• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A review of dual-spin projectile stability

    2020-04-09 18:34:32JmesNorrisAmerHmeedJohnEconomouSimonPrker
    Defence Technology 2020年1期

    Jmes Norris ,Amer Hmeed ,John Economou ,Simon Prker

    a Centre for Defence Engineering,Cranfield University,Defence Academy of the United Kingdom,Shrivenham,SN6 8LA United Kingdom

    b BAESystems,United Kingdom

    Keywords:Guided projectiles Dual-spin Gyroscopic Dynamic Stability Canards

    ABSTRACT This paper gives a succinct review of dual-spinprojectile stability and some technologies relating to them.It describes how the traditional stability factors from linear projectile theory are modified to better describe a controlled dual-spin projectile.Finally,it reviews works which have investigated how different aspects of a controlled dual-spin design can affect flight stability,primarily airframe structure and canard properties.A conclusion is given,highlighting important guidelines from the enclosed discussions.?2020 China Ordnance Society.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    1.Introduction

    Generic airframe stability has three distinct forms:static,dynamic and gyroscopic,quantified by the stability factors SS,Sd&Sgrespectively.At a specific instance,a projectile is‘stable’in one of these ways if the associated stability factor fulfils its respective inequality.If a body is statically stable then,under the influence of a small disturbing force,the body will act towards its original alignment.If a body is dynamically stable,the disturbance induces an oscillatory motion,which will damp until the body attains its initial alignment.Gyroscopic stability is the resistance of a rotating body to changing its axis of rotation.Stability factors are advantageous for projectile designers,as they allow a good estimate of ballistic stability without having to analyse a large flight envelope with numerical analysis,which can be time consuming and resource intensive.

    Projectiles are spun to mitigate aerodynamic disturbances which may detrimentally affect the flight of the projectile.Guided projectiles are far more effective,albeit more expensive per unit,at achieving a desired effect on target;how ever they are primarily designed to be non-spinning.A Dual-spin projectile design is one possible solution to imparting the benefits of controlled flight onto spin-stabilised projectiles.This paper consolidates the major works to date,which describe the stability factors for single spin(un)guided and dual-spin(un)guided projectiles.Additional literature describing any aspect of dual-spin flight stability is enclosed and discussed.Any meaningful conclusions about projectile design which can be draw n from the enclosed analysis or discussions are listed.

    Section 2 presents the origin and justification for the use of dual-spin projectiles,some useful technologies and novel guidance methods for generic guided projectiles.Section 3 provides a brief origin of the static,dynamic and gyroscopic stability factors from linear projectile theory,followed by a review of the major works to date which have built upon these factors to account for the addition of control surfaces,a dual-spin design and a combination of both.Section 4 gives a review of works which have investigated how stability can be analysed from other perspectives,as well as how it is affected by both projectile and control mechanism parameters.Section 5 gives a summary of the paper and important elements of the enclosed discussions.

    2.Dual-spin projectiles and related technologies

    This section explains why spin stabilisation is useful for projectiles along with some of the problems which can arise after implementing it.Guided projectiles are introduced along with the rationale behind the dual-spin configuration.Finally,relevant technology such as MEMS,piezoelectric actuators and novel methods of imparting a control moment are presented.

    The projectile,as an effector,has been used in warfare for almost as long as warfare has existed.It has long been know n that spinning a projectile improves stability and since Greenhill's formula[1],that there is an optimal spin rate.Too little spin and the projectile will not have the gyroscopic inertia to resist the disturbing force experienced during flight and the precession will be too large.Too much spin and the gyroscopic inertia will resist the aligning aerodynamic forces from the aerodynamic design creating too large an angle of attack;know n as super-stability[2].Ballistic stability,as it is understood today,is defined as the ability of a projectile to maintain its trajectory,ensuring the desired range and designated level of accuracy is achieved.A ballistically unstable projectile will tumble during flight,adversely affecting the aerodynamics and thus the range and accuracy.Hence,spinning a projectile intends to alleviate the inconsistency and inaccuracy caused by these disturbances.

