• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of material of metallic frame on the penetration resistances of ceramic-metal hybrid structures

    2020-04-09 18:37:34XuanyiAnChaoTianQitianSunYongxiangDong
    Defence Technology 2020年1期

    Xuanyi An,Chao Tian,Qitian Sun,Yongxiang Dong

    State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing,100081,China

    Keywords:Hybrid structures Zirconia toughened alumina Penetration resistance Long-rod projectile Metallic frame

    ABSTRACT The effects of metallic material on the penetration resistances of ceramic-metal hybrid structures against vertical long-rod tungsten projectiles were studied by artillery-launched experiments and numerical simulation.Hybrid structures with rectangular cores in transverse orthogonal arrangement and slidefitting ceramic inserts of zirconia toughened alumina prisms were fabricated with titanium alloy TC4(Ti6Al4V),AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy panels,respectively.The results showed that the hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V exhibited the highest penetration resistance,followed by that of 7075 aluminum alloy with the same area density.The penetration resistance of the hybrid structure of AISI 4340 steel was the low est.The underlying mechanisms showed that the metallic material of a ceramicmetal hybrid structure can directly affect its energy absorption from the impact projectile,which further affects its penetration resistance.Different metallic frames exhibited different failure characteristics,resulting in different constraint conditions or support conditions for ceramic prisms.The high penetration resistance of the Ti6Al4V hybrid structure was due to its stronger back support to ceramic prisms as compared with that of AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure,and better constraint condition for ceramic prisms by metallic webs as compared with that of 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure.The results of mass efficiency and thickness efficiency show ed that the Ti6Al4V hybrid structure has advantages in reducing both the thickness and the mass of protective structure.In addition,because the ceramic-metal hybrid structures in the present work were heterogeneous,impact position has slight influence on their penetration resistances.?2020 China Ordnance Society.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    1.Introduction

    Hybrid sandwich structures have been extensively explored for blast loading and projectile penetration resistance[1-13].It has been reported that,under blast loadings or compressive loadings,the deformations of extruded 6061-T6 aluminum sandwich panels with corrugated cores[1,6]are less significant than those of monolithic alloy panels with the same area densities.How ever,a recent study[4]suggests that the extruded 6061-T6 aluminum sandwich panel without inserting,triangular corrugated cores showed similar penetration resistance against high-speed spherical projectile with mass of about 8.4 g compared with monolithic alloy panel with a thickness approximately that of the two face sheets.Yet the triangular alumina prisms inserted into core channels can significantly affect the penetration resistances of the panels.The targets with alumina filled possess very complicated failure mechanisms,such as ductile hole initiated in the face sheet,as well as the tensile failure and shear failure of the joints between back/face sheet and cores,the cone crack[14-15]initiated in the ceramic prisms separated by metallic webs,and the perforation of back sheet due to shear plugging.In addition,the ballistic limit of hybrid structure is highly sensitive to the impact location of projectile due to its asymmetry.For example,the impact at prism base engages a higher ballistic limit than that at the monolithic alloy panel with the same area density.In contrast,the impact at prism apex engages a lower ballistic limit than that at the monolithic alloy panel with the same area density.

    Due to the sensitivity of penetration resistance to impact location,Wadley investigated the effects of the shape of ceramic inserts on penetration resistance against a high-speed of 8.4 g spherical projectile and found that the hybrid structure with rectangular ceramic prisms exhibited the highest penetration resistance,follow ed by those with trapezoidal and triangular ceramic prisms[3].In addition,they also reported that the penetration resistance was related to not only the shape of ceramic prisms beneath the projectile,but also the shape of ceramic prisms of their adjacent ones,and the penetration resistance increased with the width of ceramic prisms increasing.However,wider ceramic prisms can enhance the extent of lateral damage,which decreases the penetration resistance of the hybrid structure in multi-hit scenarios[16].

