• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effect of transverse compression on the residual tensile strength of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene(Dyneema?SK-76)yarns

    2020-04-09 18:36:16KaranShahSubramaniSockalingam
    Defence Technology 2020年1期

    Karan Shah ,Subramani Sockalingam ,*

    a McNAIR Center for Aerospace Innovation and Research,University of South Carolina,SC,USA

    b Department of Mechanical Engineering,University of South Carolina,SC,USA

    Keywords:Polymer fibers Compression Tensile strength

    ABSTRACT Ballistic impact induces complex stress states on fiber-based armor systems.During impact fibers undergo multiaxial loading which includes axial tension,axial compression,transverse compression,and transverse shear.Transverse compression induced by the projectile leads to permanent deformation and fibrillation of fibers resulting in degradation of material tensile strength.Previous work(Sockalingam et al.Textile Res.J2018)has shown a reduction of 20%in the tensile strength of Dyneema?SK76 single fibers subjected to 77%nominal transverse compressive strains.Experimental investigation of quasistatic transverse compression on Dyneema?SK-76 yarns,unconstrained in the lateral direction,indicate an average of 4%reduction in tensile strength of yarns compressed to 77%nominal strains.In this work we use finite element modeling techniques to understand the difference in residual tensile strength between single fibers and yarns observed in laterally unconstrained transverse compression experiments.Finite element study of the transverse compression response of single fibers and yarns indicate that local strains developed in fibers within the yarn are much lower than the local strains developed in single fibers subjected to a given nominal strain and may explain the less reduction in strength observed in yarns.?2020 China Ordnance Society.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    1.Introduction

    Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene(UHMWPE)is a linear flexible polymer of C2H4molecules.When C2H4molecules are drawn using a gel-spun process,they result in a highly crystalline and oriented chain of molecules along the fiber direction.As compared to a melt crystallized block of the same molecules that results in an entangled spaghetti type molecular structure,the gel spinning and drawing process results in a long chain of parallel molecules in a crystal lattice.Such a crystal structure enables UHMPWE fibers to offer a combination of low density,high strength and high stiffness,making them suitable for armor systems.UHMWPE fibers are used in the form of textile fabrics and composites in ballistic applications[[1,2]].Ballistic impact on these fiber-based systems results in complex loading of fibers and yarns at high strain rates[3-6].Fibers and yarns are loaded in different deformation modes including axial tension,axial compression,transverse shear, and transverse compression. Transverse compression induced by the projectile causes permanent deformation and fibrillation of fibers[7-9]near the region of impact.This causes degradation of material tensile strength eventually leading to failure.Axial tensile fiber properties are key contributors to the ballistic performance[10].Thus,it is important to understand the influence of multiaxial loading on fiber tensile strength.

    Previous studies on the effect of transverse compression on tensile strength have focused on single fibers.Experiments on Kevlar?KM2 single fibers by Sockalingam et al.[11]show a decrease in tensile strength with an increase in the amount of applied transverse compression.Sockalingam et al.also experimentally investigated the quasi-static and high strain rate transverse compression response of Dyneema?SK-76 single fibers[7,9].Their results show a non-linear stress-strain response of Dyneema?SK-76 fibers in transverse compression at both low and high strain rates.A recent study by Golovin and Phoenix[12]reports a reduction of about 44%and 25%in the tensile strength of Dyneema?SK-76 single fibers that are transversely compressed by hand method and machine roll method respectively.Experimental results from a study by Thomaset al.[[13,14]]show a 20%reduction in the Q-Stensile strength of Dyneema?SK-76 fibers compressed at average nominal strains of 77%.

    There are limited investigations in literature on the transverse compression response of individual yarns as compared to single fibers.In our earlier work,we have experimentally studied the effect of quasi-static transverse compression on Dyneema?SK-76 yarns[15].A brief summary of the experimental procedure and results are presented in the next section.In this study,we extend our previous work using finite element modeling techniques to better understand the influence of transverse compression on Dyneema?SK-76 yarns.We aim to understand the differences in the residual tensile strength of yarns and single fibers observed in our experiments.We model the transverse compression response of single fibers and yarns at both quasi-static and high strain rates to investigate the true stress-strains developed in single fibers and yarns during transverse compression.Finally,we make comparisons between simulation and experimental results to understand the differences in transverse compression response of yarns and single fibers.

