• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    NUIST ESM v3 Data Submission to CMIP6

    2021-02-26 08:22:28JianCAOLibinMAFeiLIUJingCHAIHaikunZHAOQiongHEBoWANGYanBAOJuanLIYoungminYANGHuaDENGandBinWANG
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2021年2期

    Jian CAO, Libin MA, Fei LIU, Jing CHAI, Haikun ZHAO, Qiong HE, Bo WANG, Yan BAO,Juan LI, Young-min YANG, Hua DENG, and Bin WANG

    1Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters,Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    2Earth System Modeling Center, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    3State Key Laboratory of Severe Weather, Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

    4Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96825, USA

    ABSTRACT

    Key words:NESM3,CMIP6,Scenario MIP,PMIP

    1.Introduction

    Since the launch of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP) in 1995, participating model simulations have not only attracted tremendous attention from the scientific community (Meehl et al., 2000) but also provided scientific guidance for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (e.g., IPCC, 2013). Phase 6 of CMIP(CMIP6) was recently launched and has registered over 100 model versions. It has designed a handful of basic experiments, proposed an ensemble of endorsed Model Intercomparison Projects (MIPs), and defined the structure of model outputs to address the scientific questions proposed by the World Climate Research Program (Eyring et al., 2016). In particular, CMIP6 endorses over 20 MIPs, which focus on more specific scientific targets (Eyring et al., 2016).

    The Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Earth System Model (NUIST-ESM, or NESM) is a new member of the CMIP community. The development of NESM dates back to 2012, and the first version of NESM was released in 2014. It couples the ECHAM v5.3, NEMO v3.4, and CICE v4.1 via the OASIS_3.0-MCT coupler (Cao et al., 2015). NESM v1 was widely used to study global monsoon dynamics and predictability, tropical cyclone dynamics, and paleoclimate formation (e.g., Wang et al., 2018;Cao et al., 2019a, b). The subsequent version of NESM,NESM v2, targeted an improvement in the understanding of seasonal predictability. To better facilitate CMIP6, a more comprehensive model version was developed: NESM v3(NESM3), which has upgraded atmospheric and land-surface model components, improved ocean–ice coupling, and increased model resolutions (Cao et al., 2018; Ma et al.,2020). NESM3 has registered the Diagnostic, Evaluation and Characterization of Klima (DECK), historical simulation, and serval other CMIP6-endorsed MIPs.

    The DECK run includes the Atmospheric MIP (AMIP)simulation, pre-industrial (PI) experiment, abrupt quadrupling of CO(abrupt4×CO2) experiment, and 1%yrCOincrease (1pctCO2) experiment. The DECK and historical simulations are regarded as the baseline experiments of CMIP6. In this study, we systematically introduce the activities of NESM3 in the DECK, historical simulation, Scenario MIP, and Paleoclimate MIP (PMIP) experiments. These experiments are used to validate and measure NESM3’s performances in reproducing the modern climate and its responses to different external forcing.

    The CMIP6 Scenario MIP is driven by the forcing from the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), which are more closely linked to societal concerns compared to their counterparts in previous phases (Eyring et al., 2016; O’Neill et al., 2016). Five types of SSPs (i.e., SSP1–5) are designed in the Scenario MIP. Each SSP is an integrated scenario that describes human development, economic growth, investments in education and health, and future energy planning and land-use changes (O’Neill et al., 2016). The results of SSPs could be compared with the results from the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) of CMIP5 using the criterion of the same long-term global averaged radiative forcing level. Multi-optional experiments are suggested in Scenario MIP to facilitate the cooperation between Scenario MIP and other MIPs.

    The MH and Last Interglacial (LIG) periods are the two most recent warm periods in Earth’s history (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2017). The MH and LIG are ~6 and ~127 ka before present, respectively. Paleo-data synthesis has revealed the changes in the global climate and environment relative to the modern climate. The changes are mainly attributed to external forcing of the Earth’s orbital parameters, which induces incoming solar radiation redistribution (Capron et al., 2017; Hoffman et al., 2017). The two periods are often discussed analogously with future climate changes due to anthropocentric warming (Yin and Berger, 2015). Both model–proxy data and model–model comparison studies have contributed to climate model evaluation and understanding of climate changes (e.g., Scussolini et al., 2019), especially for the MH simulation explicitly designed since the first phase of CMIP (Joussaume and Taylor, 1995).

    So far, NESM3 has completed the DECK, historical,Scenario MIP, and PMIP experiments, and the outputs are available to users. In section 2, we present the model configuration and detailed experimental designs of all simulations. Preliminary evaluation of model results is shown in section 3,data submissions are introduced in section 4, and conclusions are given in section 5.

