• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparative Research on Facultative Anaerobic Cellulose Decomposing Bacteria Screened from Soil and Rumen Content and Diet of Dairy Cow

    2018-04-02 09:18:15LiYanfangWangLeiLiangZichaoZhangMeimeiWangJingjingandLiuDasen

    Li Yan-fang, Wang Lei, Liang Zi-chao, Zhang Mei-mei, Wang Jing-jing, and Liu Da-sen,

    1 College of Animal Sciences and Technology, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

    2 College of Science, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150030, China

    Introduction

    Cellulose as the most abundant, wasteless resource in the biosphere has caught the attention of researchers(Ulrich and Wirth, 1999).Cellulose is a polysaccharide constituted of D-glucose linked byβ-1, 4-glycosidic bonds and a helpful raw material for producing important chemicals (Ragauskaset al., 2006; Hahn-H?egerdalet al., 2006).Enzymatic hydrolysis is difficult because of insolubility and heterogeneity of cellulose.However, microorganisms could hydrolyse it with the help of a multi-enzyme system (Schwarz,2001).The cellulases consist of endoglucanases and cellobiohydrolases enzymes, which function together in degrading microbes (Dashtbanet al., 2009).Consequently, there is an urgent need for the studies about cellulolytic microorganisms as well as their degradation abilities in cellulose were carried out.Some celluloses are digested by protozoa, but it is indicated that degrading activity of protozoa is lower than that of bacteria (Cheng and Costerton, 1980),which are able to degrade cellulose by the action of extracellular cellulase.For years, cellulase-producing bacteria have been isolated from multitude of sources such as the feces of ruminants, soils and organic matter,agricultural residues and forestry (Lyndet al., 1991).

    In the soil ecosystem, the cellulolytic bacteria play important roles in the decomposition and transformation of organic matter, and they also provide a significant carbon source to the microbial community in the soil.In the rumen, cellulolytic microorganisms are important to the rumen ecosystem for their role in providing volatile fatty acids (VFA) by fermenting plant polysaccharides, and VFA is the primary energy source for the ruminant animal (Mcdonaldet al.,2012).The reports of the cellulose decomposition bacteria isolated from the diary cow diets are rarely.

    Majority of isolated cellulolytic bacteria belong to the aerobic bacteria (Lyndet al., 2002), because culturing the anaerobic bacteria needs specialized techniques and methods.Wenzelet al.(2002) isolated the facultative anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria from the gut of the termiteZootermopsis angusticollis.Cheng and Costerton (1980) indicated that extensive important populations of bacteria have been found not only in rumen fluid, but also in feed particles.Therefore, the fact that the cellulose-decomposing bacteria isolated from rumen contents might be associated with the cellulose-decomposing bacteria adhered on ration fed by animals was speculated in our laboratory.

    The comparison researches about the facultative anaerobic cellulose-decomposing bacteria from different sources and their abilities of degrading cellulose are rare.Hence, the objective of this study was to isolate cellulose-decomposing bacteria from the rumen content of dairy cow, the soil around the barn and the ration of cow, respectively, and then evaluated what the relationship was among them by 16SrDNA gene sequences molecular biology methods,meanwhile, compared with their cellulase activities.The test would better qualify facultative anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria and provide basic data for using the bacteria in the future.

    Materials and Methods

    Animal care

    The experimental procedure was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in Northeast Agricultural University.

    Samples for separating bacteria

    Three fistulaed dairy cows (three and a half years old)in dry period were provided a total mixed ration (TMR)with concentrate: forage at a 45 : 55 ratio to fulfill their nutrient requirement for maintenance.Compositions of the ration (kg · kg-1) were: 0.50 L.chinensis, 0.33 ground corn, 0.05 soybean cake, 0.05 rapeseed dregs,0.04 cottonseed meal, and 0.03 vitamins and minerals.The cows were fed twice daily at 6:00 a.m.and 6:00 p.m.,and accessed to fresh waterad libitum.Whole rumen contents withdrawn from each of the three cows prior to the first meal in the morning were mixed equally,and then were poured into a pre-warmed thermos which filled with carbon dioxide.Subsequently,1 mL rumen fluid and 1 g residue were put into two sterilized tubes, into which were added 9 mL sterile water and fully shaken for preparation of bacterial suspension.

