• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Evaluation of Chinese rice varieties resistant to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola

    2018-03-07 11:39:56ZhanLipingDingZhongPEngDeliangPEnghuanKongLinganLiuShimingLiuYingLiZhongcaihuangWenkun
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年3期

    Zhan Li-ping, Ding Zhong, PEng De-liang, PEng huan, Kong Ling-an, Liu Shi-ming, Liu Ying,Li Zhong-cai, huang Wen-kun

    1 State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests/Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, P.R.China

    2 College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, P.R.China

    3 Agriculture Bureau of Hanshou County, Hunan Province, Changde 415900, P.R.China

    1.introduction

    Cultivated rice (Oryza sativa) is the predominant staple food for most countries in Asia and provides 20% of the dietary energy supply worldwide (Schatz et al.2014).Rice varieties in Asia are traditionally classified into two major groups: indica and japonica (Chang 2003).Indica varieties are widely cultivated in lowland tropical areas,whereas japonica varieties are cultivated in both lowland and high-elevation upland areas.Based on differences in isozymes and simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers,the indica group of Asian rice can be further subdivided into two subpopulations (indica and aus) and the japonica group into three subpopulations, temperate japonica, tropical japonica and aromatic (Glaszmann 1987; Garris et al.2005;Zhao et al.2010).These subpopulations exhibit broad differences in geographical distribution, morphological traits, physiological differentiation and genetic divergence(Chang 1976).

    The root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola is widely distributed in every rice-producing country in South and Southeast Asia and is considered one of the most important pests affecting Asian rice (Kyndt et al.2012; Ji et al.2013).After second-stage juveniles (J2s) hatch from eggs, they invade at the root tips and inject pharyngeal secretions into vascular cells to induce a specialized nematode feeding site called a giant cell (Kyndt et al.2013).Root-knot nematodes keep these giant cells, which are embedded in galls after J2 root penetration (Gheysen and Mitchum 2011), alive as a food resource throughout their life cycle.These root galls are typically direct reflection of infection level of nematode and always correlate with susceptibility of plants to nematode (Wang et al.2012).M.graminicola infection causes substantial damage to rice root systems in nurseries and significant yield loss in the field (Patil and Gaur 2014; Dimkpa et al.2016).In Bangladesh and Thailand, nematicide application in M.graminicola-infested rice fields resulted in yield increases of 16 to 33% (Arayarungsarit 1987; Sharma-Poudyal et al.2004).In the Philippines, rice yields following two crops of cowpea and treatment with carbofuran resulted in a 34% increase, and nematicide application in upland rice fields in Indonesia resulted in yield increases of 28 to 87%(Dutta et al.2012).Although M.graminicola has been identified in most rice-growing areas in southern China,systematic investigation of rice yield loss after nematode infection is lacking.

    Many economical practices have been used alone or in combination to manage M.graminicola population densities below the damage threshold.For example, crop rotation with non-host plants, flooding and fallowing for several months can effectively decrease populations of M.graminicola and reduce yield losses (Ventura et al.1981; Rahman 1990).However, these management practices have a number of drawbacks.The wide host range of M.graminicola limits the use of crop rotation, and flooding cannot be applied in water-limited areas.Furthermore, areas left fallow for several months or a crop season can significantly reduce overall output (De Waele et al.2013).Popular in many riceplanting areas, soil sterilization with chemical nematicides is the most effective management method.Nonetheless,chemical nematicides are expensive, environmentally harmful and pose potential risks to beneficial organisms.Accordingly, searching for resistant or tolerant rice varieties may be an eco-friendly management strategy to manage this nematode.

    To date, resistance to M.graminicola has been evaluated in a number of Asian rice accessions, the majority of which are susceptible to M.graminicola.Indeed, only a few are truly resistant (Bridge et al.2005).One accession(WL02) of Oryza longistaminata and three accessions of Oryza glaberrima (TOG7235, TOG5674, TOG5675) in the Philippines were found to be resistant to M.graminicola(Soriano et al.1999), and two commonly grown rice cultivars, Masuli and Chaite-6, were moderately resistant to M.graminicola in Nepal (Sharma-Poudyal et al.2004).The recurrent parent Teqing and the donors Type 3,Zihui 100 and Shwe Thwe Yin Hyv were resistant to the nematode in India (Prasad et al.2006).Regardless, in China, limited information is available on the resistance of rice accessions, and very little effort has been devoted to identifying and breeding resistant rice cultivars.Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the response of the most commonly grown commercial rice varieties to M.graminicola in China.

    2.Materials and methods

    2.1.Rice seed collection

    In total, 136 rice varieties were used to characterize the response of plants to M.graminicola, as well as one highly resistant (Rongyou 368, a hybrid indica rice variety) and one susceptible (Boyou 998, a hybrid indica rice variety) control.Of the 138 rice varieties, 16 are aus, 33 are hybrid aus, 10 are indica, 45 are hybrid indica, 10 are temperate japonica,and 24 are tropical japonica (Appendix A).Most hybrid varieties were collected from the China National Hybrid Rice R&D Center; others were obtained from seed markets in different provinces.All the information of rice varieties can be find at China Rice Data Center (http://www.ricedata.cn).

