• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Clinical outcomes after major hepatectomy are acceptable in lowvolume centers in the Caribbean

    2019-03-21 11:34:34ShamirCawichRaviMaharajVijayNaraynsinghNeilPearceWesleyFrancisKimonBonadieDexterThomas
    World Journal of Hepatology 2019年2期

    Shamir O Cawich, Ravi Maharaj, Vijay Naraynsingh, Neil Pearce, Wesley Francis, Kimon O Bonadie,Dexter A Thomas

    Abstract BACKGROUND Major hepatectomies are routinely performed because they are often the only curative treatment for metastatic liver disease. There has been a trend to concentrate major hepatectomies in referral hospitals that perform these operations at high volumes. These high volume referral centers are usually located in developed countries, but many patients in developing nations are not able to access these centers because of financial limitations, lack of social support and/or travel restrictions. Therefore, local hospitals are often the only options many of these patients have for surgical treatment of metastatic liver disease.This is the situation in many Caribbean countries.AIM To determine the clinical outcomes after major liver resections in a low-resource hepatobiliary center in the Caribbean.METHODS We prospectively studied all patients who underwent major liver resections over five years. The following data were extracted: patient demographics, diagnoses,ECOG status, operation performed, post-operative morbidity and mortality.Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver 16.0 RESULTS There were 69 major liver resections performed by two teams at a mean case volume of 13.8 major resections/year. Sixty-nine major hepatic resections were performed for: colorectal liver metastases 40 (58%), non-colorectal metastases 9(13%), hepatocellular carcinoma 8 (11.6%), ruptured adenomas 4 (5.8%), hilar cholangiocarcinomas 4 (5.8%), hemangiomata 2 (2.9%), trauma 1 (1.5%) and hepatoblastoma 1 (1.5%). Twenty-one patients had at least one complication, for an overall morbidity rate of 30.4%. There were minor complications in 17 (24.6%)patients, major complications in 11 (15.9%) patients and 4 (5.8%) deaths.CONCLUSION There are unique geographic, political and financial limitations to healthcare delivery in the Caribbean. Nevertheless, clinical outcomes are acceptable in the established, low-volume hepatobiliary centers in the Eastern Caribbean.

    Key words: Liver; Surgery; Resection; Caribbean; Volume; Outcomes

    INTRODUCTION

    Major hepatectomies are routinely performed because they are often the only curative treatment for metastatic liver disease[1]. They are accepted to be safe procedures when performed by trained hepatobiliary teams in specialized, high-volume centers[1-3].

    There has been a trend to concentrate major hepatectomies in referral hospitals that perform these operations at high volumes[3,4,5]. These high volume referral centers are usually located in developed countries, but many patients in developing nations are not able to access these centers because of financial limitations, lack of social support and/or travel restrictions. Therefore, local hospitals are often the only options many of these patients have for surgical treatment of metastatic liver disease. This is the situation in many Caribbean countries.

    While there are hepatobiliary units in the Caribbean, none meet the criteria to be defined as high-volume[3,4,5,6,7]. Additionally, hepatobiliary units in the Caribbean operate in challenging, resource-poor environments. In this study, we sought to determine whether the clinical outcomes were acceptable when major hepatectomies were performed in a low-volume, resource-poor hepatobiliary unit in the Eastern Caribbean.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    In 2011, an attempt was made to achieve service centralization in the Caribbean with the establishment of three hepatobiliary units in the Bahamas, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago. They were intended to serve as regional referral centers for patients requiring major hepatectomies across the English-speaking Caribbean[8]. This was supported by the Americas Hepatopancreatobiliary Association (AHPBA),culminating with the formation of a Caribbean Chapter of the AHPBA in 2015.

    The hepatobiliary unit in Trinidad and Tobago is the largest referral unit in the English-speaking Caribbean[8-9]. This unit is comprised of two hepatobiliary teams each headed by fellowship-trained hepatobiliary surgeons. All cases are discussed in a multidisciplinary team meeting where decisions are made for treatment of patients with hepatobiliary diseases.