    The hybrid structures with ceramic inserts mentioned above possess high penetration resistances against the high-speed spherical projectile of 8.4 g.In terms of thicker hybrid structures against the high-speed long-rod projectiles with much greater masses,we explored the responses of the hybrid structures with rectangular cores of same area density,yet arranged differently against a vertical 86 g long-rod tungsten projectile[17].The results indicate that the penetration resistance of the targets is significantly improved when the arrangement of ceramic cores changes from upright to transverse parallel or transverse orthogonal(Fig.1)because the hybrid structures with transverse core arrangements show better constraint conditions for ceramic prisms by metallic webs to blunt and erode the projectiles compared to that with upright core arrangement.

    Although ceramic-metal hybrid sandwich structures with transverse core arrangements possess high penetration resistances against long-rod projectiles,there are many factors that can affect their penetration mechanisms and the efficacy of ceramic in ballistic performance.The previous research[17]show ed that the constraint condition for ceramic prisms by metallic frames played an important role in the design of hybrid structure.Therefore,it is essential to investigate the effects of material of metallic frame on the penetration resistances of ceramic-metal hybrid structures,which can offer a good reference for the design of next generation of lightweight protection structures.In the present work,transverse orthogonal hybrid structures with ceramic inserts of zirconiatoughened alumina prisms were prepared respectively with titanium alloy TC4(Ti6Al4V),AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy,and their penetration resistances to 86 g long-rod tungsten projectiles were experimentally studied.The detailed penetration process and energy absorption of the substructures were numerically simulated,aiming to explore the related penetration resisting mechanism.

    2.Structure design and experimental procedure

    2.1.Target preparation

    Three ceramic-metal hybrid structures,A,B and C,were fabricated with Ti6Al4V,AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy panels,respectively.Fig.2 shows the detailed fabrication process of hybrid structure A.Brie fly,two mutually perpendicular layers including 10 rectangular prisms(18 mm×18 mm×100 mm)were horizontally removed from a 55 mm thick Ti6Al4V panel.Ten ceramic prisms were inserted into the voids of the Ti6Al4V panel by slid-f t i ting and glued to the panel using epoxy adhesive.A 5 mm thick 603 armor steel sheet was attached to the bottom of the panel using epoxy adhesive to complete the structure.

    Hybrid structures B and C were prepared with the same procedure,but using a AISI 4340 steel panel and a 7075 aluminum alloy panel,respectively(Fig.3 and Fig.4).Table 1 shows their area densities.The maximum relative deviation of the area densities of the structures is 5%.Therefore,the area densities of hybrid structures A,B and C were considered as same.

    2.2.Ballistic testing and characterization

    The penetration resistances of hybrid structures A,B and C were experimentally examined against a pointed long-rod tungsten projectile(Hardness 57 HRC)with the mass of 86 g.Fig.5 shows the experimental arrangement and the parameters of the projectile for ballistic testing.A long-rod 93 tungsten projectile with nylon sabot(Fig.7)was shot using a powder gun with the caliber of 40 mm at normal incidence toward the center of a hybrid structure fixed in a positioning frame(Fig.5).The incident velocity of the projectile to the target face and its penetration characteristics near the target were measured and recorded using a Phantom 710 high-speed camera(Vision Research,Inc.Wayne,New Jersey,USA).In the experiment,the frame rate of the high-speed camera was 30839 fps,and the exposure time was 4.5μs.The exit energy of projectile was evaluated using a witness panel made of AISI 4340 steel if the incident velocity of projectile was higher than the ballistic limit of the hybrid structure.

