• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Nomogram to predict prolonged postoperative ileus after gastrectomy in gastric cancer

    2019-10-28 09:17:56WenQuanLiangKeChengZhangJianXinCuiHongQingXiAiZhenCaiJiYangLiYuHuaLiuJieLiuWangZhangPengPengWangBoWeiLinChen
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2019年38期

    Wen-Quan Liang, Ke-Cheng Zhang, Jian-Xin Cui, Hong-Qing Xi, Ai-Zhen Cai, Ji-Yang Li, Yu-Hua Liu, Jie Liu,Wang Zhang, Peng-Peng Wang, Bo Wei, Lin Chen

    Abstract BACKGROUND Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is one of the common complications in gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy. Evidence on the predictors of PPOI after gastrectomy is limited and few prediction models of nomogram are used to estimate the risk of PPOI. We hypothesized that a predictive nomogram can be used for clinical risk estimation of PPOI in gastric cancer patients.AIM To investigate the risk factors for PPOI and establish a nomogram for clinical risk estimation.METHODS Between June 2016 and March 2017, the data of 162 patients with gastrectomy were obtained from a prospective and observational registry database. Clinical data of patients who fulfilled the criteria were obtained. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were performed to detect the relationship between variables and PPOI. A nomogram for PPOI was developed and verified by bootstrap resampling. The calibration curve was employed to detect the concentricity between the model probability curve and ideal curve. The clinical usefulness of our model was evaluated using the net benefit curve.RESULTS This study analyzed 14 potential variables of PPOI in 162 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy. The incidence of PPOI was 19.75% in patients with gastrectomy. Age older than 60 years, open surgery, advanced stage (III-IV), and postoperative use of opioid analgesic were independent risk factors for PPOI. We developed a simple and easy-to-use prediction nomogram of PPOI after gastrectomy. This nomogram had an excellent diagnostic performance [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.836, sensitivity = 84.4%, and specificity = 75.4%]. This nomogram was further validated by bootstrapping for 500 repetitions. The AUC of the bootstrap model was 0.832 (95%CI: 0.741-0.924). This model showed a good fitting and calibration and positive net benefits in decision curve analysis.CONCLUSION We have developed a prediction nomogram of PPOI for gastric cancer. This novel nomogram might serve as an essential early warning sign of PPOI in gastric cancer patients.

    Key words: Prolonged postoperative ileus; Gastric cancer; Complication; Nomogram;Bootstrap

    INTRODUCTION

    Postoperative ileus (POI) is an iatrogenic gastrointestinal dysfunction following abdominal surgery[1]. The clinical manifestations of POI are characterized by abdominal distension and pain, nausea and vomiting, lack of bowel sounds,accumulation of gas and fluid, inability to pass stools, and accumulation of gas and fluid[2-6]. Usually, it resolves within 2-4 d, although it may persist for longer days or reoccur. When the symptoms extend beyond the expected duration, it is called prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI). However, the period of POI to PPOI remains unclear. A systematic review and global survey proposed that PPOI is best defined as ileus that occurs 96 h after surgery based on the results of the previous literature,which has been acknowledged by many investigators[7]. PPOI is a frequent complication of abdominal surgery that results in severe disease burden and pain[8,9]. A multicenter survey of 17876 patients undergoing colectomy showed that the frequency of PPOI was 15.3%, which prolonged hospitalization and increased health care resource utilization[10]. However, the majority of the previous studies on PPOI were based on patients referred to colonic or rectal resection, and little data existed on gastrectomy[11,12].

    Gastric cancer (GC) is a major health issue worldwide, which remains the third leading cause of cancer death[13]. Immunologic impairment, surgical trauma,inflammatory responses, and tract stasis can increase the frequency of PPOI and bacterial overgrowth and translocation, potentially leading to bacteremia and systemic sepsis[11]. Therefore, to identify the risk indicators for PPOI and determine optimal management strategies, a risk prediction model is urgently required. Of all the available models, a nomogram can provide a highly accurate, individualized evidence-based risk estimation[14,15]. Nomograms predicting survival of patients with unresectable or metastatic GC were well established[16]. To date, various risk indicators have been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of PPOI[17-20]. However, to our knowledge, few prediction models of a nomogram were used to estimate the risk of PPOI after abdominal surgery, especially in patients who underwent radical gastrectomy.

