• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Longitudinal decrease in platelet counts as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis

    2020-12-10 04:08:18NetaGotliebNaamaSchwartzShiraZelberSagiGabrielChodickVardaShalevOrenShibolet
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年38期

    Neta Gotlieb, Naama Schwartz, Shira Zelber-Sagi, Gabriel Chodick, Varda Shalev, Oren Shibolet

    Abstract

    Key Words: Cirrhosis; Platelets; Count; Trend; Prediction; Range

    INTRODUCTION

    Liver cirrhosis is an important public health concern and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The global prevalence of cirrhosis ranges from 4.5% to 9.5% of the general population and is likely to increase due to the aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients and rise in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)[1,2]. In 2017, Cirrhosis caused more than 1.32 million deaths globally, compared with less than 899000 deaths in 1990. Most of the cases were secondary to decompensated liver disease[3]. Chronic liver disease (CLD) is usually indolent and asymptomatic early in its course, thus many cirrhotic patients are diagnosed late, when manifestations of portal hypertension (HTN) such as variceal bleeding, ascites or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) appear. Early diagnosis of cirrhosis is important in order to enroll patients into HCC surveillance programs and offer therapeutic interventions to halt or reverse disease progression. Nearly 1.5% of patients with cirrhosis remain undiagnosed throughout life, therefore, better diagnostics tools using laboratory and imaging modalities are needed[4].

    Patients with advanced liver disease and cirrhosis may present changes in laboratory values such as thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, abnormal clotting function, anemia, and changes in hepatocellular and cholestatic liver enzymes. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150000/μL) is one of the most common abnormalities in patients with cirrhosis, seen in up to 78% of cirrhotic patients[5]. Thrombocytopenia carries important prognostic information in terms of the presence of cirrhosis, portal hypertensive complications, hepatocellular carcinoma, post-liver resection and the post-transplant course[6]. Indeed, there is a correlation between the degree of thrombocytopenia and the stage and severity of liver disease; severe thrombocytopenia (< 50000/μL) is a poor prognostic factor associated with significant morbidity, indicating an advanced liver disease with established portal HTN[7,8]. This strong association has been corroborated by a study indicating that liver diseases is the underlying cause of thrombocytopenia in 58% of outpatients from all hospital departments[9].

    The pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in CLD and liver cirrhosis is multifactorial. Possible causes include splenic sequestration of platelets, suppression of platelet production in the bone marrow, decreased thrombopoetin production in the liver and an autoimmune mediated destruction[5]. Additionally, platelets actively participate in pathophysiologic processes in the liver, resulting in fibrosis and cirrhosis; previous studies including animal models showed that platelets have a major role in liver inflammationviainteractions with the hepatic sinusoidal endothelium and myeloid cells, inducing diverse hepatic processes ranging from liver repair and regeneration to necroinflammation and fibrosis[10,11]. Additionally, studies hypothesized that circulating platelet-neutrophil aggregates can induce neutrophil activation, thus driving end organ damage in patients with cirrhosis. Indeed, various liver diseases are associated with neutrophil recruitment; these include cholestatic liver injury, alcoholic hepatitis, drugs and chemical-induced injury[12].

    While the association between thrombocytopenia and cirrhosis is well-established, little is known about the association between subtle changes in platelet counts over time and the long-term risk of cirrhosis development. Few previous studies have shown that platelet counts may start to fall earlier in the course of NAFLD and HCV induced liver diseases[13,14]. Additionally, platelet counts have been incorporated into non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Among others, these are the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and NAFLD fibrosis score which are used to assess the presence of liver fibrosis[15,16]. However, the platelet values in the aforementioned scores and studies were taken as a single value at a single time point. No study has tested the association between platelet trends within the normal range and cirrhosis incidence. Current computerized systems allow the collection of big data sets and enable the detection of subtle platelet changes, decades prior to the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Subtle trends in laboratory results are now being incorporated in machine learning algorithms which utilize artificial intelligence to generate predictive models more effectively than conventional methods, through detection of hidden patterns within large data sets.

