• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effect of AAPH oxidation on digestion characteristics of seed watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var) kernels protein isolates

    2020-05-26 06:07:08ShugangLiZhihaoLiXiutingLiPingWangXiongwiYuQinliFuSihaiGao

    Shugang Li, Zhihao Li, Xiuting Li, Ping Wang, Xiongwi Yu, Qinli Fu,Sihai Gao

    aSchool of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China

    bKey Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering, Ministry of Education, Glyn O. Phillips Hydrophilic Colloid Research Center, Faculty of Light Industry, School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, 430068, China

    cBeijing Technology and Business University, Beijing, 100048, China

    dHuazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan, 430070, China

    eWuhan Xudong Food Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430000, China

    fDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China

    ABSTRACT

    Seed watermelon kernel is a typical complex food with high fat and protein contents. During storage and processing, it is often affected by various factors to undergo interactions between components, which lead to its quality change. In this experiment, seed watermelon kernels were used as research objects,and the effects of 2′-Azobis (2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) on seed watermelon kernel protein isolates (WMP) were investigated. The structure and digestion characteristics of WMP after oxidation were studied. The results showed that with the increase of AAPH concentration (0.05?5 mol/L),WMP showed obvious aggregation, and its solubility decreased from 6.76 mg/mL to 9.59 mg/mL. The free sulfhydryl content of WMP was 18.24 mmol/g decreased to 11.25 mmol/g, α-helix decreased and β-sheet decreased in secondary structure, and its disulfide bond increased by 43.06 mmol/g from 39.57 mmol/g,enthalpy (ΔH) and denaturation temperature increased (Td) (P < 0.05). By mass spectrometry results of simulated gastric digestion products, it was found that oxidation adversely affected the digestion characteristics of WMP. It can be seen that the lipid oxidation product APPH of seed watermelon kernel can significantly affect the structure and function of the protein extracted from the seed kernel.

    Keywords:

    Seed watermelon kernel protein

    Digestion characteristics

    AAPH oxidation

    1. Introduction

    The seed watermelon (Citrullus lanatus var) is Cucurbitaceae,belonging to the watermelon family [1]. The protein content of its seed kernel is as high as 36%–40%, furthermore its ratio of essential amino acids is even closer to the Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO) recommendation than that of soybean, which makes the seed watermelon kernel protein a nutritionally balanced plant protein with high values to be developed [2]. The kernels of seed watermelon seeds are easily oxidized and produce metabolites (such as peroxidation-derived free radicals, lipid hydroxides and reactive aldehydes) due to the high content of unsaturated fatty acids, which could indirectly lead to the oxidation of proteins [3]. The protein oxidation is the covalent structure modification of proteins caused because of the direct action of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or secondary oxidation products on the protein [4], which would result in the loss of nutrition and deterioration of products in the process of food processing and storage.

    Therefore, the research on protein oxidation in food has important practical significance for improving product quality and protecting human health. In normal food processing, the main factor leading to protein oxidation is that the active intermediate of ROS-induced lipid oxidation indirectly mediates protein oxidation,in which lipoxygenase (LOX) is a key factor in oxidation. As in many fat-rich foods, the seed melon kernel protein is susceptible to lipid peroxides catalyzed by LOX during process and storae, which could lead to multiple structural changes in proteins, including oxidation of side chain groups, backbone cleavage, unfolding, degradation and aggregation [5].

    A large number of studies have con firmed that the oxidation of proteins can lead to a decrease in their functional properties[6]. Studies by Cui et al. [7] have shown that the emulsifying and foaming properties of whey proteins treated by hydroxyl radical oxidation are reduced. Chanarat et al. [8] treated tilapia myosin with hydrogen peroxide and found that its gelling properties and water holding capacity were significantly reduced. The same result was demonstrated in the study by Wu et al. [3]. Lipid peroxideinduced protein oxidation had a negative effect on its gelling properties. But the effects of oxidation on protein digestion have very different results. A large number of studies have reported that oxidation can inhibit protein digestion, however some researchers have discovered that moderate oxidation can improve protein digestion [9,10]. Among them, Lin et al. [11] studied the in vitro digestibility of catechin-modified glycinin under oxidative stress,which showed that oxidation had a positive or negative effect on protein digestibility depending on the degree of oxidation.

