• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effect of long-term continuous cropping of strawberry on soil bacterial community structure and diversity

    2018-11-06 08:19:20LIWeihuaLIUQizhiCHENPeng
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年11期

    LI Wei-hua, LIU Qi-zhi, CHEN Peng

    College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.China

    Abstract Long-term monoculture leads to continuous cropping (CC) problems, which complicate agricultural production, both locally and abroad. This study contrasted the different bacterial community compositions, physicochemical properties and enzyme activities of strawberry soil subjected to CC, CC rhizosphere (CCR), non-CC (NCC) and non-CC rhizosphere(NCCR) treatments. The soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities were significantly reduced after long-term CC. In addition, five variation trends were observed for the 11 major bacterial genera in the soil. Sphingomonas was the only stable group among all treatments. The proportions of Novosphingobium, Rhodoplanes, Povalibacter, Cellvibrio and Stenotrophobacter decreased after CC. The relative abundances of Pelagibius, Thioprofundum and Allokutzneria increased only in the CC treatment. Nitrospira were more abundant in rhizosphere soil than in non-rhizosphere soil. The relative abundance of Bacillus increased after CC. Redundancy analysis revealed that Bacillus, Pelagibius and Allokutzneria had significant negative correlations with the soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities. Therefore, these genera may be the key bacteria influenced by the physicochemical properties and enzyme activities altered by replanting. These results indicate that long-term CC of strawberry leads to less favourable rhizosphere soil conditions, which can be understood as a stress-induced response of the bacterial community diversity. Further research is needed to determine how the quality of soil is reduced by the shift in the diversity of the soil bacterial community.

    Keywords: rhizosphere soil, high-throughput sequencing, biogeochemical cycle, bacterial diversity

    1. Introduction

    Long-term monocultures often lead to a change in the structure of soil microorganisms, such as the accumulation of soil-borne pathogens and the growth inhibition of beneficial bacteria (Wang et al. 2017). Changes in the soil microorganism structure lead to a decline in plant health and yield (She et al. 2017). Many studies have demonstrated that the yields of soybean, cotton, eggplant and garlic decline after long-term continuous cropping (CC)of the same land (Wang et al. 2014; Bai et al. 2015; Guo et al. 2015), and this problem also exists for strawberry.CC is a historical problem, particularly for horticultural crops, and there has long been a need to overcome this challenge in agricultural development, both locally and abroad (Suranyi 1998; Yin et al. 2009; Mondal et al. 2013).CC is also known as replanting and refers to a system in which certain crops are “replanted” in soils that have previously supported the same or similar plant species(Rietz and Haynes 2003). This practice has been shown to influence biotic and abiotic factors such as changes in the soil microbial community structure, the deterioration of soil physicochemical properties, decreases in soil enzyme activities and increases in soil-borne pathogens (Fuentes et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2013). Recent studies have shown that CC can decrease soil pH, shifting the soil environment from neutral to acidic. This shift promotes the growth of fungi and inhibits the reproduction of bacteria and actinomycetes in the plant growth process (Vargas Gil et al. 2011).

    Soil microorganisms play vital roles in many soil processes, particularly in agricultural production (Kennedy 1999; Garbeva et al. 2004). Microbes are critical for the production of pristine soil and the decomposition of animal and plant residues into soil organic matter (OM) (Yin et al.2010). Microbes regulate nutrient cycling and provide nutrients to crops (Mondal et al. 2013; Ling et al. 2014). In addition to soil-borne plant pathogens, microbial communities also make important contributions to plant growth and health(Baek and Kim 2009), such as the carbon, nitrogen and sulfur cycles. Microbes play key roles in element transport and transformation, during which soil microorganisms are essential for nutrient cycling (Sun et al. 2004). In addition,pollutants, which are degraded by bacteria, affect microbial structure and stimulate functional microbial groups (Fetzner 1998). Many studies have shown that the ecological and environmental factors regulate microbial community and diversity, such as bacterial responses to carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus availability (Kragelund et al. 1997; Ramos et al. 2000; Koch et al. 2001; Axtell and Beattie 2002; Singh et al. 2004; DeAngelis et al. 2005). Furthermore, many of the specific antagonistic microbial communities play an important role in soil in the suppression of soil-borne plant diseases via antibiosis, competition or stimulation of plant host defences (Conway 1996).