    2.2.nematode culture and inoculation

    M.graminicola was originally collected from an infested field in Hanshou County, Hunan Province, China, and maintained on O.sativa cv.Nipponbare in a greenhouse at 26°C.Eggs of nematodes were collected from root galls and hatched in a 200-μm sieve.J2 nematodes were extracted with a modified flotation-sieving method and collected using a 25-μm sieve, as described in Huang et al.(2015).Nematode number was estimated under a microscope and adjusted to ±150 juveniles per milliliter for subsequent inoculation.

    2.3.Pot experiments

    Plants were grown in polyvinylchloride (PVC) tubes (3.2 cm diameter and 17.8 cm height) in a greenhouse at 26°C under a 16-h/8-h light/dark regime.Rice seeds were germinated at 30°C for 4 d, and one seed was sown in each pot filled with sand and synthetic absorbent polymer (SAP), as described in Reversat et al.(1999).Each 2-wk-old plant was inoculated with approximately 150 nematode juveniles as Huang et al.(2015).The experiment was performed three times, with six replicates each.The plants were watered and fertilized with 20 mL Hoagland solution twice per week.At 14-days post inoculation (dpi), six plants were uprooted,and the roots were washed free of soil for calculating the root gall index.All roots were further cleared in 0.6% NaClO for 5 min and boiled in 0.8% acetic acid and 0.013% acid fuchsin for 3 min (Nahar et al.2011).After destaining in 4% acidified glycerol for 3 to 4 d, nematodes from different stages inside the roots were assessed under a stereomicroscope.

    2.4.Field experiment

    The field experiment was performed from July to August in a continuous cropping field in Hanshou County, under irrigated conditions in 2015 and 2016.This field was severely infected with M.graminicola for at least three years,with a density of 157±42 nematodes per gram soil.Soils in this field were mixed well with rotary cultivator before seeding.The management conditions were consistent in different varieties during testing.Seeds were germinated at 30°C for 4 d and directly seeded in each plot at 30 kg ha-1.Each plot measured approximate 20 m2(4 m×5 m),and each treatment was arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replicates.To prevent water loss and the spread of nematodes, an earthen levee with height of 25 cm and width of 30 cm was constructed around each plot (Khanam et al.2016).At 30 d after seeding, 10 plants from each plot were uprooted, and the roots were washed free of soil for calculating the root gall index.

    2.5.Resistance/susceptibility scoring methods

    At 14 dpi in the pot experiment or 30 d after seeding in the field experiment, ten plants in each plot were uprooted randomly to evaluate resistance/susceptibility using the gall index according to Pederson and Windham (1989),with minor modifications.Root galling was rated on a scale of 0 to 5, where level 0=no galls, level 1=1-2, level 2=3-10, level 3=11-20, level 4=21-30, level 5≥30 galls per root system.The gall index (GI) was calculated using the following formula:

    Where, Siwas root galling scale of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.Niwas the number of plants in each root galling scale.N was the total number of evaluated plants in each plot.GI was used to score resistance/susceptibility as follows: immune (I) GI=0;highly resistant (HR) 0.1≤GI≤5.0; resistant (R) 5.1≤GI≤25.0;moderately susceptible (MS) 25.1≤GI≤50.0; susceptible (S)50.1≤GI≤75.0; highly susceptible (HS) GI>75.0.The highly resistant variety Rongyou 368 and the highly susceptible variety Boyou 998, evaluated by Huang et al.(2011), were used as the controls.

    2.6.Relationship between the root gall index and the number of nematodes inside the roots

    To assess the relationship between the root gall index and number of nematodes inside the roots, 35 rice varieties exhibiting different susceptibilities to M.graminicola were selected for another pot experiment.The responses of all varieties were evaluated in PVC tubes in a greenhouse, as described in pot experiment.One germinated seed was sown in each tube, and six seedlings for each variety were maintained per replication.After 2 wk, each plant was inoculated with approximately 150 nematode juveniles.The experiment was performed three times, with six replicates each.At 14 dpi, the plants were uprooted, and the root gall number and the number of nematodes inside the roots were calculated.Correlations between the root gall index and the number of nematodes inside the roots were analyzed with SPSS software.

    2.7.nematode development in resistant varieties

    To investigate nematode development, seeds of a resistant variety and three highly resistant varieties were germinated and transferred to SAP in PVC tubes.The highly susceptible variety Boyou 998 and the resistant variety Rongyou 368 were used as the controls.One germinated seed was sown in each tube, and 12 seedlings for each variety were maintained per replication.After 2 wk, each plant was inoculated with approximately 150 nematode juveniles.At 3 dpi, six plants of each variety were uprooted, the roots were washed clean, and the root galls and number of nematodes inside the roots were calculated as described above.At 14 dpi, the other plants were uprooted, and the different stages of nematodes inside the roots were examined and calculated as described in Kong et al.(2016).The experiment was performed three times, with six replicates each.

    2.8.Data analysis

    Data were analyzed using SPSS software 22 (IBM SPSS,Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).Correlation between the scoring system and the number of nematodes was determined with the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient with the significance test (P=0.05).Mean nematode numbers of each rice variety with different susceptibilities were compared using Duncan’s multiple mean comparison test.