    Because there are few reports on the chemical modification of protein digestibility by lipid peroxide products, this experiment took seed watermelon kernel protein as raw material to compare different AAPH concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L)treatment of the structure and in vitro digestibility of seed watermelon kernel protein, combined with MALDI-TOF-MS analysis of digestion products. The study aimed to reveal the effect of nut lipid oxidation products on its protein structure and function, and provided theoretical support for the development and utilization of nut foods represented by seed watermelon kernels.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Samples and materials

    Seed watermelon kernel were purchased from 10th company horticultural field of 9th Regiment, 1st division of Xinjiang Construction Corps (Xinjiang, China). Bovine serum albumin (BSA)and 8-Anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANS) were purchased from Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). 2,2′-Azobis(2-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAPH) (CAS No. 2997-92-4)was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, America). All other chemicals were of analytical reagent grade and obtained in China.

    2.2. Watermelon kernel protein isolates (WMP) preparation

    The WMP was prepared according to the method described by Li et al. [12]. The shell of seed watermelon kernels was removed,and kernels were milled through a 50 mesh sieve, then 5 g of the sample was degreased with petroleum ether (30–60°C) using the material to liquid ratio of 1:30 (g/mL), and then filtered by suction, the petroleum ether was volatile under a fume hood. The degreasing process was repeated once to obtain the degreased seed watermelon kernel powder. The degreased powder was added into ultrapure water, and extracted at a material to liquid ratio of 1:30 (g/mL) for 3 h (pH 9.5, temperature at 35°C). After centrifugation at 8000 × g (Multifuge X1R, Thermo, America) for 20 min,the supernatant was collected, the residue was washed with the same extract solution and centrifuged for 10 min, this process was repeated twice. The pH of collected supernatant was adjusted to 7.0 and dialyzed against ultrapure water (MWCO: 8000–14000 Da)for 3 days. The seed watermelon kernel protein isolate (WMP) was obtained by freeze-drying and stored at 4°C.

    2.3. Modification of WMP with AAPH

    Oxidized WMP was prepared according to the method described by Liu et al. [13]. WMP was formulated as a 40 mg/mL protein solution (0.05% NaN3bacteriostatic) using 0.01 mol/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). A quantity of AAPH (2′-Azobis(2-amidinopropane)dihydrochloride) was mixed with the WMP solution to a final concentration of 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0 mmol/L.After sealing at 25°C for 24 h, the temperature was lowered to 4°C and centrifuged at 8000 × g for 20 min. The supernatant was dialyzed against ultrapure water at 4°C for 24 h, lyophilized and stored at 4°C for use.

    2.4. Sulfhydryl and disulfide bond

    The content of free sulfhydryl groups in the oxidized WMP was determined using method by Beveridge et al. [14]. The oxidized WMP sample was placed in a solution of 5 mg/mL in 8 mol/L urea Tris-Gly buffer (pH 8.0) and protected from light for 30 min at room temperature. The suspension was centrifuged at 8000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, and the protein concentration in the supernatant was determined by Coomassie Brilliant Blue method. 3 mL of the supernatant was then reacted with 0.02 mL of DTNB reagent (4 mg/mL)dissolved in Tris-Gly buffer. The mixture was allowed to stand at room temperature for 1 h, and the absorbance was measured at 412 nm using a UV–vis spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Xipu, China).The content of sulfhydryl and total sulfhydryl groups was calculated by extinction coef ficient of 13600 L/mol.

