• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Soil physical properties degrade further on skid trails in the year following operations

    2018-03-27 12:10:00RaminNaghdiAhmadSolgiEricZennerFarshadKeivanBehjou
    Journal of Forestry Research 2018年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:耐受性靜置產(chǎn)氣

    Ramin Naghdi·Ahmad Solgi·Eric K.Zenner·Farshad Keivan Behjou

    Introduction

    Soil compaction is the physical consolidation of the soil by an applied force that destroys structure,reduces porosity,limits water and air in filtration,increases resistance to root penetration and nutrient acquisition(Greacen and Sands 1980;Quesnel and Curran 2000;Zhao et al.2010),and ultimately restrains plant growth(Meyer et al.2014;Kozlowski 1999).The magnitude of soil compaction depends on many factors,such as traf fic intensity,slope,site characteristics,harvesting machines,planning of skid roads and production season(Naghdi and Solgi 2014;Solgi and Naja fi2014;Naja fiet al.2009;Demir et al.2007;Eliasson and W?sterlund 2007;Laffan et al.2001).

    Traf fic intensity(the number of passes of a harvesting machine on a skid trail)plays an important role in compaction,because soil deformations typically increase with the number of passes and can lead to excessive soil disturbance(Solgi and Naja fi2014;Mosaddeghi et al.2000).Bulk densities are non-linearly related to traf fic intensities(Naja fiet al.2010;McNabb et al.1997),indicating that the majority of the surface compaction occurs during the first few passes,but the amount and depth to which bulk density may increase grows with more intensive traf fic(Brais and Camiré1998;Williamson and Neilsen 2000).Impacts of traf fic intensity can deteriorate soils even more on steeper slopes(Naja fiet al.2009),presumably because a given load develops a more uneven weight balance on the axles(usually the rear axle is weighted more heavily)during skidding operations on steeper terrain.Similarly with increased traf fic intensity,traf fic on steeper slopes can increase soil disturbance in both extent and depth(Naja fiet al.2009).

    While much is known about the negative effects of machine traf fic on the physical structure of forest soils(e.g.,Greacen and Sands 1980;Kozlowski 1999;Williamson and Neilsen 2000),much less is known about soil resilience to machine traf fic.Soil resilience,de fined as the ability of the soil to recover after a disturbance(Greenland and Szabolas 1994),depends primarily on natural soil processes(Froehlich and McNabb 1984).Processes such as swelling and shrinking as a result of moisture changes(humid-dry cycles),movement of soil particles due to cycles of freezing and thawing(including frost heave),and biological factors such as activities of soil biota and vegetation(particularly root penetration)aid the recovery of soil physical properties toward pre-disturbance conditions(Reisinger et al.1988).Three factors appear to be necessary for effective recovery processes:(1)the soil must be sensitive to the processes;(2)the climate must produce the temperature and moisture regimes necessary for the processes to occur;and,(3)the cycles or processes must occur with suf ficient frequency and duration(Froehlich and McNabb 1984).

    Despite the potential for recovery,natural recovery of compacted soil is a very complex and slow process that can take between 5 and 140 years depending on the soil type,degree of compaction,and climate(Greacen and Sands 1980;Froehlich et al.1985;Webb et al.1986;Rab 2004;Ezzati et al.2012).Under cool temperate conditions,the consequences of soil disturbance by harvest machinery may persist for decades in clay to silt loam soils(Froehlich et al.1985;Greacen and Sands 1980;Rab 2004).In addition to the necessary factors that drive effective recovery processes,recovery rates of soil physical properties are strongly in fluenced by soil type,vegetation,soil biota,and climate as well as by logging-related factors such as the degree of compaction and the depth of compacting layer(Ezzati et al.2012;Zenner et al.2007;Rab 2004;Webb 2002).For example,if the soil is not highly compacted,repetitions of alternate dry and wet periods can reduce compaction in a clay soil to a much higher degree than in sandy soils(Farrakh Nawaz et al.2013).Further,natural recovery of the top 10 cm of physically disturbed soil is possible at a more rapid pace than at lower depths where recovery processes are much slower due to reduced burrowing activities of macro-invertebrates associated with dung deposition that are most pronounced between the soil surface and a depth of about 5 cm(Drewry 2006).Because the short-term,natural recovery of the soil physical condition is typically restricted to surface layers(Drewry 2006),in this study we concentrated on the short-term recovery of these layers.Speci fically,we focused on the recovery of bulk density and porosity that closely re flect the effects of soil compaction and are regarded as the most important indicators for soil recovery(Heinonen 1977;Farrakh Nawaz et al.2013).

