• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Lyu Cheng’s Thoughts on Hetuvidyā and Buddhist Argumentation

    2020-04-12 14:25:14XiankunZeng
    邏輯學(xué)研究 2020年3期
    關(guān)鍵詞:唯識(shí)中觀理論

    Xiankun Zeng

    Abstract.Studies on Buddhist Logic during the period of the Republic of China have been strongly shaped by the Western logical theories and Japanese Hetuvidyā researches that were introduced into China at that time.Unlike most scholars who endorsed the idea that the threeform reasoning(三支論式)of Hetuvidyā can be identified with the Aristotelian syllogism,Lyu Cheng has argued that Hetuvidyā is indeed a particular kind of Buddhist Logic in the sense of the theory of Pramāa(量論),which includes studies on the structure and rules,the epistemological foundation and the applications of Buddhist Logic.Lyu Cheng’s work has set up a new research paradigm for the study of Hetuvidyā that is particularly focused on the logical perspective,and therefore ensured the later developments of Buddhist Logic studies as a discipline.However,since there remains to be a lack of clear conception of logic,Lyu Cheng’s research paradigm has left behind many important issues that are in need of further investigation.

    1 Introduction

    After the Western logical theories and JapaneseHetuvidyāstudies were both introduced into mainland China,particularly in the period of the Republic of China(1912–1949),Buddhist Logic has gradually become a field of research that is of interest to many Chinese scholars.However,researches on Buddhist logic at that time have also been strongly influenced by the imported logical theories andHetuvidyāstudies.During that time,for many scholars,such as Xie Wuliang,Zhang Taiyan,Zhang Shizhao,and Taixu,it is a common view that the three-form reasoning ofHetuvidyā(三支論式)is just the same as the Aristotelian syllogism.Specifically,they submit that the notions of Claim (宗)、Cause (因) and Illustration (喻) can simply be identified,respectively,with that of conclusion,minor premise and major premise in a syllogism.Nevertheless,there is also a dissenter,Lyu Cheng(1896–1989),who has strived to argue thatHetuvidyāis the study of Buddhist argumentation that has its own distinctiveness when compared with the logic developed in the West.Lyu Cheng establishes his claim mainly by a thorough text study on the classic Buddhism works,including those not only in Chinese,but also in Sanskrit,Tibetan,Pali,Japanese,Germany and English languages.For example,when analyzing theNyāya–bindu(正理–滴論),Lyu Cheng has examined first the original texts in Sanskrit and Tibetan languages,and then he has compared their different translations in Russian,English,Japanese etc.Moreover,in order to get a full and accurate understanding of the classic texts,he also tries to consult extensively the relevant works published by many others,as in his own words,he has to“discern various ideas developed in history”,“refer to important works by foreign scholars”,and “examine different thoughts of contemporaries”([10],pp.13–14).As a result,Lyu Cheng has published a number of important works inHetuvidyāstudies,and his own account is developed mainly in the works likeThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā(因明綱要),The Buddhist Logic—On Dharmakīrti’s(法稱)Hetuvidyā studies(佛家邏輯——法稱的因明說(shuō)),Hetuvidyā studies in Tibet Area(西藏所傳的因明),andLectures on Nyāya prave?a(因明入正理論講解).This paper aims to explore in a systematic way Lyu Cheng’s thoughts onHetuvidyāstudies.I will first examine in section 2 Lyu Cheng’s understanding onHetuvidyāin general,and then in section 3 his understanding on Buddhist argumentation in particular.On that basis,in section 4 I will also discuss Lyu Cheng’s efforts in establishingHetuvidyāstudies as a discipline.

    2 Lyu Cheng on Hetuvidyā

    Reviewing the works published by Lyu Cheng,we can find that his interest inHetuvidyāstudies has lasted for about 40 years.Historically,Lyu Cheng has started to teach courses onHetuvidyāsince 1923 with his book ofThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā,and his last paper on topics related toHetuvidyāwas published in 1961.Lyu Cheng has taken in particular a historical perspective to examine the evolution of the connotation ofHetuvidyā.As a result,he has clarified in a better way its relationships with the theory of(量論),Buddhism and Logic,and at last he contended thatHetuvidyāis the theory of Pramāa.According to him,“Buddhist philosophy is in general a theory of knowledge,which includes both the Buddhist principles and the tools for interpreting them.”([2],p.364) The study ofHetuvidyā,in particular,would consist of three parts:the structure of argumentation and its norm,the epistemological foundation of argumentation,and the practice of argumentation.As he has clarified,“Hetuvidyāfocuses on justifying and refuting,and explores(現(xiàn)量)and(比量)as the source of reasons in the three-form reasoning.Hence it is not the same as the theory ofVij?anavada(唯識(shí)學(xué)).”([10],p.12)Here it is indicated that Lyu Cheng indeed takes the theory of(量論) to be including epistemological studies on Buddhist argumentation and its applications,and regards it as theoretical tools for Buddhist argumentation practice.