    2.5. Surface hydrophobicity (Ho)

    The surface hydrophobicity of the protein was determined using the ANS fluorescent probe (F-7000, Hitachi, Japan) following the method of Kato et al. [15] with some modifications. The sample was diluted to 0.00125, 0.0025, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02 mg/mL with phosphate buffer (0.01 mol/L, pH 7.4), and 20 μL of ANS solution (8 mmol/L)was added to 4 mL of the diluted protein solution and shaken. The fluorescence intensity was measured at an excitation and emission wavelength slit width of 2.5 nm, an excitation wavelength of 390 nm, and an emission wavelength of 470 nm. The surface hydrophobicity is determined from the initial slope of the fluorescence intensity and protein concentration curve.

    2.6. Fluorescence

    According to the method of Lv et al. [16], the sample was dissolved in phosphate buffer (0.01 mol/L, pH 7.4), diluted to 2 mg/mL,centrifuged at 8000 × g for 20 min, and the supernatant was filtered with 0.22 μm. The sample was scanned by a fluorescence spectrophotometer at an excitation wavelength of 280 nm and a scanning wavelength of 300–420 nm.

    2.7. Particle size distributions of WMP measurement

    The particle size distribution was detected by dynamic light scattering (DSL) using a Zeta sizer Nano-ZS instrument (Malvern Instruments, Worcestershire, UK). 0.1 mg/mL WMP solution was prepared in phosphate buffer (0.01 mol/L, pH 7.4). The suspension was stirred with a magnetic stirrer and centrifuged at 8000 × g for 10 min. 1.5 mL of the supernatant was placed in a quartz cuvette for DLS measurement. The results were analyzed by using Dispersion Technology Software version 4.20.

    2.8. Circular dichroism spectra (CD)

    The CD spectrum was measured at 190–250 nm using a J-1500(J-1500, JASCO, Japan) spectropolarimeter, and the sample was placed in a 1 mg/mL solution with ultrapure water and centrifuged at 10000 × g for 10 min. The protein concentration in the supernatant was determined by the Coomassie Brilliant Blue method,and data was generated using a resolution of 0.1 nm, a response time of 1 s, and an average of 3 scans.

    2.9. FTIR

    The FTIR spectra of MP samples were recorded using a Nexus-470 FTIR spectrometer (Nexus-470, Mettler, USA) [17]. The dried sample was mixed with KBr at a ratio of 1:100 and compressed into disks. The spectra were recorded in the range of wavenumber from 4000 cm?1to 400 cm?1with KBr spectrum was used as a background. The curve in the wavenumber range of 1600–1700 cm?1was fitted by using Peak-Fit version 4.12 software to analyze the secondary structure of samples.

    2.10. SDS-PAGE

    SDS-PAGE analysis was carried out by SDS gel electrophoresis analysis electrophoresis (DYY-8C, Liu yi, China) [18]. Mix 2 mg lyophilized sample with 500 mL sample buffer, boil the sample buffer with β-mercaptoethanol for 5 min, and add 10 μL sample to polyacrylamide gel after centrifugation at 8000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Glue was made from 12% separation gel and 5% concentrated gel.

    2.11. Solubility

    Solubility was determined by the method of Bera et al. [19,20].Protein samples were dispersed into phosphate buffer (0.01 mol/L,pH 7.4) and stirred at room temperature for 1 h to prepare 10 mg/mL solutions. Then centrifuged at 8000 × g for 20 min.The protein content in the supernatant was determined by the Coomassie Brilliant Blue method.

    2.12. Differential scanning calorimeter

    Differential scanning calorimetric study was performed using a Micro DSC III Evo thermal analyzer (Micro DSC III Evo, Setaram,France). The sample was con figured as a 10 mg/mL protein solution using ultrapure water, and 300 mg of ultrapure water was placed in the sample cell and the reference cell, respectively, and equilibrated at 25°C for 1 h. The running temperature was from 25°C to 110°C,with a rate of 5°C/min. Peak denaturation temperature (Td) and enthalpy change (ΔH) were calculated from the curves by Universal Analysis 2000, version 4.1D (TA Instruments Waters LLC).

