• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Lyu Cheng’s Thoughts on Hetuvidyā and Buddhist Argumentation

    2020-04-12 14:25:14XiankunZeng
    邏輯學(xué)研究 2020年3期
    關(guān)鍵詞:唯識(shí)中觀理論

    Xiankun Zeng

    Abstract.Studies on Buddhist Logic during the period of the Republic of China have been strongly shaped by the Western logical theories and Japanese Hetuvidyā researches that were introduced into China at that time.Unlike most scholars who endorsed the idea that the threeform reasoning(三支論式)of Hetuvidyā can be identified with the Aristotelian syllogism,Lyu Cheng has argued that Hetuvidyā is indeed a particular kind of Buddhist Logic in the sense of the theory of Pramāa(量論),which includes studies on the structure and rules,the epistemological foundation and the applications of Buddhist Logic.Lyu Cheng’s work has set up a new research paradigm for the study of Hetuvidyā that is particularly focused on the logical perspective,and therefore ensured the later developments of Buddhist Logic studies as a discipline.However,since there remains to be a lack of clear conception of logic,Lyu Cheng’s research paradigm has left behind many important issues that are in need of further investigation.

    1 Introduction

    After the Western logical theories and JapaneseHetuvidyāstudies were both introduced into mainland China,particularly in the period of the Republic of China(1912–1949),Buddhist Logic has gradually become a field of research that is of interest to many Chinese scholars.However,researches on Buddhist logic at that time have also been strongly influenced by the imported logical theories andHetuvidyāstudies.During that time,for many scholars,such as Xie Wuliang,Zhang Taiyan,Zhang Shizhao,and Taixu,it is a common view that the three-form reasoning ofHetuvidyā(三支論式)is just the same as the Aristotelian syllogism.Specifically,they submit that the notions of Claim (宗)、Cause (因) and Illustration (喻) can simply be identified,respectively,with that of conclusion,minor premise and major premise in a syllogism.Nevertheless,there is also a dissenter,Lyu Cheng(1896–1989),who has strived to argue thatHetuvidyāis the study of Buddhist argumentation that has its own distinctiveness when compared with the logic developed in the West.Lyu Cheng establishes his claim mainly by a thorough text study on the classic Buddhism works,including those not only in Chinese,but also in Sanskrit,Tibetan,Pali,Japanese,Germany and English languages.For example,when analyzing theNyāya–bindu(正理–滴論),Lyu Cheng has examined first the original texts in Sanskrit and Tibetan languages,and then he has compared their different translations in Russian,English,Japanese etc.Moreover,in order to get a full and accurate understanding of the classic texts,he also tries to consult extensively the relevant works published by many others,as in his own words,he has to“discern various ideas developed in history”,“refer to important works by foreign scholars”,and “examine different thoughts of contemporaries”([10],pp.13–14).As a result,Lyu Cheng has published a number of important works inHetuvidyāstudies,and his own account is developed mainly in the works likeThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā(因明綱要),The Buddhist Logic—On Dharmakīrti’s(法稱)Hetuvidyā studies(佛家邏輯——法稱的因明說(shuō)),Hetuvidyā studies in Tibet Area(西藏所傳的因明),andLectures on Nyāya prave?a(因明入正理論講解).This paper aims to explore in a systematic way Lyu Cheng’s thoughts onHetuvidyāstudies.I will first examine in section 2 Lyu Cheng’s understanding onHetuvidyāin general,and then in section 3 his understanding on Buddhist argumentation in particular.On that basis,in section 4 I will also discuss Lyu Cheng’s efforts in establishingHetuvidyāstudies as a discipline.

    2 Lyu Cheng on Hetuvidyā

    Reviewing the works published by Lyu Cheng,we can find that his interest inHetuvidyāstudies has lasted for about 40 years.Historically,Lyu Cheng has started to teach courses onHetuvidyāsince 1923 with his book ofThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā,and his last paper on topics related toHetuvidyāwas published in 1961.Lyu Cheng has taken in particular a historical perspective to examine the evolution of the connotation ofHetuvidyā.As a result,he has clarified in a better way its relationships with the theory of(量論),Buddhism and Logic,and at last he contended thatHetuvidyāis the theory of Pramāa.According to him,“Buddhist philosophy is in general a theory of knowledge,which includes both the Buddhist principles and the tools for interpreting them.”([2],p.364) The study ofHetuvidyā,in particular,would consist of three parts:the structure of argumentation and its norm,the epistemological foundation of argumentation,and the practice of argumentation.As he has clarified,“Hetuvidyāfocuses on justifying and refuting,and explores(現(xiàn)量)and(比量)as the source of reasons in the three-form reasoning.Hence it is not the same as the theory ofVij?anavada(唯識(shí)學(xué)).”([10],p.12)Here it is indicated that Lyu Cheng indeed takes the theory of(量論) to be including epistemological studies on Buddhist argumentation and its applications,and regards it as theoretical tools for Buddhist argumentation practice.

