• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A review of dual-spin projectile stability

    2020-04-09 18:34:32JmesNorrisAmerHmeedJohnEconomouSimonPrker
    Defence Technology 2020年1期

    Jmes Norris ,Amer Hmeed ,John Economou ,Simon Prker

    a Centre for Defence Engineering,Cranfield University,Defence Academy of the United Kingdom,Shrivenham,SN6 8LA United Kingdom

    b BAESystems,United Kingdom

    Keywords:Guided projectiles Dual-spin Gyroscopic Dynamic Stability Canards

    ABSTRACT This paper gives a succinct review of dual-spinprojectile stability and some technologies relating to them.It describes how the traditional stability factors from linear projectile theory are modified to better describe a controlled dual-spin projectile.Finally,it reviews works which have investigated how different aspects of a controlled dual-spin design can affect flight stability,primarily airframe structure and canard properties.A conclusion is given,highlighting important guidelines from the enclosed discussions.?2020 China Ordnance Society.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.on behalf of KeAi Communications Co.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    1.Introduction

    Generic airframe stability has three distinct forms:static,dynamic and gyroscopic,quantified by the stability factors SS,Sd&Sgrespectively.At a specific instance,a projectile is‘stable’in one of these ways if the associated stability factor fulfils its respective inequality.If a body is statically stable then,under the influence of a small disturbing force,the body will act towards its original alignment.If a body is dynamically stable,the disturbance induces an oscillatory motion,which will damp until the body attains its initial alignment.Gyroscopic stability is the resistance of a rotating body to changing its axis of rotation.Stability factors are advantageous for projectile designers,as they allow a good estimate of ballistic stability without having to analyse a large flight envelope with numerical analysis,which can be time consuming and resource intensive.

    Projectiles are spun to mitigate aerodynamic disturbances which may detrimentally affect the flight of the projectile.Guided projectiles are far more effective,albeit more expensive per unit,at achieving a desired effect on target;how ever they are primarily designed to be non-spinning.A Dual-spin projectile design is one possible solution to imparting the benefits of controlled flight onto spin-stabilised projectiles.This paper consolidates the major works to date,which describe the stability factors for single spin(un)guided and dual-spin(un)guided projectiles.Additional literature describing any aspect of dual-spin flight stability is enclosed and discussed.Any meaningful conclusions about projectile design which can be draw n from the enclosed analysis or discussions are listed.

    Section 2 presents the origin and justification for the use of dual-spin projectiles,some useful technologies and novel guidance methods for generic guided projectiles.Section 3 provides a brief origin of the static,dynamic and gyroscopic stability factors from linear projectile theory,followed by a review of the major works to date which have built upon these factors to account for the addition of control surfaces,a dual-spin design and a combination of both.Section 4 gives a review of works which have investigated how stability can be analysed from other perspectives,as well as how it is affected by both projectile and control mechanism parameters.Section 5 gives a summary of the paper and important elements of the enclosed discussions.

    2.Dual-spin projectiles and related technologies

    This section explains why spin stabilisation is useful for projectiles along with some of the problems which can arise after implementing it.Guided projectiles are introduced along with the rationale behind the dual-spin configuration.Finally,relevant technology such as MEMS,piezoelectric actuators and novel methods of imparting a control moment are presented.

    The projectile,as an effector,has been used in warfare for almost as long as warfare has existed.It has long been know n that spinning a projectile improves stability and since Greenhill's formula[1],that there is an optimal spin rate.Too little spin and the projectile will not have the gyroscopic inertia to resist the disturbing force experienced during flight and the precession will be too large.Too much spin and the gyroscopic inertia will resist the aligning aerodynamic forces from the aerodynamic design creating too large an angle of attack;know n as super-stability[2].Ballistic stability,as it is understood today,is defined as the ability of a projectile to maintain its trajectory,ensuring the desired range and designated level of accuracy is achieved.A ballistically unstable projectile will tumble during flight,adversely affecting the aerodynamics and thus the range and accuracy.Hence,spinning a projectile intends to alleviate the inconsistency and inaccuracy caused by these disturbances.