    2.13. Protein hydrolysis pro filing

    The degree of hydrolysis of WMP digests was analyzed using the OPA method [21]. The OPA reagent was prepared according to the method of Chen et al. [22]. 400 μL of WMP hydrolysate was mixed with 3 mL of OPA reagent for 2 min. Then, the absorbance was measured at a wavelength of 340 nm, and the degree of hydrolysis(DH) was calculated as follows:

    Where β is 0.342 mequv/g, α is 0.970 mequv/g, htotis the constant of WMP 7.8 mequv/g.

    2.14. Peptide products of pepsin digestion

    Peptide fractions were analyzed using a Dionex 3000 RSLC UHPLC system and a Q Exactive mass spectrometer. A 10 μL sample was loaded onto an Aeris PEPTIDE 2.6 mm XB-C18, 250 4.6 mm column. The peptide was eluted with a chromatographic gradient of 0%–60% solvent (80% acetonitrile, 0.1% formic acid) for 60 min at a flow rate of 250 mL/min. The mass spectrometer runs in the data-dependent mode and automatically switches between MS and MS/MS. MS scans (200–2000 m/z) were acquired in an orbitrap analyzer with a resolution of 70000, 400 m/z. Select the top strongest ion for MS/MS (target value is 3106 ions and maximum ion fill time is set to 50 ms). The peptide was subjected to a higher energy collision dissociation (HCD) MS/MS (standardized collision energy 1/428, 3500 resolution). The data was analyzed using Proteome Discover (version 1.4, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the Sequent search algorithm using the following standard protein database(www.uniprot.org, UP000009136).

    2.15. Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis was carried out using SPSS 19.0. Data were shown as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). Differences between means of each group were assessed using one-way analysis of variance followed by Duncan’s test. significant differences were accepted as a P < 0.05.

    3. Results and discussion

    3.1. Sulfhydryl and disulfide bond

    The degree of oxidation of the protein is usually characterized by the content of free sulfhydryl groups and disulfide bonds, since the protein can be oxidized to a reversible form of disulfide, sulfenic acid or irreversible form of sulfinic acid, sulfonic acid under different circumstances [23]. As shown in Fig. 1, with the increase of AAPH concentration, the content of free sulfhydryl groups decreased from 18.24 mmol/g to 11.25 mmol/g, and the content of disulfide bonds increased from 39.57 mmol/g to 43.06 mmol/g.According to a study by Davies et al. [5], the free radical (ROO—)provided by AAPH can rapidly react with free sulfhydryl groups in proteins to form sulfinyl free radicals, which are then joined with molecular oxygen to form thiol free radicals. The thiol free radicals can further induce protein oxidation, resulting in a decrease in sulfhydryl content, and induces the conversion of a sulfurcontaining amino acid side chain in cysteine and methionine to a disulfide bond by oxidative stress. In the study of skeletal muscle fibril protein oxidation system by Morzel et al. [24], it was found that the free sulfhydryl group was reduced by 80% when the oxidant concentration changed from 0.2 mmol/L to 20 mmol/L.Wei et al. [3] also found a similar rule in the study of AAPH oxidation of soy protein. Since cysteine and disulfide bonds have an important Influence on the structure of proteins, oxidation induced the conversion of free sulfhydryl groups in WMP into disulfide bonds, which causes the changes of the protein structure.

    Fig. 1. Sulfhydryl and disulfide bond content of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C.

    Fig. 2. Surface hydrophobicity of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L, WMP treated with 0, 0.05, 0.1,0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L AAPH. Different superscript letters indicate significant difference(P < 0.05).