    How ever,there are two notable instances of amplified instability when projectiles are spun.Spin-yaw resonance occurs when the spin rate approaches the yaw rate,the projectile may begin to undergo a large amplitude yawing motion called‘lunar’yawing[2].Catastrophic yaw occurs when a large yawing motion is amplified by non-linear Magnus effects,which creates further dynamic instability,leading to a cascade effect.Indeed,Magnus force interactions affect a projectile's flight in many ways,Seifert[3]has provided a comprehensive review of the Magnus effect and its implications in aeronautics.In another relevant study[4]CFD simulations were used to predict the aerodynamic coefficients and flow fields for a 25 mm spin-stabilised projectile.The goal being to deduce which parameters are necessary for an accurate computation of the Magnus moment and roll damping moment.While spun projectiles are subject to Magnus forces in flight,these can be reliably accounted for prior to projectile launch[5].

    The accuracy demanded by today's weaponry has led to the development of guided weapons,where control and guidance hardware is incorporated directly into the projectile.Guided weapons provide substantial benefits over conventional ammunition,namely reduced collateral damage,improved lethality and effectiveness per unit.Conventional,non-spun,guided munitions are already well established in modern arsenals(e.g.M 982 Excalibur[6],M712 Copperhead[7]),primarily using control surfaces such as canards for control.How ever,the high RPM inherent with spin stabilisation is not conducive to the use of tracking sensors or guidance hardware.A relatively recent solution to this problem is to use a‘dual-spin’configuration,shown in Fig.1.The aft section of the projectile retains its high spin rate and innate gyroscopic stability while the foreword section,adorned with the guidance and control hardware,has a much lower spin rate.This design allow s spun projectiles to be controlled in instances where reducing the spin is detrimental or otherwise undesired,an example of this would be smaller calibres which are more susceptible to aerodynamic disturbances.If stockpiles of unguided,spin-stabilised munitions exist,they can be upgraded by replacing the existing fuse with a course-correcting fuse(CCF)which contains the control and guidance hardware[8].

    Fig.1.Depiction of dual-spin projectile(Liang et al.[57]).

    Restricting the control and guidance hardware to such a small volume is driving the miniaturisation of sub-systems.As a result,technology is being adopted from other fields. Microelectromechanical Systems(MEMS)for example,are already being made more resilient due to use in aerospace[9].MEMS describe any system with moving parts on the micro-scale;relevant examples used in guided projectiles would be gyroscopes and accelerometers.Additionally,experiments are being conducted to adapt newer technologies,such as piezoelectric actuators,which are robust,have very high operational frequencies and no moving parts(aside from the physical deformation of the actuator).Different designs of piezoelectric actuators,such bi-morph actuators[10,11]and snap-through actuators[12],have been incorporated into projectile fins and control methodologies have been considered[13,14].Smaller designs usually equate to higher projectile speeds[15].It has been shown both numerically and experimentally,that conventional fin designs are able to produce significant deflections when subjected to supersonic speeds in excess of Mach 4[16](a 25 mm projectile achieved 1.4 m of deflection over a range of 160 m).

