• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Dynamics of dead wood decay in Swiss forests

    2020-10-20 08:21:30OleksandraHararukWernerKurzandMarkusDidion
    Forest Ecosystems 2020年3期

    Oleksandra Hararuk ,Werner A.Kurz and Markus Didion

    Abstract

    Keywords: Carbon residence time, Carbon dynamics,National Forest Inventory

    Background

    Under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and Kyoto Protocol, the countries that ratified the above are required to report their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals. Forests are an important component of such reports, because forests can be sources or sinks of CO2, depending on the net balance of CO2emissions and removals. The rate of forests’carbon(C)removal is dependent primarily on their species composition,age of the living biomass,and climate(Churkina and Running 1998; Pregitzer and Euskirchen 2004;Drake et al.2011).The rate of forests’CO2emissions from decomposition is determined by the amount of dead organic matter stored in dead wood,litter,and soil in a forest stand,its degradability and climatic conditions(Prescott 2010; Hu et al. 2018). Forest productivity is often inferred from yield tables (e.g. Kurz et al. 2009) or from satellite products(e.g.Pan et al.2006),whereas the dynamics of the dead organic matter are most commonly modeled (e.g.Kurz et al. 2009; Parton et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2010).These models usually consist of three parts: a first-order exponential decay of various components, such as dead wood; C transition rate from the upstream dead organic matter pools to the downstream pools, e.g. C transition from standing snags to downed logs; and C transfer efficiency from degradable to recalcitrant pools.To accurately determine the magnitude of forests’ emissions of CO2it is essential to use appropriate parameterization for the models of the dead organic matter dynamics.

    Appropriate parameterization of models that simulate ecosystem C pools and fluxes can be achieved by using statistical techniques to inform model parameters with the observed C pools and fluxes (Williams et al. 2005;Luo et al. 2015). National Forest Inventories (NFIs) are an exceptional source of observations, because they provide records of living and dead biomass that can be converted to C pools (Goodale et al. 2002; Tomppo et al.2010) and used as a benchmark for model evaluation(Saatchi et al. 2011; Shaw et al. 2014) or a source of observations for calibration of model parameters (Hararuk et al. 2017). The long-term records made possible by regular NFI campaigns are particularly valuable for constraining C dynamics in slow-decomposing C pools, such as coarse woody debris,which often has high uncertainties around model predictions due to short-term or no observations(Williams et al.2005;Keenan et al.2012).

    Decomposition of coarse woody debris depends mostly on microbial activity, which in turn is controlled by temperature and moisture conditions as well as wood traits and physical position of wood(i.e.whether dead wood is a standing snag or downed log). Increases in temperature promote microbial activity and increase the decomposition rate of coarse woody debris, which has been reflected in higher decay rate constants at warmer locations (Mackensen et al.2003;Russell et al.2014)and increases of withinsite respiration fluxes with warmer conditions (Herrmann and Bauhus 2013). Increased moisture also stimulates microbial activity on coarse woody debris, however, unlike the relationship with temperature, decay rate relationship with moisture content is parabolic due to oxygen limitation of microbial activity under high wood moisture content(Harmon et al.1986;Olajuyigbe et al.2012).

    Downed logs have been shown to have higher decay rates compared to standing snags (Hararuk et al. 2017),which could be caused by faster colonization by microbes from direct contact with soil (Boddy 2001) or more favorable moisture conditions closer to soil surface(Shorohova and Kapitsa 2014; P?ívětivy et al. 2018).Lastly, wood is highly variable in internal structure and chemical composition, which also has been shown to affect the speed of its decomposition. For instance,hardwoods have vessels that have larger diameters compared to the tracheids in softwoods, and are more continuous, which promotes faster colonization by fungi(Harmon et al. 1986; Wilcox 1973). Hardwoods also have higher nitrogen content and lower C:N ratios,which has been shown to stimulate wood decomposition rate (Weedon et al. 2009; Hu et al. 2018), whereas softwoods have higher lignin content (Savidge 2000; Weedon et al. 2009), which has been shown to protect wood from decay (Scheffer 1966; Freschet et al. 2012). Thus,both climatic and trait variables are important determinants of the wood decomposition rate (Hu et al. 2018),and it is important to test and account for these controls during model development.

    Apart from the microbe-driven decomposition of snags and logs, the bulk turnover rates of coarse woody debris are affected by the transition rates of snags into logs (or fall rates). Thus, quantifying only the decay rates of snags and logs would not give a full picture of dead wood fate, because fall rates might prolong or shorten dead wood residence times (cf. Angers et al. 2010). Unlike in the microbe-driven decay rates, there appears to be no clear pattern in factors that affect snag fall rates.For instance, while some studies reported that tree diameter at breast height (DBH) had a significant negative effect on snag fall rates (M?kinen et al. 2006; Vanderwel et al. 2006b), others reported positive or no effect of DBH on snag longevity (M?kinen et al. 2006; Angers et al. 2010). Similarly, a recent regional analysis of the U.S. forest inventory data revealed that snag fall rates tended to increase with mean annual temperatures(Oberle et al. 2018), however no temperature-dependent patterns in fall rates were evident from the regional analysis of data from permanent sample plots across Canada(Hilger et al. 2012), but the latter study reported that, on average, hardwood trees had lower fall rates compared to softwood trees. Given such variability in controls of snag fall rates and their substantial effect on bulk residence time of coarse woody debris, it is important to estimate snag fall rates and explore what affects their variability in Swiss forests.

