• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of afforestation of agricultural land with grey alder(Alnus incana(L.)Moench)on soil chemical properties,comparing two contrasting soil groups

    2020-10-20 08:13:38ertsNikodemusrtaKaupeImantsKukuGuntisBrmelisRaimondsKasparinskisIlutaDaukaneandAgitaTreimane
    Forest Ecosystems 2020年3期

    O??erts Nikodemus ,Dārta Kaupe,Imants Kuku?s,Guntis Brūmelis,Raimonds Kasparinskis,Iluta Dau?kane and Agita Treimane

    Abstract

    Keywords: Afforestation, Grey alder, Soil properties,Umbrisols, Arenosols, Topsoil

    Background

    Abandonment of agricultural land and gradual overgrowing with trees and shrubs are common processes across Europe, and were particularly rapid in Eastern Europe after the collapse of the Soviet system (Prishchepov et al. 2012; Estel et al. 2015). Abandonment of agricultural practice and establishment of forest cause changes in the environment, including changes in soil.Data on changes of soil properties in some cases are inconsistent or incomplete, and thus create a need for further research on effect of land use change on ecosystem development. In some studies an increase in soil organic carbon (SOC) stock was observed after afforestation of agricultural lands (Del Galdo et al. 2003;Hooker and Compton 2003; Mao et al. 2010; Armolaitis et al. 2013). However, there have also been cases where the SOC in soil decreased during the first years of afforestation (Ross et al. 1999; Paul et al. 2002; Chen et al.2004). In the advanced stages of forest development,when SOC begins to accumulate in the litter horizon,the total SOC content in soil increases (Kuku?s et al.2015). During forest development, the increase in SOC content is accompanied by an increase in soil nitrogen content (Li et al. 2012; Holubík et al. 2014). Other studies have reported a decrease in magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca) and potassium (K) concentration in soil,which may affect soil fertility and thus productivity of tree stands (Berthrong et al. 2009). There are inconsistent results on changes in phosphorous (P) levels after land transformation (MacDonald et al. 2012; Deng et al.2016). After afforestation, the content and behaviour of P forms in soil differ within former agricultural lands,depending on soil properties. Changes in labile P content after afforestation were reported to depend on soil characteristics like clay content and pH, while changes in total P were not observed (MacDonald et al. 2012).Changes in SOC and nutrient element content in soil during forest development depend on other factors like previous land use (grasslands, herbaceous plants, etc.),soil tillage and cultivation, tree species, tree stand age,relief, climate and soil properties like clay content and pH value (Paul et al. 2002; Jandl et al. 2007; Laganière et al. 2010; Uri et al. 2014; Cukor et al. 2017). Afforestation of agricultural land with deciduous trees like alder(Alnus) species is common in temperate (Anthelem et al. 2001) and hemi-boreal biomes of Europe (Uri et al.2011). It is considered that afforestation of abandoned lands with grey alder has a potential to increase biomass supply and carbon (C) capture in northern Europe. It is well known that grey alder (Alnus incana (L.) Moench)in symbiosis with Frankia group Actinomycetes captures nitrogen from the atmosphere and litter deposition causes accumulation of nitrogen (N) in soil, along with increase of organic carbon content (Bārdule and Lazdi?? 2010; Uri et al. 2011, 2014). Soil conditions can also affect accumulation of C, N and other chemical elements. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine changes in soil properties during the natural afforestation of abandoned agricultural lands with grey alder,depending on soil group. We paid attention to development of spatial heterogeneity of soil properties during the afforestation from concentric tree patches.

    Materials and methods

    Characteristics of study site

    The study was conducted in the central part of Latvia, in Vidzeme upland (Fig. 1). Mean annual precipitation in Latvia is 750-800 mm, of which about 500 mm falls in warm seasons. Mean temperature during the warm period is 16.9°C and 5.4°C during the cold period.Mean snow depth is 22-26 cm (Briede and Kore?ska 2018).The study territory is located in the hemiboreal forest zone (Ahti et al. 1968). The landscape of the study territory is a mosaic of agricultural land, forests dominated by spruce, pine, birch and aspen, and former agricultural land mostly overgrown by grey alder and spruce (Ruskule et al. 2016).

