玉米生產(chǎn)上3個主推品種光合特性、干物質(zhì)積累轉(zhuǎn)運及灌漿特性

徐田軍 呂天放 趙久然 王榮煥 陳傳永 劉月娥 劉秀芝 王元東 劉春閣

?

玉米生產(chǎn)上3個主推品種光合特性、干物質(zhì)積累轉(zhuǎn)運及灌漿特性

徐田軍**呂天放**趙久然*王榮煥*陳傳永 劉月娥 劉秀芝 王元東 劉春閣

北京市農(nóng)林科學(xué)院玉米研究中心 / 玉米DNA指紋及分子育種北京重點實驗室, 北京 100097

以當(dāng)前玉米生產(chǎn)主推品種鄭單958、先玉335和京科968為試驗材料, 考察其光合特性、干物質(zhì)積累與轉(zhuǎn)運及籽粒灌漿特性, 以揭示高產(chǎn)玉米品種的產(chǎn)量形成特性, 為玉米高產(chǎn)生產(chǎn)提供依據(jù)。結(jié)果表明: (1)產(chǎn)量以京科968最高、先玉335次之、鄭單958最低, 京科968分別較鄭單958和先玉335高14.55%和7.93%。(2)穗位葉凈光合速率和冠層光合能力表現(xiàn)為京科968>先玉335>鄭單958, 且吐絲期>乳熟期。京科968吐絲期和乳熟期的穗位葉凈光合速率分別比先玉335高7.84%和16.78%, 比鄭單958高22.23%和24.44%; 冠層光合能力分別較先玉335高38.77%和58.41%, 較鄭單958高50.83%和56.49%。(3)花后干物質(zhì)積累量、轉(zhuǎn)移量、干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率和干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運對籽粒貢獻率均以京科968最高, 分別比先玉335高13.72%、21.20%、6.32%和4.77%, 比鄭單958高31.87%、39.96%、18.49%和10.42%。(4)籽粒灌漿參數(shù)在不同品種間存在較大差異, 京科968與先玉335的平均灌漿速率(0.73和0.75 g 100-grain–1d–1)相當(dāng), 且均高于鄭單958 (0.67 g 100-grain–1d–1); 活躍灌漿期以鄭單958 (53.69 d)最長、京科968 (51.02 d)次之、先玉335 (48.95 d)最短。(5)相關(guān)分析表明, 產(chǎn)量與凈光合速率顯著正相關(guān), 與花后干物質(zhì)積累量及轉(zhuǎn)運率極顯著正相關(guān)。京科968具有較高的光合效率、花后干物質(zhì)積累量及轉(zhuǎn)運率、灌漿速率及較長的灌漿持續(xù)期, 是較鄭單958和先玉335高產(chǎn)的重要原因。

玉米; 光合特性; 干物質(zhì)積累轉(zhuǎn)運; 籽粒灌漿

玉米是我國種植面積最大、總產(chǎn)量最高的第一大糧食作物, 對保障國家糧食安全和滿足市場需要發(fā)揮著主力軍作用[1-2]。玉米產(chǎn)量主要取決于穗粒數(shù)和粒重[3], 而粒重與光合特性、干物質(zhì)積累分配、灌漿速率、灌漿持續(xù)期等密切相關(guān)[4-6]。

光合作用為作物的產(chǎn)量形成提供主要物質(zhì)基礎(chǔ)[7-8]。葉片是作物光合作用的主要場所, 90%的干物質(zhì)來自葉片的光合作用[9-10], 光合特性與產(chǎn)量密切相關(guān)[11-12]。提高玉米葉片的光合速率, 延長其光合有效功能期, 促進光合產(chǎn)物積累及轉(zhuǎn)運, 有利于提高粒重, 進而增加產(chǎn)量[13-15]。光合產(chǎn)物對玉米籽粒干物質(zhì)的貢獻很大, 此外花前及花后臨時貯藏在莖葉鞘等營養(yǎng)器官中的干物質(zhì)的貢獻也很重要[16-17]。研究表明, 在一定范圍內(nèi)玉米干物質(zhì)積累量與產(chǎn)量呈正相關(guān), 干物質(zhì)積累越多, 產(chǎn)量越高; 莖、葉、鞘等營養(yǎng)器官的干物質(zhì)積累、轉(zhuǎn)移與分配是玉米籽粒產(chǎn)量形成的重要因素, 其中葉片和苞葉的干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運量對籽粒貢獻率較大, 莖鞘和穗軸的貢獻率相對較小[18-20]。玉米籽粒的灌漿持續(xù)期和灌漿速率決定了粒重和產(chǎn)量[21-22], 籽粒灌漿特性受播期[23-25]、密度[26]、肥料[27]等外部環(huán)境條件的影響, 但主要取決于品種的遺傳特性[28]。

目前, 圍繞我國玉米生產(chǎn)主推大品種的產(chǎn)量、光合效率、干物質(zhì)積累分配及灌漿特性等系統(tǒng)深入研究的相關(guān)報道還較少。本文就此展開深入研究, 旨在為解析玉米高產(chǎn)機制和指導(dǎo)玉米高產(chǎn)高效生產(chǎn)提供理論參考。