    How ever,there are two notable instances of amplified instability when projectiles are spun.Spin-yaw resonance occurs when the spin rate approaches the yaw rate,the projectile may begin to undergo a large amplitude yawing motion called‘lunar’yawing[2].Catastrophic yaw occurs when a large yawing motion is amplified by non-linear Magnus effects,which creates further dynamic instability,leading to a cascade effect.Indeed,Magnus force interactions affect a projectile's flight in many ways,Seifert[3]has provided a comprehensive review of the Magnus effect and its implications in aeronautics.In another relevant study[4]CFD simulations were used to predict the aerodynamic coefficients and flow fields for a 25 mm spin-stabilised projectile.The goal being to deduce which parameters are necessary for an accurate computation of the Magnus moment and roll damping moment.While spun projectiles are subject to Magnus forces in flight,these can be reliably accounted for prior to projectile launch[5].

    The accuracy demanded by today's weaponry has led to the development of guided weapons,where control and guidance hardware is incorporated directly into the projectile.Guided weapons provide substantial benefits over conventional ammunition,namely reduced collateral damage,improved lethality and effectiveness per unit.Conventional,non-spun,guided munitions are already well established in modern arsenals(e.g.M 982 Excalibur[6],M712 Copperhead[7]),primarily using control surfaces such as canards for control.How ever,the high RPM inherent with spin stabilisation is not conducive to the use of tracking sensors or guidance hardware.A relatively recent solution to this problem is to use a‘dual-spin’configuration,shown in Fig.1.The aft section of the projectile retains its high spin rate and innate gyroscopic stability while the foreword section,adorned with the guidance and control hardware,has a much lower spin rate.This design allow s spun projectiles to be controlled in instances where reducing the spin is detrimental or otherwise undesired,an example of this would be smaller calibres which are more susceptible to aerodynamic disturbances.If stockpiles of unguided,spin-stabilised munitions exist,they can be upgraded by replacing the existing fuse with a course-correcting fuse(CCF)which contains the control and guidance hardware[8].

    Fig.1.Depiction of dual-spin projectile(Liang et al.[57]).

    Restricting the control and guidance hardware to such a small volume is driving the miniaturisation of sub-systems.As a result,technology is being adopted from other fields. Microelectromechanical Systems(MEMS)for example,are already being made more resilient due to use in aerospace[9].MEMS describe any system with moving parts on the micro-scale;relevant examples used in guided projectiles would be gyroscopes and accelerometers.Additionally,experiments are being conducted to adapt newer technologies,such as piezoelectric actuators,which are robust,have very high operational frequencies and no moving parts(aside from the physical deformation of the actuator).Different designs of piezoelectric actuators,such bi-morph actuators[10,11]and snap-through actuators[12],have been incorporated into projectile fins and control methodologies have been considered[13,14].Smaller designs usually equate to higher projectile speeds[15].It has been shown both numerically and experimentally,that conventional fin designs are able to produce significant deflections when subjected to supersonic speeds in excess of Mach 4[16](a 25 mm projectile achieved 1.4 m of deflection over a range of 160 m).

    Much research has been conducted into unconventional control methodologies.While fins are still the primary source of control moments for projectiles,developments in these novel methods may prove useful in future guided weapon design,dual-spin or not.Project SCORPION,a collaboration between DARPA,U.S.Army Research Labs(USARL)and Georgia Institute of Technology,investigated the feasibility of mircoadaptive flow control(MAFC)as a means to control spin stabilised projectiles[17].It utilised the Coanda effect interaction with the projectile boattail,in combination with a high frequency piezoelectric actuator which distorts the boattail.The USARL have also proposed and analysed an asymmetric,spin stabilised projectile controlled by a singular fin or‘paddle’[18].‘Tail-spoilers’have been proven able to manoeuvre a 105 mm projectile at speeds up to Mach 3[19],with a range enhancement of 7%or a controllable deflection of 1.5 km,over a 10 km range.Tests have been conducted with an articulable nose/ogive,achieving bandwidths of up to 200 Hz at Mach 3.3[15].Microvanes have been investigated as a method for flow control on a supersonic spinning projectile[20].It was found that the vanes inhibit flow separation on the surface of the projectile,the normal force coefficient and pitching moment stabilised,which led to greater projectile stability via reduced oscillations.In addition,there exist a plethora of patents[21-25]describing novel guidance methods such as air jets,gyroscopes and asymmetric ogives.Since fin control methods are so predominant,they are assumed to be the source of all control moments throughout this paper.