    In this study we aimed to explore whether platelet counts trajectories over time can advance the diagnosis of early liver disease and its predictive ability across the different etiologies of cirrhosis, in parallel to different fibrosis scores. In addition, we aimed to test the association between platelets decline and portal HTN complications (variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, HCC) among cirrhotic patients.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Setting

    A nested case-control study with diagnosed cirrhosis patients and matched controls, utilizing the Maccabi Health Services (MHS) database was performed. MHS is a 2.3-million-member state-mandated health services organization, representing 25% of the local population of Israel[17]. MHS's data are automatically collected and include information regarding all diagnoses, comorbidities, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, physician visits, outpatient specialist visits, purchase of medications, laboratory tests and radiologic imaging results. MHS’s database was established and collects data from 1998, with a 99% members’ retention rate which enables a unique opportunity to assess the long-term trends in laboratory results. All biochemical assessments are performed by a single laboratory that maintains a quality management system, as required and using the same standard laboratory methods[18]. The data are automatically and continuously updated, and are not dependent on active reporting by physicians.

    Study population

    Cases included all cirrhotic patients aged 18 to 80 years diagnosed between 2001 and 2018 using the International Classification of Diseases, 9thRevision (ICD-9) codes (Supplementary table 1). The first diagnosis was defined as the index date.

    Controls were hepatic disease-free MHS members, matched for age, sex and birth country at a ratio of 1:3. Sampling date in the control group was matched to the cirrhosis diagnosis date. All study patients were required to have at least three PTC measurements prior to index date.

    Patients with known etiologies for thrombocytopenia other than cirrhosis (various diseases and medications), as indicated in the medical record, were excluded from analysis (ICD-9 codes in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

    Clinical data

    Cirrhosis etiology (viral, autoimmune/cholestatic, NAFLD) as well as data regarding the complications of cirrhosis and portal HTN (hepatocellular carcinoma, ascites, varices, hepatic encephalopathy, splenomegaly) were all based on ICD-9 codes (Supplementary Table 4). We calculated the longitudinal trends of PTC as well the following laboratory parameters throughout the preceding 20 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis compared to healthy controls: Complete blood count, bilirubin (total), liver enzymes [aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), gammaglutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase], coagulation tests [prothrombin time (PT/INR), aPTT] and albumin were recorded (normal ranges are presented in Supplementary Table 5). APRI and FIB-4 were calculated for each patient according to the previously described formulas[15].

    Ethical consideration

    The study was approved by the MHS institutional review board (IRB). Since this is a retrospective study in which we used coded (anonymized) administrative data from electronic medical records, exemption from informed consent was granted by the IRB committee.

    Statistical analysis

    The statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States). Significance was set atP< 0.05. Categorical variables are presented using frequencies and percent. Continuous variables are presented using mean (standard deviation) [median, interquartile range]. The non-parametric locally weighted scatterplot smoothing was used for the presentation of the PTC (as well as other laboratory measurements) throughout 15 years period. For the cirrhosis group, the measurements were prior to the cirrhosis diagnosis and for the control group, the measurements were prior to the sampling year of each individual. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using PROC GENMOD utilizing general estimation equation methodology for correlated data (i.e., several platelets measurements for each subject). The model included the platelets measurements, as well as the time gaps (in years) of each measurement from the diagnosis/sample year for the cirrhosis and control respectively. The number of measurements was also included in the model. Adjusted odds ratio as well as 95%CI were used to display the association between the study groups and the potential risk factors.

    RESULTS

    Characteristics of the study population

    Characteristics of study population are presented in Table 1. The mean age in both groups was 56 (SD 15.8) and 54% were females. Most patients (25.7%) were diagnosed with cirrhosis in the years 2009-2012 while the least (14%) were diagnosed earlier between 2001 to 2004. Co-morbid conditions are presented in Table 2. Cases were more likely to be smokers (OR = 1.5; 95%CI: 1.39-1.6) as well as to be diagnosed with diabetes (OR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.02-1.33), chronic kidney disease (CKD, OR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.09-1.4) and tended to have higher prevalence of HTN (OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 0.96-1.37).