    2.Experimental observations

    This section summarizes the experimental results of transverse compression of Dyneema?SK-76 single fibers and yarns.We first report the results from literature for Dyneema?SK-76 single fibers followed by experimental results from our previous work[15].The influence of transverse compression on the residual tensile strength of single fibers and yarns is measured using two experiments.First,the single fibers or yarns are compressed in the transverse direction.Then the compressed single fibers or yarns are pulled in axial tension to measure the residual tensile strength.

    Thomas et al.[13]have studied the influence of transverse compression on single fiber at high strain rates.Their results indicate a 20%reduction in the tensile strength of single fibers compressed to 77%average nominal strains.For tensile experiments,nominal stress and nominal strain is defined as follows:

    where F is the applied load,A is the original cross-sectional area,u is the displacement and l is the original gage length of a single fiber or yarn.

    For transverse compression experiments,nominal stress and nominal strain is defined as:

    where f is the compressive load per unit length and where t is the original thickness of a single fiber or yarn.

    Fig.1 shows the schematic for the single fiber experiments[8]and Fig.2 presents the experimental results as a comparison between the uncompressed and compressed tensile strength of single fibers[13].

    The effect of transverse compression on yarns was studied using a similar methodology as single fibers.A detailed explanation of the procedure and the results can be found in our previous work[15].We only present a brief summary of the procedure and the results here.As described before,individual yarns were first compressed in quasi-static compression and then pulled in quasi-static axial tension.All experiments were performed on a Instron single column tester,Model 5944.Untwisted yarns of length 254 mm(10 inches)were compressed to a maximum load of 1800 Nat a displacement rate of 0.6 mm/min.The length of yarn under compression was 46.0 mm.Yarns were compressed to average nominal strains of 77%single fiber experiments.The compressed yarns were then pulled in quasi-static tension according to the ASTM standard D7269-07[16].A 2 k N load cell and a displacement rate of 127 mm/min(5 inches/min)is used for tension testing of yarns.Microscope images of yarns captured after compression show regions of compression dispersed across the yarn(marked by red circles)as shown in Fig.3.This suggests that fibers within the yarn undergo non-uniform loading.Fig.4(a)shows the results of fitting a two-parameter statistical Weibull model to the tension test results of compressed and uncompressed specimens.The cumulative distribution function for two-parameter Weibull analysis is given in Eq.(5)and Table 1 gives the Weibull shape and scale parameters.

    where F(σ)is the cumulative probability of failure,σ is the tensile strength of the yarn,m is the shape parameter,σ0is the scale parameter.The Weibull plot in Fig.4(a)displays a shift in the curve of the compressed sample to left indicating a reduced tensile strength.Table 1 presents the Weibull fitting parameters for both curves.

    Fig.1.Schematic of single fiber transverse compression experiment[8,13].

    Fig.2.Single fiber HSRTC experimental results(a)Average tensile strength with 95% confidence interval(b)Weibull plot for fiber strength[13].

    Fig.3.Microscope image of a compressed yarn.The red circles show regions of compression dispersed across the yarn.

    Fig.4.(a)Yarn Weibull plot,(b)Mean tensile strength of yarn samples with standard deviations.

    Table 1 Weibull model parameters.

    Weibull modulus is an indicator of variability in the data.A lower Weibull modulus indicates a higher variability in the modelled data quantity.For an example,the compressed sample in this study shows a lower Weibull modulus compared to the baseline(uncompressed)sample,thus indicating a wider spread in its strength.It should be noted here that the modulus of the baseline yarns found through experiments in this study is lower than the results published in the literature[2]for Dyneema?SK-75 yarns(m=31.2 at 40 twists per meter).This is likely due to the untwisted yarns tested in this work.

    A comparison of the mean tensile strength between the compressed and uncompressed samples at 95% confidence interval is shown in Fig.4(b).There is only a small decrease of 3.9% in the tensile strength of compressed yarns compared to single fibers which show a 20%reduction in their tensile strength on transverse compression.Finite element modeling is required to understand this difference in behavior seen between single fibers and yarns by studying the local stress strains developed during transverse compression.Our aim is to use finite element simulations to investigate how the local strains(true strains)vary in the fibers within the yarn when it is transversely compressed to same nominal strains(u/t)as in experiments.The local or true strains of fibers are obtained directly from the commercial code LS-DYNA.LS-DYNA outputs tensorial(true)instantaneous strains and is accurate for large displacements.In the following sections,we first discuss the finite element simulation of transverse compression of single fibers,follow ed by yarns and compare the simulation results to the experimental results.