    Ethics

    The local institutional review board granted permission to collect and examine data from all patients who underwent major hepatectomies in this setting.

    Study population

    We prospectively recorded data from all patients who underwent major hepatectomies with the hepatobiliary unit in Trinidad and Tobago over a five-year period from January 1, 2012 to December 30, 2016. We used the standardized definition of major hepatectomies as defined by Reddy et al[10]: resection of four or more liver segments.

    Data analysis

    The following data were recorded for all patients who underwent major hepatectomies during the study period: patient demographics, diagnoses, ECOG status, operation performed, operative details, therapeutic outcomes, post-operative morbidity and mortality. Complications were classified according to the modified Clavien-Dindo system[11]. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver 16.0.

    RESULTS

    There were 69 major hepatectomies performed over the five-year study period.Therefore, the mean annual case volume was 13.8 major hepatectomies per annum.When examined chronologically, there was a steady increase in the number of hepatectomies performed each year, except in the year 2016 (Figure 1). During this time, the nation experienced an economic recession.

    Indications for operation

    All major hepatectomies were performed by one of two trained hepatobiliary surgeons for the following indications: colorectal liver metastases 40 (58%), noncolorectal metastases 9 (13%), hepatocellular carcinoma 8 (11.6%), ruptured adenomas 4 (5.8%), hilar cholangiocarcinomas 4 (5.8%), hemangiomata 2 (2.9%), trauma 1 (1.5%)and hepatoblastoma 1 (1.5%).

    Patient demographics

    The patients in this series consisted of 40 men and 29 women, with a mean age of 63 years (Range 34-80; SD +/- 10.3; Median 65). Sixty-four (93%) patients had at least one co-morbidity. Overall, there were 40 (58%) patients with ASA scores ≥ III, as detailed in Table 1, and 39 (56.5%) patients with ECOG scores ≥ 2, as detailed in Table 2.

    After pre-operative multidisciplinary review, we anticipated that the hepatectomy procedure would be technically complex in 26 (37.7%) patients for: emergency hepatectomy for ruptured tumours or trauma (6), multiple intra-hepatic hepaticojejunostomies for hilar cholangiocarcinomas (4), IVC resection and reconstruction (4),borderline future liver remnants (4), synchronous colorectal operations (3),synchronous gastric resections (2), prior open hepatectomy scheduled for repeat laparoscopic resections (2) and synchronous nephrectomy (1).

    Operative details

    Fourteen (20.3%) hepatectomies were attempted using the laparoscopic approach,with 3 (21.4%) conversions for unclear anatomy (1), bleeding (1) and repair of IVC injury (1). The remaining 55 (79.7%) operations were planned using an open approach. No patients in this series underwent veno-venous bypass during major hepatectomies. The hanging maneuver with anterior parenchymal transection technique was used to complete hepatectomy in 18 (26.1%) patients and the conventional technique was used in the remaining 51 (73.9%) cases.

    Clinical outcomes

    Excluding patients who had synchronous resections performed, the mean operating time for a major hepatectomy alone was 380 min (Range 260-600; SD +/-75.8; Median 350). The operations in these patients were accompanied by a mean blood loss of 1405 mL (Range 600-4000; SD+/- 729; Median 1200) and mean transfusion requirements of 1.8 units of packed cells (Range 0-5; SD +/- 1.43; Median 2).

    Figure 1 Chronologic relationship of major liver resections performed.

    When we evaluated the subset of 26 patients in whom technically complex operations were anticipated, the mean operating time was 461.5 min (Range 300-650;SD+/-95.6; Median 455), mean estimated blood loss was 2009 mL (Range 800-3500;SD+/-667.4; Median 2000) and the mean transfusion requirement was 3.2 units of packed cells (Range 1-5; SD+/-1.05; Median 3).