    Arenosols, Podzols, Cambisols, Retisols, Luvisols, Stagnosols, Gleysols, Umbrisols and Histosols are the most dominant soils in the studied region, which formed on glacigenic (loam, sandy loam and sand), glaciofluvial(sand, coarse sand) and peat deposits (Kasparinskis et al.2017). Afforestation with grey alder was studied in two sites. In one, Dystric Arenosols formed on glacigenic deposits of loamy sand in the soil parent material and sand in the topsoil. In the other, afforestation occurred on Endostagnic Umbrisols formed by loamy sand in topsoil,and loam, silt loam and sandy loam in soil parent material. The depth of the Ap horizon varied from 24 to 40 cm in the Arenosols, and from 30 to 50 cm in the Umbrisols. Agricultural practice in both sites was discontinued in the mid-1990s. Historically these lands were managed as meadows and croplands.

    Study methods

    Three patches of grey alder were selected in each territory delineated by a soil group. We selected tree patches that contained only grey alder. The mean area of grey alder patches was 81 m2. Lists of plants species were made within and just outside (2-3 m) the selected tree patches prior to soil sampling. Age of the grey alder trees was determined from tree cores obtained with a Presler’s auger.

    Soil textural classes were determined according to FAO Guidelines for Soil Description (Jahn et al. 2006).Soil profiles were described and soil groups were determined according to the international WRB soil classification (IUSS Working Group WRB 2015).

    Soil samples for chemical analysis were collected at the centre of patches, and at distances of 2 and 4 m in north, east, south and west directions from the centre to the edges of the patches (Fig. 2). The patch edges were only recently colonised and this zone contained only a few small alder trees. Control samples were collected in the grassland 1-2 m outside the tree crown and alder rooting zone, at a distance about 3-4 m from the sample located at 4 m from the patch centre. Soil samples were collected from small pits with size 20 cm×20 cm at depths 0-10 cm and 11-20 cm. In each grey alder patch,the soil profile was described in pits. A total of 32 soil samples were collected from each alder patch.

    Three replicates were taken from each collected soil sample and analysed in the soil laboratory of the University of Latvia Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences.Air dried samples were broken up and sieved through a 2-mm mesh. Particle sizes were determined by pipette analysis (van Reeuwijk 1995; Cools and De Vos 2010),pH value was measured with an “Adrona pH meter AM1605” in 1 mol·L-1BaCl2solution (Tan 2005; Cools and De Vos 2010),content of total carbon(Ctot) and total nitrogen (Ntot) was determined by an “EuroVector EuroEA”analyser(Tan 2005;Cools and De Vos 2010)and content of exchangeable cations (Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Fe3+,Al3+)in 1 mol·L-1BaCl2solution by an atomic absorption spectrometer “Perkin Elmer Analyst 200” (Tan 2005;Cools and De Vos 2010). Available phosphorous (Pl) content was determined by Mehlich 3 extraction method with an “Thermo Scientific iCAP7000 ICP-OES” spectrometer(Gutiérrez Boem et al.2011;AgroEcoLab 2016).

    Data analysis

    The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for normal distributions. For statistical analysis, data on soil physical and chemical properties not conforming to normal distribution (pHBaCl2, Ntot, K+, Fe3+and Al3+) underwent lognormal distribution transformation. Firstly, main and interaction effects of soil, horizon and location under the canopy were tested by 3-way ANOVA.Then, statistically significant (p <0.05) differences between soil types for each soil horizon in the grassland (control) sites were determined by Tukey’s one-way ANOVA. A one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to test for significant differences in soil properties between locations for each soil type and horizon. SPSS PASW Statistics 18 software was used for the analysis.

    Results

    Tree patches

    Tree age in the centre of the patches was up to 20 to 25 years and the youngest trees (4 to 10 years old) were at the edges, demonstrating concentric vegetative spread around trees that colonised by seed. Average height of trees in the centre of the patches was 13.2±0.5 m on sandy Dystric Arenosols and 12.2±0.6 m on sandy loam Endostagnic Umbrisols. Average diameter of these trees was 16.2±0.7 cm and 14.8±0.7 cm, respectively. Height and diameter of the trees gradually decreased from centre to the edges of patches. Vegetation in the study site on Arenosols was dominated by Elytrigia repens,

    Dactylis glomerata and Festuca ovina, and on Umbrisols soil by Elytrigia repens, Aegopodium podagraria, Vicia cracca and other plants (Table 1).

    Descriptive statistics

    Three-way ANOVA indicated significant main effects of soil, horizon and location on chemical properties, except for soil on Ntotand location on Ca2+and pH (Table 2).Significant interaction effects of soil horizon occurred for Ntot, K+, Ca2+, Al3+and pH, and of soil location for Ntot, Ctot, P, Mg2+, K+and Al3+. For the grassland sampling sites, which can indicate soil properties before treecolonisation, there were no significant differences (1-way ANOVA) in Ntotcontent between Dystric Arenosols and Endostagnic Umbrisols (Table 3). Sandy Arenosols had higher pHBaCl2and Mg2+and Fe3+and Al3+content,while Ctotand P content was higher in sandy loam Endostagnic Umbrisol soil.