    3.Single fiber transverse compression response(SFTCR)

    A Dyneema?SK-76 single fiber is approximately circular[7]with an average diameter of 17.0μm and a density of 0.980 g/cm3.Ayarn of Dyneema?SK-76 is comprised of 780 such single fibers.The transverse compression response of single fibers and yarns at both quasi-static and high strain rate is studied using a 2-D plane strain FE model.The fibers are modelled using non-linear inelastic material properties presented in Table 2.These properties are derived from the experimental and modeling study by Sockalingam et al.[9]which reports a nonlinear inelastic behavior of Dyneema?SK-76 single fiber under transverse compression.All simulations are performed using the commercial FE code LS-DYNA.The following sections explain the modeling and simulation results of SFTCR and YTCR.

    A previous study by Sockalingam et al.has shown that 300 finite elements are required to accurately capture the transverse compression response of Dyneema?SK-76 fiber[7].Fig.5 shows the quarter symmetric fiber model constructed using 300 2-D plane strain elements(element formulation 13 in LS-DYNA).A 2-D single surface contact is used to define the contact between the fiber and the rigid platens with a friction coefficient of 0.2.The upper platen compresses the fiber at velocity of 1.0μm/s.A nonlinear inelastic behavior is assumed for the fiber with material properties given in Table 2 and platens are assumed as rigid bodies.

    After wandering about for several days until he was weary and hungry, he at last succeeded in finding a way out of the forest, and soon came to a wide and rapid river, which he followed, hoping to find some means of crossing it, and it happened that as the sun rose the next morning he saw something of a dazzling whiteness moored76 out in the middle of the stream

    3.1.Single fiber quasi-static transverse compression

    Fig.6 shows the simulated stress-strain response.The stressstrain response is non-linear inelastic as was observed in experiments[7].Fig.7 shows the true compressive strain contours developed in the fiber at 50%and 77%applied nominal strains.It can be observed from Fig.7 that the region near the center of the fiber develops high compressive strains and the strains reduce in magnitude away from the center.Fig.7 shows that the local true compressive strains developed in the fiber are significantly higher than the applied nominal strains of 50%and 77%.At an applied nominal strain of 77%the maximum true strain developed in the fiber is approximately 1.5 times higher,i.e.150%.These strain levels are significant enough to cause permanent deformation and fibrillation of fibers as explained in the next section.

    3.2.Single fiber high strain rate transverse compression

    As mentioned earlier,the transverse compression response of Dyneema?SK-76 fiber is non-linear inelastic.Sockalingam et al.in their study[9]have characterized this fiber stress-strain response into three distinct zones.

    The second row in Table 2 presents the material properties applied to the fiber for high strain rate transverse compression.We consider the same finite element model as described above for HSR transverse compression of Dyneema?SK-76 single fiber with the only modification to the velocity for the upper platen.The velocity of the upper-platen is set to 1.1 m/s same as experiments.

    Fig.5.SFTCR quarter-symmetric FE model.

    Fig.6.SFTCR predicted nominal stress nominal strain curve.

    Fig.7.True compressive strain at(a)50%and(b)77%applied nominal strain from single fiber Q-S compression model.

    Table 2 Non-linear inelastic properties of Dyneema?SK-76 fiber[9].

    Fig.8 shows the simulated fiber nominal stress-nominal strain response.The stress-strain response is non-linear inelastic with a very small elastic limit as was also observed in experiments[9].Nominal stress for an applied nominal strain of 77%is twice as high for high strain rate compression(Fig.8)compared to quasi-static compression of single fiber.Fig.9 shows the strain distribution from the simulation at an applied nominal strain of 77%.The maximum true compressive strains developed in the fiber are approximately 1.5 times to 2 times higher than the applied nominal strain.This result is similar to the result observed for the quasistatic compression response of the fiber.Comparing Figs.9 and 7(b),we can see that the true strain distribution across the fiber is similar for both the quasi-static and high strain rate compression at 77% applied nominal strains.Dyneema?SK-76 fibers have weaker inter-fibrillar interactions compared to Kevlar fibers which possess hydrogen bonding to influence off-axis stability.At high nominal strains,fibrillation is the dominant mode of deformation in Dyneema?SK-76 fibers as reported by McDaniel et al.[7].Their results show that fibrillation begins at small loads and nominal strains in Dyneema?SK-76 fibers and leads to the breakage of fibril network into micro fibrils with significant void formation and permanent deformation.Therefore,the reduction in the tensile strength seen in experiments[13]can be attributed to fibrillation triggered by the high level of true strains developed during transverse compression.In the next section,we use SFTCR as a basis to study the transverse compression response of a yarn composed of 780 single fibers.