    In the 43 cases where technical difficulty was not anticipated pre-operatively, the mean operating time was 367 min (Range 260-600; SD+/-69.4; Median 350), mean EBL of 1236.7 mL (Range 600-4000; SD+/-679.5; Median 1000) and mean transfusion requirements of 1.37 units (Range 0-4; SD+/-1.3; Median 1).

    In this setting, we maintained a policy of mandatory ICU admission after major hepatectomy because institutional limitations generally did not allow the expected level of supportive care outside of the ICU setting. Therefore, all patients were admitted to the ICU post-hepatectomy, with a mean ICU stay of 5.3 d (Range 1-40;SD+/-7.37; Median 3). Fifteen (21.7%) patients required a prolonged ICU stay beyond 72 h for invasive treatment, ventilator and/or inotropic support. Overall, the mean duration of hospitalization after major hepatectomy was 16 d (Range 9-103; SD+/-13.35; Median 12).

    Morbidity / mortality analysis

    There were 58 patients with no complications or minor morbidity. These patients had a mean ICU stay of 3.2 d (Range 1-8; SD+/-1.55; Median 3) and mean hospital stay of 13.2 d (Range 9-35; SD+/-6.85; Median 10). In comparison, the 11 patients with major morbidity had a mean ICU stay of 16.3 d (Range 5-40; SD+/-14.1; median 6) and mean overall hospital stay of 31.1 d (Range 13-103; SD+/-25.4; Median 23).

    Twenty-one patients experienced at least one complication in this series. Minor complications were recorded in 17 (24.6%) patients and major complications in 11(15.9%) patients. The individual complications are outlined in Table 3.

    There were 4 (5.8%) reported deaths within 30 d of operation in this series. These included: (1) a 69 year-old man who underwent an abdomino-perineal resection and synchronous major hepatectomy. He developed intra-abdominal sepsis after a leak from a bladder injury; (2) an 80-year old man who underwent an extended right hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. He developed a significant bile leak, with resultant collections and eventually succumbed to intra-abdominal sepsis; (3) a 69-year old woman who had extended right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma and developed post-hepatectomy liver failure despite a 40% functional liver remnant;and (4) a 79-year old man who had an extended right hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. He developed a small bowel anastomotic leak and eventually succumbed to intra-abdominal sepsis.

    DISCUSSION

    At the turn of the 21stcentury, we witnessed the era of service centralization wheresurgical treatment for complex diseases was concentrated in specific centers in order to support sub-specialty teams performing these operations at high volumes[7,12,13]. This trend was supported by accumulating data to suggest that there were better perioperative outcomes in high-volume referral hospitals[3,4,5,6,14,15,16,17].

    Table 1 ASA scores for patients undergoing major liver resections in a low volume Caribbean center

    Specifically for major hepatectomies, the data demonstrated that high-volume centers achieved significant reductions in overall morbidity[3,5,6,14,16], 30-day mortality[3,5,14,15,16,17], readmission rates[16], cost[14]and the duration of hospital stay[6,14,16].Lu et al[14]also reported that high-volume centers achieved longer 5-year survival rates. These data seem to lend strong support to the principle of centralization.

    However, a closer look at the existing data revealed that there is no standardized definition of “high volumes”, with researchers applying ad-hoc definitions that range from as low as 10 as cases per annum[16]to as high as 150 cases per annum[18]. Most papers in the literature quote numbers in excess of 20 cases per annum[3,19,20,21,22,23].Using these definitions, the hepatobiliary unit in Trinidad and Tobago does not qualify as high volume, with a mean case volume of 13.8 major hepatectomies per year.

    Furthermore, the high volume centers are often tertiary referral hospitals that serve large catchment populations and attract significant funding. They are usually located in major cities within developed countries. Unfortunately, many patients in lessdeveloped Caribbean countries cannot access care in these high volume centers because of travel restrictions, financial limitations, lack of health insurance coverage and/or a paucity of social support structures. Even within the United States,Eppsteiner et al[17]noted that there was socio-economic inequity for access to care at high volume centers.