    Speci fic objectives of this study were:(1)to quantify the extent of compaction associated with different harvest traf fic intensities and different slope gradients using four important soil physical characteristics,(i.e.,bulk density,total porosity,macroporosity and microporosity);and,(2)to investigate whether the recovery of these soil characteristics 1 year following operations differed among plots subjected to different traf fic intensities on different slope gradients.

    Materials and methods

    Study site

    This research was conducted between June 2013 and June 2014 in the Shenrood Forest,Guilan province,northern Iran(36°59′N and 37°1′N and 50°3′E and 50°7′E).The harvested stand was mixed Oriental beech(Fagus orientalis Lipsky)and hornbeam(Carpinus betulus L.)with a canopy cover of 85%,a stand density of 180 trees/ha,an average diameter at breast height of 32.5 cm,and an average height of 21.8 m.The elevation of the research area is approximately 1400 m above sea level with a northerly aspectand an average annualrainfallof 1200 mm.Themaximum meanmonthlyrainfallof 120 mm usually occurs in October,while the minimum rainfall of 25 mm occurs in August.The mean annual temperature is 15°C,with the lowest values in February.At the time of skidding with an ‘Onezhets 110’crawler tractor(Table 1),weather conditions had been damp,with an average soil moisture content of 28%.One year after skidding(June 2014),the average soil moisture content was 21%.Texture was analyzed using the Bouyoucos hydrometer method and was determined to be clay loam along the skid trail.The soil had not been driven on before the experiment.

    Experimental design and data collection

    The initial effects of combining g frequency of skidder passes and trail slope gradients on soil physical properties were studied in comparison with undisturbed nearby areas.Recovery ofphysicalproperties was quanti fied bycomparing 1 year post-skidding soil bulk densities and porosities sampled in proximity to the original locations on skid trails to immediate post-skidding values and to values from undisturbed areas.Sampling was done along a skid trail that covered a range of longitudinal gradients,including portions without any lateral slope and a maximum slope of 31%in the steepest portion.To compare our results to previous findings,we combined our data into two classes(≤20%and>20%).Slope class≤20%included skid trail sections ranging from 3 to 15%,whereas the slope class>20%contained sections from 24 to 29%.In addition to the two slope gradients,treatment plots included three levels of skidder traf fic intensity:light,moderate and heavy(Fig.1).Each combination ofsoilgradient×traf fic intensity was replicated three times.

    Table 1 Features of the ‘Onezhets 110’tractor

    Moreover,for control purposes,samples were taken from an undisturbed area 50–60 m away from the skid trail(two tree lengths to reduce side impacts)not exposed to skidding impact.Hence,24 sampling plots(6 control and 18 sample plots)were established.Each was 10 m long by 4 m wide,with a minimum buffer of 5 m between each plot(Fig.1).Plots included four randomized 4-m wide samples placed across the wheel tracks perpendicular to the direction of travel,with a 2-m buffer zone between lines to ensure subsampling covered the entire plot.Along each line,one sample was taken from a depth of up to 10 cm at three different points:left track(LT),between track(BT),and right track(RT).Sampling was repeated 1 year later in locations that were within 30 cm of the previous year’s sample locations.

    Soil samples from 0 to 10 cm depth were collected,placed in polyethylene bags and brought to the laboratory for weighing.Samples were oven-dried at 105°C for 24 h and moisture content measured gravimetrically after drying(Kalra and Maynard 1991).

    (8) 低溫耐受性。向乙醇體積分數(shù)10%(V/V),pH值3.1,SO250 mg/L的模擬酒中接種酵母,于12,16℃條件下靜置培養(yǎng)48 h,記錄產(chǎn)氣體積[18]。

    Soil bulk density was calculated as:

    where Db is dry bulk density(g cm-3),Wdthe weight of the dry soil(g),and VC the volume of the soil cores(196.25 cm3).

    Fig.1 Sampling layout with four sample lines placed perpendicular to the direction of skidder traf fic.Sample plots were placed on top of the left wheel track(LWT),between the wheels(BWT),and on top of the right wheel track(RWT)

    Total soil porosity was calculated as:

    where AP is the total porosity(%),Db the dry bulk density(g cm-3),and 2.65(g cm-3)the particle density.