    3.2. Surface hydrophobicity

    Surface hydrophobicity is an important property for maintaining protein structure and a common method for assessing changes in protein structure. As the protein concentration increases, the linear relationship of fluorescence intensity accurately describes the hydrophobicity of the protein. It can be seen from Fig. 2 that the hydrophobicity of WMP decreased significantly with the increase of AAPH concentration, and its value decreased from 8807 to 3066 (P < 0.05). The results of this study are highly consistent with the findings of Grune et al. [25]. Low concentrations of AAPH expose the hydrophobic groups inside the WMP and form aggregates by interaction, reducing the solubility of the protein.Thereby, the hydrophobicity of the surface is first lowered and then stabilized. When the AAPH concentration is increased from 1 mmol/L to 5 mmol/L, the decrease in hydrophobicity of the protein surface may be due to the re-aggregation of unfolded protein molecules by hydrophobic associations, the covalent modification of the exposed hydrophobic residues (e.g. tryptophan residues),as well as the formation of partially hydrophilic groups (e.g. protein carbonyl groups) by structural change of oxidized surface hydrophobic amino acids [25–27].

    Fig. 3. The fluorescence intensity of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L, WMP treated with 0, 0.05,0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L AAPH.

    Fig. 4. The particle size distribution of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L, WMP treated with 0, 0.05,0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L AAPH.

    3.3. Fluorescence chromatography

    Since tryptophan is sensitive to the environment and is highly susceptible to oxidation, changes in the fluorescence intensity of the protein are usually used to reveal the spatial structure and degree of oxidation of the tryptophan residue. As shown in Fig. 3, as the AAPH concentration increases, the fluorescence intensity of WMP decreases, and the maximum fluorescence intensity red-shifted. This is consistent with the results of Campos et al.[28], because tryptophan has the lowest single-electron oxidation potential, and as the degree of oxidation increases, tryptophan residues were transformed by lipid peroxides into metastable tryptophan free radical, which combined with divided molecular oxygen atom to form tryptophan peroxy radicals, which were ultimately converted to kynurenine, resulting in a decrease in fluorescence intensity [29]. St?anciuc et al. [30] demonstrated that AAPH oxidation unfolded protein structure, tryptophan residues gradually transferred from internal protein molecules to protein surface, the protein molecules were unfolded, larger protein aggregates were formed, and the protein fluorescence intensity λ max red shifted.

    3.4. Particle size distributions of WMP measurement

    Dynamic light scattering is commonly used to monitor the formation of protein aggregates [31]. As shown in Fig. 4, the particle size distribution of the oxidized WMP was analyzed by DLS. When the concentration of AAHP is between 0 and 1 mmol/L, the particle size of WMP increases from 190.1 nm to 396.1 nm, and a small amount of large particles appear. At higher AAPH concentrations(1–5 mmol/L), further increase in oxidation promotes the formation of insoluble components. At a concentration of 5 mmol/L, the particle size was reduced to 220.2 nm. It is possible that some of the larger soluble aggregates break down into smaller soluble peptides,which are converted into insoluble components by centrifugation,covalent and non-covalent direct interactions [32]. This is consistent with the results of Huang et al. [33]. The decrease in peaks in Fig. 4 con firms the formation of insoluble aggregates, resulting in a decrease in WMP solubility.

    Fig. 5. Deconvoluted FTIR spectra in the amide I region of WMP modified at different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. A-F, WMP treated with 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L AAPH.

    Fig. 6. SDS-PAGE of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. Lanes: 1, marker proteins, 2-7, WMP treated with 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L AAPH.

    3.5. Secondary structure of protein

    CD spectroscopy is widely used to study protein secondary structure. The secondary structure content of WMP is shown in Table 1 by spectral analysis software calculations. When the AAPH concentration was 0–1 mmol/L, the α-helix content decreased from41.62% to 33.87%, the β-sheet content increased from 4.65% to 32.1%, and the β-turn content decreased from 14.12% to 1.52%. The Random coil content decreased from 39.61% to 32.41%. When the AAPH concentration was 5 mmol/L, the solubility decreased due to an increase in the degree of aggregation of the protein, resulting in data close to the blank group (0 mmol/L).