    Lyu Cheng submits that the study on the structures and norms of argument inHetuvidyāis focused on the argumentative function of justifying and refuting a proposition.These argument structures and norms were taken as requirements on discourse in the ancientHetuvidyāstudies and in some other theories other than Buddhism.And inDinnāga’s (陳那) early theory,they had also been interpreted as the rules of three-form reasoning and the inference “for others” (為他比量).As Lyu Cheng claims,“Hetuvidyāis the study for discerning the things in the world and their underlying principles.It probes into the causes in order to distinguish the true from the false,thereforeHetuvidyāhas stressed a methodology focusing on investigating the cause……Unlike many others who simply understand argumentation as a disputation aiming for winning over your opponent,Buddhists have recognized it as a way for gaining wisdom.”([10],p.9)In particular,for those similar studies conducted by non-Buddhist scholars,Lyu Cheng believes that they should be called the Theory of Causes.It is different fromHetuvidyāstudies,for only the system of knowledge achieved in Buddhist investigation about the cause could be calledHetuvidyā.This idea is indeed in line with the work ofDiscourse on the Stages of Yogic Practice(瑜伽師地論),as he further clarifies,“the logical studies in India is calledHetuvidyā,which have long been carried out by philosophical schools other than Buddhists.For example,the School ofNyāya(正理派)has also emphasized logical thoughts as the core of their philosophy.Moreover,sinceNyāyascholars also contended that what is true should be established on sufficient ground,hence they highlighted the investigation on causes,therefore their theory could better be called the Theory of Causes.”([12],p.177)

    According to Lyu Cheng,although the studies onHetuvidyāin India could be roughly divided into five historical periods,the most noticeable developments were stimulated byDinnāga(陳那).Dinnāgahas substantially developedHetuvidyāinto a new form,and now it is common to call theHetuvidyāstudies beforeDinnāgaas the ancientHetuvidyā.The ancientHetuvidyāstudies normally take the five-form reasoning as its central focus,as is further clarified by Lyu Cheng,“theHetuvidyāstudies in its early times stressed an investigation on argumentation,including the conditions and rules of argumentation as its research subjects.”([5],pp.232–239)For example,in theDiscourse on the Stages of Yogic PracticetheHetuvidyāis mainly a study on discourse:“it concentrates on addressing an issue by seven types of different matters that are pertaining to discourse,and there the application ofHetuvidyāis aimed to discern the true from the false,which can only be achieved through thoughtful discourses.”([12],p.178) However,the representative reasoning in ancientHetuvidyāhas been rebuilt byDinnāgainto a three-form reasoning,andDinnāgahas also formulated the rules pertaining to it.Lyu Cheng examines the three-form reasoning and its corresponding rules in hisThe Outlines of HetuvidyāandLectures on Nyāyaprave?a.TheHetuvidyāstudies have continued to be developed by laterDinnāga,who has,especially in the(集量論),“revised the framework ofHetuvidyāin terms of(現(xiàn)量),the inference‘for one self’(為自比量)and the inference‘for others’(為他比量),in which justifying and refuting propositions are all inferences‘for others”’([5],pp.232–239).At last,in a paper titled OnDharmakīrti’sHetuvidyāStudies,Lyu Cheng has carefully examinedDharmakīrti’s(法稱)contributions in developingHetuvidyā,especially his efforts in reforming the understanding of three-form reasoning.

