• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Interface defeat studies of long-rod projectile impacting on ceramic targets

    2020-04-09 18:36:44ZhiWuFng
    Defence Technology 2020年1期

    Y.X.Zhi ,H.Wu ,Q.Fng

    a Amy Engineering University of PLA,Nanjing,210007,China

    b Research Institute of Structural Engineering and Disaster Reduction,College of Civil Engineering,Tongji University,Shanghai,200092,China

    Keywords:Interface defeat Ceramic Transition velocity Numerical simulation Parametric study

    ABSTRACT The interface defeat phenomenon always occurs when a long-rod projectile impacting on the ceramic target with certain velocity,i.e.,the projectile is forced to flow radially on the surface of ceramic plates for a period of time without significant penetration.Interface defeat has a direct effect upon the ballistic performance of the armor piercing projectile,which is studied numerically and theoretically at present.Firstly,by modeling the projectiles and ceramic targets with the SPH(Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics)particles and Lagrange finite elements,the systematic numerical simulations on interface defeat are performed with the commercial finite element program AUTODYN.Three different responses,i.e.,complete interface defeat,dwell and direct penetration,are reproduced in different types of ceramic targets(bare,buffered,radially confined and oblique).Furthermore,by adopting the validated numerical algorithms,constitutive models and the corresponding material parameters,the influences of projectile(material,diameter,nose shape),constitutive models of ceramic(JH-1 and JH-2 models),buffer and cover plate(thickness,constraints,material),as well as the prestress acted on the target(radial and hydrostatic)on the interface defeat(transition velocity and dwell time)are systematically investigated.Finally,based on the energy conservation approach and taking the strain rate effect of ceramic material into account,a modified model for predicting the upper limit of transition velocity is proposed and validated.The present work and derived conclusions can provide helpful reference for the design and optimization of both the long-rod projectile and ceramic armor.?2020 China Ordnance Society.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    1.Introduction

    Ceramics are widely applied as protective materials on armored vehicles on account of its high compressive strength and hardness.Meanwhile,the low density of ceramic makes it possible to reduce the total weight,which is of great significance in designing modern weight-efficient armored system.The role of ceramic plates in the interaction of high-velocity long-rod projectiles and armor is to plastically deform and decelerate the projectiles,in this scenario,there exists a special phenomenon,i.e.,the projectile is forced to flow radially on the surface of ceramic plates for a period of time without significant penetration,seen in Fig.1(a and b)[1,2].This remarkable phenomenon,know n as interface defeat,was firstly reported by Hauver et al.[3-7].

    Fig.1(c)shows the dependence of the instantaneous penetration velocity of the projectile nose with the initial impact velocity of projectile v0,and three succeeding different responses of projectile with v0increasing can be found.Whenthe complete interface defeat of projectile occurs on the surface of ceramic target without substantial penetration.Wheni.e.,the dwell stage,the partial interface defeat occurs firstly and follow ed by penetrations.When,the direct penetration occurs with minimal dwell on the ceramic surface.The non-negligible kinetic energy of projectile losses due to erosion and deceleration during the dwell stage,and the ballistic performance of projectile will be obviously reduced if the dwell stage can be effectively elongated.Therefore,the interface defeat is well worth deep study for both the weapon and armored vehicle designers.The key parameters for the interface defeat are the lowerand uppervelocity bounds of dwell stage(called transition velocity),as well as the corresponding time duration(called dw ell time).

    In the existing experimental work,Behner et al.[8,9]performed the reverse ballistic tests to determine the penetration dynamics and interface defeat capability of bare and buffered SiC targets against pure gold long-rod projectiles,respectively.Furthermore,the depth of penetration(DOP)tests were carried out to study the dwell characteristics of tungsten alloy long-rod projectiles impacting on the unconfined finite-thickness SiC targets[10].By using the flash X-ray radiographs,a series of reverse ballistic tests were conducted by Lundberg's group[11-13]to determine the transition velocity of different combinations of metallic(tungsten and molybdenum)long-rod projectiles and radially confined ceramic targets(SiC,B4C,TiB2,Syndie),respectively.Furthermore,the parametric influences on the transition velocity,including the hardness,fracture toughness of ceramic targets and nose shape of projectiles were discussed by Lundberg et al.[1].The oblique impacts,which are more likely occurred,were experimentally studied by Anderson et al.[14],in which the interface defeat and dwell time of pure gold projectile impacting SiC targets with the obliquity of 30°,45°and 60°are compared with the normal impacting scenarios.The details of the above tests will be given in Section 2.

    As for the numerical simulation work,by adopting the 2D meshless projectiles and 2D Lagrange finite elements for ceramic targets which are then automatically convert into meshless particles due to severe distortions,Holmquist and Johnson[15-18]numerically examined the dynamic responses of ceramic targets subjected to the high-speed projectile impacts,including the complete interface defeat,dwell and direct penetration scenarios.By establishing the projectile and SiC target with SPH(Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics)particles and Lagrange finite elements,Quan et al.[19]compared the numerical predictions of interface defeat for confined targets with the experimental observations draw n by Lundberg et al.[11],in which JH-1 model[20]was adopted to describe the ceramic material.Chi et al.[21]further proposed a numerical technique to apply the prestress on the confined ceramic targets with the non-linear analysis program AUTODYN[22],and the effects of different prestress condition,i.e.,radial,axial,and hydrostatic,on the impact resistance of ceramic targets and interface defeat were discussed.