1 材料與方法

1.1 試驗材料與地點

以我國玉米生產(chǎn)中種植面積66.7萬公頃以上的主推大品種鄭單958 (ZD958)、先玉335 (XY335)和京科968 (JK968)為試驗材料。2015年和2016年, 在北京市昌平區(qū)國家精準(zhǔn)農(nóng)業(yè)科技示范園區(qū)開展試驗, 兩年均于5月10日播種, 10月7日收獲。試驗田土壤0~20 cm耕層含有機質(zhì)1.11%、全氮0.08%、有效氮65.6 μg g–1、速效磷65.2 μg g–1和速效鉀124.02 μg g–1。

1.2 試驗設(shè)計

12行區(qū), 行長5 m, 行距0.60 m, 小區(qū)面積36 m2。隨機區(qū)組排列, 3次重復(fù)。留苗密度為67 500株hm–2。管理同當(dāng)?shù)卮筇锷a(chǎn)。

1.3 測定內(nèi)容及方法

1.3.1 葉面積指數(shù) 在三葉期、拔節(jié)期、大喇叭口期、吐絲期、乳熟期和成熟期測定每小區(qū)生長一致的6株。

葉面積=葉片最大長度×最大寬度×0.75

葉面積指數(shù)(LAI)=單株葉面積×單位土地面積株數(shù)/單位土地面積

1.3.2 葉片光合速率及氣體交換參數(shù)的測定 吐絲前選擇生長一致的植株掛牌標(biāo)記。分別在吐絲期和乳熟期, 用LI-6400XT光合測定儀測定穗位葉的凈光合速率(n, μmol CO2m–2s–1)。選擇晴朗天氣上午10:00—12:00, 測定每處理3株, 重復(fù)3次。采用開放式氣路, 穗位葉附近的CO2濃度為400 μmol mol–1左右, 光合有效輻射為1600 μmol m–2s–1。

1.3.3 冠層光合能力 冠層光合能力是凈光合速率和葉面積指數(shù)的綜合反映。冠層光合能力=凈光合速率(n)×葉面積指數(shù)(LAI)[29]。

1.3.4 干物質(zhì)積累、分配及轉(zhuǎn)運 吐絲期和成熟期, 取代表性植株5株, 吐絲期按莖、葉、鞘, 成熟期按莖、葉、鞘、雌穗(穗軸、苞葉和籽粒)分別進行處理。105℃殺青30 min, 然后80℃烘干至恒重, 分別稱重。計算單株玉米器官干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運量、轉(zhuǎn)運率等[30]。

花后干物質(zhì)積累量(kg hm–2) = 成熟期地上部干物質(zhì)積累量?吐絲期地上部干物質(zhì)積累量

干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)移量(kg hm–2) = 吐絲期地上部干物質(zhì)積累量?成熟期地上部營養(yǎng)器官干物質(zhì)積累量

干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率(%) = 干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)移量/吐絲期地上部干物質(zhì)積累量×100

干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)移對籽粒的貢獻率(%)=干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)移量/籽粒干重×100

收獲指數(shù)=籽粒產(chǎn)量/收獲時總干物質(zhì)重

1.3.5 籽粒灌漿參數(shù) 吐絲前選擇生長健壯一致的果穗掛牌標(biāo)記, 統(tǒng)一授粉。于授粉后第15、22、29、36、43、50、57、64、71和78 d取樣。每次從各小區(qū)取3穗, 取中部籽粒100粒, 稱鮮重, 在105℃烘箱中殺青30 min后, 80℃烘干至恒重, 測定最終百粒重。以授粉后天數(shù)(d)為自變量、授粉后每隔7 d測得的百粒重為因變量(), 參照朱慶森等[31]的方法, 利用Richards方程(1+e-)-1/D模擬籽粒灌漿過程。籽粒灌漿速率:e-/(1+e)(D+1)/D, 式中:為粒重(g);為最終粒重(g);為授粉后天數(shù)(d);為回歸方程所確定的參數(shù), 計算下列灌漿特征參數(shù):

最大灌漿速率max= (max/)[1-(max/)]

平均灌漿速率ave=/(2+4)

達到最大灌漿速率的時間max= (ln-ln)/

灌漿活躍期(約完成總積累量的90%)= 2(+2)/

1.3.6 產(chǎn)量及產(chǎn)量構(gòu)成因素 成熟期收獲每個小區(qū)中間的4行果穗, 隨機選取30個考察穗行數(shù)、行粒數(shù)、千粒重。收獲穗全部脫粒后自然風(fēng)干, 用水分儀測定水分后, 按14%含水量折合成公頃產(chǎn)量。

1.4 數(shù)據(jù)處理與統(tǒng)計分析

采用Microsoft Excel 2007處理和計算數(shù)據(jù), 采用SPSS 19.0統(tǒng)計軟件進行方差分析和多重比較(采用LSD法), 采用SigmaPlot 10.0軟件作圖。

2 結(jié)果與分析

2.1 生育期天數(shù)

由表1可知, 2015年和2016年參試品種的生育期表現(xiàn)為京科968和鄭單958相當(dāng), 均為126 d和127 d, 先玉335較鄭單958和先玉335少3 d。