    3.Results

    3.1.Relationship between the root gall index and the number of nematodes inside the roots

    Before screening the susceptibility/resistance of rice varieties in field experiments, 35 that showed different susceptibility to M.graminicola in a preliminary experiment were randomly selected to analyze the correlation between the root gall index and the number of nematodes inside the roots.Evaluation at 14 dpi revealed that the number of nematodes observed differed significantly among the 35 selected varieties (P<0.05, R2=0.76) and correlated strongly(r=0.87, P<0.05) with the nematode gall index (Fig.1).For the highly resistant control variety Rongyou 368, fewer than three juveniles of M.graminicola penetrated the roots, and only 1 to 2 root galls were observed.In contrast, for the susceptible rice variety Boyou 998, more than 50 juveniles in roots and greater than 30 galls per plant were observed.These results confirm that the number of nematodes in the roots correlates with the number of galls in the roots.The results of repeat analyses with 35 randomly selected rice varieties confirmed the initial assessment (data not shown),indicating that the method is highly repeatable in pot and field experiments.

    3.2.Reaction of rice varieties to M.graminicola in pot experiments

    For pot experiments, the root gall index and nematode number in roots were evaluated at 14 dpi (Appendix A).Only 1 to 4 nematodes were observed in highly resistant varieties, with a root gall index of 1.7 to 4.3.Seventeen varieties exhibited resistance, with a root gall index of 7.6 to 23.2, whereas a moderately susceptible response was observed for 41 varieties, with a root gall index of 25.4 to 49.3.Most of the local varieties exhibited high susceptibility,with a root gall index of greater than 50.

    Among five tested subpopulations, temperate japonica exhibited the highest gall index, followed by indica, tropical japonica, hybrid indica, aus and hybrid aus (Fig.2).Zhonghua 11, the aus variety from Tianjing, exhibited only 1 to 2 galls in any of six replicates, with a gall index of 1.7 and 2.4 nematodes in the roots of each plant (Fig.3).In addition,another variety from the hybrid aus subpopulation from Hunan, Shenliangyou 1, showed 1 to 2 galls in only one of six replicates, with a root gall index of 3.3 and 5.3 nematodes in the roots of each plant.For another variety from the hybrid indica subpopulation from Hunan, Cliangyou 4418, 1 to 2 galls in one or two of six replicates were found, with a root gall index of 4.4 and 8.6 nematodes in the roots of each plant(Fig.3).The four highest scoring varieties were observed in two hybrid indicas, Wuyou 7 and Jingliangyouhuazhan,and two temperate japonicas, Hajingdao 3 and Liangjing 10.These plants showed a root gall index over 80 and about 57.8 juveniles in the roots of each plant.

    Fig.1 Relationship between the root gall index and the actual number of nematodes inside each plant.The responses of 35 randomly selected varieties were evaluated at 14 days post inoculation (dpi) in pot experiments.The experiment was performed three times, with six replicates each.

    Fig.2 Box plot of the root gall index for the different subpopulations of rice in pot experiments.The root gall index (GI) was used to score resistance/susceptibility in rice varieties, as follows: immune (I) GI=0; highly resistant (HR)0.1≤GI≤5.0; resistant (R) 5.1≤GI≤25.0; moderately susceptible(MS) 25.1≤GI≤50.0; susceptible (S) 50.1≤GI≤75.0; highly susceptible (HS) GI>75.0.The bars represent the means±SE of the data from three independent biological replicates, each containing six plants.

    3.3.Response of rice varieties to M.graminicola in field experiments

    The responses of all varieties to M.graminicola were further evaluated in field experiments, with observations similar to the pot experiments for most resistant varieties.Most varieties showed same resistance level in both 2015 and 2016.However, the root gall index of most varieties was slightly increased in the field compared with the pot experiment.Temperate japonica displayed the highest gall index, followed by tropical japonica, indica, hybrid indica, aus, and hybrid aus (Fig.4).The three highest scorings were among the aus variety Xiangzaoxian 6,the hybrid aus Wangliangyou 1133, and the hybrid indica Fengliangyou 3, with root gall index greater than 90.High gall indices were also observed in the pot experiments for these three varieties, with values exceeding 70.The aus variety Zhonghua 11 from Tianjin, the hybrid aus variety Shenliangyou 1 from Hunan, and the hybrid indica Cliangyou 4418 from Hunan showed only 1 to 2 galls in six replicates, with a root gall index of 2 to 4.These three varieties exhibited high resistance in both pot and field experiments.However, the germination rates of the highly susceptible varieties Xiangzaoxian 6 and Wangliangyou 1133 were only 70%, significantly lower than the other varieties (data not shown).In addition, some plants of these two highly susceptible varieties gradually became yellow and exhibited necrosis one month after seeding.

    3.4.nematode development in resistant varieties

    Nematode infection and development in three highly resistant varieties, Zhonghua 11, Shenliangyou 1, and Cliangyou 4418, were assessed in another pot experiment.In total, the number of M.graminicola individuals in the roots of the highly resistant varieties was considerably reduced compared with the highly susceptible varieties.At 3 dpi, only 3 to 6 J2s and 1 to 2 galls were detected in the roots of the highly resistant varieties Zhonghua 11 and Shenliangyou 1,and 6.9 J2s and 2.3 galls were present in the highly resistant variety Rongyou 368.At the same time point,10.9 J2s and 4.8 galls were observed in the resistant variety Cliangyou 4418.Conversely, 44.2 J2s and 20.8 galls were found in the susceptible variety Boyou 998 (Table 1).The resistant variety that exhibited the fewest root galls at 3 dpi was further investigated to evaluate nematode development.At 14 dpi, examination of nematode-infected rice roots revealed that all M.graminicola J2s failed to develop into fourth-stage juveniles (J4s) within the roots of Zhonghua 11 and remained at third-stage juveniles (J3s) (Table 1,Fig.5).Approximately 38.7% of juveniles in Shengliangyou 1 exhibited delayed development into females and remained at the J3s+J4s, and approximately 25.2% juveniles in the highly resistant variety Cliangyou 4418 showed delayed development into females and remained at the J3s+J4s.In the resistant control variety Rongyou 368, only 18.9%juveniles exhibited delayed development into females and remained at the J3s+J4s.In contrast, most nematodes that infected the susceptible variety Boyou 998 gradually developed into the female stage at 14 dpi, with only 6.3%juveniles remaining at the J3s+J4s.The lower number of infected nematodes and those that failed to develop into the J3s in Zhonghua 11 or the female stage in Shengliangyou 1 and Cliangyou 4418 revealed that these highly resistant varieties are able to inhibit nematode development inside their roots.

