• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Improving robustness of complex networks by a new capacity allocation strategy

    2021-01-21 02:13:06JunLiu劉軍
    Chinese Physics B 2021年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:劉軍

    Jun Liu(劉軍)

    Department of Information Science and Technology,Tianjin University of Finance and Economics,Tianjin 300222,China

    Keywords: capacity,cascading failure,complex network,robustness

    1. Introduction

    In the past few years,complex network theory has developed rapidly and has been used to study robustness of infrastructure network against cascading failures,such as transportation networks,[1,2]logistics network,supply chain networks,[3]and power grids.[4,5]Cascading failure can make great damage to infrastructure networks,which can be described as follows. If there are some nodes fail, it can cause the redistribution of loads, which may make the loads of some nodes exceed their capacities, so the failures scale will be continuously expanded,eventually,resulting in collapse of the entire network. Cascading failure is fatal to the functioning of infrastructure networks. These infrastructure networks are important for us,once they are destroyed,it will seriously affect people’s production and life and cause great property losses.In June 2019,Argentina and Uruguay suffered massive power outages across the country.The blackout also affected cities in Paraguay,southern Brazil,and parts of Chile. What is worse,the power outages have led to water and gas shortages in five South American countries, as well as the closure of subway,bus and intercity railway, which have severely affected residents’ lives. So cascading failures[6–9]and robustness[10,11]of infrastructure networks are paid more attention by scholars because of their great importance. Chen et al.[12]researched controllable robustness on networks with considering the external or internal failure.Jing et al.[13]constructed a cascading failure model by considering time delay in failure propagation process and considered the effect of the node recovery probability on cascading failures.

    As we all know, there exists load on nodes in infrastructure networks.[14]So the failure of nodes can cause the redistribution of the load. And it will make the load of some nodes exceed their capacities,which can lead to further overload failures and ultimately spread over the entire network. In order to improve the robustness of complex networks against cascading failure, scholars have researched from different perspectives,such as the initial load of node, the capacity allocation strategy, and load redistribution strategy.[15–18]. Motter et al.[15]proposed a classical ML load model,which consider that network information was exchanged along the shortest path between nodes, so they defined the betweenness of a node as its initial load. At the same time, they assume that the capacity of a node is proportional to its initial load due to the cost limit,this capacity allocation strategy is adopted in many researches.[18–21]The ML model requires each node to master the whole information of the network. So,it is appropriate for small networks. In fact the global information is hard to obtain,especially for large scale networks.And in the actual network system the load may not be transmitted along the shortest path,such as public transport network. Wang et al.[22]defined the initial load of node as the product of the degree of node and the sum of the degree of its neighbors,which is in positive correlation with betweenness centrality.[23]Considering both local and global information,Liu et al.[24]defined the load of a node by combining the node degree with the betweenness. We all know that cascading failures do not occur as long as the capacity of the node is large enough.However,capacity is costly,the capacity of a node cannot be infinite. So it is very meaningful to study the capacity allocation strategy under limited resources, which has great effect on the network robustness.However,there is not much literature on the dynamical capacity allocation procession to resist the cascading failure. Wang et al.[25]proposed an improved capacity model based on ML model, and defined the cost to protect vertices. According to the definition of cost,their model has always a lower value of the cost than ML model. However, in this model, there will be no fault-tolerant capacity for some nodes if β /=0, which is unreasonable. Because the load on a node usually fluctuates in real network, and the network will not work properly due to the presence of these nodes without fault-tolerant capacity. Li et al.[26]also proposed an improved capacity model based on ML model. Different from ML model, the faulttolerant capacity and topological structure are interrelated in their model,which can achieve better network robustness. But the model considered that network information was exchanged along the shortest paths between nodes. In fact, the loads in some real networks are not always exchanged along the shortest paths.[17]To solve this problem,Wang et al.[17]proposed a load redistribution strategy based on local information. Since then,more and more scholars[20,21,27]began to study the load redistribution strategy based on local information or to use the load local redistribution strategy to study the cascading failure. And most of them considered that the capacity of the node is proportionate to its initial load which was proposed in ML model.