2.2 產(chǎn)量及產(chǎn)量構(gòu)成因素

由表2可知, 產(chǎn)量、穗粒數(shù)和百粒重在品種和年際間差異顯著, 以京科968最高、先玉335次之、鄭單958最低。其中, 京科968產(chǎn)量、實收穗數(shù)、穗粒數(shù)和百粒重分別較先玉335高7.93%、3.28%、0.23%和5.43%, 較鄭單958高14.55%、2.20%、3.15%和15.53%。

2.3 光合特性

2.3.1 光合作用 由圖1可知, 凈光合速率、氣孔導(dǎo)度、胞間CO2濃度和蒸騰速率在品種和生育時期間均存在顯著差異。吐絲期和乳熟期的穗位葉凈光合速率表現(xiàn)為京科968 (35.35 μmol m–2s–1和28.72 μmol m–2s–1) > 先玉335 (32.58 μmol m–2s–1和23.93 μmol m–2s–1) >鄭單958 (27.49 μmol m–2s–1和21.70 μmol m–2s–1), 且在乳熟期京科968凈光合速率顯著高于先玉335和鄭單958, 氣孔導(dǎo)度表現(xiàn)為京科968 (0.65 μmol m–2s–1和0.58 μmol m–2s–1) >先玉335 (0.59 μmol m–2s–1和0.41 μmol m–2s–1) >鄭單958 (0.31 μmol m–2s–1和0.21 μmol m–2s–1), 而胞間CO2濃度表現(xiàn)為鄭單958>先玉335>京科968; 蒸騰速率表現(xiàn)為先玉335>京科968>鄭單958; 不同生育時期間, 表現(xiàn)為灌漿期高于乳熟期。

表1 參試品種生育期

表2 參試品種的產(chǎn)量及產(chǎn)量構(gòu)成因素

同一列數(shù)字后不同小寫字母表示不同處理間差異達0.05 顯著水平。**表示在< 0.01水平差異顯著, *表示在< 0.05水平差異顯著。

Values within a column followed by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level among different treatments. **: significantly different at< 0.01; *: significantly different at< 0.05.

圖1 參試品種的凈光合速率、氣孔導(dǎo)度、胞間CO2濃度和蒸騰速率

SS: 吐絲期; MK: 乳熟期。ZD958: 鄭單958; XY335: 先玉335; JK968: 京科968。誤差線上字母不同表示品種類型間存在顯著差異 (< 0.05)。

SS: silking stage; MK: milking stage. ZD958: Zhengdan 958; XY335: Xianyu 335; JK968: Jingke 968. Different letters above error bars indicate significant difference between two types of varieties (< 0.05).

2.3.2 冠層光合能力 由圖2可知, 參試品種的葉面積指數(shù)隨生育期天數(shù)呈S型變化, 播種后65 d之前差別不大, 之后則差異較大, 表現(xiàn)為京科968>鄭單958>先玉335。葉面積指數(shù)在吐絲期達峰值, 其中京科968最大, 為5.32。先玉335和鄭單958分別為4.62和4.35。由圖1 (凈光合速率)和圖2可知, 冠層光合能力在品種間表現(xiàn)為京科968>先玉335>鄭單958, 不同生育期間表現(xiàn)為吐絲期>乳熟期, 其中吐絲期京科968的冠層光合能力較先玉335和鄭單958高38.77%和50.83%, 乳熟期分別高58.41%和56.49%。

圖2 參試品種葉面積指數(shù)和冠層光合能力

縮寫同圖1。誤差線上字母不同表示品種類型間存在顯著差異(< 0.05)。

Abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 1. Different letters above error bars indicate significant difference between two types of varieties (< 0.05).

2.4 干物質(zhì)積累、分配及轉(zhuǎn)運

由表3可知, 花后干物質(zhì)的積累量、轉(zhuǎn)移量、轉(zhuǎn)運率以及干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運對籽粒的貢獻率均表現(xiàn)為京科968>先玉335>鄭單958。其中, 京科968的花后干物質(zhì)積累量、轉(zhuǎn)移量和轉(zhuǎn)運率分別比先玉335高13.72%、21.2%、6.33%, 比鄭單958高31.87%、39.96%和18.49%。收獲指數(shù)在品種間差異不顯著, 京科968為0.56, 鄭單958和先玉335均為0.55。

2.5 灌漿特性

2.5.1 粒重和灌漿速率 由圖3可知, 籽粒灌漿期間百粒重呈“慢—快—慢”的S型變化趨勢, 籽粒灌漿速率呈“先升后降”的單峰變化。最大灌漿速率表現(xiàn)為先玉335>京科968>先玉335; 到達最大灌漿速率的時間以先玉335最早、鄭單958次之、京科968最晚。

表3 參試品種的花后干物質(zhì)積累、分配及轉(zhuǎn)運

同一列數(shù)字后不同小寫字母表示不同處理間差異達0.05 顯著水平。

Values within a column followed by different letters are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level among different treatments.

圖3 參試品種的籽粒灌漿動態(tài)和灌漿速率

縮寫同圖1。Abbreviations are the same as those given in Fig. 1.