    The existing theoretical analyses on the interface defeat are mainly concentrated in the predictions of the lower and upper bounds of transition velocity as well as the dwell time.By assuming the approximate radial distribution of the normal pressure loading on the ceramic target during projectile penetrations,the expression of the transition velocity was given by Lundberg et al.[11],which was validated by the tests of different projectiles/ceramic targets combinations.Based on the Alekseevskii-Tate(A-T)model[23,24],Anderson and Walker[2]presented an analytical model that captures the essential mechanics of interface defeat and dw ell,which was validated by both the small arms and long-rod projectile impacting test on ceramic targets.Li et al.[25,26]extended the Alekseevskii-Tate(A-T)model[23,24]to predict the penetration velocity decay as well as the mass loss of flat and conical nosed long-rod projectiles during the interface defeat.By taking the Hugoniot elastic limit(HEL)of ceramic material into account,Li et al.[26]modified the lower bound of transition velocity initially proposed by Lundberg et al.[11].Furthermore,the transition velocity and dwell time for the oblique impact were discussed by Li and Chen[27],and the corresponding comparisons with the normal impact scenario were performed.

    Generally,the systematic experimental studies on the interface defeat of long-rod projectiles normally and obliquely impacting bare,buffered and confined ceramic targets have been conducted.Nevertheless,the corresponding numerical simulation work as well as the related parametric influences are rarely reported.Besides,the upper bound of transition velocity vupper0proposed by Lundberg et al.[11]and Liet al.[26]are deviated from the corresponding test results.At present,by adopting the SPH particles and Lagrange finite elements for projectiles and ceramic targets,the existing tests of interface defeat[8-14]are firstly numerically simulated,and the transition velocity and dwell time are discussed comprehensively.Then,based on the validated numerical algorithm,constitutive model and parameters,the parametric analyses,including the projectile,constitutive models of ceramic,buffer and cover plate as well as the prestress acted on the target are numerically performed.Finally,based on energy conservation approach and taking the strain rate effect of ceramic material into account,a modified model for predicting the upper bound of transition velocity is proposed.

    2.Numerical simulations of the existing tests

    Systematic experimental studies on the interface defeat of ceramic targets were carried out successively by Behner,Lundberg,and Anderson's group from 2000 to 2011[8-14].Table 1 summarizes the main parameters of projectiles and targets,where ρpand ρtare the densities of projectile and target,L and D are the length and diameter of projectile,respectively.The corresponding target configurations,i.e.,bare or buffered target(Type I),radially confined target with cover and back plates(Type II),and bare or buffered oblique target(Type III)are given in the last column of Table 1.

    2.1.Behner's test[8-10]

    2.1.1.Pure gold projectiles impacting bare and buffered SiC ceramic targets

    Firstly,the pure gold projectile penetration test on bare SiC ceramic target[9]is numerically simulated to calibrate the related parameters of pure gold.During the test,two typical pure gold long-rod projectiles with the diameters of 0.75 mm and 1.00 mm and lengths of 50 and 70 mm were used,and the ceramic targets were SiC-N regular cylinders with a diameter of 20 mm and a length of 35 mm,respectively.As shown in Fig.2 and D axisymmetric models of the pure gold long-rod projectile and the bare SiC ceramic target were established in AUTODYN[22].Considering the response of radial flow during the dwell stage and large deformation in the subsequent penetration stage,the projectile was discretized into SPH particles.The projectile particles were permitted to move freely without the restriction of the grid.The SPH particle size is chosen as 0.125 mm,which guarantees the values of SPH particles along the radius and diameter of projectile are both integer.It is also identical with which adopted by Quan et al.[19]and Chi et al.[21].Besides,the SiC ceramic target was represented in Lagrange algorithm,taking the efficiency and accuracy of computation into account,the mesh size is determined as 0.25 mm by trial and error.

    Considering that the comprehensive parameters of pure gold were rarely reported,the Von Mises constitutive model with linear Equation of State(EOS)and plastic strain failure model was selected to describe the behavior of pure gold.Based on the shear modulus G and the Poisson's ratio νgiven by Steinberg[28],the bulk modulus K of pure gold can be derived,i.e.,K= 2(1+ ν)G/3(1-2ν)=165.67 GPa.As for SiC ceramic,the JH-1 model embedded in the AUTODYN material library[22]was selected with adding an erosion algorithm to ensure the continuity of computing.The maximum strength of the failed ceramic Sfmaxin JH-1 model can not be determined directly.At present,similar with the existing work[16],by trial and error,Sfmaxof SiC and the plastic strain of the pure gold are determined as 0.45 GPa and 0.15 based on the direct penetration test[9].The adopted parameters of pure gold and SiC ceramic are listed in Table 2.The comparisons between the numerical and experimental penetration depth and residual length of projectile[9]are illustrated in Fig.3(a).Furthermore,the comparisons between the numerical images and the flash X-ray photographs[9]at different time instants are further shown in Fig.3(b).The excellent agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data can be found,thus the correctness and applicability of the constitutive model parameters and numerical algorithm of the pure gold and SiC ceramic are both verified.

    Fig.2.2D axisymmetric numerical models of projectile and target.

    Table 1 Details of the interface defeat test.

    Table 2 Parameters of pure gold,SiCand Cu.

    For the interface defeat test,the transition velocity for pure gold long-rod projectile with diameter of 1 mm and a length-todiameter ratio of 70 impacting bare SiC ceramic target was obtained experimentally as 776-958 m/s[8].Based on the numerical algorithm and model parameters validated above,the numerical simulation of the shots with striking velocities of 776 m/s and 958 m/s were performed,respectively.The corresponding numerically simulated impact processes are shown in Fig.4.It can be seen from Fig.4(a)that the complete interface defeat of projectile occurs on the surface of SiC ceramic target,while no obvious penetration is happened.Comparably,in Fig.4(b),a minor penetration can be seen at 6μs,which is close to the experimental dwell time value of 6.25μs[8].

