• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Modified Child-Pugh grade vs albumin-bilirubin grade for predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients after hepatectomy

    2020-03-16 07:33:50FengHuangJianGao
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年7期

    Feng Huang, Jian Gao

    Abstract BACKGROUND Hepatectomy is the main treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) and it has a high possibility for long-term cure potential. But the postoperative mortality and recurrence rates remain high. Since the long-term prognosis of HCC patients is strongly linked to liver function, preoperative assessment of liver function is very important for HCC patients.AIM To compare the predictive power of the modified Child-Pugh (MCP) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grades for the long-term outcome of HCC.METHODS From January 2010 to June 2017, a total of 204 patients with HCC who underwent surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were enrolled in this retrospective study. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictive factors of survival and relapse. The area under the curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the discriminative performance of the MCP grade and ALBI grade to predict the postoperative overall survival(OS) time and recurrence-free survival (RFS) time.RESULTS The median OS and RFS times were 44.0 mo (range: 22.0-74.0 mo) and 22.0 mo(range: 5.0-45.0 mo), respectively. The median OS and RFS times of MCP grades 1, 2, and 3 patients were 60.0, 39.0, and 18.0 mo (P < 0.001) and 36.0, 15.0, and 7.0 mo (P < 0.001), respectively. The median OS and RFS times of ALBI grades 1, 2,and 3 patients were 56.0, 26.0, and 6.0 mo (P < 0.001) and 25.0, 10.0, and 3.0 mo (P= 0.003), respectively. Both the MCP and ALBI grades were more accurate than the Child-Pugh grade for predicting long-term prognosis. Further analysis demonstrated that for both predicting OS and RFS, the MCP grade performed better than the ALBI grade (AUC: 0.642 vs 0.605 for OS; 0.659 vs 0.594 for RFS).CONCLUSION The MCP grade is more accurate than the ALBI grade for predicting long-term outcome of patients with HCC.

    Key words: Modified Child-Pugh grade; Albumin-Bilirubin grade; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Prognosis; Hepatectomy; Child-Pugh

    INTRODUCTION

    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the second most common cancer and the fifth most common cause of cancer-related death in the world[1]. Hepatectomy is the main treatment for HCC[2]and it has a high possibility for long-term cure potential[2-4].Unfortunately, the postoperative mortality and recurrence rates remain high. It is widely perceived that the prognosis of HCC is related to many clinical factors such as tumor characteristics, vascular invasion, and liver function[5,6]. Thus, evaluating liver function is critical for the prognosis of HCC patients.

    The Child-Pugh (C-P) grade is widely used as a standard measure of liver function[7,8]and prognostic tool[9,10]. However, the C-P grading system has some limitations. The two variables of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy are highly subjective, and some indicators such as ascites and albumin are correlated[11,12].Therefore, as an objective, recognizable, and simple method for evaluating HCC liver function, the albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade was proposed and has been widely proven in the international environment[13]. This score includes only two variables,albumin and total bilirubin, and has a preferable prognostic ability for the survival analysis of HCC patients compared with the C-P score[12,14]. Prealbumin (PA) is a new and reliable indicator of liver function. Many studies have confirmed the predictive value of serum PA for liver function[7,15,16]and the long-term prognosis of patients with HCC[16-18]. It has been reported that the integration of PA into the C-P scoring system to form a modified C-P (MCP) scoring system that includes four factors, PA, albumin,total bilirubin, and prothrombin time, and removes the subjective indicators of ascites and hepatic encephalopathy can improve the accuracy of prognosis prediction in HCC patients[19]. However, the relevant data is still not enough. So, based on the fact that both the MCP and ALBI scores are objective, simple, and easy to obtain, we analysed and compared the predictive power of the MCP and ALBI scores for the long-term outcome of hepatectomy patients with HCC. Then, a scoring system with higher accuracy for predicting the overall survival (OS) time and recurrence-free survival (RFS) time of HCC patients can be selected. This will provide a more effective, objective, and simple method to assess the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy and make it easier and more accurate for surgeons to select suitable HCC patients for hepatectomy.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    We included 204 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy from January 2010 to June 2017 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Pathology identified as HCC; (2) No treatment prior to hepatic resection and no other malignancies; and (3) Adequate clinical data that could be assessed in the hospital. In the first year after hepatectomy, all of the patients were followed every 3 mo and then every 6 mo in the following years. The diagnosis of tumour recurrence was based on image findings. The last follow-up was in June 2019 or the day the patient died. And during our follow-up, one patient died due to severe postoperative liver failure on the day of the hepatectomy, and two patients were lost to follow-up. This study was registered at www.chictr.org.cn(ChiCTR1900026738) (Supplementary Table 1 contains study data of this study). The study was in line with the ethical guidelines of 1964 Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the review committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University.