    3.Stability factors

    Many popular textbooks and literature[2,26-30]can provide a detailed derivation of the stability factors from linear projectile theory,this section gives a brief description following McCoy[26].It then elaborates on the relation between these factors and their importance in determining the effect projectile dimensions have on ballistic stability.Then it is shown how different works to date have modified these factors to account for different iterations of projectile models.The DOF models form which the stability factors are derived from have been shown able to replicate technical data and atmospheric flight models,when applied to small calibre munitions[31].The NATO Armaments Ballistic Kernel(NABK)also utilises a 6-DOF model,which has also been shown to predict the behaviour of small calibre munitions(7.62 mm×51 mm)[32].Additionally,the statistical methodology used to evaluate projectile dispersion during that study characteristics is sufficient[33].

    3.1.Classical aeroballistic stability factors

    The static stability factor Ss,for a projectile of mass m,is given by

    where CM αis the overturning moment coefficient as a function of angle of attack α,or CMα≡?CM/?α[34].A body has‘positive’static stability(i.e.is statically stable)if SS<0;SS=0 and SS>0 correlate to neutral and negative static stability respectively.Depending on whether the static stability is positive,neutral or negative,the body's alignment after a disturbance will respectively:return to its original position,maintain its new alignment or continue moving in the direction of the disturbance.Apart from CMα,all parameters in Eq.(1)are positive,hence to achieve SS<0 we necessitate that CMα<0;for a non-spin stabilised body this means practically that the COM is located ahead of the centre of pressure(COP).Fig.2 shows a plot of the relation between CMandα,static stability is present when the line pertaining to a given body has negative gradient.To optimise SSbased on the coefficients of CMα,a heavy projectile with a large cross section and small transverse moment of inertia is preferable,though this contradicts conventional ballistic design.

    The procedure for deriving the gyroscopic and dynamic stability factors involves solving,under a series of assumptions,the equations of motion(EOM)for a projectile model and imparting boundary conditions on the solutions.In the most basic case presented,we assume a spin stabilised,uncontrolled projectile which is aerodynamically symmetric,has a rigid body,a uniform density and the centre of mass(COM)located on the longitudinal axis.Euler angles and angles of attack are assumed to be small and the effects of gravity are neglected.The solutions to a projectile's EOM describe damped oscillatory motion with two modes;a large amplitude slow frequency‘precession’(ωp)and a low amplitude fast frequency‘nutation’(ωn)with damping frequencies λpand λnrespectively.For the solutions to represent real and damped oscillations,we impose boundaries on the oscillation and damping rates.From the resulting inequalities,the gyroscopic stability factor is defined as

    Fig.2.Example of overturning moment coefficient C Mαagainst angle of attack α for two abstract bodies.

    The dynamic stability factor is defined as

    N.B.the last two terms in the denominator of Eq.(3)are only included by some texts[26,29]to account for variable velocity due to drag and gravity.These equations are cumbersome so they are written in a more compact notation using substitution parameters,the gyroscopic stability factor is written as

    and the dynamic stability factor is represented as

    Future iterations of the stability factors are written in this compact form and all substitution parameters are shown in Appendix A.The mathematical condition for gyroscopic stability is Sg≥1,though it has been shown that the ballistic coefficient of a bullet is adversely affected by tumbling as Sgis lowered past a threshold of 1.3[35].The ratio p/V decreases along the trajectory of an uncontrolled projectile(assuming flat-fire),thus it is apparent Sgwill decrease down range.A projectile is dynamically stable if

    By substituting Sgfrom Eq.(4)into Eq.(6)we can define the axial spin limit Slimfrom the resulting inequality,

    which shows the critical value of P2for which the inequality in Eq.(6)is no longer satisfied.Fig.3 shows a plot of the corresponding equality of Eq.(6),with the shaded region indicating where the inequality is fulfilled.