    In several of his works,Lyu Cheng has also probed into the epistemological foundation of argumentation,and reached the conclusion that“it is from the work ofDinnāgathat the Buddhist study ofHetuvidyāhas shifted its focus from discourse and then become a study of‘’.The latter is related to the notion of knowledge,hence it is in many ways epistemological.After that,most scholars in theYogacaraSchool (瑜伽學(xué)派) have started to develop their theory ofVij?anavada(唯識(shí)理論)on the basis of‘’studies.”([3],pp.199–224)As is further clarified by Lyu Cheng,“theYogacarascholars used to focus their research ofHetuvidyāon discourse…for themHetuvidyāwas only a study of justifying and refuting propositions…h(huán)owever,it isDinnāgawho has broken this restriction and extended the study ofHetuvidyāinto the full scope of Buddhism,and in such a wayHetuvidyāhas become a general epistemology for Buddhist philosophy,namely,the theory of‘’.Then,it is not only useful for guiding discourses,but also helpful in seeking the truth.It will include all the knowledge about how to practice Buddhism,and how to gain wisdom to attain Buddhahood.Accordingly,inDinnāga’s theory,the theory of ‘’ is the prerequisites for attaining Buddhahood,and only when you have finally attained Buddhahood,you can truly know the world and discern the true from the false.”([12],p.190)

    The followers ofDharmakīrti(法稱) can be distinguished into three different groups:the school of literal interpretation(釋文派),the school of commentators(闡義派)and the third or religious school of commentators(明教派).According to Lyu Cheng,“it can be said that theYogacaraschool of Buddhism has been reformed in the work ofDharmakīrti,in such a way that their studies have since then shifted the focus from the purelyCittamatratheorizing(唯識(shí)學(xué)說(shuō))to the justifying of theCittamatratheory by means of the theory of Pramāa.”([12],pp.209–210)Furthermore,“they have also stressed that the knowledge ofHetuvidyāis indispensable for all the believers and wise men,for it can improve our thinking,and also help in the understanding of Buddhist doctrines.This view is indeed originated inDharmakīrti’s(量評(píng)釋論),which was in turn inherited fromDinnāga’s(集量論).”([4],pp.276–280)As Lyu Cheng has summarized,“the study ofHetuvidyāwas originally known for its investigation on the reason(cause)for making a judgment.From the beginning,it focuses particularly on debate and argumentation,with an aim to defend the Buddhist standpoints against the other competing views.Then it has been developed into a form of epistemological study that highlights the acquisition of knowledge,and its normative criteria…Hence from the perspective ofHetuvidyā,the process of knowing starts from the,and it develops out new understanding by means of,and aims to reach the highest level of knowledge as in Buddhahood.”([1],p.341)

    Moreover,Lyu Cheng has also stressed the crucial importance ofHetuvidyāfor Buddhism theorizing and Buddhist argumentation.“The Buddhists have to establish their philosophical claims by argumentation,which,in turn,requires a study of persuasive reasons.Accordingly,Hetuvidyāis developed out as a particular study on reasons.”([7],p.1505) In this connection,the study ofHetuvidyāis different from the Buddhist theory and its principles in that it is the methodology for Buddhism.As Lyu Cheng contends,“the study ofHetuvidyāoriginates from the investigation of discourses that are aimed to defend or refute some claim,hence it is closely related to Buddhist argumentation.”([8],p.1384)Moreover,“as a distinctive discipline,however,the study ofHetuvidyāhas also its own theoretical insights that are different from those of Buddhist theory.For example,in the study ofHetuvidyā,the notions of individuality and commonality are to be interpreted as some fundamental elements with their own strict and specific definitions:individuality is revealed on the basis of(現(xiàn)量),while commonality is found by means of(比量).Nevertheless,as in Buddhist theory,with the wisdom of Buddahood there is no sharp distinction between individuality and commonality,and they both fall into the scope of.”([8],p.1385)

    To sum up,since the study ofHetuvidyāincludes as its own integral parts the studies on the structure and norms of argument,the studies on the epistemological foundation and the application of Buddhist argumentation,Lyu Cheng concludes thatHetuvidyāis indeed a systematic study of Buddhist logic.To quote his own words,“the study ofHetuvidyāis exactly the study of Buddhist logic”([5],pp.232–239),and“all the Buddhist logical studies should be calledHetuvidyā”([3],pp.199–224).

    3 Lyu Cheng on Buddhist Argumentation

    Lyu Cheng pays close attention to discuss the peculiarities of Buddhist argumentation.InThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā,based on his reading ofNyāya-mukha(因明正理門論)andNyāya-prave?a(因明入正理論),he has provided a general theorizing about Buddhist argumentation.There Lyu Cheng has undertaken a theoretical analysis on the correctness of three-form reasoning,the refutation of fallacious arguments,the inventions of reasons,and also the issues pertaining to the arguer,the purpose of arguing etc.