    Much research has been conducted into unconventional control methodologies.While fins are still the primary source of control moments for projectiles,developments in these novel methods may prove useful in future guided weapon design,dual-spin or not.Project SCORPION,a collaboration between DARPA,U.S.Army Research Labs(USARL)and Georgia Institute of Technology,investigated the feasibility of mircoadaptive flow control(MAFC)as a means to control spin stabilised projectiles[17].It utilised the Coanda effect interaction with the projectile boattail,in combination with a high frequency piezoelectric actuator which distorts the boattail.The USARL have also proposed and analysed an asymmetric,spin stabilised projectile controlled by a singular fin or‘paddle’[18].‘Tail-spoilers’have been proven able to manoeuvre a 105 mm projectile at speeds up to Mach 3[19],with a range enhancement of 7%or a controllable deflection of 1.5 km,over a 10 km range.Tests have been conducted with an articulable nose/ogive,achieving bandwidths of up to 200 Hz at Mach 3.3[15].Microvanes have been investigated as a method for flow control on a supersonic spinning projectile[20].It was found that the vanes inhibit flow separation on the surface of the projectile,the normal force coefficient and pitching moment stabilised,which led to greater projectile stability via reduced oscillations.In addition,there exist a plethora of patents[21-25]describing novel guidance methods such as air jets,gyroscopes and asymmetric ogives.Since fin control methods are so predominant,they are assumed to be the source of all control moments throughout this paper.

    3.Stability factors

    Many popular textbooks and literature[2,26-30]can provide a detailed derivation of the stability factors from linear projectile theory,this section gives a brief description following McCoy[26].It then elaborates on the relation between these factors and their importance in determining the effect projectile dimensions have on ballistic stability.Then it is shown how different works to date have modified these factors to account for different iterations of projectile models.The DOF models form which the stability factors are derived from have been shown able to replicate technical data and atmospheric flight models,when applied to small calibre munitions[31].The NATO Armaments Ballistic Kernel(NABK)also utilises a 6-DOF model,which has also been shown to predict the behaviour of small calibre munitions(7.62 mm×51 mm)[32].Additionally,the statistical methodology used to evaluate projectile dispersion during that study characteristics is sufficient[33].

    3.1.Classical aeroballistic stability factors

    The static stability factor Ss,for a projectile of mass m,is given by

    where CM αis the overturning moment coefficient as a function of angle of attack α,or CMα≡?CM/?α[34].A body has‘positive’static stability(i.e.is statically stable)if SS<0;SS=0 and SS>0 correlate to neutral and negative static stability respectively.Depending on whether the static stability is positive,neutral or negative,the body's alignment after a disturbance will respectively:return to its original position,maintain its new alignment or continue moving in the direction of the disturbance.Apart from CMα,all parameters in Eq.(1)are positive,hence to achieve SS<0 we necessitate that CMα<0;for a non-spin stabilised body this means practically that the COM is located ahead of the centre of pressure(COP).Fig.2 shows a plot of the relation between CMandα,static stability is present when the line pertaining to a given body has negative gradient.To optimise SSbased on the coefficients of CMα,a heavy projectile with a large cross section and small transverse moment of inertia is preferable,though this contradicts conventional ballistic design.

    The procedure for deriving the gyroscopic and dynamic stability factors involves solving,under a series of assumptions,the equations of motion(EOM)for a projectile model and imparting boundary conditions on the solutions.In the most basic case presented,we assume a spin stabilised,uncontrolled projectile which is aerodynamically symmetric,has a rigid body,a uniform density and the centre of mass(COM)located on the longitudinal axis.Euler angles and angles of attack are assumed to be small and the effects of gravity are neglected.The solutions to a projectile's EOM describe damped oscillatory motion with two modes;a large amplitude slow frequency‘precession’(ωp)and a low amplitude fast frequency‘nutation’(ωn)with damping frequencies λpand λnrespectively.For the solutions to represent real and damped oscillations,we impose boundaries on the oscillation and damping rates.From the resulting inequalities,the gyroscopic stability factor is defined as

    Fig.2.Example of overturning moment coefficient C Mαagainst angle of attack α for two abstract bodies.