    Table 1 Characterisation of the dominant vegetation in the study sites,listed by decreasing cover

    Effect of location under the tree canopy

    One-way ANOVA for each soil type and soil layer showed that soil pHBaCl2, Ca2+and Mg2+content after 25 years of afforestation. Ntotcontent in topsoil (1-10 cm layer) was significantly higher (by 29.4%) in the centre of the grey alder patches on sandy Dystric Arenosol soil than in the periphery of wood patches and in grassland (Fig. 3a). In the deeper 11-20 cm soil layer,the difference in Ntotcontent was greater, being 60%higher in the patch centre than in the grassland. In loamy clay Endostagnic Umbrisol soil, the Ntotcontent did not significantly differ between sampling sites (Fig.3a). In all studied sites Ntotcontent in the top layer of the Ap horizon (0-10 cm) was higher than in the deeper layer (11-20 cm).

    Ctotcontent in the 0-10 cm and 11-20 cm layers of the sandy Dystric Arenosols was significantly higher at the centre of tree patches than in sampling sites closer to the edges and grasslands (Fig. 3b). Afforestation with grey alder increased Ctotcontent by 37.9% in the 0-10 cm and by 88.1% in the 11-20 cm layer. However, Ctotcontent did not significantly differ between sampling locations in the sandy loam Endostagnic Umbrisols (Fig.3b). Both of the studied soils had higher Ctotcontent in the 0-10 cm layer compared to the 11-20 cm layer.

    Soil in the centre of tree patches in sandy Dystric Arenosols also had significantly higher K+content than in the periphery and grassland (Fig. 3c). K+content of soil in the centre of wood patch was two times higher than in the grassland. This spatial pattern was not observed for the Endostagnic Umbrisols. Mean content of P in the 0-10 cm layer in the centre of patches was higher than in the grassland for both soils (Fig. 3d), but this difference was significant (by 84.9%) only for sandy Dystric Arenosols.

    The only significant difference in Fe3+concentration between sampling sites was observed in Endostagnic Umbrisols in the 0-10 cm layer, where Fe3+concentration in the centre of wood patch was higher by about 140% than in the other sites (Fig. 4a). Aluminium was the only studied element that had higher content in the deeper layer (11-20 cm) than in the top layer (0-10 cm)(Fig. 4b). In Endostagnic Umbrisols, the Al3+concentration in the 11-20 cm layer tended to be higher toward the patch centre (Fig. 4b).

    Discussion

    The observed interaction of soil and horizon effects was not surprising considering impact of soil texture on soil chemistry and processes (Vanmechelen et al. 1997).However, the significant interaction effect of soil andlocation under the tree canopy clearly shows the importance of soil type in understanding of the role of grey alder in afforestation. The space-for time study clearly showed impact of afforestation by grey alder on soil properties, with the effect being stronger in the centre of tree patches where colonisation was initiated, and weaker toward the edges where trees were younger.

    Table 2 Three-way ANOVA effects of soil,horizon and location under grey alder canopy on soil chemistry

    Table 3 Mean values of chemical properties of sandy Dystric Arenosols and sandy loam Endostagnic Umbrisols in the grassland sites

    Sandy Dystric Arenosols, which are relatively poor in nutrients (P and K+) and organic matter, accumulated carbon and nutrient elements (nitrogen, potassium,phosphorous) during the afforestation of grasslands at a higher rate than in the more fertile Endostagnic Umbrisols. Many other studies have reported the role of grey alder afforestation in soil enrichment with nitrogen (Uri et al. 2014; Innangi et al. 2017; Morozov et al. 2018) and carbon (Uri et al. 2017). The changes in topsoil (0-10 cm) are caused by the accumulation of alder leaf litter and formation of easy decomposable and nitrogen-rich biomass (Innangi et al. 2017). The development of rootnodule symbioses with Frankia in roots of alder (Huss-Danell and Lundmark 1988) is affected by soil properties like pH value and nitrogen content. Increased nitrogen content in soil can affect nodulation of Frankia causing decreased nitrogen accumulation (Bond et al. 1954). In our case, there were no differences between the studied soils in N content in grassland, suggesting that this factor did not cause differences between the soil types in N fixation and uptake with plant roots. In contrast to the Dystric Arenosols soils, Endostagnic Umbrisols soil in grassland had significantly higher Ctot, P and K+content.Experimental studies have shown that nitrogen fixation by grey alder can be affected by phosphorous and potassium content in soil (Ekblad and Huss-Danell 1995). Low soil P availability limits N2fixation in alder stands (Uliassi and Ruess 2002), while high P content in soil has an positive effect on nodulation and N2-fixation rate (Ekblad and Huss-Danell 1995; Uliassi and Ruess 2002; Gentili and Huss-Danell 2003). In our study more rapid accumulation of Ntotand available P in soil after afforestation of agricultural lands with grey alder occurred in the soil type with lower phosphorus content(Fig. 3a and d).