    In this study we quantify the snag fall rates, as well as the decay rates and residence times (the period, after which 90% of standing snags or downed logs would be decomposed) of standing and downed dead wood using data from the Swiss NFI. In Swiss forests dead wood comprises around 4.7% of growing stock (m3·ha-1) in hardwood-dominated stands, and 7.9% of growing stock in the softwood-dominated stands. These values decrease to 3.5% and 5.6%, respectively when expressed as biomass (Br?ndli et al. 2020a, 2020b) as a result of a decrease in wood density during decomposition (Cioldi et al. 2020). Dead wood volume estimates alone, which are included in many NFIs, do not provide sufficient information on wood decay dynamics, because changes in dead wood densities (e.g. as in Paletto and Tosi 2010)are not reported, therefore the dynamics of the dead wood biomass needs to be simulated with a processbased C cycle model. To produce accurate estimates of dead wood biomass and C emissions it is essential to accurately represent the decay dynamics of dead wood in these process-based models, which can be achieved by using representative dead wood decay rates. Here, we use machine learning techniques to quantify the decay rates of standing snags and downed logs, and the dependency of these decay rates on climate and substrate recalcitrance.

    Methods

    NFI data

    To estimate dead wood decay rates and factors determining their variability we used information from the Swiss National Forest Inventory (NFI). Data were available from four inventories (NFI1: 1983-1985, EAFV(Eidgen?ssische Anstalt für das forstliche Versuchswesen), BFL (Bundesamt für Forstwesen und Landschaftsschutz) 1988; NFI2: 1993-1995, Brassel and Br?ndli 1999; NFI3: 2004-2006, Br?ndli 2010; NFI4:2009-2017, Br?ndli et al. 2020a, 2020b). The NFI is based on permanent sample plots located on a 1.4-km grid covering the entire Swiss territory (Br?ndli and H?geli 2019). Forested plots are identified based on aerial and terrestrial interpretation. Comprehensive stand and tree data are collected on all accessible plots excluding brush forests, e.g., in avalanche chutes (number of sampled plots during NFI1: 10,981; NFI2: 6412; NFI3:6608; NFI4: 6042). Historically, the Swiss NFI has used a threshold of 12-cm diameter at breast height (DBH) for identifying trees for repeated sampling (Lanz et al.2019). All live and dead trees >12 cm DBH are measured on circular areas of 200 m2and trees with DBH >36 cm are measured on circular areas of 500 m2. Measured attributes of dead trees include DBH, position with reference to the center of the sample plot, tree status (standing or downed), and decay status (five classes:raw wood, solid dead wood, rotten wood, mould wood,duff wood as defined in Hunter (1990)); decay status has only been recorded since NFI3. Based on the information from a previous inventory, including recorded tree position and mark of the DBH measurement along the stem, individual trees are located again in later inventories to ensure consistent measurements. Downed logs consistent of still compact pieces are only measured if they can be identified to be part of a previously alive sampled tree. The DBH of downed logs is measured twice, parallel and perpendicular to the ground to account for flattening during decomposition, and the mean of the two measurements is used for volume estimation.The volume of live and dead trees is estimated as a function of DBH which was calibrated based on DBH, diameter at 7-m height, and total tree height from ca. Forty thousand tree DBH and height measurements (Lanz et al. 2019).

    Volume estimates for snags and logs are converted to biomass by multiplying the former by measured wood densities obtained in a study by Dobbertin and Jüngling(2009)(see also Didion et al. 2019)for all five decay classes. In order to obtain accurate and representative data,the study by Dobbertin and Jüngling was restricted to snags and logs of Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica, the dominant coniferous and broadleaved tree species in Swiss forests (Table 1). Extrapolation of F. sylvatica wood densities to other hardwood species may be reasonable, because chemical composition of beech wood is similar to that of other hardwood species (Pettersen 1984; Popescu et al. 2011), whereas softwood species can vary substantially in wood chemical composition (e.g.lignin content(Pettersen 1984)),and thus wood densities across decay classes may not be similar among softwoods. However, most of snags and logs belonged to P.abies, therefore we do not expect the bias to be substantial. C content did not vary significantly across five decay classes and mean C concentrations of 49.3% for conifers and 47.6% for broadleaves were used to convert biomassinto C stocks regardless of the decay status (Didion et al.2019). Since decay status has been recorded only since the NFI3, we followed the approach by Didion et al.(2014) to obtain estimates of biomass and carbon in dead trees at the time of the NFI2. To derive such estimates, first, trees were selected that were observed as dead in the NFI2 and were either alive in the NFI1 or not recorded in the NFI1 due to a diameter below the caliper threshold of 12 cm(n=269).Second,for the time of the NFI2 we quantified a range of C stock estimates for these trees based on decay class specific wood densities (Supplementary Table S1) and the measured C contents of 49.3% for conifers and 47.6% for broadleaves (cf.Didion et al. 2014). A high C stock estimate was calculated based on wood density for decay class 1 (“raw wood”), and a low estimate was calculated using wood density for decay class 2 (“solid dead wood”). All other trees, i.e. trees that were recorded as dead during NFI1,NFI2, NFI3, and NFI4 (n=747), decay class in NFI2 was assigned to be the same as observed in NFI3, yielding a low C stock estimate, or one less than recorded during NFI3, yielding a high C stock estimate. More details on C stock calculation are described in Didion et al. (2014).During parameter estimation in the wood decay model(see Eq. 1), we used the average of low and high C stock estimates in NFI2 as the initial wood C pool values.

