• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Soil physical properties degrade further on skid trails in the year following operations

    2018-03-27 12:10:00RaminNaghdiAhmadSolgiEricZennerFarshadKeivanBehjou
    Journal of Forestry Research 2018年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:耐受性靜置產(chǎn)氣

    Ramin Naghdi·Ahmad Solgi·Eric K.Zenner·Farshad Keivan Behjou

    Introduction

    Soil compaction is the physical consolidation of the soil by an applied force that destroys structure,reduces porosity,limits water and air in filtration,increases resistance to root penetration and nutrient acquisition(Greacen and Sands 1980;Quesnel and Curran 2000;Zhao et al.2010),and ultimately restrains plant growth(Meyer et al.2014;Kozlowski 1999).The magnitude of soil compaction depends on many factors,such as traf fic intensity,slope,site characteristics,harvesting machines,planning of skid roads and production season(Naghdi and Solgi 2014;Solgi and Naja fi2014;Naja fiet al.2009;Demir et al.2007;Eliasson and W?sterlund 2007;Laffan et al.2001).

    Traf fic intensity(the number of passes of a harvesting machine on a skid trail)plays an important role in compaction,because soil deformations typically increase with the number of passes and can lead to excessive soil disturbance(Solgi and Naja fi2014;Mosaddeghi et al.2000).Bulk densities are non-linearly related to traf fic intensities(Naja fiet al.2010;McNabb et al.1997),indicating that the majority of the surface compaction occurs during the first few passes,but the amount and depth to which bulk density may increase grows with more intensive traf fic(Brais and Camiré1998;Williamson and Neilsen 2000).Impacts of traf fic intensity can deteriorate soils even more on steeper slopes(Naja fiet al.2009),presumably because a given load develops a more uneven weight balance on the axles(usually the rear axle is weighted more heavily)during skidding operations on steeper terrain.Similarly with increased traf fic intensity,traf fic on steeper slopes can increase soil disturbance in both extent and depth(Naja fiet al.2009).

    While much is known about the negative effects of machine traf fic on the physical structure of forest soils(e.g.,Greacen and Sands 1980;Kozlowski 1999;Williamson and Neilsen 2000),much less is known about soil resilience to machine traf fic.Soil resilience,de fined as the ability of the soil to recover after a disturbance(Greenland and Szabolas 1994),depends primarily on natural soil processes(Froehlich and McNabb 1984).Processes such as swelling and shrinking as a result of moisture changes(humid-dry cycles),movement of soil particles due to cycles of freezing and thawing(including frost heave),and biological factors such as activities of soil biota and vegetation(particularly root penetration)aid the recovery of soil physical properties toward pre-disturbance conditions(Reisinger et al.1988).Three factors appear to be necessary for effective recovery processes:(1)the soil must be sensitive to the processes;(2)the climate must produce the temperature and moisture regimes necessary for the processes to occur;and,(3)the cycles or processes must occur with suf ficient frequency and duration(Froehlich and McNabb 1984).

    Despite the potential for recovery,natural recovery of compacted soil is a very complex and slow process that can take between 5 and 140 years depending on the soil type,degree of compaction,and climate(Greacen and Sands 1980;Froehlich et al.1985;Webb et al.1986;Rab 2004;Ezzati et al.2012).Under cool temperate conditions,the consequences of soil disturbance by harvest machinery may persist for decades in clay to silt loam soils(Froehlich et al.1985;Greacen and Sands 1980;Rab 2004).In addition to the necessary factors that drive effective recovery processes,recovery rates of soil physical properties are strongly in fluenced by soil type,vegetation,soil biota,and climate as well as by logging-related factors such as the degree of compaction and the depth of compacting layer(Ezzati et al.2012;Zenner et al.2007;Rab 2004;Webb 2002).For example,if the soil is not highly compacted,repetitions of alternate dry and wet periods can reduce compaction in a clay soil to a much higher degree than in sandy soils(Farrakh Nawaz et al.2013).Further,natural recovery of the top 10 cm of physically disturbed soil is possible at a more rapid pace than at lower depths where recovery processes are much slower due to reduced burrowing activities of macro-invertebrates associated with dung deposition that are most pronounced between the soil surface and a depth of about 5 cm(Drewry 2006).Because the short-term,natural recovery of the soil physical condition is typically restricted to surface layers(Drewry 2006),in this study we concentrated on the short-term recovery of these layers.Speci fically,we focused on the recovery of bulk density and porosity that closely re flect the effects of soil compaction and are regarded as the most important indicators for soil recovery(Heinonen 1977;Farrakh Nawaz et al.2013).