    Bacteria are the largest component of the microbial groups present in soil. They influence nutrient cycling,soil structure and biological interactions (Kennedy 1999).Bacterial community structure and diversity can be used as indicators of soil quality for agricultural land (Sharma et al. 2010). Bacteria can be classfied as autotrophic,heterotrophic, chemotrophic and phototrophic organisms according to the way they utilizing the diverse energy and carbon sources. Bacteria are more sexually compatible when living in aerobic or anaerobic environments (Mccarthy and Williams 1992). Bacteria produce extracellular polysaccharides that assist in the stabilization of the soil structure (Zelles 1999). In addition, the bacterial community structure and diversity in an ecosystem are influenced by the rhizosphere system and the soil environment (Kennedy 1999). The rhizosphere is the volume of soil under the direct influence of the roots (Singh et al. 2004). Previous studies have suggested that the rhizosphere soil contains abundant microbes that are beneficial to plant growth and plant pathogenic microorganisms, and rhizosphere organisms also influence plant growth and health, especially bacteria(Mendes et al. 2013).

    A thorough analysis of the microbial community and diversity requires methodologies for analysing large amounts of information, which is expensive and timeconsuming. Soil microbial diversity analysis involves various methods. Traditional technologies have demonstrated that only a limited minority (ca. up to 5%) of microbes can be cultured, and an enormous quantity of microbial groups cannot be studied using microbial cultivation techniques(Mendes et al. 2013). New methods can be divided into biochemical, molecular and analytical methods, including phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) and fatty acid methyl ester(FAME) profile analyses. These methods have been used to describe the communities and diversities of soil microorganisms and to distinguish broad groups of fungi and bacteria (Zelles et al. 1992, 1995). Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) target a particular locus of 16S rRNA and produce electrophoretic bands that are used to describe the diversity of microorganisms (de Oliveira et al. 2006). Although these methods have overcome the challenge of identifying unculturable microorganisms, they cannot yield accurate classification information. In addition,both techniques require a considerable amount of cloning and sequencing, which are expensive and time-consuming(Yin et al. 2010). At present, the rapid development of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) technology provides a thorough and accurate evaluation of soil microorganism groups (Zhang et al. 2014), as it enables more accurate identification of the base sequences of microbial groups than PLFA, FAME, DGGE and T-RFLP techniques in a complex environment (Sogin et al. 2006; Roesch et al. 2007). As a consequence, this approach offers a more detailed picture of the structure and dynamics of the microbial population in soil ecosystems without the limitation of needing a microbial culture.

    This research described a comparative analysis of the physiochemical properties, enzyme activities, bacterial community structures and bacterial abundances in strawberry soils subjected to CC, CC rhizosphere (CCR),non-CC (NCC) and non-CC rhizosphere (NCCR) treatments.This study was designed to: 1) explore the potential correlations among physiochemical properties, enzyme activities and soil bacteria; 2) provide a better understanding of the soil bacterial communities present during strawberry growth in a CC system and a rhizosphere soil system; and 3)determine the key bacteria present during CC of strawberry crops. A future study will investigate changes in the fungal community diversity of strawberry rhizosphere soil. This research will contribute to agricultural production and soil improvements.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Site description and soil sampling

    The study site is located at the Beijing Academy of Forestry and Pomology Sciences (40°1′21′′N, 116°16′32′′E), China.Beijing is one of the primary strawberry-producing areas in China. The agrotype in this area is fluvo-aquic soil. The average annual rainfall and temperature are 628.9 mm and 12.5°C, respectively (Wang et al. 2014). In this study, soil samples were collected from six greenhouses, including three continuously cropped greenhouses and three noncontinuously cropped greenhouses. Continuously cropped soils were those that had been cultivated with strawberries for 12 years. Non-continuously cropped soils were collected from a greenhouse that was planted with strawberries for the first time. The samples were collected on 14 November 2015 (squaring stage). The six greenhouses were at the same location and were maintained under the same climate conditions and tillage management patterns. Basic fertilizer,i.e., farm manure (29 985 kg ha-1organic matter>25%)and NPK fertilizer (300 kg ha-1, N+P2O4+K2O≥45%), was applied on July 10; the fertilizer was repeatedly mixed prior to application, and sulfur fumigation was used once per 20 days for pest control during growing season. The water supply method was drip irrigation. Each greenhouse contained 80 strawberry beds, each of which was, 800 cm length×40 cm width×40 cm height. Walnuts were planted in the continuous cropping greenhouse before the strawberries were continuously cropped for 12 years. Similarly, walnuts were planted in the non-continuous cropping greenhouse prior to the planting of strawberry.

