• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Witnesses of Tiet efore and After Democratic Reform

    2019-05-15 10:39:02ZhangNing,HuangWeizhong
    民族學(xué)刊 2019年2期

    Zhang Ning, Huang Weizhong

    Astract:At the time when the Tietan Language Class of the Minzu University of China, class of 1954, went to Tiet for their internship from 1958 to 1959, Tiet was experiencing a period of great social upheaval. Under the guidance of the two teachers, Hu Tan and Luosang Duoji, they arrived in Lhasa on the eve of the May 1, 1958, and started their internship. At that time, their internship units included Lhasa No. One Primary School, Lhasa No. Two Primary School, Lhasa Middle School, Tiet Local Cadre School, the Tiet Sports Committee, and so on. However, their internship was interrupted less than half a year after their arrival due to work needs. eginning at that time, they successively participated in a series of work assignments, such as conducting a social and historical investigation of Tiet, identifying prisoners after pacifying the revolt, and assisting democratic reform. Almost everyone was a generalist, and some students were even assigned to stay in Lhasa. It can e said that they witnessed the ups and downs of Tiets history, and their experiences are worth exploring. Therefore, ased on interviews of relevant people, including Hu Tan, Zhang Lan, ian Zhenxun and Liu Renpei, as well as the reminiscences of Lu Liandi and other relevant research articles,? we wrote this article titled A Record of the Internship of the Tietan Language Class of Minzu University of China, Class of 1954, in Tiet .

    Key Words:Tiet;democratic reform;the Tietan Language Class;class of 1954;intership

    References:

    Lu Liandi. wo de xueyu qing (My Passion for the Land of Snow ). In Chuai Zhenyu,ed. weida de qidian—xinzhongguo minzu dadiaocha jinian wenji (Great Starting Point—A Commemorative Anthology of New Chinas Ethnic Survey). eijing:zhongguo shehui kexue chuanshe,2007.

    Party History Data Collection Committee of Tiet Autonomous Region, Leading Group for Collecting Data on the Party History of the Tiet Military Region, ed. xizang de minzu gaige(Democratic Reform in Tiet). Lahsa: Xizang renmin chuanshe,1995.

    Song Shuhua,Mandu Ertu,ed. zhongguo minzuxue wushinian 1949-1999(Fifty Years of Chinese Ethnology 1949-1999). eijing:renmin chuanshe,2004.

    yonghu guanyu heping jiefang xizang enfa de xieyi(Agreement on the Support of the measures for Peaceful Lieration of Tiet). In the Peoples Daily, May 27,1951.

    Zhu Xiaoming,Zhang Yun,Zhou Yuan,Wang Xiaoin,ed. xizang tongshi·dangdai juan(General History of Tiet·Contemporary Volume[I.]).eijing:zhongguo zangxue chuanshe,2016.

    The Gloal Frontier:Comparative History and the Frontierorderlands Approach in American Foreign Relations

    Nathan J.Citino(Author)1; Yuan Jian, Liu Xihong(Translators)2

    (1.Department of History, Rice University,Houston ,Texas ,USA;

    2.School of Ethnology and Sociology, Minzu University of China,eijing,China)

    JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY, VOL. 10, NO.2, 27-40, 2019 (CN51-1731/C, in Chinese)

    DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9391.2019.02.03

    Astract:Historians of American foreign relations would seemingly e well positioned to offer a cuttingedge historical interpretation of Fordlandia to match the rilliance of Sguiglias literary treatment. Persistent calls for methodological innovation, ranging in tone from philippic to jeremiad, have prompted scholars to introduce race, culture, ideology, postmodernism, literary criticism, and gender into their analyses. They have studied nonstate actors and marginalized groups and orrowed from political science, cultural studies, and other disciplines.ut in general, these new approaches to U.S. foreign relations neither challenge the exceptionalist assumptions that have for so long een associated with the field nor provide comparative perspective on the American experience in the world.Recent scholarship on orderlands and frontiers, however, offers historians valuale insights into the nature of cultural encounters and shifting cultural identities, the fringes of states political authority, and the integration of the human and natural resources of peripheral areas into larger systems of economic exchange. Fordlandia serves as a case study of these phenomena, one in which distinctly American notions of Manifest Destiny played an important role, as well as of larger patterns in gloal history that shaped the continental development and overseas expansion of the United States. The diverse group of historians, anthropologists, and area specialists who study orderlands and frontiers do not simply offer scholars of U.S. foreign relations another category of analysis to add to their repertoire. As some historians have already discovered, their approaches point the way toward a transnational history of the United States encompassing oth the unique aspects of the American experience and a gloal, comparative context that enriches our understanding of U.S. history.

