• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Longitudinal decrease in platelet counts as a surrogate marker of liver fibrosis

    2020-12-10 04:08:18NetaGotliebNaamaSchwartzShiraZelberSagiGabrielChodickVardaShalevOrenShibolet
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年38期

    Neta Gotlieb, Naama Schwartz, Shira Zelber-Sagi, Gabriel Chodick, Varda Shalev, Oren Shibolet

    Abstract

    Key Words: Cirrhosis; Platelets; Count; Trend; Prediction; Range

    INTRODUCTION

    Liver cirrhosis is an important public health concern and a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The global prevalence of cirrhosis ranges from 4.5% to 9.5% of the general population and is likely to increase due to the aging of hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients and rise in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)[1,2]. In 2017, Cirrhosis caused more than 1.32 million deaths globally, compared with less than 899000 deaths in 1990. Most of the cases were secondary to decompensated liver disease[3]. Chronic liver disease (CLD) is usually indolent and asymptomatic early in its course, thus many cirrhotic patients are diagnosed late, when manifestations of portal hypertension (HTN) such as variceal bleeding, ascites or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) appear. Early diagnosis of cirrhosis is important in order to enroll patients into HCC surveillance programs and offer therapeutic interventions to halt or reverse disease progression. Nearly 1.5% of patients with cirrhosis remain undiagnosed throughout life, therefore, better diagnostics tools using laboratory and imaging modalities are needed[4].

    Patients with advanced liver disease and cirrhosis may present changes in laboratory values such as thrombocytopenia, hypoalbuminemia, abnormal clotting function, anemia, and changes in hepatocellular and cholestatic liver enzymes. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 150000/μL) is one of the most common abnormalities in patients with cirrhosis, seen in up to 78% of cirrhotic patients[5]. Thrombocytopenia carries important prognostic information in terms of the presence of cirrhosis, portal hypertensive complications, hepatocellular carcinoma, post-liver resection and the post-transplant course[6]. Indeed, there is a correlation between the degree of thrombocytopenia and the stage and severity of liver disease; severe thrombocytopenia (< 50000/μL) is a poor prognostic factor associated with significant morbidity, indicating an advanced liver disease with established portal HTN[7,8]. This strong association has been corroborated by a study indicating that liver diseases is the underlying cause of thrombocytopenia in 58% of outpatients from all hospital departments[9].

    The pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in CLD and liver cirrhosis is multifactorial. Possible causes include splenic sequestration of platelets, suppression of platelet production in the bone marrow, decreased thrombopoetin production in the liver and an autoimmune mediated destruction[5]. Additionally, platelets actively participate in pathophysiologic processes in the liver, resulting in fibrosis and cirrhosis; previous studies including animal models showed that platelets have a major role in liver inflammationviainteractions with the hepatic sinusoidal endothelium and myeloid cells, inducing diverse hepatic processes ranging from liver repair and regeneration to necroinflammation and fibrosis[10,11]. Additionally, studies hypothesized that circulating platelet-neutrophil aggregates can induce neutrophil activation, thus driving end organ damage in patients with cirrhosis. Indeed, various liver diseases are associated with neutrophil recruitment; these include cholestatic liver injury, alcoholic hepatitis, drugs and chemical-induced injury[12].

    While the association between thrombocytopenia and cirrhosis is well-established, little is known about the association between subtle changes in platelet counts over time and the long-term risk of cirrhosis development. Few previous studies have shown that platelet counts may start to fall earlier in the course of NAFLD and HCV induced liver diseases[13,14]. Additionally, platelet counts have been incorporated into non-invasive tools for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Among others, these are the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and NAFLD fibrosis score which are used to assess the presence of liver fibrosis[15,16]. However, the platelet values in the aforementioned scores and studies were taken as a single value at a single time point. No study has tested the association between platelet trends within the normal range and cirrhosis incidence. Current computerized systems allow the collection of big data sets and enable the detection of subtle platelet changes, decades prior to the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis. Subtle trends in laboratory results are now being incorporated in machine learning algorithms which utilize artificial intelligence to generate predictive models more effectively than conventional methods, through detection of hidden patterns within large data sets.