    2.3.Numerical simulation

    The penetration process of each hybrid structure was numerically simulated using the nonlinear finite element code LS-DYNA 971 to determine the effect of metal material on the ballistic responses of hybrid structures[18].The Johnson-Cook model is the most popular model for metallic materials subjected to large strains,high strain rates,and high temperature[19-23].In this model,the yield strength depends on the state of equivalent plastic strain,strain rate and temperature.The Johnson-Holmquist 2(JH-2)model is a computational model which is widely used for brittle materials subjected to large strains,large strain rates and high pressures[19,24,25 and 26].This model includes pressure dependent strength,damage and fracture,significant strength after fracture,bulking and strain rate effects.Therefore,the Johnson-Holmquist 2 (JH-2)model was used to simulate zirconiatoughened alumina and the metallic materials including Ti6Al4V,AISI4340 steel,7075 aluminum alloy,tungsten alloy and 603 armor steel were simulated using the Johnson-Cook(JC)model.The JC model constants and JH-2 model constants are listed in Table 2[19-23]and Table 3[24]respectively.The hybrid structure and projectile were modeled with eight node solid elements.Due to the low strength and low thickness of the epoxy adhesive,as compared with the steel and ceramic,“CONTACT-TIED-SURFACE-TO-SURFACE”was used to model the adhesive,instead of constructing an epoxy layer in the model.The tensile stress at failure and the shear stress at failure of the adhesive were set to 120 MPa and 80 MPa,respectively[27].Each part of the system was connected with“CONTACT-ERODING-SURFACE-TO-SURFACE”[18].The contacts were updated once the elements on the free surface of structure were eliminated by the relevant material failure criteria.The minimum and maximum element sizes were set to 0.3 mm and 0.33 mm,respectively.In the damage analyses of hybrid structures,a half model of each armor system was established due to the symmetry of the hybrid structures(Fig.6).

    Fig.1.Schematic of hybrid structures with different arrangements[17].

    Fig.2.Fabrication process and detailed parameters of hybrid structure A.

    Fig.3.Detailed parameters of hybrid structure B and picture of hybrid structure B before impact test.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Experimental analysis

    Fig.4.Detailed parameters of hybrid structure C and picture of hybrid structure C before impact test.

    Table 1 Area densities of hybrid structures A,B and C.

    Hybrid structures A,B and C with the same structure but different materials were tested to explore the effects of metallic material on penetration resistance.Table 4 summarizes the results of projectile impacts on hybrid structures A,B and C.The incident velocity of the projectile launched by the powder gun was 950 m/s with the variation within 1.6%,and thus was considered same for each structure.All the impacts were normal impacts as shown in Fig.7 obtained from the high-speed camera.Fig.8,Fig.9 and Fig.10 show the pictures of hybrid structures A,B and C after the test,respectively.

    As shown in Fig.8[17],hybrid structure A was able to hold the incident projectile.The 603 armor steel attached to hybrid structure A after the impact test,yet a perforated hole was found in the face sheet,and a minor but obvious deformation was observed on both back sheet of the titanium alloy frame and the 603 armor steel plate.In addition,a few cracks were formed on the edges of the first and second layers of the metallic frame in the axial direction of ceramic prisms(Fig.8(c)and Fig.8(d)).After the impact test,the TC4 frame of hybrid structure A was cut open along its impact zone using a wire electrical discharge machine after removing ceramic prisms in its voids,in order to obtain its intact thickness(Fig.8(f)).Some node failures were found between the cells and the face/middle/back sheet of the hybrid structure on the cross section across the penetration hole(Fig.8(f)),similar to the joint failure of the extruded 6061-T6 aluminum sandwich panel caused by the impact of a high-speed spherical projectile[4].The total intact thickness of the impacted hybrid structure A including the 603 armor steel sheet was measured to be 14 mm.The projectile with the mass of 16.5 g was recovered after the impact(Fig.8(e)),and 80.8%of the projectile mass was lost.

    Fig.5.Schematic of experimental setup and photo of site layout.

    Fig.6.Numerical models of one half of the armor systems(a)Hybrid structure A(b)Hybrid structure B(c)Hybrid structure C.

    Fig.7.Illustration of normal projectile impact on the target taken by the high-speed camera.

    As shown in Fig.9,hybrid structure B was completely perforated.The 603 armor steel of hybrid structure B was not de-bonded from the structure after the impact either.Although no fractures were found on the edges of hybrid structure B,elliptical ruptures near a ductile hole were initiated on the face sheet due to the movement of shattering ceramic prisms along the inverse direction of the impact(Fig.9(d))and fractures were also observed along the axial direction of ceramic prisms in the back-face of metallic frame made of AISI 4340 steel due to the combined impacts of the projectile and crushed ceramic prisms beneath the projectile(Fig.9(e)).A large permanent deformation with a petaling hole and a bulge of 25 mm was observed on the back of the 603 armor steel sheet(Fig.9(f)).Craters were formed in the witness panel made of AISI 4340 steel(Fig.9(a)).