    Based on the above analyses, we put forward a new capacity allocation strategy based on the community structure,meanwhile we use the load local redistribution strategy to research the robustness of complex networks. And in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the new strategy, a comparison was made with the capacity allocation strategy of ML model.

    2. Capacity allocation strategy and cascading failure model

    Cascading failures of the network can be described as follows, each node has an initial load L(0) and load capability C, under normal circumstances, L(t)<C, the network is in the steady state. After the node is removed (attacked or mechanical failure),the load on the failed node is redistributed to its neighbors. If the capacity of the neighbor is not enough to handle the extra loads,the neighbor would collapse,which can lead to load-redistribution and further overload failures and finally result in the collapse of the entire network. Assume that the potential cascading failure is caused by the removal of one single node, then we pay attention to the following dynamic process of the network. Cascading failure model used in this paper is briefly described as follows.

    2.1. Definition of initial load

    The initial load of node j is set as

    where Lj(0) is the initial load of node j, kjand Γjare the degree of node j and the set of neighbors of node j, respectively. θ is a tunable parameter and governs the strength of the node load. The definition of initial load is reasonable because the product of the degree of node and the sum of the degree of its neighbors is in positive correlation with betweenness centrality.[28,29]

    2.2. Capacity allocation strategy

    In the existing model, one model should be paid special attention: the capacity allocation strategy in Motter–Lai(ML)model,[15]which is widely used to study cascading failures in complex networks. The ML model assumes the capacity of node j is proportional to its initial load as

    where β (≥0)is a tolerance parameter representing the extra capacity.

    In this paper, we put forward a new capacity allocation strategy against cascading failures,as folows:

    In the new capacity allocation strategy model proposed in this paper,the cost is

    where siis the number of nodes in community i.

    Different from ML model,the fault-tolerant capacity and community structure are interrelated in the current model,and the intensity of correlation is controlled by γ.Considering that each component of the network may have different fault tolerance capabilities,this work proposes a more general allocation strategy to allocate additional capacity.

    2.3. Load-redistribution strategy

    Considering the time-varying load and the time-varying residual capacity, we adopted the method in Ref.[31], which can be defined as

    where ΔLjiis the extra load that node j should obtain from the failure node i,Cjis the capacity of node j,Lj(t)is the load of node j at the time step t,q is the number of time steps before the cascading process stops. j is the nearest neighbor of node i,Γiis the set of the nearest neighbors of node i.

    So at the time step t+1,if Lj(t)≤Cj,the load of node j is

    where Γiis the set of the nearest neighbors of node j.

    3. Simulation and analysis

    According to Ref. [31], Piis used to evaluate the size of the cascade due to the removal of node i

    where Fiis the number of failure nodes caused by the removal of node i. N is the total number of nodes in the complex network.

    The average size of the cascade due to the removal of one node can be described as

    In this paper, we focus on cascading failure triggered by the removal of a single node. And to measure the overall level of the network robustness against cascading failures due to the removal of a single node,we randomly remove only one node(such as node i)each time,and calculate the proportion of failure nodes(Pi)induced by removing node i.Remove a different node each time until all nodes have been removed once. Then the average proportion of failure nodes P is calculated according to Eq.(11)to evaluate the overall level of the network robustness against cascading failures. Each result is the average value of more than 20 realizations for the same topology.

    Two artificial network models are tested, i.e., Erd¨os–R′enyi model and the Barabasi–Albert (BA) model.[32]The two typical complex networks used in this paper are all generated by Pajek with network size N=1000 and average degree〈k〉=8. Furthermore,US power grid network as real complex network is considered. US power grid network is the highvoltage power grid in the Western States of the United States of America. There are 4941 nodes and 6594 edges in the power grid of the western United States. The nodes are transformers, substations, and generators, and the ties are high-voltage transmission lines.