    In this study we aimed to explore whether platelet counts trajectories over time can advance the diagnosis of early liver disease and its predictive ability across the different etiologies of cirrhosis, in parallel to different fibrosis scores. In addition, we aimed to test the association between platelets decline and portal HTN complications (variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, HCC) among cirrhotic patients.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Setting

    A nested case-control study with diagnosed cirrhosis patients and matched controls, utilizing the Maccabi Health Services (MHS) database was performed. MHS is a 2.3-million-member state-mandated health services organization, representing 25% of the local population of Israel[17]. MHS's data are automatically collected and include information regarding all diagnoses, comorbidities, hospitalizations, emergency department visits, physician visits, outpatient specialist visits, purchase of medications, laboratory tests and radiologic imaging results. MHS’s database was established and collects data from 1998, with a 99% members’ retention rate which enables a unique opportunity to assess the long-term trends in laboratory results. All biochemical assessments are performed by a single laboratory that maintains a quality management system, as required and using the same standard laboratory methods[18]. The data are automatically and continuously updated, and are not dependent on active reporting by physicians.

    Study population

    Cases included all cirrhotic patients aged 18 to 80 years diagnosed between 2001 and 2018 using the International Classification of Diseases, 9thRevision (ICD-9) codes (Supplementary table 1). The first diagnosis was defined as the index date.

    Controls were hepatic disease-free MHS members, matched for age, sex and birth country at a ratio of 1:3. Sampling date in the control group was matched to the cirrhosis diagnosis date. All study patients were required to have at least three PTC measurements prior to index date.

    Patients with known etiologies for thrombocytopenia other than cirrhosis (various diseases and medications), as indicated in the medical record, were excluded from analysis (ICD-9 codes in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3).

    Clinical data

    Cirrhosis etiology (viral, autoimmune/cholestatic, NAFLD) as well as data regarding the complications of cirrhosis and portal HTN (hepatocellular carcinoma, ascites, varices, hepatic encephalopathy, splenomegaly) were all based on ICD-9 codes (Supplementary Table 4). We calculated the longitudinal trends of PTC as well the following laboratory parameters throughout the preceding 20 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis compared to healthy controls: Complete blood count, bilirubin (total), liver enzymes [aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), gammaglutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase], coagulation tests [prothrombin time (PT/INR), aPTT] and albumin were recorded (normal ranges are presented in Supplementary Table 5). APRI and FIB-4 were calculated for each patient according to the previously described formulas[15].

    Ethical consideration

    The study was approved by the MHS institutional review board (IRB). Since this is a retrospective study in which we used coded (anonymized) administrative data from electronic medical records, exemption from informed consent was granted by the IRB committee.

    Statistical analysis

    The statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States). Significance was set atP< 0.05. Categorical variables are presented using frequencies and percent. Continuous variables are presented using mean (standard deviation) [median, interquartile range]. The non-parametric locally weighted scatterplot smoothing was used for the presentation of the PTC (as well as other laboratory measurements) throughout 15 years period. For the cirrhosis group, the measurements were prior to the cirrhosis diagnosis and for the control group, the measurements were prior to the sampling year of each individual. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using PROC GENMOD utilizing general estimation equation methodology for correlated data (i.e., several platelets measurements for each subject). The model included the platelets measurements, as well as the time gaps (in years) of each measurement from the diagnosis/sample year for the cirrhosis and control respectively. The number of measurements was also included in the model. Adjusted odds ratio as well as 95%CI were used to display the association between the study groups and the potential risk factors.

    RESULTS

    Characteristics of the study population

    Characteristics of study population are presented in Table 1. The mean age in both groups was 56 (SD 15.8) and 54% were females. Most patients (25.7%) were diagnosed with cirrhosis in the years 2009-2012 while the least (14%) were diagnosed earlier between 2001 to 2004. Co-morbid conditions are presented in Table 2. Cases were more likely to be smokers (OR = 1.5; 95%CI: 1.39-1.6) as well as to be diagnosed with diabetes (OR = 1.17; 95%CI: 1.02-1.33), chronic kidney disease (CKD, OR = 1.24; 95%CI: 1.09-1.4) and tended to have higher prevalence of HTN (OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 0.96-1.37).