    The dynamic stability factor is defined as

    N.B.the last two terms in the denominator of Eq.(3)are only included by some texts[26,29]to account for variable velocity due to drag and gravity.These equations are cumbersome so they are written in a more compact notation using substitution parameters,the gyroscopic stability factor is written as

    and the dynamic stability factor is represented as

    Future iterations of the stability factors are written in this compact form and all substitution parameters are shown in Appendix A.The mathematical condition for gyroscopic stability is Sg≥1,though it has been shown that the ballistic coefficient of a bullet is adversely affected by tumbling as Sgis lowered past a threshold of 1.3[35].The ratio p/V decreases along the trajectory of an uncontrolled projectile(assuming flat-fire),thus it is apparent Sgwill decrease down range.A projectile is dynamically stable if

    By substituting Sgfrom Eq.(4)into Eq.(6)we can define the axial spin limit Slimfrom the resulting inequality,

    which shows the critical value of P2for which the inequality in Eq.(6)is no longer satisfied.Fig.3 shows a plot of the corresponding equality of Eq.(6),with the shaded region indicating where the inequality is fulfilled.

    Dynamic stability is concerned with the oscillations induced in a moving body after a disturbance is applied and as with static stability,it can be positive,neutral or negative.With positive dynamic stability the oscillations eventually damp towards the original alignment,neutral dynamic stability causes oscillations to reside indefinitely with constant amplitude,while negative dynamic stability has oscillations which amplify chaotically.When Sd=1 the body has positive dynamic stability,or is perfectly dynamically stable.If Sd<1 the precession is unstable and if Sd>1 the nutation is unstable,both catastrophically so at the asymptotes(Sd=0 or Sd=2 respectively).The transition from positive to neutral to negative dynamic stability for a projectile is dependent on the magnitude of the deviation from Sd=1.The magnitude at which the transitions occur is dependent on the projectile and trajectory parameters,but is not well characterised.Provided 0<Sd<2 in practice,the projectile can be spun sufficiently to ensure ballistic stability.Table 1 shows the effect on ballistic stability of occupying different static and dynamic regimes.

    Note that the projectile geometry required to maximise aerodynamic efficiency and terminal effectiveness,almost always results in negative static stability.From Table 1 we can see that in the unstable static regime,a dynamically stable projectile can still be ballistically stabilised if the spin rate is sufficiently high.Thus,projectile designers can effectively disregard the static stability of a projectile,solely focusing on the relation between Sdand Sg;i.e.it is sufficient,to ensure a prototype projectile lies in the stable region(as central as possible)of Fig.3 for the anticipated flight envelope.

    Fig.4.Dynamic stability plot of various NATO calibres for different projectile velocities.

    Fig.4 shows a dynamic stability plot for three conventional NATO calibres: 5.56 mm×45 mm, 7.62 mm×51 mm and 12.7 mm×99 mm.The bullet geometry is loaded into PRODAS ballistic software and calculated for flat-fire trajectories.Each line represents one calibre,each point on the line represents a pair of stability factors calculated at a given bullet velocity.The velocity range is Mach 1.5-4 in increments of 0.5,the low est speed corresponds to the lowest/left most point of each line,increasing progressively.

    3.2.Stability factor development

    To account for the contribution of passivated control surfaces(canards or fins),a term n can be appended to the EOM[30,36],where

    Note that the n term could be modified to account for any of the novel control methodologies described at the end of Section 2,provided the control moment can be characterised and integrated into the EOM.If the same mathematical treatment as above is applied to this modified EOM,the result is that Sdis unaffected,while Sgbecomes:

    At least for the assumptions of this model,the canard parameters considered only affect Sg,not Sd.In a comprehensive paper by Costello et al.(2000)[37]a dynamic model was produced for a dual-spin projectile with no control surfaces,which utilised a 7-DOF model.The stability factors derived from this are shown below in Eq.(11)and Eq.(12).

    Burchett et al.[38]developed this model further to analyse the effect that lateral pulse jets,as a method of control,have on the swerving motion of a projectile;though they did not derive any stability factors for their model.Costello uses the same assumptions as the classical case with the addition that V,φA&φFare large compared to the dynamic model coordinates θ,ψ,q,r,v,&w,so a product of any of these small quantities and any of their derivatives is negligible.