    Fig.8.Single fiber HSRTC predicted nominal stress-nominal strain curve.

    Fig.9.True compressive strain at applied nominal strain of 77%from single fiber HSR compression model.

    4.Yarn transverse compression response(YTCR)

    In this section,we model the transverse compression response of yarns to gain a better understanding of the local stress strain behavior of fibers within the yarn.

    4.1.Finite element model of yarn

    We consider a 2-D plane strain FE model of yarn at fiber-scale similar to the model considered by Sockalingam et al.for Kevlar KM2 fibers[17].A yarn of Dyneema?SK-76 consists of 780 single fibers.The cross-section of the yarn can be approximated as an ellipse with major and minor axis as 0.6 mm and 0.193 mm respectively.Cross-section images of Dyneema?composite laminates depict an approximately hexagonally close packing of fibers[18,19].Fig.10 shows the 2-D FE model of a yarn consisting of fibers arranged in a hexagonal closed packing.Each fiber has a circular cross-section of diameter 17.0μm and is modelled using 84 2-D plane strain elements for computational efficiency.A 2-D single surface contact with a friction coeffecient of 0.2 is defined to account for the inter-fiber interactions and the interactions between fibers and platen.The upper platen compresses the yarn at a displacement rate of 0.6 mm/min same as experiments[15].The yarn is unconstrained in the lateral direction and is free to spread.The fibers are modelled using the same non-linear inelastic material model and properties as for SFTCR.Platens are assumed as rigid body materials.

    4.1.1.Yarn quasi-static transverse compression

    Fig.11 shows the predicted force vs.displacement curve and nominal stress vs.nominal strain response of the yarn model compared to experiments.The experimental curve in Fig.11 represents an average of stress-strain curves produced from yarn transverse compression experiments[15].Overall,the predicted stress strain response of the yarn model is stiffer than the experimental curve.This may be due to the assumption of a hexagonally closed packed structure(maximum fiber volume fraction 0.907)for fibers in the FE model.Factors such as fiber entanglements,actual fiber packing etc.is not accounted by the FE model considered in this study.How ever,the predicted model curve and the experimental curve both show little to no increase in force until a platen displacement of 0.073 mm or 38%nominal strain.This is due to significant spreading and spatial rearrangement of the fibers as can be seen from Fig.12(a)and Fig.12(b).

    Fig.10.Yarn transverse compression response FE model.

    Fig.11.(a)Force versus displacement and(b)Stress versus strain comparison between predicted response from yarn model and experiments.

    Fig.12.True compressive strain contours at(a)10%,(b)30%,(c)45%,(d)55%applied nominal strain from yarn Q-S compression model.

    On further loading,both the experimental and the model curve show an increase in load or nominal stress.How ever,unlike the experimental response the predicted response exhibits another drop-in force at nominal strain of 45%.This is attributed to further spreading and rearrangement of fibers within the yarn due to a low surface friction coefficient between them.Further loading results in an increased deformation of fibers as shown by the rapid increase in force or stresses in Fig.11(b).The steeper rise in force or stress observed in the predicted response compared to the experiments after a nominal strain of 45%is due to the assumed hexagonal close packing of the fibers in the model.The actual packing and volume of fraction of fibers within the yarn is less than 90.7%as approximated by a hexagonally closed pack structure.The actual microstructure induce lower stresses for a given applied nominal strain in experiments compared to the model.

    This understanding is reinforced by observing the yarn response and true compressive strains in Fig.12.At 10%applied nominal strain the fibers have displaced from their original position and show no deformation.At 55%applied nominal strains the fibers have spread significantly and have rearranged themselves within the yarn cross-section.Fibers near the center of the yarn crosssection are loaded in compression compared to fibers near the edges which show little or no deformation.It should be noted that at 55%applied nominal strain a large proportion of the fibers within the yarn show true strains only between 20%and 30%.