    Cirrhosis etiology and complications

    Of the cases with known etiology (n= 2058), the most common etiology for liver disease was viral infection (48%) followed by alcoholic liver disease (ALD, 24%) and NAFLD (20%). A total of 2768 cases had complications of liver cirrhosis, includingsplenomegaly (14.5%), varices (10.5%), ascites (8.5%) and hepatic encephalopathy (5.6%). Portal vein thrombosis was documented in 1.3% of cases and 10 patients (0.19%) had HCC (Table 3).

    Table 1 Demographic characteristic of cases with cirrhosis and controls, n (%)

    Platelets trends along 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis and comparison to controls

    In both groups, the mean time gap between the first PTC and the diagnosis/sampling year was similar (7.57-7.68 years) and the mean number of platelets measurements increased gradually from 2.5 (SD 2.1) to 6.4 (SD 5.7) close to the diagnosis date.

    The platelets trends along the study years (total 250646 platelets measurements) stratified by the study groups are presented in Figure 1. The mean PTC in the cirrhosis group decreased from 240000/μL starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis to approximately 190000/μL close to the diagnosis date. In the control group, the PTC remained stable throughout the years (240-250000/μL). In addition, for each subject in both groups, the mean PTC was calculated per year; the difference in mean PTC per year between groups is presented in Supplementary Table 6.

    Males had lower baseline PTC in both groups (Supplementary figure 1). In the cirrhosis group, males had a mean PTC of 210000 decreasing to 170000/μLvsfemales, with a mean number of 250000 decreasing to 215000/μL. In the control group, the same pattern was observed: males had a mean PTC of 225-230000/μL compared to females with ranges of 250000/μL. However, despite the sex differences, the trend of gradual decrease in PTC prior the diagnosis of cirrhosis was seen in both sexes. Additional sub-grouping was performed in order to assess whether age had a modifying effect within each sex. Among younger patients (17-40), PTC was constantin both males and females throughout the years, while among older patients, a trend of gradual decrease in PTC was seen in both sexes prior to cirrhosis diagnosis.

    Table 2 Comparison between the number of platelets measurements and co-morbidities between cases with cirrhosis and controls, n (%)

    Table 3 Distribution of cirrhosis etiology and complications among cirrhotic patients (n = 5258)

    In contrast, there was no significant change in hemoglobin levels in both groups (range of 12.8-13.4 g/dL). But, there was a steep decrease in white blood cell (WBC) counts prior the diagnosis of cirrhosis compared to controls, which had an increase of these values (Supplementary figures 2 and 3).

    Platelets trends among cirrhosis patients by etiology and complications

    Figure 1 Trends in platelet counts across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls (n total = 21032, 250646 platelets measurements). Done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing trend. The mean platelet counts in the cirrhosis group decreased from 240000/μL to 190000/μL, starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, compared to stable values in the control group.

    In the cirrhosis group, the trend in PTC was calculated and compared among the most common etiologies of liver cirrhosis in the cohort (viral and ALD). There was a gradual decrease in PTC prior to cirrhosis diagnosis, within the normal ranges in both etiologies. However, cirrhotic patients with ALD had lower mean platelets levels compared to those with viral liver disease, starting 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis (230-180000/μLvs200-170000/μL) (Supplementary figure 4A and B). Stratification of cases by complications of cirrhosis and portal HTN revealed a steeper decrease in PTC in cirrhotic patients who had esophageal varices, ascites and hepatosplenomegaly compared to cirrhotic patients with no such complications (Figure 2A and B).

    Trends of liver enzymes and other laboratory markers of liver function

    The trends of liver enzymes during the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis (or sampling year for the control group) were calculated (Supplementary Figures 5-8). Compared to controls, whose enzymes levels remained stable and within the normal range, there was a gradual increase in both ALT and AST in cirrhotic patients during the 15 years preceding the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, whose mean levels were both above the normal range: ALT increased from 50 U/L 15 years prior diagnosis to 75 U/L close to the diagnosis date; AST increased from 40 U/L to 70 U/L close to the diagnosis date.