2.5.2 灌漿參數(shù) 由表4可知, 用Richards模型可以較好地擬合籽粒灌漿過程, 決定系數(shù)為0.9932~0.9987。3個品種達到最大灌漿速率的時間(max)以先玉335最早(23.48 d), 鄭單958次之(25.97 d), 京科968最晚(28.54 d); 最大灌漿速率(max)和平均灌漿速率(ave)表現(xiàn)為先玉335>京科968>鄭單958; 達到最大灌漿速率時的生長量(max)表現(xiàn)為京科968>先玉335>鄭單958, 活躍灌漿期()表現(xiàn)為鄭單958 (53.69 d)>京科968 (51.02 d)>先玉335 (48.95 d)。由此可見, 鄭單958雖然活躍灌漿期長, 但平均灌漿速率低; 先玉335雖然灌漿速率高, 但活躍灌漿期短, 京科968灌漿速率與先玉335相當(dāng), 但活躍灌漿期相對較長。

2.6 灌漿參數(shù)、干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率和光合特性與產(chǎn)量的相關(guān)性分析

由表5可知, 產(chǎn)量與花后干物質(zhì)積累量(0.99**)、干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率(0.96**)極顯著正相關(guān), 與凈光合速率(0.97*)顯著正相關(guān), 與平均灌漿速率正相關(guān), 但未達到顯著水平, 與活躍灌漿期呈負(fù)相關(guān), 但不顯著。

表4 參試品種的籽粒灌漿特征參數(shù)

表5 灌漿參數(shù)、干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率和光合特性與產(chǎn)量的相關(guān)性分析

1: 平均灌漿速率;2: 活躍灌漿期;3: 凈光合速率;4: 花后干物質(zhì)積累量;5: 干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率;6: 產(chǎn)量。**表示在< 0.01水平差異顯著,*表示在< 0.05水平差異顯著。

1: the average grain filling rate;2: active grain filling stage;3: net photosynthetic rate;4: dry matter accumulation after siling;5:translocation efficiency of dry matter;6: yield.**Significantly different at< 0.01;*significantly different at< 0.05.

3 討論

葉片是玉米進行光合作用的主要器官, 是截獲光能的物質(zhì)載體[32]。葉面積大小及光合作用強弱對玉米生長發(fā)育及產(chǎn)量有重要影響[33]。前人研究表明, 延長葉片持綠期及其有效光合作用時間, 提高玉米吐絲后群體光合速率, 能夠顯著提高產(chǎn)量[34]。本研究相關(guān)分析表明, 葉片光合速率與玉米產(chǎn)量呈顯著正相關(guān)(相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.97*)。凈光合速率、氣孔導(dǎo)度、胞間CO2濃度和蒸騰速率在品種和生育時期間均存在較大差異, 且在乳熟期京科968凈光合速率顯著高于先玉335和鄭單958。冠層光合能力是凈光合速率與葉面積指數(shù)的綜合反映。京科968的冠層光合能力較先玉335和鄭單958高48.6%和53.7%。在灌漿期, 參試玉米品種葉面積指數(shù)隨生育期推進呈下降趨勢, 且先玉335和鄭單958葉片衰老進程高于京科968。京科968生育后期較強的凈光合速率與較高的葉面積是其獲得較高產(chǎn)量和粒重的重要生理基礎(chǔ)之一, 這與鄭友軍等研究結(jié)果一致[35]。灌漿期是玉米籽粒產(chǎn)量形成關(guān)鍵時期, 也是植株生理功能漸進衰退時期, 產(chǎn)量最高的京科968在乳熟期仍具有較強的光合能力, 凈光合速率下降相對緩慢, 延長光合同化物的積累時間, 保證充足的光合產(chǎn)物供應(yīng)玉米籽粒灌漿。

籽粒干物質(zhì)也來自花后物質(zhì)積累與轉(zhuǎn)運。作物經(jīng)濟產(chǎn)量由干物質(zhì)積累量決定, 花后物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)與分配對產(chǎn)量具有重要影響, 光合產(chǎn)物的積累與分配決定作物的群體產(chǎn)量[36]。本研究表明, 花后干物質(zhì)積累量、干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率與產(chǎn)量之間存在極顯著正相關(guān)(相關(guān)系數(shù)為0.99**和0.96**), 而不同品種的干物質(zhì)積累、轉(zhuǎn)運與分配差別各異, 表現(xiàn)為花后與花前干物質(zhì)生產(chǎn)的比例不同, 最終表現(xiàn)出產(chǎn)量水平的差異。京科968花后干物質(zhì)積累量和干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運量分別比鄭單958高31.87%和39.96%; 干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)移率比先玉335高6.33%、比鄭單958高18.49%。干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)移對籽粒的貢獻率以京科968最高, 先玉335次之, 鄭單958最低。京科968的干物質(zhì)向籽粒轉(zhuǎn)運與分配的能力高于先玉335和鄭單958, 有利于獲得較高的產(chǎn)量水平。