    Table 1 Number of standing snags and downed logs by tree species over time

    In total, data were available for 1016 individual dead stems across 671 plots that were measured repeatedly during NFI2, NFI3, and NFI4 (see Table 1 for number of standing snags and downed logs by tree species). Available measurements were as follows:

    · DBH range:12 to 109 cm;mean:29 cm;median 24 cm

    · Volume range: 0.03 to 7.31 m3;mean: 0.84 m3;median 0.35 m3

    · Biomass range: 12 to 2851 kg;mean: 324 kg;median 148 kg

    · Elevation range of sample plots: 322 to 2195 m a.s.l.

    In addition to the collected NFI data, we extracted the observed climatic variables from a spatially gridded dataset prepared by the Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss. Based on its station network across Switzerland and accounting for topographic effects, MeteoSwiss calculates near-surface climate variables on a high-resolution grid over Switzerland(MeteoSwiss, Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology 2019). For the location of each NFI sampling plot,data for mean monthly absolute temperature (°C) and for monthly precipitation sum (mm) were extracted from the respective current versions of the gridded data,i.e. TabsM (MeteoSwiss, Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology 2016a) and RhiresM v1.0 (MeteoSwiss,Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology 2016b).Across the 671 NFI plots, mean annual temperatures(norm 1981-2010) ranged from -2°C to 12°C with a mean and standard error of 5.5±0.1°C, and mean annual precipitation sum (norm 1981-2010) ranged from 540 to 2300 mm with a mean and standard error of 1453±14 mm.

    To examine potential drivers of decomposition that have been found in relevant studies, additional measured attributes were obtained from the NFI database; these attributes were available for NFI3 and NFI4 only:

    · stem damage (Storaunet and Rolstad 2002); of the 1016 snags and logs used in this study, 41% in the NFI3 and 35% in the NFI4 had no observed damage,>80% had no or minor observed damage (Table 2)

    · soil contact (P?ívětivy et al. 2018);

    · bark cover (Kahl et al. 2012).

    Model

    To quantify dead wood decay dynamics, we adopted a widely-used first order exponential decay approach (e.g.Scheller and Mladenoff 2004; Kurz et al. 2009; Hérault et al. 2010):

    where Xtis C stock at the time t; X0is the initial C stock; k10is the baseline decay rate, or decay rate at T=10°C; and f(T) is temperature dependence of the dead wood decay rate, which is often represented as

    Table 2 Observed damage on snags and logs used in this study

    where Q10is temperature sensitivity of decay, or a factor by which decay rate changes with a 10°C increase in temperature (T).

    Parameter estimation

    We calibrated the model parameters using a Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique (Besag et al. 1995). Bayesian inversion can be summarized as

    where p(c|Z) is a posterior probability density function of parameters c; p(Z|c) is a likelihood function of parameters c; p(c) is a prior probability density function of parameters c; and a is a normalization constant (Mosegaard and Sambridge 2002). Assuming that the prediction errors are uncorrelated and have a Gaussian distribution, the likelihood p(Z|c)can be expressed as

    where f is the median fall rate estimated from Swiss NFI data. For logs the residence time was calculated as

    Similarly, the half-lives were calculated as follows:

    When the study that reported turnover rates,residence times,or half-lives did not report climatic data,we calculated turnover rates and residence times (Eqs. 10-12)using the long-term climatic averages from WorldClim(Fick and Hijmans 2017) for the corresponding geographic locations.

    As mentioned previously, decay rates of snags and logs alone do not give a full picture of dead wood fate without incorporating the fall rates, which may prolong or shorten dead wood residence times. Unfortunately, there were many snag samples at Swiss NFI plots that did not transition into logs during more than 30 years of observations, so we made rough assumptions about snag fall rates in order to evaluate the ranges of total dead wood residence times. Fall rates were calculated from the data as the inverse of halved difference between the first date that a snag was classified a log, and the first date the snag was classified as a snag; for all snags that remained standing for over 30 years, we assumed that they would fall within the next 5-7 years. This assumption appears justified given the findings by M?kinen et al. (2006) who reported low probabilities of snags remaining upright for more than 40 years in Finnish forests, and findings by Storaunet and Rolstad (2004) who reported that 75% of snags would fall after 40 years.