    Similarly, a gradual increase in both cholestatic enzymes could be seen during the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis: Alkaline phosphatase increased from 75 U/L 15 years prior diagnosis to 135 U/L close to the diagnosis dates; GGT increased from 60 U/L to 200 U/L close to the diagnosis date. As for the control group, there was a gradual mild increase in both enzymes over the years.

    Regarding markers of the synthetic functions of the liver, a gradual increase in bilirubin levels occurred within the normal range, in the cirrhosis group compared to controls. Albumin levels decreased in both groups, but remained within the normal range (Supplementary Figure 9).

    Trends in fibrosis scores

    We calculated FIB-4 and APRI for both cirrhotics and controls. In the preceding years before cirrhosis diagnosis, FIB-4 and APRI increased gradually, ranging from 1.3 to 3 and 0.48 to 0.93 respectively, compared to controls whose scores either increased minimally or remained stable respectively throughout the years (Figure 3A and B).

    Association between PTC and cirrhosis in multivariate analysis

    Since cases were matched with controls by age, gender, birth country and time period (i.e.cirrhosis diagnosis year and the sampling year for the control group), these factors were adjusted by selection. After adjusting for the platelet’s measurements time points and the number of measurements, we found that for every 50 units decrease in the platelets, the odds of cirrhosis increase by 1.3-fold (95%CI: 1.25-1.35).

    Figure 2 Trends in platelet counts across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls, stratified by cirrhosis complications A: Varices (n = 551) and B: Ascites (n = 450), both done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing for trend. In patients with complications of portal hypertension (varices and ascites), platelet counts decline is steeper compared to those with no such complications.

    DISCUSSION

    Based on a large, well-characterized cohort, the results of this nested case-control study indicate that liver cirrhosis is characterized by a longitudinal decrement in platelet counts, within the normal limits, that may start 15 years prior to diagnosis. This trend is consistent regardless of sex, etiology of liver disease and observed after the age of 40.

    In the cirrhosis group, more patients had diabetes mellitus (DM), CKD, a tendency for HTN and were smokers compared to controls. The relationship between these metabolic factors and CLD or cirrhosis is well established. However, their effect on PTC is unclear. We did not find a clear relationship between the presence of DM or HTN and lower PTC in the literature. The exact pattern of PTC in patients with CKD is controversial but several studies revealed a decrease in PTC and platelets dysfunction in renal failure[19-21]. The trend of PTC decrease was consistent in both sexes although males had generally lower PTC values compared to females among both cases and controls. The literature on thrombocytopenia in liver disease does not show clear gender predominance so we can assume that this difference, in both groups, is physiological[22-25].

    Figure 3 Trends in fibrosis-4 and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores across 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis among cases and controls. Trends in A: Fibrosis-4 and B: Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index scores, both done with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing trend. There is a gradual increase in both scores in the cirrhosis group compared to controls, ranging from 1.3 to 3 and 0.48 to 0.93 respectively.

    We compared other laboratory parameters that are related to CLD and portal HTN and examined the trends in the years prior to the diagnosis of cirrhosis. ALT, AST and GGT where above the upper normal limit (UNL) in the years preceding the diagnosis of cirrhosis, markedly so in the last two years before diagnosis, compared to controls in which liver enzymes were in the normal range. In both groups, there was a slight gradual increase in bilirubin and a slight decrease in albumin. These laboratory changes are probably physiological; several studies show small but incremental increases in bilirubin and a fall in serum albumin concentration that occurs with increasing age[26-29]. There was no change in the hemoglobin levels, while WBC decreased in cirrhotics compared to controls.

    Due to the nature of the study we cannot ascertain why specific blood tests were taken and if liver disease was suspected by the treating physician which triggered more laboratory testing. Compared to the liver enzymes that were above to UNL and should have theoretically alerted the treating physician to the presence of liver disease, at any given time or visit, the PTC during this period decreased within the normal range and were thus easy to miss.

