• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effect of transverse compression on the residual tensile strength of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene(Dyneema?SK-76)yarns

    2020-04-09 18:36:16KaranShahSubramaniSockalingam
    Defence Technology 2020年1期

    Karan Shah ,Subramani Sockalingam ,*

    a McNAIR Center for Aerospace Innovation and Research,University of South Carolina,SC,USA

    b Department of Mechanical Engineering,University of South Carolina,SC,USA

    Keywords:Polymer fibers Compression Tensile strength

    ABSTRACT Ballistic impact induces complex stress states on fiber-based armor systems.During impact fibers undergo multiaxial loading which includes axial tension,axial compression,transverse compression,and transverse shear.Transverse compression induced by the projectile leads to permanent deformation and fibrillation of fibers resulting in degradation of material tensile strength.Previous work(Sockalingam et al.Textile Res.J2018)has shown a reduction of 20%in the tensile strength of Dyneema?SK76 single fibers subjected to 77%nominal transverse compressive strains.Experimental investigation of quasistatic transverse compression on Dyneema?SK-76 yarns,unconstrained in the lateral direction,indicate an average of 4%reduction in tensile strength of yarns compressed to 77%nominal strains.In this work we use finite element modeling techniques to understand the difference in residual tensile strength between single fibers and yarns observed in laterally unconstrained transverse compression experiments.Finite element study of the transverse compression response of single fibers and yarns indicate that local strains developed in fibers within the yarn are much lower than the local strains developed in single fibers subjected to a given nominal strain and may explain the less reduction in strength observed in yarns.?2020 China Ordnance Society.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.This is an open access article under the CCBY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    1.Introduction

    Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene(UHMWPE)is a linear flexible polymer of C2H4molecules.When C2H4molecules are drawn using a gel-spun process,they result in a highly crystalline and oriented chain of molecules along the fiber direction.As compared to a melt crystallized block of the same molecules that results in an entangled spaghetti type molecular structure,the gel spinning and drawing process results in a long chain of parallel molecules in a crystal lattice.Such a crystal structure enables UHMPWE fibers to offer a combination of low density,high strength and high stiffness,making them suitable for armor systems.UHMWPE fibers are used in the form of textile fabrics and composites in ballistic applications[[1,2]].Ballistic impact on these fiber-based systems results in complex loading of fibers and yarns at high strain rates[3-6].Fibers and yarns are loaded in different deformation modes including axial tension,axial compression,transverse shear, and transverse compression. Transverse compression induced by the projectile causes permanent deformation and fibrillation of fibers[7-9]near the region of impact.This causes degradation of material tensile strength eventually leading to failure.Axial tensile fiber properties are key contributors to the ballistic performance[10].Thus,it is important to understand the influence of multiaxial loading on fiber tensile strength.

    Previous studies on the effect of transverse compression on tensile strength have focused on single fibers.Experiments on Kevlar?KM2 single fibers by Sockalingam et al.[11]show a decrease in tensile strength with an increase in the amount of applied transverse compression.Sockalingam et al.also experimentally investigated the quasi-static and high strain rate transverse compression response of Dyneema?SK-76 single fibers[7,9].Their results show a non-linear stress-strain response of Dyneema?SK-76 fibers in transverse compression at both low and high strain rates.A recent study by Golovin and Phoenix[12]reports a reduction of about 44%and 25%in the tensile strength of Dyneema?SK-76 single fibers that are transversely compressed by hand method and machine roll method respectively.Experimental results from a study by Thomaset al.[[13,14]]show a 20%reduction in the Q-Stensile strength of Dyneema?SK-76 fibers compressed at average nominal strains of 77%.

    There are limited investigations in literature on the transverse compression response of individual yarns as compared to single fibers.In our earlier work,we have experimentally studied the effect of quasi-static transverse compression on Dyneema?SK-76 yarns[15].A brief summary of the experimental procedure and results are presented in the next section.In this study,we extend our previous work using finite element modeling techniques to better understand the influence of transverse compression on Dyneema?SK-76 yarns.We aim to understand the differences in the residual tensile strength of yarns and single fibers observed in our experiments.We model the transverse compression response of single fibers and yarns at both quasi-static and high strain rates to investigate the true stress-strains developed in single fibers and yarns during transverse compression.Finally,we make comparisons between simulation and experimental results to understand the differences in transverse compression response of yarns and single fibers.