    Defining “frontier” and “orderland” is a daunting challenge to say the least, given the myriad cases to which scholars have applied these two terms. Frederick Jackson Turner, whose wellknown thesis is a fixture of diplomatic historians lectures, replaced the European concept of frontier as national oundary with his account of the North American frontier as “the meeting point etween savagery and civilization.” Though criticism of Turners ethnocentrism has een nearly universal, and some scholars have questioned his portrayal of the frontier as coming to a close y the 1890s, others have retained his emphasis on cultural encounter within a shifting political geography. In their comparison of the United States and South Africa, for example, Leonard Thompson and Howard Lamar define a frontier “not as a oundary or line, ut as a territory or zone of interpenetration etween two previously distinct societies.” Jeremy Adelman and Stephen Aron have conceived the North American frontier as “a meeting place of peoples in which geographic and cultural orders were not clearly defined.” Such definitions therefore minimize the importance of the state, whose “sharp edge of sovereignty” had een synonymous with the earlier meaning of “frontier.” Adelman and Aron distinguish the frontier from “orderlands,” which they regard as “contested oundaries etween colonial domains” in North America. Indeed, the term “orderland” can implicitly reinforce the primacy of the state, either y designating the geographic arena for political rivalry among states or y referring to land oth claimed y a state and adjacent to an acknowledged oundary.

    Any attempt to hash out an elusive distinction etween “frontiers” and “orderlands” ased upon North American history alone risks on the one hand perpetuating exceptionalist assumptions aout the development of the United States and on the other suggesting that the American experience with frontiers and orderlands is somehow definitive. In this essay, these two concepts are delierately conflated to descrie a road approach to studying relations etween different peoples that regards official diplomacy among sovereign states as only one element in a range of contacts encompassing cultural interaction, economic exchange, human migrations, and environmental transformation. Far from suggesting the irrelevance of the state, the frontierorderlands approach strives for a sophisticated understanding of state power y investigating the degree to which states are successful in expanding their oundaries, imposing their political control over outlying territories, and even defining the identities of those over whom governments claim authority. Such themes, though central to the story of American continental and overseas expansion, were hardly unique to it. In fact, their prevalence across a variety of historical contexts invites comparison and offers a powerful challenge to American exceptionalism.

    For those in American foreign relations, it is most profitale to consider the comparative possiilities of the frontierorderlands approach y examining how scholars working in other fields have used it. For U.S. historians, “frontier” and “orderlands” denote particular research specialties. Turner has remained the touchstone for the study of the American frontier West, even as his thesis has sustained successive waves of revision, most recently in the form of a New Western History that has challenged his celeratory account of AngloAmerican settlement and greatly expanded the types of actors and sujects considered part of Westernhistory.Herert E. olton, Turners student, applied his mentors thesis to the parts of northern New Spain incorporated into the territory of the United States and, in the words of one scholar, “virtually created the Spanish orderlands as a field of professional history.”Historians of U.S. foreign relations would do well to uild on comparative themes developed y colleagues working in these two fields – to egin exploring the gloal frontier, as it were, in their own ackyard.

    While Turner set regional history in a national context and moved the frontier to the center of American life, these historians connect the West to changes in the capitalist world system and highlight the historical passage of the United States from the economic periphery to the core. These perspectives ring frontier history to the doorstep of the American foreign relations field, which has associated the peripherytocore evolution with expanding foreign interests and with a paradigm shift to a “new” diplomacy, one in which the federal government helped to facilitate overseas economic expansion just as it had shaped the economic and political development of the western frontier. Although diplomatic historians have made productive use of Turners thesis and susequent literature on continental expansion to understand American foreign relations, they have yet to employ a comparative approach to escape emiss exceptionalism in the way that Western historians have to challenge Turners.