    Speci fic objectives of this study were:(1)to quantify the extent of compaction associated with different harvest traf fic intensities and different slope gradients using four important soil physical characteristics,(i.e.,bulk density,total porosity,macroporosity and microporosity);and,(2)to investigate whether the recovery of these soil characteristics 1 year following operations differed among plots subjected to different traf fic intensities on different slope gradients.

    Materials and methods

    Study site

    This research was conducted between June 2013 and June 2014 in the Shenrood Forest,Guilan province,northern Iran(36°59′N and 37°1′N and 50°3′E and 50°7′E).The harvested stand was mixed Oriental beech(Fagus orientalis Lipsky)and hornbeam(Carpinus betulus L.)with a canopy cover of 85%,a stand density of 180 trees/ha,an average diameter at breast height of 32.5 cm,and an average height of 21.8 m.The elevation of the research area is approximately 1400 m above sea level with a northerly aspectand an average annualrainfallof 1200 mm.Themaximum meanmonthlyrainfallof 120 mm usually occurs in October,while the minimum rainfall of 25 mm occurs in August.The mean annual temperature is 15°C,with the lowest values in February.At the time of skidding with an ‘Onezhets 110’crawler tractor(Table 1),weather conditions had been damp,with an average soil moisture content of 28%.One year after skidding(June 2014),the average soil moisture content was 21%.Texture was analyzed using the Bouyoucos hydrometer method and was determined to be clay loam along the skid trail.The soil had not been driven on before the experiment.

    Experimental design and data collection

    The initial effects of combining g frequency of skidder passes and trail slope gradients on soil physical properties were studied in comparison with undisturbed nearby areas.Recovery ofphysicalproperties was quanti fied bycomparing 1 year post-skidding soil bulk densities and porosities sampled in proximity to the original locations on skid trails to immediate post-skidding values and to values from undisturbed areas.Sampling was done along a skid trail that covered a range of longitudinal gradients,including portions without any lateral slope and a maximum slope of 31%in the steepest portion.To compare our results to previous findings,we combined our data into two classes(≤20%and>20%).Slope class≤20%included skid trail sections ranging from 3 to 15%,whereas the slope class>20%contained sections from 24 to 29%.In addition to the two slope gradients,treatment plots included three levels of skidder traf fic intensity:light,moderate and heavy(Fig.1).Each combination ofsoilgradient×traf fic intensity was replicated three times.

    Table 1 Features of the ‘Onezhets 110’tractor

    Moreover,for control purposes,samples were taken from an undisturbed area 50–60 m away from the skid trail(two tree lengths to reduce side impacts)not exposed to skidding impact.Hence,24 sampling plots(6 control and 18 sample plots)were established.Each was 10 m long by 4 m wide,with a minimum buffer of 5 m between each plot(Fig.1).Plots included four randomized 4-m wide samples placed across the wheel tracks perpendicular to the direction of travel,with a 2-m buffer zone between lines to ensure subsampling covered the entire plot.Along each line,one sample was taken from a depth of up to 10 cm at three different points:left track(LT),between track(BT),and right track(RT).Sampling was repeated 1 year later in locations that were within 30 cm of the previous year’s sample locations.

    Soil samples from 0 to 10 cm depth were collected,placed in polyethylene bags and brought to the laboratory for weighing.Samples were oven-dried at 105°C for 24 h and moisture content measured gravimetrically after drying(Kalra and Maynard 1991).

    (8) 低溫耐受性。向乙醇體積分數(shù)10%(V/V),pH值3.1,SO250 mg/L的模擬酒中接種酵母,于12,16℃條件下靜置培養(yǎng)48 h,記錄產(chǎn)氣體積[18]。

    Soil bulk density was calculated as:

    where Db is dry bulk density(g cm-3),Wdthe weight of the dry soil(g),and VC the volume of the soil cores(196.25 cm3).

    Fig.1 Sampling layout with four sample lines placed perpendicular to the direction of skidder traf fic.Sample plots were placed on top of the left wheel track(LWT),between the wheels(BWT),and on top of the right wheel track(RWT)

    Total soil porosity was calculated as:

    where AP is the total porosity(%),Db the dry bulk density(g cm-3),and 2.65(g cm-3)the particle density.