    The present study aimed to investigate the pre-, intra-, and postoperative risk factors for PPOI as well as develop and validate a nomogram using clinicopathological variables of patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for GC.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Study patients

    Between June 2016 and March 2017, 203 patients who underwent gastrectomy were identified from a prospectively collected registry database of PPOI in the Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital. The process for patient selection is presented in Figure 1. Patients diagnosed with resectable gastric cancer who were able to provide written informed consent were eligible for this study. All of the included patients were scheduled to receive gastrectomy with curative intent according to the 2010 Japanese GC treatment guidelines (v. 3)[21]. All resections were performed by a specialized gastric surgical team at the Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. During the study period, 41 patients who underwent the following types of surgery were excluded to avoid the confounding bias: Resection at urgent operation (n = 12), palliative surgery (n = 11), planned laparoscopic surgery converted to open surgery (n = 9), open-close operation (n = 5),and multi-visceral resection (n = 4). Finally, a total of 162 patients were included in the final analysis.

    All the included patients were informed of the clinical trial process and signed an informed consent form before surgery. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The protocol of this study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, and all information was obtained with appropriate Institutional Review Board waivers(registration number: S2016-092-01).

    Definition of PPOI

    A systematic review and global survey proposed a definition of PPOI[7], which was supported by numerous studies[19,22,23]. PPOI was diagnosed if patients met two or more of the following five criteria on day 4 or more postoperatively: Nausea or vomiting for 12 h or more without relief, intolerance to a solid or semi-solid oral diet,persistent abdominal distension, absence of passage of both stool and flatus for 24 h or more, and ileus noted on plain abdominal films or CT scans. We adopted this definition, and the diagnosis of PPOI must independently concur based on two experienced surgeons.

    Data collection

    Clinical data of patients who fulfilled the criteria were obtained from the prospective registry database before the assessment of PPOI. Such steps ensured the authenticity and reliability of the data. Patient's baseline data were collected upon admission as following: Sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and history of previous abdominal surgery. The operation time, surgical bleeding volume, intraoperative blood transfusion, surgical procedure, lymph node dissection, and type of surgical approach(open or laparoscopic) were also obtained. All patients were operated under standard general anesthesia, and the tumor-node-metastasis stage was staged according to the 7thedition of the International Union Against Cancer tumor-node-metastasis classification of malignant tumors. Over the study period, the results of patients'postoperative physical examination, hematopoietic levels, and biochemical levels were examined within 24 h after surgery. White blood cell (WBC) count and body temperature on the first postoperative day were measured. Patients' albumin levels improved after receiving postoperative oral feeding and enteric nutrition, which were evaluated in this study. Postoperative potassium plays an essential role in smooth muscle autoregulation and is associated with the development of PPOI[24].Postoperative potassium level was monitored in our study. Opioid analgesic could induce bowel dysfunction, which usually occurred immediately after the first dose and persisted within the duration of therapy. Opioid analgesic was reported as an essential indicator of PPOI[25,26]. Whether opioid analgesics were used postoperatively was also evaluated as a consequence of pain tolerance of patients on the first day after surgery.

    Figure 1 Flowchart of the process of patient enrollment. PPOI: Prolonged postoperative ileus.

    Model establishment and validation

    Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were used to detect the relationship between variables and PPOI. In the univariate analysis, crude analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors. All variables having a bivariate association with PPOI with P < 0.1 were included in the multivariable model. A collinearity screening was performed on all independent variables to eliminate the variable with a variance inflation factor > 10. A stepwise nomogram model of PPOI was developed using a multivariate logistic regression. The nomogram model was performed following a backward step-down selection process using a threshold of P <0.05. We can explain the nomogram by the following steps: First, determine the value of the variable on the corresponding axis; second, draw a vertical line to the total points axis to determine the points; third, add the points of each variable; and finally,draw a line from the total point axis to determine the PPOI probabilities at the lower line of the nomogram. The discriminatory ability of the model was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The accuracy of our model was further verified by bootstrap validation using computer resampling for 500 repetitions of simple random sampling with replacement. The calibration curve was employed to detect the concentricity between the model probability curve and ideal curve. The clinical usefulness of our model was evaluated using the net benefit curve, which was derived by Vickers et al[27].