    Recent scholarship has looked eyond oltons work to the postcolonial United States and Mexico, whose intertwined histories challenge assumptions of sovereignty and independence so central to each countrys national mythology. Andrés Reséndez has reinterpreted the history of the orderlands during the MexicanAmerican War y “paying attention to how the Mexican and the American national projects collided there and how conflicts played out at the local level.” Reséndez examines the use of rituals and political symolism in American and Mexican claims to orderlands territory and explains how local groups responded to such appeals on the asis of selfinterest. Reséndez uses New Mexico as a case study for his approach and shows that while local Spanishspeaking officers and merchants acquiesced in annexation to protect their economic interests, Puelo Indians resisted out of opposition to further land expropriation y Anglos. Colonel Stephen W. Kearny therefore marched into Santa Fe unopposed in 1846, ut soon faced reellion from Taos Puelos. Lisaeth Haass study of California examines the persistence of Native American identities despite conquest y the Spanish in the eighteenth century, the ascendancy of local Californios who defied Mexico City and ostructed Indian emancipation during the period of Mexican independence, and conquest again y the Americans in the midnineteenth century. Rival state uilding enterprises have therefore shaped the history of the orderlands since the retreat of European empires, and scholars are increasingly focusing on how these enterprises

    appeared to different local populations.

    Certain scholars have comined expertise on the American West and nonU.S. areas into a transnational perspective that situates the United States within the patterns of gloal economic integration. While comparing the American West to other frontiers, these historians regard the North American conquest and the extension of U.S. economic hegemony over peripheral regions of the gloe as elements of a single historical process. William H. McNeill places the frontier at the center of world history y rehailitating Wes Great Frontier concept, though, unlike We, McNeill addresses the experiences of Native Americans y portraying U.S. history as an “extreme case of contact and collision etween societies at different levels of skill.” McNeill regards technological disparities etween cultures as the “principal drive wheel of historical change,” a factor that helps to explain why frontiers are not always the egalitarian settings of Turners thesis. When cashcropping or extractive industries are involved, frontiers are more likely to yield a “social hierarchy steeper than anything familiar in Europe.”Roert Vitalis notes that exceptionalist ideologies justified exploitation of oth the North American mineral frontier of the nineteenth century and the eastern Araian oil frontier of the twentieth, succeeding instances in which U.S. corporations managed extractive enterprises and presided over racial hierarchies. Whereas Manifest Destiny sanctified American expansion into the transMississippi West, Wahhai Islam stamped Gods imprimatur on Saudi custodianship of Araias petroleum, a claim the Saudis advanced with the help of the AraianAmerican Oil Companys pulic relations department and the western novelist Wallace Stegner.Paul Sain has identified similarities among oil frontiers in Alaska, Ecuador, and elsewhere not as parallel case studies, ut as sharing a “direct lineage etween earlier American Wests and later developments” linked y common patterns of corporate expansion, missionary activity, and environmental transformation. For Sain, the story of the West is a transnational epic that cannot e contained within political oundaries, just as frontier history cannot properly e the exclusive domain of either Western or diplomatic historians.

    Key Words: America; gloal frontier; foreign relations; comparative

    References:

    See page 3940 in this journal.