    Many literatures assume that node load is constant when studying network robustness,but in fact,node load is variable.Hence, in order to verify the effectiveness of our method, we conduct experiments from two aspects,i.e.,the load in the network is constant during normal operation and the load in the network is time-varying during normal operation.

    The time-varying load Li(0)of node i can be defined as

    where Δl is the disturbance variable,it can be defined according to the variation trend of the load. Here,in order to explore the effectiveness of the model for simplicity,Δl=βL0iεi,εiis a random number between-1 and 1.

    First of all,we compare and analyze the new strategy and ML method based on two typical networks.

    Figure 1 shows the experimental results in BA network.From Fig.1 one can see that the new strategy(as shown in the line) can effectively reduce the scale of cascade failure compared with ML model(as shown in the dotted line)in BA network regardless of whether the load is variable or fixed. And with other parameters unchanged, the cascading failure scale decreases as the value of γ increases. γ is an adjustable parameter in Eq.(3),the smaller the value of γ is,the more homogeneous the capacity of node is. With the increase of γ,capacity resources tend to be allocated to communities with high average node degree. The experimental results indicate that allocating more capacity resources to the community with high average node degree is beneficial to reduce the scale of cascading failure. In Fig. 1, with the increase of β, the scale of cascading failure decreases,and one can see that cascading failures can be avoided if the capacity is large enough,which is consistent with the actual situation. Meanwhile,we can find that the scale of cascading failure decreases with the increase of θ for the same β, γ, which means that the more heterogeneous the initial load of the network nodes is, the stronger the overall destruction resistance of the network will be. But this kind of network can be vulnerability to deliberate attack with the increase of θ (shown in Fig. 7). Furthermore, comparing Figs.1(a),1(c),and 1(e)with Figs.1(b),1(d),and 1(f),we can find that the scale of cascading failure under constant load condition is lower than that under time-varying load condition, which indicates that BA network is more vulnerable under time-varying load condition.

    Fig.1. The average proportion of failure nodes P as a function of β and γ based on ML model and new strategy in BA networks for different θ. (a)Constant load, θ =0.4; (b) time-varying load, θ =0.4; (c) constant load, θ =1; (d) time-varying load, θ =1; (e) constant load, θ =1.6; (f) timevarying load,θ =1.6. The dotted curves reflect the relationship between P and β for different θ and γ based on ML model. The solid curves present the relationship between P and β for different θ and γ based on new strategy.

    Fig.2. The average proportion of failure nodes P as a function of β and γ based on ML model and new strategy in ER networks for different θ.(a)Constant load,θ =0.4;(b)time-varying load,θ =0.4;(c)constant load,θ =1;(d)time-varying load,θ =1;(e)constant load,θ =1.6;(f)time-varying load,θ =1.6. The dotted curves reflect the relationship between P and β for different θ and γ based on ML model. The solid curves present the relationship between P and β for different θ and γ based on new strategy.

    Figure 2 shows the experimental results in ER network.As can be seen from the experimental results,compared with the capacity allocation strategy proposed in ML model, the new strategy also can reduce the scale of cascading failure most of the time even though it is not obvious. For the random network,the average degree of each community does not differ much,so the effect of the new strategy is not obvious.In Fig.2,P is decreasing with the increase of β for the same θ,γ,which is consistent with the basic theory that there will be no cascading failures as long as the network has sufficient capacity. And focus on the effect of θ on the robustness of complex network,one can see that in ER network P is decreasing with the increase of θ. But the effect is not obvious in ER network compared with that in BA network. Moreover, considering the comparative analysis under constant node load and timevarying load, almost all the results (Figs. 1 and 2) show that the network is more vulnerable under time-varying load condition. Although the load redistribution strategy adopted in this paper has considered the time-varying characteristics of the load, the random variation of the load makes the distribution of the residual capacity in the network uncontrollable.For example,large load nodes may have little surplus capacity while low load nodes have relatively high surplus capacity. So capacity cannot be fully utilized due to the unreasonable distribution of residual capacity, which increases the network’s vulnerability.