    2.Model and experimental design

    2.1.Model description

    NESM3 consists of three component models, which are

    coupled by the OASIS_3.0-MCT3 coupler (Valcke et al.,2015). The atmospheric component model of NESM3 is ECHAM v6.3, which implicitly couples the JSBACH landsurface model (Giorgetta et al., 2013). The ocean and seaice component models are NEMO v3.4 (Madec and the NEMO team, 2012) and CICE v4.1 (Hunke and Lipscomb,2010), respectively.NESM3 includes two subversions—namely, standard resolution and lower resolution. The standard resolution NESM3 is used to perform all CMIP6 experiments. The resolution of the atmospheric component model is T63L47,which corresponds to ~1.9° × ~1.9°, and 47 vertical layers extending from the surface to 0.01 hPa. The ocean component model uses the ORCA1 configuration, which is a tripole grid system. The horizonal resolution is ~1° in both longitudinal and latitudinal directions, with meridional refinement to 1/3° near the equator. There are 46 vertical layers in the ocean model, with 10 layers in the uppermost 100 m.The CICE model is configured in a displaced-polar grid system, with its horizontal resolution of the sea-ice model being ~1° and ~0.5° in longitudinal and latitudinal directions, respectively. CICE v4.1 solves the dynamic and thermodynamic equations for five categories of ice thickness.Detailed model description and model development can be found in Cao et al. (2018).

    2.2.CMIP6 forcing for NESM3

    In NESM3 CMIP6 activities, all forcings follow the CMIP6 experimental designs and can be downloaded from https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/input4mips/. The monthly mean values of globally averaged long-lived and wellmixed greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations are used in NESM3. The aerosol-radiative effect of the anthropogenic aerosol is prescribed by the spatiotemporally distributed optical depth, symmetry factor, and single scattering albedo, while only the Twomey effect (Twomey, 1977) is considered in the cloud–aerosol interaction effect in NESM3. The change in stratospheric aerosol is only considered by the three-dimensionally distributed ozone concentration. The monthly mean land-surface forcing (land use and land cover) and solar forcing are also used.

    2.3.Experimental design of DECK and historical experiments

    The initial conditions (ICs) for the ocean and land-surface models are critical for accelerating the coupled model spin-up process. In NESM3, the IC of the ocean model is from a 2000-year ocean model standalone integration forced by modern climatology. The IC of the land-surface model is from MPI-ESM-LR (Brovkin et al., 2013), which uses the same land-surface model as in NESM3. The ICs for the atmospheric model and sea-ice model are from modern observations. In the spin-up and production integrations of the PI experiment, the Earth orbital parameters, ozone concentration, GHG concentrations, and land-surface condition are the values in 1850, while the solar constant, natural tropospheric aerosol, and stratospheric aerosol forcing are the decadal-averaged values of the 1850s. We conducted a 500-year simulation for the PI experiment after a 700-year spinup (Table 1).

    Two COexperiments, 1pctCO2 and abrupt4×CO2,were conducted and launched from the PI experiment,except for the difference in COconcentration. The 1pctCO2 experiment is forced by 1%yrof COconcentration increase during the whole 150-year integration. In the abrupt4×CO2 experiment, the COconcentration is abruptly quadrupled and then held constant during the 150-year integration (Table 1).

    As one of the CMIP6 standard experiments, the community explicitly defined the external forcing for the historical experiment (Eyring et al., 2016). Five types of external forcing are used to drive NESM3, including monthly mean globally averaged GHG concentrations, global land-use and land-cover forcing, solar irradiance, prescribed aerosol optical properties and change of cloud droplet effective radius fraction, and prescribed ozone concentration. The time-lag method is used to initialize the five ensembles of the historical experiments with different ICs from the PI experiment (Table 1). Five AMIP experiments were initialized by the atmospheric ICs from the corresponding realization of the historical experiments. The sea surface temperature (SST) and sea-ice concentration were obtained from the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison.The integrations of all AMIP experiments span from 1975 to 2014, and the outputs from 1979 to 2014 have been submitted (Table 1).

    2.4.Experimental design of the Scenario MIP experiment

    In Scenario MIP, we considered three types of Tier-1 experiments—namely, SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 as our priority. These scenarios are the successors to RCP2.6,RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 in CMIP5, respectively. Two ensemble members of each experiment were conducted, which were initialized at the end of realizations 1 and 2 of the historical experiments, respectively. The simulations span from 2015 to 2100 (Table 1). In addition to solar radiation and volcanic forcing, other external forcings are different in the SSP experiments. Volcanic forcing uses the same values as those in the PI experiment. The same suite of temporally evolving solar radiation forcing is used in all SSP experiments. All scenario experiments are also driven by the landsurface forcing, stratospheric aerosol and anthropogenic aerosol forcing, and globally averaged long-lived GHG concentrations of each scenario as designed in O’Neill et al. (2016).

    2.5.Experimental design of the PMIP experiment

    The registered MH and LIG experiments are the Tier-1 experiments of PMIP4/CMIP6 (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2017).Compared to the PI experiment, two types of external forcing, Earth’s orbital parameters and GHG concentrations,are considered in the designs of the MH and LIG experiments (Table 2). All other boundary conditions (e.g.,land–sea configuration, ice sheets) are identical to those of the CMIP6 PI experimental design (Table 2). Both the MH and LIG experiments branch from the PI experiment, and anadditional 500-year spin-up is conducted before the 100-year integration of each experiment. The outputs of the two experiments follow the requirements of PMIP4.

    Table 1. Information on the experimental designs.

    Table 2. Forcing and boundary conditions for the PI, MH and LIG experiments.