    Macroporosity was calculated as:

    where MP is the macroporosity(%),Db the dry bulk density(g cm-3),2.65(g cm-3)the particle density,and θmthe water content on a mass basis(%).

    Microporosity was calculated as:

    where MIP is the microporosity(%),AP the total porosity(%),and MP the macroporosity(%).

    Statistical analysis

    Two-way ANOVAs were performed using the SPSS 11.5 software to analyze the effects of traf fic intensity and gradient on soil physical responses.Mean values of soil physical properties of each plot were compared with those in undisturbed areas using Duncan’s multiple range test(Zar 1999).One-way ANOVA(signi ficance test criterion α≤0.05)compared soil physical properties amongst the three traf fic intensities(main effects)with those in undisturbed areas.Paired t-tests analyzed soil property data in the two sampling periods and in the two slope gradients for each period at an α-level of 0.05.

    Results

    Dry bulk density,total porosity,microporosity,and macroporosity showed statistically signi ficant differences between samples taken from skid trails at a depth of 0–10 cm and those from undisturbed areas(Table 2).

    Dry bulk density

    Average dry bulk densities across three traf fic intensities and two slope gradients increased from 0.7 g cm-3in undisturbed plotsto 1.26 g cm-3(0.96–1.49 g cm-3)immediately after skidding, and to 1.40 g cm-3(1.08–1.64 g cm-3)1 year after skidding(Tables 2,4).After 4,10,and 16 passes,average dry bulk density increased by 52,86,and 103%,respectively,compared to undisturbed areas.In both time periods,dry bulk density increased statistically signi ficantly with traf fic intensity(p<0.05)and skid trail slope(p<0.05),but traf fic intensity×skid trail slope interaction was not statistically signi ficant(Tables 3,4).Compared to values of dry bulk density immediately after skidding,no signi ficant reduction was detected on any portion of the skid trail 1 year after skidding.In fact,bulk density values in the top 10 cm of the soil pro file were greater(+11%)1 year after skidding than immediately after skidding,indicating that no recovery in had taken place since the initial disturbance(Figs.2,3).

    Total porosity

    Mean total porosity declined from 67%in undisturbed plots to 50%(40–59%)immediately after skidding and to 44%(33–57%)1 year later(Tables 2,4).In both time periods,total porosity was signi ficantly reduced with increasing traf fic intensity and slope gradient(Tables 3,4;Fig.4).In each traf fic intensity class,mean total porosity was consistently lower on steeper than on shallower slopes;the reduction in total porosity was more severe on steeper slopes for the same traf fic intensity.Compared to undisturbed and traf ficked areas immediately after skidding,no signi ficant recovery of total porosity was observed after 1 year in any of the traf fic intensity×slope gradient combinations.In fact,1 year after skidding,total porosity in the top 10 cm of the traf ficked pro file was a further 11%increased than immediately after skidding.

    Macroporosity

    Mean macroporosity decreased from 47%in undisturbed plots to 24%(13–34%)immediately after skidding and to 17%(5–32%)1 year after skidding(Tables 2,4).In both time periods,macroporosity was statistically signi ficantly reduced with increasing traf fic intensity(p<0.05)and slope gradient(p<0.05),but traf fic intensity×slope interaction was not signi ficant(Table 3).Macroporositywas considerably lower in traf ficked areas compared to undisturbed areas on both slopes(Fig.5)and on steeper ones regardless of traf fic intensity(Table 4).Compared to undisturbed and traf ficked areas immediately after skidding,macroporosity in the top 10 cm of the traf ficked soil pro file did not recover after 1 year in any of the traf fic intensity×slope gradient combinations and was a further 28%lower than immediately after skidding.

    Table 2 Average bulk density,total porosity,macroporosity,and microporosity in undisturbed areas and on skid trails,immediately after skidding operations(IAS)and 1 year later(IYAS)

    Table 3 P values based on analysis of variance on the effects of traf fic intensity,slope,and their interaction on different soil physical properties for two time periods

    Table 4 Mean values of different soil physical properties by time period(IAS:immediate after skidding;IYAS:1 year after skidding)for trails exposed to different traf fic intensities on two slope classes letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Fig.2 Mean bulk densities on slope classes averaged across traf fic intensity classes.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Fig.3 Mean bulk densities of trail sections exposed to different traf fic intensities averaged across gradient classes immediately termination and 1 year later.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Fig.4 Mean total porosity on skid trails exposed to different traf fic intensities averaged across slope classes immediately after termination of operations and 1 year later.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Fig.5 Mean macroporosity exposed to different traf fic intensities averaged across gradient classes immediately after and termination and 1 year later.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Microporosity