    The strawberries were carefully pulled from the ground,and the conglutinating soil from the strawberry roots was mildly crushed and shaken to collect the soil located within 2 mm of the plant root surfaces; this was defined as rhizosphere soil (continuous cropping rhizosphere soil(CCR) or non-continuous cropping rhizosphere soil (NCCR)of strawberries). Bulk soil (continuous cropping (CC) soil or non-continuous cropping (NCC) soil of strawberries)located 10-20 cm away from the strawberries and without significant root influence was collected as “non-rhizosphere”soil (Wang et al. 2014). Each sample was composed of three replicates. Each replicate, consisting of 30 samples,was collected from a different greenhouse. The subsamples of the same replicates of soil samples were taken from different sites based on a Z-pattern and were mixed in an aseptic bag. These bags were placed in ice boxes and were subsequently transported to the laboratory. A portion of the samples was stored at -80°C for microbial analysis by extracting a DNA composite sample from each replicate.The remaining samples were sieved through a 2-mm mesh sieve and were dried at 60°C to determine physicochemical properties and enzymatic activities.

    2.2. Soil physicochemical properties and enzyme activities

    All of the physicochemical analyses were based on published physicochemical analysis methods for soils(Sarkar 2010). OM was measured using the vitriol acidpotassium dichromate oxidation method. Soil total nitrogen(TN) was determined using an automatic Kjeldahl distillationtitration unit (Foss, Sweden). Soil available phosphorus (AP)was determined using the molybdenum blue colourimetric method. Flame photometry was used to analyse soil available potassium (AK). Soil pH and electrical conductivity(EC) were determined in a 1:2.5 (w/v) soil-water suspension(Eivazi et al. 2003). Urease and alkaline phosphatase activities were determined using methodology described by Black (1965) and Smith (2010). Invertase activities were determined on the basis of the method described by Prathasarathi and Ranganathan (2000).

    2.3. Soil DNA extraction and PCR conditions

    Total soil DNA was extracted from each repeat using a Powersoil?DNA Isolation Kit (Mobile Biometry,USA). The V3-V4 region of the bacteria 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified using universal forward(5′-GTACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3′) and reverse 806R(5′-GTGGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′) primers. The 16S rRNA in the DNA samples was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) before Illumina MiSeq sequencing.The PCR system contained 2 μL of template DNA, 2 μL of forward primer (10 μmol L-1), 2 μL of reverse primer(10 μmol L-1), 4 μL of dNTPs (2.5 μmol L-1), 5 μL of 10×Pyrobest buffer, 0.3 μL of Pyrobest DNA polymerase (2.5 U μL-1), and 34.7 μL of ddH2O. The reaction programme was 5 min at 95°C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at 56°C, and 40 s at 72°C, with a final elongation step of 10 min at 72°C, and a hold at 4°C (Zhang et al. 2015). After PCR amplification, the products were examined using 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry (determining the optical densities for the 260 nm/280 nm ratio).

    2.4. High-throughput sequencing

    The PCR products of the V3-V4 region in the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were sequenced using QuantiFluor?-ST (Promega, USA). Purified amplicons were pooled in equimolar amounts and paired-end sequenced (Paired-end 300) on an Illumina MiSeq platform according to standard protocols.

    Noisy amplicon sequences (low-quality sequences)were filtered out from the high-quality sequences using the Precluster tool in the QIIME package (Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology) (ver. 1.2.1). This quality filtration was performed to remove the low-quality sequences.Reads shorter than 110 bp were removed, sequences with homopolymers longer than 10 bp were filtered using a sliding window filter score of <20 over 50 bp and truncated reads shorter than 50 bp were discarded. Finally, only sequences that overlapped by more than 10 bp were assembled on the basis of their overlap sequence; reads that could not be assembled were discarded.