    Wernert(2009)[39]expanded this dual-spin model to include the contribution of passivated canards,leading to the following stability factors

    Comparing Eq.(11)and Eq.(13),we can see the method for including canard effects for the dual-spin design is analogous to the single-spin design between Eq.(4)and Eq.(9),the addition of a term in the denominator.How ever,Wernert remarks that the Sdhe arrived at is not satisfactory since the contribution of the canards to the Magnus forces/moments was not considered.

    Zhu et al.[40]further developed this model by including terms to account for the effects of gravity and Euler pitch angle(θE),which led them to the following stability factors.

    Using the assumption of a flat fire trajectory,θE=0,the stability factors were then shown to reduce and remain consistent with the previously established theory.Fig.5 illustrates the model and various parameters used by both Wernert and Zhu et al.The value of Sgin Eq.(4)for a single spin,uncontrolled projectile has been validated for conventional small scale projectiles[35],though the dual-spin modifications to Sgmade by Costello,Wernert and Zhu et al.are yet to be validated for small scale,due to the absence of such small scale dual-spin prototypes.

    Fig.6 shows a comparison of each iteration of the stability factors,equations(4),(5),(9)-(14),for a 155 mm projectile.There is an inherent difficulty in directly comparing these equations,since they model fundamentally different projectiles.We can assume the total mass of a single spin projectile is the sum of masses of the forward and aft sections.Canards are assumed to have negligible mass,yet still provide an aerodynamic moment.The aft spin rate is chosen to be equal to the single-spin(1445 rad/s)while the forward section is chosen be sufficiently low to allow the operation of control and sensing hardware(30 rad/s).The aerodynamic coefficients,moments of inertia and balancing distances(R(A,F(xiàn))x,Rm(A,F(xiàn))xr(A,F(xiàn))x)were calculated using a projectile model in PRODAS,once the single spin projectile was divided into two distinct sections.It is worthwhile to note which modifications to a dual-spin projectile are necessary to achieve the stability of a single-spin projectile.However,this optimisation task is very complex and beyond the scope of this paper,since all aerodynamic coefficients are functions of projectile geometry.

    4.Works pertaining to dual-spin stability

    This section review s publications which consider different elements affecting projectile stability from a perspective other than stability factors.The chapters categorise a number of publications which have a similar focal point.

    An alternative method of stability analysis,conducted by Theodoulis et al.[41],created a linear-parameter-varying(LPV)model for a canard guided,single spin projectile.The aerodynamic information is encoded into certain state space matrices,the eigenvalues of which correspond to the precession and nutation frequencies of the projectile at any given instance.Additionally,root locus analysis of the system can identify stable operating regions,the parameters of which can be obtained and substituted into the stability criteria,depending on how the system is modelled.Indeed,ISL have conducted a significant amount of research into the modelling and control of dual-spin projectiles[39,41-45].

    The‘Miller twist rule’is an imperial unit formula which can be used to calculate the optimal twist rate of a barrel as a function of bullet attributes and Sg[5],thus it can also be used to determine Sgif the twist rate is know n.Courtney et al.has shown empirically,that the Miller rule can be modified for use with plastic tipped bullets with non-homogenous densities[46],as well as for open tip style bullets[47].

    Fig.5.Depiction of dual-spin projectile model(modified from Ref.[40]).

    Fig.6.Dynamic stability comparison for each iteration of stability formula.

    4.1.Airframe

    Lahti et al.[48]designed a methodology to control the exterior ballistic properties of a spinning projectile by re-distributing the centre of mass around the inside of the bullet.The stability factors used in the paper follow McCoy[26],an appropriate usage since bullets are single-spin stabilised projectiles with no control method.The aerodynamic coefficients used in the analysis are calculated from a modified version of Slender Body Theory[49],where a correction termis appended to account for f l ow compressibility.While it is stated the coefficients are not well estimated near the transonic boundary,they are assumed to be representative based on experimental data[50].A bullet model was created with a large number of cells populating the interior,each may possess a specific density.A global optimisation algorithm was then used to find the mass distribution which can provide ballistic stability at the lowest velocity,by satisfying the stability factors.Since velocity decreases with projectile range,this method will find the mass distribution which enables the longest range(a training round with limited range was also investigated,but this review is mainly concerned with results from the long range specimen).Fig.7 shows the result from their paper.