    The Expansion of Research on the Types of Chinas Frontiers and

    Governance Models in International Perspectives

    Xu Fang1,Wu Chuke2

    (1.Department of Sociology, School of Law,eihua University, Jilin,132013, Jilin China;

    2. Minzu University of China, eijing,100081,China)

    JOURNAL OF ETHNOLOGY, VOL. 10, NO.2, 41-48, 2019 (CN51-1731/C, in Chinese)

    DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-9391.2019.02.04

    Astract:Under the guidance of the elt and Road Initiative, Chinas frontier research cannot e conducted y ignoring an international perspective , and the international perspective should start from two dimensions, i.e. security and development. This means the relationship etween China and its neighoring countries, including oth good and ad aspects; and the level of economic development of countries ordering China, including oth developed and underdeveloped. Within the context of international relations, on the one hand, the degree of development of the ordering countries determines the commercial opportunities that can e provided to various frontier provinces. On the other hand, Chinas relations with neighoring countries have always affected the security and openness of the various frontier provinces. In order to construct a “frontier” for internal and external communication and effectively promote the transformation and upgrading of the social governance of Chinas orderland, this paper theoretically astracts, expands and summarizes the types of Chinas frontier and their governance models. Starting from the internal and external environment, and dimensions of security and development,? and taking into account external international relations, the level of economic development of the ordering countries, the degree of internal social security and the degree of economic development as the asic dimensions for measuring the characteristics of frontiers, this paper classifies 16 types of frontier using the tool of the 4×4 matrix: closed periphery, locked periphery, cooperative periphery, shared periphery, closedrisk, lockedrisk, cooperativerisk, sharedrisk, closedstaile, lockedstaile, cooperativestaile , sharedstaile, closedcenter , lockedcenter, cooperativecenter, and sharedcenter types.

    1.Closed periphery type. This type of order region has a low degree of development and a low degree of security. It has a poor relationship with the countries ordering the country and the level of economic development of the ordering countries is also relatively low. These areas internal natural environment is poor; infrastructure is ackward; production factors, capital investment, economic development and human capital are all insufficient; they are lacking in external markets and communication channels with external communication, or are in a closed state. As a result, various internal and external economic factors cannot flow and have cooperation, therey creating a negative effect on the level of economic development.

    2.locked periphery type. This type of order region has a low degree of development and a low degree of security. It has a poor relationship with the ordering countries, ut the level of economic development of ordering countries is very high. These areas lack various internal development factors, are poor and weak,? and are locked y developed countries. So, they lack external opportunities for economic development.

    3.Cooperative periphery type. This type of order region has a low degree of development and a low degree of security. It has good relationships with ordering countries, and the level of economic development of the ordering countries is low.

    4.Shared periphery? type. This type of order region has a low degree of development and a low degree of security. It has good relations with ordering countries, and the economic development level of the ordering countries is relatively high.

    5.Closedrisk type. This type of order region has a high degree of development and a low degree of security. It has poor relationships with ordering countries, and the? economic development level of the ordering countries is relatively low. Due to aundant natural resources, such as minerals, oil, natural gas, forests and water resources,? resourceased cities or uran agglomerations form in these areas, ringing aout an overall higher level of economic development in the region. At the same time, due to serious internal hierarchical divisions, this type is intertwined with ethnic and religious issues. Concerning external factors, the poor relations with neighoring countries have led to tensions in lockades, confrontations, conflicts and even wars. The separatist forces or religious extremists aroad use internal ethnic, religious, and hierarchical conflicts to create terrorist incidents, causing nontraditional security threats. This kind of internal and external insecurity often leads to a dilemma in economic development, turning economic growth into a “flash in the pan”. In order to maintain economic development, it is necessary to properly handle the relationships etween the countries and deal with the internal contradictions among the people.

    6.lockedrisk type. This type of order region has a high degree of development and a low degree of security. It has a poor relationship with the ordering countries, and the economic development level of the ordering countries is relatively high.

    7.Cooperativerisk type. This type of order region has a high degree of development and a low degree of security. It has good relations with the ordering countries and the economic development level of the ordering countries is relatively low. Security issues produce a fatal constraint on development.

    8.Sharedrisk type. This type of order region has a high degree of development and a low degree of security. It has a good relationship with the countries ordering the country, and the economic development level of the ordering countries is relatively high. Internal security and staility could affect the quality and effectiveness of cooperation. Even if the relationship etween countries is good and the overall economic development of the country is good, the low level of security in the region will create risks for different kinds of cooperation, greatly reduce their effects, and? ring aout high costs for cooperation.