    The unique sequence set was classified into different operation taxonomic units (OTUs) by UCLUST Software(Edgar 2010), and the OTUs were defined based on 97%similarity. Chimeric sequences were identified and removed using USEARCH. The taxonomy of each 16S rRNA gene sequence was analysed by UCLUST against the Silva 119 16S rRNA database at a confidence threshold of 70%.

    2.5. Statistical analysis

    The physicochemical data and enzyme activities were analysed by one-way ANOVA using SPSS 20.0 (SPSS Inc., USA). Drawings were created using PRISM (ver.7.0). The relationship between the species diversity and environmental factors was analysed using redundancy analysis (RDA) by Canoco for Windows (ver. 4.5). The significance level for differences in this research was set at P<0.05.

    3. Results

    3.1. Soil physicochemical properties

    The results of the soil physicochemical (Table 1) analyses showed that the concentrations of OM, ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N), TN and AP decreased in the order of NCC>NCCR>CC>CCR. However, the difference in AK between CC and CCR was not significant, and the levels in these treatments were significantly lower than that in the control. Soil pH was not significantly different among samples with the same original soil but did differ significantly among samples with different original soils.

    3.2. Soil enzyme activities

    This study tested the activities of three enzymes (invertase,urease, and alkaline phosphatase) in all of the soil samples at the harvest stage (Fig. 1). The three enzyme activities were ranked in the order of CC<CCR<NCC<NCCR. In a comparison of four soil samples, the enzyme activity values showed significant differences (P<0.05) between each of the enzymes. On the basis of different soil sample tests, the order of the average value variation among the three enzyme activities was urease>invertase>alkaline phosphatase.

    3.3. Bacterial community phylotypes and diversity

    The results were used to compare the microbial diversity levels of four samples with corresponding data from the literature.

    In total, 5 755 450 clean tag sequences were generated from the 12 sediment samples, i.e., 41 055 for the CC sample, 47 684 for the CCR sample, 35 212 for the NCC sample and 36 349 for the NCCR sample. The average high-quality sequence length was 430.3 bp. The numbers of OTUs were 1 087, 1 219, 1 415 and 1 241 for CC, CCR,NCC and NCCR, respectively.

    3.4. Bacterial community structures of different soil samples

    The result showed that the four treatments contained 33 types of bacteria at the phylum level (Fig. 2). The relative abundances were greater than 1% for 16 phyla (Fig. 3-A):Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria,Gemmatimonadetes, Bacteroidetes, TM7, Nitrospirae,Deinococcus-thermus, Planctomycetes, Firmicutes,Verrucomicrobia, JL-ETNP-Z39, Candidate division WS3,Cyanobacteria and Thermotogae. The average abundance of Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi was greater than 10% (Fig. 3-B-E). Proteobacteria presented the highest abundance in all samples, accounting for 24.9-38.95%(the average was 34.04%) of the total effective bacterial sequences. A comparison of all bacteria at the genus level(relative abundance>0.0001%) yielded 223 genera. Eleven genera had relative abundances greater than 1% in a single sample (Table 2): Sphingomonas, Novosphingobium,Bacillus, Rhodoplanes, Stenotrophobacter, Povalibacter,Nitrospira, Pelagibius, Thioprofundum, Cellvibrio and Allokutzneria, with average values of 3.93, 1.54, 0.98, 0.85,0.85, 0.79, 0.70, 0.58, 0.45, 0.42, and 0.35%, respectively.Novosphingobium, Rhodoplanes and Nitrospira might participate in the phosphorus cycle, and Novosphingobium,Povalibacter and Nitrospira might participate in the sulfur cycle (Liu et al. 2005; Blackburne et al. 2007; Lakshmi et al. 2009; Nogi et al. 2014). Analysis of the different relative abundances of these 11 genera, based on a heat map (Fig. 4), revealed five types of variation trends. First,in terms of relative abundance, Sphingomonas was the primary genus in all of the samples, and its proportion changed little across samples (basic group). With respect to the second type of variation trend (common group, Fig. 5),the relative abundance of Novosphingobium, Rhodoplanes,Povalibacter, Cellvibrio and Stenotrophomona was significantly higher in the control groups (NCC and NCCR)than that in the experimental groups (CC and CCR)(Table 2; Fig. 4). The third variation trend (amended group, Fig. 5) showed that the abundance of Bacillus in continuously cropped soils (CC and CCR) was higher than that in non-continuously cropped soils (NCC and NCCR)(Table 2; Fig. 4). With respect to the fourth variation trend(rhizosphere group), the abundance of Nitrospira was higher than 1% only in the rhizosphere soil. The last variation trend(exclusive groups, Fig. 5) included Pelagibius, Thioprofundum and Allokutzneria, which were all concentrated in CC (Fig. 4).