    Dynamic stability is concerned with the oscillations induced in a moving body after a disturbance is applied and as with static stability,it can be positive,neutral or negative.With positive dynamic stability the oscillations eventually damp towards the original alignment,neutral dynamic stability causes oscillations to reside indefinitely with constant amplitude,while negative dynamic stability has oscillations which amplify chaotically.When Sd=1 the body has positive dynamic stability,or is perfectly dynamically stable.If Sd<1 the precession is unstable and if Sd>1 the nutation is unstable,both catastrophically so at the asymptotes(Sd=0 or Sd=2 respectively).The transition from positive to neutral to negative dynamic stability for a projectile is dependent on the magnitude of the deviation from Sd=1.The magnitude at which the transitions occur is dependent on the projectile and trajectory parameters,but is not well characterised.Provided 0<Sd<2 in practice,the projectile can be spun sufficiently to ensure ballistic stability.Table 1 shows the effect on ballistic stability of occupying different static and dynamic regimes.

    Note that the projectile geometry required to maximise aerodynamic efficiency and terminal effectiveness,almost always results in negative static stability.From Table 1 we can see that in the unstable static regime,a dynamically stable projectile can still be ballistically stabilised if the spin rate is sufficiently high.Thus,projectile designers can effectively disregard the static stability of a projectile,solely focusing on the relation between Sdand Sg;i.e.it is sufficient,to ensure a prototype projectile lies in the stable region(as central as possible)of Fig.3 for the anticipated flight envelope.

    Fig.4.Dynamic stability plot of various NATO calibres for different projectile velocities.

    Fig.4 shows a dynamic stability plot for three conventional NATO calibres: 5.56 mm×45 mm, 7.62 mm×51 mm and 12.7 mm×99 mm.The bullet geometry is loaded into PRODAS ballistic software and calculated for flat-fire trajectories.Each line represents one calibre,each point on the line represents a pair of stability factors calculated at a given bullet velocity.The velocity range is Mach 1.5-4 in increments of 0.5,the low est speed corresponds to the lowest/left most point of each line,increasing progressively.

    3.2.Stability factor development

    To account for the contribution of passivated control surfaces(canards or fins),a term n can be appended to the EOM[30,36],where

    Note that the n term could be modified to account for any of the novel control methodologies described at the end of Section 2,provided the control moment can be characterised and integrated into the EOM.If the same mathematical treatment as above is applied to this modified EOM,the result is that Sdis unaffected,while Sgbecomes:

    At least for the assumptions of this model,the canard parameters considered only affect Sg,not Sd.In a comprehensive paper by Costello et al.(2000)[37]a dynamic model was produced for a dual-spin projectile with no control surfaces,which utilised a 7-DOF model.The stability factors derived from this are shown below in Eq.(11)and Eq.(12).

    Burchett et al.[38]developed this model further to analyse the effect that lateral pulse jets,as a method of control,have on the swerving motion of a projectile;though they did not derive any stability factors for their model.Costello uses the same assumptions as the classical case with the addition that V,φA&φFare large compared to the dynamic model coordinates θ,ψ,q,r,v,&w,so a product of any of these small quantities and any of their derivatives is negligible.

    Wernert(2009)[39]expanded this dual-spin model to include the contribution of passivated canards,leading to the following stability factors

    Comparing Eq.(11)and Eq.(13),we can see the method for including canard effects for the dual-spin design is analogous to the single-spin design between Eq.(4)and Eq.(9),the addition of a term in the denominator.How ever,Wernert remarks that the Sdhe arrived at is not satisfactory since the contribution of the canards to the Magnus forces/moments was not considered.