    Fig.3 Responses of resistant rice varieties to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola at 14 days post inoculation (dpi) in pot experiments.The response of each variety was evaluated in terms of the root gall index of each variety (A) and the number of nematodes per plant (B).The resistant variety Rongyou 368 and the susceptible variety Boyou 998 were used as control treatments to analyze the susceptibility of rice varieties Zhonghua 11, Shenliangyou 1 and Cliangyou 4418.Each plant was inoculated with±150 second-stage juveniles (J2s).Each bar with standard error represents the average number of gall index or nematodes.Varieties with different letters on the error bars are statistically significant (P≤0.05).The experiment was performed three times,with six replicates each.C, root symptom of high resistance and high susceptible of rice varieties.The highly resistant variety Rongyou 368 and the highly susceptible variety Boyou 998 were used as the controls.Zhonghua 11 and Cliangyou 4418 were used as representatives of tested highly resistant varieties.

    Fig.4 Box plot of the root gall index for the different subpopulations of rice in field experiments.The root gall index(GI) was used to score resistance/susceptibility in rice varieties,as follows: immune (I) GI=0; highly resistant (HR) 0.1≤GI≤5.0;resistant (R) 5.1≤GI≤25.0; moderately susceptible (MS)25.1≤GI≤50.0; susceptible (S) 50.1≤GI≤75.0; highly susceptible(HS) GI>75.0.The experiment was performed twice, with six replicates each.The bars represent the means±SE of the data from two independent biological replicates, each containing six plants.

    Fig.5 Development of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola inside the roots of tested plants at 14 days post inoculation (dpi).The different developmental stages of M.graminicola inside three resistant varieties, Zhonghua 11,Shenliangyou 1 and Cliangyou 4418, were examined by staining the roots with acid fuchsin.The resistant variety Rongyou 368 and the susceptible variety Boyou 998 were used as control treatments.Each plant was inoculated with ±150 second-stage juveniles (J2s).The experiment was performed three times,with six replicates each.

    Table 1 Time course of root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola development within the roots of tested plants1)

    4.Discussion

    In the present research, 136 rice varieties were evaluated after nematode infection in both pot and field experiments to identify effective resources of resistance against M.graminicola in China.Significant variation in the level of susceptibility of O.sativa varieties to M.graminicola infection was identified in different subpopulations, supporting the findings of others that varieties differ in their reaction to M.graminicola (Shrestha et al.2007; Dimkpa et al.2016).The remarkable finding in this research is the high resistance to M.graminicola of the aus variety Zhonghua 11, hybrid aus Shenliangyou 1 and hybrid indica Cliangyou 4418.Our results indicate a mechanism of pre-infection resistance to M.graminicola in the resistant varieties examined.The significant positive relationship between the number of nematodes in roots and the root gall index in pot experiments and the consistent susceptibility in both pot and field experiments for most varieties confirm the repeatability of the method.

    Analysis of infected resistant rice varieties at 3 dpi revealed reduced nematode penetration for Zhonghua 11 and Shenliangyou 1, suggesting that these rice varieties may prevent or delay penetration at a very early stage(Dimkpa et al.2016).Further research on M.graminicola development in highly resistant varieties revealed that very few nematodes developed into later stages.Previous research suggested that susceptible plants would allow root-knot nematodes to feed and develop successfully but that resistant plants may allow nematodes to penetrate but prevent maturation (Trudgill 1991).De Waele et al.(2013)found delayed nematode reproduction in three resistant genotypes of O.glaberrima: CG14, TOG5674 and TOG5675.Indeed, compared with susceptible genotypes, the fecundity and size of M.graminicola females were reduced (Cabasan et al.2012; De Waele et al.2013).In addition, Dimkpa et al.(2016) reported no nematode penetration at 2 dpi and no nematode galls during the 5-wk experiment for two immune accessions, LD24 (an aus from Thailand) and Khao Pahk Maw (an indica from Sri Lanka).Kumari et al.(2016) observed that M.graminicola penetrated, developed and reproduced more rapidly in the susceptible rice variety Pusa 1121 than in the resistant rice variety Vandana.The data from these similar studies suggest that the response of rice accessions resistant to M.graminicola is associated with reduced penetration (Cabasan et al.2012).However,this resistance mechanism differs from that of the Mi gene,whereby the root-knot nematode M.incognita penetrates into tomato roots but induces rapid and localized host cell necrosis when attempting to establish giant cells(Williamson and Hussey 1996).Resistant rice plants might express pre-infection resistance factors at the root surface, enhancing their ability to limit root penetration by nematode juveniles.Such a mechanism may involve root epidermal barriers or biochemical secretions (Huang 1985).Moreover, differences in root anatomy may also contribute to the observed differences in penetration.Such physical root barriers and biochemical defenses were previously suggested in resistant cotton infected with M.incognita(Anwar et al.1994) and resistant grape rootstock infected with M.arenaria (Aanwa and Mckenry 2000).