    Table 1 The basic physiochemical properties of the soil1)

    Fig. 1 Invertase, alkaline phosphate and urease activity levels in different soil samples (mg g-1 DW). CC, continuously cropped soil; NCC, non-continuously cropped soil; CCR, continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil; NCCR, non-continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil. Different letters indicate significant differences among the different durations of continuous strawberry strawberry (Duncan’s multiple range test, P<0.05, mean±SE).

    Fig. 2 Heat map at the phylum level. NCCR, non-continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil; CCR, continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil; CC, continuously cropped soil; NCC, non-continuously cropped soil.

    Fig. 3 Phylum-level compositions. A, the average bacterial phyla distributed across different soil samples. CC, continuously cropped soil; NCC, non-continuously cropped soil; CCR, continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil; NCCR, non-continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil. B, C, D and E, the relative abundance of the bacterial phyla found in CC, NCC, CCR and NCCR, respectively.

    3.5. Redundancy analysis (RDA) results of microbial communities and environmental factors

    RDA is based on the population abundance and environmental variables and was performed using Canoco 4.5 Software (Ithaca,NY, USA). Bacterial species are indicated by different generic letters and are shown as solid blue lines. Environmental variables are indicated by different generic letters and are shown as solid red lines with filled arrows. Samples are represented by green triangles. The axis 1 explained 75.3% and axis 2 explained 20.2% of the variance (Fig. 6). The RDA results showed that the environmental variables were positively associated with NCC and NCCR and negatively associated with CC and CCR. The environmental variables were negatively associated with Bacillus,Allokutzneria, Pelagibius and Thioprofundum and were positively related to the Novosphingobium, Povalibacter, Rhodoplanes and Stenotrophobacter genera. Sphingomonas and Nitrospira were positively correlated with pH, OM, urease, invertase and alkaline phosphatase and were negatively correlated with NH4+-N, AK,AP and TN. In addition, the bacterial groups were negatively correlated with the environmental variables, and the abundances of the bacterial groups in CC and CCR were higher than those in NCC and NCCR. Therefore, Bacillus, Pelagibius, Thioprofundum and Allokutzneria may be key bacteria involved in the replant problem.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Physicochemical properties and enzyme activities

    Physicochemical property analysis (Table 1) revealed that the nutrient contents of the soil decreased after strawberries were planted in the same soil. Moreover, the nutrient content of the non-continuously cropped soil was significantly higher than that of the continuously cropped soil. Agegnehu et al. (2016) found that acidic soil might limit root growth as well as the uptake of N, P and K during plant growth. These consequences originate from changes in soil pH. This result is in general agreement with previous research (Li et al. 2016). Long-term application of chemical fertilizers might be the key factor leading to soil acidification(Schroder et al. 2011). Other studies have suggested that soil enzyme activities correlate positively with SOC, soil temperature,soil moisture content, total N, P, and K contents, and microbial populations (Qi et al. 2016), which is similar to this study. Alkaline phosphate (ALP) is correlated with OM and available phosphorus(Agegnehu et al. 2016). In particular, invertase, phosphatase and urease belong to hydrolases, which can indirectly affect the degradation of organic pollutants by altering the metabolic activities of degraders through nutrient supply or limitation (Wei et al. 2017).In addition, soil properties such as the organic carbon content,pH, contamination, and land use patterns can affect the activity of soil hydrolases (Stursova and Baldrian 2011).Invertase, phosphatase and urease are closely related to the physicochemical properties of the soil, as well as the microbial biomass, and can indirectly describe the effects of physicochemical properties on microbial activity (Wei et al.2015; Agegnehu et al. 2016; Qi et al. 2016). Moreover,urease plays an important role in increasing soil nutrient solubility. Some studies have indicated that invertase can reflect the contents of stable water aggregates, OM, and humus, as well as the cation exchange capacity of arable soil (Li et al. 2012).

