol. Sulfate aerosols can cool the atmosphere by reflecting solar irradiation directly or by making clouds more reflective via aerosol indirect effects. The anthropogenic emissions of SOfrom fuel combustion and industrial activities constitute the main precursor of atmospheric sulfate. A large amount of sulfate in the atmosphere is believed to have significant cooling effects at regional and global scales, although large uncertainties remain in the magnitude of these effects. BCC-ESM1 can capture the major features of aerosols reasonably well in comparison with observed aerosol concentrations and their optical properties (Wu et al., 2020a). In this paper, we use ground-based monitoring networks to extend the evaluation of sulfate. Simulation from the historical experiment is examined here.

    The sulfate observations are from three monitoring networks: the European Monitoring and Evaluation Program(EMEP; T?rseth et al., 2012); the United States Interagency Monitoring of Protected Visual Environment (IMPROVE;Malm et al., 2004) extensive ground-based networks; and the Acid Deposition Monitoring Network in East Asia(EANET, 2019). For each observation site, model data are selected only when the monthly observation is available. To maximize the amount of data available for comparison but also ensure the climatological representativeness of the observation, all 12 monthly means are required to calculate an annual mean, as in Mulcahy et al. (2020).

    Fig.6. Annual mean near-surface zonal wind (UAS) in (a) BCC-ESM1 and (b) ERA5 from 1986 to 2005. (c) The UAS biases. (d–f) As in (a–c) but for the near-surface meridional wind (VAS). Units: m s?1.

    The annual mean surface sulfate concentrations from 274 monitoring sites are calculated and shown in Fig.7a. Surface sulfate concentrations at EMAP, EANET and IMPROVE sites are about 3.33 μg m, 3.20 μg mand 1.35 μg m, respectively. Generally, sulfate is higher in southern Europe than in northern Europe and higher in the east of the U.S. than in the west. BCC-ESM1 tends to overestimate the observations by about 0.95 μg mbut shows a high spatial correlation of 0.77, significant at the 1% level using a Student’s t-test (Fig.7b). The surface sulfate concentrations are comparable with the observation at the EMEP sites (3.18 μg m) but overestimated by approximately 2 μg mat the EANET and IMPROVE sites. BCC-ESM1 can capture the observed sulfate centers well over the eastern U.S., southern Europe, and Japan.

    Regional statistical evaluations are shown in Fig.8. Considering the relatively low model resolution and the high heterogeneous distribution of sulfate, simulations falling with the range of 50% to 200% of the observations (gray dashed lines in Fig.8) are considered to be reasonable. Over the EMEP sites (Europe), the model shows a significant correlation of 0.66, with a slight underestimation over the southern EMEP sites, where the measured sulfate concentration is relatively large. Over EANET sites (East Asia), the comparison shows a high degree of scattering, with a low correlation with the observation of 0.39. Over the western U.S., the sulfate concentration is about twice that of the observation.As one of the major emission centers, the eastern U.S. is more polluted than the west. Among the four regions, the simulations perform best over the eastern U.S., with the highest correlation coefficient with the observation (0.87) and the smallest root-mean-square error (RMSE; 1.04 μg m). Generally, the performance of BCC-ESM1 in reproducing the surface sulfate concentration is comparable to instrumental measurements, and its performance is comparable with that of UKESM1 (Mulcahy et al., 2020). The major discrepancy is that BCC-ESM1 tends to overestimate sulfate levels over the western U.S. and East Asia, which may partly contribute to the regional cooling biases as shown in Fig.4c.

    Fig.7. (a) Annual mean surface sulfate concentration in 2000–09 at 274 monitoring sites in the three ground-based networks: EMEP in Europe, IMPROVE in the U.S., and EANET in East Asia. (b) Corresponding simulation in BCCESM1. All 12 monthly means are required to calculate annual mean results. Units: μg m?3.

    Fig.8. Comparison of simulated annual mean SO42? from BCC-ESM1 against ground-based measurements from (a)EMEP (Europe), (b) EANET (East Asia), (c) West IMPROVE(western U.S.), and (d) East IMPROVE (eastern U.S.)networks. Observations and model data cover the years 1978 to 2009 for EMEP, 2000 to 2014 for EANET, and 1990 to 2014 for IMPROVE. NMB stands for normalized mean bias,RMSE for root-mean-square error, and COR for correlation coefficient. Linear regression statistics are also included.Units: μg m?3.

    Figure 9 shows the evolution of the simulated and observed annual mean sulfate concentration, averaged across all the available ground-based observations, for all available years in the four typical regions. The uncertainty is calculated as ±1 standard deviation of the observed annual means across all the measurement sites. Simulations are suggested to be comparable with observations if the evolutions of the mean series of all sites are similar and the bands of uncertainty ranges are well overlapped. Generally, despite the systematic overestimation in East Asia and the western U.S., BCC-ESM1 can reproduce the changes in sulfate concentration at regional scales reasonably well.

