• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Estimate of Hydrofluorocarbon Emissions for 2012-16 in the Yangtze River Delta, China

    2020-06-23 03:40:54JingjiaoPUHonghuiXUBoYAOYanYUYujunJIANGQianliMAandLiquCHEN
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2020年6期

    Jingjiao PU, Honghui XU, Bo YAO, Yan YU, Yujun JIANG,, Qianli MA, and Liqu CHEN

    1Zhejiang Meteorological Science Institute, Hangzhou 310008, China

    2Meteorological Observation Center of China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China

    3Zhejiang Lin'an Atmospheric Background National Observation and Research Station, Hangzhou 311307, China

    ABSTRACT

    Key words: hydrofluorocarbons, emissions, Yangtze River Delta, tracer ratio method

    1. Introduction

    Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), since containing no ozonedepleting chlorine or bromine, have been widely used in China as substitutes for ozone-depleting substances (ODSs),the production and use of which are being phased out under the Montreal Protocol. However, HFCs are also long-lived potent greenhouse gases with global warming potentials(GWPs) as high as ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbons(CFCs) and halons (IPCC, 2005). Consequently, HFCs are regulated under both the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and the 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol (WMO, 2018).According to the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) network, the global surface mean mixing ratios of HFCs in the atmosphere increased from 2012 to 2016 by average rates of 1.6 parts per trillion (ppt) yr-1for HFC-32 (CH2F2), 2.1 ppt yr-1for HFC-125 (CHF2CF3), 5.6 ppt yr-1for HFC-134a (CH2FCF3), and 1.5 ppt yr-1for HFC-143a (CH3CF3), which were larger than the mean increases respectively reported for 2008—12 (WMO, 2018).As emission sources of HFCs are mainly from industrial sectors, such as foam blowing, household/commercial refrigeration, fire extinguishing, etc. (Fang et al., 2018), the increased mixing ratios of HFCs in the atmosphere can be attributed to anthropogenic emissions (Forster et al., 2007).Therefore, many recent studies have focused on estimating anthropogenic HFC emissions.

    Three methods are widely used to estimate the emissions of halocarbons including HFCs. The bottom-up method is based on the data of production and consumption from various sectors, as well as empirical emission factors(IPCC, 2005). China’s halocarbon emission inventories have been reported by using this approach, e.g., China’s historical emissions of ODSs until 2014 (Fang et al., 2018),HFC emissions in China for 2005—13 (Fang et al., 2016),China’s halocarbon emissions for 1995—2004 (Wan et al.,2009), and HFC-410A emissions from the room air-conditioning sector in China for 2006—17 (Liu et al., 2019). The topdown method combines atmospheric measurements and inverse models to simulate the potential sources to the measurement sites and geographic distribution of emission intensities. This approach has been used in estimating the HCFC and HFC emissions in East Asia for the year 2008 (Stohl et al., 2010), CFC-11 emissions from eastern Asia for 2008—17 (Rigby et al., 2019), and HFC and HCFC emissions from China for 2011—17 (Fang et al., 2019; Yao et al.,2019). The third method is the tracer ratio method, which is based on the ratios of measured halocarbons to selected tracers with known emissions, such as CO or HCFC-22. It has been used to infer halocarbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) (Shao et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2014),HFC and PFC emissions from the North China Plain (Yao et al., 2012), and anthropogenic halocarbon emissions from China (Fang et al., 2012a).