    Mean microporosity increased from 21%in undisturbed plots to 26%(24–27%)immediately after skidding and to 27%(25–31%)1 year later(Tables 2,4).In both time periods,microporosity increased signi ficantly with traf fic intensity(p<0.05)and slope gradient(p<0.05),but traf fic intensity×slope interaction was not signi ficant(Table 3).Microporosity increased in traf ficked compared to undisturbed areas on both slopes(Fig.6)and was signi ficantly greater on steeper than on more shallow slopes,regardless of traf fic(Table 4).Compared to undisturbed and traf ficked areas immediately after skidding,microporosity in the top 10 cm did not recover after 1 year in any of traf fic intensity×slope gradient combinations and was 5%greater than immediately after skidding.

    Fig.6 Mean microporosity exposed to different traf fic intensities averaged across gradient classes immediately after termination of operations and 1 year later.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Discussion

    Soil physical changes of increased bulk density,decreased total porosity and macroporosity,and increased microporosity observed in this study are neither unexpected nor new findings.When a crawler tractor with a weight of 11.2 t drives over a soft forest soil with an average moisture content of 28%,physics will inevitably lead to increased compaction with the accompanying features of reductions in total and macroporosity.The main result of this study,however,i.e.,the continued degradation of physical properties documented 1 year following the termination of operations,was not expected.This indicates that the recovery of soils following skidding is at best delayed,if not altogether compromised,by failing to properly retire abandoned skid trails,particularly on steeper slopes.

    Overall magnitudes of increase in soil compaction with increasing traf fic intensities,with most of the increases in compaction/bulk density or decreases in total/macroporosity occurring after the first few passes,are consistent with other studies that have similarly documented a>50%increase in bulk density after three passes and with continued but lower rates of increases thereafter(Ampoorter et al.2007;Zenner et al.2007;Naghdi and Solgi 2014).The reduction of total porosity is typical and occurs at the expense of the large air- filled pores in soil surface layers due to a conversion of soil macropores to micropores(Williamson and Neilsen 2000).The reduction in macropores is a typical effect of harvest traf fic(Rab 1996;Blouin et al.2005;Ezzati et al.2012).It is noteworthy that the<50%reduction of macropores and the<25%increase of micropores at moderate and severe traf fic levels is considerably lower than the 68–89%reduction in macropores and much more modest than the 75%increase in micropores reported for a similar soil exposed to moderate and severe compaction treatments(Shestak and Busse 2005).Nonetheless,signi ficant decreases in macroporosity and corresponding increases in microporosity have been shown to cause poor aeration,reduce permeability to water,produce waterlogged conditions,and inhibit gaseous exchange between soil and air(Greacen and Sands 1980).

    The signi ficantly more negative effects of harvest traf fic on bulk density,total porosity,and macroporosity on steeper slopes observed in this study have also been documented in other studies(e.g.,Naja fiet al.2009;Ezzati et al.2012;Jourgholami et al.2014;Solgi et al.2014).These negative effects are is most likely due to a different machine operation on steeper terrain that causes higher stress,particularly under the front chain track when the weight of the vehicle is transferred to a lower contact area(Marsili et al.1998).In addition,lower average travel speeds of machines on steeper slopes typically cause more transfer of engine vibration to the top soil and enhance adverse effects on soil physical properties(Naja fiet al.2009;Ezzati et al.2012;Solgi et al.2014).

    Without ameliorative treatments,natural recovery of a compacted soil is a slow process that can take many decades to return to pre-disturbance levels(Greacen and Sands 1980;Froehlich et al.1985;Webb et al.1986;Rab 2004;Webb 2002;Ezzati et al.2012).This is of particular concern in regions with milder climates such as the temperate forests of Iran that lack signi ficant freeze–thaw cycles that speed up recovery processes(cf.Froehlich and McNabb 1984).Freeze–thaw cycles may have contributed to a partial recovery in the upper 10-cm layer and a full recovery of the surface layer(to 5 cm)on trails affected by four or fewer passes in a climate with hot summers and cold winters in as few as 3 years after skidding(Zenner et al.2007).Fine-textured clay-loam soils in more temperate areas failed to recover to pre-harvest conditions even after 10 years(Page-Dumroese et al.2006).Such delayed recovery may occur because compaction breaks down soil particles and/or realigns them into more of a platy structure that allows them to fit closer together after traf fic(Johnson et al.2007).Therefore,our expectation that the effects of machine-induced compaction would persist for some years and would not exhibit a signi ficant recovery of physical propertieswithin 1 yearwaswell-supported by our research.The further deterioration of bulk density,total porosity,and macroporosity,and the magnitude of this deterioration(10–30%)over 1 year following closure of skid trails,was unexpected an most important result of this study that warrants further attention.