    In order to show the effect of the new strategy more intuitively,we introduce indicator w,as

    where PMLis the average size of the cascade under the ML model, PNewis the average size of the cascade under the new capacity allocation strategy.

    Considering that the overall destruction resistance of the network is stronger with θ =1.6,we analyze the effects of β and γ on w with θ =1.6 in two typical networks.

    From Fig. 3 one can see that the new strategy improved the robustness of BA network compared with the strategy of ML model,and the robustness of BA network is gradually enhanced with the increase of γ regardless of whether the load is variable or fixed. The performance of the BA network against cascading failures has been improved by nearly 90%when β =0.13 and γ =1.9 (as shown in Fig. 3(a)). Meanwhile, we find that wincreases as βincreases, but wpresents a downward trend when β >1.3, which indicates that there is a β =βmaxthat maximizes w for each γ. A similar conclusion can be drawn on random networks,which can be seen in Fig. 4. However, the performance of the ER network against cascading failures has been improved by nearly 10%based on the new strategy,which is much less than that in BA network.

    Although the cost for the two methods (i.e., ML model and the new strategy)can be calculated by Eq.(5),cost cannot be used to judge the merits of the two methods.And the impact of capacity cost on network destructiveness is more suitable as an evaluation index. So we introduce contribution rate of unit capacity to network robustness Q,which is defined as

    The larger Q is,the higher the capacity utilization is.

    Fig.3. Indicator w as a function of β and γ for fixed θ =1.6 in BA network,with N=1000 and〈k〉=8. (a)Constant load and(b)time-varying load.

    Fig.4. Indicator w as a function of β and γ for fixed θ =1.6 in ER network,with N=1000 and〈k〉=8. (a)Constant load and(b)time-varying load.

    From the results shown in Fig.5,one can see that Q goes up and then goes down with the increase of β in BA network.In other words,there is a β =βmaxthat maximizes Q for each θ. It indicates that it is not economical to increase the cost of capacity when β >βmax. Meanwhile, the scale of cascading failure has been reduced to a very low level when β =βmax,which can be seen in Fig. 1. So β ≤βmaxis a more reasonable range of β in the actual networks. Compared with ML model, our method can achieve a higher Q for the sameβ,when β ≤βmax. It indicates that the new strategy is more efficient in using network capacity. Figure 6 shows the experimental results in ER network.As shown in Fig.6,at the beginning Q increases with the increase of β,but once β reaches a certain value,Q stops growing as β goes up.Meanwhile,compared with ML model, the new strategy can achieve a higher Q for the same β in ER network even though it is not obvious.Comparing Fig.5 with Fig.6, one can see that the new strategy is more advantageous in the rational utilization of network capacity in BA scale-free network.

    Fig.5. Q as a function of βand γ for different θ under different strategies in BA networks: (a)constant load,θ =0.4;(b)time-varying load,θ =0.4;(c)constant load,θ =1; (d)time-varying load,θ =1; (e)constant load,θ =1.6; (f)time-varying load,θ =1.6. The dotted curves are the results of ML model. The solid curves are the results of the new strategy.

    Although typical model networks are useful in understanding how real networks behave, they cannot catch many of the structural properties of the real systems. Therefore,we consider a real complex network,i.e.,US power grid network.Here we mainly study its robustness against deliberate attacks.So we selected the top 10 highest degree nodes in US power grid network. And each time only one of the ten nodes is removed, then the size of the cascade Pidue to the removal of the node is calculated. The average size of the cascade due to the removal of one node can be described as

    where Γ represents the set of the top 10 highest degree nodes.

    As you can see from Fig. 7, our new strategy still performs well against deliberate attacks on real network,whether the load is fixed or time-varying. When parameter θ is small,cascading failure scale is more sensitive to the change of β. it can be seen in Fig.7(a),When β increases from 0.09 to 0.21,P10can decrease from 1 to 0. However,with the increase of θ,the effect of the increase of β on improving the robustness of the network against deliberate attacks becomes less obvious.It indicates that the increase of θ can reduce the robustness of the network against deliberate attacks if the capacity cost is fixed.Moreover,the increase of γ can improve the robustness of the network against deliberate attacks when other parameters are fixed.