    Over Europe (EMEP), the sulfate concentration decreases by about 4 μg mfrom 1978 to 2009. BCC-ESM1 captures the reduction and the changes are well within the observed uncertainty range, albeit the negative trend is slightly smaller. This underestimation of the annual mean surface sulfate concentration over Europe is also evident in UKESM1 simulations (Mulcahy et al., 2020) and is suggested to be related to a low bias in wintertime in UKESM1(Turnock et al., 2015).

    Over EANET sites, the surface sulfate concentration increases slightly with large interannual variability and uncertainties (about 3–4 μg m). It increases in the early 2000s,decreases by about 1.5 μg mfrom 2006 to 2012, and then bounces back afterward. The model generally tracks the observation quite well, despite a systematic overestimation by about 2 μg m. The simulation also shows large variations across all the measurement locations. Note that the EANET sites here are mostly in Japan and the southern countries.China is also a main sulfate emissions center with large spatial heterogeneity. Local evaluation over China will be interesting when high coverage monitoring data are available.

    Fig.9. Time series of annual mean observed (red lines) and simulated (blue lines) sulfate concentrations averaged across all measurement locations in each network for a particular year. Shaded areas show ±1 standard deviation of the observed and modeled annual mean values across all the measurement locations. Units: μg m?3.

    Over the western U.S., the sulfate concentration is relatively small with little to no trend. The simulated sulfate concentration is about twice that of the observation with a small decreasing trend. This region is generally remote from source regions and differences may be attributable to the biases in transportation from the source region, oxidants, or removal rates (Mulcahy et al., 2020).

    Over the eastern U.S., one of the major anthropogenic source regions, a significant negative trend is observed due to reductions in emissions. Although the model generally overestimates concentrations by about 0.8 μg m, the decreasing rate and the uncertainty range in BCC-ESM1 show reasonable agreement with the observations.

    4.Summary and relevant studies

    This paper summarizes the experiments and datasets of BCC-ESM1, specifically for the CMIP6-endorsed AerChem-MIP. The basic performance of BCC-ESM1 is evaluated,revealing that: the climate sensitivities in BCC-ESM1 are well within the likely ranges suggested by IPCC AR5; SAT and precipitation can be reasonably represented (the biases of which are discussed); and the present-day surface sulfate concentrations also compare well with observations, including their spatial structure and regional trends.

    BCC-ESM1 is one of the few ESMs participating in CMIP6 with interactive atmospheric chemistry, and its Aer-ChemMIP outputs have been widely used in recent atmospheric chemistry studies (i.e., Allen et al., 2020; Griffiths et al., 2020; Thornhill et al., 2020; Turnock et al., 2020).For example, in the special issue for AerChemMIP, BCCESM1 data are used to estimate the climate and air quality impact of mitigation policies. Turnock et al. (2020) used the outputs from BCC-ESM1 and nine other ESMs to make a first assessment of the impact on historical and future changes to air pollutants (Oand PM). CMIP6 models show a consistent overestimation of surface Oconcentration but an underestimation of surface PMwith a large diversity in the historical period. For scenario ssp370,which encompasses the highest levels of short-lived climate pollutants without climate policy, both surface Oand PMincrease across most regions. In BCC-ESM1, surface Ochanges are about 3 ppbv higher than the multimodel mean value for the historical period and the surface Oprediction is large in scenario ssp370. The large Oresponse in BCC-ESM1 may be related to the absence of NOtitration,which will reduce surface Oconcentrations. Allen et al.(2020) quantified the 2015–2055 climate and air quality effects of non-methane NTCFs with “weak” and “strong”levels of air quality controls. Their findings suggest air quality improvement with non-methane NTCF reductions, but additional surface warming and wetting may occur, particularly in Asia and the Arctic. Generally, results in BCCESM1 are consistent with the seven other ESMs participating in CMIP6, both in terms of global mean climate anomalies and air pollution anomalies due to NTCF mitigation.

    5.Usage notes

    The variables of Priority 1 in AerChemMIP have been generated, including meteorological variables at various time scales (monthly, daily, six-hourly, and hourly) and chemical variable outputs at the monthly scale. All the variables are listed at http://clipc-services.ceda.ac.uk/dreq/tabs03/expt_AerChemMIP_AerChemMIP_1_1.html. For brevity,we summarize the chemical outputs in Table 2, including the volume mixing ratios of gas-phase chemical species in the atmosphere, the mass mixing ratios of aerosols, atmospheric optical thickness, etc.

    The horizontal resolution of all the variables is T42(approximately 280 km). Most of the 3D atmospheric outputs are on model atmosphere levels (26 levels in a hybrid sigma-pressure vertical coordinate system). To facilitate multimodel comparisons, 11 atmospheric variables are interpolated to 19 fixed pressure levels for monthly outputs, and 6 of them are interpolated to 8 fixed pressure levels for daily outputs (Table 3).