    About 1 kg soil was randomly collected from five sites, which was near the dairy barn, but not polluted by the cow waste, and then sieved to remove vegetation waste.One g of mixed soil sample was dissolved in 100 mL sterile water, then cultured 2 h at 37℃ on an orbital shaker at 180 r · min-1(Ulrich and Wirth, 1999).One g of diet was also suspended in 100 mL distilled water and cultured shakily 2 h at 37℃ at 180 r · min-1.

    Bacteria isolation and screening

    The bacteria suspension of rumen fluid and residues,soil, and dairy diet were consecutively diluted into a serial solutions from 10-2to 10-6, then 100 μL of each of the dilutions was spread on the nutrient agar plate medium.Bacterial colonies capable of utilizing cellulose as sole carbon source were selected on sodium CMC agar media (composing of KH2PO40.5 g, MgSO40.25 g, gelatin 2 g, sodium car boxy methyl cellulose 20 g, and agar 12 g in 1 L of distilled water).

    Morphological characteristic of bacterial colonies

    Phenotypic characteristics of the isolated bacterial colonies were determined after cultured 48 h on the sodium CMC plate medium based on the microbial application laboratory manual in general microbiology 8th ed (Benson, 2005).Macroscopic and microscopic analyses were included, morphological feature about bacteria included color, surface, shape, border, eleva-tion, Gram's features and spore.

    Cellulose degradation capability of bacteria

    Bacteria were cultured for 48 h at 39℃ on Congo-Red agar medium.The diameter size of clear zones around strains indicated the capability of degrading cellulose of bacteria.In this paper, bacteria with more than 10 cm diameter of clear zone were described as stronger capability for degradation.

    Determination of cellulase activity of bacteria

    It is widely accepted that complete enzymatic degradation of cellulose need synergistic action of system of three major types of enzymes, which consist of endoglucanases (EG), exoglucanases (ExG) andβ-glucosidases (βG) (Dashtbanet al., 2010).The measurements of the individual enzymes and the total cellulase activities were described as the followings:

    Filter paper assay (FPase activity): the total cellulase activities

    Filter paper assay (FPAase) is the key method for analysis of the total cellulase activity based on Mandelset al(1976).Filter paper activity (FPase) was defined as the micromole of glucose from generated filter per minute.

    Carboxymethyl cellulase assay (CMCase)

    Endoglucanase (EG) activity was measured using CMC as substrate according to Ghose (1987).One unit(IU) of EG was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 μmol of glucose per minute under assay conditions (Mandelset al., 1976).

    β-glucosidases assay

    The activity ofβ-glucosidases was measured at pH 4.8 using 1 mmol · L-1p-nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside as substrate described previously by Kubicek (1982).One unit (IU) ofβ-glucosidase activity was defined as the amount of enzyme that liberated 1 μmol of reducing sugar as glucose equivalents per minute (Chandraet al., 2009).

    16SrDNA gene sequencing analysis

    Genomic DNA was extracted from the strains that showed stronger capability of cellulose decomposition following the methods of Johnson (1994).16SrDNA genes were amplified using universal primer of bacteria 27f (5-3'): AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG AACGAACGCT and 1 492f (5-3'): TACGGCTACC TTGTTACGACTTCACCCC (Weisburget al., 1991)by polymerase chain reaction (PCR).Amplification was conducted in a total reaction volume of 50 μL,containing 2 μL primers, 3 μL dNTPs, 25 μL PolymeraseTaqand 20 μL nuclease free water.

    16SrDNA gene sequences were compared with database at GeneBank using Blast-N search program in the website of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).In light of similar results, the generic affiliation and homology of the bacterial were con firmed.The accession numbers of strains were also applied for by Bankit.