    Macroporosity was calculated as:

    where MP is the macroporosity(%),Db the dry bulk density(g cm-3),2.65(g cm-3)the particle density,and θmthe water content on a mass basis(%).

    Microporosity was calculated as:

    where MIP is the microporosity(%),AP the total porosity(%),and MP the macroporosity(%).

    Statistical analysis

    Two-way ANOVAs were performed using the SPSS 11.5 software to analyze the effects of traf fic intensity and gradient on soil physical responses.Mean values of soil physical properties of each plot were compared with those in undisturbed areas using Duncan’s multiple range test(Zar 1999).One-way ANOVA(signi ficance test criterion α≤0.05)compared soil physical properties amongst the three traf fic intensities(main effects)with those in undisturbed areas.Paired t-tests analyzed soil property data in the two sampling periods and in the two slope gradients for each period at an α-level of 0.05.

    Results

    Dry bulk density,total porosity,microporosity,and macroporosity showed statistically signi ficant differences between samples taken from skid trails at a depth of 0–10 cm and those from undisturbed areas(Table 2).

    Dry bulk density

    Average dry bulk densities across three traf fic intensities and two slope gradients increased from 0.7 g cm-3in undisturbed plotsto 1.26 g cm-3(0.96–1.49 g cm-3)immediately after skidding, and to 1.40 g cm-3(1.08–1.64 g cm-3)1 year after skidding(Tables 2,4).After 4,10,and 16 passes,average dry bulk density increased by 52,86,and 103%,respectively,compared to undisturbed areas.In both time periods,dry bulk density increased statistically signi ficantly with traf fic intensity(p<0.05)and skid trail slope(p<0.05),but traf fic intensity×skid trail slope interaction was not statistically signi ficant(Tables 3,4).Compared to values of dry bulk density immediately after skidding,no signi ficant reduction was detected on any portion of the skid trail 1 year after skidding.In fact,bulk density values in the top 10 cm of the soil pro file were greater(+11%)1 year after skidding than immediately after skidding,indicating that no recovery in had taken place since the initial disturbance(Figs.2,3).

    Total porosity

    Mean total porosity declined from 67%in undisturbed plots to 50%(40–59%)immediately after skidding and to 44%(33–57%)1 year later(Tables 2,4).In both time periods,total porosity was signi ficantly reduced with increasing traf fic intensity and slope gradient(Tables 3,4;Fig.4).In each traf fic intensity class,mean total porosity was consistently lower on steeper than on shallower slopes;the reduction in total porosity was more severe on steeper slopes for the same traf fic intensity.Compared to undisturbed and traf ficked areas immediately after skidding,no signi ficant recovery of total porosity was observed after 1 year in any of the traf fic intensity×slope gradient combinations.In fact,1 year after skidding,total porosity in the top 10 cm of the traf ficked pro file was a further 11%increased than immediately after skidding.

    Macroporosity

    Mean macroporosity decreased from 47%in undisturbed plots to 24%(13–34%)immediately after skidding and to 17%(5–32%)1 year after skidding(Tables 2,4).In both time periods,macroporosity was statistically signi ficantly reduced with increasing traf fic intensity(p<0.05)and slope gradient(p<0.05),but traf fic intensity×slope interaction was not signi ficant(Table 3).Macroporositywas considerably lower in traf ficked areas compared to undisturbed areas on both slopes(Fig.5)and on steeper ones regardless of traf fic intensity(Table 4).Compared to undisturbed and traf ficked areas immediately after skidding,macroporosity in the top 10 cm of the traf ficked soil pro file did not recover after 1 year in any of the traf fic intensity×slope gradient combinations and was a further 28%lower than immediately after skidding.

    Table 2 Average bulk density,total porosity,macroporosity,and microporosity in undisturbed areas and on skid trails,immediately after skidding operations(IAS)and 1 year later(IYAS)

    Table 3 P values based on analysis of variance on the effects of traf fic intensity,slope,and their interaction on different soil physical properties for two time periods

    Table 4 Mean values of different soil physical properties by time period(IAS:immediate after skidding;IYAS:1 year after skidding)for trails exposed to different traf fic intensities on two slope classes letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Fig.2 Mean bulk densities on slope classes averaged across traf fic intensity classes.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Fig.3 Mean bulk densities of trail sections exposed to different traf fic intensities averaged across gradient classes immediately termination and 1 year later.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Fig.4 Mean total porosity on skid trails exposed to different traf fic intensities averaged across slope classes immediately after termination of operations and 1 year later.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Fig.5 Mean macroporosity exposed to different traf fic intensities averaged across gradient classes immediately after and termination and 1 year later.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Microporosity