    Basically,Lyu Cheng has focused on studying the rules of three-form reasoning,and used them to evaluate Buddhist argumentation.In order to illustrate his theory,he has offered more than 60 examples of argumentation that are taken from religious contexts including Buddhism.Most examples are taken from the classic works ofMadhyamika(中觀學(xué)派) andVij?anavada(唯識(shí)學(xué)派) schools,and many of these examples are cited for their being conforming or violating the rules of three-form reasoning.In general,Lyu Cheng has proposed an eight-step method for determining the correctness of Buddhist argumentation.The first step is to check whether the claim to be argued is exactly the point defended by the proponent but disapproved by the opponent,otherwise it cannot meet the requirement that the claim to be argued must be a disagreement.The second step is to check whether it is a complete threeform reasoning,for none of its elements is allowed to be missing.The third step is to determine whether it is arguing for or against a claim,while the fourth is to check whether all the concepts used in the argument are well accepted by both the proponent and opponent,for otherwise the reasons adduced in the argument would deem to be unacceptable.Lyu Cheng has asserted that“the three-form reasoning is used by all participants in the argumentation,where the proponent should try to argue for his own position based on claims that are accepted by both the proponents and opponent.Accordingly,the correctness of reasoning is also related to their common consensus.”([10],p.16)The fifth step,according to Lyu Cheng,is to examine whether the claim to be argued is incorrect in some other ways,and the sixth step is to examine carefully the correctness of reasons adduced in the argument.Then,the seventh step is to look into the support offered by reasons to the conclusion,and the last step is an overall judgment made on the correctness of the argument.In particular,Lyu Cheng has illustrated this method in more detail with an example borrowed from the works ofMadhyamikaon truth and falsity([10],pp.55–57),and in his analysis,that argument is fallacious because five faults can be detected in these eight steps.Moreover,inThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā,11 examples are cited for illustrating the examination of the claim to be argued,13 examples for that of reason,9 examples for the support offered by reasons,and there are also 11 examples for the application of three-form reasoning,18 examples of effective refutation and 2 examples of fallacious refutation.Here it is particularly worth noting that it is indeed Lyu Cheng’s own intention to use exclusively Buddhist argumentation examples in his analysis.He does not explain any of his ideas with an illustration of any arguments in ordinary life,for he truly believes that the rules and criteria inHetuvidyāare only applicable to Buddhist argumentation.According to Lyu Cheng,they are not as universal as the rules of syllogism.

    Moreover,Lyu Cheng has also exerted considerable efforts to discuss the application ofHetuvidyāknowledge in analyzing and resolving the controversies over the proof of idealism (唯識(shí)比量).In theYinmingruzhenglilunshu(因明入正理論疏),Kuiji(窺基)has divided the notion of(比量)into three different types,depending on whether the starting points used in the argument are accepted by the proponent,by the opponent or by both.In particular,Kuiji has distinguished inferences based on the proponent’s starting points,inferences based on the opponent’s starting points,and inferences based on common starting points,and he has also formulated their corresponding rules respectively.On that basis,Kuiji contends that the proof of idealism is indeed a form of inference based on common starting points,for all the concepts used in the claims of the proof are commonly recognized by both the proponent and the opponent.However,Kuiji’s position is not convincing to all the later scholars who are interested in analyzing the proof of idealism,hence there is often controversy over the logical adequacy of the proof.Some scholars claimed that it is indeed fallacious,some believed that it is correct,and there are still others who submitted that its correctness can not be judged from the logical point of view.In this context,Lyu Cheng has used rules of three-form reasoning to examine the proof of idealism,and contended that it is correct because it indeed conforms to all rules of three-form reasoning(see[11,p.268]).Another case is the analysis ofzhangzhen biliang(掌珍比量)by Lyu Cheng.The zhangzhen biliang is derived from theDacheng zhangzhen lun(大乘掌珍論),which was put forward byBhavaviveka(清辨) and aimed at denying the the reality beneath all things (諸法有相) ofDharmapala(護(hù)法).However,since Xuanzang,scholars have held different views on the zhangzhen biliang.According to the rule of the three-form reasoning,Lyu Cheng believes the Claim to be erroneous,the proponent and opponent have a different understanding of the concepts used in the Claim.And Claim was meant to make for others,if the Claim is not(世俗諦),it would be difficult to achieve the goal of making others understand.Therefore,Lyu Cheng thought that thewhich is set up inzhangzhen biliangis fallacious.Disapproval of Lyu Cheng’s views are later expressed by many scholars,such as Wang Enyang and Taixu (太虛).According to Wang Enyang,Lyu Cheng is definitely wrong to criticize those arguments as being invalid,for the analysis and evaluation of Buddhist argumentation have to be located within the particular Buddhist theories in which they are put to use,hence their conforming to the rules of three-form reasoning only plays a secondary role([13],pp.284–287).While for Taixu,it is believed that theMadhyamika(中觀學(xué))andVij?anavada(唯識(shí)學(xué))schools are similar in their theorizing,hence if the proof of idealism is regarded by Lyu Cheng as conforming to the rules of three-form reasoning,the same judgment should be passed on the argument inMadhyamikatheory([9],pp.389–390).Here clearly the controversy is indeed caused by their disagreements on topics like what are the specific norms for evaluating Buddhist argumentation,and how they could be properly used in the Buddhism contexts.