籽粒灌漿期是玉米產(chǎn)量形成的重要階段。灌漿速率受基因型和環(huán)境條件共同影響, 灌漿時間和灌漿速率決定了玉米籽粒的干物質(zhì)積累量, 灌漿速率和灌漿過程持續(xù)天數(shù)均與粒重顯著相關(guān)[37]。馬赟花等[38]和Jorge[39]研究發(fā)現(xiàn)玉米產(chǎn)量的提高主要是籽粒灌漿時間延長的結(jié)果, 建議把灌漿時間作為高產(chǎn)玉米選擇的有效指標(biāo); 而本課題組研究認(rèn)為, 灌漿速率高是提高玉米粒重和產(chǎn)量的重要因素[23-25]。本研究表明, 當(dāng)前我國玉米生產(chǎn)3個主推大品種中, 鄭單958活躍灌漿期長但平均灌漿速率低, 產(chǎn)量最低; 先玉335灌漿速率高但活躍灌漿期短, 產(chǎn)量中等; 京科968灌漿速率與先玉335相當(dāng), 活躍灌漿期相對較長, 產(chǎn)量最高。由此可見, 京科968更易實現(xiàn)高產(chǎn), 表現(xiàn)出干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率較高、光合速率較高、灌漿速率高、活躍灌漿期長, 進而獲得高產(chǎn)。這與黃振喜等研究結(jié)果一致[40]。

4 結(jié)論

玉米產(chǎn)量與花后干物質(zhì)積累量、干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)運率極顯著正相關(guān), 與凈光合速率顯著正相關(guān)。京科968具有較高的花后干物質(zhì)積累量、干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)移量和干物質(zhì)轉(zhuǎn)移率, 較高的光合速率及冠層光合能力, 以及相對較高的灌漿速率和較長的活躍灌漿期, 是較鄭單958和先玉335高產(chǎn)的重要原因。

[1] 南紀(jì)琴, 肖俊夫, 劉戰(zhàn)東. 黃淮海夏玉米高產(chǎn)栽培技術(shù)研究. 中國農(nóng)學(xué)通報, 2010, 26(21): 106–110 Nan J Q, Xiao J F, Liu Z D. Study on the technologies of maize high-yield cultivation in Huang-Huai-Hai, 2010, 26(21): 106–110 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[2] 趙久然, 王榮煥. 中國玉米生產(chǎn)發(fā)展歷程、存在問題及對策. 中國農(nóng)業(yè)科技導(dǎo)報, 2013, 15(3): 1–6 Zhao J R, Wang R H. Development process, problem and countermeasure of maize production in China., 2013, 15(3): 1–6 (in Chinese)

[3] Oscar R V, Matthijs T. Vertical profile of leaf senescence during the grain filling period in older and newer maize hybrids ., 2004, 44: 827–834

[4] 王志剛, 高聚林, 張寶林, 羅瑞林, 楊恒山, 孫繼穎, 于曉芳, 蘇治軍, 胡樹平. 內(nèi)蒙古平原灌區(qū)高產(chǎn)春玉米(15 t hm–2以上)產(chǎn)量性能及增產(chǎn)途徑. 作物學(xué)報, 2012, 38: 1318–1327 Wang Z G, Gao J L, Zhang B L, Luo R L, Yang H S, Sun J Y, Yu X F, Su Z J, Hu S P. Productivity performance of high-yield spring maize and approaches to increase grain yield (above 15 t ha–1) in irrigated plain of inner Mongolia., 2012, 38: 1318–1327 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[5] 童淑媛, 杜震宇, 徐洪文, 劉勝群, 朱先燦, 宋鳳斌. 不同株型玉米葉片凈光合速率差異研究. 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報, 2011, 42(4): 42–47 Tong S Y, Du Z Y, Xu H W, Liu S Q, Zhu X C, Song F B. Study on differences of net photosynthetic rate of leaf in different corn types., 2011, 42(4): 42–47 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[6] Kalt-Torres W, Kerr P S, Usuda H, Huber S C. Diurnal changes in maize leaf photosynthesis: I. Carbon exchange rate, assimilate export rate, and enzyme activities., 1987, 83: 283–288

[7] 董樹亭, 王空軍, 胡昌浩. 玉米品種更替過程中群體光合特性的演變. 作物學(xué)報, 2000, 26: 200–204 Dong S T, Wang K J, Hu C H. Development of canopy apparent photosynthesis among maize varieties from different eras., 2000, 26: 200–204 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[8] 王慶成, 劉開昌, 張秀清, 王英春. 玉米的群體光合作用. 玉米科學(xué), 2001, 9(4): 57–61 Wang Q C, Liu K C, Zhang X Q, Wang Y C. Canopy photosynthesis of maize (L.)., 2001, 9(4): 57–61 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[9] 董樹亭, 高榮岐, 胡昌浩, 王群瑛, 王空軍. 玉米花粒期群體光合性能與高產(chǎn)潛力研究. 作物學(xué)報, 1997, 23: 318–325 Dong S T, Gao R Q, Hu C H, Wang Q Y, Wang K J. Study of canopy photosynthesis property and high yield potential after anthesis in maize., 1997, 23: 318–325 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[10] 王慶燕, 管大海, 潘海波, 李建民, 段留生, 張明才, 李召虎. 油菜素內(nèi)酯對春玉米灌漿期葉片光合功能與產(chǎn)量的調(diào)控效應(yīng). 作物學(xué)報, 2015, 41: 1557–1563 Wang Q Y, Guan D H, Pan H B, Li J M, Duan L S, Zhang M C, Li Z H. Effect of brassinolide on leaf photosynthetic function and yield in spring maize filling stage., 2015, 41: 1557–1563 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[11] Ma B L, Dwyer I M. Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids in leaf senescence., 1998, 199: 283–291