    2.Experimental observations

    This section summarizes the experimental results of transverse compression of Dyneema?SK-76 single fibers and yarns.We first report the results from literature for Dyneema?SK-76 single fibers followed by experimental results from our previous work[15].The influence of transverse compression on the residual tensile strength of single fibers and yarns is measured using two experiments.First,the single fibers or yarns are compressed in the transverse direction.Then the compressed single fibers or yarns are pulled in axial tension to measure the residual tensile strength.

    Thomas et al.[13]have studied the influence of transverse compression on single fiber at high strain rates.Their results indicate a 20%reduction in the tensile strength of single fibers compressed to 77%average nominal strains.For tensile experiments,nominal stress and nominal strain is defined as follows:

    where F is the applied load,A is the original cross-sectional area,u is the displacement and l is the original gage length of a single fiber or yarn.

    For transverse compression experiments,nominal stress and nominal strain is defined as:

    where f is the compressive load per unit length and where t is the original thickness of a single fiber or yarn.

    Fig.1 shows the schematic for the single fiber experiments[8]and Fig.2 presents the experimental results as a comparison between the uncompressed and compressed tensile strength of single fibers[13].

    The effect of transverse compression on yarns was studied using a similar methodology as single fibers.A detailed explanation of the procedure and the results can be found in our previous work[15].We only present a brief summary of the procedure and the results here.As described before,individual yarns were first compressed in quasi-static compression and then pulled in quasi-static axial tension.All experiments were performed on a Instron single column tester,Model 5944.Untwisted yarns of length 254 mm(10 inches)were compressed to a maximum load of 1800 Nat a displacement rate of 0.6 mm/min.The length of yarn under compression was 46.0 mm.Yarns were compressed to average nominal strains of 77%single fiber experiments.The compressed yarns were then pulled in quasi-static tension according to the ASTM standard D7269-07[16].A 2 k N load cell and a displacement rate of 127 mm/min(5 inches/min)is used for tension testing of yarns.Microscope images of yarns captured after compression show regions of compression dispersed across the yarn(marked by red circles)as shown in Fig.3.This suggests that fibers within the yarn undergo non-uniform loading.Fig.4(a)shows the results of fitting a two-parameter statistical Weibull model to the tension test results of compressed and uncompressed specimens.The cumulative distribution function for two-parameter Weibull analysis is given in Eq.(5)and Table 1 gives the Weibull shape and scale parameters.

    where F(σ)is the cumulative probability of failure,σ is the tensile strength of the yarn,m is the shape parameter,σ0is the scale parameter.The Weibull plot in Fig.4(a)displays a shift in the curve of the compressed sample to left indicating a reduced tensile strength.Table 1 presents the Weibull fitting parameters for both curves.

    Fig.1.Schematic of single fiber transverse compression experiment[8,13].

    Fig.2.Single fiber HSRTC experimental results(a)Average tensile strength with 95% confidence interval(b)Weibull plot for fiber strength[13].

    Fig.3.Microscope image of a compressed yarn.The red circles show regions of compression dispersed across the yarn.

    Fig.4.(a)Yarn Weibull plot,(b)Mean tensile strength of yarn samples with standard deviations.

    Table 1 Weibull model parameters.

    Weibull modulus is an indicator of variability in the data.A lower Weibull modulus indicates a higher variability in the modelled data quantity.For an example,the compressed sample in this study shows a lower Weibull modulus compared to the baseline(uncompressed)sample,thus indicating a wider spread in its strength.It should be noted here that the modulus of the baseline yarns found through experiments in this study is lower than the results published in the literature[2]for Dyneema?SK-75 yarns(m=31.2 at 40 twists per meter).This is likely due to the untwisted yarns tested in this work.

    A comparison of the mean tensile strength between the compressed and uncompressed samples at 95% confidence interval is shown in Fig.4(b).There is only a small decrease of 3.9% in the tensile strength of compressed yarns compared to single fibers which show a 20%reduction in their tensile strength on transverse compression.Finite element modeling is required to understand this difference in behavior seen between single fibers and yarns by studying the local stress strains developed during transverse compression.Our aim is to use finite element simulations to investigate how the local strains(true strains)vary in the fibers within the yarn when it is transversely compressed to same nominal strains(u/t)as in experiments.The local or true strains of fibers are obtained directly from the commercial code LS-DYNA.LS-DYNA outputs tensorial(true)instantaneous strains and is accurate for large displacements.In the following sections,we first discuss the finite element simulation of transverse compression of single fibers,follow ed by yarns and compare the simulation results to the experimental results.