    We observed that most current reports, even those supporting centralization,documented that the majority of major hepatectomies are being performed in lowvolume centers - even in developed countries in the 21stcentury. Fong et al[3]reported in 2005 that only 1% of the hospitals that offered major hepatectomies in the United States of America actually qualified as high-volume centers. In fact, Fong et al[3]reported that the 1272 low-volume centers in the United States performed an average of 1 major hepatectomy per annum - substantially below the “high-volume mark”.

    Similar findings were reported by other researchers: Choti et al[5]reported that only 2.7% (1) of the 37 facilities performing major liver resections in the state of Maryland qualified as high-volume. The low-volume facilities performed an average of 1.5 cases annually[5]. Similarly, Glasgow et al[6]reported that only 3% of 138 hospitals performing liver resections in the state of California qualified as high volume. The low-volume hospitals performed ≤ 3 hepatectomies per annum[6].

    It seems that there is still not universal buy in to the concept of centralization for major hepatectomies. One reason for this may be the lack of practicality. This is especially true in developing countries and it can be appreciated by examining the health care environment in the Anglophone Caribbean. Narayansingh et al[24]outlined the unique challenges to healthcare delivery in this setting: (1) many countries are island states that are geographically separated by the Caribbean Sea; (2) there are political barriers since each country is independent and separately governed; (3) each island has distinctly different cultures; and (4) many surgeons, even those with subspecialty training, are required to perform a wide repertoire of general surgical procedures at low volumes. In addition, most of these countries have underfunded health care systems[8], leadership deficiencies[25,26], cultural resistance to multidisciplinary collaboration[8]and limited access to specialists and subspecialists[9,24]. These factors were all obstacles to service centralization in the Anglophone Caribbean.

    Despite the obstacles, surgical leaders recognized the need and established a hepatobiliary unit in Trinidad and Tobago to serve patients in the Eastern Caribbean[8]. There has been some success in this regard, as measured by theconsistent increase in the annual number of major liver resections performed by this unit (Figure 1). The reduction in case volumes in the year 2016 correlated with the country experiencing a recession. This led to a lack of consumables in Governmentfunded hospitals and it highlights our point that these demanding operations require significant resources. Coupled with the fact that these hospitals face unique challenges(scarcity of specialized equipment, blood products, ICU space and operating lists),one can realize that the environment is not always conducive to observing best practice recommendations.

    Table 2 Performance scores for patients undergoing major liver resections in a low volume Caribbean center

    Nevertheless, the clinical outcomes in this established low-volume hepatobiliary unit were acceptable. The perioperative mortality rate was 5.8% in our setting.Although reported 30-d mortality in high-volume centers ranged widely from 1.5%[5]to 9.4%[6], most high volume centers reported 30-d mortality between 4% and 6.5%[3,5,16,19]. Our results compared favourably to these high-volume centers. In contrast, the reported 30-day mortality in low volume centers range from 5%-22.7%[3,5,6,17,22].

    Major complications occurred in 15.9% of our patients. This was comparable to reports in the existing medical literature, where major hepatectomies in high-volume centers resulted in major morbidity in 13.2%[22]to 27%[27]of cases. Similarly, minor morbidity (24.6%) rates were comparable to existing reports from high-volume centers, ranging from 9.3%[18]to 26.9%[22].

    Potential critics may suggest that therapeutic outcomes may appear reasonable because of “case selection”, where high-risk patients are referred onward to highvolume referral centers. Obviously, it could have skewed the results toward improved outcomes if only low-risk patients were selected for major hepatectomies in our setting. However, more than half of the major hepatectomies at our facility were performed in high-risk patients, with ASA scores ≥ III (58%), ECOG scores ≥ 2 (57%)and at least one co-morbidity (93%). Moreover, after pre-operative MDT assessment a further 38% of the major hepatectomies performed in this setting were technically difficult operations.