    As shown in Fig.10,hybrid structure C was completely perforated.The hybrid structure C made of 7075 aluminum alloy was almost completely disintegrated by the impact(Fig.10(b)).Most of the ceramic prisms fell off,and a few of ceramic prisms remained in the structure were cracked.The recovered ceramic fragments could remain its size with slight fractures.A ductile hole with a bulge of 16 mm was observed on the back of the 603 armor steel sheet(Fig.10(c)).Craters were also formed in the witness panel made of AISI 4340 steel(Fig.10(d)).

    Based on these results,it can be clearly seen that the metallic material of hybrid structure can significantly affect its penetration resistance against long-rod tungsten projectile.The penetration resistances of hybrid structures A,B and C that were prepared with exactly same arrangement of bilayer transverse orthogonal ceramic inserts but different materials(Ti6Al4V,AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy,respectively)at the same area density follow ed the order of A>C>B.Hybrid structure A was able to hold the projectile with a thick intact thickness(Fig.8(f)),while hybrid structure B was completely perforated.No fracture was formed on the edges of hybrid structure B,indicating that its ceramic prisms were endow ed good constraint condition by the metallic webs of the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure.How ever,the density of AISI 4340 steel is higher than that of Ti6Al4V,and thus the back support of hybrid structure B is thinner than that of hybrid structure A with the samearea density.The large fractures formed along the axial direction of ceramic prisms on the back-face of the metallic frame made of AISI 4340 steel and the large permanent deformation with a petaling hole on the back of 603 armor steel sheet of hybrid structure B indicate that it failed to stop the projectile because its back sheet was not strong enough to support the ceramic prisms to erode and resist the projectile.Although hybrid structure C was also completely perforated,the impact produced less scattered debris with lower kinetic energies behind it than behind hybrid structure B,resulting in fewer scattered craters with smaller total area and depth in the witness panel(Fig.10(d)and Table 4).Compared to hybrid structure A,the complete disintegration of hybrid structure C suggests that 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure failed to provide a good constraint condition for ceramic prisms to blunt and erode the projectile,consistent with Yang's conclusion that 7075 aluminum alloy was a brittle material under dynamic impact loading conditions[28].These experimental results indicate that different metallic frames exhibited different failure characteristics,resulting in different constraint conditions or support conditions for ceramic prisms.The hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V exhibited the highest penetration resistance,as compared with those of AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy,because of the strong back support to ceramic prisms and good constraint condition for ceramic prisms by metallic webs.

    Table 2 JC material model constants for metallic materials[19-23].

    Table 3 JH-2 material model constants for zirconia-toughened alumina[24].

    3.2.Numerical simulation analysis

    The element size in numerical simulation plays an important role to provide accurate outputs.How ever,extremely small size of element makes the numerical process time-consuming.Therefore,the effects of element size on numerical results were investigated in the present work.Fig.11 shows the relative errors between experimental results and numerical results with different element sizes for the intact thickness of hybrid structure A after impact.It can be seen that the relative error varies a lot with the element size increasing.When the element sizes are under 0.35 mm,the relative errors have no big difference and numerical simulation outputs show ed good agreement with the experimental results.Hence,0.3-0.33 mm elements in the present work were enough to provide accurate results.

    To further understand the effect of metallic material on penetration resistance,the impact processes of the hybrid structures A,B,and C were numerically simulated.Fig.12 shows the representative simulated material damage contours in the ceramic prisms of hybrid structure A,and deformations of 603 armor steel in hybrid structure B and hybrid structure C.As can be seen,the damage inthe ceramic prisms moves much faster than the penetration velocity of projectile,although the ceramic prisms are separated by the metallic webs.Hybrid structure A is able to hold the incident projectile,while hybrid structures B and C are completely perforated.Table 5 shows the comparison of the numerical and experimental results.The maximum difference between the numerical and experimental results is 10.8%with the average value of 8.97%.Fig.13,Fig.14 and Fig.15 show the numerical and experimental results of failure characteristics of the metallic frames of hybrid structures A,B and C after the test,respectively.It can be clearly seen that numerical simulation outputs show ed good agreement with the experimental results.These results suggest that the numerical models are reliable to simulate the impact processes of the hybrid structures against long-rod projectiles.

