• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of material of metallic frame on the penetration resistances of ceramic-metal hybrid structures

    2020-04-09 18:37:34XuanyiAnChaoTianQitianSunYongxiangDong
    Defence Technology 2020年1期

    Xuanyi An,Chao Tian,Qitian Sun,Yongxiang Dong

    State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology,Beijing Institute of Technology,Beijing,100081,China

    Keywords:Hybrid structures Zirconia toughened alumina Penetration resistance Long-rod projectile Metallic frame

    ABSTRACT The effects of metallic material on the penetration resistances of ceramic-metal hybrid structures against vertical long-rod tungsten projectiles were studied by artillery-launched experiments and numerical simulation.Hybrid structures with rectangular cores in transverse orthogonal arrangement and slidefitting ceramic inserts of zirconia toughened alumina prisms were fabricated with titanium alloy TC4(Ti6Al4V),AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy panels,respectively.The results showed that the hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V exhibited the highest penetration resistance,followed by that of 7075 aluminum alloy with the same area density.The penetration resistance of the hybrid structure of AISI 4340 steel was the low est.The underlying mechanisms showed that the metallic material of a ceramicmetal hybrid structure can directly affect its energy absorption from the impact projectile,which further affects its penetration resistance.Different metallic frames exhibited different failure characteristics,resulting in different constraint conditions or support conditions for ceramic prisms.The high penetration resistance of the Ti6Al4V hybrid structure was due to its stronger back support to ceramic prisms as compared with that of AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure,and better constraint condition for ceramic prisms by metallic webs as compared with that of 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure.The results of mass efficiency and thickness efficiency show ed that the Ti6Al4V hybrid structure has advantages in reducing both the thickness and the mass of protective structure.In addition,because the ceramic-metal hybrid structures in the present work were heterogeneous,impact position has slight influence on their penetration resistances.?2020 China Ordnance Society.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    1.Introduction

    Hybrid sandwich structures have been extensively explored for blast loading and projectile penetration resistance[1-13].It has been reported that,under blast loadings or compressive loadings,the deformations of extruded 6061-T6 aluminum sandwich panels with corrugated cores[1,6]are less significant than those of monolithic alloy panels with the same area densities.How ever,a recent study[4]suggests that the extruded 6061-T6 aluminum sandwich panel without inserting,triangular corrugated cores showed similar penetration resistance against high-speed spherical projectile with mass of about 8.4 g compared with monolithic alloy panel with a thickness approximately that of the two face sheets.Yet the triangular alumina prisms inserted into core channels can significantly affect the penetration resistances of the panels.The targets with alumina filled possess very complicated failure mechanisms,such as ductile hole initiated in the face sheet,as well as the tensile failure and shear failure of the joints between back/face sheet and cores,the cone crack[14-15]initiated in the ceramic prisms separated by metallic webs,and the perforation of back sheet due to shear plugging.In addition,the ballistic limit of hybrid structure is highly sensitive to the impact location of projectile due to its asymmetry.For example,the impact at prism base engages a higher ballistic limit than that at the monolithic alloy panel with the same area density.In contrast,the impact at prism apex engages a lower ballistic limit than that at the monolithic alloy panel with the same area density.

    Due to the sensitivity of penetration resistance to impact location,Wadley investigated the effects of the shape of ceramic inserts on penetration resistance against a high-speed of 8.4 g spherical projectile and found that the hybrid structure with rectangular ceramic prisms exhibited the highest penetration resistance,follow ed by those with trapezoidal and triangular ceramic prisms[3].In addition,they also reported that the penetration resistance was related to not only the shape of ceramic prisms beneath the projectile,but also the shape of ceramic prisms of their adjacent ones,and the penetration resistance increased with the width of ceramic prisms increasing.However,wider ceramic prisms can enhance the extent of lateral damage,which decreases the penetration resistance of the hybrid structure in multi-hit scenarios[16].