    In the present research, juvenile development was delayed in resistant varieties, with most nematodes failing to develop into females at 14 dpi, which is consistent with observations in other resistant plants (Cabasan et al.2012).For example, the number of M.graminicola females developing in resistant rice genotypes TOG564 and Khao Pahk Maw was significantly reduced compared with susceptible rice genotypes (Dimkpa et al.2016).Additionally, compared with the susceptible variety CO47, the life cycle of M.graminicola was completed 7 d later in the moderately resistant rice ADT45 (Priya and Subramanian 2013).In soybean cultivars resistant to M.arenaria, fewer nematodes developed fully into females,and most nematodes remained in the juvenile stage (Noe 1991; Pedrosa et al.1996).Similarly, in a cotton genotype resistant to M.incognita, the majority of nematodes did not develop past the juvenile stage, and those that developed into females were 2 d later compared with susceptible plants (Moura et al.1993).The delayed development of root-knot nematodes in resistant varieties indicates that the interaction between nematode and host differs for resistant and susceptible plants (Cabasan et al.2012).In resistant O.sativa varieties, necrosis was observed in the cortex and delayed establishment of the feeding site and M.graminicola juvenile development (Jena and Rao 1977; Cabasan et al.2012).Similar results were observed in O.glaberrima resistant to M.graminicola, whereby J2 penetration was significantly reduced and giant cell development arrested (Kyndt et al.2014).Moreover, giant cells were gradually degraded to cells with a low cytoplasmic content and high vacuolation, which appears to be the most common resistance response to M.graminicola.In Vitis spp., cortical necrosis not only halted the migration of juveniles but also reduced female size and fecundity in M.arenaria (Aanwa and Mckenry 2000).As giant cells serve as obligate nutrient sources after infection, the formation of giant cells is correlated with nematode development (Ji et al.2013), and phytohormones play a role in giant cell formation and host-nematode interaction (Bird and Koltai 2000).For instance, gibberellins are important stimulators of cell division and elongation and have a critical function in the development, maintenance, and maturation of giant cells (Richards et al.2001).Transient transcriptional activation of DR5, an auxin reporter gene, in early stages of feeding cell induction by root-knot nematodes demonstrated that auxin is involved in the formation of giant cells in the roots of Arabidopsis (Karczmarek et al.2004).However,transcription of genes necessary for jasmonate biosynthesis were suppressed in early-stage giant cells, and activation of the jasmonic acid pathway via external application of methyl jasmonate is an effective method for protecting rice from root-knot nematode infection (Nahar et al.2011; Kyndt et al.2012).In addition, a series of defense-related pathways were strongly activated in the infected root system at the initial time point (Kyndt et al.2014; Kumari et al.2016).Furthermore, Nahar et al.(2011) demonstrated that ethylene(ET) plays a role in defense against M.graminicola in rice plants, and pharmacological inhibition of ET biosynthesis in rice led to a significantly increased susceptibility to the nematode.Brassinosteroids are involved in plant innate immunity, and an exogenous supply of high concentrations of epibrassinolide invoked systemic defense against M.graminicola (Nahar et al.2013).Therefore, differences in M.incognita infection and development in resistant and susceptible rice varieties can be attributed to changes in molecular and histological responses to nematode infection among these plants (Cabasan et al.2012).

    In the early stage of infection, gall formation and female nematode growth in the host plant can be useful for evaluating the response of rice.Understanding the response of different varieties to M.graminicola and the mechanism of resistance could help to establish criteria for traditional breeding selection in rice (Cabasan et al.2012).In China, hybrid rice has a yield advantage of 10 to 20%over conventional varieties and is commercially grown in more than 50% of rice-growing areas (Cheng et al.2007).Compared with hybrid indica, japonica/indica hybrid rice exhibits strong heterosis and increased yield potential(Yuan 1994; Wei et al.2016).In the Chinese super-rice breeding program, new male sterile germplasm and intersubspecies (indica×japonica) crosses have been employed to broaden the genetic base of parental lines and improve yield and quality (Cheng et al.2007; Zhu et al.2017).The promising resistant varieties included in our study can be used for identification of resistance gene(s) that will provide valuable information to develop root-knot nematode resistant varieties (Soriano and Reversat 2003; Gheysen and Jones 2006; Cabasan et al.2012).Based on molecular analyses of plant-nematode interactions, hybrid rice varieties with valuable agronomic traits and resistance to M.graminicola can provide a highly practical measure for nematode management in most rice-growing areas.

    5.Conclusion

    In the present study, resistance/susceptibility to M.graminicola in different subpopulations of O.sativa was evaluated in pot and field experiments.Three varieties, Zhonghua 11 (aus),Shenliangyou 1 (hybrid aus) and Cliangyou 4418 (hybrid indica) were observed highly resistant to M.graminicola under both pot and field conditions.M.graminicola penetrated less often into highly resistant varieties and failed to develop into females more often than with susceptible varieties.The promising varieties found in the present research might be useful for nematode management.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was financially supported by the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571986)and the National Basic Research Programme of China(2013CB127502).