    Zhu et al.[40]further developed this model by including terms to account for the effects of gravity and Euler pitch angle(θE),which led them to the following stability factors.

    Using the assumption of a flat fire trajectory,θE=0,the stability factors were then shown to reduce and remain consistent with the previously established theory.Fig.5 illustrates the model and various parameters used by both Wernert and Zhu et al.The value of Sgin Eq.(4)for a single spin,uncontrolled projectile has been validated for conventional small scale projectiles[35],though the dual-spin modifications to Sgmade by Costello,Wernert and Zhu et al.are yet to be validated for small scale,due to the absence of such small scale dual-spin prototypes.

    Fig.6 shows a comparison of each iteration of the stability factors,equations(4),(5),(9)-(14),for a 155 mm projectile.There is an inherent difficulty in directly comparing these equations,since they model fundamentally different projectiles.We can assume the total mass of a single spin projectile is the sum of masses of the forward and aft sections.Canards are assumed to have negligible mass,yet still provide an aerodynamic moment.The aft spin rate is chosen to be equal to the single-spin(1445 rad/s)while the forward section is chosen be sufficiently low to allow the operation of control and sensing hardware(30 rad/s).The aerodynamic coefficients,moments of inertia and balancing distances(R(A,F(xiàn))x,Rm(A,F(xiàn))xr(A,F(xiàn))x)were calculated using a projectile model in PRODAS,once the single spin projectile was divided into two distinct sections.It is worthwhile to note which modifications to a dual-spin projectile are necessary to achieve the stability of a single-spin projectile.However,this optimisation task is very complex and beyond the scope of this paper,since all aerodynamic coefficients are functions of projectile geometry.

    4.Works pertaining to dual-spin stability

    This section review s publications which consider different elements affecting projectile stability from a perspective other than stability factors.The chapters categorise a number of publications which have a similar focal point.

    An alternative method of stability analysis,conducted by Theodoulis et al.[41],created a linear-parameter-varying(LPV)model for a canard guided,single spin projectile.The aerodynamic information is encoded into certain state space matrices,the eigenvalues of which correspond to the precession and nutation frequencies of the projectile at any given instance.Additionally,root locus analysis of the system can identify stable operating regions,the parameters of which can be obtained and substituted into the stability criteria,depending on how the system is modelled.Indeed,ISL have conducted a significant amount of research into the modelling and control of dual-spin projectiles[39,41-45].

    The‘Miller twist rule’is an imperial unit formula which can be used to calculate the optimal twist rate of a barrel as a function of bullet attributes and Sg[5],thus it can also be used to determine Sgif the twist rate is know n.Courtney et al.has shown empirically,that the Miller rule can be modified for use with plastic tipped bullets with non-homogenous densities[46],as well as for open tip style bullets[47].

    Fig.5.Depiction of dual-spin projectile model(modified from Ref.[40]).

    Fig.6.Dynamic stability comparison for each iteration of stability formula.

    4.1.Airframe

    Lahti et al.[48]designed a methodology to control the exterior ballistic properties of a spinning projectile by re-distributing the centre of mass around the inside of the bullet.The stability factors used in the paper follow McCoy[26],an appropriate usage since bullets are single-spin stabilised projectiles with no control method.The aerodynamic coefficients used in the analysis are calculated from a modified version of Slender Body Theory[49],where a correction termis appended to account for f l ow compressibility.While it is stated the coefficients are not well estimated near the transonic boundary,they are assumed to be representative based on experimental data[50].A bullet model was created with a large number of cells populating the interior,each may possess a specific density.A global optimisation algorithm was then used to find the mass distribution which can provide ballistic stability at the lowest velocity,by satisfying the stability factors.Since velocity decreases with projectile range,this method will find the mass distribution which enables the longest range(a training round with limited range was also investigated,but this review is mainly concerned with results from the long range specimen).Fig.7 shows the result from their paper.