    The hybrid structures with ceramic inserts mentioned above possess high penetration resistances against the high-speed spherical projectile of 8.4 g.In terms of thicker hybrid structures against the high-speed long-rod projectiles with much greater masses,we explored the responses of the hybrid structures with rectangular cores of same area density,yet arranged differently against a vertical 86 g long-rod tungsten projectile[17].The results indicate that the penetration resistance of the targets is significantly improved when the arrangement of ceramic cores changes from upright to transverse parallel or transverse orthogonal(Fig.1)because the hybrid structures with transverse core arrangements show better constraint conditions for ceramic prisms by metallic webs to blunt and erode the projectiles compared to that with upright core arrangement.

    Although ceramic-metal hybrid sandwich structures with transverse core arrangements possess high penetration resistances against long-rod projectiles,there are many factors that can affect their penetration mechanisms and the efficacy of ceramic in ballistic performance.The previous research[17]show ed that the constraint condition for ceramic prisms by metallic frames played an important role in the design of hybrid structure.Therefore,it is essential to investigate the effects of material of metallic frame on the penetration resistances of ceramic-metal hybrid structures,which can offer a good reference for the design of next generation of lightweight protection structures.In the present work,transverse orthogonal hybrid structures with ceramic inserts of zirconiatoughened alumina prisms were prepared respectively with titanium alloy TC4(Ti6Al4V),AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy,and their penetration resistances to 86 g long-rod tungsten projectiles were experimentally studied.The detailed penetration process and energy absorption of the substructures were numerically simulated,aiming to explore the related penetration resisting mechanism.

    2.Structure design and experimental procedure

    2.1.Target preparation

    Three ceramic-metal hybrid structures,A,B and C,were fabricated with Ti6Al4V,AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy panels,respectively.Fig.2 shows the detailed fabrication process of hybrid structure A.Brie fly,two mutually perpendicular layers including 10 rectangular prisms(18 mm×18 mm×100 mm)were horizontally removed from a 55 mm thick Ti6Al4V panel.Ten ceramic prisms were inserted into the voids of the Ti6Al4V panel by slid-f t i ting and glued to the panel using epoxy adhesive.A 5 mm thick 603 armor steel sheet was attached to the bottom of the panel using epoxy adhesive to complete the structure.

    Hybrid structures B and C were prepared with the same procedure,but using a AISI 4340 steel panel and a 7075 aluminum alloy panel,respectively(Fig.3 and Fig.4).Table 1 shows their area densities.The maximum relative deviation of the area densities of the structures is 5%.Therefore,the area densities of hybrid structures A,B and C were considered as same.

    2.2.Ballistic testing and characterization

    The penetration resistances of hybrid structures A,B and C were experimentally examined against a pointed long-rod tungsten projectile(Hardness 57 HRC)with the mass of 86 g.Fig.5 shows the experimental arrangement and the parameters of the projectile for ballistic testing.A long-rod 93 tungsten projectile with nylon sabot(Fig.7)was shot using a powder gun with the caliber of 40 mm at normal incidence toward the center of a hybrid structure fixed in a positioning frame(Fig.5).The incident velocity of the projectile to the target face and its penetration characteristics near the target were measured and recorded using a Phantom 710 high-speed camera(Vision Research,Inc.Wayne,New Jersey,USA).In the experiment,the frame rate of the high-speed camera was 30839 fps,and the exposure time was 4.5μs.The exit energy of projectile was evaluated using a witness panel made of AISI 4340 steel if the incident velocity of projectile was higher than the ballistic limit of the hybrid structure.