    2.6.Observational data

    The observational data used for model evaluation in this study are as follows: (1) monthly mean precipitation data of GPCP, version 2.2 (Huffman et al., 2009); (2) SST and sea-ice concentration data from HadISST (Rayner et al.,2003); (3) surface air temperature (SAT) from NCEP-2(Kanamitsu et al., 2002); and (4) surface temperature anomalies from HadCRUT4 (Morice et al., 2012).

    3.Results from DECK, historical and Scenario MIP experiments

    A reasonable coupled system response to the temporally evolving external forcing requires the coupled model to realistically reproduce the complex feedbacks among the atmosphere, land surface, hydrosphere, cryosphere, and biosphere. To this end, the performance of NESM3 is evaluated in terms of the climatological mean states and atmosphere–sea-ice–ocean interaction phenomena among the model components for the modern climate. With respect to future climate change, changes in the warming magnitudes,large-scale features (e.g., surface temperature, precipitation,and monsoon), and related Earth system internal modes(e.g., ENSO and MJO) under different scenarios are the main concern (e.g., Collins et al., 2013). Thus, the projected global mean surface temperature (GMST), Northern Hemisphere (NH) sea-ice extent (SIE), anomalies in SAT and precipitation, ENSO behavior, and MJO in the SSP1-2.6,SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5 experiments are discussed in this study.

    3.1.Equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response

    The equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response (TCR) are used to demonstrate the responses of a coupled model to abrupt and transient COforcing. ECS is defined as the GMST change due to forcing in the form of an abrupt doubling of COafter reaching the new equilibrium state. ECS values estimated by the Gregory method (Gregory et al., 2004) show a continuous increase from CMIP3 to CMIP6; particularly, there is a substantial change from 3.31 ± 0.74 K in CMIP5 models to 3.86 ± 1.10 K in CMIP6 models (Flato et al., 2013; Zelinka et al., 2020).The abrupt4×CO2 experiment predicts an equilibrium temperature change of 9.4 K when the Earth reaches the new equilibrium state (Fig.1a). This means that the ECS is 4.7 in NESM3, which is larger than most CMIP5/6 models (Flato et al., 2013; Meehl et al., 2020).

    TCR is regarded as the averaged GMST change during years 60–80 in the 1pctCO2 experiment. Previous studies have shown that the high-ECS models have high TCR values in CMIP5/6 models (Flato et al., 2013; Meehl et al.,2020). The TCR of NESM3 is 2.8 K (Fig.1b), which is higher than that of most CMIP6 models (Meehl et al.,2020).

    3.2.Evolution of GMST and SIE

    As one of the most concerning factors for the historical simulation, the simulated GMST time series are first discussed and compared with the HadCRUTv4 observation.Figure 2a shows the GMST anomalies in five historical simulations, the historical ensemble mean, and the observed GMST anomalies relative to 1961–90. NESM3 simulates the temporal evolution of GMST very well, such as the significant global warming trend in recent decades, the warming hiatus around the 1950s, and the cooling response of surface temperature to large volcanic eruptions. The simulated GMST in the historical ensemble mean increases by 0.52°C in 1985–2014 compared to the preindustrial period (1850–79). The warming magnitude is 0.21°C less than the observation. This is mainly due to the warmer bias before the 1940s(Fig.2a). Model results show the ensemble spread is small when the external forcing is large, e.g., the volcanic eruption years.

    Fig.1. The calculations of ECS and TCR from the abrupt4×CO2 experiment and 1pctCO2 experiment,respectively: (a) Relationship between the annual mean TOA net downward radiative flux and GMST anomalies relative to the PI experiment. The solid line represents the linear leastsquares regression fit to the 150 years of model outputs. It predicts the equilibrium temperature change of 9.4 K, yielding an ECS of 4.7 K. (b) GMST response forcing in the form of a 1% per year increase in CO2. The average temperature anomaly between years 60–80 (marked by green shading) is defined as the TCR. The dashed line shows the TCR value.

    Fig.2. Time series of global mean quantities: (a) GMST (unit:℃) from observation (red), five historical experiments (dashed black), and the MME mean (blue). (b) GMST (unit: ℃) from realizations 1 and 2 of the historical experiments (black),SSP1-2.6 experiments (blue), SSP2-4.5 experiments (red), and SSP5-8.5 experiments (purple). The reference period for the GMST is 1961–90. (c) September Arctic SIE (units: 106 km2)from realizations 1 and 2 of the historical experiments (black),SSP1-2.6 experiments (blue), SSP2-4.5 experiments (red), and SSP5-8.5 experiments (purple). The observed SIE is shown in magenta.

    Figure 2b shows the projected GMST evolution in realizations 1 and 2 of the historical experiments and the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 experiments. The warming of GMST is similar for the three scenarios from 2015 to 2035.Regarding the SSP1-2.6 scenario, both realizations show a GMST peak at around 2060 and a slight decay before 2100.This is consistent with the experimental design of SSP1-2.6,which has a decline of radiative forcing in the middle of this century (O’Neill et al., 2016). Both the SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 experiments show a continuous increase of GMST during this century. During 2079–2100, the simulated GMSTs show an increase of 1.6°C, 2.4°C and 4.1°C in the ensemble mean of the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 experiment,respectively, relative to 1850–79.