    3.Single fiber transverse compression response(SFTCR)

    A Dyneema?SK-76 single fiber is approximately circular[7]with an average diameter of 17.0μm and a density of 0.980 g/cm3.Ayarn of Dyneema?SK-76 is comprised of 780 such single fibers.The transverse compression response of single fibers and yarns at both quasi-static and high strain rate is studied using a 2-D plane strain FE model.The fibers are modelled using non-linear inelastic material properties presented in Table 2.These properties are derived from the experimental and modeling study by Sockalingam et al.[9]which reports a nonlinear inelastic behavior of Dyneema?SK-76 single fiber under transverse compression.All simulations are performed using the commercial FE code LS-DYNA.The following sections explain the modeling and simulation results of SFTCR and YTCR.

    A previous study by Sockalingam et al.has shown that 300 finite elements are required to accurately capture the transverse compression response of Dyneema?SK-76 fiber[7].Fig.5 shows the quarter symmetric fiber model constructed using 300 2-D plane strain elements(element formulation 13 in LS-DYNA).A 2-D single surface contact is used to define the contact between the fiber and the rigid platens with a friction coefficient of 0.2.The upper platen compresses the fiber at velocity of 1.0μm/s.A nonlinear inelastic behavior is assumed for the fiber with material properties given in Table 2 and platens are assumed as rigid bodies.

    After wandering about for several days until he was weary and hungry, he at last succeeded in finding a way out of the forest, and soon came to a wide and rapid river, which he followed, hoping to find some means of crossing it, and it happened that as the sun rose the next morning he saw something of a dazzling whiteness moored76 out in the middle of the stream

    3.1.Single fiber quasi-static transverse compression

    Fig.6 shows the simulated stress-strain response.The stressstrain response is non-linear inelastic as was observed in experiments[7].Fig.7 shows the true compressive strain contours developed in the fiber at 50%and 77%applied nominal strains.It can be observed from Fig.7 that the region near the center of the fiber develops high compressive strains and the strains reduce in magnitude away from the center.Fig.7 shows that the local true compressive strains developed in the fiber are significantly higher than the applied nominal strains of 50%and 77%.At an applied nominal strain of 77%the maximum true strain developed in the fiber is approximately 1.5 times higher,i.e.150%.These strain levels are significant enough to cause permanent deformation and fibrillation of fibers as explained in the next section.

    3.2.Single fiber high strain rate transverse compression

    As mentioned earlier,the transverse compression response of Dyneema?SK-76 fiber is non-linear inelastic.Sockalingam et al.in their study[9]have characterized this fiber stress-strain response into three distinct zones.

    The second row in Table 2 presents the material properties applied to the fiber for high strain rate transverse compression.We consider the same finite element model as described above for HSR transverse compression of Dyneema?SK-76 single fiber with the only modification to the velocity for the upper platen.The velocity of the upper-platen is set to 1.1 m/s same as experiments.

    Fig.5.SFTCR quarter-symmetric FE model.

    Fig.6.SFTCR predicted nominal stress nominal strain curve.

    Fig.7.True compressive strain at(a)50%and(b)77%applied nominal strain from single fiber Q-S compression model.

    Table 2 Non-linear inelastic properties of Dyneema?SK-76 fiber[9].

    Fig.8 shows the simulated fiber nominal stress-nominal strain response.The stress-strain response is non-linear inelastic with a very small elastic limit as was also observed in experiments[9].Nominal stress for an applied nominal strain of 77%is twice as high for high strain rate compression(Fig.8)compared to quasi-static compression of single fiber.Fig.9 shows the strain distribution from the simulation at an applied nominal strain of 77%.The maximum true compressive strains developed in the fiber are approximately 1.5 times to 2 times higher than the applied nominal strain.This result is similar to the result observed for the quasistatic compression response of the fiber.Comparing Figs.9 and 7(b),we can see that the true strain distribution across the fiber is similar for both the quasi-static and high strain rate compression at 77% applied nominal strains.Dyneema?SK-76 fibers have weaker inter-fibrillar interactions compared to Kevlar fibers which possess hydrogen bonding to influence off-axis stability.At high nominal strains,fibrillation is the dominant mode of deformation in Dyneema?SK-76 fibers as reported by McDaniel et al.[7].Their results show that fibrillation begins at small loads and nominal strains in Dyneema?SK-76 fibers and leads to the breakage of fibril network into micro fibrils with significant void formation and permanent deformation.Therefore,the reduction in the tensile strength seen in experiments[13]can be attributed to fibrillation triggered by the high level of true strains developed during transverse compression.In the next section,we use SFTCR as a basis to study the transverse compression response of a yarn composed of 780 single fibers.