    2.3.Numerical simulation

    The penetration process of each hybrid structure was numerically simulated using the nonlinear finite element code LS-DYNA 971 to determine the effect of metal material on the ballistic responses of hybrid structures[18].The Johnson-Cook model is the most popular model for metallic materials subjected to large strains,high strain rates,and high temperature[19-23].In this model,the yield strength depends on the state of equivalent plastic strain,strain rate and temperature.The Johnson-Holmquist 2(JH-2)model is a computational model which is widely used for brittle materials subjected to large strains,large strain rates and high pressures[19,24,25 and 26].This model includes pressure dependent strength,damage and fracture,significant strength after fracture,bulking and strain rate effects.Therefore,the Johnson-Holmquist 2 (JH-2)model was used to simulate zirconiatoughened alumina and the metallic materials including Ti6Al4V,AISI4340 steel,7075 aluminum alloy,tungsten alloy and 603 armor steel were simulated using the Johnson-Cook(JC)model.The JC model constants and JH-2 model constants are listed in Table 2[19-23]and Table 3[24]respectively.The hybrid structure and projectile were modeled with eight node solid elements.Due to the low strength and low thickness of the epoxy adhesive,as compared with the steel and ceramic,“CONTACT-TIED-SURFACE-TO-SURFACE”was used to model the adhesive,instead of constructing an epoxy layer in the model.The tensile stress at failure and the shear stress at failure of the adhesive were set to 120 MPa and 80 MPa,respectively[27].Each part of the system was connected with“CONTACT-ERODING-SURFACE-TO-SURFACE”[18].The contacts were updated once the elements on the free surface of structure were eliminated by the relevant material failure criteria.The minimum and maximum element sizes were set to 0.3 mm and 0.33 mm,respectively.In the damage analyses of hybrid structures,a half model of each armor system was established due to the symmetry of the hybrid structures(Fig.6).

    Fig.1.Schematic of hybrid structures with different arrangements[17].

    Fig.2.Fabrication process and detailed parameters of hybrid structure A.

    Fig.3.Detailed parameters of hybrid structure B and picture of hybrid structure B before impact test.

    3.Results and discussion

    3.1.Experimental analysis

    Fig.4.Detailed parameters of hybrid structure C and picture of hybrid structure C before impact test.

    Table 1 Area densities of hybrid structures A,B and C.

    Hybrid structures A,B and C with the same structure but different materials were tested to explore the effects of metallic material on penetration resistance.Table 4 summarizes the results of projectile impacts on hybrid structures A,B and C.The incident velocity of the projectile launched by the powder gun was 950 m/s with the variation within 1.6%,and thus was considered same for each structure.All the impacts were normal impacts as shown in Fig.7 obtained from the high-speed camera.Fig.8,Fig.9 and Fig.10 show the pictures of hybrid structures A,B and C after the test,respectively.

    As shown in Fig.8[17],hybrid structure A was able to hold the incident projectile.The 603 armor steel attached to hybrid structure A after the impact test,yet a perforated hole was found in the face sheet,and a minor but obvious deformation was observed on both back sheet of the titanium alloy frame and the 603 armor steel plate.In addition,a few cracks were formed on the edges of the first and second layers of the metallic frame in the axial direction of ceramic prisms(Fig.8(c)and Fig.8(d)).After the impact test,the TC4 frame of hybrid structure A was cut open along its impact zone using a wire electrical discharge machine after removing ceramic prisms in its voids,in order to obtain its intact thickness(Fig.8(f)).Some node failures were found between the cells and the face/middle/back sheet of the hybrid structure on the cross section across the penetration hole(Fig.8(f)),similar to the joint failure of the extruded 6061-T6 aluminum sandwich panel caused by the impact of a high-speed spherical projectile[4].The total intact thickness of the impacted hybrid structure A including the 603 armor steel sheet was measured to be 14 mm.The projectile with the mass of 16.5 g was recovered after the impact(Fig.8(e)),and 80.8%of the projectile mass was lost.

    Fig.5.Schematic of experimental setup and photo of site layout.

    Fig.6.Numerical models of one half of the armor systems(a)Hybrid structure A(b)Hybrid structure B(c)Hybrid structure C.

    Fig.7.Illustration of normal projectile impact on the target taken by the high-speed camera.

    As shown in Fig.9,hybrid structure B was completely perforated.The 603 armor steel of hybrid structure B was not de-bonded from the structure after the impact either.Although no fractures were found on the edges of hybrid structure B,elliptical ruptures near a ductile hole were initiated on the face sheet due to the movement of shattering ceramic prisms along the inverse direction of the impact(Fig.9(d))and fractures were also observed along the axial direction of ceramic prisms in the back-face of metallic frame made of AISI 4340 steel due to the combined impacts of the projectile and crushed ceramic prisms beneath the projectile(Fig.9(e)).A large permanent deformation with a petaling hole and a bulge of 25 mm was observed on the back of the 603 armor steel sheet(Fig.9(f)).Craters were formed in the witness panel made of AISI 4340 steel(Fig.9(a)).