    Identifying factors that affect wood decay

    We explored the dependence of the dead wood decay dynamics on different dead wood attributes including substrate recalcitrance, soil surface contact, bark cover, and damage, as well as climatic variables, such as temperature and precipitation. To explore this dependence, we tested whether the listed variables were significant predictors of the residuals of a model (Eq. 1), in which the base decay rate k10and temperature sensitivity Q10were calibrated against the decay dynamics over time of individual standing snags or downed logs. Softwood stems contain on average 10% more lignin than hardwood stems (Savidge 2000),which protects a plant cell from decay and has been associated with longer C residence times in wood(Freschet et al. 2012), therefore we assumed that binary classification of wood into hardwood (HW) and softwood(SW) type would be sufficient to detect the effect of substrate recalcitrance on dead wood decay. We used a machine learning technique,recursive partitioning by conditional inference (Hothorn et al. 2006), to represent model residuals as a function of substrate recalcitrance,soil surface contact,bark cover,degree of damage,climatic variables, such as temperature and precipitation, wood type(HW vs SW),and species to account for the possible species-specific factors not accounted by other variables in the model. Unlike many recursive partitioning methods,conditional inference trees do not overfit the models and are not biased towards covariates with many possible splits.This method is available in the R package“partykit”(Hothorn et al.2015),which we used to analyze the residuals in this study.

    We also used a conditional inference tree to explore whether wood type, diameter at breast height,temperature and precipitation were significant predictors of the calculated snag fall rates. Lastly, an exponential distribution was fitted to the frequency distribution of the fall rates using “fitdistrplus” package in R (Delignette-Muller and Dutang 2015), which yielded an optimal λ=14 (Supp. Figure S1). The fall rates were randomly drawn from the exponential distribution to simulate transition from standing to downed dead wood; and decay of snags and logs was simulated using Eq. 1.

    Results

    The best-fitting parameters indicated that in Swiss forests logs decay 1.7 times faster compared to standing snags (Fig. 1a, d); the baseline snag decay was 0.023 yr-1,and log decay rate at 10°C was 0.04 yr-1. Unlike baseline decay rates, temperature sensitivities (Q10) did not differ between the standing snags and downed logs (Fig. 1b, e).Overall, the C half-lives in the snag pool varied from 22 years in the warmest NFI plots to 118 years in the coldest NFI plots, and in the log pool - from 11 to around 65 years (Fig. 1c, f).

    Species, annual precipitation, and wood type were significant predictors of model residuals (Fig. 2), therefore,these variables influenced dead wood decay dynamics.The calibrated model overpredicted the mass of Fagus spp.snags by 63.2 kg C·ha-1in 50%of the cases(Fig.2a),indicating that Fagus spp. snags decayed substantially faster compared to other snags. For snags that originated from other species, precipitation was a significant predictor of decay:at sites with annual precipitation less than 1837 mm, snag mass was underpredicted by 5.6 kg C·ha-1in 50% of the cases, indicating slower than expected decay rate at those sites,and at sites where annual precipitation exceeded 1837 mm, the model overpredicted the snag mass by 8.2 kg C·ha-1in 50%of the cases,indicating the decay rate was faster than expected. Wood type was the only significant predictor of the model residuals for log mass. The calibrated model overpredicted hardwood log mass by 23.5 kg C·ha-1in 50%of the cases,indicating faster than expected decay rate for hardwood logs, and underpredicted softwood log mass by 6.1 kg C·ha-1in 50%of the cases,indicated slower decay of these logs than predicted by the calibrated model.

    Significant effects of wood type, species, and precipitation on dead wood decay rates prompted us to estimate baseline decay rates and temperature sensitivities separately for F. sylvatica snags, non-Fagus spp. snags under high and low precipitation (i.e. PPT >1837 mm and ≤1837 mm, respectively), hardwood logs, and softwood logs to further characterize their decay dynamics. F. sylvatica snag baseline decay rate was 0.084 yr-1(Fig. 3a)and was 6-fold faster than base decay rate of snags in low precipitation plots (Fig. 3d), and 3-fold faster than the decay rate in high precipitation plots (Fig. 3g).Temperature sensitivity of F. sylvatica snag decay was highly uncertain (Fig. 3b), whereas temperature sensitivities of non-Fagus spp. snags were more constrained(Fig. 3e, h), with lower temperature sensitivity in dryer plots and higher in wetter plots. Overall, the C half-lives in F. sylvatica snags varied from 10 years in the warmest NFI plots to 25 years in the coldest NFI plots (Fig. 3c);and half-lives of non-Fagus spp. snags varied from 45 to 105 years in lower precipitation plots (Fig. 3f) and from 25 to 105 years in higher precipitation plots (Fig. 3i).

    Downed logs of softwood species decayed at the rate of 0.036 yr-1under 10°C temperature(Fig.4a),whereas hardwood logs decayed faster,at the rate of 0.069 yr-1(Fig.4d).However, the decay rate of softwood logs was more sensitive to temperature (Q10= 2.3, Fig. 4b), compared to the decay rate of hardwood logs(Q10=1.36,Fig.4e).The lower temperature sensitivities translated into lower variability of half-lives of hardwood logs across NFI plots, which ranged from 10 to 18 years (Fig. 4f), compared to the variability of half-lives of softwood logs(18-65 years,Fig.4c).