    The most common etiologies for cirrhosis in our cohort were viral hepatitis, ALD and NAFLD. The trend of decrease in PTC in our study was consistent regardless the etiology of liver cirrhosis. It was previously suggested, that different etiologies may be associated with different hepatic damage mechanisms relating to platelets which play a role in the induction of hepatic fibrosis[30,31]. A previous study in NAFLD, showed that PTC were decreased in cirrhotics over a 5 year follow up compared to healthy controls[14]. Additionally, a negative correlation between the PTC and the severity of liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients has been demonstrated; a linear decrease of the PTC was correlated with increasing histological fibrosis stage. A similar trend occurs in chronic HBV and HCV infection; previous studies showed that liver fibrosis in HCV patients, assessed by biomarkers and FibroScan?, was negatively correlated with PTC. Moreover, patients with advanced liver fibrosis had significantly lower PTC[32-36].

    The platelets decrease trend in our study was most pronounced in patients with complications of liver cirrhosis and portal HTN with the steepest decline in patients who had varices. Studies show that together with liver and spleen stiffness measurements, PTC correlates with significant portal HTN and particularly in the presence of varices. The risk of having varices increases with decreasing PTC and have been used to assess the presence of varices non-invasively[37-40].

    Our results suggest for the first time that the platelets trends can be used for the prediction of liver cirrhosis regardless the underlying etiology. In multivariate regression analysis, we found that for every 50 units decrease in the PTC, the odds of cirrhosis were 1.3 times higher. When looking at the normal range of PTC, a gradual decrease in PTC, still within the normal range, from 380 to 180 over time would signify 5.2- fold increase in the risk of being diagnosed with cirrhosis compared to individuals with no change in the PTC. Indeed, the progression to cirrhosis usually takes years to develop and may be missed due to lack of clinical symptoms or laboratory aberrations before significant portal HTN appears.

    Diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis are vital part of the clinical management of CLD of any etiology as it is associated with poor outcomes. Although liver biopsy is recommended as the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of fibrosis, due to its invasive nature and other disadvantages, indirect assessments of liver fibrosis have been developed and are widely used. These include blood-based biomarkers (APRI, FIB-4, enhanced liver fibrosis, Fibro Test) and image-based techniques (US, transient elastography, shear wave elastography, Magnetic resonance elastography) as well as innovative methods that uses combined modalities including advanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences like diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing[41,42].

    Fibrosis risk scores have been developed based on readily available clinical and laboratory parameters that are simple to use at point of care, and can be implemented into computerized medical systems. However, current risk scores have several limitations; they incorporate PTC in the formulation, however, they do not consider progressive, longitudinal changes in PTC and use a single platelets value each time they are used[15,16,43-45].

    Among others, FIB-4 have been most extensively studied and validated in diverse populations for the prediction of advanced fibrosis. Two cut-off values were defined; FIB-4 score ≤ 1.3 can be regarded as having a low risk for advanced fibrosis while score > 3.25 represents advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. It was published previously, that intermediate FIB-4 values of 1.45–3.25 have negative predictive value of 89% for excluding advanced fibrosis and patients in this range would require a liver biopsy to assess the fibrosis stage. Thirty to forty percent of patients have an indeterminate score, and in these cases, additional testing is needed[35,46].

    In our study, we show that along with the increase in AST (above the ULN) and age, a longitudinal PTC decrease before the diagnosis of cirrhosis, still within the normal range was associated in high FIB-4 and APRI scores, which were mostly in the range of 1.4-3.25, reaching values compatible with advanced fibrosis. Together with the intermediated values of FIB-4, the longitudinal PTC decrease, even within the normal levels, may reflect progressing fibrosis and can predict cirrhosis development. These combined changes may be picked up by computers and alert the treating physician of an ongoing liver disease before advanced fibrosis takes place, enabling therapeutic and preventing measures.