    Data collection and analysis

    All the data were analyzed by one way ANOVA using MIXED procedure of SAS 9.2.

    The model used for cellulase activity was:Yij=μ+Ti+eij, where,Yijwas an observation of the dependent variableij;μwas the population mean for the variable;Tiwas effect of the bacterial strains ( fixed effect); andeijwas random error that associated with the observedij.

    In all the cases, Duncan test was carried out to determine the significant difference within the variables with significance declaredp<0.05.The average mean of results of the three replicates was represented with standard deviations.

    Results

    Morphological characteristics of cellulose decomposing bacteria

    For 29 strains of bacteria, both the gram-negative(GN) bacteria with coccus cell morphology and grampositive (GP) bacteria with bacilli cell morphology were found.By observation, many of GN bacteria were opaque yellowish-white colony with wet, convex and rounded characteristic.In addition, majority of GP bacteria were white colony with dry, convex and rounded profiles.Of the 29 strains, only four strains were GN bacteria with no spore, three of the four strains were isolated from rumen fluid, and the rest were from soil.Other 25 strains were GP bacteria with spore.The growth status of the strains in aerobic condition was not different compared with anaerobic condition, therefore, these strains were considered as facultative anaerobic bacteria.The diameters of clear zone of cellulose decomposing microorganisms were between 7-15 mm, and L5 was the largest, reaching to 15 mm.Table 1 showed the diameters of clear zone no less than 10 mm.

    Table 1 BLAST-N results of 16SrDNA gene of isolates which diameter of clear circles ≥10 mm and their diameters of clear circles dyed by Congo red

    Molecular identification of cellulolytic bacteria

    Generally, bacteria with high level of 16SrDNA sequence similar to the genera at NCBI GenBank were thought to belong to the same species of genera.In the test, the sequences similar with databases sequences reached to more than 94% for most isolates.It was observed that only L1 strain pertained toAcinetobacter, all other isolates wereBacillusgenus(Table 2).For the isolates from rumen fluid, L3 belonged toBacillus sonorensis, L6 pertained toBacillus subtilis, while L8 belonged toBacillus amyloliquefaciens; for the isolates from rumen residue,many of them belonged toBacillus amyloliquefaciens,except N2, N5 and N7 belonged toBacillus subtilis;for the isolates from rations, all of them belonged toBacillus subtilisapart from S2 wasBacillus amyloliquefacien; for the isolates from soil, most of them pertained toBacillusn amyloliquefacien, besides T5 belonged toBacillus subtilis.

    BLAST_N results of 16SrDNA gene of isolates are presented in Tables 1 and 2.The sequences of all the isolates had been reserved in GeneBank under the consecutive accession numbers of the bacterial strains which the clear zone diameter more than 10 mm were KX426073 to KX426078.And others were KX588160 to KX588172 except for the isolates which had lower Query cover compared with the database.

    Cellulase activity of bacteria

    The cellulase production of different strains about the total cellulase, endoglucanases andβ-glucosidases were presented in Table 3.Filter paper activity (FPase)and CMCase activity which represented the total cellulase and endoglucanases activity, respectively,were the highest in L5, moreover, FPase activity had no significantly different in L7, N5 and L5 and they produced 57% more glucose than T1, which implied that CMCase and FPase activities were the highest in the strains isolated from rumen fluid and the lowest isolated from soil.The differences ofβ-glucosidases activity among various strains were significant(p<0.05), with the highest activity in T1 and the lowest in N5.Additional,β-glucosidases activity was the highest in strains isolated from soil, and the lowest isolated from rumen residues.CMCase activities were similar among L7, N5 and N9, but higher than those of S6 and T1.The data is shown in Table 3.

    Table 2 BLAST-N results of 16SrDNA gene isolate

    Nearest relatives on GenBank and percentage similarities are listed.L, Bacterial strains isolated from rumen fluid; N, Bacterial strains isolated from rumen residue; S, Bacterial strains isolated from rations; T, Bacterial strains isolated from soil.