    Even though our expectation was that of a very modest recovery,there may in fact be several reasons to the further deterioration of soil physical properties.Compacted soils are often layered,with one layer being more compact and less permeable than others(Greacen and Sands 1980)and it is conceivable that the crawler tractor used for skidding in this study may have loosened the top layer to a depth of 2–3 cm from the lower,denser layer.This may have resulted in the erosion of the soft layer following rain events.Field capacity,which is to a great extent affected by microporosity,unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and their ordering and distribution between layers,can greatly affect water movement(Warkentin 1971).With continued compaction,a point is reached where the total porosity declines and is converted into relative increases in the proportion of micropores.This results in reduced volumetric water content at field capacity(Hill and Sumner 1967).Thus,soil compaction and reduced macroporosity can increase surface runoff due to reduced in filtration rates(Greacen and Sands 1980).In addition to changes in soil permeability,the loss of organic matter after canopy removal may also enhance the physical impact of raindrops on the exposed soil,which may explain the further deterioration of soil physical properties following traf fic of harvesting machinery(Page-Dumroese et al.2006).

    It has long been known that the speed of recovery of soil physical properties is primarily affected by the magnitude of compaction that occurs during skidding,and that the prevention of widespread compaction is best achieved through the designation of skid trails,the use of low impact equipment(i.e.,machines with low ground pressure),and the temporal limitation of operations to dry or frozen conditions(Greacen and Sands 1980).The reduction of adverse initial impacts of logging operations on soils,and especially soil displacement on skid trails is often accomplished by covering the soil with slash(Jourgholami et al.2014).In light of the findings in this study,covering skid trails with tree tops and slash might be viewed as a means to protect soils from further deterioration by reducing the physical impact of raindrops where organic matter has been removed and that are prone to surface erosion.Alternatively,mechanical treatment such as ripping and disking could be considered as the ultima ratio to reduce soil compaction and initiate the process of soil recovery(Farrakh Nawaz et al.2013).The latter approach would,however,be most successful if accompanied by the addition of organic matter through arti ficial seeding of deeprooting vegetation such as legumes or lucerne grasses that may speed recovery and improve the nitrogen status of compacted soil(Talha et al.1973).In light of our research results,it is important that foresters expand their views on cover crops following logging operations to include not only the long-term bene fits of improved soil nutrient status,but more importantly to consider cover crops as a means to act as a physical buffer against the physical force of rain drops on bare soil.We thus reiterate the recommendations by Greacen and Sands(1980)that several simple and inexpensive techniques to prevent and ameliorate soil compaction exist that could be readily incorporated in a post-logging management strategy.Though techniques for prevention and amelioration of soil compaction and proper retirement of skid trails are available,forest managers seem frequently unconvinced that the effort is worth-while.To change this perception,future studies need to investigate the mechanisms,magnitudes,and time frames over which unmanaged post-logging skid trails deteriorate and how this contrasts with properly retired skid trails.

    Conclusion

    As anticipated,harvest machinery increased soil bulk density and microporosity,and decreased total porosity and macroporosity in the top 10 cm of a clay-loam soil.Increased traf fic frequency and slope gradient increased adverse effects on bulk density,total porosity,macroporosity,and microporosity.Interestingly however,1 year after the skid trails were decommissioned,soil physical properties exhibited degradation levels in excess of those observed immediately after the cessation of skidding.Although we can only speculate on the mechanisms that led to this deterioration which we largely attribute to the physical force of rain drops on exposed soil surfaces,our research nonetheless demonstrates the consequences of the failure to properly retire the abandoned skid trails,which are most serious on steeper slopes.We conclude that forest engineers might want to utilize organic material to avoid enhanced levels of compaction in the first place and use cover crops,to not only aid in the recovery process of compacted soils,but to prevent further deterioration after the termination of skidding operations.