    As shown in Fig.10,hybrid structure C was completely perforated.The hybrid structure C made of 7075 aluminum alloy was almost completely disintegrated by the impact(Fig.10(b)).Most of the ceramic prisms fell off,and a few of ceramic prisms remained in the structure were cracked.The recovered ceramic fragments could remain its size with slight fractures.A ductile hole with a bulge of 16 mm was observed on the back of the 603 armor steel sheet(Fig.10(c)).Craters were also formed in the witness panel made of AISI 4340 steel(Fig.10(d)).

    Based on these results,it can be clearly seen that the metallic material of hybrid structure can significantly affect its penetration resistance against long-rod tungsten projectile.The penetration resistances of hybrid structures A,B and C that were prepared with exactly same arrangement of bilayer transverse orthogonal ceramic inserts but different materials(Ti6Al4V,AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy,respectively)at the same area density follow ed the order of A>C>B.Hybrid structure A was able to hold the projectile with a thick intact thickness(Fig.8(f)),while hybrid structure B was completely perforated.No fracture was formed on the edges of hybrid structure B,indicating that its ceramic prisms were endow ed good constraint condition by the metallic webs of the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure.How ever,the density of AISI 4340 steel is higher than that of Ti6Al4V,and thus the back support of hybrid structure B is thinner than that of hybrid structure A with the samearea density.The large fractures formed along the axial direction of ceramic prisms on the back-face of the metallic frame made of AISI 4340 steel and the large permanent deformation with a petaling hole on the back of 603 armor steel sheet of hybrid structure B indicate that it failed to stop the projectile because its back sheet was not strong enough to support the ceramic prisms to erode and resist the projectile.Although hybrid structure C was also completely perforated,the impact produced less scattered debris with lower kinetic energies behind it than behind hybrid structure B,resulting in fewer scattered craters with smaller total area and depth in the witness panel(Fig.10(d)and Table 4).Compared to hybrid structure A,the complete disintegration of hybrid structure C suggests that 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure failed to provide a good constraint condition for ceramic prisms to blunt and erode the projectile,consistent with Yang's conclusion that 7075 aluminum alloy was a brittle material under dynamic impact loading conditions[28].These experimental results indicate that different metallic frames exhibited different failure characteristics,resulting in different constraint conditions or support conditions for ceramic prisms.The hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V exhibited the highest penetration resistance,as compared with those of AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy,because of the strong back support to ceramic prisms and good constraint condition for ceramic prisms by metallic webs.

    Table 2 JC material model constants for metallic materials[19-23].

    Table 3 JH-2 material model constants for zirconia-toughened alumina[24].

    3.2.Numerical simulation analysis

    The element size in numerical simulation plays an important role to provide accurate outputs.How ever,extremely small size of element makes the numerical process time-consuming.Therefore,the effects of element size on numerical results were investigated in the present work.Fig.11 shows the relative errors between experimental results and numerical results with different element sizes for the intact thickness of hybrid structure A after impact.It can be seen that the relative error varies a lot with the element size increasing.When the element sizes are under 0.35 mm,the relative errors have no big difference and numerical simulation outputs show ed good agreement with the experimental results.Hence,0.3-0.33 mm elements in the present work were enough to provide accurate results.

    To further understand the effect of metallic material on penetration resistance,the impact processes of the hybrid structures A,B,and C were numerically simulated.Fig.12 shows the representative simulated material damage contours in the ceramic prisms of hybrid structure A,and deformations of 603 armor steel in hybrid structure B and hybrid structure C.As can be seen,the damage inthe ceramic prisms moves much faster than the penetration velocity of projectile,although the ceramic prisms are separated by the metallic webs.Hybrid structure A is able to hold the incident projectile,while hybrid structures B and C are completely perforated.Table 5 shows the comparison of the numerical and experimental results.The maximum difference between the numerical and experimental results is 10.8%with the average value of 8.97%.Fig.13,Fig.14 and Fig.15 show the numerical and experimental results of failure characteristics of the metallic frames of hybrid structures A,B and C after the test,respectively.It can be clearly seen that numerical simulation outputs show ed good agreement with the experimental results.These results suggest that the numerical models are reliable to simulate the impact processes of the hybrid structures against long-rod projectiles.