    Table 4 Impact results of hybrid structures A,B and C.

    Fig.8.Pictures of hybrid structure A impacted by a long-rod 93 tungsten projectile[17].(a)Retrieved ceramic debris;(b)Hybrid structure A with perforated face sheet and remained ceramic prisms;(c)Fractures formed in the cellular direction on the first layer of cores;(d)Fractures on the second layer;(e)Residual projectile with the mass of 16.5 g after impact;(f)Cross section of the TC4 frame across the penetration hole.

    Fig.9.Pictures of hybrid structure B impacted by the projectile.(a)Craters formed on the witness panel made of AISI4340 steel;(b)Retrieved ceramic debris;(c)Hybrid structure B impacted by the projectile;(d)Elliptic fractures caused by the shear and tearing near a ductile hole on the face sheet;(e)Fractures formed along the axial direction of the ceramic prisms on the back-face sheet of the metallic frame made of AISI 4340 steel near a hole;(f)Permanent deformation with a petaling hole on the 603 armor steel sheet.

    Fig.10.Pictures of hybrid structure C impacted by an 8 mm diameter projectile(a)Retrieved ceramic debris and 7075 aluminum alloy debris(b)Broken metallic frame(c)603 armor steel back plate after the impact test(d)Craters formed on the witness panel made of AISI 4340 steel.

    Fig.11.Relative errors between experimental results and numerical results with different element sizes for the intact thickness of hybrid structure A.

    Fig.16 shows the variation of the projectile's kinetic energy with time for the three hybrid structures.As can be seen,the kinetic energy of projectile in hybrid structure A decreases much more rapidly than those in hybrid structures B and C,indicating that the hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V possesses a higher penetration resistance than those of AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy.In addition,the total energies(sum of kinetic energy and internal energy)(t=220μs)of the metallic frames and 603 armor steel panels of hybrid structures B and C are higher than those of hybrid structure A due to their more significant permanent deformations(Fig.17).How ever,compared with those in hybrid structures B and C,the ceramic prisms in hybrid structure A can absorb more energies from the impact projectile due to its stronger back support and better constraint conditions by metallic webs(Fig.17),consistent with the experimental results described in Section 3.1.These results indicate that the metallic material of hybrid structure can directly affect the energy absorption of the structure from the impact projectile,and a strong back support to ceramic prisms and strong confinement for ceramic prisms by metallic webs are the keys to improve the penetration resistance of hybrid structures against long-rod projectiles.

    Fig.12.Simulated material damage contours in the ceramic prisms of hybrid structure A(a)and deformations of 603 armor steel in hybrid structure B(b)and hybrid structure C(c).

    Table 5 Comparison of the numerical and experimental results.

    Fig.13.Numerical and experimental results of failure characteristics of the TC4 frame of hybrid structure A.

    To clearly compare the penetration resistances of the hybrid structures fabricated with different materials,the mass efficiency and thickness efficiency of hybrid structures A,B and C were investigated numerically as shown in Fig.18.The incident velocities of the projectiles were 1200 m/s.The mass efficiency and thickness efficiency compare the ballistic performance of the targets with that of the 603 armor steel target(Quasi static state:Hardness 42 HRC/395 HB,Yield strength 0.91 GPa,Ultimate strength 1.25 GPa,Elongation 24%),and are defined as[29-30]:

    Fig.14.Numerical and experimental results of fractures along the axial direction of ceramic prisms in the back-face of metallic frame made of AISI 4340 steel from hybrid structure B.

    Fig.15.Numerical and experimental results of the disintegration of metallic frame made of 7075 aluminum alloy from hybrid structure C.

    where Fmis the mass efficiency,Fsis the thickness efficiency,Prefis the depth of penetration in 603 armor steel without the hybrid structure,Presis the residual depth of penetration in 603 armor steel by the projectile penetrated through the hybrid structure,δ is the thickness of the hybrid structure,ρ603is the density of 603 armor steel,and ρhsis the average density of the hybrid structure.