    9.Closedstaile type. This type of order region has a low degree of development and a high degree of security. It has a poor relationship with ordering countries, and the level of economic development of the ordering countries is relatively low. In such frontier areas, the natural environment has more restrictive conditions and fewer resources, such as ecologically fragile areas, sparsely populated areas, insufficient or missing economic development factors, insufficient state administrative capacity or low effective investment, ackward transportation facilities and insufficient infrastructure, all of which lead to a low level of economic development. Due to its key geographical location or strategic position in the interstate relations, the states investment in the social staility is very ig.

    10.lockedstaile type. This type of order region has a low degree of development and a high degree of security. It has a poor relationship with ordering countries, and the level of economic development of the ordering countries is relatively high.

    11.Cooperativestaile type. This type of order region has a low degree of development and a high degree of security. It has good relations with ordering countries, and the level of economic development of the ordering countries is relatively low.

    12.Sharedstaile type. This type of order region has a low degree of development and a high degree of security. It has good relations with the ordering countries, and the economic development level of the ordering countries is relatively high.

    13.Closedcenter type. This type of order region has a high degree of development and a high degree of security. It has a ad relationship with ordering countries, and the level of economic development of the ordering countries is relatively low.

    14.lockedcenter type. This type of order region has a high degree of development and a high degree of security. It has ad relations with ordering countries, and the level of economic development of the ordering countries is relatively high.

    15.Cooperativecenter type. This type of order region has a high degree of development and a high degree of security. It has good relations with the ordering countries . The economic development level of the ordering countries is relatively low.

    16.Sharedcenter type. This type of order region has a high degree of development and a high degree of security. It has a good relationship with the ordering countries , and the economic development level of the ordering countries is relatively high.

    The sixteen types mentioned aove all are distanced from reality. When any reality is compared with any of the types, the reality is always richer and more vivid. The sixteen types are just a tool for us to understand the reality, and help us to view the status, history and changes of Chinas frontiers dimensionally, stereoscopically, and historically.

    The ideal type is the 16th while the other 15 require us to create various conditions, which eventually will enale them to evolve them into the 16th type , namely “the type with four highs” , i.e. high economic growth, high social staility, good(high) relations with the neighoring countries, and high economic growth of the ordering countries .? The elt and Road Initiative and the “Community of Human Destiny” concept can create the values and actions of the “SharedCentertype” China frontier on a macro level. However, there will e various changes and twisting paths throughout the actual operation.

    y comining international strategy and diplomatic policy, the model for order governance can e classified into six modes: securitycooperation mode, security isolation mode, development cooperation mode, developmentisolation mode, “pendulum” mode and “multiwin sharing” mode.

    1. Securitycooperation mode. The main ody of frontier governance adopts the idea of safety as a priority, maintains social staility in the order areas, develops relations with neighoring countries, seeks international cooperation, and then promotes economic development. This model is suitale for areas with sharp internal contradictions, and low social security and staility. It prioritizes security issues, optimizes a series of social security systems and regional security cooperation strategies, constructs a relatively safe internal and external environment, and seeks development and cooperation on the asis of safety.

    2.Securityisolation mode. Due to the inaility to reconcile relations with relevant neighoring countries, the frontier governance odies give up improving relations, and even prepare for war. Internally, it prioritizes safety? and maintains? social staility in the order areas. In an isolationist mode, the speed of economic development will slow down. It seeks an internal path open to the frontiers, and uses assistance from the center to share capital, resources, talents, technology and markets in order to complete economic development. This model is conductive to promoting the integration of the order areas with the central areas, and strengthening regional cooperation and internal solidarity within the country.

    3. Developmentcooperation model. This model elieves that development is the asolute principle , so it uses? “development to solve prolems”, strengthens international cooperation, uses all international resources to develop the local economy, continuously improves the living standards of the people,? and resolves ethnic and religious contradictions in the process of development. However, due to the complexity of ethnic and religious issues in the frontier society, this model is only applicale to areas with a stale social foundation.

    4. Developmentisolation mode. This model is suitale for the frontier regions where separatist forces are relatively rampant. However, under the isolationist strategy, the development of the economy requires more government investment, higher governance aility, stronger intraregional cooperation, as well as the willingness and aility for communication.