    When reviewing the examples collected inThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā,and his specific study on the proof of idealism,we can find it clear that Lyu Cheng has focused particularly on Buddhist argumentation in his study ofHetuvidyā,attempting to substantiate the view thatHetuvidyāis indeed the tools for Buddhist argumentation.As is clarified by himself“Hetuvidyāis a theoretical tool for Buddhist theorizing,just as inVasubandhu’s(世親)later work,it can be used to clear up the misconceptions and resolving the disagreement.” ([12],p.179)

    4 Lyu Cheng on the discipline of Buddhist Logic

    Lyu Cheng has made great effort to establish Buddhist Logic as a discipline.For the first,he has tried to argue that studies in Buddhist Logic has not only a logical nature,but also its own Buddhist particularity.Accordingly,he has borrowed many notions from Western logic,such as syllogism,middle term,categorical proposition,the law of contradiction and that of the excluded middle,in order to conduct a comparative analysis onHetuvidyā.For example,he explains that“two three-form reasonings will conflict with each other(相違決定)if they are used to argue respectively for two contradictory claims.Committing to this error is just like being faulty of violating the law of contradiction or the law of excluded middle.” ([11],p.233)When explaining the structure of three-form reasoning,he also comments that“while the syllogism in Formal Logic is a form of deductive reasoning,the three-form reasoning inHetuvidyāis more of an inductive nature.Accordingly,we can find that they are different not only in their reasoning forms,but also in their contents.For example,in the studies of Formal Logic,in case of a syllogism which has an universal affirmative proposition as its premise,its conclusion is just included in its premise…However,for the threeform reasoning,universal propositions will normally take the form of a hypothetical judgment such as‘if it is artificial then it will not be eternal’,and their function would in turn be more flexible.Besides,the use of three-form reasoning will also require an illustration with examples,hence include in it a mechanism of induction.” ([11],pp.248–249)Moreover,as Lyu Cheng has analyzed,“in the study of Formal Logic there is a notion of middle term,which appears in both premises of a syllogism.And it is a rule for valid syllogisms that the middle term must be distributed at least once in these premises.But there is no such rules inHetuvidyā.Instead,normally two examples(one of them being a counter-example)are used inHetuvidyāas a means to judge the validity of argument,which can likewise help us to reach a right verdict.”([11],p.315)Based on these comparative illustrations,it is quite obvious to see that Lyu Cheng is trying to reveal the similarity and difference between Western Logic andHetuvidyā.Besides,he has also offered a discussion focusing on the different conceptions of Truth in those two disciplines:“the notion of Truth in Buddhism refers to the Good in the moral sense,thus in Buddhist studies the distinction between the truth and falsity is closely related to a discrimination of being good from being evil.In other words,the Buddhist notion of truth should be conceived fundamentally from a moral point of view.” ([12],p.232)Consequently,the Buddhist argumentation that are built upon such a conception of truth would also be characteristically different.