    Cirrhosis etiology and complications

    Of the cases with known etiology (n= 2058), the most common etiology for liver disease was viral infection (48%) followed by alcoholic liver disease (ALD, 24%) and NAFLD (20%). A total of 2768 cases had complications of liver cirrhosis, includingsplenomegaly (14.5%), varices (10.5%), ascites (8.5%) and hepatic encephalopathy (5.6%). Portal vein thrombosis was documented in 1.3% of cases and 10 patients (0.19%) had HCC (Table 3).

    Table 1 Demographic characteristic of cases with cirrhosis and controls, n (%)

    Platelets trends along 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis and comparison to controls

    In both groups, the mean time gap between the first PTC and the diagnosis/sampling year was similar (7.57-7.68 years) and the mean number of platelets measurements increased gradually from 2.5 (SD 2.1) to 6.4 (SD 5.7) close to the diagnosis date.

    The platelets trends along the study years (total 250646 platelets measurements) stratified by the study groups are presented in Figure 1. The mean PTC in the cirrhosis group decreased from 240000/μL starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis to approximately 190000/μL close to the diagnosis date. In the control group, the PTC remained stable throughout the years (240-250000/μL). In addition, for each subject in both groups, the mean PTC was calculated per year; the difference in mean PTC per year between groups is presented in Supplementary Table 6.

    Males had lower baseline PTC in both groups (Supplementary figure 1). In the cirrhosis group, males had a mean PTC of 210000 decreasing to 170000/μLvsfemales, with a mean number of 250000 decreasing to 215000/μL. In the control group, the same pattern was observed: males had a mean PTC of 225-230000/μL compared to females with ranges of 250000/μL. However, despite the sex differences, the trend of gradual decrease in PTC prior the diagnosis of cirrhosis was seen in both sexes. Additional sub-grouping was performed in order to assess whether age had a modifying effect within each sex. Among younger patients (17-40), PTC was constantin both males and females throughout the years, while among older patients, a trend of gradual decrease in PTC was seen in both sexes prior to cirrhosis diagnosis.

    Table 2 Comparison between the number of platelets measurements and co-morbidities between cases with cirrhosis and controls, n (%)

    Table 3 Distribution of cirrhosis etiology and complications among cirrhotic patients (n = 5258)

    In contrast, there was no significant change in hemoglobin levels in both groups (range of 12.8-13.4 g/dL). But, there was a steep decrease in white blood cell (WBC) counts prior the diagnosis of cirrhosis compared to controls, which had an increase of these values (Supplementary figures 2 and 3).

    Platelets trends among cirrhosis patients by etiology and complications

    Figure 1 Trends in platelet counts across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls (n total = 21032, 250646 platelets measurements). Done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing trend. The mean platelet counts in the cirrhosis group decreased from 240000/μL to 190000/μL, starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, compared to stable values in the control group.

    In the cirrhosis group, the trend in PTC was calculated and compared among the most common etiologies of liver cirrhosis in the cohort (viral and ALD). There was a gradual decrease in PTC prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, within the normal ranges in both etiologies. However, cirrhotic patients with ALD had lower mean platelets levels compared to those with viral liver disease, starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis (230-180000/μLvs200-170000/μL) (Supplementary figure 4A and B). Stratification of cases by complications of cirrhosis and portal HTN revealed a steeper decrease in PTC in cirrhotic patients who had esophageal varices, ascites and hepatosplenomegaly compared to cirrhotic patients with no such complications (Figure 2A and B).

    Trends of liver enzymes and other laboratory markers of liver function

    The trends of liver enzymes during the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis (or sampling year for the control group) were calculated (Supplementary Figures 5-8). Compared to controls, whose enzymes levels remained stable and within the normal range, there was a gradual increase in both ALT and AST in cirrhotic patients during the 15 years preceding the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, whose mean levels were both above the normal range: ALT increased from 50 U/L 15 years prior diagnosis to 75 U/L close to the diagnosis date; AST increased from 40 U/L to 70 U/L close to the diagnosis date.