    Part of the nitrogen released from alder leaf litter may have been taken up by the herb layer plants under the tree canopy. This might have caused part of the differences in N accumulation in soil between the soil groups.The herb layer was visually denser on the richer Endostagnic Umbrisols, but we did not investigate nitrogen uptake by herb layer plants. Previously, it has been reported that nitrogen accumulation by plants can cause a decrease in soil nitrogen content (Mileti? et al. 2012;Podwika et al. 2018)after afforestation.

    Our results showed that leaf litter accumulation not only had significant effect on N accumulation in soil, but also on K+and available P content in the upper layer of soil (Fig. 3c and d). The decreased Kexchcontent in the centre of alder patches in the Endostagnic Umbrisols soils might be due to herb layer plant uptake. The observed P accumulation in soil after afforestation with grey alder has also been reported in other studies (Uri et al.2003;Taleshi et al.2009),which can be explained by microbiological and mycorrhizal activity (Ingestad 1987;Giardina et al. 1995; Arveby and Granhall 1998). Alder has also been reported to increase availability of phosphorus via root secretion of phosphate enzymes(Giardina et al. 1995). However, the increase in available P content was statistically significant only in the sandy Dystric Arenosols and not in the Endostagnic Umbrisols.

    The increased Al3+concentration in the centre of grey alder patches in the deeper horizon of Endostagnic Umbrisols might be due to root exudates that indirectly affect soil reaction by solubilising unavailable aluminium(Skyllberg 1996). However, in our study a significant change in pH value was not observed in topsoil after afforestation with grey alder. The literature contains contrasting reports on effect of alder afforestation on soil pH value. In some cases afforestation with grey alder has been observed to cause soil acidification (Uri et al. 2014;Podwika et al. 2018), while other studies showed an increase of soil reaction and exchangeable base content(Huss-Danell and Lundmark 1988).

    During the afforestation of grasslands with grey alder high spatial heterogeneity in soil properties was found,indicated by significant differences between tree patches and grassland, and also within tree patches. However,with creation of a closed cover of alder over time, the soil properties in grassland can be expected to converge.Formation of soil properties after afforestation is also affected by soil bacterial communities (Preem et al. 2012),and the developmental trajectories of these may differ depending on soil properties. Further studies are needed in soil ecology to evaluate effect of tree roots on soil physical properties, moisture conditions, biochemical and other processes.

    Conclusions

    The results showed increased content of Ctot, Ntot, available P and exchangeable K+concentration in topsoil after afforestation of agricultural lands with grey alder(Alnus incana (L.) Moench) during the time span of 25 years on sandy soils poor in organic matter soils. The effect in more fertile soils with higher organic matter content was less evident and might have been confounded by herb layer plant uptake. Afforestation of agricultural lands with grey alder had effects on physical-chemical and biochemical processes in soils: increased P availability to plants in soil, and changes in Al3+and Fe3+ion mobility. Our results show that initial soil properties in grasslands significantly interact with effects due to afforestation with grey alder, which adds complexity to producing models of biogeochemical processes and creates difficulty in extrapolation of results to other soil types to guide land management.

    Mosaic type afforestation was shown to create higher spatial variability of soil properties, which needs to be considered during soil mapping and in choosing the correct mapping scale.

    Abbreviations

    Ctot: Total carbon; Ntot:Total nitrogen;SOC: Soil organic carbon; Ca2+, Mg2+,K+,Fe3+,Al3+: Exchangeable cations.

    Acknowledgments

    Not applicable.