    Mean microporosity increased from 21%in undisturbed plots to 26%(24–27%)immediately after skidding and to 27%(25–31%)1 year later(Tables 2,4).In both time periods,microporosity increased signi ficantly with traf fic intensity(p<0.05)and slope gradient(p<0.05),but traf fic intensity×slope interaction was not signi ficant(Table 3).Microporosity increased in traf ficked compared to undisturbed areas on both slopes(Fig.6)and was signi ficantly greater on steeper than on more shallow slopes,regardless of traf fic(Table 4).Compared to undisturbed and traf ficked areas immediately after skidding,microporosity in the top 10 cm did not recover after 1 year in any of traf fic intensity×slope gradient combinations and was 5%greater than immediately after skidding.

    Fig.6 Mean microporosity exposed to different traf fic intensities averaged across gradient classes immediately after termination of operations and 1 year later.Letters indicate statistically signi ficant differences(α ≤ 0.05)among group means based on Duncan’s multiple range test

    Discussion

    Soil physical changes of increased bulk density,decreased total porosity and macroporosity,and increased microporosity observed in this study are neither unexpected nor new findings.When a crawler tractor with a weight of 11.2 t drives over a soft forest soil with an average moisture content of 28%,physics will inevitably lead to increased compaction with the accompanying features of reductions in total and macroporosity.The main result of this study,however,i.e.,the continued degradation of physical properties documented 1 year following the termination of operations,was not expected.This indicates that the recovery of soils following skidding is at best delayed,if not altogether compromised,by failing to properly retire abandoned skid trails,particularly on steeper slopes.

    Overall magnitudes of increase in soil compaction with increasing traf fic intensities,with most of the increases in compaction/bulk density or decreases in total/macroporosity occurring after the first few passes,are consistent with other studies that have similarly documented a>50%increase in bulk density after three passes and with continued but lower rates of increases thereafter(Ampoorter et al.2007;Zenner et al.2007;Naghdi and Solgi 2014).The reduction of total porosity is typical and occurs at the expense of the large air- filled pores in soil surface layers due to a conversion of soil macropores to micropores(Williamson and Neilsen 2000).The reduction in macropores is a typical effect of harvest traf fic(Rab 1996;Blouin et al.2005;Ezzati et al.2012).It is noteworthy that the<50%reduction of macropores and the<25%increase of micropores at moderate and severe traf fic levels is considerably lower than the 68–89%reduction in macropores and much more modest than the 75%increase in micropores reported for a similar soil exposed to moderate and severe compaction treatments(Shestak and Busse 2005).Nonetheless,signi ficant decreases in macroporosity and corresponding increases in microporosity have been shown to cause poor aeration,reduce permeability to water,produce waterlogged conditions,and inhibit gaseous exchange between soil and air(Greacen and Sands 1980).

    The signi ficantly more negative effects of harvest traf fic on bulk density,total porosity,and macroporosity on steeper slopes observed in this study have also been documented in other studies(e.g.,Naja fiet al.2009;Ezzati et al.2012;Jourgholami et al.2014;Solgi et al.2014).These negative effects are is most likely due to a different machine operation on steeper terrain that causes higher stress,particularly under the front chain track when the weight of the vehicle is transferred to a lower contact area(Marsili et al.1998).In addition,lower average travel speeds of machines on steeper slopes typically cause more transfer of engine vibration to the top soil and enhance adverse effects on soil physical properties(Naja fiet al.2009;Ezzati et al.2012;Solgi et al.2014).

    Without ameliorative treatments,natural recovery of a compacted soil is a slow process that can take many decades to return to pre-disturbance levels(Greacen and Sands 1980;Froehlich et al.1985;Webb et al.1986;Rab 2004;Webb 2002;Ezzati et al.2012).This is of particular concern in regions with milder climates such as the temperate forests of Iran that lack signi ficant freeze–thaw cycles that speed up recovery processes(cf.Froehlich and McNabb 1984).Freeze–thaw cycles may have contributed to a partial recovery in the upper 10-cm layer and a full recovery of the surface layer(to 5 cm)on trails affected by four or fewer passes in a climate with hot summers and cold winters in as few as 3 years after skidding(Zenner et al.2007).Fine-textured clay-loam soils in more temperate areas failed to recover to pre-harvest conditions even after 10 years(Page-Dumroese et al.2006).Such delayed recovery may occur because compaction breaks down soil particles and/or realigns them into more of a platy structure that allows them to fit closer together after traf fic(Johnson et al.2007).Therefore,our expectation that the effects of machine-induced compaction would persist for some years and would not exhibit a signi ficant recovery of physical propertieswithin 1 yearwaswell-supported by our research.The further deterioration of bulk density,total porosity,and macroporosity,and the magnitude of this deterioration(10–30%)over 1 year following closure of skid trails,was unexpected an most important result of this study that warrants further attention.