    Similarly, a gradual increase in both cholestatic enzymes could be seen during the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis: Alkaline phosphatase increased from 75 U/L 15 years prior diagnosis to 135 U/L close to the diagnosis dates; GGT increased from 60 U/L to 200 U/L close to the diagnosis date. As for the control group, there was a gradual mild increase in both enzymes over the years.

    Regarding markers of the synthetic functions of the liver, a gradual increase in bilirubin levels occurred within the normal range, in the cirrhosis group compared to controls. Albumin levels decreased in both groups, but remained within the normal range (Supplementary Figure 9).

    Trends in fibrosis scores

    We calculated FIB-4 and APRI for both cirrhotics and controls. In the preceding years before cirrhosis diagnosis, FIB-4 and APRI increased gradually, ranging from 1.3 to 3 and 0.48 to 0.93 respectively, compared to controls whose scores either increased minimally or remained stable respectively throughout the years (Figure 3A and B).

    Association between PTC and cirrhosis in multivariate analysis

    Since cases were matched with controls by age, gender, birth country and time period (i.e.cirrhosis diagnosis year and the sampling year for the control group), these factors were adjusted by selection. After adjusting for the platelet’s measurements time points and the number of measurements, we found that for every 50 units decrease in the platelets, the odds of cirrhosis increase by 1.3-fold (95%CI: 1.25-1.35).

    Figure 2 Trends in platelet counts across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls, stratified by cirrhosis complications A: Varices (n = 551) and B: Ascites (n = 450), both done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing for trend. In patients with complications of portal hypertension (varices and ascites), platelet counts decline is steeper compared to those with no such complications.

    DISCUSSION

    Based on a large, well-characterized cohort, the results of this nested case-control study indicate that liver cirrhosis is characterized by a longitudinal decrement in platelet counts, within the normal limits, that may start 15 years prior to diagnosis. This trend is consistent regardless of sex, etiology of liver disease and observed after the age of 40.

    In the cirrhosis group, more patients had diabetes mellitus (DM), CKD, a tendency for HTN and were smokers compared to controls. The relationship between these metabolic factors and CLD or cirrhosis is well established. However, their effect on PTC is unclear. We did not find a clear relationship between the presence of DM or HTN and lower PTC in the literature. The exact pattern of PTC in patients with CKD is controversial but several studies revealed a decrease in PTC and platelets dysfunction in renal failure[19-21]. The trend of PTC decrease was consistent in both sexes although males had generally lower PTC values compared to females among both cases and controls. The literature on thrombocytopenia in liver disease does not show clear gender predominance so we can assume that this difference, in both groups, is physiological[22-25].

    Figure 3 Trends in fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls. Trends in A: Fibrosis-4 and B: Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores, both done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing trend. There is a gradual increase in both scores in the cirrhosis group compared to controls, ranging from 1.3 to 3 and 0.48 to 0.93 respectively.

    We compared other laboratory parameters that are related to CLD and portal HTN and examined the trends in the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis. ALT, AST and GGT where above the upper normal limit (UNL) in the years preceding the diagnosis of cirrhosis, markedly so in the last two years before diagnosis, compared to controls in which liver enzymes were in the normal range. In both groups, there was a slight gradual increase in bilirubin and a slight decrease in albumin. These laboratory changes are probably physiological; several studies show small but incremental increases in bilirubin and a fall in serum albumin concentration that occurs with increasing age[26-29]. There was no change in the hemoglobin levels, while WBC decreased in cirrhotics compared to controls.

    Due to the nature of the study we cannot ascertain why specific blood tests were taken and if liver disease was suspected by the treating physician which triggered more laboratory testing. Compared to the liver enzymes that were above to UNL and should have theoretically alerted the treating physician to the presence of liver disease, at any given time or visit, the PTC during this period decreased within the normal range and were thus easy to miss.