    Fig.8.Single fiber HSRTC predicted nominal stress-nominal strain curve.

    Fig.9.True compressive strain at applied nominal strain of 77%from single fiber HSR compression model.

    4.Yarn transverse compression response(YTCR)

    In this section,we model the transverse compression response of yarns to gain a better understanding of the local stress strain behavior of fibers within the yarn.

    4.1.Finite element model of yarn

    We consider a 2-D plane strain FE model of yarn at fiber-scale similar to the model considered by Sockalingam et al.for Kevlar KM2 fibers[17].A yarn of Dyneema?SK-76 consists of 780 single fibers.The cross-section of the yarn can be approximated as an ellipse with major and minor axis as 0.6 mm and 0.193 mm respectively.Cross-section images of Dyneema?composite laminates depict an approximately hexagonally close packing of fibers[18,19].Fig.10 shows the 2-D FE model of a yarn consisting of fibers arranged in a hexagonal closed packing.Each fiber has a circular cross-section of diameter 17.0μm and is modelled using 84 2-D plane strain elements for computational efficiency.A 2-D single surface contact with a friction coeffecient of 0.2 is defined to account for the inter-fiber interactions and the interactions between fibers and platen.The upper platen compresses the yarn at a displacement rate of 0.6 mm/min same as experiments[15].The yarn is unconstrained in the lateral direction and is free to spread.The fibers are modelled using the same non-linear inelastic material model and properties as for SFTCR.Platens are assumed as rigid body materials.

    4.1.1.Yarn quasi-static transverse compression

    Fig.11 shows the predicted force vs.displacement curve and nominal stress vs.nominal strain response of the yarn model compared to experiments.The experimental curve in Fig.11 represents an average of stress-strain curves produced from yarn transverse compression experiments[15].Overall,the predicted stress strain response of the yarn model is stiffer than the experimental curve.This may be due to the assumption of a hexagonally closed packed structure(maximum fiber volume fraction 0.907)for fibers in the FE model.Factors such as fiber entanglements,actual fiber packing etc.is not accounted by the FE model considered in this study.How ever,the predicted model curve and the experimental curve both show little to no increase in force until a platen displacement of 0.073 mm or 38%nominal strain.This is due to significant spreading and spatial rearrangement of the fibers as can be seen from Fig.12(a)and Fig.12(b).

    Fig.10.Yarn transverse compression response FE model.

    Fig.11.(a)Force versus displacement and(b)Stress versus strain comparison between predicted response from yarn model and experiments.

    Fig.12.True compressive strain contours at(a)10%,(b)30%,(c)45%,(d)55%applied nominal strain from yarn Q-S compression model.

    On further loading,both the experimental and the model curve show an increase in load or nominal stress.How ever,unlike the experimental response the predicted response exhibits another drop-in force at nominal strain of 45%.This is attributed to further spreading and rearrangement of fibers within the yarn due to a low surface friction coefficient between them.Further loading results in an increased deformation of fibers as shown by the rapid increase in force or stresses in Fig.11(b).The steeper rise in force or stress observed in the predicted response compared to the experiments after a nominal strain of 45%is due to the assumed hexagonal close packing of the fibers in the model.The actual packing and volume of fraction of fibers within the yarn is less than 90.7%as approximated by a hexagonally closed pack structure.The actual microstructure induce lower stresses for a given applied nominal strain in experiments compared to the model.

    This understanding is reinforced by observing the yarn response and true compressive strains in Fig.12.At 10%applied nominal strain the fibers have displaced from their original position and show no deformation.At 55%applied nominal strains the fibers have spread significantly and have rearranged themselves within the yarn cross-section.Fibers near the center of the yarn crosssection are loaded in compression compared to fibers near the edges which show little or no deformation.It should be noted that at 55%applied nominal strain a large proportion of the fibers within the yarn show true strains only between 20%and 30%.

    Transverse compression experiments on unidirectional Dyneema?laminate in the literature[18]also shows an increase in the spreading of fibers with increase in applied nominal strains.The lower reduction in the tensile strength of Dyneema?SK-76 yarns as compared to single fibers may be attributed to fiber spreading and non-uniform fiber loading during compression as seen from the simulation results in Fig.12.

    Fig.13.Yarn HSR transverse compression predicted nominal stress-nominal strain curve.