    Lyu Cheng submits that the study on the structures and norms of argument inHetuvidyāis focused on the argumentative function of justifying and refuting a proposition.These argument structures and norms were taken as requirements on discourse in the ancientHetuvidyāstudies and in some other theories other than Buddhism.And inDinnāga’s (陳那) early theory,they had also been interpreted as the rules of three-form reasoning and the inference “for others” (為他比量).As Lyu Cheng claims,“Hetuvidyāis the study for discerning the things in the world and their underlying principles.It probes into the causes in order to distinguish the true from the false,thereforeHetuvidyāhas stressed a methodology focusing on investigating the cause……Unlike many others who simply understand argumentation as a disputation aiming for winning over your opponent,Buddhists have recognized it as a way for gaining wisdom.”([10],p.9)In particular,for those similar studies conducted by non-Buddhist scholars,Lyu Cheng believes that they should be called the Theory of Causes.It is different fromHetuvidyāstudies,for only the system of knowledge achieved in Buddhist investigation about the cause could be calledHetuvidyā.This idea is indeed in line with the work ofDiscourse on the Stages of Yogic Practice(瑜伽師地論),as he further clarifies,“the logical studies in India is calledHetuvidyā,which have long been carried out by philosophical schools other than Buddhists.For example,the School ofNyāya(正理派)has also emphasized logical thoughts as the core of their philosophy.Moreover,sinceNyāyascholars also contended that what is true should be established on sufficient ground,hence they highlighted the investigation on causes,therefore their theory could better be called the Theory of Causes.”([12],p.177)

    According to Lyu Cheng,although the studies onHetuvidyāin India could be roughly divided into five historical periods,the most noticeable developments were stimulated byDinnāga(陳那).Dinnāgahas substantially developedHetuvidyāinto a new form,and now it is common to call theHetuvidyāstudies beforeDinnāgaas the ancientHetuvidyā.The ancientHetuvidyāstudies normally take the five-form reasoning as its central focus,as is further clarified by Lyu Cheng,“theHetuvidyāstudies in its early times stressed an investigation on argumentation,including the conditions and rules of argumentation as its research subjects.”([5],pp.232–239)For example,in theDiscourse on the Stages of Yogic PracticetheHetuvidyāis mainly a study on discourse:“it concentrates on addressing an issue by seven types of different matters that are pertaining to discourse,and there the application ofHetuvidyāis aimed to discern the true from the false,which can only be achieved through thoughtful discourses.”([12],p.178) However,the representative reasoning in ancientHetuvidyāhas been rebuilt byDinnāgainto a three-form reasoning,andDinnāgahas also formulated the rules pertaining to it.Lyu Cheng examines the three-form reasoning and its corresponding rules in hisThe Outlines of HetuvidyāandLectures on Nyāyaprave?a.TheHetuvidyāstudies have continued to be developed by laterDinnāga,who has,especially in the(集量論),“revised the framework ofHetuvidyāin terms of(現(xiàn)量),the inference‘for one self’(為自比量)and the inference‘for others’(為他比量),in which justifying and refuting propositions are all inferences‘for others”’([5],pp.232–239).At last,in a paper titled OnDharmakīrti’sHetuvidyāStudies,Lyu Cheng has carefully examinedDharmakīrti’s(法稱)contributions in developingHetuvidyā,especially his efforts in reforming the understanding of three-form reasoning.