    The most common etiologies for cirrhosis in our cohort were viral hepatitis, ALD and NAFLD. The trend of decrease in PTC in our study was consistent regardless the etiology of liver cirrhosis. It was previously suggested, that different etiologies may be associated with different hepatic damage mechanisms relating to platelets which play a role in the induction of hepatic fibrosis[30,31]. A previous study in NAFLD, showed that PTC were decreased in cirrhotics over a 5 year follow up compared to healthy controls[14]. Additionally, a negative correlation between the PTC and the severity of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients has been demonstrated; a linear decrease of the PTC was correlated with increasing histological fibrosis stage. A similar trend occurs in chronic HBV and HCV infection; previous studies showed that liver fibrosis in HCV patients, assessed by biomarkers and FibroScan?, was negatively correlated with PTC. Moreover, patients with advanced liver fibrosis had significantly lower PTC[32-36].

    The platelets decrease trend in our study was most pronounced in patients with complications of liver cirrhosis and portal HTN with the steepest decline in patients who had varices. Studies show that together with liver and spleen stiffness measurements, PTC correlates with significant portal HTN and particularly in the presence of varices. The risk of having varices increases with decreasing PTC and have been used to assess the presence of varices non-invasively[37-40].

    Our results suggest for the first time that the platelets trends can be used for the prediction of liver cirrhosis regardless the underlying etiology. In multivariate regression analysis, we found that for every 50 units decrease in the PTC, the odds of cirrhosis were 1.3 times higher. When looking at the normal range of PTC, a gradual decrease in PTC, still within the normal range, from 380 to 180 over time would signify 5.2- fold increase in the risk of being diagnosed with cirrhosis compared to individuals with no change in the PTC. Indeed, the progression to cirrhosis usually takes years to develop and may be missed due to lack of clinical symptoms or laboratory aberrations before significant portal HTN appears.

    Diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are vital part of the clinical management of CLD of any etiology as it is associated with poor outcomes. Although liver biopsy is recommended as the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of fibrosis, due to its invasive nature and other disadvantages, indirect assessments of liver fibrosis have been developed and are widely used. These include blood-based biomarkers (APRI, FIB-4, enhanced liver fibrosis, Fibro Test) and image-based techniques (US, transient elastography, shear wave elastography, Magnetic resonance elastography) as well as innovative methods that uses combined modalities including advanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences like diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing[41,42].

    Fibrosis risk scores have been developed based on readily available clinical and laboratory parameters that are simple to use at point of care, and can be implemented into computerized medical systems. However, current risk scores have several limitations; they incorporate PTC in the formulation, however, they do not consider progressive, longitudinal changes in PTC and use a single platelets value each time they are used[15,16,43-45].

    Among others, FIB-4 have been most extensively studied and validated in diverse populations for the prediction of advanced fibrosis. Two cut-off values were defined; FIB-4 score ≤ 1.3 can be regarded as having a low risk for advanced fibrosis while score > 3.25 represents advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. It was published previously, that intermediate FIB-4 values of 1.45–3.25 have negative predictive value of 89% for excluding advanced fibrosis and patients in this range would require a liver biopsy to assess the fibrosis stage. Thirty to forty percent of patients have an indeterminate score, and in these cases, additional testing is needed[35,46].

    In our study, we show that along with the increase in AST (above the ULN) and age, a longitudinal PTC decrease before the diagnosis of cirrhosis, still within the normal range was associated in high FIB-4 and APRI scores, which were mostly in the range of 1.4-3.25, reaching values compatible with advanced fibrosis. Together with the intermediated values of FIB-4, the longitudinal PTC decrease, even within the normal levels, may reflect progressing fibrosis and can predict cirrhosis development. These combined changes may be picked up by computers and alert the treating physician of an ongoing liver disease before advanced fibrosis takes place, enabling therapeutic and preventing measures.

    We acknowledge several limitations of this study. The main limitation is the retrospective nature of the study, with its built-in weaknesses of data collection and selection bias. Due to the nature of the study, we could not know why specific data was ordered/collected; especially which circumstances have led to the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Additionally, clinical events may have been missed or only partly followed up, so that the diagnosis of cirrhosis could have been missed or not recorded. Additionally, we could not look at radiology or endoscopic results of each patient in order to identify signs of CLD, cirrhosis and portal HTN. All diagnoses were made exclusively according to ICD-9 codes. However, although we might have missed a large number of undiagnosed cirrhotic patients, our sample is large and representative enough to offer sound observations.