    Fall rates ranged from 0.02276 to 0.22 yr-1, with 50%of the values being less than 0.04 yr-1(Supp. Figure S1).Fall rates were not significantly related to temperature,precipitation, or snag diameter, and therefore were randomly drawn from the exponential distribution (Supp.Figure S1) to simulate transition from standing to downed dead wood in order to estimate bulk wood decay rates in Swiss forests (Fig.5).

    The shortest dead wood residence times were for the wood originating from F. sylvatica, with 90% of mass gone after 27 years at the warmest sites, 35 years at the average sites, and 54 years at the coldest sites (Fig. 5e).Other hardwood species growing in wet sites lost 90% of their mass after 45, 60, and 92 years at warmest, average,and coldest sites, respectively (Fig. 5d), and hardwoods growing at drier sites lost the 90% of mass after 62, 73,and 95 years for the same sites (Fig. 5c). Softwoods had the longest residence times, losing 90% of their mass after 58, 91, and 191 years at wetter warm, average, and cold sites (Fig. 5b), and 78, 135, and 286 years for the drier warm, average, and cold sites (Fig. 5a).

    Discussion

    Snag and log C residence times

    This study is among the few that estimated decomposition rates of snags alone, without merging the decay rates with the fall rates, or combining the snag data with the downed dead wood that has contact with soil (e.g.Aakala 2010; Vacek et al. 2015). Furthermore, quantitative data on long-term dead wood decay from forests in the European Alps are rare (Petrillo et al. 2016). We assumed that the effects of substrate quality and environmental conditions on the dynamics of woodcolonizing microbes in Swiss forest was similar to those in forests in similar climates across Eurasia and North America, and compared our wood decay rates to the rates reported in other studies. Angers et al. (2011) measured snag decay rates of two softwood species in northwestern Quebec, Canada, and reported the range of 0.0058 to 0.0274 yr-1, whereas our temperature-adjusted estimates yielded the range of 0.0068-0.011 yr-1, thus underestimating variability in the decay rate of softwood snags for the given temperature. Yatskov et al. (2003) estimated decay rates in St. Petersburg region of Russia(MAT=3.4°C, PPT=708 mm) for P. abies snags to be 0.044 yr-1±0.018 (SE), which was the highest decay rate found among the studied conifers; and the estimates for Pinus siberica in Irkutsk region (MAT=-0.6°C, PPT=216 mm) and Pinus koraiensis in Khabarovsk region(MAT=-1.9°C, PPT=909 mm) to be 0.003±(0.001)yr-1and 0.003±(0.002) yr-1, respectively. Our decay rate estimates for P. abies snags for the corresponding climate conditions were lower, ranging from 0.008 to 0.013 yr-1, however the turnover rates for the colder sites were higher than reported in (Yatskov et al. 2003),ranging from 0.006 to 0.011 yr-1for both Pinus siberica and Pinus koraiensis sites.

    Aakala (2010) analysed decay of Picea abies snags at three locations in Finland and northwestern Russia and reported the half-lives between 12 and 27 years, whereas our estimates for the corresponding species group, once adjusted for local mean annual temperatures, and the median fall rate estimated in this study ranged between 14 and 15 years. A study in eastern Europe reported that the residence time of P. abies snags was over 40 years(Vacek et al. 2015), which was close to our estimates(45-48 years) after adjustment for site temperature and precipitation (MAT=4.5°C, PPT=713 mm, obtained from WorldClim database, Fick and Hijmans 2017) and the median fall rate of 0.04 yr-1estimated in this study.

    Unlike the estimates for snag decay dynamics, our estimates for softwood log decay often encompassed the ranges reported in the literature, however there were cases where observed log decay rates were faster than the ones calculated with the parameters calibrated in this study. The baseline log decay rate for both hardwoods and softwoods obtained in this study was 0.04 yr-1(Fig. 1d) and was lower than the estimate obtained using the data from Canada’s NFI in Hararuk et al.(2017), 0.064 yr-1, as well as the estimate from global deadwood decay analysis (Harmon et al. 2020), 0.059 yr-1, but was close to the baseline decay rate assumed in Kurz et al. (2009), 0.037 yr-1. The maximum likelihood temperature sensitivity of log decay in Swiss forests was substantially higher than the one obtained for logs across Canada (2.6 vs. 1.53, Hararuk et al. 2017), however it was close to the temperature sensitivity estimated from the data on deadwood decay across the globe (2.59, Harmon et al. 2020). At three locations in Finland and Russia half-lives of Picea abies logs had a fairly short range of 20-40 years (Aakala 2010), whereas our estimates calculated for those sites ranged from 38 to 61 years. Parameters calibrated against Swiss NFI also underestimated the decay rates of softwood logs at a site in Russia: the decay rates calculated with our parameters ranged from 0.018 to 0.026 yr-1, whereas the observed decay rates were0.033-0.034 yr-1(Krankina and Harmon 1995). However, repeated measurements in the same region resulted in slower decay rates of conifer logs, ranging from 0.015 to 0.049 yr-1(Yatskov et al. 2003), which was more consistent with our findings. Petrillo et al. (2016) reported that Picea abies decay rates ranged from 0.01 to 0.025 yr-1for the sites with MAT ranging from 0 to 8.2°C, and softwood decay rates for these sites calculated with the calibrated parameters obtained in this study ranged from 0.0126 to 0.034 yr-1. In the Western Carpathians, residence times of A. alba and P. abies logs ranged between 44 and 119 (P?ívětivy et al. 2018) and were close to our estimates for the softwood logs decomposing under the same climatic conditions (74-115 years). Decay rates for softwood logs at a site in southwest Germany calculated with the parameters estimated in this study(0.024-0.03 yr-1) were close to the range estimated by authors for P. abies logs, which was 0.023±0.007 yr-1(Herrmann and Bauhus 2013); and similarly, at the site in Czech Republic our calibrated parameters produced the residence times of softwood logs that were fairly close to the observed residence times of P. abies (78-95 years vs. 50-85 years, Vacek et al. 2015). Our range for softwood log decay rates at the sites in southern Germany and south-east France (0.025-0.042 yr-1)agreed well with the estimates reported by Herrmann et al. (2015), which ranged from 0.021 to 0.05 yr-1.Lastly, the range of the decay rates calculated with our parameters for softwood logs across the eastern USA tended to be wider, i.e. more sensitive to temperature(0.014-0.077 yr-1for temperature range of 1.4-19.8°C)compared to the observed values, which spanned from 0.024 to 0.04 yr-1for the same temperature range (Russell et al. 2014).