    For the buffered target,the simulation of SiC ceramic with a front 2 mm-thick copper buffer subjected to the impact of pure gold long-rod projectile was further performed.CU-OFHC in the standard material library in AUTODYN[22]was adopted to model the behavior of the copper,and the parameters of which are listed in Table 2.The mesh size of the copper buffer was identical with that of the ceramic target(0.25 mm)and the calculation algorithm and model parameters are identical with that in Section 2.1.1.The simulated impact process with the striking velocities of 1578 m/s is shown in Fig.5(a).Fig.5(b)further shows the comparisons between the numerical and experimental penetration depth as well as the residual length of projectile[9],where the interface between the buffer and ceramic is identified as the initial penetration depth of 0 mm.It can be seen from Fig.5(b)that,after perforating the copper buffer,the dw ell of the projectile occurs at the time instant of about 2.6μs and lasts to about 9.1μs.Therefore,the dw ell time is about 9.1-2.6=6.5μs,which is close to the experimental data of 7μs[9].During the dwell stage,the residual length of projectile reduces by 7.6%with no penetration occurs,which further addresses the significance of dwell in the design of ceramic armor under long-rod projectile impact.

    2.1.2.Tungsten projectiles impacting SiC/RHA steel composite targets

    For the tungsten projectiles impacting SiC/RHA steel composite targets conducted by Behner et al.[10],the corresponding 2D axisymmetric model was established,as shown in Fig.6.Similarly,the projectile was discretized into SPH particles with the size of 0.125 mm,and both the SiC ceramic and RHA steel were modeled in Lagrange algorithm with the mesh size of 0.25 mm.

    Fig.3.Experimental and numerical simulation results(a)DOP and residual length of projectile(b)penetration process.

    Fig.4.Simulated impact process of pure gold long-rod projectile impacting bare SiC ceramic target with the striking velocity of(a)776 m/s(b)958 m/s.

    Fig.5.Pure gold long-rod projectile impacting buffered SiC ceramic target with striking velocity of 1578 m/s(a)simulated impact process(b)comparisons.

    The corresponding parameters are listed in Table 3.The comparisons between the simulated and experimental total areal density of the penetrated materials,as well as the impact process with striking velocities of 525 m/s and 1356 m/s are given in Fig.7.Obviously,good agreements are obtained.Two different responses,i.e.,the radial flow and splash of projectile as well as the direct penetration with few projectile particles ejecting outwards,are reproduced,which are consistent with the experimental observations draw n by Behner et al.[10].

    Fig.6.2D axisymmetric models of projectile and target.

    2.2.L undberg's test[11-13]

    The 2D axisymmetric models of projectile and target were established and shown in Fig.8,in which the numerical algorithm as well as the mesh size were identical with those adopted in Section 2.1.The model parameters of 4340 steel and Mar 350 steel are listed in Table 3.

    The numerical simulations of tungsten alloy long-rod projectiles impacting confined SiC ceramic targets with striking velocities of 1410 m/s,1645 m/sand 2175 m/s were carried out,respectively.The corresponding impact process at different time instants,as well asthe comparisons between the simulated and experimental penetration depths(the interface between 4340 steel cover plate and SiC ceramic is identified as the initial penetration depth of 0 mm)are shown in Fig.9.It can be seen that,the numerical simulations can reproduce the three different responses of the projectiles with increasing the initial velocity,i.e.,complete interface defeat,dwell(for about 6μs)and direct penetration.Simultaneously,good agreements between the simulated and experimental DOP can be found.

    Table 3 Parameters of tungsten alloy,RHA,4340 steel and Mar 350.

    Fig.7.Comparisons between the simulated and experimental(a)total areal density of penetrated materials(b)impact process.

    Fig.8.2D axisymmetric model of projectile and target.

    Fig.9.Comparisons between the simulated and experimental results(a)1410 m/s,complete interface defeat(b)1645 m/s,dwell(c)2175 m/s,direct penetration(d)penetration depth.

    2.3.Anderson's test[14]

    Fig.10.3D models of the projectile and the oblique buffered ceramic target.

    Considering the asymmetric test setup of the oblique impact,Fig.10 illustrates the 3D models of projectile and the oblique buffered ceramic target,in which the pure gold long-rod projectile was similarly discretized into SPH particles with the particle size of 0.125 mm.The 3D models of both the oblique SiC ceramic and copper buffer were also established in using Lagrange algorithm with the mesh size of 0.25 mm.

    Based on the material parameters of pure gold and SiC ceramic given in Table 2,for ceramic targets with obliquities of 45°and 60°,Fig.11 shows the comparisons between the simulated and the experimental penetration depths and residual lengths of projectile,respectively.Comparisons between the simulated impact images(including the cross-sections of the penetrated ceramic targets in Fig.12(d))and the experimental flash X-ray photographs[14]at different time instants are further given in Fig.12.It can be seen that the simulation results are in good agreement with the experimental data,the responses of complete interface defeat and dwell are both reproduced numerically.

    Furthermore,the numerical simulation of a copper-buffered oblique SiC ceramic target impacted by pure gold long-rod projectile was undertaken,and the parameters of copper material were listed in Table 2.Fig.13 shows the comparisons between the simulated and experimental penetration depths and the residual lengths of projectile for ceramic targets with obliquities of 30°,45°and 60°,and the corresponding comparisons of the impact process are further given in Fig.14.Obviously,good agreements between the simulation results and the experimental data as well as the flash X-ray photographs are derived.