    It is stated the Magnus effect is the main method by which the mass distribution affects stability,especially toward the aft of the projectile[26].From Fig.7,it is apparent the algorithm selected the largest available density to populate mostly the aft of the projectile,which has the effect of minimising the resulting Magnus moment.These results indicate that mounting control and guidance hardware in the forward section of a projectile is beneficial for projectile stability,since electronic components generally have a lower density than the conventional core material,lead.

    Jintao et al.[51]have investigated the effects to flight stability and manoeuvrability caused by the elastic deformation of a spinning projectile by conducting numerical simulations.It was shown that aerodynamic coefficients increase with movement frequency,that an elastic deformation induces two aerodynamic components opposite and perpendicular to the deformation,and that the induced angle of attack from deformation decreases as Mach number increases.

    Xu et al.[52]have modelled the stability factors for a missile under thrust,assuming a flexible chassis.It was shown that thrust has a‘critical value’where dynamic stability is maximised;if thrust ishigher or lower than the critical value,then dynamic instability is induced by elastic or rigid vibrational frequencies respectively.Additionally,structural stiffness is low ered as thrust increases,which leads to reduced static stability.

    4.2.Canard modification and general control

    Chang et al.[53]have investigated the spin-rate of dual-spin projectiles as a function of canard properties,by characterising the ratio of aft to forward axial moment of inertia,IAx/IFx.The canards were modelled with zero deflection angle,so any contribution comes purely from the roll damping moment.It was found that for an initial spin rate of 420 rev/s(muzzle velocity 980 m/s with elevation angle of 45°),the dual-spin configuration itself causes a spin-rate discrepancy of 25 rev/s between the aft and forward sections,while deploying the canards led to a difference of 250 rev/s.The spin attenuation of the aft section was greater for values of IAx/IFx<1,while the spin attenuation of the forward section was greater for values of>1.For very large values of IAx/IFx,the aft section spin-rate was found to drastically reduce at first,then increase for a short period and finally attenuate as prior.Impact point drift was caused by any deviation from IAx/IFx=1.The maximum angle of attack was found to increase drastically to 16°for IAx/IFx<0.3,but remain around 1.7°for all IAx/IFx>0.3.The ratio of inertial moments has significant effects on both spin rate and angle of attack and must therefore be considered carefully during the design of a dual-spin projectile.

    Fig.7.The optimal mass distribution of a long range bullet,Lahti et al.[48].

    Wang et al.[54]have conducted numerical simulations investigating the effect of yawing force frequency on the angular motion and ballistic characteristics of dual-spin projectiles.The precession and nutation rates(λpand λn)were calculated following the linear theory described in Ref.[26].It was found λpand λnfor the system decrease over the projectile trajectory.As a result,the spin-rate of the aft or forward section could coincide with these intrinsic frequencies at certain intervals,which are dependent on the chosen projectile parameters.At resonance,there is an increase in angle of attack(~0.2°)and decrease in projectile range(~0.4 km decrease over~33.5 km).A Monte Carlo simulation was then conducted,which showed a 10 Hz control force applied to the projectile reduces projectile dispersion,but not significantly.

    Cooper et al.have investigated the implications on flight stability caused by projectile asymmetry from the addition of canards[55].Linear projectile theory was extended to account for radial mass asymmetries,which was shown to reduce back to standard theory when the asymmetry was zero.The dynamic stability of the projectile was found by root locus analysis of the system eigenvalues in state space,in the same way as Theodoulis et al.[41,42,44].The canards were modelled with sinusoidal actuation,when the frequency of this driving wave is close to λpor λn,dynamic instability results;this is in agreement with the investigation of[54].When the actuation moment of the canards was sufficiently large,it was shown to adversely affect the oscillatory motion of the projectile,leading to ballistic instability.