    Authors’contributions

    Study concept and design:Nikodemus O, Kaupe D, Brūmelis G. Analysis and interpretation of data: Kaupe D, Kuku?s I, Dau?kane I,Treimane A. Drafting of the manuscript: Nikodemus O, Kaupe D. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kuku?s I, Brūmelis G, Kasparinskis R.Statistical analysis: Kaupe D, Kasparinskis R. Obtained funding: Nikodemus O.Study supervision: Nikodemus O. The author(s)read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    The study was supported by University of Latvia grant Nr. AAp2016/B041//Zd2016/AZ03 within the project “Climate change and sustainable use of natural resources”.

    Availability of data and materials

    Research data are not shared.

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

    Author details

    1Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1,Riga LV-1004, Latvia.2Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1,Riga LV-1004, Latvia.

    Received: 20 December 2019 Accepted: 9 June 2020

    国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日本 av在线| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 久久青草综合色| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 日韩免费av在线播放| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 999精品在线视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| av福利片在线| 18禁观看日本| 国产亚洲欧美98| av福利片在线| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 免费高清视频大片| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 在线观看日韩欧美| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品一二三| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产99白浆流出| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 久久久国产成人免费| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久久国产成人免费| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 欧美日韩精品网址| 性少妇av在线| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲av成人av| 久久中文看片网| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | 9热在线视频观看99| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 香蕉丝袜av| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 精品一区二区三卡| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产成人av教育| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产麻豆69| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 大码成人一级视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 超色免费av| 在线av久久热| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 97碰自拍视频| 欧美午夜高清在线| 在线天堂中文资源库| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 满18在线观看网站| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 热re99久久国产66热| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| av福利片在线| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 色播在线永久视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 热99re8久久精品国产| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 久久久久久大精品| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| av欧美777| 黄色视频不卡| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 日韩免费av在线播放| 97碰自拍视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 在线看a的网站| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 多毛熟女@视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 精品国产一区二区久久| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 高清av免费在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 国产精品成人在线| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 香蕉国产在线看| 久久草成人影院| 免费观看精品视频网站| av电影中文网址| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 看免费av毛片| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 成人精品一区二区免费| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 岛国在线观看网站| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | www国产在线视频色| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| www日本在线高清视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 五月开心婷婷网| 又大又爽又粗| av福利片在线| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 精品国产一区二区久久| bbb黄色大片| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲色图av天堂| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲中文av在线| 亚洲黑人精品在线| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 久久性视频一级片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久影院123| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 精品福利观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 身体一侧抽搐| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 精品国产一区二区久久| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久中文字幕一级| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产成人影院久久av| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 五月开心婷婷网| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 日韩有码中文字幕| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 久久香蕉国产精品| 级片在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产成人影院久久av| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 91麻豆av在线| av中文乱码字幕在线| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 一本综合久久免费| videosex国产| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产黄色免费在线视频| a级毛片黄视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 制服人妻中文乱码| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| xxx96com| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 成人手机av| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 国产在线观看jvid| 成人国语在线视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 中文欧美无线码| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 91av网站免费观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产成人系列免费观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产av在哪里看| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 精品久久蜜臀av无| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产精品免费视频内射| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 欧美乱妇无乱码| 9热在线视频观看99| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 欧美大码av| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 成人国语在线视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 色综合婷婷激情| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 久久久国产成人免费| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产色视频综合| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久草成人影院| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 一区二区三区激情视频| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产麻豆69| 看片在线看免费视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 999久久久国产精品视频| 电影成人av| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲av美国av| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 色综合站精品国产| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 午夜激情av网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 久久亚洲真实| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 久久中文看片网| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 视频区图区小说| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久99久视频精品免费| 怎么达到女性高潮| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| aaaaa片日本免费| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 在线免费观看的www视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产野战对白在线观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 久久香蕉精品热| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 三级毛片av免费| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 91大片在线观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 久久久久久大精品| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久久久久大精品| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 日本a在线网址| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 一本综合久久免费| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 在线观看www视频免费| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 91成人精品电影| 一级片'在线观看视频| 免费高清视频大片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产精品影院久久| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 免费在线观看完整版高清| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一区二区三区激情视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 91字幕亚洲| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲av美国av| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产色视频综合| 精品电影一区二区在线| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品成人在线| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 精品久久久久久成人av| 天堂动漫精品| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久99一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 午夜91福利影院| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 91在线观看av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 伦理电影免费视频| 黄色视频不卡| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | av天堂久久9| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| av在线播放免费不卡| 热re99久久国产66热| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 久久久久久人人人人人| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 丁香六月欧美| 久久久久国内视频| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 嫩草影院精品99| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久这里只有精品19| 99热只有精品国产| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 搡老乐熟女国产| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| www国产在线视频色| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 一进一出抽搐动态| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 超色免费av| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 |