[12] Motto M. Genotype-dependent leaf senescence in maize: inheritance and effects of pollination-prevention., 1987, 85: 720–725

[13] Scott C C, Hector J B. Using a chlorophylls meter to estimate specific leaf nitrogen of tropical maize during vegetative growth., 1997, 89: 557–562

[14] 董紅芬, 李洪, 李愛軍, 閻曉光. 不同密度下玉米穗莖生長與雌穗分化的關(guān)系. 玉米科學(xué), 2010, 18(5): 65–71 Dong H F, Li H, Li A J, Yan X G. Relationships between spike and stem growth and female spike differentiation under different densities., 2010, 18(5): 65–71 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[15] Morinaka Y, Sakamoto T, Inukai Y, Agetsuma M, Kitano H, Ashikari M, Matsuoka M. Morphological alteration caused by brassinosteroid insensitivity increases the biomass and grain production of rice., 2006, 141: 924–931

[16] Johnson D R, Tanner L W. Calculation of the rate and duration of grain filling in corn (L.)., 1972, 12: 485–486

[17] 呂麗華, 趙明, 趙久然, 陶洪斌, 王璞. 不同施氮量下夏玉米冠層結(jié)構(gòu)及光合特性的變化. 中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2008, 41: 2624–2632 Lyu L H, Zhao M, Zhao J R, Tao H B, Wang P. Canopy structure and photosynthesis of summer maize under different nitrogen fertilizer application rates., 2008, 41: 2624–2632 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[18] 王楚楚, 高亞男, 張家玲, 曹慶軍, 陳乾隆, 陳紅強, 熊萍, 毛慶明, 崔金虎. 種植行距對春玉米干物質(zhì)積累與分配的影響. 玉米科學(xué), 2011, 19: 108–111 Wang C C, Gao Y N, Zhang J L, Cao Q J, Chen Q L, Chen H Q, Xiong P, Mao Q M, Cui J H. Effect of row spacing on the regularity of accumulation and distribution of dry matter in spacing maize., 2011, 19: 108–111 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[19] 黃智鴻, 王思遠(yuǎn), 包巖, 梁煊赫, 孫剛, 申林, 曹洋, 吳春勝. 超高產(chǎn)玉米品種干物質(zhì)積累與分配特點的研究. 玉米科學(xué), 2007, 15(3): 95–98 Huang Z H, Wang S Y, Bao Y, Liang X H, Sun G, Shen L, Cao Y, Wu C S. Studies on dry matter accumulation and distributive characteristic in super high-yield maize., 2007, 15(3): 95–98 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[20] 戴明宏, 趙久然, 楊國航, 王榮煥, 陳國平. 不同生態(tài)區(qū)和不同品種玉米的源庫關(guān)系及碳氮代謝. 中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2011, 44: 1585–1595 Dai M H, Zhao J R, Yang G H, Wang R H, Chen G P. Source-sink relationship and carbon-nitrogen metabolism of maize in different ecological regions and varieties., 2011, 44: 1585–1595 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[21] 王曉慧, 張磊, 劉雙利, 曹玉軍, 魏雯雯, 劉春光, 王永軍, 邊少鋒, 王立春. 不同熟期春玉米品種的籽粒灌漿特性. 中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2014, 47: 3557–3565 Wang X H, Zhang L, Liu S L, Cao Y J, Wei W W, Liu C G, Wang R J, Bian S F, Wang L C. Grain filling characteristics of maize hybrids differing in maturities., 2014, 47: 3557–3565 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[22] 徐云姬, 顧道健, 秦昊, 張耗, 王志琴, 楊建昌. 玉米灌漿期果穗不同部位籽粒碳水化合物積累與淀粉合成相關(guān)酶活性變化. 作物學(xué)報, 2015, 41: 297–307 Xu Y J, Gu D J, Qin H, Zhang H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Changes in carbohydrate accumulation and activities of enzymes involved in starch synthesis in maize kernels at different positions on an ear during grain filling., 2015, 41: 297–307 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[23] 王榮煥, 趙久然, 陳傳永, 徐田軍, 劉秀芝, 王元東, 劉春閣. 京單38不同播期子粒灌漿特性研究. 玉米科學(xué), 2013, 21(6): 59–63 Wang R H, Zhao J R, Chen C Y, Xu T J, Liu X Z, Wang Y D, Liu C G. Grain filling characters of maize hybrid Jingdan38., 2013, 21(6): 59–63 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[24] 徐田軍, 呂天放, 趙久然, 王榮煥, 陳傳永, 劉月娥, 劉秀芝, 王元東. 玉米籽粒灌漿特性對播期的響應(yīng). 應(yīng)用生態(tài)學(xué)報, 2016, 27: 2513–2519 Xu T J, Lyu T F, Zhao J R, Wang R H, Chen C R, Liu Y E, Liu X Z, Wang Y D. Response of grain filling characteristics of maize to sowing date., 2016, 27: 2513–2519 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[25] 徐田軍, 呂天放, 陳傳永, 趙久然, 王榮煥, 劉月娥, 劉秀芝, 王元東, 劉春閣, 成廣雷. 播期對玉米干物質(zhì)積累轉(zhuǎn)運和籽粒灌漿特性的影響. 中國農(nóng)業(yè)科技導(dǎo)報, 2016, 18(6): 112–118 Xu T J, Lyu T F, Chen C Y, Zhao J R, Wang R H, Liu Y E, Liu X Z, Wang Y D, Liu C G, Cheng G L. Effect of sowing date on maize dry matter accumulation, transformation and grain filling characters., 2016, 18(6): 112–118 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[26] 付晉峰, 王璞. 播期和種植密度對玉米子粒灌漿的影響. 玉米科學(xué), 2016, 24(3): 117–122 Fu J F, Wang P. Effects of sowing date and planting density on maize filling.2016, 24(3): 117–122 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[27] 申麗霞, 王璞, 張紅芳, 易鎮(zhèn)邪. 施氮對夏玉米不同部位籽粒灌漿的影響. 作物學(xué)報, 2005, 31: 532–534 Shen L X, Wang P, Zhang H F, Yi Z X. Effect of nitrogen supply on grain filling at different ear position in summer maize., 2005, 31: 532–534 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[28] 陳晨, 董樹亭, 劉鵬, 張吉旺, 趙斌. 種植密度對不同粒型玉米品種子粒灌漿進程、產(chǎn)量及品質(zhì)的影響. 玉米科學(xué), 2012, 20(6): 107–111 Chen C, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhang J W, Zhao B. Effects of planting density on grain filling characteristics of different maize inbred lines., 2012, 20(6): 107–111 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[29] 王祥宇, 魏珊珊, 董樹亭, 劉鵬, 張吉旺, 趙斌. 種植密度對熟期不同夏玉米群體光合性能及產(chǎn)量的影響. 玉米科學(xué), 2015, 23(1): 134–138 Wang X Y, Wei S S, Dong S T, Liu P, Zhang J W, Zhao B. Effects of planting densitieson canopy apparent photosynthesis characteristics of summer maize in different maturity periods., 2015, 23(1): 134–138