    It is stated the Magnus effect is the main method by which the mass distribution affects stability,especially toward the aft of the projectile[26].From Fig.7,it is apparent the algorithm selected the largest available density to populate mostly the aft of the projectile,which has the effect of minimising the resulting Magnus moment.These results indicate that mounting control and guidance hardware in the forward section of a projectile is beneficial for projectile stability,since electronic components generally have a lower density than the conventional core material,lead.

    Jintao et al.[51]have investigated the effects to flight stability and manoeuvrability caused by the elastic deformation of a spinning projectile by conducting numerical simulations.It was shown that aerodynamic coefficients increase with movement frequency,that an elastic deformation induces two aerodynamic components opposite and perpendicular to the deformation,and that the induced angle of attack from deformation decreases as Mach number increases.

    Xu et al.[52]have modelled the stability factors for a missile under thrust,assuming a flexible chassis.It was shown that thrust has a‘critical value’where dynamic stability is maximised;if thrust ishigher or lower than the critical value,then dynamic instability is induced by elastic or rigid vibrational frequencies respectively.Additionally,structural stiffness is low ered as thrust increases,which leads to reduced static stability.

    4.2.Canard modification and general control

    Chang et al.[53]have investigated the spin-rate of dual-spin projectiles as a function of canard properties,by characterising the ratio of aft to forward axial moment of inertia,IAx/IFx.The canards were modelled with zero deflection angle,so any contribution comes purely from the roll damping moment.It was found that for an initial spin rate of 420 rev/s(muzzle velocity 980 m/s with elevation angle of 45°),the dual-spin configuration itself causes a spin-rate discrepancy of 25 rev/s between the aft and forward sections,while deploying the canards led to a difference of 250 rev/s.The spin attenuation of the aft section was greater for values of IAx/IFx<1,while the spin attenuation of the forward section was greater for values of>1.For very large values of IAx/IFx,the aft section spin-rate was found to drastically reduce at first,then increase for a short period and finally attenuate as prior.Impact point drift was caused by any deviation from IAx/IFx=1.The maximum angle of attack was found to increase drastically to 16°for IAx/IFx<0.3,but remain around 1.7°for all IAx/IFx>0.3.The ratio of inertial moments has significant effects on both spin rate and angle of attack and must therefore be considered carefully during the design of a dual-spin projectile.

    Fig.7.The optimal mass distribution of a long range bullet,Lahti et al.[48].

    Wang et al.[54]have conducted numerical simulations investigating the effect of yawing force frequency on the angular motion and ballistic characteristics of dual-spin projectiles.The precession and nutation rates(λpand λn)were calculated following the linear theory described in Ref.[26].It was found λpand λnfor the system decrease over the projectile trajectory.As a result,the spin-rate of the aft or forward section could coincide with these intrinsic frequencies at certain intervals,which are dependent on the chosen projectile parameters.At resonance,there is an increase in angle of attack(~0.2°)and decrease in projectile range(~0.4 km decrease over~33.5 km).A Monte Carlo simulation was then conducted,which showed a 10 Hz control force applied to the projectile reduces projectile dispersion,but not significantly.

    Cooper et al.have investigated the implications on flight stability caused by projectile asymmetry from the addition of canards[55].Linear projectile theory was extended to account for radial mass asymmetries,which was shown to reduce back to standard theory when the asymmetry was zero.The dynamic stability of the projectile was found by root locus analysis of the system eigenvalues in state space,in the same way as Theodoulis et al.[41,42,44].The canards were modelled with sinusoidal actuation,when the frequency of this driving wave is close to λpor λn,dynamic instability results;this is in agreement with the investigation of[54].When the actuation moment of the canards was sufficiently large,it was shown to adversely affect the oscillatory motion of the projectile,leading to ballistic instability.