    We acknowledge several limitations of this study. The main limitation is the retrospective nature of the study, with its built-in weaknesses of data collection and selection bias. Due to the nature of the study, we could not know why specific data was ordered/collected; especially which circumstances have led to the diagnosis of cirrhosis. Additionally, clinical events may have been missed or only partly followed up, so that the diagnosis of cirrhosis could have been missed or not recorded. Additionally, we could not look at radiology or endoscopic results of each patient in order to identify signs of CLD, cirrhosis and portal HTN. All diagnoses were made exclusively according to ICD-9 codes. However, although we might have missed a large number of undiagnosed cirrhotic patients, our sample is large and representative enough to offer sound observations.

    The number of platelets measurements and distribution in the preceding years before cirrhosis/sampling date was not equal. Cirrhotic patients had more PTC generally with the highest platelets measurements close to the diagnosis date. We hypothesize that there was a recognizable change in the medical condition of the patient which lead to more frequent tests. Due to the nature of this study, this information is not available. However, adjustment for the number and timing of testing did not attenuate the association.

    Other limitations should also be noted. A relatively large proportion of patients in the cirrhosis group had missing data regarding the etiology of cirrhosis. However, this should not have an effect on the general observation.

    This study also holds important strengths. We present longitudinal changes in PTC, compared to previous studies in which PTC were presented as a single measurement in a certain point of time. By using continuous and repeated measurements for the same individual, this method represented dynamic changes in laboratory data that indicated a trend before the diagnosis of cirrhosis. This method could potentially be used for longitudinal assessment of fibrosis regression following therapeutic interventions such as antiviral therapy or life style changes for NAFLD.

    The recent interest in Big Data Mining, which is aimed at identifying patterns that are often unrecognizable during routine clinical management, enabled us to use the MHS database which offers high-quality data from electronic medical records, automatic data capture, and a central laboratory. The large number of members in this insurance group enabled the inclusion of a large study population both overall and in matched groups during a long period of time. Patients with various diseases (hematological/viraletc) and medications that could affect the PCT were excluded from the study so that the change in PTC could be attributed with high probability to the ongoing liver disease. Furthermore, our cohort represents a cohort of cirrhotic patients in a community and likely avoids selection bias seen in cohorts from tertiary referral centers.

    CONCLUSION

    Years before the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis is made there is a progressive decline in platelet counts, within the normal range, matched to a gradual increase in fibrosis scores. These changes may be identified by machine learning algorithms and alert the treating physicians of an early liver disease and may enable early therapeutic and preventive interventions before serious complications occur.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research objectives

    To explore whether big data analysis of PTC trajectories over time, can predict advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis complications across the different etiologies of liver diseases.

    Research methods

    A nested case-control study with diagnosed cirrhosis patients and matched controls, utilizing the Maccabi Health Services database was performed. The trends of PTC, liver enzymes, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, albumin and fibrosis scores [fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) and aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index] throughout the preceding 20 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis were calculated and compared to healthy controls. The association between PTC, cirrhosis complications and fibrosis scores prior to cirrhosis diagnosis was investigated.

    Research results

    Cirrhosis cases (n= 5258) were compared to controls (n= 15744) matched for age and sex at a ratio of 1:3. The leading cirrhosis etiologies were viral, alcoholic and fatty liver disease. The mean PTC decreased from 240000/μL to 190000/μL up to 15 years prior to cirrhosis diagnosis compared to controls who’s PTC remained stable around the values of 240000/μL. This trend was consistent regardless of sex, cirrhosis etiology and was more pronounced in patients who developed varices and ascites. Compared to controls whose values remained in the normal range, in the cirrhosis FIB-4 increased gradually from 1.3 to 3 prior to cirrhosis diagnosis. Additionally, in multivariable regression analysis, a decrease of 50 units in PTC was associated with 1.3 times odds of cirrhosis (95%CI: 1.25-1.35).

    Research conclusions

    This study indicates that a progressive decline in platelet counts, within the normal range, is associated with a gradual increase in fibrosis scores, starting up to 15 years before the diagnosis of cirrhosis.

    Research perspectives

    Progressive PTC decline in the preceding years before the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis, when still within the normal limits, may be identified by machine learning algorithms and alert the treating physicians of an early liver disease and may enable early therapeutic and preventive interventions before serious complications occur.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The author is grateful to the staffs in Maccabi Health Services for their valuable assistance with this work.