    Transverse compression experiments on unidirectional Dyneema?laminate in the literature[18]also shows an increase in the spreading of fibers with increase in applied nominal strains.The lower reduction in the tensile strength of Dyneema?SK-76 yarns as compared to single fibers may be attributed to fiber spreading and non-uniform fiber loading during compression as seen from the simulation results in Fig.12.

    Fig.13.Yarn HSR transverse compression predicted nominal stress-nominal strain curve.

    4.1.2.Yarn high strain rate transverse compression

    We consider the same FE model described above for yarn HSR transverse compression with the only modification to the velocity for the upper platen as 10.0 m/s and using an explicit dynamic solver.The fibers assume non-linear inelastic behavior with high strain rate properties presented in the second row of Table 2.Platens assume elastic behavior.

    Fig.13 shows the predicted nominal stress vs.nominal strain response of the yarn HSR transverse compression model.Nominal stresses are approximately six times larger for the yarn HSR compression model compared to the quasi-static model.Fig.14 shows the strain contours at approximately 55%applied nominal strain.This represents the last stable state that we were able to obtain from the model.

    As observed from Fig.14 the higher strains are developed in fibers near the center of the yarn and strains within the fibers reduce going away from the center.True strains developed in fibers varies from approximately 74%-118%in the center of the yarn and reduces to applied nominal strain of 55%laterally away from the center.However,a large proportion of the fibers located away from the center and towards the yarn edges show true strains of 10%or lower compared to the applied nominal strain of 55%.Compared to the quasi-static yarn results(Fig.12),greater deformation is seen in the center of the yarn as shown by the higher strain levels in Fig.14.This may be because at high strain rates the fibers within the yarn do not have sufficient time to spread and rearrange themselves on loading.

    On comparing the predicted nominal stress-nominal strain results from the single fiber model(Figs.6 and 8)and the yarn model(Figs.11 and 13)we can see that the nominal stresses developed in single fibers are approximately three times higher than those developed in yarns for an applied nominal strain of 55%.Furthermore,true compressive strains developed in single fiber(Figs.7 and 9)are significantly higher than the applied nominal strain whereas for yarns(Figs.12 and 14)a higher proportion of fibers show true strains below the applied nominal strain.The true strains observed in single fibers are high enough to cause fibrillation and permanent deformation of fibers.Fibrillation breaks down the fibril network and results in the reorientation of micro fibrils.This off-axis reorientation weakens the ability of fibril structure to carry axial loading and may likely be the reason for higher reduction in tensile strength of compressed single fibers.Transverse compression response of yarns involves significant spreading and rearrangement of fibers which is not present in the response of single fibers.The average true strains for fibers in the yarn are not significant enough to cause fibrillation of fibers within the yarn and may be the reason for a lower reduction in tensile strength of yarns as observed in experiments.How ever,it must be noted that the yarn model discussed in this study is simplistic and does not account for factors like,fiber entanglements,actual fiber packing etc.which may also contribute towards the lower tensile strength reduction observed in transverse compression experiments.It should also be noted here that yarns in a woven fabric would be constrained by the adjacent orthogonal interlacing yarns and the yarns in a composite would be constrained by the surrounding matrix resin resulting in different boundary conditions than what is considered in this study.

    Fig.14.True compressive strain contours at 55%nominal strain from yarn HSR compression model.

    5.Conclusions

    This work presents the effect of laterally unconstrained quasistatic transverse compression on the residual tensile strength of Dyneema?SK-76 single yarns.Experimental results show that there is only a small decrease of about 4%in the tensile strength of compressed yarns at an applied average nominal strain of 77%compared to single fibers which show a 20%reduction in tensile strength.A finite element study of the transverse compression response of single fibers and yarns indicate that true strains developed in single fibers are higher than the applied nominal strain whereas a large proportion of fibers within the yarns develop true strain below the applied nominal strain.True strains developed in single fibers are 1.5-2 times higher than the applied nominal strain and are significant enough to cause fibrillation and permanent deformation of fiber.On the other hand,yarns demonstrate significant spreading and rearrangement of fibers on transverse compression.This may be the reason for the lower strains observed in yarns as compared to single fiber for the same applied nominal strain.It can also explain the lower degradation in tensile strength of yarns compared to single fibers as seen in experiments.Future areas of work is to focus on yarn high strain rate transverse compression and multi-axial loading experiments to better understand yarn failure.