    Table 1Secondary structure table calculated by circular dichroism spectroscopy.

    Table 2The denaturation temperature and enthalpy of AAPH oxidized WMP.

    The Amide I band was known to be sensitive to the secondary structure of proteins [17]. The amide I band (1700–1600 cm?1)in FTIR spectra of different samples was fitted by the Gaussian model and the results shown in Fig. 5. As the AAPH concentration increased (0–5 mmol/L), the α-helix content decreased from 45.94% to 12.55%, while the β-sheet content increased from 12.39% to 39.09%, and the random coil decreased from 26.69% to 19.24%. Some studies had shown that the nutritional value and digestion characteristics of protein was related to protein secondary structure, the content of α-helix and random coil was positively associated with in vitro digestibility of protein, while β-sheet content was negatively correlated with in vitro digestibility [34]. So it indicated that the digestibility of WMP was decreased in the presence of APPH.

    3.6. SDS-PAGE

    SDS-PAGE is commonly used to characterize the molecular weight distribution of proteins. It can be seen from Fig. 6 that the distribution of WMP is mainly concentrated between 50 and 70 KDa. As the concentration of AAPH increases, the protein mobility decreases gradually (lanes 2–7). This indicates an increase in the molecular weight of WMP, which may be caused by peroxy radicals leading to cross-linking of covalent bonds in WMP [35]. In addition, as the AAPH concentration increases, the electrophoresis strips fade in the low molecular weight region (14.4–31 kDa) (lanes 3–6), which meant that high concentrations of free oxygen radicals could cause WMP oxidative decomposition into small molecular weight peptides fragment [36].

    3.7. Solubility

    Solubility is one of the indicators for evaluating the functional properties of proteins. It can largely characterize the hydration ability of proteins, and can also be used to simply characterize the aggregation and denaturation of seed watermelon kernel protein.

    As shown in Fig. 7, as the concentration of AAPH increased, the solubility decreased significantly (9.59–6.76 mg/mL) (P < 0.05). At low oxidation (0–1 mmol/L), WMP produces soluble aggregates. As the degree of protein oxidation increases, covalent bond crosslinking may lead to further aggregation of these soluble aggregates,resulting in insoluble aggregates [35], resulting in WMP solubility is reduced.

    Fig. 7. Solubility of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mM, WMP treated with 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mM AAPH. The different superscript letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).

    3.8. Differential scanning calorimeter

    DSC was widely used to characterize the stability of proteins.As illustrated in Table 2, the two peak transition temperatures (Td)of WMP were about 60 and 80°C, respectively, corresponded to the thermal denaturation temperatures of WMP components. The enthalpy value, mainly came from the undenatured protein, and the decrease of enthalpy was always accompanied by the denaturation of protein [37,38]. The Td1and Td2increased while ΔH2value and the solubility of WMP gradually decreased with the increasing AAPH concentration, indicating the protein was denatured with the addition of APPH. The value of Tdreflected the thermal stability or tertiary conformational stability of the proteins. AAPH-modified WMP exhibited higher Tdwhen compared with the control, which suggested that the denatured protein possessed a more stable structure. This could be attributed to the cross-linking between molecules caused by disulfide bonds which could enhanced the thermal stability of protein.

    3.9. Characteristics of the in vitro digestion

    The degree of hydrolysis is the percentage of peptide bond cleavage in protein hydrolysates, and the in vitro digestibility of proteins is often evaluated using the degree of hydrolysis of the protein [39].The hydrolysis of WMP using pepsin was shown in Fig. 8. The degree of protein hydrolysis increased as the hydrolysis time prolonged(P < 0.05). Meanwhile, the hydrolysis rate reduced, mainly due to the reduction of available hydrolysis sites and the inhibition coming from the digestion products of the enzyme [40]. According to the previous studies, the same digestion pattern was observed in the hydrolysis of soy protein by pepsin [24]. Within the first 60 min,the degree of hydrolysis of WMP increased rapidly with digestion time and stabilized around 120 min.