    In several of his works,Lyu Cheng has also probed into the epistemological foundation of argumentation,and reached the conclusion that“it is from the work ofDinnāgathat the Buddhist study ofHetuvidyāhas shifted its focus from discourse and then become a study of‘’.The latter is related to the notion of knowledge,hence it is in many ways epistemological.After that,most scholars in theYogacaraSchool (瑜伽學(xué)派) have started to develop their theory ofVij?anavada(唯識(shí)理論)on the basis of‘’studies.”([3],pp.199–224)As is further clarified by Lyu Cheng,“theYogacarascholars used to focus their research ofHetuvidyāon discourse…for themHetuvidyāwas only a study of justifying and refuting propositions…h(huán)owever,it isDinnāgawho has broken this restriction and extended the study ofHetuvidyāinto the full scope of Buddhism,and in such a wayHetuvidyāhas become a general epistemology for Buddhist philosophy,namely,the theory of‘’.Then,it is not only useful for guiding discourses,but also helpful in seeking the truth.It will include all the knowledge about how to practice Buddhism,and how to gain wisdom to attain Buddhahood.Accordingly,inDinnāga’s theory,the theory of ‘’ is the prerequisites for attaining Buddhahood,and only when you have finally attained Buddhahood,you can truly know the world and discern the true from the false.”([12],p.190)

    The followers ofDharmakīrti(法稱) can be distinguished into three different groups:the school of literal interpretation(釋文派),the school of commentators(闡義派)and the third or religious school of commentators(明教派).According to Lyu Cheng,“it can be said that theYogacaraschool of Buddhism has been reformed in the work ofDharmakīrti,in such a way that their studies have since then shifted the focus from the purelyCittamatratheorizing(唯識(shí)學(xué)說(shuō))to the justifying of theCittamatratheory by means of the theory of Pramāa.”([12],pp.209–210)Furthermore,“they have also stressed that the knowledge ofHetuvidyāis indispensable for all the believers and wise men,for it can improve our thinking,and also help in the understanding of Buddhist doctrines.This view is indeed originated inDharmakīrti’s(量評(píng)釋論),which was in turn inherited fromDinnāga’s(集量論).”([4],pp.276–280)As Lyu Cheng has summarized,“the study ofHetuvidyāwas originally known for its investigation on the reason(cause)for making a judgment.From the beginning,it focuses particularly on debate and argumentation,with an aim to defend the Buddhist standpoints against the other competing views.Then it has been developed into a form of epistemological study that highlights the acquisition of knowledge,and its normative criteria…Hence from the perspective ofHetuvidyā,the process of knowing starts from the,and it develops out new understanding by means of,and aims to reach the highest level of knowledge as in Buddhahood.”([1],p.341)

    Moreover,Lyu Cheng has also stressed the crucial importance ofHetuvidyāfor Buddhism theorizing and Buddhist argumentation.“The Buddhists have to establish their philosophical claims by argumentation,which,in turn,requires a study of persuasive reasons.Accordingly,Hetuvidyāis developed out as a particular study on reasons.”([7],p.1505) In this connection,the study ofHetuvidyāis different from the Buddhist theory and its principles in that it is the methodology for Buddhism.As Lyu Cheng contends,“the study ofHetuvidyāoriginates from the investigation of discourses that are aimed to defend or refute some claim,hence it is closely related to Buddhist argumentation.”([8],p.1384)Moreover,“as a distinctive discipline,however,the study ofHetuvidyāhas also its own theoretical insights that are different from those of Buddhist theory.For example,in the study ofHetuvidyā,the notions of individuality and commonality are to be interpreted as some fundamental elements with their own strict and specific definitions:individuality is revealed on the basis of(現(xiàn)量),while commonality is found by means of(比量).Nevertheless,as in Buddhist theory,with the wisdom of Buddahood there is no sharp distinction between individuality and commonality,and they both fall into the scope of.”([8],p.1385)

    To sum up,since the study ofHetuvidyāincludes as its own integral parts the studies on the structure and norms of argument,the studies on the epistemological foundation and the application of Buddhist argumentation,Lyu Cheng concludes thatHetuvidyāis indeed a systematic study of Buddhist logic.To quote his own words,“the study ofHetuvidyāis exactly the study of Buddhist logic”([5],pp.232–239),and“all the Buddhist logical studies should be calledHetuvidyā”([3],pp.199–224).

    3 Lyu Cheng on Buddhist Argumentation

    Lyu Cheng pays close attention to discuss the peculiarities of Buddhist argumentation.InThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā,based on his reading ofNyāya-mukha(因明正理門論)andNyāya-prave?a(因明入正理論),he has provided a general theorizing about Buddhist argumentation.There Lyu Cheng has undertaken a theoretical analysis on the correctness of three-form reasoning,the refutation of fallacious arguments,the inventions of reasons,and also the issues pertaining to the arguer,the purpose of arguing etc.