    Fig.16.Energy histories of the projectiles.

    Fig.17.Total energy of the substructures of hybrid structures.

    Fig.18.Schematic of depth of penetration test.

    The depth of penetration in 603 armor steel without the hybrid structure was 69 mm,and the results of the mass efficiency and thickness efficiency are shown in Table 6.It can be seen that hybrid structure A had the highest mass efficiency,followed by that of hybrid structure C,and the mass efficiency of hybrid structure B was the low est.How ever,the thickness efficiency of hybrid structure B was higher than that of hybrid structure C.All of the mass efficiencies are larger than 1,which means that hybrid structures A,B and C have advantages in reducing the mass of protective structure.How ever,only the thickness efficiency of hybrid structure A is larger than 1,which means that only hybrid structure A has advantages in reducing the thickness of the protective structure.

    To further explore the penetration resistance of hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V with ceramic insertions in transverse orthogonal arrangement(hybrid structure A),which exhibited the highest penetration resistance,five representative impact positions were selected to investigate the sensitivity of penetration resistance to impact location as shown in Fig.19.The penetration resistance of the hybrid structure was compared with that of 603 monolithic plate with the same areal density to further understand the antipenetration performance of the hybrid structure.The incident velocities of the projectiles were 1200 m/s,and Fig.20 shows energy histories of the projectiles.It can be seen that the impacts at different positions result in slightly different energy absorptions.The impact at P1 dissipates the energy most,yet which is only 11%higher than the impact at P5,indicating that impact position has only slight influence on the penetration resistance of hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V with ceramic insertions in transverse orthogonal arrangement.The energy dissipated by the hybrid stricture is 24%-35%higher than that dissipated by the 603 monolithic plate with the same areal density,indicating the excellent antipenetration performance of the hybrid structure.

    4.Conclusions

    Fig.19.Schematic of different impact positions(top view).

    Fig.20.Energy histories of the projectiles impacted on the hybrid structure at different positions and on 603 monolithic plate.

    The responses of metallic materials of hybrid structures with ceramic insertions in transverse orthogonal arrangement against a vertical long-rod tungsten projectile with mass of 86 g were investigated experimentally and numerically.The hybrid structure fabricated with Ti6Al4V exhibited the highest penetration resistance(with a total intact thickness of 14 mm),while that of AISI 4340 steel and that of 7075 aluminum alloy were completely perforated.The penetration resistance of the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure was the lowest because the impact of the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure produced more scattered craters with larger total area(697 mm2)and depth(7 mm)in the witness panel than that of the 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure(producing craters with the total area of 550 mm2and the depth of 4 mm in the witness panel).It can be explained that the metallic material of a hybrid structure can directly affect its energy absorption from the impact projectile.Different metallic frames exhibited different failure characteristics,resulting in different constraint conditions or support conditions for ceramic prisms.The ceramic prisms in the hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V were more strongly supported than those in the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure and were under better constraint conditions than those in the 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure,which endowed them the ability to erode and resist the projectile,resulting in higher energy absorption of the ceramic prisms(2.19 times that of ceramic prisms in the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure,and 1.91 times that of ceramic prisms in the 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure).Therefore,a strong back support to ceramic prisms and strong confinement for ceramic prisms bymetallic webs are the key factors to improve the penetration resistances of ceramic-metal hybrid structures against long-rod projectiles.The results of mass efficiency and thickness efficiency showed that the Ti6Al4V hybrid structure has advantages in reducing both the thickness and the mass of protective structure.The results also indicate that the energy dissipated by the Ti6Al4V hybrid stricture is 24%-35%higher than that dissipated by the 603 monolithic plate with the same areal density,indicating the excellent anti-penetration performance of the hybrid structure.In addition,impact position has only slight influence on the penetration resistance of hybrid structure with ceramic insertions in transverse orthogonal arrangement,with no more than 11%difference.

    Table 6 Results of the mass efficiency and thickness efficiency.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are very grateful for the support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.11872121).