    Table 3 Comparison of cellulase production among different strains on the total cellulase, endoglucanases and β-glucosidase

    Different letters in the same column differ significantly (p<0.05) (means±SD) (n=3).L, Bacterial strains isolated from rumen fluid; N, Bacterial strains isolated from rumen residue; S, Bacterial strains isolated from rations; T, Bacterial strains isolated from soil.

    Discussion

    Isolate and screening of cellulose decomposition microbes

    Sodium CMC medium is the traditional culture medium used for screening cellulose degradation bacteria, bacterial colonies capable of utilizing cellulose as sole source of carbon are isolated on cellulose agar media (Guptaet al., 2012).Based on morphological and molecular identification of 16SrDNA gene, the cellulose bacteria screened in this experiment mainly belonged to GPBacillus, this result was in accordance with the reports that lots of producing cellulose bacteria are GPBacillus(Dekaet al., 2011; Mohammedet al., 2003).However,three strains that isolated from rumen fluid were GN bacteria, this might be related to the foraging situation of cows.When cows were fed a concentrate diet, the bacteria were predominantly of the gramnegative cell wall type, if cows were fed normal diets, the bacteria were gram-positive bacteria in rumen fluid (Cheng and Costerton, 1980).The phylogenetic analysis of the bacterial strains using its 16SrDNA sequence data showed that strains had the highest homology withBacillusgenus.Due to lacking overall genome relatedness, chemotaxonomic data, the specific epithet of the strains could not be assigned and identified asBacillussp., this still need lots of relevant researches to be proved.

    Congo-Red is an indicator for cellulose degradation in an agar medium, which provides the basis for a rapid and sensitive screening for cellulolytic bacteria(Guptaet al., 2012).In this experiment, the range of clearing zone diameter was between 7-15 mm,which was smaller than that of previous reports, the clearing zone diameter reached to more than 28 mm,whereas the strains were isolated from four different invertebrates in previous study.This could be due to various sources of cellulase micro-organisms, but could also be the result of the problems associated with enzyme activity determinations.

    Cellulolytic activity of bacterial isolates

    Cellulase activity ranged from 2.578 to 6.274 IU · mL-1for FPCase, and 3.214 to 7.981 IU · mL-1for endoglucanase in our trial.However, Guptaet al.(2012)reported that the bacterial cellulase activities ranged from 0.012 to 0.196 IU · mL-1for FPase and 0.162 to 0.400 IU · mL-1for endoglucanase assay, which were much lower than ours, this could be related to the methods of enzyme activity determinations, kinds of strains, culture time, determination conditions and other factors.For CMCase and FPase activities, the strains isolated from rumen fluid were dominant,which was in accordance with the reports that domestic and international studies have confirmed,the reason might be that there existed fungi that could secrete cellulase in rumen fluid, the cellulolytic enzyme activity of rumen fungi was higher than that of rumen bacteria (Kamra, 2005).It was shown that CMCase and FPase activities were the lowest in soil cellulose-decomposing bacteria, of which the reasons needed to be researched.

    Conclusions

    All of the 29 strains cellulose-decomposing bacteria screened from rumen residues, rumen fluid, soil and ration of dairy cow were facultative anaerobic,and most of them wereBacillusgenus, although the bacterial strains of four sources could not be completely separated by the genus.The activities of FPase and CMCase were significantly higher for L5 bacterial strains isolated from rumen fluid than other strains.However,β-glucosidase activity was the highest for T1 bacterial strain.

    Benson H J.2005.Microbiological applications : laboratory manual in general microbiology.McGraw-Hill, 85(4): 173-174

    Chandra M, Kalra A, Sharma P K,et al.2009.Cellulase production by sixTrichodermaspp.fermented on medicinal plant processings.Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 36(4): 605-614.

    Cheng K J, Costerton J W.1980.Adherent rumen bacteria—their role in the digestion of plant material,urea and epithelial cells.Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants.Springer Netherlands.