    Basically,Lyu Cheng has focused on studying the rules of three-form reasoning,and used them to evaluate Buddhist argumentation.In order to illustrate his theory,he has offered more than 60 examples of argumentation that are taken from religious contexts including Buddhism.Most examples are taken from the classic works ofMadhyamika(中觀學(xué)派) andVij?anavada(唯識(shí)學(xué)派) schools,and many of these examples are cited for their being conforming or violating the rules of three-form reasoning.In general,Lyu Cheng has proposed an eight-step method for determining the correctness of Buddhist argumentation.The first step is to check whether the claim to be argued is exactly the point defended by the proponent but disapproved by the opponent,otherwise it cannot meet the requirement that the claim to be argued must be a disagreement.The second step is to check whether it is a complete threeform reasoning,for none of its elements is allowed to be missing.The third step is to determine whether it is arguing for or against a claim,while the fourth is to check whether all the concepts used in the argument are well accepted by both the proponent and opponent,for otherwise the reasons adduced in the argument would deem to be unacceptable.Lyu Cheng has asserted that“the three-form reasoning is used by all participants in the argumentation,where the proponent should try to argue for his own position based on claims that are accepted by both the proponents and opponent.Accordingly,the correctness of reasoning is also related to their common consensus.”([10],p.16)The fifth step,according to Lyu Cheng,is to examine whether the claim to be argued is incorrect in some other ways,and the sixth step is to examine carefully the correctness of reasons adduced in the argument.Then,the seventh step is to look into the support offered by reasons to the conclusion,and the last step is an overall judgment made on the correctness of the argument.In particular,Lyu Cheng has illustrated this method in more detail with an example borrowed from the works ofMadhyamikaon truth and falsity([10],pp.55–57),and in his analysis,that argument is fallacious because five faults can be detected in these eight steps.Moreover,inThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā,11 examples are cited for illustrating the examination of the claim to be argued,13 examples for that of reason,9 examples for the support offered by reasons,and there are also 11 examples for the application of three-form reasoning,18 examples of effective refutation and 2 examples of fallacious refutation.Here it is particularly worth noting that it is indeed Lyu Cheng’s own intention to use exclusively Buddhist argumentation examples in his analysis.He does not explain any of his ideas with an illustration of any arguments in ordinary life,for he truly believes that the rules and criteria inHetuvidyāare only applicable to Buddhist argumentation.According to Lyu Cheng,they are not as universal as the rules of syllogism.

    Moreover,Lyu Cheng has also exerted considerable efforts to discuss the application ofHetuvidyāknowledge in analyzing and resolving the controversies over the proof of idealism (唯識(shí)比量).In theYinmingruzhenglilunshu(因明入正理論疏),Kuiji(窺基)has divided the notion of(比量)into three different types,depending on whether the starting points used in the argument are accepted by the proponent,by the opponent or by both.In particular,Kuiji has distinguished inferences based on the proponent’s starting points,inferences based on the opponent’s starting points,and inferences based on common starting points,and he has also formulated their corresponding rules respectively.On that basis,Kuiji contends that the proof of idealism is indeed a form of inference based on common starting points,for all the concepts used in the claims of the proof are commonly recognized by both the proponent and the opponent.However,Kuiji’s position is not convincing to all the later scholars who are interested in analyzing the proof of idealism,hence there is often controversy over the logical adequacy of the proof.Some scholars claimed that it is indeed fallacious,some believed that it is correct,and there are still others who submitted that its correctness can not be judged from the logical point of view.In this context,Lyu Cheng has used rules of three-form reasoning to examine the proof of idealism,and contended that it is correct because it indeed conforms to all rules of three-form reasoning(see[11,p.268]).Another case is the analysis ofzhangzhen biliang(掌珍比量)by Lyu Cheng.The zhangzhen biliang is derived from theDacheng zhangzhen lun(大乘掌珍論),which was put forward byBhavaviveka(清辨) and aimed at denying the the reality beneath all things (諸法有相) ofDharmapala(護(hù)法).However,since Xuanzang,scholars have held different views on the zhangzhen biliang.According to the rule of the three-form reasoning,Lyu Cheng believes the Claim to be erroneous,the proponent and opponent have a different understanding of the concepts used in the Claim.And Claim was meant to make for others,if the Claim is not(世俗諦),it would be difficult to achieve the goal of making others understand.Therefore,Lyu Cheng thought that thewhich is set up inzhangzhen biliangis fallacious.Disapproval of Lyu Cheng’s views are later expressed by many scholars,such as Wang Enyang and Taixu (太虛).According to Wang Enyang,Lyu Cheng is definitely wrong to criticize those arguments as being invalid,for the analysis and evaluation of Buddhist argumentation have to be located within the particular Buddhist theories in which they are put to use,hence their conforming to the rules of three-form reasoning only plays a secondary role([13],pp.284–287).While for Taixu,it is believed that theMadhyamika(中觀學(xué))andVij?anavada(唯識(shí)學(xué))schools are similar in their theorizing,hence if the proof of idealism is regarded by Lyu Cheng as conforming to the rules of three-form reasoning,the same judgment should be passed on the argument inMadhyamikatheory([9],pp.389–390).Here clearly the controversy is indeed caused by their disagreements on topics like what are the specific norms for evaluating Buddhist argumentation,and how they could be properly used in the Buddhism contexts.