    For the second,Lyu Cheng has well distinguished the Buddhist Logic from the theory of Buddhism,just as the Chinese Logic is different from the Chinese philosophy in general.In particular,he regardsHetuvidyāto be the prerequisites that are necessary and contributory for attaining Buddhahood.Accordingly to him,the learning of the theory of Buddhism would go through three stages,in which the second one is“the transforming into a believer,where we aim to attain the enlightenment of Buddhahood,by seeking to the good and avoiding the evil deeds.However,this transformation is very difficult,hence two more books can be recommended for some help.The first one will be the book ofNyāya-prave?a(因明入正理論),for the knowledge ofHetuvidyāis widely used for guiding discussion and thinking,and it is especially important for the latter.Through discussions,we can understand the others,but by the way of thinking,we can reflect on our own,as the Confucians have realized,the gains come from thinking.Accordingly,the learning ofHetuvidyāis necessary,and when following the rules ofHetuvidyā,we can better understand both ourselves and the others,by doing half the work while getting double the result.”([6],p.628)

    The third stage,as identified by Lyu Cheng in the learning of Buddhism,is“to understand the conditions under which the attaining of Buddhahood becomes possible.And here again two books can be recommended for offering some help.The first one is(集量論),a collection of works authored byDinnāga.The book deals extensively with the studies inHetuvidyā,but the discussions in the book are indeed conducive for explaining the Buddhism theory.Dinnāgaactually takes the knowledge ofHetuvidyāas indispensable to the interpretation of Buddhism theory,hence the book should not be regarded as a treatise simply onHetuvidyā.In particular,the method of three-form reasoning has been elaborated in the book,which...should also be used continuously in the learning of Buddhism.”([6],p.641)

    In general,Lyu Cheng takesHetuvidyāto be the theory of(量論),and regards it as Buddhist Logic.There are(現(xiàn)量)and(比量),in which“involves the use of concept,while Pratyakam does no.” ([12],p.191)More specifically,the inference “for one self” (為自比量)and the inference“for others”(為他比量)need to be distinguished,with the former“refers to the thinking methods we used to know things…[but the latter]refers to the language expressions we used to pass our knowledge to the others,or to construct arguments for our own positions.” ([12],p.208)However,although Lyu Cheng has contended that Buddhist Logic is a type of logic,he does not pay much attention to reveal the general scope and the characteristic features of logical studies including buddhist logic.This leads to,consequently,sharp disagreements in the later studies on Buddhist argumentation.This failure can be evidenced clearly by his critical discussion on two Buddhist argumentations (二量) in theDacheng zhangzhen lun(大乘掌珍論),which are significant inMadhyamika(中觀學(xué))and also in the format of three-form reasoning.

    Hence it can be seen that Lyu Cheng’s efforts in establishing the discipline of Buddhist Logic are not completely successful,leaving behind many issues that need to be further explored.For example,there remains to be several significant differences between a three-form reasoning and a syllogism:the claim to be argued in the former is always given in advance,while in the latter it is implied by necessity; the reasons adduced in a three-form reasoning have to be a common ground between the proponent and the opponent; and the use of a three-form reasoning will always involve a concern of the arguer,hence it can hardly be abstracted into an impersonal formal structure.Moreover,the classic works ofdiscuss not only the structure and rules of three-form reasoning,but also the concrete Buddhist argumentative practices.Therefore,when the study ofHetuvidyāis conceived,as proposed by Lyu Cheng,to be the theory of,it will for sure broaden the scope ofHetuvidyāstudies,and it will also renew our understanding about the nature and the function ofHetuvidyāstudies.In particular,it would be improper to interpret the Buddhist logic in terms of the notions like deduction or induction,rather,the study of Buddhist logic will have to be located in the context of Buddhist argumentative practices.