    The number of platelets measurements and distribution in the preceding years before cirrhosis/sampling date was not equal. Cirrhotic patients had more PTC generally with the highest platelets measurements close to the diagnosis date. We hypothesize that there was a recognizable change in the medical condition of the patient which lead to more frequent tests. Due to the nature of this study, this information is not available. However, adjustment for the number and timing of testing did not attenuate the association.

    Other limitations should also be noted. A relatively large proportion of patients in the cirrhosis group had missing data regarding the etiology of cirrhosis. However, this should not have an effect on the general observation.

    This study also holds important strengths. We present longitudinal changes in PTC, compared to previous studies in which PTC were presented as a single measurement in a certain point of time. By using continuous and repeated measurements for the same individual, this method represented dynamic changes in laboratory data that indicated a trend before the diagnosis of cirrhosis. This method could potentially be used for longitudinal assessment of fibrosis regression following therapeutic interventions such as antiviral therapy or life style changes for NAFLD.

    The recent interest in Big Data Mining, which is aimed at identifying patterns that are often unrecognizable during routine clinical management, enabled us to use the MHS database which offers high-quality data from electronic medical records, automatic data capture, and a central laboratory. The large number of members in this insurance group enabled the inclusion of a large study population both overall and in matched groups during a long period of time. Patients with various diseases (hematological/viraletc) and medications that could affect the PCT were excluded from the study so that the change in PTC could be attributed with high probability to the ongoing liver disease. Furthermore, our cohort represents a cohort of cirrhotic patients in a community and likely avoids selection bias seen in cohorts from tertiary referral centers.

    CONCLUSION

    Years before the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis is made there is a progressive decline in platelet counts, within the normal range, matched to a gradual increase in fibrosis scores. These changes may be identified by machine learning algorithms and alert the treating physicians of an early liver disease and may enable early therapeutic and preventive interventions before serious complications occur.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research objectives

    To explore whether big data analysis of PTC trajectories over time, can predict advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis complications across the different etiologies of liver diseases.

    Research methods

    A nested case-control study with diagnosed cirrhosis patients and matched controls, utilizing the Maccabi Health Services database was performed. The trends of PTC, liver enzymes, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, albumin and fibrosis scores [fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index] throughout the preceding 20 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis were calculated and compared to healthy controls. The association between PTC, cirrhosis complications and fibrosis scores prior to cirrhosis diagnosis was investigated.

    Research results

    Cirrhosis cases (n= 5258) were compared to controls (n= 15744) matched for age and sex at a ratio of 1:3. The leading cirrhosis etiologies were viral, alcoholic and fatty liver disease. The mean PTC decreased from 240000/μL to 190000/μL up to 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis compared to controls who’s PTC remained stable around the values of 240000/μL. This trend was consistent regardless of sex, cirrhosis etiology and was more pronounced in patients who developed varices and ascites. Compared to controls whose values remained in the normal range, in the cirrhosis FIB-4 increased gradually from 1.3 to 3 prior to cirrhosis diagnosis. Additionally, in multivariable regression analysis, a decrease of 50 units in PTC was associated with 1.3 times odds of cirrhosis (95%CI: 1.25-1.35).