    Dashtban M, Maki M, Kamtin L,et al.2010.Cellulase activities in biomass conversion: measurement methods and comparison.Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 30(4): 302-321.

    Dashtban M, Schraft H, Qin W S.2009.Fungal bioconversion of lignocellulosic residues; opportunities & perspectives.International Journal of Biological Sciences, 5(5): 578-595.

    Deka D, Bhargavi P, Sharma A,et al.2011.Enhancement of cellulase activity from a new strain of bacillus subtilis by medium optimization and analysis with various cellulosic substrates.Enzyme Research, 2011(2011): 151656.

    Ghose T K.1987.Measurement of cellulase activities.Pure & Applied Chemistry, 59(2): 257-268.

    Gupta P, Samant K, Sahu A.2012.Isolation of cellulose-degrading bacteria and determination of their cellulolytic potential.International Journal of Microbiology, 2012(6): 578925.

    Hahn-H?gerdal B, Galbe M, Gorwa-Grauslund M F,et al.2006.Bioethanol–the fuel of tomorrow from the residues of today.Trends in Biotechnology, 24(12): 549-556.

    Johnson J L.1994.Similarity analysis of DNAs.In: Gerhardt P,Murray R G E, Wood W A.Methods for general and molecular bacteriology.American Society for Micro-biology, Washington, DC.pp.656-682.

    Kamra D N.2005.Rumen microbial ecosystem.Current Science,89(1): 124-135.

    Kubicek C P.1982.β-glucosidase excretion byTrichoderma pseudokoningii: correlation with cell wall boundβ-1.3-glucanase activities.Archives of Microbiology, 132(4): 349-354.

    Lynd L R, Weimer P J, van Zyl W H,et al.2002.Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.Microbiology &Molecular Biology Reviews, 66(3): 506-577.

    Lynd L R, Cushman J H, Nichols R J,et al.1991.Fuel ethanol from cellulosic biomass.Science, 251(4999): 1318-1323.

    Mandels M, Andreotti R, Roche C.1976.Measurement of saccharifying cellulose.Biotechnology & Bioengineering Symposium, 16(6):21-33.

    Mcdonald J E, Rooks D J, Mccarthy A J.2012.Methods for the isolation of cellulose-degrading microorganisms.Methods in Enzymology,510: 349-374.

    Mohammed N, Onodera R, Or-Rashid M M.2003.Degradation of tryptophan and related indolic compounds by ruminal bacteria,protozoa and their mixturein vitro.Amino Acids, 24(1): 73-80.

    Ragauskas A J, Williams C K, Davison B H,et al.2006.The path forward for biofuels and biomaterials.Science, 311(5760): 484-490.

    Schwarz W.2001.The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria.Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 56(5):634-649.

    Strobel H J.2010.Basic laboratory culture methods for anaerobic bacteria.Humana Press, Biofuels.pp.247-261.

    Ulrich A, Wirth S.1999.Phylogenetic diversity and population densities of culturable cellulolytic soil bacteria across an agricultural encatchment.Microbial Ecology, 37(4): 238-247.

    Wenzel M, Sch?nig I, Berchtold M,et al.2002.Aerobic and facultatively anaerobic cellulolytic bacteria from the gut of the termiteZootermopsis angusticollis.Journal of Applied Microbiology, 92(1):32-40.

    Weisburg W G, Barns S M, Pelletier D A,et al.1991.16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study.Journal of Bacteriology,173(2): 697-703.