    Table 4 Impact results of hybrid structures A,B and C.

    Fig.8.Pictures of hybrid structure A impacted by a long-rod 93 tungsten projectile[17].(a)Retrieved ceramic debris;(b)Hybrid structure A with perforated face sheet and remained ceramic prisms;(c)Fractures formed in the cellular direction on the first layer of cores;(d)Fractures on the second layer;(e)Residual projectile with the mass of 16.5 g after impact;(f)Cross section of the TC4 frame across the penetration hole.

    Fig.9.Pictures of hybrid structure B impacted by the projectile.(a)Craters formed on the witness panel made of AISI4340 steel;(b)Retrieved ceramic debris;(c)Hybrid structure B impacted by the projectile;(d)Elliptic fractures caused by the shear and tearing near a ductile hole on the face sheet;(e)Fractures formed along the axial direction of the ceramic prisms on the back-face sheet of the metallic frame made of AISI 4340 steel near a hole;(f)Permanent deformation with a petaling hole on the 603 armor steel sheet.

    Fig.10.Pictures of hybrid structure C impacted by an 8 mm diameter projectile(a)Retrieved ceramic debris and 7075 aluminum alloy debris(b)Broken metallic frame(c)603 armor steel back plate after the impact test(d)Craters formed on the witness panel made of AISI 4340 steel.

    Fig.11.Relative errors between experimental results and numerical results with different element sizes for the intact thickness of hybrid structure A.

    Fig.16 shows the variation of the projectile's kinetic energy with time for the three hybrid structures.As can be seen,the kinetic energy of projectile in hybrid structure A decreases much more rapidly than those in hybrid structures B and C,indicating that the hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V possesses a higher penetration resistance than those of AISI 4340 steel and 7075 aluminum alloy.In addition,the total energies(sum of kinetic energy and internal energy)(t=220μs)of the metallic frames and 603 armor steel panels of hybrid structures B and C are higher than those of hybrid structure A due to their more significant permanent deformations(Fig.17).How ever,compared with those in hybrid structures B and C,the ceramic prisms in hybrid structure A can absorb more energies from the impact projectile due to its stronger back support and better constraint conditions by metallic webs(Fig.17),consistent with the experimental results described in Section 3.1.These results indicate that the metallic material of hybrid structure can directly affect the energy absorption of the structure from the impact projectile,and a strong back support to ceramic prisms and strong confinement for ceramic prisms by metallic webs are the keys to improve the penetration resistance of hybrid structures against long-rod projectiles.

    Fig.12.Simulated material damage contours in the ceramic prisms of hybrid structure A(a)and deformations of 603 armor steel in hybrid structure B(b)and hybrid structure C(c).

    Table 5 Comparison of the numerical and experimental results.

    Fig.13.Numerical and experimental results of failure characteristics of the TC4 frame of hybrid structure A.

    To clearly compare the penetration resistances of the hybrid structures fabricated with different materials,the mass efficiency and thickness efficiency of hybrid structures A,B and C were investigated numerically as shown in Fig.18.The incident velocities of the projectiles were 1200 m/s.The mass efficiency and thickness efficiency compare the ballistic performance of the targets with that of the 603 armor steel target(Quasi static state:Hardness 42 HRC/395 HB,Yield strength 0.91 GPa,Ultimate strength 1.25 GPa,Elongation 24%),and are defined as[29-30]:

    Fig.14.Numerical and experimental results of fractures along the axial direction of ceramic prisms in the back-face of metallic frame made of AISI 4340 steel from hybrid structure B.

    Fig.15.Numerical and experimental results of the disintegration of metallic frame made of 7075 aluminum alloy from hybrid structure C.

    where Fmis the mass efficiency,Fsis the thickness efficiency,Prefis the depth of penetration in 603 armor steel without the hybrid structure,Presis the residual depth of penetration in 603 armor steel by the projectile penetrated through the hybrid structure,δ is the thickness of the hybrid structure,ρ603is the density of 603 armor steel,and ρhsis the average density of the hybrid structure.

    Fig.16.Energy histories of the projectiles.