    When reviewing the examples collected inThe Outlines of Hetuvidyā,and his specific study on the proof of idealism,we can find it clear that Lyu Cheng has focused particularly on Buddhist argumentation in his study ofHetuvidyā,attempting to substantiate the view thatHetuvidyāis indeed the tools for Buddhist argumentation.As is clarified by himself“Hetuvidyāis a theoretical tool for Buddhist theorizing,just as inVasubandhu’s(世親)later work,it can be used to clear up the misconceptions and resolving the disagreement.” ([12],p.179)

    4 Lyu Cheng on the discipline of Buddhist Logic

    Lyu Cheng has made great effort to establish Buddhist Logic as a discipline.For the first,he has tried to argue that studies in Buddhist Logic has not only a logical nature,but also its own Buddhist particularity.Accordingly,he has borrowed many notions from Western logic,such as syllogism,middle term,categorical proposition,the law of contradiction and that of the excluded middle,in order to conduct a comparative analysis onHetuvidyā.For example,he explains that“two three-form reasonings will conflict with each other(相違決定)if they are used to argue respectively for two contradictory claims.Committing to this error is just like being faulty of violating the law of contradiction or the law of excluded middle.” ([11],p.233)When explaining the structure of three-form reasoning,he also comments that“while the syllogism in Formal Logic is a form of deductive reasoning,the three-form reasoning inHetuvidyāis more of an inductive nature.Accordingly,we can find that they are different not only in their reasoning forms,but also in their contents.For example,in the studies of Formal Logic,in case of a syllogism which has an universal affirmative proposition as its premise,its conclusion is just included in its premise…However,for the threeform reasoning,universal propositions will normally take the form of a hypothetical judgment such as‘if it is artificial then it will not be eternal’,and their function would in turn be more flexible.Besides,the use of three-form reasoning will also require an illustration with examples,hence include in it a mechanism of induction.” ([11],pp.248–249)Moreover,as Lyu Cheng has analyzed,“in the study of Formal Logic there is a notion of middle term,which appears in both premises of a syllogism.And it is a rule for valid syllogisms that the middle term must be distributed at least once in these premises.But there is no such rules inHetuvidyā.Instead,normally two examples(one of them being a counter-example)are used inHetuvidyāas a means to judge the validity of argument,which can likewise help us to reach a right verdict.”([11],p.315)Based on these comparative illustrations,it is quite obvious to see that Lyu Cheng is trying to reveal the similarity and difference between Western Logic andHetuvidyā.Besides,he has also offered a discussion focusing on the different conceptions of Truth in those two disciplines:“the notion of Truth in Buddhism refers to the Good in the moral sense,thus in Buddhist studies the distinction between the truth and falsity is closely related to a discrimination of being good from being evil.In other words,the Buddhist notion of truth should be conceived fundamentally from a moral point of view.” ([12],p.232)Consequently,the Buddhist argumentation that are built upon such a conception of truth would also be characteristically different.