    Observations reveal an accelerated decline of the NH summer sea-ice coverage in recent decades (Overland and Wang, 2013). The projected summertime Arctic SIEs in all SSP experiments are shown in Fig.2c. NESM3 can reproduce the accelerated decay of SIE during the past three decades (1985–2014). The simulated SIE decreases by about 50% from 1985 to 2014, which is slightly higher than the observation (Fig.2c). The shrinkage of SIE is shown to be more rapid in the ensuing decades, proceeding to a sea-icefree summer in all SSP experiments. A sea-ice-free summer is projected to be reached by around 2034, 2036 and 2027 in SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5, respectively.Here, a sea-ice-free summer is defined as the first time that the 5-year running mean SIE is less than 1 × 10km(Massonnet et al., 2012). The sea-ice-free timing is earlier than the estimate from CMIP5 RCP experiments (Massonnet et al., 2012; Jahn et al., 2016).

    3.3.Climatological temperature and precipitation

    For the modern-day mean state evaluation, we compare the model results of the last 30 years (1985–2014)from the historical experiment with the observation. All the mean states are derived from the ensemble mean of the five historical simulations, while the result from ensemble 1 of the historical experiment is used in the evaluation of interannual variation.

    Figure 3 presents NESM3’s ability to reproduce the observed SAT, and shows the patterns of SAT changes in the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 experiments relative to 1985–2014. The ensemble mean of the five historical experiments can successfully reproduce the observed temperature distribution, with the bias being within 1°C (2°C) over most of the ocean (land) (Figs. 3a–c). The simulated surface temperature is colder than the observation over the central-eastern equatorial Pacific, and the major cold bias centers are located over the high-latitude Atlantic Ocean and Antarctica. There is a warm bias over the Southern Ocean, midlatitude Asia, and tropical northern Africa (Fig.3c). The SAT biases over the high-latitude oceans are closely associated with the biases of excessive SIE over the Arctic and deficient SIE around Antarctica (not shown).

    Fig.3. Climatological mean surface air temperature (units: ℃) in the (a) observation, (b) ensemble mean of five historical experiments, and (c) their differences. (d–f) Changes in SAT from the ensemble mean of the (d) SSP1-2.6,(e) SSP2-4.5 and (f) SSP5-8.5 experiments relative to the simulated modern climatology (1985–2014) from the historical experiment.

    For the three global warming experiments, the patterns of SAT anomalies are similar, except for differences in magnitude. The SAT warming pattern is characterized by a warmer NH than SH and warmer land than ocean. The hemispheric temperature contrasts are more evident over the higher latitudes than the lower latitudes (Figs. 3d–f). That is, the temperature contrast between the hemispheres will be enlarged under future global warming. Over the tropics, the projected SAT change is larger over the eastern equatorial Pacific than over the western equatorial Pacific. In summary, the projected SAT change is dominated by “warmer NH than SH” and “warmer land than ocean” patterns, as well as an El Ni?o-like warming over the tropics. Note that the subpolar Atlantic Ocean is relatively less warm than most of the globe. This so-called Atlantic “warming hole” is also shown by many CMIP5 RCP4.5 experiments (Collins et al., 2013).

    The simulated annual mean precipitation during 1985 to 2014 is compared with the observation (Figs. 4a–c).NESM3 can reproduce well the large-scale feature of observed precipitation. The simulated major heavy precipitation regions are located in the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), South Pacific Convergence Zone, and the mid-latitude storm-track regions. However, the model still suffers from double-ITCZ precipitation biases. Meanwhile,extensive precipitation appears over the upwind side of the mountain, and a dry bias dominates over the Amazon region. Surprisingly, a large dry bias is located over the central-eastern equatorial Pacific, where a slightly cold SST bias is simulated, which is deserving of further investigation.Reducing the bias of the precipitation mean state is one of the targets in the next phase of model development.

    Fig.4. As in Fig.3 but for precipitation (units: mm d?1).

    Under future global warming, precipitation is projected to increase in all SSP experiments because of the enhanced strength of the hydrological cycle, with the globally averaged precipitation increasing by 0.08, 0.12 and 0.18 mm din the SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 experiments, respectively. The scaled precipitation changes by temperature changes yield about 2% of the precipitation increase per degree of global warming in all SSP experiments, which is consistent with prior studies (Li et al., 2013; Held and Soden, 2006). The spatial distribution of precipitation anomalies shows that the increment of NH precipitation is greater than its SH counterpart, and the reduction in precipitation is more obvious over the SH subtropics than the NH subtropics. The hemispheric-averaged precipitation change over the NH is double that over the SH, probably due to the enlarged hemispheric thermal contrast and its associated enhanced cross-equatorial flow during boreal summer (not shown).Over the NH, the enhancement of precipitation is more robust over the Eastern Hemisphere (EH), especially over the North African and Asian monsoon regions. The enhanced EH monsoon precipitation could be due to the“warmer NH than SH” and “warmer land than ocean” patterns. The enlarged hemispheric and land–sea thermal contrasts can enhance the cross-equatorial flow and monsoon circulation over the EH (Lee and Wang, 2014; Cao and Zhao,2020; Cao et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020), leading to a greater increase in precipitation over the EH monsoon region (Figs. 4d–f). The projected precipitation is deficient over the tropical and subtropical Atlantic sector. Studies have suggested that the subtropics will become dryer under global warming owing to reduced moisture convergence(e.g., Chou and Neelin, 2004; Held and Soden, 2006). Wang et al. (2020) also pointed out that El Ni?o-like SST warming would enhance the subsidence over the American monsoon region. These two mechanisms might be responsible for the dryer tropical and subtropical Atlantic in NESM3.The details of the physical processes involved are deserving of further investigation. Over the tropics, the model projects enhanced precipitation over the equatorial Pacific and suppressed precipitation over the southern Indian Ocean.