    Ampoorter E,Goris R,Cornelis WM,Verheyen K(2007)Impact of mechanized logging on compaction status of sandy forest soils.For Ecol Manage 241:162–174

    Blouin VM,Schmidt MG,Bulmer CE,Krzic M(2005)Mechanical disturbance impacts on soil properties and lodgepole pine growth in British Columbia’s central interior.Can J Soil Sci 85:681–691

    Brais S,CamiréC(1998)Soil compaction induced by careful logging in the clay belt region of northwestern Quebec(Canada).Can J Soil Sci 78:197–206

    Demir M,Makineci E,Yilmaz E(2007)Investigation of timber harvesting impacts on herbaceous cover,forest floor and surface soil properties on skid road in an oak(Quercus petrea L.)stand.Build Environ 42:1194–1199

    Drewry J(2006)Natural recovery of soil physical properties from treading damage of pastoral soils in New Zealand and Australia:a review.Agr Ecosyst Environ 114:159–169

    Eliasson L,W?sterlund I(2007)Effects of slash reinforcement of strip roads on rutting and soil compaction on a moist fine-grained soil.For Ecol Manage 252:118–123

    Ezzati S,Naja fiA,Rab MA,Zenner EK(2012)Recovery of soil bulk density,porosity and rutting from ground skidding over a 20-year period after timber harvesting in Iran.Silva Fenn 46:521–538

    Farrakh Nawaz M,BourriéG,Trolard F(2013)Soil compaction impact and modelling:a review.Agron Sustain Dev 33:291–309

    Froehlich HA,McNabb DH(1984)Minimizing soil compaction in Paci fic Northwest forests.In:Stone EL(ed)Forest soils and treatment impacts,proceedings of the 6th North American forest soils conference,Department of Forestry,Wildlife,and Fisheries,University of Tennessee,Knoxville,TN,pp 159–192

    Froehlich HA,Miles DWR,Robbins RW(1985)Soil bulk density recovery on compacted skid trails in Central Idaho.Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1015–1017

    Greacen EL,Sands R(1980)Compaction of forest soils:a review.Aust J Soil Res 18:163–189

    Greenland DJ,Szabolas I(1994)Soil resilience and sustainable land use.In:Proceedings of a symposium held in Budapest,CAB International,Wallingford,28 September to 2 October 1992

    Heinonen R(1977)Towards ‘normal’soil bulk density.Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:1214–1215

    Hill JNS,Sumner ME(1967)Effect of bulk density on moisture characteristics of soils.Soil Sci 103:234–238

    Johnson LR,Page-Dumroese D,Han HS(2007)Effects of machine traf fic on the physical properties of ash-cap soils.In:USDA Forest Service Proceedings,RMRS-P-44.pp 14

    Jourgholami M,Soltanpour S,Etehadi Abari A,Zenner EK(2014)In fluence of slope on physical soil disturbance due to farm tractor forwarding in a Hyrcanian forest of northern Iran.iForest Biogeosci For 7:342–348

    Kalra YP,Maynard DG(1991)Methods and manual for forest soil and plant analysis.Forestry Canada,Re NOR-X-319.Northern Forestry Center

    Kozlowski TT(1999)Soil compaction and growth of woody plants.Scand J For Res 14:596–619

    Laffan M,Jordan G,Duhig N(2001)Impacts on soils from cablelogging steep slopes in northeastern Tasmania,Australia.For Ecol Manag 144:91–99

    Marsili A,Servadio P,Pagliai M,Vignozzi N(1998)Change of some physical properties of a clay soil following passage of rubberand metal-tracked tractors.Soil Tillage Res 49:185–199

    McNabb KL,Miller MS,Lockaby BG,Stokes BJ,Clawson RG,Stanturf JA,Silva JNM(1997)Selection harvest in Amazonian rainforest:long term impacts on soil properties.For Ecol Manag 93:153–160

    Meyer C,Lüscher P,Schulin R(2014)Recovery of forest soil from compaction in skid tracks planted with black alder(Alnus glutinosa(L.)Gaertn).Soil Tillage Res 143:7–16

    Mosaddeghi MR,Hajabbasi MA,Hemmat A,Afyuni M(2000)Soil compactibility as affected by soil moisture content and farmyard manure in central Iran.Soil Tillage Res 55:87–97

    Naghdi R,Solgi A(2014)Effects of skidder passes and slope on soil disturbance in two soil water contents.Croati J For Eng 35:73–80