    Fig.11.Comparisons between the simulated and experimental penetration depths and residual lengths of projectile(a)45°targets,930 m/s,complete interface defeat(b)45°targets,1015 m/s,dw ell(c)60°targets,1008 m/s,complete interface defeat(d)60°targets,1515 m/s,dw ell.

    In this section,the numerical simulations of the existing tests of interface defeat were systematically carried out.Good agreements betw een the numerical predictions and experimental measurements are obtained in various impact scenarios.Meanwhile,different responses of the projectile,i.e.,complete interface defeat,dwell and direct penetration are all reproduced well numerically.Therefore,the numerical algorithm,constitutive models and the corresponding material parameters are validated,which are further adopted in the following parametric studies.

    3.Parametric influences on interface defeat

    In this section,based on the above validated numerical algorithm as well as the corresponding constitutive models and parameters of both the projectiles and targets,the influences of projectile(material,diameter,nose shape),constitutive models of ceramic(JH-1 and JH-2 models[20,30]),buffer and cover plate(thickness,constraints,material),as well as the prestress acted on the target(radial and hydrostatic)on the interface defeat(transition velocity and dwell time)are systematically investigated.

    3.1.Projectile

    The pure gold long-rod projectile impacting on bare SiC ceramic target[8]is taken as the control test,the influences of the material,diameter and nose shape of projectile on the interface defeat are discussed.

    3.1.1.Material

    Three different projectile materials,i.e.,tungsten,gold and molybdenum,were chosen to study the influences of projectile material on the interface defeat characteristics.The models of projectiles with three different materials,as well as identical mass and diameter were established,the corresponding density ρ and dynamic yield strength σypare listed in Table 4,and the numerical algorithm and mesh size are identical with those adopted in Section 2.1.The numerically predicted transition velocity for three different projectiles impacting bare SiCceramic target are given in the first three row s of Table 4.The transition velocity of 920-1180 m/s for pure gold projectile impacting bare SiC ceramic target is determined numerically,which is consistent with the experimental observations that the complete interface defeat and dwell lasted for about 7μs occurred at the striking velocity of 776 m/s and 958 m/s,respectively[8].Furthermore,it can be seen from Table 4 that,under the identical impacting scenario,the transition velocity of pure gold projectile is the highest on account of its lowest yield strength,and then is the tungsten alloy projectile,which is followed by the molybdenum projectile.

    3.1.2.Diameter

    The influence of the projectile diameter on the interface defeat is discussed by changing the projectile shank diameter while keeping the projectile total mass unchanged.The numerical algorithm as well as the mesh size remain unchanged,and the corresponding geometry size of the projectiles and the simulation results are given in the middle four row s of Table 4.Under the impact of pure gold projectiles with different diameters and initial striking velocities of 920 m/s,Fig.15 shows the distributions of Von Mises stress in SiC ceramic targets at the same time instant of 3μs,respectively.It can be seen that,the wider distributions of Von Mises stress and larger damage areas occur for the relatively larger projectile diameters,i.e.,1.5 mm and 2 mm.Besides,the upper bound of the transition velocityincreases gradually,i.e.,the direct penetration capacity of gold projectile into the bare ceramic target is weakened with increasing the diameter of projectile.Meanwhile,the lower bound of the transition velocitydecreases gradually,which indicates that complete interface defeat will occur easier with increasing the diameter.

    Fig.12.Comparisons between the flash X-ray images[14]and simulated results(a)45°target,930 m/s(b)45°target,1015 m/s(c)60°target,1008 m/s(d)60°target,1515 m/s.

    3.1.3.Nose shape

    The influence of projectile nose shape on interface defeat is discussed by changing the nose shape while keeping the projectile total mass unchanged.The numerical algorithm as well as the mesh size remain unchanged.The schematic diagram and geometric sizes of the projectiles with different nose shapes are given in Fig.16(a)and Table 4,respectively.Fig.16(b)further shows the damage distributions in SiC ceramic targets at the same instant of 5 μs for the three impacting scenarios,in which the initial striking velocities are 1100 m/s.Different responses,i.e.,penetration,dwell(from interface defeat to penetration)and interface defeat,corresponding to the three different nose shapes can be seen in Fig.16(b).The comparisons of the numerically derived transition velocities for the three projectile nose shapes are listed in the last three rows of Table 4.It indicates that,compared with the flat nosed projectile,the influence of hemispherical nose is slightly(the upper and lower bounds of the transition velocity decrease by 6.68%and 5.43%),while the truncated conical nose can significantly increase the lower limit of the transition velocity(the upper and lower bounds of the transition velocity increase by 4.24%and 19.57%).Based on Fig.16,it indicates that,the initial contact area between the truncated conical nose projectile and the ceramic target is the smallest,which prolongs the damage accumulation period of ceramic target.Moreover,the ballistic performance of the truncated conical projectile will be reduced on account of the continuous defeat of the nose and the decreasing velocity.Therefore,the truncated conical projectile leads to the highest transition velocity.

    3.2.Constitutive models of ceramic

    3.2.1.Introduction of JH-1 and JH-2 models[20,30]

    JH-1 and JH-2 constitutive models[20,30]are applicable to describe the dynamic responses of brittle materials such as ceramics subjected to large strains,high strain rates and high pressures.As shown in Fig.17,JH-1 strength model adopts a linear yield surface in which the complete strength includes two inflection points(p1,S1)and(p2,S2),and the residual strength contains the damage parameter α and the maximum residual strength parameter Sfmaxof the fractured ceramic.As for JH-2 strength model,nonlinear normalized yield surface is adopted in which the expressions of the intact strength σ*iand the fracture strength σ*fare

    where A and N are the intact strength coefficient and exponent,B and M are the fracture strength coefficient and exponent,respectively.The normalized pressure is p*=p/pHEL,where p is the actual pressure and pHELis the pressure at the HEL.The normalized maximum tensile hydrostatic pressure is T*=T/pHEL,where T is the maximum tensile hydrostatic pressure the ceramic can withstand.