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± SD or median (min-max value),while categorical data are expressed as number and percentage. The associations between PPOI and variables were assessed using χ2tests, Fisher exact tests, and logistic regression models. Statistical analyses were two tailed with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A P value < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 (IBM, New York), R software (http://www. Rproject.org), and Empower Stats software (www.empowerstats.com, X&Y Solutions,Inc., Boston, Boston, Massachusetts).

    RESULTS

    Patient characteristics

    We retrospectively analyzed data from a prospective registry database developed and updated by the Department of General Surgery, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital. The patient, operation, tumor, and postoperative characteristics of 162 GC patients who underwent gastrectomy from June 2016 to March 2017 are summarized in Table 1. Overall, the mean age at diagnosis was 59.5 ± 10.9 years, and 124 (76.54%) patients were men. Thirty-one (19.14%) patients previously underwent abdominal surgery, while 61.11% underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy. Opioid analgesic was used for postoperative pain relief in 62 (38.27%) patients. Of 162 patients, PPOI occurred in 36 (19.75%, 95%CI: 14.1%-26.8%) patients.

    Table 1 Patient, operation, tumor, and postoperative characteristics

    Risk factors for PPOI

    Table 2 shows the results of the univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses performed to detect the relationship between variables and PPOI. The risk of PPOI among patients aged ≤ 60 years was lower than that of patients aged > 60 years(OR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.19-0.95, P = 0.033) and the risk increased 5% for per year increase in age. Compared with the laparoscopic group, more patients in the open surgery group developed PPOI, with a significantly increased risk (OR = 2.44, 95%CI: 1.11-5.26, P = 0.025). Patients with early-stage (I and II) gastric carcinoma were less likely to suffer from PPOI than those with advanced-stage GC (III and IV), with a decreased risk of 59% (OR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.19-0.92, P = 0.027). Besides, avoiding the use of opioid analgesics during the postoperative period reduced the frequency of PPOI by 71% (OR = 0.29, 95%CI: 0.13-0.64, P = 0.002). For postoperative albumin and potassium levels, there was no relationship with PPOI when considered as categorical variables; however, significant differences were found when they were regarded as continuous variable, and these results need to be further excavated in the following studies. In addition, there was no significant difference in the incidence of PPOI between the two groups in terms of sex, BMI, previous abdominal surgery, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, surgical procedure, lymph node dissection, postoperative body temperature, and postoperative WBC count. All variables having a bivariate association with PPOI with P < 0.1 were included in the multivariable logistic regression, which yielded the adjusted ORs shown in Table 2. In the multivariable model, the significant predictors of PPOI were: Age older than 60 years (OR = 2.70, 95%CI: 1.10-6.66, P = 0.030), open surgery (OR = 3.45, 95%CI: 1.33-9.09, P = 0.010), advanced III-IV stage (OR = 3.23, 95%CI: 1.32-7.90, P = 0.010), and postoperative use of opioid analgesic (OR = 5.84, 95%CI: 2.25-15.16, P < 0.001). All possible two-way interactions among variables in the multivariable model were examined, but no statistically significant (P > 0.05) interaction was found.

    Nomogram for PPOI

    Fourteen clinicopathological variables were analyzed to determine their association with PPOI. Of the initial 14 variables, 5 were filtered out: Age, postoperative opioid analgesic, postoperative K+, operation methods, and tumor stage. In this study, the stepwise selected model was computed as follows: 3.24671 + 0.07000 × (age) + 1.55342× (postoperative opioid analgesic = yes) - 2.60385 × (postoperative K+) - 1.59227 ×(operation methods = laparoscopic surgery) + 1.58622 × (tumor stage = III-IV). The probability of PPOI can be estimated using the stepwise nomogram, as described in Figure 2. The performance of this nomogram was measured using ROC curve analysis, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of this model was 0.836, indicating a good diagnostic performance (Figure 3) with a sensitivity of 84.4% and a specificity of 75.4% at the optimal cutoff value.