    Even though our expectation was that of a very modest recovery,there may in fact be several reasons to the further deterioration of soil physical properties.Compacted soils are often layered,with one layer being more compact and less permeable than others(Greacen and Sands 1980)and it is conceivable that the crawler tractor used for skidding in this study may have loosened the top layer to a depth of 2–3 cm from the lower,denser layer.This may have resulted in the erosion of the soft layer following rain events.Field capacity,which is to a great extent affected by microporosity,unsaturated hydraulic conductivity and their ordering and distribution between layers,can greatly affect water movement(Warkentin 1971).With continued compaction,a point is reached where the total porosity declines and is converted into relative increases in the proportion of micropores.This results in reduced volumetric water content at field capacity(Hill and Sumner 1967).Thus,soil compaction and reduced macroporosity can increase surface runoff due to reduced in filtration rates(Greacen and Sands 1980).In addition to changes in soil permeability,the loss of organic matter after canopy removal may also enhance the physical impact of raindrops on the exposed soil,which may explain the further deterioration of soil physical properties following traf fic of harvesting machinery(Page-Dumroese et al.2006).

    It has long been known that the speed of recovery of soil physical properties is primarily affected by the magnitude of compaction that occurs during skidding,and that the prevention of widespread compaction is best achieved through the designation of skid trails,the use of low impact equipment(i.e.,machines with low ground pressure),and the temporal limitation of operations to dry or frozen conditions(Greacen and Sands 1980).The reduction of adverse initial impacts of logging operations on soils,and especially soil displacement on skid trails is often accomplished by covering the soil with slash(Jourgholami et al.2014).In light of the findings in this study,covering skid trails with tree tops and slash might be viewed as a means to protect soils from further deterioration by reducing the physical impact of raindrops where organic matter has been removed and that are prone to surface erosion.Alternatively,mechanical treatment such as ripping and disking could be considered as the ultima ratio to reduce soil compaction and initiate the process of soil recovery(Farrakh Nawaz et al.2013).The latter approach would,however,be most successful if accompanied by the addition of organic matter through arti ficial seeding of deeprooting vegetation such as legumes or lucerne grasses that may speed recovery and improve the nitrogen status of compacted soil(Talha et al.1973).In light of our research results,it is important that foresters expand their views on cover crops following logging operations to include not only the long-term bene fits of improved soil nutrient status,but more importantly to consider cover crops as a means to act as a physical buffer against the physical force of rain drops on bare soil.We thus reiterate the recommendations by Greacen and Sands(1980)that several simple and inexpensive techniques to prevent and ameliorate soil compaction exist that could be readily incorporated in a post-logging management strategy.Though techniques for prevention and amelioration of soil compaction and proper retirement of skid trails are available,forest managers seem frequently unconvinced that the effort is worth-while.To change this perception,future studies need to investigate the mechanisms,magnitudes,and time frames over which unmanaged post-logging skid trails deteriorate and how this contrasts with properly retired skid trails.

    Conclusion

    As anticipated,harvest machinery increased soil bulk density and microporosity,and decreased total porosity and macroporosity in the top 10 cm of a clay-loam soil.Increased traf fic frequency and slope gradient increased adverse effects on bulk density,total porosity,macroporosity,and microporosity.Interestingly however,1 year after the skid trails were decommissioned,soil physical properties exhibited degradation levels in excess of those observed immediately after the cessation of skidding.Although we can only speculate on the mechanisms that led to this deterioration which we largely attribute to the physical force of rain drops on exposed soil surfaces,our research nonetheless demonstrates the consequences of the failure to properly retire the abandoned skid trails,which are most serious on steeper slopes.We conclude that forest engineers might want to utilize organic material to avoid enhanced levels of compaction in the first place and use cover crops,to not only aid in the recovery process of compacted soils,but to prevent further deterioration after the termination of skidding operations.