    Fig. 4 Heat map at the genus level for the relative abundance of the bacterial communities among the four samples. CC,continuously cropped soil; CCR, continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil; NCC, non-continuously cropped soil; NCCR,non-continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil.

    The decreased enzyme activities may also be attributable to reduced microbial abundance, decreased microbial activity and changes in the microbial community composition(Martens et al. 1992; Zhao et al. 2009). In addition, many studies have shown that N fertilization can accelerate the mineralization of OM by modifying soil microbial communities (Kuzyakov 2010). A lack of phosphorus in P-poor soil can inhibit microbial activity (Cleveland et al.2002), and potassium deficiencies reduce the crop quality and the capacity to resist adversity (Jenkinson et al. 1985;Kuzyakov 2010).

    4.2. Changes in the bacterial community structure

    In this experiment, the soil bacterial classification was obtained using HTS technology at a high certainty level.In all of the samples, Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria were the most predominant phyla (Fig. 3). In addition,the following three phyla had a single genus with an abundance greater than 1%: Firmicutes, Nitrospirae and Actinobacteria (Table 2). These five phyla contained 11 genera (Table 2). Proteobacteria constitute a major phylum of heterotrophic gram-negative bacteria in various ecosystems, including soil, plant leaf surfaces, atmosphere,seawater and freshwater (Duangma et al. 2014). This study shows that Proteobacteria was the most stable phylum that contained the most abundant genera. At the genus level, this phylum contained seven genera (Sphingomonas,Novosphingobium, Rhodoplanes, Pelagibius, Povalibacter,Cellvibrio and Thioprofundum) with abundances greater than 1% (Table 2). Proteobacteria are capable of inducing nitrogen fixation in symbiosis with plants (Emmert and Handelsman 1999). A comparison of the different treatments indicated that the abundance of Proteobacteria did not differ among the different soil environments (Fig. 3-A). In addition,Firmicutes, Nitrospirae, Acidobacteria and Actinobacteria had only one genus with an abundance greater than 1%.

    Fig. 5 Changes in the primary bacterial groups in rhizosphere soil under continuous cropping. CC, continuously cropped soil;CCR, continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil; NCC, non-continuously cropped soil; NCCR, non-continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil. Blue lines denote down-regulation; red lines show up-regulation, and black lines indicate normality.

    Fig. 6 Redundancy analysis (RDA) showing the relationships between environmental variables and major bacterial species.OM, organic matter; NH4+-N, ammonia nitrogen; TN, total nitrogen; AP, available phosphorus; AK, available potassium.CC, continuously cropped soil; CCR, continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil; NCC, non-continuously cropped soil; NCCR, non-continuously cropped strawberry rhizosphere soil. Different dots represent different soil samples. The major bacterial species are indicated using blue lines, and the environmental variables are indicated using red lines.