    Fig.6. Q as a function of β and γ for different θ under different strategies in ER networks: (a)constant load,θ =0.4;(b)time-varying load,θ =0.4;(c)constant load,θ =1; (d)time-varying load,θ =1; (e)constant load,θ =1.6; (f)time-varying load,θ =1.6. The dotted curves are the results of ML model. The solid curves are the results of the new strategy.

    Fig.7. P10 as a function of β and γ for different θ under different strategies in US power grid networks. (a)Constant load,θ =0.4;(b)time-varying load,θ =0.4;(c)constant load,θ =1;(d)time-varying load,θ =1;(e)constant load,θ =1.6;(f)time-varying load,θ =1.6. The dotted curves are the results of ML model. The solid curves are the results of the new strategy.

    Furthermore,we research the contribution rate of unit capacity to network robustness Q in US power grid network.From the experimental results, we can see that our new strategy has a higher capacity utilization. And from Fig.8,one can see that Q is decreasing with the increase of θ. It is reasonable because the heterogeneity of the network becomes more obvious with the increase of θ. And heterogeneous networks are vulnerable to deliberate attacks by high degree nodes. So the contribution rate of unit capacity decreases as θ increases.When θ is small, the value of Q increases rapidly with the increase of β,which indicates that the network with homogeneous load distribution can effectively improve its robustness against deliberate attacks by increasing capacity cost. When θ is big, the value of Q grows slowly with the increase of β,which indicates that network with heterogeneous load distribution cannot resist the deliberate attack on generous nodes simply by increasing capacity cost.

    Fig.8. Q as a function of βand γ for different θ under different strategies in power grid networks: (a)Constant load,θ =0.4; (b)time-varying load,θ =0.4; (c)constant load, θ =1; (d)time-varying load, θ =1; (e)constant load, θ =1.6; (f)time-varying load, θ =1.6. The dotted curves are the results of ML model. The solid curves are the results of the new strategy.

    4. Conclusions

    The cascading failure is a crucial process in many real systems,which can cause significant damage to network functions. Limited network capacity is a necessary condition for cascading failures, but the capacity of real system cannot be infinite. Changing the topology of the network can effectively improve the robustness of the network, but the topology of many existing network systems is not easy to change. So it is very important to allocate the limited network capacity reasonably without changing the network topology.

    In this paper, we developed a new strategy to allocate the limited capacity for suppressing cascade failure. Through comparison experiments,one can see that the new strategy can effectively reduce the scale of cascading failure. And it works better in scale-free networks than in random networks. Furthermore,we find that capacity efficiency is not monotonically increasing as the cost of capacity increases,that is to say,there is a cost threshold βmax. It is not economical to improve network robustness by increasing capacity costs when the cost is higher than βmax. And the capacity utilization of the new strategy is higher than that of ML model when the cost is lower than βmax. Meanwhile,the increase of γ can improve capacity utilization when β ≤βmax. Furthermore, it is found that cascading failures are more likely to occur when the network load is time-varying through comparative analysis.