    For the second,Lyu Cheng has well distinguished the Buddhist Logic from the theory of Buddhism,just as the Chinese Logic is different from the Chinese philosophy in general.In particular,he regardsHetuvidyāto be the prerequisites that are necessary and contributory for attaining Buddhahood.Accordingly to him,the learning of the theory of Buddhism would go through three stages,in which the second one is“the transforming into a believer,where we aim to attain the enlightenment of Buddhahood,by seeking to the good and avoiding the evil deeds.However,this transformation is very difficult,hence two more books can be recommended for some help.The first one will be the book ofNyāya-prave?a(因明入正理論),for the knowledge ofHetuvidyāis widely used for guiding discussion and thinking,and it is especially important for the latter.Through discussions,we can understand the others,but by the way of thinking,we can reflect on our own,as the Confucians have realized,the gains come from thinking.Accordingly,the learning ofHetuvidyāis necessary,and when following the rules ofHetuvidyā,we can better understand both ourselves and the others,by doing half the work while getting double the result.”([6],p.628)

    The third stage,as identified by Lyu Cheng in the learning of Buddhism,is“to understand the conditions under which the attaining of Buddhahood becomes possible.And here again two books can be recommended for offering some help.The first one is(集量論),a collection of works authored byDinnāga.The book deals extensively with the studies inHetuvidyā,but the discussions in the book are indeed conducive for explaining the Buddhism theory.Dinnāgaactually takes the knowledge ofHetuvidyāas indispensable to the interpretation of Buddhism theory,hence the book should not be regarded as a treatise simply onHetuvidyā.In particular,the method of three-form reasoning has been elaborated in the book,which...should also be used continuously in the learning of Buddhism.”([6],p.641)

    In general,Lyu Cheng takesHetuvidyāto be the theory of(量論),and regards it as Buddhist Logic.There are(現(xiàn)量)and(比量),in which“involves the use of concept,while Pratyakam does no.” ([12],p.191)More specifically,the inference “for one self” (為自比量)and the inference“for others”(為他比量)need to be distinguished,with the former“refers to the thinking methods we used to know things…[but the latter]refers to the language expressions we used to pass our knowledge to the others,or to construct arguments for our own positions.” ([12],p.208)However,although Lyu Cheng has contended that Buddhist Logic is a type of logic,he does not pay much attention to reveal the general scope and the characteristic features of logical studies including buddhist logic.This leads to,consequently,sharp disagreements in the later studies on Buddhist argumentation.This failure can be evidenced clearly by his critical discussion on two Buddhist argumentations (二量) in theDacheng zhangzhen lun(大乘掌珍論),which are significant inMadhyamika(中觀學(xué))and also in the format of three-form reasoning.

    Hence it can be seen that Lyu Cheng’s efforts in establishing the discipline of Buddhist Logic are not completely successful,leaving behind many issues that need to be further explored.For example,there remains to be several significant differences between a three-form reasoning and a syllogism:the claim to be argued in the former is always given in advance,while in the latter it is implied by necessity; the reasons adduced in a three-form reasoning have to be a common ground between the proponent and the opponent; and the use of a three-form reasoning will always involve a concern of the arguer,hence it can hardly be abstracted into an impersonal formal structure.Moreover,the classic works ofdiscuss not only the structure and rules of three-form reasoning,but also the concrete Buddhist argumentative practices.Therefore,when the study ofHetuvidyāis conceived,as proposed by Lyu Cheng,to be the theory of,it will for sure broaden the scope ofHetuvidyāstudies,and it will also renew our understanding about the nature and the function ofHetuvidyāstudies.In particular,it would be improper to interpret the Buddhist logic in terms of the notions like deduction or induction,rather,the study of Buddhist logic will have to be located in the context of Buddhist argumentative practices.