    We do acknowledge that high volume referral centers treat more patients,including high-risk cases with multiple co-morbidities and complicated surgical histories. However, in our setting in the Caribbean, we did not have the luxury of“case selection” because the patients treated at our facilities had no other options for care, for reasons already discussed. We believe, therefore, that referral practices/case selection could not account for the clinical outcomes in this setting. Furthermore, this was a resource-poor environment with limited support services and numerous institutional limitations. These results demonstrated that, despite multiple challenges,the outcomes are not solely dependent on numbers.

    We agree with Gasper et al[28]that modern hospitals are complex adaptive systems whose outputs are determined by interactions between internal agents. We also agree with Hashimoto et al[29]that annual volume only contributes a partial assessment and that there is also a substantial contribution by surgeon training and experience. In this regard, we attribute our outcomes to the unit staff (1) having appropriate training; (2)developing an intimate knowledge of the health care system in which they work; (3)fostering a spirit of collective teamwork; (4) maintaining due diligence in care administration; (5) continued audit; and (6) knowledge of population-based data[30,31,32].

    In conclusion, Caribbean hospitals do not, and possibly never will, qualify as highvolume centers due to unique geographic, political and financial limitations to healthcare delivery in the region. Nevertheless, there can be good short-term outcomes when major hepatectomies are performed in low-volume hepatobiliary units in the Eastern Caribbean, despite a high proportion of high-risk patients requiring technically complex operations. This demonstrates that case volume is not the only determinant of good outcomes after major hepatectomy. To achieve goodoutcomes, there is also the need for teamwork, appropriately trained staff, due diligence in care administration, continued audit and knowledge of population-based data.

    Table 3 Complications after major liver resections in patients undergoing major liver resections in a low volume Caribbean center

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    In the past two decades, there was a trend to concentrate major hepatectomies in specific centers in order to support sub-specialty teams performing these operations at high volumes. This trend was supported by accumulating data to suggest that there were better peri-operative outcomes in high-volume referral hospitals. However, this is not practical in the Caribbean and other resource-poor countries.

    Research motivation

    Clinicians in the Caribbean do not have the luxury of “case selection” because most patients treated at our facilities have no other options for care. Therefore, these patients must receive treatment at low-volume, resource-poor centers with limited support services and numerous institutional limitations. The motivation for our research was to determine if the clinical outcomes are acceptable despite the numerous limitations.

    Research objectives

    To determine the clinical outcomes after major hepatectomies in a low-volume, resource-poor center in the Caribbean.

    Research methods

    We prospectively studied post-operative morbidity and mortality in all patients undergoing major hepatectomies in a low-volume Caribbean hepatobiliary center over a five-year study period. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS ver 16.0.

    Research results

    There were 69 major hepatectomies performed over the study period (mean case volume of 13.8 major resections/year). More than half of the major hepatectomies were performed in high-risk patients, with ASA scores ≥ III (58%), ECOG scores ≥ 2 (57%) or at least one co-morbidity (93%).A further 38% of the major hepatectomies performed in this setting were technically difficult operations. Twenty-one patients experienced at least 1 complication, for an overall morbidity rate of 30.4%. There were minor complications in 17 (24.6%) patients, major complications in 11(15.9%) patients and 4 (5.8%) deaths.

    Research conclusions

    Although Caribbean hospitals do not qualify as high-volume centers, there can be good shortterm outcomes after major hepatectomies are performed in established hepatobiliary units. This demonstrates that case volume is not the only determinant of good outcomes after major hepatectomy.

    Research perspectives

    To achieve good outcomes, there is the need for teamwork, appropriately trained staff, due diligence in care administration, continued audit and knowledge of population-based data. Case volume is not the only determinant of good outcomes after major hepatectomy.