    4.1.2.Yarn high strain rate transverse compression

    We consider the same FE model described above for yarn HSR transverse compression with the only modification to the velocity for the upper platen as 10.0 m/s and using an explicit dynamic solver.The fibers assume non-linear inelastic behavior with high strain rate properties presented in the second row of Table 2.Platens assume elastic behavior.

    Fig.13 shows the predicted nominal stress vs.nominal strain response of the yarn HSR transverse compression model.Nominal stresses are approximately six times larger for the yarn HSR compression model compared to the quasi-static model.Fig.14 shows the strain contours at approximately 55%applied nominal strain.This represents the last stable state that we were able to obtain from the model.

    As observed from Fig.14 the higher strains are developed in fibers near the center of the yarn and strains within the fibers reduce going away from the center.True strains developed in fibers varies from approximately 74%-118%in the center of the yarn and reduces to applied nominal strain of 55%laterally away from the center.However,a large proportion of the fibers located away from the center and towards the yarn edges show true strains of 10%or lower compared to the applied nominal strain of 55%.Compared to the quasi-static yarn results(Fig.12),greater deformation is seen in the center of the yarn as shown by the higher strain levels in Fig.14.This may be because at high strain rates the fibers within the yarn do not have sufficient time to spread and rearrange themselves on loading.

    On comparing the predicted nominal stress-nominal strain results from the single fiber model(Figs.6 and 8)and the yarn model(Figs.11 and 13)we can see that the nominal stresses developed in single fibers are approximately three times higher than those developed in yarns for an applied nominal strain of 55%.Furthermore,true compressive strains developed in single fiber(Figs.7 and 9)are significantly higher than the applied nominal strain whereas for yarns(Figs.12 and 14)a higher proportion of fibers show true strains below the applied nominal strain.The true strains observed in single fibers are high enough to cause fibrillation and permanent deformation of fibers.Fibrillation breaks down the fibril network and results in the reorientation of micro fibrils.This off-axis reorientation weakens the ability of fibril structure to carry axial loading and may likely be the reason for higher reduction in tensile strength of compressed single fibers.Transverse compression response of yarns involves significant spreading and rearrangement of fibers which is not present in the response of single fibers.The average true strains for fibers in the yarn are not significant enough to cause fibrillation of fibers within the yarn and may be the reason for a lower reduction in tensile strength of yarns as observed in experiments.How ever,it must be noted that the yarn model discussed in this study is simplistic and does not account for factors like,fiber entanglements,actual fiber packing etc.which may also contribute towards the lower tensile strength reduction observed in transverse compression experiments.It should also be noted here that yarns in a woven fabric would be constrained by the adjacent orthogonal interlacing yarns and the yarns in a composite would be constrained by the surrounding matrix resin resulting in different boundary conditions than what is considered in this study.

    Fig.14.True compressive strain contours at 55%nominal strain from yarn HSR compression model.

    5.Conclusions

    This work presents the effect of laterally unconstrained quasistatic transverse compression on the residual tensile strength of Dyneema?SK-76 single yarns.Experimental results show that there is only a small decrease of about 4%in the tensile strength of compressed yarns at an applied average nominal strain of 77%compared to single fibers which show a 20%reduction in tensile strength.A finite element study of the transverse compression response of single fibers and yarns indicate that true strains developed in single fibers are higher than the applied nominal strain whereas a large proportion of fibers within the yarns develop true strain below the applied nominal strain.True strains developed in single fibers are 1.5-2 times higher than the applied nominal strain and are significant enough to cause fibrillation and permanent deformation of fiber.On the other hand,yarns demonstrate significant spreading and rearrangement of fibers on transverse compression.This may be the reason for the lower strains observed in yarns as compared to single fiber for the same applied nominal strain.It can also explain the lower degradation in tensile strength of yarns compared to single fibers as seen in experiments.Future areas of work is to focus on yarn high strain rate transverse compression and multi-axial loading experiments to better understand yarn failure.

    Acknowledgments

    Dyneema?SK-76 yarns used in this work was provided by DSM Dyneema?and is acknowledged.The useful discussions provided by Drs.Ulrich Heisserer,Harm van der Werff and Mark Hazard of DSM Dyneema?is gratefully acknowledged.The authors KSand SS acknow ledges the startup funding provided by the University of South Carolina.