    Naja fiA,Solgi A,Sadeghi SH(2009)Soil disturbance following four wheel rubber skidder logging on the steep trail in the north mountainous forest of Iran.Soil Tillage Res 103:165–169

    Naja fiA,Solgi A,Sadeghi SH(2010)Effects of skid trail slope and ground skidding on soil disturbance.Casp J Environ Sci 8:13–23

    Page-Dumroese DS,Jurgensen MF,Tiarks AE,Ponder F Jr,Sanchez FG,Fleming RL,Kranabetter JM,Powers RF,Stone DM,Elioff JD,Scott DA(2006)Soil physical property changes at the North American long-term soil productivity study sites:1 and 5 years after compaction.Can J For Res 36:551–564

    Quesnel HJ,Curran MP(2000)Shelterwood harvesting in rootdisease infected stands–post-harvest soil disturbance and compaction.For Ecol Manag 133:89–113

    Rab MA(1996)Soil physical and hydrological properties following logging and slash burning in the Eucalyptus regnans forest of southeastern Australia.For Ecol Manag 84:159–176

    Rab MA(2004)Recovery of soil physical properties from compaction and soil pro file disturbance caused by logging of native forest in Victorian centralhighlands,Australia.ForEcolManag 191:329–340

    Reisinger TW,Simmons GL,Pope PE(1988)The impact of timber harvesting on soil properties and seedling growth in the south.South J Appl For 12:58–67

    Shestak CJ,Busse MD(2005)Compaction alters physical but not biological indices of soil health.Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:236–246

    Solgi A,Naja fiA(2014)The impacts of ground-based logging equipment on forest soil.J For Sci 60:28–34

    Solgi A,Naja fiA,Sam Daliri H(2013)Assessment of crawler tractor effects on soil surface properties.Casp J Environ Sci 11:185–193

    Solgi A,Naja fiA,Sadeghi SH(2014)Effects of traf fic frequency and skid trail slope on surface runoff and sediment yield.Int J For Eng 25:171–178

    Talha M,Eldamaty AM,El-Gala AM,Abe-Zayed IS(1973)Changes in physical properties of virgin calcareous soil by several seasons of alfalfa cultivation.Z P flanz.Bodenkunde 137:2–5

    Warkentin BP (1971)Effects of compaction on content and transmission of water in soils.In:Compaction of agricultural soils.American Society of Agricultural Engineering Monograph,pp 126–153

    Webb RH(2002)Recovery of severely compacted soils in the Mojave desert,California(USA).Arid Land Res Manag 16:291–305

    Webb RH,Stiger JW,Wilshire HG(1986)Recovery of compacted soils in Mojave Desert ghost towns.Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1341–1344

    Williamson JR,Neilsen WA(2000)The in fluence of forest site on rate and extent of soil compaction andpro file disturbance of skid trails during ground-based harvesting.Can J For Res 30:1196–1205

    Zar JH(1999)Biostatistical analysis,4th edn.Prentice Hall,Upper Saddle River

    Zenner EK,Fauskee JT,Berger AL,Puettmann KJ(2007)Impacts of skidding traf fic intensity on soil disturbance,soil recovery,and aspen regeneration in north central Minnesota.North J Appl For 24:177–183

    Zhao Y,Krzic M,Bulmer CE,Schmidt MG,Simard SW(2010)Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its in fluence on tree height.Can J For Res 40:1724–1734