    As shown in Fig.17,JH-1 and JH-2 models are essentially different in describing the relationship between the strength and the accumulated damage of ceramic materials.JH-1 model deems that the strength of ceramic will not decrease during the damage accumulation process,but it will drop to the residual strength instantaneously when the ceramic is completely damaged(D=1.0).Comparably,in JH-2 model,the strength of ceramic decreases gradually in the process of damage accumulation and will drop to the residual strength terminally when the ceramic is completely damaged(D=1.0).Grady and Moody[31]found that the strength of ceramic materials decreased slightly even under high impact pressure(about 20-30 GPa)while considerable damage has accumulated.It indicated that ceramics would maintain relatively complete strength for a certain period of time during the damage accumulation process.Furthermore,Holmquist and Johnson[16]pointed out that the JH-1 model was more accurate in describing the relationship between strength and damage accumulation of ceramic materials and was more suitable for numerically describing the interface defeat phenomenon than JH-2 model.

    Fig.13.Comparisons between the simulated and experimental results(a)30°targets,1419 m/s,complete interface defeat(b)30°targets,1529 m/s,dwell(c)45°targets,1545 m/s,dwell(d)60°targets,1548 m/s,dwell.

    3.2.2.Numerical simulation of interface defeat with JH-1 and JH-2 models

    The validations of JH-1 and JH-2 models have been verified comprehensively in different impact scenarios[15-21]whereas the systematical comparisons of these two models for interface defeat are limited.In this section,the normalized intact yield surface of JH-2 model is obtained by fitting the parameters of JH-1 model,and the corresponding comparisons of interface defeat simulated by above two models are further performed.

    As shown in Fig.18,based on the parameter pairs((p1,S1),(p2,S2))and the hydrostatic tensile limit T of JH-1 strength model(listed in Table 2),as well as the data proposed by Grady and Moody[31]for SiC ceramic,the parameters of A=0.69 and N=0.4 of the normalized intact yield face in JH-2 strength model are derived by fitting the intact strength surface of JH-1 model.Furthermore,based on the maximum fracture strength parameter Sfmaxvalidated in Section 2.1.1,the normalized residual strength parameters of B=0.0414 and M=0.107 in JH-2 model are determined.In summary,the parameters of JH-2 model are given in Table 5,and it is worth noting that the parameters except for the intact and fractured strength models are referred from Holmquist and Johnson[16]and Cronin et al.[32].

    As for pure gold long-rod projectile impacting on bare SiC ceramic target(simulated by JH-1 model),the maximum velocity of complete interface defeat of projectile was obtained numerically as 920 m/s(seen in Section 3.1.1 for details).Keeping the numerical algorithm as well as the mesh size unchanged,the corresponding numerical simulation by JH-2 model with the identical striking velocity was further conducted.It is found that about 8μs of the dwell time is obtained before the penetration into SiC target occurs.The distributions of Mises stress and damage in ceramic target at the time instant of 8μs described by JH-1 and JH-2 models are further given in Fig.19(a),respectively.It can be seen that,there is not much differences between the maximum Von Mises stress in the ceramic target predicted by above two models,while the distribution of damage area in JH-1 model is much wider than that in JH-2 model.At 8μs after the projectile impacting on the target,the occurrence of interface defeat phenomenon is predicted by JH-1 model,while the penetration has already begun simulated by JH-2 model.Besides,as for the partial interface defeat scenario,about 7μs of dwell was derived experimentally[8]when the striking velocity of pure gold increased up to 958 m/s.Similarly,the distributions of Mises stress and damage at the time instant of 7μs derived numerically by JH-1 and JH-2 models are given in Fig.19(b).Accumulation of damage can be seen in JH-1 model with the ceramic remains almost intact,which indicates that the dwell response occur.While in the JH-2 model,the fractured region(D=1)can be seen,which indicates that the penetration has already begun.

    In conclusion,compared with JH-2 model,JH-1 model is more suitable to describe the relationship between the strength and damage accumulation of ceramic material under projectile impact,and thus more accurate to reproduce both the complete and partial interface defeat characteristics.

    3.3.Buffer and cover plate

    The brittleness and significant decrease of penetration resistance of damaged ceramic make it unsuitable as a single target to resist the projectile impact.Therefore,buffers and cover plate are always attached to the front face of ceramic target to weaken the impact pressure as well as to enhance the interface defeat.It should be pointed out that the influence of buffer thickness may be varied on account of the material and geometric dimensions of projectiles and targets.Behner et al.[9]pointed out that the buffer thickness had a non-negligible effect on the dwell time of interface defeat.Crouch et al.[33]found that attaching a copper buffer would attenuate the shock stress and lead to a relatively gradual loading to the ceramic,which resulted in limiting the dwell of small-caliber projectile with deformable mild steel cores and striking velocities of~700 m/s.The main purpose of this section is to discuss the influence of buffer thickness on the dwell of long rods.Besides,as for the relatively thick cover plate,the focus is paid on the configuration and material of the cover plate at present.

    Fig.14.Comparisons between the flash X-ray images[14]and simulated results(a)30°target,1419 m/s(b)30°target,1529 m/s(c)45°target,1545 m/s(d)60°target,1548 m/s.