    Ampoorter E,Goris R,Cornelis WM,Verheyen K(2007)Impact of mechanized logging on compaction status of sandy forest soils.For Ecol Manage 241:162–174

    Blouin VM,Schmidt MG,Bulmer CE,Krzic M(2005)Mechanical disturbance impacts on soil properties and lodgepole pine growth in British Columbia’s central interior.Can J Soil Sci 85:681–691

    Brais S,CamiréC(1998)Soil compaction induced by careful logging in the clay belt region of northwestern Quebec(Canada).Can J Soil Sci 78:197–206

    Demir M,Makineci E,Yilmaz E(2007)Investigation of timber harvesting impacts on herbaceous cover,forest floor and surface soil properties on skid road in an oak(Quercus petrea L.)stand.Build Environ 42:1194–1199

    Drewry J(2006)Natural recovery of soil physical properties from treading damage of pastoral soils in New Zealand and Australia:a review.Agr Ecosyst Environ 114:159–169

    Eliasson L,W?sterlund I(2007)Effects of slash reinforcement of strip roads on rutting and soil compaction on a moist fine-grained soil.For Ecol Manage 252:118–123

    Ezzati S,Naja fiA,Rab MA,Zenner EK(2012)Recovery of soil bulk density,porosity and rutting from ground skidding over a 20-year period after timber harvesting in Iran.Silva Fenn 46:521–538

    Farrakh Nawaz M,BourriéG,Trolard F(2013)Soil compaction impact and modelling:a review.Agron Sustain Dev 33:291–309

    Froehlich HA,McNabb DH(1984)Minimizing soil compaction in Paci fic Northwest forests.In:Stone EL(ed)Forest soils and treatment impacts,proceedings of the 6th North American forest soils conference,Department of Forestry,Wildlife,and Fisheries,University of Tennessee,Knoxville,TN,pp 159–192

    Froehlich HA,Miles DWR,Robbins RW(1985)Soil bulk density recovery on compacted skid trails in Central Idaho.Soil Sci Soc Am J 49:1015–1017

    Greacen EL,Sands R(1980)Compaction of forest soils:a review.Aust J Soil Res 18:163–189

    Greenland DJ,Szabolas I(1994)Soil resilience and sustainable land use.In:Proceedings of a symposium held in Budapest,CAB International,Wallingford,28 September to 2 October 1992

    Heinonen R(1977)Towards ‘normal’soil bulk density.Soil Sci Soc Am J 41:1214–1215

    Hill JNS,Sumner ME(1967)Effect of bulk density on moisture characteristics of soils.Soil Sci 103:234–238

    Johnson LR,Page-Dumroese D,Han HS(2007)Effects of machine traf fic on the physical properties of ash-cap soils.In:USDA Forest Service Proceedings,RMRS-P-44.pp 14

    Jourgholami M,Soltanpour S,Etehadi Abari A,Zenner EK(2014)In fluence of slope on physical soil disturbance due to farm tractor forwarding in a Hyrcanian forest of northern Iran.iForest Biogeosci For 7:342–348

    Kalra YP,Maynard DG(1991)Methods and manual for forest soil and plant analysis.Forestry Canada,Re NOR-X-319.Northern Forestry Center

    Kozlowski TT(1999)Soil compaction and growth of woody plants.Scand J For Res 14:596–619

    Laffan M,Jordan G,Duhig N(2001)Impacts on soils from cablelogging steep slopes in northeastern Tasmania,Australia.For Ecol Manag 144:91–99

    Marsili A,Servadio P,Pagliai M,Vignozzi N(1998)Change of some physical properties of a clay soil following passage of rubberand metal-tracked tractors.Soil Tillage Res 49:185–199

    McNabb KL,Miller MS,Lockaby BG,Stokes BJ,Clawson RG,Stanturf JA,Silva JNM(1997)Selection harvest in Amazonian rainforest:long term impacts on soil properties.For Ecol Manag 93:153–160

    Meyer C,Lüscher P,Schulin R(2014)Recovery of forest soil from compaction in skid tracks planted with black alder(Alnus glutinosa(L.)Gaertn).Soil Tillage Res 143:7–16

    Mosaddeghi MR,Hajabbasi MA,Hemmat A,Afyuni M(2000)Soil compactibility as affected by soil moisture content and farmyard manure in central Iran.Soil Tillage Res 55:87–97