    Chang[56]has studied the dynamic response of a dual-spin,canard-stabilised projectile,when the coupling between canard control and gravity are considered.A new analytical solution was proposed to predict the maximum angle of attack induced by canard actuation,the yaw of repose due to canard control and the phase shift of the swerve response.It was found if the moment imparted on the projectile by the canards,or‘control moment’,is large then it will more drastically alter the trajectory,but lead to airframe instability.

    Wang et al.[36]investigated the effects of different control strategies on the flight stability criterion derived in Ref.[40],by assuming all parameters other than those associated with the rolling motion of the body to be invariant.It was found that canards should be designed so the produced roll moment is as small as possible.During the period in which the roll angle is adjusted,it was found that control strategy has no impact on flight stability;it was suggested that the target spin rate of the forward section should be as low as possible for practical purposes(as discussed in Section 1).The behaviour of the motor torque was also characterised in terms of both trajectory and projectile parameters.

    Liang et al.[57]have proposed a methodology for optimising the aerodynamic parameters of control canards.A 3D model is created with chosen canard parameters,then the aerodynamic coefficients for this are generated through the CFD program FLUENT and the efficiency is analysed by mapping how the normal force coefficient(CNα)changes with respect to canard deflection angle,over different angles of attack and Mach numbers.It would be interesting to see how this methodology could improve if used in conjunction with all the works listed above,where the canards’performance is quantified for each mechanism of affecting projectile stability,for varying control strategies,and having the optimum configuration selected based upon this.

    5.Conclusions

    This paper has shown the origin of stability factors,their use and interpretation for projectile design and how they should be modified to describe a dual-spin,controlled projectile.When more dual-spin prototypes are available,further work should involve validating the 7-DOF models used in numerical analysis.What follows is a summary of the publications reviewed here,aiming to provide guidelines to maximise the ballistic stability of a prototype projectile;full detail being found in the accompanying reference.

    Lahtiet al.[48]have shown that mass should be concentrated at the back of the projectile as much as possible,to increase the range.Jintao et al.[51]have shown that an increasing airframe vibrational frequency,or increasing elastic deformation amplitude,will increase aerodynamic coefficients through an increasing angle of attack,at a rate proportional to Mach number.Xu et al.[52]showed that projectile thrust has an optimal value to maximise dynamic stability,which is dependent on airframe parameters.This is not so applicable to gun-launched projectiles but is an important consideration nonetheless.Chang et al.[53]show ed that spin attenuation of the aft/forward section increased for IAx/IFx<1 and IAx/IFx>1 respectively,and that maximum angle of attack increases drastically(~16°)for all IAx/IFx<0.3,remaining almost constant(~1.7°)otherwise.The intrinsic nutation and precession frequency,which are dependent on airframe parameters,decrease over a trajectory.It has been sow n that the control force frequency(Wang et al.[54])and canard actuation frequency(Cooper et al.[55])should be chosen to avoid these modes if possible.Chang[56]has shown that if the control moment of the canards is too large then ballistic stability is affected.Finally,Wang et al.[36]have shown that the roll moment of the canards should be as small as possible.

    Conflicts of interest

    None to declare.

    Funding

    This paper was sponsored by EPSRC ICASE Grant reference 1700064 and BAE Systems.

    APPENDIX

    A.Substitution parameters Single-spin no canards(Classic)

    The last two terms of H are added by certain authors[26,29]to represent variable velocity due to gravity and drag.

    where

    Canard Guided

    Dual-spin without canards

    Any symbol with an A or F subscript or superscript indicates the usual meaning of the symbol,but with respect to the Aft or forward section of the projectile respectively.

    where

    Dual-spin with canards

    Then by Zhu

    Where g*=gl sin(θT)/V2and ε=0.5 tan(θE).