[30] 周玲, 王朝輝, 李富翠, 孟曉瑜, 李可懿, 李生秀. 不同產(chǎn)量水平旱地冬小麥品種干物質(zhì)累積和轉(zhuǎn)移的差異分析. 生態(tài)學(xué)報, 2012, 32: 4123–4131 Zhou L, Wang Z H, Li F C, Meng X Y, Li K Y, Li S X. Analysis of dry matter accumulation and translocation for winter wheat cultivars with different yields on dryland., 2012, 32: 4123–4131 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[31] 朱慶森, 曹顯祖, 駱亦其. 水稻籽粒灌漿的生長分析. 作物學(xué)報, 1988, 14: 182–193 Zhu Q S, Cao X Z, Luo Y Q. Growth analysis on the process of grain filling in rice., 1988, 14: 182–193 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[32] 徐慶章, 王慶成, 牛玉貞, 王忠孝, 張軍. 玉米株型與群體光合作用的關(guān)系研究. 作物學(xué)報, 1995, 21: 492–496 Xu Q Z, Wang Q C, Niu Y Z, Wang Z X, Zhang J. Studies on relationship between plant type and canopy photosynthesis in maize., 1995, 21: 492–496 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[33] 王志剛, 高聚林, 任有志, 趙明, 董志強, 李少昆, 楊鳳山. 春玉米超高產(chǎn)群體冠層結(jié)構(gòu)的研究. 玉米科學(xué), 2007, 15(6): 51–56 Wang Z G, Gao J L, Ren Y Z, Zhao M, Dong Z Q, Li S K, Yang F S. Study on canopy structure of super-high yield colony in spring maize., 2007, 15(6): 51–56 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[34] 沈秀瑛, 戴俊英, 胡安暢, 顧慰連, 鄭波. 玉米群體冠層特征與光截獲及產(chǎn)量關(guān)系的研究. 作物學(xué)報, 1993, 19: 246–251 Shen X Y, Dai J Y, Hu A C, Gu W L, Zheng B. Studies on relationship among character of canopy light interception and yield in maize populations (L.).,1993, 19: 246–251 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[35] 鄭友軍, 張斌, 浦軍, 張仁和, 路海東, 何仲陽, 薛吉全. 春玉米高產(chǎn)栽培下(≥15 000 kg hm–2)光合和物質(zhì)積累轉(zhuǎn)運特性. 西北農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報, 2013, 22(1): 54–59 Zheng Y J, Zhang B, Pu J, Zhang R H, Lu H D, He Z Y, Xue J Q. The photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation and translocation characteristics of spring maize under high yield cultivation (≥15000 kg hm–2)., 2013, 22(1): 54–59 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[36] Echarte L, Luque S, Andrade F H, Sadras V O, Cirilo A, Otegui M E, Vega C R C. Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Argentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1995., 2000, 68: 1–8