    Fig. 8. Hydrolysis curve of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L, WMP treated with 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5,1 and 5 mmol/L AAPH.

    As the degree of oxidation increased, the DH of WMP decreased significantly (P < 0.05). Because many crosslinks between protease chains and peptide chains were formed during the protein oxidation, they masked the action sties of proteases and reduced the sensitivity of protein hydrolysis [35], and at 5 mmol/L AAPH, WMP formed oxidized aggregates, which could not be efficiently digested by pepsin. Morzel et al. [24] reported a reduction in proteolysis caused by oxidative aggregates. Santé-Lhoutellier et al. [10] also demonstrated that the digestion rate of myofibrillar protein by pepsin was reduced due to AAPH oxidation.

    3.10. Peptide products of pepsin digestion

    From the mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) analysis of Fig. 9, it can be seen that the peptides after digestion by WMP without AAPH are concentrated between 1000 and 1500 Da,and the peptides after WMP digestion are treated with low concentration of AAPH (0.05–0.5 mmol/L). The segments were concentrated between 1500 and 2000 Da. The high-concentration AAPH (1–5 mmol/L) treated WMP digested peptides were concentrated between 1500 and 2500 Da. As the degree of oxidation increases, the molecular weight of the peptide segment after WMP digestion gradually increases. This is because as the degree of oxidation increases, WMP cross-links and aggregates, masking the pepsin cleavage site, thereby affecting the digestibility of WMP.

    The Venn diagram (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html) (Oliveros and Venny) intuitively displayed the common and unique peptides of each sample treated with only pepsin(Fig. 10). Among the enzymatic hydrolysates, 3135 unique peptides were identified after WMP digestion without AAPH treatment.After treatment with 0.05 mmol/L AAPH, the digested products of WMP identified 2958 unique peptides. After treatment with 0.5 mmol/L AAPH, the digested products of WMP identified 3594 unique peptides. After digestion with 5 mmol/L AAPH, the digested products of WMP identified 6174 unique peptides, of which the four treatment groups shared 91 peptides.

    Fig. 9. Mass fingerprints of digested products of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. A-F, WMP treated with 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 5 mmol/L AAPH.

    Fig. 10. Peptide Venn diagram of digested products of WMP incubated with different concentration of AAPH for 24 h at 25°C. 0, 0.05, 0.5 and 5 mmol/L, WMP treated with 0, 0.05, 0.5 and 5 mmol/L AAPH.

    4. Conclusions

    In this study, the protein of seed watermelon kernel was treated by different concentrations of AAPH, and the structure and digestion characteristics of the isolated proteins were analyzed and characterized. The digestion products were analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS. The results showed that under AAPH treatment conditions, the free sulfhydryl group in the seed watermelon kernel protein is converted into disulfide bond, intermolecular crosslinking, the average particle size distribution increases, the thermal stability is enhanced, the α-helix content of the protein decreases and the β-sheet content increases, and the pepsin cleavage position The point is buried inside the protein, and the digestibility of the seed watermelon kernel protein is reduced. The results of mass spectrometry of the digested product showed that the molecular weight of the peptide segment identified in the WMP digestion product gradually increased with the increase of the degree of oxidation, and was not easily absorbed by the human body. The research results provide a good theoretical basis and technical support for the development and utilization of seed watermelon kernels and storage and preservation. However, the in fluencing factors and related mechanisms are still Insufficient, and further research is needed.

    Declaration of Competing Interest

    The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

    Acknowledgements

    This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 31760477), Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Food Nutrition and Human Health (No: 20181007) and Youth Science and Technology Innovation, Leader in Corps (No:2016BC001).

    欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 俺也久久电影网| 老司机福利观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 日韩欧美免费精品| 一进一出抽搐动态| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 搞女人的毛片| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 热99在线观看视频| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲成人久久性| 美女黄网站色视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 级片在线观看| 免费看光身美女| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲综合色惰| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产毛片a区久久久久| av国产免费在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久草成人影院| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 永久网站在线| 亚洲av成人av| 久久久国产成人免费| 怎么达到女性高潮| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 精品人妻视频免费看| 我要搜黄色片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲内射少妇av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 看免费av毛片| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 日本五十路高清| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久亚洲真实| 观看免费一级毛片| av在线蜜桃| 天堂√8在线中文| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 男人舔奶头视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 久久久久性生活片| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 欧美bdsm另类| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 69av精品久久久久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品 | 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 极品教师在线视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 日本五十路高清| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲内射少妇av| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产乱人视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 亚洲美女黄片视频| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 老女人水多毛片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲av一区综合| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 午夜激情欧美在线| 成年版毛片免费区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美在线黄色| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 午夜免费激情av| 成人精品一区二区免费| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| a在线观看视频网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 三级毛片av免费| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日韩中字成人| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 一本精品99久久精品77| 午夜福利在线在线| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久久久久久久大av| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 特级一级黄色大片| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 91麻豆av在线| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 欧美潮喷喷水| www.色视频.com| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲色图av天堂| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 高清在线国产一区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 少妇高潮的动态图| 色哟哟·www| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日本五十路高清| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲av成人av| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产精华一区二区三区| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 嫩草影院精品99| 99热这里只有是精品50| av欧美777| 国产日本99.免费观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 看黄色毛片网站| 免费av毛片视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 午夜福利高清视频| 青草久久国产| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 99久久精品热视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| eeuss影院久久| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 免费看光身美女| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 青草久久国产| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产在线男女| www.999成人在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 免费大片18禁| 91在线观看av| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 九色国产91popny在线| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产乱人视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 99热6这里只有精品| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久性视频一级片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 我要搜黄色片| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 床上黄色一级片| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久精品影院6| 国产高清三级在线| 88av欧美| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产精品野战在线观看| 久久久久久大精品| 免费av观看视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美日本视频| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 久久香蕉精品热| 成人无遮挡网站| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 永久网站在线| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 天堂√8在线中文| av专区在线播放| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 变态另类丝袜制服| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 身体一侧抽搐| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产美女午夜福利| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产av不卡久久| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 午夜免费激情av| 不卡一级毛片| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 香蕉av资源在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 91久久精品电影网| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 免费av观看视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产乱人视频| 如何舔出高潮| 在线免费观看的www视频| av专区在线播放| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 变态另类丝袜制服| 91狼人影院| 夜夜爽天天搞| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 午夜a级毛片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲最大成人av| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 一进一出抽搐动态| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产色婷婷99| 日本免费a在线| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 美女免费视频网站| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 99热只有精品国产| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 一本久久中文字幕| av中文乱码字幕在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 变态另类丝袜制服| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产在视频线在精品| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 精品人妻视频免费看| 观看免费一级毛片| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久99热6这里只有精品| www.色视频.com| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久热精品热| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品三级大全| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 久99久视频精品免费| 欧美bdsm另类| 丁香六月欧美| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 久9热在线精品视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 色哟哟·www| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 日本 av在线| 午夜视频国产福利| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲18禁久久av| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 一本一本综合久久| 少妇丰满av| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产精品影院久久| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产日本99.免费观看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 91av网一区二区| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久久精品大字幕| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 欧美激情在线99| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 天堂网av新在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 免费看a级黄色片| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品久久久久久,| 国产精品野战在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久久成人免费电影| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 99热只有精品国产| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 有码 亚洲区|