    99热国产这里只有精品6| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲国产欧美网| 精品福利永久在线观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产高清videossex| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产三级黄色录像| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 日韩高清综合在线| 久久香蕉国产精品| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 9色porny在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 免费观看精品视频网站| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 很黄的视频免费| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 在线视频色国产色| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 黄色视频不卡| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲av熟女| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 9热在线视频观看99| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 91字幕亚洲| 搡老岳熟女国产| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 在线观看66精品国产| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 久久久久国内视频| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 两性夫妻黄色片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 久久精品影院6| 午夜精品在线福利| 丝袜美足系列| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 视频区图区小说| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| av天堂在线播放| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 看片在线看免费视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| svipshipincom国产片| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| av欧美777| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 一区在线观看完整版| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久久久久中文| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 一级毛片精品| 成人三级黄色视频| 午夜免费激情av| 欧美大码av| 在线观看www视频免费| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲精品一二三| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 国产成人影院久久av| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 老司机靠b影院| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 在线国产一区二区在线| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 黄片播放在线免费| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产激情久久老熟女| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 长腿黑丝高跟| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 在线免费观看的www视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 成人精品一区二区免费| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 视频区图区小说| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 精品国产亚洲在线| 日本免费a在线| 高清av免费在线| 丁香六月欧美| ponron亚洲| 国产区一区二久久| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 精品高清国产在线一区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 一a级毛片在线观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 黄片播放在线免费| 老司机靠b影院| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 日本五十路高清| 国产精品 国内视频| 我的亚洲天堂| av在线播放免费不卡| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 成人三级做爰电影| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 9191精品国产免费久久| 乱人伦中国视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 深夜精品福利| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 999久久久国产精品视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 麻豆av在线久日| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 级片在线观看| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 午夜免费激情av| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲av美国av| 夫妻午夜视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 老司机福利观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久香蕉国产精品| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产麻豆69| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 黄频高清免费视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久草成人影院| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 人人澡人人妻人| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| aaaaa片日本免费| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | av片东京热男人的天堂| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 久久伊人香网站| 午夜影院日韩av| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 高清在线国产一区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 久久亚洲真实| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久精品影院6| 欧美大码av| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 丁香欧美五月| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡 | 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 国产99白浆流出| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产精品成人在线| 我的亚洲天堂| 亚洲片人在线观看| 91麻豆av在线| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 夜夜爽天天搞| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 一夜夜www| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 在线视频色国产色| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 香蕉久久夜色| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 亚洲自拍偷在线| 视频区图区小说| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 精品国产亚洲在线| 青草久久国产| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 午夜精品在线福利| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲第一青青草原| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 成人三级黄色视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品国产国语对白av| 欧美午夜高清在线| 午夜老司机福利片| 欧美日韩精品网址| 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品永久免费网站| 18禁观看日本| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 久久性视频一级片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费 | 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 91老司机精品| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址 | 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美在线黄色| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 亚洲 国产 在线| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产免费男女视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 午夜免费激情av| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 精品人妻1区二区| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 日韩高清综合在线| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲精品在线美女| 电影成人av| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 自线自在国产av| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| av天堂久久9| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 天天添夜夜摸| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 99热只有精品国产| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久久青草综合色| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| cao死你这个sao货| 超碰97精品在线观看| 午夜老司机福利片| 午夜福利欧美成人| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 日本wwww免费看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 中文欧美无线码| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| av天堂在线播放| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 少妇 在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 免费在线观看日本一区| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 一区福利在线观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 黄频高清免费视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 免费不卡黄色视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片 | 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 亚洲人成电影观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 91国产中文字幕| av天堂在线播放| 成人18禁在线播放| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久99久视频精品免费| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 免费高清视频大片| 窝窝影院91人妻| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| av有码第一页| av天堂久久9| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产精品影院久久| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产在线观看jvid| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产区一区二久久| 国产成年人精品一区二区 | 黄片大片在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 在线观看www视频免费| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 美女福利国产在线| 麻豆av在线久日| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 美国免费a级毛片| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 热99re8久久精品国产| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 不卡av一区二区三区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 无限看片的www在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 黄色女人牲交|