    Fig.17.Total energy of the substructures of hybrid structures.

    Fig.18.Schematic of depth of penetration test.

    The depth of penetration in 603 armor steel without the hybrid structure was 69 mm,and the results of the mass efficiency and thickness efficiency are shown in Table 6.It can be seen that hybrid structure A had the highest mass efficiency,followed by that of hybrid structure C,and the mass efficiency of hybrid structure B was the low est.How ever,the thickness efficiency of hybrid structure B was higher than that of hybrid structure C.All of the mass efficiencies are larger than 1,which means that hybrid structures A,B and C have advantages in reducing the mass of protective structure.How ever,only the thickness efficiency of hybrid structure A is larger than 1,which means that only hybrid structure A has advantages in reducing the thickness of the protective structure.

    To further explore the penetration resistance of hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V with ceramic insertions in transverse orthogonal arrangement(hybrid structure A),which exhibited the highest penetration resistance,five representative impact positions were selected to investigate the sensitivity of penetration resistance to impact location as shown in Fig.19.The penetration resistance of the hybrid structure was compared with that of 603 monolithic plate with the same areal density to further understand the antipenetration performance of the hybrid structure.The incident velocities of the projectiles were 1200 m/s,and Fig.20 shows energy histories of the projectiles.It can be seen that the impacts at different positions result in slightly different energy absorptions.The impact at P1 dissipates the energy most,yet which is only 11%higher than the impact at P5,indicating that impact position has only slight influence on the penetration resistance of hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V with ceramic insertions in transverse orthogonal arrangement.The energy dissipated by the hybrid stricture is 24%-35%higher than that dissipated by the 603 monolithic plate with the same areal density,indicating the excellent antipenetration performance of the hybrid structure.

    4.Conclusions

    Fig.19.Schematic of different impact positions(top view).

    Fig.20.Energy histories of the projectiles impacted on the hybrid structure at different positions and on 603 monolithic plate.

    The responses of metallic materials of hybrid structures with ceramic insertions in transverse orthogonal arrangement against a vertical long-rod tungsten projectile with mass of 86 g were investigated experimentally and numerically.The hybrid structure fabricated with Ti6Al4V exhibited the highest penetration resistance(with a total intact thickness of 14 mm),while that of AISI 4340 steel and that of 7075 aluminum alloy were completely perforated.The penetration resistance of the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure was the lowest because the impact of the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure produced more scattered craters with larger total area(697 mm2)and depth(7 mm)in the witness panel than that of the 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure(producing craters with the total area of 550 mm2and the depth of 4 mm in the witness panel).It can be explained that the metallic material of a hybrid structure can directly affect its energy absorption from the impact projectile.Different metallic frames exhibited different failure characteristics,resulting in different constraint conditions or support conditions for ceramic prisms.The ceramic prisms in the hybrid structure of Ti6Al4V were more strongly supported than those in the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure and were under better constraint conditions than those in the 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure,which endowed them the ability to erode and resist the projectile,resulting in higher energy absorption of the ceramic prisms(2.19 times that of ceramic prisms in the AISI 4340 steel hybrid structure,and 1.91 times that of ceramic prisms in the 7075 aluminum alloy hybrid structure).Therefore,a strong back support to ceramic prisms and strong confinement for ceramic prisms bymetallic webs are the key factors to improve the penetration resistances of ceramic-metal hybrid structures against long-rod projectiles.The results of mass efficiency and thickness efficiency showed that the Ti6Al4V hybrid structure has advantages in reducing both the thickness and the mass of protective structure.The results also indicate that the energy dissipated by the Ti6Al4V hybrid stricture is 24%-35%higher than that dissipated by the 603 monolithic plate with the same areal density,indicating the excellent anti-penetration performance of the hybrid structure.In addition,impact position has only slight influence on the penetration resistance of hybrid structure with ceramic insertions in transverse orthogonal arrangement,with no more than 11%difference.

    Table 6 Results of the mass efficiency and thickness efficiency.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are very grateful for the support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.11872121).