    Model validation

    The stepwise nomogram was further validated using internal bootstrap validation.The ROC curve was measured by bootstrapping for 500 repetitions, and the AUC of the bootstrap stepwise model was 0.832 (95%CI: 0.741-0.924), with a statistical power similar to that of the initial stepwise model (Figure 4A). The internal bootstrap validation calibration curve demonstrated that at a probability of 0-0.5, the nomogram-derived curve may underestimate the risk of PPOI (Figure 4B). When the probability was higher than 0.5, the nomogram may overestimate the probability. In general, our model showed a good fitting and calibration with the ideal curve. In addition, decision curve analysis demonstrated good positive net benefits in the predictive model under a threshold probability of 0.8, indicating the favorable potential clinical effect of the predictive model (Figure 5).

    DISCUSSION

    This study analyzed 14 potential variables of PPOI in 162 GC patients who underwent gastrectomy. The following independent risk factors were identified: Age older than 60 years, open surgery, advanced stage (III-IV), and postoperative use of opioid analgesic. A simple and easy-to-use prediction nomogram for PPOI after gastrectomy using multivariate analyses was developed for the first time. Five variables were filtered out for the nomogram using stepwise regression. This nomogram had an excellent diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.836, sensitivity = 84.4%, and specificity =75.4%) and was validated internally using the bootstrap sampling method. Besides,this prediction model showed superior performance when used in the clinical setting based on the results of the decision curve analysis.

    Knowledge on the incidence of PPOI could make a vital contribution to the development of new strategies to prevent or decrease such incidence. A total of 36 patients were diagnosed with PPOI in the present study, accounting for 19.75% of the total patients who underwent radical gastrectomy. The frequency of PPOI in our study was lower than that in the study of Huang et al[12](32.4%), which was conducted in patients with GC, and the study of Mao et al[28](27%), which was conducted in patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery, and was similar to that reported in the study of Wolthuis et al[29](15.9%), which was conducted in patients after colorectal resection. A meta-analysis of 54 studies revealed a PPOI incidence of 10.3%after colorectal surgery[19]. Notably, the frequency of PPOI varied in the previous studies, depending on the type of abdominal surgery and definitions of PPOI. There is no widely accepted precise cutoff time over which ileus should persist before being regarded as prolonged, which varied from 3 d to 7 d in different studies[8,22,30]. A standardized and universally accepted definition of the exact point in time when normal POI changes to PPOI should be identified in future research. In the presentstudy, advanced age (> 60 years) was identified as an independent predictor of PPOI.This finding is in line with those of several previous studies[12,31], which indicated that physicians should pay more attention to those patients. Older patients usually have reduced peristalsis and need more time for postoperative recovery[32]. Low albumin has been identified as an independent risk factor for the development of PPOI[6]and older patients generally have a poor nutritional and functional status. Our study emphasizes the need for perioperative dietary intervention in older patients who underwent gastrectomy for advanced GC.

    Table 2 Association of prolonged postoperative ileus with background, operative, and postoperative variables in bivariate analysis and in multivariable models

    Figure 2 Nomogram prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus. The steps are: Determine the value of the variable on the corresponding axis, draw a vertical line to the total points axis to determine the points, add the points of each variable, and draw a line from the total point axis to determine the PPOI probabilities at the lower line of the nomogram. PPOI: Prolonged postoperative ileus.

    We identified the laparoscopic approach as a way to limit PPOI, and this finding is consistent with the results reported in other studies[29-31]. The long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy for patients with GC were comparable to those of open gastrectomy in a large-scale, multicenter, retrospective clinical study conducted in 2976 patients[33]. With the development of minimally invasive techniques, experienced surgeons can safely perform laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced GC[34]. The gastrointestinal function of patients who underwent open abdominal surgery took 2 d to recover compared with that of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery[6]. Laparoscopy is recommended as a feasible and reproducible procedure in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with GC, which results in decreased PPOI, faster recovery, and definite clinical effect.

    Opioid-related dysmotility is thought to play a central role in postoperative gut dysfunction, and the effect of opioid analgesic on gastrointestinal function has been well elucidated in previous studies[25,26]. Opioid analgesic was also identified as an independent risk factor for PPOI in the present study. Opioid analgesic usually activates peripheral μ-opioid receptors located in the myenteric plexus, further inhibits acetylcholine, and impairs the gut motility[35]. Peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists methylnaltrexone and alvimopan, which are potentially used for the prevention of PPOI, are a new class of drugs designed to reverse opioid-induced side effects on the gastrointestinal system without compromising pain relief[25,36,37].