    Naghdi R,Solgi A(2014)Effects of skidder passes and slope on soil disturbance in two soil water contents.Croati J For Eng 35:73–80

    Naja fiA,Solgi A,Sadeghi SH(2009)Soil disturbance following four wheel rubber skidder logging on the steep trail in the north mountainous forest of Iran.Soil Tillage Res 103:165–169

    Naja fiA,Solgi A,Sadeghi SH(2010)Effects of skid trail slope and ground skidding on soil disturbance.Casp J Environ Sci 8:13–23

    Page-Dumroese DS,Jurgensen MF,Tiarks AE,Ponder F Jr,Sanchez FG,Fleming RL,Kranabetter JM,Powers RF,Stone DM,Elioff JD,Scott DA(2006)Soil physical property changes at the North American long-term soil productivity study sites:1 and 5 years after compaction.Can J For Res 36:551–564

    Quesnel HJ,Curran MP(2000)Shelterwood harvesting in rootdisease infected stands–post-harvest soil disturbance and compaction.For Ecol Manag 133:89–113

    Rab MA(1996)Soil physical and hydrological properties following logging and slash burning in the Eucalyptus regnans forest of southeastern Australia.For Ecol Manag 84:159–176

    Rab MA(2004)Recovery of soil physical properties from compaction and soil pro file disturbance caused by logging of native forest in Victorian centralhighlands,Australia.ForEcolManag 191:329–340

    Reisinger TW,Simmons GL,Pope PE(1988)The impact of timber harvesting on soil properties and seedling growth in the south.South J Appl For 12:58–67

    Shestak CJ,Busse MD(2005)Compaction alters physical but not biological indices of soil health.Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:236–246

    Solgi A,Naja fiA(2014)The impacts of ground-based logging equipment on forest soil.J For Sci 60:28–34

    Solgi A,Naja fiA,Sam Daliri H(2013)Assessment of crawler tractor effects on soil surface properties.Casp J Environ Sci 11:185–193

    Solgi A,Naja fiA,Sadeghi SH(2014)Effects of traf fic frequency and skid trail slope on surface runoff and sediment yield.Int J For Eng 25:171–178

    Talha M,Eldamaty AM,El-Gala AM,Abe-Zayed IS(1973)Changes in physical properties of virgin calcareous soil by several seasons of alfalfa cultivation.Z P flanz.Bodenkunde 137:2–5

    Warkentin BP (1971)Effects of compaction on content and transmission of water in soils.In:Compaction of agricultural soils.American Society of Agricultural Engineering Monograph,pp 126–153

    Webb RH(2002)Recovery of severely compacted soils in the Mojave desert,California(USA).Arid Land Res Manag 16:291–305

    Webb RH,Stiger JW,Wilshire HG(1986)Recovery of compacted soils in Mojave Desert ghost towns.Soil Sci Soc Am J 50:1341–1344

    Williamson JR,Neilsen WA(2000)The in fluence of forest site on rate and extent of soil compaction andpro file disturbance of skid trails during ground-based harvesting.Can J For Res 30:1196–1205

    Zar JH(1999)Biostatistical analysis,4th edn.Prentice Hall,Upper Saddle River

    Zenner EK,Fauskee JT,Berger AL,Puettmann KJ(2007)Impacts of skidding traf fic intensity on soil disturbance,soil recovery,and aspen regeneration in north central Minnesota.North J Appl For 24:177–183

    Zhao Y,Krzic M,Bulmer CE,Schmidt MG,Simard SW(2010)Relative bulk density as a measure of compaction and its in fluence on tree height.Can J For Res 40:1724–1734