    The parameters for hardwood logs produced turnover rates and residence times that were close to the observed values at the sites outside Swiss forests.Fagus sylvatica logs were reported to decompose within 20 to 40 years at some sites in Czech Republic(Vacek et al. 2015), which agrees with our estimates of 31-52 years for that climate; at a site in southwest Germany the decay rates of F. sylvatica logs were reported to be 0.052±0.19 yr-1(Herrmann and Bauhus 2013), which was also close to our estimates of 0.05-0.074 yr-1for the climate at that location. Our range for hardwood log decay rates at the sites in southern Germany and south-east France (0.054-0.075 yr-1)agreed well with the estimates reported by Herrmann et al. (2015), which ranged from 0.035 to 0.078 yr-1.Lastly, the range and temperature sensitivities of hardwood log decay rates across the eastern USA were 0.041-0.0794 yr-1for temperature range 1.4-19.8°C, and were close to the observed range of 0.043-0.064 yr-1(Russell et al. 2014).

    Effects of environment, plant traits, and disturbance on wood decay

    Temperature, precipitation and plant traits affected snag decay at Swiss NFI plots. Decay of F. sylvatica snags was significantly faster compared to the decay of snags belonging to other species even within hardwoods, and this difference was not explained by site-specific climatic variables (Figs. 2 and 3). The reasons behind such distinction in F. sylvatica decay are not straightforward,because the chemical composition of beech wood is similar to that of other hardwood species (Pettersen 1984; Popescu et al. 2011), however some evidence that fungal decay of beech wood occurred at lower moisture contents compared to other species (Meyer and Brischke 2015) may point at lower inherent resistance of beech wood to fungal decay. Indeed, results from Maringer et al. (2016) who showed that fungi infestations are an important driver of F. sylvatica mortality. It is important to account for this distinction in beech wood decay and investigate it further, given the spatial distribution of F.sylvatica across Europe (Huntley et al. 1989). Lastly, understanding of patterns of wood decay could be further improved by using species-specific wood densities at each decay class instead of using F. sylvatica densities for hardwoods and P. abies densities for softwoods,which could have introduced a bias to our results.

    For snags we found a precipitation threshold of 1837 mm, which resulted in the highest contrast in decomposition speed of all species, except F. sylvatica. This threshold is fairly high compared to average precipitation across Swiss forests (1453±14 mm), and was higher than the mean annual precipitation range of 1100-1300 mm identified by Zell et al. (2009) as optimal for decay,which implies that decomposition should have slowed down at sites where the annual precipitation is above this threshold. However, the data used by Zell et al.(2009) include primarily downed dead wood with smaller DBH compared to those in our study. In our study, snags at high precipitation sites decomposed faster and were more sensitive to temperature compared to the snags in the low precipitation sites (Figs. 3 d, e, g, h).Wood is thought to be decayed mainly by fungi (Cornwell et al. 2009), which grow better in moister conditions (Griffin 1977), therefore higher precipitation likely resulted in higher wood moisture content, facilitating faster fungal decay of snags at Swiss NFI plots. Increased temperature also stimulates microbial metabolism, however this effect weakens under sub-optimal moisture conditions (Suseela et al. 2012), which was detected in Swiss NFI plots as well and manifested as lower Q10 values at drier sites (Fig. 3e, h).

    Decay of downed logs was not affected by precipitation(Fig. 2b), which was consistent with findings by Petrillo et al. (2016) and may be due to more stable moisture conditions closer to the soil surface. However, this observation did not agree with a wood decay study at the West Carpathians,where precipitation affected the decay of downed logs, but not standing snags (P?ívětivy et al.2018). Hardwood species decomposed faster and were less sensitive to temperature compared to softwood species. Several substantial differences may have contributed to faster decomposition of hardwoods, such as larger and more continuous vessels, which promotes faster colonization by fungi (Harmon et al. 1986; Wilcox 1973), higher nitrogen content (and lower C:N ratios),which has been shown to stimulate wood decomposition rate (Weedon et al. 2009; Hu et al. 2018), and lower lignin content (Savidge 2000; Weedon et al. 2009; Freschet et al. 2012). Lower temperature sensitivity of hardwood logs decay may have been due to higher substrate quality(i.e. lower wood lignin content and C:N ratios) - a phenomenon that was previously reported for soil organic matter mineralization (Leifeld and Fuhrer 2005).

    Although plant traits and temperature were significant predictors for decay rates of standing snags and logs,and precipitation significantly affected decay of standing snags, there was still substantial variability in model residuals that could not be reduced by available predictors(Fig. 2). This unexplained variability likely arises from the unaccounted effects of the environment and the resulting biotic dynamics. For instance, the annual precipitation from MeteoSwiss included rain and snow, and while the former could affect the decay through improving the growing conditions for microorganisms, the latter could supply moisture during snowmelt, and, in addition, exert stress on the standing snags, potentially increasing snag fall rates and therefore overall rates of wood decay. In high elevation forests, the aspect of a slope could be another variable that can affect wood decay as shown in (Bardelli et al. 2018) who monitored decomposition of P. abies wood blocks in north- and south-facing slopes of the Italian Alps, and found that wood mass loss was 32% higher in the north- than south-facing slopes. The authors also concluded that higher wood mass loss was due to higher fungal abundance in the cooler and moister north-facing slopes.Snag fall rates could be affected by agent of mortality,site history and management. Snags that originate from fire tend to have lower longevity (Morrison and Raphael 1993), while snags that originate from suppression or insect outbreak (e.g. spruce budworm) tend to have higher longevity (Garber et al. 2005); stands with higher tree density and shorter harvest intervals have reduced snag longevity (Garber et al. 2005; Russell and Weiskittel 2012). Snag longevity is also associated with the exposure to wind (Montoro Girona et al. 2019) as well as the average wind speed (Hogg and Michaelian 2015) and is itself a function of snag decay as it is correlated with presence of fungi and borers on snags (Hogg and Michaelian 2015). Lastly, the unexplained variability in model errors can also arise from microsite conditions and various factors affecting microbial colonization rates,such as proximity of old woody debris, soil animals and other factors discussed in (Bradford et al. 2014), and highlights the importance of further research into controls of wood decomposition processes.

    The susceptibility of forests to natural disturbances and the resulting recruitment of dead wood is to some degree a function of forest management (e.g. Seidl et al.2011). In addition, the amount of dead wood in forests can also be controlled by forest management (e.g. Ranius et al. 2003; Vanderwel et al. 2006a). As the amount and diversity of dead wood is of significance for a variety of forest functions and services such as maintaining biodiversity (e.g. Lassauce et al. 2011) and carbon sequestration (e.g. Russell et al. 2015), our findings on rates of dead wood loss and their environmental controls present valuable information that can be used within carbon budget modelling framework to (1) develop forest management strategies to meet targets of dead wood in forests (cf. Vítková et al. 2018) and (2) improve performance of the carbon budget models, such as the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector(Kurz et al. 2009) in Swiss forests.

    Conclusions

    In this study we illustrated how long-term dead wood observations collected and remeasured during several NFI campaigns can be used to (1) estimate dead wood decay rates,which are important parameters in process-based C cycle models used to estimate C pools and fluxes, and (2)gain understanding about controls of dead wood dynamics by analyzing the residuals of the model calibrated with the NFI data. We learned that tree characteristics as well as climatic variables have a significant effect on dead wood dynamics,with F.sylvatica dead wood decaying the fastest and being least sensitive to climatic conditions compared to other species, and softwoods decaying the slowest and being most sensitive to temperature. It is important to note that the wood decay parameters estimated in this study are not sufficient for predicting the actual CO2emissions from dead wood, as some unknown fraction of the woody mass will be converted to soil organic matter,where it will continue to decay at a slower rate. However,these parameters can be used for“worst case scenario”estimates of CO2emissions from heterotrophic respiration associated with dead wood under current conditions or under various climate change and disturbance scenarios.Lastly, the parameters determining wood residence time obtained in this study can be implemented in models used to facilitate sustainable deadwood management strategies in European forests.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary informationaccompanies this paper at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-020-00248-x.

    Additional file 1:Figure S1. Fit of the exponential probability

    distribution to the snag fall rates, solid black line represents the fit of the exponential distribution with λ=14. Table S1.Mean and standard deviation (SD) of measured densities of dead wood samples in four decay stages from solid dead wood to duff wood. In the decay state classification by Hunter (1990), raw wood is defined as fresh wood with a short time since death, hence wood densities of living trees are used for fresh wood. Dead wood data were collected during the summer of 2009 on 21 Picea abies-dominated sites and 19 Fagus sylvatica dominated sites across Switzerland. To obtain wood densities, samples were dried at 105-110°C, and for C content - at 65°C (Dobbertin and Jüngling 2009).

    Abbreviations

    C: Carbon; DBH: Diameter at breast height; GHG: Greenhouse gas;MAT: Mean annual temperature; MCMC: Markov Chain Monte Carlo;NFI: National Forest Inventory; PPT: Annual precipitation; Spp.:Species;UNFCCC: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

    Acknowledgements

    We thank the Swiss NFI team for data collection, processing and analysis,and three anonymous reviewers who helped improve this manuscript.