    Acknowledgements.

    This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFA0602103), the National Key Research and Development Program of China CERC-WET Project (Grant No.2018YFE0196000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41805063).

    Table 2. Chemical outputs of BCC-ESM1 in CMIP6. Variables marked with an asterisk (*) are only provided for the first member of historical experiments.

    Table 2. (Continued.)

    Table 3. Monthly outputs of 11 variables that have been interpolated to 19 fixed pressure levels at 1000, 925, 850, 700, 600, 500, 400,300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 70, 50, 30, 20, 10, 5, and 1 hPa. Daily outputs of 6 variables have been interpolated to 8 fixed pressure levels at 1000, 850, 700, 500, 250, 100, 50, and 10 hPa.

    Data availability statement

    The data for the BCC-ESM1 simulations (Zhang et al.,2019) are available on the ESGF nodes (https://esgfnode.llnl.gov/projects/cmip6/). The dataset is in Network Common Data Form (NetCDF), version 4.

    Disclosure statement

    No potential conflicts of interest are reported by the authors.

    Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

    午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 天堂网av新在线| 免费av不卡在线播放| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 免费搜索国产男女视频| av线在线观看网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 国产高潮美女av| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 日本熟妇午夜| 精品人妻视频免费看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久人妻av系列| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产一级毛片在线| 男女那种视频在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 黄片wwwwww| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 99久久人妻综合| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 51国产日韩欧美| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 99热精品在线国产| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| www.av在线官网国产| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 一级爰片在线观看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| or卡值多少钱| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 免费av观看视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 如何舔出高潮| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 综合色丁香网| 如何舔出高潮| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合 | 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| eeuss影院久久| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲五月天丁香| videos熟女内射| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 中国国产av一级| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 三级经典国产精品| av免费在线看不卡| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 1024手机看黄色片| 特级一级黄色大片| 色吧在线观看| 久久久久性生活片| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产成人福利小说| 如何舔出高潮| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| a级毛色黄片| 欧美日本视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 永久网站在线| 精品国产三级普通话版| 舔av片在线| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 色综合站精品国产| videossex国产| 热99re8久久精品国产| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| kizo精华| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日本午夜av视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产美女午夜福利| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | videossex国产| 色视频www国产| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 搞女人的毛片| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| av福利片在线观看| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产综合懂色| 男人舔奶头视频| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产淫语在线视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 成人欧美大片| 日本与韩国留学比较| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 综合色av麻豆| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产三级在线视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜福利在线在线| 一本一本综合久久| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 18+在线观看网站| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄 | 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 69av精品久久久久久| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久久国产成人免费| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 国产午夜精品论理片| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| av卡一久久| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 观看免费一级毛片| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 男女那种视频在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 中文资源天堂在线| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 99热网站在线观看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 欧美zozozo另类| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日本免费在线观看一区| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 色5月婷婷丁香| 97超视频在线观看视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 久久久久久伊人网av| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 男女那种视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 三级经典国产精品| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产探花极品一区二区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 国产 一区精品| 51国产日韩欧美| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲性久久影院| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美3d第一页| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久久久性生活片| 只有这里有精品99| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 1024手机看黄色片| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国内精品宾馆在线| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲综合精品二区| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产精品伦人一区二区| www日本黄色视频网| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 22中文网久久字幕| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 一本久久精品| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 日韩中字成人| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| videos熟女内射| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 一级爰片在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产亚洲最大av| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久久久久大精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 免费大片18禁| 黄色配什么色好看| 欧美成人a在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 永久网站在线| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日本午夜av视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 日日撸夜夜添| 免费观看精品视频网站| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 日韩强制内射视频| 日本熟妇午夜| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 老司机影院成人| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 日本熟妇午夜| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| videossex国产| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 毛片女人毛片| 永久网站在线| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 精品酒店卫生间| av视频在线观看入口| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久精品夜色国产| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产真实乱freesex| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 高清毛片免费看| 午夜a级毛片| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产亚洲最大av| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 三级经典国产精品| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 97超碰精品成人国产| 欧美zozozo另类| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲无线观看免费| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲图色成人| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 在线观看66精品国产| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 少妇高潮的动态图| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 日本与韩国留学比较| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日本色播在线视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 乱人视频在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 成人国产麻豆网| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产视频内射| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 看黄色毛片网站| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 色网站视频免费| 99热全是精品| 久久久久久久久大av| kizo精华| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 九九在线视频观看精品| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 日本黄大片高清| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 1024手机看黄色片| 黄片wwwwww| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| av黄色大香蕉| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 熟女电影av网| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 在线播放无遮挡| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲av男天堂| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 久久久久网色| 精品一区二区免费观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 97超视频在线观看视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 久久久欧美国产精品| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久久欧美国产精品| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 色5月婷婷丁香| 在线免费十八禁| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲最大成人中文| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美3d第一页| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 久久久久久久国产电影| 深爱激情五月婷婷|