    Chang[56]has studied the dynamic response of a dual-spin,canard-stabilised projectile,when the coupling between canard control and gravity are considered.A new analytical solution was proposed to predict the maximum angle of attack induced by canard actuation,the yaw of repose due to canard control and the phase shift of the swerve response.It was found if the moment imparted on the projectile by the canards,or‘control moment’,is large then it will more drastically alter the trajectory,but lead to airframe instability.

    Wang et al.[36]investigated the effects of different control strategies on the flight stability criterion derived in Ref.[40],by assuming all parameters other than those associated with the rolling motion of the body to be invariant.It was found that canards should be designed so the produced roll moment is as small as possible.During the period in which the roll angle is adjusted,it was found that control strategy has no impact on flight stability;it was suggested that the target spin rate of the forward section should be as low as possible for practical purposes(as discussed in Section 1).The behaviour of the motor torque was also characterised in terms of both trajectory and projectile parameters.

    Liang et al.[57]have proposed a methodology for optimising the aerodynamic parameters of control canards.A 3D model is created with chosen canard parameters,then the aerodynamic coefficients for this are generated through the CFD program FLUENT and the efficiency is analysed by mapping how the normal force coefficient(CNα)changes with respect to canard deflection angle,over different angles of attack and Mach numbers.It would be interesting to see how this methodology could improve if used in conjunction with all the works listed above,where the canards’performance is quantified for each mechanism of affecting projectile stability,for varying control strategies,and having the optimum configuration selected based upon this.

    5.Conclusions

    This paper has shown the origin of stability factors,their use and interpretation for projectile design and how they should be modified to describe a dual-spin,controlled projectile.When more dual-spin prototypes are available,further work should involve validating the 7-DOF models used in numerical analysis.What follows is a summary of the publications reviewed here,aiming to provide guidelines to maximise the ballistic stability of a prototype projectile;full detail being found in the accompanying reference.

    Lahtiet al.[48]have shown that mass should be concentrated at the back of the projectile as much as possible,to increase the range.Jintao et al.[51]have shown that an increasing airframe vibrational frequency,or increasing elastic deformation amplitude,will increase aerodynamic coefficients through an increasing angle of attack,at a rate proportional to Mach number.Xu et al.[52]showed that projectile thrust has an optimal value to maximise dynamic stability,which is dependent on airframe parameters.This is not so applicable to gun-launched projectiles but is an important consideration nonetheless.Chang et al.[53]show ed that spin attenuation of the aft/forward section increased for IAx/IFx<1 and IAx/IFx>1 respectively,and that maximum angle of attack increases drastically(~16°)for all IAx/IFx<0.3,remaining almost constant(~1.7°)otherwise.The intrinsic nutation and precession frequency,which are dependent on airframe parameters,decrease over a trajectory.It has been sow n that the control force frequency(Wang et al.[54])and canard actuation frequency(Cooper et al.[55])should be chosen to avoid these modes if possible.Chang[56]has shown that if the control moment of the canards is too large then ballistic stability is affected.Finally,Wang et al.[36]have shown that the roll moment of the canards should be as small as possible.

    Conflicts of interest

    None to declare.

    Funding

    This paper was sponsored by EPSRC ICASE Grant reference 1700064 and BAE Systems.

    APPENDIX

    A.Substitution parameters Single-spin no canards(Classic)

    The last two terms of H are added by certain authors[26,29]to represent variable velocity due to gravity and drag.

    where

    Canard Guided

    Dual-spin without canards

    Any symbol with an A or F subscript or superscript indicates the usual meaning of the symbol,but with respect to the Aft or forward section of the projectile respectively.

    where

    Dual-spin with canards

    Then by Zhu

    Where g*=gl sin(θT)/V2and ε=0.5 tan(θE).