    Among 11 genera, only five bacterial groups(Sphingomonas, Pelagibius, Thioprofundum, Bacillus,and Allokutzneria) had abundances greater than 1% in the continuously cropped soil, and two bacterial groups(Sphingomonas and Nitrospira) had abundances greater than 1% in the CCR soil (Table 2). Five variation trends(Fig. 4) were observed at the genus level for the CC treatment compared to the NCC treatment, e.g., the basic group (Sphingomonas), common group, amended group(Bacillus), rhizosphere group (Nitrospira) and exclusive group (Pelagibius and Allokutzneria). Previous research reported that Sphingomonas is widely distributed in nature,and it has been isolated from many different environments,such as land, water habitats and plant root systems.Under these conditions, Sphingomonas can survive at low nutrient concentrations and can metabolize a wide variety of carbon sources. Various strains of Sphingomonas have been isolated from environments contaminated with toxic compounds, displaying the capacity to utilize the contaminants as nutrients (Yabuuchi et al. 1990).Therefore, the relative abundance of Sphingomonas did not change significantly and was higher than that of the other genera (Table 2 and Fig. 4). Thioprofundum can utilize sulfur, but its abundance was not significant in the NCC soil environment (Mori et al. 2011). The experimental data for Pelagibius were significantly negatively correlated with urease and alkaline phosphatase activity (Fig. 5), similar to previous research (Choi et al. 2009). Duangma et al.(2014) reported that Allokutzneria from plant rhizosphere soil produces highly active antiviral antibiotics and cycloviracins.Bacillus is a common beneficial bacterium and is often considered as a primary soil conditioner. Many species of Bacillus can produce different antibiotics and different amounts of enzymes, which can act as biocontrol agents that kill soil-borne pathogens (Emmert and Handelsman 1999). Hence, Bacillus might play a key role in amending continuously cropped soil. In addition, Pelagibius and Allokutzneria might play a key role in inhibiting elements of the soil cycle (Choi et al. 2009; Duangmal et al. 2014). The abundance of saprophytic bacteria (Novosphingobium and Povalibacter) in continuously cropped soil was significantly decreased to less than 1% in the non-continuously cropped soil. The cause of the decrease in Novosphingobium and Povalibacter was potentially the lack of organic material after CC. Nitrospira uncharacteristically increased in rhizosphere soil relative to non-rhizosphere soil, which may be explained as follows: Nitrospira utilize a variety of strategies (r- and K-strategist models) under different nitrite proportions in the soil environment (Kim and Kim 2006; Blackburne et al.2007; Dytczak et al. 2008).

    All tests and analyses show that bacteria can be influenced by other soil environmental factors, such as the physicochemical properties and enzyme activities (Fraser et al. 2015; Ye et al. 2015; Zhalnina et al. 2015). In addition,the physicochemical properties were positively correlated with each other and were negatively correlated with the CC soil environment based on the RDA results (Fig. 6). The soil enzyme activities were positively correlated with the soil physicochemical properties and were negatively correlated with the CC soil environment (Fig. 6).

    4.3. Redundancy analysis

    Bacillus, Allokutzneria and Pelagibius significantly increased after CC. RDA showed that these genera were significantly negatively correlated with environmental variables. Bacillus might play a key role in amending continuously cropped soil, and Allokutzneria and Pelagibius might play a key role in leading to more serious CC problems according to their respective characteristics (Tomita et al. 1993; Satomi et al. 2006; Choi et al. 2009). Nitrospira can achieve normal growth in rhizosphere soil, but the contribution of this genus was not evident in this environment. The other eight bacterial genera were affected by the environmental variables and participated in the biogeochemical cycles, but they were not the key bacteria involved.

    5. Conclusion

    These research findings provide insights into the bacterial changes at the genus level based on high-throughput analysis of the CC, CCR, NCC and NCCR treatments associated with strawberry plants. Based on the results and the data available in the literature, a hypothetical model was designed that described the transformation processes of the biological community that was affected after replanting(Fig. 6). The results showed that Bacillus might have a significant effect in amending the soil environment under continuously cropped strawberry, and Allokutzneria and Pelagibius might play a key role in leading to more serious CC. The CC phenomenon that may be caused by the change in the soil pH from environmental factors.

    Dissecting the bacterial mechanisms that affect plant growth is regarded as one of the future challenges of agricultural ecological research. Exploring the complexity of the interactions between the plant roots and bacteria within the soil environment will be particularly difficult. The results from this research will provide insights into the functions and actions of fungi in continuously and non-continuously cropped soil.

    Acknowledgements

    The present study was supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program (2014BAD16B07). We thank the support of Beijing Academy of Forestry and Pomology Sciences.