[37] 金益, 張永林, 王振華, 孫朝杰. 玉米灌漿后期百粒重變化的品種間差異分析. 東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報, 1998, 29(1): 7–10 Jin Y, Zhang Y L, Wang Z H, Sun C J. Difference analysis on 100 kernel weight in 30-60 days after silking in maize hydrides., 1998, 29(1): 7–10 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[38] 馬赟花, 薛吉全, 張仁和, 張林春, 郝?lián)P, 孫娟. 不同高產(chǎn)玉米品種干物質(zhì)積累轉(zhuǎn)運與產(chǎn)量形成的研究. 廣東農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2010, (3): 36–40 Ma Y H, Xue J Q, Zhang R H, Zhang L C, Hao Y, Sun J. Relationship between dry matter accumulation and distribution to yield of different maize cultivars., 2010, (3): 36–40 (in Chinese with English abstract)

[39] Jorge B. Physiological bases for yield differences in selected maize cultivars from Central America., 1995, 42: 69–80

[40] 黃振喜, 王永軍, 王空軍, 李登海, 趙明, 柳京國, 董樹亭, 王洪軍, 王軍海, 楊今勝. 產(chǎn)量15 000 kg ha–1以上夏玉米灌漿期間的光合特性. 中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué), 2007, 40: 1898–1906 Huang Z X, Wang Y J, Wang K J, Li D H, Zhao M, Liu J G, Dong S T, Wang H J, Wang J H, Yang J S. Photosynthetic characteristics during grain filling stage of summer maize hybrids with high yield potential of 15 000 kg ha–1., 2007, 40: 1898–1906 (in Chinese with English abstract)

Photosynthetic Characteristics, Dry Matter Accumulation and Translocation, Grain Filling Parameter of Three Main Maize Varieties in Production

XU Tian-Jun**, LYU Tian-Fang**, ZHAO Jiu-Ran*, WANG Rong-Huan*, CHEN Chuan-Yong, LIU Yue-E, LIU Xiu-Zhi, WANG Yuan-Dong, and LIU Chun-Ge

Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing Key Laboratory of Maize DNA Fingerprinting and Molecular Breeding, Beijing 100097, China

The objective of this study was to explore yield-forming characteristics of high yield maize varieties. Using three widely cultivated maize varieties Zhengdan 958 (ZD958), Xianyu 335 (XY335) and Jingke 968 (JK968), we tested grain yield, photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and translocation, and grain filling characteristics. The yield of JK968 was the highest, and was 14.55% and 7.93% higher than that of ZD958 and XY335, respectively. The photosynthetic rate and canopy photosynthetic capacity showed JK968 > XY335 > ZD958 and silking stage > milk stage. The ear photosynthetic rate of JK968 at silking stage and milk stage was 7.84% and 16.78% higher than that of XY335, as well as 22.23% and 24.44% higher than that of ZD958, respectively. The photosynthetic capacity of JK968 at silking stage and milk stage was 38.77% and 58.41% higher than that of XY335, as well as 50.83% and 56.49% higher than that of ZD958, respectively. Dry matter accumulation after silking stage, the transfer amount of dry matter, translocation efficiency of dry matter and contribution to grain dry matter for JK968 were the highest, with 13.72%, 21.20%, 6.32%, and 4.77% higher than those of XY335, as well as 31.87%, 39.96%, 18.49%, and 10.42% higher than those of ZD958, respectively. There was a big difference in grain filling parameters among those different varieties, the average filling rate of JK968 (0.73 g 100-grain–1d–1) and XY335 (0.75 g 100-grain–1d–1) was higher than that of ZD958 (0.67 g 100-grain–1d–1) and the active grain filling period of ZD958 (53.69 d) was longer than that of the JK968 (51.02 d) and XY335 (48.95 d). Maize yield was significantly correlated with net photosynthetic rate at< 0.05, and with the dry matter accumulation after silking stage and the translocation rate at< 0.01. Thus, JK968 had higher photosynthetic efficiency, dry matter accumulation after silking stage, translocation rate, grain filling rate and longer grain filling period, which is the main reason that JK968 had the higher yield than ZD958 and XY335.

maize; photosynthetic characteristics; dry matter accumulation and translocation; grain filling

2017-05-28;

2017-11-21;

2017-12-13.

10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00414

本研究由國家重點研發(fā)計劃項目(2016YFD0300106), 北京市農(nóng)林科學(xué)院青年科研基金(QNJJ201728), 北京市農(nóng)林科學(xué)院院級科技創(chuàng)新團隊建設(shè)項目(JNKYT201603), 國家現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)產(chǎn)業(yè)技術(shù)體系建設(shè)專項(CARS-02-11)和國家自然科學(xué)基金青年科學(xué)基金項目(31601247)資助。

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Developing Program of China (2016YFD0300106), the Youth Research Fund of the Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences (QNJJ201728), the Innovative Team Construction Project of BAAFS (JNKYT201603), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-02-11), and the National Natural Science Fund Youth Science Fund Project (31601247).

(Corresponding authors趙久然, E-mail: maizezhao@126.com, Tel: 010-51503936; 王榮煥, E-mail: ronghuanwang@126.com, Tel: 010-51503703

(Contributed equally to this work

徐田軍, E-mail: xtjxtjbb@163.com; 呂天放, E-mail: 314565358@qq.com

http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.1809.S.20171211.0849.010.html