    3.3.1.Thickness of buffer

    Taking pure gold long-rod projectile impacting 2 mm-thick copper-buffered SiC target as the control test(see in Section 2.1.1),the related impact scenarios of bare,3 mm-thick and 4 mm-thick copper-buffered targets are further numerically simulated to discuss the influence of buffer thickness on the interface defeat characteristics.Fig.20 shows the corresponding numerical simulation results of DOP.Compared with the bare target,obvious dwell stage can be induced by attaching buffers to the front face of the ceramic target.It is noteworthy that the 3 mm-thick buffer can prolong the dwell time to about 8μs while the corresponding dwell time elongation of 4 mm-thick buffer is about 6μs,which indicates that the dwell time cannot be prolonged monotonously with increasing the buffer thickness.One possible reason lies in that the radial flow of projectile material will be constrained when the buffer thickness exceeds a critical value,thus there exists an optimal thickness of buffer.The simulation results are consistent with the experimental observations from Behner et al.[10],in which the 3 mm-thick copper-buffered target leads to the highest transition velocity,follow ed by 2 mm-thick and 4 mm-thick buffer.

    3.3.2.Constraints of cover plate

    Taking the test of tungsten alloy projectile impacting the confined SiC target(free constraints of 4340 steel cover plate)with the striking velocity of 1645 m/s[10]as reference,the influence of cover plate configuration is studied by further applying the fixed restraints to the cover plate.Fig.21 shows the comparisons of the simulated DOP and the corresponding impact images at different time instants,respectively.It can be seen that,compared with the scenario of free cover plate,the fixed cover plate can further prolong the dwell time for about 4μs and can effectively reduce the damage area of ceramic target.Furthermore,the final DOP is reduced by about 10%when applying the fixed restraint to the cover plate.

    3.3.3.Materials of cover plate

    By taking the tungsten alloy projectile impacting test on the confined SiC target[10]as reference,the influences of cover plate materials(steel,copper and aluminum)on interface defeat are discussed under the principles of equal thickness or areal density,respectively.The material parameters of copper and 4340 steel are given in Tables2 and 3,respectively.The 6061-T6 Al(Shock EOS and Steinberg Guinan Strength)in AUTODYN material library[22]along with the failure strain of 1.5 is adopted to model the dynamic response of aluminum.The simulated transition velocities for thecover plates having equal thickness or equal areal density are given in Table 6.It can be seen that,(i)when the thickness of cover plate is fixed,the transition velocity of 4340 steel is obviously higher than that of another two metallic materials,while there is little difference between the transition velocities of copper and aluminum cover plates;(ii)when the areal density of the cover plate is equal,the 4340 steel also leads to the highest transition velocity.The corresponding results of aluminum cover plate increase obviously attributed to its low est density and largest thickness,and the transition velocity of copper is the low est due to its largest density and least yield strength.Therefore,aiming to improve the impact resistance of ceramic composite target and increase the corresponding transition velocity,the 4340 steel is the optimal cover plate material based on the principles of either equal thickness or equal areal density,respectively.

    Table 4 Simulated transition velocity with different projectile parameters.

    Fig.15.Von Mises stress in SiC ceramic targets subjected to the impact of pure gold projectiles with different diameters.

    Fig.16.Pure gold projectile impacting on bare SiC ceramic target(a)schematic diagram of projectiles(b)damage distributions in targets.

    3.4.Prestress on the ceramic target

    Obvious enhancement of ballistic performance can be realized by attaching confinement to the ceramic target as well as imposing the prestress on it[34,35].By proposing a numerical method of applying the prestress on the ceramic target,the influence of various prestressing states(radial,axial and hydrostatic prestress)and different levels of prestress on the ballistic performance were studied by Holmquist and Johnson[17]and Chi et al.[21],respectively.Since the overall pressure due to the axial prestress in all cases and their differences are less than that for radial prestress[21],the influences of radial and hydrostatic prestress on the ballistic performance,especially on the dwell time are discussed in this section.

    Fig.17.Strength models and strength-damage accumulation relationship of ceramic material in(a)JH-1 model(b)JH-2 model[20,30].

    Fig.18.Yield surface of JH-1 and JH-2 models.

    3.4.1.Numerical method of applying prestress on ceramic target

    The tungsten alloy projectile impacting the confined SiC targets with striking velocities of 1645 m/s[11]is taken as the control test,and the geometry of the target is given in Fig.22(a)and Fig.22(b).The inner dimensions of the confinement(including the tube,the cover and back plates)are 20 mm in diameter and 20 mm in height,while the diameter D′and the height H′of the cylinder ceramic are varied to induce different stress states and prestress levels(see Fig.23).

    Taking the radial prestress for example,the following steps are performed in order to impose the prestress on SiC target.Firstly,the target components including the tube and SiC ceramic are modeled in which the ceramic is slightly larger than the inner dimensions of the tube,it should be noted that no contact between the ceramic and the tube is defined in this step.Secondly,the boundary condition of a constant pressure or velocity is applied to the ceramicuntil the size of ceramic is slightly smaller than the tube,after that the boundary condition is removed and replaced by the fixed constraint.Besides,in this step,the edges of the ceramic which are perpendicular to the direction of the applied pressure or velocity are fixed,seen in Fig.22(c).Thirdly,the contact between the tube and ceramic is activated and all the boundary conditions on the ceramic are removed.The ceramic expands and comes into contact with the inner side of the tube,thus the prestress state is realized.More importantly,the static damping in AUTODYN[22]is utilized in this step to eliminate the stress oscillations and ensure a steady state of prestress.

    Table 5 Parameters of JH-2 model for SiC ceramic.