    日本三级黄在线观看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 久久久色成人| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 久久久久九九精品影院| 久久精品影院6| 成人三级黄色视频| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 欧美大码av| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 日本 欧美在线| 久久久久国内视频| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 香蕉av资源在线| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 青草久久国产| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| a级毛片a级免费在线| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美午夜高清在线| 黄色女人牲交| 日本 av在线| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 日本成人三级电影网站| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 毛片女人毛片| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 两性夫妻黄色片| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| www.www免费av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产成人av教育| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 久久久久久大精品| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 黄频高清免费视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 在线a可以看的网站| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国产成人av教育| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 亚洲最大成人中文| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 国产午夜精品论理片| 免费看光身美女| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产99白浆流出| 不卡一级毛片| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久久成人免费电影| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| av视频在线观看入口| a级毛片在线看网站| 香蕉国产在线看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 三级毛片av免费| 美女高潮的动态| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 一级毛片精品| 成人国产综合亚洲| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 97碰自拍视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| av天堂在线播放| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 免费高清视频大片| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 久久久久性生活片| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| www.自偷自拍.com| 丁香欧美五月| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 波多野结衣高清作品| 长腿黑丝高跟| 嫩草影院精品99| 综合色av麻豆| 一夜夜www| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 制服人妻中文乱码| 怎么达到女性高潮| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产三级中文精品| av欧美777| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| www.精华液| 香蕉久久夜色| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 免费看日本二区| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲色图av天堂| 午夜福利高清视频| 在线视频色国产色| 国产av不卡久久| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 久久久国产成人免费| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 91字幕亚洲| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品九九99| 欧美zozozo另类| 午夜精品在线福利| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 日本成人三级电影网站| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| tocl精华| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 一级毛片精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 伦理电影免费视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 18禁观看日本| 长腿黑丝高跟| 久9热在线精品视频| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 91老司机精品| 亚洲精品在线美女| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产乱人伦免费视频| avwww免费| 久久久久国内视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 不卡av一区二区三区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 日韩免费av在线播放| 亚洲无线在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产三级在线视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 日本 av在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 91老司机精品| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 三级毛片av免费| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 一夜夜www| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久久色成人| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 最好的美女福利视频网| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 国产精品永久免费网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产成人av教育| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 久久草成人影院| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 99热只有精品国产| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 午夜a级毛片| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 午夜影院日韩av| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 熟女电影av网| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 99热精品在线国产| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久性视频一级片| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 高清在线国产一区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 嫩草影视91久久| 欧美zozozo另类| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 日韩高清综合在线| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 久久久久久久午夜电影| 精品久久久久久成人av| 18禁观看日本| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 怎么达到女性高潮| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久色成人| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 日本黄色片子视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 成在线人永久免费视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产精品久久视频播放| 9191精品国产免费久久| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 身体一侧抽搐| 黄频高清免费视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| ponron亚洲| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 丁香欧美五月| 在线观看日韩欧美| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 99久国产av精品| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 草草在线视频免费看| bbb黄色大片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久这里只有精品19| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 丰满的人妻完整版| 性欧美人与动物交配| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产成人精品无人区| 91在线观看av| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 露出奶头的视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 精品久久久久久,| 国产成人aa在线观看| 99视频精品全部免费 在线 | 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 男人舔奶头视频| 久久久久国内视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 午夜福利18| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 免费观看人在逋| 看片在线看免费视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 男女那种视频在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 嫩草影院入口| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 两个人看的免费小视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产视频内射| 97碰自拍视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 在线观看66精品国产| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 级片在线观看| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产高清videossex| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 午夜久久久久精精品| 最新中文字幕久久久久 | 搞女人的毛片| 舔av片在线| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| xxx96com| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产精华一区二区三区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 色播亚洲综合网| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 波多野结衣高清作品| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 丰满的人妻完整版| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 美女午夜性视频免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 色在线成人网| 国产视频内射| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 观看美女的网站| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 久久久久久大精品| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产av不卡久久| 99热精品在线国产| 免费高清视频大片| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 88av欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久精品影院6| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 天堂√8在线中文| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 少妇丰满av| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 热99re8久久精品国产| 两个人的视频大全免费| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | 美女高潮的动态| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 美女黄网站色视频| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 免费看日本二区| 国产三级中文精品| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产av在哪里看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 搡老岳熟女国产| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 搡老岳熟女国产| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 精品国产三级普通话版| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 久久这里只有精品中国| 精品久久久久久成人av| 宅男免费午夜| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲国产色片| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站|