    5. “Pendulum” mode. This model reflects a realist way of thinking. The ruling ody will use internal development, security, and external cooperation and isolation as a means of developing the frontier into the “sharedcenter type.” When there are major prolems with internal security, it will take compulsory measures to control social staility. When the situation is stale, it will adopt an “economic supremacy” attitude and strive to develop the economy. Externally, when neighoring countries endanger national security, it will take a series of measures such as isolation, suppression, and lockade to safeguard national interests and never give in. After the national security crisis has passed, it will also work hard to reak the ice and resume cooperation through negotiation and dialogue.

    6. “multiwin sharing” mode. This model is generally a longterm national strategy. It refers to the countrys toplevel design for a strategic roadmap for order governance, and implements a “walking with four legs” strategy ased on the frontiers social security, economic development, regional cooperation, and international cooperation.

    The aove six models for frontier governance are a theoretical astraction ased on the ideal types of frontiers, and are a general response to the real empirical world. In reality, the choice of governance model will e more diversified, and the considerations will e more limitless and rich, such as international order, national strategies, diplomatic policies, comprehensive strengths, political systems, regional events, natural geographical factors, ethnic and religious cultural factors, economic and social development stages, etc. In order to achieve the goal of uilding a great, prosperous and democratic China, the state will explore different ways and means of governance in different regions in different historical periods. It is the constant exploration, timely corrective action, and old actions that promoted the transformation and upgrading of Chinas order governance model, and the modernization and internationalization of governance capailities.

    Key Words: frontier type; order governance model; internal environment; international relations

    References:

    Fang Shengju. ianjiang zhili zai guojia zhili zhong de diwei he zuoyong (The Status and Role of Frontier Governance in State Governance). In Exploration,? 2015(6).

    Fang Shengju, Lu Zhaohui.zhongguo ludi ianjiang de ruan zhili yu yin zhili ( Soft Governance and Hard Governance of China”s Land orders). In Jinyang Journal, 2013( 5).

    He Ming.ianjiang tezhenglun (The Characteristics of Frontiers). In Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities,2016(1).

    Owen Lattimore. zhonguo de yazhou neilu ianjiang (Inner Asian Frontiers of China), original pulication date : 1940. Nanjing: jiangsu renmin chuanshe, 2010.

    Shi Qinghuan.cong “dalu ianjiang”dao “quanqiu ianjiang”—meiguo zouxiang shijie de lishi jincheng (From “Continental Frontier” to “Gloal Frontier”: The Historical Process of the United States Going to the World).In Journal of Liaoning University,2005,(4).

    Xia Liping. “gaoianjiang” lilun shiyu xia meiguo quaqnqiu kuaisu changui daji jihua (The United States? Gloal Rapid Conventional Strike Plan under the Perspective of “High Frontier” Theory) . In? International Oservations, 2014( 5).

    Xie Shangguo, Zhang Hongshi. “he” ian jumin:xinshiqi ianjiang shehui zhili de youxiao fanglue (“Comination” and Concentration of the People: An Effective Strategy of Social Management in order Areas in the New Era). InJournal of Guangxi University for Nationalities, 2017( 3).

    Yang Kunfei. “ianjiang”zai tan:gainian,leixing yu zhili lujing(Reexploration of “orders”: Concept, Type and Governance Path).InGuangxi Ethnic Studies, 2017(2).

    Zhang Jian.ianjiang zhili de moshi leixing jiqi xiaoying yanjiu—yi zhengfu,shichang he shehui sanzhe guanxi wei shijiao de fenxi (Study on the Types and Effects of Frontier Governance—Analysis from the Perspective of the Relationship among Government, Market and Society). In Ideological Front,2013(1).

    Zhu Jinchun. ianjiang zhili de zhuanxing yu chonggou (Transformation and Reconstruction of orderland Governance).In Journal of Xinjiang Normal University,2016(3).