    超碰97精品在线观看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 男女免费视频国产| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 美女福利国产在线| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 美女主播在线视频| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 乱人伦中国视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 九九在线视频观看精品| 桃花免费在线播放| av卡一久久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 宅男免费午夜| 岛国毛片在线播放| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| av在线app专区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 久久97久久精品| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 搡老乐熟女国产| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 久久久久久人妻| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 九九在线视频观看精品| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 91成人精品电影| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美另类一区| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 色5月婷婷丁香| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久久国产网址| 老女人水多毛片| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 只有这里有精品99| 男人操女人黄网站| 日韩伦理黄色片| 久久这里只有精品19| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 精品午夜福利在线看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| av福利片在线| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 高清毛片免费看| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久久久久伊人网av| 丝袜美足系列| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 免费观看av网站的网址| 大码成人一级视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 精品国产国语对白av| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品免费大片| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产色婷婷99| 九九在线视频观看精品| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 午夜91福利影院| 18禁观看日本| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 性色avwww在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 七月丁香在线播放| 9热在线视频观看99| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产乱来视频区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 五月开心婷婷网| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久青草综合色| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 成人影院久久| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 18在线观看网站| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 婷婷成人精品国产| 成人免费观看视频高清| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲性久久影院| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产淫语在线视频| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 乱人伦中国视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日日啪夜夜爽| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| av福利片在线| 欧美日韩av久久| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 91精品国产国语对白视频| videos熟女内射| 国产成人精品无人区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 精品久久国产蜜桃| av不卡在线播放| 一个人免费看片子| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 久久影院123| a级毛色黄片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 免费观看av网站的网址| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | av片东京热男人的天堂| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 免费看不卡的av| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产精品.久久久| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 久久97久久精品| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 日韩伦理黄色片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 一级a做视频免费观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久97久久精品| 国产淫语在线视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 国产av码专区亚洲av| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲综合精品二区| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 亚洲四区av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 久热这里只有精品99| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久久久久伊人网av| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 中文字幕制服av| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 性色avwww在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久影院123| 欧美97在线视频| 日本wwww免费看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 搡老乐熟女国产| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 欧美另类一区| 精品一区二区三卡| av片东京热男人的天堂| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| www日本在线高清视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 高清毛片免费看| 日本av免费视频播放| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 黄色一级大片看看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 插逼视频在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 丁香六月天网| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲av.av天堂| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 成人国产麻豆网| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 天堂8中文在线网| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件 | 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| av天堂久久9| 亚洲伊人色综图| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 亚洲综合色网址| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 草草在线视频免费看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 日本午夜av视频| 久久久久网色| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 97在线人人人人妻| 男女边摸边吃奶| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 日本91视频免费播放| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 综合色丁香网| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 熟女电影av网| 色哟哟·www| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| av有码第一页| 国产精品三级大全| 少妇 在线观看| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产毛片在线视频| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久久久精品性色| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 丰满乱子伦码专区| videos熟女内射| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲精品第二区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 黄片播放在线免费| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 美女视频免费永久观看网站| av网站免费在线观看视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日本av免费视频播放| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 精品国产一区二区久久| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产激情久久老熟女| 午夜视频国产福利| 久久影院123| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲成色77777| 99久久综合免费| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 人妻系列 视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 少妇的逼水好多| 两个人看的免费小视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 午夜激情av网站| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 成人国产麻豆网| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产视频首页在线观看| 国产成人91sexporn| 久久99一区二区三区| 高清av免费在线| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 色哟哟·www| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 免费观看在线日韩| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 日本av免费视频播放| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲第一av免费看| 日韩伦理黄色片| 成人无遮挡网站| 欧美人与善性xxx| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 久久狼人影院| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产成人一区二区在线| 黑人高潮一二区| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 精品一区在线观看国产| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 亚洲四区av| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 成人影院久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 18禁观看日本| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜激情av网站| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看 | 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 免费少妇av软件| 一级毛片 在线播放| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产成人aa在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 高清欧美精品videossex| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久久久国产网址| av国产精品久久久久影院| kizo精华| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产色婷婷99| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 午夜影院在线不卡| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 熟女电影av网| 欧美成人午夜精品| 日本wwww免费看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产成人91sexporn| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 超色免费av| 精品亚洲成国产av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲av.av天堂| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 美女主播在线视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 黄片播放在线免费| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 999精品在线视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 韩国av在线不卡| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 七月丁香在线播放| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 曰老女人黄片| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 亚洲综合色惰| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 黄色 视频免费看| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 青春草国产在线视频| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 另类精品久久| 日韩av免费高清视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区|