    动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲无线在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 黄片播放在线免费| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 久9热在线精品视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 日日夜夜操网爽| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久热在线av| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| svipshipincom国产片| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 69av精品久久久久久| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产又爽黄色视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 哪里可以看免费的av片| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| a级毛片在线看网站| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 无限看片的www在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 黄色成人免费大全| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 精品久久久久久久末码| 热99re8久久精品国产| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 手机成人av网站| 欧美日韩黄片免| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| www.999成人在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 老司机福利观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆 | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 男女视频在线观看网站免费 | 一进一出抽搐动态| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 日韩免费av在线播放| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 香蕉av资源在线| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 1024视频免费在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲av熟女| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| www.999成人在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产激情久久老熟女| 成年版毛片免费区| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 老司机靠b影院| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 搞女人的毛片| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 操出白浆在线播放| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 91老司机精品| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 在线播放国产精品三级| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| www国产在线视频色| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| tocl精华| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 色综合站精品国产| 成人18禁在线播放| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久久国产成人免费| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 精品久久久久久,| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 嫩草影视91久久| 天天添夜夜摸| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 丁香六月欧美| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 制服人妻中文乱码| 久久久久久人人人人人| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 中文字幕久久专区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 91成人精品电影| 免费观看人在逋| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 精品电影一区二区在线| www.999成人在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 精品福利观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲五月天丁香| 男女那种视频在线观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 久久香蕉激情| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲第一av免费看| 麻豆av在线久日| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 精品久久久久久,| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 一本一本综合久久| 老司机福利观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 精品久久久久久,| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国内精品久久久久精免费| ponron亚洲| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲av美国av| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 俺也久久电影网| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 99re在线观看精品视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 一级毛片精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 无限看片的www在线观看| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 日本免费a在线| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国产一区二区激情短视频| xxxwww97欧美| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 老司机福利观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 91av网站免费观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲激情在线av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2 | 中出人妻视频一区二区| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 日本免费a在线| 一本一本综合久久| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 88av欧美| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产三级在线视频| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲av熟女| 欧美色视频一区免费| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 国产精品二区激情视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 无限看片的www在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| www.精华液| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 日本 av在线| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 久久国产精品影院| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 精品久久久久久成人av| www.自偷自拍.com| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 在线观看午夜福利视频| netflix在线观看网站| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 一区福利在线观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 女警被强在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产在线观看jvid| 亚洲激情在线av| 国产成年人精品一区二区| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 极品教师在线免费播放| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品高清国产在线一区| 宅男免费午夜| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 成人18禁在线播放| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 日韩有码中文字幕| 看黄色毛片网站| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 超碰成人久久| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产精品,欧美在线| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播 | 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 色老头精品视频在线观看| 自线自在国产av| 不卡av一区二区三区| 色综合婷婷激情| 身体一侧抽搐| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产视频内射| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 日本a在线网址| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲五月天丁香| 午夜激情av网站| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 精品高清国产在线一区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 九色国产91popny在线| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 无限看片的www在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 午夜视频精品福利| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 九色国产91popny在线| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲成人久久性| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲片人在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产av在哪里看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 日本a在线网址| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 99热6这里只有精品| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线 | 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 很黄的视频免费| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 级片在线观看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产熟女xx| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 精品国产国语对白av| 夜夜爽天天搞| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲av成人av| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 波多野结衣高清作品| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 国产三级黄色录像| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 成人精品一区二区免费| a级毛片在线看网站| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 午夜免费观看网址| 9191精品国产免费久久| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区 | 亚洲成人久久爱视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产高清激情床上av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 夜夜爽天天搞| 午夜福利在线在线| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产单亲对白刺激| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 不卡av一区二区三区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 一a级毛片在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 岛国在线观看网站| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 久久精品成人免费网站| 日本五十路高清| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 在线av久久热| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产视频内射| 长腿黑丝高跟| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 在线av久久热| 国产精品九九99| 欧美日韩精品网址| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 曰老女人黄片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 在线免费观看的www视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站|