    Research conclusions

    This study indicates that a progressive decline in platelet counts, within the normal range, is associated with a gradual increase in fibrosis scores, starting up to 15 years before the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

    Research perspectives

    Progressive PTC decline in the preceding years before the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, when still within the normal limits, may be identified by machine learning algorithms and alert the treating physicians of an early liver disease and may enable early therapeutic and preventive interventions before serious complications occur.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The author is grateful to the staffs in Maccabi Health Services for their valuable assistance with this work.

    av在线天堂中文字幕| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| av黄色大香蕉| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 99国产精品99久久久久| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 精品电影一区二区在线| 精品日产1卡2卡| 极品教师在线免费播放| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 一进一出抽搐动态| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 色视频www国产| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 99热精品在线国产| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 丁香欧美五月| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲国产欧美网| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 欧美日韩精品网址| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| a级毛片a级免费在线| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 免费观看精品视频网站| 久久伊人香网站| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 舔av片在线| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 一本精品99久久精品77| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| netflix在线观看网站| 国产视频内射| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 日本五十路高清| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 91av网一区二区| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲av成人av| ponron亚洲| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 级片在线观看| www.www免费av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| xxxwww97欧美| 久久性视频一级片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 成人18禁在线播放| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 中国美女看黄片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 日本黄色片子视频| 1024手机看黄色片| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品野战在线观看| 欧美大码av| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 免费看日本二区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 麻豆av在线久日| 嫩草影院入口| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 国产精华一区二区三区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 久久久国产成人免费| 欧美色视频一区免费| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 国产精品野战在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 美女大奶头视频| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲九九香蕉| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 午夜影院日韩av| 日本与韩国留学比较| www日本黄色视频网| 美女免费视频网站| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 香蕉av资源在线| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 看免费av毛片| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 丁香六月欧美| 高清在线国产一区| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 最好的美女福利视频网| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 日本三级黄在线观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 99久国产av精品| 亚洲国产色片| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| www日本黄色视频网| 日韩欧美三级三区| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 久久久国产成人免费| 校园春色视频在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 久久精品91蜜桃| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| ponron亚洲| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | 国产99白浆流出| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 日韩高清综合在线| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 成人三级做爰电影| 天堂影院成人在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 精品福利观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 一区福利在线观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产高清三级在线| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 日本五十路高清| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产美女午夜福利| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 最好的美女福利视频网| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 全区人妻精品视频| 日本 av在线| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 精品无人区乱码1区二区| svipshipincom国产片| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 最好的美女福利视频网| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| tocl精华| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 国产精品影院久久| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 国产精品,欧美在线| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 在线播放国产精品三级| 成人国产综合亚洲| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 欧美日韩精品网址| 少妇丰满av| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产精品久久视频播放| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 免费在线观看日本一区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 看片在线看免费视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 天天添夜夜摸| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产综合懂色| 久久国产精品影院| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| a在线观看视频网站| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 精品久久久久久,| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 手机成人av网站| 99re在线观看精品视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 伦理电影免费视频| h日本视频在线播放| 亚洲激情在线av| tocl精华| 国产精品野战在线观看| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲无线在线观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 在线看三级毛片| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产高潮美女av| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 黄色日韩在线| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产视频内射| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久中文看片网| 国产美女午夜福利| 一本综合久久免费| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 操出白浆在线播放| 91在线观看av| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 九色成人免费人妻av| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产午夜精品论理片| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 特级一级黄色大片| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产三级中文精品| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产三级在线视频| 日本 欧美在线| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 成人三级黄色视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| xxx96com| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 波多野结衣高清作品| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产黄片美女视频| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲无线在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 色吧在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| www.精华液| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 香蕉丝袜av| 日本一本二区三区精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 日韩欧美免费精品| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲av成人av| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 黄频高清免费视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 少妇丰满av| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 黄色女人牲交| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 欧美日韩精品网址| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲五月天丁香| 香蕉久久夜色| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 色av中文字幕| 亚洲 国产 在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲av美国av| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲国产看品久久| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产三级中文精品| 国产真实乱freesex| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 在线国产一区二区在线| 长腿黑丝高跟| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 一本一本综合久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产美女午夜福利| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲无线在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美午夜高清在线| 色av中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品v在线| aaaaa片日本免费| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 女警被强在线播放| 国产99白浆流出| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 日韩免费av在线播放| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 亚洲激情在线av| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 日本一本二区三区精品| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 毛片女人毛片| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲九九香蕉| 中文资源天堂在线| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产黄片美女视频| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 毛片女人毛片| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产成人av教育| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产成人av教育| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 91麻豆av在线| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区|