    The Yangtze River Delta (YRD) is a fast-growing region in China with rapid urbanization and industrialization. The region accounted for 16.1% of China’s population and 23.5% of its Gross Domestic Product (GDP) from 2012 to 2016 (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013a,2014a, 2015a, 2016a, 2017a). Rapid economic growth has been partly driven by the expanding manufacturing sector,including the fluorine chemical industry, production of electronics, air conditioners, refrigerators and automobiles,which would result in a large amount of HFC emissions. Previous studies have reported that HFC emissions from China grew rapidly since 2005 due to the phase-out of ODSs, and China has become a major producer and consumer of HFCs around the world (Zhang and Wang, 2014; Fang et al.,2016). Mixing ratios of HFCs have been reported in China,as well as in a few specific regions in China, including the YRD (Barletta et al., 2006; Fang et al., 2012b; Zhang et al.,2017). However, studies on China’s HFC emissions or their emission sources have mainly been conducted in the PRD(Wu et al., 2014), Yellow River Delta (Zheng et al., 2019),North China Plain (Yao et al., 2012), and the entire country(Yao et al., 2012, 2019), while few studies have been conducted in the YRD, an area that might contribute significantly to China’s total HFC emissions (Li et al., 2014). In this study, weekly flask measurements for 10 HFCs (HFC-23,HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-152a,HFC-227ea, HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc)were performed at Lin’an Regional Background (LAN) station in the YRD over the period 2012—16. The correlation between HFC and CO enhanced mixing ratios was analyzed and HFC emissions in the YRD were further inferred by the tracer ratio method. The results were compared with those derived by both the inverse modeling method (FLEXPART-model-based Bayesian inverse modeling) and bottom-up method. Finally, the contribution of HFCs in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions from the YRD to the national total was evaluated to inform understanding of the regional significance.

    2. Methods

    2.1. Sampling site

    The sampling site was at LAN station [(30.30°N,119.73°E), 138.6MSL, as shown in Fig. 1], which is located in the south of the YRD region and is about 60 km to the west of Hangzhou and about 195 km to the southwest of Shanghai. The station is well vegetated, surrounded by hilly lands, forest and farmland. The prevailing wind directions are northeasterly and southwesterly (seen in Fig. A1 in Appendix), with distinct meteorological characteristics of subtropical monsoon climate. According to previous studies,LAN station can represent the background circumstances well in the YRD region (Yan et al., 2012; Feng et al., 2015;Deng et al., 2018).

    The areas that might contribute significant emissions to LAN station were identified by backward trajectory calculations using the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART (V9.01; Stohl et al., 2005). The model was driven by ECMWF (European Centre for Medium range Weather Forecasts) Operational Analysis Data, with a global resolution of 1° × 1° and regional resolution of 0.2° × 0.2° over eastern China. Ten-day air mass backward trajectories were calculated at the sampling time. The derived source receptor relationships (SRRs) (Seibert and Frank, 2004) demonstrated the sensitivity of the mixing ratio observations at LAN to emissions on the grid. The total SRR calculated for HFC pollution events at LAN station from 2012 to 2016 revealed that the potential source area with significant influence was concentrated in four provinces of the YRD (Anhui, Jiangsu,Shanghai and Zhejiang).

    2.2. Experimental method

    The sampling time was 1400—1430 LST, when the atmosphere was well mixed, every Wednesday, over the period 2012—16. The ambient air was drawn from the top of a 50-m-high tower and pressurized into two 3-L canisters that were connected in series. The air samples were shipped to the Greenhouse Gases Laboratory of the Meteorological Observation Center of the China Meteorological Administration (MOC/CMA) in Beijing, where the mixing ratios of the 10 HFCs (HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-152a, HFC-227ea, HFC-236fa, HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc) were measured by the Medusa GC-MS technique developed by AGAGE. The relative measurement precisions were typically < 3% for HFC-365mfc and < 1% for other HFCs. The system was calibrated by standards traced to AGAGE reference standards and the HFC mixing ratios were reported on the primary calibration scales developed at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography. More detailed information on the sampling, instruments and quality control was provided in previous studies (Zhang et al., 2017;Yao et al., 2019).

    CO was observed in-situ by a cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) analyzer (G2401, Picarro Inc., Califonia,USA). The air sample was collected from the same inlet as the HFC samples, and delivered to the analyzer by a membrane pump. After being filtered, the air samples were dried to a dew point of approximately -60°C. The precision of CO measured with this technique is < 2 parts per billion(ppb). The system was calibrated by standard gases that were traceable to WMO/GAW primary standards every 6 h.The observing method was described in detail in Fang et al.(2013). The 5-min average CO concentration closest to the HFC sampling time was chosen, and the time interval between the corresponding samples of the two observations should be no more than 1 h.