    猜你喜歡
    耐受性靜置產(chǎn)氣
    濕垃圾與病死豬混合厭氧消化產(chǎn)氣性能研究
    靜置狀態(tài)蓄冷水箱斜溫層的實驗與模擬研究
    煤氣與熱力(2021年4期)2021-06-09 06:16:56
    4個地被菊新品系對濕熱脅迫的耐受性研究
    園林科技(2020年2期)2020-01-18 03:28:18
    Meso-mechanical model of concrete under a penetration load
    巴氏醋桿菌核酸修復(fù)酶UvrA對大腸桿菌耐受性的影響
    煤層氣排采產(chǎn)氣通道適度攜煤粉理論
    miR-29b通過靶向PI3K/Akt信號通路降低胃癌細胞對順鉑的耐受性
    阿米替林治療腦卒中后中樞痛的療效和耐受性分析
    橋梁群樁基礎(chǔ)壓力注漿靜置時間預(yù)測試驗
    產(chǎn)氣剖面測試在蘇里格氣田東區(qū)的應(yīng)用
    亚洲国产精品国产精品| 一级爰片在线观看| 只有这里有精品99| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲性久久影院| 午夜视频国产福利| 午夜视频国产福利| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久久久久久精品精品| 成年免费大片在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品 | 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产老妇女一区| 久久久成人免费电影| 久久97久久精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 中国国产av一级| a级毛色黄片| 熟女av电影| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 夫妻午夜视频| 日本黄色片子视频| 搞女人的毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 一级毛片电影观看| 性色av一级| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 深夜a级毛片| 久久久久久久精品精品| 日日啪夜夜爽| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 五月天丁香电影| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 69人妻影院| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 三级国产精品片| av在线亚洲专区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 嫩草影院入口| videos熟女内射| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产一级毛片在线| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| av免费在线看不卡| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 成年免费大片在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产极品天堂在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 精品久久久噜噜| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲成色77777| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 直男gayav资源| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产视频内射| 熟女电影av网| 中国国产av一级| 91精品国产九色| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 日本免费在线观看一区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 两个人的视频大全免费| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 熟女av电影| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| h日本视频在线播放| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲无线观看免费| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 五月天丁香电影| 内射极品少妇av片p| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 日韩av免费高清视频| 成人二区视频| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 成人无遮挡网站| 少妇的逼水好多| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产精品成人在线| 久久久久网色| 三级经典国产精品| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 深夜a级毛片| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 色综合色国产| 久久影院123| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日本色播在线视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美激情在线99| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 直男gayav资源| freevideosex欧美| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 高清毛片免费看| 国产乱人视频| 毛片女人毛片| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日韩强制内射视频| 99久久人妻综合| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 一级a做视频免费观看| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| freevideosex欧美| 久久久久精品性色| av.在线天堂| 综合色丁香网| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| av在线观看视频网站免费| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美人与善性xxx| 高清av免费在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 只有这里有精品99| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 人妻系列 视频| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 欧美3d第一页| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 91狼人影院| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 秋霞伦理黄片| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 成人综合一区亚洲| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 成人国产av品久久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产毛片在线视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 只有这里有精品99| 国产视频内射| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 69人妻影院| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | av在线蜜桃| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 三级经典国产精品| 久久6这里有精品| 伦精品一区二区三区| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 成人欧美大片| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产在线男女| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产在线男女| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 尾随美女入室| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 综合色丁香网| 岛国毛片在线播放| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲成色77777| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 免费看光身美女| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产成人freesex在线| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 老司机影院毛片| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 色网站视频免费| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 三级经典国产精品| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久久久久伊人网av| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 91精品国产九色| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| www.色视频.com| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 精品久久久久久久久av| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产综合懂色| 一级a做视频免费观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 嫩草影院精品99| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 免费av不卡在线播放| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 永久免费av网站大全| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 香蕉精品网在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久久久久久国产电影| 成人国产av品久久久| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | tube8黄色片| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 午夜免费观看性视频| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 日韩伦理黄色片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| av线在线观看网站| 亚州av有码| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 免费少妇av软件| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产在线男女| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 亚洲综合精品二区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 少妇 在线观看| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲图色成人| 在线观看三级黄色| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 欧美激情在线99| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 日本免费在线观看一区| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 黄片wwwwww| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产av不卡久久| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产av不卡久久| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 老司机影院成人| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 舔av片在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 欧美另类一区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 在线观看三级黄色| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 精品久久久噜噜| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 少妇的逼好多水| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 赤兔流量卡办理| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 免费av毛片视频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 大码成人一级视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 男女国产视频网站| 久久久久久久久久成人| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| .国产精品久久| 久久午夜福利片| 欧美区成人在线视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 一本一本综合久久| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产高潮美女av| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 成人二区视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 99热这里只有精品一区| 草草在线视频免费看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 性色av一级| av播播在线观看一区| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 亚洲不卡免费看| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲成色77777| 久久精品夜色国产| 精品国产三级普通话版| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产成人精品福利久久| 亚洲国产色片| 少妇丰满av| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产乱来视频区| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲精品一二三| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| av在线app专区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 久久久久九九精品影院| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 久久久久久久精品精品| av在线蜜桃| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 日本黄大片高清| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 在线观看国产h片| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 91精品国产九色| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| av免费观看日本| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 久久久久九九精品影院| av免费观看日本| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产在视频线精品| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 欧美潮喷喷水| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲在线观看片| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看|