    91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 日本wwww免费看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 少妇的逼好多水| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 成人二区视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 综合色丁香网| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看 | 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产高清三级在线| 9色porny在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 大香蕉久久网| www.色视频.com| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产亚洲最大av| 欧美日韩av久久| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 九草在线视频观看| www.色视频.com| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 日日撸夜夜添| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产av精品麻豆| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 色哟哟·www| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| av免费观看日本| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 一级av片app| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| .国产精品久久| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 99久久综合免费| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲成色77777| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 大香蕉久久网| 观看av在线不卡| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产美女午夜福利| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 一级毛片 在线播放| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产视频内射| 一级爰片在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 99九九在线精品视频 | 国产精品成人在线| 22中文网久久字幕| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| av在线播放精品| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 看免费成人av毛片| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 搡老乐熟女国产| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | tube8黄色片| av黄色大香蕉| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品久久久精品久久久| videossex国产| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 人妻一区二区av| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产淫语在线视频| 免费少妇av软件| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| h视频一区二区三区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产精品成人在线| 久久久久久伊人网av| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 一区在线观看完整版| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 日韩强制内射视频| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 午夜91福利影院| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 99热全是精品| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲性久久影院| 欧美区成人在线视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| tube8黄色片| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 五月天丁香电影| 一级av片app| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 嫩草影院入口| 99热全是精品| 亚洲第一av免费看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 欧美97在线视频| .国产精品久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久99一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产成人精品婷婷| 韩国av在线不卡| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久97久久精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 高清av免费在线| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 日韩强制内射视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 久久久久久人妻| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 人妻一区二区av| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 午夜免费鲁丝| 免费看av在线观看网站| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 观看av在线不卡| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看 | 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产色婷婷99| 成人国产麻豆网| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 99久久精品热视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| av福利片在线| 99九九在线精品视频 | 亚洲综合色惰| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 国产成人一区二区在线| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 亚洲图色成人| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日本免费在线观看一区| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 人妻 亚洲 视频| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 一区在线观看完整版| 性色avwww在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 97超碰精品成人国产| 中文天堂在线官网| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 少妇 在线观看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| av在线app专区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| av线在线观看网站| 男女免费视频国产| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产av精品麻豆| av天堂久久9| 99热这里只有精品一区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久影院123| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 欧美区成人在线视频| av一本久久久久| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 精品久久久噜噜| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 内射极品少妇av片p| xxx大片免费视频| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 色吧在线观看| 国产 精品1| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 中国国产av一级| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| av黄色大香蕉| 国产高清三级在线| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 极品教师在线视频| 91久久精品电影网| 成人无遮挡网站| 中文资源天堂在线| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 性色avwww在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 99热这里只有是精品50| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 三级国产精品片| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 中文字幕制服av| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 美女国产视频在线观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 精品久久久精品久久久| 黄色配什么色好看| 在线观看国产h片| 国产淫语在线视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 搡老乐熟女国产| 超碰97精品在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 高清av免费在线| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 99热6这里只有精品| kizo精华| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国内精品宾馆在线| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产在线视频一区二区| 深夜a级毛片| 一级毛片我不卡| 午夜影院在线不卡| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | videossex国产| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 成年av动漫网址| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 日本av免费视频播放| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美97在线视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 成人国产麻豆网| 简卡轻食公司| www.av在线官网国产| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产乱来视频区| 国产精品.久久久| 日韩av免费高清视频| 成人二区视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲成人手机| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产色婷婷99| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲av.av天堂| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲成色77777| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产在线男女| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产av国产精品国产| av视频免费观看在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 亚洲综合精品二区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 欧美日韩av久久| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 久久人人爽人人片av| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 久久久久久久久大av| 极品教师在线视频| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 日韩中字成人| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产在视频线精品| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 国产在线男女| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日本午夜av视频| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久久精品94久久精品| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 男女免费视频国产| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 99久久综合免费| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 成年人免费黄色播放视频 | 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| a级毛色黄片| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 性色av一级| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国内精品宾馆在线| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 看免费成人av毛片| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久热这里只有精品99| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 成人特级av手机在线观看| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| av天堂久久9| 岛国毛片在线播放| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 少妇高潮的动态图|