    Data collection

    We collected patient data including sex, age, body mass index (BMI), cause of hepatitis, portal hypertension (PH), liver cirrhosis, BCLC (Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer) stage, and C-P grade. The biochemical indicators were as follows: Serum PA,serum albumin (ALB), total bilirubin (TBIL), prothrombin time (PT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), international normalised ratio(INR), and platelet count (PLT). The tumor characteristics included the number of tumors, tumor size, portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), capsule formation, and differentiation. The intraoperative parameters included surgical bleeding, blood transfusion, type of liver resection, and intraoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Based on previous description, the calculation formula of ALBI score was as follows: ALBI = log10 bilirubin × 0.66 + albumin × (-0.085), where the bilirubin is expressed in μmol/L and the albumin in g/L. The ALBI grades were classified as follows: ≤ -2.60, grade 1; > -2.60 to ≤ -1.39, grade 2; and ≥ -1.39, grade 3[13]. For the MCP scoring system, the sex difference was considered using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve plots to set the optimal cut-off values for male and female PAs, respectively. The PA levels in the male and female patients ranged from 130 mg/L to 190 mg/L and 120 mg/L to 170 mg/L, respectively, similar to a previous report[19]. The MCP scoring system is shown in Table 1.

    Statistical analysis

    mean ± SD or median (quartile range) is used to present the continuous variables. The categorical variables are presented as n (%) and were compared via the χ2test or Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the OS and RFS rates and the independent predictive factors for survival and relapse were determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. The cut-off value was determined via the ROC curve. Areas under the ROC curves (AUCs) were used to evaluate the accuracy of the MCP and ALBI scoring systems to predict the postoperative survival time and RFS time in the HCC patients. The difference was considered statistically significant at P <0.05. All of the statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS 20.0 software. The statistical methods of this study were reviewed by Jian Gao, who is both the corresponding author and the biomedical statistician of this article.

    RESULTS

    Patient characteristics

    A total of 204 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy were enrolled in this study, and the median follow-up time was 36 mo. As shown in Table 2, there were 174(85.3%) males and 30 (14.7%) females with a mean age of 52.0 ± 11.4 years. Most of the patients (85.3%) had a viral hepatitis B background, 120 (58.8%) patients had liver cirrhosis, and most patients (72.5%) have been implanted with radiation particles (I125or I131) or chemotherapy pumps during the surgery. Of the 204 patients, 113 (55.4%)had BCLC stage 0 or A disease, 62 (30.4%) had stage B, and 29 (14.2%) had stage C;and 187 (91.7%) were classified as C-P grade A, 17 (8.3%) were classified as B, and there was no patient classified as grade C. According to the ALBI grade, 136 (66.7%)had grade 1, 66 (32.4%) had grade 2, and only 2 (0.9%) had grade 3. For the MCP grade, 110 (53.9%), 52 (25.5%), and 42 (20.6%) patients were classified as grades 1, 2,and 3, respectively. The median OS and RFS times were 44.0 mo and 22.0 mo,respectively.

    Table 1 Modified Child-Pugh scoring system

    Comparison of the characteristics of three groups in ALBI grade and MCP grade

    Statistically significant differences between the three groups in each grade were found for the following variables: In the MCP grade groups for gender (P = 0.038), BMI (P =0.008), ALT (P = 0.026), C-P grade (P < 0.001), BCLC (P = 0.01), blood transfusion (P =0.045), and surgical bleeding (P = 0.019), in addition to PA, albumin, total bilirubin,and prothrombin time (P < 0.001) that are included in this grade; in the ALBI grade groups for INR (P = 0.012), C-P grade (P < 0.001), BCLC stage (P = 0.013), number of tumours (P = 0.008), tumour size (P = 0.049), blood transfusion (P = 0.006), and type of liver resection (P = 0.011), in addition to PA, albumin, total bilirubin, and prothrombin time (P < 0.001) that are the variables included in this grade (Supplementary Table 1).