    青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲av熟女| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 久久久久国产网址| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 免费av不卡在线播放| 免费观看在线日韩| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 欧美日韩在线观看h| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 熟女电影av网| 亚州av有码| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久精品91蜜桃| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 一本精品99久久精品77| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产亚洲欧美98| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 乱人视频在线观看| 舔av片在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 如何舔出高潮| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美潮喷喷水| 伦精品一区二区三区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 欧美激情在线99| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产精品野战在线观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 97热精品久久久久久| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 黄色配什么色好看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 综合色av麻豆| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 毛片女人毛片| 99热全是精品| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| av在线蜜桃| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产成人a区在线观看| 免费av观看视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲图色成人| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 色吧在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲av一区综合| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 在线观看66精品国产| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 三级毛片av免费| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 中文欧美无线码| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲不卡免费看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 日韩国内少妇激情av| av免费观看日本| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| avwww免费| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 嫩草影院精品99| 一级av片app| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 久久热精品热| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲国产色片| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 三级经典国产精品| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99热网站在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 嫩草影院入口| 国产单亲对白刺激| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 日本五十路高清| 欧美成人a在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| avwww免费| 毛片女人毛片| 国产色婷婷99| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久这里只有精品中国| 99热网站在线观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 亚洲成人久久性| 精品国产三级普通话版| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜福利高清视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久久久国产网址| 乱人视频在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产真实乱freesex| 看黄色毛片网站| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 久久精品影院6| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久精品人妻少妇| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 美女大奶头视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 色吧在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产精品一及| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 成年版毛片免费区| 久久久久久大精品| 99热精品在线国产| 久久中文看片网| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 伦精品一区二区三区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久6这里有精品| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 嫩草影院入口| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 老女人水多毛片| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 热99re8久久精品国产| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲18禁久久av| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 少妇的逼水好多| 日日啪夜夜撸| 一夜夜www| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 国产一级毛片在线| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产成人精品婷婷| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 99热只有精品国产| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产成人freesex在线| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 一级毛片电影观看 | 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 中国国产av一级| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久久精品大字幕| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 国产高清激情床上av| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 1024手机看黄色片| 悠悠久久av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 九九在线视频观看精品| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久午夜福利片| 国产精品.久久久| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产精品久久视频播放| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久久九九精品影院| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产三级中文精品| 色视频www国产| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 久久草成人影院| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 91精品国产九色| 深夜a级毛片| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产极品天堂在线| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 中文欧美无线码| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品国产三级普通话版| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久久久久久久大av| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 观看美女的网站| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 色吧在线观看| 99热精品在线国产| 舔av片在线| 伦精品一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 久久中文看片网| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 伦精品一区二区三区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 99久久精品热视频| 国产成人精品一,二区 | 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 99久久精品热视频| 如何舔出高潮| 国产三级在线视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产高潮美女av| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 中文字幕制服av| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲成人久久性| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 91狼人影院| 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 色综合站精品国产| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 观看美女的网站| 中文字幕久久专区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 如何舔出高潮| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 色哟哟·www| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久人人爽人人片av| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 中出人妻视频一区二区| www.色视频.com| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| av在线天堂中文字幕| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 国产亚洲欧美98| 热99在线观看视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| av.在线天堂| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 欧美精品一区二区大全| 一级av片app| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 免费看日本二区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 久久久久久久久中文| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 1000部很黄的大片| 99久国产av精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 欧美日本视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产成人一区二区在线| 春色校园在线视频观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲国产色片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 悠悠久久av| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 在线观看66精品国产| 97热精品久久久久久| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 综合色丁香网| 欧美日本视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 中文资源天堂在线| 日本免费a在线| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| www.av在线官网国产| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产成人福利小说| www.av在线官网国产| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 美女大奶头视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频 | 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一级av片app| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 成人av在线播放网站| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产成人a区在线观看| av在线播放精品| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久精品影院6| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 99热全是精品| 97超视频在线观看视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲综合色惰| 日本熟妇午夜| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 在线免费十八禁| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 18+在线观看网站| 禁无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 久久午夜福利片| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 美女高潮的动态| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 舔av片在线| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲av熟女| avwww免费|