    久久久久久久久大av| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 91成人精品电影| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 桃花免费在线播放| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产男女内射视频| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 精品一区二区免费观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 满18在线观看网站| 免费av中文字幕在线| 一本大道久久a久久精品| av在线app专区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 在线观看三级黄色| a级毛片黄视频| 久久狼人影院| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 美女主播在线视频| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 观看av在线不卡| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产精品免费大片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久狼人影院| 精品酒店卫生间| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 日本色播在线视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 日本wwww免费看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| a级毛片黄视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 在线看a的网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品三级大全| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 一本久久精品| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 久久狼人影院| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产极品天堂在线| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲内射少妇av| 在线观看国产h片| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 亚洲成人一二三区av| av视频免费观看在线观看| 老司机影院毛片| 国产 一区精品| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 制服人妻中文乱码| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 在线观看三级黄色| 精品国产国语对白av| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 午夜av观看不卡| 97在线视频观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产综合精华液| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产成人精品福利久久| 日本av免费视频播放| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 欧美+日韩+精品| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 丁香六月天网| 国产综合精华液| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 99久久精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 视频区图区小说| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 一区二区三区精品91| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 国产永久视频网站| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产成人aa在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 精品少妇内射三级| 久久久久久久国产电影| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 日本与韩国留学比较| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| av线在线观看网站| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 午夜激情av网站| 久久婷婷青草| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 日本91视频免费播放| 五月开心婷婷网| av福利片在线| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 免费看不卡的av| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 蜜桃在线观看..| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日本色播在线视频| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 午夜av观看不卡| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产永久视频网站| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 如何舔出高潮| 免费av不卡在线播放| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产男女内射视频| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 日本午夜av视频| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲第一av免费看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产成人一区二区在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 熟女av电影| 最黄视频免费看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产成人精品福利久久| 成人国语在线视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产精品一国产av| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 欧美97在线视频| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 免费少妇av软件| 91国产中文字幕| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 91国产中文字幕| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 一区二区三区精品91| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 亚洲国产色片| 91精品三级在线观看| 一级毛片 在线播放| a级毛片黄视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产视频首页在线观看| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 在线天堂最新版资源| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| av在线app专区| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲第一av免费看| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲四区av| 欧美人与善性xxx| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 久久影院123| 伊人久久国产一区二区| freevideosex欧美| 午夜91福利影院| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 青春草国产在线视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 免费看av在线观看网站| 插逼视频在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 97在线人人人人妻| 超色免费av| 婷婷色综合www| 国产成人一区二区在线| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品一区二区三卡| 美女主播在线视频| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲成色77777| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产高清三级在线| 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 老司机影院毛片| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 丁香六月天网| 日本午夜av视频| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲中文av在线| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 制服诱惑二区| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 一区二区三区精品91| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 久久久久久久久大av| 成人二区视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 久久午夜福利片| 91精品三级在线观看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 男人操女人黄网站| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| av不卡在线播放| 岛国毛片在线播放| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产男女内射视频| 丁香六月天网| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 成人二区视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 久久久久网色| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲国产精品999| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产成人精品一,二区| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲精品视频女| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产在视频线精品| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 黄色一级大片看看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 免费看不卡的av| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 简卡轻食公司| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| av有码第一页| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 91精品三级在线观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 97在线视频观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 一个人免费看片子| av免费在线看不卡| videos熟女内射| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 18禁观看日本| av免费观看日本| 飞空精品影院首页| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 日本午夜av视频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产精品无大码| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片 | 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 欧美日韩av久久| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 亚洲精品视频女| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 22中文网久久字幕| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| av免费在线看不卡| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品三级大全| 在线观看国产h片| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产男女内射视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 精品久久久久久久久av| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久精品94久久精品| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产综合精华液| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 黄片播放在线免费| 精品酒店卫生间| 成人无遮挡网站| 日本黄大片高清| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲天堂av无毛| av黄色大香蕉| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费看av在线观看网站| 日韩av免费高清视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 韩国av在线不卡| 黑人高潮一二区| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 97在线视频观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 18禁观看日本| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产av国产精品国产| 超碰97精品在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 丁香六月天网| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 日本黄大片高清| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 少妇丰满av| 成人综合一区亚洲| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 中文欧美无线码| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产永久视频网站|