    猜你喜歡
    唯識(shí)中觀理論
    堅(jiān)持理論創(chuàng)新
    “唯識(shí)與中觀”專題討論
    神秘的混沌理論
    遍計(jì)·依他·圓成——唯識(shí)典籍中的音樂審美文獻(xiàn)探賾
    “《智取生辰綱》:于‘智’的角逐中觀情節(jié)之妙”教學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)
    理論創(chuàng)新 引領(lǐng)百年
    相關(guān)于撓理論的Baer模
    材料界面之超微觀表征:“鏡”中觀乾坤——材料界面、微納分論壇側(cè)記
    新時(shí)代糧食宏觀、中觀、微觀“三觀”維度思考
    菲林唯識(shí) 神凡兩忘
    上海制造(2013年10期)2014-03-31 03:26:40
    国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 制服诱惑二区| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美色视频一区免费| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | av线在线观看网站| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 色在线成人网| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 色在线成人网| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 国产欧美亚洲国产| av有码第一页| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| av视频免费观看在线观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产精品影院久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 免费少妇av软件| 成在线人永久免费视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 超碰成人久久| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲第一av免费看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 成年动漫av网址| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | av欧美777| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 日本wwww免费看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜精品在线福利| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 91成人精品电影| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| www.999成人在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产成人影院久久av| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| www.999成人在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久亚洲真实| 高清在线国产一区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 91麻豆av在线| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 99热只有精品国产| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一级毛片精品| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久亚洲真实| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 日本欧美视频一区| 久久九九热精品免费| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 午夜两性在线视频| videosex国产| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 精品福利观看| 国产三级黄色录像| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 99国产精品一区二区三区| avwww免费| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 国产色视频综合| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 飞空精品影院首页| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产成人系列免费观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 国产精品影院久久| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久久国产成人免费| 午夜91福利影院| 国产成人系列免费观看| 18在线观看网站| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 曰老女人黄片| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产99白浆流出| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 午夜福利欧美成人| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产男女内射视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 91在线观看av| 深夜精品福利| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 欧美日韩黄片免| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产高清videossex| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 国产成人影院久久av| 91在线观看av| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久热在线av| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 一级片'在线观看视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 91成年电影在线观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 老熟女久久久| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| av电影中文网址| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产野战对白在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| а√天堂www在线а√下载 | 一本综合久久免费| 黄色视频不卡| 久久人妻av系列| tube8黄色片| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产1区2区3区精品| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 黄片播放在线免费| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久99一区二区三区| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲伊人色综图| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲av美国av| 一区二区三区精品91| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 久久草成人影院| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 日韩有码中文字幕| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国产区一区二久久| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 丁香六月欧美| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久热在线av| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| av天堂在线播放| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 99久久人妻综合| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 999久久久国产精品视频| 两性夫妻黄色片| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 亚洲成人手机| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 窝窝影院91人妻| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲精品一二三| 伦理电影免费视频| 久久中文看片网| 成人影院久久| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 91成年电影在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 91av网站免费观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 在线看a的网站| www日本在线高清视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 色播在线永久视频| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 久久99一区二区三区| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美日韩黄片免| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 中国美女看黄片| 欧美大码av| 老司机靠b影院| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 欧美日韩精品网址| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 身体一侧抽搐| 热99re8久久精品国产| 99久久人妻综合| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 91老司机精品| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 看黄色毛片网站| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 日本a在线网址| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 中国美女看黄片| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 午夜免费观看网址| 日日夜夜操网爽| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 亚洲五月天丁香| 欧美成人午夜精品| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 人人澡人人妻人| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 三级毛片av免费| 午夜影院日韩av| 亚洲综合色网址| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| av天堂久久9| 十八禁网站免费在线| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 9色porny在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久中文字幕一级| 在线观看日韩欧美| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲九九香蕉| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 视频区图区小说| 午夜激情av网站| 老司机影院毛片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 777米奇影视久久| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久久草成人影院| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 久久中文看片网| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| av网站在线播放免费| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 91大片在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 欧美日韩乱码在线| 午夜91福利影院| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 久久青草综合色| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 大香蕉久久网| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 日韩免费av在线播放| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产成人欧美| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| www.999成人在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 又大又爽又粗| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产亚洲欧美98| 免费少妇av软件| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产不卡一卡二| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 午夜福利欧美成人| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲av美国av| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 香蕉国产在线看| 丁香欧美五月| 看免费av毛片| 精品福利永久在线观看| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 天堂动漫精品| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 国产成人影院久久av| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 成人手机av| 老熟女久久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 成人影院久久| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 看黄色毛片网站| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 在线观看66精品国产| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 一a级毛片在线观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲五月天丁香| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| av天堂在线播放| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 嫩草影视91久久| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久久久久人人人人人| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 国产成人欧美| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 老司机靠b影院| 成人18禁在线播放| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 中文字幕制服av| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 性少妇av在线| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 在线av久久热| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 一级片'在线观看视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| av网站免费在线观看视频|