    Acknowledgments

    Dyneema?SK-76 yarns used in this work was provided by DSM Dyneema?and is acknowledged.The useful discussions provided by Drs.Ulrich Heisserer,Harm van der Werff and Mark Hazard of DSM Dyneema?is gratefully acknowledged.The authors KSand SS acknow ledges the startup funding provided by the University of South Carolina.

    超色免费av| 制服诱惑二区| 成人国语在线视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 最黄视频免费看| 黄片播放在线免费| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 日本色播在线视频| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 成人免费观看视频高清| 观看av在线不卡| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 丁香六月天网| 色网站视频免费| 成人国产麻豆网| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| av.在线天堂| 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 美国免费a级毛片| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 久久久久网色| 一级爰片在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 成人国语在线视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产野战对白在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 香蕉丝袜av| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| av网站在线播放免费| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产色婷婷99| 欧美精品一区二区大全| www.精华液| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲免费av在线视频| www.精华液| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 天堂8中文在线网| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| videosex国产| 色吧在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| 男女边摸边吃奶| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 欧美在线黄色| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 色94色欧美一区二区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 老司机靠b影院| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| av天堂久久9| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 尾随美女入室| bbb黄色大片| 无限看片的www在线观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 只有这里有精品99| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 男女免费视频国产| 成人影院久久| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 久久久国产一区二区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产视频首页在线观看| 国产成人欧美| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 99热全是精品| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 超色免费av| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美97在线视频| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 成人手机av| 亚洲成人手机| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 中文欧美无线码| 色播在线永久视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 精品久久久精品久久久| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 免费av中文字幕在线| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 黄频高清免费视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 乱人伦中国视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 色播在线永久视频| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲图色成人| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久狼人影院| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 捣出白浆h1v1| 亚洲综合色网址| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美在线黄色| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| av一本久久久久| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 一级毛片 在线播放| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产精品.久久久| 国产精品三级大全| 嫩草影视91久久| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 色吧在线观看| 老司机靠b影院| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 丁香六月欧美| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 777米奇影视久久| 18禁观看日本| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 男女免费视频国产| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 日韩视频在线欧美| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 韩国av在线不卡| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 999精品在线视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 丝袜美足系列| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 免费看不卡的av| 在线观看三级黄色| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产成人系列免费观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 在线看a的网站| netflix在线观看网站| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| av在线app专区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 午夜激情av网站| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 久久久久网色| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 久久av网站| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 午夜日本视频在线| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 色网站视频免费| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产精品无大码| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| xxx大片免费视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 亚洲av福利一区| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲国产av新网站| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 永久免费av网站大全| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产精品二区激情视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久这里只有精品19| 18禁观看日本| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 电影成人av| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 永久免费av网站大全| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲国产欧美网| av有码第一页| 午夜福利视频精品| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 韩国av在线不卡| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 电影成人av| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 电影成人av| 国产精品免费视频内射| 国产极品天堂在线| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 国产精品成人在线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产男女内射视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 一本久久精品| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 午夜激情av网站| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 成人国产麻豆网| 97在线人人人人妻| xxx大片免费视频| 一区福利在线观看| 国产视频首页在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 日本午夜av视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| bbb黄色大片| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 日韩电影二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 午夜老司机福利片| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 多毛熟女@视频| 老熟女久久久| 久久性视频一级片| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 91老司机精品| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产麻豆69| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 91精品三级在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 一级爰片在线观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久性视频一级片| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| avwww免费| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| av片东京热男人的天堂| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 一级片免费观看大全| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 久久免费观看电影| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 黄片播放在线免费| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产 一区精品| www.自偷自拍.com| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 蜜桃在线观看..| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 日本午夜av视频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产一级毛片在线| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产1区2区3区精品| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 综合色丁香网| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一级黄片播放器| 午夜老司机福利片| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| xxx大片免费视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| av线在线观看网站| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 精品亚洲成国产av| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久热这里只有精品99| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| videosex国产| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 免费不卡黄色视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产在视频线精品| 青草久久国产| 免费少妇av软件| av国产精品久久久久影院| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 成年av动漫网址| 大码成人一级视频| kizo精华| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产精品成人在线| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| av网站在线播放免费| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 9热在线视频观看99| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| videos熟女内射| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 蜜桃在线观看..| 丁香六月欧美| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日本色播在线视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产黄频视频在线观看|