    2.3. Data analysis

    The mixing ratios of HFCs were distinguished as“baseline level” and “pollution level” by sequentially applying the “robust extraction of baseline signal” filter (REBS;Ruckstuhl et al., 2012) and a background wind sector method. Firstly, the REBS technique was applied to filter the observation data iteratively so as to fit a local regression curve, and the outliers outside the 1σ range around the current baseline were excluded iteratively until all the data were within the ± 1σ range of the baseline, which could be flagged as “background values”. Secondly, the pollution values were identified by a meteorological data filter, when the airflow came from polluted wind sectors. The background and polluted wind sectors were defined by local pollution sources and the characteristics of other tracers such as CO(Zhou et al., 2003, 2004). The filtered results can be seen in Fig. A2. Finally, the mixing ratio enhancements of HFCs were determined by the absolute value of the polluted mixing ratios minus the background mixing ratios. Considering the lack of background values at LAN, where anthropogenic emissions render significant influence, the background mixing ratios of HFCs in this study were employed via the measurements at Shangri-la (XGL) station[(28°01′N, 99°26′E), 3580.0 MSL], with similar latitude and located far away from human habitat. The air was sampled at XGL with the same method and analyzed with the same instrument type in the lab at MOC/CMA (Zhang et al.,2017; Yao et al., 2019). The background mixing ratio at XGL observed on the same date as that at LAN was chosen first, and if it was missing, the monthly average at XGL was used instead. In-situ CO concentrations were filtered by the REBS filter method (Ruckstuhl et al., 2012).

    2.4. Emissions estimation

    This study adopted the tracer ratio method, which has been widely used in estimating halocarbon emissions. CO was chosen as a tracer since its anthropogenic emissions could be better known than HCFC-22. Many previous studies have focused on CO emissions (Ohara et al., 2007;Zhang et al., 2009; Li et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2018a,2018b). The CO emissions of the YRD (including Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu and Anhui provinces) were derived from the CO anthropogenic emissions inventory of MEIC(Multi-resolution Emissions Inventory for China) based on the years 2010 and 2016 (Li et al., 2017), with values of 22.4 and 19.6 Tg yr-1, respectively. The interannual trend of CO emissions in the YRD over the period 2012—15 was determined according to a -2% yr-1decrease in total Chinese CO emissions (Zheng et al., 2018a, 2018b) and the annual growth rate of smoke and dust emissions from the YRD (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013a, 2014a,2015a, 2016a, 2017a), resulting in annual CO emissions of 23.1, 24.5, 35.9 and 30.6 Tg yr-1from 2012 to 2015. Thus,the average CO emissions rate of the YRD was about 26.7 Tg yr-1over the period 2012—16. The uncertainty of CO emissions was assumed to be 35%, as reported in previous studies (Zhang et al., 2009; Li et al., 2017).

    The correlations of mixing ratio enhancements between specific HFCs and CO were analyzed in order to assess the applicability of the tracer ratio method to estimate HFC emissions, because a reliable tracer should have significant correlation with most other compounds (Wang et al., 2014). The emissions of the target HFC, Ex(Gg yr-1), can be calculated by its mixing ratio enhancement (ΔCx) and the mixing ratio enhancement of CO (ΔCCO) as follows:

    where Exand ECOrepresent the total emissions of target HFC and that of CO, respectively. Mxand MCOare the molecular weight of the target HFC and CO, respectively.The uncertainty of the emissions estimate was calculated by error propagation, as below:

    where b is the mixing ratio enhancement slope; and σband σEcoare the uncertainties of b and ECO, respectively. Finally,the HFC CO2-equivalent emissions were calculated using the emissions of each HFC multiplied by their 100-yr GWPs (Forster et al., 2007), to evaluate the contribution of the greenhouse effect of HFC emissions in the YRD to that of China.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1. HFC mixing ratios

    The mixing ratios of HFCs at LAN from 4 January 2012 to 28 December 2016 are illustrated in Table 1 (except for the observation of HFC-365mfc, which started from 6 August 2014), and five-year time series for HFC mixing ratios are presented in Fig. A2. The background mixing ratios of both HFC-23 and HFC-32 accounted for less than 5%, while the background values of HFC-125, HFC-134a,HFC-152a and HFC-245fa took percentages of 10%—20%.Therefore, the background mixing ratios of all 10 HFCs at XGL were instead considered. The relative errors between the background mixing ratios of HFCs at LAN and at XGL were 3.8% (HFC-23), 23.0% (HFC-32), 3.9% (HFC-125),5.2% (HFC-134a), 6.0% (HFC-143a), 31.8% (HFC-152a),0.0% (HFC-227ea), 7.1% (HFC-236fa), 10.3% (HFC-245fa) and 10.6% (HFC-365mfc), which could be mainly explained by the asynchronous sampling time of the background samples at these two stations. Also, they were muchlower than the relative differences between background mixing ratios and pollution mixing ratios of HFCs at LAN,except for HFC-152a, for the mixing ratio of HFC-152a probably has a non-negligible latitudinal gradient (Zhang et al.,2017). Overall, it was feasible to employ the background mixing ratios of HFCs at XGL to represent those at LAN to calculate the mixing ratio enhancements.

    Table 1. Mixing ratios of HFCs measured at LAN and XGL during 2012—16.

    The pollution mixing ratios of HFCs at LAN were much higher than the background values observed at XGL over the period 2012—16. The enhancements between mixing ratios measured at these two stations were 30%—50%(HFC-23, HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-245fa and HFC-365mfc), 61% (HFC-125), 87% (HFC-227ea), 102% (HFC-152a), 179% (HFC-32) and 931% (HFC-236fa).

    3.2. Interspecies correlations of HFCs and CO

    The interspecies correlations of enhanced mixing ratios of the 10 HFCs versus CO are shown in Table 2 and Fig. 2.HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-152a and HFC-245fa presented significant correlations with the tracer CO (p<0.001), showing Pearson correlation coefficients larger than 0.31. HFC-134a and HFC-227ea also displayed significant but slightly worse correlations (p <0.025), with the correlation coefficients between 0.22 and 0.23. The enhanced mixing ratios of HFC-143a, HFC-236fa and HFC-365mfc did not significantly correlate with those of CO, which might be partly explained by less polluted samples compared to other HFCs (Table 2), and China’s emissions of these three HFCs were relatively small among all HFCs in previous studies(Kim et al., 2010; Yao et al., 2019). Therefore, the emissions of HFC-143a, HFC-236fa and HFC-365mfc are not discussed in this paper.

    3.3. HFC emissions of the YRD

    As listed in Table 3, the estimated total emissions of HFCs in the YRD from 2012 to 2016 were 2.4±1.4 Gg yr-1for HFC-23, 2.8±1.2 Gg yr-1for HFC-32, 2.2±1.2 Gg yr-1for HFC-125, 4.8±4.8 Gg yr-1for HFC-134a, 0.9±0.6 Gg yr-1for HFC-152a, 0.3±0.3 Gg yr-1for HFC-227ea and 0.3±0.2 Gg yr-1for HFC-245fa, respectively. As shown in Fig. 3,among these seven HFCs, HFC-134a, HFC-32, HFC-23 and HFC-125 were the four main HFCs in the YRD, with propor-tions of 35%, 21%, 18% and 16%, respectively, while the total emissions of the other three HFCs shared less than 11%.

    Table 2. Pearson correlation coefficient (R) and regression slope (S) of mixing ratio enhancements between HFCs and CO, with 95%confidence bounds, over the period 2012—16.

    Fig. 2. Correlation coefficient matrix between observed CO and HFC mixing ratio enhancements (a), and regression plots of mixing ratio enhancement of HFC-32 and CO as an example (b).

    Fig. 3. HFC emission proportions in the YRD over the period 2012—16: (a) mass emissions; (b) CO2-equivalent emissions.

    In terms of CO2-equivalent emissions, HFC-23 contributed about two thirds to the total CO2-equivalent emissions due to its high GWP (GWP100=14800) among all 10 of the HFCs in this study. The contribution of HFC-125 or HFC-134a to total CO2-equivalent HFC emissions exceeded 10%,and HFC-32 emissions contributed 3.6%, while the other three HFCs in total contributed less than 3%. Thus, the major HFC compounds in the YRD were HFC-134a, HFC-23, HFC-125 and HFC-32, with both largest mass emissions and CO2-equivalent emissions, and HFC-23 was the primary HFC considering CO2-equivalent emissions. The total CO2-equivalent emissions of HFCs reached 53 Gg yr-1in the YRD, accounting for 2.3% of the CO2emissions without landuse, land-use change and forestry in this region(CCGGWP, 2019).

    HFC emissions in this study were also compared with results reported by previous studies using the bottom-up method, as listed in Table 3. The HFC emissions of the whole of China are listed because studies of the YRD are limited. HFC-23 and HFC-134a emissions in this study and those using the bottom-up method (CCGGWP, 2019)differed relatively little, at 4.2% and 14.5%, respectively.HFC-23 is mainly emitted as a byproduct of HCFC-22 production (Miller et al., 2010). There are nine fluorine chemistry plants producing HCFC-22 in the YRD, of which three are located in Jiangsu Province (contributing 18% of HFC-23 emissions) and six in Zhejiang Province (contributing 82%of HFC-23 emissions). HFC-134a is mainly used as a substitute for CFC-12 in the automobile air-conditioning sector(Hu et al., 2010). Over the period 2012—16, the HFC-134a emissions in the YRD derived from the tracer ratio method comprised 18.6% of those in China by the inverse modeling method, which was consistent with the percentage(approximately 20%) of vehicle numbers in the YRD of the whole country (National Bureau of Statistics of China,2013a, 2014a, 2015a, 2016a, 2017a). There were understandable differences in HFC-125 and HFC-32 emissions between this study and those using the bottom-up method(CCGGWP, 2019) because only their consumption as mixed-blend HFC-410A from the room air-conditioning sector was considered by the bottom-up method. Besides their primary usage, HFC-125 and HFC-32 are also used as R-32 or other mixed blends, such as R-404a and R-507a (Li et al.,2011). The ratios of HFC-410A emissions (sum of HFC-32 emissions and HFC-125 emissions) by the bottom-up method (CCGGWP, 2019) to the sum of HFC-32 and HFC-125 emissions by the tracer ratio method or top-down method were all around 0.5, both in the YRD and at the national scale, indicating that half of HFC-32 and HFC-125 might be used as HFC-410A in the room air-conditioning sector in China.

    It should be noted that up-to-date HFC emissions in China have been reported by a few different studies in the past two years (MEE, 2018; CCGGWP, 2019; Yao et al.,2019). However, there were significantly large differences(as large as 2 to 90 times, depending on specific HFC species) among the different studies, which could hardly be explained by their different time scales. Further studies are needed to reduce these discrepancies.

    3.4. The YRD’s HFC emissions contribution to China

    The proportion of HFC emissions in the YRD to national totals reflects the regional significance. Here, the emissions using the top-down method for the same period(Yao et al., 2019) and HFC-23 emissions in 2015 by CCGGWP (2019) were chosen to represent national levels.Therefore, the HFC emissions in the YRD counted for 46%(HFC-23), 38% (HFC-32), 23% (HFC-125), 19% (HFC-134a), 18% (HFC-152a), 36% (HFC-227ea) and 27%(HFC-245fa) of national totals. The total CO2-equivalent emissions of these seven HFCs in the YRD contributed 34%of the total HFC emissions in China. In comparison with previous studies that were carried out in other regions of China,the HFC-134a in the PRD accounted for only about 8% of national total emissions in 2010 (Wu et al., 2014), and the per capita HFC-134a emissions rate was 12.5 g yr-1, which is much lower than that in the YRD at 18.7 g yr-1. Therefore, the YRD constitutes a significant emissions source of HFCs in China.

    Fig. 4. Comparison of total HFC CO2-equivalent emission intensities of the YRD, China and global levels from 2012 to 2016. National CO2-equivalent emissions of HFC-23 were derived from the bottom-up method (CCGGWP, 2019), and other HFC emissions were from the inverse modeling method(Yao et al., 2019). Global total CO2-equivalent emissions were based on emissions derived from observations at remote AGAGE stations (Rigby et al., 2014; Engel et al., 2018).

    The CO2-equivalent emission intensities of HFCs are illustrated in Fig. 4. Here, global total CO2-equivalent emissions were based on emissions derived from observations at remote AGAGE stations (Rigby et al., 2014; Engel et al.,2018), and the global population and GDP were derived from the International Statistical Yearbook (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013b, 2014b, 2015b, 2016b,2017b). The national population and GDP data were from the China Statistical Yearbook (National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2013a, 2014a, 2015a, 2016a, 2017a). Compared with either the national or global emissions intensity,the YRD displayed as a higher HFC emitter. The per capita HFC CO2-equivalent emissions intensity of the YRD was nearly twice the national or global levels, at 240 kg per capita per year. In terms of emissions per unit area, the emissions intensity of the YRD was about 24 times the global value and 8 times the national value, amounting to more than 150 Mg km-2yr-1. The emissions rate per million GDP in Chinese Yuan (CNY) was 3500 kg yr-1, twice the global value. In conclusion, the emissions intensity of HFCs in the YRD was notably high, whether in terms of per capita or per unit area or per unit GDP. It should be noted that HFC-23 emissions in the YRD contributed around two thirds to total HFC emissions in the YRD, or more than 1/5 to the national HFC emissions, in terms of CO2-equivalent.Hence, if HFC-23 emissions were totally eliminated, the emissions intensity of the YRD would be lower than national and global levels, and thus HFC-23 is the key HFC species when considering the mitigation potential of HFCs in the YRD, or even in China as a whole.

    4. Conclusions

    Based on co-located atmospheric measurements of 10 HFCs and CO at LAN in the YRD from 2012 to 2016, significant correlations were found between the enhanced mixing ratio of CO and those of seven HFCs, which were HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, HFC-134a, HFC-152a, HFC-227ea and HFC-245fa. The emissions of these HFCs were estimated by the tracer ratio method. Among these seven HFCs,HFC-134a, HFC-23, HFC-32 and HFC-125 contributed more than 89% of the total emissions, while in terms of CO2-equivalent emissions, HFC-23 contributed approximately two thirds of all HFCs.

    HFC-23 and HFC-134a emissions in this study were estimated to be quite close to those using the bottom-up method. However, there were large discrepancies among different studies in terms of national-scale estimation.

    The total HFC CO2-equivalent emissions of the YRD contributed 34% of the national total, and the HFC emissions intensity of the YRD was much larger than the national or global level in terms of per capita, or per unit area, or per unit GDP. Therefore, the YRD region is a significant source area for HFC emissions in China, indicating the considerable mitigation potential that could be achieved by regulating HFC-23 in the YRD region.

    Acknowledgements. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.41575114 and 41730103), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. LY19D050002) and the Meteorological Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province(Grant No. 2019ZD12). We thank the station personnel who have supported canister sampling at XGL. We also thank the AGAGE network for its technical assistance and the Scripps Institution of Oceanography for help with the technique transfer, processing software and calibration standards.

    APPENDIX

    TIME SERIES of HFC MIXING RATIOS at LAN

    Figure A2 shows the time series of the HFC mixing ratios observed at LAN from 2012 to 2016. The progressive increase of eight HFC (HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125,HFC-134a, HFC-143a, HFC-227ea, HFC-245fa, and HFC-365mfc) mixing ratios at LAN can be seen, while the annual average mixing ratios of HFC-152a and HFC-236fa fluctuated without rapid increase at LAN from 2012 to 2016. Compared to the annual mean growth rates of HFCs observed at SDZ station in the North China Plain from 2010 to 2011 (Yao,et al, 2012), the values at LAN were much higher for HFC-23, HFC-32, HFC-125, and HFC-134a, but not HFC-152a.

    Fig. A1. Wind rose at LAN station from January 2012 to December 2016 based on hourly data.

    Fig. A2. Time series of HFC mixing ratios at LAN station from January 2012 to December 2016.

    中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 日本在线视频免费播放| or卡值多少钱| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 国产av不卡久久| .国产精品久久| 久久草成人影院| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| eeuss影院久久| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 免费av观看视频| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| www.色视频.com| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产综合懂色| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| netflix在线观看网站| 99热这里只有是精品50| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 97碰自拍视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 精品久久久噜噜| 极品教师在线免费播放| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 一进一出抽搐动态| 极品教师在线免费播放| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 在线免费观看的www视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| av国产免费在线观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 97碰自拍视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| aaaaa片日本免费| 一a级毛片在线观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 午夜精品在线福利| 美女黄网站色视频| 悠悠久久av| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 免费看日本二区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 午夜福利18| 18+在线观看网站| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 在线看三级毛片| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 看片在线看免费视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 美女高潮的动态| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 九色国产91popny在线| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 精品福利观看| 久久久久久久久中文| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲五月天丁香| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 日日撸夜夜添| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| av在线亚洲专区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 赤兔流量卡办理| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 在线看三级毛片| 51国产日韩欧美| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| xxxwww97欧美| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产综合懂色| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 精品久久久久久,| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 成人欧美大片| 久久久精品大字幕| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 91狼人影院| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 不卡一级毛片| 97碰自拍视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 永久网站在线| 国产三级中文精品| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 午夜福利在线在线| av在线蜜桃| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| www.色视频.com| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 国产精品一及| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 色综合站精品国产| 99热网站在线观看| 黄色女人牲交| 国产精品三级大全| 极品教师在线免费播放| 中国美女看黄片| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 一级av片app| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲avbb在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 88av欧美| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 久久香蕉精品热| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 内射极品少妇av片p| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 欧美区成人在线视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| av国产免费在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 少妇丰满av| 嫩草影院精品99| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 在线看三级毛片| 成人综合一区亚洲| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产色婷婷99| 免费观看精品视频网站| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| av国产免费在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 中国美女看黄片| 久久久久性生活片| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产精品一及| 色综合色国产| 美女免费视频网站| avwww免费| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 免费av观看视频| 不卡一级毛片| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 成年免费大片在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 最好的美女福利视频网| 变态另类丝袜制服| a在线观看视频网站| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 永久网站在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 91精品国产九色| 午夜视频国产福利| 一级黄色大片毛片| 午夜福利欧美成人| 色哟哟·www| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 97超视频在线观看视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 欧美成人a在线观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 色综合婷婷激情| ponron亚洲| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| av专区在线播放| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 波多野结衣高清作品| 一本一本综合久久| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲最大成人av| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 舔av片在线| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 直男gayav资源| 搞女人的毛片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 精品人妻1区二区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 97超视频在线观看视频| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 级片在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 黄色女人牲交| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| www.www免费av| 亚洲在线观看片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 色哟哟·www| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产色婷婷99| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 有码 亚洲区| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 永久免费av网站大全| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 人妻系列 视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 多毛熟女@视频| 极品教师在线视频| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 熟女电影av网| 国产成人91sexporn| 51国产日韩欧美| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 中文天堂在线官网| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲内射少妇av| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲精品视频女| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 少妇人妻 视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 黄色配什么色好看| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 草草在线视频免费看| 成人无遮挡网站| 日韩视频在线欧美| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲国产精品999| www.色视频.com| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日本黄大片高清| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产色婷婷99| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| av不卡在线播放| 91狼人影院| 国产精品三级大全| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产 一区精品| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产高清三级在线| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 国产亚洲最大av| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 极品教师在线视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 有码 亚洲区| 免费看日本二区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 日日撸夜夜添| 韩国av在线不卡| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| av在线播放精品| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产成人91sexporn| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 精品久久久噜噜| 日日撸夜夜添| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美一区二区亚洲| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产成人精品久久久久久| videossex国产| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 少妇的逼好多水| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久热精品热| 简卡轻食公司| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 久久精品夜色国产| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 男女免费视频国产| 五月天丁香电影| 国产高潮美女av| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| av.在线天堂| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 免费观看a级毛片全部| a级毛色黄片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 在线免费十八禁| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| av在线播放精品| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲国产精品999| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 久久久精品免费免费高清| 97在线视频观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日韩强制内射视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 亚洲天堂av无毛| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲综合色惰| 日本欧美视频一区| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久精品夜色国产| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 欧美3d第一页| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站|