    Fig.19.Distributions of Von Mises stress and damage in JH-1 and JH-2 models with striking velocities of(a)920 m/s(b)958 m/s.

    Fig.20.Simulated DOP for different buffer thicknesses.

    3.4.2.Radial and hydrostatic prestress on interface defeat

    Follow ing the above procedure,different levels of radial(Rr=D′/20)and hydrostatic(Rh=H′/20)prestress on SiC ceramic are realized numerically,as shown in Fig.26.

    Furthermore,the influences of different levels of radial and hydrostatic prestress on the interface defeat especially on the dwell time are discussed.The distributions of damage in ceramic targets with radial and hydrostatic prestress at the time instant of 16μs,as well as the corresponding DOP time-histories are shown in Fig.24 and Fig.25,respectively.It can be seen that,compared with the control test(Fig.9(b)),obvious enhancement of dwell of projectile is occurred when the radial or hydrostatic prestress is imposed on the SiC ceramic target.Meanwhile,the damage distributions in ceramic at the same time instant are all effectively reduced and become more concentrated with increasing the radial or hydrostatic prestress.Furthermore,within the given prestress levels(1≤Rr≤1.02,and 1≤Rh≤1.02),the dwell time of about 6μs derived numerically in Section 2.2 and Section 3.3.2 is prolonged monotonously with increasing the radial and hydrostatic prestress,and the influence of the hydrostatic prestress is more significant than that of the radial prestress.

    Fig.21.Comparisons for different constraints of cover plate(a)DOP(b)free cover plate(c)fixed cover plate.

    Table 6 Simulated transition velocities for the cover plate with equal thickness and equal areal density.

    Fig.22.Geometry of the target(a)tube,cover and back plates(b)ceramic(c)boundary condition during the prestress imposing process.

    Fig.23.Different levels of(a)radial prestress(b)hydrostatic prestress on SiC ceramic.

    4.A modified model to predict the upper bound of the transition velocity

    4.1.Predictions of the transition velocity

    Fig.24.Distributions of damage in ceramic targets with the(a)radial prestress(b)hydrostatic prestress.

    The approximate range of the pressure loading on the ceramic target corresponding to the dwell response from interface defeat to direct penetration was firstly proposed by Lundberg et al.[11]as

    where

    Fig.25.Influence of prestress on DOP(a)radial(b)hydrostatic.

    Fig.26.Comparisons between experimental and theoretical transition velocities.

    where ν and σy0are the Poisson's ratio and static yield strength of the ceramic material,respectively.qpis the stagnation pressure of an ideal fluid and v0is the impact velocity of projectile.Besides,the projectile is considered to be linearly elastic and perfectly plastic with the bulk modulus of Kp,yield strength of σypand density of ρp.Liet al.[26]proposed that the brittle ceramic can not withstand the plastic deformation and damage would occur when the impact induced pressure exceeds the HEL of the ceramic material.Therefore,it will be more reasonable to replace the lower bound of Eq.(3)with HEL,thus it has

    By integrating Eq.(4)~Eq.(7)and ignoring the compressibility of the projectile material,i.e.,1/2α→0,the lower and upper bounds of the transition velocitywere further simplified by Li et al.[26]as

    The transition velocities of tungsten alloy long-rod projectiles impacting nine different ceramic targets were experimentally obtained by Lundberg et al.[11]based on the reverse ballistic test,and the related parameters of ceramic targets are listed in Table 7.The comparisons between the theoretical predictions and experimental data are shown in Fig.26.It can be seen that,for the lower bound of the transition velocity,Li et al.[26](Eq.(8a))gives a satisfied prediction,while the corresponding results from Lundberg et al.[11](Eq.(3))are much lower than the test data.Besides,the predictions for the upper bound of the transition velocity proposed by Lundberg et al.[11](Eq.(3))and Li et al.[26](Eq.(8b))are both higher than the corresponding test results,thus the upper bound of the transition velocity is discussed in the next section.

    Table 7 Parameters of ceramics.

    4.2.A modified model to predict the upper bound of the transition velocity

    During the penetration process,a cylindrical cavity could be formed,which can be seen in both the experimental flash X-ray photograph[36]and the numerical simulation contour,as shown in Fig.27.

    Based on the energy conservation approach,Hill and Mech[37]proposed the pressure required to form a cylindrical cavity on the surface of ceramic target without considering the strain rate effect

    where E is the elastic modulus of the ceramic material.How ever,the strain rate effect(104~105s-1)of the ceramic target during the ultra-high speed(about 1500 m/s or more)penetration cannot be ignored.The yield strengththat considering the strain rate effect has been given in JH-1 and JH-2 constitutive models[20,30]for ceramic material as

    Based on Eq.(10)and Eq.(11),the yield strength considering strain rate effect as well as the corresponding pressure required to form a cylindrical cavity on the surface of ceramic target can be calculated and listed in Table 7.It should be pointed out that the strain rate effect parameters of TiB2and Syndie are both assumed as 0.005.

    In summary,the range of the pressure loading on the ceramic corresponding to the dw ell response from interface defeat to direct penetration can be further modified as

    Fig.28 further shows the corresponding comparisons of the experimental and theoretical predicted upper bounds of transition velocities.It can be seen that the upper bounds of the transition velocity calculated from Eq.(12)are more close to the test data except for the SiC-2 ceramic target(target material No.6).Therefore,the correctness and applicability of Eq.(12)are validated,which can be adopted to predict the transition velocities for different combinations of projectiles and ceramic targets.

    5.Conclusion

    Fig.27.Direct penetration(a)flash X-ray photograph[36](b)numerical simulation contour.