    一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 在线av久久热| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 欧美另类一区| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 午夜激情av网站| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 婷婷色综合www| 一级黄色大片毛片| 飞空精品影院首页| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲精品一二三| av有码第一页| 国产成人精品无人区| 久久性视频一级片| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产麻豆69| av一本久久久久| 精品高清国产在线一区| 精品福利观看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 久久中文字幕一级| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 9色porny在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲国产看品久久| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 欧美大码av| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 精品国产国语对白av| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 夫妻午夜视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 99热全是精品| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 只有这里有精品99| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 我的亚洲天堂| 五月天丁香电影| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 丁香六月天网| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 在线观看www视频免费| 美女中出高潮动态图| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 久久99一区二区三区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 丁香六月欧美| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 午夜视频精品福利| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| av网站在线播放免费| 热re99久久国产66热| 一级黄片播放器| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日本a在线网址| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久久久久久精品精品| 少妇 在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 黄色视频不卡| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产又爽黄色视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 深夜精品福利| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 久久影院123| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 午夜免费鲁丝| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲精品一二三| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 一级黄片播放器| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 午夜免费观看性视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 久久中文字幕一级| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| av网站在线播放免费| 一本综合久久免费| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| netflix在线观看网站| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 99久久综合免费| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 天天添夜夜摸| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| www日本在线高清视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 少妇 在线观看| 人妻一区二区av| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产av国产精品国产| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 悠悠久久av| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| av在线播放精品| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 乱人伦中国视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 婷婷色综合www| av欧美777| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 日韩av免费高清视频| 久久久久网色| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 成人手机av| 丁香六月欧美| 精品亚洲成国产av| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 女警被强在线播放| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 宅男免费午夜| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 在线av久久热| 国产精品免费视频内射| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| avwww免费| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久久热在线av| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| a级毛片在线看网站| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 大型av网站在线播放| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| www日本在线高清视频| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 999久久久国产精品视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| av天堂在线播放| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 欧美人与善性xxx| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产精品 国内视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 深夜精品福利| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| www.自偷自拍.com| 超色免费av| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 午夜两性在线视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| av在线app专区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 精品福利观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 久9热在线精品视频| 手机成人av网站| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 精品第一国产精品| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 国产在线一区二区三区精| 一区二区三区精品91| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | netflix在线观看网站| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 一区二区三区精品91| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| av福利片在线| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| videos熟女内射| 美女主播在线视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 最黄视频免费看| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 9191精品国产免费久久| 一个人免费看片子| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 视频区图区小说| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 蜜桃国产av成人99| 又大又爽又粗| 午夜激情av网站| 男女免费视频国产| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲人成电影观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产在视频线精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 脱女人内裤的视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 精品久久久久久电影网| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 大香蕉久久网| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 中文欧美无线码| 五月天丁香电影| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 在线天堂中文资源库| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 老司机影院毛片| 一本久久精品| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久99精品国语久久久| 午夜两性在线视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 久久国产精品影院| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久免费观看电影| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 午夜福利,免费看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 国产1区2区3区精品| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 我的亚洲天堂| 五月开心婷婷网| 一本综合久久免费| 男女免费视频国产| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 另类精品久久| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| avwww免费| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 免费看不卡的av| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 熟女av电影| 美女福利国产在线| 国产三级黄色录像| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产一区二区三区av在线| www.自偷自拍.com| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 免费看不卡的av| av在线播放精品| 久久中文字幕一级| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 中文欧美无线码| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 一区福利在线观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 看十八女毛片水多多多| av不卡在线播放| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 婷婷成人精品国产| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 在线观看免费高清a一片| 免费观看av网站的网址| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 日韩av免费高清视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| netflix在线观看网站| av网站免费在线观看视频| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说|