    3.4.ENSO and MJO

    ENSO is one of the dominant internal variabilities of the Earth system; it modulates tropical and global teleconnections and is used as a prediction source on seasonal to interannual time scales (McPhaden et al., 2006). The observed and simulated ENSO variabilities are presented by the standard deviation of the December–February (DJF)-averaged SST anomaly over the tropical region in the observation and ensemble 1 of the historical experiment (Figs. 5a and b).NESM3 reproduces well the spatial pattern of ENSO variability, with enhanced variability over the equatorial eastern Pacific (Fig.5c). The simulated ENSO has a broad frequency range of between 2 and 7 years, agreeing well with the observations (figure not shown).

    Compared to the modern climatology, all global warming experiments, SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, and SSP5-8.5, project similar changes of ENSO variability (Figs. 5d–f). The amplitude of the SST variability is reduced over the central and eastern Pacific. The reduction of ENSO variability is more evident in the SSP5-8.5 experiment than in the other scenarios. This is consistent with previous studies that revealed about half of CMIP5 models project a decreased ENSO amplitude under the RCP8.5 scenario (e.g., Chen et al., 2015).

    The MJO is a planetary-scale convectively coupled circulation system that affects the tropical climate and weather on the intraseasonal time scale (Waliser et al., 2003; Zhao et al., 2015a, b, 2018). Figure 6 compares the simulated and observed wavenumber-frequency spectra of 20–100 bandpass-filtered equatorial (10°S–10°N) precipitation. The observed MJO signal shows a distinct peak at wavenumbers 1–3 and a periodicity of about 30–60 days (Fig.6a).The NESM3-simulated wavenumber and frequency characteristics resemble the observed MJO counterparts, as evidenced by the reasonable east–west propagation asymmetry,30–90-day oscillation, and planetary-scale selection.However, the simulation tends to shift to a higher-frequency and smaller-scale oscillation than the observations(Fig.6b). Under future global warming, NESM3 projects increased spectral power of precipitation anomalies and shortened MJO periodicity in all three Scenario MIP experiments (Figs. 6c–e). Indeed, previous studies have suggested amplification of the MJO variability under future global warming in models with superior MJO simulation capability (Rushley et al., 2019; Cui and Li, 2019).

    4.Results from MH and LIG experiments

    4.1.Changes in solar insolation

    Abundant proxy records have revealed the existence of the current interglacial (Holocene) and most recent interglacial (LIG) periods (Marcott et al., 2013; Fischer et al.,2018). The numerical simulation of the MH has been conducted in all phases of PMIP, whist the LIG experiment is included in PMIP for the first time (Otto-Bliesner et al.,2017). Paleo-data synthesis has suggested that GMSTs during the MH/LIG were ~0.7/~1.0°C warmer than those of the PI period (Marcott et al., 2013; Fischer et al., 2018). The major driving force of MH and LIG climate changes is the changes in solar radiation, rather than changes in GHG forcing (Fig.7), although GHG forcing is the primary driver of future anthropogenic warming (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2017).Comparative research on the two different types of warming climate provides a unique opportunity to understand the efficiency of different external forcing in changing the global climate. For example, Cao et al. (2019b) revealed that global monsoon precipitation efficacies are different under different external forcing, given the same impact in changing GMST.

    Fig.5. Standard deviation of DJF-averaged SST (units: ℃) in the (a) observation, (b) realization 1 of the historical experiment, and (c) their differences. (d–f) Changes in standard deviation of the DJF-mean SST in realization 1 of the (d)SSP1-2.6, (e) SSP2-4.5 and (f) SSP5-8.5 experiments relative to realization 1 of the historical experiment.

    Fig.6. Wavenumber–frequency spectra of spatiotemporally filtered precipitation (units: mm d?1) in the boreal winter season (December–February) for the (a) observation, (b) historical experiment, and (c) SSP1-2.6, (d) SSP2-4.5 and(e) SSP5-8.5 experiments over the equatorial region (10°S–10°N). A 20–100-day bandpass filter was applied to the precipitation after removing its climatological seasonal cycle. The vertical dashed lines indicate the periods of 100 and 20 days, respectively. The period used in the observation and historical experiment is 1997–2014; and the period used for the SSP experiments is 2086–2100.

    Fig.7. Zonal-mean latitude–month insolation (units: W m?2)changes in the (a) MH and (b) LIG experiments relative to the PI experiment.

    Figure 7 shows the changes in top-of-the-atmosphere(TOA) irradiance during the MH and LIG periods. The change in TOA irradiance is larger in the higher latitudes than in the lower latitudes for both MH and LIG relative to PI. Over the NH, strengthened and weakened insolation are shown during June–September and November–April, respectively, in MH. Over the SH, the insolation is enhanced during July–November and weakened during January–April.The enhancement of TOA irradiance exceeds 30 W mat high latitudes of both hemispheres during MH (Fig.7a). In the LIG experiment, a positive/negative insolation anomaly is apparent during April–July/August–March over the majority of the NH. Over the SH, the pronounced changes in insolation are the reduced insolation during austral summer (December–March) and increased insolation during June–October(Fig.7b). The reduction/increase of insolation can reach?40/50 W mover the mid-to-high latitudes of both hemispheres during the LIG period (Fig.7b). The changes in TOA solar radiation would enlarge the seasonal cycle of TOA irradiance, especially over the NH. In terms of the global mean value, the changes in globally averaged TOA irradiance are small during both the MH and LIG periods relative to the PI.

    4.2.Climatological temperature and precipitation

    In response to the change in TOA irradiance, the changes in global mean SAT are about ?0.3°C and 0.1°C in the MH and LIG experiments (Figs. 8a and b), respectively,relative to the PI period. In the MH experiment, the change in SAT is generally less than 0.5°C over most of the globe,except for a large negative temperature response over the low-latitude landmass of the NH (Fig.8a). This negative temperature anomaly is more obvious during boreal winter(Fig.8e). During June–August (JJA), the SAT is increased over the midlatitudes of the NH continent due to the enhanced solar radiation (Figs. 7a and 8c). The enhanced seasonal contrast of SAT can also be attributed to the enlarged seasonal cycle of solar radiation over the NH.

    The annual mean SAT change between the LIG and PI experiments is less than 1°C over most of the globe (Fig.8b).The result is consistent with the PMIP4 multi-model ensemble (MME) results (Otto-Bliesner et al., 2020),although paleo-proxy data suggest a warmer climate compared to the simulations. The SAT anomaly pattern is characterized by cool SAT over the African and Asian monsoon regions and warm SAT over the Antarctic region (Fig.8b).During boreal summer (JJA), warmer SAT appears over most of the global land surface, with maximum warming of 5°C over the midlatitude NH (Fig.8d). During boreal winter(DJF), the land surface temperature during the LIG is cooler than during the PI period (Fig.8f). Interestingly, the SAT response is opposite over the Barents Sea between the MH and LIG experiments (Figs. 8a and b), especially during the winter season (Figs. 8e and f). This difference in SAT responses may cause different climate impacts during the two periods, since extensive studies have emphasized the climate impacts of the sea-ice variability over the Barents Sea(Budikova, 2009; Vihma, 2014; Gao et al., 2015).

    In summary, the changes in global mean SAT are small in the MH and LIG experiments compared to the PI experiment due to the small change in global mean TOA irradiance. However, the season cycles of SAT are enlarged in both the MH and LIG experiments because of the latitudinal and seasonal redistribution of TOA irradiance. The temperature responses simulated by NESM3 in the MH and LIG experiments are consistent with the PMIP4 MME mean.

    In terms of precipitation, the anomalous patterns of annual mean precipitation are similar in the MH and LIG experiments, except for the larger magnitude in the LIG experiment. Over land, precipitation is enhanced over the NH monsoon regions, while it is decreased over the SH monsoon regions (Figs. 9a and b). Over the tropical ocean, precipitation is generally reduced, especially over the Pacific. This is due to the magnitude of precipitation change being larger in summer (Figs. 9c and d) than in winter (Figs. 9e and f), yielding the decreased annual mean precipitation in both the MH and LIG experiments. The anomalous patterns of precipitation during the MH and LIG periods in NESM3 are consistent with the MME mean of PMIP4 models (Scussolini et al., 2019; Brierley et al., 2020). Besides, the simulated precipitation anomaly is consistent with the proxy data over the NH continent, except for eastern Europe in the LIG experiment (Scussolini et al., 2019).

    Fig.8. SAT changes (units: ℃) in the (a, c, e) MH and (b, d, f) LIG experiments relative to the PI experiment: (a, b)annual mean; (c, d) JJA mean; (e, f) DJF mean. Note that different colorbars are used.

    In JJA, precipitation is increased over the NH land region, especially the monsoon region, but decreased over the Indo-Pacific region and southern equatorial Atlantic, in both the MH and LIG experiments (Figs. 9c and d). This could be attributable to the enhanced hemispheric thermal contrasts due to the larger warming over the NH mid-to-high latitudes. As suggested by Cao et al. (2020), the simulated enlarged meridional temperature gradient could induce a northward shift of the tropical rainband by altering the hemispheric energy transport and its associated Hadley circulation change (Figs. 8c and d). The changes in large-scale circulation drive the enhancement of moisture convergence over the NH monsoon region and weakening of moisture convergence over the Indo-Pacific region and southern equatorial Atlantic. Note that the summer monsoon precipitation changes over North Africa and Asia are enhanced under the solar radiative forcing and GHG forcing (Figs. 4d–f, Figs. 8c and d). In contrast, the responses of the North American summer monsoon precipitation are different for the two types of forcing. The associated underlying physical interpretation of these differences is beyond the scope of this study.

    In DJF, NESM3 simulates a wetter tropical ocean but dryer austral continents in both the MH and LIG experiments (Figs. 9e and f). The weakened austral-summer monsoon precipitation over land is closely linked to the decreased land–sea thermal contrast and its associated weakened monsoon circulation (Figs. 8e and f, Figs. 9e and f).

    4.3.ENSO variability

    Given the uncertainty of projected changes in ENSO amplitude (Chen et al., 2015), examining paleo ENSO behavior provides a promising way to deepen our understanding of its physics, especially its responses to different SST mean states and different SST seasonal cycles (Brown et al.,2020). In this study, ENSO variability is defined by the standard deviation of DJF-mean SST in the central-eastern tropical Pacific. Figure 10 shows the changes in ENSO variability in the MH and LIG experiments relative to the PI experiment. The change in ENSO variability is small in the MH,while there is a noticeable decrease in ENSO variability under the LIG forcing (Fig.10). The DJF SST standard deviation is decreased in the central equatorial Pacific but increased in the eastern equatorial Pacific during MH. The averaged ENSO amplitudes in the Ni?o3.4 region are reduced in both the MH and LIG experiments. This result is consistent with the evidence from paleo-proxy data during the MH period and MH and LIG simulations from most PMIP4 models (Carré et al., 2014; Brown et al., 2020).

    Fig.9. Precipitation changes (units: mm d?1) and 850-hPa circulation changes (units: m s?1) in the (a, c, e) MH and(b, d, f) LIG experiments relative to the PI experiment: (a, b) annual mean; (c, d) JJA mean; (e, f) DJF mean.

    Fig.10. Changes in DJF-averaged SST standard deviation (units: ℃) in the(a) MH and (b) LIG experiments relative to the PI experiment.

    5.Experiment outputs

    The NESM3 outputs were post-processed following the CMIP6 requirements, and have been submitted to the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) nodes. There are 48 variables for the atmosphere model (Table A1), 24 variables for the ocean model (Table A2), and 26 variables for the sea-ice model (Table A3). Detailed information regarding these variables in NESM3 is provided in the Appendix. Most of the variables in the atmosphere model are on pressure layers,while six and three variables are outputs on the model levels with frequencies of six-hourly and monthly, respectively.The model levels’ pressures can be calculated using the following equation:

    where Pis the derived pressure on model level interfaces, Pis 1013.25 hPa in NESM3, and Pdenotes the surface pressure of each model grid. The coefficients aand bindicate the hybrid level “A” and “B” coefficients on the interfaces, respectively (Giorgetta et al., 2013). The values of aand bare listed in the data files. The outputs from the ocean and sea-ice models are stored on the original model grids. They can be interpolated using tools like Climate Data Operators (https://code.mpimet.mpg.de/projects/cdo/embedded/cdo.pdf ). All the model submissions are stored in the NetCDF (Network Common Data Form) format,which can be processed easily using appropriate software.

    6.Summary

    NESM3, a new member of the CMIP6 community, has performed the DECK, historical, Scenario MIP, and PMIP experiments for CMIP6. They include a 500-year PI experiment, a 150-year 1pctCO2 experiment, a 150-year abrupt4×CO2 experiment, five ensembles of historical experiments,two ensembles of SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 experiments, a 100-year MH experiment, and a 100-year LIG experiment. All the outputs from these experiments have been submitted to the ESGF nodes to facilitate their download. In response to forcing in the form of an abrupt quadrupling of COand 1%yrincrease in CO, NESM3 simulates ECS and TCR values of 4.7 K and 2.8 K, respectively, which are slightly higher than the MME values of the CMIP6 models.Validation shows that NESM3 can reproduce reasonably well the temporal evolution of observed GMST, the climatological mean SAT, and precipitation, as well as the observed ENSO variability and MJO. Some common outstanding biases (e.g., double-ITCZ) still exist in NESM3.

    The projected climatological SAT and precipitation show similar changes for all three Scenario MIP experiments, but with different amplitudes. The change in SAT shows clear “NH warmer than SH” and “l(fā)and warmer than ocean” patterns, as well as the El Ni?o-like SST warming in the tropics. Shaped by this SAT pattern, the projected NH precipitation is increased more than the SH precipitation, and EH precipitation is enhanced more than the western hemisphere precipitation. This precipitation pattern is closely linked to the large-scale circulation change due to largescale differential SAT warming. The projected summertime Arctic SIE declines rapidly, and the Arctic summer will be sea-ice-free by around 2034, 2036 and 2027 in SSP1-2.6,SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5, respectively. In the three SSP experiments, all projections of ENSO amplitude are found to decrease in the central and eastern tropical Pacific.