    Appendicesassociated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    Aanwar S A, Mckenry M V.2000.Penetration, development and reproduction of Meloidogyne arenaria on two new resistant Vitis spp.Nematropica, 30, 9-17.

    Anwar S A, Trudgill D L, Philipps M S.1994.The contribution of variation in invasion and development rates of Meloidogyne incognita to host status differences.Nematologica, 40,579-586.

    Arayarungsarit L.1987.Yield ability of rice varieties in fields infested with the root-knot nematode.International Rice Research Newsletter, 12, 14.

    Bird D M, Koltai H.2000.Plant parasitic nematodes: Habitats,hormones and horizontally-acquired genes.Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 19, 183-194.

    Bridge J, Plowright R A, Peng D.2005.Nematode parasites of rice.In: Luc M, Sikora R A, Bridge J, eds., Plant Parasitic Nematodes in Subtropical and Tropical Agriculture.CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.pp.87-130.

    Cabasan M T N, Kumar A, Waele D.2012.Comparison of migration, penetration, development and reproduction of Meloidogyne graminicola on susceptible and resistant rice genotypes.Nematology, 14, 405-415.

    Chang T.1976.The origin, evolution, cultivation, dissemination,and diversification of Asian and African rices.Euphytica,25, 425-441.

    Chang T T.2003.Origin, domestication, and diversification In: Smith C W, Dilday R H, eds., Rice: Origin, History,Technology, and Production.J.Wiley and Sons, New Jersey.pp.3-25.

    Cheng S H, Zhuang J Y, Fan Y Y, Du J H, Cao L Y.2007.Progress in research and development on hybrid rice:A super-domesticate in China.Annals of Botany, 100,959-966.

    Dimkpa S O N, Lahari Z, Shrestha R, Douglas A, Gheysen G, Price A.2016.A genome-wide association study of a global rice panel reveals resistance in Oryza sativa to root-knot nematodes.Journal of Experimental Botany, 67,1191-1200.

    Dutta T K, Ganguly A K, Gaur H S.2012.Global status of rice root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola.African Journal of Microbiology Research, 6, 6016-6021.

    Garris A J, Tai T H, Coburn J, Kresovich S, McCouch S.2005.Genetic structure and diversity in Oryza sativa L.Genetics,169, 1631-1638.

    Gheysen G, Jones J T.2006.Molecular Aspects of Plant-Nematode Interactions in Plant Nematology.CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.pp.234-254.

    Gheysen G, Mitchum M G.2011.How nematodes manipulate plant development pathways for infection.Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14, 415-421.

    Glaszmann J C.1987.Isozymes and classification of Asian rice varieties.Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 74, 21-30.

    Huang J S.1985.Mechanisms of resistance to root-knot nematodes.In: Sasser J N, Carter C C, eds., An Advanced Treatise on Meloidogyne.vol.1.Biology and Control.North Carolina State University, USA.pp.165-174.

    Huang K.2011.The studies on pathogenicity of Meloidogyne graminicola to different rice cultivars and biological characteristics.MSc thesis, South China Agricultural University.pp.17-20.(in Chinese)

    Huang W K, Ji H L, Gheysen G, Debode J, Kyndt T.2015.Biochar-amended potting medium reduces the susceptibility of rice to root-knot nematode infections.BMC Plant Biology,15, 267.

    Ji H, Gheysen G, Denil S, Lindsey K, Topping J F, Nahar K, Haegeman A, De Vos Winnok H, Trooskens G, Van Criekinge W, De Meyer T, Kyndt T.2013.Transcriptional analysis through RNA sequencing of giant cells induced by Meloidogyne graminicola in rice roots.Journal of Experimental Botany, 64, 3885-3898.

    Jena R N, RaoY S.1977.Nature of resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.) to the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne graminicola Golden and Birchfield).II.Mechanism of resistance.Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences,86, 31-38.

    Karczmarek A, Overmars H, Helder J, Goverse A.2004.Feeding cell development by cyst and root-knot nematodes involves a similar early, local and transient activation of a specific auxin-inducible promoter element.Molecular Plant Pathology, 5, 343-346.

    Khanam S, Akanda A M, Ali M A, Kyndt T, Gheysen G.2016.Identification of Bangladeshi rice varieties resistant to ufra disease caused by the nematode Ditylenchus Angustus.Crop Protection, 79, 162-169.

    Kong L A, Wu D Q, Cui J K, Huang W K, Peng H, Peng D L.2016.Testing and modelling the potential of three diploid plants in Poaceae as a new pathosystem to investigate the interactions between cereal hosts and cereal cyst nematode(Heterodera avenae).Plant Pathology, 65, 682-688.

    Kumari C, Dutta T K, Banakar P, Rao U.2016.Comparing the defence-related gene expression changes upon root-knot nematode attack in susceptible versus resistant cultivars of rice.Scientific Reports, 6, 22846.

    Kyndt T, Denil S, Haegeman A, Trooskens G, Bauters L, Van Criekinge W, De Meyer T, Gheysen G.2012.Transcriptional reprogramming by root knot and migratory nematode infection in rice.New Phytologist, 196, 887-900.

    Kyndt T, Fernandez D, Gheysen G.2014.Plant-parasitic nematode infections in rice: Molecular and cellular insights.Annual Review of Phytopathology, 52, 135-153.