    猜你喜歡
    唯識(shí)中觀理論
    堅(jiān)持理論創(chuàng)新
    “唯識(shí)與中觀”專題討論
    神秘的混沌理論
    遍計(jì)·依他·圓成——唯識(shí)典籍中的音樂審美文獻(xiàn)探賾
    “《智取生辰綱》:于‘智’的角逐中觀情節(jié)之妙”教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)
    理論創(chuàng)新 引領(lǐng)百年
    相關(guān)于撓理論的Baer模
    材料界面之超微觀表征:“鏡”中觀乾坤——材料界面、微納分論壇側(cè)記
    新時(shí)代糧食宏觀、中觀、微觀“三觀”維度思考
    菲林唯識(shí) 神凡兩忘
    上海制造(2013年10期)2014-03-31 03:26:40
    我的老师免费观看完整版| 91精品国产九色| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 日本黄大片高清| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日本wwww免费看| 免费观看在线日韩| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲国产色片| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 免费观看人在逋| 热99在线观看视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产综合懂色| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产av在哪里看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 欧美日本视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 99热网站在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 色5月婷婷丁香| 老司机福利观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 舔av片在线| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 伦精品一区二区三区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 免费观看人在逋| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 成年av动漫网址| 成人av在线播放网站| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 只有这里有精品99| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 天堂网av新在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 床上黄色一级片| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 色网站视频免费| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 热99在线观看视频| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 91av网一区二区| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 麻豆成人av视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 长腿黑丝高跟| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 简卡轻食公司| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产视频内射| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产三级在线视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日本一二三区视频观看| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合 | 欧美bdsm另类| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 中文天堂在线官网| 插逼视频在线观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 色5月婷婷丁香| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 级片在线观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲综合精品二区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 天堂√8在线中文| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 看黄色毛片网站| 国产综合懂色| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产男人的电影天堂91| 美女国产视频在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 男人舔奶头视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 如何舔出高潮| 国产真实乱freesex| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 高清毛片免费看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 青春草国产在线视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产精品久久视频播放| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产男人的电影天堂91| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 男女国产视频网站| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 久久久久久大精品| 国产成人精品婷婷| 变态另类丝袜制服| 九色成人免费人妻av| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 欧美成人a在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 精品久久久久久久末码| av卡一久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 色视频www国产| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 99热这里只有精品一区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 内地一区二区视频在线| 老女人水多毛片| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 永久免费av网站大全| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 热99在线观看视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产综合懂色| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲成色77777| 永久免费av网站大全| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲av福利一区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲四区av| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲av福利一区| 久久久久久大精品| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 人妻系列 视频| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| av在线观看视频网站免费| 在线观看一区二区三区| www.色视频.com| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲综合精品二区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 亚洲在久久综合| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产单亲对白刺激| 男女那种视频在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| av.在线天堂| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产成人精品婷婷| 免费观看性生交大片5| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产黄片美女视频| 只有这里有精品99| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 久久久久九九精品影院| 韩国av在线不卡| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 欧美人与善性xxx| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 舔av片在线| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 欧美潮喷喷水| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 久99久视频精品免费| 欧美人与善性xxx| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 毛片女人毛片| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 国产av不卡久久| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚州av有码| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 男人舔奶头视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 赤兔流量卡办理| av在线老鸭窝| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 老司机影院毛片| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 69人妻影院| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 日日啪夜夜撸| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产淫语在线视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产视频内射| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 舔av片在线| 只有这里有精品99| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 永久网站在线| 日日啪夜夜撸| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 99久久精品热视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 七月丁香在线播放| 97在线视频观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| www.色视频.com| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 熟女电影av网| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 色播亚洲综合网| 日韩高清综合在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产免费男女视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 我的老师免费观看完整版| ponron亚洲| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 久久精品影院6| 乱人视频在线观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产精品永久免费网站| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 久久久久性生活片| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 搞女人的毛片| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 欧美激情在线99| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产色婷婷99| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 三级毛片av免费| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 日本熟妇午夜| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 一级av片app| 国产午夜精品论理片| 色综合色国产| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| eeuss影院久久| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久 | 色综合站精品国产| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产成人精品一,二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 六月丁香七月| 三级毛片av免费| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产视频首页在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 天堂√8在线中文| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 有码 亚洲区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产三级在线视频| av在线播放精品| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 美女高潮的动态| av在线老鸭窝| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产成人精品婷婷| 热99re8久久精品国产| 久久人妻av系列| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产高潮美女av| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕制服av| 九草在线视频观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧美3d第一页| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 亚洲av熟女| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产视频首页在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 日本黄色片子视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| videossex国产| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| kizo精华| 91av网一区二区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 午夜免费激情av| 久久久久性生活片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| www.av在线官网国产| 69人妻影院| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日本免费a在线| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 内射极品少妇av片p| 69人妻影院| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 全区人妻精品视频| 午夜免费激情av| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| av在线蜜桃| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久久久性生活片| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 一本久久精品| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 免费观看人在逋| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| av国产免费在线观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 免费av不卡在线播放| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产精品无大码| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久99热这里只有精品18|