    Authors’ contributions

    OH conceived the study and performed the analyses; all authors interpreted the results and contributed to writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    M. Didion received financial support from the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment;O. Hararuk and W.A. Kurz received financial support from the Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada.

    Availability of data and materials

    The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from Dr. Markus Didion (markus.didion@wsl.ch) on reasonable request.

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1Department of Biology, University of Central Florida, 4110 Libra Dr, Orlando,FL 32816, USA.2Pacific Forestry Centre, 506 Burnside Road West, Victoria,British Columbia V8Z 1M5, Canada.3Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL,Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903 Birmensdorf, Switzerland.

    Received: 27 November 2019 Accepted: 22 May 2020

    久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲国产色片| 国产淫语在线视频| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 精品国产一区二区久久| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 免费观看性生交大片5| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲中文av在线| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产成人精品婷婷| 99热全是精品| 1024香蕉在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 在线观看国产h片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 日韩电影二区| 18在线观看网站| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产乱来视频区| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 午夜久久久在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 亚洲av男天堂| 精品国产国语对白av| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久影院123| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 欧美在线黄色| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 中文字幕制服av| 五月开心婷婷网| 日韩伦理黄色片| 嫩草影院入口| 美女中出高潮动态图| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产一级毛片在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 大码成人一级视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 久久影院123| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 香蕉丝袜av| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 看免费成人av毛片| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 久久婷婷青草| 久久99精品国语久久久| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 超色免费av| 看免费av毛片| av线在线观看网站| 1024视频免费在线观看| 色播在线永久视频| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲第一av免费看| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲成人手机| 国产色婷婷99| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 老熟女久久久| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲av综合色区一区| kizo精华| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 欧美成人午夜精品| 考比视频在线观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 国产精品成人在线| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 春色校园在线视频观看| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 性少妇av在线| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 多毛熟女@视频| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 精品久久久精品久久久| 1024香蕉在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产成人欧美| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 美女福利国产在线| 午夜福利,免费看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 黄色 视频免费看| 丝袜喷水一区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 精品久久久精品久久久| tube8黄色片| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久久久久视频综合| 婷婷色综合www| 国产野战对白在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 少妇的丰满在线观看| www日本在线高清视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 永久网站在线| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲av.av天堂| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 有码 亚洲区| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产综合精华液| av在线app专区| 只有这里有精品99| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 国产精品.久久久| 制服人妻中文乱码| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 性少妇av在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 永久免费av网站大全| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 精品少妇内射三级| 五月开心婷婷网| 精品第一国产精品| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产麻豆69| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 青草久久国产| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 另类精品久久| 香蕉国产在线看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 精品亚洲成国产av| 日本av免费视频播放| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看 | 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 黄色一级大片看看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 久久久久精品性色| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 三级国产精品片| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 久久热在线av| 亚洲图色成人| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 大码成人一级视频| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 丁香六月天网| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 丁香六月天网| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 免费少妇av软件| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 大片免费播放器 马上看| h视频一区二区三区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 免费高清在线观看日韩| videossex国产| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 精品少妇内射三级| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲四区av| 免费观看在线日韩| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产乱来视频区| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| av在线老鸭窝| 高清av免费在线| 精品一区二区三卡| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| av国产精品久久久久影院| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| www.av在线官网国产| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 性色avwww在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| a级毛片在线看网站| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 少妇人妻 视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 色吧在线观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲在久久综合| 成年动漫av网址| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| av有码第一页| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 大码成人一级视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲中文av在线| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 99热全是精品| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 午夜激情av网站| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产亚洲最大av| 黄片小视频在线播放| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久99精品国语久久久| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久热这里只有精品99| 成人影院久久| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲精品视频女| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 在线天堂中文资源库| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 免费观看在线日韩| 韩国av在线不卡| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 成年动漫av网址| 国产成人91sexporn| 香蕉精品网在线| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 日日撸夜夜添| www.自偷自拍.com| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久热久热在线精品观看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产成人精品福利久久| 我的亚洲天堂| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 高清欧美精品videossex| 中文天堂在线官网| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产一级毛片在线| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| av网站在线播放免费| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 成人手机av| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 视频区图区小说| 午夜免费观看性视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 色播在线永久视频| freevideosex欧美| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 国产在线免费精品| 国产成人aa在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 美女午夜性视频免费| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 免费少妇av软件| 久久久久久久精品精品| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| videossex国产| 超色免费av| 一个人免费看片子| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 黄频高清免费视频| 如何舔出高潮| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 美女福利国产在线| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| tube8黄色片| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产亚洲最大av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 婷婷成人精品国产| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日韩中字成人| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 婷婷色综合www| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 赤兔流量卡办理| av电影中文网址| 亚洲天堂av无毛| h视频一区二区三区| 精品国产国语对白av| 中文欧美无线码| 免费少妇av软件| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| videos熟女内射| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 一级片免费观看大全| videos熟女内射| 免费观看性生交大片5| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| videos熟女内射| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 欧美97在线视频| videossex国产| 日本色播在线视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 99热全是精品| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久|