    Prognostic factors for OS and RFS

    The median OS time and RFS time of the whole cohort were 44.0 mo (range: 22.0-74.0 mo) and 22.0 mo (range: 5.0-45.0 mo), respectively. In order to identify the potential prognostic indicators for the OS and RFS, we included the variables in the univariate analysis with P < 0.05 into the multivariable cox regression analysis (Table 3). As demonstrated by univariate analyses, age, INR, tumor size, surgical bleeding, blood transfusion, hepatectomy type, PVTT, differentiation, C-P grade, BCLC stage, ALBI grade, and MCP grade were significant indicators for OS; except for the indicator of age, the other factors mentioned above were significant indicators for RFS, but liver cirrhosis was not the predictor of OS or RFS. Next, a multivariable regression analysis was conducted to further define the significant independent predictors. As shown in Table 3, age [P = 0.002, hazard ratio (HR) = 1.853], differentiation (P < 0.001, HR =2.230), BCLC stage B (P = 0.012, HR = 2.635), and MCP grade 2 (P = 0.008, HR = 1.864)or 3 (P = 0.030, HR = 2.005) were the independent predictors of OS. For RFS, surgical bleeding (P = 0.027, HR = 2.246), BCLC stage B (P = 0.012, HR = 2.635), and MCP grade 2 (P = 0.002, HR = 1.830) were the independent predictors.

    Discriminatory power of MCP grade and ALBI grade for OS and RFS

    The Kaplan-Meier curves of the OS and RFS showed a significant discrimination between the patients in different C-P, MCP, and ALBI grades (P < 0.05) (Figure 1).Visual observation of the OS curves indicated that compared with the C-P score, the MCP and ALBI scores had more significant differences in various groups, and the difference in MCP grade displayed a superior over ALBI grade. The median OS times of grades 1, 2, and 3 patients were 60.0, 39.0, and 18.0 mo, and those of ALBI grades 1,2, and 3 patients were 56.0, 26.0, and 6.0 mo, respectively. Similarly, MCP also demonstrated a greater advantage for predicting RFS than C-P grade and ALBI grade(Figure 2). The median RFS times of MCP grades 1, 2, and 3 patients were 36.0, 15.0,and 7.0 mo, respectively, and those of ALBI grades 1, 2, and 3 patients were 25.0, 10.0,and 3.0 mo, respectively.

    The analyses of the ROC curves found that both the MCP and ALBI grades had greater ability to predict the OS and RFS times compared with the C-P grade (Figure 3). For the OS (Figure 3A), the AUC of the MCP grade was 0.642 (95%CI: 0.572-0.707),which was larger than that of the ALBI grade (AUC = 0.605; 95%CI: 0.534-0.673),although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.263). For the RFS (Figure 3B), we observed the same advantages; the AUC was 0.659 (95%CI: 0.590-0.724) for the MCP grade, and 0.594 (95%CI: 0.524-0.662) for the ALBI grade, and the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.038). The differences of the AUCs between the two grades seemed not obvious and the discriminatory power may be a little weak, butregardless of the OS or RFS, the MCP grade displayed a slight advantage over the ALBI grade.

    Table 2 Baseline characteristics of the 204 patients

    DISCUSSION

    The long-term outcome of liver cancer patients is closely related to liver function[5,6].The estimation of liver function reserve is key for HCC patients before hepatic resection. The C-P grade is widely used to estimate liver function[7,8]. Compared with the C-P grade, the MCP and ALBI grades are more objective, simpler, and easier to obtain[19,20]. Based on the same advantages of the two scoring systems mentioned above, and the little data on the MCP grade, we conducted this study to analyse and compare the predictive power of the MCP score and ALBI score for the long-term outcome of HCC patients and to provide clinicians with a more objective, simpler,and more discriminative scoring system.

    This study demonstrated the advantages of the MCP and ALBI scores in the longterm outcome of HCC patients compared with the C-P score. As shown in Figure 3,both the visual inspection and formal statistical analyses demonstrated that the MCP grade had better discrimination in assessing the OS and RFS of HCC patients than the ALBI grade. This study found several strengths of the MCP grading systems compared to the ALBI grading systems. First, PA was included in the MCP classification. Huang et al[7]demonstrated a close correlation between PA and liverfunction in HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy, while Jia et al[16]proposed that PA can help predict the long-term prognosis of patients after hepatectomy. As Wen et al[19]reported, the integration of PA into the C-P grading system to form the MCP grading systems can improve the accuracy of postoperative prognosis prediction in HCC patients, and our study is in agreement with this result. Second, the univariate analysis displayed that both the ALBI grade and MCP grade were the predictors of OS or RFS, but the further multivariable regression analysis showed that the independent predictor was MCP grade. Third, the Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the MCP grade had a preferable prognostic discrimination ability (Figures 1 and 2).The median survival time predicted with the MCP grading system was much longer than that with the ALBI grading system, and the median survival time in the same grade could even differ by more than 10 mo (such as grade 2: 39.0 mo vs 26.0 mo for OS; grade 1: 36 mo vs 25 mo for RFS). Fourth, the MCP grading system had a more favorable patient distribution compared to the ALBI grading system, whose weight tended to be grade 1 (66.7%), and there were only two patients in grade 3. This might have been related to the fact that the liver function of the HCC patients with ALBI grade 3 was too poor to treat by surgery. But the distribution of MCP grades was relatively uniform. The proportions of MCP grades 1, 2, and 3 patients were 53.9%,25.5%, and 20.6%, respectively. Finally, the ROC curve of the MCP grade had higher

    accuracy than the ALBI grade, and the AUC of the MCP grade was larger than the ALBI grade, which further validated that the MCP grade had a better predictive value for the long-term prognosis of HCC patients than the ALBI grade.

    Table 3 Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival

    Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier curves of the overall survival of the 204 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent hepatectomy in the present study.

    There are several limitations to this study. First, the total number of patients was small and all were from one single centre; therefore, larger and multicentre studies are needed to further validate the results. Second, as a retrospective study, it was hard to avoid selection bias. Further prospective studies on the MCP grading system are necessary.

    In conclusion, the current study suggests that the MCP grade is more advantageous than the ALBI grade for predicting postoperative long-term outcomes in patients with HCC, and the MCP grade could be conducive to the selection of HCC treatment strategies. This may benefit more HCC patients.

    Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves for the recurrence-free survival of the 204 hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent hepatectomy in the present study.

    Figure 3 Comparisons of the area under curve for overall survival and recurrence-free survival predictions among the MCP, ALBl, and C-P grades using receiver operating characteristics curves.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Liver resection is the main treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and it has a high possibility for long-term cure potential. But the postoperative mortality and recurrence rates remain high. Since the long-term prognosis of HCC patients is strongly linked to liver function, preoperative assessment of liver function is very important.

    Research motivation

    The main aim of this study was to compare the predictive power of the modified Child-Pugh(MCP) and albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grades for the long-term outcome of HCC.

    Research objectives

    We can provide a more effective, objective, and simple method to assess the prognosis of HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy and makes it easier and more accurate for surgeons to select suitable HCC patients for hepatectomy.

    Research methods

    A total of 204 patients with HCC who underwent surgery were enrolled in this retrospective study, the median follow-up time was 36 mo. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independent predictive factors for survival and relapse. The area under the curve was used to evaluate the discriminative performance of the MCP grade and ALBI grade to predict the postoperative overall survival (OS) time and recurrence-free survival (RFS) time.

    Research results

    Both the MCP and ALBI grades were more accurate than the Child-Pugh grade for predicting long-term prognosis. And further analysis demonstrated that for both predicting OS and RFS,the MCP grade performed better than the ALBI grade. This can provide a more effective,objective, and simple tool for the selection of HCC treatment strategies.

    Research conclusions

    We found that the new grading system, MCP grade, had predictive value for the long-term prognosis of HCC patients after hepatectomy. Both the MCP and ALBI scoring systems are objective, simple, and discriminative, and the ALBI grade has been widely proven in the international environment for predicting the long-term prognosis of HCC patients. We hypothesized that the MCP grade is superior to the ALBI grade in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients. In this study, we adopted the traditional method to prove the hypothesis, and we found a new phenomenon in which there was no patient in Child-Pugh grade C, and there were few patients in ALBI grade 3, but the patient distribution of MCP grade was relatively uniform.And eventually through the patient distribution, Kaplan-Meier curves and ROC curves of the MCP and ALBI grades and so on, we confirmed the hypothesis that the MCP grade is superior to the ALBI. But in this study, the sample size is not very large, the patients were from one clinical center, and it is a retrospective study, so in the future, we can further confirm the value of MCP in predicting the prognosis of HCC patients through larger samples, multi-center studies and prospective studies. When evaluating liver function of HCC patients before surgery, we should pay more attention to the serum PA levels of patients, and we can choose the MCP grade to assess the prognosis of patients.

    Research perspectives

    Larger samples, multi-center studies and prospective studies are needed to further validate the value of the MCP grade for the long-term prognosis of HCC patients. And how to improve the liver function of the HCC patients with a higher MCP grade to further improve the prognosis of HCC patients after surgery remains a question that needs to be answered in future studies.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We would like to thank Mr. Xiao-Peng Hu and Miss Jing Lei for their help in the preparation of this manuscript.