    猜你喜歡
    耐受性靜置產(chǎn)氣
    濕垃圾與病死豬混合厭氧消化產(chǎn)氣性能研究
    靜置狀態(tài)蓄冷水箱斜溫層的實驗與模擬研究
    煤氣與熱力(2021年4期)2021-06-09 06:16:56
    4個地被菊新品系對濕熱脅迫的耐受性研究
    園林科技(2020年2期)2020-01-18 03:28:18
    Meso-mechanical model of concrete under a penetration load
    巴氏醋桿菌核酸修復(fù)酶UvrA對大腸桿菌耐受性的影響
    煤層氣排采產(chǎn)氣通道適度攜煤粉理論
    miR-29b通過靶向PI3K/Akt信號通路降低胃癌細胞對順鉑的耐受性
    阿米替林治療腦卒中后中樞痛的療效和耐受性分析
    橋梁群樁基礎(chǔ)壓力注漿靜置時間預(yù)測試驗
    產(chǎn)氣剖面測試在蘇里格氣田東區(qū)的應(yīng)用
    麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久久成人免费电影| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 久99久视频精品免费| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 极品教师在线视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 熟女电影av网| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 我要搜黄色片| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产日本99.免费观看| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 特级一级黄色大片| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产视频内射| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 在线看三级毛片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 美女高潮的动态| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 此物有八面人人有两片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 在线免费观看的www视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 久久精品国产自在天天线| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 午夜精品在线福利| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| av视频在线观看入口| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 三级经典国产精品| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产在线男女| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久久久久大精品| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 色5月婷婷丁香| 午夜福利18| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 色视频www国产| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久久精品大字幕| 日日啪夜夜撸| av在线天堂中文字幕| 色视频www国产| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 老司机福利观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 91狼人影院| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 免费看av在线观看网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| av卡一久久| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产三级在线视频| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频 | 激情 狠狠 欧美| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产精品无大码| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美成人a在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 不卡一级毛片| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 色综合色国产| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 1000部很黄的大片| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 插逼视频在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲无线观看免费| av免费在线看不卡| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| av免费在线看不卡| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 性色avwww在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 永久网站在线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 九色成人免费人妻av| 一进一出抽搐动态| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 亚洲国产色片| 特级一级黄色大片| 日日撸夜夜添| videossex国产| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 三级毛片av免费| 国产在线男女| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| www.色视频.com| 精品久久久久久久末码| 欧美成人a在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 欧美性感艳星| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 黄色一级大片看看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产三级中文精品| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 日本 av在线| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 99热网站在线观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 少妇丰满av| 中国美女看黄片| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 91av网一区二区| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 中国国产av一级| 久久草成人影院| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 免费观看人在逋| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 午夜a级毛片| 一进一出抽搐动态| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 观看美女的网站| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 99热精品在线国产| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| .国产精品久久| 波多野结衣高清作品| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 长腿黑丝高跟| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 色av中文字幕| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 小说图片视频综合网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 中国国产av一级| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 免费观看精品视频网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产美女午夜福利| av专区在线播放| 国产精品无大码| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 黄片wwwwww| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产av不卡久久| 美女高潮的动态| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日本免费a在线| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产综合懂色| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 在线免费十八禁| 欧美人与善性xxx| 一a级毛片在线观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 特级一级黄色大片| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲最大成人中文| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 美女免费视频网站| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 韩国av在线不卡| av.在线天堂| 国产精华一区二区三区| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 久久久久久久久久成人| 色综合站精品国产| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 有码 亚洲区| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| av.在线天堂| 美女免费视频网站| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 成人三级黄色视频| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产在线男女| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 身体一侧抽搐| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 久久热精品热| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 嫩草影院入口| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 嫩草影视91久久| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 日本黄色片子视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 在线免费十八禁| 97超碰精品成人国产| avwww免费| 久久久色成人| 国产精品野战在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 99久国产av精品| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 一级毛片我不卡| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 黄色配什么色好看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 美女大奶头视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产综合懂色| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产成人一区二区在线| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 九九热线精品视视频播放| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲综合色惰| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| av黄色大香蕉| 九九在线视频观看精品| 我要搜黄色片| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 久久人妻av系列| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久这里只有精品中国| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 色吧在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 此物有八面人人有两片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产成人福利小说| 免费观看精品视频网站| 欧美bdsm另类| 色av中文字幕| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 1000部很黄的大片| 禁无遮挡网站| 日本黄大片高清| 一级毛片我不卡| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 国产日本99.免费观看| 色在线成人网| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 九九在线视频观看精品| 综合色丁香网| 国产探花极品一区二区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 成人欧美大片| 色在线成人网| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 在线天堂最新版资源| 深夜精品福利| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 尾随美女入室| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久久欧美国产精品| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 色吧在线观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 露出奶头的视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 老司机影院成人| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 成年av动漫网址| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久久久久久久久成人| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| av在线老鸭窝| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产在线男女| 色哟哟·www| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| ponron亚洲| 精品久久久久久久末码| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 日本a在线网址| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲在线观看片| 精品国产三级普通话版| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 日本a在线网址| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久久色成人| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 在线播放无遮挡| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 人人妻人人看人人澡|