    尾随美女入室| 很黄的视频免费| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 免费大片18禁| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 十八禁网站免费在线| 波多野结衣高清作品| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 欧美性感艳星| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 日本 欧美在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲五月天丁香| 禁无遮挡网站| xxxwww97欧美| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 成年版毛片免费区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 熟女电影av网| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 在线a可以看的网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产三级在线视频| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产综合懂色| 小说图片视频综合网站| av国产免费在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 成年免费大片在线观看| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 热99re8久久精品国产| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲第一电影网av| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 在线国产一区二区在线| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 免费高清视频大片| av在线天堂中文字幕| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 1000部很黄的大片| 日韩强制内射视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美日本视频| 97碰自拍视频| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | av在线老鸭窝| 国产老妇女一区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产精品三级大全| 热99re8久久精品国产| 久久人妻av系列| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 嫩草影视91久久| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 亚洲精华国产精华精| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 69人妻影院| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 午夜福利在线在线| 嫩草影院新地址| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 一夜夜www| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久香蕉精品热| 99热网站在线观看| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| av黄色大香蕉| 日本成人三级电影网站| av国产免费在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 欧美人与善性xxx| 特级一级黄色大片| 久久6这里有精品| 综合色av麻豆| 日本一二三区视频观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 色综合婷婷激情| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 三级毛片av免费| 长腿黑丝高跟| 一a级毛片在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 午夜福利18| 国产三级中文精品| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 69av精品久久久久久| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲最大成人av| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲av成人av| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 一级黄片播放器| 午夜久久久久精精品| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲性久久影院| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 99热只有精品国产| 亚洲av熟女| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 黄色日韩在线| 天堂√8在线中文| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 99热精品在线国产| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 嫩草影院入口| 色综合婷婷激情| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 天堂动漫精品| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 级片在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产成人a区在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 99热网站在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 亚洲四区av| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 日本 欧美在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 乱人视频在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 精品人妻视频免费看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 九色国产91popny在线| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 一级av片app| 久久热精品热| 69av精品久久久久久| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美人与善性xxx| 午夜福利18| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 69av精品久久久久久| 尾随美女入室| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 日日夜夜操网爽| 热99在线观看视频| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 天堂网av新在线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 很黄的视频免费| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 免费av毛片视频| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 春色校园在线视频观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 露出奶头的视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产色婷婷99| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产高清激情床上av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 午夜福利欧美成人| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 精品国产三级普通话版| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 久久久国产成人免费| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 床上黄色一级片| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国产精品,欧美在线| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产不卡一卡二| 一级av片app| 精品人妻1区二区| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 小说图片视频综合网站| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 午夜老司机福利剧场| .国产精品久久| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 中国美女看黄片| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 欧美zozozo另类| 91狼人影院| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| av在线亚洲专区| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 内射极品少妇av片p| or卡值多少钱| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 中国美女看黄片| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 精品久久久久久久末码| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 免费观看精品视频网站| 少妇丰满av| 欧美3d第一页| 1000部很黄的大片| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 91在线观看av| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产成人影院久久av| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 草草在线视频免费看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 黄色一级大片看看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| 精品人妻1区二区| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲国产色片| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 97碰自拍视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 色5月婷婷丁香| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 亚洲 国产 在线| 春色校园在线视频观看| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 中文字幕久久专区| 香蕉av资源在线| 99久国产av精品| 日日啪夜夜撸| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 在线观看66精品国产| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产成人av教育| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 综合色av麻豆| 精品久久久噜噜| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 尾随美女入室| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 91av网一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国产综合懂色| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久九九热精品免费| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 搞女人的毛片| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲四区av| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 午夜福利欧美成人| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 91久久精品电影网| 久久久久国内视频| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲av一区综合| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 亚洲av美国av| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 99热网站在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久午夜福利片| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 床上黄色一级片| 窝窝影院91人妻| 久久精品影院6| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 十八禁网站免费在线| 中文字幕久久专区| 少妇的逼好多水| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 看片在线看免费视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 日韩欧美免费精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产精品一及| 男女那种视频在线观看| 色综合站精品国产| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产探花极品一区二区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲色图av天堂| 一本久久中文字幕| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 精品久久久噜噜| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 91狼人影院| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产真实乱freesex| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 能在线免费观看的黄片| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产老妇女一区| 成人av在线播放网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 免费av毛片视频| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜福利欧美成人| 直男gayav资源| 国产av不卡久久| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产成人av教育| 午夜福利18| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 国产精品,欧美在线| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久久久久大精品| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 韩国av在线不卡|