    Kyndt T, Vieira P, Gheysen G, De Almeida-Engler J.2013.Nematode feeding sites: Unique organs in plant roots.Planta, 238, 807-818.

    Moura R M, Davis E L, Luzzi B M, Boerma H R, Hussey R S.1993.Post-infectional development of Meloidogyne incognita on susceptible and resistant soybean genotypes.Nematropica, 23, 7-13.

    Nahar K, Kyndt T, Hause B, H?fte M, Gheysen G.2013.Brassinosteroids suppress rice defense against rootknot nematodes through antagonism with the jasmonate pathway.Molecular Plant Microbe Interaction, 26, 106-115.

    Nahar K, Kyndt T, De Vleesschauwer D, H?fte M, Gheysen G.2011.The jasmonate pathway is a key player in systemically induced defense against root knot nematodes in rice.Plant Physiology, 157, 305-316.

    Noe J P.1991.Development of Meloidogyne arenaria on peanut and soybean under two temperature cycles.Journal of Nematology, 23, 468-476.

    Patil J, Gaur H S.2014.The effect of root-knot nematode,Meloidogyne graminicola, on the quality and vigour of rice seed.Nematology, 16, 555-564.

    Pederson G A, Windham G L.1989.Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita in trifolium interspecific hybrids and species related to white clover.Plant Disease, 73, 567-569.

    Pedrosa E M R, Hussey R S, Boerma H R.1996.Penetration and post-infectional development and reproduction of Meloidogyne arenaria races 1 and 2 on susceptible and resistant soybean genotypes.Journal of Nematology, 28,343-351.

    Prasad J S, Vijayakumar C H M, Sankar M, Varaprasad K S,Srinivasa P M, Kondala R Y.2006.Root-knot nematode resistance in advanced back cross populations of rice developed for water stress conditions.Nematologia Mediterranea, 34, 3-8.

    Priya M S, Subramanian S.2013.Comparison of migration,penetration, development, reproduction and histological responses of rice root knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola between susceptible (CO47) and moderately resistant (ADT 45) rice varieties.The Madras Agricultural Journal, 100, 743-744.

    Rahman M L.1990.Effect of different cropping sequences on the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne graminicola, and yield of deepwater rice.Nematologia Mediterranea, 18, 213-217.

    Reversat G, Boyer J, Pando-Bahuon A, Sannier C.1999.Use of a mixture of sand and water-absorbent synthetic polymer as substrate for the xenic culturing of plant-parasitic nematodes in the laboratory.Nematology, 1, 209-212.

    Richards D E, King K E, Ait-ali T, Harberd N P.2001.How gibberellin regulates plant growth and development: A molecular genetic analysis of gibberellin signaling.Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology,52, 67-88.

    Schatz M C, Maron L G, Stein J C, Wences A H, Gurtowski J,Biggers E, Lee H, Kramer M, Antoniou E, Ghiban E, Wright M H, Chia J, Ware D, McCouch S R, McCombie W R.2014.Whole genome de novo assemblies of three divergent strains of rice, Oryza sativa, document novel gene space of aus and indica.Genome Biology, 15, 506.

    Sharma-Poudyal D, Pokharel R, Shrestha S M, Khatri-Chhetri G B.2004.Evaluation of common Nepalese rice cultivars against rice root knot nematode.Nepal Agriculture Research Journal, 5, 33-36.

    Shrestha R, Uzzo F, Wilson M J, Price A H.2007.Physiological and genetic mapping study of tolerance to root-knot nematode in rice.New Phytologist, 176, 665-672.

    Soriano I R, Reversat G.2003.Management of Meloidogyne graminicola and yield of upland rice in South-Luzon,Philippines.Nematology, 5, 879-884.

    Soriano I R, Schmit V, Brar D S, Prot J C, Reversat G.1999.Resistance to rice root-knot nematode Meloidogyne graminicola identified in Oryza longistaminata and O.glaberrima.Nematology, 1, 395-398.

    Trudgill D L.1991.Resistance to and tolerance of plant parasitic nematodes in plants.Annual Review of Phytopathology,29, 167-192.

    Ventura W, Watanabe I, Castillo M B, De la Cruz A.1981.Involvement of nematodes in the soil sickness of a dryland rice-based cropping system.Soil Science & Plant Nutrition,27, 305-315.

    Yuan L P.1994.Increasing yield potential in rice by exploitation of heterosis.In: Virmani S S, ed., Hybrid Rice Technology,New Developments and Future Prospects.International Rice Research Institute, Philippines.pp.1-6.

    De Waele D, Das K, Zhao D, Tiwari R K S, Shrivastava D K, Vera-Cruz C, Kumar A.2013.Host response of rice genotypes to the rice root-knot (Meloidogyne graminicola)under aerobic conditions.Archives of Phytopathology &Plant Protection, 46, 670-681.

    Wang C, Ulloa M, Mullens T R, Yu J Z, Roberts P A.2012.QTL analysis for transgressive resistance to root-knot nematode in interspecific cotton (Gossypium spp.) progeny derived from susceptible parents (Gossypium spp.).PLoS ONE,7, e34874.

    Wei H H, Li C, Xing Z P, Wang W T, Dai Q G, Zhou G S, Wang L, Xu K, Huo Z Y, Guo B W, Wei H Y, Zhang H C.2016.Suitable growing zone and yield potential for late-maturity type of Yongyou Japonica/indica hybrid rice in the lower reaches of Yangtze River, China.Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15, 50-62.