    Fig.28.Comparisons between the experimental and theoretical upper bounds of the transition velocities.

    Interface defeat phenomenon always occur when a long-rod projectile high-speed impacting on the ceramic target,which is studied numerically and theoretically in this paper.By respectively modeling the projectiles and ceramic targets with the SPH particles and Lagrange finite elements,the numerical algorithms,constitutive models and related material parameters are validated by comparing with the existing large amounts of test data.Three different responses,i.e.,complete interface defeat,dwell and direct penetration,are reproduced in different types of ceramic targets.The parametric studies are further carried out and it indicates that(i)the transition velocity of pure gold projectile is the highest compared with the tungsten and molybdenum projectiles,the lower bound of transition velocity decreases gradually with increasing the projectile diameter and can be significantly increased by truncated conical nose;(ii)JH-1 model is more suitable to describe the response of complete and partial interface defeat compared with JH-2 model;(iii)the dwell time cannot be prolonged monotonously with increasing the buffer thickness,while the damage area and penetration depth can be reduced effectively by applying constraints to the cover plates;(iv)compared with copper and aluminum,the 4340 steel is the optimal cover plate material based on the principles of either equal thickness or equal areal density;(v)obvious enhancement of ballistic performance can be realized by applying prestress on ceramic targets,and the influence of the hydrostatic prestress is more significant than that of the radial prestress.Finally,based on the energy conservation approach and taking the strain rate effect into account,a modified model to predict the upper bound of transition velocity is proposed and validated.

    Acknowledgment

    The project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51878507).

    精品第一国产精品| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 身体一侧抽搐| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 久久香蕉国产精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 91字幕亚洲| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲激情在线av| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 久久 成人 亚洲| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 88av欧美| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| av天堂久久9| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 一进一出抽搐动态| 热re99久久国产66热| 午夜视频精品福利| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产片内射在线| 成年版毛片免费区| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 91老司机精品| 国产99白浆流出| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 一进一出抽搐动态| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 91成人精品电影| 国产av精品麻豆| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品久久久久久成人av| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲av美国av| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产成人欧美| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 久99久视频精品免费| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲片人在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 看免费av毛片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 91老司机精品| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 午夜免费鲁丝| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| av福利片在线| 91大片在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| av网站在线播放免费| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 黄色女人牲交| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| av电影中文网址| 不卡一级毛片| 国产不卡一卡二| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 美女大奶头视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| www.自偷自拍.com| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲中文av在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产精品成人在线| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 一级黄色大片毛片| 91成人精品电影| 久久精品影院6| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| a在线观看视频网站| 精品久久久久久电影网| 制服人妻中文乱码| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 十八禁网站免费在线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 亚洲精品一二三| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 大型av网站在线播放| av福利片在线| 女人被狂操c到高潮| xxx96com| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| aaaaa片日本免费| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 免费少妇av软件| a在线观看视频网站| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 一本大道久久a久久精品| 丁香欧美五月| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 久热这里只有精品99| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 在线观看66精品国产| 手机成人av网站| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 性少妇av在线| 成人影院久久| 岛国在线观看网站| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | bbb黄色大片| 老司机福利观看| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 成人国语在线视频| 黄色视频不卡| 国产精品 国内视频| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 看免费av毛片| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 成人国语在线视频| 美女福利国产在线| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 免费高清视频大片| 日韩高清综合在线| av网站在线播放免费| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久青草综合色| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 岛国在线观看网站| 久久久久久大精品| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 久久草成人影院| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 精品福利观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 亚洲伊人色综图| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 热re99久久国产66热| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久久久九九精品影院| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久青草综合色| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 成人手机av| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲国产欧美网| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 中国美女看黄片| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产av在哪里看| av福利片在线| 亚洲 国产 在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产成人影院久久av| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 精品高清国产在线一区| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲中文av在线| 日日夜夜操网爽| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 1024香蕉在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 多毛熟女@视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 超碰97精品在线观看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日韩欧美三级三区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 很黄的视频免费| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 久99久视频精品免费| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 精品久久久久久电影网| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 午夜福利欧美成人| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产精品九九99| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 免费不卡黄色视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 一级片'在线观看视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 两性夫妻黄色片| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 免费av毛片视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 99久久人妻综合| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | www.www免费av| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 日本三级黄在线观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 天天添夜夜摸| 精品福利观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| www.自偷自拍.com| 91麻豆av在线| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产成人av教育| 黄色 视频免费看| 免费看十八禁软件| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 一级毛片精品| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| ponron亚洲| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| av在线播放免费不卡| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 制服诱惑二区| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 久久精品影院6| 香蕉久久夜色| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 999精品在线视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 9色porny在线观看| 午夜影院日韩av| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 88av欧美| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品人妻1区二区| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 色综合站精品国产| 制服人妻中文乱码| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产亚洲欧美98| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 1024视频免费在线观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲av美国av| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 99久久国产精品久久久| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 日韩免费av在线播放| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 手机成人av网站| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| cao死你这个sao货| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产熟女xx| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产高清激情床上av| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产av在哪里看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| av欧美777| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 日本a在线网址| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| av视频免费观看在线观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| www.999成人在线观看| 9色porny在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 丰满的人妻完整版| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 午夜免费观看网址| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品国产亚洲在线| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产区一区二久久| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲国产看品久久| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | www日本在线高清视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产精品影院久久| av网站在线播放免费| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 美女福利国产在线| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| av福利片在线| 国产在线观看jvid| 看免费av毛片| 久久精品成人免费网站| 丁香欧美五月| 热re99久久国产66热| 两性夫妻黄色片| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 一本综合久久免费| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇|