• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Liver stiffness and perfusion changes for hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome in rabbit model

    2020-03-16 07:33:44JaeseungShinHaesungYoonYoonJinChaKyunghwaHanMiJungLeeMyungJoonKimHyunJooShin
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年7期

    Jaeseung Shin, Haesung Yoon, Yoon Jin Cha, Kyunghwa Han, Mi-Jung Lee, Myung-Joon Kim, Hyun Joo Shin

    Jaeseung Shin, Haesung Yoon, Yoon Jin Cha, Kyunghwa Han, Mi-Jung Lee, Myung-Joon Kim, Hyun Joo Shin

    Abstract BACKGROUND Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is caused by damage to hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells that results in fibrous obliteration of intrahepatic venules and necrosis of hepatocytes. Currently the diagnosis is primarily based on nonspecific clinical features and invasive liver biopsy. Therefore, noninvasive imaging methods are required for the early diagnosis and severity assessment of hepatic SOS.AIM To determine the effectiveness of supersonic shear wave imaging (SSI) and dual energy computed tomography (DECT) for diagnosing hepatic SOS using a rabbit model.METHODS Among nine New Zealand white rabbits (3-4 kg, male), three in control group ingested normal saline for 20 d and six in the SOS group ingested 6-thioguanine(5 mg/kg/d) for 20 d. Liver stiffness was measured using SSI on days 0, 3, 10,and 20. On the same days, liver perfusion was evaluated from virtual monochromatic images of 55 keV and iodine map using DECT. Morphologic changes in the liver were assessed using CT. Final pathology scores were compared between the two groups. Liver stiffness and perfusion parameters were compared according to the groups, days, and pathology scores.RESULTS Final pathology scores were significantly higher in the SOS than the control group (median 22 vs 2, P = 0.024). No gross morphologic changes were seen in livers. Liver stiffness, Hounsfield Unit values, and iodine concentrations were higher in the SOS compared to the control group on days 10 and 20 (all, P ≤0.007). Compared to day 0, liver stiffness and perfusion parameters were higher on day 20 in the SOS group (all, P ≤ 0.001). Correlation coefficients for liver stiffness (r = 0.635), Hounsfield Unit values (r = 0.587), and iodine concentration(r = 0.611) with final pathology scores were positive without significance (all, P >0.05).CONCLUSION Liver stiffness and perfusion parameters were significantly increased in the livers of a rabbit SOS model. SSI and DECT might aid in early diagnosis of hepatic SOS.

    Key words: Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome; Elasticity imaging techniques;Iodine; Computed tomography; Liver; Animals

    INTRODUCTION

    Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a well-known serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and is associated with drugs including oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy[1-4]. Hepatic SOS, also known as hepatic veno-occlusive disease, is caused by damage to hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cells that results in fibrous obliteration of intrahepatic venules and necrosis of centrilobular hepatocytes[3,5]. In pediatric patients, SOS is the most common cause of death after graft-versus-host reaction and infection in patients with HSCT with nonspecific symptoms of painful hepatomegaly, fluid retention, and hyperbilirubinemia[3,6]. Liver biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of hepatic SOS, but is limited because of its invasiveness, interobserver variation, and sampling error. Even though conventional computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography (US) have demonstrated that gross changes in hepatic SOS, such as heterogeneous hypoattenuation and patchy parenchymal enhancement with narrowing of hepatic veins, those imaging findings are nonspecific and present after disease progression while diagnosing hepatic SOS in clinical setting[7]. Therefore, new noninvasive imaging biomarker for early diagnosis and severity assessment of hepatic SOS are required as alternatives to liver biopsy and conventional imaging modalities[8].

    US elastography is a noninvasive tool for evaluating liver stiffness. In addition to transient elastography (TE) validated for assessment of liver fibrosis[9,10], shear wave elastography (SWE) uses ultrasound waves to quantify the tissue-specific propagation speed of shear waves for guidance of grayscale US images[11,12]. SWE gives more reliable results than TE[13]. Supersonic shear wave imaging (SSI) is a recently introduced SWE technique characterized by ultrafast image acquisition using multiple push beams and a color map with a wide range. SSI enables real-time analysis with color display, a large field of view and multiple regions of interest, for advantages over acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI). Although a few studies reported elevated liver stiffness using TE and ARFI in a rat or human SOS[14-18]and patients undergoing HSCT[19,20], no study has evaluated liver stiffness in hepatic SOS using SSI.

    Dual energy CT (DECT) uses photon spectra generated by two distinctive tube voltages to obtain additional information about tissue composition based on spectral properties[21]. With material-specific information, virtual monochromatic images(VMIs) and concentration map images of materials such as iodine and calcium can be generated by DECT for quantitative diagnosis of liver steatosis and fibrosis[22-24]. In hepatic SOS, toxic injury to sinusoidal endothelial cells might cause loss of autoregulation and reduction of blood flow in the sinusoids[1]. We postulated that these events could result in different iodine concentrations in livers with SOS, but little has been published on DECT imaging in hepatic SOS. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to know liver stiffness and perfusion changes using SSI and DECT for diagnosis of hepatic SOS using a rabbit model.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Animal model

    This study was approved by our institution’s Animal Experimental Committee and performed according to local animal care guidelines. Nine male New Zealand white rabbits weighting 3-4 kg were used. Three rabbits ingested normal saline via a 1 cc syringe for 20 d and were the control group. Six rabbits ingested 6-thioguanine (6-TG,5 mg/kg/d, four days in a week) for 20 d according to a previous study[25]and were the SOS group. Rabbits received standard diets during the experiments. Rabbit conditions were monitored by radiologists and a veterinarian.

    Laboratory studies

    On days 0, 3, 10, and 20 during medication, laboratory and imaging examinations were performed under sedation. Sedation was accomplished by intramuscular injection of xylazine hydrochloride (1 mg/kg, Rompun; Bayer Korea, Seoul, South Korea) and intravenous injection of alfaxalone (3 mg/kg, Alfaxan?; Careside,Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) with the help of a veterinarian before starting examinations.

    Laboratory tests were performed with samples from ear veins. Tests were for serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (Tbil), and direct bilirubin (Dbil) levels.

    Imaging studies

    For imaging studies, SWE and DECT were performed on days 0, 3, 10, and 20. Rabbits were in a supine position on the scan table, with forelegs up and tightened with bandages. The upper abdomen was shaved for contact with the US probe. For SWE,SSI (Aixplorer, SuperSonic Imagine, Aix-en-Provence, France; software version of 9.2)was used with a 10-2 MHz linear transducer. An experienced pediatric radiologist performed examinations. Liver stiffness was measured for the liver parenchyma at an epigastric area because in rabbits, the liver left lobe was large and had fewer artifacts from bowel loops than other lobes. Color maps were made for the liver parenchyma avoiding hepatic vessels and bile ducts. A round region of interest (ROI) with diameter 2-4 mm and depth of about 1.5 cm was put on color maps when maps appeared homogeneous during regular free breathing without intubation. Mean value for liver stiffness within the ROI was automatically recorded in kPa units based on Young’s modulus. Measurements were repeated seven times as in a previous study[26]and mean values were recorded (Figure 1A). All processes were repeated twice and two representative values were used for each rabbit.

    CT was performed using DECT with fast kVp switching (80/140 kVp) on a singlesource dual-energy 64-channel multidetector CT scanner (GE Discovery CT750 HD scanner, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States) on the same days.Contrast agent iobitridol (Xenetics 300, Guerbet, Roissy, France) at 2 cc/kg was manually injected into an auricular vein, using the same institutional protocol as for neonates. Scanning parameters were: Helical mode, rapid kVp switching between 80 and 140 kVp, tube current 260 mA, detector collimation 64 mm × 0.625 mm,acquisition mode in axial plane, slice thickness 2.5 mm, pitch 1.375:1, soft convolution kernel, and CT dose index volume 6.48 mGy. Single-phase portal venous phase was acquired at fixed time delay 40 s following contrast material injection according to the institutional CT scan protocol for neonates. Livers were scanned in the craniocaudal direction.

    Morphologic liver changes during the study period were assessed using CT. A pediatric radiologist assessed the presence of liver parenchymal as heterogeneous patchy enhancement, gallbladder (GB) wall edema, narrowed or invisible hepatic veins, hepatomegaly showing inferior liver margin below the right kidney, or presence of ascites using DECT images according to previous studies[7,27,28].

    Figure 1 Representative images from supersonic shear wave imaging and dual energy computed tomography of rabbits in a sinusoidal obstruction syndrome group on day 20.

    For quantitative assessments, filtered back projection images without iterative reconstruction were used for reconstruction and analysis. VMIs at 55 keV were used for analysis because 70 or 80 kVp images were routinely used for neonate abdominal CT in our hospital. Material density iodine maps were reconstructed. Round ROIs were drawn in liver parenchyma avoiding hepatic vessels using an AW server (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States; software version 2.0). ROIs were positioned in the same place in the liver parenchyma on VMI 55 keV image and iodine map (Figure 1B). Mean CT attenuations in Hounsfield units (HUs) and iodine concentrations (mg/mL) within ROIs were recorded. ROIs were drawn three times over liver parenchyma and three values were acquired for each parameter.

    Radiation dose using mean effective dose by multiplying dose-length product with k (conversion factor, 0.049 used for pediatric patients younger than one year old) of all rabbits were assessed.

    Pathologic scoring of hepatic SOS

    On day 21, rabbits were sacrificed and hepatic specimens were obtained. Specimens were fixed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin (pH 7.1) for 24 h and put in 70%ethanol. After obtaining paraffin blocks, hematoxylin and eosin, Masson’s trichrome,and Verhoeffe-Van Gieson staining was performed. Final pathology scores for SOS were assessed by an experienced board-certificated pathologist according to a scoring system used previously[25]. Scores were assessed as the sum of each subscore in three categories: sinusoidal, central vein, and necro-inflammatory damage. For evaluating sinusoidal damage, sinusoidal dilatation, or congestion were evaluated using subscores from 0 to 3. For evaluation of central vein damage, fraying of endothelial cells and sludge in central veins were assessed. For the evaluation of necroinflammatory damage, apoptotic bodies, inflammatory cell infiltrates, steatosis, and necrosis were scored separately. All scores were evaluated for 10 areas in lower power fields; the possible range of scores 0 to 240. The pathologist was blind to the final diagnosis of the rabbits.

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis was done with SAS (version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC,United States). Final pathology scores between control and SOS groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Differences in changing pattern of laboratory results and quantitative imaging parameters including liver stiffness on SSI, HU values on VMI 55 keV images, and iodine concentration (mg/mL) on iodine maps were assessed using linear mixed models. Values were compared between groups for each day and compared between days 0 and 20 for each group in post hoc analysis.Spearman’s correlation tests were used to determine correlations between results measured on day 20 and final pathology scores. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    During the study period, three of six rabbits in the SOS group died unexpectedly on days 10, 11, and 17. Results for these rabbits until the day of unexpected death were used as much as possible. Pathology results were obtained on the day of death for these rabbits, except the rabbit that died on day 17. The remaining three rabbits in the SOS group all had examinations on days 0, 3, 10, and 20 and pathology results on day 21. Therefore, days 0 and 3 had results from all six rabbits, while day 10 had results from 5 rabbits, and day 20 had results from 3 rabbits in the SOS group. The three rabbits in the control group were alive through day 20.

    Final pathology scores were significantly higher in the SOS group (n = 5, range 20-42, median 22) than the control group (n = 3, range 2-11, median 2) (P = 0.024).According to the categories, the sum of scores for sinusoidal damage was 121 in the SOS group and 15 in the control group. For central vein damage, the score was 3 for the SOS group and 0 for the control group. For necro-inflammatory damage, the score was 9 for the SOS group and 0 for the control group. Liver parenchymal patchy heterogeneous enhancement, GB wall edema, narrowed or invisible hepatic veins,hepatomegaly, or ascites were not presented in CT images for both SOS and control groups during the study period. The mean effective dose of DECT was 7.9 ± 1.6 mSv for all rabbits.

    Using linear mixed models, we saw significant differences in changing patterns of liver stiffness, HU values in VMI 55 keV, and iodine concentration between two groups (all, P < 0.001) (Figure 2). Laboratory results showed no significant differences between the two groups in patterns over 20 d. Post hoc analyses of laboratory and imaging studies are in Table 1 and 2. Compared to controls, on day 20, AST, ALT, and D.bil values were significantly higher in the SOS group (P = 0.004, 0.008, 0.013,respectively) (Table 1). Liver stiffness values were significantly higher in the SOS group on day 10 (9.48 kPa vs 4.02 kPa, P < 0.001) and day 20 (7.71 kPa vs 4.67 kPa, P =0.007) compared to the control group (Table 2). HU values for VMI 55 keV were significantly higher in the SOS group on day 3 (167.68 HU vs 147.18 HU, P = 0.045),day 10 (185.42 HU vs 129.05 HU, P < 0.001) and day 20 (179.81 HU vs 148.95 HU, P =0.006). Iodine concentrations were significantly higher in the SOS group on day 3(26.74 mg/mL vs 20.72 mg/mL, P = 0.022), day 10 (31.86 mg/mL vs 19.16 mg/mL, P <0.001), and day 20 (35.14 mg/mL vs 23.85 mg/mL, P < 0.001).

    When comparing laboratory results, AST, ALT, and Dbil values were significantly higher on day 20 than on day 0 in the SOS group (P = 0.001, 0.001, and 0.004,respectively), while there were no significant differences between days 0 and 20 in the control group (Table 3). In quantitative imaging studies (Table 4), liver stiffness values were significantly higher on day 20 than on day 0 in the SOS group (7.71 kPa vs 3.89 kPa, P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference of stiffness between day 0 and day 20 in the control group (4.67 kPa vs 4.35 kPa, P = 0.752) (Table 4). HU values for VMI 55 keV were significantly higher on day 20 in the SOS group (179.81 HU vs 158.77 HU, P = 0.001), with no differences in the control group (147.95 HU vs 153.18 HU, P = 0.510). Iodine concentrations were also significantly higher on day 20 in the SOS group (35.14 mg/mL vs 24.2 mg/mL, P < 0.001), with no differences in the control group (23.85 mg/mL vs 24.8 mg/mL, P = 0.539).

    In assessing correlations among final pathology scores and laboratory results (Table 5), correlation coefficients were 0.323 for AST, 0.491 for ALT, 0.156 for Tbil, and 0.261 for Dbil, without statistical significance (P > 0.05). In imaging studies, correlation coefficients were 0.635 for liver stiffness, 0.587 for VMI 55 keV, and 0.611 for iodine concentration, even without statistical significance (P > 0.05).

    DISCUSSION

    In our animal study, hepatic SOS was induced in a rabbit model by orally administered 6-TG. As described by Oancea et al[25], orally administered 6-TG causes hepatic SOS in a dose-dependent manner in a murine model and our findings confirmed early and acute sinusoidal injury in rabbit model by pathology. Our pathology results showed early and acute changes in the SOS group, which was different from the control group. Because rabbits in the SOS group did not show morphologic changes on CT images, these results confirmed the early disease stages of our rabbit model. In this model, non-invasive SSI and DECT examinations had promising results for diagnosing hepatic SOS. Our study was meaningful because changes in quantitative imaging studies with SSI and DECT occurred earlier than morphologic changes in conventional CT.

    Our SSI results indicated that hepatic SOS led to elevated liver stiffness. Significantstiffness changes measured by SSI were observed starting on day 10, with no obvious morphologic change even with contrast enhanced CT throughout the test days. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the effectiveness of SSI for assessing hepatic SOS. SSI has benefits such as a large area to measure, ultrafast imaging, and low failure rate compared with TE or ARFI[29]. Previous studies with TE or ARFI reported an increased liver stiffness in a rat model[14]and in pediatric or adult patients following HSCT[15-18,30]. A study demonstrated that SWE detects earlier changes than color Doppler study in SOS[20]. Increased liver stiffness could be from hepatic venous congestion in the SOS model, although liver inflammation and cholestasis could also affect increased liver stiffness[31]. Our study confirmed that SSI could be a method for monitoring disease progression or treatment response to SOS.The SSI values were highest on day 10 and decreased on day 20. Attention is required to interpret decreased SSI value on day 20 because of the relatively small number of animals at day 20. Further clinical research is required to prove the potential utility of SSI in the detection and follow up of hepatic SOS.

    Table 1 Comparison of laboratory results between control and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome groups

    Previous studies with conventional CT reported nonspecific morphologic changes such as hepatomegaly, ascites, heterogeneous patchy parenchymal enhancement,narrowed hepatic veins, and GB wall edema for diagnosis of hepatic SOS; these might lack sensitive detection for early changes in hepatic SOS[28,32]. Our study demonstrated that quantitative DECT showed increased HU values on VMI 55 keV and increased iodine concentrations in material density maps in the liver parenchyma before gross morphologic changes occurred. These quantitative values also showed increasing trends throughout the study period, which may be promising for follow-up of the severity of hepatic SOS. Low-keV images using VMI could enhance iodine effects[33].This method could aid in the detection of changing patterns of iodine accumulation in the liver parenchyma in hepatic SOS using low-keV images and iodine maps.

    Increased HU values and iodine concentrations in our study might be from iodine congestion due to endothelial injury of sinusoids and small intrahepatic venules. A previous study found that on pathology, hepatic SOS showed blood stagnation in dilated sinusoids[32]. However, heterogeneous hypoattenuation and patchy liver enhancement were observed in a small number of SOS patients following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or pyrrolizidine alkaloid ingestion[7,27,34,35]. These heterogeneous hypoattenuations might be related to delayed blood inflow and decreased flow velocity from damaged sinusoids filled with cell debris, red cells, and extracellular matrix[34,35]. Different patterns of enhancement in hepatic SOS could be from different stages and etiologies of SOS according to the studies. Delayed blood flow and decreased flow velocity from hepatic SOS could represent an advanced stage and this could be different from our study. Our study found iodine accumulation inthe liver parenchyma in the acute stage of the SOS from blood stagnation. Endothelial injuries and edema of sinusoids could occur in early stage SOS, while hepatic necrosis and deposition of collagen, fibrous tissues could occur in disease progression[7].Therefore, different stages of SOS might have different enhancement patterns. A previous study suggested that the etiology of SOS could cause different enhancement patterns because tumor-related factors also alter liver perfusion and steatosis could affect liver attenuation after receiving chemotherapy[34]. Direct quantification of iodine in the liver parenchyma with DECT may be a possible objective method for overcoming the inherent ambiguous nature of attenuation in livers with SOS using conventional CT[24,36]. Further studies for assessing DECT results according to stage and etiology of SOS in patients are needed.

    Table 2 Comparison of quantitative imaging results between control and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome groups

    This study has several limitations. First, the small number of animals and unexpected death in SOS group in this experimental study was the main reason for the lack of statistical significance in the correlation between final pathology scores and laboratory results or imaging parameters, even though correlation coefficients were about 0.6 for quantitative imaging results. Second, we did not assess hepatic arterial resistance index or flow direction of the portal vein using Doppler US in rabbits.Third, rabbits were assessed until day 20 and advanced disease stages with apparent morphologic changes were not evaluated. However, because this study demonstrated the potential effectiveness of SSI and DECT for hepatic SOS, further large studies with patients and animal models are needed.

    In conclusion, changes of quantitative parameters with SSI and DECT could aid the diagnosis of hepatic SOS before morphologic changes were apparent in the liver of a rabbit model. Liver stiffness on SSI, HU values on VMI with low keV, and iodine concentrations on DECT were significantly increased in livers according to SOS progression.

    Table 3 Comparison of laboratory results between days 0 and 20

    Table 4 Comparison of quantitative imaging results between day 0 and 20

    Table 5 Assessment of correlation between final pathologic scores and laboratory results and quantitative imaging parameters

    Figure 2 Changing patterns of imaging results.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) is a well-known serious complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is associated with chemotherapy. Noninvasive imaging methods are required for the early diagnosis and severity assessment of hepatic SOS.

    Research motivation

    In pediatric patients, SOS is the most common cause of death in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with nonspecific symptoms. Currently the diagnosis is primarily based on nonspecific clinical features and invasive liver biopsy. Therefore, noninvasive imaging methods are required for the early diagnosis and severity assessment of hepatic SOS. Supersonic shear wave imaging (SSI) is a recently introduced US elastography technique and is a noninvasive tool for evaluating liver stiffness. Dual energy computed tomography (DECT) could quantify tissue composition or iodine concentration. We postulated that these imaging studies could quantify liver stiffness and perfusion changes in hepatic SOS.

    Research objectives

    The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of SSI and DECT for diagnosing hepatic SOS using a rabbit model.

    Research methods

    Among nine New Zealand white rabbits, three were in control group and six with 6-thioguanine ingestion were in SOS group. Liver stiffness was measured using SSI and liver perfusion was evaluated from virtual monochromatic images of 55 keV and iodine map using DECT on days 0,3, 10, and 20. Liver stiffness and perfusion parameters were compared according to the groups,days, and pathology scores.

    Research results

    Compared to the control group, final pathology scores were significantly higher in the SOS group, while there were no gross morphologic changes using conventional imaging. Liver stiffness, Hounsfield Unit values, and iodine concentrations were higher in the SOS compared to the control group as disease progression.

    Research conclusions

    This study showed that liver stiffness on SSI and perfusion parameters on DECT were significantly increased according to SOS progression in a rabbit model. We suggested that quantitative imaging with SSI and DECT could aid in the early diagnosis of hepatic SOS.

    Research perspectives

    SSI and DECT could be the noninvasive imaging studies for early diagnosis and severity assessment of hepatic SOS. Because this study demonstrated the potential effectiveness of SSI and DECT for hepatic SOS, further large studies with patients are needed.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Authors thank to In Sook Yang, Department of Laboratory Animal Resources, Avison BioMedical Research Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, for her help in animal preparation.

    一区二区三区高清视频在线| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 免费av毛片视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产午夜精品论理片| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 中文资源天堂在线| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 88av欧美| 88av欧美| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 级片在线观看| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| h日本视频在线播放| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 国产精品无大码| 少妇丰满av| 深夜精品福利| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| www.www免费av| 热99re8久久精品国产| 一级av片app| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产在线男女| 久久久久久久久久成人| 一区二区三区激情视频| 黄片wwwwww| 国产av不卡久久| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 在线播放国产精品三级| 尾随美女入室| av天堂中文字幕网| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| eeuss影院久久| 少妇的逼好多水| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产在视频线在精品| 在线国产一区二区在线| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 深夜精品福利| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 日日啪夜夜撸| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 美女大奶头视频| 一夜夜www| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| a级毛片a级免费在线| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 99热这里只有精品一区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 日日啪夜夜撸| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 色av中文字幕| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 看黄色毛片网站| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 99热网站在线观看| 欧美性感艳星| 久久久色成人| 成人二区视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 韩国av在线不卡| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 色哟哟·www| 久久草成人影院| 亚洲电影在线观看av| a级毛片a级免费在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 日本黄大片高清| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 免费av观看视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 丰满的人妻完整版| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 露出奶头的视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久中文看片网| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 久久这里只有精品中国| av在线天堂中文字幕| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 老女人水多毛片| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 嫩草影院新地址| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 99久国产av精品| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 国产精品伦人一区二区| 99热这里只有是精品50| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产av在哪里看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 看片在线看免费视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 午夜a级毛片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 精品福利观看| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| av国产免费在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产 一区精品| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av成人av| 性色avwww在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 不卡一级毛片| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 日本一本二区三区精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 乱人视频在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 日本五十路高清| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 免费看av在线观看网站| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 97碰自拍视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 长腿黑丝高跟| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 成人欧美大片| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 成年版毛片免费区| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 精品福利观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 特级一级黄色大片| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 床上黄色一级片| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产高清三级在线| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 在线播放无遮挡| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 毛片女人毛片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 欧美bdsm另类| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 久久久久久久久中文| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 免费观看人在逋| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 日本 av在线| 在线免费十八禁| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产真实乱freesex| .国产精品久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 一区福利在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产成人福利小说| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 少妇丰满av| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产综合懂色| 日日啪夜夜撸| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 韩国av在线不卡| 永久网站在线| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美+日韩+精品| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| av专区在线播放| av国产免费在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 嫩草影院精品99| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 中国美女看黄片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 乱人视频在线观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 热99re8久久精品国产| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 久久6这里有精品| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产高清三级在线| 国产不卡一卡二| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| a在线观看视频网站| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 午夜福利18| 51国产日韩欧美| 全区人妻精品视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 露出奶头的视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 美女免费视频网站| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| av黄色大香蕉| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲不卡免费看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 99久国产av精品| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 1024手机看黄色片| 悠悠久久av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 日日撸夜夜添| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产精品一及| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 成年免费大片在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 99热这里只有精品一区| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 天堂网av新在线| 国产成人福利小说| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 嫩草影院精品99| 免费看光身美女| 色播亚洲综合网| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 69人妻影院| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 日本 av在线| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 成人国产麻豆网| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲avbb在线观看| avwww免费| 国产综合懂色| 国产精品三级大全| 在线播放无遮挡| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲四区av| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| av.在线天堂| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 一本一本综合久久| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 一级黄片播放器| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 黄片wwwwww| 高清在线国产一区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 99热精品在线国产| 床上黄色一级片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 亚洲av不卡在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 99热这里只有精品一区| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久草成人影院| 少妇丰满av| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 深夜精品福利| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲无线在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 日日撸夜夜添| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产成人福利小说|