    午夜免费鲁丝| 国产高清videossex| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产av又大| 极品教师在线免费播放| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 我的亚洲天堂| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产精华一区二区三区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 多毛熟女@视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | av免费在线观看网站| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 黄片播放在线免费| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| www.999成人在线观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 五月开心婷婷网| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产单亲对白刺激| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 久久久国产成人免费| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 免费av毛片视频| 天堂动漫精品| 国产三级黄色录像| 欧美在线黄色| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 女警被强在线播放| 国产成人精品无人区| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| a在线观看视频网站| av福利片在线| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 久久香蕉国产精品| 在线看a的网站| 国产精华一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 超色免费av| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 制服人妻中文乱码| 咕卡用的链子| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲第一av免费看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 最好的美女福利视频网| 天天影视国产精品| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久国产精品影院| 黄色 视频免费看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| www国产在线视频色| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产成人精品在线电影| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 黄片小视频在线播放| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美日韩黄片免| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 9色porny在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲精品一二三| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 精品第一国产精品| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 看片在线看免费视频| 精品福利观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 亚洲自拍偷在线| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 老司机福利观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久九九热精品免费| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 午夜免费鲁丝| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 在线视频色国产色| av在线播放免费不卡| av欧美777| 在线免费观看的www视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 午夜免费激情av| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 9191精品国产免费久久| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 99re在线观看精品视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 夜夜爽天天搞| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 免费av中文字幕在线| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 99久久人妻综合| 欧美午夜高清在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产成人av教育| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产99白浆流出| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 久久久国产一区二区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日韩高清综合在线| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 91老司机精品| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产不卡一卡二| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 日本免费a在线| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| www国产在线视频色| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 97碰自拍视频| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产高清videossex| av电影中文网址| 身体一侧抽搐| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 男人操女人黄网站| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| av网站在线播放免费| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 一区二区三区精品91| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国产高清videossex| 咕卡用的链子| 在线观看www视频免费| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲av成人av| a在线观看视频网站| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| av片东京热男人的天堂| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 久久中文字幕一级| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 超色免费av| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜 | 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲国产欧美网| 在线视频色国产色| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久久久九九精品影院| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 天堂动漫精品| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲成人久久性| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 大香蕉久久成人网| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 在线视频色国产色| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 悠悠久久av| 天堂√8在线中文| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 免费观看精品视频网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 免费高清视频大片| 国产av又大| 午夜免费鲁丝| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 一级毛片精品| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久精品影院6| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 亚洲色图av天堂| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 一级毛片精品| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 88av欧美| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲中文av在线| 日本wwww免费看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 香蕉丝袜av| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 一区福利在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 无限看片的www在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产免费男女视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 91av网站免费观看| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 久久香蕉精品热| 嫩草影院精品99| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 在线国产一区二区在线| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 很黄的视频免费| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 免费少妇av软件| 午夜免费激情av| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 咕卡用的链子| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 中文字幕高清在线视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 久久国产精品影院| 五月开心婷婷网| 精品日产1卡2卡| 国产99白浆流出| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| av福利片在线| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 精品国产国语对白av| avwww免费| 久久香蕉激情| 手机成人av网站| 国产三级黄色录像| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| netflix在线观看网站| 午夜a级毛片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 成人影院久久| 成人三级黄色视频| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| svipshipincom国产片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 青草久久国产| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 曰老女人黄片| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 青草久久国产| 欧美日韩av久久| av有码第一页| 国产高清videossex| 精品人妻1区二区| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 黄色视频不卡| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久影院123| 99re在线观看精品视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产精品影院久久| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久精品91蜜桃| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 免费高清视频大片| xxx96com| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 一级片免费观看大全| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 18禁观看日本| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久99一区二区三区| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 丁香六月欧美| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| av天堂久久9| 国产成人系列免费观看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品久久视频播放| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 国产成人精品在线电影| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲av美国av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 丁香欧美五月| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 丁香欧美五月| 一级片'在线观看视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 91大片在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 日韩免费av在线播放| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 高清在线国产一区| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 美女午夜性视频免费| 成人国语在线视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| avwww免费| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产又爽黄色视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产精品av久久久久免费| 美国免费a级毛片| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 免费观看精品视频网站| 露出奶头的视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 91av网站免费观看| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 成人影院久久| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 两个人看的免费小视频|