    Two paleoclimate simulations, i.e., the MH and LIG experiments, were conducted following the experimental design of PMIP4. The simulated changes in SAT are in line with the changes in TOA irradiance for both experiments.These are characterized by an enhanced seasonal contrast of temperature over the NH, especially over land. Correspondingly, enhanced NH monsoon precipitation over land and suppressed precipitation over the majority of the tropics are seen. Changes in temperature and precipitation are closely consistent with those of other CMIP6/PMIP4 models and proxy data. Additionally, a decreased ENSO amplitude under the LIG forcing can be seen in NESM3.

    Acknowledgements.

    This work was jointly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20180812, BK20181412), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42005017, 41675072, 41922033),and the Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of NUIST(Grant No. 2018r063). We acknowledge the computer resources at the NUIST High Performance Computer Center. This is ESMC publication NO. 330.

    Data availability

    The datasets of the DECK, historical, Scenario MIP, and PMIP experiments are available at https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6/.

    Open Access

    This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source,provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

    APPENDIX

    The submitted variables in the atmospheric, ocean and sea-ice model components are listed in Tables A1, A2 and A3, respectively. The “Variable ” and “Description ”columns present the output name and its detailed description in the CMIP6 archive, respectively. The “Frequency”column is the submission data frequencies.

    Table A1. Atmospheric model output variables. The notation “6hrLev” in the frequency column indicates the variables are outputted over model levels.

    Table A2. Ocean model output variables.

    Table A3. Sea ice model output variables.

    av线在线观看网站| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 如何舔出高潮| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲国产欧美网| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| av免费观看日本| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 日本91视频免费播放| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 一级毛片 在线播放| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产成人一区二区在线| 999久久久国产精品视频| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美+日韩+精品| 一区福利在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| av国产精品久久久久影院| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 蜜桃在线观看..| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 看免费av毛片| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 熟女电影av网| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 日韩视频在线欧美| av在线app专区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 另类精品久久| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| av在线app专区| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 曰老女人黄片| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 色播在线永久视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 夫妻午夜视频| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 男人操女人黄网站| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日本午夜av视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 一个人免费看片子| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 婷婷成人精品国产| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产野战对白在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av | 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产男女内射视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 大码成人一级视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 日韩av免费高清视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 尾随美女入室| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产麻豆69| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 老女人水多毛片| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 国产精品无大码| 午夜av观看不卡| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 中国国产av一级| 不卡av一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 天天影视国产精品| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 天堂8中文在线网| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 我的亚洲天堂| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲精品视频女| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 高清av免费在线| 中国国产av一级| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 永久免费av网站大全| 成人手机av| av免费在线看不卡| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 18在线观看网站| 欧美另类一区| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 成人国语在线视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久 成人 亚洲| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产精品.久久久| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲伊人色综图| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 精品少妇内射三级| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 亚洲成色77777| 18在线观看网站| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 在线观看国产h片| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| www.自偷自拍.com| 宅男免费午夜| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 男人操女人黄网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 午夜久久久在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产成人精品一,二区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| h视频一区二区三区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 性少妇av在线| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产精品免费视频内射| 丁香六月天网| videosex国产| 美女主播在线视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产在线免费精品| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久99一区二区三区| 精品一区在线观看国产| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 深夜精品福利| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久 成人 亚洲| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 五月天丁香电影| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 色播在线永久视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品999| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲国产av新网站| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 丝袜美足系列| 18禁观看日本| 捣出白浆h1v1| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区 | 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 观看av在线不卡| 久久热在线av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲成色77777| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 一本久久精品| 国产成人精品一,二区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 桃花免费在线播放| 99九九在线精品视频| av线在线观看网站| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 不卡av一区二区三区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| av.在线天堂| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久久精品94久久精品| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 免费看不卡的av| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产亚洲最大av| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 美女国产视频在线观看| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 777米奇影视久久| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| videos熟女内射| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 一级毛片我不卡| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久久网色| 久久av网站| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 一级爰片在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 久久久精品区二区三区| 看免费成人av毛片| 性少妇av在线| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 韩国av在线不卡| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| xxx大片免费视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 日本wwww免费看| 曰老女人黄片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 看免费av毛片| videos熟女内射| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 高清不卡的av网站| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲伊人色综图| 美女主播在线视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| av一本久久久久| av在线app专区| 1024视频免费在线观看| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产 精品1| 国产精品.久久久| 多毛熟女@视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 丝袜喷水一区| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 人妻一区二区av| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产av精品麻豆| 成人影院久久| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 麻豆av在线久日| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 两个人看的免费小视频| 99久久人妻综合| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 美女午夜性视频免费| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| a级毛片黄视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 观看av在线不卡| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 尾随美女入室| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 大码成人一级视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 一级毛片电影观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 一区二区av电影网| 三级国产精品片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久97久久精品| 伦精品一区二区三区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 欧美bdsm另类| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 满18在线观看网站| 午夜91福利影院| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国产综合精华液| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av一本久久久久| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久99精品国语久久久| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 欧美97在线视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日韩中字成人| 久热久热在线精品观看| 美女主播在线视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 日韩伦理黄色片| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 97在线人人人人妻| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| av一本久久久久| 1024香蕉在线观看| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 久久久久久人人人人人| 制服诱惑二区| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 日日撸夜夜添| 日韩电影二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 欧美日韩av久久| 只有这里有精品99| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 一个人免费看片子|