    猜你喜歡
    劉軍
    劉軍作品
    大眾文藝(2022年10期)2022-06-08 02:33:28
    彩泥大變身
    The energy-saving advantages of burst-and-glide mode for thunniform swimming *
    Using spanwise flexibility of caudal fin to improve swimming performance for small fishlike robots *
    Numerical and experimental studies of hydrodynamics of flapping foils *
    映像畜牧業(yè)
    搶電視
    愛你(2017年35期)2017-11-24 18:30:41
    搶電視
    圖說
    看圖作文寫作指導(dǎo)
    成年版毛片免费区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 午夜两性在线视频| av国产免费在线观看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 成在线人永久免费视频| 两个人视频免费观看高清| av视频在线观看入口| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 久久热在线av| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 青草久久国产| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 草草在线视频免费看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 男人舔女人的私密视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 午夜a级毛片| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 人妻久久中文字幕网| xxx96com| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲色图av天堂| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 日本熟妇午夜| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| www.自偷自拍.com| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 我要搜黄色片| 日本一二三区视频观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 高清在线国产一区| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 亚洲 国产 在线| 色综合站精品国产| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | www.精华液| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 99热只有精品国产| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 青草久久国产| 欧美日本视频| ponron亚洲| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久久亚洲真实| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 久久精品成人免费网站| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产视频内射| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产片内射在线| 脱女人内裤的视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 一级片免费观看大全| 一级片免费观看大全| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 成年免费大片在线观看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲全国av大片| 99热只有精品国产| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 一本精品99久久精品77| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| a在线观看视频网站| 国产单亲对白刺激| 窝窝影院91人妻| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 国产精品,欧美在线| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 成人三级黄色视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 精品电影一区二区在线| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 日日夜夜操网爽| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 99久久精品热视频| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产亚洲欧美98| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲成人久久性| 深夜精品福利| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 在线观看66精品国产| www日本黄色视频网| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 九色成人免费人妻av| 午夜精品在线福利| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产视频内射| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 级片在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产熟女xx| 午夜免费观看网址| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 美女免费视频网站| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 88av欧美| 老司机福利观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 黄频高清免费视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 禁无遮挡网站| av福利片在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 午夜影院日韩av| 香蕉国产在线看| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| av中文乱码字幕在线| 91国产中文字幕| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产成人av教育| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 嫩草影视91久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久香蕉激情| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 香蕉丝袜av| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精华一区二区三区| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 午夜久久久久精精品| 精品久久久久久,| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 99热只有精品国产| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| 小说图片视频综合网站| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 看黄色毛片网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产三级在线视频| bbb黄色大片| 一区二区三区激情视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久这里只有精品中国| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 午夜福利在线观看吧| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 美女大奶头视频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 国产三级在线视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 男女那种视频在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 欧美3d第一页| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| aaaaa片日本免费| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 1024手机看黄色片| 999精品在线视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 午夜两性在线视频| 俺也久久电影网| 日本成人三级电影网站| 中国美女看黄片| 9191精品国产免费久久| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 91老司机精品| 天堂√8在线中文| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 免费看a级黄色片| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 美女免费视频网站| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| www日本黄色视频网| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产日本99.免费观看| 精品人妻1区二区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 波多野结衣高清无吗| bbb黄色大片| 此物有八面人人有两片| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 高清在线国产一区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 91成年电影在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 免费观看精品视频网站| 色综合站精品国产| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产99白浆流出| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 在线看三级毛片| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美色视频一区免费| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久久精品大字幕| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 久久久精品大字幕| 99久久精品热视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 宅男免费午夜| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲九九香蕉| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 手机成人av网站| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 美女午夜性视频免费| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 午夜免费观看网址| 日日夜夜操网爽| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 看免费av毛片| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产熟女xx| 日本 欧美在线| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 午夜激情av网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 高清在线国产一区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 1024视频免费在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 老司机福利观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 中文资源天堂在线| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 午夜久久久久精精品| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 久久香蕉激情| 国产不卡一卡二| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| www国产在线视频色| 99热只有精品国产| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 午夜免费激情av| 日本五十路高清| 伦理电影免费视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 成年版毛片免费区| 女警被强在线播放| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 日本 欧美在线| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 1024视频免费在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 美女免费视频网站| 日日夜夜操网爽| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 欧美日韩精品网址| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 在线播放国产精品三级| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 欧美3d第一页| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 午夜激情av网站| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产三级中文精品| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 一夜夜www| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 舔av片在线| 在线观看www视频免费| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久久久久久久久中文| 午夜免费激情av| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日本一二三区视频观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 成人手机av| 美女午夜性视频免费| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 禁无遮挡网站| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 91在线观看av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 在线a可以看的网站| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区|