    Williamson V M, Hussey R S.1996.Nematode pathogenesis and resistance in plants.The Plant Cell, 8, 1735-1745.

    Zhao K, Wright M, Kimball J, Eizenga G, McClung A, Kovach M,Tyagi W, Ali M L, Tung C W, Reynolds A, Bustamante C D,McCouch S R.2010.Genomic diversity and introgression in O.sativa reveal the impact of domestication and breeding on the rice genome.PLoS ONE, 5, e10780.

    Zhu D, Zhang H, Guo B, Xu K, Dai Q, Wei C, Zhou G, Huo Z.2017.Physicochemical properties of indica-japonica hybrid rice starch from Chinese varieties.Food Hydrocolloids, 63,356-363.

    在线观看免费视频网站a站| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲综合精品二区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 满18在线观看网站| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲四区av| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| av免费在线看不卡| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲图色成人| 免费高清在线观看日韩| av免费在线看不卡| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| av电影中文网址| 99久久人妻综合| 国产成人精品福利久久| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 伦理电影免费视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 久久av网站| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 日日啪夜夜爽| kizo精华| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 一区二区av电影网| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲av福利一区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 丁香六月天网| 中文天堂在线官网| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 岛国毛片在线播放| 中国三级夫妇交换| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 超碰成人久久| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 熟女av电影| 91国产中文字幕| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 大码成人一级视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产 一区精品| av在线播放精品| 乱人伦中国视频| 熟女电影av网| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲中文av在线| 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久久久精品性色| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久久久久伊人网av| 不卡av一区二区三区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 超色免费av| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 自线自在国产av| 美女中出高潮动态图| 午夜免费观看性视频| 一区福利在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 18在线观看网站| 国产精品.久久久| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 午夜av观看不卡| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产激情久久老熟女| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 午夜91福利影院| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 中文天堂在线官网| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 欧美bdsm另类| 9色porny在线观看| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美97在线视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品免费视频内射| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 熟女av电影| 久久这里只有精品19| 老司机影院成人| 熟女av电影| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 久久久久国产网址| 国产男女内射视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 美女国产视频在线观看| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| av一本久久久久| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品三级大全| 丝袜喷水一区| av福利片在线| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 久久97久久精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| av网站免费在线观看视频| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 青草久久国产| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 最黄视频免费看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 在线观看三级黄色| 亚洲伊人色综图| 1024视频免费在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 美女午夜性视频免费| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 人妻系列 视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 青草久久国产| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 永久免费av网站大全| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 高清不卡的av网站| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产精品.久久久| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 丝袜喷水一区| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 国产片内射在线| 国产乱来视频区| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 嫩草影院入口| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 人妻一区二区av| 日本免费在线观看一区| 久久久久久伊人网av| 婷婷色综合www| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 亚洲综合色网址| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 一区福利在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 97在线人人人人妻| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 黄频高清免费视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 精品酒店卫生间| 中国国产av一级| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 成人影院久久| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 少妇 在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 在线观看国产h片| 久久婷婷青草| 亚洲av福利一区| 日本91视频免费播放| 视频区图区小说| 如何舔出高潮| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 在线观看www视频免费| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 99久久综合免费| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 一级毛片 在线播放| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 青草久久国产| 国产成人欧美| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 丝袜美足系列| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 少妇的逼水好多| 日韩av免费高清视频| tube8黄色片| 视频区图区小说| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| av免费观看日本| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 9热在线视频观看99| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 在现免费观看毛片| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 在线观看人妻少妇| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 成年动漫av网址| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产在线免费精品| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 一级片免费观看大全| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| av在线app专区| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆 | 国产成人精品久久二区二区91 | 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 另类精品久久| 国产精品一国产av| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 久久av网站| 久久青草综合色| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| www日本在线高清视频| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲精品第二区| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 999精品在线视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产男女内射视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 青草久久国产| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| av在线老鸭窝| 夫妻午夜视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 中文欧美无线码| 久久久久久久国产电影| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 国产在线一区二区三区精| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 国产成人精品福利久久| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 免费观看av网站的网址| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 大香蕉久久网| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 免费观看在线日韩| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲精品一二三| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 永久网站在线| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 丝袜美足系列| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 妹子高潮喷水视频| 99热网站在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 一级毛片 在线播放| 18+在线观看网站| 国产1区2区3区精品| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 如何舔出高潮| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| av在线app专区| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 中文字幕制服av| 久久久久视频综合| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 日本91视频免费播放| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 一区福利在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 电影成人av| 老熟女久久久| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| kizo精华| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国产在线视频一区二区| 曰老女人黄片| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 考比视频在线观看| 一级毛片我不卡| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 我的亚洲天堂| 精品福利永久在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲国产欧美网| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| av在线老鸭窝| 国产av国产精品国产| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久久久久人妻| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 在线观看www视频免费| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 五月开心婷婷网| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 美女国产视频在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 曰老女人黄片| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 午夜影院在线不卡| av在线播放精品| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 日日啪夜夜爽| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 97在线视频观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 超碰97精品在线观看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 人妻系列 视频| av网站在线播放免费| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 色哟哟·www| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 国产精品.久久久| 一区二区三区激情视频| 一边亲一边摸免费视频|