    Figure 3 Receiver operating characteristic curve. AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

    The nomogram was used to calculate the overall probability of PPOI for an individual patient in the present study. This prediction model is important for risk estimation, improving the communication between patients and physicians, and clinical decision-making. In the present study, five independent variables were filtered out using stepwise regression, and the nomogram was established to predict the risk of PPOI in GC patients. The nomogram showed an excellent diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.836) and yielded a sensitivity of 84.4% and specificity of 75.4%at the optimal cutoff value. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate a nomogram for predicting PPOI in GC patients. The nomogram might serve as a statistical tool to calculate the overall probability of PPOI in patients who underwent gastrectomy. This novel nomogram might serve as an essential early warning sign of PPOI in gastric cancer patients. If patients are associated with higher risk estimates,doctors and nurses may take appropriate measures including postoperative management and adjustments in pharmacological treatment.

    The present study has some strengths. First, the majority of the previous studies focused on investigating the incidence of PPOI in patients with colonic or rectal cancer, and only a few studies were conducted among GC patients. This study provided novel evidence of PPOI in GC. Second, a nomogram prediction model of PPOI was first established for GC patients, which had great potential value for the clinical recommendation. Besides, the nomogram was confirmed to be constant by internal bootstrap validation and was found to have good positive net benefits by decision curve analysis. By contrast, the present study has several limitations. First,the retrospective nature of the study and the relatively small sample size may have weakened the results of the analyses. Second, the nomogram lacked a robust external validation. Therefore, these results need further validation in the subsequent studies.

    In conclusion, PPOI is one of the common complications in GC patients who underwent gastrectomy. Age, postoperative opioid analgesic, operation methods, and tumor stage are independent risk factors for PPOI. Less traumatic operative technique and avoidance of postoperative pain medications are encouraged for GC patients.This study has established an easy-to-use nomogram model for predicting PPOI in GC patients. The novel nomogram might serve as an essential early warning sign to help doctors and nurses take appropriate measures.

    Figure 4 lnternal validation of the nomogram using the bootstrap sampling. A: The ROC curve was measured by bootstrapping for 500 repetitions, and the AUC of the bootstrap stepwise model was showed; B: Calibration curve for predicted probability of the PPOI nomogram. The X axis is the predicted probability of the nomogram, and the Y axis is the observed probability. The red line shows the ideal calibration line, while the yellow area shows the 95% confidence interval of the prediction model. AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; PPOI: Prolonged postoperative ileus.

    Figure 5 Decision curve analysis for the prediction model. Red solid line: Prediction model. Tin slash line: Assume all patients have PPOI. Solid horizontal line:Assume no patients have PPOI. The graph indicates the expected net benefit per patient relative to the nomogram prediction of PPOI. PPOI: Prolonged postoperative ileus.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is one of the common complications in gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy. PPOI is an essential contributor to cause the increase of hospitalization expense and extension of hospitalization time.

    Research motivation

    For the research of PPOI, most of previous studies were focused on colorectal cancer. Evidence in gastric cancer is scanty and needs further study.

    Research objectives

    This study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for PPOI after gastrectomy in gastric cancer and put forward a prediction model for clinical practitioners.

    Research methods

    In this retrospective study, we performed univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses to detect the relationship between variables and PPOI. We established a nomogram model for PPOI following a backward step-down selection process.

    Research results

    The incidence of PPOI was 19.75% in patients with gastrectomy. Age, postoperative opioid analgesic, surgical methods, and tumor stage were independent risk factors of PPOI. A nomogram was established and had a good performance. The nomogram was further validated using internal bootstrap validation, and the decision curve analysis demonstrated good positive net benefits of this model.

    Research conclusions

    The novel nomogram might serve as an essential early warning sign of PPOI in gastric cancer patients and thus will help doctors and nurses take appropriate measures.

    Research perspectives

    Further studies are needed to validate this predictive nomogram model, and some basic medical studies are meaningful to investigate the mechanism of PPOI.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We are very grateful to Wan-Guo Xue, PhD (Gastric Cancer Specialized Disease Database Construction Project of National Engineering Laboratory, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital), Hui Luo, PhD (Gastric Cancer Specialized Disease Database Construction Project of National Engineering Laboratory, Chinese PLA General Hospital), Chi Chen and Xing-Lin Chen of Yi-er College for their help in statistical analysis.

    亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 插逼视频在线观看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| h日本视频在线播放| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 免费少妇av软件| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片 | 秋霞伦理黄片| 多毛熟女@视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 在线免费十八禁| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产 精品1| 久久青草综合色| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 一个人免费看片子| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 99久久精品热视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 91久久精品电影网| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 黄色配什么色好看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产乱来视频区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产精品免费大片| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 亚洲成人手机| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 免费看不卡的av| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 一级a做视频免费观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 午夜免费鲁丝| 免费观看在线日韩| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 极品教师在线视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久久久久久久久成人| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 观看免费一级毛片| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 极品教师在线视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 99热这里只有精品一区| 午夜免费观看性视频| av天堂中文字幕网| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲成人手机| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲在久久综合| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 三级国产精品片| videos熟女内射| 亚洲成人手机| 日本wwww免费看| www.av在线官网国产| 成年免费大片在线观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 又爽又黄a免费视频| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 免费看光身美女| 熟女av电影| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 免费少妇av软件| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产毛片在线视频| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 一本一本综合久久| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 99久久综合免费| 少妇丰满av| 五月开心婷婷网| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产综合精华液| 在线免费十八禁| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 国产精品成人在线| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产在视频线精品| 久久久久久久久大av| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 97超碰精品成人国产| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 成人国产av品久久久| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久久久性生活片| 天堂8中文在线网| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 一级黄片播放器| 欧美性感艳星| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日韩av免费高清视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 精品久久国产蜜桃| av播播在线观看一区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 中国国产av一级| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 成人综合一区亚洲| 一级黄片播放器| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 中国三级夫妇交换| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 如何舔出高潮| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 在线观看国产h片| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 一本久久精品| 成人影院久久| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产精品久久久久成人av| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 一级片'在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产成人a区在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 在线天堂最新版资源| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲成人手机| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 99热网站在线观看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 熟女av电影| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲成人手机| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产成人精品福利久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 成人综合一区亚洲| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 高清av免费在线| 97在线视频观看| 亚洲av福利一区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 观看av在线不卡| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 免费观看在线日韩| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 精品久久久久久电影网| 一本久久精品| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 毛片女人毛片| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| av黄色大香蕉| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久久久性生活片| 少妇 在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 99久久精品热视频| 成人国产麻豆网| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 最黄视频免费看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 97在线人人人人妻| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 欧美人与善性xxx| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产成人freesex在线| 黄色一级大片看看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产黄片美女视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 简卡轻食公司| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 性色av一级| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 99久久人妻综合| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久久久久伊人网av| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 91久久精品电影网| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲国产av新网站| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产在线男女| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚州av有码| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 精品酒店卫生间| 在线免费十八禁| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 99热网站在线观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 中文天堂在线官网| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 老司机影院毛片| 国产av国产精品国产| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 人人妻人人看人人澡| 少妇人妻 视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产色婷婷99| 在线看a的网站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 秋霞伦理黄片| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 亚洲精品一二三| 高清av免费在线| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 中国国产av一级| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 久久久久国产网址| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 直男gayav资源| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲成色77777| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 在线播放无遮挡| 精品久久久久久久久av| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 中文字幕制服av| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 插逼视频在线观看| av卡一久久| 九草在线视频观看| 在线观看三级黄色| 赤兔流量卡办理| 中国国产av一级| 美女中出高潮动态图| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 观看美女的网站| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 少妇丰满av| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 欧美zozozo另类| 久久av网站| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 最黄视频免费看| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 一本一本综合久久| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 黄色日韩在线| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产精品.久久久| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产在线男女| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 成年av动漫网址| 美女主播在线视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 最黄视频免费看| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 中文字幕制服av| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 成人国产麻豆网| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产 精品1| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲性久久影院| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美3d第一页| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 99久久人妻综合| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久久久网色| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 免费看av在线观看网站| 日日撸夜夜添| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久午夜福利片| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 日韩一区二区三区影片| av国产免费在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 91久久精品电影网| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 熟女电影av网| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 午夜福利高清视频| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 青春草国产在线视频| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 性色avwww在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产成人精品一,二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产精品一及| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久婷婷青草| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 久久97久久精品| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产综合精华液| av在线蜜桃| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产一级毛片在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 三级国产精品片| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产成人免费观看mmmm|