    夜夜爽天天搞| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 中文字幕制服av| 国产成人精品在线电影| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 高清欧美精品videossex| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品九九99| 五月天丁香电影| 91av网站免费观看| 9色porny在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| av有码第一页| 免费不卡黄色视频| 色94色欧美一区二区| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 18禁观看日本| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲 国产 在线| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 视频区图区小说| 视频区图区小说| 少妇精品久久久久久久| av一本久久久久| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品少妇内射三级| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 免费少妇av软件| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 飞空精品影院首页| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 桃花免费在线播放| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 精品国产国语对白av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产在视频线精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 69av精品久久久久久 | 老司机福利观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| av一本久久久久| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久国产精品影院| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 久热这里只有精品99| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 两性夫妻黄色片| 久久人妻av系列| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 中国美女看黄片| 久久热在线av| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 三级毛片av免费| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 黄片小视频在线播放| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 中文字幕制服av| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 国产色视频综合| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产在线免费精品| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产成人av教育| netflix在线观看网站| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| a级毛片在线看网站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 婷婷成人精品国产| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| www日本在线高清视频| 成年动漫av网址| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产1区2区3区精品| 日本五十路高清| 久久99一区二区三区| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | av国产精品久久久久影院| 黄色 视频免费看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 999久久久国产精品视频| 91av网站免费观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 久久久久国内视频| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品免费大片| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 午夜久久久在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产精品影院久久| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 成年版毛片免费区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲成人手机| 一级毛片电影观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 亚洲 国产 在线| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 欧美午夜高清在线| 大香蕉久久网| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 三级毛片av免费| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 久久久久网色| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久久 成人 亚洲| 亚洲伊人色综图| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 18在线观看网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 手机成人av网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲国产av新网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| av免费在线观看网站| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 我要看黄色一级片免费的| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 天天影视国产精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 黄色视频不卡| 又大又爽又粗| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 黄色成人免费大全| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 女警被强在线播放| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 9色porny在线观看| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 成年动漫av网址| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 美女午夜性视频免费| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| www日本在线高清视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 91成年电影在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 夫妻午夜视频| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 岛国在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产男女内射视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| tube8黄色片| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久香蕉激情| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 久久香蕉激情| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久国产精品影院| 免费看a级黄色片| 日韩欧美免费精品| 香蕉国产在线看| 性少妇av在线| 国产1区2区3区精品| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| videos熟女内射| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 亚洲精品在线美女| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 91老司机精品| 伦理电影免费视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 一区福利在线观看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 久久狼人影院| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区 | 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 在线观看www视频免费| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 在线观看www视频免费| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 无限看片的www在线观看| 色在线成人网| 成人国产av品久久久| 极品教师在线免费播放| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 两性夫妻黄色片| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| cao死你这个sao货| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 人人澡人人妻人| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产成人影院久久av| 成人精品一区二区免费| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 在线观看人妻少妇| 777米奇影视久久| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久久国产成人免费| 18禁观看日本| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 乱人伦中国视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产av又大| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 曰老女人黄片| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 日本wwww免费看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 丁香六月欧美| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽 | 亚洲伊人色综图| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产又爽黄色视频| 久久亚洲真实| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 一区二区av电影网| 久久青草综合色| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 在线av久久热| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 黄频高清免费视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产成人欧美| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 国产男女内射视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 脱女人内裤的视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 嫩草影视91久久| 香蕉丝袜av| 国精品久久久久久国模美| videos熟女内射| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产高清激情床上av| 超色免费av| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| av天堂在线播放| videos熟女内射| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| www.999成人在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 老司机靠b影院| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 一本久久精品| 嫩草影视91久久| 黄色视频不卡| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 两个人看的免费小视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产精品九九99| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产高清激情床上av| 18在线观看网站| 久久国产精品影院| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 91精品三级在线观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 国产成人精品在线电影| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 久久中文看片网| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产在视频线精品| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 高清av免费在线| 丝袜美足系列| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 高清在线国产一区| 91成人精品电影| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| av福利片在线| 午夜激情av网站| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| av国产精品久久久久影院| 大香蕉久久网| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 免费在线观看完整版高清| av网站在线播放免费| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 正在播放国产对白刺激| tube8黄色片| 午夜老司机福利片| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| a在线观看视频网站| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看|